In vitro antimicrobial activity of aztreonam alone and in combination against bacterial isolates from pediatric patients

Development of mechanism-based antibacterial synergy between Fmoc-phenylalanine hydrogel and aztreonam

Recently, fluorenylmethyloxycarbonyl (Fmoc) conjugated amino acids (Fmoc-AA), especially Fmoc-phenylalanine (Fmoc-F), have been discovered to have antimicrobial properties specific to Gram-positive bacteria including MRSA. Their weak antibacterial activity against Gram-negative bacteria is due to their inability to cross the bacterial membrane. Here in order to increase the antibacterial spectrum of Fmoc-F, we prepared a formulation of Fmoc-F with the Gram-negative specific antibiotic aztreonam (AZT). This formulation displayed antibacterial activity against both Gram-positive and Gram-negative bacteria and significantly reduced the bacterial load in a mouse wound infection model. The combination produced a synergistic effect and higher efficacy against P. aeruginosa due to the increased Fmoc-F permeability by AZT through the bacterial membrane. This combinatorial approach could be an effective strategy for other Fmoc-AA having a Gram-positive specific antibacterial effect for the better management of bacterial wound infections.

Synergistic, collaterally sensitive β-lactam combinations suppress resistance in MRSA

Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) is one of the most prevalent multidrug-resistant pathogens worldwide, exhibiting increasing resistance to the latest antibiotic therapies. Here we show that the triple β-lactam combination meropenem-piperacillin-tazobactam (ME/PI/TZ) acts synergistically and is bactericidal against MRSA subspecies N315 and 72 other clinical MRSA isolates in vitro and clears MRSA N315 infection in a mouse model. ME/PI/TZ suppresses evolution of resistance in MRSA via reciprocal collateral sensitivity of its constituents. We demonstrate that these activities also extend to other carbapenem-penicillin-β-lactamase inhibitor combinations. ME/PI/TZ circumvents the tight regulation of the mec and bla operons in MRSA, the basis for inducible resistance to β-lactam antibiotics. Furthermore, ME/PI/TZ subverts the function of penicillin-binding protein-2a (PBP2a) via allostery, which we propose as the mechanism for both synergy and collateral sensitivity. Showing in vivo activity similar to that of linezolid, ME/PI/TZ demonstrates that combinations of older β-lactam antibiotics could be effective against MRSA infections in humans.

Dual beta-lactam therapy for serious Gram-negative infections: is it time to revisit?

We are rapidly approaching a crisis in antibiotic resistance, particularly among Gram-negative pathogens. This, coupled with the slow development of novel antimicrobial agents, underscores the exigency of redeploying existing antimicrobial agents in innovative ways. One therapeutic approach that was heavily studied in the 1980s but abandoned over time is dual beta-lactam therapy. This article reviews the evidence for combination beta-lactam therapy. Overall, in vitro, animal and clinical data are positive and suggest that beta-lactam combinations produce a synergistic effect against Gram-negative pathogens that rivals that of beta-lactam-aminoglycoside or beta-lactam-fluoroquinolone combination therapy. Although the precise mechanism of improved activity is not completely understood, it is likely attributable to an enhanced affinity to the diverse penicillin-binding proteins found among Gram negatives. The collective data indicate that dual beta-lactam therapy should be revisited for serious Gram-negative infections, especially in light of the near availability of potent beta-lactamase inhibitors, which neutralize the effect of problematic beta-lactamases.

Systemic antibiotic agents

Understanding the breadth of systemic antimicrobial agents available for use by the dermatologist and their associated side-effect profiles and drug interactions allows the clinician to offer patients optimal care in the management of cutaneous infectious disease.

