Dynamics of early post-operative plasma ddcfDNA levels in kidney transplantation: a single-center pilot study

Advances and challenges in the application of donor-derived cell-free DNA for diagnosis and treatment in liver transplantation: a narrative review

In the field of liver disease treatment, liver transplantation (LT) has become an effective option for end-stage liver disease. However, issues such as immune rejection and graft damage remain important factors influencing the success rate of liver transplantation and patients' quality of life. In recent years, with the advancement of genetic testing technologies, the study and application of donor-derived cell-free DNA (dd-cfDNA) in LT diagnosis and treatment have gradually gained attention. This review explores the research advancements in dd-cfDNA within liver transplant management, evaluating its potential applications throughout the liver transplantation process, while exploring the challenges faced by current studies and outlining future research directions. As a strategic tool for postoperative monitoring in LT, dd-cfDNA shows promising potential in areas such as immune rejection, graft damage, immunosuppressant adjustment, complication monitoring, and personalized treatment, and is poised to become a reliable biomarker in LT management.

Clinical use of donor-derived cell-free DNA in kidney transplantation

Traditional monitoring of kidney transplant recipients for allograft dysfunction caused by rejection involves serial checks of serum creatinine with biopsy of the renal allograft if dysfunction is suspected. This approach is labor-intensive, invasive and costly. In addition, because this approach relies on a rise in serum creatinine above historical baselines, injury to the allograft can be extensive before this rise occurs. In an effort to address this, donor-derived cell-free DNA (dd-cf DNA) is being used with increasing frequency in the clinical setting as a means of diagnosing a rejection of the renal allograft early in the course. This can potentially allow for early intervention to minimize not only injury, but the intensity of antirejection therapy needed and the avoidance of side effects. Here, we will review the available methodology for the determination and quantification of dd-cf DNA, the data supporting its use in clinical practice and the limitations of this technology.

Analysis of the primary factors influencing donor derived cell-free DNA testing in kidney transplantation

The donor-derived cell-free DNA (ddcfDNA) is found in the plasma and urine of kidney transplant recipients and displays notable potential in diagnosing rejection, specifically antibody-mediated rejection (ABMR). Nonetheless, the quantitative methods of ddcfDNA lacking standardization and diverse detection techniques can impact the test outcomes. Besides, both the fraction and absolute values of ddcfDNA have been reported as valuable markers for rejection diagnosis, but they carry distinct meanings and are special in various pathological conditions. Additionally, ddcfDNA is highly sensitive to kidney transplant injury. The various sampling times and combination with other diseases can indeed impact ddcfDNA detection values. This review comprehensively analyses the various factors affecting ddcfDNA detection in kidney transplantation, including the number of SNPs and sequencing depths. Furthermore, different pathological conditions, distinct sampling time points, and the presence of complex heterologous signals can influence ddcfDNA testing results in kidney transplantation. The review also provides insights into ddcfDNA testing on different platforms along with key considerations.

Single center study investigating the clinical association of donor-derived cell-free DNA with acute outcomes in lung transplantation

Background

Circulating donor-derived cell-free DNA (dd-cfDNA) levels have been proposed as a potential tool for the diagnosis of graft injury. In this study, we prospectively investigated dd-cfDNA plasma levels and their association with severe primary graft dysfunction (PGD) and graft rejection after lung transplant.

Methods

A total of 40 subjects undergoing de-novo lung transplants at our institution were recruited in this study. Blood samples were collected at various time points before and after lung transplant for 1 year. Dd-cfDNA in samples was determined using AlloSure assay (CareDx Inc.). The correlation of the value of %dd-cfDNA was investigated with the incidence of PGD, acute cellular rejection (ACR), and donor-specific antibody.

Results

We observed a rapid increase of %dd-cfDNA in the blood of recipients after lung transplantation compared to baseline. The levels of dd-cfDNA decreased during the first two weeks. The peak was observed within 72 h after transplantation. The peak values of %dd-cfDNA varied among subjects and did not correlate with severe PGD incidence. We observed an association between levels of %dd-cfDNA from blood collected at the time of transbronchial biopsy and the histological diagnosis of ACR at 3 weeks.

Conclusion

Our data show that circulating dd-cfDNA levels are associated with ACR early after transplantation but not with severe PGD. Plasma levels of dd-cfDNA may be a less invasive tool to estimate graft rejection after lung transplantation however larger studies are still necessary to better identify thresholds.

Early kinetics of donor-derived cell-free DNA after transplantation predicts renal graft recovery and long-term function

BACKGROUND

Ischemia-reperfusion injury (IRI) upon transplantation is one of the most impactful events that the kidney graft suffers during its life. Its clinical manifestation in the recipient, delayed graft function (DGF), has serious prognostic consequences. However, the different definitions of DGF are subject to physicians' choices and centers' policies, and a more objective tool to quantify IRI is needed. Here, we propose the use of donor-derived cell-free DNA (ddcfDNA) for this scope.

METHODS

ddcfDNA was assessed in 61 kidney transplant recipients of either living or deceased donors at 24 h, and 7, 14 and 30 days after transplantation using the AlloSeq cfDNA Kit (CareDx, San Francisco, CA, USA). Patients were followed-up for 6 months and 7-year graft survival was estimated through the complete and functional iBox tool.

