In vitro activities of linezolid combined with other antimicrobial agents against Staphylococci, Enterococci, Pneumococci, and selected gram-negative organisms

From Burst to Sustained Release: The Effect of Antibiotic Structure Incorporated into Chitosan-Based Films

Background/Objectives: Medical devices are susceptible to bacterial colonization and biofilm formation, which can result in severe infections, leading to prolonged hospital stays and increased burden on society. Antibacterial films have the potential to assist in preventing biofilm formation, thereby reducing administration of antibiotics and the emergence of antibiotic-resistant strains. In a previous study, a chitosan-based matrix crosslinked with tannic acid and loaded with gentamicin was reported. In this study, five different antibiotics (moxifloxacin, ciprofloxacin, trimethoprim, sulfamethoxazole or linezolid) were loaded into these chitosan-based films, and their impact on the release behavior carefully assessed. Methods: The samples were characterized according to their thickness, swelling, and mass loss in phosphate-buffered saline (PBS), as well as by morphology using scanning electron microscopy (SEM) and optical phase contrast microscopy. Antibiotic release over time was quantified in PBS by high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC). Antibacterial activity was investigated by disk diffusion test and antibiotic release over time. Finally, the cytotoxicity of the samples was assessed with human dermal fibroblasts. Results: The obtained results differed significantly, especially regarding the antibiotic release time and antibacterial activity, which varied from one day to six months, enabling classification of the films from burst/transient to prolonged release. The films also showed antibacterial features against bacteria mostly present in medical devices and displayed to be non-cytotoxic. Conclusions: In conclusion, it was demonstrated that the antibiotics structure significantly alters the release kinetics, and that by carefully selecting the antibiotic, the consequent release can be tuned. This approach yielded films that could be used for potentially-scalable release in antimicrobial coatings specific to medical devices, aiming to reduce biomaterial associated infections (BAIs).

In vitro antibacterial activity of sulbactam-durlobactam in combination with other antimicrobial agents against Acinetobacter baumannii-calcoaceticus complex

Combinations of the β-lactam/β-lactamase inhibitor sulbactam-durlobactam and seventeen antimicrobial agents were tested against strains of Acinetobacter baumannii in checkerboard assays. Most combinations resulted in indifference with no instances of antagonism. These results suggest sulbactam-durlobactam antibacterial activity against A. baumannii is unlikely to be affected if co-dosed with other antimicrobial agents.

Synergistic properties of linezolid against Enterococcus spp. isolates: a systematic review from in vitro studies

PURPOSE

Vancomycin-resistant enterococci (VRE) are a leading cause of hospital-acquired infections with limited therapeutic options. Combination of at least two antimicrobials is a possible strategy to obtain rapid and sustained bactericidal effects and overcome the emergence of resistance. We revised the literature on linezolid synergistic properties from in vitro studies to assess its activity in combination with molecules belonging to other antibiotic classes against Enterococcus spp.

METHODS

We performed a systematic review of the literature from three peer-reviewed databases including papers evaluating linezolid synergistic properties in vitro against Enterococcus spp. isolates.

RESULTS

We included 206 Enterococcus spp. isolates (92 E. faecalis, 90 E. faecium, 2 E. gallinarum, 3 E. casseliflavus, 19 Enterococcus spp.) from 24 studies. When an isolate was tested with different combinations, each combination was considered independently for further analysis. The most frequent interaction was indifferent effect (247/343, 72% of total interactions). The highest synergism rates were observed when linezolid was tested in combination with rifampin (10/49, 20.4% of interactions) and fosfomycin (16/84, 19.0%, of interactions). Antagonistic effect accounted for 7/343 (2.0%) of total interactions.

CONCLUSION

Our study reported overall limited synergistic in vitro properties of linezolid with other antibiotics when tested against Enterococcus spp. The clinical choice of linezolid in combination with other antibiotics should be guided by reasoned empiric therapy in the suspicion of a polymicrobial infection or targeted therapy on microbiological results, rather than on an intended synergistic effect of the linezolid-based combination.

Phenotypic and genotypic characterization of linezolid resistance and the effect of antibiotic combinations on methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus clinical isolates

BACKGROUND

Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) causes life-threatening infections, with narrow therapeutic options including: vancomycin and linezolid. Accordingly, this study aimed to characterize phenotypically and genotypically, the most relevant means of linezolid resistance among some MRSA clinical isolates.

METHODS

A total of 159 methicillin-resistant clinical isolates were collected, of which 146 were indentified microscopically and biochemically as MRSA. Both biofilm formation and efflux pump activity were assessed for linezolid-resistant MRSA (LR-MRSA) using the microtiter plate and carbonyl cyanide 3-chlorophenylhydrazone (CCCP) methods, respectively. Linezolid resistance was further characterized by polymerase chain reaction (PCR) amplification and sequencing of domain V of 23 S rRNA; rplC; rplD;and rplV genes. Meanwhile, some resistance genes were investigated: cfr; cfr(B); optrA; msrA;mecA; and vanA genes. To combat LR-MRSA, the effect of combining linezolid with each of 6 different antimicrobials was investigated using the checkerboard assay.

RESULTS

Out of the collected MRSA isolates (n = 146), 5.48% (n = 8) were LR-MRSA and 18.49% (n = 27) were vancomycin-resistant (VRSA). It is worth noting that all LR-MRSA isolates were also vancomycin-resistant. All LR-MRSA isolates were biofilm producers (r = 0.915, p = 0.001), while efflux pumps upregulation showed no significant contribution to development of resistance (t = 1.374, p = 0.212). Both mecA and vanA genes were detected in 92.45% (n = 147) and 6.92% (n = 11) of methicillin-resistant isolates, respectively. In LR-MRSA isolates, some 23 S rRNA domain V mutations were observed: A2338T and C2610G (in 5 isolates); T2504C and G2528C (in 2 isolates); and G2576T (in 1 isolate). Amino acids substitutions were detected: in L3 protein (rplC gene) of (3 isolates) and in L4 protein (rplD gene) of (4 isolates). In addition, cfr(B) gene was detected (in 3 isolates). In 5 isolates, synergism was recorded when linezolid was combined with chloramphenicol, erythromycin, or ciprofloxacin. Reversal of linezolid resistance was observed in some LR-MRSA isolates when linezolid was combined with gentamicin or vancomycin.

CONCLUSIONS

LR-MRSA biofilm producers' phenotypes evolved in the clinical settings in Egypt. Various antibiotic combinations with linezolid were evaluated in vitro and showed synergistic effects.