Carbapenems and monobactams: imipenem, meropenem, and aztreonam

Imipenem and meropenem, members of the carbapenem class of beta-lactam antibiotics, are among the most broadly active antibiotics available for systemic use in humans. They are active against streptococci, methicillin-sensitive staphylococci, Neisseria, Haemophilus, anaerobes, and the common aerobic gram-negative nosocomial pathogens including Pseudomonas. Resistance to imipenem and meropenem may emerge during treatment of P. aeruginosa infections, as has occurred with other beta-lactam agents; Stenotrophomonas maltophilia is typically resistant to both imipenem and meropenem. Like the penicillins, the carbapenems have inhibitory activity against enterococci. In general, the in vitro activity of imipenem against aerobic gram-positive cocci is somewhat greater than that of meropenem, whereas the in vitro activity of meropenem against aerobic gram-negative bacilli is somewhat greater than that of imipenem. Daily dosages may range from 0.5 to 1 g every 6 to 8 hours in patients with normal renal function; the daily dose of meropenem, however, can be safely increased to 6 g. Infusion-related nausea and vomiting, as well as seizures, which have been the main toxic effects of imipenem, occur no more frequently during treatment with meropenem than during treatment with other beta-lactam antibiotics. The carbapenems should be considered for treatment of mixed bacterial infections and aerobic gram-negative bacteria that are not susceptible to other beta-lactam agents. Indiscriminate use of these drugs will promote resistance to them. Aztreonam, the first marketed monobactam, has activity against most aerobic gram-negative bacilli including P. aeruginosa. The drug is not nephrotoxic, is weakly immunogenic, and has not been associated with disorders of coagulation. Aztreonam may be administered intramuscularly or intravenously; the primary route of elimination is urinary excretion. In patients with normal renal function, the recommended dosing interval is every 8 hours. Patients with renal impairment require dosage adjustment. Aztreonam is used primarily as an alternative to aminoglycosides and for the treatment of aerobic gram-negative infections. It is often used in combination therapy for mixed aerobic and anaerobic infections. Approved indications for its use include infections of the urinary tract or lower respiratory tract, intra-abdominal and gynecologic infections, septicemia, and cutaneous infections caused by susceptible organisms. Concurrent initial therapy with other antimicrobial agents is recommended before the causative organism has been determined in patients who are seriously ill or at risk for gram-positive or anaerobic infection.

Antimicrobial agents for the dermatologist. I. Beta-lactam antibiotics and related compounds

We review the newer antimicrobial agents that are being employed by dermatologists with increased frequency as well as some of the more commonly used older agents. Particular emphasis is based on selection factors such as causative pathogens and their resistance profiles, routes of administration, toxicity, drug interactions, and dosing requirements. Emphasis in this review is on the newer classes of antimicrobials such as third- and fourth-generation cephalosporins; beta-lactam, beta-lactamase inhibitor combination agents; monobactams; carbapenems; macrolides; and fluoroquinolones. Dermatologic indications and treatment alternatives are highlighted; this will expand the practicing clinician's therapeutic armamentarium and enable him/her to make rational decisions concerning treatment approaches to infectious disease problems encountered in daily practice.

The monobactams

The monobactam antibiotics are synthetic compounds, although monocyclic beta-lactam compounds have been found in nature in various soil bacteria. Although additional orally and parenterally administered monobactams are under investigation, the first marketed monobactam was aztreonam. This agent has an antimicrobial spectrum similar to that of gentamicin and tobramycin, aminoglycoside antibiotics. Aztreonam, however, is not nephrotoxic, is weakly immunogenic, and has not been associated with disorders of coagulation. Aztreonam may be administered intramuscularly or intravenously; absorption after oral administration is poor. The primary route of elimination is the urine. The serum half-life of the drug in patients with normal renal function is 1.5 to 2.1 hours; the recommended dosing interval in patients with normal renal function is every 8 hours. Dosage adjustment is necessary in patients with renal impairment. The strictly gram-negative aerobic spectrum of aztreonam limits its use as a single empiric agent. Approved indications for its use include infections of the urinary tract or lower respiratory tract, intra-abdominal and gynecologic infections, septicemia, and cutaneous infections caused by susceptible organisms. Concurrent initial therapy with other antimicrobial agents is recommended before the causative organism (or organisms) has been determined in patients who are seriously ill and at risk for gram-positive or anaerobic infections.

Overview of synergy with reference to double beta-lactam combinations

Combination antimicrobial therapy is used to expand the bacterial coverage over a single agent, to prevent the emergence of resistant organisms, to decrease toxicity by allowing lower doses of both agents, or for synergy. Synergy is one of the most common of these reasons, especially in serious infections. The introduction of new broad-spectrum beta-lactam antimicrobials has led to their combination in the treatment of seriously ill patients. Whereas a combination of an aminoglycoside and a beta-lactam antimicrobial is frequently synergistic, much less is known about synergy between combinations of beta-lactams. In vitro testing shows most combinations of two beta-lactams to be indifferent or additive in their effects; rarely does synergy occur. Antagonism can sometimes be seen, particularly with combinations involving cefoxitin or imipenem, especially if the treated organism is Enterobacter or Pseudomonas. Results of clinical trials comparing double beta-lactam (DBL) therapy with aminoglycoside/beta-lactam combinations show no difference in clinical response rates. Highly active DBL combinations may substitute for standard aminoglycoside-containing regimens in certain situations, even though they are not reliably synergistic. However, in the treatment of seriously ill patients such combinations may be less desirable.

