Liposomal Rifabutin-A Promising Antibiotic Repurposing Strategy against Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus Infections

Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (M RSA) infections, in particular biofilm-organized bacteria, remain a clinical challenge and a serious health problem. Rifabutin (RFB), an antibiotic of the rifamycins class, has shown in previous work excellent anti-staphylococcal activity. Here, we proposed to load RFB in liposomes aiming to promote the accumulation of RFB at infected sites and consequently enhance the therapeutic potency. Two clinical isolates of MRSA, MRSA-C1 and MRSA-C2, were used to test the developed formulations, as well as the positive control, vancomycin (VCM). RFB in free and liposomal forms displayed high antibacterial activity, with similar potency between tested formulations. In MRSA-C1, minimal inhibitory concentrations (MIC) for Free RFB and liposomal RFB were 0.009 and 0.013 μg/mL, respectively. Minimum biofilm inhibitory concentrations able to inhibit 50% biofilm growth (MBIC50) for Free RFB and liposomal RFB against MRSA-C1 were 0.012 and 0.008 μg/mL, respectively. Confocal microscopy studies demonstrated the rapid internalization of unloaded and RFB-loaded liposomes in the bacterial biofilm matrix. In murine models of systemic MRSA-C1 infection, Balb/c mice were treated with RFB formulations and VCM at 20 and 40 mg/kg of body weight, respectively. The in vivo results demonstrated a significant reduction in bacterial burden and growth index in major organs of mice treated with RFB formulations, as compared to Control and VCM (positive control) groups. Furthermore, the VCM therapeutic dose was two fold higher than the one used for RFB formulations, reinforcing the therapeutic potency of the proposed strategy. In addition, RFB formulations were the only formulations associated with 100% survival. Globally, this study emphasizes the potential of RFB nanoformulations as an effective and safe approach against MRSA infections.

Antibiotic Adjuvant 4-Hexylresorcinol Enhances the Efficiency of Antituberculosis Drugs

We studied the possibility of using 4-hexylresorcinol to increase the efficiency of anti-mycobacterial chemotherapy. In an in vitro experiment, 4-hexylresorcinol increased the efficiency of rifampicin, kanamycin, and isoniazid against Mycobacterium smegmatis by 3-5 times. Experiments in sanitation of BALB/c mice infected with M. smegmatis showed the best efficacy of the isoniazid and 4-hexylresorcinol combination in comparison with isoniazid monotherapy. The growth-inhibiting activity of the combination of antibiotic rifabutin with 4-hexylresorcinol was shown on 6 strains of M. tuberculosis. A 2-fold decrease in the minimum inhibitory concentration of this antibiotic in the presence of half-minimum inhibitory concentration of 4-hexylresorcinol was demonstrated for monoresistant strain M. tuberculosis 5360/42Hr. On the mouse model of experimental tuberculosis caused by M. tuberculosis H37Rv, a 5-fold decrease in lung contamination and more rapid complete cure were achieved in animals treated with the combination of rifabutin and 4-hexylresorcinol in comparison with rifabutin monotherapy.

Exploring Alternative Treatment Choices for Multidrug-Resistant Clinical Strains of Helicobacter pylori in Mongolia

Helicobacter pylori is a pathogen related to severe diseases such as gastric cancer; because of rising antimicrobial-resistant strains, failure to eradicate H. pylori with antibiotics has increased worldwide. Multidrug-resistant H. pylori and gastric cancer is common in Mongolia; therefore, we aimed to explore alternative antimicrobial treatments and the genomes of resistant strains in this country. A total of 361 H. pylori strains isolated from patients in Mongolia were considered. Minimal inhibitory concentrations for two fluoroquinolones (ciprofloxacin and moxifloxacin), rifabutin, and furazolidone were determined via two-fold agar dilution. Genomic mutations in antibiotic-resistant strains were identified by next-generation sequencing using the Illumina Miseq platform and compared with genes from a reference H. pylori strain (26695). The resistance rate of H. pylori strains to quinolones was high (44% to ciprofloxacin and 42% to moxifloxacin), and resistance to rifabutin was low (0.5%); none were resistant to furazolidone. Most quinolone-resistant strains possessed gyrA gene mutations causing amino acid changes (e.g., N87K, A88P, and D91G/Y/N). While one rifabutin-resistant strain had amino acid-substituting mutations in rpoB (D530N and R701C), the other had three novel rpoB mutations; both rifabutin-resistant strains were sensitive to furazolidone. Overall, our findings suggest that rifabutin and/or furazolidone may be an alternative, effective H. pylori treatment in patients who have failed to respond to other treatment regimens.

Novel Drug-Drug Interaction of Potential Rifabutin-Induced Edoxaban Failure: A Case Report

Purpose: To report an incident of a breakthrough deep vein thrombosis (DVT) and potential example of a drug-drug interaction in a patient treated with edoxaban and rifabutin who was being treated for respiratory tuberculosis. Case: A 76-year-old male presented with anemia requiring transfusion and subsequent shortness of breath that was later diagnosed to be respiratory tuberculosis. He experienced a prolonged hospital stay due to persistently positive Mycobacterium tuberculosis respiratory samples and a complicated social situation that required continuous hospitalization for approximately five months. During his treatment the patient was transitioned from apixaban to edoxaban due to a drug-drug interaction with rifabutin. He subsequently had a DVT while on edoxaban after two months of therapy that would require him to transition to warfarin. Conclusion: This case represents an example of a potentially significant drug-drug interaction between edoxaban and rifabutin. Other direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) exhibit a potential drug-drug interaction that limit their effectiveness when used with rifamycins. This report describes the first known case of a patient experiencing a DVT after prolonged edoxaban use in combination with rifabutin. Treatment with DOACs for patients taking concomitant cytochrome P450 (CYP) inducers such as rifabutin may be more complicated than previously believed.

Rifabutin-Containing Triple Therapy Versus Bismuth Quadruple Therapy for Helicobacter pylori Rescue Treatment: A Multicenter, Randomized Controlled Trial

BACKGROUND

We compared the efficacy and safety of rifabutin-containing triple therapy with bismuth quadruple therapy for rescue treatment of Helicobacter pylori.

METHODS

This was a noninferiority study trial of H. pylori treatment for subjects who had failed at least 2 prior treatments. Subjects were randomly assigned to receive rifabutin triple therapy with 14-day esomeprazole (20 mg), amoxicillin (1.0 g), and rifabutin (150 mg) twice a day; or bismuth quadruple therapy with esomeprazole (20 mg) and bismuth (220 mg) twice a day, plus metronidazole (400 mg) and tetracycline (500 mg) 4 times a day. Antimicrobial susceptibility was assessed by agar dilution and E-test.

RESULTS

From May 2021 to October 2022, a total of 364 subjects were randomized. The eradication rates by intention-to-treat, per-protocol, and modified intention-to-treat were 89.0% (162/182; 95% confidence interval [CI], 83.6%-92.8%), 94.0% (157/167; 95% CI, 89.3%-96.7%), and 93.6% (162/173; 95% CI, 89.0%-96.4%) for rifabutin triple group. For bismuth quadruple group, they were 89.6% (163/182; 95% CI, 84.3%-93.2%), 95.3% (143/150; 95% CI, 90.7%-97.7%), and 93.7% (163/174; 95% CI, 89.0%-96.4%).

CONCLUSIONS

The rifabutin triple therapy is an alternative to classical bismuth quadruple therapy for the rescue treatment of H. pylori with fewer side effects and higher compliance.

CLINICAL TRIALS REGISTRATION

NCT04879992.

A Phase 1, Open-Label, Fixed-Sequence, Drug-Drug Interaction Study of Zanubrutinib with Rifabutin in Healthy Volunteers

Zanubrutinib is a second-generation Bruton tyrosine kinase inhibitor that is primarily metabolized by CYP3A enzymes. Previous drug-drug interaction (DDI) studies have demonstrated that co-administration of zanubrutinib with rifampin, a strong CYP3A inducer, reduces zanubrutinib plasma concentrations, potentially impacting activity. The impact of the co-administration of zanubrutinib with less potent CYP3A inducers is unclear. This phase 1, open-label, fixed-sequence DDI study evaluated the pharmacokinetics, safety, and tolerability of zanubrutinib when co-administered with steady-state rifabutin, a known CYP3A inducer less potent than rifampin, in 13 healthy male volunteers (NCT04470908). Co-administration of zanubrutinib with rifabutin resulted in a less than 2-fold reduction of zanubrutinib exposures. Overall, zanubrutinib was well tolerated. The results of this study provide useful information for the evaluation of the DDI between rifabutin and zanubrutinib. In conjunction with safety and efficacy data from other clinical studies, these results will be taken into consideration to determine the appropriate dose recommendation of zanubrutinib when co-administered with CYP3A inducers.