Loss of erm(B)-Mediated rRNA Dimethylation and Restoration of Erythromycin Susceptibility in Erythromycin-Resistant Enterococci Following Induced Linezolid Resistance

Linezolid has been reported to restore erythromycin susceptibility in erythromycin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus. This phenomenon has not been reported in enterococci and the mechanisms involved therein are still unknown. The purpose of this study was to investigate the mechanisms involved and the effect of combining linezolid with erythromycin on erythromycin-resistant enterococci. Checkerboard techniques were used to determine drug interactions, and 12 of 14 isolates showed a synergistic effect between erythromycin and linezolid (fractional inhibitory concentration <0.5). We observed that the erm(B) gene, which encodes a dimethyltransferase responsible for erythromycin resistance, was expressed from transposon Tn1545 in the tested erythromycin-resistant enterococci. After exposure to linezolid, erm(B)-mediated rRNA dimethylation at A2071 could not be detected, and the erm(B) gene was lost following acquisition of erythromycin susceptibility. Thus, in conclusion, linezolid combined with erythromycin exerts a synergistic effect against erythromycin-resistant enterococci. Linezolid treatment suppressed erm(B)-mediated rRNA dimethylation at A2071, which could lead to loss of the erm(B) gene.

Hurdle Effects of Ethanolic Plant Extracts with Antimicrobials Commonly Used in Food against Foodborne Pathogenic Escherichia coli

Escherichia coli (E. coli) O157:H7 is a major foodborne pathogen that causes severe human infections. Plant extracts, glycine, and sodium acetate (NaOAc) exert antimicrobial effects that can be used to control pathogenic E. coli. However, their combinations have not been investigated. Thus, this study investigates the combination of ethanolic plant extracts with glycine and NaOAc against E. coli at various pH and temperature levels. Clove and rosemary extracts exhibited significant (p ≤ 0.05) antimicrobial activity against E. coli. At neutral pH, the combination of plant extracts with 1.0% glycine or 0.1% NaOAc reduced the minimum inhibitory concentration of clove from 0.4% to 0.2%; at pH 5.5, clove (0.1%) and rosemary (0.2%) extracts supplemented with NaOAc (0.1%) showed an additive effect. The population of E. coli O157:H7 in phosphate-buffered saline with 0.2% clove extract, 2% glycine, and 2% NaOAc showed a more than 5 log reduction after incubation at 15 °C for 96 h, while the combination of 0.1% clove extract with 2% NaOAc at pH 5.5 completely inhibited E. coli within 24 h at 35 °C. Thus, the combination of plant extracts with glycine and NaOAc could serve as a promising hurdle technology in controlling the growth of E. coli.

Prevalence and mechanisms of linezolid resistance among staphylococcal clinical isolates from Egypt

The emergence of methicillin-resistant staphylococci necessitated the search for alternative agents as linezolid, introduced to treat infections due to multidrug-resistant bacteria. Linezolid resistance has since emerged, yet its global prevalence remains low. In Egypt, little is known about the situation. We investigated the prevalence and mechanisms of resistance among Egyptian staphylococcal clinical isolates. Linezolid resistance among 232 staphylococcal isolates obtained from Alexandria Main Hospitals between 2011 and 2016 was assessed using disc diffusion and minimum inhibitory concentration. Resistant isolates were checked for cfr presence using polymerase chain reaction. The V domain of different alleles of 23S rRNA gene was investigated for mutations. Selection for linezolid-resistant mutants was performed in vitro through serial passages in linezolid sub-inhibitory concentrations. Combinations of linezolid with imipenem or anti-inflammatory agents were investigated using time-kill and modified checkerboard assays. Three Staphylococcus haemolyticus isolates (1.3%) from 2015 to 2016 were linezolid-resistant. One isolate carried cfr which was plasmid-borne, and together with another isolate which had a G2603T point mutation in the V domain of 23S rRNA gene. Successive exposure to linezolid sub-inhibitory concentrations was selected for three resistant Staphylococcus aureus mutants out of ten susceptible isolates. These mutants were more resistant towards different antibiotic classes than their susceptible parents. Linezolid combinations with imipenem, ibuprofen, or aspirin were synergistic against the isolates and mutants. Despite unregulated use of linezolid, resistance remains fairly low among the Egyptian isolates. Strict antimicrobial stewardship guidelines are needed in hospitals and the community to guard against further evolution of resistant mutants.

Re-sensitizing Ampicillin and Kanamycin-Resistant E. coli and S. aureus Using Synergistic Metal Micronutrients-Antibiotic Combinations

Due to the recent emergence of multi-drug resistant strains, the development of novel antimicrobial agents has become a critical issue. The use of micronutrient transition metals is a promising approach to overcome this problem since these compounds exhibit significant toxicity at low concentrations in prokaryotic cells. In this work, we demonstrate that at concentrations lower than their minimal inhibitory concentrations and in combination with different antibiotics, it is possible to mitigate the barriers to employ metallic micronutrients as therapeutic agents. Here, we show that when administered as a combinatorial treatment, Cu²⁺, Zn²⁺, Co²⁺, Cd²⁺, and Ni²⁺ increase susceptibility of Escherichia coli and Staphylococcus aureus to ampicillin and kanamycin. Furthermore, ampicillin-resistant E. coli is re-sensitized to ampicillin when the ampicillin is administered in combination with Cu²⁺, Cd²⁺, or Ni². Similarly, Cu²⁺, Zn²⁺, or Cd²⁺ re-sensitize kanamycin-resistant E. coli and S. aureus to kanamycin when administered in a combinatorial treatment with those transition metals. Here, we demonstrate that for both susceptible and resistant bacteria, transition-metal micronutrients, and antibiotics interact synergistically in combinatorial treatments and exhibit increased effects when compared to the treatment with the antibiotic alone. Moreover, in vitro and in vivo assays, using a murine topical infection model, showed no toxicological effects of either treatment at the administered concentrations. Lastly, we show that combinatorial treatments can clear a murine topical infection caused by an antibiotic-resistant strain. Altogether, these results suggest that antibiotic-metallic micronutrient combinatorial treatments will play an important role in future developments of antimicrobial agents and treatments against infections caused by both susceptible and resistant strains.

Population pharmacokinetic analysis of linezolid in patients with different types of shock: Effect of platelet count

Linezolid was approved by the Food and Drug Administration for the treatment of serious infections. However, patients with serious frequently develop shock, and it is currently elusive whether shock affects the pharmacokinetics of linezolid. The aim of the present study was to explore whether the pharmacokinetics of linezolid are different among patients with various types of shock or patients without shock and whether potential confounders are involved in their outcomes. A population pharmacokinetic analysis using a non-linear mixed-effects model was performed to examine the pharmacokinetics of patients with different types of shock or patients without shock. The pharmacokinetics of linezolid in patients with different types of shock or patients without shock was described by a one-compartment model. In our results, the patients with different types of shock or patients without shock demonstrated no differences in pharmacokinetics, whereas the platelet count was identified as a significant influencing factor. The results demonstrated that the pharmacokinetics of linezolid exhibited no significant differences among patients with different types of shock or patients without shock, whereas the platelet count significantly affected the clearance rate of linezolid.

