Tegoprazan, a Novel Potassium-Competitive Acid Blocker to Control Gastric Acid Secretion and Motility

Efficacy and Safety of Fexuprazan Versus Esomeprazole for Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease-Related Chronic Cough: A Randomized, Double-Blind, Active-Controlled Exploratory Trial

PURPOSE

Potassium-competitive acid blockers (P-CABs) are a newer class of acid suppressants with convenient dosing and a rapid onset of action, while showing efficacy comparable to proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) in treating peptic symptoms of gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD). This study aimed to assess the effect of P-CABs on GERD-related chronic cough.

METHODS

This randomized, double-blind, active-controlled, exploratory trial evaluated adults with chronic cough (≥ 8 weeks) and a recent physician diagnosis of GERD or peptic symptoms (< 1 month). Participants were randomized (1:1) to receive either fexuprazan 40 mg or esomeprazole 40 mg (PPI) once daily for eight weeks, along with matched placebos. The primary endpoint was the change in Leicester Cough Questionnaire (LCQ) score from baseline. Secondary endpoints included changes in the cough severity Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) and Reflux Disease Questionnaire (RDQ) scores. Safety was evaluated through monitoring adverse events.

RESULTS

Of the 190 subjects recruited, 161 met the selection criteria and were randomized, and 146 completed the trial. The participants were predominantly female (74.3%, mean age 39 ± 12 years). After 8 weeks of treatment, cough-related quality of life improved significantly, with comparable LCQ scores change between the groups (fexuprazan: 4.9 ± 4.0 vs. esomeprazole: 5.3 ± 3.8, p = 0.558). Changes in cough severity NRS and RDQ scores were also similar between the groups. Adverse events were comparable and consisted mostly of mild symptoms.

CONCLUSION

These findings support the potential of P-CABs as a promising alternative to PPIs for patients with chronic cough requiring acid-suppressive therapy.

A Randomized, Comparative Trial of a Potassium-Competitive Acid Blocker (X842) and Lansoprazole for the Treatment of Patients With Erosive Esophagitis

INTRODUCTION

X842 is a new type of gastric acid-suppressing agent with a rapid onset of action and a long duration of effect. We aim to investigate the efficacy and safety of different doses of X842 vs lansoprazole in the treatment of patients with erosive esophagitis (EE).

METHODS

This phase 2 study included 90 patients with EE (Los Angeles grades A-D) who were randomized (1:1:1) to receive oral low-dose X842 (50 mg/d, n = 31), high-dose X842 (100 mg/d, n = 31), or lansoprazole (30 mg/d, n = 30) for 4 weeks. The main efficacy end point was the EE healing rate, which was the proportion of patients who achieved endoscopic healing after 4 weeks of treatment.

RESULTS

For intention-to-treat analysis, the EE healing rates at 4 weeks were 93.6% (29/31), 79.3% (23/29), and 80.0% (24/30) for the X842 50 mg, the X842 100 mg, and the lansoprazole 30 mg groups. For per-protocol analysis, the EE healing rates at 4 weeks were 93.6% (29/31), 80.8% (21/26), and 82.1% (23/28) in the 3 groups, respectively. The EE healing rate did not significantly differ among the 3 groups in either the intention-to-treat ( P = 0.2351) or per-protocol ( P = 0.3320) analysis. The incidence of drug-related treatment-emergent adverse events did not differ among groups. No severe drug-related treatment-emergent adverse events occurred in the X842 group.

DISCUSSION

Our findings confirmed that X842 had efficacy and a favorable safety profile similar to those of lansoprazole. Therefore, X842, a novel potassium-competitive acid blocker, is expected to become a promising therapeutic agent for EE.

PPIs Have It: Does Tegoprazan Affect Gastric Emptying and Produce Dyspeptic Symptoms?

The potassium-competitive acid blockers (P-CABs) are a novel class of potent antisecretory drugs that unlike the proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) are not dependent on activated proton pumps, acting near maximally from the first dose, a pharmacokinetic advantage over PPIs. Tegoprazan, a novel P-CAB, offers potent and rapid acid suppression without delaying gastric emptying, distinguishing it from PPIs. This commentary contextualizes these results within the broader landscape of functional dyspepsia management, highlighting the potential benefits of tegoprazan in patients requiring antisecretory therapy, emphasizing the need for further research into its long-term impacts on motility, gut microbiota composition, and symptomatology. This analysis underscores how P-CABs may redefine antisecretory therapies.

Structure Determination of Tegoprazan((S)-4-((5,7-difluorochroman-4-yl)oxy)-N,N,2-trimethyl-1H-benzo[d]imidazole-6-formamide) Polymorphs A and B by Laboratory X-Ray Powder Diffraction

Tegoprazan is a potassium ion-competitive acid blocker (P-CAB) and a novel inhibitor of gastric acid secretion. The compound exists in two crystalline polymorphs, A and B, whose structures had not previously been reported. In this study, both polymorphs were analyzed by liquid- and solid-state NMR, revealing identical tautomeric states. Using this information, the crystal structures were determined from laboratory powder X-ray diffraction data by simulated annealing and Rietveld refinement. Both forms were found to crystallize in the monoclinic space group P21, with Z = 4 and two independent molecules in the asymmetric unit (Z' = 2). To assess the stability and reliability of the refined structures, we attempted geometry optimization and vibrational analysis using DFT-D methods. However, due to the high conformational complexity of Z' = 2 systems, these calculations failed to converge or produced imaginary frequencies. Instead, single-point energy calculations were performed on the refined models. The resulting relative energy differences, together with solubility data, van't Hoff enthalpies, and DSC profiles, consistently indicated that Polymorph A is more stable than Polymorph B. These results highlight the challenges of structure validation via DFT-D for complex molecular crystals and demonstrate the value of integrating experimental and computational approaches for polymorph characterization.

Effects of Tegoprazan, Potassium-Competitive Acid Blocker, on the Gastric Emptying and Postprandial Symptoms in Healthy Humans

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

Proton pump inhibitors are potent gastric acid inhibitors. However, they may worsen symptoms such as postprandial fullness and early satiation by reducing gastric emptying (GE). This study aims to evaluate the effects of tegoprazan, a new potassium-competitive acid blocker, on GE and dyspeptic symptoms.

METHODS

A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled design was adopted for this study. Participants underwent GE tests and responded to a questionnaire regarding gastrointestinal symptoms before and after administration of tegoprazan 50 mg. GE was assessed using scintigraphy over 4 h with a standardized solid meal.

RESULTS

Thirty participants were recruited (19 men, mean age 28.2 ± 7.3 years). After medication, no significant differences were observed in gastric half emptying time (T1/2) and gastric retention at 4 h (GE 4 h) between the tegoprazan and the control group (114.2 ± 48.9 min vs. 93.7 ± 34.7 min, P = 0.20; 10.1 ± 12.0% vs. 4.3 ± 5.4%, P = 0.11, respectively). Furthermore, there were no statistically significant differences detected in the changes within each group between two groups (T1/2, 9.9 ± 52.7 min vs. - 4.7 ± 30.5 min, P = 0.36; GE 4 h, 5.2 ± 13.9% vs. - 1.3 ± 6.5%, P = 0.12). The changes in dyspeptic symptom scores after tegoprazan administration did not significantly differ from those in the control group with no correlation between symptoms and GE parameters.

CONCLUSIONS

In healthy adults, the administration of tegoprazan did not show a significant impact on GE and dyspeptic symptoms, especially postprandial fullness or early satiation.

Tegoprazan-Containing Versus Proton Pump Inhibitor-Containing Therapy for First-Line Eradication of Helicobacter pylori: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials

Introduction

Concerns have been raised regarding the decreasing success rates of the standard treatment of Helicobacter pylori (proton pump inhibitor (PPI) and two/three antibiotics) and the long-term effects carried by PPI. Despite conflicting data, Tegoprazan, a potassium-competitive acid blocker, is hypothesized to be superior to PPI for eradicating H pylori. This systematic review and meta-analysis aim to determine the superiority of Tegoprazan-containing therapy to PPI-containing therapy for H pylori eradication.

Methods

A systematic literature search identified studies published until December 12, 2024, from MEDLINE, EMBASE, SCOPUS, and CENTRAL. The search strategy included the following keywords: "Tegoprazan," "Proton Pump Inhibitors," and "Helicobacter pylori." Only randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that compared the efficacy of Tegoprazan to any PPI were included. Risk of bias assessment was performed using the Cochrane Risk of Bias 2 (RoB2) tool for RCTs. The random-effect model was used to calculate the pooled risk ratio (RR) and its 95% Confidence Interval (95% CI) from the intention-to-treat population.

Results

Six RCTs with low risks of bias were included in this meta-analysis. All studies included treatment-naïve patients and compared first-line H pylori treatment. The overall eradication rates of Tegoprazan-containing (N = 1052) versus PPI-containing therapy (N = 1058) were 83.37% and 80.06%, respectively (RR 1.045; 95% CI 1.008-1.084; I 2 = 0%). Tegoprazan-containing therapy demonstrated comparable treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE) rates compared to PPI-containing therapy (46.48% vs. 46.31%; RR 1.026; 95% CI 0.952-1.106; I 2 = 48%).

