Encouraging experience using multi-transgenic xenografts in a pig-to-baboon cardiac xenotransplantation model

The pig as an optimal animal model for cardiovascular research

Cardiovascular disease is a worldwide health problem and a leading cause of morbidity and mortality. Preclinical cardiovascular research using animals is needed to explore potential targets and therapeutic options. Compared with rodents, pigs have many advantages, with their anatomy, physiology, metabolism and immune system being more similar to humans. Here we present an overview of the available pig models for cardiovascular diseases, discuss their advantages over other models and propose the concept of standardized models to improve translation to the clinical setting and control research costs.

Advances in Organ and Tissue Xenotransplantation

End-stage organ failure can result from various preexisting conditions and occurs in patients of all ages, and organ transplantation remains its only treatment. In recent years, extensive research has been done to explore the possibility of transplanting animal organs into humans, a process referred to as xenotransplantation. Due to their matching organ sizes and other anatomical and physiological similarities with humans, pigs are the preferred organ donor species. Organ rejection due to host immune response and possible interspecies infectious pathogen transmission have been the biggest hurdles to xenotransplantation's success. Use of genetically engineered pigs as tissue and organ donors for xenotransplantation has helped to address these hurdles. Although several preclinical trials have been conducted in nonhuman primates, some barriers still exist and demand further efforts. This review focuses on the recent advances and remaining challenges in organ and tissue xenotransplantation.

Historical Review and Future of Cardiac Xenotransplantation

Along with the development of immunosuppressive drugs, major advances on xenotransplantation were achieved by understanding the immunobiology of xenograft rejection. Most importantly, three predominant carbohydrate antigens on porcine endothelial cells were key elements provoking hyperacute rejection: α1,3-galactose, SDa blood group antigen, and N-glycolylneuraminic acid. Preformed antibodies binding to the porcine major xenoantigen causes complement activation and endothelial cell activation, leading to xenograft injury and intravascular thrombosis. Recent advances in genetic engineering enabled knock-outs of these major xenoantigens, thus producing xenografts with less hyperacute rejection rates. Another milestone in the history of xenotransplantation was the development of co-stimulation blockaded strategy. Unlike allotransplantation, xenotransplantation requires blockade of CD40-CD40L pathway to prevent T-cell dependent B-cell activation and antibody production. In 2010s, advanced genetic engineering of xenograft by inducing the expression of multiple human transgenes became available. So-called 'multi-gene' xenografts expressing human transgenes such as thrombomodulin and endothelial protein C receptor were introduced, which resulted in the reduction of thrombotic events and improvement of xenograft survival. Still, there are many limitations to clinical translation of cardiac xenotransplantation. Along with technical challenges, zoonotic infection and physiological discordances are major obstacles. Social barriers including healthcare costs also need to be addressed. Although there are several remaining obstacles to overcome, xenotransplantation would surely become the novel option for millions of patients with end-stage heart failure who have limited options to traditional therapeutics.

Preclinical rationale and current pathways to support the first human clinical trials in cardiac xenotransplantation

Recent initiation of the first FDA-approved cardiac xenotransplantation suggests xenotransplantation could soon become a therapeutic option for patients unable to undergo allotransplantation. Until xenotransplantation is widely applied in clinical practice, consideration of benefit versus risk and approaches to management of clinical xenografts will based at least in part on observations made in experimental xenotransplantation in non-human primates. Indeed, the decision to proceed with clinical trials reflects significant progress in last few years in experimental solid organ and cellular xenotransplantation. Our laboratory at the NIH and now at University of Maryland contributed to this progress, with heterotopic cardiac xenografts surviving more than two years and life-supporting cardiac xenografts survival up to 9 months. Here we describe our contributions to the understanding of the mechanism of cardiac xenograft rejection and development of methods to overcome past hurdles, and finally we share our opinion on the remaining barriers to clinical translation. We also discuss how the first in human xenotransplants might be performed, recipients managed, and graft function monitored.

