Dose Selection and Validation for Ceftazidime-Avibactam in Adults with Complicated Intra-abdominal Infections, Complicated Urinary Tract Infections, and Nosocomial Pneumonia

Antimicrobials from endophytes as novel therapeutics to counter drug-resistant pathogens

The rapid increase in antimicrobial resistance (AMR) projects a "global emergency" and necessitates a need to discover alternative resources for combating drug-resistant pathogens or "superbugs." One of the key themes in "One Health Concept" is based on the fact that the interconnected network of humans, the environment, and animal habitats majorly contribute to the rapid selection and spread of AMR. Moreover, the injudicious and overuse of antibiotics in healthcare, the environment, and associated disciplines, further aggravates the concern. The prevalence and persistence of AMR contribute to the global economic burden and are constantly witnessing an upsurge due to fewer therapeutic options, rising mortality statistics, and expensive healthcare. The present decade has witnessed the extensive exploration and utilization of bio-based resources in harnessing antibiotics of potential efficacies. The discovery and characterization of diverse chemical entities from endophytes as potent antimicrobials define an important yet less-explored area in natural product-mediated drug discovery. Endophytes-produced antimicrobials show potent efficacies in targeting microbial pathogens and synthetic biology (SB) mediated engineering of endophytes for yield enhancement, forms a prospective area of research. In keeping with the urgent requirements for new/novel antibiotics and growing concerns about pathogenic microbes and AMR, this paper comprehensively reviews emerging trends, prospects, and challenges of antimicrobials from endophytes and their effective production via SB. This literature review would serve as the platform for further exploration of novel bioactive entities from biological organisms as "novel therapeutics" to address AMR.

Dose selection for aztreonam-avibactam, including adjustments for renal impairment, for Phase IIa and Phase III evaluation

PURPOSE

A series of iterative population pharmacokinetic (PK) modeling and probability of target attainment (PTA) analyses based on emerging data supported dose selection for aztreonam-avibactam, an investigational combination antibiotic for serious Gram-negative bacterial infections.

METHODS

Two iterations of PK models built from avibactam data in infected patients and aztreonam data in healthy subjects with "patient-like" assumptions were used in joint PTA analyses (primary target: aztreonam 60% fT > 8 mg/L, avibactam 50% fT > 2.5 mg/L) exploring patient variability, infusion durations, and adjustments for moderate (estimated creatinine clearance [CrCL] > 30 to ≤ 50 mL/min) and severe renal impairment (> 15 to ≤ 30 mL/min). Achievement of > 90% joint PTA and the impact of differential renal clearance were considerations in dose selection.

RESULTS

Iteration 1 simulations for Phase I/IIa dose selection/modification demonstrated that 3-h and continuous infusions provide comparable PTA; avibactam dose drives joint PTA within clinically relevant exposure targets; and loading doses support more rapid joint target attainment. An aztreonam/avibactam 500/137 mg 30-min loading dose and 1500/410 mg 3-h maintenance infusions q6h were selected for further evaluation. Iteration 2 simulations using expanded PK models supported an alteration to the regimen (500/167 mg loading; 1500/500 mg q6h maintenance 3-h infusions for CrCL > 50 mL/min) and selection of doses for renal impairment for Phase IIa/III clinical studies.

CONCLUSION

A loading dose plus 3-h maintenance infusions of aztreonam-avibactam in a 3:1 fixed ratio q6h optimizes joint PTA. These analyses supported dose selection for the aztreonam-avibactam Phase III clinical program.

CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION

NCT01689207; NCT02655419; NCT03329092; NCT03580044.

Ceftazidime-avibactam induced renal disorders: past and present

With the increasing prevalence of multidrug-resistant Gram-negative bacterial pathogens worldwide, antimicrobial resistance has become a significant public health concern. Ceftazidime-avibactam (CAZ-AVI) exhibited excellent in vitro activity against many carbapenemase-producing pathogens, and was widely used for the treatment of various complicated infections. CAZ-AVI is well tolerated across all dosing regimens, and its associated acute kidney injury (AKI) in phase II/III clinical trials is rare. However, recent real-world studies have demonstrated that CAZ-AVI associated AKI was more frequent in real-world than in phase II and III clinical trials, particularly in patients receiving concomitant nephrotoxic agents, with critically ill patients being at a higher risk. Herein, we reviewed the safety data related to renal impairment of CAZ-AVI, and discussed its pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic targets and dosage adjustment in patients with impaired renal function. This review aimed to emphasize the importance for healthcare professionals to be aware of this adverse event of CAZ-AVI and provide practical insights into the dosage optimization in critically ill patients with renal dysfunction.

Translational PK/PD for the Development of Novel Antibiotics-A Drug Developer's Perspective

Antibiotic development traditionally involved large Phase 3 programs, preceded by Phase 2 studies. Recognizing the high unmet medical need for new antibiotics and, in some cases, challenges to conducting large clinical trials, regulators created a streamlined clinical development pathway in which a lean clinical efficacy dataset is complemented by nonclinical data as supportive evidence of efficacy. In this context, translational Pharmacokinetic/Pharmacodynamic (PK/PD) plays a key role and is a major contributor to a "robust" nonclinical package. The classical PK/PD index approach, proven successful for established classes of antibiotics, is at the core of recent antibiotic approvals and the current antibacterial PK/PD guidelines by regulators. Nevertheless, in the case of novel antibiotics with a novel Mechanism of Action (MoA), there is no prior experience with the PK/PD index approach as the basis for translating nonclinical efficacy to clinical outcome, and additional nonclinical studies and PK/PD analyses might be considered to increase confidence. In this review, we discuss the value and limitations of the classical PK/PD approach and present potential risk mitigation activities, including the introduction of a semi-mechanism-based PK/PD modeling approach. We propose a general nonclinical PK/PD package from which drug developers might choose the studies most relevant for each individual candidate in order to build up a "robust" nonclinical PK/PD understanding.

First-in-human study to evaluate the safety, tolerability, and population pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic target attainment analysis of FL058 alone and in combination with meropenem in healthy subjects

FL058 is a novel diazabicyclooctane β-lactamase inhibitor. This first-in-human study evaluated the safety, tolerability, and population pharmacokinetic (PK)/pharmacodynamic target attainment analysis of FL058 alone and in combination with meropenem in healthy subjects. The results showed that the maximum tolerated dose of FL058 was 3,000 mg after single-dose infusion. FL058 in combination with meropenem did not cause any grade 3 or higher adverse event when the dose was escalated up to 1,000 mg/2,000 mg. FL058 exposure PK parameters showed dose proportionality. FL058 was excreted primarily in urine. No significant PK interaction was found between FL058 and meropenem. Population PK model analysis indicated that the PK profiles of FL058 and meropenem were consistent with the two-compartment model. The impact of covariates, creatinine clearance, concomitant use of meropenem, body weight, sex, and FL058 dose, on FL058 exposure was less than 10%. FL058/meropenem combination was safe and well tolerated up to a 1,000-mg/2,000-mg dose in healthy adults. The recommended minimum dose of FL058/meropenem combination was 500 mg/1,000 mg by intravenous infusion over 2 h every 8 h based on target attainment analysis. The good safety, tolerability, and satisfactory PK profiles of FL058 alone and in combination with meropenem in this first-in-human study will support further clinical development of FL058 in combination with meropenem in patients with target infections (ClinicalTrials.gov identifiers: NCT05055687, NCT05058118, and NCT05058105).

Integrated Transcriptomic and Metabolomic Mapping Reveals the Mechanism of Action of Ceftazidime/Avibactam against Pan-Drug-Resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae

Here, we employed an integrated metabolomics and transcriptomics approach to investigate the molecular mechanism(s) of action of ceftazidime/avibactam against a pan-drug-resistant K. pneumoniae clinical isolate from a patient with urinary tract infection. Ceftazidime/avibactam induced time-dependent perturbations in the metabolome and transcriptome of the bacterium, mainly at 6 h, with minimal effects at 1 and 3 h. Metabolomics analysis revealed a notable reduction in essential lipids involved in outer membrane glycerolipid biogenesis. This disruption effect extended to peptidoglycan and lipopolysaccharide biosynthetic pathways, including lipid A and O-antigen assembly. Importantly, ceftazidime/avibactam not only affected the final steps of peptidoglycan biosynthesis in the periplasm, a common mechanism of ceftazidime action, but also influenced the synthesis of lipid-linked intermediates and early stages of cytoplasmic peptidoglycan synthesis. Furthermore, ceftazidime/avibactam substantially inhibited central carbon metabolism (e.g., the pentose phosphate pathway and tricarboxylic acid cycle). Consistently, the dysregulation of genes governing these metabolic pathways aligned with the metabolomics findings. Certain metabolomics and transcriptomics signatures associated with ceftazidime resistance were also perturbed. Consistent with the primary target of antibiotic activity, biochemical assays also confirmed the direct impact of ceftazidime/avibactam on peptidoglycan production. This study explored the intricate interactions of ceftazidime and avibactam within bacterial cells, including their impact on cell envelope biogenesis and central carbon metabolism. Our findings revealed the complexities of how ceftazidime/avibactam operates, such as hindering peptidoglycan formation in different cellular compartments. In summary, this study confirms the existing hypotheses about the antibacterial and resistance mechanisms of ceftazidime/avibactam while uncovering novel insights, including its impact on lipopolysaccharide formation.

