• Reference Citation Analysis
  • v
  • v
  • Find an Article
Find an Article PDF (5008094)   Today's Articles (1128)
For: Green T, Faulkner A, Rosen S, Macherey O. Enhancement of temporal periodicity cues in cochlear implants: effects on prosodic perception and vowel identification. J Acoust Soc Am 2005;118:375-85. [PMID: 16119358 DOI: 10.1121/1.1925827] [Citation(s) in RCA: 65] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/04/2023]
Number Cited by Other Article(s)
1
Wohlbauer DM, Dillier N. A Hundred Ways to Encode Sound Signals for Cochlear Implants. Annu Rev Biomed Eng 2025;27:335-369. [PMID: 40310887 DOI: 10.1146/annurev-bioeng-102623-121249] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/03/2025]
2
Ashjaei S, Behroozmand R, Fozdar S, Farrar R, Arjmandi M. Vocal control and speech production in cochlear implant listeners: A review within auditory-motor processing framework. Hear Res 2024;453:109132. [PMID: 39447319 DOI: 10.1016/j.heares.2024.109132] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/24/2024] [Revised: 10/11/2024] [Accepted: 10/14/2024] [Indexed: 10/26/2024]
3
Ajay EA, Thompson AC, Azees AA, Wise AK, Grayden DB, Fallon JB, Richardson RT. Combined-electrical optogenetic stimulation but not channelrhodopsin kinetics improves the fidelity of high rate stimulation in the auditory pathway in mice. Sci Rep 2024;14:21028. [PMID: 39251630 PMCID: PMC11385946 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-024-71712-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/21/2023] [Accepted: 08/30/2024] [Indexed: 09/11/2024]  Open
4
Camarena A, Goldsworthy RL. Characterizing the relationship between modulation sensitivity and pitch resolution in cochlear implant users. Hear Res 2024;448:109026. [PMID: 38776706 PMCID: PMC11572715 DOI: 10.1016/j.heares.2024.109026] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/28/2023] [Revised: 03/28/2024] [Accepted: 04/30/2024] [Indexed: 05/25/2024]
5
Buss E, Richter ME, Sweeney VN, Davis AG, Dillon MT, Park LR. Effect of Age and Unaided Acoustic Hearing on Pediatric Cochlear Implant Users' Ability to Distinguish Yes/No Statements and Questions. JOURNAL OF SPEECH, LANGUAGE, AND HEARING RESEARCH : JSLHR 2024;67:1932-1944. [PMID: 38748909 DOI: 10.1044/2024_jslhr-23-00631] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/07/2024]
6
Aronoff JM, Soleimanifar S, Bk P. Temporal pitch matching with bilateral cochlear implants. JASA EXPRESS LETTERS 2024;4:044401. [PMID: 38558234 PMCID: PMC10989667 DOI: 10.1121/10.0025507] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/11/2024] [Accepted: 03/20/2024] [Indexed: 04/04/2024]
7
Kovačić D, James CJ. Stimulation Rate and Voice Pitch Perception in Cochlear Implants. J Assoc Res Otolaryngol 2022;23:665-680. [PMID: 35918501 PMCID: PMC9613839 DOI: 10.1007/s10162-022-00854-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/03/2020] [Accepted: 06/05/2022] [Indexed: 06/15/2023]  Open
8
Ajay E, Gunewardene N, Richardson R. Emerging therapies for human hearing loss. Expert Opin Biol Ther 2022;22:689-705. [PMID: 35485229 DOI: 10.1080/14712598.2022.2072208] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/04/2022]
9
Goldsworthy RL, Bissmeyer SRS, Camarena A. Advantages of Pulse Rate Compared to Modulation Frequency for Temporal Pitch Perception in Cochlear Implant Users. J Assoc Res Otolaryngol 2022;23:137-150. [PMID: 34981263 PMCID: PMC8782986 DOI: 10.1007/s10162-021-00828-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/11/2021] [Accepted: 12/01/2021] [Indexed: 02/03/2023]  Open
10
Meta-Analysis on the Identification of Linguistic and Emotional Prosody in Cochlear Implant Users and Vocoder Simulations. Ear Hear 2021;41:1092-1102. [PMID: 32251011 DOI: 10.1097/aud.0000000000000863] [Citation(s) in RCA: 28] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
11
Intonational cues for speech perception in noise by cochlear implant listeners. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 2020;277:3315-3321. [DOI: 10.1007/s00405-020-06055-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/16/2020] [Accepted: 05/13/2020] [Indexed: 10/24/2022]
12
Neurophysiological Differences in Emotional Processing by Cochlear Implant Users, Extending Beyond the Realm of Speech. Ear Hear 2020;40:1197-1209. [PMID: 30762600 DOI: 10.1097/aud.0000000000000701] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/25/2023]