Using Dynamic Oral Dosing of Rifapentine and Rifabutin to Simulate Exposure Profiles of Long-Acting Formulations in a Mouse Model of Tuberculosis Preventive Therapy

Administration of tuberculosis preventive therapy (TPT) to individuals with latent tuberculosis infection is an important facet of global tuberculosis control. The use of long-acting injectable (LAI) drug formulations may simplify and shorten regimens for this indication. Rifapentine and rifabutin have antituberculosis activity and physiochemical properties suitable for LAI formulation, but there are limited data available for determining the target exposure profiles required for efficacy in TPT regimens. The objective of this study was to determine exposure-activity profiles of rifapentine and rifabutin to inform development of LAI formulations for TPT. We used a validated paucibacillary mouse model of TPT in combination with dynamic oral dosing of both drugs to simulate and understand exposure-activity relationships to inform posology for future LAI formulations. This work identified several LAI-like exposure profiles of rifapentine and rifabutin that, if achieved by LAI formulations, could be efficacious as TPT regimens and thus can serve as experimentally determined targets for novel LAI formulations of these drugs. We present novel methodology to understand the exposure-response relationship and inform the value proposition for investment in development of LAI formulations that have utility beyond latent tuberculosis infection.

CRISPR Interference-Based Inhibition of MAB_0055c Expression Alters Drug Sensitivity in Mycobacterium abscessus

There is an unmet medical need for effective treatments against Mycobacterium abscessus infections. Although advanced molecular genetic tools to validate drug targets and resistance of M. abscessus exist, the practical design and construction of plasmids are relatively laborious and time-consuming. Thus, for this purpose, we used CRISPR interference (CRISPRi) combined with catalytically deactivated Cas9 to inhibit the gene expression of a predicted LysR-type transcriptional regulator gene, MAB_0055c, in M. abscessus and evaluated its contribution to the development of drug resistance. Our results showed that silencing the MAB_0055c gene lead to increased rifamycin susceptibility depending on the hydroquinone moiety. These results demonstrate that CRISPRi is an excellent approach for studying drug resistance in M. abscessus. IMPORTANCE In this study, we utilized CRISPR interference (CRISPRi) to specifically target the MAB_0055c gene in M. abscessus, a bacterium that causes difficult-to-treat infections. The study found that silencing the gene lead to increased rifabutin and rifalazil susceptibility. This study is the first to establish a link between the predicted LysR-type transcriptional regulator gene and antibiotic resistance in mycobacteria. These findings underscore the potential of using CRISPRi as a tool for elucidating resistance mechanisms, essential drug targets, and drug mechanisms of action, which could pave the way for more effective treatments for M. abscessus infections. The results of this study could have important implications for the development of new therapeutic options for this challenging-to-treat bacterial infection.

Design and in vitro assessment of chitosan nanocapsules for the pulmonary delivery of rifabutin

Tuberculosis (TB) is a life-threatening disease and a main cause of death worldwide. It mainly affects the lungs, and it is attributed to the infection with Mycobacterium tuberculosis (MTB). Current treatments consist of the oral administration of combinations of antibiotics including rifabutin, in high doses and for long periods of time. These therapeutic regimens are associated with many side effects and high rates of drug resistance. To overcome these problems, this study aims at developing a nanosystem for the improved delivery of antibiotics, with potential application in pulmonary delivery. Chitosan-based nanomaterials are widely used in biomedical applications, due to their biodegradability and biocompatibility, as well as their potential antimicrobial effects and lack of toxicity. In addition, this polymer is particularly attractive for mucosal delivery due to its bioadhesive properties. Therefore, the structure of the proposed nanocarrier consists of a chitosan shell and a lipid core with a combination of different oils and surfactants to allow optimal association of the hydrophobic drug rifabutin. These nanocapsules were characterized in terms of size, polydispersity index, surface charge, morphology, encapsulation efficiency and biological stability. The release kinetics of the drug-loaded nanostructures was evaluated in simulated lung media. Moreover, in vitro studies in different cell models (A549 and Raw 264.7 cells) demonstrated the safety of the nanocapsules as well as their efficient internalization. An antimicrobial susceptibility test was performed to evaluate the efficacy of the rifabutin-loaded nanocapsules against Mycobacterium phlei. This study indicated complete inhibition for antibiotic concentrations within the expected susceptibility range of Mycobacterium (≤ 0.25-16 mg/L).

Efficacy of Omadacycline-Containing Regimen in a Mouse Model of Pulmonary Mycobacteroides abscessus Disease

Mycobacteroides abscessus is an opportunistic pathogen in people with structural lung conditions such as bronchiectasis, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, and cystic fibrosis. Pulmonary M. abscessus infection causes progressive symptomatic and functional decline as well as diminished lung function and is often incurable with existing antibiotics. We investigated the efficacy of a new tetracycline, omadacycline, in combination with existing antibiotics recommended to treat this indication, in a mouse model of M. abscessus lung disease. Amikacin, azithromycin, bedaquiline, biapenem, cefoxitin, clofazimine, imipenem, linezolid, and rifabutin were selected as companions to omadacycline. M. abscessus burden in the lungs of mice over a 4-week treatment duration was considered the endpoint. Omadacycline in combination with linezolid, imipenem, cefoxitin, biapenem, or rifabutin exhibited early bactericidal activity compared to any single drug. Using three M. abscessus isolates, we also determined the in vitro frequency of spontaneous resistance against omadacycline to be between 1.9 × 10-10 and 6.2 × 10-10 and the frequency of persistence against omadacycline to be between 5.3 × 10-6 and 1.3 × 10-5. Based on these findings, the combination of omadacycline and select drugs that are included in the recent treatment guidelines may exhibit improved potency to treat M. abscessus lung disease. IMPORTANCE M. abscessus disease incidence is increasing in the United States. This disease is difficult to cure with existing antibiotics. In this study, we describe the efficacy of a new tetracycline antibiotic, omadacycline, in combination with an existing antibiotic to treat this disease. A mouse model of M. abscessus lung disease was used to assess the efficacies of these experimental treatment regimens. Omadacycline in combination with select existing antibiotics exhibited bactericidal activity during the early phase of treatment.

Comparison of Compartmental and Non-Compartmental Analysis to Detect Biopharmaceutical Similarity of Intravenous Nanomaterial-Based Rifabutin Formulations

Pharmacometric analysis is often used to quantify the differences and similarities between formulation prototypes. In the regulatory framework, it plays a significant role in the evaluation of bioequivalence. While non-compartmental analysis provides an unbiased data evaluation, mechanistic compartmental models such as the physiologically-based nanocarrier biopharmaceutics model promise improved sensitivity and resolution for the underlying causes of inequivalence. In the present investigation, both techniques were applied to two nanomaterial-based formulations for intravenous injection, namely, albumin-stabilized rifabutin nanoparticles and rifabutin-loaded PLGA nanoparticles. The antibiotic rifabutin holds great potential for the treatment of severe and acute infections of patients co-infected with human immunodeficiency virus and tuberculosis. The formulations differ significantly in their formulation and material attributes, resulting in an altered biodistribution pattern as confirmed in a biodistribution study in rats. The albumin-stabilized delivery system further undergoes a dose-dependent change in particle size which leads to a small yet significant change in the in vivo performance. A second analysis was conducted comparing the dose fraction-scaled pharmacokinetic profiles of three dose levels of albumin-stabilized rifabutin nanoparticles. The dose strength affects both the nanomaterial-related absorption and biodistribution of the carrier as well as the drug-related distribution and elimination parameters, increasing the background noise and difficulty of detecting inequivalence. Depending on the pharmacokinetic parameter (e.g., AUC, C_max, Cl_obs), the relative (percentage) difference from the average observed using non-compartmental modeling ranged from 85% to 5.2%. A change in the formulation type (PLGA nanoparticles vs. albumin-stabilized rifabutin nanoparticles) resulted in a similar level of inequivalence as compared to a change in the dose strength. A mechanistic compartmental analysis using the physiologically-based nanocarrier biopharmaceutics model led to an average difference of 152.46% between the two formulation prototypes. Albumin-stabilized rifabutin nanoparticles tested at different dose levels led to a 128.30% difference, potentially due to changes in particle size. A comparison of different dose strengths of PLGA nanoparticles, on average, led to a 3.87% difference. This study impressively illustrates the superior sensitivity of mechanistic compartmental analysis when dealing with nanomedicines.