Conclusion

This meta-analysis demonstrated that Tegoprazan-containing therapy is superior to PPI-containing therapy for first-line H pylori eradication, with comparable safety profiles.

Efficacy of Potassium-Competitive Acid Blockers Versus Proton Pump Inhibitors for Gastric Ulcers: Bayesian and Frequentist Network Meta-Analysis With Cross-Inference Through a Quality management System

Purpose

Proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) have been the mainstay treatment for gastric ulcer (GU) for over 30 years. However, since the discovery of a new class of acid suppressants, potassium-competitive acid blockers (P-CABs), the desire for a therapeutic agent has continued and the clinical trials on P-CABs have been conducted. In this regard, we aimed to assess whether P-CABs are noninferior to PPIs in patients with GU in terms of efficacy.

Methods

We performed a systematic review and network meta-analysis (NMA) based on randomized controlled trials (RCTs). Additionally, we used a new methodology of inference concept with the purpose of grouping between P-CABs and PPIs. Moreover, our quality management system was integrated throughout the research to ensure data accuracy.

Findings

We initially screened 438 studies and extracted 10 homogeneous GU RCTs with 6315 participants. The odds ratios (ORs) for the 4-week cure rate in Bayesian + frequentist NMA, tegoprazan 100 mg (OR = 4.14, 95% credible interval [CI] 0.56-26.3) and pantoprazole 40 mg (OR = 4.12, 95% CI 1.90-8.88) were the largest, respectively. The ORs for the 8-week cure rate in Bayesian + frequentist NMA, lansoprazole 30 mg (OR = 8.77, 95% credible interval [CI] 0.95-78.9) and lansoprazole 30 mg (OR = 7.91, 95% CI 2.60-24.03) was the largest, respectively.

Conclusions

The results of the NMA reveal that the cure rates of P-CABs in cases of GU were not inferior to those of PPIs. As the inference by grouping PPIs and P-CABs, the results showed similar trends in terms of effectiveness between the two therapeutic classes.

Comparison of tegoprazan and proton pump inhibitors for first-line Helicobacter pylori eradication: a systematic review with meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Tegoprazan (TPZ), a potassium-competitive acid blocker with potent gastric acid-suppressing activity, may be a potential agent for treating Helicobacter pylori infection. The study aimed to evaluate the efficacy of TPZ-based therapy for H. pylori eradication compared with proton pump inhibitor (PPI)-based therapy.

RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS

A comprehensive literature search was conducted up to August 2024 using PubMed, Embase, and the Cochrane Library to investigate the beneficial effects of TPZ-based therapy for H. pylori eradication. Studies that evaluated the eradication rates between the TPZ- and PPI-based therapies were included. The authors conducted a meta-analysis to calculate the eradication rate and pooled risk ratio (RR) with a 95% confidence interval.

RESULTS

Seven studies involving 3200 patients were included. H. pylori eradication rates did not differ significantly between the TPZ- and PPI-based therapies based on the intention-to-treat (77.3% vs. 76.4%, p = 0.68; pooled RR = 1.01 [0.97-1.05]) and per-protocol (84.3% vs. 84.2%, p = 0.69; pooled RR = 1.01 [0.98-1.04]) analyses. Additionally, no significant difference was observed in the adverse drug events between TPZ- and PPI-based therapies (27.2% vs. 30.8%, p = 0.26; pooled RR = 0.91 [0.76-1.08]).

CONCLUSIONS

H. pylori eradication and adverse drug event rates with TPZ- and PPI-based treatments were similar.

Comparison of Tegoprazan and Lansoprazole in Patients With Erosive Esophagitis up to 4 Weeks: A Multi-Center, Randomized, Double-Blind, Active-Comparator Phase 4 Trial

BACKGROUND

The aims of this study were to confirm the non-inferiority of tegoprazan to lansoprazole up to week 4 in patients with erosive esophagitis (EE) and to evaluate its effectiveness in rapid mucosal healing and symptom relief at week 2.

METHODS

In this multi-center, randomized, double-blind, active-comparator non-inferiority trial, 218 patients with endoscopically confirmed EE (Los Angeles Classification Grades A-D) were randomly allocated to either the tegoprazan (50 mg) or lansoprazole (30 mg) group. The primary endpoint was the cumulative proportion of patients with healed EE up to week 4, as confirmed through endoscopy. The proportion of patients with healed EE at week 2 was also evaluated. Furthermore, CYP2C19 genotypes, symptoms, safety, and tolerability were assessed.

KEY RESULTS

In the full-analysis set, 103 and 109 participants in the tegoprazan and lansoprazole groups, respectively, were analyzed. The cumulative healing rates up to week 4 were 95.2% (98/103) and 86.2% (94/109) (difference [95% confidence interval], 8.91 [1.22-16.59]; p < 0.0001 for non-inferiority and 0.0266 for superiority), while those at week 2 were 88.4% (91/103) and 82.6% (90/109) (5.78 [-3.66-15.22], p = 0.0005 for non-inferiority) for tegoprazan and lansoprazole, respectively. Tegoprazan showed consistent healing rates regardless of CYP2C19 genotypes.

CONCLUSIONS AND INFERENCES

Tegoprazan was superior to lansoprazole in the treatment of EE up to 4 weeks. Further studies are necessary to confirm these findings and clarify the superiority of tegoprazan, especially in the treatment of severe EE.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT05267743.

How ligands modulate the gastric H,K-ATPase activity and its inhibition by tegoprazan

The introduction of potassium-competitive acid blockers (P-CABs) has been a major innovation in gastric H,K-ATPase inhibition and many laboratories are actively engaged in the development of novel molecules within this class. This work investigates the interaction between H,K-ATPase and tegoprazan, a representative of the P-CABs group, in terms of K+ and H+ binding, through functional and structural analyses. First, by studying the H,K-ATPase activity, we found a model to describe the non-Michaelis-Menten kinetics through a "ping-pong" mechanism that explains a stoichiometry of 1 H+, 1 K+, and 1 ATP molecule, but also considering the influence of H+ on the ionization states of the protein. A kinetic evaluation of the inhibition of tegoprazan denotes the binding to two different intermediates states with apparent Kd (μM) 0.56 ± 0.04 and 2.70 ± 0.24 at pH 7.2. Molecular dynamics simulations revealed important changes in the interactions of tegoprazan with the transmembrane residues depending on whether the site contains K+ or not. This explains the decrease in affinity as a function of K+ concentration observed in the kinetic experiments. On the other hand, the structures predict that the protonation of tegoprazan is responsible for the change in its dihedral angle. The rotation of the benzimidazole ring allows the inhibitor to be positioned further into the luminal cavity, a situation compatible with the higher inhibition affinity of H,K-ATPase measured at low pH. Results presented herein will provide a basis for the rational design of novel P-CABs ligands.

Efficacy and safety of tegoprazan- and rabeprazole-based concomitant therapies for Helicobacter pylori infection: Real-world evidence

BACKGROUND AND AIM

Tegoprazan, a novel potassium-competitive acid blocker, has been approved for Helicobacter pylori eradication in Korea. We compared the efficacy and safety of tegoprazan- and rabeprazole-based concomitant therapies for H. pylori eradication in real-world clinical practice.

METHODS

We retrospectively analyzed data from patients with H. pylori infection treated with tegoprazan- or rabeprazole-based concomitant therapies. The primary endpoint was H. pylori eradication rate. The secondary endpoint was adverse events.

RESULTS

Among the 1474 included patients, 620 and 854 received tegoprazan- and rabeprazole-based concomitant therapies, respectively. Intention-to-treat analysis showed no significant difference in the eradication rates between the tegoprazan- and rabeprazole-based concomitant therapy groups (74.7% [95% confidence interval [CI], 71.1-78.0%] vs 72.7% [95% CI, 69.7-75.6%], P = 0.400). Per-protocol analysis also demonstrated similar eradication rates for the groups (tegoprazan vs rabeprazole: 88.0% [95% CI, 85.0-90.6%] vs 85.9% [95% CI, 83.2-88.3%], P = 0.288). Although the overall adverse event rate did not differ between groups (tegoprazan vs rabeprazole, 39.2% vs 40.6%, P = 0.578), abdominal discomfort was less frequent in the tegoprazan group than in the rabeprazole group (1.3 vs 4.8%, P = 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

Tegoprazan- and rabeprazole-based concomitant therapies for H. pylori eradication showed comparable efficacy and overall safety. The effect of tegoprazan on dose increases or other regimens, such as bismuth-containing quadruple therapy, should be further evaluated, because the efficacy of tegoprazan-based concomitant therapy may be suboptimal in regions where the clarithromycin resistance rate is high.

Potassium-competitive Acid Blockers: Current Clinical Use and Future Developments

PURPOSE OF THE REVIEW

Acid suppression with proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) represents the standard of care in the treatment of acid-related diseases. However, despite their effectiveness, PPIs display some intrinsic limitations, which underlie the unmet clinical needs that have been identified over the past decades. The aims of this review are to summarize the current status and future development of the new class of antisecretory drugs (potassium-competitive acid blockers, P-CABs) that have recently been introduced into medical practice.