Genetic engineering of pigs for xenotransplantation to overcome immune rejection and physiological incompatibilities: The first clinical steps

Xenotransplantation has the potential to solve the shortfall of human organ donors. Genetically modified pigs have been considered as potential animal donors for human xenotransplantation and have been widely used in preclinical research. The genetic modifications aim to prevent the major species-specific barriers, which include humoral and cellular immune responses, and physiological incompatibilities such as complement and coagulation dysfunctions. Genetically modified pigs can be created by deleting several pig genes related to the synthesis of various pig specific antigens or by inserting human complement- and coagulation-regulatory transgenes. Finally, in order to reduce the risk of infection, genes related to porcine endogenous retroviruses can be knocked down. In this review, we focus on genetically modified pigs and comprehensively summarize the immunological mechanism of xenograft rejection and recent progress in preclinical and clinical studies. Overall, both genetically engineered pig-based xenografts and technological breakthroughs in the biomedical field provide a promising foundation for pig-to-human xenotransplantation in the future.

The immunobiology and clinical use of genetically engineered porcine hearts for cardiac xenotransplantation

A summary of the scientific rationale of the advancements that led to the first genetically modified pig-to-human cardiac xenotransplantation is lacking in a complex and rapidly evolving field. Here, we aim to aid the general readership in the understanding of the gradual progression of cardiac (xeno)transplantation research, the immunobiology of cardiac xenotransplantation (including the latest immunosuppression, cardiac preservation and genetic engineering required for successful transplantation) and the regulatory landscape related to the clinical application of cardiac xenotransplantation for people with end-stage heart failure. Finally, we provide an overview of the outcomes and lessons learned from the first genetically modified pig-to-human cardiac heart xenotransplantation.

Current status of xenotransplantation research and the strategies for preventing xenograft rejection

Transplantation is often the last resort for end-stage organ failures, e.g., kidney, liver, heart, lung, and pancreas. The shortage of donor organs is the main limiting factor for successful transplantation in humans. Except living donations, other alternatives are needed, e.g., xenotransplantation of pig organs. However, immune rejection remains the major challenge to overcome in xenotransplantation. There are three different xenogeneic types of rejections, based on the responses and mechanisms involved. It includes hyperacute rejection (HAR), delayed xenograft rejection (DXR) and chronic rejection. DXR, sometimes involves acute humoral xenograft rejection (AHR) and cellular xenograft rejection (CXR), which cannot be strictly distinguished from each other in pathological process. In this review, we comprehensively discussed the mechanism of these immunological rejections and summarized the strategies for preventing them, such as generation of gene knock out donors by different genome editing tools and the use of immunosuppressive regimens. We also addressed organ-specific barriers and challenges needed to pave the way for clinical xenotransplantation. Taken together, this information will benefit the current immunological research in the field of xenotransplantation.

Genetically Modified Porcine-to-Human Cardiac Xenotransplantation

A 57-year-old man with nonischemic cardiomyopathy who was dependent on venoarterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) and was not a candidate for standard therapeutics, including a traditional allograft, received a heart from a genetically modified pig source animal that had 10 individual gene edits. Immunosuppression was based on CD40 blockade. The patient was weaned from ECMO, and the xenograft functioned normally without apparent rejection. Sudden diastolic thickening and failure of the xenograft occurred on day 49 after transplantation, and life support was withdrawn on day 60. On autopsy, the xenograft was found to be edematous, having nearly doubled in weight. Histologic examination revealed scattered myocyte necrosis, interstitial edema, and red-cell extravasation, without evidence of microvascular thrombosis - findings that were not consistent with typical rejection. Studies are under way to identify the mechanisms responsible for these changes. (Funded by the University of Maryland Medical Center and School of Medicine.).

hEPCR.hTBM.hCD47.hHO-1 with donor clodronate and DDAVP treatment improves perfusion and function of GalTKO.hCD46 porcine livers perfused with human blood

INTRODUCTION

Platelet sequestration, inflammation, and inappropriate coagulation cascade activation are prominent in liver xenotransplant models and are associated with poor outcomes. Here, we evaluate a cassette of six additional genetic modifications to reduce anti-pig antibody binding (α-1,3-galactosyl transferase knockout [GalTKO]) and target coagulation dysregulation (human endothelial protein C receptor [hEPRC] and thrombomodulin [hTBM]), complement pathway regulation (human membrane cofactor protein, hCD46), inflammation heme oxygenase 1 [hHO-1]), and a self-recognition receptor (integrin-associated protein [hCD47]), as well as donor pharmacologic treatments designed to blunt these phenomena.

