1
|
Azees AA, Thompson AC, Ruther P, Ajay EA, Zhou J, Aregueta Robles UA, Garrett DJ, Quigley A, Fallon JB, Richardson RT. Spatially precise activation of the mouse cochlea with a multi-channel hybrid cochlear implant. J Neural Eng 2025; 22:036005. [PMID: 40273935 DOI: 10.1088/1741-2552/add091] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/01/2024] [Accepted: 04/24/2025] [Indexed: 04/26/2025]
Abstract
Objective.Cochlear implants are among the few clinical interventions for people with severe or profound hearing loss. However, current spread during monopolar electrical stimulation results in poor spectral resolution, prompting the exploration of optical stimulation as an alternative approach. Enabled by introducing light-sensitive ion channels into auditory neurons (optogenetics), optical stimulation has been shown to activate a more discrete neural area with minimal overlap between each frequency channel during simultaneous stimulation. However, the utility of optogenetic approaches is uncertain due to the low fidelity of responses to light and high-power requirements compared to electrical stimulation.Approach.Hybrid stimulation, combining sub-threshold electrical and optical pulses, has been shown to improve fidelity and use less light, but the impact on spread of activation and channel summation using a translatable, multi-channel hybrid implant is unknown. This study examined these factors during single channel and simultaneous multi-channel hybrid stimulation in transgenic mice expressing the ChR2/H134R opsin. Acutely deafened mice were implanted with a hybrid cochlear array containing alternating light emitting diodes and platinum electrode rings. Spiking activity in the inferior colliculus was recorded during electrical-only or hybrid stimulation in which optical and electrical stimuli were both at sub-threshold intensities. Thresholds, spread of activation, and threshold shifts during simultaneous hybrid stimulation were compared to electrical-only stimulation.Main results.The electrical current required to reach activation threshold during hybrid stimulation was reduced by 7.3 dB compared to electrical-only stimulation (p< 0.001). The activation width measured at two levels of discrimination above threshold and channel summation during simultaneous hybrid stimulation were significantly lower compared to electrical-only stimulation (p< 0.05), but there was no spatial advantage of hybrid stimulation at higher electrical stimulation levels.Significance.Reduced channel interaction would facilitate multi-channel simultaneous stimulation, thereby enhancing the perception of temporal fine structure which is crucial for music and speech in noise.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ajmal A Azees
- The Bionics Institute, Fitzroy, VIC 3065, Australia
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, RMIT University, Melbourne, VIC 3000, Australia
| | - Alex C Thompson
- The Bionics Institute, Fitzroy, VIC 3065, Australia
- Medical Bionics Department, University of Melbourne, East Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| | - Patrick Ruther
- Department of Microsystems Engineering (IMTEK), University of Freiburg, 79110 Freiburg, Germany
- BrainLinks-BrainTools Center, University of Freiburg, 79110 Freiburg, Germany
| | - Elise A Ajay
- The Bionics Institute, Fitzroy, VIC 3065, Australia
- Faculty of Engineering and Information Technology, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| | - Jenny Zhou
- The Bionics Institute, Fitzroy, VIC 3065, Australia
| | - Ulises A Aregueta Robles
- Graduate School of Biomedical Engineering, University of New South Wales, Sydney, NSW 2033, Australia
| | - David J Garrett
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, RMIT University, Melbourne, VIC 3000, Australia
| | - Anita Quigley
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, RMIT University, Melbourne, VIC 3000, Australia
- St Vincent's Hospital Melbourne, Aikenhead Centre for Medical Discovery, Fitzroy, Melbourne, VIC 3065, Australia
- St. Vincent's Hospital Melbourne, Centre for Clinical Neurosciences and Neurological Research, Fitzroy, Melbourne, VIC 3065, Australia
- Department of Medicine, St Vincent's Hospital Melbourne, The University of Melbourne, Fitzroy, Melbourne, VIC 3065, Australia
| | - James B Fallon
- The Bionics Institute, Fitzroy, VIC 3065, Australia
- Department of Surgery (Otolaryngology), University of Melbourne, The Royal Victorian Eye and Ear Hospital, East Melbourne, VIC 3002, Australia
- Medical Bionics Department, University of Melbourne, East Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| | - Rachael T Richardson
- The Bionics Institute, Fitzroy, VIC 3065, Australia
- Medical Bionics Department, University of Melbourne, East Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Wohlbauer DM, Hem CB, McCallick C, Arenberg JG. Speech performance in adults with cochlear implants using combined channel deactivation and dynamic current focusing. Hear Res 2025; 463:109285. [PMID: 40347546 DOI: 10.1016/j.heares.2025.109285] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/03/2024] [Revised: 04/09/2025] [Accepted: 04/21/2025] [Indexed: 05/14/2025]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES AND METHODS Cochlear implant listeners show difficulties in understanding speech in noise. Channel interactions from activating overlapping neural populations reduce the signal accuracy necessary to interpret complex signals. Optimizing programming strategies based on focused detection thresholds to reduce channel interactions has led to improved performance. In the current study, two previously suggested methods, channel deactivation and focused dynamic tripolar stimulation, were combined. Utilizing an automatic channel selection algorithm from focused detection threshold profiles, three cochlear implant programs were created with the same deactivated channels but varying proportions of channels employing focused stimulation, monopolar, dynamic focused and a mixed program. Thirteen ears in eleven adult cochlear implant listeners with Advanced Bionics HiRes90k devices were tested. Vowel identification and sentence perception in quiet and noise served as outcome measures, and the influences of listening experience, age, clinical consonant-nucleus-consonant performance, and perceptual thresholds on speech performance were assessed. RESULTS Across subjects, different degrees of focusing showed individual performance improvements for vowels and sentences over the monopolar program. Focused listening benefits were shown for individuals with less cochlear implant experience, and clinically poor performers seem to benefit more from focusing than good performers. However, only slight trends and no significant group improvements were observed. CONCLUSION The current findings suggest that deactivating and focusing subsets of channels might improve speech performance for some individuals, especially poor performers, a possible effect of reduced channel interactions. The findings also show that performance is largely variable among individuals.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Dietmar M Wohlbauer
- Harvard Medical School, Department of Otolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, Boston, 02114, MA, USA; Massachusetts Eye and Ear, Department for Audiology, Boston, 02114, MA, USA.
| | - Charles B Hem
- Massachusetts Eye and Ear, Department for Audiology, Boston, 02114, MA, USA; Harvard University, Cambridge, 02114, MA, USA
| | - Caylin McCallick
- Massachusetts Eye and Ear, Department for Audiology, Boston, 02114, MA, USA
| | - Julie G Arenberg
- Harvard Medical School, Department of Otolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, Boston, 02114, MA, USA; Massachusetts Eye and Ear, Department for Audiology, Boston, 02114, MA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Wohlbauer DM, Dillier N. A Hundred Ways to Encode Sound Signals for Cochlear Implants. Annu Rev Biomed Eng 2025; 27:335-369. [PMID: 40310887 DOI: 10.1146/annurev-bioeng-102623-121249] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/03/2025]
Abstract
Cochlear implants are the most successful neural prostheses used to restore hearing in severe-to-profound hearing-impaired individuals. The field of cochlear implant coding investigates interdisciplinary approaches to translate acoustic signals into electrical pulses transmitted at the electrode-neuron interface, ranging from signal preprocessing algorithms, enhancement, and feature extraction methodologies to electric signal generation. In the last five decades, numerous coding strategies have been proposed clinically and experimentally. Initially developed to restore speech perception, increasing computational possibilities now allow coding of more complex signals, and new techniques to optimize the transmission of electrical signals are constantly gaining attention. This review provides insights into the history of multichannel coding and presents an extensive list of implemented strategies. The article briefly addresses each method and considers promising future directions of neural prostheses and possible signal processing, with the ultimate goal of providing a current big picture of the large field of cochlear implant coding.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Dietmar M Wohlbauer
- Department of Otolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, Massachusetts Eye and Ear, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA;
| | - Norbert Dillier
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, University Hospital Zürich, University of Zürich, Zürich, Switzerland
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Perkel DJ, Giardina CK, Goldwyn JH, Arenberg JG. Model-Based Inference of Electrode Distance and Neuronal Density from Measured Detection Thresholds in Cochlear Implant Listeners. J Assoc Res Otolaryngol 2025; 26:185-201. [PMID: 40048122 PMCID: PMC11996727 DOI: 10.1007/s10162-025-00978-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/27/2024] [Accepted: 02/04/2025] [Indexed: 04/15/2025] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE Cochlear implants (CI) are a highly successful neural prosthesis that can restore hearing in individuals with sensorineural hearing loss. However, the extent of hearing restoration varies widely. Two major factors likely contribute to poor performance: (1) the distances between electrodes and surviving spiral ganglion neurons and (2) the density of those neurons. Reprogramming the CI at a poor electrode-neuron interface, using focused tripolar stimulation or remapping the electrodes, would benefit from understanding the cause of the poor interface. METHODS We used a cochlear model with simplified geometry and neuronal composition to investigate how the interface affects stimulation thresholds. We then inverted the model to infer electrode distance and neuronal density from monopolar and tripolar threshold values obtained behaviorally. We validated this inverted model for known scenarios of electrode distance and neuronal density. Finally, we assessed the model using data from 18 CI users whose electrode distances were measured from CT imaging. RESULTS The inverted model accurately inferred electrode distance and neuronal density for known scenarios. It also reliably reproduced behavioral monopolar and tripolar threshold profiles for CI users, with mean prediction errors within 1 dB for 17/18 subjects. Fits of electrode distance were more variable; accuracy depended on the assumed value of temporal bone resistivity. Twelve subjects had minimum distance error (0.31 mm) using low resistivity (70 Ω-cm) while the others had better fits (0.30 mm) with higher resistivity (250 Ω-cm). CONCLUSION This inverted model shows promise as a simple, practical tool to better assess and understand the electrode-neuron interface.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- David J Perkel
- Departments of Biology and Otolaryngology, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, 98195-1800, USA.
| | - Christopher K Giardina
- Department of Otolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery and Eaton Peabody Laboratories, Massachusetts Eye and Ear, Harvard Medical School, 243 Charles Street, Boston, MA, 02114, USA
| | - Joshua H Goldwyn
- Department of Mathematics and Statistics, Swarthmore College, Swarthmore, PA, 19081, USA
| | - Julie G Arenberg
- Department of Otolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery and Eaton Peabody Laboratories, Massachusetts Eye and Ear, Harvard Medical School, 243 Charles Street, Boston, MA, 02114, USA
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Konerding W, Arenberg J, Sznabel D, Kral A, Baumhoff P. An Electrically Evoked Compound Action Potential Marker for Local Spiral Ganglion Neuron Degeneration: The Failure Index. J Neurosci 2025; 45:e0954242024. [PMID: 39663117 PMCID: PMC11823333 DOI: 10.1523/jneurosci.0954-24.2024] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/21/2024] [Revised: 11/13/2024] [Accepted: 11/18/2024] [Indexed: 12/13/2024] Open
Abstract
Spiral ganglion neuron (SGN) degeneration is a candidate factor for reduced hearing outcomes in cochlear implant (CI) users. However, there is no procedure available to identify CI contacts close to focal SGN degeneration in human patients. In an animal model, we assessed the impact of focal SGN degeneration on electrical responsiveness and derived an electrophysiological marker for the presence, location, and size of such lesions. We introduced cochlear microlesions in 13 guinea pigs (six female) and recorded electrically evoked compound action potentials (eCAP) after 8-12 d. These were compared with recordings from controls (N = 8) and acutely lesioned cochleae (N = 12). We stimulated via 6-contact CIs in monopolar configuration with symmetric, biphasic pulses of alternating polarity. We histologically assessed the lesion and its relative position to the CI contacts. The lesions (230-850 µm) significantly elevated thresholds and reduced amplitudes. The effect was found at stimulation distances of 3.5 mm from the lesion. A novel eCAP marker, Failure Index (FI: maximal input/output ratio), was significantly elevated in the presence of degenerated SGN. It indicates the failure to efficiently transduce the stimulation current into neural activation (N1P1 amplitude). The FI showed classification accuracies of 80% and identified contacts closest to the lesion in ∼80% of cases within ±700 µm (∼electrode spacing) from the lesion site and was correlated with the lesion size. Thus, the FI is a clinically relevant, noninvasive marker that is suitable for clinical datasets without a priori knowledge on lesions, when combined with the statistical method of median splitting.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Wiebke Konerding
- Department of Experimental Otology, Hannover Medical School, Hannover 30625, Germany
| | - Julie Arenberg
- Massachusetts Eye and Ear Infirmary, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts 02114
| | - Dorota Sznabel
- Department of Experimental Otology, Hannover Medical School, Hannover 30625, Germany
| | - Andrej Kral
- Department of Experimental Otology, Hannover Medical School, Hannover 30625, Germany
- Cluster of Excellence "Hearing4all", DFG Exc. 2177
| | - Peter Baumhoff
- Department of Experimental Otology, Hannover Medical School, Hannover 30625, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Peng T, Garcia C, Haneman M, Shader MJ, Carlyon RP, McKay CM. Comparing Patient-Specific Variations in Intra-Cochlear Neural Health Estimated Using Psychophysical Thresholds and Panoramic Electrically Evoked Compound Action Potentials (PECAPs). J Assoc Res Otolaryngol 2025; 26:77-91. [PMID: 39779632 PMCID: PMC11861486 DOI: 10.1007/s10162-024-00972-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/18/2023] [Accepted: 12/10/2024] [Indexed: 01/11/2025] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE Variations in neural survival along the cochlear implant electrode array leads to off-place listening, resulting in poorer speech understanding outcomes for recipients. Therefore, it is important to develop and compare clinically viable tests to identify these patient-specific intra-cochlear neural differences. METHODS Nineteen experienced cochlear implant recipients (9 males and 10 females) were recruited for this study. We estimated the neural health along the electrode array for a group of experienced adult implant recipients using two methods: the difference between psychophysical detection thresholds in bipolar vs. monopolar mode and the panoramic electrically evoked compound action potential method (PECAP). We hypothesised that: neural health estimated using both methods at single electrodes will be correlated at the participant level and the group level; and participants with larger variations in neural health along the electrode array will have poorer speech outcomes. RESULTS At the individual level, the two neural measures correlated significantly across electrodes (p < 0.05) for 5 out of 15 participants. At the group level, we observed a weak but significant across-electrode correlation (R2 = 0.111, p < 0.001). While a larger variation in neural measures estimated from psychophysical thresholds was associated with lower phoneme speech scores (R2 = 0.499, p < 0.01), no significant association was found between variations in PECAP's neural health estimates and phoneme speech scores (R2 = 0.082, p = 0.366). CONCLUSION Our evidence suggests that both methods likely quantify a shared underlying neural basis, hypothesised to be the neural health along the cochlear implant array. The differences between the two measures may be attributed to differences in stimulus rate or loudness used to elicit responses and/or the influence of factors arising more centrally than the auditory nerve.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tommy Peng
- The Bionics Institute, 384-388 Albert St, East Melbourne, VIC, 3002, Australia.
