• Reference Citation Analysis
  • v
  • v
  • Find an Article
Find an Article PDF (5125658)   Today's Articles (12712)
For: Throckmorton CS, Collins LM. Investigation of the effects of temporal and spatial interactions on speech-recognition skills in cochlear-implant subjects. J Acoust Soc Am 1999;105:861-873. [PMID: 9972571 DOI: 10.1121/1.426275] [Citation(s) in RCA: 53] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/22/2023]
Number Cited by Other Article(s)
1
Wohlbauer DM, Hem CB, McCallick C, Arenberg JG. Speech performance in adults with cochlear implants using combined channel deactivation and dynamic current focusing. Hear Res 2025;463:109285. [PMID: 40347546 PMCID: PMC12167761 DOI: 10.1016/j.heares.2025.109285] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/03/2024] [Revised: 04/09/2025] [Accepted: 04/21/2025] [Indexed: 05/14/2025]
2
Azees AA, Thompson AC, Thomas R, Zhou J, Ruther P, Wise AK, Ajay EA, Garrett DJ, Quigley A, Fallon JB, Richardson RT. Spread of activation and interaction between channels with multi-channel optogenetic stimulation in the mouse cochlea. Hear Res 2023;440:108911. [PMID: 37977051 DOI: 10.1016/j.heares.2023.108911] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/16/2023] [Revised: 10/19/2023] [Accepted: 11/02/2023] [Indexed: 11/19/2023]
3
Joly CA, Reynard P, Hermann R, Seldran F, Gallego S, Idriss S, Thai-Van H. Intra-Cochlear Current Spread Correlates with Speech Perception in Experienced Adult Cochlear Implant Users. J Clin Med 2021;10:jcm10245819. [PMID: 34945115 PMCID: PMC8709369 DOI: 10.3390/jcm10245819] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/10/2021] [Revised: 12/03/2021] [Accepted: 12/08/2021] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]  Open
4
Listening to speech with a guinea pig-to-human brain-to-brain interface. Sci Rep 2021;11:12231. [PMID: 34112826 PMCID: PMC8192924 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-021-90823-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/09/2020] [Accepted: 05/12/2021] [Indexed: 11/30/2022]  Open
5
Radeloff A, Nada N, El Mahallawi T, Kolkaila E, Vollmer M, Rak K, Hagen R, Schendzielorz P. Transplantation of adipose-derived stromal cells protects functional and morphological auditory nerve integrity in a model of cochlear implantation. Neuroreport 2021;32:776-782. [PMID: 33994529 DOI: 10.1097/wnr.0000000000001651] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/25/2022]
6
Agarwal A, Tan X, Xu Y, Richter CP. Channel Interaction During Infrared Light Stimulation in the Cochlea. Lasers Surg Med 2021;53:986-997. [PMID: 33476051 DOI: 10.1002/lsm.23360] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/04/2020] [Revised: 10/21/2020] [Accepted: 11/07/2020] [Indexed: 12/22/2022]
7
Yang H, Won JH, Choi I, Woo J. A computational study to model the effect of electrode-to-auditory nerve fiber distance on spectral resolution in cochlear implant. PLoS One 2020;15:e0236784. [PMID: 32745116 PMCID: PMC7398541 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0236784] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/12/2019] [Accepted: 07/15/2020] [Indexed: 11/24/2022]  Open
8
Improved Speech Perception in Cochlear Implant Users With Interleaved High-Rate Pulse Trains. Otol Neurotol 2018;39:e319-e324. [DOI: 10.1097/mao.0000000000001790] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
9
Rødvik AK, von Koss Torkildsen J, Wie OB, Storaker MA, Silvola JT. Consonant and Vowel Identification in Cochlear Implant Users Measured by Nonsense Words: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. JOURNAL OF SPEECH, LANGUAGE, AND HEARING RESEARCH : JSLHR 2018;61:1023-1050. [PMID: 29623340 DOI: 10.1044/2018_jslhr-h-16-0463] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/09/2017] [Accepted: 12/18/2017] [Indexed: 06/08/2023]