METHODS

Livers from GaltKO.hCD46 pigs ("2-gene," n = 3) and GalTKO.hCD46 pigs also transgenic for hEPRC, hTBM, hCD47, and hHO-1 ("6-gene," n = 4) were perfused ex vivo with whole human blood. Six-gene pigs were additionally pretreated with desmopressin (DDAVP) and clodronate liposomes to deplete vWF and kupffer cells, respectively.

RESULTS

The average perfusion times increased from 304 (±148) min in the 2-gene group to 856 (±61) min in the 6-gene group (p = .010). The average heparin administration was decreased from 8837 U/h in the 2-gene to 1354 U/h in the 6-gene group (p = .047). Platelet sequestration tended to be delayed in the 6-gene group (p = .070), while thromboxane B2 (TXB2, a platelet activation marker) levels were lower over the first hour (p = .044) (401 ± 124 vs. 2048 ± 712 at 60 min). Thrombin production as measured by F1+2 levels tended to be lower in the 6-gene group (p = .058).

CONCLUSIONS

The combination of the hEPCR.hTBM.hCD47.hHO-1 cassette along with donor pig DDAVP and clodronate liposome pretreatment was associated with prolonged function of xenoperfused livers, reduced coagulation pathway perturbations, and decreased TXB2 elaboration, and reflects significant progress to modulate liver xenograft injury in a pig to human model.

Heterotopic Porcine Cardiac Xenotransplantation in the Intra-Abdominal Position in a Non-Human Primate Model

Heterotopic cardiac transplantation in the intra-abdominal position in a large animal model has been essential in the progression of the field of cardiac transplantation. Our group has over 10 years of experience in cardiac xenotransplantation with pig to baboon models, the longest xenograft of which survived over 900 days, with rejection only after reducing immunosuppression. This article aims to clarify our approach to this model in order to allow others to share success in long-term survival. Here, we demonstrate the approach to implantation of a cardiac graft into the intra-abdominal position in a baboon recipient for the study of transplantation and briefly highlight our model's ability to provide insight into not only xenotransplantation but across disciplines. We include details that have provided us with consistent success in this model; performance of the anastomoses, de-airing of the graft, implantation of a long-term telemetry device for invasive graft monitoring, and ideal geometric positioning of the heart and telemetry device in the limited space of the recipient abdomen. We additionally detail surveillance techniques to assess long-term graft function.

Expression of human thrombomodulin on porcine endothelial cells can reduce platelet aggregation but did not reduce activation of complement or endothelium - an experimental study

Clinical xenotransplantation will only be feasible when present limitations can be controlled sufficiently. Activation of endothelium and complement as well as coagulopathy and thrombotic microangiopathy (TMA) is important barriers. Transgenic expression of hTBM on porcine endothelial cells is a reasonable approach to reduce activation of haemostasis. Endothelial cells from wild-type pigs as well from pigs expressing hTBM alone or in combination with hCD46 and knockout of the alpha-1,3,-galactosyltransferase (GTKO) were perfused with platelet-rich plasma in a microfluidic flow chamber. Platelet aggregation and activation, coagulation, complement and endothelial cell activation were assessed. Perfusion of wild-type porcine aortic endothelial cells (PAEC) resulted in distinct platelet aggregation. Expression of hTBM in either mono-transgenic or triple-transgenic (GTKO/hCD46/hTBM) PAEC showed significantly reduced or absent platelet aggregation. Flow cytometric analysis of platelets showed an increased CD62P expression in wild-type PAEC and significantly reduced expression in mono- or triple-transgenic PAEC. Activation of coagulation measured by TAT occured in WT PAEC and was clearly reduced in hTBM and GTKO/hCD46/hTBM PAEC. Activation of complement and endothelial cells was only reduced in GTKO/hCD46/hTBM but not in PAEC expressing hTBM alone. Expression of hTBM was able to prevent activation of coagulation and platelet aggregation in mono- and triple-transgenic PAEC, while activation of complement and endothelial cells was not reduced in mono-transgenic PAEC.

