Absorption, disposition, and urinary metabolism of 14C-rifabutin in rats

Comparison of Compartmental and Non-Compartmental Analysis to Detect Biopharmaceutical Similarity of Intravenous Nanomaterial-Based Rifabutin Formulations

Pharmacometric analysis is often used to quantify the differences and similarities between formulation prototypes. In the regulatory framework, it plays a significant role in the evaluation of bioequivalence. While non-compartmental analysis provides an unbiased data evaluation, mechanistic compartmental models such as the physiologically-based nanocarrier biopharmaceutics model promise improved sensitivity and resolution for the underlying causes of inequivalence. In the present investigation, both techniques were applied to two nanomaterial-based formulations for intravenous injection, namely, albumin-stabilized rifabutin nanoparticles and rifabutin-loaded PLGA nanoparticles. The antibiotic rifabutin holds great potential for the treatment of severe and acute infections of patients co-infected with human immunodeficiency virus and tuberculosis. The formulations differ significantly in their formulation and material attributes, resulting in an altered biodistribution pattern as confirmed in a biodistribution study in rats. The albumin-stabilized delivery system further undergoes a dose-dependent change in particle size which leads to a small yet significant change in the in vivo performance. A second analysis was conducted comparing the dose fraction-scaled pharmacokinetic profiles of three dose levels of albumin-stabilized rifabutin nanoparticles. The dose strength affects both the nanomaterial-related absorption and biodistribution of the carrier as well as the drug-related distribution and elimination parameters, increasing the background noise and difficulty of detecting inequivalence. Depending on the pharmacokinetic parameter (e.g., AUC, C_max, Cl_obs), the relative (percentage) difference from the average observed using non-compartmental modeling ranged from 85% to 5.2%. A change in the formulation type (PLGA nanoparticles vs. albumin-stabilized rifabutin nanoparticles) resulted in a similar level of inequivalence as compared to a change in the dose strength. A mechanistic compartmental analysis using the physiologically-based nanocarrier biopharmaceutics model led to an average difference of 152.46% between the two formulation prototypes. Albumin-stabilized rifabutin nanoparticles tested at different dose levels led to a 128.30% difference, potentially due to changes in particle size. A comparison of different dose strengths of PLGA nanoparticles, on average, led to a 3.87% difference. This study impressively illustrates the superior sensitivity of mechanistic compartmental analysis when dealing with nanomedicines.

Rifabutin for infusion (BV100) for the treatment of severe carbapenem-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii infections

Rifamycin antibiotics were discovered during the 1950s, and their main representative, rifampicin, remains a cornerstone treatment for TB. The clinical use of rifamycin is restricted to mycobacteria and Gram-positive infections because of its poor ability to penetrate the Gram-negative outer membrane. Rifabutin, a rifamycin antibiotic approved for the prevention of Mycobacterium avium complex disease, makes an exception to this rule by hijacking the iron uptake system of Acinetobacter baumannii, resulting in potent activity against this important Gram-negative pathogen. Here, we describe recent findings on the specific activity of rifabutin and provide evidence of the need for the development of an intravenous formulation of rifabutin (BV100) for the treatment of difficult-to-treat carbapenem-resistant A.baumannii infections.

A Pharmacology Perspective of Simultaneous Tuberculosis and Hepatitis C Treatment

Tuberculosis (TB) and hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection are both major public health problems. Despite high rates of co-infection there is scarce literature addressing the convergence of the two diseases. One particularly unexplored area is the potential for simultaneous treatment of TB and HCV which would allow for leveraging an extensive global TB treatment infrastructure to help scale up HCV treatment. We review the drug metabolism of anti-TB and HCV drugs and the known and potential drug-drug interactions between recommended HCV regimens and individual anti-TB drugs. Rifampin is the only anti-TB drug to have been formally studied for potential drug interactions with anti-HCV direct-acting antivirals (DAAs) and existing data precludes these combinations. However, based on known pathways of drug metabolism and enzyme effects, the combination of HCV DAA regimens with all other anti-TB drugs may be feasible. Pharmacokinetic studies are needed next to help move co treatment regimens forward for clinical use among patients coinfected with TB and HCV.