13
Lindenbeck MJ, Laback B, Majdak P, Srinivasan S. Temporal-pitch sensitivity in electric hearing with amplitude modulation and inserted pulses with short inter-pulse intervals. THE JOURNAL OF THE ACOUSTICAL SOCIETY OF AMERICA 2020;147:777. [PMID: 32113255 PMCID: PMC7002171 DOI: 10.1121/10.0000610] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/21/2018] [Revised: 12/26/2019] [Accepted: 01/02/2020] [Indexed: 06/10/2023]
14
Damm SA, Sis JL, Kulkarni AM, Chatterjee M. How Vocal Emotions Produced by Children With Cochlear Implants Are Perceived by Their Hearing Peers. JOURNAL OF SPEECH, LANGUAGE, AND HEARING RESEARCH : JSLHR 2019;62:3728-3740. [PMID: 31589545 PMCID: PMC7201339 DOI: 10.1044/2019_jslhr-s-18-0497] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/15/2018] [Revised: 06/13/2019] [Accepted: 07/16/2019] [Indexed: 06/10/2023]
15
Chatterjee M, Kulkarni AM, Siddiqui RM, Christensen JA, Hozan M, Sis JL, Damm SA. Acoustics of Emotional Prosody Produced by Prelingually Deaf Children With Cochlear Implants. Front Psychol 2019;10:2190. [PMID: 31632320 PMCID: PMC6779094 DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2019.02190] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/31/2019] [Accepted: 09/11/2019] [Indexed: 11/27/2022]  Open
16
Morris DJ, Burholt Kristensen L, Tøndering J. Standardization of the Prosody in Use Battery (PUB): a speech prosody perception test in Danish. CLINICAL LINGUISTICS & PHONETICS 2019;33:1165-1183. [PMID: 31112661 DOI: 10.1080/02699206.2019.1615990] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/17/2019] [Revised: 05/01/2019] [Accepted: 05/03/2019] [Indexed: 06/09/2023]
17
Evaluation of the Optimized Pitch and Language Strategy in Cochlear Implant Recipients. Ear Hear 2019;40:555-567. [DOI: 10.1097/aud.0000000000000627] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/25/2022]
18
Gaudrain E, Başkent D. Discrimination of Voice Pitch and Vocal-Tract Length in Cochlear Implant Users. Ear Hear 2019;39:226-237. [PMID: 28799983 PMCID: PMC5839701 DOI: 10.1097/aud.0000000000000480] [Citation(s) in RCA: 76] [Impact Index Per Article: 12.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/09/2017] [Accepted: 06/29/2017] [Indexed: 12/02/2022]
19
Lehnert-LeHouillier H, Spencer LJ, Machmer EL, Burchell KL. The Production of Question Intonation by Young Adult Cochlear Implant Users: Does Age at Implantation Matter? JOURNAL OF SPEECH, LANGUAGE, AND HEARING RESEARCH : JSLHR 2019;62:257-271. [PMID: 30950697 PMCID: PMC6436888 DOI: 10.1044/2018_jslhr-s-17-0468] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/19/2017] [Revised: 05/30/2018] [Accepted: 10/29/2018] [Indexed: 06/09/2023]
20
A tonal-language benefit for pitch in normally-hearing and cochlear-implanted children. Sci Rep 2019;9:109. [PMID: 30643156 PMCID: PMC6331606 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-018-36393-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 28] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/18/2018] [Accepted: 11/21/2018] [Indexed: 11/08/2022]  Open
21
Steinmetzger K, Rosen S. The role of envelope periodicity in the perception of masked speech with simulated and real cochlear implants. THE JOURNAL OF THE ACOUSTICAL SOCIETY OF AMERICA 2018;144:885. [PMID: 30180719 DOI: 10.1121/1.5049584] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/04/2018] [Accepted: 07/22/2018] [Indexed: 06/08/2023]
22
Sheft S, Cheng MY, Shafiro V. Discrimination of Stochastic Frequency Modulation by Cochlear Implant Users. J Am Acad Audiol 2018;26:572-81. [PMID: 26134724 DOI: 10.3766/jaaa.14067] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/17/2022]
23
Xu Y, Chen M, LaFaire P, Tan X, Richter CP. Distorting temporal fine structure by phase shifting and its effects on speech intelligibility and neural phase locking. Sci Rep 2017;7:13387. [PMID: 29042580 PMCID: PMC5645416 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-017-12975-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/12/2017] [Accepted: 09/13/2017] [Indexed: 11/27/2022]  Open
24
Ping L, Wang N, Tang G, Lu T, Yin L, Tu W, Fu QJ. Implementation and preliminary evaluation of ‘C-tone’: A novel algorithm to improve lexical tone recognition in Mandarin-speaking cochlear implant users. Cochlear Implants Int 2017. [PMID: 28629258 DOI: 10.1080/14670100.2017.1339492] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/19/2022]
