Standardization of the proceedings for preparing clinical trials of corneal xenotransplantation in South Korea

Immunoglobulin M and Immunoglobulin G Subclass Distribution of Anti-galactose-Alpha-1,3-Galactose and Anti-N-Glycolylneuraminic Acid Antibodies in Healthy Korean Adults

BACKGROUND

Human preformed antibodies (Abs), anti-galactose-alpha-1,3-galactose (Gal) and anti-N-glycolylneuraminic acid (Neu5Gc), can react with porcine antigens of wild-type pigs. To provide basic population data of the Abs for potential application in clinical xenotransplantation, we developed enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay methods and investigated the serum titers of anti-Gal and anti-Neu5Gc Abs, including immunoglobulin (Ig) M and IgG along with its subclasses, in humans.

METHODS

Anti-Gal and anti-Neu5Gc Abs serum titers were measured in 380 healthy Korean adults using the in-house enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays. The frequency and median values of anti-Gal and anti-Neu5Gc were measured, and their class and subclass distribution were evaluated.

RESULTS

The detection frequencies of anti-Gal were 99.2%, 95.0%, 23.2%, 94.5%, 12.4%, and 3.4% for IgM, IgG, IgG1, IgG2, IgG3, and IgG4, respectively. The detection frequencies of anti-Neu5Gc Abs were 87.4%, 96.6%, 1.6%, 46.3%, 0.0%, and 0.0% for IgM, IgG, IgG1, IgG2, IgG3, and IgG4, respectively. The median values of anti-Gal IgM (1001.6 ng/mL) and IgG (1198.3 ng/mL) were significantly higher than those of anti-Neu5Gc Abs (IgM, 328.4 ng/mL; IgG, 194.7 ng/mL; P < .001). IgG2 titers of both anti-Gal and anti-Neu5Gc Abs correlated better with the IgG class than the titers of other IgG subclasses.

CONCLUSIONS

The titers of anti-Gal Abs were higher than those of anti-Neu5Gc Abs. IgG2 was the main IgG subclass in both anti-Gal and anti-Neu5Gc Abs. Variation in the titers of anti-Gal or anti-Neu5Gc Abs may partly explain the biological and immunologic changes that occur in recipients of xenotransplants.

Corneal xenotransplantation: Where are we standing?

The search for alternatives to allotransplants is driven by the shortage of corneal donors and is demanding because of the limitations of the alternatives. Indeed, current progress in genetically engineered (GE) pigs, the introduction of gene-editing technology by clustered regularly interspaced short palindromic repeats (CRISPR)-Cas9, and advanced immunosuppressants have made xenotransplantation a possible option for a human trial. Porcine corneal xenotransplantation is considered applicable because the eye is regarded as an immune-privileged site. Furthermore, recent non-human primate studies have shown long-term survival of porcine xenotransplants in keratoplasty. Herein, corneal immune privilege is briefly introduced, and xenogeneic reactions are compared with allogeneic reactions in corneal transplantation. This review describes the current knowledge on special issues of xenotransplantation, xenogeneic rejection mechanisms, current immunosuppressive regimens of corneal xenotransplantation, preclinical efficacy and safety data of corneal xenotransplantation, and updates of the regulatory framework to conduct a clinical trial on corneal xenotransplantation. We also discuss barriers that might prevent xenotransplantation from becoming common practice, such as ethical dilemmas, public concerns on xenotransplantation, and the possible risk of xenozoonosis. Given that the legal definition of decellularized porcine cornea (DPC) lies somewhere between a medical device and a xenotransplant, the preclinical efficacy and clinical trial data using DPC are included. The review finally provides perspectives on the current standpoint of corneal xenotransplantation in the fields of regenerative medicine.

The potential role of 3D-bioprinting in xenotransplantation

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

To review the impact of a new technology, 3D-bioprinting, in xenotransplantation research.

RECENT FINDINGS

Genetically engineered pigs, beginning with human (h) CD55-transgenic and Gal-knockout pigs, have improved the outcomes of xenotransplantation research. Today, there are more than 30 different genetically engineered pigs either expressing human gene(s) or lacking pig gene(s). CRIPSR/cas9 technology has facilitated the production of multigene pigs (up to nine genes in a single pig), which lack multiple pig xenoantigens, and express human transgenes, such as hCD46, hCD55, hThrombomodulin, hCD39, etc. Although recent studies in nonhuman primates (NHPs) have demonstrated prolonged survival after life-supporting pig kidney, heart, and islet xenotransplantation, researchers have difficulty determining the best genetic combination to test in NHPs because of a potential greater than 100 000 genetic combinations. 3D-bioprinting of genetically engineered pig cells: is superior to 2D in-vitro testing, enables organ-specific testing, helps to understand differences in immunogenicity between organs, and is faster and cheaper than testing in NHPs. Moreover, 3D-bioprinted cells can be continuously perfused in a bioreactor, controlling for all variables, except the studied variable.

SUMMARY

3D-bioprinting can help in the study of the impact of specific genes (human or pig) in xenotransplantation in a rapid, inexpensive, and reliable way.