Multicopy suppressors of the cold-sensitive phenotype of the pcsA68 (dinD68) mutation in Escherichia coli

Interaction of RecA mediated SOS response with bacterial persistence, biofilm formation, and host response

Antibiotics have a primary mode of actions, and most of them have a common secondary mode of action via reactive species (ROS and RNS) mediated DNA damage. Bacteria have been able to tolerate this DNA damage by SOS (Save-Our-Soul) response. RecA is the universal essential key protein of the DNA damage mediated SOS repair in various bacteria including ESKAPE pathogens. In addition, antibiotics also triggers activation of various other bacterial mechanisms such as biofilm formation, host dependent responses, persister subpopulation formation. These supporting the survival of bacteria in unfriendly natural conditions i.e. antibiotic presence. This review highlights the detailed mechanism of RecA mediated SOS response as well as role of RecA-LexA interaction in SOS response. The review also focuses on inter-connection between DNA damage repair pathway (like SOS response) with other survival mechanisms of bacteria such as host mediated RecA induction, persister-SOS interplay, and biofilm-SOS interplay. This understanding of inter-connection of SOS response with different other survival mechanisms will prove beneficial in targeting the SOS response for prevention and development of therapeutics against recalcitrant bacterial infections. The review also covers the significance of RecA as a promising potent therapeutic target for hindering bacterial SOS response in prevailing successful treatments of bacterial infections and enhancing the conventional antibiotic efficiency.

Bacteriophage crosstalk: coordination of prophage induction by trans-acting antirepressors

Many species of bacteria harbor multiple prophages in their genomes. Prophages often carry genes that confer a selective advantage to the bacterium, typically during host colonization. Prophages can convert to infectious viruses through a process known as induction, which is relevant to the spread of bacterial virulence genes. The paradigm of prophage induction, as set by the phage Lambda model, sees the process initiated by the RecA-stimulated self-proteolysis of the phage repressor. Here we show that a large family of lambdoid prophages found in Salmonella genomes employs an alternative induction strategy. The repressors of these phages are not cleaved upon induction; rather, they are inactivated by the binding of small antirepressor proteins. Formation of the complex causes the repressor to dissociate from DNA. The antirepressor genes lie outside the immunity region and are under direct control of the LexA repressor, thus plugging prophage induction directly into the SOS response. GfoA and GfhA, the antirepressors of Salmonella prophages Gifsy-1 and Gifsy-3, each target both of these phages' repressors, GfoR and GfhR, even though the latter proteins recognize different operator sites and the two phages are heteroimmune. In contrast, the Gifsy-2 phage repressor, GtgR, is insensitive to GfoA and GfhA, but is inactivated by an antirepressor from the unrelated Fels-1 prophage (FsoA). This response is all the more surprising as FsoA is under the control of the Fels-1 repressor, not LexA, and plays no apparent role in Fels-1 induction, which occurs via a Lambda CI-like repressor cleavage mechanism. The ability of antirepressors to recognize non-cognate repressors allows coordination of induction of multiple prophages in polylysogenic strains. Identification of non-cleavable gfoR/gtgR homologues in a large variety of bacterial genomes (including most Escherichia coli genomes in the DNA database) suggests that antirepression-mediated induction is far more common than previously recognized.

Two modes of binding of DinI to RecA filament provide a new insight into the regulation of SOS response by DinI protein

RecA protein plays a principal role in bacterial SOS response to DNA damage. The induction of the SOS response is well understood and involves the cleavage of the LexA repressor catalyzed by the RecA nucleoprotein filament. In contrast, our understanding of the regulation and termination of the SOS response is much more limited. RecX and DinI are two major regulators of RecA's ability to promote LexA cleavage and strand exchange reaction, and are believed to modulate its activity in ongoing SOS events. DinI's function in the SOS response remains controversial, since its interaction with the RecA filament is concentration dependent and may result in either stabilization or depolymerization of the filament. The 17 C-terminal residues of RecA modulate the interaction between DinI and RecA. We demonstrate that DinI binds to the active RecA filament in two distinct structural modes. In the first mode, DinI binds to the C-terminus of a RecA protomer. In the second mode, DinI resides deeply in the groove of the RecA filament, with its negatively charged C-terminal helix proximal to the L2 loop of RecA. The deletion of the 17 C-terminal residues of RecA favors the second mode of binding. We suggest that the negatively charged C-terminus of RecA prevents DinI from entering the groove and protects the RecA filament from depolymerization. Polymorphic binding of DinI to RecA filaments implies an even more complex role of DinI in the bacterial SOS response.