RECENT FINDINGS

Over the past decades, clinical needs unmet by the current acid suppressants have been recognized, especially in the management of patients with GERD, Helicobacter pylori infection and NSAID-related peptic ulcer. The failure to address these needs is mainly due to their inability to achieve a consistent acid suppression in all patients and, particularly, to control nighttime acidity. It was then realized that an extended duration of acid suppression would exert additional benefits. The available data with P-CABs show that they are able to address these unmet clinical needs. Four different P-CABs (vonoprazan, tegoprazan, fexuprazan and keverprazan) are currently available. However, only two of them are approved outside Asia. Vonoprazan is available in North, Central and South America while tegoprazan is marketed only in Latin American countries. Two other compounds (namely linazapran glurate and zestaprazan) are presently under clinical development. While clinical trials on GERD have been performed with all P-CABs, only vonoprazan and tegoprazan have been investigated as components of Helicobacter pylori eradication regimens. The available data show that-in the above two clinical indications-P-CABs provide similar or better efficacy in comparison with PPIs. Their safety in the short-term overlaps that of PPIs, but data from long-term treatment are needed.

Efficacy and safety of tegoprazan (LXI-15028) vs. esomeprazole in patients with erosive esophagitis: A multicenter, randomized, double-blind, non-inferiority phase Ⅲ trial

BACKGROUND

An evidence gap still exists regarding the efficacy and safety of tegoprazan in Chinese patients with erosive esophagitis (EE) in China. This study aimed to verify the efficacy and safety of tegoprazan vs. esomeprazole in patients with EE in China.

METHODS

This study was a multicenter, randomized, double-blind, parallel, active-controlled, non-inferiority phase III trial of patients with EE randomized 1:1 to tegoprazan 50 mg/day vs. esomeprazole 40 mg/day. This study was conducted in 32 sites between October 24, 2018 and October 18, 2019. The primary endpoint was the cumulative endoscopic healing rate at week 8. The secondary endpoint included endoscopic healing rate at week 4, changes in the reflux disease questionnaire (RDQ) and gastroesophageal reflux disease health-related quality of life (GERD-HRQL) scores, and symptom improvement.

RESULTS

A total of 261 patients were randomized: 132 to the tegoprazan group and 129 to the esomeprazole group. The cumulative endoscopic healing rate at 8 weeks in the tegoprazan group was non-inferior to that of the esomeprazole group (91.1% vs. 92.8%, difference: -1.7, 95% confidence interval [CI]: -8.5, 5.0, P = 0.008). There were no statistically significant differences in the changes in RDQ (total, severity, and frequency) and GERD-HRQL scores between the two groups (all P >0.05). The percentages of days without symptoms, including daytime and nighttime symptoms based on patients' diaries, were similar between the two groups (all P >0.05). In the tegoprazan and esomeprazole groups, 71.5% (93/130) and 61.7% (79/128) of the participants reported adverse events (AEs), 2.3% and 0 experienced serious AEs, while 70.0% and 60.2% had treatment-emergent AEs, respectively.

CONCLUSION

Tegoprazan 50 mg/day demonstrated non-inferior efficacy in healing EE, symptom improvement, and quality of life, and it has similar tolerability compared with esomeprazole 40 mg/day.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT03615677.

A Study on the Glucose Breath Test Positivity Rate and Occurrence of Small Intestine Bacterial Overgrowth-Related Symptoms Caused by Long-Term Use of Proton Pump Inhibitor (PPI) Versus Potassium-Competitive Acid Blocker (P-CAB) in Elderly Patients: SIBO Between PPI and P-CAB

Background/Aims: Long-term acid suppression with proton pump inhibitors (PPI) leads to hypochlorhydria and facilitates the growth of bacterial flora in the small intestine. Novel acid-suppressants called potassium-competitive acid blockers (P-CABs) seem to be superior to PPIs. However, data on the risk of small intestinal bacterial overgrowth (SIBO) in patients taking P-CABs are limited. Method: We retrospectively analyzed a consecutive series of patients with long-term acid-suppressant (PPIs or P-CABs) use for gastroesophageal reflux disease or nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug (NSAID)-induced gastropathy. All of them underwent endoscopic examinations and Helicobacter pylori testing and took PPIs or P-CABs for at least 3 months. Glucose hydrogen breath tests (GBT) were performed to check for SIBO, and newly developed SIBO-related symptoms including bloating, postprandial discomfort, diarrheas, and constipation, were evaluated. Results: A total of 142 patients were enrolled. Six patients were excluded due to equivocal Helicobacter pylori infection results. The frequency of positive GBTs was 31.7% (25/79) for PPI and 22.8% (13/57) for P-CAB use (p=0.15). Regarding GBT positivity, age-related factor was found to be significant in multivariate analysis (p=0.02). The results of multivariate analysis in cases of SIBO-related symptoms showed that GBT positivity and PPI use were significant (p < 0.01). Conclusion: Long-term use of gastric acid suppressants resulted in positive GBT in approximately 30% of patients, and the risk was particularly high in elderly patients. The occurrence of SIBO-related symptoms was significant in long-term use of PPIs and in patients with positive GBT.

Efficacy of Tegoprazan-Containing Sequential Eradication Treatment Compared to Esomeprazole-Containing Sequential Eradication of Helicobacter pylori in South Korea, a Region With High Antimicrobial Resistance: A Prospective, Randomized, Single Tertiary Center Study

BACKGROUND

Treatment with potassium-competitive acid blockers has shown acceptable efficacy in Helicobacter pylori eradication. In regions like Korea, where the clarithromycin resistance rate is high, alternative combinations like non-bismuth quadruple therapies have shown favorable results. This study compared the outcomes of sequential eradication therapy with new potassium-competitive acid blocker tegoprazan and conventional esomeprazole-containing sequential therapy.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Patients with Helicobacter pylori (H. pylori) infection were consecutively recruited. Patients were allocated to either an esomeprazole-containing sequential or a tegoprazan-containing sequential therapy group. Sequential therapy comprised esomeprazole (40 mg) or tegoprazan (50 mg) plus amoxicillin (1000 mg) twice daily for the initial 5 days, followed by esomeprazole (40 mg) or tegoprazan (50 mg) with clarithromycin (500 mg) and metronidazole (500 mg) twice daily for the remaining 5 days. Eradication rate, compliance, and adverse events were recorded.

RESULTS

A total of 406 patients with H. pylori infection were enrolled in the trial and analyzed per protocol. Eradication rate by intention-to-treat and per-protocol was 83.8% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 78.7-88.9) for esomeprazole-containing sequential therapy, and 87.1% (95% CI: 82.5-91.8) for tegoprazan-containing sequential therapy, with no statistical significance (p = 0.399). Additionally, there was no statistically significant difference in treatment compliance between the two groups. Nausea was more prevalent (23.3%, 27/202) with sequential tegoprazans than with esomeprazole-containing sequential therapy (14.2%, 29/204; p = 0.022).

CONCLUSION

Tegoprazan-containing 10-day sequential eradication treatment demonstrated similar eradication efficacy compared to esomeprazole-containing treatment, even in regions with high antimicrobial resistance, such as Korea.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT06382493.

Bismuth add-on improves the efficacy of 2-week tegoprazan-based triple therapy for first-line Helicobacter pylori eradication: a real-world evidence study

BACKGROUND

This study aimed to investigate the efficacy of bismuth added to a 2-week triple therapy consisting of tegoprazan (TPZ), amoxicillin, and clarithromycin for first-line Helicobacter pylori eradication.

RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS

We reviewed the retrospective data of patients who received a 2-week TPZ-based triple therapy with or without 300 mg bismuth twice daily. The primary endpoint was the H. pylori eradication rate of adding bismuth to the TPZ-based triple regimen (TAC-B group), compared to no bismuth added (TAC group).

RESULTS

In total, 306 and 256 patients were included in the intention-to-treat (ITT) and per-protocol (PP) analyses, respectively. The eradication success rates were significantly higher in the TAC-B group than in the TAC group (ITT, 82.9% vs. 71.8%, p = 0.029; PP, 95.8% vs. 87.5%, p = 0.027, respectively). The adherence rate to the eradication regimen was 100% in the TAC-B group and 97.0% in the TAC group. The adverse drug event rate in the TAC-B group was comparable to that in the TAC group (29.2% vs. 27.3%, p = 0.742). No use of bismuth was significantly associated with eradication failure (p = 0.038).

CONCLUSIONS

The bismuth add-on increased the first-line H. pylori eradication rate of 2-week TPZ-based triple therapy.

CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION

www.clinicaltrials.gov identifier is NCT05453994.

Efficacy of Tegoprazan in Patients With Functional Dyspepsia: A Prospective, Multicenter, Single-arm Study

Background/Aims

Acid-suppressive drugs, such as proton pump inhibitors (PPIs), are treatment options for functional dyspepsia (FD). However, the efficacy of potassium-competitive acid blockers (P-CABs) in treating FD has not yet been established. This prospective multicenter clinical trial-based study aimed to assess the efficacy and safety of tegoprazan as a P-CAB treatment in patients with FD.

Methods

FD was diagnosed using the Rome IV criteria. All patients received tegoprazan 50 mg once daily for 8 weeks. Dyspeptic symptoms were assessed using a dyspepsia symptom questionnaire (5-point Likert scale, Nepean Dyspepsia Index-Korean [NDI-K], and gastroesophageal reflux disease-health-related quality of life [GERD-HRQL]). The main outcome was satisfactory symptom relief rates at 8 weeks.