Using dynamic oral dosing of rifapentine and rifabutin to simulate exposure profiles of long-acting formulations in a mouse model of tuberculosis preventive therapy

Administration of tuberculosis preventive therapy (TPT) to individuals with latent tuberculosis infection is an important facet of global tuberculosis control. The use of long-acting injectable (LAI) drug formulations may simplify and shorten regimens for this indication. Rifapentine and rifabutin have anti-tuberculosis activity and physiochemical properties suitable for LAI formulation, but there are limited data available for determining the target exposure profiles required for efficacy in TPT regimens. The objective of this study was to determine exposure-activity profiles of rifapentine and rifabutin to inform development of LAI formulations for TPT. We utilized a validated paucibacillary mouse model of TPT in combination with dynamic oral dosing of both drugs to simulate and understand exposure-activity relationships to inform posology for future LAI formulations. This work identified several LAI-like exposure profiles of rifapentine and rifabutin that, if achieved by LAI formulations, could be efficacious as TPT regimens and thus can serve as experimentally-determined targets for novel LAI formulations of these drugs. We present novel methodology to understand the exposure-response relationship and inform the value proposition for investment in development of LAI formulations that has utility beyond latent tuberculosis infection.

Drug-drug interaction between rifabutin and dolutegravir: A population pharmacokinetic model

Rifampicin, a potent enzyme inducer, causes marked reduction of dolutegravir exposure. Rifabutin, a less potent enzyme inducer, may offer an alternative to rifampicin. We aimed to characterize the population pharmacokinetics of dolutegravir when co-administered with rifabutin. We extended an existing dolutegravir model to include data from volunteers co-administered with dolutegravir 50 mg and rifabutin 300 mg once daily. We ran simulations of dolutegravir with and without rifabutin co-administration and compare dolutegravir trough concentrations with the IC90 and EC90 of 0.064 and 0.3 mg/L, respectively. Rifabutin decreased dolutegravir's volume of distribution by 33.1% (95% confidence interval 25.1%-42.3%) but did not affect the area under the concentration-time curve. Simulations showed that when 50 mg dolutegravir is co-administered with rifabutin once daily, the probability to attain trough concentrations above the IC90 of 0.064 mg/L is more than 99%. Therefore, there is no need for dolutegravir dose adjustment. Rifabutin may offer an alternative to rifampicin for the treatment of HIV/tuberculosis co-infected individuals.

Successful Anticoagulation With Warfarin After Switching From Rifampin to Rifabutin

PURPOSE

A case of a patient receiving warfarin for pulmonary embolism (PE) concomitantly with rifampin for treatment of active pulmonary tuberculosis (PTB) is presented. A successful clinical intervention whereby the patient achieved therapeutic anticoagulation after switching to an alternative rifamycin antibacterial, rifabutin, is described.

SUMMARY

The drug-drug interaction between warfarin and rifampin is well known and documented. However, to our knowledge, no case reports of the interaction between warfarin and rifabutin have been published, and literature describing this interaction is lacking. We describe the case of a 27-year-old African American female referred to a pharmacist-managed anticoagulation clinic for treatment of PE with warfarin. The patient was also being treated for active tuberculosis with rifampin, isoniazid, pyrazinamide, and ethambutol. Warfarin was initiated and over the course of 1 month was continuously increased to a total weekly dose (TWD) of 140 mg without ever achieving the target international normalized ratio (INR) of 2 to 3. In an attempt to reach the target INR, rifampin was switched to rifabutin to minimize the drug-drug interaction with warfarin. Six days after this switch, the target INR was achieved with a lower warfarin TWD of 115 mg. Rifabutin interacts with warfarin to a lesser degree than rifampin and may be considered as an alternative in patients taking warfarin who require treatment with a rifamycin.

CONCLUSION

For patients in whom therapeutic anticoagulation with warfarin has been difficult, the use of rifabutin may be considered in place of rifampin when the concomitant use of a rifamycin is required.

The Inappropriateness of Using Rifampicin E-Test to Predict Rifabutin Resistance in Helicobacter pylori

BACKGROUND

The aim of this study was to evaluate the rifamycin cross-resistance in Helicobacter pylori, and whether the use of rifampicin E-test strips to screen H. pylori rifabutin resistance is appropriate.

METHODS

A total of 89 H. pylori isolates were included. Rifampicin minimum inhibitory concentrations (MICs) were obtained by E-test, while the MICs for rifapentine, rifaximin, and rifabutin were determined by agar dilution method. The rifamycin resistance rates based on different breakpoints were compared. Isolates with high-level rifampicin resistance were subjected to whole-genome sequencing.

RESULTS

A wide distribution of MICs (mostly in the range 0.125-8 mg/L) was observed for rifampicin, rifapentine, and rifaximin. Using MIC >1, ≥ 4, and > 4 mg/L as the breakpoints, resistance rates to rifampicin/rifapentine/rifaximin were 60.4%/48.3%/38.2%, 28.1%/25.8%/23.6%, and 15.7%/16.9%/7.9%, respectively. However, the rifabutin MICs of all the tested H. pylori isolates were extremely low (≤0.016 mg/L). Applying MIC ≥ 0.125 mg/L as the breakpoint, rifabutin resistance was nil. No mutation was found in the rpoB gene sequences of the 2 isolates with high-level rifampicin resistance.

CONCLUSIONS

There is a lack of cross-resistance between rifabutin and other rifamycins in H. pylori. The use of rifampicin E-test to predict H. pylori rifabutin resistance is inappropriate.

Mycobacterium abscessus HelR interacts with RNA polymerase to confer intrinsic rifamycin resistance

Rifampicin (RIF), the frontline drug against M. tuberculosis, is completely ineffective against M. abscessus, partially due to the presence of an ADP-ribosyltransferase (Arr) that inactivates RIF. Using RNA-seq, we show that exposure of M. abscessus to sublethal doses of RIF and Rifabutin (RBT), a close analog of RIF, results in an ∼25-fold upregulation of Mab_helR in laboratory and clinical isolates. An isogenic deletion in Mab_helR results in RIF/RBT hypersensitivity, and overexpression of Mab_helR confers RIF tolerance in M. tuberculosis. We demonstrate an increased HelR-RNAP association in RIF-exposed bacteria and a MabHelR-mediated dissociation of RNAP from stalled initiation complexes in vitro. Finally, we show that the tip of the PCh-loop of Mab_helR, present in proximity to RIF, is critical for conferring RIF resistance but dispensable for dissociation of stalled RNAP complexes, suggesting that HelR-mediated RIF resistance requires a step in addition to displacement of RIF-stalled RNAP.

C25-modified rifamycin derivatives with improved activity against Mycobacterium abscessus

Infections caused by Mycobacterium abscessus are difficult to treat due to its intrinsic resistance to most antibiotics. Formation of biofilms and the capacity of M. abscessus to survive inside host phagocytes further complicate eradication. Herein, we explored whether addition of a carbamate-linked group at the C25 position of rifamycin SV blocks enzymatic inactivation by Arr_Mab, an ADP-ribosyltransferase conferring resistance to rifampicin (RMP). Unlike RMP, 5j, a benzyl piperidine rifamycin derivative with a morpholino substituted C3 position and a naphthoquinone core, is not modified by purified Arr_Mab. Additionally, we show that the Arr_Mab D82 residue is essential for catalytic activity. Thermal profiling of Arr_Mab in the presence of 5j, RMP, or rifabutin shows that 5j does not bind to Arr_Mab. We found that the activity of 5j is comparable to amikacin against M. abscessus planktonic cultures and pellicles. Critically, 5j also exerts potent antimicrobial activity against M. abscessus in human macrophages and shows synergistic activity with amikacin and azithromycin.