Antibiotic Prescriptions in Critically Ill Patients with Bloodstream Infection Due to ESBL-Producing Enterobacteriaceae: Compliance with the French Guidelines for the Treatment of Infections with Third-Generation Cephalosporin-Resistant Enterobacteriaceae-A Multicentric Retrospective Cohort Study

National and international guidelines were recently published regarding the treatment of Enterobacteriaceae resistant to third-generation cephalosporins infections. We aimed to assess the implementation of the French guidelines in critically ill patients suffering from extended-spectrum β-lactamase-producing Enterobacteriaceae bloodstream infection (ESBL-E BSI). We conducted a retrospective observational cohort study in the ICU of three French hospitals. Patients treated between 2018 and 2022 for ESBL-E BSI were included. The primary assessment criterion was the proportion of adequate empirical carbapenem prescriptions, defined as prescriptions consistent with the French guidelines. Among the 185 included patients, 175 received an empirical anti-biotherapy within 24 h of ESBL-E BSI onset, with a carbapenem for 100 of them. The proportion of carbapenem prescriptions consistent with the guidelines was 81%. Inconsistent prescriptions were due to a lack of prescriptions of a carbapenem, while it was recommended in 25% of cases. The only factor independently associated with adequate empirical carbapenem prescription was ESBL-E colonization (OR: 107.921 [9.303-1251.910], p = 0.0002). The initial empirical anti-biotherapy was found to be appropriate in 83/98 patients (85%) receiving anti-biotherapy in line with the guidelines and in 56/77 (73%) patients receiving inadequate anti-biotherapy (p = 0.06). Our results illustrate the willingness of intensivists to spare carbapenems. Promoting implementation of the guidelines could improve the proportion of initial appropriate anti-biotherapy in critically ill patients with ESBL-E BSI.

In Vitro Activities of Aztreonam-Avibactam, Eravacycline, Cefoselis, and Other Comparators against Clinical Enterobacterales Isolates: a Multicenter Study in China, 2019

Aztreonam-avibactam, eravacycline, and cefoselis are three novel antimicrobial agents for the treatment of serious infections caused by Gram-negative bacteria. We evaluated the in vitro activities of the above-mentioned three antimicrobial agents against clinical Enterobacterales isolates. A total of 1,202 Enterobacterales isolates, including 10 genera or species, were collected from 26 hospitals that cover seven regions of China. The susceptibilities of the 30 antimicrobial agents were interpreted based on the combination of U.S. Food and Drug Administration and Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute guidelines. The results indicated that all Enterobacterales isolates showed high susceptibility to aztreonam-avibactam (98.25%), eravacycline (85.69%), and cefoselis (62.73%). The first two antimicrobial agents also demonstrated potent activities against multidrug-resistant and carbapenem-resistant Enterobacterales independent of antimicrobial resistance mechanisms. The rates of susceptibility to aztreonam-avibactam, eravacycline, and cefoselis were lowest in Morganella spp. (84.42%), Proteus spp. (33.65%), and Escherichia coli (40.14%), respectively. In general, the lower rates of susceptibility to eravacycline and cefoselis were in the older inpatient group. The strains isolated from urinary tract exhibited the lowest rate of susceptibility (78.97%) to eravacycline, and the lowest rate of susceptibility (45.83%) to cefoselis was observed in nervous system specimens. The strains isolated from intensive care unit (ICU) wards showed significantly reduced susceptibility to cefoselis compared with those isolated from non-ICU wards. The MIC values of aztreonam-avibactam and ceftazidime-avibactam have poor consistency (weighted kappa = 0.243), as did eravacycline and tigecycline (weighted kappa = 0.478). Cefoselis and cefepime showed highly similar activities against Enterobacterales (weighted kappa = 0.801). Our results support the clinical development of aztreonam-avibactam, eravacycline, and cefoselis to treat infections caused by Enterobacterales. IMPORTANCE Infections caused by multidrug-resistant (MDR) Enterobacterales, especially carbapenem-resistant Enterobacterales (CRE), have been a challenging clinical problem due to the limited therapeutic options. Therefore, the need to develop novel antimicrobial agents and evaluate their activities against Enterobacterales in vitro is urgent. Our results show that the novel antimicrobial agents aztreonam-avibactam and eravacycline retain activities against MDR and CRE isolates, including carbapenemase producers and non-carbapenemase producers. Further analysis combined with clinical information on the strains tested revealed that no significant differences were observed in susceptibility rates of strains with different demographic parameters to aztreonam-avibactam. Age, specimen source, and department were associated with the susceptibility of strains to eravacycline and cefoselis (P ≤ 0.01). Compared with ceftazidime-avibactam, aztreonam-avibactam has its advantages and limitations against Enterobacterales. The potent activity of eravacycline against Enterobacterales was higher than that of tigecycline. Cefoselis and cefepime showed a highly consistent activity against Enterobacterales.

Bloodstream Infection and Gram-Negative Resistance: The Role for Newer Antibiotics

Gram-negative resistance remains a major challenge. Rates of in vitro resistance to commonly utilized antibiotics have skyrocketed over the last decade. Clinicians now encounter multidrug-resistant organisms routinely. Fortunately, newer agents, such as ceftazidime-avibactam, ceftolozone-tazobactam, meropenem-vaborbactam, and cefiderocol, have been developed and are now available for use against these pathogens. Clinical trials with these novel therapies have focused on multiple infection types ranging from complicated urinary tract infections to nosocomial pneumonia. Nonetheless, there remains little information about the efficacy of these drugs for bacteremia. To better appreciate the types and limitations of the evidence supporting the role for these unique molecules in bloodstream infection, one requires an appreciation of the initial clinical trials supporting the regulatory approval of these antibiotics. Furthermore, physicians must understand the subsequent case series and reports specifically focusing on outcomes for patients with bacteremia treated with these drugs. Despite the limitations of the data and reports relating to treatment for bacteremia with these antibiotics, each agent appears to be efficacious and can provide good outcomes in bloodstream infections due to resistant pathogens.

All Roads Lead to Rome: Enhancing the Probability of Target Attainment with Different Pharmacokinetic/Pharmacodynamic Modelling Approaches

In light of rising antimicrobial resistance and a decreasing number of antibiotics with novel modes of action, it is of utmost importance to accelerate development of novel treatment options. One aspect of acceleration is to understand pharmacokinetics (PK) and pharmacodynamics (PD) of drugs and to assess the probability of target attainment (PTA). Several in vitro and in vivo methods are deployed to determine these parameters, such as time-kill-curves, hollow-fiber infection models or animal models. However, to date the use of in silico methods to predict PK/PD and PTA is increasing. Since there is not just one way to perform the in silico analysis, we embarked on reviewing for which indications and how PK and PK/PD models as well as PTA analysis has been used to contribute to the understanding of the PK and PD of a drug. Therefore, we examined four recent examples in more detail, namely ceftazidime-avibactam, omadacycline, gepotidacin and zoliflodacin as well as cefiderocol. Whereas the first two compound classes mainly relied on the ‘classical’ development path and PK/PD was only deployed after approval, cefiderocol highly profited from in silico techniques that led to its approval. Finally, this review shall highlight current developments and possibilities to accelerate drug development, especially for anti-infectives.

Optimizing antibiotic dosing regimens for nosocomial pneumonia: a window of opportunity for pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic modeling

INTRODUCTION

Determining antibiotic exposure in the lung and the threshold(s) needed for effective antibacterial killing is paramount during development of new antibiotics for the treatment of nosocomial pneumonia, as these exposures directly affect clinical outcomes and resistance development. The use of pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic modeling is recommended by regulatory agencies to evaluate antibiotic pulmonary exposure and optimize dosage regimen selection. This process has been implemented in newer antibiotic development.

AREAS COVERED

This review will discuss the basis for conducting pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic studies to support dosage regimen selection and optimization for the treatment of nosocomial pneumonia. Pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic data that supported recent hospital-acquired bacterial pneumonia/ventilator-associated bacterial pneumonia indications for ceftolozane/tazobactam, ceftazidime/avibactam, imipenem/cilastatin/relebactam, and cefiderocol will be reviewed.

EXPERT OPINION

Optimal drug development requires the integration of preclinical pharmacodynamic studies, healthy volunteers and ideally patient bronchoalveolar lavage pharmacokinetic studies, Monte-Carlo simulation, and clinical trials. Currently, plasma exposure has been successfully used as a surrogate for lung exposure threshold. Future studies are needed to identify the value of lung pharmacodynamic thresholds in nosocomial pneumonia antibiotic dosage optimization.