In vitro transcription profiling of the σS subunit of bacterial RNA polymerase: re-definition of the σS regulon and identification of σS-specific promoter sequence elements

Specific promoter recognition by bacterial RNA polymerase is mediated by σ subunits, which assemble with RNA polymerase core enzyme (E) during transcription initiation. However, σ⁷⁰ (the housekeeping σ subunit) and σ^S (an alternative σ subunit mostly active during slow growth) recognize almost identical promoter sequences, thus raising the question of how promoter selectivity is achieved in the bacterial cell. To identify novel sequence determinants for selective promoter recognition, we performed run-off/microarray (ROMA) experiments with RNA polymerase saturated either with σ⁷⁰ (Eσ⁷⁰) or with σ^S (Eσ^S) using the whole Escherichia coli genome as DNA template. We found that Eσ⁷⁰, in the absence of any additional transcription factor, preferentially transcribes genes associated with fast growth (e.g. ribosomal operons). In contrast, Eσ^S efficiently transcribes genes involved in stress responses, secondary metabolism as well as RNAs from intergenic regions with yet-unknown function. Promoter sequence comparison suggests that, in addition to different conservation of the −35 sequence and of the UP element, selective promoter recognition by either form of RNA polymerase can be affected by the A/T content in the −10/+1 region. Indeed, site-directed mutagenesis experiments confirmed that an A/T bias in the −10/+1 region could improve promoter recognition by Eσ^S.

The helicases DinG, Rep and UvrD cooperate to promote replication across transcription units in vivo

How living cells deal with head-on collisions of the replication and transcription complexes has been debated for a long time. Even in the widely studied model bacteria Escherichia coli, the enzymes that take care of such collisions are still unknown. We report here that in vivo, the DinG, Rep and UvrD helicases are essential for efficient replication across highly transcribed regions. We show that when rRNA operons (rrn) are inverted to face replication, the viability of the dinG mutant is affected and over-expression of RNase H rescues the growth defect, showing that DinG acts in vivo to remove R-loops. In addition, DinG, Rep and UvrD exert a common function, which requires the presence of two of these three helicases. After replication blockage by an inverted rrn, Rep in conjunction with DinG or UvrD removes RNA polymerase, a task that is fulfilled in its absence by the SOS-induced DinG and UvrD helicases. Finally, Rep and UvrD also act at inverted sequences other than rrn, and promote replication through highly transcribed regions in wild-type E. coli.

Overexpression of the LexA-regulated tisAB RNA in E. coli inhibits SOS functions; implications for regulation of the SOS response

The DNA damage induced SOS response in Escherichia coli is initiated by cleavage of the LexA repressor through activation of RecA. Here we demonstrate that overexpression of the SOS-inducible tisAB gene inhibits several SOS functions in vivo. Wild-type E. coli overexpressing tisAB showed the same UV sensitivity as a lexA mutant carrying a noncleavable version of the LexA protein unable to induce the SOS response. Immunoblotting confirmed that tisAB overexpression leads to higher levels of LexA repressor and northern experiments demonstrated delayed and reduced induction of recA mRNA. In addition, induction of prophage λ and UV-induced filamentation was inhibited by tisAB overexpression. The tisAB gene contains antisense sequences to the SOS-inducible dinD gene (16 nt) and the uxaA gene (20 nt), the latter encoding a dehydratase essential for galacturonate catabolism. Cleavage of uxaA mRNA at the antisense sequence was dependent on tisAB RNA expression. We showed that overexpression of tisAB is less able to confer UV sensitivity to the uxaA dinD double mutant as compared to wild-type, indicating that the dinD and uxaA transcripts modulate the anti-SOS response of tisAB. These data shed new light on the complexity of SOS regulation in which the uxaA gene could link sugar metabolism to the SOS response via antisense regulation of the tisAB gene.