- Department of Medical Bionics, University of Melbourne, Parkville, VIC, 3010, Australia.
| | - Charlotte Garcia
- MRC Cognition and Brain Sciences Unit, Cambridge Hearing Group, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, CB2 7EF, UK
| | - Mica Haneman
- The Bionics Institute, 384-388 Albert St, East Melbourne, VIC, 3002, Australia
- Department of Medical Bionics, University of Melbourne, Parkville, VIC, 3010, Australia
| | - Maureen J Shader
- The Bionics Institute, 384-388 Albert St, East Melbourne, VIC, 3002, Australia
- Department of Medical Bionics, University of Melbourne, Parkville, VIC, 3010, Australia
- Department of Speech, Language, and Hearing Sciences, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN, 47907, USA
| | - Robert P Carlyon
- MRC Cognition and Brain Sciences Unit, Cambridge Hearing Group, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, CB2 7EF, UK
| | - Colette M McKay
- The Bionics Institute, 384-388 Albert St, East Melbourne, VIC, 3002, Australia
- Department of Medical Bionics, University of Melbourne, Parkville, VIC, 3010, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Garcia C, Morse-Fortier C, Guérit F, Hislop S, Goehring T, Carlyon RP, Arenberg JG. Investigating the Effect of Blurring and Focusing Current in Cochlear Implant Users with the Panoramic ECAP Method. J Assoc Res Otolaryngol 2024; 25:591-609. [PMID: 39414747 DOI: 10.1007/s10162-024-00966-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/29/2024] [Accepted: 09/27/2024] [Indexed: 10/18/2024] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE For some cochlear implants (CIs), it is possible to focus electrical stimulation by partially returning current from the active electrode to nearby, intra-cochlear electrodes (partial tripolar (pTP) stimulation). Another method achieves the opposite: "blurring" by stimulating multiple electrodes simultaneously. The Panoramic ECAP (PECAP) method provides a platform to investigate their effects in detail by measuring electrically evoked compound action potentials and estimating current spread and neural responsiveness along the length of the CI electrode array. We investigate how sharpening and broadening the electrical current spread are reflected in PECAP estimates. METHODS PECAP measurements were recorded at most comfortable level in 12 ears of Advanced Bionics CI users. Focused thresholds were also determined. For the electrodes with the highest and lowest focused thresholds, additional PECAP measurements were recorded while stimulating in pTP mode and in "blurred" mode with 3 or 5 adjacent electrodes simultaneously stimulated. Current spread and neural responsiveness were then estimated along the electrode array using PECAP. RESULTS PECAP revealed increased current spread estimates across participants for blurred stimulation of the targeted electrodes towards the apex of the cochlea. Variable results for pTP stimulation were found, with two of eight ears appearing to drive a small group-level effect of increased current spread. CONCLUSION When stimulating multiple electrodes simultaneously, PECAP detected localized increases in current spread towards the apex (but not the base) of the cochlea. pTP stimulation showed mixed effects on PECAP current spread estimates. These findings are in line with behavioral speech perception studies and have implications for cochlear implant optimization.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Charlotte Garcia
- Cambridge Hearing Group, MRC Cognition & Brain Sciences Unit, University of Cambridge, 15 Chaucer Road, Cambridge, CB27EF, UK.
| | - Charlotte Morse-Fortier
- Eaton Peabody Laboratories (EPL), Massachusetts Eye and Ear, Harvard Medical School, 243 Charles Street, Boston, MA, 02114, USA
| | - François Guérit
- Cambridge Hearing Group, MRC Cognition & Brain Sciences Unit, University of Cambridge, 15 Chaucer Road, Cambridge, CB27EF, UK
| | - Scott Hislop
- Cambridge Hearing Group, MRC Cognition & Brain Sciences Unit, University of Cambridge, 15 Chaucer Road, Cambridge, CB27EF, UK
| | - Tobias Goehring
- Cambridge Hearing Group, MRC Cognition & Brain Sciences Unit, University of Cambridge, 15 Chaucer Road, Cambridge, CB27EF, UK
| | - Robert P Carlyon
- Cambridge Hearing Group, MRC Cognition & Brain Sciences Unit, University of Cambridge, 15 Chaucer Road, Cambridge, CB27EF, UK
| | - Julie G Arenberg
- Eaton Peabody Laboratories (EPL), Massachusetts Eye and Ear, Harvard Medical School, 243 Charles Street, Boston, MA, 02114, USA
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Wohlbauer DM, Hem C, McCallick C, Arenberg JG. Speech in noise performance in adults with cochlear implants using a combined channel deactivation strategy with a variable number of dynamic focused channels. BIORXIV : THE PREPRINT SERVER FOR BIOLOGY 2024:2024.10.31.621419. [PMID: 39554103 PMCID: PMC11565966 DOI: 10.1101/2024.10.31.621419] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/19/2024]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES AND METHODS Cochlear implant listeners show difficulties in understanding speech in noise. Channel interactions from activating overlapping neural populations reduce the signal accuracy necessary to interpret complex signals. Optimizing programming strategies based on focused detection thresholds to reduce channel interactions has led to improved performance. In the current study, two previously suggested methods, channel deactivation and focused dynamic tripolar stimulation, were combined to create three cochlear implant programs. Utilizing an automatic channel selection algorithm from focused detection threshold profiles, three programs were created with the same deactivated channels but varying proportions of channels employing focused stimulation, monopolar, dynamic focused and a mixed program. Thirteen ears in eleven adult cochlear implant listeners with Advanced Bionics HiRes90k devices were tested. Vowel identification and sentence perception in quiet and noise served as outcome measures, and the influences of listening experience, age, clinical consonant-nucleus-consonant performance, and perceptual thresholds on speech performance were assessed. RESULTS Across subjects, different degrees of focusing showed individual performance improvements for vowels and sentences over the monopolar program. However, only slight trends and no significant group improvements were observed. Focused listening benefits were shown for individuals with less cochlear implant experience, and clinically poor performers seem to benefit more from focusing than good performers. CONCLUSION The current findings suggest that deactivating and focusing subsets of channels improves speech performance for some individuals, especially poor performers, a possible effect of reduced channel interactions. The findings also show that individual performance is largely variable, possibly due to listening experience, age, or the underlying detection threshold.
Collapse
|
9
|
Gabr T, Debis H, Hafez A. Electric Auditory Brainstem Response Audiometry in Cochlear Implants: New Recording Paradigm. Audiol Res 2024; 14:581-592. [PMID: 39051193 PMCID: PMC11270165 DOI: 10.3390/audiolres14040049] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/21/2024] [Revised: 06/09/2024] [Accepted: 06/13/2024] [Indexed: 07/27/2024] Open
Abstract
(1) Background: Cochlear implants (CIs) are widely applied to recover audition for patients with severe degrees of or total hearing loss. Electrical stimulation using the electrically evoked ABR (E-ABR) can be recorded in CI recipients through the device. This work was designed to study E-ABR recorded individually from different channels located at the apical, middle, and basal cochlear regions in comparison to their simultaneous separated or adjacent combined recordings. (2) Methods: This study included 17 children fitted with unilateral cochlear implants. All children were subjected to impedance measurement, electrical compound action potentials (ECAP), and E-ABR recording of three channels located at the apical, middle, and basal cochlear regions. This was followed by simultaneous E-ABR recording of the three "separated" channels in comparison to E-ABR recording from three adjacent channels located at the middle cochlear region. (3) Results: Similar E-ABR latencies and amplitudes were found using either individual or simultaneously separated or adjacent combined recording. However, the mean amplitude measures of E-ABR for combined adjacent channels showed a positive correlation with the applied current level. (4) Conclusions: Combined E-ABR recording from adjacent channels is a faster and more reliable technique that can be used effectively without compromising the results of the recorded E-ABR.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Takwa Gabr
- Audiovestibular Medicine Unit, Faculty of Medicine, Kafrelsheikh University, Elgeesh Street, Kafrelsheikh 33516, Egypt
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
10
|
Cychosz M, Winn MB, Goupell MJ. How to vocode: Using channel vocoders for cochlear-implant research. THE JOURNAL OF THE ACOUSTICAL SOCIETY OF AMERICA 2024; 155:2407-2437. [PMID: 38568143 PMCID: PMC10994674 DOI: 10.1121/10.0025274] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/19/2023] [Revised: 02/14/2024] [Accepted: 02/23/2024] [Indexed: 04/05/2024]
Abstract
The channel vocoder has become a useful tool to understand the impact of specific forms of auditory degradation-particularly the spectral and temporal degradation that reflect cochlear-implant processing. Vocoders have many parameters that allow researchers to answer questions about cochlear-implant processing in ways that overcome some logistical complications of controlling for factors in individual cochlear implant users. However, there is such a large variety in the implementation of vocoders that the term "vocoder" is not specific enough to describe the signal processing used in these experiments. Misunderstanding vocoder parameters can result in experimental confounds or unexpected stimulus distortions. This paper highlights the signal processing parameters that should be specified when describing vocoder construction. The paper also provides guidance on how to determine vocoder parameters within perception experiments, given the experimenter's goals and research questions, to avoid common signal processing mistakes. Throughout, we will assume that experimenters are interested in vocoders with the specific goal of better understanding cochlear implants.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Margaret Cychosz
- Department of Linguistics, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California 90095, USA
| | - Matthew B Winn
- Department of Speech-Language-Hearing Sciences, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota 55455, USA
| | - Matthew J Goupell
- Department of Hearing and Speech Sciences, University of Maryland, College Park, College Park, Maryland 20742, USA
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Quass GL, Kral A. Tripolar configuration and pulse shape in cochlear implants reduce channel interactions in the temporal domain. Hear Res 2024; 443:108953. [PMID: 38277881 DOI: 10.1016/j.heares.2024.108953] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/01/2023] [Revised: 01/08/2024] [Accepted: 01/11/2024] [Indexed: 01/28/2024]
Abstract
The present study investigates effects of current focusing and pulse shape on threshold, dynamic range, spread of excitation and channel interaction in the time domain using cochlear implant stimulation. The study was performed on 20 adult guinea pigs using a 6-channel animal cochlear implant, recording was performed in the auditory midbrain using a multielectrode array. After determining the best frequencies for individual recording contacts with acoustic stimulation, the ear was deafened and a cochlear implant was inserted into the cochlea. The position of the implant was controlled by x-ray. Stimulation with biphasic, pseudomonophasic and monophasic stimuli was performed with monopolar, monopolar with common ground, bipolar and tripolar configuration in two sets of experiments, allowing comparison of the effects of the different stimulation strategies on threshold, dynamic range, spread of excitation and channel interaction. Channel interaction was studied in the temporal domain, where two electrodes were activated with pulse trains and phase locking to these pulse trains in the midbrain was quantified. The results documented multifactorial influences on the response properties, with significant interaction between factors. Thresholds increased with increasing current focusing, but decreased with pseudomonophasic and monophasic pulse shapes. The results documented that current focusing, particularly tripolar configuration, effectively reduces channel interaction, but that also pseudomonophasic and monophasic stimulation and phase duration intensity coding reduce channel interactions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Gunnar L Quass
- Institute for AudioNeuroTechnology (VIANNA) & Department of Experimental Otology, Otolaryngology Clinics, Hannover Medical School, Hannover, Germany; Cluster of Excellence "Hearing4All" (EXC 2177), Germany.
