1
|
LeVine DN, Kidd L, Garden OA, Brooks MB, Goggs R, Kohn B, Mackin AJ, Eldermire ERB, Chang YM, Allen J, Christopherson PW, Glanemann B, Maruyama H, Naskou MC, Nielsen LN, Shropshire S, Viall AK, Birkenheuer AJ, Forman MA, Hanzlicek AS, Langner KF, Lashnits E, Lunn KF, Makielski KM, Roura X, Spada E. ACVIM consensus statement on the diagnosis of immune thrombocytopenia in dogs and cats. J Vet Intern Med 2024; 38:1958-1981. [PMID: 38752421 PMCID: PMC11256148 DOI: 10.1111/jvim.16996] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/20/2023] [Accepted: 01/16/2024] [Indexed: 07/19/2024] Open
Abstract
Immune thrombocytopenia (ITP) is the most common acquired primary hemostatic disorder in dogs. Immune thrombocytopenia less commonly affects cats but is an important cause of mortality and treatment-associated morbidity in both species. Immune thrombocytopenia remains a diagnosis of exclusion for which diagnostic guidelines are lacking. Primary, or non-associative, ITP refers to autoimmune platelet destruction. Secondary, or associative, ITP arises in response to an underlying disease trigger. However, evidence for which comorbidities serve as ITP triggers has not been systematically evaluated. To identify key diagnostic steps for ITP and important comorbidities associated with secondary ITP, we developed 12 Population Evaluation/Exposure Comparison Outcome (PECO) format questions. These questions were addressed by evidence evaluators utilizing a literature pool of 287 articles identified by the panelists using a structured search strategy. Evidence evaluators, using panel-designed templates and data extraction tools, summarized evidence and created guideline recommendations that then were integrated by diagnosis and comorbidity domain chairs. The revised PECO responses underwent a Delphi survey process to reach consensus on final guidelines. A combination of panel expertise and PECO responses were employed to develop algorithms for diagnosis of ITP in dogs and cats, which also underwent 4 iterations of Delphi review. Comorbidity evidence evaluators employed an integrated measure of evidence (IME) tool to determine evidence quality for each comorbidity; IME values combined with evidence summaries for each comorbidity were integrated to develop ITP screening recommendations, which also were subjected to Delphi review. Commentary was solicited from multiple relevant professional organizations before finalizing the consensus. The final consensus statement provides clinical guidelines for the diagnosis of, and underlying disease screening for, ITP in dogs and cats. The systematic consensus process identified numerous knowledge gaps that should guide future studies. This statement is a companion manuscript to the ACVIM Consensus Statement on the Treatment of Immune Thrombocytopenia.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Dana N LeVine
- Department of Clinical Sciences, College of Veterinary Medicine, Auburn University, Auburn, Alabama, USA
| | - Linda Kidd
- Western University of Health Sciences College of Veterinary Medicine, Pomona, California, USA
- Zoetis Animal Health Diagnostics, Parsippany, New Jersey, USA
| | - Oliver A Garden
- School of Veterinary Medicine, Louisiana State University, Baton Rouge, Louisiana, USA
| | - Marjory B Brooks
- Department of Population Medicine and Diagnostic Sciences, College of Veterinary Medicine, Cornell University, Ithaca, New York, USA
| | - Robert Goggs
- Department of Clinical Sciences, College of Veterinary Medicine, Cornell University, Ithaca, New York, USA
| | - Barbara Kohn
- Clinic for Small Animals, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Freie Universität Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Andrew J Mackin
- College of Veterinary Medicine, Mississippi State University, Starkville, Mississippi, USA
| | - Erin R B Eldermire
- Flower-Sprecher Veterinary Library, College of Veterinary Medicine, Cornell University, Ithaca, New York, USA
| | - Yu-Mei Chang
- Department of Comparative Biomedical Sciences, Royal Veterinary College, London, UK
| | - Julie Allen
- Veterinary Information Network, Davis, California, USA
| | - Peter W Christopherson
- Department of Pathobiology, College of Veterinary Medicine, Auburn University, Auburn, Alabama, USA
| | - Barbara Glanemann
- Department of Clinical Science and Services, Royal Veterinary College, University of London, London, UK
| | - Haruhiko Maruyama
- Department of Veterinary Medicine, College of Bioresource Sciences, Nihon University, Chiyoda City, Japan
| | - Maria C Naskou
- Department of Pathobiology, College of Veterinary Medicine, Auburn University, Auburn, Alabama, USA
| | - Lise N Nielsen
- Department of Veterinary Clinical Sciences, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Sarah Shropshire
- College of Veterinary Medicine and Biomedical Sciences, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, Colorado, USA
| | - Austin K Viall