Molecular Design and Functional Organization of the RecA Protein

The bacterial RecA protein participates in a remarkably diverse set of functions, all of which are involved in the maintenance of genomic integrity. RecA is a central component in both the catalysis of recombinational DNA repair and the regulation of the cellular SOS response. Despite the mechanistic differences of its functions, all require formation of an active RecA/ATP/DNA complex. RecA is a classic allosterically regulated enzyme, and ATP binding results in a dramatic increase in DNA binding affinity and a cooperative assembly of RecA subunits to form an ordered, helical nucleoprotein filament. The molecular events that underlie this ATP-induced structural transition are becoming increasingly clear. This review focuses on descriptions of our current understanding of the molecular design and allosteric regulation of RecA. We present a comprehensive list of all published recA mutants and use the results of various genetic and biochemical studies, together with available structural information, to develop ideas regarding the design of RecA functional domains and their catalytic organization.

The SOS Regulatory Network

All organisms possess a diverse set of genetic programs that are used to alter cellular physiology in response to environmental cues. The gram-negative bacterium, Escherichia coli, mounts what is known as the "SOS response" following DNA damage, replication fork arrest, and a myriad of other environmental stresses. For over 50 years, E. coli has served as the paradigm for our understanding of the transcriptional, and physiological changes that occur following DNA damage (400). In this chapter, we summarize the current view of the SOS response and discuss how this genetic circuit is regulated. In addition to examining the E. coli SOS response, we also include a discussion of the SOS regulatory networks in other bacteria to provide a broader perspective on how prokaryotes respond to DNA damage.

Regulation of bacterial RecA protein function

The RecA protein is a recombinase functioning in recombinational DNA repair in bacteria. RecA is regulated at many levels. The expression of the recA gene is regulated within the SOS response. The activity of the RecA protein itself is autoregulated by its own C-terminus. RecA is also regulated by the action of other proteins. To date, these include the RecF, RecO, RecR, DinI, RecX, RdgC, PsiB, and UvrD proteins. The SSB protein also indirectly affects RecA function by competing for ssDNA binding sites. The RecO and RecR, and possibly the RecF proteins, all facilitate RecA loading onto SSB-coated ssDNA. The RecX protein blocks RecA filament extension, and may have other effects on RecA activity. The DinI protein stabilizes RecA filaments. The RdgC protein binds to dsDNA and blocks RecA access to dsDNA. The PsiB protein, encoded by F plasmids, is uncharacterized, but may inhibit RecA in some manner. The UvrD helicase removes RecA filaments from RecA. All of these proteins function in a network that determines where and how RecA functions. Additional regulatory proteins may remain to be discovered. The elaborate regulatory pattern is likely to be reprised for RecA homologues in archaeans and eukaryotes.

Isolation of the rstA gene as a multicopy suppressor of YjeE, an essential ATPase of unknown function in Escherichia coli

YjeE is an essential ATPase in Escherichia coli whose cellular function remains uncharacterized. Using a genomic library, we have identified rstA as a multicopy suppressor of a conditional yjeE deletion strain. High-copy rstA is the first recorded suppressor for a lesion in yjeE, and this newly charted genetic interaction has the potential to be informative about the function, with further study of the interacting partners.

Transposition is modulated by a diverse set of host factors in Escherichia coli and is stimulated by nutritional stress

The role of host factors in regulating bacterial transposition has never been comprehensively addressed, despite the potential consequences of transposition. Here, we describe a screen for host factors that influence transposition of IS903, and the effect of these mutations on two additional transposons, Tn10 and Tn552. Over 20,000 independent insertion mutants were screened in two strains of Escherichia coli; from these we isolated over 100 mutants that altered IS903 transposition. These included mutations that increased or decreased the extent of transposition and also altered the timing of transposition during colony growth. The large number of gene products affecting transposition, and their diverse functions, indicate that the overall process of transposition is modulated at many different steps and by a range of processes. Previous work has suggested that transposition is triggered by cellular stress. We describe two independent mutations that are in a gene required for fermentative metabolism during anaerobic growth, and that cause transposition to occur earlier than normal during colony development. The ability to suppress this phenotype by the addition of fumarate therefore provides direct evidence that transposition occurs in response to nutritional stress. Other mutations that altered transposition disrupted genes normally associated with DNA metabolism, intermediary metabolism, transport, cellular redox, protein folding and proteolysis and together these define a network of host proteins that could potentially allow readout of the cell's environmental and nutritional status. In summary, this work identifies a collection of proteins that allow the host to modulate transposition in response to cell stress.