In vitro antibacterial activity of plumbagin isolated from Plumbago zeylanica L. against methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus

Plumbagin (5-hydroxy-2-methyl-1,4-napthoquinone) is a bicyclic naphthoquinone, found in three major plant families viz. Plumbaginaceae, Ebenceae and Droseraceae. The phytochemical is reported to exhibit various pharmacological properties. In this study, plumbagin isolated from Plumbago zeylanica L. was investigated for its in vitro activity against methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA). Against 100 MRSA isolates that included multi-drug-resistant phenotypes, plumbagin showed consistent activity with a narrow minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) range of 4-8 μg ml^-1 . The time-kill study revealed 99% kill of a reference MRSA strain, 8 h after exposure to plumbagin. In the combination MIC study using the reference MRSA strain, plumbagin showed synergistic effect with ciprofloxacin and piperacillin while additive or indifference effect with other commonly used antibiotics. The transmission electron micrograph of the reference MRSA strain treated with plumbagin confirmed cell wall and cytoplasmic changes. Our results demonstrated potent anti-MRSA activity of plumbagin which was not impacted by multi-drug resistance. This is a first ever study that evaluated in vitro anti-MRSA activity of plumbagin employing large number of MRSA isolates. The findings of this study support the need for the further investigation on this phytochemical agent for therapeutic application. SIGNIFICANCE AND IMPACT OF THE STUDY: This study revealed phytochemical plumbagin's potent and consistent in vitro antibacterial activity against clinically problematic methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) including multi-drug-resistant (MDR) phenotypes. The study results support further research to assess the clinical scope of plumbagin.

Antibacterial Activity of combinatorial treatments composed of transition-metal/antibiotics against Mycobacterium tuberculosis

Notwithstanding evidence that tuberculosis (TB) is declining, one of the greatest concerns to public health is the emergence and spread of multi-drug resistant strains of Mycobacterium tuberculosis (MDR-TB). MDR-TB are defined as strains which are resistant to at least isoniazid (INH) and rifampicin, the two most potent TB drugs, and their increasing incidence is a serious concern. Recently, notable efforts have been spent on research to pursue novel treatments against MDR-TB, especially on synergistic drug combinations as they have the potential to improve TB treatment. Our research group has previously reported promising synergistic antimicrobial effects between transition-metal compounds and antibiotics in Gram-negative and Gram-positive bacteria. In this work, we evaluated antimycobacterial activity of transition-metals/antibiotics combinatorial treatments against first-line drug resistant strains of Mycobacterium tuberculosis. Our data showed that INH/AgNO₃ combinatorial treatment had an additive effect (bactericidal activity) in an isoniazid-resistant clinical strain of Mycobacterium tuberculosis. Moreover, in vitro evaluation of cytotoxicity induced by both, the individual tratments of AgNO₃ and INH and the combinatorial treatment of INH/AgNO₃ in murine RAW 264.7 macrophages and human A549 lung cells; showed no toxic effects. Together, this data suggests that the INH/AgNO₃ combinatorial treatment could be used in the development of new strategies to treat resistant strains of Mycobacterium tuberculosis.

Clinical profile, risk factors and outcome of medical, surgical and adjunct interventions in patients with Pythium insidiosum keratitis

PURPOSE

To report clinical profile and compare management options for Pythium keratitis.

METHOD

Retrospective interventional study of 46 patients diagnosed as Pythium keratitis by PCR DNA sequencing from January 2014 to July 2017. Interventions were categorised into medical management (MM) (topical azithromycin and linezolid with oral azithromycin at presentation), surgery (S) (therapeutic penetrating keratoplasty, TPK), surgical adjunct (SA) (cryotherapy±alcohol with TPK) and medical adjunct (MA) (MM after TPK).

RESULTS

Primary treatment included MM (1 eye), SA (3 eyes) and S (42 eyes). Recurrence occurred in 27/43 eyes (MM+S group). Second surgery (S) was required in 11 eyes (TPK-2), with additional procedures (SA) in 10 eyes and evisceration in five eyes. 8/43 eyes received MA after TPK-1. One eye required TPK-3. Recurrence occured in all eyes that received MA (100%) and in 28 of 54 TPKs (51.8%) (TPK 1+2+3) in 42 eyes. Recurrence was noted in 1/14 (7.1%) that underwent SA.

CONCLUSION

The currently available and recommended treatment for Pythium keratitis is surgical by means of a TPK and in worse cases evisceration. In our study, MM/MA measures showed no benefit with recurrence or worsening of infection requiring resurgery. Almost 50% of TPKs had a recurrence requiring resurgery. However, adjunctive procedures during TPK appear to have additional benefit with low risk of recurrence and could be included as routine care.

Combination of Tedizolid and Daptomycin against Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus in an In Vitro Model of Simulated Endocardial Vegetations

Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) is a major pathogen responsible for health care-associated infections, and treatment options are limited. Tedizolid (TZD) is a novel oxazolidinone antibiotic with activity against MRSA. Previously, daptomycin (DAP) has demonstrated synergy with other antibiotics against MRSA. We sought to determine the efficacy of the combination of TZD and DAP against MRSA in an in vitro model of simulated endocardial vegetations (SEVs). TZD simulations of 200 mg once daily and DAP simulations of 6 mg/kg of body weight and 10 mg/kg once daily were tested alone and in the combinations TZD plus DAP at 6 mg/kg or DAP at 10 mg/kg against two clinical strains of MRSA, 494 and 67. These regimens were tested in SEV models over 8 days to determine the antibacterial activity of the regimens and whether synergy or antagonism might be present between the agents. Against both strains 494 and 67 and at both DAP dose regimens, the combination of TZD and DAP was antagonistic at 192 h. In all cases, DAP alone was statistically superior to DAP plus TZD. When the combination was stopped after 96 h, transitioning to DAP at 6 mg/kg or DAP at 10 mg/kg alone resulted in better antibacterial activity than either of the TZD-plus-DAP combinations, further demonstrating antagonistic effects. Against MRSA, we demonstrated that TZD and DAP have antagonistic activity that hinders their overall antimicrobial efficacy. The exact nature of this antagonistic relationship is still undetermined, but its presence warrants further study of the potentially harmful grouping of the two antibiotics in clinical use.

Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing of Bacteria of Veterinary Origin

Antimicrobial susceptibility testing is an essential tool to the veterinarian for selecting the most appropriate agent for treatment of bacterial diseases of animals. The availability of well-defined methods that incorporate the necessary quality controls coupled to clinical outcome data is foundational in providing relevant test results for clinical decisions. Since 1993, the Clinical Laboratory and Standards Institute (CLSI) Subcommittee on Veterinary Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing (VAST) has developed specific test methods and interpretive criteria for veterinary pathogens. This information has allowed for veterinarians to more effectively treat animal diseases thereby protecting both animal welfare and human food security. Moreover, the availability of standardized test methods for veterinary pathogens has allowed for the development of antimicrobial surveillance programs to detect the emergence of resistance among veterinary pathogens. Future work by the VAST and other groups will be critical to expanding the current test methods and interpretive criteria to more pathogen-antibacterial combinations, as well as, the incorporation of genomic information for routine antimicrobial susceptibility testing in the veterinary diagnostic laboratory.

Exploring the pharmacodynamic interactions between tedizolid and other orally bioavailable antimicrobials against Staphylococcus aureus and Staphylococcus epidermidis

Objectives

Tedizolid is an orally bioavailable oxazolidinone with once-daily dosing and broad-spectrum Gram-positive activity. Combination therapy is commonly indicated to improve efficacy against difficult-to-treat pathogens and biofilms. There are no studies describing the pharmacodynamic interactions between tedizolid and other orally bioavailable antimicrobials.

Methods

MICs of tedizolid, rifampicin, trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole, doxycycline and moxifloxacin were determined by broth microdilution against a convenience sample of 45 staphylococcal isolates. Seven MRSA isolates and three Staphylococcus epidermidis were evaluated by time-kill using concentrations equal to 0.5× the MIC. These strains had variable susceptibility to the investigated antimicrobials. Synergy was defined as a ≥2 log 10 cfu/mL reduction of the combination over the most active single agent, antagonism was defined as ≥1 log 10 cfu/mL growth compared with the most active single agent, and other interactions were indifferent.

Results

Three of 45 strains tested were non-susceptible to tedizolid (MIC = 1 mg/L), but the MIC 90 was 0.5 mg/L. Interactions between tedizolid and other agents were largely indifferent (80%). Tedizolid was synergistic with doxycycline and rifampicin against 2/10 and 3/10 strains, respectively. Tedizolid was antagonistic with moxifloxacin against 3/10 strains. Other interactions were indifferent.

Conclusions

The addition of rifampicin to tedizolid appears to be the most likely to improve activity but synergy was not universal. The combination of tedizolid plus moxifloxacin should be avoided due to the risk of antagonism. The addition of other orally bioavailable anti-staphylococcal agents to tedizolid may be unlikely to improve killing but further research is warranted to assess the impact of these combinations on resistance prevention, or against biofilm-embedded organisms.

In vitro activity of linezolid alone and combined with other antibiotics against clinical enterococcal isolates

BACKGROUND

The increasing incidence of antimicrobial resistance has led to research on finding new antimicrobial agents or identifying drug combinations with synergistic effects. Enterococcal infections, particularly those associated with vancomycin-resistant enterococci (VREs), are therapeutic problems. Linezolid (LZD), an oxazolidinone antibiotic, shows good activity against Gram-positive bacteria including enterococci. To avoid the emergence of linezolid-resistant subpopulations and achieve enhanced activity or bactericidal effect, the use of combined therapy has been considered.

METHODS

The in vitro activity of LZD in combination with five different antibiotics was evaluated using a microdilution checkerboard method and time-kill study against 12 clinical enterococcus isolates.

RESULTS

With the checkerboard method, LZD plus doxycycline (DX) had the highest frequency among all synergistic combinations. This combination and the one of LZD plus ceftriaxone (CRO) were the most frequent effective combinations against VREs. Time-kill studies using selected synergistic combinations-LZD + DX and LZD + CRO-showed an indifferent interaction. One tested combination of LZD + rifampicin showed antagonism.

CONCLUSIONS

Antagonistic interactions in combinations containing LZD are rare. LZD + DX and LZD + CRO may be beneficial in the treatment of VREs. However, more time-kill studies as well as in vivo experiments are required.

Vancomycin-Resistant Enterococci: Therapeutic Challenges in the 21st Century

Vancomycin-resistant enterococci are serious health threats due in part to their ability to persist in rugged environments and their propensity to acquire antibiotic resistance determinants. Enterococci have now established a home in our hospitals and possess mechanisms to defeat most currently available antimicrobials. This article reviews the history of the struggle with this pathogen, what is known about the traits associated with its rise in the modern medical environment, and the current understanding of therapeutic approaches in severe infections caused by these microorganisms. As the 21st century progresses, vancomycin-resistant enterococci continue to pose a daunting clinical challenge.

Synergistic Antimicrobial Effects of Silver/Transition-metal Combinatorial Treatments

Due to the emergence of multi-drug resistant strains, development of novel antibiotics has become a critical issue. One promising approach is the use of transition metals, since they exhibit rapid and significant toxicity, at low concentrations, in prokaryotic cells. Nevertheless, one main drawback of transition metals is their toxicity in eukaryotic cells. Here, we show that the barriers to use them as therapeutic agents could be mitigated by combining them with silver. We demonstrate that synergism of combinatorial treatments (Silver/transition metals, including Zn, Co, Cd, Ni, and Cu) increases up to 8-fold their antimicrobial effect, when compared to their individual effects, against E. coli and B. subtilis. We find that most combinatorial treatments exhibit synergistic antimicrobial effects at low/non-toxic concentrations to human keratinocyte cells, blast and melanoma rat cell lines. Moreover, we show that silver/(Cu, Ni, and Zn) increase prokaryotic cell permeability at sub-inhibitory concentrations, demonstrating this to be a possible mechanism of the synergistic behavior. Together, these results suggest that these combinatorial treatments will play an important role in the future development of antimicrobial agents and treatments against infections. In specific, the cytotoxicity experiments show that the combinations have great potential in the treatment of topical infections.

Predicting effects of antibiotic combinations using MICs determined at pharmacokinetically derived concentration ratios: in vitro model studies with linezolid- and rifampicin-exposed Staphylococcus aureus

To predict the effects of combined use of antibiotics on their pharmacodynamics, the susceptibility of Staphylococcus aureus to linezolid-rifampicin combinations was tested at concentration ratios equal to the ratios of 24-area under the concentration-time curve (AUC₂₄) simulated in an in vitro dynamic model. The linezolid MICs in combination with rifampicin decreased 8- to 67-fold. The rifampicin MICs were similar with or without linezolid. The enhanced activity of linezolid combined with rifampicin increased the AUC₂₄/MIC ratios and provided more pronounced antibacterial effects compared with single treatments. The areas between the control growth and time-kill curves (ABBCs) determined in combined and single treatments with linezolid were plotted against AUC₂₄/MIC on the same graph (r² 0.94). These findings suggest that the effects of linezolid-rifampicin combinations can be predicted by AUC₂₄/MICs of linezolid using its MIC determined at pharmacokinetically derived linezolid-to-rifampicin concentration ratios.