[A comparative review of combination therapy: 2 beta-lactams versus beta-lactam plus aminoglycoside]

We have reviewed the available literature on the controlled use of combinations of beta-lactams in the treatment of fever in neutropenic patients, as compared to that of combinations of beta-lactams and aminoglycosides. We compared overall responses, responses in septicemia and various other infections, according to different pathogens and degree of neutropenia, and we evaluated toxicity. Overall, these results showed that response rates with combinations of two beta-lactams are similar to those obtained with combinations of a beta-lactam and an aminoglycoside for infections in immunocompromised patients with serious underlying diseases. They also suggest that the emergence of resistance of pathogens to beta-lactams has often been coped by the use of newer drugs in infections caused by Enterobacteriaceae, but much less effectively in the case of Pseudomonas aeruginosa infections. There are still other important theoretical reasons for preferring an aminoglycoside-containing combination for empiric therapy in febrile neutropenic patients, and our overall conclusion is that a large-scale study comparing beta-lactam combinations to the traditional beta-lactam plus aminoglycoside regimens is mandatory.

Pharmacologic considerations in drug therapy in foals

Rational drug therapy in the foal requires a sound knowledge of the pharmacodynamics and pharmacokinetics of various drugs as well as a thorough understanding of the physiologic differences that exist between the neonate and the adult and that may serve to alter drug disposition and, therefore, drug response. A summary of these physiologic factors with emphasis on the foal is presented and is followed by recommendations regarding the applied therapeutics of various antimicrobial agents.

Single-dose pharmacokinetics of aztreonam in children with cystic fibrosis

The single-dose pharmacokinetics of aztreonam was evaluated in 10 clinically stable subjects with cystic fibrosis. Each child received 30 mg aztreonam/kg intravenously over 2 to 3 minutes. Multiple timed blood samples were obtained over 8 hours for determination of aztreonam elimination kinetics; all urine excreted for 24 hours was collected in timed aliquots for the determination of aztreonam and its microbiologically inactive metabolite, SQ 26,992. Aztreonam pharmacokinetic parameters were determined by model-independent methods. Mean t1/2, steady-state volume distribution, and body clearance were 1.3 hr, 0.25 L/kg, and 127.2 ml/min/1.73m2, respectively. In 9 of the 10 subjects, two-compartment pharmacokinetic analysis was possible and compared favorably with model-independent parameter estimates. Twenty-four-hour urinary recovery of aztreonam was 76.3% of the administered dose; 2.6% was recovered as the metabolite SQ 26,992. The renal clearance of aztreonam averaged 92.5 ml/min/1.73m2. When these data are combined with in vitro susceptibility data for aztreonam against Pseudomonas aeruginosa isolated from the sputum of patients with cystic fibrosis, a dose of 200 mg aztreonam/kg/day divided six hourly would be predicted to maintain serum concentrations above the minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) for these organisms for the majority of the dosing interval.

Aztreonam therapy in neutropenic patients with cancer

Combinations of aztreonam/vancomycin, aztreonam/vancomycin/amikacin, and moxalactam/ticarcillin were compared in a prospective randomized trial as empiric therapy for febrile neutropenic cancer patients. Vancomycin was added to aztreonam to provide coverage against gram-positive organisms. Of 535 febrile episodes included in the study, 455 were evaluable. The aztreonam/vancomycin and aztreonam/vancomycin/amikacin combinations were both more effective than the moxalactam/ticarcillin combination in a total of 244 episodes of documented infection. The difference was due to the fact that both aztreonam-containing combinations were more effective than the moxalactam/ticarcillin combination in documented gram-positive infections. The three regimens were equally effective in 67 documented infections due to a single gram-negative bacterial species. (The response rates were 87, 86 and 94 percent for the aztreonam/vancomycin, aztreonam/vancomycin/amikacin, and moxalactam/ticarcillin combinations, respectively.) Aztreonam was effective as the single active antibiotic in the treatment of gram-negative infections in neutropenic patients; however, it must be used in combination with another antibiotic to provide gram-positive coverage.