Ceftazidime/Avibactam for the Treatment of Carbapenem-Resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa Infection in Lung Transplant Recipients

Background

Experience of ceftazidime-avibactam (CAZ/AVI) for carbapenem-resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa (CRPA) infection in recipients after lung transplantation (LT) is relatively limited.

Methods

A retrospective observational study was conducted on lung transplant recipients receiving CAZ/AVI therapy for CRPA infection. The primary outcomes were the 14-day and 30-day mortality. The secondary outcomes were clinical cure and microbiological cure.

Results

Among 183 LT recipients, a total of 15 recipients with CRPA infection who received CAZ/AVI therapy were enrolled in this study. The mean age of recipients was 54 years and 73.3% of recipients were male. The median time from infection onset to initiation of CAZ/AVI treatment was 4 days (IQR, 3-7) and the mean duration of CAZ/AVI therapy was 10 days. CAZ/AVI was mainly administered as monotherapy in LT recipients (80%). Among these eligible recipients, 14-day and 30-day mortality were 6.7% and 13.3%, respectively. The clinical cure and microbiological cure rates of CAZ/AVI therapy were 53.3% and 60%, respectively. Three recipients (20%) experienced recurrent infection. In addition, the mean lengths of ICU stay and hospital stay were 24 days and 35 days, respectively, among LT recipients.

Conclusion

CAZ/AVI may be an alternative and promising regimen for CRPA eradiation in lung transplant recipients.

Population Pharmacokinetic Modeling for Ceftazidime-Avibactam Renal Dose Adjustments in Pediatric Patients 3 months and Older

Ceftazidime-avibactam is a novel β-lactam/β-lactamase inhibitor combination developed to treat serious Gram-negative bacterial infections; approved indications include complicated urinary tract infection, complicated intra-abdominal infection, and hospital-acquired pneumonia including ventilator-associated pneumonia in patients ≥ 3 months old. Because of the predominantly renal clearance of ceftazidime and avibactam, dose adjustments (reductions) are required for patients with estimated creatinine clearance (CrCL) ≤ 50 mL/min. We describe the application of combined adult and pediatric population pharmacokinetic models in developing ceftazidime-avibactam dose recommendations for pediatric patients ≥ 2 to < 18 years old with body surface area-normalized CrCL ≤ 50 mL/min/1.73 m² , including moderate, severe, or very severe renal impairment, or end-stage renal disease requiring hemodialysis, and for patients ≥ 3 months to < 2 years old with mild, moderate, or severe renal impairment. Models included allometric scaling for all subjects and simulations (1,000 subjects per age group, renal function group, and indication) were performed nonparametrically using post hoc random effects. Doses were selected based on simulated pediatric patients achieving steady-state exposures similar to adults and high probability of target attainment (using a simultaneous joint target for both ceftazidime and avibactam). Because there were few children with renal impairment in the ceftazidime-avibactam clinical trials, selected pediatric doses were guided by extrapolation and matching of adult exposures associated with efficacy and within established safety margins. The recommended doses for pediatric patients with estimated CrCL ≤ 50 mL/min/1.73 m² use equivalent adjustments in dose quantity and/or administration interval (vs. the corresponding age group with normal renal function) as those for adults.

Efficacy and Pharmacodynamic Target Attainment for Ceftazidime-Avibactam Off-Label Dose Regimens in Patients with Continuous or Intermittent Venovenous Hemodialysis: Two Case Reports

Limited data are available for ceftazidime-avibactam (CZA) dosing in patients receiving renal replacement therapy, especially the data on the dosing in patients receiving intermittent hemodialysis (IHD). In this report, we firstly described a case in which CZA was administered as 2.5 g after each time of IHD, and a dose of 1.25 g was added on the 48^th-hour for the 72-h interdialytic interval. Plasma concentrations of CZA measured at different time indicated that > 50% of administered ceftazidime and avibactam were removed during the 4-h hemodialysis. In addition, we described another case on continuous venovenous hemodialysis (CVVHD), in which CZA was administered as 2.5 g q12h in 2-h infusions. The dose regimen for these two cases could achieve trough concentration of ceftazidime higher than fourfold of the MIC and trough concentration of avibactam higher than the threshold of 1 μg/mL during the treatment, and exert efficient antimicrobial effect.

Cefepime pharmacodynamic targets against Enterobacterales employing neutropenic murine lung infection and in vitro pharmacokinetic models

BACKGROUND

Very limited studies, so far, have been conducted to identify the pharmacodynamic targets of cefepime, a well-established fourth-generation cephalosporin. As a result, conventional targets representing the cephalosporin class are used for cefepime target attainment analysis.

OBJECTIVES

We employed both a neutropenic murine lung infection model and an in vitro pharmacokinetic model (IVPM) to determine cefepime's pharmacodynamic target [percentage of the dosing interval during which unbound drug concentrations remain higher than the MIC (%fT>MIC)] for bacteriostatic and 1 log10 kill effects.

METHODS

Ten strains with cefepime MICs ranging from 0.03 to 16 mg/L were studied in the lung infection. In the IVPM, five cefepime-resistant strains with cefepime/tazobactam (fixed 8 mg/L) MICs ranging from 0.25 to 8 mg/L were included. Through 24 h dose fractionation, both in lung infection and IVPM (in the latter case, tazobactam 8 mg/L continuous infusion was used to protect cefepime), varying cefepime exposures and corresponding pharmacodynamic effect scenarios were generated to identify the pharmacodynamic targets.

RESULTS

Using a non-linear sigmoidal maximum-effect (Emax) model, the cefepime's plasma fT>MIC for 1 log10 kill in lung infection ranged from 17% to 53.7% and a combined exposure-response plot yielded 30%. In the case of IVPM, T>MIC ranged from 6.9% to 75.4% with a mean value of 34.2% for 1 log10 kill.

CONCLUSIONS

Both in vivo and in vitro studies showed that cefepime's pharmacodynamic requirements are lower than generally reported for cephalosporins (50%-70% fT>MIC). The lower requirement for cefepime could be linked with factors such as cefepime's better permeation properties and multiple PBP affinity-driven enhanced bactericidal action.

Drug development concerning metallo-β-lactamases in gram-negative bacteria

β-Lactams have been a clinical focus since their emergence and indeed act as a powerful tool to combat severe bacterial infections, but their effectiveness is threatened by drug resistance in bacteria, primarily by the production of serine- and metallo-β-lactamases. Although once of less clinical relevance, metallo-β-lactamases are now increasingly threatening. The rapid dissemination of resistance mediated by metallo-β-lactamases poses an increasing challenge to public health worldwide and comprises most existing antibacterial chemotherapies. Regrettably, there have been no clinically available inhibitors of metallo-β-lactamases until now. To cope with this unique challenge, researchers are exploring multidimensional strategies to combat metallo-β-lactamases. Several studies have been conducted to develop new drug candidates or calibrate already available drugs against metallo-β-lactamases. To provide an overview of this field and inspire more researchers to explore it further, we outline some promising candidates targeting metallo-β-lactamase producers, with a focus on Escherichia coli, Klebsiella pneumoniae, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, and Acinetobacter baumannii. Promising candidates in this review are composed of new antibacterial drugs, non-antibacterial drugs, antimicrobial peptides, natural products, and zinc chelators, as well as their combinations with existing antibiotics. This review may provide ideas and insight for others to explore candidate metallo-β-lactamases as well as promote the improvement of existing data to obtain further convincing evidence.

Therapeutic Drug Monitoring of Ceftazidime-Avibactam Concentrations in Carbapenem-Resistant K. pneumoniae-Infected Patients With Different Kidney Statuses

Aims: Carbapenem-resistant K. pneumoniae (CRKP) is the most common carbapenem-resistant Enterobacteriaceae with high mortality. Ceftazidime-avibactam (CAZ-AVI) has exhibited excellent in vitro activity in vivo against CRKP. However, the efficacy of CAZ-AVI in KPC-producing CRKP-infected patients with different kidney statuses varies, such as renal insufficiency, normal renal function, and augmented renal clearance (ARC). We explored the use of therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) to evaluate the concentration and efficacy of CAZ-AVI in CRKP-infected patients with different kidney statuses.

Methods: Serum concentrations for CAZ and AVI were determined by the high-performance liquid chromatography method. Bacterial identification, routine susceptibility testing, renal function index, and others were performed in standard protocols in the hospital’s clinical laboratories.

Results: In the two patients with ARC, in case 1, CAZ-AVI 2.5g q6h was used with good efficacy, and the concentrations were up to the pharmacokinetics/pharmacodynamics targets. In Case 2, 2.5 g q8h was used with invalid effectiveness, and AVI C_min was only 0.797 mg/l, which is lower than the PK/PD target. Case 3 was renal insufficiency using CAZ-AVI 1.25 q8h, and case 4 was normal renal function using 2.5 g q8h. Their concentrations were both up to the PK/PD targets.