Pharmacodynamic and response surface analysis of linezolid or vancomycin combined with meropenem against Staphylococcus aureus

PURPOSE

To systematically assess the impact of pharmacodynamic interactions when adding either linezolid or vancomycin to meropenem on the antibacterial activity against methicillin-susceptible Staphylococcus aureus (MSSA). These regimens are frequently used in empiric therapy when risk factors for MRSA are present, but MSSA will often turn out as pathogen.

METHODS

Checkerboard and time-kill curve studies were performed against three strains of MSSA covering clinically relevant concentrations of all antibiotics. We newly elaborated a response surface analysis (RSA) to quantify the extent of the pharmacodynamic interactions.

RESULTS

The most prominent result was that linezolid fully antagonised the rapid (4-6 h) bactericidal effect of meropenem against MSSA to bacteriostasis at clinically relevant concentrations of both drugs. This interaction was invisible in the conventional checkerboard analysis (insensitive turbidity threshold). RSA quantified a 1.5-3.2 log10-fold higher bacterial load compared to expected additivity for linezolid and meropenem. Vancomycin and meropenem interacted partly synergistic (subinhibitory) or additive (inhibitory combinations) being bactericidal after 24 h.

CONCLUSIONS

Standard doses of linezolid and meropenem will provide inhibitory concentrations and thus pharmacodynamic antagonism throughout the whole dosing interval for MSSA. Further data is required to assess the clinical significance of this interaction.

Interaction between lichen secondary metabolites and antibiotics against clinical isolates methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus strains

The in vitro antimicrobial activities of five compounds isolated from lichens, collected in several Southern regions of Chile (including the Chilean Antarctic Territory), were evaluated alone and in combination with five therapeutically available antibiotics, using checkerboard microdilution assay against methicillin-resistant clinical isolates strains of Staphylococcus aureus. MIC90, MIC50, as well as MBC90 and MBC50, for the lichen compounds were evaluated. The MIC90 was ranging from 32 µg/ml for perlatolic acid to 128 µg/ml for α-collatolic acid. MBC90 was ranging from onefold up to twofold the MIC90 for each compound. A synergistic action was observed in combination with gentamicin, whilst antagonism was observed for some lichen compounds in combination with levofloxacin. All combinations with erythromycin were indifferent, whilst variability was observed for clindamycin and oxacillin combinations. Data from checkerboard assay were analysed and interpreted using the fractional inhibitory concentration index and the response surface approach using the ΔE model. Discrepancies were found between both methods for some combinations. These could mainly be explained by the failure of FIC approach, being too much subjective and sensitive to experimental errors. These findings suggest, however, that the natural compounds from lichens are good candidates for the individuation of novel templates for the development of new antimicrobial agents or combinations of drugs for chemotherapy.

In vitro antibacterial screening of six proline-based cyclic dipeptides in combination with β-lactam antibiotics against medically important bacteria

The in vitro synergistic antibacterial activity of six proline-based cyclic dipeptides [cyclo(D-Pro-L-Leu), cyclo(L-Pro-L-Met), cyclo(D-Pro-L-Phe), cyclo(L-Pro-L-Phe), cyclo(L-Pro-L-Tyr), and cyclo(L-Pro-D-Tyr)] in combination imipenem and ceftazidime was investigated in the present manuscript. The minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) and minimum bactericidal concentration (MBC) of the cyclic dipeptides were compared with those of the standard antibiotics (imipenem and ceftazidime). The synergistic antibacterial activities of cyclic dipeptides with imipenem or ceftazidime were assessed using the checkerboard and time-kill methods. The results of the present study showed that the combined effect of six cyclic dipeptides with imipenem predominantly recorded synergistic interaction (FIC index <0.5), whereas combination of certain cyclic dipeptides with ceftazidime recorded additive. The time-kill curve showed that the growth of the test bacteria was completely attenuated after 12-24 h of treatment with a 50:50 ratio of proline-based cyclic dipeptides and antibiotics. These synergistic effects have a potential role in delaying the development of resistance as the antibacterial activity is achieved with the very low concentrations of cyclic dipeptides and antibiotics. The cytotoxicity of cyclic dipeptides was tested against VERO cell line (African green monkey kidney cell line), and no cytotoxicity was recorded for cyclic dipeptides up to 100 μg/mL. These findings suggest that combination of cyclic dipeptides and antibiotics might be a good strategy for the individualization of novel templates for the development of new antimicrobial agents or combinations of drugs for antimicrobial chemotherapy. Moreover, these combinations may lead to the development of a new and vital antimicrobial combination against the infections caused by pathogenic bacteria. The in vitro synergistic activity of cyclic dipeptides with antibiotics against medically important bacteria is reported here for the first time.

A review of linezolid: the first oxazolidinone antibiotic

Resistance of Gram-positive bacterial pathogens, such as Staphylococcus aureus and Enterococcus faecium, to existing antibiotics continues to increase, and new antibiotics with activity against these pathogens are in demand. Linezolid (Zyvox, Pharmacia and Upjohn) is the first agent of a new class of antibiotics called the oxazolidinones. Linezolid possesses excellent microbial activity against a wide variety of Gram-positive pathogens including those resistant to methicillin and vancomycin (Vancocin, Eli Lilly). Linezolid is available for intravenous and oral administration and possesses excellent bioavailability. It exhibits good penetration into pulmonary, as well as skin and related structure tissues, and does not require dosage adjustment in hepatic or renal dysfunction. Linezolid is generally well-tolerated, with the predominant adverse effect manifesting as a duration dependent, reversible thrombocytopenia. Linezolid possesses monoamine oxidase inhibitor activity and caution is warranted with coadministration of adrenergic or seritonergic medications. Clinical trials conducted with linezolid in skin and structure infections, lower respiratory tract infections and vancomycin-resistant enterococcal infections demonstrate that linezolid is an effective therapy. Recent data suggest that linezolid may be superior to vancomycin for the treatment of infections caused by methicillin-resistant S. aureus. Linezolid is an excellent and promising new antibiotic for the treatment of resistant Gram-positive pathogens.