Differential Impact of the rpoB Mutant on Rifampin and Rifabutin Resistance Signatures of Mycobacterium tuberculosis Is Revealed Using a Whole-Genome Sequencing Assay

Drug resistance in Mycobacterium tuberculosis (MTB) has long been a serious health issue worldwide. Most drug-resistant MTB isolates were identified due to treatment failure or in clinical examinations 3~6 months postinfection. In this study, we propose a whole-genome sequencing (WGS) pipeline via the Nanopore MinION platform to facilitate the efficacy of phenotypic identification of clinical isolates. We used the Nanopore MinION platform to perform WGS of clinical MTB isolates, including susceptible (n = 30) and rifampin- (RIF) or rifabutin (RFB)-resistant isolates (n = 20) according to results of a susceptibility test. Nonsynonymous variants within the rpoB gene associated with RIF resistance were identified using the WGS analytical pipeline. In total, 131 variants within the rpoB gene in RIF-resistant isolates were identified. The presence of the emergent Asp531Gly or His445Gln was first identified to be associated with the rifampin and rifabutin resistance signatures of clinical isolates. The results of the minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) test further indicated that the Ser450Leu or the mutant within the rifampin resistance-determining region (RRDR)-associated rifabutin-resistant signature was diminished in the presence of novel mutants, including Phe669Val, Leu206Ile, or Met148Leu, identified in this study.

IMPORTANCE Current approaches to diagnose drug-resistant MTB are time-consuming, consequently leading to inefficient intervention or further disease transmission. In this study, we curated lists of coding variants associated with differential rifampin and rifabutin resistant signatures using a single molecule real-time (SMRT) sequencing platform with a shorter hands-on time. Accordingly, the emerging WGS pipeline constitutes a potential platform for efficacious and accurate diagnosis of drug-resistant MTB isolates.

Efficacy and safety of low-dose rifabutin-based 7-day triple therapy as a third- or later-line Helicobacter pylori eradication regimen

BACKGROUND

Rifabutin-based regimens are used as rescue therapy for refractory Helicobacter pylori infection; however, the duration for which treatment is required and side effects are concerning. This study assessed the efficacy and safety of 7-day rifabutin, amoxicillin, and vonoprazan triple therapy as third- or later-line treatment for H. pylori infection.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Patients who did not respond to second-line therapy were enrolled. After H. pylori infection was confirmed with the culture method, the patients received rifabutin-containing triple therapy (20 mg vonoprazan b.i.d., 500 mg amoxicillin q.i.d., and 150 mg rifabutin q.d.) for 7 days. Twelve weeks after the eradication therapy, successful eradication was confirmed using a ¹³ C urea breath test or the H. pylori stool antigen test. The results obtained from our previous study that reported a 10-day or 14-day esomeprazole based rifabutin-containing triple therapy as a third- or fourth-line rescue therapy treated patients were used as historical control. We determined the minimum inhibitory concentrations of amoxicillin and rifabutin. We also evaluated whether the patients were positive for the mutation of the rpoB gene.

RESULTS

Intention-to-treat and per-protocol analyses showed that our regimen resulted in a high eradication rate (91.2%, 95% CI: 84%-99% and 92.7%, 95% CI: 86%-100%, respectively). Adverse events occurred in 31.6% of the patients, and two patients discontinued the therapy.

CONCLUSIONS

This is the first study to evaluate the efficacy and safety of a 7-day low-dose rifabutin-based triple therapy with vonoprazan and amoxicillin. Our results suggest that our regimen was effective and safe as a third- or later-line H. pylori eradication regimen. To clarify what component in this regimen are critical, subsequent studies using a factorial design (comparing vonoprazan-amoxicillin dual therapy vs. vonoprazan-rifabutin triple therapy) will be needed.

Drug-level change and optimal dose adjustment of tacrolimus with the use of rifabutin for treating mycobacterial disease in solid organ transplant recipients

BACKGROUND

Little is known about the change in drug level and the need for dose adjustment of calcineurin inhibitor when it is used with rifabutin in solid organ transplant (SOT) recipients. We aimed to analyze whether the drug level of tacrolimus significantly reduced after the use of rifabutin and to assess optimal adjustment of tacrolimus dose in SOT recipients.

METHODS

Of the SOT recipients in a tertiary referral center in South Korea in 2000-2019, 50 patients who maintained an unchanged dose of tacrolimus after the use of rifabutin for treating mycobacterial disease were enrolled. Their medical records were reviewed retrospectively.

RESULTS

The mean age of the patients was 53.9 ± 11.5 years. The most commonly transplanted organ was the liver (66.0%). The most common indication of rifabutin use was for treating active tuberculosis (78.0%). After rifabutin initiation, the trough level of tacrolimus decreased significantly to the subtherapeutic range in 38 (76.0%) patients. The drug levels of these 38 patients dropped from 7.2 to 3.8 ng/mL (p < 0.001) after rifabutin treatment. In these patients, the median 1.5-fold increase in the tacrolimus dose was required to restore the drug level to the within-therapeutic range.

CONCLUSIONS

These findings indicate that careful tacrolimus drug-level monitoring and dose adjustment are necessary for most SOT recipients when rifabutin is administered for the treatment of mycobacterial disease. This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.

A Case Series of Rifabutin Use in Staphylococcal Prosthetic Infections

This case series describes seven patients who received rifabutin in place of rifampin combined with conventional antimicrobial therapy for treatment of hardware-associated staphylococcal infections. Infection recurrence, defined as need for unplanned surgical intervention within the evaluable follow up period after starting rifabutin, occurred in two patients. Two patients experienced possible treatment-associated adverse effects. Findings support future work to examine rifabutin use, when rifampin is not suitable, for adjunctive treatment of staphylococcal hardware infections. IMPORTANCE This work evaluates real-world data and clinical outcomes when rifabutin is used in place of rifampin for adjunctive management of staphylococcal hardware-associated infections. This is the second case study looking at this specific use of rifabutin, signifying the current lack of clinical data in this area. Assessing use of rifabutin in this capacity is clinically important given its lower propensity for drug interactions compared to rifampin.

In Vitro Activity of Rifabutin against Mycobacterium abscessus, Including Clarithromycin-Insusceptible Multidrug-Resistant Clinical Isolates

The antibiotic options available for Mycobacterium abscessus (M. abscessus) infection are limited and no definitive therapeutic strategies have been formulated. The recent discovery that rifabutin is active against M. abscessus has raised interest in using rifabutin to treat this intractable disease. In this study, we evaluated the in vitro activity of rifabutin against 194 M. abscessus clinical isolates collected during 2012 January to 2017 December. As respected, rifabutin demonstrated considerably lower MICs against M. abscessus, with an MIC₅₀ of 2μg/ml and MIC₉₀ of 4μg/ml, respectively. Notably, the anti-M.abscessus activity was even stronger among clarithromycin-insusceptible strains. In addition, M. abscessus isolates with a rough morphotype were more sensitive to rifabutin compared with those forming smooth colonies when considered as a whole or in separate subspecies. Results from synergistic experiments revealed that the in vitro activity of rifabutin was significantly enhanced by the addition of amikacin, suggesting a promising strategy for M. abscessus infection combination treatment. Finally, five and three mutation patterns in rpoB and arr, respectively, were identified among the 194 strains through whole genome sequencing. However, none of them conferred rifabutin resistance. Our study is among the first to report the susceptibility of M. abscessus to rifabutin in vitro with a large amount of clinical isolates, suggesting that rifabutin is active, both alone and in combination, against M. abscessus and is worth considering as part of a combination treatment regimen for M. abscessus infections.

Novel Regimens of Bedaquiline-Pyrazinamide Combined with Moxifloxacin, Rifabutin, Delamanid and/or OPC-167832 in Murine Tuberculosis Models

A recent landmark trial showed a 4-month regimen of rifapentine, pyrazinamide, moxifloxacin, and isoniazid (PZMH) to be noninferior to the 6-month standard of care. Here, two murine models of tuberculosis were used to test whether novel regimens replacing rifapentine and isoniazid with bedaquiline and another drug would maintain or increase the sterilizing activity of the regimen. In BALB/c mice, replacing rifapentine in the PZM backbone with bedaquiline (i.e., BZM) significantly reduced both lung CFU counts after 1 month and the proportion of mice relapsing within 3 months after completing 1.5 months of treatment. The addition of rifabutin to BZM (BZMRb) further increased the sterilizing activity. In the C3HeB/FeJ mouse model characterized by caseating lung lesions, treatment with BZMRb resulted in significantly fewer relapses than PZMH after 2 months of treatment. A regimen combining the new DprE1 inhibitor OPC-167832 and delamanid (BZOD) also had superior bactericidal and sterilizing activity compared to PZM in BALB/c mice and was similar in efficacy to PZMH in C3HeB/FeJ mice. Thus, BZM represents a promising backbone for treatment-shortening regimens. Given the prohibitive drug-drug interactions between bedaquiline and rifampin or rifapentine, the BZMRb regimen represents the best opportunity to combine, in one regimen, the treatment-shortening potential of the rifamycin class with that of BZM and deserves high priority for evaluation in clinical trials. Other 4-drug BZM-based regimens and BZOD represent promising opportunities for extending the spectrum of treatment-shortening regimens to rifamycin- and fluoroquinolone-resistant tuberculosis.