Rifabutin: where do we stand in 2016?

Rifabutin is a spiro-piperidyl-rifamycin structurally closely related to rifampicin that shares many of its properties. We attempted to address the reasons why this drug, which was recently recognized as a WHO Essential Medicine, still had a far narrower range of indications than rifampicin, 24 years after its launch. In this comprehensive review of the classic and more recent rifabutin experimental and clinical studies, the current state of knowledge about rifabutin is depicted, relying on specific pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics, antimicrobial properties, resistance data and side effects compared with rifampicin. There are consistent in vitro data and clinical studies showing that rifabutin has at least equivalent activity/efficacy and acceptable tolerance compared with rifampicin in TB and non-tuberculous mycobacterial diseases. Clinical studies have emphasized the clinical benefits of low rifabutin liver induction in patients with AIDS under PIs, in solid organ transplant patients under immunosuppressive drugs or in patients presenting intolerable side effects related to rifampicin. The contribution of rifabutin for rifampicin-resistant, but rifabutin-susceptible, Mycobacterium tuberculosis isolates according to the present breakpoints has been challenged and is now controversial. Compared with rifampicin, rifabutin's lower AUC is balanced by higher intracellular penetration and lower MIC for most pathogens. Clinical studies are lacking in non-mycobacterial infections.

A hand-held apparatus for "nose-only" exposure of mice to inhalable microparticles as a dry powder inhalation targeting lung and airway macrophages

Microparticles containing isoniazid and rifabutin were aerosolised using a simple apparatus fabricated from a 15-ml centrifuge tube. The dose available for inhalation by rodents was determined by collecting microparticles emitted at the delivery port. The dose available for inhalation was proportional to durations of exposure ranging from 10 to 90 s (10.5-13.5 CV%) and the weight of powder taken for fluidization (10-50 mg, r2=0.982). The apparatus was then used to administer inhalations of microparticles to mice. Other groups of mice received free rifabutin orally, or by i.v. injection. Rifabutin was estimated in serum and tissues of dosed mice by HPLC. When approximately 20 mg of microparticles were loaded in the apparatus, approximately 2.5 mg were collected at the delivery port in 30 s of operation. Mice inhaled approximately 300 microg of the 2.5 mg emitted at the delivery port. Airway and lung macrophages of mice receiving inhalations for 30 s accumulated 0.38 microg of rifabutin, while the amount in blood serum of these mice was 0.62 microg. In mice receiving 83 microg rifabutin i.v. or orally, the intracellular amounts were 0.06 and 0.07 microg respectively, while the amounts in serum were 1.02 and 0.80 microg. These observations confirmed that inhalation of microparticles targeted airway and lung macrophages.

High-performance liquid chromatographic determination of 3'-hydroxy-5'-(4-isobutyl-1-piperazinyl)benzoxazinorifamycin (KRM-1648) and its deacetyl metabolite in plasma, whole blood, urine and tissue samples in rats

A reversed-phase high-performance liquid chromatographic method was developed for the determination of 3'-hydroxy-5'-(4-isobutyl-1-piperazinyl)benzoxazinorifamycin (KRM-1648, I), a new rifamycin derivative, and its 25-deacetyl metabolite (KRM-1671, II) in plasma, whole blood, tissues and urine from rats. I and II were coextracted with an internal standard from each sample matrix by solid-phase extraction (Bond Elut). Plasma and urine were directly loaded onto Bond Elut, while whole blood and tissues were homogenized and extracted with methanol or dichloromethane-chloroform prior to Bond Elut extraction. The extracts were chromatographed on Shim-pack CLC-ODS(M) using acetonitrile-0.02 M citrate buffer containing 0.1 M sodium perchlorate (2:1, v/v), and peaks were detected at 643 nm. The validation data showed that the assays for I and II in plasma, whole blood, tissues and urine were selective, accurate and reproducible.