Xenotransplantation: Progress Along Paths Uncertain from Models to Application

For more than a century, transplantation of tissues and organs from animals into man, xenotransplantation, has been viewed as a potential way to treat disease. Ironically, interest in xenotransplantation was fueled especially by successful application of allotransplantation, that is, transplantation of human tissue and organs, as a treatment for a variety of diseases, especially organ failure because scarcity of human tissues limited allotransplantation to a fraction of those who could benefit. In principle, use of animals such as pigs as a source of transplants would allow transplantation to exert a vastly greater impact than allotransplantation on medicine and public health. However, biological barriers to xenotransplantation, including immunity of the recipient, incompatibility of biological systems, and transmission of novel infectious agents, are believed to exceed the barriers to allotransplantation and presently to hinder clinical applications. One way potentially to address the barriers to xenotransplantation is by genetic engineering animal sources. The last 2 decades have brought progressive advances in approaches that can be applied to genetic modification of large animals. Application of these approaches to genetic engineering of pigs has contributed to dramatic improvement in the outcome of experimental xenografts in nonhuman primates and have encouraged the development of a new type of xenograft, a reverse xenograft, in which human stem cells are introduced into pigs under conditions that support differentiation and expansion into functional tissues and potentially organs. These advances make it appropriate to consider the potential limitation of genetic engineering and of current models for advancing the clinical applications of xenotransplantation and reverse xenotransplantation.

The complex functioning of the complement system in xenotransplantation

The role of complement in xenotransplantation is well-known and is a topic that has been reviewed previously. However, our understanding of the immense complexity of its interaction with other constituents of the innate immune response and of the coagulation, adaptive immune, and inflammatory responses to a xenograft is steadily increasing. In addition, the complement system plays a function in metabolism and homeostasis. New reviews at intervals are therefore clearly warranted. The pathways of complement activation, the function of the complement system, and the interaction between complement and coagulation, inflammation, and the adaptive immune system in relation to xenotransplantation are reviewed. Through several different mechanisms, complement activation is a major factor in contributing to xenograft failure. In the organ-source pig, the detrimental influence of the complement system is seen during organ harvest and preservation, for example, in ischemia-reperfusion injury. In the recipient, the effect of complement can be seen through its interaction with the immune, coagulation, and inflammatory responses. Genetic-engineering and other therapeutic methods by which the xenograft can be protected from the effects of complement activation are discussed. The review provides an updated source of reference to this increasingly complex subject.

Potential pathological role of pro-inflammatory cytokines (IL-6, TNF-α, and IL-17) in xenotransplantation

The major limitation of organ transplantation is the shortage of available organs from deceased human donors which leads to the deaths of thousands of patients each year. Xenotransplantation is considered to be an effective way to resolve the problem. Immune rejection and coagulation dysfunction are two major hurdles for the successful survival of pig xenografts in primate recipients. Pro-inflammatory cytokines, such as IL-6, TNF-α, and IL-17, play important roles in many diseases and in allotransplantation. However, the pathological roles of these pro-inflammatory cytokines in xenotransplantation remain unclear. Here, we briefly review the signaling transduction and expression regulation of IL-6, TNF-α, and IL-17 and evaluate their potential pathological roles in in vitro and in vivo models of xenotransplantation. We found that IL-6, TNF-α, and IL-17 were induced in most in vitro or in vivo xenotransplantation model. Blockade of these cytokines using gene modification, antibody, or inhibitor had different effects in xenotransplantation. Inhibition of IL-6 signaling with tocilizumab decreased CRP but did not increase xenograft survival. The one possible reason is that tocilizumab can not suppress IL-6 signaling in porcine cells or organs. Other drugs which inhibit IL-6 signaling need to be investigated in xenotransplantation model. Inhibition of TNF-α was beneficial for the survival of xenografts in pig-to-mouse, rat, or NHP models. Blockade of IL-17 using a neutralizing antibody also increased xenograft survival in several animal models. However, the role of IL-17 in the pig-to-NHP xenotransplantation model remains unclear and needs to be further investigated. Moreover, blockade of TNF-α and IL-6 together has got a better effect in pig-to-baboon kidney xenotransplantation. Blockade two or even more cytokines together might get better effect in suppressing xenograft rejection. Better understanding the role of these cytokines in xenotransplantation will be beneficial for choosing better immunosuppressive strategy or producing genetic modification pig.