Experience with Rifabutin-Containing Therapy in 500 Patients from the European Registry on Helicobacter pylori Management (Hp-EuReg)

BACKGROUND

First-line Helicobacter pylori (H. pylori) treatments have been relatively well evaluated; however, it remains necessary to identify the most effective rescue treatments. Our aim was to assess the effectiveness and safety of H. pylori regimens containing rifabutin.

METHODS

International multicentre prospective non-interventional European Registry on H. pylori Management (Hp-EuReg). Patients treated with rifabutin were registered in AEG-REDCap e-CRF from 2013 to 2021. Modified intention-to-treat and per-protocol analyses were performed. Data were subject to quality control.

RESULTS

Overall, 500 patients included in the Hp-EuReg were treated with rifabutin (mean age 52 years, 72% female, 63% with dyspepsia, 4% with peptic ulcer). Culture was performed in 63% of cases: dual resistance (to both clarithromycin and metronidazole) was reported in 46% of the cases, and triple resistance (to clarithromycin, metronidazole, and levofloxacin) in 39%. In 87% of cases rifabutin was utilised as part of a triple therapy together with amoxicillin and a proton-pump-inhibitor, and in an additional 6% of the patients, bismuth was added to this triple regimen. Rifabutin was mainly used in second-line (32%), third-line (25%), and fourth-line (27%) regimens, achieving overall 78%, 80% and 66% effectiveness by modified intention-to-treat, respectively. Compliance with treatment was 89%. At least one adverse event was registered in 26% of the patients (most frequently nausea), and one serious adverse event (0.2%) was reported in one patient with leukopenia and thrombocytopenia with fever requiring hospitalisation.

CONCLUSION

Rifabutin-containing therapy represents an effective and safe strategy after one or even several failures of H. pylori eradication treatment.

Pharmacokinetic features of dolutegravir with rifampicin and rifabutin among patients coinfected with human immunodeficiency virus and tuberculosis/mycobacterium avium complex

BACKGROUND

Rifamycins are the cornerstone of anti-tuberculosis therapy while they are potent inducers of drug metabolizing enzymes. For the first time, we evaluated the effect of rifampicin (RIF) and rifabutin (RBT) on the pharmacokinetics (PK) of dolutegravir (DTG) in patients with HIV and tuberculosis (TB)/ mycobacterium avium complex (MAC) co-infection.

METHODS

Both HIV/TB (or MAC) co-infected patients and HIV infected patients without TB/MAC were enrolled. Patients in the RIF group received DTG 50 mg twice daily together with 600mg of RIF, while patients in the RBT group received DTG 50 mg once daily together with 300 mg of RBT. The DTG pharmacokinetic profiles in different groups were assessed.

RESULTS

A total of 13 subjects in the RIF group, 12 subjects in the RBT group, and 10 subjects in non-TB/MAC group were enrolled. The geometric mean ratio (GMR) of the trough concentration (Ctr) of DTG in the RIF group to non-TB/MAC group was 1.33 [90% confidence interval (CI):0.97 to 1.81], while the GMR of the maximum concentration (Cmax) of DTG was 1.29 (90% CI: 1.23 to 1.36). The GMR of the Ctr of DTG in the RBT group to non-TB/MAC group was 0.41 (90% CI: 0.30 to 0.57), while the GMR of the Cmax of DTG was 0.55 (90% CI: 0.52 to 0.57).

CONCLUSIONS

Due to the relatively low trough concentrations of DTG with RBT, DTG 50mg once daily together with RBT could only serve as an alternative option for HIV/TB (or MAC) co-infected patients.

Effect of Rifabutin in Dolutegravir Dosing: A Case Series

Background: Tuberculosis (TB) is the leading cause of death in human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)-infected people worldwide. Currently there are no studies examining the use of Rifabutin (RBN) and Dolutegravir (DTG) in co-infected persons. This is a case series of 4 co-infected patients receiving both agents who underwent Pharmacokinetic (PK) analysis. Methods and Results: This is a retrospective chart review study of four patients diagnosed with both HIV and TB, receiving RBN and DTG and undergoing therapeutic drug monitoring. All 4 cases had lower than expected DTG concentrations at least once, including those on the current recommended dose of DTG with RBN, and even those receiving higher doses. Conclusions: Given the frequency of low DTG and RBN concentrations, therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) for these drugs is advisable. Prospective clinical studies are needed to further determine the PK interactions between RBN and DTG, and virologic response to treatment.

In Vitro Activity of Rifabutin and Rifampin against Antibiotic-Resistant Acinetobacter baumannii, Escherichia coli, Staphylococcus aureus, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, and Klebsiella pneumoniae

We recently reported that the antimicrobial activity of rifabutin against Acinetobacter baumannii is best modeled by the use of RPMI for in vitro susceptibility testing. Here, we define the effects of medium on the susceptibility and frequency of resistance emergence in a panel of A. baumannii, Escherichia coli, Staphylococcus aureus, Klebsiella pneumoniae, and Pseudomonas aeruginosa clinical isolates. Only A. baumannii was hypersusceptible to rifabutin in vitro and in vivo using a Galleria mellonella infection model. In vitro, the frequency of resistance emergence was greater when the bacteria were selected on RPMI versus tryptic soy agar (TSA) or Mueller-Hinton II (MHII) agar plates. However, the frequency of resistance emergence was lower in vivo than in the RPMI in vitro condition. IMPORTANCE Rifabutin has been recently described as a potential adjunctive therapy for antibiotic-resistant A. baumannii infections due to hypersensitivity in iron-depleted media, which may more closely mimic an in vivo environment. Here, we report that this hyperactivity is specific for A. baumannii, rather than being a general effect for other pathogens.

Rifamycin resistance, rpoB gene mutation, and clinical outcomes of Staphylococcus species isolated from prosthetic joint infections in Korea

PURPOSE

We conducted an in vitro investigation of rifamycin activity against planktonic and biofilm states of Staphylococcus aureus and S. epidermidis isolated from patients with prosthetic join infection (PJIs), characterized their rpoB mutations, and analyzed the clinical outcomes of rifampin-resistant isolates.

METHODS

A total of 110 staphylococcal isolates were collected from patients with PJIs. Antimicrobials tested using the broth microdilution method included rifampin, rifabutin, rifapentine, and rifaximin. We evaluated rpoB gene mutations to identify rifampin resistance mechanisms. Clinical outcomes were assessed in rifampin-resistant isolates.

RESULTS

Among the 110 staphylococcal isolates, we detected 85 S. aureus (methicillin-resistant, 55%) and 25 S. epidermidis (methicillin-resistant, 100%) isolates. Seven S. aureus isolates and two S. epidermidis isolates were rifampin resistant (minimum inhibitory concentration [MIC], ≥ 2 μg/mL); these exhibited rpoB gene mutations. Among 78 rifampin-susceptible S. aureus isolates and 23 S. epidermidis isolates, 76 S. aureus isolates and all S. epidermidis isolates were highly susceptible (MIC ≤ 0.06 μg/mL) to other rifamycins. The rifampin, rifabutin, rifapentine, and rifaximin minimum biofilm bactericidal concentrations for ≥ 50% of isolates were 4, 1, 2, and 4 μg/mL for S. aureus and 1, 0.125, 0.25, and 0.5 μg/mL for S. epidermidis, respectively, among rifampin-susceptible isolates. Among nine patients bearing rifampin-resistant isolates, only three (33%) had successful outcomes.

CONCLUSIONS

Rifamycins other than rifampin show promising staphylococcal activity, including antibiofilm activity. Rifamycin-resistant staphylococci exhibit rpoB gene mutations.