Results

In this study, from the initial screening of 209 patients, 173 were included in the per-protocol set analysis. Satisfactory symptom relief rates at 8 and 4 weeks were 86.7% and 74.6%, respectively. In addition, the NDI-K and GERD-HRQL scores significantly improved at 8 and 4 weeks compared with the baseline scores. The efficacy of tegoprazan was not influenced by the FD subtype or Helicobacter pylori status. In patients with overlapping FD and GERD, there was a greater improvement in the NDI-K and GERD-HRQL scores than in patients with FD symptoms only. No serious drug-related adverse events occurred during this study.

Conclusion

Tegoprazan (50 mg) administered once daily provided satisfactory symptom relief for FD.

Potassium-competitive acid blockers and proton-pump inhibitors for healing of erosive esophagitis: a systematic review and network meta-analysis

Background

Proton-pump inhibitors (PPIs) and potassium-competitive acid blockers (P-CABs) are recommended for erosive esophagitis (EE), with good safety and tolerance. However, it is unclear which is the best treatment option for EE.

Objectives

This study aimed to evaluate the comparative efficacy of P-CABs and PPIs for healing EE patients, seeking an appropriate treatment choice in the 4- or 8-week treatment and standard or double dose.

Design

A systematic review and network meta-analysis.

Data sources and methods

Relevant databases were searched to collect randomized controlled trials of PPIs and P-CABs in the treatment of EE up to 31 May 2023. Studies on standard or double-dose PPIs or P-CABs which were published in English and assessed 4- or 8-week healing effects in EE were included. A network meta-analysis was performed to evaluate the efficacy of the treatments under the frequentist framework. Sensitivity and subgroup analyses of patients with different baseline EE were also conducted.

Results

In all, 34 studies involving 25,054 patients and 9 PPIs, 6 P-CABs, or placebo treatment interventions were included. The pooled 4-week healing rate was significantly statistically lower than the pooled 8-week healing rate for most treatments. Besides, the higher healing rate of double-dose treatment than standard-dose treatment was not observed in the initial treatment of most drugs. The main analysis only included studies conducted for both patients with and without severe EE at baseline, and the proportion of severe EE included in the study was >10%, Keverprazan 20 mg qd ranked best with a surface under the cumulative ranking curve (SUCRA) value of 84.7, followed by Ilaprazole 10 mg qd with a SUCRA value of 82.0, for the healing rate at 8 weeks. Sensitivity analysis showed that the results were robust. Subgroup analysis showed that most P-CABs had higher healing rates than PPIs, particularly for patients with severe EE. And the healing rate of Keverprazan 20 mg qd at 8 weeks ranked best in the subgroup without or with severe EE at baseline.

Conclusion

This study showed that an 8-week treatment seemed more effective than the 4-week treatment for healing EE patients. The healing effect of Keverprazan (20 mg qd) ranked best in 8-week treatment, for both severe and non-severe EE patients.

Trial registration

The study protocol was registered with INPLASY (registration number INPLASY2023120053).

The Effect of Tegoprazan on the Treatment of Endoscopic Resection-Induced Artificial Ulcers: A Multicenter, Randomized, Active-Controlled Study

BACKGROUND/AIMS

: Tegoprazan is a novel potassium-competitive acid blocker that has beneficial effects on acid-related disorders such as gastroesophageal reflux and peptic ulcer diseases. This study aimed to validate the effect of tegoprazan on endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD)-induced artificial ulcers.

METHODS

: Patients from 16 centers in Korea who underwent ESD for gastric neoplasia were enrolled. After ESD, pantoprazole was administered intravenously for 48 hours. The patients were randomly allocated to either the tegoprazan or esomeprazole group. Tegoprazan 50 mg or esomeprazole 40 mg were administered for 4 weeks, after which gastroscopic evaluation was performed. If the artificial ulcer had not healed, the same dose of tegoprazan or esomeprazole was administered for an additional 4 weeks, and a gastroscopic evaluation was performed.

RESULTS

: One hundred sixty patients were enrolled in this study. The healing rates of artificial ulcers at 4 weeks were 30.3% (23/76) and 22.1% (15/68) in the tegoprazan and esomeprazole groups, respectively (p=0.006). At 8 weeks after ESD, the cumulative ulcer healing rates were 73.7% (56/76) and 77.9% (53/68) in the tegoprazan and esomeprazole groups, respectively (p=0.210). Delayed bleeding occurred in two patients in the tegoprazan group (2.6%) and in one patient in the esomeprazole group (1.5%). Other adverse events were negligible in both groups.

CONCLUSIONS

: Tegoprazan showed similar effects on post-ESD artificial ulcer healing in comparison with esomeprazole.

A Comprehensive Review of Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease (GERD) Treatment and its Clinical Perspectives

Gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) occurs by regurgitation of food in the stomach. Aggressive factors increase GERD whereas defensive factors decrease GERD progression. GERD if mild can be put under control by lifestyle modification and giving non-pharmacological treatment methods to patients however if the disease progresses non-pharmacological methods are ineffective. Drugs reduce GERD progression and also maintain the pH of the stomach to a normal level and prevent abnormal acid exposure to the oesophagus. Antacids and alginate protect oesophagus by reducing acidity and increasing viscosity. Proton pump inhibitors and histamine 2 receptor antagonists reduce acid secretion by inhibiting its secretion. Prokinetic agents increase the motility of the stomach and reduce obesity. Metabotropic glutamate receptors, gamma-aminobutyric acid receptor agonists, and cannabinoid receptors are receptor-specific drugs that act on receptors underlying the gastrointestinal tract and alter the function of receptors which increases reflux disease. Combination of antacid and alginate, domperidone and omeprazole, omeprazole and baclofen, aluminum hydroxide, magnesium, and simethicone are frequently given in GERD to expedite the healing rate and reduce acid secretion. Combinations of suitable medications reduce the adverse effects of a single medication and also make it therapeutically more effective than using monotherapy drugs. The pharmacological method is safe and effective and treats GERD completely.

Neuroendocrine mechanism of gastric acid secretion: Historical perspectives and recent developments in physiology and pharmacology

The physiology of gastric acid secretion is one of the earliest subjects in medical literature and has been continuously studied since 1833. Starting with the notion that neural stimulation alone drives acid secretion, progress in understanding the physiology and pathophysiology of this process has led to the development of therapeutic strategies for patients with acid-related diseases. For instance, understanding the physiology of parietal cells led to the developments of histamine 2 receptor blockers, proton pump inhibitors (PPIs), and recently, potassium-competitive acid blockers. Furthermore, understanding the physiology and pathophysiology of gastrin has led to the development of gastrin/CCK2 receptor (CCK2 R) antagonists. The need for refinement of existing drugs in patients have led to second and third generation drugs with better efficacy at blocking acid secretion. Further understanding of the mechanism of acid secretion by gene targeting in mice has enabled us to dissect the unique role for each regulator to leverage and justify the development of new targeted therapeutics for acid-related disorders. Further research on the mechanism of stimulation of gastric acid secretion and the physiological significances of gastric acidity in gut microbiome is needed in the future.

Anti-Inflammatory Effects of Tegoprazan in Lipopolysaccharide-Stimulated Bone-Marrow-Derived Macrophages

The purpose of this study was to investigate the anti-inflammatory effect of tegoprazan (TEGO) in lipopolysaccharide (LPS)-stimulated bone-marrow-derived macrophages (BMMs). To this end, compared to methylprednisolone (MP; positive control), we evaluated whether TEGO effectively differentiates LPS-stimulated BMMs into M2-phenotype macrophages. Moreover, the expression of pro- and anti-inflammatory cytokines genes influenced by TEGO was measured using quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction (qRT-PCR) analysis. TEGO was found to reduce nitric oxide (NO) production in BMMs significantly. In addition, TEGO significantly decreased and increased the gene expression levels of pro-inflammatory and anti-inflammatory cytokines, respectively. In addition, we evaluated the phosphorylated values of the extracellular signal-regulatory kinase (ERK) and p38 in the mitogen-activated protein (MAP) kinase signaling pathway through Western blotting. TEGO significantly reduced the phosphorylated values of the ERK and p38. In other words, TEGO suppressed the various pro-inflammatory responses in LPS-induced BMMs. These results show that TEGO has the potential to be used as an anti-inflammatory agent.

Efficacy of Tegoprazan in Patients with Laryngopharyngeal Reflux Disease: A Preliminary Feasibility Study

Tegoprazan is a novel, potent, and highly selective potassium-competitive acid blocker that inhibits gastric acid secretion with rapid onset of action and prolonged control of gastric acidity. We performed a preliminary feasibility study to evaluate whether tegoprazan could control symptoms more effectively than a placebo in patients with laryngopharyngeal reflux disease (LPRD). In this double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled trial, 35 patients with LPRD were randomly assigned to two groups: tegoprazan 50 mg daily and placebo. The primary endpoint was the complete resolution rate of LPRD symptoms after 8 weeks of medication, and the secondary endpoints were the complete resolution rate of LPRD symptoms after 4 weeks of medication and changes in the reflux symptom index (RSI) and reflux finding score (RFS) from baseline at 4 and 8 weeks of medication. There was no difference in the complete symptom resolution rates at 8 weeks between the tegoprazan and placebo groups (29.4% [5/17] vs. 27.8% [5/18], p = 1.000). Moreover, there was no significant difference in the complete symptom resolution rates at 4 weeks between the two groups. Compared with the baseline, both tegoprazan and placebo significantly reduced the total RSI and RFS scores after 4 and 8 weeks of medication; however, tegoprazan was not superior to the placebo. In conclusion, tegoprazan (50 mg daily) administration improved LPRD symptoms and signs. However, tegoprazan did not show superiority over placebo. Considering the potential effectiveness of tegoprazan as an acid-suppressing therapy and the possibility of type II error due to a low number of included patients herein, prospective, large-scale, multi-center studies with a higher dose of tegoprazan for a prolonged duration are required to elucidate the efficacy of tegoprazan in patients with LPRD. (ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT05871398).

