Isolation and characterization of the modification methylase M . SinI

Conversion of the CG specific M.MpeI DNA methyltransferase into an enzyme predominantly methylating CCA and CCC sites

We used structure guided mutagenesis and directed enzyme evolution to alter the specificity of the CG specific bacterial DNA (cytosine-5) methyltransferase M.MpeI. Methylation specificity of the M.MpeI variants was characterized by digestions with methylation sensitive restriction enzymes and by measuring incorporation of tritiated methyl groups into double-stranded oligonucleotides containing single CC, CG, CA or CT sites. Site specific mutagenesis steps designed to disrupt the specific contacts between the enzyme and the non-substrate base pair of the target sequence (5'-CG/5'-CG) yielded M.MpeI variants with varying levels of CG specific and increasing levels of CA and CC specific MTase activity. Subsequent random mutagenesis of the target recognizing domain coupled with selection for non-CG specific methylation yielded a variant, which predominantly methylates CC dinucleotides, has very low activity on CG and CA sites, and no activity on CT sites. This M.MpeI variant contains a one amino acid deletion (ΔA323) and three substitutions (N324G, R326G and E305N) in the target recognition domain. The mutant enzyme has very strong preference for A and C in the 3' flanking position making it a CCA and CCC specific DNA methyltransferase.

In vivo DNA protection by relaxed-specificity SinI DNA methyltransferase variants

The SinI DNA methyltransferase, a component of the SinI restriction-modification system, recognizes the sequence GG(A/T)CC and methylates the inner cytosine to produce 5-methylcytosine. Previously isolated relaxed-specificity mutants of the enzyme also methylate, at a lower rate, GG(G/C)CC sites. In this work we tested the capacity of the mutant enzymes to function in vivo as the counterpart of a restriction endonuclease, which can cleave either site. The viability of Escherichia coli cells carrying recombinant plasmids with the mutant methyltransferase genes and expressing the GGNCC-specific Sau96I restriction endonuclease from a compatible plasmid was investigated. The sau96IR gene on the latter plasmid was transcribed from the araBAD promoter, allowing tightly controlled expression of the endonuclease. In the presence of low concentrations of the inducer arabinose, cells synthesizing the N172S or the V173L mutant enzyme displayed increased plating efficiency relative to cells producing the wild-type methyltransferase, indicating enhanced protection of the cell DNA against the Sau96I endonuclease. Nevertheless, this protection was not sufficient to support long-term survival in the presence of the inducer, which is consistent with incomplete methylation of GG(G/C)CC sites in plasmid DNA purified from the N172S and V173L mutants. Elevated DNA ligase activity was shown to further increase viability of cells producing the V173L variant and Sau96I endonuclease.

Characterization of a complex restriction-modification system detected in Staphylococcus aureus and Streptococcus agalactiae strains isolated from infections of domestic animals

Characterization of classic type II restriction-modification systems (RMS) (restriction endonucleases and modification methyltransferases) was carried out in isolates of Staphylococcus aureus and Streptococcus agalactiae obtained from clinical material. Among the 100 isolates of S. aureus two different RMS type II were detected. The first was expressed in isolates 32 and 33 (Sau32 I and Sau33 I); the targeting sequence was determined as 5'-GGN CC-3' (Sau96 I isoschizomer). The second was found in isolates no. 90, 93, 96*, and 98 (Sau90 I, Sau93 I, Sau96* I, Sau98 I) and enzymes recognized sequence 5'-CTY RAG-3' (SmlI isoschizomer). Analysis of 40 isolates of S. agalactiae revealed only one RMS; it was detected in two isolates (no. 16 and 23; Sag16 I and Sag23 I). Restriction endonuclease expressed by these isolates cleaved DNA in sequence 5'-CTG CA/G-3' (PstI isoschizomer). In RMS-positive S. aureus and S. agalactiae isolates plasmid DNA capable of replication in Escherichia coli and Bacillus subtilis was also detected and isolated.

Role of DNA minor groove interactions in substrate recognition by the M.SinI and M.EcoRII DNA (cytosine-5) methyltransferases

The SinI and EcoRII DNA methyltransferases recognize sequences (GG(A)/(T)CC and CC(A)/(T)GG, respectively), which are characterized by an (A)/(T) ambiguity. Recognition of the A.T and T.A base pair was studied by in vitro methyltransferase assays using oligonucleotide substrates containing a hypoxanthine.C base pair in the central position of the recognition sequence. Both enzymes methylated the substituted oligonucleotide with an efficiency that was comparable to methylation of the canonical substrate. These observations indicate that M.SinI and M.EcoRII discriminate between their canonical recognition site and the site containing a G.C or a C.G base pair in the center of the recognition sequence (GG(G)/(C)CC and CC(G)/(C)GG, respectively) by interaction(s) in the DNA minor groove. M.SinI mutants displaying a decreased capacity to discriminate between the GG(A)/(T)CC and GG(G)/(C)CC sequences were isolated by random mutagenesis and selection for the relaxed specificity phenotype. These mutations led to amino acid substitutions outside the variable region, previously thought to be the sole determinant of sequence specificity. These observations indicate that (A)/(T) versus (G)/(C) discrimination is mediated by interactions between the large domain of the methyltransferase and the minor groove surface of the DNA.