Conclusion: TDM results demonstrated that CAZ-AVI steady-state plasma concentration varies among patients with different kidney statuses, providing evidence for the utility of TDM of CAZ-AVI in individualized drug dose adjustment. ARC patients may need more CAZ-AVI daily doses than the standard dose.

The primary pharmacology of ceftazidime/avibactam: in vivo translational biology and pharmacokinetics/pharmacodynamics (PK/PD)

This review describes the translational in vivo and non-clinical pharmacokinetics/pharmacodynamics (PK/PD) research that supported clinical trialling and subsequently licensing approval of ceftazidime/avibactam, a new β-lactam/β-lactamase inhibitor combination aimed at the treatment of infections by Enterobacterales and Pseudomonas aeruginosa. The review thematically follows on from the co-published article, Nichols et al. (J Antimicrob Chemother 2022; dkac171). Avibactam protected ceftazidime in animal models of infection with ceftazidime-resistant, β-lactamase-producing bacteria. For example, a single subcutaneous dose of ceftazidime at 1024 mg/kg yielded little effect on the growth of ceftazidime-resistant, blaKPC-2-carrying Klebsiella pneumoniae in the thighs of neutropenic mice (final counts of 4 × 108 to 8 × 108 cfu/thigh). In contrast, co-administration of avibactam in a 4:1 ratio (ceftazidime:avibactam) was bactericidal in the same model (final counts of 2 × 104 to 3 × 104 cfu/thigh). In a rat abdominal abscess model, therapy with ceftazidime or ceftazidime/avibactam (4:1 w/w) against blaKPC-2-positive K. pneumoniae resulted in 9.3 versus 3.3 log cfu/abscess, respectively, after 52 h. With respect to PK/PD, in Monte Carlo simulations, attainment of unbound drug exposure targets (ceftazidime fT>8 mg/L and avibactam fT>1 mg/L, each for 50% of the dosing interval) for the labelled dose of ceftazidime/avibactam (2 and 0.5 g, respectively, q8h by 2 h IV infusion), including dose adjustments for patients with impaired renal function, ranged between 94.8% and 99.6% of patients, depending on the infection modelled.

The primary pharmacology of ceftazidime/avibactam: in vitro translational biology

Previous reviews of ceftazidime/avibactam have focused on in vitro molecular enzymology and microbiology or the clinically associated properties of the combination. Here we take a different approach. We initiate a series of linked reviews that analyse research on the combination that built the primary pharmacology data required to support the clinical and business risk decisions to perform randomized controlled Phase 3 clinical trials, and the additional microbiological research that was added to the above, and the safety and chemical manufacturing and controls data, that constituted successful regulatory licensing applications for ceftazidime/avibactam in multiple countries, including the USA and the EU. The aim of the series is to provide both a source of reference for clinicians and microbiologists to be able to use ceftazidime/avibactam to its best advantage for patients, but also a case study of bringing a novel β-lactamase inhibitor (in combination with an established β-lactam) through the microbiological aspects of clinical development and regulatory applications, updated finally with a review of resistance occurring in patients under treatment. This first article reviews the biochemistry, structural biology and basic microbiology of the combination, showing that avibactam inhibits the great majority of serine-dependent β-lactamases in Enterobacterales and Pseudomonas aeruginosa to restore the in vitro antibacterial activity of ceftazidime. Translation to efficacy against infections in vivo is reviewed in the second co-published article, Nichols et al. (J Antimicrob Chemother 2022; dkac172).

Combined PK/PD Index May Be a More Appropriate PK/PD Index for Cefoperazone/Sulbactam against Acinetobacter baumannii in Patients with Hospital-Acquired Pneumonia

Cefoperazone/sulbactam (CPZ/SUL) is a β-lactam and β-lactamase inhibitor combination therapy for the treatment of respiratory tract infections. Using data from a prospective, multiple-center, open-label clinical trial in 54 patients with hospital-acquired pneumonia or ventilator-associated pneumonia caused by multidrug-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii (Ab), we showed that a combined PK/PD index %(T > MICcpz*T > MICsul) is a more appropriate PK/PD index against Ab, compared to the PK/PD index (%T > MIC) for a single drug. For a 2 h infusion, the PK/PD cutoff of CPZ/SUL (2 g/1 g, q8h) for clinical and microbiological efficacy was 4/2 and 1/0.5 mg/L, respectively. The corresponding cumulative fraction of response was 46.5% and 25.3%, respectively. Results based on the combined PK/PD index were quite similar to that based on the joint probability of target attainment. The two drugs have interaction from the viewpoint of PK/PD. When the dose of one drug was too high, the PK/PD cutoff was often determined by another drug in which the dose was maintained. In most cases, sulbactam exerted the main effect against infection by Ab in the complex CPZ/SUL, which was similar to the literature reports. When the MIC of CPZ was 8, 16, or 32 mg/L, a CPZ/SUL 2 g/1 g (q8h), 2 g/2 g (q8h), or 2 g/2 g (q6h) (infusion was all 3 h) was recommended, respectively. A clinical efficacy and safety study to confirm simulation results is warranted.

Efficient simulation of clinical target response surfaces

Simulation of combination therapies is challenging due to computational complexity. Either a simple model is used to simulate the response for many combinations of concentration to generate a response surface but parameter variability and uncertainty are neglected and the concentrations are constant—the link to the doses to be administered is difficult to make—or a population pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic model is used to predict the response to combination therapy in a clinical trial taking into account the time‐varying concentration profile, interindividual variability (IIV), and parameter uncertainty but simulations are limited to only a few selected doses. We devised new algorithms to efficiently search for the combination doses that achieve a predefined efficacy target while taking into account the IIV and parameter uncertainty. The result of this method is a response surface of confidence levels, indicating for all dose combinations the likelihood of reaching the specified efficacy target. We highlight the importance to simulate across a population rather than focus on an individual. Finally, we provide examples of potential applications, such as informing experimental design.

Ceftazidime dosing in obese patients: is it time for more?

INTRODUCTION

Ceftazidime is used for the treatment of many bacterial infections, including severe P. aeruginosa infections. Like other beta-lactams, inter-individual variability in ceftazidime pharmacokinetics has been described. Due to its related pathophysiological modifications, obesity might influence ceftazidime pharmacokinetics.

AREAS COVERED

The objective of this review is to assess the current state of knowledge about the impact of obesity on ceftazidime treatment. A literature search was conducted on PubMed-MEDLINE (2016-2021) to retrieve pharmacokinetic studies published in English, matching the terms 'ceftazidime' AND 'pharmacokinetics.'

EXPERT OPINION

The impact of obesity on pharmacokinetics is generally poorly known, mainly because obese patients are often excluded from clinical studies. However, the published literature clearly shows that obese patients have significantly lower ceftazidime concentrations. This could be explained by increased volume of distribution and clearance. This low exposure represents a major factor of therapeutic failure, potentially fatal for critically ill patients. While further studies would be useful to better assess the magnitude and understanding of this variability, the use of higher doses of ceftazidime is needed in obese patients. Moreover, therapeutic drug monitoring for dose adaptation is of major interest for these patients, as the efficacy of ceftazidime seems to be directly related to its plasma concentration.

Pharmacodynamic Thresholds for Beta-Lactam Antibiotics: A Story of Mouse Versus Man

Beta-lactams remain a critical member of our antibiotic armamentarium and are among the most commonly prescribed antibiotic classes in the inpatient setting. For these agents, the percentage of time that the free concentration remains above the minimum inhibitory concentration (%fT > MIC) of the pathogen has been shown to be the best predictor of antibacterial killing effects. However, debate remains about the quantity of fT > MIC exposure needed for successful clinical response. While pre-clinical animal based studies, such as the neutropenic thigh infection model, have been widely used to support dosing regimen selection for clinical development and susceptibility breakpoint evaluation, pharmacodynamic based studies in human patients are used validate exposures needed in the clinic and for guidance during therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM). For the majority of studied beta-lactams, pre-clinical animal studies routinely demonstrated the fT > MIC should exceed approximately 40–70% fT > MIC to achieve 1 log reductions in colony forming units. In contrast, clinical studies tend to suggest higher exposures may be needed, but tremendous variability exists study to study. Herein, we will review and critique pre-clinical versus human-based pharmacodynamic studies aimed at determining beta-lactam exposure thresholds, so as to determine which targets may be best suited for optimal dosage selection, TDM, and for susceptibility breakpoint determination. Based on our review of murine and clinical literature on beta-lactam pharmacodynamic thresholds, murine based targets specific to each antibiotic are most useful during dosage regimen development and susceptibility breakpoint assessment, while a range of exposures between 50 and 100% fT > MIC are reasonable to define the beta-lactam TDM therapeutic window for most infections.

Pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic simulations of cost-effective dosage regimens of ceftolozane/tazobactam and ceftazidime/avibactam in patients with renal impairment

The pharmacokinetics of ceftolozane/tazobactam (TOL/TAZ) and ceftazidime/avibactam (CEF/AVI) is influenced by renal function. Application of recommended dosages in patients with renal impairment require to use fractions of the full dose, as only one dosage is available for both antibiotics. The objective of this study was to evaluate the adequacy of alternative dosage regimens based on the full dose. We performed pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic (PK/PD) simulations of recommended and alternative dosage regimens in patients with various degrees of renal impairment, by using the Pmetrics program. Alternative regimens included longer dosage interval and prolonged infusions of the full dose for both drugs. Probabilities of target attainment (PTA) were assessed considering PK/PD targets defined for cephalosporins and beta-lactamase inhibitors as well as MIC breakpoints. The risk of overexposure was also assessed. Results showed that alternative dosage regimens based on a full dose of TOL/TAZ and CEF/AVI administered every 12 or 24h were associated with PTA similar to that of recommended dosages, especially when administered as prolonged infusion. The alternative dosage regimens were not associated with overexposure in most cases. In addition, those regimens could reduce dosing errors, drug cost and nurse labor. Clinical investigation of those alternative dosage regimens would be required before implementation.

Efficacy of Ceftazidime-Avibactam in the Treatment of Carbapenem-Resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae Infection After Kidney Transplantation

Purpose

The clinical efficacy of ceftazidime-avibactam (CAZ-AVI) in treating carbapenem-resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae (CRKP)-infected recipients after kidney transplantation (KT) has not been well evaluated. We aimed to assess its efficacy in a single-center cohort of KT recipients infected with CRKP.

Materials and Methods

We retrospectively observed KT recipients diagnosed with CRKP infection from June 2019 to July 2021. The primary outcome was 30-day mortality and secondary outcomes were 14-day clinical cure and 14-day microbiological cure. Logistic regression analysis was used to evaluate the relationship between CAZ-AVI treatment and prognosis.

Results

A total of 54 CRKP-infected KT recipients were recorded in this study. Twenty-two recipients received CAZ-AVI and 32 received other antibiotic regimens. Recipients in both groups had similar baseline characteristics, with the most common site of infection being surgical site infections (n=27; 50.0%) and bloodstream infections (n=23; 42.6%). Recipients treated with CAZ-AVI had significantly lower 30-day mortality (3/22 vs 14/32, P=0.019), significantly higher 14-day clinical cure (18/22 vs 17/32, P=0.030) and 14-day microbiological cure (19/22 vs 15/32, P=0.003) compared with recipients receiving other treatment regimens. Kaplan–Meier survival curves for 30-day mortality confirmed the findings (log-rank=0.014). In a multivariate logistic regression model, receiving CAZ-AVI was found to be an independent protective factor for 30-day mortality (odds ratio=0.148, 95% confidence interval, 0.027–0.800; P=0.026). No significant side effects were recorded.

Conclusion

CAZ-AVI may be more valuable than other antibiotic regimens for the treatment of CRKP infection after kidney transplantation, and further large randomized controlled trials are needed to assess its efficacy.

The Monte Carlo Simulation of Three Antimicrobials for Empiric Treatment of Adult Bloodstream Infections With Carbapenem-Resistant Enterobacterales in China

Introduction: The aim of this study was to predict and evaluate three antimicrobials for treatment of adult bloodstream infections (BSI) with carbapenem-resistant Enterobacterales (CRE) in China, so as to optimize the clinical dosing regimen further.

Methods: Antimicrobial susceptibility data of blood isolates were obtained from the Blood Bacterial Resistance Investigation Collaborative Systems in China. Monte Carlo simulation was conducted to estimate the probability target attainment (PTA) and cumulative fraction of response (CFR) of tigecycline, polymyxin B, and ceftazidime/avibactam against CRE.

Results: For the results of PTAs, tigecycline following administration of 50 mg every 12 h, 75 mg every 12 h, and 100 mg every 12 h achieved > 90% PTAs when minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) was 0.25, 0.5, and 0.5 μg/mL, respectively; polymyxin B following administration of all tested regimens achieved > 90% PTAs when MIC was 1 μg/mL with CRE; ceftazidime/avibactam following administration of 1.25 g every 8 h, 2.5 g every 8 h achieved > 90% PTAs when MIC was 4 μg/mL, 8 μg/mL with CRE, respectively. As for CFR values of three antimicrobials, ceftazidime/avibactam achieved the lowest CFR values. The highest CFR value of ceftazidime/avibactam was 77.42%. For tigecycline and ceftazidime/avibactam, with simulated regimens daily dosing increase, the CFR values were both increased; the highest CFR of tigecycline values was 91.88%. For polymyxin B, the most aggressive dosage of 1.5 mg/kg every 12 h could provide the highest CFR values (82.69%) against CRE.

Conclusion: This study suggested that measurement of MICs and individualized therapy should be considered together to achieve the optimal drug exposure. In particular, pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic modeling based on local antimicrobial resistance data can provide valuable guidance for clinicians for the administration of empirical antibiotic treatments for BSIs.

Treatment of UTIs Due to Klebsiella pneumoniae Carbapenemase-Producers: How to Use New Antibiotic Drugs? A Narrative Review

Background: K. pneumoniae is one of the bacteria most frequently causing health care-associated urinary tract infections, and increasingly incriminating Klebsiella pneumoniae carbapenemase producers (KPCp). Most infections caused by KPCp are nosocomial and might cause serious issues, even leading to death in half of the reported cases. Our aim was to identify the best strategy, based on available scientific data, for the use of new antibiotic treatments to manage KPCp UTIs. Methods: this narrative review of the literature was performed according to the criteria of preferred reporting items for systematic review and meta-analyses statement (PRISMA) (2020). Results and Conclusions: KPCp-UTIs are a real challenge for physicians. While cefiderocol, meropenem-vaborbactam, ceftazidim-avibactam, and imipenem-relebactam represent a major step forward in the treatment of these UTIs, no guidelines are currently available, in view of choosing the most appropriate treatment, in each specific case.

Beta-Lactams Dosing in Critically Ill Patients with Gram-Negative Bacterial Infections: A PK/PD Approach

Beta-lactam antibiotics are often the backbone of treatment for Gram-negative infections in the critically ill. Beta-lactams exhibit time-dependent killing, and their efficacy depends on the percentage of dosing interval that the concentration remains above the minimum inhibitory concentration. The Gram-negative resistance rates of pathogens are increasing in the intensive care unit (ICU), and critically ill patients often possess physiology that makes dosing more challenging. The volume of distribution is usually increased, and drug clearance is variable. Augmented renal clearance and hypermetabolic states increase the clearance of beta-lactams, while acute kidney injury reduces the clearance. To overcome the factors affecting ICU patients and decreasing susceptibilities, dosing strategies involving higher doses, and extended or continuous infusions may be required. In this review, we specifically examined pharmacokinetic models in ICU patients, to determine the desired beta-lactam regimens for clinical breakpoints of Enterobacterales and Pseudomonas aeruginosa, as determined by the European Committee on Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing. The beta-lactams evaluated included penicillins, cephalosporins, carbapenems, and monobactams. We found that when treating less-susceptible pathogens, especially P. aeruginosa, continuous infusions are frequently needed to achieve the desired pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic targets. More studies are needed to determine optimal dosing strategies in the novel beta-lactams.

Review of Ceftazidime-Avibactam for the Treatment of Infections Caused by Pseudomonas aeruginosa

Pseudomonas aeruginosa is an opportunistic Gram-negative pathogen that causes a range of serious infections that are often challenging to treat, as this pathogen can express multiple resistance mechanisms, including multidrug-resistant (MDR) and extensively drug-resistant (XDR) phenotypes. Ceftazidime–avibactam is a combination antimicrobial agent comprising ceftazidime, a third-generation semisynthetic cephalosporin, and avibactam, a novel non-β-lactam β-lactamase inhibitor. This review explores the potential role of ceftazidime–avibactam for the treatment of P. aeruginosa infections. Ceftazidime–avibactam has good in vitro activity against P. aeruginosa relative to comparator β-lactam agents and fluoroquinolones, comparable to amikacin and ceftolozane–tazobactam. In Phase 3 clinical trials, ceftazidime–avibactam has generally demonstrated similar clinical and microbiological outcomes to comparators in patients with complicated intra-abdominal infections, complicated urinary tract infections or hospital-acquired/ventilator-associated pneumonia caused by P. aeruginosa. Although real-world data are limited, favourable outcomes with ceftazidime–avibactam treatment have been reported in some patients with MDR and XDR P. aeruginosa infections. Thus, ceftazidime–avibactam may have a potentially important role in the management of serious and complicated P. aeruginosa infections, including those caused by MDR and XDR strains.

Ceftazidime-Avibactam in Combination with In Vitro Non-susceptible Antimicrobials Versus Ceftazidime-Avibactam in Monotherapy in Critically Ill Patients with Carbapenem-Resistant Klebsiella Pneumoniae Infection: A Retrospective Cohort Study

BACKGROUND

No clinical study has investigated the use of ceftazidime-avibactam combination schemes with an in vitro non-susceptible antimicrobial that could be superior to ceftazidime-avibactam monotherapy against carbapenem-resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae.