Carcinogenicity assessment of tegoprazan in Sprague-Dawley (Crl:CD) rats and ICR (Crl:CD1) mice

Tegoprazan is a novel potassium-competitive acid blocker (P-CAB) that reversibly inhibits the proton pump in gastric parietal cells and has been approved for the treatment of acid-related diseases in Korea. This study aimed to evaluate the carcinogenic potential of tegoprazan in Sprague-Dawley rats and CD-1 mice. Tegoprazan was administered daily by oral gavage to rats for up to 94 weeks and mice for up to 104 weeks. Evidence of carcinogenic potential of tegoprazan was identified in rats only and was limited to benign and/or malignant neuroendocrine cell tumors at exposures >7-fold of the recommended human dose. Glandular stomach findings were considered secondary to the expected pharmacology of tegoprazan, characterized by their location in the fundic and body regions of the stomach. Overall, tegoprazan induced gastric enterochromaffin-like (ECL) cell tumors in SD rats, but did not produce any treatment-related statistically significant increase in the incidence of neoplasms relevant to humans when administered to SD rats and CD-1 mice by gavage at doses up to 300 and 150 mg/kg/day, respectively. Gastric ECL cell tumors are thought to be induced by the exaggerated indirect pharmacological effect of tegoprazan, similar to that reported for proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) and other P-CABs.

Efficacy of tegoprazan-based bismuth quadruple therapy compared with bismuth quadruple therapy for Helicobacter pylori infection: A randomized, double-blind, active-controlled study

BACKGROUND

Bismuth-based quadruple therapy (BQT) is recommended as the first-line empirical therapy for Helicobacter pylori eradication as it is not associated with resistance. However, few studies have investigated the use of potassium-competitive acid blockers for BQT.

AIM

To investigate the efficacy and safety profiles of tegoprazan-based BQT (TBMT) versus lansoprazole-based BQT (LBMT) for H. pylori eradication.

METHODS

We included patients older than 18 with an H. pylori infection without a history of H. pylori eradication who visited four university-affiliated hospitals between March 2020 and December 2021. H. pylori infection was diagnosed using a rapid urease test or Giemsa staining. Patients were randomly assigned to the TBMT or LBMT group.

RESULTS

217 subjects were randomly allocated to receive either TBMT (n = 108) or LBMT (n = 109) therapy. Intention-to-treat (ITT) eradication rates of TBMT and LBMT were 80.0% and 77.4% (95% confidence interval [CI]: -8.4 to 13.7, p = 0.0124), respectively. Corresponding modified ITT rates were 90.3% and 84.5% (95% CI: -3.6 to 15.2, p = 0.0005), respectively. Per-protocol (PP) eradication rates of TBMT and LBMT were 90.2% and 82.4% (95% CI: -2.5 to 18.2, p = 0.0003), respectively. There was no significant difference in the rate of adverse events between the TBMT and LBMT groups (39.1% vs. 43.4%, p = 0.5211). TBMT showed higher eradication rates than that of LBMT in ITT, m-ITT, and PP analysis.

CONCLUSION

TBMT showed a noninferior eradication rate and similar adverse events to LBMT as a first-line eradication regimen. Our results suggest that tegoprazan might be substituted for proton pump inhibitors in H. pylori eradication regimens.

Prediction of the Drug–Drug Interaction Potential between Tegoprazan and Amoxicillin/Clarithromycin Using the Physiologically Based Pharmacokinetic and Pharmacodynamic Model

Tegoprazan is a novel potassium-competitive acid blocker. This study investigated the effect of drug–drug interaction on the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of tegoprazan co-administered with amoxicillin and clarithromycin, the first-line therapy for the eradication of Helicobacter pylori, using physiologically based pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic (PBPK/PD) modeling. The previously reported tegoprazan PBPK/PD model was modified and applied. The clarithromycin PBPK model was developed based on the model provided by the SimCYP® compound library. The amoxicillin model was constructed using the middle-out approach. All of the observed concentration–time profiles were covered well by the predicted profiles with the 5th and 95th percentiles. The mean ratios of predicted to observed PK parameters, including the area under the curve (AUC), maximum plasma drug concentration (Cmax), and clearance, were within the 30% intervals for the developed models. Two-fold ratios of predicted fold-changes of Cmax and AUC from time 0 to 24 h to observed data were satisfied. The predicted PD endpoints, including median intragastric pH and percentage holding rate at pH above 4 or 6 on day 1 and day 7, were close to the corresponding observed data. This investigation allows evaluation of the effects of CYP3A4 perpetrators on tegoprazan PK and PD changes, thus providing clinicians with the rationale for co-administration dosing adjustment.

Asymmetric Synthesis of US-FDA Approved Drugs over Five Years (2016–2020): A Recapitulation of Chirality

Chirality is a major theme in the design, discovery, and development of new drugs. Historically, pharmaceuticals have been synthesized as racemic mixtures. However, the enantiomeric forms of drug molecules have distinct biological properties. One enantiomer may be responsible for the desired therapeutic effect (eutomer), whereas the other may be inactive, interfere with the therapeutic form, or exhibit toxicity (distomer). Classical chemical synthesis usually leads to a racemic mixture unless stereospecific synthesis is employed. To meet the requirements of single-enantiomeric drugs, asymmetric synthesis has evolved at the forefront of drug discovery. Asymmetric synthesis involves the conversion of an achiral starting material into a chiral product. This review emphasizes the methods used for synthesizing FDA-approved chiral drugs during 2016–2020, with a special focus on asymmetric synthesis by means of chiral induction, resolution, or chiral pool.

Effects of Tegoprazan Versus Esomeprazole on Nighttime Heartburn and Sleep Quality in Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease: A Multicenter Double-blind Randomized Controlled Trial

BACKGROUND/AIMS

Patients with gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) frequently experience nighttime heartburn and sleep disturbance. Tegoprazan is a new potassium-competitive acid blocker that can rapidly block acid secretion. This study aims to evaluate the efficacy of tegoprazan compared with esomeprazole in relieving nighttime heartburn and sleep disturbances.

METHODS

Patients with erosive esophagitis, nighttime heartburn, and sleep disturbances were randomized to receive tegoprazan 50 mg or esomeprazole 40 mg for 2 weeks. The primary endpoint was time to first nighttime heartburn-free interval. The percentage of nighttime heartburn-free days was also compared between the 2 groups.

RESULTS

A total of 46 patients were enrolled in this study. Time to the first nighttime heartburn-free interval was shorter with tegoprazan than with esomeprazole but the difference was not statistically significant (1.5 days vs 3 days, P = 0.151). The percentage of nighttime heartburn-free days was higher in the tegoprazan group but the difference was insignificant (57.8% vs 43.1%, P = 0.107). Adverse events occurred in 2 patients. They were mild in severity.

CONCLUSIONS

Tegoprazan may induce faster relief of nighttime heartburn symptoms and may improve sleep disorders associated with nighttime heartburn. Further large-scale studies are required to validate our findings.

Comparison of Pharmacodynamics between Tegoprazan and Dexlansoprazole Regarding Nocturnal Acid Breakthrough: A Randomized Crossover Study

Background/Aims

Tegoprazan, a novel potassium-competitive acid blocker, is expected to overcome the limitations of proton pump inhibitors and effectively control nocturnal acid breakthrough. To evaluate the pharmacodynamics of tegoprazan versus dexlansoprazole regarding nocturnal acid breakthrough in healthy subjects.

Methods

In a randomized, open-label, single-dose, balanced incomplete block crossover study, 24 healthy male volunteers were enrolled and randomized to receive oral tegoprazan (50, 100, or 200 mg) or dexlansoprazole (60 mg) during each of two administration periods, separated by a 7- to 10-day washout period. Blood samples were collected for pharmacokinetic parameter analysis; gastric monitoring was performed for pharmacodynamic parameter evaluation.

Results

All 24 subjects completed the study. Average maximum plasma concentration, area under the plasma concentration-time curve, and mean time with gastric pH >4 and pH >6 for tegoprazan demonstrated dose-dependent incremental increases. All the tegoprazan groups reached mean pH ≥4 within 2 hours, whereas the dexlansoprazole group required 7 hours after drug administration. Based on pharmacodynamic parameters up to 12 hours after evening dosing, 50, 100, and 200 mg of tegoprazan presented a stronger acid-suppressive effect than 60 mg of dexlansoprazole. Moreover, the dexlansoprazole group presented a comparable acid-suppressive effect with the tegoprazan groups 12 hours after dosing.