RESULTS

Twenty-four-hour ddcfDNA was associated with functional DGF [7.20% (2.35%-15.50%) in patients with functional DGF versus 2.70% (1.55%-4.05%) in patients without it, P = .023] and 6-month estimated glomerular filtration rate (r = -0.311, P = .023). At Day 7 after transplantation, ddcfDNA was associated with dialysis duration in DGF patients (r = 0.612, P = .005) and worse 7-year iBox-estimated graft survival probability (β -0.42, P = .001) at multivariable analysis. Patients with early normalization of ddcfDNA (<0.5% at 1 week) had improved functional iBox-estimated probability of graft survival (79.5 ± 16.8%) in comparison with patients with 7-day ddcfDNA ≥0.5% (67.7 ± 24.1%) (P = .047).

CONCLUSIONS

ddcfDNA early kinetics after transplantation reflect recovery from IRI and are associated with short-, medium- and long-term graft outcome. This may provide a more objective estimate of IRI severity in comparison with the clinical-based definitions of DGF.

Donor-Derived Cell-Free DNA as a Non-Invasive Biomarker for Graft Rejection in Kidney Transplant Recipients: A Prospective Study among the Indian Population

Monitoring graft health and detecting graft rejection is crucial for the success of post-transplantation outcomes. In Western countries, the use of donor-derived cell-free DNA (dd-cfDNA) has gained widespread recognition as a diagnostic tool for kidney transplant recipients. However, the role of dd-cfDNA among the Indian population remains unexplored. The recipients were categorized into two groups: the post-transplant recipient (PTR) group (n = 16) and the random recipient (RR) group (n = 87). Blood samples were collected daily from the PTR group over a 7-day period, whereas the RR group's samples were obtained at varying intervals. In this study, we used a targeted approach to identify dd-cfDNA, which eliminated the need for genotyping, and is based on the minor allele frequency of SNP assays. In the PTR group, elevated dd-cfDNA% levels were observed immediately after transplantation, but returned to normal levels within five days. Within the RR group, heightened serum creatinine levels were directly proportional to increased dd-cfDNA%. Sixteen recipients were advised to undergo biopsy due to elevated serum creatinine and other pathological markers. Among these sixteen recipients, six experienced antibody-mediated rejection (ABMR), two exhibited graft dysfunctions, two had active graft injury, and six (37.5%) recipients showed no rejection (NR). In cases of biopsy-proven ABMR and NR, recipients displayed a mean ± SD dd-cfDNA% of 2.80 ± 1.77 and 0.30 ± 0.35, respectively. This study found that the selected SNP assays exhibit a high proficiency in identifying donor DNA. This study also supports the use of dd-cfDNA as a routine diagnostic test for kidney transplant recipients, along with biopsies and serum creatinine, to attain better graft monitoring.

Donor-Derived Cell-Free DNA at 1 Month after Kidney Transplantation Relates to HLA Class II Eplet Mismatch Load

Kidney transplantation is the preferred therapeutic option for end-stage renal disease; however, the alloimmune response is still the leading cause of renal allograft failure. To better identify immunologic disparities in order to evaluate HLA compatibility between the donor and the recipient, the concept of eplet load has arisen. Regular kidney function monitoring is essential for the accurate and timely diagnosis of allograft rejection and the appropriate treatment. Donor-derived cell-free DNA (dd-cfDNA) has been proposed as a potential biomarker of acute rejection and graft failure in kidney transplantation. The proportion of plasma dd-cfDNA was determined in forty-two kidney patients at 1 month after transplantation. A total of eleven (26.2%) patients had a dd-cfDNA proportion of ≥1.0%. The only pretransplant variable related to dd-cfDNA > 1.0% was the HLA class II eplet mismatch load, mainly the HLA-DQB1 eplet mismatch load. Furthermore, dd-cfDNA was able to discriminate the patients with antibody-mediated rejection (AbMR) (AUC 87.3%), acute rejection (AUC 78.2%), and troubled graft (AUC 81.4%). Increased dd-cfDNA levels were associated with kidney allograft deterioration, particularly rejection, as well as a greater HLA class II eplet mismatch load. Consequently, combining dd-cfDNA determination and HLA eplet mismatch load calculation should improve the assessment of the risk of short- and long-term allograft damage.

Cell-free DNA as a plausible biomarker of chronic kidney disease

Circulating cell-free DNA (cf-DNA) is released from dead and/or apoptotic leukocytes and due to neutrophil extracellular traps contributing to an inflammatory response. Previous clinical studies have reported that the peak concentrations and dynamic changes of cf-DNA may be used as a noninvasive biomarker of worsening kidney function as well as a guide to the management of kidney allograft rejection. We hypothesized that the pattern and dynamic changes of cf-DNA might be a plausible predictive biomarker for patients at risk of chronic kidney disease (CKD), including individuals with type 2 diabetes mellitus, heart failure, cardiovascular disease and established CKD. Along with it, pre- and posthemodialysis levels of serum cf-DNA appear to be a independent predictor for all-cause mortality in patients with end-stage kidney disease.

