The stationary-phase sigma factor sigma(S) is responsible for the resistance of Escherichia coli stationary-phase cells to mazEF-mediated cell death

Control of a chemical chaperone by a universally conserved ATPase

The universally conserved YchF/Ola1 ATPases regulate stress response pathways in prokaryotes and eukaryotes. Deletion of YchF/Ola1 leads to increased resistance against environmental stressors, such as reactive oxygen species, while their upregulation is associated with tumorigenesis in humans. The current study shows that in E. coli, the absence of YchF stimulates the synthesis of the alternative sigma factor RpoS by a transcription-independent mechanism. Elevated levels of RpoS then enhance the transcription of major stress-responsive genes. In addition, the deletion of ychF increases the levels of polyphosphate kinase, which in turn boosts the production of the evolutionary conserved and ancient chemical chaperone polyphosphate. This potentially provides a unifying concept for the increased stress resistance in bacteria and eukaryotes upon YchF/Ola1 deletion. Intriguingly, the simultaneous deletion of ychF and the polyphosphate-degrading enzyme exopolyphosphatase causes synthetic lethality in E. coli, demonstrating that polyphosphate production needs to be fine-tuned to prevent toxicity.

The expression of type II TA system genes following persister cell formation in Pseudomonas aeruginosa isolates in the exponential and stationary phases

Failure of infection therapy in the presence of antibiotics has become a major problem which has been mostly attributed to the ability of bacterial persister cell formation. Bacteria use various mechanisms to form persister cells in different phases, among which is the toxin-antitoxin (TA) systems. This study aimed at investigating the expression of type II TA system genes under the stress of ciprofloxacin and colistin antibiotics in the exponential and stationary phases. To determine the effects of ciprofloxacin and colistin on persister cell formation in the exponential and stationary phases of Pseudomonas aeruginosa strains, colony counting was performed at different time intervals in the presence of fivefold MIC of ciprofloxacin and colistin. In addition, the expression of relBE, Xre-COG5654, vapBC, and Xre-GNAT genes in P. aeruginosa isolates was assessed 3.5 h after antibiotic treatment in the exponential and stationary phases using qRT-PCR. Our results indicated the presence of persister phenotype of P. aeruginosa strains in the presence of fivefold MIC of ciprofloxacin and colistin compared to the control after 3.5 h of incubation in the exponential and stationary phases. Also, the number of persister cells in the stationary phase was higher than that of the exponential phase. According to the results of qRT-PCR, ciprofloxacin and colistin may induce persister cells by increasing the expression of type II TA systems in stationary and exponential phases. Ciprofloxacin and colistin may increase the formation of persister cells by affecting the expression of type II TA systems.

Ribosomal elongation factor 4 promotes cell death associated with lethal stress

Ribosomal elongation factor 4 (EF4) is highly conserved among bacteria, mitochondria, and chloroplasts. However, the EF4-encoding gene, lepA, is nonessential and its deficiency shows no growth or fitness defect. In purified systems, EF4 back-translocates stalled, posttranslational ribosomes for efficient protein synthesis; consequently, EF4 has a protective role during moderate stress. We were surprised to find that EF4 also has a detrimental role during severe stress: deletion of lepA increased Escherichia coli survival following treatment with several antimicrobials. EF4 contributed to stress-mediated lethality through reactive oxygen species (ROS) because (i) the protective effect of a ΔlepA mutation against lethal antimicrobials was eliminated by anaerobic growth or by agents that block hydroxyl radical accumulation and (ii) the ΔlepA mutation decreased ROS levels stimulated by antimicrobial stress. Epistasis experiments showed that EF4 functions in the same genetic pathway as the MazF toxin, a stress response factor implicated in ROS-mediated cell death. The detrimental action of EF4 required transfer-messenger RNA (tmRNA, which tags truncated proteins for degradation and is known to be inhibited by EF4) and the ClpP protease. Inhibition of a protective, tmRNA/ClpP-mediated degradative activity would allow truncated proteins to indirectly perturb the respiratory chain and thereby provide a potential link between EF4 and ROS. The connection among EF4, MazF, tmRNA, and ROS expands a pathway leading from harsh stress to bacterial self-destruction. The destructive aspect of EF4 plus the protective properties described previously make EF4 a bifunctional factor in a stress response that promotes survival or death, depending on the severity of stress.

Translation elongation factor 4 (EF4) is one of the most conserved proteins in nature, but it is dispensable. Lack of strong phenotypes for its genetic knockout has made EF4 an enigma. Recent biochemical work has demonstrated that mild stress may stall ribosomes and that EF4 can reposition stalled ribosomes to resume proper translation. Thus, EF4 protects cells from moderate stress. Here we report that EF4 is paradoxically harmful during severe stress, such as that caused by antimicrobial treatment. EF4 acts in a pathway that leads to excessive accumulation of reactive oxygen species (ROS), thereby participating in a bacterial self-destruction that occurs when cells cannot effectively repair stress-mediated damage. Thus, EF4 has two opposing functions—at low-to-moderate levels of stress, the protein is protective by allowing stress-paused translation to resume; at high-levels of stress, EF4 helps bacteria self-destruct. These data support the existence of a bacterial live-or-die response to stress.