Conclusions

All the tegoprazan groups demonstrated a significantly faster onset of gastric pH increase and longer holding times above pH >4 and pH >6 up to 12 hours after evening dosing than the dexlansoprazole group.

Comparison of hepatotoxicity of tegoprazan, a novel potassium-competitive acid blocker, with proton pump inhibitors using real-world data: A nationwide cohort study

Background

Proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) are acid suppressants that are frequently prescribed in many countries to reduce heartburn. A potassium-competitive acid blocker (P-CAB; tegoprazan) was launched relatively recently that also inhibits gastric acid secretion. This study aimed to compare the hepatotoxicity of the six existing PPIs with P-CAB.

Methods

This retrospective cohort study was conducted between January 2019 and December 2020 and included data from the total population of 50 million inhabitants in Korea. Propensity score (PS) matching was performed using 10 variables, and the differences in hepatotoxicity between P-CAB and the six PPIs were compared in a similar distribution. The primary endpoint was hepatotoxicity which included toxic liver disease, hepatitis, hepatic failure, liver transplantation, and other liver diseases.

Results

The risk ratios (RR) of tegoprazan vs. the six PPIs (dexlansoprazole, esomeprazole, lansoprazole, omeprazole, pantoprazole, and rabeprazole) were all significant [RR: 0.70 (95% CI: 0.69-0.72), 0.81 (95% CI: 0.79-0.83), 0.61 (95% CI: 0.59-0.63), 1.17 (95% CI: 1.13-1.20), 0.61 (95% CI: 0.59-0.62), and 0.73 (95% CI: 0.71-0.75), respectively]. The risk ratio of tegoprazan vs. the six existing PPIs was 0.73 (95% CI: 0.72-0.75). The hazard ratios (HRs) of hepatotoxicity of the six PPIs to tegoprazan showed significantly higher values apart from omeprazole (HR: dexlansoprazole, 1.13; esomeprazole, 1.04; lansoprazole, 1.25; omeprazole, 0.77; pantoprazole, 1.26; rabeprazole, 1.15, respectively, and the six existing PPIs, 1.10).

Conclusion

Using a large-scale data cohort analysis consisting of 50 million Koreans, tegoprazan did not induce higher hepatotoxicity compared with the six conventional PPIs.

Triple Therapy-Based on Tegoprazan, a New Potassium-Competitive Acid Blocker, for First-Line Treatment of Helicobacter pylori Infection: A Randomized, Double-Blind, Phase III, Clinical Trial

BACKGROUND/AIMS

We examined the efficacy and safety of tegoprazan as a part of first-line triple therapy for Helicobacter pylori eradication.

METHODS

A randomized, double-blind, controlled, multicenter study was performed to evaluate whether tegoprazan (50 mg)-based triple therapy (TPZ) was noninferior to lansoprazole (30 mg)- based triple therapy (LPZ) (with amoxicillin 1 g and clarithromycin 500 mg; all administered twice daily for 7 days) for treating H. pylori. The primary endpoint was the H. pylori eradication rate. Subgroup analyses were performed according to the cytochrome P450 (CYP) 2C19 genotype, the minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) of amoxicillin and clarithromycin, and underlying gastric diseases.

RESULTS

In total, 350 H. pylori-positive patients were randomly allocated to the TPZ or LPZ group. The H. pylori eradication rates in the TPZ and LPZ groups were 62.86% (110/175) and 60.57% (106/175) in an intention-to-treat analysis and 69.33% (104/150) and 67.33% (101/150) in a per-protocol analysis (non-inferiority test, p=0.009 and p=0.013), respectively. Subgroup analyses according to MICs or CYP2C19 did not show remarkable differences in eradication rate. Both first-line triple therapies were well-tolerated with no notable differences.

CONCLUSIONS

TPZ is as effective as proton pump inhibitor-based triple therapy and is as safe as first-line H. pylori eradication therapy but does not overcome the clarithromycin resistance of H. pylori in Korea (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier NCT03317223).

Current guidelines for Helicobacter pylori treatment in East Asia 2022: Differences among China, Japan, and South Korea

Helicobacter pylori (H. pylori) infection is highly prevalent in East Asia. The overall seroprevalence rate of H. pylori infection is 44.2% in China, 37.6%-43.2% in Japan, and 51.0% in South Korea. H. pylori can cause peptic ulcer disease and gastric cancer. East Asian countries have high rates of gastric cancer (age-standardized incidence rate: 20-30 per 100000). The Kyoto global consensus report emphasized that H. pylori gastritis should be considered the main cause for the development of gastric cancer. H. pylori treatment guidelines in China, Japan, and South Korea have recently been revised according to data from each of those countries. However, emerging antibiotic resistance is an important barrier to H. pylori eradication. The recommended H. pylori treatment regimens differ among those three East Asian countries. In this review, recent guidelines and up-to-date research on H. pylori treatment regimens from China, Japan, and South Korea are discussed.

Pharmacokinetic Interactions Between Tegoprazan and Naproxen, Aceclofenac, and Celecoxib in Healthy Korean Male Subjects

PURPOSE

Tegoprazan is a potassium-competitive acid blocker used for gastric acid suppression and may be used with NSAIDs to reduce gastrointestinal adverse effects. The aim of this study was to evaluate the pharmacokinetic interaction between tegoprazan and commonly used NSAIDS, namely, naproxen, aceclofenac, and celecoxib.

METHODS

An open-label, 3-cohort, randomized, multiple-dose, 3-way crossover study was conducted in healthy male subjects. In cohort 1, tegoprazan (50-mg tablet, once daily) and naproxen (500-mg tablet, twice daily) were administered separately or concurrently for 7 days in each period. In cohort 2, tegoprazan and aceclofenac (100-mg tablet, twice daily) were administered separately or concurrently for 7 days in each period. In cohort 3, tegoprazan and celecoxib (200-mg capsule, twice daily) were administered separately or concurrently for 7 days in each period. Pharmacokinetic blood samples were collected up to 24 hours after the last dose.

FINDINGS

Seventeen subjects from cohort 1, sixteen subjects from cohort 2, and thirteen subjects from cohort 3 were included in the pharmacokinetic analysis. In cohort 1, the geometric least squares mean ratios (90% CIs) for AUC_τ (AUC profiles over the dosing interval) and C_ss,max (C_max at steady state) were 1.01 (0.91-1.12) and 0.99 (0.83-1.17) for tegoprazan, and 1.00 (0.97-1.03) and 1.04 (0.99-1.09) for naproxen, respectively. The values in cohort 2 were 1.03 (0.93-1.13) and 0.94 (0.86-1.04) for tegoprazan, and 1.06 (1.00-1.12) and 1.31 (1.08-1.60) for aceclofenac. The values in cohort 3 were 1.01 (0.86-1.18) and 1.02 (0.87-1.19) for tegoprazan, and 1.08 (0.96-1.22) and 1.18 (0.97-1.43) for celecoxib.

IMPLICATIONS

Changes in the maximum aceclofenac or celecoxib concentrations were detected after concurrent administration with tegoprazan, which were considered mainly due to the pharmacodynamic effect of tegoprazan. Because systemic drug exposure (shown as AUC_τ) was unchanged after concurrent administration of any 3 NSAIDs with tegoprazan, the increase in aceclofenac or celecoxib C_ss,max when administered with tegoprazan would not be clinically significant in practice.

CLINICALTRIALS

gov Identifier: NCT04639804.

Design, synthesis and biological evaluation of novel 5-methyl-2,4,5,6-tetrahydropyrrolo[3,4-c]pyrazole derivatives as potent potassium-competitive acid blockers

With the aim to discover a novel potent potassium-competitive acid blocker (P-CAB) agent, a series of 5-methyl-2,4,5,6-tetrahydropyrrolo[3,4-c]pyrazole derivatives were synthesized, and their H+/K+-ATPase inhibitory activities and inhibitory action on histamine-stimulated gastric acid secretion in rats were evaluated. Among the compounds synthesized, compound 3'-((3-(2-fluorophenyl)-5-methyl-5,6-dihydropyrrolo[3,4-c]pyrazol-2(4H)-yl)methyl)-[1,1'-biphenyl]-3-carboxamide not only exhibited potent H+/K+-ATPase inhibitory activity but olso showed potent inhibitory action in vivo on histamine-stimulated gastric acid secretion. In addition, the lead compound displayed favourable oral pharmacokinetic properties in rats, which was worthy of further study as a novel P-CAB agent.

Acid Suppressive Drugs

Histamine H₂ receptor antagonists (H₂RAs) suppress gastric acid production by blocking H₂ receptors in parietal cells. Studies have shown that proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) are superior to H₂RAs as a treatment for acid-related disorders, such as peptic ulcer disease (PUD) and gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD). PPIs reduce gastric acid production by irreversibly inhibiting the H⁺/K⁺ ATPase pump, and they also increase gastric emptying. Although PPIs have differing pharmacokinetic properties, each PPI is effective in managing GERD and PUDs. However, PPIs have some limitations, including short plasma half-lives, breakthrough symptoms (especially at night), meal-associated dosing, and concerns associated with long-term PPI use. Potassium-competitive acid blockers (P-CABs) provide more rapid and profound suppression of intragastric acidity than PPIs. P-CABs are non-inferior to lansoprazole in healing erosive esophagitis and peptic ulcers, and may also be effective in improving symptoms in patients with non-erosive reflux disease. Acid suppressive drugs are the most commonly used drugs in clinical practice, and it is necessary to understand the pharmacological properties and adverse effects of each drug.