Molecular immune monitoring in kidney transplant rejection: a state-of-the-art review

Although current regimens of immunosuppressive drugs are effective in renal transplant recipients, long-term renal allograft outcomes remain suboptimal. For many years, the diagnosis of renal allograft rejection and of several causes of renal allograft dysfunction, such as chronic subclinical inflammation and infection, was mostly based on renal allograft biopsy, which is not only invasive but also possibly performed too late for proper management. In addition, certain allograft dysfunctions are difficult to differentiate from renal histology due to their similar pathogenesis and immune responses. As such, non-invasive assays and biomarkers may be more beneficial than conventional renal biopsy for enhancing graft survival and optimizing immunosuppressive drug regimens during long-term care. This paper discusses recent biomarker candidates, including donor-derived cell-free DNA, transcriptomics, microRNAs, exosomes (or other extracellular vesicles), urine chemokines, and nucleosomes, that show high potential for clinical use in determining the prognosis of long-term outcomes of kidney transplantation, along with their limitations.

Total Cell-Free DNA as a Noninvasive Biomarker of a Delayed Graft Function After Kidney Transplantation From Donors After Cardiac Death

BACKGROUND

Because of the organ shortage, donation after cardiac death (DCD) kidney transplantation (KTx) is an alternative way of achieving KTx using brain-dead donors (BDs). Although the prognosis of DCD-KTx is improving, the graft suffers from delayed graft function (DGF), the management of which is essential. With progress in understanding the characteristics of cell-free DNA (CF-DNA), we consider plasma total CF-DNA (tCF-DNA) to be a useful biomarker for predicting DGF in DCD-KTx.

STUDY DESIGN AND METHOD

Consecutive patients from living donors (LDs; n = 9), BDs (n = 8), or DCD donors (n = 13) were enrolled. Plasma samples were collected after KTx and on postoperative days 3 and 5. CF-DNA was isolated, and tCF-DNA was quantified using the TapeStation 2200 software program.

RESULTS

The tCF-DNA levels after BD-KTx and DCD-KTx were higher than those after LD-KTx (LD, 78 ± 27 (ng/mL); BD, 99 ± 20; DCD, 150 ± 23); the difference between DCD-KTx and LD-KTx was statistically significant (P < .05). The tCF-DNA levels declined at postoperative day 5 (LD, 45 ± 10; BD, 51 ± 11; DCD, 66 ± 13). tCF-DNA levels were significantly increased in patients with DGF after KTx (DGF, 139 ± 22; immediate function, 91 ± 18; P < .05). The tCF-DNA level was correlated with the duration of DGF (r = 0.5825, P < .05).

CONCLUSION

Although the mechanism underlying DNA release from transplanted grafts into the recipient circulation remains unclear, cell death by apoptosis or necrosis and the active secretion of the immune system may play important roles in DGF. These data suggest that monitoring tCF-DNA may help predict graft recovery after DCD-KTx.

Application of plasma donor-derived cell free DNA for lung allograft rejection diagnosis in lung transplant recipients

BACKGROUND

Donor-derived cell-free DNA (dd-cfDNA) has been applied to monitor acute rejection (AR) in kidney and heart transplantation. This study was aimed to investigate the application of dd-cfDNA levels in the diagnosis of AR and chronic lung allograft dysfunction (CLAD) among the lung transplantation recipients (LTRs).

METHODS

One hundred and seventy LTRs were enrolled at the First Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University between 1 June 2015 and 30 March 2021. Patients were divided into 4 groups: stable group, AR group, infection group and CLAD group. The level of dd-cfDNA was analyzed using target region sequencing and the performance characteristics of dd-cfDNA for diagnosis of AR and CLAD were determined, respectively.

RESULTS

Kruskal-Wallis test showed that there were some significant differences in the level of dd-cfDNA (%) among the 4 groups, with p < 0.001. Among them, the level of dd-cfDNA (%) was highest (median 2.17, IQR [1.40-3.82]) in AR group, and higher in CLAD group (median 1.07, IQR [0.98-1.31]), but lower in infection group (median 0.71, IQR [0.57-1.07]) and lowest in stable group (median 0.71, IQR [0.61-0.84]). AUC-ROC curve analysis showed that the threshold of dd-cfDNA for AR was 1.17%, with sensitivity being 89.19% and specificity being 86.47%, and the optimal threshold of 0.89% was determined of CLAD, with sensitivity being 95.00% and specificity of 76.99%.

CONCLUSIONS

Plasma dd-cfDNA could be a useful tool for the assessment of lung allograft rejection, including AR and CLAD, and holds promise as a noninvasive biomarker for "allograft injury" in both acute and chronic rejection following lung transplantation.