Protein mimicry of DNA and pathway regulation

The discoveries of DNA mimicry by proteins inspired by Ugi experiments led by Dale Mosbaugh and his colleagues have sparked dramatic insights for our understanding of DNA and protein interactions. Currently only a small number protein mimics of DNA are known or suspected, including Ugi, HI1450, Ocr, TAF1, MfpA, and Dinl. These proteins are structurally diverse, but together they share common themes we define here. These mimics tend to resemble distorted rather than normal B-DNA, possibly to prevent cross-reactions with other DNA metabolizing proteins that should not be inhibited. Side-chain carboxylates of glutamates and aspartates functionally replace phosphates and thereby generate an overall charge pattern resembling the DNA phosphate backbone. Most protein mimics of DNA have strikingly hydrophobic cores that likely stabilize the protein fold despite substantial charge localization and a relatively small internal volume enforced by the restrictions from DNA size. These common characteristics for protein mimicry of DNA should prove useful for future identifications of DNA mimics, which seem likely to be found in bacteriophages, conjugative plasmids, eukaryotic viruses, and transcription machinery. We also suggest approaches to the design of novel DNA mimics to inhibit specific pathways and could be important for basic science applications and for use as therapeutic agents. Moreover, mimicry in general is of critical importance in that it provides an elegant mechanism by which interfaces can be reused to force sequential rather than simultaneous complex formations such as seen in systems involving polar protein assemblies and DNA repair machinery.

The DinI protein stabilizes RecA protein filaments

When DinI is present at concentrations that are stoichiometric with those of RecA or somewhat greater, DinI has a substantial stabilizing effect on RecA filaments bound to DNA. Exchange of RecA between free and bound forms was almost entirely suppressed, and highly stable filaments were documented with several different experimental methods. DinI-mediated stabilization did not affect RecA-mediated ATP hydrolysis and LexA co-protease activities. Initiation of DNA strand exchange was affected in a DNA structure-dependent manner, whereas ongoing strand exchange was not affected. Destabilization of RecA filaments occurred as reported in earlier work but only when DinI protein was present at very high concentrations, generally superstoichiometric, relative to the RecA protein concentration. DinI did not facilitate RecA filament formation but stabilized the filaments only after they were formed. The interaction between the RecA protein and DinI was modulated by the C terminus of RecA. We discuss these results in the context of a new hypothesis for the role of DinI in the regulation of recombination and the SOS response.

The pKO2 linear plasmid prophage of Klebsiella oxytoca

Temperate bacteriophages with plasmid prophages are uncommon in nature, and of these only phages N15 and PY54 are known to have a linear plasmid prophage with closed hairpin telomeres. We report here the complete nucleotide sequence of the 51,601-bp Klebsiella oxytoca linear plasmid pKO2, and we demonstrate experimentally that it is also a prophage. We call this bacteriophage phiKO2. An analysis of the 64 predicted phiKO2 genes indicate that it is a fairly close relative of phage N15; they share a mosaic relationship that is typical of different members of double-stranded DNA tailed-phage groups. Although the head, tail shaft, and lysis genes are not recognizably homologous between these phages, other genes such as the plasmid partitioning, replicase, prophage repressor, and protelomerase genes (and their putative targets) are so similar that we predict that they must have nearly identical DNA binding specificities. The phiKO2 virion is unusual in that its phage lambda-like tails have an exceptionally long (3,433 amino acids) central tip tail fiber protein. The phiKO2 genome also carries putative homologues of bacterial dinI and umuD genes, both of which are involved in the host SOS response. We show that these divergently transcribed genes are regulated by LexA protein binding to a single target site that overlaps both promoters.