METHODS

We performed a retrospective cohort study at two tertiary hospitals in China for patients with carbapenem-resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae infection treated with ceftazidime-avibactam for at least 72 h. A Cox proportional hazards regression model was used to evaluate covariates that potentially affected 30-day mortality.

RESULTS

Sixty-two patients were eligible for our study; 41 (66.1%) received ceftazidime-avibactam combination therapy and 21 (33.9%) received ceftazidime-avibactam monotherapy. The overall 30-day mortality was 33.9% (21 patients): 24.4% (10/41) and 47.6% (11/21), P = 0.028, in combination and monotherapy groups, respectively. Combination therapy was significantly associated with lower 30-day mortality (Hazard ratio, 0.167; 95% Confidence Interval, 0.060-0.465, P = 0.001). At the same time, a higher APACHE II score, use of vasoactive drugs and comorbidity of organ transplantation were considered factors that increased mortality. The propensity score showed no significant alterations with other variables after adding it to the final model. In the subgroup analysis, the protective effect was revealed when combined with carbapenems, tigecycline or fosfomycin were applied, and in the following subgroups of patients: with sepsis, with creatinine clearance > 50 mL/min, stayed in the intensive care unit ≤ 30 days or underwent mechanical ventilation.

CONCLUSIONS

Ceftazidime-avibactam combined with another in vitro non-susceptible antimicrobial, especially carbapenems, fosfomycin and tigecycline, could significantly decrease the 30-day mortality rate for critically ill patients with carbapenem-resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae infection. Further investigation should be carried out to confirm this conclusion and identify autofit antimicrobials in ceftazidime-avibactam combination schemes.

Pragmatic options for dose optimization of ceftazidime/avibactam with aztreonam in complex patients

BACKGROUND

Avibactam is a β-lactamase inhibitor that is combined with aztreonam against Enterobacterales co-expressing serine- and metallo-β-lactamases (MBL). Optimal dosing of aztreonam with avibactam is not well-defined in critically ill patients and contingent on ceftazidime/avibactam product labelling.

OBJECTIVES

To identify a pragmatic dosing strategy for aztreonam with avibactam to maximize the probability of target attainment (PTA).

METHODS

We conducted a prospective observational pharmacokinetic study. Five blood samples were collected around the fourth dose of aztreonam or ceftazidime/avibactam and assayed for all three drugs. Population pharmacokinetic (PK) analysis coupled with Monte Carlo simulations were used to create a dosing nomogram for aztreonam and ceftazidime/avibactam based on drug-specific pharmacodynamic (PD) targets.

RESULTS

A total of 41 participants (59% male) median age of 75 years (IQR 63-79 years) were enrolled. They were critically ill (46%) with multiple comorbidities and complications including burns (20%). Population PK analysis identified higher volume of distribution and lower clearance (CL) compared with typical value expectations for aztreonam and ceftazidime/avibactam. Estimated glomerular filtration (eGFR) rate using the CKD-EPI equation predicted CL for all three drugs. The need for high doses of aztreonam and ceftazidime/avibactam above those in the existing product labels are not predicted by this analysis with the exception of ceftazidime/avibactam for patients with eGFR of 6-15 mL/min, in whom suboptimal PTA of ≤71% is predicted.

CONCLUSIONS

Pragmatic and lower daily-dose options are predicted for aztreonam and ceftazidime/avibactam when the eGFR is <90 mL/min. These options should be tested prospectively.

Pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic target attainment in critically ill renal patients on antimicrobial usage: focus on novel beta-lactams and beta lactams/beta-lactamase inhibitors

INTRODUCTION

Several novel beta-lactams (BLs) and/or beta lactams/beta-lactamase inhibitors (BL/BLIs) have been recently developed for the management of multidrug-resistant bacterial infections. Data concerning dose optimization in critically ill patients with altered renal function are scanty.

AREAS COVERED

This article provides a critical reappraisal of pharmacokinetic and clinical issues emerged with novel BLs and/or BL/BLIs in renal critically ill patients. Clinical and pharmacokinetic studies published in English until December 2020 were searched on the PubMed-MEDLINE database.

EXPERT OPINION

Several issues emerged with the use of novel BLs and/or BL/BLIs in critically ill renal patients. Suboptimal clinical response rate with ceftazidime-avibactam and ceftolozane-tazobactam was reported in phase II-III trials in patients with moderate kidney injury; data on patients undergoing renal replacement therapy are limited to some case reports; dose adjustment in augmented renal clearance is provided only for cefiderocol. Implementation of altered dosing strategies (prolonged infusion and/or higher dosage) coupled with adaptive real-time therapeutic drug monitoring could represent the most effective approach in warranting optimal pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic targets with novel BLs and/or BL/BLIs in challenging scenarios, thus minimizing the risk of clinical failure and/or of resistance selection.

Evaluation of the post-antibiotic effect in vivo for the combination of a β-lactam antibiotic and a β-lactamase inhibitor: ceftazidime-avibactam in neutropenic mouse thigh and lung infections

The post-antibiotic effect (PAE) of ceftazidime-avibactam in vivo was evaluated using models of thigh- and lung-infection with Pseudomonas aeruginosa in neutropenic mice. In thigh-infected mice, the PAE was negative (-2.18 to -0.11 h) for three of four strains: caused by a 'burst' of rapid bacterial growth after the drug concentrations had fallen below their pre-specified target values. With lung infection, PAE was positive, and longer for target drug concentrations in ELF (>2 h) than plasma (1.69-1.88 h). The time to the start of regrowth was quantified as a new parameter, PAE_R, which was positive (0.35-1.00 h) in both thigh- and lung-infected mice. In the context that measurements of the PAE of β-lactam/β-lactamase inhibitor combinations in vivo have not previously been reported, it is noted that the negative values were consistent with previous measurements of the PAE of ceftazidime-avibactam in vitro and of ceftazidime alone in vivo.

Microbial Resistance Movements: An Overview of Global Public Health Threats Posed by Antimicrobial Resistance, and How Best to Counter

Antibiotics changed medical practice by significantly decreasing the morbidity and mortality associated with bacterial infection. However, infectious diseases remain the leading cause of death in the world. There is global concern about the rise in antimicrobial resistance (AMR), which affects both developed and developing countries. AMR is a public health challenge with extensive health, economic, and societal implications. This paper sets AMR in context, starting with the history of antibiotics, including the discovery of penicillin and the golden era of antibiotics, before exploring the problems and challenges we now face due to AMR. Among the factors discussed is the low level of development of new antimicrobials and the irrational prescribing of antibiotics in developed and developing countries. A fundamental problem is the knowledge, attitude, and practice (KAP) regarding antibiotics among medical practitioners, and we explore this aspect in some depth, including a discussion on the KAP among medical students. We conclude with suggestions on how to address this public health threat, including recommendations on training medical students about antibiotics, and strategies to overcome the problems of irrational antibiotic prescribing and AMR.

Ceftazidime/avibactam and ceftolozane/tazobactam for the treatment of extensively drug-resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa post-neurosurgical infections: three cases and a review of the literature

PURPOSE

Post-neurosurgical infection caused by extensively drug resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa (XDR-PA) are becoming a matter of great concern due to limited therapeutic options. Although not approved for these indications, the new BetaLactam-BetaLactamase Inhibitor combinations (BLBLIs) could represent a valid salvage treatment. We describe one nosocomial meningitis and two cervical osteomyelitis due to an XDR-PA who were treated with ceftazidime/avibactam (CZA) and ceftolozane/tazobactam (C/T) and review the literature.

METHODS

The first and the third patients developed an osteomyelitis following cervical stabilization surgery due to an XDR-PA. Although the first patient started treatment with a high dose of C/T, resistance to C/T occurred, so therapy was switched to CZA plus aztreonam. The third patient switched to aztreonam plus CZA due to development of acute kidney injury during therapy with colistin. The second patient had an XDR-PA meningitis following the insertion of an external ventricular catheter and he was treated with C/T plus meropenem and amikacin.

RESULTS

All three cases reported were successfully conservatively treated thanks to the use of the new BLBLIs with different combinations. Only few experiences demonstrated an equally favorable outcome: one patient treated with C/T plus fosfomycin for otogenic meningitis caused by an XDR-PA and another case of XDR-PA post-surgical meningitis with CZA in combination with colistin. Finally, the combination of CZA plus aztreonam has proven to be effective on XDR-PA only in limited mostly in vitro studies.

CONCLUSION

These recently developed antibiotics, C/T and CZA are promising and complementary therapy options against post-neurosurgical hard-to-treat P. aeruginosa infections. Further prospective real-life studies are required to validate these findings in this special setting.

In vitro Activity of Ceftazidime-Avibactam and Aztreonam-Avibactam Against Carbapenem-resistant Enterobacteriaceae Isolates Collected from Three Secondary Hospitals in Southwest China Between 2018 and 2019

Purpose

To assess the antimicrobial activities of ceftazidime/avibactam (CAZ/AVI) and aztreonam/avibactam (ATM/AVI) against carbapenem-resistant Enterobacteriaceae (CRE) isolates collected from three secondary hospitals in Southwest China between 2018 and 2019.