Detection of BK polyomavirus-associated nephropathy using plasma graft-derived cell-free DNA: Development of a novel algorithm from programmed monitoring

Graft-derived cell-free DNA (GcfDNA) is a promising non-invasive biomarker for detecting allograft injury. In this study, we aimed to evaluate the efficacy of programmed monitoring of GcfDNA for identifying BK polyomavirus-associated nephropathy (BKPyVAN) in kidney transplant recipients. We recruited 158 kidney transplant recipients between November 2020 and December 2021. Plasma GcfDNA was collected on the tenth day, first month, third month, and sixth month for programmed monitoring and one day before biopsy. ΔGcfDNA (cp/mL) was obtained by subtracting the baseline GcfDNA (cp/mL) from GcfDNA (cp/mL) of the latest programmed monitoring before biopsy. The receiver operating characteristic curve showed the diagnostic performance of GcfDNA (cp/mL) at biopsy time and an optimal area under the curve (AUC) of 0.68 in distinguishing pathologically proven BKPyVAN from pathologically unconfirmed BKPyVAN. In contrast, ΔGcfDNA (cp/mL) had a sensitivity and specificity of 80% and 84.6%, respectively, and an AUC of 0.83. When distinguishing clinically diagnosed BKPyVAN from clinical excluded BKPyVAN, the AUC of GcfDNA (cp/mL) was 0.59 at biopsy time, and ΔGcfDNA (cp/mL) had a sensitivity and specificity of 81.0% and 76.5%, respectively, and an AUC of 0.81. Plasma ΔGcfDNA (cp/mL) was not significantly different between TCMR [0.15 (0.08, 0.24) cp/mL] and pathologically proven BKPyVAN[0.34 (0.20, 0.49) cp/mL]. In conclusion, we recommend programmed monitoring of plasma GcfDNA levels after a kidney transplant. Based on our findings from the programmed monitoring, we have developed a novel algorithm that shows promising results in identifying and predicting BKPyVAN.

Plasma Donor-Derived Cell-Free DNA Levels Are Associated With the Inflammatory Burden and Macrophage Extracellular Trap Activity in Renal Allografts

Recent studies have confirmed the role of plasma donor-derived cell-free DNA (ddcfDNA) as a reliable non-invasive biomarker for allograft injury after kidney transplantation. Whereas the variability of plasma ddcfDNA levels among recipients has limited their clinical use. This study aimed to explore the intrinsic factors associated with plasma ddcfDNA elevation by investigating the impact of Banff lesions and inflammatory infiltrates on ddcfDNA levels in kidney transplant recipients. From March 2017 to September 2019, a total of 106 kidney transplant recipients with matched allograft biopsies were included, consisting of 13 recipients with normal/nonspecific changes, 13 recipients with borderline changes, 60 with T cell-mediated rejection, and 20 with antibody-mediated rejection. Histologic classification was performed according to the Banff 2017 criteria by two experienced pathologists. Plasma ddcfDNA fractions ranged from 0.12% to 10.22%, with a median level of 0.91%. Banff histology subelements including glomerulitis, intimal arteritis, and severe interstitial inflammation were correlated with increased plasma ddcfDNA levels. The inflammatory cell infiltrate in the allografts was phenotyped by immunochemistry and automatically counted by digital image recognition. Pearson correlation analysis revealed a significant positive correlation between macrophage infiltrations in allografts and plasma ddcfDNA levels. Additionally, macrophage extracellular trap (MET) activity was significantly associated with the rise in plasma ddcfDNA levels. Our findings demonstrated that plasma ddcfDNA could reflect the inflammatory state in renal allografts and suggested the potential role of METs in the pathogenesis of allograft injury.

Cell-free DNA as a solid-organ transplant biomarker: technologies and approaches

High-quality biomarkers that detect emergent graft damage and/or rejection after solid-organ transplantation offer new opportunities to improve post-transplant monitoring, allow early therapeutic intervention and facilitate personalized patient management. Donor-derived cell-free DNA (DD-cfDNA) is a particularly exciting minimally invasive biomarker because it has the potential to be quantitative, time-sensitive and cost-effective. Increased DD-cfDNA has been associated with graft damage and rejection episodes. Efforts are underway to further improve sensitivity and specificity. This review summarizes the procedures used to process and detect DD-cfDNA, measurement of DD-cfDNA in clinical transplantation, approaches for improving sensitivity and specificity and long-term prospects as a transplant biomarker to supplement traditional organ monitoring and invasive biopsies.

Dynamics of Donor-Derived Cell-Free DNA at the Early Phase After Pediatric Kidney Transplantation: A Prospective Cohort Study

Background: Donor-derived cell-free DNA (ddcfDNA) has been suggested as an indicator of allograft injury in adult and pediatric kidney transplantation (KTx). However, the dynamics of ddcfDNA in pediatric KTx have not been investigated. In addition, it has not been demonstrated whether donor-recipient (D/R) size mismatch affect ddcfDNA level.

Methods: Pediatric KTx recipients with a single donor kidney were enrolled and followed up for 1 year. ddcfDNA, calculated as a fraction (%) in the recipient plasma, was examined longitudinally within 3 months post-transplant. D/R size mismatch degree was described as D/R height ratio. The 33rd percentile of D/R height ratio (0.70) was used as the cut-off to divide the patients into low donor-recipient height ratio group (<0.70) and high donor-recipient height ratio group (≥0.70). The dynamics of ddcfDNA were analyzed and the impact factors were explored. Stable ddcfDNA was defined as the first lowest ddcfDNA. ddcfDNA flare-up was defined as a remarkable elevation by a proportion of >30% from stable value with a peak value >1% during elevation.