Model-Based Prediction of Acid Suppression and Proposal of a New Dosing Regimen of Fexuprazan in Humans

Fexuprazan is a potassium-competitive acid blocker (P-CAB). The compounds in this newly developed drug family suppress intragastric acidity. As there are already other acid-suppressing drugs on the market, such as H₂ antagonists and proton pump inhibitors (PPIs), it would be informative to compare the biological effects of fexuprazan against another approved drug with the same indication. The drug concentration predicted by the pharmacokinetic (PK) model could serve as an input function for a pharmacodynamic (PD) model. The apparent pharmacokinetics of fexuprazan could be described by a simpler model. However, a physiologically based pharmacokinetic (PBPK) model was developed in a previous study. A one-compartment model was also proposed in the present study. Both the newly suggested model and the previously validated PBPK model were used as input functions of the PD models. Our simulation revealed that the effects of fexuprazan could be effectively simulated by the proposed PK–PD models. A PK–PD model was also proposed for the oral administration of the PPI reference drug esomeprazole. A model-based analysis was then performed for intragastric pH using several dosing methods. The expected pH could be predicted for both drugs under several dosing regimens using the proposed PK–PD models.

2020 Seoul Consensus on the Diagnosis and Management of Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease

Gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) is a condition in which gastric contents regurgitate into the esophagus or beyond, resulting in either troublesome symptoms or complications. GERD is heterogeneous in terms of varied manifestations, test findings, and treatment responsiveness. GERD diagnosis can be established with symptomatology, pathology, or physiology. Recently the Lyon consensus defined the "proven GERD" with concrete evidence for reflux, including advanced grade erosive esophagitis (Los Angeles classification grades C and or D esophagitis), long-segment Barrett's mucosa or peptic strictures on endoscopy or distal esophageal acid exposure time > 6% on 24-hour ambulatory pH-impedance monitoring. However, some Asian researchers have different opinions on whether the same standards should be applied to the Asian population. The prevalence of GERD is increasing in Asia. The present evidence-based guidelines were developed using a systematic review and meta-analysis approach. In GERD with typical symptoms, a proton pump inhibitor test can be recommended as a sensitive, cost-effective, and practical test for GERD diagnosis. Based on a meta-analysis of 19 estimated acid-exposure time values in Asians, the reference range upper limit for esophageal acid exposure time was 3.2% (95% confidence interval, 2.7-3.9%) in the Asian countries. Esophageal manometry and novel impedance measurements, including mucosal impedance and a post-reflux swallow-induced peristaltic wave, are promising in discrimination of GERD among different reflux phenotypes, thus increasing its diagnostic yield. We also propose a long-term strategy of evidence-based GERD treatment with proton pump inhibitors and other drugs.

Prediction of Drug-Drug Interaction Potential of Tegoprazan Using Physiologically Based Pharmacokinetic Modeling and Simulation

This study aimed to develop a physiologically based pharmacokinetic (PBPK) model of tegoprazan and to predict the drug-drug interaction (DDI) potential between tegoprazan and cytochrome P450 (CYP) 3A4 perpetrators. The PBPK model of tegoprazan was developed using SimCYP Simulator^® and verified by comparing the model-predicted pharmacokinetics (PKs) of tegoprazan with the observed data from phase 1 clinical studies, including DDI studies. DDIs between tegoprazan and three CYP3A4 perpetrators were predicted by simulating the difference in tegoprazan exposure with and without perpetrators, after multiple dosing for a clinically used dose range. The final PBPK model adequately predicted the biphasic distribution profiles of tegoprazan and DDI between tegoprazan and clarithromycin. All ratios of the predicted-to-observed PK parameters were between 0.5 and 2.0. In DDI simulation, systemic exposure to tegoprazan was expected to increase about threefold when co-administered with the maximum recommended dose of clarithromycin or ketoconazole. Meanwhile, tegoprazan exposure was expected to decrease to ~30% when rifampicin was co-administered. Based on the simulation by the PBPK model, it is suggested that the DDI potential be considered when tegoprazan is used with CYP3A4 perpetrator, as the acid suppression effect of tegoprazan is known to be associated with systemic exposure.

Randomised clinical trial: comparison of tegoprazan and placebo in non-erosive reflux disease

BACKGROUND

Tegoprazan is a novel, fast- and long-acting potassium-competitive acid blocker that suppresses gastric acid secretion, which could benefit patients with non-erosive reflux disease (NERD), a type of gastroesophageal reflux disease.

AIM

To evaluate the efficacy and safety profiles of tegoprazan compared with those of a placebo in Korean patients with NERD.

METHODS

In this phase 3, double-blind, placebo-controlled, multicentre study, 324 Korean patients with NERD were randomised into three treatment groups: tegoprazan 50 mg, tegoprazan 100 mg and placebo. These drugs were provided once daily for 4 weeks. The primary endpoint was the proportion of patients with complete resolution of major symptoms (both heartburn and regurgitation) for the last 7 days of the 4-week treatment period. Other outcomes related to efficacy, safety and tolerability were also evaluated.

RESULTS

Among all, 42.5% (45/106), 48.5% (48/99) and 24.2% (24/99) of patients showed complete resolution of major symptoms at week 4 after receiving tegoprazan 50 mg, tegoprazan 100 mg, and placebo, respectively. Both doses of tegoprazan showed superior efficacy than the placebo (P = 0.0058 and P = 0.0004, respectively). The complete resolution rates of heartburn and proportions of heartburn-free days (as other efficacy outcomes) were significantly higher in both tegoprazan groups than in the placebo group (P < 0.05 for all). No significant difference in the incidence of treatment-emergent adverse events were noted.

CONCLUSIONS

Tegoprazan 50 and 100 mg showed superior therapeutic efficacy compared with the placebo, as well as a favourable safety profile in patients with NERD. Registration number: ClinicalTrials.gov identifier NCT02556021.

Effect of Food on the Pharmacokinetics and Pharmacodynamics of a Single Oral Dose of Tegoprazan

PURPOSE

Tegoprazan is a potassium-competitive acid blocker (P-CAB) that is designed to treat acid-related diseases through a fundamentally different mechanism than that of proton pump inhibitors (PPIs). Because PPIs inhibit only activated parietal cell H⁺/K⁺ adenosine triphosphatase, stimulation of parietal cells by a meal is necessary for optimal results. In contrast, P-CABs can inactivate proton pumps without acid activation and bind to both activated and inactivated adenosine triphosphatase. This study evaluates the effect of food consumption on the pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic properties of tegoprazan after a single oral dose in healthy men.

METHODS

In this open-label, 2-period crossover study, 24 healthy men were randomized to 1 of 2 treatment sequence groups: administration of tegoprazan under the fasting condition and administration of tegoprazan under the fed condition. The dosing periods of both sequence groups were separated by a washout period of 7 days. At each dosing period, the participants received a single dose of 200 mg of tegoprazan followed by pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic analysis.

FINDINGS

After the oral administration of 200 mg tegoprazan, the C_max was decreased and delayed under the fed condition compared with that of the fasting condition. However, no significant differences were observed in the AUC and the time of gastric acid suppression (inhibition of integrated acidity) during 24 hours.

IMPLICATIONS

The pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic properties of tegoprazan are independent of food effect; thus, tegoprazan could be administered regardless of the timing of food consumption in patients. ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT01830309.

Development of Physiologically Based Pharmacokinetic Model for Orally Administered Fexuprazan in Humans

Fexuprazan is a new drug candidate in the potassium-competitive acid blocker (P-CAB) family. As proton pump inhibitors (PPIs), P-CABs inhibit gastric acid secretion and can be used to treat gastric acid-related disorders such as gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD). Physiologically based pharmacokinetic (PBPK) models predict drug interactions as pharmacokinetic profiles in biological matrices can be mechanistically simulated. Here, we propose an optimized and validated PBPK model for fexuprazan by integrating in vitro, in vivo, and in silico data. The extent of fexuprazan tissue distribution in humans was predicted using tissue-to-plasma partition coefficients in rats and the allometric relationships of fexuprazan distribution volumes (V_SS) among preclinical species. Urinary fexuprazan excretion was minimal (0.29-2.02%), and this drug was eliminated primarily by the liver and metabolite formation. The fraction absorbed (Fa) of 0.761, estimated from the PBPK modeling, was consistent with the physicochemical properties of fexuprazan, including its in vitro solubility and permeability. The predicted oral bioavailability of fexuprazan (38.4-38.6%) was within the range of the preclinical datasets. The C_max, AUC_last, and time-concentration profiles predicted by the PBPK model established by the learning set were accurately predicted for the validation sets.