Materials and Methods

A total of 120 unique CRE clinical isolates were collected and carbapenemase genes were detected using PCR. Antimicrobial susceptibility was determined using standard broth microdilution method and the results were interpreted according to CLSI breakpoints.

Results

The 120 carbapenem-resistant strains included 92 Klebsiella pneumoniae, 10 Escherichia coli, 10 Enterobacter cloacae, five Klebsiella aerogenes, and three Klebsiella oxytoca isolates. Seventy-four percent of these 120 CRE isolates were collected from patients located in non-ICUs; 65.0% of these CRE isolates were collected from male patients; and 34.2% of these isolates were isolated from respiratory tracts. Four different carbapenemase genes were identified among 103 carbapenemase-producing Enterobacteriaceae (CPE) isolates, including bla _KPC-2 (n=77), bla _NDM-1 (n=16), bla _NDM-5 (n=12) and bla _IMP-4 (n=2). Overall, 21.7%, 37.5%, 40.8%, 75.0%, and 100% of the CRE strains were susceptible to levofloxacin, trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole, amikacin, CAZ/AVI, and ATM/AVI, respectively. In addition, antimicrobial susceptibility testing showed that 96.7% isolates (n=116) were resistant to aztreonam, and the addition of avibactam (4 mg/L) significantly reduced the MICs of those aztreonam-resistant isolates by more than 128-fold (range: ≤0.125-4 mg/L), and 90.0% (n=108) of total 120 isolates were inhibited at ATM/AVI concentration ≤1 mg/L.

Conclusion

Our study revealed significant antimicrobial resistance among the CRE isolates against some commonly used antibiotics in three secondary Chinese hospitals. ATM/AVI exhibited potent activity against CRE isolates, including double carbapenemase-producing isolates, whereas CAZ/AVI was active against all KPC producers.

Treatment options for K. pneumoniae, P. aeruginosa and A. baumannii co-resistant to carbapenems, aminoglycosides, polymyxins and tigecycline: an approach based on the mechanisms of resistance to carbapenems

The management of carbapenem-resistant infections is often based on polymyxins, tigecycline, aminoglycosides and their combinations. However, in a recent systematic review, we found that Gram-negative bacteria (GNB) co-resistant to carbapanems, aminoglycosides, polymyxins and tigecycline (CAPT-resistant) are increasingly being reported worldwide. Clinical data to guide the treatment of CAPT-resistant GNB are scarce and based exclusively on few case reports and small case series, but seem to indicate that appropriate (in vitro active) antimicrobial regimens, including newer antibiotics and synergistic combinations, may be associated with lower mortality. In this review, we consolidate the available literature to inform clinicians dealing with CAPT-resistant GNB about treatment options by considering the mechanisms of resistance to carbapenems. In combination with rapid diagnostic methods that allow fast detection of carbapenemase production, the approach proposed in this review may guide a timely and targeted treatment of patients with infections by CAPT-resistant GNB. Specifically, we focus on the three most problematic species, namely Klebsiella pneumoniae, Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Acinetobacter baumannii. Several treatment options are currently available for CAPT-resistant K. pneumonia. Newer β-lactam-β-lactamase combinations, including the combination of ceftazidime/avibactam with aztreonam against metallo-β-lactamase-producing isolates, appear to be more effective compared to combinations of older agents. Options for P. aeruginosa (especially metallo-β-lactamase-producing strains) and A. baumannii remain limited. Synergistic combination of older agents (e.g., polymyxin- or fosfomycin-based synergistic combinations) may represent a last resort option, but their use against CAPT-resistant GNB requires further study.

Pharmacologic optimization of antibiotics for Gram-negative infections

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Antimicrobial resistance among Gram-negative organisms is a rapidly escalating global challenge. Pharmacologic dose optimization based on pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic principles is essential for managing Gram-negative infections. High-risk patient populations may receive nonoptimized antimicrobial dosing because pf physiologic changes in acute illness and/or medical interventions. The purpose of this review is to discuss opportunities for pharmacologic optimization of new agents and highlight patient populations that are often associated with poor drug exposure profiles.

RECENT FINDINGS

Dose optimization of the novel β-lactam-β-lactamase inhibitor combinations has been evaluated through optimizing exposure at the site of infection, evaluating target attainment of both the β-lactam and the β-lactamase-inhibitor in critically ill patients, and evaluating drug exposure to prevent the development of resistance. Plazomicin, a novel aminoglycoside, has pharmacodynamic optimization potential via therapeutic drug monitoring and nomogram-based dosing. Recent studies have evaluated the adequacy of dosing in varying degrees of renal function specifically acute kidney injury, continuous renal replacement therapy (CRRT), and augmented renal clearance (ARC).

SUMMARY

The application of fundamental pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic principles is required to optimize new antimicrobials in the treatment of serious Gram-negative infections. Exposure at the site of infection, pharmacokinetics in critically ill patients, and exposures to prevent resistance are all considerations to improve microbiologic and clinical outcomes. Therapeutic drug monitoring may be needed for high-risk patients.

In vitro activity of aztreonam-avibactam against metallo-β-lactamase-producing Enterobacteriaceae-A multicenter study in China

OBJECTIVES

To study the molecular epidemiology of clinical metallo-β-lactamase (MBL)-producing Enterobacteriaceae isolates in China and to evaluate the antimicrobial susceptibility of MBL-Enterobacteriaceae isolates to aztreonam-avibactam.

METHODS

Bacterial speciation was determined using matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionization time-of-flight mass spectrometry. PCR was used to screen for common carbapenemase genes. Antimicrobial susceptibility testing of common clinical antibiotics and aztreonam-avibactam was performed using the standard broth microdilution method.

RESULTS

A total of 161 MBL-Enterobacteriaceae isolates were included, with Klebsiella pneumoniae (n = 73, 45.4%) and Escherichia coli (n = 53, 32.9%) being the most common species. Among the 161 isolates, bla_NDM (n = 151), bla_IMP (n = 13), and bla_VIM (n = 2) were detected, including five strains (3.1%) co-harboring two MBLs. MBL-Enterobacteriaceae isolates frequently contained two (n = 55, 34.2%) or more (n = 89, 55.3%) additional serine β-lactamase genes (bla_KPC, bla_CTX-M, bla_TEM, or bla_SHV). Antimicrobial susceptibility testing showed that 81.4% of isolates (n = 131) were resistant to aztreonam. The rates of resistance to cefazolin, ceftazidime, ceftriaxone, cefotaxime, ampicillin-sulbactam, amoxicillin-clavulanic acid, and piperacillin-tazobactam were all over 90%. The addition of avibactam (4 μg/ml) significantly reduced the minimum inhibitory concentrations (MICs) of the aztreonam-resistant isolates by more than 8-fold (range ≤0.125 to 4 μg/ml), with a MIC₅₀/MIC₉₀ of ≤0.125/1 μg/ml among the 131 isolates. Overall, 96.9% (n = 156) of the total isolates were inhibited at an aztreonam-avibactam concentration of ≤1 μg/ml. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression analysis found that in patients with MBL-Enterobacteriaceae infections, the presence of pre-existing lung disease (adjusted odds ratio 8.267, 95% confidence interval 1.925-28.297; p = 0.004) was associated with a hazard effect on worse disease outcomes.

CONCLUSIONS

The combined use of aztreonam-avibactam is highly potent against MBL-Enterobacteriaceae and may serve as a new candidate for the treatment of infections caused by MBL-Enterobacteriaceae in China.

Update on the role of ceftazidime-avibactam in the management of carbapenemase-producing Enterobacterales

Ceftazidime-avibactam is a novel combination of a known cephalosporin and a non-β-lactam/β-lactamase inhibitor that has been approved for the treatment of complicated intra-abdominal and urinary tract infections, hospital-acquired pneumonia as well as Gram-negative infections with limited treatment options in Europe. Since its approval, it has been used in patients with infections due to carbapenem-resistant bacteria, in many occasions as off-label indication or salvage therapy, with promising clinical and microbiological cure rates. Emergence of resistance during therapy to this new combination has already been described, which is a matter of concern. A rational use of these new therapeutic options is critical in the multidrug resistance era. The current review focuses on the clinical experience in real life of ceftazidime-avibactam use in the treatment of carbapenemase-producing Enterobacterales.

Unorthodox Parenteral β-Lactam and β-Lactamase Inhibitor Combinations: Flouting Antimicrobial Stewardship and Compromising Patient Care

In India and China, indigenous drug manufacturers market arbitrarily combined parenteral β-lactam and β-lactamase inhibitors (BL-BLIs). In these fixed-dose combinations, sulbactam or tazobactam is indiscriminately combined with parenteral cephalosporins, with BLI doses kept in ratios similar to those for the approved BL-BLIs. Such combinations have been introduced into clinical practice without mandatory drug development studies involving pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic, safety, and efficacy assessments being undertaken. Such unorthodox combinations compromise clinical outcomes and also potentially contribute to resistance development.