25
Barone P, Chambaudie L, Strelnikov K, Fraysse B, Marx M, Belin P, Deguine O. Crossmodal interactions during non-linguistic auditory processing in cochlear-implanted deaf patients. Cortex 2016;83:259-70. [PMID: 27622640 DOI: 10.1016/j.cortex.2016.08.005] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/26/2016] [Revised: 05/17/2016] [Accepted: 08/15/2016] [Indexed: 12/13/2022]
26
Meng Q, Zheng N, Li X. Loudness Contour Can Influence Mandarin Tone Recognition: Vocoder Simulation and Cochlear Implants. IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng 2016;25:641-649. [PMID: 27448366 DOI: 10.1109/tnsre.2016.2593489] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/09/2022]
27
Vandali AE, Dawson PW, Arora K. Results using the OPAL strategy in Mandarin speaking cochlear implant recipients. Int J Audiol 2016;56:S74-S85. [PMID: 27329178 DOI: 10.1080/14992027.2016.1190872] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/21/2022]
28
Stahl P, Macherey O, Meunier S, Roman S. Rate discrimination at low pulse rates in normal-hearing and cochlear implant listeners: Influence of intracochlear stimulation site. THE JOURNAL OF THE ACOUSTICAL SOCIETY OF AMERICA 2016;139:1578. [PMID: 27106306 DOI: 10.1121/1.4944564] [Citation(s) in RCA: 20] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/05/2023]
29
Galvin JJ, Oba S, Başkent D, Fu QJ. Modulation frequency discrimination with single and multiple channels in cochlear implant users. Hear Res 2015;324:7-18. [PMID: 25746914 DOI: 10.1016/j.heares.2015.02.007] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/23/2014] [Revised: 02/18/2015] [Accepted: 02/21/2015] [Indexed: 11/25/2022]
30
Francart T, Osses A, Wouters J. Speech perception with F0mod, a cochlear implant pitch coding strategy. Int J Audiol 2015;54:424-32. [DOI: 10.3109/14992027.2014.989455] [Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/13/2022]
31
Kalathottukaren RT, Purdy SC, Ballard E. Prosody perception and musical pitch discrimination in adults using cochlear implants. Int J Audiol 2015;54:444-52. [DOI: 10.3109/14992027.2014.997314] [Citation(s) in RCA: 20] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/13/2022]
32
Li Y, Zhang G, Galvin JJ, Fu QJ. Mandarin speech perception in combined electric and acoustic stimulation. PLoS One 2014;9:e112471. [PMID: 25386962 PMCID: PMC4227806 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0112471] [Citation(s) in RCA: 22] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/03/2014] [Accepted: 10/16/2014] [Indexed: 11/18/2022]  Open
33
Lee T, Yu S, Yuan M, Wong TKC, Kong YY. The effect of enhancing temporal periodicity cues on Cantonese tone recognition by cochlear implantees. Int J Audiol 2014;53:546-57. [PMID: 24694089 DOI: 10.3109/14992027.2014.893374] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/13/2022]
34
Hegarty L, Faulkner A. The perception of stress and intonation in children with a cochlear implant and a hearing aid. Cochlear Implants Int 2013;14 Suppl 4:S35-9. [DOI: 10.1179/1467010013z.000000000132] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/31/2022]
35
Pitch and loudness matching of unmodulated and modulated stimuli in cochlear implantees. Hear Res 2013;302:32-49. [DOI: 10.1016/j.heares.2013.05.004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/03/2012] [Revised: 04/30/2013] [Accepted: 05/06/2013] [Indexed: 11/23/2022]
36
Heeren W, Coene M, Vaerenberg B, Avram A, Cardinaletti A, del Bo L, Pascu A, Volpato F, Govaerts PJ. Development of the A§E test battery for assessment of pitch perception in speech. Cochlear Implants Int 2013;13:206-19. [DOI: 10.1179/1754762811y.0000000035] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/31/2022]
37
Cortical processing of musical sounds in children with Cochlear Implants. Clin Neurophysiol 2012;123:1966-79. [DOI: 10.1016/j.clinph.2012.03.008] [Citation(s) in RCA: 30] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/11/2011] [Revised: 02/26/2012] [Accepted: 03/04/2012] [Indexed: 11/23/2022]
38
Vandali AE, van Hoesel RJM. Enhancement of temporal cues to pitch in cochlear implants: effects on pitch ranking. THE JOURNAL OF THE ACOUSTICAL SOCIETY OF AMERICA 2012;132:392-402. [PMID: 22779486 DOI: 10.1121/1.4718452] [Citation(s) in RCA: 19] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/01/2023]