Results: Twenty-one clinically stable recipients were enrolled. The median D/R height ratio was 0.83 (0.62–0.88). It took a median of 8 days for ddcfDNA to drop from day 1 and reach a stable value of 0.67% (0.46–0.73%). Nevertheless, 61.5% patients presented ddcfDNA>1% at day 30. Besides, 81.0% (17/21) of patients experienced elevated ddcfDNA and 47.6% (10/21) met the standard of ddcfDNA flare-up. Donor-recipient height ratio was an independent risk factor for ddcfDNA flare-up (odds ratio = 0.469 per 0.1, 95% CI 0.237–0.925, p = 0.029) and low donor-recipient height ratio (<0.70) was found to increase the risk of flare-up occurrence (odds ratio = 15.00, 95% CI 1.342–167.638, p = 0.028).

Conclusions: ddcfDNA rebounds in many stable pediatric KTx recipients without rejection. This may be induced by significant D/R size mismatch and may affect its diagnostic performance at the early phase after pediatric KTx in children.

Emerging role of cell-free DNA in kidney transplantation

Monitoring kidney transplants for rejection conventionally includes serum creatinine, immunosuppressive drug levels, proteinuria, and donor-specific antibody (DSA). Serum creatinine is a late marker of allograft injury, and the predictive ability of DSA regarding risk of rejection is variable. Histological analysis of an allograft biopsy is the standard method for diagnosing rejection but is invasive, inconvenient, and carries risk of complications. There has been a long quest to find a perfect biomarker that noninvasively predicts tissue injury caused by rejection at an early stage, so that diagnosis and treatment could be pursued without delay in order to minimize irreversible damage to the allograft. In this review, we discuss relatively novel research on identifying biomarkers of tissue injury, specifically elaborating on donor-derived cell-free DNA, and its clinical utility.

Diagnostic value of donor-derived cell-free DNA to predict antibody-mediated rejection in donor-specific antibody-positive renal allograft recipients

Circulating donor‐specific antibodies (DSA) do not necessarily indicate antibody‐mediated rejection (ABMR). Here, we evaluated the diagnostic value of donor‐derived cell‐free DNA (dd‐cfDNA) as an add‐on to DSA detection. The study included two independent cohorts of DSA⁺ kidney allograft recipients, 45 subclinical cases identified by cross‐sectional antibody screening (cohort 1), and 30 recipients subjected to indication biopsies (cohort 2). About 50% of the DSA⁺ recipients had ABMR and displayed higher dd‐cfDNA levels than DSA⁺ABMR⁻ recipients (cohort 1: 1.90% [median; IQR: 0.78–3.90%] vs. 0.52% [0.35–0.72%]; P < 0.001); (cohort 2: 1.20% [0.82–2.50%] vs. 0.59% [0.28–2.05%]; P = 0.086). Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis revealed an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.89 and 0.69 for dd‐cfDNA, and 0.88 and 0.77 for DSA mean fluorescence intensity (MFI), respectively. In combined models, adding dd‐cfDNA to DSA‐MFI or vice versa significantly improved the diagnostic accuracy. Limited diagnostic performance of dd‐cfDNA in cohort 2 was related to the frequent finding of other types of graft injury among ABMR⁻ recipients, like T cell‐mediated rejection or glomerulonephritis. For dd‐cfDNA in relation to injury of any cause an AUC of 0.97 was calculated. Monitoring of dd‐cfDNA in DSA⁺ patients may be a useful tool to detect ABMR and other types of injury.

Diagnostic Accuracy of Donor-derived Cell-free DNA in Renal-allograft Rejection: A Meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Donor-derived cell-free DNA (dd-cfDNA) is a potential noninvasive molecular marker of graft rejection after kidney transplant, whose diagnostic accuracy remains controversial.

METHODS

We performed a systematic review and metaanalysis to evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of dd-cfDNA. Relevant literature was searched from online databases, and the data on the diagnostic accuracy of discriminating main rejection episodes (MRE) and antibody-mediated rejection (AMR) were merged, respectively.

RESULTS

Nine studies were included in the metaanalysis, of which 6 were focused on the diagnostic accuracy of dd-cfDNA for MRE, whose pooled sensitivity, specificity, area under the receiver operating characteristics curve, diagnostic odds ratio, overall positive likelihood ratio, and negative likelihood ratio with 95% confidence intervals were 0.70 (0.57-0.81), 0.78 (0.70-0.84), 0.81 (0.77-0.84), 8.18 (5.11-13.09), 3.15 (2.47-4.02), and 0.39 (0.27-0.55), respectively. Five tests were focused on discriminating AMR, whose pooled indicators were 0.84 (0.75-0.90), 0.80 (0.74-0.84), 0.89 (0.86-0.91), 20.48 (10.76-38.99), 4.13(3.21-5.33), and 0.20(0.12-0.33), respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Donor-derived cell-free DNA can be a helpful marker for the diagnosis of AMR among those recipients suspected of renal dysfunction. Its diagnostic accuracy on the MRE remains uncertain, which requires further prospective, large-scale, multicenter, and common population research.

