Simultaneous detection and differentiation of anti-Helicobacter pylori antibodies by flow microparticle immunofluorescence assay

Non-invasive diagnostic tests for Helicobacter pylori infection

BACKGROUND

Helicobacter pylori (H pylori) infection has been implicated in a number of malignancies and non-malignant conditions including peptic ulcers, non-ulcer dyspepsia, recurrent peptic ulcer bleeding, unexplained iron deficiency anaemia, idiopathic thrombocytopaenia purpura, and colorectal adenomas. The confirmatory diagnosis of H pylori is by endoscopic biopsy, followed by histopathological examination using haemotoxylin and eosin (H & E) stain or special stains such as Giemsa stain and Warthin-Starry stain. Special stains are more accurate than H & E stain. There is significant uncertainty about the diagnostic accuracy of non-invasive tests for diagnosis of H pylori.

OBJECTIVES

To compare the diagnostic accuracy of urea breath test, serology, and stool antigen test, used alone or in combination, for diagnosis of H pylori infection in symptomatic and asymptomatic people, so that eradication therapy for H pylori can be started.

SEARCH METHODS

We searched MEDLINE, Embase, the Science Citation Index and the National Institute for Health Research Health Technology Assessment Database on 4 March 2016. We screened references in the included studies to identify additional studies. We also conducted citation searches of relevant studies, most recently on 4 December 2016. We did not restrict studies by language or publication status, or whether data were collected prospectively or retrospectively.

SELECTION CRITERIA

We included diagnostic accuracy studies that evaluated at least one of the index tests (urea breath test using isotopes such as 13C or 14C, serology and stool antigen test) against the reference standard (histopathological examination using H & E stain, special stains or immunohistochemical stain) in people suspected of having H pylori infection.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Two review authors independently screened the references to identify relevant studies and independently extracted data. We assessed the methodological quality of studies using the QUADAS-2 tool. We performed meta-analysis by using the hierarchical summary receiver operating characteristic (HSROC) model to estimate and compare SROC curves. Where appropriate, we used bivariate or univariate logistic regression models to estimate summary sensitivities and specificities.

MAIN RESULTS

We included 101 studies involving 11,003 participants, of which 5839 participants (53.1%) had H pylori infection. The prevalence of H pylori infection in the studies ranged from 15.2% to 94.7%, with a median prevalence of 53.7% (interquartile range 42.0% to 66.5%). Most of the studies (57%) included participants with dyspepsia and 53 studies excluded participants who recently had proton pump inhibitors or antibiotics.There was at least an unclear risk of bias or unclear applicability concern for each study.Of the 101 studies, 15 compared the accuracy of two index tests and two studies compared the accuracy of three index tests. Thirty-four studies (4242 participants) evaluated serology; 29 studies (2988 participants) evaluated stool antigen test; 34 studies (3139 participants) evaluated urea breath test-13C; 21 studies (1810 participants) evaluated urea breath test-14C; and two studies (127 participants) evaluated urea breath test but did not report the isotope used. The thresholds used to define test positivity and the staining techniques used for histopathological examination (reference standard) varied between studies. Due to sparse data for each threshold reported, it was not possible to identify the best threshold for each test.Using data from 99 studies in an indirect test comparison, there was statistical evidence of a difference in diagnostic accuracy between urea breath test-13C, urea breath test-14C, serology and stool antigen test (P = 0.024). The diagnostic odds ratios for urea breath test-13C, urea breath test-14C, serology, and stool antigen test were 153 (95% confidence interval (CI) 73.7 to 316), 105 (95% CI 74.0 to 150), 47.4 (95% CI 25.5 to 88.1) and 45.1 (95% CI 24.2 to 84.1). The sensitivity (95% CI) estimated at a fixed specificity of 0.90 (median from studies across the four tests), was 0.94 (95% CI 0.89 to 0.97) for urea breath test-13C, 0.92 (95% CI 0.89 to 0.94) for urea breath test-14C, 0.84 (95% CI 0.74 to 0.91) for serology, and 0.83 (95% CI 0.73 to 0.90) for stool antigen test. This implies that on average, given a specificity of 0.90 and prevalence of 53.7% (median specificity and prevalence in the studies), out of 1000 people tested for H pylori infection, there will be 46 false positives (people without H pylori infection who will be diagnosed as having H pylori infection). In this hypothetical cohort, urea breath test-13C, urea breath test-14C, serology, and stool antigen test will give 30 (95% CI 15 to 58), 42 (95% CI 30 to 58), 86 (95% CI 50 to 140), and 89 (95% CI 52 to 146) false negatives respectively (people with H pylori infection for whom the diagnosis of H pylori will be missed).Direct comparisons were based on few head-to-head studies. The ratios of diagnostic odds ratios (DORs) were 0.68 (95% CI 0.12 to 3.70; P = 0.56) for urea breath test-13C versus serology (seven studies), and 0.88 (95% CI 0.14 to 5.56; P = 0.84) for urea breath test-13C versus stool antigen test (seven studies). The 95% CIs of these estimates overlap with those of the ratios of DORs from the indirect comparison. Data were limited or unavailable for meta-analysis of other direct comparisons.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

In people without a history of gastrectomy and those who have not recently had antibiotics or proton ,pump inhibitors, urea breath tests had high diagnostic accuracy while serology and stool antigen tests were less accurate for diagnosis of Helicobacter pylori infection.This is based on an indirect test comparison (with potential for bias due to confounding), as evidence from direct comparisons was limited or unavailable. The thresholds used for these tests were highly variable and we were unable to identify specific thresholds that might be useful in clinical practice.We need further comparative studies of high methodological quality to obtain more reliable evidence of relative accuracy between the tests. Such studies should be conducted prospectively in a representative spectrum of participants and clearly reported to ensure low risk of bias. Most importantly, studies should prespecify and clearly report thresholds used, and should avoid inappropriate exclusions.