- Department of Pathology, Microbiology, and Immunology, School of Veterinary Medicine, University of California, Davis, Davis, California, USA
| | - Adam J Birkenheuer
- College of Veterinary Medicine, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, North Carolina, USA
| | - Marnin A Forman
- Cornell University Veterinary Specialists, Stamford, Connecticut, USA
| | | | - Kathrin F Langner
- Western Australian Veterinary Emergency and Specialty, Perth, Australia
| | - Erin Lashnits
- School of Veterinary Medicine, University of Wisconsin, Madison, Wisconsin, USA
| | | | - Kelly M Makielski
- College of Veterinary Medicine, University of Minnesota, St Paul, Minnesota, USA
| | - Xavier Roura
- Hospital Clinic Veterinari, Universitat Autonoma de Barcelona, Bellaterra, Spain
| | - Eva Spada
- Veterinary Transfusion Research Laboratory (REVLab), Department of Veterinary Medicine and Animal Sciences, University of Milan, Lodi, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Brooks MB, Goggs R, Frye AH, Armato J, Forman M, Hertl J, Koch M, Loftus JP, Lucy J, Mattison B, Merriam J, Shropshire S, Van Vertloo L, Viall A, LeVine DN. A prospective cohort study to identify clinical diagnostic and prognostic markers of primary immune thrombocytopenia in dogs. J Vet Intern Med 2024; 38:1022-1034. [PMID: 38205735 PMCID: PMC10937499 DOI: 10.1111/jvim.16985] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/24/2023] [Accepted: 12/15/2023] [Indexed: 01/12/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Primary immune thrombocytopenia (pITP) in dogs presents a diagnostic challenge, and clinical markers of severity are lacking. OBJECTIVES Identify clinicopathologic features that differentiate pITP from secondary ITP (sITP) and markers related to bleeding severity, transfusion, and survival of dogs with pITP. ANIMALS Ninety-eight thrombocytopenic dogs (58 pITP and 40 sITP). METHODS Client-owned dogs with platelet counts <50 000/μL were enrolled in a prospective, multi-institution cohort study. History and treatment information, through a maximum of 7 days, was recorded on standard data forms. Bleeding severity was scored daily using a bleeding assessment tool (DOGiBAT). At-admission blood samples were collected for CBC, biochemistry, C-reactive protein concentration, and coagulation panels, and to measure platelet surface-associated immunoglobulin G (PSAIg) and expression of platelet membrane proteins and phospholipids. Dogs with evidence of coincident disease were classified as sITP. RESULTS No definitive pITP diagnostic test was found. However, pITP cases were characterized by lower platelet counts, D dimer concentrations, and platelet membrane protein expression than sITP cases. Differentiation between pITP and sITP was further enhanced using logistic regression modeling combining patient sex, coagulation profile, platelet count, D dimer, and PSAIg. A second model of pITP severity indicated that low hematocrit and high BUN concentration were associated with non-survival. Low hematocrit at admission, but not platelet count or DOGiBAT score, was associated with transfusion. CONCLUSIONS AND CLINICAL IMPORTANCE Pending validation studies, models constructed from at-admission clinicopathologic findings may improve differentiation of pITP from sITP and identify the most severe pITP cases at the time of presentation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marjory B. Brooks
- Population Medicine & Diagnostic SciencesCornell University, 240 Farrier RoadIthaca, New York 14853USA
| | - Robert Goggs
- Clinical Sciences, C3‐502D Clinical Programs CenterCornell University, 930 Campus RoadIthaca, New York 14853‐0001USA
| | - Amelia H. Frye
- Population Medicine & Diagnostic SciencesCornell University, 240 Farrier RoadIthaca, New York 14853USA
| | - Jessica Armato
- Internal MedicineCornell University Veterinary SpecialistsStamfordConnecticutUSA
| | - Marnin Forman
- Internal MedicineCornell University Veterinary SpecialistsStamfordConnecticutUSA
| | - Julia Hertl
- Population Medicine & Diagnostic SciencesCornell University, 240 Farrier RoadIthaca, New York 14853USA
| | - Michael Koch
- Veterinary Internal Medicine ConsultingRochesterNew YorkUSA
| | - John P. Loftus
- Clinical SciencesCollege of Veterinary Medicine, Cornell University, 930 Campus RoadIthaca, New York 14853USA
| | - John Lucy
- Internal Medicine, Oradell Animal HospitalParamusNew JerseyUSA
| | - Brandi Mattison
- Arizona Veterinary Emergency & Critical Care CenterPeoriaArizonaUSA
| | - Julia Merriam
- Blue Pearl Pet Hospital NorthfieldNorthfieldIllinoisUSA
| | | | - Laura Van Vertloo
- Veterinary Clinical SciencesCollege of Veterinary Medicine, Iowa State UniversityAmesIowaUSA
| | - Austin Viall
- Department of Pathology, Microbiology and ImmunologyUniversity of California, DavisDavisCaliforniaUSA
| | - Dana N. LeVine
- Veterinary Clinical SciencesCollege of Veterinary Medicine, Auburn University, 1600 S 16th StAuburn, Alabama 36849USA
| |
Collapse
|