The Monitoring of Donor-derived Cell-free DNA in Kidney Transplantation

Cell-free DNA (cfDNA) exists in plasma and can be measured by several techniques. It is now possible to differentiate donor-derived cfDNA (ddcfDNA) from recipient cfDNA in the plasma or urine of solid organ transplant recipients in the absence of donor and recipient genotyping. The assessment of ddcfDNA is being increasingly studied as a noninvasive means of identifying acute rejection (AR) in solid organ transplants, including subclinical AR. We herein review the literature on the correlation of ddcfDNA with AR in kidney transplantation. There have been at least 15 observational studies that have assessed ddcfDNA in urine or plasma using various methodologies with various thresholds for abnormality. Overall, elevated ddcfDNA indicates allograft injury as may occur with AR, infection, or acute tubular injury but may also be found in clinically stable patients with normal histology. Sensitivity is greater for antibody-mediated AR than for cell-mediated AR, and normal levels do not preclude significant cell-mediated rejection. Measurement of ddcfDNA is not a replacement for biopsy that remains the gold standard for diagnosing AR. Serial monitoring of stable patients may allow earlier detection of subclinical AR, but the efficacy of this approach remains to be established. Normal levels should not preclude planned protocol biopsies. There may be roles for following ddcfDNA levels to assess the adequacy of treatment of AR and to guide the intensity of immunosuppression in the individual patient. Randomized controlled trials are necessary to validate the benefit and cost-effectiveness for these various uses. No firm recommendations can be made at this time.

Donor-derived cell-free DNA: An independent biomarker in kidney transplant patients with antibody-mediated rejection

INTRODUCTION

Antibody-mediated rejection (ABMR) is a major cause of kidney transplant failure which requires donor-specific antibodies (DSA) for a definitive diagnosis. Donor-derived cell-free DNA (ddcfDNA) is an emerging biomarker used to assess kidney allograft injury. However, current data is limited to predict the accuracy of ddcfDNA in ABMR diagnosis. This study was conducted to compare the performance of DSA with plasma ddcfDNA for the diagnosis of ABMR.

METHODS

In this retrospective single-center observational study, we enrolled 50 kidney transplant recipients who were diagnosed with the suspicion of rejection between June 2018 and May 2019 at the Jinling Hospital. Plasma ddcfDNA was measured by using a novel target region capture sequencing methodology. A total of 37 patients who were tested with DSA and biopsy were divided into four subgroups (ABMR+/DSA+, ABMR+/DSA-, ABMR-/DSA+, ABMR-/DSA-) for the distribution of ddcfDNA (%) by ABMR and DSA.

RESULTS

The median level of ddcfDNA in biopsy showed that the ABMR group (1.66%, IQR 1.34-3.76%) was significantly higher than the median level (0.63%, IQR 0.43-0.74%) in non-ABMR (p < 0.001). With a ddcfDNA cutoff of 0.96%, the AUC was 0.90 (95%CI, 0.86-0.95), which was associated with a sensitivity of 90.5% (95%CI, 69.6-98.8%) and specificity of 96.6% (95%CI, 82.2-100%), a PPV of 95% (95%CI, 73.4-99.2%) and NPV of 93.3% (95%CI, 78.9-98.1%) were also observed. Among the four subgroups, ddcfDNA had no significant difference in both DSA+ group and DSA-group (p > 0.05). In the diagnosis of ABMR, the specificity, sensitivity, PPV and NPV of DSA were 50%, 74.1%, 41.7%, 80%, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

ddcfDNA levels in the blood could highly distinguish (biopsy-supported) ABMR occurrence, irrespective of whether this method is accompanied by DSA or not.

Donor-Derived Cell-Free DNA (ddcf-DNA) and Acute Antibody-Mediated Rejection in Kidney Transplantation

Monitoring kidney transplant recipients for evidence of allograft rejection is essential to lower the risk of graft loss. The traditional method relies on serial checks in serum creatinine with a biopsy of the allograft if dysfunction is suspected. This is invasive, labor-intensive and costly. As such, there is widespread interest in the use of biomarkers to provide a noninvasive approach to detecting allograft rejection. One such biomarker is donor-derived cell-free DNA (ddcf-DNA). Here, we review the methodology for the determination of the amount/fraction of ddcf-DNA, evaluate the available data of its use in kidney transplantation and render an opinion in the clinical decision-making of these patients.

A novel urine cell-free DNA preservation solution and its application in kidney transplantation

AIM

Urine cell-free DNA (cfDNA) is a new type of liquid biopsy biomarker used in tumours and allograft injury detection but is highly susceptible to degradation by the high nuclease activity of urine. This study presents a newly developed urine cfDNA preservation solution (AlloU), efficient for examining allograft injury in kidney transplant recipients (KTx).

METHODS

We established urine-preserve solution called AlloU based on the response-surface methodology, with two commercial collection reagents (Streck and K2 EDTA preservation solution) included for analysis. A total of 120 urine samples from KTx patients, including morning, nocturnal and random urine from specific storage time were subjected to investigation. The urine total cfDNA concentration was quantified by fluorometry, fragment distribution was analysed by qPCR, and donor-derived cfDNA (ddcfDNA) was detected by next-generation sequencing.

RESULTS

Urine total cfDNA concentration and fragment size of samples preserved with AlloU and Streck did not change significantly within 5 days whereas the ddcfDNA also did not change significantly within 7 days. However, compared with EDTA, the total cfDNA concentration increased significantly on the third day. When compare with different urine types, it was found that samples preserved with AlloU showed no significant differences in total cfDNA concentration, fragment size, and ddcfDNA concentration, however, the SD for morning urine was significantly smaller in total cfDNA and ddcfDNA concentration.