| | - Andrej Kral
- Institute for AudioNeuroTechnology (VIANNA) & Department of Experimental Otology, Otolaryngology Clinics, Hannover Medical School, Hannover, Germany; Cluster of Excellence "Hearing4All" (EXC 2177), Germany; Australian Hearing Hub, School of Medicine and Health Sciences, Macquarie University, Sydney, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Jahn KN, Morse-Fortier C, Griffin AM, Faller D, Cohen MS, Kenna MA, Doney E, Arenberg JG. Programming Levels and Speech Perception in Pediatric Cochlear Implant Recipients With Enlarged Vestibular Aqueduct or GJB2 Mutation. Otol Neurotol 2023; 44:e273-e280. [PMID: 37167444 PMCID: PMC10176457 DOI: 10.1097/mao.0000000000003879] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/13/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To determine the relationship between hearing loss etiology, cochlear implant (CI) programming levels, and speech perception performance in a large clinical cohort of pediatric CI recipients. STUDY DESIGN Retrospective chart review. SETTING Tertiary care hospitals. PATIENTS A total of 136 pediatric CI recipients (218 ears) were included in this study. All patients had diagnoses of either enlarged vestibular aqueduct (EVA) or GJB2 (Connexin-26) mutation confirmed via radiographic data and/or genetic reports. All patients received audiologic care at either Boston Children's Hospital or Massachusetts Eye and Ear in Boston, MA, between the years 1999 and 2020. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES Electrode impedances and programming levels for each active electrode and speech perception scores were evaluated as a function of etiology (EVA or GJB2 mutation). RESULTS Children with EVA had significantly higher impedances and programming levels (thresholds and upper stimulation levels) than the children with GJB2 mutation. Speech perception scores did not differ as a function of etiology in this sample; rather, they were positively correlated with duration of CI experience (time since implantation). CONCLUSIONS Differences in electrode impedances and CI programming levels suggest that the electrode-neuron interface varies systematically as a function of hearing loss etiology in pediatric CI recipients with EVA and those with GJB2 mutation. Time with the CI was a better predictor of speech perception scores than etiology, suggesting that children can adapt to CI stimulation with experience.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kelly N Jahn
- Department of Speech, Language, and Hearing, University of Texas at Dallas, Richardson, Texas
| | | | | | - David Faller
- Department of Otolaryngology and Communication Enhancement, Boston Children's Hospital
| | - Michael S Cohen
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
13
|
van Groesen NRA, Briaire JJ, de Jong MAM, Frijns JHM. Dynamic Current Focusing Compared to Monopolar Stimulation in a Take-Home Trial of Cochlear Implant Users. Ear Hear 2023; 44:306-317. [PMID: 36279119 DOI: 10.1097/aud.0000000000001282] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/05/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES This study compared the performance of a dynamic partial tripolar cochlear implant speech encoding strategy termed dynamic current focusing (DCF) to monopolar stimulation (MP) using spectro-temporal, temporal, and speech-in-noise recognition testing. DESIGN DCF is a strategy that utilizes tripolar or high partial tripolar stimulation at threshold level and increases loudness by slowly widening current spread towards most comfortable level. Thirteen cochlear implant users were fitted with DCF and a non-steered MP matched on pulse rate, pulse width, and active electrodes. Nine participants completed the single-blinded within-subject crossover trial. Repeated testing consisted of four sessions. Strategies were allocated in a DCF-MP-DCF-MP or MP-DCF-MP-DCF design. Three-week adaptation periods ended with a test session in which speech-in-noise recognition (matrix speech-in-noise sentence test), spectro-temporal ripple tests (SMRT and STRIPES) and a temporal amplitude modulation detection test were conducted. All participants recorded their subjective experiences with both strategies using the Speech, Spatial and Qualities of Hearing Scale questionnaire. RESULTS Participants' SMRT thresholds improved 0.40 ripples per octave ( p = 0.02, Bonferroni-corrected: p = 0.1) with DCF over MP at 65 dB SPL. No significant differences between the strategies were found on speech-in-noise recognition at conversational (65 dB SPL) and soft (45 dB SPL) loudness levels, temporal testing, STRIPES, or the SMRT at 45 dB SPL. After Bonferroni correction, a learning effect remained on the matrix speech-in-noise sentence test at both loudness levels (65 dB SPL: p = 0.01; 45 dB SPL: p = 0.02). There was no difference in learning effects over time between DCF and MP. Similarly, no significant differences were found in subjective experience on the Speech, Spatial and Qualities of Hearing Scale questionnaire. DCF reduced average battery life by 48% (5.1 hours) ( p < 0.001) compared to MP. CONCLUSIONS DCF may improve spectral resolution over MP at comfortable loudness (65 dB SPL) in cochlear implant users. However, the evidence collected in this study was weak and the significant result disappeared after Bonferroni correction. Also, not all spectral tests revealed this improvement. As expected, battery life was reduced for DCF. Although the current study is limited by its small sample size, considering previous studies, DCF does not consistently improve speech recognition in noise over MP strategies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Jeroen Johannes Briaire
- Otorhinolaryngology and Head and Neck Surgery, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, the Netherlands
| | - Monique Anna Maria de Jong
- Otorhinolaryngology and Head and Neck Surgery, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, the Netherlands
| | - Johannes Hubertus Maria Frijns
- Otorhinolaryngology and Head and Neck Surgery, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, the Netherlands
- Leiden Institute for Brain and Cognition, Leiden, the Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Lambriks L, van Hoof M, Debruyne J, Janssen M, Hof J, Hellingman K, Devocht E, George E. Toward neural health measurements for cochlear implantation: The relationship among electrode positioning, the electrically evoked action potential, impedances and behavioral stimulation levels. Front Neurol 2023; 14:1093265. [PMID: 36846130 PMCID: PMC9948626 DOI: 10.3389/fneur.2023.1093265] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/08/2022] [Accepted: 01/10/2023] [Indexed: 02/11/2023] Open
Abstract
Introduction Estimating differences in neural health across different sites within the individual cochlea potentially enables clinical applications for subjects with a cochlear implant. The electrically evoked compound action potential (ECAP) is a measure of neural excitability that possibly provides an indication of a neural condition. There are many factors, however, that affect this measure and increase the uncertainty of its interpretation. To better characterize the ECAP response, its relationship with electrode positioning, impedances, and behavioral stimulation levels was explored. Methods A total of 14 adult subjects implanted with an Advanced Bionics cochlear electrode array were prospectively followed up from surgery to 6 months postoperative. Insertion depth, distance to the modiolus, and distance to the medial wall were assessed for each electrode by postoperative CT analysis. ECAPs were measured intraoperatively and at three visits postoperatively on all 16 electrodes using the NRI feature of clinical programming software and characterized using multiple parameters. Impedances and behavioral stimulation levels were measured at every fitting session. Results Patterns in ECAPs and impedances were consistent over time, but high variability existed among subjects and between different positions in the cochlea. Electrodes located closer to the apex of the cochlea and closer to the modiolus generally showed higher neural excitation and higher impedances. Maximum loudness comfort levels were correlated strongly with the level of current needed to elicit a response of 100 μV ECAP. Conclusion Multiple factors contribute to the ECAP response in subjects with a cochlear implant. Further research might address whether the ECAP parameters used in this study will benefit clinical electrode fitting or the assessment of auditory neuron integrity.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lars Lambriks
- Department of ENT/Audiology, School for Mental Health and NeuroScience, Maastricht University Medical Centre, Maastricht, Netherlands,*Correspondence: Lars Lambriks ✉
| | - Marc van Hoof
- Department of ENT/Audiology, School for Mental Health and NeuroScience, Maastricht University Medical Centre, Maastricht, Netherlands
| | - Joke Debruyne
- Department of ENT/Audiology, School for Mental Health and NeuroScience, Maastricht University Medical Centre, Maastricht, Netherlands
| | - Miranda Janssen
- Department of ENT/Audiology, School for Mental Health and NeuroScience, Maastricht University Medical Centre, Maastricht, Netherlands,Department of Methodology and Statistics, Care and Public Health Research Institute, Maastricht University, Maastricht, Netherlands
| | - Janny Hof
- Department of ENT/Audiology, School for Mental Health and NeuroScience, Maastricht University Medical Centre, Maastricht, Netherlands
| | - Katja Hellingman
- Department of ENT/Audiology, School for Mental Health and NeuroScience, Maastricht University Medical Centre, Maastricht, Netherlands
| | - Elke Devocht
- Department of ENT/Audiology, School for Mental Health and NeuroScience, Maastricht University Medical Centre, Maastricht, Netherlands
| | - Erwin George
- Department of ENT/Audiology, School for Mental Health and NeuroScience, Maastricht University Medical Centre, Maastricht, Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Tahmasebi S, Segovia-Martinez M, Nogueira W. Optimization of Sound Coding Strategies to Make Singing Music More Accessible for Cochlear Implant Users. Trends Hear 2023; 27:23312165221148022. [PMID: 36628453 PMCID: PMC9837293 DOI: 10.1177/23312165221148022] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/12/2023] Open
Abstract
Cochlear implants (CIs) are implantable medical devices that can partially restore hearing to people suffering from profound sensorineural hearing loss. While these devices provide good speech understanding in quiet, many CI users face difficulties when listening to music. Reasons include poor spatial specificity of electric stimulation, limited transmission of spectral and temporal fine structure of acoustic signals, and restrictions in the dynamic range that can be conveyed via electric stimulation of the auditory nerve. The coding strategies currently used in CIs are typically designed for speech rather than music. This work investigates the optimization of CI coding strategies to make singing music more accessible to CI users. The aim is to reduce the spectral complexity of music by selecting fewer bands for stimulation, attenuating the background instruments by strengthening a noise reduction algorithm, and optimizing the electric dynamic range through a back-end compressor. The optimizations were evaluated through both objective and perceptual measures of speech understanding and melody identification of singing voice with and without background instruments, as well as music appreciation questionnaires. Consistent with the objective measures, results gathered from the perceptual evaluations indicated that reducing the number of selected bands and optimizing the electric dynamic range significantly improved speech understanding in music. Moreover, results obtained from questionnaires show that the new music back-end compressor significantly improved music enjoyment. These results have potential as a new CI program for improved singing music perception.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sina Tahmasebi
- Department of Otolaryngology, Hannover Medical School, Hannover, Germany
- Cluster of Excellence Hearing4all, Hannover, Germany
- Sina Tahmasebi, Karl-Wiechert-Allee 3, 30625 Hannover, Germany.
Waldo Nogueira, Karl-Wiechert-Allee 3, 30625 Hannover, Germany.
| | | | - Waldo Nogueira
- Department of Otolaryngology, Hannover Medical School, Hannover, Germany
- Cluster of Excellence Hearing4all, Hannover, Germany
- Sina Tahmasebi, Karl-Wiechert-Allee 3, 30625 Hannover, Germany.
Waldo Nogueira, Karl-Wiechert-Allee 3, 30625 Hannover, Germany.
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Garadat SN, Colesa DJ, Swiderski DL, Raphael Y, Pfingst BE. Estimating health of the implanted cochlea using psychophysical strength-duration functions and electrode configuration. Hear Res 2022; 414:108404. [PMID: 34883366 PMCID: PMC8761176 DOI: 10.1016/j.heares.2021.108404] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/24/2021] [Revised: 11/17/2021] [Accepted: 11/25/2021] [Indexed: 02/03/2023]
Abstract
It is generally believed that the efficacy of cochlear implants is partly dependent on the condition of the stimulated neural population. Cochlear pathology is likely to affect the manner in which neurons respond to electrical stimulation, potentially resulting in differences in perception of electrical stimuli across cochlear implant recipients and across the electrode array in individual cochlear implant users. Several psychophysical and electrophysiological measures have been shown to predict cochlear health in animals and were used to assess conditions near individual stimulation sites in humans. In this study, we examined the relationship between psychophysical strength-duration functions and spiral ganglion neuron density in two groups of guinea pigs with cochlear implants who had minimally-overlapping cochlear health profiles. One group was implanted in a hearing ear (N = 10) and the other group was deafened by cochlear perfusion of neomycin, inoculated with an adeno-associated viral vector with an Ntf3-gene insert (AAV.Ntf3) and implanted (N = 14). Psychophysically measured strength-duration functions for both monopolar and tripolar electrode configurations were then compared for the two treatment groups. Results were also compared to their histological outcomes. Overall, there were considerable differences between the two treatment groups in terms of their psychophysical performance as well as the relation between their functional performance and histological data. Animals in the neomycin-deafened, neurotrophin-treated, and implanted group (NNI) exhibited steeper strength-duration function slopes; slopes were positively correlated with SGN density (steeper slopes in animals that had higher SGN densities). In comparison, the implanted hearing (IH) group had shallower slopes and there was no relation between slopes and spiral ganglion density. Across all animals, slopes were negatively correlated with ensemble spontaneous activity levels (shallower slopes with higher ensemble spontaneous activity levels). We hypothesize that differences in strength-duration function slopes between the two treatment groups were related to the condition of the inner hair cells, which generate spontaneous activity that could affect the across-fiber synchrony and/or the size of the population of neural elements responding to electrical stimulation. In addition, it is likely that spiral ganglion neuron peripheral processes were present in the IH group, which could affect membrane properties of the stimulated neurons. Results suggest that the two treatment groups exhibited distinct patterns of variation in conditions near the stimulating electrodes that altered detection thresholds. Overall, the results of this study suggest a complex relationship between psychophysical detection thresholds for cochlear implant stimulation and nerve survival in the implanted cochlea. This relationship seems to depend on the characteristics of the electrical stimulus, the electrode configuration, and other biological features of the implanted cochlea such as the condition of the inner hair cells and the peripheral processes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Soha N Garadat
- Department of Hearing and Speech Sciences, The University of Jordan, Amman 11942, Jordan; Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Kresge Hearing Research Institute, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI 48109-5616, USA.