Investigation of the influence of xenoreactive antibodies on activation of complement and coagulation in an ex vivo perfusion animal study using porcine kidneys

During pig-to-primate xenotransplantation or perfusion of porcine organs with human blood, a xenogeneic coagulopathy with consecutive development of thrombotic microangiopathy (TMA) can be observed. The aim of this study was to elucidate the influence of the reduction of xenoreactive natural antibodies on the coagulopathy using an ex vivo perfusion system. Thirteen perfusion experiments using landrace wild-type porcine kidneys were performed in three different experimental groups: autologous, xenogeneic, and immunoadsorption. During and after perfusion, blood and tissue samples were collected to assess markers of coagulation, complement, inflammation, and endothelial activation. Immunoadsorption prior to perfusion did not prolong perfusion time (174 min ±28) compared to xenogeneic (182 min ±22) experiments, whereas autologous perfusion was possible for maximum of 240 min in all experiments. Activation of coagulation was similar comparing perfusions after immunoadsorption (D-Dimer 24 186 μg/l ±5813; TAT 566 μg/l ±34) to xenogeneic (D-Dimer 22 175 μg/l ±7826, TAT 600 μg/l ±0) experiments. But antibody-mediated complement activation was reduced in the immunoadsorption group. TNF-alpha and markers of endothelial cell activation were lower in the immunoadsorption group compared to the xenogeneic experiments. In this ex vivo perfusion model, we observed that marked removal of xenogeneic antibodies can reduce complement activation via the classical pathway as well as endothelial cell activation and inflammation. Immunoadsorption cannot prevent the activation of the terminal complement cascade and coagulation.

Cardiac xenografts show reduced survival in the absence of transgenic human thrombomodulin expression in donor pigs

A combination of genetic manipulations of donor organs and target-specific immunosuppression is instrumental in achieving long-term cardiac xenograft survival. Recently, results from our preclinical pig-to-baboon heterotopic cardiac xenotransplantation model suggest that a three-pronged approach is successful in extending xenograft survival: (a) α-1,3-galactosyl transferase (Gal) gene knockout in donor pigs (GTKO) to prevent Gal-specific antibody-mediated rejection; (b) transgenic expression of human complement regulatory proteins (hCRP; hCD46) and human thromboregulatory protein thrombomodulin (hTBM) to avoid complement activation and coagulation dysregulation; and (c) effective induction and maintenance of immunomodulation, particularly through co-stimulation blockade of CD40-CD40L pathways with anti-CD40 (2C10R4) monoclonal antibody (mAb). Using this combination of manipulations, we reported significant improvement in cardiac xenograft survival. In this study, we are reporting the survival of cardiac xenotransplantation recipients (n = 3) receiving xenografts from pigs without the expression of hTBM (GTKO.CD46). We observed that all grafts underwent rejection at an early time point (median 70 days) despite utilization of our previously reported successful immunosuppression regimen and effective control of non-Gal antibody response. These results support our hypothesis that transgenic expression of human thrombomodulin in donor pigs confers an independent protective effect for xenograft survival in the setting of a co-stimulation blockade-based immunomodulatory regimen.