10
DeVries L, Arenberg JG. Current Focusing to Reduce Channel Interaction for Distant Electrodes in Cochlear Implant Programs. Trends Hear 2018;22:2331216518813811. [PMID: 30488764 PMCID: PMC6277758 DOI: 10.1177/2331216518813811] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/21/2018] [Revised: 10/17/2018] [Accepted: 10/26/2018] [Indexed: 11/17/2022]  Open
11
He S, Teagle HFB, Buchman CA. The Electrically Evoked Compound Action Potential: From Laboratory to Clinic. Front Neurosci 2017;11:339. [PMID: 28690494 PMCID: PMC5481377 DOI: 10.3389/fnins.2017.00339] [Citation(s) in RCA: 69] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/27/2017] [Accepted: 05/30/2017] [Indexed: 11/13/2022]  Open
12
Zheng Y, Escabí M, Litovsky RY. Spectro-temporal cues enhance modulation sensitivity in cochlear implant users. Hear Res 2017;351:45-54. [PMID: 28601530 DOI: 10.1016/j.heares.2017.05.009] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/11/2017] [Revised: 05/12/2017] [Accepted: 05/23/2017] [Indexed: 10/19/2022]
13
Hughes ML, Goehring JL, Baudhuin JL, Schmid KK. Effects of stimulus level and rate on psychophysical thresholds for interleaved pulse trains in cochlear implants. THE JOURNAL OF THE ACOUSTICAL SOCIETY OF AMERICA 2016;140:2297. [PMID: 27794318 PMCID: PMC6910005 DOI: 10.1121/1.4963903] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/01/2016] [Revised: 09/09/2016] [Accepted: 09/14/2016] [Indexed: 06/06/2023]
14
Wiegner A, Wright CG, Vollmer M. Multichannel cochlear implant for selective neuronal activation and chronic use in the free-moving Mongolian gerbil. J Neurosci Methods 2016;273:40-54. [PMID: 27519925 DOI: 10.1016/j.jneumeth.2016.08.006] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/31/2016] [Revised: 08/05/2016] [Accepted: 08/08/2016] [Indexed: 12/18/2022]
15
Pitch adaptation patterns in bimodal cochlear implant users: over time and after experience. Ear Hear 2016;36:e23-34. [PMID: 25319401 DOI: 10.1097/aud.0000000000000114] [Citation(s) in RCA: 41] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/25/2022]
16
Kashio A, Tejani VD, Scheperle RA, Brown CJ, Abbas PJ. Exploring the Source of Neural Responses of Different Latencies Obtained from Different Recording Electrodes in Cochlear Implant Users. Audiol Neurootol 2016;21:141-9. [PMID: 27082667 DOI: 10.1159/000444739] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/15/2015] [Accepted: 02/17/2016] [Indexed: 11/19/2022]  Open
17
George SS, Wise AK, Shivdasani MN, Shepherd RK, Fallon JB. Evaluation of focused multipolar stimulation for cochlear implants in acutely deafened cats. J Neural Eng 2015;11:065003. [PMID: 25420148 DOI: 10.1088/1741-2560/11/6/065003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 25] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/11/2022]
18
Scheperle RA, Abbas PJ. Relationships Among Peripheral and Central Electrophysiological Measures of Spatial and Spectral Selectivity and Speech Perception in Cochlear Implant Users. Ear Hear 2015;36:441-53. [PMID: 25658746 PMCID: PMC4478147 DOI: 10.1097/aud.0000000000000144] [Citation(s) in RCA: 28] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/25/2022]
19
Objective measures of electrode discrimination with electrically evoked auditory change complex and speech-perception abilities in children with auditory neuropathy spectrum disorder. Ear Hear 2015;35:e63-74. [PMID: 24231629 DOI: 10.1097/01.aud.0000436605.92129.1b] [Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/25/2022]