| | - Deborah J Colesa
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Kresge Hearing Research Institute, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI 48109-5616, USA
| | - Donald L Swiderski
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Kresge Hearing Research Institute, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI 48109-5616, USA
| | - Yehoash Raphael
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Kresge Hearing Research Institute, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI 48109-5616, USA
| | - Bryan E Pfingst
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Kresge Hearing Research Institute, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI 48109-5616, USA
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Arjmandi MK, Jahn KN, Arenberg JG. Single-Channel Focused Thresholds Relate to Vowel Identification in Pediatric and Adult Cochlear Implant Listeners. Trends Hear 2022; 26:23312165221095364. [PMID: 35505617 PMCID: PMC9073113 DOI: 10.1177/23312165221095364] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/04/2022] Open
Abstract
Speech recognition outcomes are highly variable among pediatric and adult cochlear implant (CI) listeners. Although there is some evidence that the quality of the electrode-neuron interface (ENI) contributes to this large variability in auditory perception, its relationship with speech outcomes is not well understood. Single-channel auditory detection thresholds measured in response to focused electrical fields (i.e., focused thresholds) are sensitive to properties of ENI quality, including electrode-neuron distance, intracochlear resistance, and neural health. In the present study, focused thresholds and speech perception abilities were assessed in 15 children and 21 adult CI listeners. Focused thresholds were measured for all active electrodes using a fast sweep procedure. Speech perception performance was evaluated by assessing listeners’ ability to identify vowels presented in /h-vowel-d/ context. Consistent with prior literature, focused thresholds were lower for children than for adults, but vowel identification did not differ significantly across age groups. Higher across-array average focused thresholds, which may indicate a relatively poor ENI quality, were associated with poorer vowel identification scores in both children and adults. Adult CI listeners with longer durations of deafness had higher focused thresholds. Findings from this study demonstrate that poor-quality ENIs may contribute to reduced speech outcomes for pediatric and adult CI listeners. Estimates of ENI quality (e.g., focused thresholds) may assist in developing customized programming interventions that serve to improve the transmission of spectral cues that are important in vowel identification.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Meisam K Arjmandi
- Department of Otolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery, 1811Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.,Eaton-Peabody Laboratories, 1866Massachusetts Eye and Ear, Boston, MA, USA.,Audiology Division, 1866Massachusetts Eye and Ear, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Kelly N Jahn
- Department of Otolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery, 1811Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.,Eaton-Peabody Laboratories, 1866Massachusetts Eye and Ear, Boston, MA, USA.,Department of Speech, Language, and Hearing, University of Texas at Dallas, Richardson, TX, USA
| | - Julie G Arenberg
- Department of Otolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery, 1811Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.,Eaton-Peabody Laboratories, 1866Massachusetts Eye and Ear, Boston, MA, USA.,Audiology Division, 1866Massachusetts Eye and Ear, Boston, MA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Heshmat A, Sajedi S, Schrott-Fischer A, Rattay F. Polarity Sensitivity of Human Auditory Nerve Fibers Based on Pulse Shape, Cochlear Implant Stimulation Strategy and Array. Front Neurosci 2021; 15:751599. [PMID: 34955717 PMCID: PMC8692583 DOI: 10.3389/fnins.2021.751599] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/01/2021] [Accepted: 11/08/2021] [Indexed: 11/28/2022] Open
Abstract
Neural health is of great interest to determine individual degeneration patterns for improving speech perception in cochlear implant (CI) users. Therefore, in recent years, several studies tried to identify and quantify neural survival in CI users. Among all proposed techniques, polarity sensitivity is a promising way to evaluate the neural status of auditory nerve fibers (ANFs) in CI users. Nevertheless, investigating neural health based on polarity sensitivity is a challenging and complicated task that involves various parameters, and the outcomes of many studies show contradictory results of polarity sensitivity behavior. Our computational study benefits from an accurate three-dimensional finite element model of a human cochlea with realistic human ANFs and determined ANF degeneration pattern of peripheral part with a diminishing of axon diameter and myelination thickness based on degeneration levels. In order to see how different parameters may impact the polarity sensitivity behavior of ANFs, we investigated polarity behavior under the application of symmetric and asymmetric pulse shapes, monopolar and multipolar CI stimulation strategies, and a perimodiolar and lateral CI array system. Our main findings are as follows: (1) action potential (AP) initiation sites occurred mainly in the peripheral site in the lateral system regardless of stimulation strategies, pulse polarities, pulse shapes, cochlear turns, and ANF degeneration levels. However, in the perimodiolar system, AP initiation sites varied between peripheral and central processes, depending on stimulation strategies, pulse shapes, and pulse polarities. (2) In perimodiolar array, clusters formed in threshold values based on cochlear turns and degeneration levels for multipolar strategies only when asymmetric pulses were applied. (3) In the perimodiolar array, a declining trend in polarity (anodic threshold/cathodic threshold) with multipolar strategies was observed between intact or slight degenerated cases and more severe degenerated cases, whereas in the lateral array, cathodic sensitivity was noticed for intact and less degenerated cases and anodic sensitivity for cases with high degrees of degeneration. Our results suggest that a combination of asymmetric pulse shapes, focusing more on multipolar stimulation strategies, as well as considering the distances to the modiolus wall, allows us to distinguish the degeneration patterns of ANFs across the cochlea.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Amirreza Heshmat
- Institute for Analysis and Scientific Computing, Vienna University of Technology, Vienna, Austria.,Laboratory for Inner Ear Biology, Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Medical University of Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria
| | - Sogand Sajedi
- Institute for Analysis and Scientific Computing, Vienna University of Technology, Vienna, Austria
| | - Anneliese Schrott-Fischer
- Laboratory for Inner Ear Biology, Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Medical University of Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria
| | - Frank Rattay
- Institute for Analysis and Scientific Computing, Vienna University of Technology, Vienna, Austria
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Navntoft CA, Landsberger DM, Barkat TR, Marozeau J. The Perception of Ramped Pulse Shapes in Cochlear Implant Users. Trends Hear 2021; 25:23312165211061116. [PMID: 34935552 PMCID: PMC8724057 DOI: 10.1177/23312165211061116] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/30/2022] Open
Abstract
The electric stimulation provided by current cochlear implants (CI) is not power
efficient. One underlying problem is the poor efficiency by which information
from electric pulses is transformed into auditory nerve responses. A novel
stimulation paradigm using ramped pulse shapes has recently been proposed to
remedy this inefficiency. The primary motivation is a better biophysical fit to
spiral ganglion neurons with ramped pulses compared to the rectangular pulses
used in most contemporary CIs. Here, we tested the hypotheses that ramped pulses
provide more efficient stimulation compared to rectangular pulses and that a
rising ramp is more efficient than a declining ramp. Rectangular, rising ramped
and declining ramped pulse shapes were compared in terms of charge efficiency
and discriminability, and threshold variability in seven CI listeners. The tasks
included single-channel threshold detection, loudness-balancing, discrimination
of pulse shapes, and threshold measurement across the electrode array. Results
showed that reduced charge, but increased peak current amplitudes, was required
at threshold and most comfortable levels with ramped pulses relative to
rectangular pulses. Furthermore, only one subject could reliably discriminate
between equally-loud ramped and rectangular pulses, suggesting variations in
neural activation patterns between pulse shapes in that participant. No
significant difference was found between rising and declining ramped pulses
across all tests. In summary, the present findings show some benefits of charge
efficiency with ramped pulses relative to rectangular pulses, that the direction
of a ramped slope is of less importance, and that most participants could not
perceive a difference between pulse shapes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Charlotte Amalie Navntoft
- Hearing Systems Group, Department of Health Technology, 5205Technical University of Denmark, Kgs. Lyngby, Denmark.,Brain and Sound Lab, Department of Biomedicine, 27209Basel University, Basel, Switzerland
| | - David M Landsberger
- Department of Otolaryngology, 12296New York University School of Medicine, New York, USA
| | - Tania Rinaldi Barkat
- Brain and Sound Lab, Department of Biomedicine, 27209Basel University, Basel, Switzerland
| | - Jeremy Marozeau
- Hearing Systems Group, Department of Health Technology, 5205Technical University of Denmark, Kgs. Lyngby, Denmark
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Langner F, Arenberg JG, Büchner A, Nogueira W. Assessing the relationship between neural health measures and speech performance with simultaneous electric stimulation in cochlear implant listeners. PLoS One 2021; 16:e0261295. [PMID: 34898654 PMCID: PMC8668108 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0261295] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/04/2020] [Accepted: 11/29/2021] [Indexed: 11/19/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVES The relationship between electrode-nerve interface (ENI) estimates and inter-subject differences in speech performance with sequential and simultaneous channel stimulation in adult cochlear implant listeners were explored. We investigated the hypothesis that individuals with good ENIs would perform better with simultaneous compared to sequential channel stimulation speech processing strategies than those estimated to have poor ENIs. METHODS Fourteen postlingually deaf implanted cochlear implant users participated in the study. Speech understanding was assessed with a sentence test at signal-to-noise ratios that resulted in 50% performance for each user with the baseline strategy F120 Sequential. Two simultaneous stimulation strategies with either two (Paired) or three sets of virtual channels (Triplet) were tested at the same signal-to-noise ratio. ENI measures were estimated through: (I) voltage spread with electrical field imaging, (II) behavioral detection thresholds with focused stimulation, and (III) slope (IPG slope effect) and 50%-point differences (dB offset effect) of amplitude growth functions from electrically evoked compound action potentials with two interphase gaps. RESULTS A significant effect of strategy on speech understanding performance was found, with Triplets showing a trend towards worse speech understanding performance than sequential stimulation. Focused thresholds correlated positively with the difference required to reach most comfortable level (MCL) between Sequential and Triplet strategies, an indirect measure of channel interaction. A significant offset effect (difference in dB between 50%-point for higher eCAP growth function slopes with two IPGs) was observed. No significant correlation was observed between the slopes for the two IPGs tested. None of the measures used in this study correlated with the differences in speech understanding scores between strategies. CONCLUSIONS The ENI measure based on behavioral focused thresholds could explain some of the difference in MCLs, but none of the ENI measures could explain the decrease in speech understanding with increasing pairs of simultaneously stimulated electrodes in processing strategies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Florian Langner
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Hannover Medical School and Cluster of Excellence Hearing4all, Hanover, Germany
| | - Julie G. Arenberg
- Department of Otolaryngology, Massachusetts Eye and Ear, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, United States of America
| | - Andreas Büchner
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Hannover Medical School and Cluster of Excellence Hearing4all, Hanover, Germany
| | - Waldo Nogueira
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Hannover Medical School and Cluster of Excellence Hearing4all, Hanover, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Carlyon RP, Goehring T. Cochlear Implant Research and Development in the Twenty-first Century: A Critical Update. J Assoc Res Otolaryngol 2021; 22:481-508. [PMID: 34432222 PMCID: PMC8476711 DOI: 10.1007/s10162-021-00811-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 51] [Impact Index Per Article: 12.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/19/2021] [Accepted: 08/02/2021] [Indexed: 12/22/2022] Open
Abstract
Cochlear implants (CIs) are the world's most successful sensory prosthesis and have been the subject of intense research and development in recent decades. We critically review the progress in CI research, and its success in improving patient outcomes, from the turn of the century to the present day. The review focuses on the processing, stimulation, and audiological methods that have been used to try to improve speech perception by human CI listeners, and on fundamental new insights in the response of the auditory system to electrical stimulation. The introduction of directional microphones and of new noise reduction and pre-processing algorithms has produced robust and sometimes substantial improvements. Novel speech-processing algorithms, the use of current-focusing methods, and individualised (patient-by-patient) deactivation of subsets of electrodes have produced more modest improvements. We argue that incremental advances have and will continue to be made, that collectively these may substantially improve patient outcomes, but that the modest size of each individual advance will require greater attention to experimental design and power. We also briefly discuss the potential and limitations of promising technologies that are currently being developed in animal models, and suggest strategies for researchers to collectively maximise the potential of CIs to improve hearing in a wide range of listening situations.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Robert P Carlyon
- Cambridge Hearing Group, MRC Cognition & Brain Sciences Unit, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, CB2 7EF, UK.
| | - Tobias Goehring
- Cambridge Hearing Group, MRC Cognition & Brain Sciences Unit, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, CB2 7EF, UK
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Jahn KN, Arenberg JG. Identifying Cochlear Implant Channels With Relatively Poor Electrode-Neuron Interfaces Using the Electrically Evoked Compound Action Potential. Ear Hear 2021; 41:961-973. [PMID: 31972772 PMCID: PMC10443089 DOI: 10.1097/aud.0000000000000844] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES The primary objective of this study was to quantify local (within ear) and global (between ear) variation in the cochlear implant (CI) electrode-neuron interface (ENI) using the electrically evoked compound action potential (ECAP). We tested the hypothesis that, within an ear, ECAP measures can be used to identify channels with presumed good and poor ENIs, which may be influenced by a combination of spiral ganglion neuron (SGN) density, electrode position, and cochlear resistivity. We also hypothesized that ECAP responses would reflect age-related differences in the global quality of the ENI between younger and older listeners who theoretically differ in SGN density. DESIGN Data were obtained from 18 implanted ears (13 individuals) with Advanced Bionics HiRes 90K devices. Six participants (8 ears) were adolescents or young adults (age range: 14-32 years), and 7 participants (10 ears) were older adults (age range: 54-88 years). In each ear, single-channel auditory detection thresholds were measured on channels 2 through 15 in response to a spatially focused electrode configuration (steered quadrupolar; focusing coefficient = 0.9). ECAP amplitudes, amplitude growth function (AGF) slopes, and thresholds were assessed on a subset of channels in each ear in response to three interphase gaps (0, 7, and 30 µs). ECAP peak amplitudes were assessed on all channels between 2 and 15. AGFs and ECAP thresholds were measured on the two nonadjacent channels with the lowest and highest focused behavioral thresholds in each ear. ECAP responses were compared across low- and high-threshold channels and between younger and older CI listeners. RESULTS Channels that were estimated to interface poorly with the auditory nerve (i.e., high-focused-threshold channels) had steeper ECAP AGF slopes, smaller dynamic ranges, and higher ECAP thresholds than channels with low focused thresholds. Younger listeners had steeper ECAP AGF slopes and larger ECAP peak amplitudes than older listeners. Moreover, younger listeners showed greater interphase gap sensitivity for ECAP amplitude than older listeners. CONCLUSIONS ECAP responses may be used to quantify both local (within ear) and global (between ear) variation in the quality of the ENI. Results of this study support future investigation into the use of ECAP responses in site-selection CI programming strategies. The present results also support a growing body of evidence suggesting that adolescents and young adults with CIs may have denser populations of functional SGNs relative to older adults. Potential differences in global SGN integrity between younger and older listeners warrant investigation of optimal CI programming interventions based on their divergent hearing histories.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kelly N. Jahn
- Department of Otolaryngology – Head and Neck Surgery, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02114, USA
- Eaton-Peabody Laboratories, Massachusetts Eye and Ear Infirmary, 243 Charles St., Boston, MA 02114, USA
| | - Julie G. Arenberg
- Department of Otolaryngology – Head and Neck Surgery, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02114, USA
- Eaton-Peabody Laboratories, Massachusetts Eye and Ear Infirmary, 243 Charles St., Boston, MA 02114, USA
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Neural Modulation Transmission Is a Marker for Speech Perception in Noise in Cochlear Implant Users. Ear Hear 2021; 41:591-602. [PMID: 31567565 DOI: 10.1097/aud.0000000000000783] [Citation(s) in RCA: 19] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES Cochlear implants (CIs) restore functional hearing in persons with a severe hearing impairment. Despite being one of the most successful bionic prosthesis, performance with CI (in particular speech understanding in noise) varies considerably across its users. The ability of the auditory pathway to encode temporal envelope modulations (TEMs) and the effect of degenerative processes associated with hearing loss on TEM encoding is assumed to be one of the reasons underlying the large intersubject differences in CI performance. The objective of the present study was to investigate how TEM encoding of the stimulated neural ensembles of human CI recipients is related to speech perception in noise (SPIN). DESIGN We used electroencephalography as a noninvasive electrophysiological measure to assess TEM encoding in the auditory pathway of CI users by means of the 40-Hz electrically evoked auditory steady state response (EASSR). Nine CI users with a wide range of SPIN outcome were included in the present study. TEM encoding was assessed for each stimulation electrode of each subject and new metrics; the CI neural modulation transmission difference (CIMTD) and the CI neural modulation transmission index (CIMTI) were developed to quantify the amount of variability in TEM encoding across the stimulated neural ensembles of the CI electrode array. RESULTS EASSR patterns varied across the CI electrode array and subjects. We found a strong correlation (r = 0.89, p = 0.001) between the SPIN outcomes and the variability in EASSR amplitudes across the array as assessed with CIMTD/CIMTI. CONCLUSIONS The results of the present study show that the 40-Hz EASSR can be used to objectively assess the neural encoding of TEMs in human CI recipients. Overall reduced or largely variable TEM encoding of the neural ensembles across the electrode array, as quantified with the CIMTD/CIMTI, is highly correlated with speech perception in noise outcome with a CI.