Antibiotics and Antifungals in Neonatal Intensive Care Units: A Review

The incidence of infections is higher in the neonatal period than at any time of life. The basic treatment of infants with infection has not changed substantially over the last years. Antibiotics (with or without supportive care) are one of the most valuable resources in managing sick newborn babies. Early-onset (ascending or transplacental) or late-onset (hospital acquired) infections present different chronology, epidemiology, physiology and outcome. Some classes of antibiotics are frequently used in the neonatal period: penicillins, cephalosporins, aminoglycosides, glycopeptides, monobactams, carbapenems. Other classes of antibiotics (chloramphenicol, cotrimoxazole, macrolides, clindamycin, rifampicin and metronidazole) are rarely used. Due to emergence of resistant bacterial strains in Neonatal Intensive Care Units (NICU), other classes of antibiotics such as quinolones and linezolid will probably increase their therapeutic role in the future. Although new formulations have been developed for treatment of fungal infections in infants, amphotericin B remains first-line treatment for systemic Candida infection. Prophylactic antibiotic therapy is almost always undesirable. Challenges from pathogens and antibiotic resistance in the NICU may warrant modification of traditional antibiotic regimens. Knowledge of local flora and practical application of different antibiotic characteristics are key to an effective and safe utilization of antibiotics and antifungals in critical newborns admitted to the NICU, and especially in very low birth weight infants.

Linezolid: A New Antibiotic for Newborns and Children?

Staphylococcus aureus remains one of the most common and troublesome microorganisms causing disease in humans, despite the development of effective antibiotics. Linezolid is a member of a new class of synthetic antibiotics called oxazolidinones, introduced into therapy due to the increasing resistance of Gram-positive pathogens to traditional antibiotics. Information about the pharmacokinetics and tolerability profile of linezolid in the pediatric population mostly derive from adult studies and especially in the neonatal field relatively few data are available. Here we summarize linezolid's characteristics and report data available in the literature regarding linezolid use in newborns and children. For this purpose, a Medline search was performed between 1990 and 2006 involving the term "linezolid" combined with the terms "newborn", "infant", "child", "pediatrics". Additional information was obtained from Reactions Weekly.

Activity and synergistic antimicrobial activity between diketopiperazines against bacteria in vitro

The aim of the present study was to determine the synergistic effects of diketopiperazines [cyclo-(L-Pro-L-Leu) (1), cyclo-(D-Pro-L-Leu) (2), and cyclo-(D-Pro-L-Tyr) (3)] purified from a Bacillus sp. N strain associated with entomopathogenic nematode Rhabditis (Oscheius) sp. on the growth of bacteria. The minimum inhibitory concentration and minimum bactericidal concentration of the diketopiperazines was compared with that of the standard antibiotics. The synergistic antibacterial activities of the combination of diketopiperazines against pathogenic bacteria were assessed using the checkerboard assay and time-kill methods. The results of the present study showed that the combination effects of diketopiperazines were predominately synergistic (FIC index <0.5). Furthermore, time-kill study showed that the growth of the tested bacteria was completely attenuated with 4-12 h of treatment with 50:50 ratios of diketopiperazines. These results suggest that the combination of diketopiperazines may be microbiologically beneficial. The three diketopiperazines are nontoxic to normal human cell line (L231 lung epithelial) up to 200 m μg/ml. The in vitro synergistic activity of cyclo-(L-Pro-L-Leu), cyclo-(D-Pro-L-Leu), and cyclo-(D-Pro-L-Tyr) against bacteria is reported here for the first time. These findings have potential implications in delaying the development of resistance as the antibacterial effect is achieved with lower concentrations of both drugs (diketopiperazines).

Effect of linezolid on the 50% lethal dose and 50% protective dose in treatment of infections by Gram-negative pathogens in naive and immunosuppressed mice and on the efficacy of ciprofloxacin in an acute murine model of septicemia

Murine models of infection were used to study the effect of linezolid on the virulence of Gram-negative bacteria and to assess potential pharmacodynamic interactions with ciprofloxacin in the treatment of these infections, prompted by observations from a recent clinical trial. Naive and immunosuppressed mice were challenged with Klebsiella pneumoniae 53A1109, K. pneumoniae GC6658, and Pseudomonas aeruginosa UC12120 in acute sepsis and pulmonary infection models, using different serial dilutions of these pathogens (groups of 8 animals each). Linezolid (100 mg/kg/dose) was administered orally at 0.5 and 4.0 h postchallenge in the sepsis model and at 4 h postchallenge followed by 2 days of twice-daily treatment in the pulmonary model. Further, ciprofloxacin alone and in combination with oral linezolid was investigated in the sepsis model. Survival was assessed for 4 and 10 days postchallenge in the systemic and respiratory models, respectively. The data were fitted to a nonlinear regression analysis to determine 50% lethal doses (LD(50)s) and 50% protective doses (PD(50)s). A clinically relevant, high-dose regimen of linezolid had no significant effect on LD(50) in these models. This lack of effect was independent of immune status. A combination of oral ciprofloxacin with linezolid yielded lower PD(50)s than oral ciprofloxacin alone (ciprofloxacin in combination, 8.4 to 32.7 mg/kg; oral ciprofloxacin, 39.4 to 88.3 mg/kg). Linezolid did not improve the efficacy of subcutaneous ciprofloxacin (ciprofloxacin in combination, 2.0 to 2.4 mg/kg; subcutaneous ciprofloxacin, 2.0 to 2.8 mg/kg). In conclusion, linezolid does not seem to potentiate infections caused by Gram-negative pathogens or to interact antagonistically with ciprofloxacin.

Managing Severe Community-Acquired Pneumonia Due to Community Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA)

Community-associated methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) is a rare, but significant cause of community-acquired pneumonia (CAP). A number of virulence determinants have been implicated in the development of severe community MRSA pneumonia, characterized by multilobar cavitating necrosis in patients without usual risk-factors for pneumonia. Optimal management is uncertain, and is extrapolated from anecdotal experiences with small case series, randomized studies of hospital-acquired pneumonia, and laboratory investigations using in vitro experiments and animal models of MRSA pneumonia. Adequate clinical suspicion, early diagnosis and administration of appropriate antibiotics are necessary for best patient outcomes, although some patients will still do badly even with early anti-MRSA therapy. Vancomycin or linezolid have been recommended as first-line therapy, possibly in combination with other antibiotics. Newer antibiotics such as ceftaroline are still being evaluated.

In vitro antimicrobial activity of pannarin alone and in combination with antibiotics against methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus clinical isolates

The in vitro antimicrobial activities of pannarin, a depsidone isolated from lichens, collected in several Southern regions of Chile (including Antarctica), was evaluated alone and in combination with five therapeutically available antibiotics, using checkerboard microdilution assay against methicillin-resistant clinical isolates strains of Staphylococcus aureus. MIC(90), MIC(50), as well as MBC(90) and MBC(50), were evaluated. A moderate synergistic action was observed in combination with gentamicin, whilst antagonism was observed in combination with levofloxacin. All combinations with erythromycin were indifferent, whilst variability was observed for clindamycin and oxacillin combinations. Data from checkerboard assay were analysed and interpreted using the fractional inhibitory concentration index and the response surface approach using the ΔE model. Discrepancies were found between both methods for some combinations. In order to asses cellular lysis after exposure to pannarin, cell membrane permeability assay was performed. The treatment with pannarin produces bactericidal activity without significant calcein release, consistent with lack of lysis or even significant structural damage to the cytoplasmic membrane. Furthermore, pannarin shows low hemolytic activity and moderate cytotoxic effect on peripheral blood mononuclear cells. These findings suggest that the natural compound pannarin might be a good candidate for the individualization of novel templates for the development of new antimicrobial agents or combinations of drugs for chemotherapy.