Yeast Nop15p is an RNA-binding protein required for pre-rRNA processing and cytokinesis

Nop15p is an essential protein that contains an RNA recognition motif (RRM) and localizes to the nucleoplasm and nucleolus. Cells depleted of Nop15p failed to synthesize the 25S and 5.8S rRNA components of the 60S ribosomal subunit, and exonucleolytic 5' processing of 5.8S rRNA was strongly inhibited. Pre-rRNAs co-precipitated with tagged Nop15p confirmed its association with early pre-60S particles and Nop15p bound a pre-rRNA transcript in vitro. Nop15p-depleted cells show an unusually abrupt growth arrest prior to substantial depletion of ribosomal subunits. Following cell synchronization in mitosis, Nop15p-depleted cells undergo nuclear division with wild-type kinetics, activate the mitotic exit network and disassemble their mitotic spindle. However, they uniformly arrest at cytokinesis and fail to assemble a contractile actin ring at the bud neck. In dividing wild-type cells, segregation of nucleolar proteins to the daughter nuclei occurs after separation of the nucleoplasm. In these late mitotic cells, Nop15p was partially delocalized from the nucleolus to the nucleoplasm, consistent with a specific function in cell division in addition to its role in ribosome synthesis.

Characterization of the DNA damage-inducible helicase DinG from Escherichia coli

The dinG promoter was first isolated in a genetic screen scoring for damage-inducible loci in Escherichia coli (Lewis, L. K., Jenkins, M. E., and Mount, D. W. (1992) J. Bacteriol. 174, 3377-3385). Sequence analysis suggests that the dinG gene encodes a putative helicase related to a group of eukaryotic helicases that includes mammalian XPD (Koonin, E. V. (1993) Nucleic Acids Res. 21, 1497), an enzyme involved in transcription-coupled nucleotide excision repair and basal transcription. We have characterized the dinG gene product from E. coli using genetic and biochemical approaches. Deletion of dinG has no severe phenotype, indicating that it is non-essential for cell viability. Both dinG deletion and over-expression of the DinG protein from a multicopy plasmid result in a slight reduction of UV resistance. DinG, purified as a fusion protein from E. coli cells, behaves as a monomer in solution, as judged from gel filtration experiments. DinG is an ATP-hydrolyzing enzyme; single-stranded (ss) DNA stimulates the ATPase activity 15-fold. Kinetic data yield a Hill coefficient of 1, consistent with one ATP-hydrolyzing site per DinG molecule. DinG possesses a DNA helicase activity; it translocates along ssDNA in a 5' --> 3' direction, as revealed in experiments with substrates containing non-natural 5'-5' and 3'-3' linkages. The ATP-dependent DNA helicase activity of DinG requires divalent cations (Mg2+, Ca2+, and Mn2+) but is not observed in the presence of Zn2+. The DinG helicase does not discriminate between ribonucleotide and deoxyribonucleotide triphosphates, and it unwinds duplex DNA with similar efficiency in the presence of ATP or dATP. We discuss the possible involvement of the DinG helicase in DNA replication and repair processes.

An NMR study on the interaction of Escherichia coli DinI with RecA-ssDNA complexes

The SOS response, a set of cellular phenomena exhibited by eubacteria, is initiated by various causes that include DNA damage-induced replication arrest, and is positively regulated by the co- protease activity of RecA. Escherichia coli DinI, a LexA-regulated SOS gene product, shuts off the initiation of the SOS response when overexpressed in vivo. Biochemical and genetic studies indicated that DinI physically interacts with RecA to inhibit its co-protease activity. Using nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) spectroscopy, we show that DinI tightly binds to the central region of RecA (between the N- and C-terminal domains) and that this interaction is enhanced upon the oligomerisation of RecA. On the other hand, DinI did not inhibit the interaction between 4mer single-stranded (ss)DNA and RecA- ATPgammaS, but had a slight effect on the structure of ssDNA-RecA-ATPgammaS complexes involving 8mer and 12mer ssDNA. We hypothesise that prevention of repressor binding to the intermolecular cleft region of RecA protomers by DinI, with the possibility of a slight conformational change induced in the DinI-bound ssDNA-RecA-ATPgammaS complex, together function to inhibit the co-protease activity of RecA.