Recent Advances in the Definition and Management of Functional Dyspepsia

In 2016, the Rome criteria were updated as Rome IV, and only minor changes were introduced for functional dyspepsia (FD). The major symptoms of FD now include not only postprandial fullness, but also epigastric pain and burning, and early satiation at above the "bothersome" level. Investigations into the effect of meal ingestion on symptom generation have indicated that not only postprandial fullness and early satiety but also epigastric pain and burning sensation and nausea (not vomiting) may increase after meals. Helicobacter pylori infection is considered to be the cause of dyspepsia if successful eradication leads to sustained resolution of symptoms for more than 6 months, and such a condition has been termed H. pylori-associated dyspepsia. Prompt esophagogastroduodenoscopy and H. pylori "test and treat" may be beneficial, especially in regions with a high prevalence of gastric cancer, such as east Asia. In terms of treatment, acotiamide, tandospirone, and rikkunshito are newly listed in Rome IV as treatment options for FD. Clinical studies in the field of FD should be strictly based on the Rome IV criteria until the next Rome V is published in 2026.

Pharmacokinetic Interactions between Tegoprazan and Metronidazole/Tetracycline/Bismuth and Safety Assessment in Healthy Korean Male Subjects

PURPOSE

Tegoprazan is a potassium-competitive acid blocker used for gastric acid suppression, which may be used with Helicobacter pylori eradication therapies. The goal of this study was to evaluate the pharmacokinetic interaction between tegoprazan and triple-antibiotic therapy containing metronidazole, tetracycline, and bismuth.

METHODS

An open-label, 2-cohort, randomized, multiple-dose, crossover study was conducted in healthy subjects. In cohort 1, tegoprazan (100 mg/d) was administered orally with or without triple-antibiotic therapy (1500 mg/d metronidazole, 2000 mg/d tetracycline, and 1200 mg/d bismuth) for 7 days in each period. In cohort 2, triple-antibiotic therapy was administered orally with or without tegoprazan for 7 days in each period. Pharmacokinetic blood samples were collected within 24 h after the last dose. Safety assessments were performed.

FINDINGS

Eleven cohort 1 subjects and ten cohort 2 subjects were included in the pharmacokinetic analysis. The AUC_τ and C_max at steady state geometric mean ratios (90% CIs) were 0.78 (0.73-0.83) and 0.75 (0.68-0.82) for tegoprazan; 0.77 (0.68-0.88) and 0.84 (0.72-0.98) for tegoprazan metabolite M1; 1.03 (0.98-1.08) and 1.08 (0.99-1.18) for metronidazole; 0.63 (0.56-0.70) and 0.64 (0.56-0.74) for tetracycline; and 1.55 (0.99-2.44) and 1.38 (0.72-2.66) for bismuth, respectively. All reported adverse events were mild.

IMPLICATIONS

Changes in the tegoprazan, tetracycline, and bismuth pharmacokinetic parameters were detected after concurrent administration. These changes were considered mainly due to the pharmacodynamic effect of tegoprazan. The adverse events were predictable and reported as frequent adverse events during triple-antibiotic therapy. There were no significant differences in safety or tolerability between quadruple therapy, including tegoprazan and triple-antibiotic therapy. ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT04066257.

Classification models and SAR analysis on CysLT1 receptor antagonists using machine learning algorithms

Cysteinyl leukotrienes 1 (CysLT1) receptor is a promising drug target for rhinitis or other allergic diseases. In our study, we built classification models to predict bioactivities of CysLT1 receptor antagonists. We built a dataset with 503 CysLT1 receptor antagonists which were divided into two groups: highly active molecules (IC₅₀ < 1000 nM) and weakly active molecules (IC₅₀ ≥ 1000 nM). The molecules were characterized by several descriptors including CORINA descriptors, MACCS fingerprints, Morgan fingerprint and molecular SMILES. For CORINA descriptors and two types of fingerprints, we used the random forests (RF) and deep neural networks (DNN) to build models. For molecular SMILES, we used recurrent neural networks (RNN) with the self-attention to build models. The accuracies of test sets for all models reached 85%, and the accuracy of the best model (Model 2C) was 93%. In addition, we made structure-activity relationship (SAR) analyses on CysLT1 receptor antagonists, which were based on the output from the random forest models and RNN model. It was found that highly active antagonists usually contained the common substructures such as tetrazoles, indoles and quinolines. These substructures may improve the bioactivity of the CysLT1 receptor antagonists.

Prevalence of behavioral disorders in patients with vonoprazan-refractory reflux symptoms

BACKGROUND

Behavioral disorders, such as supragastric belching (SGB) and rumination syndrome (RS), which may be treated by cognitive behavioral therapy, are common in patients with reflux symptoms refractory to proton pump inhibitors (PPI). Vonoprazan (VPZ) has been used as a new type of acid inhibitor in Japan since 2015. We herein investigated the prevalence of behavioral disorders in patients with VPZ-refractory reflux symptoms and attempted to identify predictive factors.

METHODS

We retrospectively analyzed esophagogastroduodenograms, high-resolution manometry, and 24-h multiluminal impedance pH-metry (MIIpH) in patients with VPZ-refractory reflux symptoms (heartburn or regurgitation) receiving 20 mg VPZ who underwent these tests at our hospital between January 2015 and April 2020. Patients were divided as follows: non-erosive reflux disease with pathological esophageal acid exposure (NERD), functional heartburn (FH), reflux hypersensitivity (RH), excessive (> 13 per day) SGB, and possible RS based on MIIpH parameters.

RESULTS

Among 49 patients, 6 (12.2%) had SGB, 4 (8.2%) possible RS, 29 (59.2%) FH, 9 (18.4%) RH, and 1 (2%) NERD. Possible RS patients had more postprandial non-acid reflux events than FH patients (p < 0.05). The multivariate logistic regression analysis did not identify any predictive factors with statistical significance.

CONCLUSION

More than 20% patients with VPZ-refractory reflux symptoms had behavioral disorders. The use of HRM and MIIpH may be clinically relevant for a better diagnosis and more specific treatment.

Safety, Tolerability and Pharmacokinetics of Single Ascending and Multiple Oral Doses of Tegoprazan in Healthy Chinese Subjects

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

Tegoprazan is one of the potassium-competitive acid blockers (P-CABs). It exhibits its anti-secretory effects by competitively and reversibly blocking the availability of K⁺ of the H⁺, K⁺-ATPase. This study was designed to investigate the safety and pharmacokinetics of tegoprazan in healthy Chinese subjects.

METHODS

Thirty-eight healthy Chinese subjects were recruited in this randomized, single-center, double-blind, placebo-controlled study, with a single ascending dose of 50, 100, 200 mg and a multiple dose of 100 mg for 10 days. The plasma concentration of tegoprazan was determined by a validated liquid chromatography tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS) method. Pharmacokinetics were evaluated via non-compartmental and compartmental model analysis. Safety was assessed by physical examinations, vital signs, clinical laboratory tests, and electrocardiograms.

RESULTS

No serious adverse event was observed in this study. After single-dose administration (50, 100 and 200 mg), tegoprazan was rapidly absorbed with a median maximum measure plasma concentration (T_max) at 0.5 h and declined with a terminal (elimination) half-life (t_1/2) of 3.87-4.57 h. The maximum measured plasma concentration (C_max) for tegoprazan was 813.80, 1494.60 and 2829.00 ng/mL. Meanwhile, the corresponding area under the concentration-time curve (AUC) from time zero to infinity (AUC_0-inf) was 2761.00, 5980.05 and 11,044.72 ng∙h/mL in 50, 100, 200 mg group, respectively. Dose-dependent increase was observed in the value of C_max and AUC after administration of tegoprazan 50 to 200 mg. The two-compartment model well described the pharmacokinetic profile of tegoprazan. In the steady state, no accumulation was found after repeated administration at the 100-mg dose level. No experimental differences were found based on gender.

CONCLUSIONS

Tegoprazan was well tolerated in the dose range of 50-200 mg in single- and 100 mg in multiple-dose studies. Tegoprazan shows dose linearity with oral administration after a single dose of 50 to 200 mg and less drug accumulation after 10 days of continuous administration in 100 mg.

The Potential Benefits of Vonoprazan as Helicobacter pylori Infection Therapy

Helicobacter pylori infection is a severe global health problem that is closely associated with acid-related diseases and gastric malignancies. Eradicating H. pylori is strongly recommended for lowering peptic ulcer recurrence and preventing gastric cancer. The current approved H. pylori eradication regimen combines a proton pump inhibitor (PPI) with two antibiotics. Unfortunately, this regimen failed to meet expectations mostly due to antibiotic resistance and insufficient gastric acid suppression. Vonoprazan, a novel potassium-competitive acid blocker, showed promising results as a PPI replacement. Vonoprazan inhibits gastric acid secretion by acting as a reversible competitive inhibitor against potassium ions and forming disulfide bonds with the cysteine molecule of H⁺/K⁺-ATPase. Vonoprazan has superior pharmacological characteristics over PPI, such as no requirement for acid activation, stability in acidic conditions, shorter optimum acid suppression period, and resistance to cytochrome P (CYP)2C19 polymorphism. Several comparative randomized controlled trials and meta-analyses revealed the superiority of vonoprazan in eradicating H. pylori, notably the resistant strains. The adverse effect caused by vonoprazan is long-term acid suppression that may induce elevated gastrin serum, hypochlorhydria, and malabsorption. All vonoprazan studies have only been conducted in Japan. Further studies outside Japan are necessary for universally conclusive results.

Editorial: tegoprazan-the newest advance in the management of acid-related diseases

LINKED CONTENT

This article is linked to Cho et al paper. To view this article, visit https://doi.org/10.1111/apt.15865