In vitro interaction of usnic acid in combination with antimicrobial agents against methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus clinical isolates determined by FICI and ΔE model methods

The in vitro antimicrobial activities of usnic acid were evaluated in combination with five therapeutically available antibiotics, using checkerboard microdilution assay against methicillin-resistant clinical isolates strains of Staphylococcus aureus. MIC₉₀, MIC₅₀, as well as MBC₉₀ and MBC₅₀, were evaluated. A synergistic action was observed in combination with gentamicin, while antagonism was observed with levofloxacin. The combination with erythromycin showed indifference, while variability was observed for clindamycin and oxacillin. Data from checkerboard assay were analysed and interpreted using the fractional inhibitory concentration index (FICI) and the response surface approach using the ΔE model. Discrepancies were found between both methods for some combinations. These could mainly be explained by the failure of FIC approach, being too much subjective and sensitive to experimental errors. These findings, beside confirm the well known antimicrobial activity of usnic acid, suggest, however, that this substance might be a good candidate for the individuation of novel templates for the development of new antimicrobial agents or combinations of drugs for chemotherapy.

Antibiotic sensitivity profile of bacterial pathogens in postoperative wound infections at a tertiary care hospital in Gujarat, India

OBJECTIVE

To find out the most common bacterial pathogens responsible for post-operative wound infection and their antibiotic sensitivity profile.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This prospective, observational study was carried out in patients of postoperative wound infection. Samples from wound discharge were collected using a sterile swab and studied for identification of isolates by Gram stains and culture growth followed by in vitro antibiotic susceptibility testing performed by disc diffusion method on Mueller Hinton agar.

RESULTS

Out of 183 organisms, 126 (68.85%) isolated organisms were gram negative. Staphylococcus aureus, 48 (26.23%), was the predominant organism. S. aureus was sensitive to rifampicin (89.58%), levofloxacin (60.42%), and vancomycin (54.17%). Pseudomonas aeruginosa was sensitive to ciprofloxacin (83.78%), gatifloxacin (51.35%), and meropenem (51.35%). Escherichia coli was sensitive to levofloxacin (72.41%) and ciprofloxacin (62.07%). Klebsiella pneumoniae was sensitive to ciprofloxacin (63.16%), levofloxacin (63.16%), gatifloxacin (63.16%), and linezolid (56.52%). Proteus mirabilis was sensitive to ciprofloxacin (75%) and linezolid (62.50). Proteus vulgaris was sensitive to ampicillin+sulbactam (57.14%) followed by levofloxacin (50%).

CONCLUSIONS

There is an alarming increase of infections caused by antibiotic-resistant bacteria, particularly in the emergence of VRSA/VISA, meropenem, and third generation cephalosporin resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Linezolid showing sensitivity against Gram negative bacteria.

Comparative in vitro activities of torezolid (DA-7157) against clinical isolates of aerobic and anaerobic bacteria in South Korea

Resistance of Gram-positive pathogens to first-line antimicrobial agents has been increasing in many parts of the world. We compared the in vitro activities of torezolid with those of other antimicrobial agents, including linezolid, against clinical isolates of major aerobic and anaerobic bacteria. Torezolid had an MIC(90) of ≤0.5 μg/ml for the Gram-positive bacterial isolates tested and was more potent than either linezolid or vancomycin.

Linezolid treatment of nosocomial bacterial infection with multiresistant Gram-positive pathogens in preterm infants: a systematic review

Linezolid is an antibiotic of the oxazolidinone class that has bacteriostatic and bactericidal activity against a broad range of Gram-positive bacteria, including multiresistant pathogens. Owing to increasing resistance of Gram-positive pathogens to traditional antibiotics such as vancomycin, the oxazolidinones were introduced into therapy. The aim of this review was to summarise actual data on the pharmacokinetics, safety and clinical use of linezolid in preterm infants. The Medline and EMBASE databases were searched using the term 'linezolid' combined with 'newborn', 'neonate', 'preterm' and 'premature' for papers published between January 1987 and June 2009. Studies reporting on a population including preterm infants and other age groups as well as case reports on preterm infants only were acceptable for analysis. Five studies and eight case reports were identified evaluating linezolid in preterm infants. A dosage regimen of 10mg/kg body weight given either orally or intravenously every 8h in infants aged >or=1 week and the same dose given every 12h in infants <1 week was shown to be safe and effective with a mean treatment duration of 10-28 days. In summary, linezolid was shown to be a safe and effective alternative to vancomycin in the treatment of infections with multiresistant Gram-positive pathogens in preterm infants.

Tolerability of prolonged linezolid therapy in bone and joint infection: protective effect of rifampicin on the occurrence of anaemia?

BACKGROUND

Linezolid therapy has shown high rates of clinical success in patients with osteomyelitis and prosthetic joint infections caused by Gram-positive cocci. Recent studies have demonstrated that linezolid/rifampicin combination therapy prevents the emergence of rifampicin-resistant mutations in vitro. However, linezolid/rifampicin combination-related haematological and neurological toxicities have not been evaluated.

OBJECTIVES

To assess the tolerability of prolonged linezolid/rifampicin combination therapy compared with other linezolid-containing regimens in patients with bone and joint infections.

METHODS

We reviewed the medical records of 94 patients who had received linezolid for >4 weeks after bone and joint infections. Anaemia was defined as a ≥2 g/dL reduction in haemoglobin, leucopenia as a total leucocyte count <4 × 10(9)/L, and thrombocytopenia as a reduction in platelet count to <75% of baseline.

RESULTS

Anaemia was less frequent among patients on linezolid/rifampicin combination therapy than among patients on linezolid alone or in combination with other drugs (9.3%, 44% and 52%, respectively; P<0.01). In multivariate analysis, age and treatment group were independently associated with anaemia. Thrombocytopenia was reported in 44% of patients on linezolid/rifampicin combination therapy, in 48% of patients on linezolid alone and in 57.7% of patients on other linezolid-containing regimens. Age was the only variable associated with thrombocytopenia (P=0.019) in univariate analysis.