20
Garadat SN, Zwolan TA, Pfingst BE. Using temporal modulation sensitivity to select stimulation sites for processor MAPs in cochlear implant listeners. Audiol Neurootol 2013;18:247-60. [PMID: 23881208 DOI: 10.1159/000351302] [Citation(s) in RCA: 65] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/09/2012] [Accepted: 03/29/2013] [Indexed: 11/19/2022]  Open
21
Fielden CA, Kluk K, McKay CM. Place specificity of monopolar and tripolar stimuli in cochlear implants: the influence of residual masking. THE JOURNAL OF THE ACOUSTICAL SOCIETY OF AMERICA 2013;133:4109-4123. [PMID: 23742363 DOI: 10.1121/1.4803909] [Citation(s) in RCA: 30] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/02/2023]
22
Kerber S, Seeber BU. Localization in reverberation with cochlear implants: predicting performance from basic psychophysical measures. J Assoc Res Otolaryngol 2013;14:379-92. [PMID: 23440517 PMCID: PMC3642272 DOI: 10.1007/s10162-013-0378-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 30] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/06/2012] [Accepted: 02/07/2013] [Indexed: 11/25/2022]  Open
23
Jones GL, Won JH, Drennan WR, Rubinstein JT. Relationship between channel interaction and spectral-ripple discrimination in cochlear implant users. THE JOURNAL OF THE ACOUSTICAL SOCIETY OF AMERICA 2013;133:425-33. [PMID: 23297914 PMCID: PMC3548834 DOI: 10.1121/1.4768881] [Citation(s) in RCA: 60] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/08/2023]
24
Srinivasan AG, Shannon RV, Landsberger DM. Improving virtual channel discrimination in a multi-channel context. Hear Res 2012;286:19-29. [PMID: 22616092 DOI: 10.1016/j.heares.2012.02.011] [Citation(s) in RCA: 21] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/01/2022]
25
Garadat SN, Zwolan TA, Pfingst BE. Across-site patterns of modulation detection: relation to speech recognition. THE JOURNAL OF THE ACOUSTICAL SOCIETY OF AMERICA 2012;131:4030-41. [PMID: 22559376 PMCID: PMC3356319 DOI: 10.1121/1.3701879] [Citation(s) in RCA: 68] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/06/2011] [Revised: 02/17/2012] [Accepted: 03/20/2012] [Indexed: 05/08/2023]
26
McKay CM. Forward masking as a method of measuring place specificity of neural excitation in cochlear implants: a review of methods and interpretation. THE JOURNAL OF THE ACOUSTICAL SOCIETY OF AMERICA 2012;131:2209-24. [PMID: 22423717 DOI: 10.1121/1.3683248] [Citation(s) in RCA: 28] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/12/2023]
27
van der Beek FB, Briaire JJ, Frijns JH. Effects of parameter manipulations on spread of excitation measured with electrically-evoked compound action potentials. Int J Audiol 2012;51:465-74. [DOI: 10.3109/14992027.2011.653446] [Citation(s) in RCA: 21] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/13/2022]
28
Zhu Z, Tang Q, Zeng FG, Guan T, Ye D. Cochlear-implant spatial selectivity with monopolar, bipolar and tripolar stimulation. Hear Res 2012;283:45-58. [PMID: 22138630 PMCID: PMC3277661 DOI: 10.1016/j.heares.2011.11.005] [Citation(s) in RCA: 78] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/13/2010] [Revised: 10/28/2011] [Accepted: 11/08/2011] [Indexed: 11/21/2022]
29
Azadpour M, McKay CM. A psychophysical method for measuring spatial resolution in cochlear implants. J Assoc Res Otolaryngol 2011;13:145-57. [PMID: 22002609 DOI: 10.1007/s10162-011-0294-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 37] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/02/2011] [Accepted: 09/14/2011] [Indexed: 11/28/2022]  Open
30