Selecting the dosage of ceftazidime-avibactam in the perfect storm of nosocomial pneumonia

PURPOSE

Ceftazidime-avibactam is a novel β-lactam/β-lactamase inhibitor combination recently approved in Europe and the USA for the treatment of adults with hospital-acquired pneumonia (HAP) and ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP), among other indications. In the phase III REPROVE trial (NCT01808092), ceftazidime-avibactam demonstrated non-inferiority to meropenem for the treatment of patients with nosocomial pneumonia (NP), including VAP. As ceftazidime-avibactam was not studied in patients with NP prior to REPROVE, selecting an appropriate dosage regimen in the "perfect storm" of NP required careful consideration of potential determinants and confounders of response specific to the NP patient population.

METHODS

This review describes the series of preclinical studies and pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic (PK/PD) analyses that supported ceftazidime-avibactam dosage selection for patients with NP/VAP (2000/500 mg by 2-h intravenous infusion every 8 h, adjusted for renal function). In parallel, important considerations for antibiotic dosage selection in patients with NP are highlighted, including adequate drug penetration into the lungs, the suitability of murine-derived plasma PK/PD targets, evaluation of MIC distributions against clinical bacterial isolates from patients with NP, and consideration of PK in patients with NP, who are often critically ill. These analyses also supported the European approval of ceftazidime-avibactam for adults with HAP, including VAP, before the completion of REPROVE.

CONCLUSIONS

This work serves as a successful practical example of dosage design for a new antibacterial drug therapy in the indication of NP, including VAP, where previous drug therapies have failed, possibly as a result of evaluation of too few variables, thereby limiting the accuracy of pharmacodynamic predictions.

CP-CRE/non-CP-CRE Stratification And CRE Resistance Mechanism Determination Help In Better Managing CRE Bacteremia Using Ceftazidime-Avibactam And Aztreonam-Avibactam

Purpose

This observational study aimed to identify the independent risk factors for both the acquisition and mortality of carbapenemase-producing carbapenem-resistant Enterobacteriaceae (CP-CRE) bacteremia and further assess the in vitro antimicrobial activities of ceftazidime–avibactam (CAZ/AVI) and aztreonam–avibactam (ATM/AVI) against recent CRE bacteremic isolates.

Patients and methods

This observational study was conducted to reveal the risk factors and mortality rate for CP-CRE bacteremia between 2012 and 2018 and also evaluate the in vitro antimicrobial activities of CAZ/AVI and ATM/AVI against recent CRE bacteremic isolates from 2016 to 2018.

Results

A total of 81 non-repetitive isolates were collected from 2012 to 2018, with 67.90% (55/81) being CP-CRE. Old age (P = 0.01), transfusion [odds ratio (OR): 17.19; 95% CI: 3.15–93.72; P = 0.001], longer ICU stay (P = 0.02), cancer (OR: 15.91; 95% CI: 3.56–71.37; P < 0.001), and previous carbapenem exposure (OR: 27.86; 95% CI: 5.03–154.19; P = 0.001) were identified as independent risk factors for the acquisition of CP-CRE bacteremia compared with the ESBL bacteremia. The in vitro antimicrobial activities of CAZ/AVI and ATM/AVI against the CRE bacteremic isolates from 2016 to 2018 showed a respective susceptibility rate of 70.68% (41/58) and 100.00% (58/58).

Conclusion

The findings indicated that both CP-CRE/non-CP-CRE stratification and CRE resistance mechanism determination were necessary for better guiding the clinical management of CRE bacteremia: ATM/AVI probably works with both non-CP-CRE and CP-CRE bacteremia, even the most notorious double-carbapenemase producer with porin loss/deficiency, whereas CAZ/AVI works with most of the non-CP-CRE and KPC-producers in the region.

Ceftazidime/avibactam versus carbapenems for the treatment of infections caused by Enterobacteriaceae: A meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials

OBJECTIVES

Enterobacteriaceae are the most common pathogens in nosocomial and community infections. Carbapenems are widely used as the most effective antibacterial agents against Enterobacteriaceae. However, increasing use of carbapenems has accelerated the emergence of carbapenem-resistant Enterobacteriaceae. This was a systematic review of recently published data to compare the clinical efficacy and safety of ceftazidime/avibactam (CAZ-AVI) and carbapenems in the treatment of Enterobacteriaceae infections. Moreover, we also attempted to assess whether it is feasible to treat Enterobacteriaceae infections with CAZ-AVI instead of carbapenems.

METHODS

A comprehensive search was performed using Medline, Embase and Cochrane Library for randomised controlled trials (RCTs) comparing the efficacy and safety of CAZ-AVI and carbapenems for the treatment of Enterobacteriaceae infections. Clinical success, microbiological success, adverse events (AEs), serious adverse events (SAEs) and mortality were assessed as the main outcomes.

RESULTS

Three RCTs (1186 patients) were included in the meta-analysis. The meta-analysis showed that there were no significant differences between CAZ-AVI and carbapenems in clinical success [risk difference (RD) = 0.00, 95% confidence interval (CI) -0.06 to 0.06; P = 0.99], microbiological success (RD = 0.07, 95% CI -0.04 to 0.18; P = 0.21) or AEs (RD = 0.00, 95% CI -0.02 to 0.03; P = 0.81). SAEs with CAZ-AVI were numerically higher than with carbapenems (RD = 0.02, 95% CI -0.00 to 0.04; P = 0.06).

CONCLUSION

CAZ-AVI is comparable with carbapenems in efficacy and safety for Enterobacteriaceae infections. More high-quality and large-scale RCTs are needed to further confirm the safety of CAZ-AVI. [PROSPERO ID: CRD42019116685.].

Monte Carlo Simulation Methodologies for β-Lactam/β-Lactamase Inhibitor Combinations: Effect on Probability of Target Attainment Assessments

Monte Carlo simulations (MCSs) are used in antibiotic development to predict the probability of pharmacodynamic target attainment (PTA) for a dosing regimen. However, for β-lactam/β-lactamase inhibitor combinations (BL-BLICs), methods for linking simulated concentration profiles of the β-lactam (BL) and β-lactamase inhibitor (BLI) components are rarely described. Using a previously defined pharmacokinetic model of ceftazidime/avibactam from critically ill patients, we performed four 5000-patient MCSs using different methods of increasing complexity to couple the BL and BLI components and compared PTA for ceftazidime and avibactam targets of >70% fT>MIC and >70% fT>1 mg/L, respectively, at MICs from 1 to 128 mg/L. Method A ignored all covariates and correlations, whereas methods B, C, and D enhanced associations by adding (B) pharmacokinetic parameter correlation within each drug only; (C) pharmacokinetic parameter correlation within each drug and creatinine clearance (CRCL); and (D) pharmacokinetic parameter correlation within each drug, CRCL, and pharmacokinetic parameter correlation between drugs. Method D produced a simulated patient population that best recapitulated the observed relationships between pharmacokinetic parameters in actual patients. Ceftazidime/avibactam PTA at MIC 8 mg/L (the susceptibility break point) and 16 mg/L ranged from 92.4% to 98.3% and 80.2% to 88.4%, respectively. PTA was lowest with method A, whereas PTA estimates were similar for all other methods. Compared with ignoring all pharmacokinetic parameter associations, the inclusion of covariate relationships and parameter correlation between both components of ceftazidime/avibactam leads to fewer patients with discordant pharmacokinetic parameters and results in higher PTA. Consideration of these methodologies should guide future MCS analyses for BL-BLIC.

Pharmacokinetics-pharmacodynamics of β-lactamase inhibitors: are we missing the target?

Introduction: β-lactamase production in Gram-negative bacteria is a leading cause of antimicrobial resistance. β-lactamase inhibitors are therapeutic agents used in combination with a partner antimicrobial to overcome the production of these enzymes and restore antimicrobial activity. To address the ongoing threat of multi-drug resistant bacteria, a recent wave of β-lactamase inhibitor development has occurred. Emphasis on the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of these agents is needed to optimize their clinical impact. Areas covered: This review will describe methods currently used to define the pharmacokinetics/pharmacodynamics of β-lactamase inhibitors. Minimal focus will be on the structure and mechanism of β-lactamase inhibitors. Emphasis will be placed on the use of specific thresholds to normalize β-lactamase inhibitor exposure. In vitro and in vivo pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic data specific to FDA approved and pipeline β-lactamase inhibitors will be explored. Expert opinion: Describing the exposure-response relationship of β-lactamase inhibitors is an ongoing challenge due to the dynamic relationship of the β-lactamase inhibitor with the active partner compound. Pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic indices and target exposures lack generalizability, as they are often specific to the infecting organism and/or β-lactamase, rather than β-lactamase inhibitor class. Selected dosage regimens of new agents should be validated via the use of population target attainment analyses.