Evaluating treatments with rifabutin and amoxicillin for eradication of Helicobacter pylori infection in adults: a systematic review

INTRODUCTION

Helicobacter pylori causes dyspepsia, peptic ulcer, and gastric malignancies. Treatments for Helicobacter pylori are mostly empirical depending on regional antibiotic resistances and the patient's history and less frequently susceptibility guided. Helicobacter pylori has a low resistance to rifabutin and has been proposed as an alternative for third-line treatment and beyond but recently has also gained attention for use as first- and second-line treatment.

AREAS COVERED

In this review, the authors systematically searched medical databases in order to present the current eradication rates for any treatment based on the two antibiotics, rifabutin and amoxicillin with a potent acid inhibitor. They also assessed the safety and tolerance of all the relative regimens.

EXPERT OPINION

Treatment with a rifabutin- and amoxicillin-containing regimen is a valuable option when treating difficult to eradicate Helicobacter pylori infections. Its efficacy is overall 71.4%, and it is not influenced by previous antibiotics, gender, smoking habits, and age. Its results were better when used as a first- or second-line treatment. In third-line therapy and beyond, eradication rates are lower. Adverse effects of all rifabutin regimens occurred in 23% of patients and were mostly mild with bone marrow suppression being very low and reversible.

Comparison of Rifabutin-Based Versus Rifampin-Based Regimens for the Treatment of Mycobacterium avium Complex: A meta-Analysis Study

Background: The incidence of Mycobacterium avium complex (MAC) increases as immunosuppressed conditions become more common. MAC's standard treatment regimen includes a macrolide, ethambutol, and a rifamycin, among which rifampin and rifabutin are the most commonly used. Although current guidelines recommend initial therapy for MAC with rifampin, it has been theorized to be less efficacious than rifabutin.

Methods: We reviewed the relevant scientific literature published up to February 18, 2020. Statistical analyses were performed with Comprehensive Meta-Analysis Software Version 2.0 (Biostat, Englewood, NJ). The pooled frequency with 95% confidence intervals (CI) was assessed using a random-effect model. We considered P <0.05 as statistically significant for publication bias.

Results: After reviewing 3665 records, we identified 24 studies that satisfied the inclusion criteria. Among these studies, 8 had rifabutin in their regimens (rifabutin group) and 16 had rifampin in their regimens (rifampin group). The estimated pooled treatment success rate was found to be 54.7% (95% CI 41.0-67.0%) in rifabutin groups and 67.5% (95% CI 55.7-77.4%) in rifampin groups. There was no evidence of publication bias among the included studies (Egger’s test p-value was 0.7).

Conclusion: In this study, it was shown that in comparison to Rifabutin, rifampin has similar treatment success rates in treating MAC. In order to determine the exact preference of each of these drugs, double-blind clinical trial studies are recommended.

Blocking Bacterial Naphthohydroquinone Oxidation and ADP-Ribosylation Improves Activity of Rifamycins against Mycobacterium abscessus

Rifampicin is an effective drug for treating tuberculosis (TB) but is not used to treat Mycobacterium abscessus infections due to poor in vitro activity. While rifabutin, another rifamycin, has better anti-M. abscessus activity, its activity is far from the nanomolar potencies of rifamycins against Mycobacterium tuberculosis. Here, we asked (i) why is rifabutin more active against M. abscessus than rifampicin, and (ii) why is rifabutin's anti-M. abscessus activity poorer than its anti-TB activity? Comparative analysis of naphthoquinone- versus naphthohydroquinone-containing rifamycins suggested that the improved activity of rifabutin over rifampicin is linked to its less readily oxidizable naphthoquinone core. Although rifabutin is resistant to bacterial oxidation, metabolite and genetic analyses showed that this rifamycin is metabolized by the ADP-ribosyltransferase Arr_Mab like rifampicin, preventing it from achieving the nanomolar activity that it displays against M. tuberculosis. Based on the identified dual mechanism of intrinsic rifamycin resistance, we hypothesized that rifamycins more potent than rifabutin should contain the molecule's naphthoquinone core plus a modification that blocks ADP-ribosylation at its C-23. To test these predictions, we performed a blinded screen of a diverse collection of 189 rifamycins and identified two molecules more potent than rifabutin. As predicted, these compounds contained both a more oxidatively resistant naphthoquinone core and C-25 modifications that blocked ADP-ribosylation. Together, this work revealed dual bacterial metabolism as the mechanism of intrinsic resistance of M. abscessus to rifamycins and provides proof of concept for the repositioning of rifamycins for M. abscessus disease by developing derivatives that resist both bacterial oxidation and ADP-ribosylation.

Safety and Pharmacokinetics of Double-Dose Lopinavir/Ritonavir + Rifampin Versus Lopinavir/Ritonavir + Daily Rifabutin for Treatment of Human Immunodeficiency Virus-Tuberculosis Coinfection

BACKGROUND

Protease inhibitor-based antiretroviral therapy may be used in resource-limited settings in persons with human immunodeficiency virus and tuberculosis (HIV-TB). Data on safety, pharmacokinetics/pharmacodynamics (PK/PD), and HIV-TB outcomes for lopinavir/ritonavir (LPV/r) used with rifampin (RIF) or rifabutin (RBT) are limited.

METHODS

We randomized adults with HIV-TB from July 2013 to February 2016 to arm A, LPV/r 400 mg/100 mg twice daily + RBT 150 mg/day; arm B, LPV/r 800 mg/200 mg twice daily + RIF 600 mg/day; or arm C, LPV/r 400 mg/100 mg twice daily + raltegravir (RAL) 400 mg twice daily + RBT 150 mg/day. All received two nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors and other TB drugs. PK visits occurred on day 12 ± 2. Within-arm HIV-TB outcomes were summarized using proportions and 95% CIs; PK were compared using Wilcoxon tests.

RESULTS

Among 71 participants, 52% were women; 72% Black; 46% Hispanic; median age, 37 years; median CD4+ count, 130 cells/mm3; median HIV-1 RNA, 4.6 log10 copies/mL; 46% had confirmed TB. LPV concentrations were similar across arms. Pooled LPV AUC12 (157 203 hours × ng/mL) and Ctrough (9876 ng/mL) were similar to historical controls; RBT AUC24 (7374 hours × ng/mL) and Ctrough (208 ng/mL) were higher, although 3 participants in arm C had RBT Cmax <250 ng/mL. Proportions with week 48 HIV-1 RNA <400 copies/mL were 58%, 67%, and 61%, respectively, in arms A, B, and C.

CONCLUSIONS

Double-dose LPV/r+RIF and LPV/r+RBT 150mg/day had acceptable safety, PK and TB outcomes; HIV suppression was suboptimal but unrelated to PK. Faster RBT clearance and low Cmax in 3 participants on RBT+RAL requires further study.

In Vitro Activity of Rifampin, Rifabutin, and Rifapentine against Enterococci and Streptococci from Periprosthetic Joint Infection

After staphylococci, streptococci and enterococci are the most frequent causes of periprosthetic joint infection (PJI). MICs and minimum biofilm bactericidal concentrations of rifampin, rifabutin, and rifapentine were determined for 67 enterococcal and 59 streptococcal PJI isolates. Eighty-eight isolates had rifampin MICs of ≤1 μg/ml, among which rifabutin and rifapentine MICs were ≤ 8 and ≤4 μg/ml, respectively. There was low rifamycin in vitro antibiofilm activity except for a subset of Streptococcus mitis group isolates.

IMPORTANCE Rifampin is an antibiotic with antistaphylococcal biofilm activity used in the management of staphylococcal periprosthetic joint infection with irrigation and debridement with component retention; some patients are unable to receive rifampin due to drug interactions or intolerance. We recently showed rifabutin and rifapentine to have in vitro activity against planktonic and biofilm states of rifampin-susceptible periprosthetic joint infection-associated staphylococci. After staphylococci, streptococci and enterococci combined are the most common causes of periprosthetic joint infection. Here, we investigated the in vitro antibiofilm activity of rifampin, rifabutin, and rifapentine against 126 Streptococcus and Enterococcus periprosthetic joint infection isolates. In contrast to our prior findings with staphylococcal biofilms, there was low antibiofilm activity of rifampin, rifabutin, and rifapentine against PJI-associated streptococci and enterococci, apart from some Streptococcus mitis group isolates.