Aminoglycosides plus beta-lactams against gram-negative organisms. Evaluation of in vitro synergy and chemical interactions

Combination antibiotic therapy has been used mainly to broaden the antibacterial spectrum and prevent the development of resistance. Antibiotic combinations proven to be synergistic in vitro are associated with a significantly better in vivo response, particularly in the compromised host in whom traditional treatment combines an antipseudomonal penicillin plus an aminoglycoside. Several investigators have examined combining new agents, such as the third-generation cephalosporins (cefotaxime, ceftriaxone, ceftizoxime, ceftazidime, cefoperazone, and moxalactam), aztreonam, or the ureidopenicillins, with amikacin. When compared with combinations of an older cephalosporin, carbenicillin or ticarcillin, plus gentamicin or tobramycin, these newer combinations produce higher rates of clinically meaningful synergy and rapid enhancement of in vitro bactericidal activity against the difficult-to-treat Enterobacteriaceae (i.e., Serratia, Citrobacter, Enterobacter, Providencia, and indole-positive Proteus species). This effect, without any evidence of antagonism, has been reported even for strains moderately or completely resistant to the former antibiotics. Unsatisfactory and unpredictable synergistic interactions against both resistant and susceptible strains of Pseudomonas aeruginosa--the most difficult nosocomial pathogen to treat--have been noted with combinations of tobramycin or gentamicin plus cefotaxime, moxalactam, or cefoperazone. Conversely, the use of amikacin plus various beta-lactams against multi-resistant strains is more frequently synergistic. Agents have been observed to exhibit such synergy in the following order of activity, from most to least synergistic: ceftazidime, ceftriaxone, moxalactam, aztreonam, cefotaxime, azlocillin, cefoperazone, cefsulodin, and carbenicillin. The combination of amikacin plus imipenem or ciprofloxacin against strains of P. aeruginosa resistant to the former and moderately resistant to the latter was recently reported to have a low probability of synergy; the combination of two of the newer beta-lactams had mostly an unpredictable or even antagonistic result. In vitro studies have also demonstrated that high concentrations of the antipseudomonal penicillins can inactivate the aminoglycosides. Among the latter compounds, the inactivation order, from most to least inactivated, was as follows: tobramycin, gentamicin, netilmicin, and amikacin. To date, the reports of aminoglycoside inactivation by the newer cephalosporins have been rather contradictory; only moxalactam has been shown produce a significant decrease in activity.

Comparative review of combination therapy: two beta-lactams versus beta-lactam plus aminoglycoside

Febrile neutropenic patients are usually treated with a combination of a beta-lactam and an aminoglycoside. Since Pseudomonas aeruginosa is an important pathogen in these patients, the empiric use of possibly synergistic combinations against that organism has been traditionally recommended. The recent appearance of beta-lactams more active against P. aeruginosa and the well-known nephrotoxicity of aminoglycosides have led some to advocate the use of beta-lactam combinations for empiric treatment of fever in neutropenic cancer patients. This article reviews the available literature on the controlled use of combinations of beta-lactams in the treatment of febrile neutropenic patients as compared with that of combinations of beta-lactams and aminoglycosides. The review includes comparison of overall response, response in patients with septicemia or other infections, response associated with different pathogens, the effect of profound neutropenia, and an evaluation of the toxicities encountered. Overall, these results show that response rates with a combination of two beta-lactams are similar to those obtained with the combinations of a beta-lactam and an aminoglycoside for infections in patients with serious underlying disease and compromised mechanisms of defense. They also suggest that the steady emergence of resistance of pathogens to beta-lactams has often been overcome by the use of newer drugs in regard to infections caused by the Enterobacteriaceae but much less effectively in regard to P. aeruginosa. There are still important theoretic reasons for preferring an aminoglycoside-containing combination as empiric therapy in febrile neutropenic patients, and our overall conclusion is that it would be appropriate to conduct a large-scale trial comparing beta-lactam combinations with the traditional beta-lactam plus aminoglycoside regimens in that setting.

Aztreonam. A review of its antibacterial activity, pharmacokinetic properties and therapeutic use

Aztreonam (azthreonam; SQ 26,776) is the first member of a new class of beta-lactam antibiotics, the monobactams. Aztreonam is selectively active against Gram-negative aerobic bacteria and inactive against Gram-positive bacteria. Thus, in vitro, aztreonam is inhibitory at low concentrations (MIC90 less than or equal to 1.6 mg/L) against Enterobacteriaceae except Enterobacter species, and is active against Pseudomonas aeruginosa, 90% of pseudomonads being inhibited by 12 to 32 mg/L. Aztreonam is inactive against Gram-positive aerobic bacteria and anaerobes, including Bacteroides fragilis. Therefore, when administered alone, aztreonam has minimal effect on indigenous faecal anaerobes. Aztreonam must be administered intravenously or intramuscularly when used to treat systemic infections, since absolute bioavailability is very low (about 1%) after oral administration. Since elimination half-life is less than 2 hours, 6- or 8-hourly administration is used in the treatment of moderately severe or severe infections, although 12-hourly injection is adequate in less severe systemic and some urinary tract infections. Therapeutic trials have shown aztreonam to be effective in Gram-negative infections including complicated infections of the urinary tract, in lower respiratory tract infections and in gynaecological and obstetric, intra-abdominal, joint and bone, skin and soft tissue infections, uncomplicated gonorrhoea and septicaemia. In comparisons with other antibiotics, aztreonam has been at least as effective or more effective than cefamandole in urinary tract infections and similar in efficacy to tobramycin or gentamicin. Where necessary, aztreonam and the standard drug have both been combined with another antibiotic active against Gram-positive and/or anaerobic bacteria. Aztreonam has been effective in eradicating pseudomonal infections in most patients (except in patients with cystic fibrosis), but the inevitably limited number of pseudomonal infections available for study prevents any conclusions as to the relative efficacy of aztreonam compared with other appropriate regimens against these infections. Thus, with an antibacterial spectrum which differs from that of other antibiotics, aztreonam should be a useful alternative to aminoglycosides or 'third generation' cephalosporins in patients with proven or suspected serious Gram-negative infections.