CONCLUSION

To the best of our knowledge, this is the first report to verify the dynamics of urine cfDNA in KTx, especially in the analysis impact of different urine types on cfDNA detection.

Preliminary clinical experience applying donor-derived cell-free DNA to discern rejection in pediatric liver transplant recipients

Donor-derived cell-free DNA (dd-cfDNA) has been of major interest recently as a non-invasive marker of graft injury, but has not yet been extensively tested in children. From May to September in 2019, a total of 76 pediatric patients receiving a liver graft were enrolled and there were 27 patients excluded. Ultimately plasma samples and matched liver specimens from 49 patients were successfully collected whenever rejection was suspected clinically. Dd-cfDNA were analyzed and then compared to biopsy. Of these, 11 (22.4%) patients were found to have rejection by biopsy. Dd-cfDNA levels were higher among patients with rejection compared to those with no rejection. In subgroup analysis, dd-cfDNA% among patients with rejection differed from those with EBV/CMV infection and DILI patients. Similarly, observations were available concerning dd-cfDNA (cp/mL). The AUC for dd-cfDNA% and dd-cfDNA (cp/mL) were 0.878, 0.841, respectively, both of which were higher than conventional LFTs. For rejection, dd-cfDNA% ≥ 28.7% yielded a sensitivity of 72.7%, specificity 94.7% and dd-cfDNA (cp/mL) ≥ 2076 cp/mL, yielded a sensitivity of 81.8%, specificity 81.9%. Of note, the dd-cfDNA distribution was significantly different between whole liver and LLS transplantation. In the setting of pediatric LTx, dd-cfDNA appears to be a sensitive biomarker indicating the presence of rejection.International Clinical Trails Registry Platform: ChiCTR1900022406.

Donor-derived cell-free DNA as a biomarker for rejection after kidney transplantation: a systematic review and meta-analysis

A systematic review and meta-analysis were performed to investigate the value of donor-derived cell-free DNA (dd-cfDNA) as a noninvasive biomarker in diagnosing kidney allograft rejection. We searched PubMed, Web of Science and the Cochrane Library for original research papers published between January 1994 and May 2020 on dd-cfDNA fractions in blood of kidney allograft recipients. A single-group meta-analysis was performed by computing pooled estimates for dd-cfDNA fractions using the weighted median of medians or quantile estimation (QE) approach. Weighted median differences in medians (WMDMs) and median differences based on the QE method were used for pairwise comparisons. Despite heterogeneity among the selected studies, the meta-analysis revealed significantly higher median dd-cfDNA fractions in patients with antibody-mediated rejection (ABMR) than patients without rejection or patients with stable graft function. When comparing patients with T cell-mediated rejection (TCMR) and patients with ABMR, our two statistical approaches revealed conflicting results. Patients with TCMR did not have different median dd-cfDNA fractions than patients without rejection or patients with stable graft function. dd-cfDNA may be a useful marker for ABMR, but probably not for TCMR.

Prognostic value of the donor-derived cell-free DNA assay in acute renal rejection therapy: A prospective cohort study

Donor-derived cell-free DNA (dd-cfDNA) is a promising biomarker for monitoring allograft status. However, whether dd-cfDNA can reflect real-time anti-rejection treatment effects remains unclear. We prospectively recruited 28 patients with acute renal rejection, including 5 with ABMR, 12 with type IA or type IB rejection, and 11 with type IIA or IIB rejection. dd-cfDNA levels in peripheral blood were measured using human single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) locus capture hybridization. The percentage of dd-cfDNA (dd-cfDNA%) declined significantly from 2.566 ± 0.549% to 0.773 ± 0.116% (P < .001) after anti-rejection therapy. The dd-cfDNA% decreased steadily over the course of 3 days with daily methylprednisolone injections, but no significant difference in the dd-cfDNA% was observed between the end of anti-rejection therapy and 2 weeks later. Changes in the dd-cfDNA% (∆dd-cfDNA%) demonstrated a positive correlation with estimated glomerular filtration rates at 1 month (ρ = 2.570, P = .022), 3 months (ρ = 3.210, P = .027), and 6 months (ρ = 2.860, P = .019) after therapy. Thus, the dd-cfDNA assay shows prognostic capabilities in therapy outcome and allograft recovery; however, its ability is inhibited by methylprednisolone regardless of the types of rejection. Additionally, a reassessment of frequency intervals for testing is required.

Urine Donor-Derived Cell-Free DNA Helps Discriminate BK Polyomavirus-Associated Nephropathy in Kidney Transplant Recipients With BK Polyomavirus Infection

Background: Studies have shown that plasma donor–derived cell-free DNA (dd-cfDNA) can predict renal allograft antibody-mediated rejection. This study was performed to evaluate the value of urine dd-cfDNA concentration and dd-cfDNA fraction (%) for discriminating BK polyomavirus-associated nephropathy (BKPyVAN) in kidney transplant recipients with urinary BK polyomavirus (BKPyV) infection.