Collapse
|
24
|
Jahn KN, DeVries L, Arenberg JG. Recovery from forward masking in cochlear implant listeners: Effects of age and the electrode-neuron interface. THE JOURNAL OF THE ACOUSTICAL SOCIETY OF AMERICA 2021; 149:1633. [PMID: 33765782 PMCID: PMC8267874 DOI: 10.1121/10.0003623] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/17/2020] [Revised: 02/12/2021] [Accepted: 02/12/2021] [Indexed: 06/12/2023]
Abstract
Older adults exhibit deficits in auditory temporal processing relative to younger listeners. These age-related temporal processing difficulties may be further exacerbated in older adults with cochlear implant (CIs) when CI electrodes poorly interface with their target auditory neurons. The aim of this study was to evaluate the potential interaction between chronological age and the estimated quality of the electrode-neuron interface (ENI) on psychophysical forward masking recovery, a measure that reflects single-channel temporal processing abilities. Fourteen CI listeners (age 15 to 88 years) with Advanced Bionics devices participated. Forward masking recovery was assessed on two channels in each ear (i.e., the channels with the lowest and highest signal detection thresholds). Results indicated that the rate of forward masking recovery declined with advancing age, and that the effect of age was more pronounced on channels estimated to interface poorly with the auditory nerve. These findings indicate that the quality of the ENI can influence the time course of forward masking recovery for older CI listeners. Channel-to-channel variability in the ENI likely interacts with central temporal processing deficits secondary to auditory aging, warranting further study of programming and rehabilitative approaches tailored to older listeners.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kelly N Jahn
- Department of Speech and Hearing Sciences, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington 98105, USA
| | - Lindsay DeVries
- Department of Hearing and Speech Sciences, University of Maryland, College Park, Maryland 20742, USA
| | - Julie G Arenberg
- Department of Speech and Hearing Sciences, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington 98105, USA
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
Zhou N, Zhu Z, Dong L, Galvin J. Sensitivity to Pulse Phase Duration as a Marker of Neural Health Across Cochlear Implant Recipients and Electrodes. J Assoc Res Otolaryngol 2021; 22:177-192. [PMID: 33559041 PMCID: PMC7943680 DOI: 10.1007/s10162-021-00784-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/17/2020] [Accepted: 01/03/2021] [Indexed: 11/19/2022] Open
Abstract
In cochlear implants, loudness has been shown to grow more slowly with increasing pulse phase duration (PPD) than with pulse amplitude (PA), possibly due to “leaky” charge integration. This leakiness has been recently quantified in terms of “charge integration efficiency,” defined as the log difference between the PPD dynamic range and PA dynamic range (both expressed in charge units), relative to a common threshold anchor. Such leakiness may differ across electrodes and/or test ears, and may reflect underlying neural health. In this study, we examined the across-site variation of charge integration in recipients of Cochlear© devices. PPD and PA dynamic ranges were measured relative to two threshold anchors with either a 25- or 50-microsecond PPD. Strength-duration functions, previously shown to relate to survival of spiral ganglion cells and peripheral processes, were compared to charge integration efficiency on selected electrodes. Results showed no significant or systematic relationship between the across-site variation in charge integration efficiency and electrode position or threshold levels. Charge integration efficiency was poorer with the 50-μs threshold anchor, suggesting that greater leakiness was associated with larger PPD dynamic ranges. Poorer and more variable charge integration efficiency across electrodes was associated with longer duration of any hearing loss, consistent with the idea that poor integration is related to neural degeneration. More variable integration efficiency was also associated with poorer speech recognition performance across test ears. The slopes of the strength-duration functions at maximum acceptable loudness were significantly correlated with charge integration efficiency. However, the strength-duration slopes were not predictive of duration of any hearing loss or speech recognition performance in our participants. As such, charge integration efficiency may be a better candidate to measure leakiness in neural populations across the electrode array, as well as the general health of the auditory nerve in human cochlear implant recipients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ning Zhou
- Department of Communication Sciences and Disorders, East Carolina University, Greenville, NC, 27834, USA
| | - Zhen Zhu
- Department of Engineering, East Carolina University, Greenville, NC, 27834, USA
| | - Lixue Dong
- Department of Communication Sciences and Disorders, East Carolina University, Greenville, NC, 27834, USA
| | - John Galvin
- House Ear Institute, 2100 W. Third St., Suite 101, Los Angeles, CA, 90057, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
Cornejo JM, Quintana AK, Beltran NE, Granados P. Measuring implanted patient response to tone pips. Biomed Eng Online 2021; 20:10. [PMID: 33446195 PMCID: PMC7807692 DOI: 10.1186/s12938-020-00844-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/27/2020] [Accepted: 12/22/2020] [Indexed: 11/24/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND An electrical potential not previously reported-electrical cochlear response (ECR)-observed only in implanted patients is described. Its amplitude and growth slope are a measurement of the stimulation achieved by a tone pip on the auditory nerve. The stimulation and recording system constructed for this purpose, the features of this potential obtained in a group of 43 children, and its possible clinical use are described. The ECR is obtained by averaging the EEG epochs acquired each time the cochlear implant (CI) processes a tone pip of known frequency and intensity when the patient is sleeping and using the CI in everyday mode. The ECR is sensitive to tone pip intensity level, microphone sensitivity, sound processor gain, dynamic range of electrical current, and responsiveness to electrical current of the auditory nerve portion involved with the electrode under test. It allows individual evaluation of intracochlear electrodes by choosing, one at the time, the central frequency of the electrode as the test tone pip frequency, so the ECR measurement due to a variable intensity tone pip allows to establish the suitability of the dynamic range of the electrode current. RESULTS There is a difference in ECR measurements when patients are grouped based on their auditory behavior. The ECR slope and amplitude for the Sensitive group is 0.2 μV/dBHL and 10 μV at 50 dBHL compared with 0.04 μV/dBHL and 3 μV at 50dBHL for the Inconsistent group. The clinical cases show that adjusting the dynamic range of current based on the ECR improved the patient's auditory behavior. CONCLUSIONS ECR can be recorded regardless of the artifact due to the electromyographic activity of the patient and the functioning of the CI. Its amplitude and growth slope versus the intensity of the stimulus differs between electrodes. The relationship between minimum ECR detection intensity level and auditory threshold suggests the possibility of estimating patient auditory thresholds this way. ECR does not depend on the subject's age, cooperation, or health status. It can be obtained at any time after implant surgery and the test procedure is the same regardless of device manufacturer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Juan M Cornejo
- Electrical Engineering Department, Biomedical Engineering Area, Metropolitan Autonomous University, Av. San Rafael Atlixco 186, Leyes de Reforma 1ra Secc, 09340, Iztapalapa, CDMX, Mexico.
| | - Agar K Quintana
- Gratuate Program in Biomedical Engineering, Metropolitan Autonomous University, Av. San Rafael Atlixco 186, Leyes de Reforma 1Ra Secc, 09340, Iztapalapa, CDMX, Mexico
| | - Nohra E Beltran
- Process and Technology Department, Metropolitan Autonomous University, Vasco de Quiroga 4871, 05348, Cuajimalpa de Morelos, CDMX, Mexico.
| | - Pilar Granados
- Electrical Engineering Department, Biomedical Engineering Area, Metropolitan Autonomous University, Av. San Rafael Atlixco 186, Leyes de Reforma 1ra Secc, 09340, Iztapalapa, CDMX, Mexico
| |
Collapse
|
27
|
Lamping W, Deeks JM, Marozeau J, Carlyon RP. The Effect of Phantom Stimulation and Pseudomonophasic Pulse Shapes on Pitch Perception by Cochlear Implant Listeners. J Assoc Res Otolaryngol 2020; 21:511-526. [PMID: 32804337 PMCID: PMC7644600 DOI: 10.1007/s10162-020-00768-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/02/2019] [Accepted: 07/31/2020] [Indexed: 01/04/2023] Open
Abstract
It has been suggested that a specialized high-temporal-acuity brainstem pathway can be activated by stimulating more apically in the cochlea than is achieved by cochlear implants (CIs) when programmed with contemporary clinical settings. We performed multiple experiments to test the effect on pitch perception of phantom stimulation and asymmetric current pulses, both supposedly stimulating beyond the most apical electrode of a CI. The two stimulus types were generated using a bipolar electrode pair, composed of the most apical electrode of the array and a neighboring, more basal electrode. Experiment 1 used a pitch-ranking procedure where neural excitation was shifted apically or basally using so-called phantom stimulation. No benefit of apical phantom stimulation was found on the highest rate up to which pitch ranks increased (upper limit), nor on the slopes of the pitch-ranking function above 300 pulses per second (pps). Experiment 2 used the same procedure to study the effects of apical pseudomonophasic pulses, where the locus of excitation was manipulated by changing stimulus polarity. A benefit of apical stimulation was obtained for the slopes above 300 pps. Experiment 3 used an adaptive rate discrimination procedure and found a small but significant benefit of both types of apical stimulation. Overall, the results show some benefit for apical stimulation on temporal pitch processing at high pulse rates but reveal that the effect is smaller and more variable across listeners than suggested by previous research. The results also provide some indication that the benefit of apical stimulation may decline over time since implantation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Wiebke Lamping
- Hearing Systems Section, Department of Health Technology, Technical University of Denmark, DK-2800, Kgs. Lyngby, Denmark.
- Medical Research Council Cognition and Brain Sciences Unit, University of Cambridge, 15 Chaucer Road, Cambridge, CB2 7EF, UK.
- Department of Clinical Neurosciences, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, CB2 0SZ, UK.
| | - John M Deeks
- Medical Research Council Cognition and Brain Sciences Unit, University of Cambridge, 15 Chaucer Road, Cambridge, CB2 7EF, UK
| | - Jeremy Marozeau
- Hearing Systems Section, Department of Health Technology, Technical University of Denmark, DK-2800, Kgs. Lyngby, Denmark
| | - Robert P Carlyon
- Medical Research Council Cognition and Brain Sciences Unit, University of Cambridge, 15 Chaucer Road, Cambridge, CB2 7EF, UK
| |
Collapse
|
28
|
Thompson AC, Wise AK, Hart WL, Needham K, Fallon JB, Gunewardene N, Stoddart PR, Richardson RT. Hybrid optogenetic and electrical stimulation for greater spatial resolution and temporal fidelity of cochlear activation. J Neural Eng 2020; 17:056046. [PMID: 33036009 DOI: 10.1088/1741-2552/abbff0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/12/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Compared to electrical stimulation, optogenetic stimulation has the potential to improve the spatial precision of neural activation in neuroprostheses, but it requires intense light and has relatively poor temporal kinetics. We tested the effect of hybrid stimulation, which is the combination of subthreshold optical and electrical stimuli, on spectral and temporal fidelity in the cochlea by recording multiunit activity in the inferior colliculus of channelrhodopsin (H134R variant) transgenic mice. APPROACH Pulsed light or biphasic electrical pulses were delivered to cochlear spiral ganglion neurons of acutely deafened mice, either as individual stimuli or as hybrid stimuli for which the timing of the electrical pulse had a varied delay relative to the start of the optical pulse. Response thresholds, spread of activation and entrainment data were obtained from multi-unit recordings from the auditory midbrain. MAIN RESULTS Facilitation occurred when subthreshold electrical stimuli were applied at the end of, or up to 3.75 ms after subthreshold optical pulses. The spread of activation resulting from hybrid stimulation was significantly narrower than electrical-only and optical-only stimulation (p < 0.01), measured at equivalent suprathreshold levels of loudness that are relevant to cochlear implant users. Furthermore, temporal fidelity, measured as maximum following rates to 300 ms pulse trains bursts up to 240 Hz, was 2.4-fold greater than optical-only stimulation (p < 0.05). SIGNIFICANCE By significantly improving spectral resolution of electrical- and optical-only stimulation and the temporal fidelity of optical-only stimulation, hybrid stimulation has the potential to increase the number of perceptually independent stimulating channels in a cochlear implant.
Collapse
|
29
|
Age-Related Changes in Listening Effort for Children and Teenagers With Normal Hearing and Cochlear Implants. Ear Hear 2020; 42:506-519. [PMID: 33109991 DOI: 10.1097/aud.0000000000000953] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES A clinically viable measure of listening effort is crucial in safeguarding the educational success of hard-of-hearing students enrolled in mainstream schools. To this end, a novel behavioral paradigm of listening effort targeting school-age children has been designed and reported in Hsu et al. (2017). The current article consists of two follow-up experiments investigating the effects of noise, processing depth, and age in a similar paradigm, first in a group of participants with normal hearing (NH) followed by a sample of school-age cochlear implant (CI) users. Research objectives include the construction of normative values of listening effort and comparing outcomes between age-matched NH and CI participants. DESIGN In Experiment 1, the listening effort dual-task paradigm was evaluated in a group of 90 NH participants with roughly even age distribution between 6 and 26 years. The primary task asked a participant to verbally repeat each of the target words presented in either quiet or noise, while the secondary task consisted of categorization true-or-false questions "animal" and "dangerous," representing two levels of semantic processing depth. Two outcome measures were obtained for each condition: a classic word recognition score (WRS) and an average response time (RT) measured during the secondary task. The RT was defined as the main listening effort metric throughout the study. Each NH participant's long-term memory retrieval speed and working memory capacity were also assessed through standardized tests. It was hypothesized that adding noise would negatively affect both WRS and RT, whereas an increase in age would see significant improvement in both measures. A subsequent Experiment 2 administered a shortened version of the paradigm to 14 school-age CI users between 5 and 14 years old at a university clinic. The patterns of results from the CI group were expected to approximate those of the NH group, except with larger between-subject variability. RESULTS For NH participants, while WRS was significantly affected by age and noise levels, RT was significantly affected by age, noise levels, and depth of processing. RT was significantly correlated with long-term memory retrieval speed but not with working memory capacity. There was also a significant interaction effect between age and noise levels for both WRS and RT. The RT data set from the NH group served as a basis to establish age-dependent 95% prediction intervals for expected future observations. For CI participants, the effect of age on the two outcome measures was more visible when target words were presented in quiet. Depending on the condition, between 35.7% and 72.7% of the children with CI exhibited higher-than-norms listening effort as measured by categorization processing times. CONCLUSION Listening effort appears to decrease with age from early school-age years to late teenage years. The effects of background noise and processing depth are comparable with those reported in Hsu et al. (2017). Future studies interested in expanding the paradigm's clinical viability should focus on the reduction of testing time while maintaining or increasing the sensitivity and external validity of its outcome measures.
Collapse
|
30
|
Audiologic Outcome of Cochlear Implantation in Children With Cochlear Nerve Deficiency. Otol Neurotol 2020; 42:38-46. [DOI: 10.1097/mao.0000000000002849] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
|
31
|
Quass GL, Baumhoff P, Gnansia D, Stahl P, Kral A. Level coding by phase duration and asymmetric pulse shape reduce channel interactions in cochlear implants. Hear Res 2020; 396:108070. [PMID: 32950954 DOI: 10.1016/j.heares.2020.108070] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/03/2020] [Revised: 08/21/2020] [Accepted: 08/31/2020] [Indexed: 10/23/2022]
Abstract
Conventional loudness coding with CIs by pulse current amplitude has a disadvantage: Increasing the stimulation current increases the spread of excitation in the auditory nerve, resulting in stronger channel interactions at high stimulation levels. These limit the number of effective information channels that a CI user can perceive. Stimulus intensity information (loudness) can alternatively be transmitted via pulse phase duration. We hypothesized that loudness coding by phase duration avoids the increase in the spread of the electric field and thus leads to less channel interactions at high stimulation levels. To avoid polarity effects, we combined this coding with pseudomonophasic stimuli. To test whether this affects the spread of excitation, 16 acutely deafened guinea pigs were implanted with CIs and neural activity from the inferior colliculus was recorded while stimulating with either biphasic, amplitude-coded pulses, or pseudomonophasic, duration- or amplitude-coded pulses. Pseudomonophasic stimuli combined with phase duration loudness coding reduced the lowest response thresholds and the spread of excitation. We investigated the channel interactions at suprathreshold levels by computing the phase-locking to a pulse train in the presence of an interacting pulse train on a different electrode on the CI. Pseudomonophasic pulses coupled with phase duration loudness coding reduced the interference by 4-5% compared to biphasic pulses, depending on the place of stimulation. This effect of pseudomonophasic stimuli was achieved with amplitude coding only in the basal cochlea, indicating a distance- or volume dependent effect. Our results show that pseudomonophasic, phase-duration-coded stimuli slightly reduce channel interactions, suggesting a potential benefit for speech understanding in humans.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Gunnar Lennart Quass
- Institute for AudioNeuroTechnology (VIANNA), ENT Clinics, Hannover Medical School, 30625 Hannover, Germany; Cluster of Excellence "Hearing4All" (EXC 2177).
| | - Peter Baumhoff
- Institute for AudioNeuroTechnology (VIANNA), ENT Clinics, Hannover Medical School, 30625 Hannover, Germany
| | | | | | - Andrej Kral
- Institute for AudioNeuroTechnology (VIANNA), ENT Clinics, Hannover Medical School, 30625 Hannover, Germany; Cluster of Excellence "Hearing4All" (EXC 2177)
| |
Collapse
|
32
|
Precompensating for spread of excitation in a cochlear implant coding strategy. Hear Res 2020; 395:107977. [PMID: 32653106 DOI: 10.1016/j.heares.2020.107977] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/22/2019] [Revised: 03/11/2020] [Accepted: 04/15/2020] [Indexed: 11/22/2022]
Abstract
Cochlear implant users' limited ability to understand speech in noisy environments has been linked to the poor spatial resolution and the high degree of spectral smearing associated with the spread of neural excitation. A sound coding algorithm that aims to improve the spectro-temporal representation of the sound signal at the implanted ear by precompensating the electrical stimulation for the spread of excitation is presented in this study. The spread precompensation algorithm was integrated into the standard clinical advanced combination encoder (ACE) strategy and the resulting strategy was called SPACE. SPACE was evaluated acutely with a group of six implant users and was compared to their daily used ACE strategy in terms of preference rating and speech recognition in four-talker babble and stationary speech-shaped noise. While no significant differences in preference rating were observed, speech recognition in four-talker babble was improved by SPACE processing. Analysis of the group results revealed a significant improvement in mean speech reception threshold (SRT) over the ACE strategy of 1.4 dB in four-talker babble, whereas the difference of 0.9 dB in stationary noise did not reach statistical significance. Assessment of individual differences showed that four out of six listeners obtained significant SRT improvements with SPACE and that no subject scored significantly worse compared to ACE. The results suggest that the proposed sound coding strategy has the potential to improve speech perception for cochlear implant users in challenging listening situations.