Development of an in-house enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay based on surface whole cell antigen for diagnosis of Helicobacter pylori infection in patients with gastroduodenal ulcer disease

Helicobacter pylori (H. pylori) is a causative agent of gastritis, gastroduodenal ulcers and gastric adenocarcinoma. More than 50% world population is colonized by H. pylori, which is closely related to the chronic gastritis and gastric ulcer infection. In this study, a total of 214 gastritis patient's serum samples were screened for anti-H. pylori IgG antibody. A 96-well plate coated with 20 μg/ml antigen and hundred-fold diluted patient's serum was allowed to react. After extensive washing with buffer, 1:2,500 diluted conjugated secondary antibody was added. Later substrate was added to observe positivity by measuring the intensity of color. Statistical analyses were performed, and p value of <0.01 was taken as significant; 84% male patients and 89% female patients, respectively, tested positive for H. pylori, while agewise distribution was 35-45 years males (40%) and 35-55 years females (52%) were found highest number of H. pylori infected patients. In-house ELISA based on surface whole cell antigen (wELISA) showed a sensitivity of 93%, specificity of 100%, accuracy 94% and κ value 0.86 with significant correlation R-0.77020; p < 0.0001. We conclude that H. pylori local isolates surface antigen was satisfactory for diagnosis as different parameters were adjusted according to the local H. pylori isolates. Fluctuations in serum antibody titer predict the variation in an individual's response of the host against H. pylori. In-house wELISA could provide a reliable and a clinically useful method for the diagnosis of H. pylori infection in patients of Karachi, Pakistan.

Helicobacter pylori multiplex serology

BACKGROUND

Helicobacter pylori infection is associated with severe gastrointestinal disease including cancer. It induces complex antibody responses that might vary depending on disease state but currently cannot be assessed adequately. The objective of this work was the development of a sensitive and specific H. pylori multiplex serology assay with high-throughput capability that allows simultaneous detection of antibodies to a protein array.

METHODS

Seventeen proteins of up to three H. pylori strains (26695, G27, 151), including CagA, VacA, UreA, Catalase, Omp, and GroEL, were recombinantly expressed as glutathione-S-transferase fusion proteins, affinity-purified, and used as antigens in a fluorescent bead-based antibody-binding assay. Reference sera (n = 317) characterized by commercial assays (screening ELISA with Western blot confirmation) were used for validation.

RESULTS

H. pylori seropositivity by multiplex serology defined as reactivity with at least four proteins showed good agreement (kappa: 0.70) with commercial serologic assay classification, and a sensitivity of 89% and specificity of 82%. For individual antigens, agreement with Western blot was good for CagA (kappa: 0.77), moderate for UreA (kappa: 0.53), and weak for VacA (kappa: 0.12). Of the 13 proteins expressed from two strains, only VacA showed serologic strain differences. High antibody reactivity to CagA (Type I infection) was negatively associated with antibodies to GroEL, Cad, CagM, catalase, HcpC, NapA, and UreA, suggesting type-specific differences in protein expression patterns and/or immune response.

CONCLUSION

With its high-throughput and simultaneous detection abilities, H. pylori multiplex serology appears suited as tool for large seroepidemiologic studies assessing H. pylori prevalence, antibody patterns, and associations with specific diseases.

The role of type-specific antibodies in colonization and infection by Helicobacter pylori

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Helicobacter pylori is a Gram-negative spiral bacterium that colonizes the stomach of humans, causing gastritis, peptic ulcer disease, or gastric cancer. H. pylori infection accounts for a high percentage of mortality and morbidity rates in developing as well as developed countries. H. pylori bacteria reside in the mucus layer covering the gastric epithelium, and therefore the type of protective measures that could confer resistance appear to be limited. Although H. pylori infection stimulates strong local and systemic specific IgA and IgG antibody production, the influence of antibodies on bacterial colonization and gastric inflammation is still controversial.

RECENT FINDINGS

Recent studies in experimental animal models have indicated a non-essential role of specific antibodies for host resistance against H. pylori infection. Recent data show that protection is mediated by T cells, CD4 T helper type 1 cells, in particular. Antibodies are not only dispensable for protection, but they impair both the elimination of bacteria and the development of gastritis. This effect appears to be IgA-dependent and is not a function of specific IgM or IgG antibodies.

SUMMARY

This review highlights the recent advances in our understanding of how antibodies may influence the development of gastric inflammation and bacterial colonization. Such information can significantly increase our basic knowledge of immune regulation and protection against H. pylori infection, but can also indicate new strategies for vaccine development.

Diagnosis of Helicobacter pylori infection

While there are some attempts to improve culture of Helicobacter pylori, molecular methods have been the main focus of this interest. Their main application concerns the development of rapid tests also allowing the determination of bacterial resistance, i.e. real-time polymerase chain reaction (PCR) or fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH), or to genotype the strains. Attempts to improve, simplify or explain the discrepancies of urea breath test results have been made and new generation of stool antigen test with monoclonal antibodies either using the standard ELISA format or rapid immunoenzymatic detection have confirmed their value. With regard to serology, studies have mainly focused on the distinction of infections with more pathogenic strains and the ability to diagnose atrophic gastritis with the Gastropanel.