Four decades of HIV and transfusion safety: Much accomplished but ongoing challenges

Suppressed HIV antibody responses following exposure to antiretrovirals-evidence from PrEP randomized trials and early antiretroviral treatment initiation studies

BACKGROUND

Exposure to antiretrovirals at or early after HIV acquisition can suppress viral replication and blunt antibody (Ab) responses; a reduced HIV detectability could impact diagnosis and blood donation screening.

METHODS

We used three antigen (Ag)/Ab assays and one nucleic acid test (NAT) to analyze samples collected in pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) trials (iPrEx; Partners PrEP) before infection detection by Ab-only rapid diagnostic tests (RDTs), and in early antiretroviral treatment (ART) initiation studies (RV254; SIPP).

RESULTS

Reactivity using NAT and Ag/Ab assays in samples collected up to 8 weeks prior to the first reactive RDT from 251 PrEP trials participants varied between 49-61% for active PrEP users and between 27-37% for placebo users. Among RV254 participants, reactivity in Ag/Ab assays was <100% at all timepoints, and lower among those initiating ART earlier. Seroreversions occurred for 29% (16/55), and blood donation screening with NAT and Ag/Ab assays could have missed up to 36% (20/55) of RV254 participants. For SIPP participants, who started ART at later timepoints, Ag/Ab assays identified infections with no evidence of reactivity waning.

CONCLUSION

PrEP and early ART initiation can delay or reduce HIV detectability. Considerations for the implementation of NAT and Ag/Ab tests in PrEP/PEP programs relying on Ab-only RDTs should be balanced according to feasibility and public health impact. While blood transfusion services using Ab-only RDTs for HIV screening should adopt higher sensitivity tests, surveillance and further research are needed to determine the need for novel HIV testing algorithms for those already using NAT and Ag/Ab screening assays.

Detection of unreported usage of the antiretroviral drug lamivudine in two blood donors

BACKGROUND

Unreported HIV antiretroviral (ARV) drug usage by blood donors compromises the ability to detect evidence of HIV infection in blood screening tests and represents a risk for blood transfusion safety. Our objective was to determine the frequency of undeclared ARV drug use by blood donors with altered HIV markers.

STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS

This was a retrospective cross-sectional analysis of donations that were tested for HIV antibody (ab), antigen (ag), and RNA by chemiluminescent immunoassay and nucleic acid screening tests. Positive samples were retested and were subjected to ARV drug testing by high-performance liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry.

RESULTS

Of 345,252 blood donations, 361 (0.1%) were positive on initial testing. Samples from 296 (81.9%) of these donations were available for further analysis. The presence of HIV ab/ag and/or RNA was confirmed in 83 (28.0%) of these samples. All 296 bloods were subjected to ARV testing. The ARV drug lamivudine, at 11.3 and 6.7 ng/mL, was detected in 2 of 83 (2.4%) donations that were HIV positive. Other drugs were not detected.

CONCLUSION

Unreported ARV usage was identified in two candidates for blood donation. More intensive efforts to educate donors about disclosure and to investigate the extent of this phenomenon in Brazil are needed.

Transfusion-Acquired HIV: History, Evolution of Screening Tests, and Current Challenges of Unreported Antiretroviral Drug Use in Brazil

Prevention of HIV acquisition by blood transfusion from its emergence to the present day is reviewed, and current challenges are delineated. The experience of Fundação Pró-Sangue/Hemocentro de São Paulo, Brazil, is highlighted in the quest for improvements in blood safety and the evolution of increasingly sensitive and specific screening tests. Concerns and establishing stringent criteria in the screening of potential blood donors are emphasized, and the current criteria for identifying and deferring candidates at high risk of acquiring sexually transmitted diseases are summarized. Future challenges relate to the identification of donors with unreported use of antiretroviral drugs for prophylaxis against possible HIV exposure or for treatment of an HIV infection whose viral expression is undetectable by current analyses. There is a need to better understand the motivation of HIV-exposed donors and to educate them about the risk of transfusion-mediated HIV transmission despite having low or undetectable viral loads. In situations in which traditional HIV RNA or antibody detection assays remain negative, more sensitive analyses are needed to identify potential donors at risk for HIV transmission.