39
Peng SC, Chatterjee M, Lu N. Acoustic cue integration in speech intonation recognition with cochlear implants. Trends Amplif 2012;16:67-82. [PMID: 22790392 PMCID: PMC3560417 DOI: 10.1177/1084713812451159] [Citation(s) in RCA: 44] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
40
Carroll J, Tiaden S, Zeng FG. Fundamental frequency is critical to speech perception in noise in combined acoustic and electric hearing. THE JOURNAL OF THE ACOUSTICAL SOCIETY OF AMERICA 2011;130:2054-62. [PMID: 21973360 PMCID: PMC3206909 DOI: 10.1121/1.3631563] [Citation(s) in RCA: 29] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/28/2011] [Revised: 05/11/2011] [Accepted: 08/05/2011] [Indexed: 05/25/2023]
41
Vandali AE, van Hoesel RJM. Development of a temporal fundamental frequency coding strategy for cochlear implants. THE JOURNAL OF THE ACOUSTICAL SOCIETY OF AMERICA 2011;129:4023-4036. [PMID: 21682423 DOI: 10.1121/1.3573988] [Citation(s) in RCA: 27] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/30/2023]
42
Macherey O, Deeks JM, Carlyon RP. Extending the limits of place and temporal pitch perception in cochlear implant users. J Assoc Res Otolaryngol 2011;12:233-51. [PMID: 21116672 PMCID: PMC3046333 DOI: 10.1007/s10162-010-0248-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 68] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/23/2010] [Accepted: 10/26/2010] [Indexed: 11/30/2022]  Open
43
Most T, Harel T, Shpak T, Luntz M. Perception of suprasegmental speech features via bimodal stimulation: cochlear implant on one ear and hearing aid on the other. JOURNAL OF SPEECH, LANGUAGE, AND HEARING RESEARCH : JSLHR 2011;54:668-678. [PMID: 20844254 DOI: 10.1044/1092-4388(2010/10-0071)] [Citation(s) in RCA: 24] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/26/2023]
44
Cullington HE, Zeng FG. Comparison of bimodal and bilateral cochlear implant users on speech recognition with competing talker, music perception, affective prosody discrimination, and talker identification. Ear Hear 2011;32:16-30. [PMID: 21178567 PMCID: PMC3059251 DOI: 10.1097/aud.0b013e3181edfbd2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 83] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
45
Straatman LV, Rietveld ACM, Beijen J, Mylanus EAM, Mens LHM. Advantage of bimodal fitting in prosody perception for children using a cochlear implant and a hearing aid. THE JOURNAL OF THE ACOUSTICAL SOCIETY OF AMERICA 2010;128:1884-1895. [PMID: 20968360 DOI: 10.1121/1.3474236] [Citation(s) in RCA: 33] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/28/2023]
46
Kong YY, Carlyon RP. Temporal pitch perception at high rates in cochlear implants. THE JOURNAL OF THE ACOUSTICAL SOCIETY OF AMERICA 2010;127:3114-23. [PMID: 21117760 DOI: 10.1121/1.3372713] [Citation(s) in RCA: 60] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/30/2023]
47
Kreft HA, Oxenham AJ, Nelson DA. Modulation rate discrimination using half-wave rectified and sinusoidally amplitude modulated stimuli in cochlear-implant users. THE JOURNAL OF THE ACOUSTICAL SOCIETY OF AMERICA 2010;127:656-659. [PMID: 20136187 PMCID: PMC2830260 DOI: 10.1121/1.3282947] [Citation(s) in RCA: 18] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/01/2009] [Revised: 12/03/2009] [Accepted: 12/09/2009] [Indexed: 05/28/2023]
48
Coene M, Govaerts P, Rooryck J, Daemers K. The role of low-frequency hearing in the acquisition of morphology. Cochlear Implants Int 2010;11 Suppl 1:272-7. [PMID: 21756630 DOI: 10.1179/146701010x12671177989156] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/31/2022]
49
Fundamental frequency and speech intelligibility in background noise. Hear Res 2009;266:52-9. [PMID: 19748564 DOI: 10.1016/j.heares.2009.08.011] [Citation(s) in RCA: 49] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/08/2009] [Revised: 08/21/2009] [Accepted: 08/25/2009] [Indexed: 10/20/2022]
50
Souza P, Rosen S. Effects of envelope bandwidth on the intelligibility of sine- and noise-vocoded speech. THE JOURNAL OF THE ACOUSTICAL SOCIETY OF AMERICA 2009;126:792-805. [PMID: 19640044 PMCID: PMC2730710 DOI: 10.1121/1.3158835] [Citation(s) in RCA: 84] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/08/2023]
PrevPage 1 of 2 12Next
© 2004-2025 Baishideng Publishing Group Inc. All rights reserved. 7041 Koll Center Parkway, Suite 160, Pleasanton, CA 94566, USA