Collapse
|
33
|
Abstract
OBJECTIVES Pitch is poorly perceived by cochlear implant (CI) users. However, as it is not well understood how pitch is encoded with electric stimulation, improving pitch representation with a CI is challenging. Changes in place of stimulation along the cochlea have been described as changes in pitch and can be accurately ranked by CI users. However, it remains unknown if place-pitch can be used to encode musical intervals, which are a necessary attribute of pitch. The objective of these experiments is to determine if place-pitch coding can be used to represent musical intervals with a CI. DESIGN In the first experiment, 10 CI users and 10 normal hearing (NH) controls were tested on their sensitivity to changes in the semitone spacing between each of the notes in the melody "Happy Birthday." The changes were implemented by uniformly expanding or compressing the frequency differences between each note in the melody. The participant's task was to scale how "out-of-tune" the melody was for various semitone spacing distortions. The notes were represented by pure-tones ≥440 Hz to minimize potential useful temporal information from the stimuli. A second experiment replicated the first experiment using single-sided deafened CI users allowing for a within-subject control. A third experiment verified that the CI users who participated in Experiment 1 were each able to determine pitch direction reliably. RESULTS Unlike NH listeners, CI listeners often ranked all distortions of interval spacing similarly in both the first and second experiment, and no effect of interval spacing was detected across CI users. Some participants found distorted interval spacings to be less out-of-tune than the nominally correct interval spacings. However, these patterns were inconsistent across listeners. Although performance was better for the NH listeners, the third experiment demonstrated that the CI listeners were able to reliably identify changes in pitch direction from place-pitch coding. CONCLUSIONS The data suggest that place-pitch intervals are not properly represented through a CI sound processor. Some limited support is found for place-pitch being useful for interval encoding as some participants demonstrated improved ratings for certain interval distortions. Presumably the interval representation for these participants could be improved by a change to the frequencies represented by each electrode. However, as these patterns vary across listeners, there is not a universal correction to frequency representation that will solve this issue. As results are similar for single-sided deafened CI users, the limitations in ratings are likely not limited by an eroded representation of the melody caused by an extended duration of deafness.
Collapse
|
34
|
Canfarotta MW, Dillon MT, Buchman CA, Buss E, O'Connell BP, Rooth MA, King ER, Pillsbury HC, Adunka OF, Brown KD. Long-Term Influence of Electrode Array Length on Speech Recognition in Cochlear Implant Users. Laryngoscope 2020; 131:892-897. [PMID: 32738069 DOI: 10.1002/lary.28949] [Citation(s) in RCA: 29] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/02/2020] [Revised: 06/17/2020] [Accepted: 06/30/2020] [Indexed: 01/06/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES/HYPOTHESIS Results from a prospective trial demonstrated better speech recognition for cochlear implant (CI) recipients implanted with a long lateral wall electrode array compared to subjects with a short array after 1 year of listening experience. As short array recipients may require an extended adaptation period, this study investigated whether differences in speech recognition continued through 4 years of CI use. STUDY DESIGN Long-term follow-up of a prospective randomized trial. METHODS Subjects were randomized to receive a MED-EL medium (24 mm) or standard (31.5 mm) array. Linear mixed models compared speech recognition between cohorts with word recognition in quiet and sentence recognition in noise at 1, 3, 6, 12, 24, and 48 months postactivation. Postoperative imaging and electric frequency filters were reviewed to assess the influence of frequency-to-place mismatch and angular separation between neighboring contacts, a metric associated with peripheral spectral selectivity. RESULTS Long (31.5 mm) array recipients demonstrated superior speech recognition out to 4 years postactivation. There was a significant effect of angular separation between contacts, with more closely spaced contacts associated with poorer speech recognition. There was no significant effect of mismatch, yet this may have been obscured by changes in frequency filters over time. CONCLUSIONS Conventional MED-EL CI recipients implanted with 31.5-mm arrays experience better speech recognition than 24-mm array recipients, initially and with long-term listening experience. The benefit conferred by longer arrays in the present cohort can be partially attributed to more widely spaced electrode contacts, presumably a result of reduced channel interaction. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE 2 Laryngoscope, 131:892-897, 2021.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Michael W Canfarotta
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, U.S.A
| | - Margaret T Dillon
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, U.S.A
| | - Craig A Buchman
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri, U.S.A
| | - Emily Buss
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, U.S.A
| | - Brendan P O'Connell
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, U.S.A
| | - Meredith A Rooth
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, U.S.A
| | - English R King
- Department of Audiology, University of North Carolina Health Care, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, U.S.A
| | - Harold C Pillsbury
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, U.S.A
| | - Oliver F Adunka
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio, U.S.A
| | - Kevin D Brown
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, U.S.A
| |
Collapse
|
35
|
Goehring T, Arenberg JG, Carlyon RP. Using Spectral Blurring to Assess Effects of Channel Interaction on Speech-in-Noise Perception with Cochlear Implants. J Assoc Res Otolaryngol 2020; 21:353-371. [PMID: 32519088 PMCID: PMC7445227 DOI: 10.1007/s10162-020-00758-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/16/2019] [Accepted: 05/21/2020] [Indexed: 01/07/2023] Open
Abstract
Cochlear implant (CI) listeners struggle to understand speech in background noise. Interactions between electrode channels due to current spread increase the masking of speech by noise and lead to difficulties with speech perception. Strategies that reduce channel interaction therefore have the potential to improve speech-in-noise perception by CI listeners, but previous results have been mixed. We investigated the effects of channel interaction on speech-in-noise perception and its association with spectro-temporal acuity in a listening study with 12 experienced CI users. Instead of attempting to reduce channel interaction, we introduced spectral blurring to simulate some of the effects of channel interaction by adjusting the overlap between electrode channels at the input level of the analysis filters or at the output by using several simultaneously stimulated electrodes per channel. We measured speech reception thresholds in noise as a function of the amount of blurring applied to either all 15 electrode channels or to 5 evenly spaced channels. Performance remained roughly constant as the amount of blurring applied to all channels increased up to some knee point, above which it deteriorated. This knee point differed across listeners in a way that correlated with performance on a non-speech spectro-temporal task, and is proposed here as an individual measure of channel interaction. Surprisingly, even extreme amounts of blurring applied to 5 channels did not affect performance. The effects on speech perception in noise were similar for blurring at the input and at the output of the CI. The results are in line with the assumption that experienced CI users can make use of a limited number of effective channels of information and tolerate some deviations from their everyday settings when identifying speech in the presence of a masker. Furthermore, these findings may explain the mixed results by strategies that optimized or deactivated a small number of electrodes evenly distributed along the array by showing that blurring or deactivating one-third of the electrodes did not harm speech-in-noise performance.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tobias Goehring
- Cambridge Hearing Group, Medical Research Council Cognition and Brain Sciences Unit, University of Cambridge, 15 Chaucer Road, Cambridge, CB2 7EF, UK.
| | - Julie G Arenberg
- Massachusetts Eye and Ear, Harvard Medical School, 243 Charles St, Boston, MA, 02114, USA
| | - Robert P Carlyon
- Cambridge Hearing Group, Medical Research Council Cognition and Brain Sciences Unit, University of Cambridge, 15 Chaucer Road, Cambridge, CB2 7EF, UK
| |
Collapse
|
36
|
DiNino M, Arenberg JG, Duchen ALR, Winn MB. Effects of Age and Cochlear Implantation on Spectrally Cued Speech Categorization. JOURNAL OF SPEECH, LANGUAGE, AND HEARING RESEARCH : JSLHR 2020; 63:2425-2440. [PMID: 32552327 PMCID: PMC7838840 DOI: 10.1044/2020_jslhr-19-00127] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/06/2019] [Revised: 08/12/2019] [Accepted: 03/30/2020] [Indexed: 06/11/2023]
Abstract
Purpose Weighting of acoustic cues for perceiving place-of-articulation speech contrasts was measured to determine the separate and interactive effects of age and use of cochlear implants (CIs). It has been found that adults with normal hearing (NH) show reliance on fine-grained spectral information (e.g., formants), whereas adults with CIs show reliance on broad spectral shape (e.g., spectral tilt). In question was whether children with NH and CIs would demonstrate the same patterns as adults, or show differences based on ongoing maturation of hearing and phonetic skills. Method Children and adults with NH and with CIs categorized a /b/-/d/ speech contrast based on two orthogonal spectral cues. Among CI users, phonetic cue weights were compared to vowel identification scores and Spectral-Temporally Modulated Ripple Test thresholds. Results NH children and adults both relied relatively more on the fine-grained formant cue and less on the broad spectral tilt cue compared to participants with CIs. However, early-implanted children with CIs better utilized the formant cue compared to adult CI users. Formant cue weights correlated with CI participants' vowel recognition and in children, also related to Spectral-Temporally Modulated Ripple Test thresholds. Adults and child CI users with very poor phonetic perception showed additive use of the two cues, whereas those with better and/or more mature cue usage showed a prioritized trading relationship, akin to NH listeners. Conclusions Age group and hearing modality can influence phonetic cue-weighting patterns. Results suggest that simple nonlexical categorization tests correlate with more general speech recognition skills of children and adults with CIs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mishaela DiNino
- Department of Psychology, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, PA
| | - Julie G. Arenberg
- Massachusetts Eye and Ear, Harvard Medical School Department of Otolaryngology, Boston
| | | | - Matthew B. Winn
- Department of Speech-Language-Hearing Sciences, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis
| |
Collapse
|
37
|
Ayton LN, Rizzo JF, Bailey IL, Colenbrander A, Dagnelie G, Geruschat DR, Hessburg PC, McCarthy CD, Petoe MA, Rubin GS, Troyk PR, for the HOVER International Taskforce. Harmonization of Outcomes and Vision Endpoints in Vision Restoration Trials: Recommendations from the International HOVER Taskforce. Transl Vis Sci Technol 2020; 9:25. [PMID: 32864194 PMCID: PMC7426586 DOI: 10.1167/tvst.9.8.25] [Citation(s) in RCA: 35] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/16/2019] [Accepted: 12/08/2019] [Indexed: 01/05/2023] Open
Abstract
Translational research in vision prosthetics, gene therapy, optogenetics, stem cell and other forms of transplantation, and sensory substitution is creating new therapeutic options for patients with neural forms of blindness. The technical challenges faced by each of these disciplines differ considerably, but they all face the same challenge of how to assess vision in patients with ultra-low vision (ULV), who will be the earliest subjects to receive new therapies. Historically, there were few tests to assess vision in ULV patients. In the 1990s, the field of visual prosthetics expanded rapidly, and this activity led to a heightened need to develop better tests to quantify end points for clinical studies. Each group tended to develop novel tests, which made it difficult to compare outcomes across groups. The common lack of validation of the tests and the variable use of controls added to the challenge of interpreting the outcomes of these clinical studies. In 2014, at the bi-annual International "Eye and the Chip" meeting of experts in the field of visual prosthetics, a group of interested leaders agreed to work cooperatively to develop the International Harmonization of Outcomes and Vision Endpoints in Vision Restoration Trials (HOVER) Taskforce. Under this banner, more than 80 specialists across seven topic areas joined an effort to formulate guidelines for performing and reporting psychophysical tests in humans who participate in clinical trials for visual restoration. This document provides the complete version of the consensus opinions from the HOVER taskforce, which, together with its rules of governance, will be posted on the website of the Henry Ford Department of Ophthalmology (www.artificialvision.org). Research groups or companies that choose to follow these guidelines are encouraged to include a specific statement to that effect in their communications to the public. The Executive Committee of the HOVER Taskforce will maintain a list of all human psychophysical research in the relevant fields of research on the same website to provide an overview of methods and outcomes of all clinical work being performed in an attempt to restore vision to the blind. This website will also specify which scientific publications contain the statement of certification. The website will be updated every 2 years and continue to exist as a living document of worldwide efforts to restore vision to the blind. The HOVER consensus document has been written by over 80 of the world's experts in vision restoration and low vision and provides recommendations on the measurement and reporting of patient outcomes in vision restoration trials.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lauren N. Ayton
- Department of Optometry and Vision Sciences and Department of Surgery (Ophthalmology), The University of Melbourne, Parkville, Australia
- Centre for Eye Research Australia, Royal Victorian Eye and Ear Hospital, East Melbourne, Australia
| | - Joseph F. Rizzo
- Department of Ophthalmology, Massachusetts Eye and Ear, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Ian L. Bailey
- School of Optometry, University of California-Berkeley, Berkeley, CA, USA
| | - August Colenbrander
- Smith-Kettlewell Eye Research Institute and California Pacific Medical Center, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Gislin Dagnelie
- Lions Vision Research and Rehabilitation Center, Johns Hopkins Wilmer Eye Institute, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Duane R. Geruschat
- Lions Vision Research and Rehabilitation Center, Johns Hopkins Wilmer Eye Institute, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Philip C. Hessburg
- Detroit Institute of Ophthalmology, Henry Ford Health System, Grosse Pointe Park, MI, USA
| | - Chris D. McCarthy
- Department of Computer Science & Software Engineering, Swinburne University of Technology, Melbourne, Australia
| | | | - Gary S. Rubin
- University College London Institute of Ophthalmology, London, UK
| | - Philip R. Troyk
- Armour College of Engineering, Illinois Institute of Technology, Chicago, IL, USA
| | | |
Collapse
|
38
|
Schvartz-Leyzac KC, Holden TA, Zwolan TA, Arts HA, Firszt JB, Buswinka CJ, Pfingst BE. Effects of Electrode Location on Estimates of Neural Health in Humans with Cochlear Implants. J Assoc Res Otolaryngol 2020; 21:259-275. [PMID: 32342256 PMCID: PMC7392989 DOI: 10.1007/s10162-020-00749-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 31] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/30/2019] [Accepted: 02/24/2020] [Indexed: 01/06/2023] Open
Abstract
There are a number of psychophysical and electrophysiological measures that are correlated with SGN density in animal models, and these same measures can be performed in humans with cochlear implants (CIs). Thus, these measures are potentially applicable in humans for estimating the condition of the neural population (so called "neural health" or "cochlear health") at individual sites along the electrode array and possibly adjusting the stimulation strategy in the CI sound processor accordingly. Some measures used to estimate neural health in animals have included the electrically evoked compound potential (ECAP), psychophysical detection thresholds, and multipulse integration (MPI). With regard to ECAP measures, it has been shown that the change in the ECAP response as a function of increasing the stimulus interphase gap ("IPG Effect") also reflects neural density in implanted animals. These animal studies have typically been conducted using preparations in which the electrode was in a fixed position with respect to the neural population, whereas in human cochlear implant users, the position of individual electrodes varies widely within an electrode array and also across subjects. The current study evaluated the effects of electrode location in the implanted cochlea (specifically medial-lateral location) on various electrophysiological and psychophysical measures in eleven human subjects. The results demonstrated that some measures of interest, specifically ECAP thresholds, psychophysical detection thresholds, and ECAP amplitude-growth function (AGF) linear slope, were significantly related to the distances between the electrode and mid-modiolar axis (MMA). These same measures were less strongly related or not significantly related to the electrode to medial wall (MW) distance. In contrast, neither the IPG Effect for the ECAP AGF slope or threshold, nor the MPI slopes were significantly related to MMA or MW distance from the electrodes. These results suggest that "within-channel" estimates of neural health such as the IPG Effect and MPI slope might be more suitable for estimating nerve condition in humans for clinical application since they appear to be relatively independent of electrode position.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kara C Schvartz-Leyzac
- Kresge Hearing Research Institute, Department of Otolaryngology, Michigan Medicine, 1150 West Medical Center Drive, Ann Arbor, MI, 48109-5616, USA.