Evaluation of aztreonam in the treatment of severe bacterial infections

We investigated the clinical efficacy and safety of aztreonam in the treatment of 50 episodes of infection in 46 adult patients. The clinical condition of patients at the beginning of treatment was critical or poor in 28 of the episodes of infection. Episodes treated were 39 urinary tract infections (12 of them with concomitant bacteremia), 2 soft tissue infections, 8 patients with osteomyelitis (1 with concomitant bacteremia), and one episode of pneumonia. Significant isolated microorganisms were aerobic or facultative gram-negative rods and were responsible for the following episodes of infection (number of episodes): members of the family Enterobacteriaceae (49), Pseudomonas aeruginosa (5), and Haemophilus influenzae (1). The overall rate of clinical response to aztreonam was 94% of the treated episodes. Colonization or superinfection or both occurred in 29 episodes, but only 8 episodes required antimicrobial therapy. Aztreonam seems to be an effective single agent therapy for many bacterial infections. Colonization and superinfection by Candida sp., Streptococcus faecalis or Staphylococcus aureus must be monitored.

Antimicrobial combinations in the therapy of infections due to gram-negative bacilli

Antimicrobial combinations are used most frequently to provide broad-spectrum coverage; however, they are also frequently employed to enhance antimicrobial activity (synergism). Although there is extensive in vitro documentation of synergism for many antibiotic combinations, a clear advantage for these combinations has been difficult to demonstrate in clinical studies. Several types of combinations have been useful in clinical medicine and frequently result in synergism. These include combinations of a cell wall-active agent with an aminoglycosidic aminocyclitol, combinations of a beta-lactamase inhibitor with a beta-lactam, and combinations of agents that inhibit sequential steps in a metabolic pathway. Given its spectrum of activity, aztreonam will often be used with clindamycin or a beta-lactam antibiotic. Combinations of beta-lactams may be synergistic via several mechanisms. However, these combinations also exhibit significant potential for antagonism when used against gram-negative bacilli and, therefore, require careful evaluation prior to clinical use.

Aztreonam: the first monobactam

A novel screening procedure led to isolation of the structurally unique, bacterially produced, monocyclic beta-lactam antibiotics early in 1979. These naturally occurring "monobactams" were not clinically useful as antibiotics because of their poor antibacterial properties. They were, however, found to interact with certain penicillin-binding proteins of bacteria and thus to interfere with the biosynthesis of bacterial cell walls. The focus of monobactam development then turned toward increasing the binding activity of the beta-lactam ring of the molecule. Aztreonam was the first compound to emerge that fulfilled the objectives of the program. It is relatively inactive against gram-positive and anaerobic bacteria but is extremely effective against aerobic gram-negative bacteria, even in low concentrations. In addition, it is highly resistant to enzymatic hydrolysis by beta-lactamases and demonstrates a high degree of stability against plasmid-mediated gram-negative lactamases. With the chromosomally mediated beta-lactamases, on the other hand, aztreonam can act either as an inhibitor or as a poor substrate. It is unique in that it does not induce production of chromosomally mediated enzymes. Interference with normal gut flora by the use of broad-spectrum antibiotics can result in decreased defense capacity and can lead to intestinal colonization by resistant pathogenic organisms. Therapy directed specifically against the invading pathogen is thus preferred. Such directed therapy is provided by aztreonam. Its narrow spectrum can, if necessary, be broadened by combining it with other antibiotics while continuing to maintain an alternative to the more generalized "shotgun" therapy with its attendant side effects such as disturbances of the natural gut flora, diarrhea, and the emergence of resistant bacteria.