Answering the Call: Coping with DNA Damage at the Most Inopportune Time

DNA damage incurred during the process of chromosomal replication has a particularly high possibility of resulting in mutagenesis or lethality for the cell. The SOS response of Escherichia coli appears to be well adapted for this particular situation and involves the coordinated up-regulation of genes whose products center upon the tasks of maintaining the integrity of the replication fork when it encounters DNA damage, delaying the replication process (a DNA damage checkpoint), repairing the DNA lesions or allowing replication to occur over these DNA lesions, and then restoring processive replication before the SOS response itself is turned off. Recent advances in the fields of genomics and biochemistry has given a much more comprehensive picture of the timing and coordination of events which allow cells to deal with potentially lethal or mutagenic DNA lesions at the time of chromosomal replication.

Physical interactions between DinI and RecA nucleoprotein filament for the regulation of SOS mutagenesis

The Escherichia coli dinI gene is one of the LexA-regulated genes, which are induced upon DNA damage. Its overexpression conferred severe UV sensitivity on wild-type cells and resulted in the inhibition of LexA and UmuD processing, reactions that are normally dependent on activated RecA in a complex with single-stranded (ss)DNA. Here, we study the mechanism by which DinI inhibits the activities of RecA. While DinI neither binds to ssDNA nor prevents the formation of RecA nucleoprotein filament, it binds to active RecA filament, thereby inhibiting its coprotease activity but not the ATPase activity. Furthermore, even under in vitro conditions where UmuD cleavage dependent on RecA-ssDNA-adeno sine-5'-(3-thiotriphosphate) is blocked in the presence of DinI, LexA is cleaved normally. This result, taken together with electron microscopy observations and linear dichroism measurements, indicates that the ternary complex remains intact in the presence of DinI, and that the affinity to the RecA filament decreases in the order LexA, DinI and UmuD. DinI is thus suited to modulating UmuD processing so as to limit SOS mutagenesis.

A model for the abrogation of the SOS response by an SOS protein: a negatively charged helix in DinI mimics DNA in its interaction with RecA

DinI is a recently described negative regulator of the SOS response in Escherichia coli. Here we show that it physically interacts with RecA and prevents the binding of single-stranded DNA to RecA, which is required for the activation of the latter. DinI also displaces ssDNA from a stable RecA-DNA cofilament, thus eliminating the SOS signal. In addition, DinI inhibits RecA-mediated homologous DNA pairing, but has no effect on actively proceeding strand exchange. Biochemical data, together with the molecular structure, define the C-terminal alpha-helix in DinI as the active site of the protein. In an unusual example of molecular mimicry, a negatively charged surface on this alpha-helix, by imitating single-stranded DNA, interacts with the loop L2 homologous pairing region of RecA and interferes with the activation of RecA.

The virulence plasmid-encoded impCAB operon enhances survival and induced mutagenesis in Shigella flexneri after exposure to UV radiation

Upon exposure to UV radiation, Shigella flexneri SA100 displayed survival and mutation frequencies comparable to those of Escherichia coli AB1157, which contains a functional UmuDC error-prone DNA repair system. Survival of SA100 after UV irradiation was associated with the presence of the 220-kb virulence plasmid, pVP. This plasmid encodes homologues of ImpA and ImpB, which comprise an error-prone DNA repair system encoded on plasmid TP110 that was initially identified in Salmonella typhimurium, and ImpC, encoded upstream of ImpA and ImpB. Although the impB gene was present in representatives of all four species of Shigella, not all isolates tested contained the gene. Shigella isolates that lacked impB were more sensitive to UV radiation than isolates that contained impB. The nucleotide sequence of a 2.4-kb DNA fragment containing the imp operon from S. flexneri SA100 pVP was 96% identical to the imp operon from the plasmid TP110. An SA100 derivative with a mutation in the impB gene had reduced survival following UV irradiation and less UV-induced mutagenesis relative to the parental strain. We also found that S. flexneri contained a chromosomally encoded umuDC operon; however, the umuDC promoter was not induced by exposure to UV radiation. This suggests that the imp operon but not the umuDC operon contributes to survival and induced mutagenesis in S. flexneri following exposure to UV radiation.