DNA bending induced by DNA (cytosine-5) methyltransferases

DNA bending induced by six DNA (cytosine-5) methyltransferases was studied using circular permutation gel mobility shift assay. The following bend angles were obtained: M.BSP:RI (GG(m5)CC), 46-50 degrees; M.HAE:III (GG(m5)CC), 40-43 degrees; M.SIN:I (GGW(m5)CC), 34-37 degrees; M.SAU:96I (GGN(m5)CC), 52-57 degrees; M.HPA:II (C(m5)CGG), 30 degrees; and M.HHA:I (G(m5)CGC), 13 degrees. M. HAE:III was also tested with fragments carrying a methylated binding site, and it was found to induce a 32 degrees bend. A phase-sensitive gel mobility shift assay, using a set of DNA fragments with a sequence-directed bend and a single methyltransferase binding site, indicated that M.HAE:III and M. BSP:RI bend DNA toward the minor groove. The DNA curvature induced by M.HAE:III contrasts with the lack of DNA bend observed for a covalent M.HAE:III-DNA complex in an earlier X-ray study. Our results and data from other laboratories show a correlation between the bending properties and the recognition specificities of (cytosine-5) methyltransferases: enzymes recognizing a cytosine 3' to the target cytosine tend to induce greater bends than enzymes with guanine in this position. We suggest that the observed differences indicate different mechanisms employed by (cytosine-5) methyltransferases to stabilize the helix after the target base has flipped out.

Effect of site-specific modification on restriction endonucleases and DNA modification methyltransferases

Restriction endonucleases have site-specific interactions with DNA that can often be inhibited by site-specific DNA methylation and other site-specific DNA modifications. However, such inhibition cannot generally be predicted. The empirically acquired data on these effects are tabulated for over 320 restriction endonucleases. In addition, a table of known site-specific DNA modification methyltransferases and their specificities is presented along with EMBL database accession numbers for cloned genes.

Specificity of restriction endonucleases and DNA modification methyltransferases a review (Edition 3)

The properties and sources of all known class-I, class-II and class-III restriction endonucleases (ENases) and DNA modification methyltransferases (MTases) are listed and newly subclassified according to their sequence specificity. In addition, the enzymes are distinguished in a novel manner according to sequence specificity, cleavage position and methylation sensitivity. Furthermore, new nomenclature rules are proposed for unambiguously defined enzyme names. In the various Tables, the enzymes are cross-indexed alphabetically according to their names (Table I), classified according to their recognition sequence homologies (Table II), and characterized within Table II by the cleavage and methylation positions, the number of recognition sites on the DNA of the bacteriophages lambda, phi X174, and M13mp7, the viruses Ad2 and SV40, the plasmids pBR322 and pBR328, and the microorganisms from which they originate. Other tabulated properties of the ENases include relaxed specificities (integrated within Table II), the structure of the generated fragment ends (Table III), interconversion of restriction sites (Table IV) and the sensitivity to different kinds of DNA methylation (Table V). Table VI shows the influence of class-II MTases on the activity of class-II ENases with at least partially overlapping recognition sequences. Table VII lists all class-II restriction endonucleases and MTases which are commercially available. The information given in Table V focuses on the influence of methylation of the recognition sequences on the activity of ENases. This information might be useful for the design of cloning experiments especially in Escherichia coli containing M.EcodamI and M.EcodcmI [H16, M21, U3] or for studying the level and distribution of site-specific methylation in cellular DNA, e.g., 5'- (M)CpG-3' in mammals, 5'-(M)CpNpG-3' in plants or 5'-GpA(M)pTpC-3' in enterobacteria [B29, E4, M30, V4, V13, W24]. In Table IV a cross index for the interconversion of two- and four-nt 5'-protruding ends into new recognition sequences is complied. This was obtained by the fill-in reaction with the Klenow (large) fragment of the E. coli DNA polymerase I (PolIk), or additional nuclease S1 treatment followed by ligation of the modified fragment termini [P3]. Interconversion of restriction sites generates novel cloning sites without the need of linkers. This should improve the flexibility of genetic engineering experiments [K56, P3].(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)