CONCLUSIONS

Linezolid/rifampicin combination therapy was associated with a significantly reduced incidence of anaemia among patients with bone and joint infections, but it did not have an effect on thrombocytopenia and peripheral neuropathy rates. Linezolid/rifampicin combination therapy was not associated with poor clinical outcomes.

Carbon monoxide is a poison... to microbes! CO as a bactericidal molecule

Inflammation and immunity result in a wide range of disease processes, including chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, ischemia-reperfusion injury, atherosclerosis, vascular thrombosis and sepsis. Heme oxygenase-1 (HO-1) is a key enzyme that is indispensable for the temporal and spatial regulation of host response and, together with its essential metabolite carbon monoxide (CO), is crucial for maintaining homeostasis, inhibition of inflammation and the preservation of function and life. The biology of HO-1 is being discussed in this review series by Soares and colleagues and thus will not be reviewed here. Rather we will complement the HO-1 overview with a comprehensive discussion of CO as perhaps the one product of HO-1 that has been most studied. Of the numerous physiologic effects observed with CO, in the past five years it has become apparent that CO has been ascribed an additional novel role as a 'bactericidal agent'. Its role in the maintenance of homeostasis remains intact; however, the designation necessitates the paradoxical induction of the inflammatory response and binding to hemoproteins in order to restore homeostasis and sustain life. In this article, we review and discuss reports that have propelled and challenged the paradoxical use of CO, once viewed as a toxic molecule, now as a host defense molecule agent against microbes.

In vitro 24-hour time-kill studies of vancomycin and linezolid in combination versus methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus

Many clinicians are trying unique strategies, including vancomycin and linezolid in combination, for treatment of patients who do not respond to conventional therapy against methicillin (meticillin)-resistant Staphylococcus aureus. In our study, which illustrated in vitro activity only, no synergistic activity was seen when the two agents were combined. Conversely, antagonistic activity occurred in three of five strains when linezolid was added to vancomycin. Our results indicate that vancomycin and linezolid in combination should be avoided.

[Presumptive bacterial meningitis in adults: initial antimicrobial therapy]

CSF sterilization should be obtained very rapidly to reduce both mortality and morbidity due to bacterial meningitis. Thus, antibiotic treatment should be adapted to the suspected bacterium and administered as early as possible at high dosage with - if necessary - a loading dose and continuous perfusion. The rates of abnormal susceptibility to penicillin of Streptococcus pneumoniae, Neisseria meningitis and Haemophilus influenzae are 37%, 30% and 12% respectively. Thus, ceftriaxone or cefotaxim must be used as empirical treatment. Listeria monocytogenes remains fully susceptible to aminopenicillin, so, the combination aminopenicillin and aminoglycoside is the first-line treatment. Antibiotic resistance, allergy or contra-indications, are in fact rare but in these cases, antibiotic combinations are often needed. The latter are more or less complex and clinically validated; they include molecules such as vancomycine, fosfomycin, fluoroquinolone or linezolid.

Linezolid alone or combined with rifampin against methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus in experimental foreign-body infection

We investigated the activity of linezolid, alone and in combination with rifampin (rifampicin), against a methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) strain in vitro and in a guinea pig model of foreign-body infection. The MIC, minimal bactericidal concentration (MBC) in logarithmic phase, and MBC in stationary growth phase were 2.5, >20, and >20 microg/ml, respectively, for linezolid; 0.01, 0.08, and 2.5 microg/ml, respectively, for rifampin; and 0.16, 0.63, >20 microg/ml, respectively, for levofloxacin. In time-kill studies, bacterial regrowth and the development of rifampin resistance were observed after 24 h with rifampin alone at 1x or 4x the MIC and were prevented by the addition of linezolid. After the administration of single intraperitoneal doses of 25, 50, and 75 mg/kg of body weight, linezolid peak concentrations of 6.8, 12.7, and 18.1 microg/ml, respectively, were achieved in sterile cage fluid at approximately 3 h. The linezolid concentration remained above the MIC of the test organism for 12 h with all doses. Antimicrobial treatments of animals with cage implant infections were given twice daily for 4 days. Linezolid alone at 25, 50, and 75 mg/kg reduced the planktonic bacteria in cage fluid during treatment by 1.2 to 1.7 log(10) CFU/ml; only linezolid at 75 mg/kg prevented bacterial regrowth 5 days after the end of treatment. Linezolid used in combination with rifampin (12.5 mg/kg) was more effective than linezolid used as monotherapy, reducing the planktonic bacteria by >or=3 log(10) CFU (P < 0.05). Efficacy in the eradication of cage-associated infection was achieved only when linezolid was combined with rifampin, with cure rates being between 50% and 60%, whereas the levofloxacin-rifampin combination demonstrated the highest cure rate (91%) against the strain tested. The linezolid-rifampin combination is a treatment option for implant-associated infections caused by quinolone-resistant MRSA.

Measurement of ampicillin, vancomycin, linezolid and gentamicin activity against enterococcal biofilms

BACKGROUND

Enterococci frequently cause biofilm infections but susceptibility of clinical isolates growing in biofilms has not been investigated. The minimum biofilm eradicating concentration (MBEC) has been suggested as a guide to treatment of biofilm infections. We measured an alternative endpoint, the minimum biofilm inhibitory concentration (MBIC) and compared the results with MIC and MBC.

OBJECTIVES

To compare the MIC, MBC and MBIC of ampicillin, vancomycin and linezolid against enterococcal biofilms, to assess the impact of additional gentamicin and correlate findings with clinical outcome.

METHODS

MIC and MBC were measured using standard techniques. MBICs were measured using a modification of the Calgary biofilm device method. Fifty-eight enterococcal isolates from episodes of intravascular catheter-related bloodstream infection were tested.

RESULTS

Tolerance to ampicillin, vancomycin and linezolid was seen in 93%, 100% and 93% of isolates, respectively. MIC(90)s of ampicillin, vancomycin and linezolid were all 4 mg/L for Enterococcus faecalis isolates. MBC(90)s of ampicillin, vancomycin and linezolid for E. faecalis isolates were 1024, >128 and 2048 mg/L, respectively. MBIC(90)s of ampicillin, vancomycin and linezolid for E. faecalis isolates were 8192, 4096 and 4096 mg/L, respectively. Results for Enterococcus faecium were similar for vancomycin and linezolid but this species was generally more resistant to ampicillin. Adding 10 mg/L gentamicin had a variable effect on MIC, MBC or MBIC, which was not predictable by gentamicin susceptibility on disc testing.

CONCLUSIONS

Very high concentrations of ampicillin, vancomycin and linezolid are required to inhibit enterococcal biofilms in vitro. Combining these agents with gentamicin significantly reduced MIC, MBC and MBIC against only a proportion of enterococcal isolates. No correlation between MBIC and outcome was found.