- Hearing Rehabilitation Center, Department of Otolaryngology, Michigan Medicine, 475 W. Market Place, Building 1, Suite A, Ann Arbor, MI, 48108, USA.
- Department of Otolaryngology, Medical University of South Carolina, 135 Rutledge Ave, MSC 550, Charleston, SC, 29425, USA.
| | - Timothy A Holden
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO, USA
| | - Teresa A Zwolan
- Hearing Rehabilitation Center, Department of Otolaryngology, Michigan Medicine, 475 W. Market Place, Building 1, Suite A, Ann Arbor, MI, 48108, USA
| | - H Alexander Arts
- Hearing Rehabilitation Center, Department of Otolaryngology, Michigan Medicine, 475 W. Market Place, Building 1, Suite A, Ann Arbor, MI, 48108, USA
| | - Jill B Firszt
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO, USA
| | - Christopher J Buswinka
- Kresge Hearing Research Institute, Department of Otolaryngology, Michigan Medicine, 1150 West Medical Center Drive, Ann Arbor, MI, 48109-5616, USA
| | - Bryan E Pfingst
- Kresge Hearing Research Institute, Department of Otolaryngology, Michigan Medicine, 1150 West Medical Center Drive, Ann Arbor, MI, 48109-5616, USA
| |
Collapse
|
39
|
Luo X, Garrett C. Dynamic current steering with phantom electrode in cochlear implants. Hear Res 2020; 390:107949. [PMID: 32200300 DOI: 10.1016/j.heares.2020.107949] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/31/2019] [Revised: 03/03/2020] [Accepted: 03/10/2020] [Indexed: 12/01/2022]
Abstract
Phantom electrode (PE) stimulation can extend the lower limit of pitch perception with cochlear implants (CIs) by using simultaneous out-of-phase stimulation of the most apical primary electrode and the adjacent basal compensating electrode. The total electrical field may push the excitation pattern beyond the most apical electrode to elicit a lower pitch, depending on the ratio of current between the compensating and primary electrodes (i.e., the compensation coefficient σ). This study tested the hypothesis that dynamic current steering of PE stimuli can be implemented by varying σ over time to encode spectral details in low frequencies. To determine the range of σ for current steering and the corresponding current levels, Experiment 1 tested CI users' loudness balance and pitch ranking of static PE stimuli with σ from 0 to 0.6 in steps of 0.2. It was found that the equal-loudness most comfortable level significantly increased with σ and can be modeled by a piecewise linear function of σ. Consistent with the previous findings, higher σ elicited either lower or similar pitches without salient pitch reversals than lower σ. Based on the results of Experiment 1, Experiment 2 created flat, rising, and falling pitch contours of 300-1000 ms using dynamic PE stimuli with time-varying σ from 0 to 0.6 and equal-loudness current levels. In a pitch contour identification (PCI) task, CI users scored 80% and above on average. Increasing the stimulus duration from 300 to 1000 ms slightly but did not significantly improve the PCI scores. Across subjects, the 1000-ms PCI scores in Experiment 2 were significantly correlated with the cumulative pitch-ranking sensitivity in Experiment 1. It is thus feasible to use dynamic current steering with PE to encode low-frequency pitch cues for CI users.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Xin Luo
- Program of Speech and Hearing Science, College of Health Solutions, Arizona State University, 975 S. Myrtle Av., P.O. Box 870102, Tempe, AZ, 85287, USA.
| | - Christopher Garrett
- Program of Speech and Hearing Science, College of Health Solutions, Arizona State University, 975 S. Myrtle Av., P.O. Box 870102, Tempe, AZ, 85287, USA
| |
Collapse
|
40
|
Jahn KN, Bergan MD, Arenberg JG. Auditory Detection Thresholds and Cochlear Resistivity Differ Between Pediatric Cochlear Implant Listeners With Enlarged Vestibular Aqueduct and Those With Connexin-26 Mutations. Am J Audiol 2020; 29:23-34. [PMID: 31934787 DOI: 10.1044/2019_aja-19-00054] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/02/2023] Open
Abstract
Purpose The goal of this study was to evaluate differences in the electrode-neuron interface as a function of hearing loss etiology in pediatric cochlear implant (CI) listeners with enlarged vestibular aqueduct (EVA) syndrome and in those with autosomal recessive connexin-26 mutations (DFNB1). Method Fifteen implanted ears (9 participants, 5 ears with EVA, 10 ears with DFNB1) were assessed. Single-channel auditory detection thresholds were measured using broad and spatially focused electrode configurations (steered quadrupolar; focusing coefficients = 0 and 0.9). Cochlear resistivity estimates were obtained via electrode impedances and electrical field imaging. Between-group differences were evaluated using linear mixed-effects models. Results Children with EVA had significantly higher auditory detection thresholds than children with DFNB1, irrespective of electrode configuration. Between-group differences in thresholds were more pronounced on apical electrodes than on basal electrodes. In the apex, electrode impedances and electrical field imaging values were higher for children with EVA than for those with DFNB1. Conclusions The electrode-neuron interface differs between pediatric CI listeners with DFNB1 and those with EVA. It is possible that optimal clinical interventions may depend, in part, on hearing loss etiology. Future investigations with large samples should investigate individualized CI programming strategies for listeners with EVA and DFNB1.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kelly N. Jahn
- Department of Otolaryngology–Head and Neck Surgery, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA
- Eaton-Peabody Laboratories, Massachusetts Eye and Ear Infirmary, Boston
| | - Molly D. Bergan
- Department of Speech and Hearing Sciences, University of Washington, Seattle
| | - Julie G. Arenberg
- Department of Otolaryngology–Head and Neck Surgery, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA
- Eaton-Peabody Laboratories, Massachusetts Eye and Ear Infirmary, Boston
| |
Collapse
|
41
|
Polarity Sensitivity as a Potential Correlate of Neural Degeneration in Cochlear Implant Users. J Assoc Res Otolaryngol 2020; 21:89-104. [PMID: 32020417 DOI: 10.1007/s10162-020-00742-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/05/2019] [Accepted: 01/16/2020] [Indexed: 12/19/2022] Open
Abstract
Cochlear implant (CI) performance varies dramatically between subjects. Although the causes of this variability remain unclear, the electrode-neuron interface is thought to play an important role. Here we evaluate the contribution of two parameters of this interface on the perception of CI listeners: the electrode-to-modiolar wall distance (EMD), estimated from cone-beam computed tomography (CT) scans, and a measure of neural health. Since there is no objective way to quantify neural health in CI users, we measure stimulus polarity sensitivity, which is assumed to be related to neural degeneration, and investigate whether it also correlates with subjects' performance in speech recognition and spectro-temporal modulation detection tasks. Detection thresholds were measured in fifteen CI users (sixteen ears) for partial-tripolar triphasic pulses having an anodic or a cathodic central phase. The polarity effect was defined as the difference in threshold between cathodic and anodic stimuli. Our results show that both the EMD and the polarity effect correlate with detection thresholds, both across and within subjects, although the within-subject correlations were weak. Furthermore, the mean polarity effect, averaged across all electrodes for each subject, was negatively correlated with performance on a spectro-temporal modulation detection task. In other words, lower cathodic thresholds were associated with better spectro-temporal modulation detection performance, which is also consistent with polarity sensitivity being a marker of neural degeneration. Implications for the design of future subject-specific fitting strategies are discussed.
Collapse
|
42
|
Effectiveness of Phantom Stimulation in Shifting the Pitch Percept in Cochlear Implant Users. Ear Hear 2020; 41:1258-1269. [PMID: 31977727 DOI: 10.1097/aud.0000000000000845] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/25/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES Phantom electrode stimulation was developed for cochlear implant (CI) systems to provide a lower pitch percept by stimulating more apical regions of the cochlea, without inserting the electrode array deeper into the cochlea. Phantom stimulation involves simultaneously stimulating a primary and a compensating electrode with opposite polarity, thereby shifting the electrical field toward the apex and eliciting a lower pitch percept. The current study compared the effect sizes (in shifts of place of excitation) of multiple phantom configurations by matching the perceived pitch with phantom stimulation to that perceived with monopolar stimulation. Additionally, the effects of electrode location, type of electrode array, and stimulus level on the perceived pitch were investigated. DESIGN Fifteen adult advanced bionics CI users participated in this study, which included four experiments to eventually measure the shifts in place of excitation with five different phantom configurations. The proportions of current delivered to the compensating electrode, expressed as σ, were 0.5, 0.6, 0.7, and 0.8 for the symmetrical biphasic pulses (SBC0.5, SBC0.6, SBC0.7, and SBC0.8) and 0.75 for the pseudomonophasic pulse shape (PSA0.75). A pitch discrimination experiment was first completed to determine which basal and apical electrode contacts should be used for the subsequent experiments. An extensive loudness balancing experiment followed where both the threshold level (T-level) and most comfortable level (M-level) were determined to enable testing at multiple levels of the dynamic range. A pitch matching experiment was then performed to estimate the shift in place of excitation at the chosen electrode contacts. These rough shifts were then used in the subsequent experiment, where the shifts in place of excitation were determined more accurately. RESULTS Reliable data were obtained from 20 electrode contacts. The average shifts were 0.39, 0.53, 0.64, 0.76, and 0.53 electrode contacts toward the apex for SBC0.5, SBC0.6, SBC0.7, SBC0.8, and PSA0.75, respectively. When only the best configurations per electrode contact were included, the average shift in place of excitation was 0.92 electrode contacts (range: 0.25 to 2.0). While PSA0.75 leads to equal results as the SBC configurations in the apex, it did not result in a significant shift at the base. The shift in place of excitation was significantly larger at the apex and with lateral wall electrode contacts. The stimulus level did not affect the shift. CONCLUSIONS Phantom stimulation results in significant shifts in place of excitation, especially at the apical part of the electrode array. The phantom configuration that leads to the largest shift in place of excitation differs between subjects. Therefore, the settings of the phantom electrode should be individualized so that the phantom stimulation is optimized for each CI user. The real added value to the sound quality needs to be established in a take-home trial.
Collapse
|
43
|
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Cochlear implant (CI) users struggle with pitch perception, particularly for polyphonic stimuli. Tripolar (TP) stimulation has been proposed as a way to mitigate the broad spread of neural excitation observed in traditional monopolar (MP) stimulation, thereby potentially improving perception of polyphony. STUDY DESIGN Prospective cohort study. SETTING Tertiary academic center. PATIENTS Eleven postlingually deafened adults with Advanced Bionics HiRes 90K CIs. INTERVENTION(S) We performed pitch ranking and polyphonic pitch detection testing under MP and TP configurations. To assess pitch ranking, users were asked to identify the higher pitch between two notes. In polyphonic pitch detection, users were asked to distinguish between single-pitch tones and two-pitch tones. Two-pitch stimuli consisted of one pitch of three base frequencies (392, 523, 740 Hz) and a second pitch between 1 and 12 semitones above the base frequency. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE Pitch performance was analyzed as a function of current delivery mode (tripolar vs. monopolar), with smaller semitone interval pitch resolution indicating better performance. RESULTS In pitch ranking tasks, TP configuration did not confer an advantage over MP stimulation. In polyphonic perception, however, tripolar stimulation improved performance in lower frequencies and resulted in statistically significant (p < 0.05) improvement at the highest base frequency, 740 Hz. CONCLUSIONS These data suggest that TP configuration may confer an advantage in the perception of polyphonic pitch, which may not be observed in monophonic pitch ranking tasks. Since music is typically polyphonic, such data offer approaches toward improving perception of real-world musical stimuli.