Linkage map of Escherichia coli K-12, edition 10: the traditional map

This map is an update of the edition 9 map by Berlyn et al. (M. K. B. Berlyn, K. B. Low, and K. E. Rudd, p. 1715-1902, in F. C. Neidhardt et al., ed., Escherichia coli and Salmonella: cellular and molecular biology, 2nd ed., vol. 2, 1996). It uses coordinates established by the completed sequence, expressed as 100 minutes for the entire circular map, and adds new genes discovered and established since 1996 and eliminates those shown to correspond to other known genes. The latter are included as synonyms. An alphabetical list of genes showing map location, synonyms, the protein or RNA product of the gene, phenotypes of mutants, and reference citations is provided. In addition to genes known to correspond to gene sequences, other genes, often older, that are described by phenotype and older mapping techniques and that have not been correlated with sequences are included.

Inhibition of Escherichia coli RecA coprotease activities by DinI

In Escherichia coli, the SOS response is induced upon DNA damage and results in the enhanced expression of a set of genes involved in DNA repair and other functions. The initial step, self-cleavage of the LexA repressor, is promoted by the RecA protein which is activated upon binding to single-stranded DNA. In this work, induction of the SOS response by the addition of mitomycin C was found to be prevented by overexpression of the dinI gene. dinI is an SOS gene which maps at 24.6 min of the E.coli chromosome and encodes a small protein of 81 amino acids. Immunoblotting analysis with anti-LexA antibodies revealed that LexA did not undergo cleavage in dinI-overexpressed cells after UV irradiation. In addition, the RecA-dependent conversion of UmuD to UmuD' (the active form for mutagenesis) was also inhibited in dinI-overexpressed cells. Conversely, a dinI-deficient mutant showed a slightly faster and more extensive processing of UmuD and hence higher mutability than the wild-type. Finally, we demonstrated, by using an in vitro reaction with purified proteins, that DinI directly inhibits the ability of RecA to mediate self-cleavage of UmuD.

Multiple pathways for SOS-induced mutagenesis in Escherichia coli: an overexpression of dinB/dinP results in strongly enhancing mutagenesis in the absence of any exogenous treatment to damage DNA

dinP is an Escherichia coli gene recently identified at 5.5 min of the genetic map, whose product shows a similarity in amino acid sequence to the E. coli UmuC protein involved in DNA damage-induced mutagenesis. In this paper we show that the gene is identical to dinB, an SOS gene previously localized near the lac locus at 8 min, the function of which was shown to be required for mutagenesis of nonirradiated lambda phage infecting UV-preirradiated bacterial cells (termed lambdaUTM for lambda untargeted mutagenesis). A newly constructed dinP null mutant exhibited the same defect for lambdaUTM as observed previously with a dinB::Mu mutant, and the defect was complemented by plasmids carrying dinP as the only intact bacterial gene. Furthermore, merely increasing the dinP gene expression, without UV irradiation or any other DNA-damaging treatment, resulted in a strong enhancement of mutagenesis in F'lac plasmids; at most, 800-fold increase in the G6-to-G5 change. The enhanced mutagenesis did not depend on recA, uvrA, or umuDC. Thus, our results establish that E. coli has at least two distinct pathways for SOS-induced mutagenesis: one dependent on umuDC and the other on dinB/P.

Nucleotide sequence of the Escherichia coli solA gene encoding a sarcosine oxidase-like protein and characterization of its product

An Escherichia coli gene, designated solA, was identified between pyrC and htrB around 24.2 min of the genetic map. The solA gene product (SolA, 372 aa) shows strong similarities (at most 42% identities over the entire length) to monomeric sarcosine (N-methylglycine) oxidases from other bacteria. However, only low levels of sarcosine oxidase activity were detected, even when SolA was overproduced. The SolA extracts exhibited much higher (about 200-fold) reactivity toward N-methyltryptophan than toward sarcosine. Thus, SolA appears to have a substrate specificity distinct from that of monomeric sarcosine oxidases, in spite of the strong similarities in the primary structure with such enzymes.