Bierer JA. Probing the electrode-neuron interface with focused cochlear implant stimulation. Trends Amplif 2010;14:84-95. [PMID: 20724356 DOI: 10.1177/1084713810375249] [Citation(s) in RCA: 107] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/17/2022]
31
Srinivasan AG, Landsberger DM, Shannon RV. Current focusing sharpens local peaks of excitation in cochlear implant stimulation. Hear Res 2010;270:89-100. [PMID: 20850513 PMCID: PMC2997903 DOI: 10.1016/j.heares.2010.09.004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 45] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/21/2010] [Revised: 08/19/2010] [Accepted: 09/08/2010] [Indexed: 10/19/2022]
32
Lazard DS, Bordure P, Lina-Granade G, Magnan J, Meller R, Meyer B, Radafy E, Roux PE, Gnansia D, Péan V, Truy E. Speech perception performance for 100 post-lingually deaf adults fitted with Neurelec cochlear implants: Comparison between Digisonic® Convex and Digisonic® SP devices after a 1-year follow-up. Acta Otolaryngol 2010;130:1267-73. [PMID: 20446821 DOI: 10.3109/00016481003769972] [Citation(s) in RCA: 22] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/13/2022]
33
Kopelovich JC, Eisen MD, Franck KH. Frequency and electrode discrimination in children with cochlear implants. Hear Res 2010;268:105-13. [PMID: 20553829 DOI: 10.1016/j.heares.2010.05.006] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/07/2009] [Revised: 04/29/2010] [Accepted: 05/14/2010] [Indexed: 11/30/2022]
34
Chatterjee M, Yu J. A relation between electrode discrimination and amplitude modulation detection by cochlear implant listeners. THE JOURNAL OF THE ACOUSTICAL SOCIETY OF AMERICA 2010;127:415-26. [PMID: 20058987 PMCID: PMC2821169 DOI: 10.1121/1.3257591] [Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/22/2009] [Revised: 10/06/2009] [Accepted: 10/07/2009] [Indexed: 05/24/2023]
35
Lim HH, Lenarz M, Lenarz T. Auditory midbrain implant: a review. Trends Amplif 2009;13:149-80. [PMID: 19762428 PMCID: PMC4111439 DOI: 10.1177/1084713809348372] [Citation(s) in RCA: 48] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/17/2022]
36
Runge-Samuelson CL. Effects of high-rate pulse trains on electrode discrimination in cochlear implant users. Trends Amplif 2009;13:76-86. [PMID: 19447763 PMCID: PMC2763511 DOI: 10.1177/1084713809336739] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
37
Verschuur C. Modeling the effect of channel number and interaction on consonant recognition in a cochlear implant peak-picking strategy. THE JOURNAL OF THE ACOUSTICAL SOCIETY OF AMERICA 2009;125:1723-1736. [PMID: 19275329 DOI: 10.1121/1.3075554] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/27/2023]
38
The Intensity–Pitch Relation Revisited: Monopolar Versus Bipolar Cochlear Stimulation. Laryngoscope 2008;118:1630-6. [DOI: 10.1097/mlg.0b013e3181799715] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
39
Hughes ML, Stille LJ. Psychophysical versus physiological spatial forward masking and the relation to speech perception in cochlear implants. Ear Hear 2008;29:435-52. [PMID: 18344869 PMCID: PMC2467511 DOI: 10.1097/aud.0b013e31816a0d3d] [Citation(s) in RCA: 55] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/25/2022]
40
Snyder RL, Middlebrooks JC, Bonham BH. Cochlear implant electrode configuration effects on activation threshold and tonotopic selectivity. Hear Res 2008;235:23-38. [PMID: 18037252 PMCID: PMC2387102 DOI: 10.1016/j.heares.2007.09.013] [Citation(s) in RCA: 61] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/01/2007] [Revised: 08/16/2007] [Accepted: 09/14/2007] [Indexed: 11/20/2022]
41