Concomitant use of isavuconazole and CYP3A4/5 inducers: Where pharmacogenetics meets pharmacokinetics

BACKGROUND

Isavuconazole is a triazole antifungal drug, approved for the treatment of invasive aspergillosis and mucormycosis. Isavuconazole is metabolised by CYP3A4 and CYP3A5, and it has been shown that the CYP3A inducer rifampin reduces isavuconazole exposure. By extrapolation, the concomitant use of isavuconazole with moderate and strong CYP450 inducers is contraindicated, although it is known that some CYP450 inducers are less potent in comparison with rifampin.

OBJECTIVES

We aim to document exposure to isavuconazole in patients concomitantly treated with a CYP450 inducer that is less potent compared to rifampin. Moreover, although it is well known that CYP3A enzymes are important for the metabolism of isavuconazole, this induction effect has never been studied in combination with the patient's CYP3A genotype.

PATIENTS

We report three patients treated with both isavuconazole and a CYP3A inducer that is less potent compared to rifampin (rifabutin or phenobarbital), in whom we determined isavuconazole concentrations.

RESULTS

These cases suggest that the CYP3A4/5 genotype is an important determinant for isavuconazole exposure and that it might also influence the CYP450 induction interaction.

CONCLUSIONS

CYP3A inducers that are less potent compared to rifampin, may be combined with isavuconazole in patients with loss of CYP3A5 activity (CYP3A5*3/*3). Therapeutic drug monitoring is recommended during this combination. However, low-isavuconazole exposure was observed in the extensive metaboliser with CYP3A4*1/*1 and CYP3A5*1/*3 alleles.

In Vitro Activity of Rifamycin Derivatives against Nontuberculous Mycobacteria, including Macrolide-/Amikacin-Resistant Clinical Isolates

We evaluated the in vitro activity of rifamycin derivatives, including rifampin, rifapentine, rifaximin, and rifabutin, against clinical nontuberculous mycobacteria (NTM) isolates. Of the rifamycin derivatives, rifabutin showed the lowest MICs against all NTM species, including Mycobacterium avium complex, M. abscessus, and M. kansasii Rifabutin also had effective in vitro activity against macrolide- and aminoglycoside-resistant NTM isolates. Rifabutin could be worth considering as a therapeutic option for NTM disease, particularly drug-resistant disease.

Comparison of Rifamycins for Efficacy Against Mycobacterium avium Complex and Resistance Emergence in the Hollow Fiber Model System

Rifamycins are integral part of the combination regimen for treatment of pulmonary Mycobacterium avium-complex [MAC] infection, but different practitioners prefer different rifamycins. The objective of the study was to compare microbial kill and resistance emergence of rifamycins using principles of pharmacokinetics/pharmacodynamics. First, we identified rifamycin MICs in 20 MAC isolates from patients followed by concentration-response studies in test-tubes. Next, we examined efficacy and resistance suppression of three doses of each rifamycin in the hollow fiber system model of pulmonary MAC [HFS-MAC], mimicking human like concentration-time profile of the drugs. HFS-MAC units were repetitively sampled for total and drug-resistant MAC burden and for drug concentration measurements. Inhibitory sigmoid E max model, linear regression, and analysis of variance was used for data analysis. For rifabutin 90% of isolates had MIC ≤ 0.125 mg/L while for both rifampin and rifapentine this was ≤2.0 mg/L. There was no statistically significant difference (p > 0.05) in maximal kill and effective concentration mediating 50% of the bacterial kill among three rifamycins in the static concentration experiment. In the HFS-MAC, the bactericidal kill (day 0-4) for rifampin was 0.89 (95% Confidence Interval (CI): 0.43-1.35), for rifapentine was 1.05 (95% CI: 0.08-1.23), and for rifabutin was 0.92 (95% CI: 0.61-1.24) log10 CFU/ml, respectively. Rifamycins monotherapy failed after just 4-days of treatment and entire MAC population was drug resistant on day 26 of the study. There was no dose dependent difference in MAC kill or resistance suppression among the three rifamycins tested in the HFS-MAC. Therefore, replacing one rifamycin, due to emergence of drug-resistance, with other may not be beneficial in clinical setting.

Clinical outcomes of concomitant rifamycin and opioid therapy: A systematic review

Opioids are one of the most prescribed classes of analgesic medications. Their narrow therapeutic index and metabolism through cytochrome p450 (CYP) enzymes can result in a drug interaction when used concomitantly with rifamycins. In clinical scenarios where concurrent therapy with an opioid and a rifamycin occurs, there is no standardized guidance for managing the interaction. The objective of this review was to examine literature which evaluates the concomitant use of opioids and rifamycins with clinically relevant CYP-inducing properties. A systematic review following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) criteria was performed. PubMed, Scopus, and OVID Embase were queried for studies from database inception to January 2020 related to rifamycin and opioid medications. Only full-text, peer-reviewed, English language articles addressing clinical outcomes from concomitant rifamycin and opioid therapy were included. The review isolated 12 articles for data extraction from an original 2260 citations identified. Rifampin (11; 92%) and rifabutin (2; 17%) were the rifamycins studied along with seven different opioids. Decreased effect of opioids with concomitant rifampin therapy manifested as withdrawal in numerous patients on methadone and a decreased analgesic effect from tramadol, morphine, and, most notably, oxycodone. Only the combinations of rifampin with buccal fentanyl and rifabutin with buprenorphine and methadone were found to have no clinically measurable interaction. Available literature suggests that a decrease in opioid clinical effects is appreciated with concomitant rifamycin therapy. Further research is needed to focus on specific mitigation strategies beyond opioid agent selection, such as dosing adjustment recommendations.

Synergistic Rifabutin and Colistin Reduce Emergence of Resistance When Treating Acinetobacter baumannii

Recently, we reported rifabutin hyperactivity against Acinetobacter baumannii. We sought to characterize potential interactions between rifabutin and colistin, the last-resort drug for carbapenem-resistant infections. Rifabutin and colistin were synergistic in vitro and in vivo, and low-dose colistin significantly suppressed emergence of resistance to rifabutin. Thus, this combination is a promising therapeutic option for highly resistant A. baumannii infections.

Recently, we reported rifabutin hyperactivity against Acinetobacter baumannii. We sought to characterize potential interactions between rifabutin and colistin, the last-resort drug for carbapenem-resistant infections. Rifabutin and colistin were synergistic in vitro and in vivo, and low-dose colistin significantly suppressed emergence of resistance to rifabutin. Thus, this combination is a promising therapeutic option for highly resistant A. baumannii infections.

Novel Use of Rifabutin and Rifapentine to Treat Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus in a Rat Model of Foreign Body Osteomyelitis

BACKGROUND

Owing to patient intolerance or drug interactions, alternative agents to rifampin are needed for management of staphylococcal periprosthetic joint infection. In the current study, we evaluated rifabutin, rifapentine and rifampin, with and without vancomycin, in a rat model of foreign body osteomyelitis.

METHODS

Proximal tibiae were inoculated with methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) and a Kirschner wire (K-wire) implanted in each. After 4 weeks of infection, rifampin, rifabutin, or rifapentine were administered, alone or with vancomycin. Tibiae and K-wires were cultured, and medians were reported as log10 colony-forming units (CFUs) per gram of bone or log10 CFUs per K-wire, respectively.

RESULTS

Rifampin, rifabutin or rifapentine administered with vancomycin yielded less MRSA from bones (0.10, 3.02, and 0.10 log10 CFUs/g, respectively) than did no treatment (4.36 log10 CFUs/g) or vancomycin alone (4.64 log10 CFUs/g) (both P ≤ .02). The K-wires of animals receiving no treatment or vancomycin monotherapy recovered medians of 1.76 and 2.91 log10 CFUs/g per K-wire, respectively. In contrast, rifampin, rifabutin and rifapentine administered with vancomycin yielded medians of 0.1 log10 CFUs per K-wire, respectively. Rifampin resistance was detected in a single animal in the rifampin monotherapy group.

CONCLUSIONS

Rifabutin or rifapentine with vancomycin were as active as rifampin with vancomycin against MRSA in rat foreign body osteomyelitis, suggesting that rifabutin and/or rifapentine may be alternatives to rifampin in the clinical management of staphylococcal periprosthetic joint infections.