Collapse
|
44
|
Winn MB. Accommodation of gender-related phonetic differences by listeners with cochlear implants and in a variety of vocoder simulations. THE JOURNAL OF THE ACOUSTICAL SOCIETY OF AMERICA 2020; 147:174. [PMID: 32006986 PMCID: PMC7341679 DOI: 10.1121/10.0000566] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/30/2019] [Revised: 12/06/2019] [Accepted: 12/13/2019] [Indexed: 06/01/2023]
Abstract
Speech perception requires accommodation of a wide range of acoustic variability across talkers. A classic example is the perception of "sh" and "s" fricative sounds, which are categorized according to spectral details of the consonant itself, and also by the context of the voice producing it. Because women's and men's voices occupy different frequency ranges, a listener is required to make a corresponding adjustment of acoustic-phonetic category space for these phonemes when hearing different talkers. This pattern is commonplace in everyday speech communication, and yet might not be captured in accuracy scores for whole words, especially when word lists are spoken by a single talker. Phonetic accommodation for fricatives "s" and "sh" was measured in 20 cochlear implant (CI) users and in a variety of vocoder simulations, including those with noise carriers with and without peak picking, simulated spread of excitation, and pulsatile carriers. CI listeners showed strong phonetic accommodation as a group. Each vocoder produced phonetic accommodation except the 8-channel noise vocoder, despite its historically good match with CI users in word intelligibility. Phonetic accommodation is largely independent of linguistic factors and thus might offer information complementary to speech intelligibility tests which are partially affected by language processing.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Matthew B Winn
- Department of Speech & Hearing Sciences, University of Minnesota, 164 Pillsbury Drive Southeast, Minneapolis, Minnesota 55455, USA
| |
Collapse
|
45
|
de Jong MAM, Briaire JJ, van der Woude SFS, Frijns JHM. Dynamic current focusing for loudness encoding in cochlear implants: a take-home trial. Int J Audiol 2019; 58:553-564. [PMID: 31012768 DOI: 10.1080/14992027.2019.1601270] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/27/2022]
Abstract
Objective: This study aimed to evaluate a more energy-efficient dynamic current focussing (DCF) speech-processing strategy after long-term listening experience. In DCF, tripolar stimulation is used near the threshold and loudness is controlled by the compensation coefficient σ. A recent acute pilot study showed improved spectral-temporally modulated ripple test (SMRT) scores at low loudness levels, but battery life was reduced to 1.5-4 hours. Design: Within-subject comparisons were made for the clinical versus. DCF strategy after 5 weeks of at-home usage. Speech intelligibility in noise, spectral ripple discrimination, temporal modulation detection, loudness growth, and subjective ratings were assessed. Study sample: Twenty HiRes90K (Advanced Bionics, Valencia, USA) cochlear implant (CI) users. Results: Average battery life was 9 hours with the newly implemented DCF compared to 13.4 hours with the clinical strategy. Compared with measurements made at the beginning of the study, SMRT-scores and speech intelligibility in noise were significantly improved with DCF. However, both measures suffered from unexpected learning effects over time. The improvement disappeared and speech intelligibility in noise declined significantly relative to the final control measurement with the clinical strategy. Conclusion: Most CI users can adapt to the DCF strategy in a take-home setting. Although DCF has the potential to improve performance on the SMRT test, learning effects complicate the interpretation of the current results.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Monique A M de Jong
- a Department of Otorhinolaryngology and Head and Neck Surgery , Leiden University Medical Center , Leiden , the Netherlands
| | - Jeroen J Briaire
- a Department of Otorhinolaryngology and Head and Neck Surgery , Leiden University Medical Center , Leiden , the Netherlands
| | - Séline F S van der Woude
- a Department of Otorhinolaryngology and Head and Neck Surgery , Leiden University Medical Center , Leiden , the Netherlands
| | - Johan H M Frijns
- a Department of Otorhinolaryngology and Head and Neck Surgery , Leiden University Medical Center , Leiden , the Netherlands.,b Leiden Institute for Brain and Cognition, Leiden University , Leiden , the Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
46
|
Abstract
OBJECTIVES In an attempt to improve spectral resolution and speech intelligibility, several current focusing methods have been proposed to increase spatial selectivity by decreasing intracochlear current spread. For example, tripolar stimulation administers current to a central electrode and uses the two flanking electrodes as the return pathway, creating a narrower intracochlear electrical field and hence increases spectral resolution when compared with monopolar (MP) stimulation. However, more current is required, and in some patients, specifically the ones with high electrode impedances, full loudness growth cannot be supported because of compliance limits. The present study describes and analyses a new loudness encoding approach that uses tripolar stimulation near threshold and gradually broadens the excitation (by decreasing compensation coefficient σ) to increase loudness without the need to increase overall current. It is hypothesized that this dynamic current focusing (DCF) strategy increases spatial selectivity, especially at lower loudness levels, while maintaining maximum selectivity at higher loudness levels, without reaching compliance limits. DESIGN Eleven adult cochlear implant recipients with postlingual hearing loss, with at least 9 months of experience with their HiRes90K implant, were selected to participate in this study. Baseline performance regarding speech intelligibility in noise (Dutch matrix sentence test), spectral ripple discrimination at 45 and 65 dB, and temporal modulation detection thresholds were assessed using their own clinical program, fitted on a Harmony processor. Subsequently, the DCF strategy was fitted on a research Harmony processor. Threshold levels were determined with σ = 0.8, which means 80% of current is returned to the flanking electrodes and the remaining 20% to the extracochlear ground electrode. Instead of increasing overall pulse magnitude, σ was decreased to determine most comfortable loudness. After 2 to 3 hr of adaptation to the research strategy, the same psychophysical measures were taken. RESULTS At 45 dB, average spectral ripple scores improved significantly from 2.4 ripples per octave with their clinical program to 3.74 ripples per octave with the DCF strategy (p = 0.016). Eight out of 11 participants had an improved spectral resolution at 65 dB. Nevertheless, no significant difference between DCF and MP was observed at higher presentation levels. Both speech-in-noise and temporal modulation detection thresholds were equal for MP and DCF strategies. Subjectively, 2 participants preferred the DCF strategy over their own clinical program, 2 preferred their own strategy, while the majority of the participants had no preference. Battery life was decreased and ranged from 1.5 to 4 hr. CONCLUSIONS The DCF strategy gives better spectral resolution, at lower loudness levels, but equal performance on speech tests. These outcomes warrant for a longer adaptation period to study long-term outcomes and evaluate if the outcomes in the ripple tests transfer to the speech scores. Further research, for example, with respect to fitting rules and reduction of power consumption, is necessary to make the DCF strategy suitable for routine clinical application.
Collapse
|
47
|
Jahn KN, Arenberg JG. Evaluating Psychophysical Polarity Sensitivity as an Indirect Estimate of Neural Status in Cochlear Implant Listeners. J Assoc Res Otolaryngol 2019; 20:415-430. [PMID: 30949879 PMCID: PMC6646612 DOI: 10.1007/s10162-019-00718-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 35] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/04/2018] [Accepted: 03/12/2019] [Indexed: 01/04/2023] Open
Abstract
The physiological integrity of spiral ganglion neurons is presumed to influence cochlear implant (CI) outcomes, but it is difficult to measure neural health in CI listeners. Modeling data suggest that, when peripheral processes have degenerated, anodic stimulation may be a more effective neural stimulus than cathodic stimulation. The primary goal of the present study was to evaluate the emerging theory that polarity sensitivity reflects neural health in CI listeners. An ideal in vivo estimate of neural integrity should vary independently of other factors known to influence the CI electrode-neuron interface, such as electrode position and tissue impedances. Thus, the present analyses quantified the relationships between polarity sensitivity and (1) electrode position estimated via computed tomography imaging, (2) intracochlear resistance estimated via electrical field imaging, and (3) focused (steered quadrupolar) behavioral thresholds, which are believed to reflect a combination of local neural health, electrode position, and intracochlear resistance. Eleven adults with Advanced Bionics devices participated. To estimate polarity sensitivity, electrode-specific behavioral thresholds in response to monopolar, triphasic pulses where the central high-amplitude phase was either anodic (CAC) or cathodic (ACA) were measured. The polarity effect was defined as the difference in threshold response to the ACA compared to the CAC stimulus. Results indicated that the polarity effect was not related to electrode-to-modiolus distance, electrode scalar location, or intracochlear resistance. Large, positive polarity effects, which may indicate SGN degeneration, were associated with relatively high focused behavioral thresholds. The polarity effect explained a significant portion of the variation in focused thresholds, even after controlling for electrode position and intracochlear resistance. Overall, these results provide support for the theory that the polarity effect may reflect neural integrity in CI listeners. Evidence from this study supports further investigation into the use of polarity sensitivity for optimizing individual CI programming parameters.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kelly N Jahn
- Department of Speech and Hearing Sciences, University of Washington, 1417 NE 42nd St., Seattle, WA, 98105, USA.
| | - Julie G Arenberg
- Massachusetts Eye and Ear, 243 Charles St., Boston, MA, 02114, USA.,Department of Otolaryngology, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, 02115, USA
| |
Collapse
|
48
|
DiNino M, O'Brien G, Bierer SM, Jahn KN, Arenberg JG. The Estimated Electrode-Neuron Interface in Cochlear Implant Listeners Is Different for Early-Implanted Children and Late-Implanted Adults. J Assoc Res Otolaryngol 2019; 20:291-303. [PMID: 30911952 PMCID: PMC6513958 DOI: 10.1007/s10162-019-00716-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/02/2018] [Accepted: 03/03/2019] [Indexed: 12/01/2022] Open
Abstract
Cochlear implant (CI) programming is similar for all CI users despite limited understanding of the electrode-neuron interface (ENI). The ENI refers to the ability of each CI electrode to effectively stimulate target auditory neurons and is influenced by electrode position, neural health, cochlear geometry, and bone and tissue growth in the cochlea. Hearing history likely affects these variables, suggesting that the efficacy of each channel of stimulation differs between children who were implanted at young ages and adults who lost hearing and received a CI later in life. This study examined whether ENI quality differed between early-implanted children and late-implanted adults. Auditory detection thresholds and most comfortable levels (MCLs) were obtained with monopolar and focused electrode configurations. Channel-to-channel variability and dynamic range were calculated for both types of stimulation. Electrical field imaging data were also acquired to estimate levels of intracochlear resistance. Children exhibited lower average auditory perception thresholds and MCLs compared with adults, particularly with focused stimulation. However, neither dynamic range nor channel-to-channel threshold variability differed between groups, suggesting that children’s range of perceptible current was shifted downward. Children also demonstrated increased intracochlear resistance levels relative to the adult group, possibly reflecting greater ossification or tissue growth after CI surgery. These results illustrate physical and perceptual differences related to the ENI of early-implanted children compared with late-implanted adults. Evidence from this study demonstrates a need for further investigation of the ENI in CI users with varying hearing histories.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mishaela DiNino
- Department of Psychology, Carnegie Mellon University, 5000 Forbes, Ave., Pittsburgh, PA, 15213, USA.
| | - Gabrielle O'Brien
- Department of Speech and Hearing Sciences, University of Washington, 1417 NE 42nd St., Box 354875, Seattle, WA, 98105, USA
| | - Steven M Bierer
- Department of Speech and Hearing Sciences, University of Washington, 1417 NE 42nd St., Box 354875, Seattle, WA, 98105, USA
| | - Kelly N Jahn
- Department of Speech and Hearing Sciences, University of Washington, 1417 NE 42nd St., Box 354875, Seattle, WA, 98105, USA
| | - Julie G Arenberg
- Department of Otolaryngology, Massachusetts Eye and Ear, Harvard Medical School, 243 Charles St., Boston, MA, 02114, USA
| |
Collapse
|
49
|
Biesheuvel JD, Briaire JJ, de Jong MAM, Boehringer S, Frijns JHM. Channel discrimination along all contacts of the cochlear implant electrode array and its relation to speech perception. Int J Audiol 2019; 58:262-268. [PMID: 30890005 DOI: 10.1080/14992027.2019.1573384] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/27/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To test the channel discrimination of cochlear implant (CI) users along all contacts of the electrode array and assess whether this is related to speech perception. DESIGN CI recipients were tested with a custom-made channel discrimination test. They were asked to distinguish a target stimulus from two reference stimuli in a three-alternative forced choice (3AFC) task. The target stimulus was evoked using current steering, with current steering coefficients (α) of 1, 0.5 and 0.25. The test provided a discrimination score (Dα) for each electrode contact along the array. STUDY SAMPLE Thirty adults implanted with a CI from Advanced Bionics. RESULTS Large variations in Dα scores were observed, both across the electrode array and between subjects. Statistical analysis revealed a significant channel-to-channel variability in Dα score (p < 0.01). Further, there was a significant relationship between subjects' Dα scores and their speech perception in quiet (p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS The large variations in Dα score emphasise the importance of testing pitch discrimination across the complete electrode array. The relationship between Dα score and speech perception indicates that pitch discrimination might be a contributing factor to the performance of individual implant users.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jan Dirk Biesheuvel
- a ENT Department , Leiden University Medical Centre , Leiden , The Netherlands
| | - Jeroen J Briaire
- a ENT Department , Leiden University Medical Centre , Leiden , The Netherlands
| | - Monique A M de Jong
- a ENT Department , Leiden University Medical Centre , Leiden , The Netherlands
| | - Stefan Boehringer
- b Department of Biomedical Data Sciences , Leiden University Medical Centre , Leiden , The Netherlands
| | - Johan H M Frijns
- a ENT Department , Leiden University Medical Centre , Leiden , The Netherlands.,c Leiden Institute for Brain and Cognition , Leiden , The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
50
|
Litovsky RY, Goupell MJ, Kan A, Landsberger DM. Use of Research Interfaces for Psychophysical Studies With Cochlear-Implant Users. Trends Hear 2019; 21:2331216517736464. [PMID: 29113579 PMCID: PMC5764139 DOI: 10.1177/2331216517736464] [Citation(s) in RCA: 23] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022] Open
Abstract
A growing number of laboratories are using research interfaces to conduct experiments with cochlear-implant (CI) users. Because these interfaces bypass a subject’s clinical sound processor, several concerns exist regarding safety and stimulation levels. Here we suggest best-practice approaches for how to safely and ethically perform this type of research and highlight areas of limited knowledge where further research is needed to help clarify safety limits. The article is designed to provide an introductory level of technical detail about the devices and the effects of electrical stimulation on perception and neurophysiology. From this, we summarize what should be the best practices in the field, based on the literature and our experience. Findings from the review of the literature suggest that there are three main safety concerns: (a) to prevent biological or neural damage, (b) to avoid presentation of uncomfortably loud sounds, and (c) to ensure that subjects have control over stimulus presentation. Researchers must pay close attention to the software–hardware interface to ensure that the three main safety concerns are closely monitored. An important area for future research will be the determination of the amount of biological damage that can occur from electrical stimulation from a CI placed in the cochlea, not in direct contact with neural tissue. As technology used in research with CIs evolve, some of these approaches may change. However, the three main safety principles outlined here are not anticipated to undergo change with technological advances.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Matthew J Goupell
- 2 Department of Hearing and Speech Sciences, University of Maryland-College Park, MD, USA
| | - Alan Kan
- 1 University of Wisconsin-Madison, WI, USA
| | | |
Collapse
|