Sigma S-dependent antioxidant defense protects stationary-phase Escherichia coli against the bactericidal antibiotic gentamicin

Stationary-phase bacteria are important in disease. The σ(s)-regulated general stress response helps them become resistant to disinfectants, but the role of σ(s) in bacterial antibiotic resistance has not been elucidated. Loss of σ(s) rendered stationary-phase Escherichia coli more sensitive to the bactericidal antibiotic gentamicin (Gm), and proteomic analysis suggested involvement of a weakened antioxidant defense. Use of the psfiA genetic reporter, 3'-(p-hydroxyphenyl) fluorescein (HPF) dye, and Amplex Red showed that Gm generated more reactive oxygen species (ROS) in the mutant. HPF measurements can be distorted by cell elongation, but Gm did not affect stationary-phase cell dimensions. Coadministration of the antioxidant N-acetyl cysteine (NAC) decreased drug lethality particularly in the mutant, as did Gm treatment under anaerobic conditions that prevent ROS formation. Greater oxidative stress, due to insufficient quenching of endogenous ROS and/or respiration-linked electron leakage, therefore contributed to the greater sensitivity of the mutant; infection by a uropathogenic strain in mice showed this to be the case also in vivo. Disruption of antioxidant defense by eliminating the quencher proteins, SodA/SodB and KatE/SodA, or the pentose phosphate pathway proteins, Zwf/Gnd and TalA, which provide NADPH for ROS decomposition, also generated greater oxidative stress and killing by Gm. Thus, besides its established mode of action, Gm also kills stationary-phase bacteria by generating oxidative stress, and targeting the antioxidant defense of E. coli can enhance its efficacy. Relevant aspects of the current controversy on the role of ROS in killing by bactericidal drugs of exponential-phase bacteria, which represent a different physiological state, are discussed.

sigmaS, a major player in the response to environmental stresses in Escherichia coli: role, regulation and mechanisms of promoter recognition

Bacterial cells often face hostile environmental conditions, to which they adapt by activation of stress responses. In Escherichia coli, environmental stresses resulting in significant reduction in growth rate stimulate the expression of the rpoS gene, encoding the alternative σ factor σ(S). The σ(S) protein associates with RNA polymerase, and through transcription of genes belonging to the rpoS regulon allows the activation of a 'general stress response', which protects the bacterial cell from harmful environmental conditions. Each step of this process is finely tuned in order to cater to the needs of the bacterial cell: in particular, selective promoter recognition by σ(S) is achieved through small deviations from a common consensus DNA sequence for both σ(S) and the housekeeping σ(70). Recognition of specific DNA elements by σ(S) is integrated with the effects of environmental signals and the interaction with regulatory proteins, in what represents a fascinating example of multifactorial regulation of gene expression. In this report, we discuss the function of the rpoS gene in the general stress response, and review the current knowledge on regulation of rpoS expression and on promoter recognition by σ(S).

Toxins-antitoxins: diversity, evolution and function

Genes for toxin-antitoxin (TA) complexes are widespread in prokaryote genomes, and species frequently possess tens of plasmid and chromosomal TA loci. The complexes are categorized into three types based on genetic organization and mode of action. The toxins universally are proteins directed against specific intracellular targets, whereas the antitoxins are either proteins or small RNAs that neutralize the toxin or inhibit toxin synthesis. Within the three types of complex, there has been extensive evolutionary shuffling of toxin and antitoxin genes leading to considerable diversity in TA combinations. The intracellular targets of the protein toxins similarly are varied. Numerous toxins, many of which are sequence-specific endoribonucleases, dampen protein synthesis levels in response to a range of stress and nutritional stimuli. Key resources are conserved as a result ensuring the survival of individual cells and therefore the bacterial population. The toxin effects generally are transient and reversible permitting a set of dynamic, tunable responses that reflect environmental conditions. Moreover, by harboring multiple toxins that intercede in protein synthesis in response to different physiological cues, bacteria potentially sense an assortment of metabolic perturbations that are channeled through different TA complexes. Other toxins interfere with the action of topoisomersases, cell wall assembly, or cytoskeletal structures. TAs also play important roles in bacterial persistence, biofilm formation and multidrug tolerance, and have considerable potential both as new components of the genetic toolbox and as targets for novel antibacterial drugs.

Recent advancements in toxin and antitoxin systems involved in bacterial programmed cell death

Programmed cell death (PCD) systems have been extensively studied for their significant role in a variety of biological processes in eukaryotic organisms. Recently, more and more researches have revealed the existence of similar systems employed by bacteria in response to various environmental stresses. This paper summarized the recent researching advancements in toxin/antitoxin systems located on plasmids or chromosomes and their regulatory roles in bacterial PCD. The most studied yet disputed mazEF system was discussed in depth, and possible roles and status of such a special bacterial death and TA systems were also reviewed from the ecological and evolutionary perspectives.