Rifabutin Is Inactivated by Mycobacterium abscessus Arr

Mycobacterium abscessus exhibits Arr (ADP-ribosyltransferase)-dependent rifampin resistance. In apparent contrast, rifabutin (RBT) has demonstrated promising activity in M. abscessus infection models, implying that RBT might not be inactivated by Arr. RBT susceptibility testing of M. abscessus Δarr revealed a strongly decreased MIC. Our findings suggest that the efficacy of RBT might be enhanced by rendering RBT resilient to Arr-dependent modification or by blocking M. abscessus Arr activity.

Rifampin-divalproex drug-drug interaction in an adult patient: A case report

The divalproex (DVP) package insert states that rifampin may increase the oral clearance of valproate by 40% and that valproic acid derivative dose adjustments may be required when starting or stopping rifampin. However, the overall clinical significance of this drug-drug interaction remains unclear given that limited clinical outcome data has been published. This case describes a 52-year-old female with bipolar disorder, borderline personality disorder, and PTSD who was previously stable on a medication regimen consisting of DVP delayed-release 500 mg every morning and 1500 mg every evening (baseline steady-state trough 99.8 mcg/mL). Throughout rifampin therapy for latent tuberculosis treatment, she required an increase in both the frequency of DVP administration, from 2 to 3 times daily, and DVP dose by 75% to maintain clinical stability. Valproic acid trough concentrations ranged from 56.4 to 75.9 mcg/mL during the 4-month course of rifampin. This report supports that the DVP-rifampin interaction may be clinically significant and of a greater magnitude than suggested by the package insert.

Rifampin-resistance-associated mutations in the rifampin-resistance-determining region of the rpoB gene of Mycobacterium tuberculosis clinical isolates in Shanghai, PR China

Introduction. Resistance to rifampin (RIF) in Mycobacterium tuberculosis infection is associated with mutations in the rpoB gene coding for the β-subunit of RNA polymerase. The contribution of various rpoB mutations to the development and level of RIF resistance remains elusive.Hypothesis/Gap Statement. Various rpoB mutations may be associated with differential levels of RIF resistance.Aim. This study aimed to investigate the relationship between specific rpoB mutations and the MICs of RIF and rifabutin (RFB) against M. tuberculosis.Methodology. Of the 195 clinical isolates, 105 and 90 isolates were randomly selected from isolates resistant to RIF and sensitive to RIF, respectively. The MICs of 12 agents for M. tuberculosis isolates were determined using commercial Sensititre M. tuberculosis MIC plates and the broth microdilution method. Strains were screened for rpoB mutations by DNA extraction, rpoB gene amplification and DNA sequence analysis.Results. One hundred isolates (95.24 %) were found to have mutations in the RIF-resistance-determining region (RRDR) of the rpoB gene. Three rpoB mutations were identified in 90 RIF-susceptible isolates. Out of 105 isolates, 86 (81.90 %) were cross-resistant to both RIF and RFB. The most frequent mutation occurred at codons 450 and 445. We also found a novel nine-nucleotide (ATCATGCAT) deletion (between positions 1543 and 1551) in the rpoB gene in two strains (1.90 %) with resistance to RIF, but susceptibility to RFB. In addition, the mutation frequency at codon 450 was significantly higher in RIF-resistant/RFB-resistant (RIF^R/RFB^R) strains than in RIF^R/RFB^S strains (75.58 % versus 21.05 %, P<0.01), whereas the mutation frequency at codon 435 was significantly lower in RIF^R/RFB^R strains than in RIF^R/RFB^S strains (1.16 % versus 26.32 %, P<0.01).Conclusion. Our data support previous findings, which reported that various rpoB mutations are associated with differential levels of RIF resistance. The specific mutations in the rpoB gene in RIF^R/RFB^R isolates differed from those in the RIF^R/RFB^S isolates. A novel deletion mutation in the RRDR might be associated with resistance to RIF, but not to RFB. Further clinical studies are required to investigate the efficacy of RFB in the treatment of infections caused by M. tuberculosis strains harbouring these mutations.

Differential In Vitro Activities of Individual Drugs and Bedaquiline-Rifabutin Combinations against Actively Multiplying and Nutrient-Starved Mycobacterium abscessus

Current treatment options for lung disease caused by Mycobacterium abscessus complex infections have limited effectiveness. To maximize the use of existing antibacterials and to help inform regimen design for treatment, we assessed the in vitro bactericidal activity of single drugs against actively multiplying and net nonreplicating M. abscessus populations in nutrient-rich and nutrient-starvation conditions, respectively. As single drugs, bedaquiline and rifabutin exerted bactericidal activity only against nutrient-starved and actively growing M. abscessus, respectively. However, when combined, both bedaquiline and rifabutin were able to specifically contribute bactericidal activity at relatively low, clinically relevant concentrations against both replicating and nonreplicating bacterial populations. The addition of a third drug, amikacin, further enhanced the bactericidal activity of the bedaquiline-rifabutin combination against nutrient-starved M. abscessus Overall, these in vitro data suggest that bedaquiline-rifabutin may be a potent backbone combination to support novel treatment regimens for M. abscessus infections. This rich data set of differential time- and concentration-dependent activity of drugs, alone and together, against M. abscessus also highlights several issues affecting interpretation and translation of in vitro findings.

Pretomanid Pharmacokinetics in the Presence of Rifamycins: Interim Results from a Randomized Trial among Patients with Tuberculosis

Shorter, more potent regimens are needed for tuberculosis. The nitroimidazole pretomanid was recently approved for extensively drug-resistant tuberculosis in combination with bedaquiline and linezolid. Pretomanid may also have benefit as a treatment-shortening agent for drug-sensitive tuberculosis. It is unclear how and whether it can be used together with rifamycins, which are key sterilizing first-line drugs. In this analysis, data were pooled from two studies: the Assessing Pretomanid for Tuberculosis (APT) trial, in which patients with drug-sensitive pulmonary TB received pretomanid, isoniazid, and pyrazinamide plus either rifampin or rifabutin versus standard of care under fed conditions, and the AIDS Clinical Trials Group 5306 (A5306) trial, a phase I study in healthy volunteers receiving pretomanid alone or in combination with rifampin under fasting conditions. In our population pharmacokinetic (PK) model, participants taking rifampin had 44.4 and 59.3% reductions in pretomanid AUC (area under the concentration-time curve) compared to those taking rifabutin or pretomanid alone (due to 80 or 146% faster clearance) in the APT and A5306 trials, respectively. Median maximum concentrations (C_max) in the rifampin and rifabutin arms were 2.14 and 3.35 mg/liter, while median AUC_0-24 values were 30.1 and 59.5 mg·h/liter, respectively. Though pretomanid exposure in APT was significantly reduced with rifampin, AUC_0-24 values were similar to those associated with effective treatment in registrational trials, likely because APT participants were fed with dosing, enhancing pretomanid relative bioavailability and exposures. Pretomanid concentrations with rifabutin were high but in range with prior observations. While pretomanid exposures with rifampin are unlikely to impair efficacy, our data suggest that pretomanid should be taken with food if prescribed with rifampin. (This study has been registered at ClinicalTrials.gov under identifier NCT02256696.).

Rifabutin for the Treatment of Helicobacter Pylori Infection: A Review

Nowadays, apart from having to know first-line Helicobacter pylori eradication regimens well, we must also be prepared to face treatment failures. The aim of this review is to summarize the role of rifabutin in the management of H. pylori infection. Bibliographical searches were performed in PubMed. Data on resistance and efficacy of rifabutin-containing regimens on H. pylori eradication were meta-analyzed. Mean H. pylori rifabutin resistance rate (39 studies, including 9721 patients) was 0.13%; when studies only including patients naïve to H. pylori eradication treatment were considered, this figure was even lower (0.07%). Mean H. pylori eradication rate (by intention-to-treat) with rifabutin-containing regimens (3052 patients) was 73%. Respective cure rates for second-, third-, fourth- and fifth-line therapies, were 79%, 69%, 69% and 72%. Most studies administered rifabutin 300 mg/day, which seemed to be more effective than 150 mg/day. The ideal length of treatment remains unclear, but 10–12-day regimens are generally recommended. Adverse events to rifabutin treatment in H. pylori studies were relatively infrequent (15%), and severe adverse events were exceptional (myelotoxicity was the most significant, although always reversible). In summary, rifabutin-containing therapy represents an encouraging strategy generally restricted, at present, to patients where previous (usually multiple) eradication regimens have failed.