Methods: In this retrospective single-center observational study, we enrolled kidney transplant recipients who were diagnosed with urine BKPyV infection between August 2018 and May 2019 at the First Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University. Urine dd-cfDNA was measured by using a novel target region capture sequencing methodology. The pathological diagnosis of BKPyVAN was confirmed by anti-SV40-T immunohistochemical staining and classified using the American Society for Transplantation schema. Receiver operating characteristic curve analysis was used to investigate the relations of urine dd-cfDNA and dd-cfDNA% to intrarenal allograft BKPyV infection states.

Results: In total, 93 patients were enrolled, including 40 cases of proven BKPyVAN, seven cases of probable BKPyVAN, 23 cases of possible BKPyVAN, and 23 cases of resolving BKPyVAN. Urine dd-cfDNA level in proven BKPyVAN (22.09 ± 21.27 ng/ml) was comparable to that in probable BKPyVAN (15.64 ± 6.73 ng/ml, P = 0.434) but was significantly higher than that in possible BKPyVAN (5.60 ± 3.53 ng/ml) and resolving BKPyVAN (5.30 ± 3.34 ng/ml) (both Ps < 0.05). Urine dd-cfDNA% of proven BKPyVAN (0.71 ± 0.21) was lower than that of probable BKPyVAN (0.91 ± 0.04, P < 0.001), but was significantly higher than that of possible BKPyVAN (0.56 ± 0.30) and resolving BKPyVAN (0.46 ± 0.28) (both Ps < 0.05). For distinguishing biopsy-proven BKPyVAN from biopsy-excluded BKPyVAN, the discrimination capacity of urine dd-cfDNA (AUC: 0.842, 95% CI: 0.735, 0.918) was superior to that of plasma BKPyV DNA load (AUC: 0.660, 95% CI: 0.537, 0.769) with 0.181 (95% CI: 0.043, 0.319) difference between areas under ROC curves (P = 0.010).

Conclusion: The elevated urine dd-cfDNA level may help discriminate BKPyVAN in kidney transplant recipients with BKPyV viruria.

Recent Advances on Biomarkers of Early and Late Kidney Graft Dysfunction

New biomarkers of early and late graft dysfunction are needed in renal transplant to improve management of complications and prolong graft survival. A wide range of potential diagnostic and prognostic biomarkers, measured in different biological fluids (serum, plasma, urine) and in renal tissues, have been proposed for post-transplant delayed graft function (DGF), acute rejection (AR), and chronic allograft dysfunction (CAD). This review investigates old and new potential biomarkers for each of these clinical domains, seeking to underline their limits and strengths. OMICs technology has allowed identifying many candidate biomarkers, providing diagnostic and prognostic information at very early stages of pathological processes, such as AR. Donor-derived cell-free DNA (ddcfDNA) and extracellular vesicles (EVs) are further promising tools. Although most of these biomarkers still need to be validated in multiple independent cohorts and standardized, they are paving the way for substantial advances, such as the possibility of accurately predicting risk of DGF before graft is implanted, of making a “molecular” diagnosis of subclinical rejection even before histological lesions develop, or of dissecting etiology of CAD. Identification of “immunoquiescent” or even tolerant patients to guide minimization of immunosuppressive therapy is another area of active research. The parallel progress in imaging techniques, bioinformatics, and artificial intelligence (AI) is helping to fully exploit the wealth of information provided by biomarkers, leading to improved disease nosology of old entities such as transplant glomerulopathy. Prospective studies are needed to assess whether introduction of these new sets of biomarkers into clinical practice could actually reduce the need for renal biopsy, integrate traditional tools, and ultimately improve graft survival compared to current management.

A Noninvasive and Donor-independent Method Simultaneously Monitors Rejection and Infection in Patients With Organ Transplant

BACKGROUND

Rejection and infection are 2 major complications affecting the health and survival of patients receiving an allograft organ transplantation. We describe a diagnostic assay that simultaneously monitors for rejection and infection in recipients of kidney transplant by sequencing of cell-free DNA (cfDNA) in plasma.

METHODS

By using cfDNA in plasma, we established a noninvasive method that simultaneously monitors rejection and infection in patients with a history of organ transplant. A total of 6200 single-nucleotide polymorphisms were captured by liquid hybridization and sequenced by next-generation sequencing. The donor-derived cfDNA (ddcfDNA) level was calculated based on maximum likelihood estimation, without relying on the donor's genotype. We also analyzed the nonhuman cfDNA to test for infections in the patients' plasma.

RESULTS

Artificial ddcfDNA levels quantified by a donor-dependent and donor-independent algorithm were significantly correlated, with the multivariate coefficient of determination, or R² value, of 0.999. This technique was applied on 30 patients (32 samples) after kidney transplantation, and a significant difference was observed on the ddcfdNA levels between nonrejection and rejection. Furthermore, 1 BK virus infection and 1 cytomegalovirus infection were revealed by this method, and the enrichment efficiency of the viral sequences was 114 and 489 times, respectively, which are consistent with clinical results.

CONCLUSION

This method can be used to simultaneously monitor for acute rejection as well as a broad spectrum of infections for patients of allograft organ transplant because it provides comprehensive information for clinicians to optimize immunosuppression therapy.