Vollmer M, Beitel RE, Snyder RL, Leake PA. Spatial selectivity to intracochlear electrical stimulation in the inferior colliculus is degraded after long-term deafness in cats. J Neurophysiol 2007;98:2588-603. [PMID: 17855592 PMCID: PMC2430866 DOI: 10.1152/jn.00011.2007] [Citation(s) in RCA: 25] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/22/2022]  Open
42
Remus JJ, Collins LM. A comparison of adaptive psychometric procedures based on the theory of optimal experiments and bayesian techniques: implications for cochlear implant testing. ACTA ACUST UNITED AC 2007;69:311-23. [PMID: 17672419 DOI: 10.3758/bf03193752] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/08/2022]
43
Fitzgerald MB, Shapiro WH, McDonald PD, Neuburger HS, Ashburn-Reed S, Immerman S, Jethanamest D, Roland JT, Svirsky MA. The effect of perimodiolar placement on speech perception and frequency discrimination by cochlear implant users. Acta Otolaryngol 2007;127:378-83. [PMID: 17453457 DOI: 10.1080/00016480701258671] [Citation(s) in RCA: 38] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/23/2022]
44
Bierer JA. Threshold and channel interaction in cochlear implant users: evaluation of the tripolar electrode configuration. THE JOURNAL OF THE ACOUSTICAL SOCIETY OF AMERICA 2007;121:1642-53. [PMID: 17407901 DOI: 10.1121/1.2436712] [Citation(s) in RCA: 129] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/10/2023]
45
Başkent D. Speech recognition in normal hearing and sensorineural hearing loss as a function of the number of spectral channels. THE JOURNAL OF THE ACOUSTICAL SOCIETY OF AMERICA 2006;120:2908-25. [PMID: 17139748 DOI: 10.1121/1.2354017] [Citation(s) in RCA: 60] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/12/2023]
46
Throckmorton CS, Selin Kucukoglu M, Remus JJ, Collins LM. Acoustic model investigation of a multiple carrier frequency algorithm for encoding fine frequency structure: implications for cochlear implants. Hear Res 2006;218:30-42. [PMID: 16797896 DOI: 10.1016/j.heares.2006.03.020] [Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/24/2006] [Revised: 03/24/2006] [Accepted: 03/27/2006] [Indexed: 01/12/2023]
47
Khan AM, Whiten DM, Nadol JB, Eddington DK. Histopathology of human cochlear implants: correlation of psychophysical and anatomical measures. Hear Res 2006;205:83-93. [PMID: 15953517 DOI: 10.1016/j.heares.2005.03.003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 43] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/29/2004] [Accepted: 03/03/2005] [Indexed: 11/24/2022]
48
Chatterjee M, Galvin JJ, Fu QJ, Shannon RV. Effects of stimulation mode, level and location on forward-masked excitation patterns in cochlear implant patients. J Assoc Res Otolaryngol 2006;7:15-25. [PMID: 16270234 PMCID: PMC2504584 DOI: 10.1007/s10162-005-0019-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 48] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/13/2005] [Revised: 09/28/2005] [Indexed: 10/25/2022]  Open
49
Hughes ML, Abbas PJ. The relation between electrophysiologic channel interaction and electrode pitch ranking in cochlear implant recipients. THE JOURNAL OF THE ACOUSTICAL SOCIETY OF AMERICA 2006;119:1527-37. [PMID: 16583898 DOI: 10.1121/1.2163273] [Citation(s) in RCA: 54] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/08/2023]
50
Cohen LT, Lenarz T, Battmer RD, Bender von Saebelkampf C, Busby PA, Cowan RSC. A psychophysical forward masking comparison of longitudinal spread of neural excitation in the Contour and straight Nucleus electrode arrays. Int J Audiol 2006;44:559-66. [PMID: 16315446 DOI: 10.1080/14992020500258743] [Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/25/2022]
PrevPage 1 of 2 12Next
© 2004-2025 Baishideng Publishing Group Inc. All rights reserved. 7041 Koll Center Parkway, Suite 160, Pleasanton, CA 94566, USA