Activation of the Bacillus subtilis spoIIG promoter requires interaction of Spo0A and the sigma subunit of RNA polymerase

The predicted acetoin dehydrogenase pathway represses sporulation of Clostridioides difficile

Clostridioides difficile is a major gastrointestinal pathogen that is transmitted as a dormant spore. As an intestinal pathogen, C. difficile must contend with variable environmental conditions, including fluctuations in pH and nutrient availability. Nutrition and pH both influence growth and spore formation, but how pH and nutrition jointly influence sporulation are not known. In this study, we investigated the dual impact of pH and pH-dependent metabolism on C. difficile sporulation. Specifically, we examined the impacts of pH and the metabolite acetoin on C. difficile growth and sporulation. We found that expression of the predicted acetoin dehydrogenase operon, acoRABCL , was pH-dependent and regulated by acetoin. Regulation of the C. difficile aco locus is distinct from other characterized systems and appears to involve a co-transcribed DeoR-family regulator rather than the sigma 54 -dependent activator. In addition, an acoA null mutant produced significantly more spores and initiated sporulation earlier than the parent strain. However, unlike other Firmicutes, growth and culture density of C. difficile was not increased by acetoin availability or disruption of the aco pathway. Together, these results indicate that acetoin, pH, and the aco pathway play important roles in nutritional repression of sporulation in C. difficile , but acetoin metabolism does not support cell growth as a stationary phase energy source.

IMPORTANCE

Clostridioides difficile, or C. diff , is an anaerobic bacterium that lives within the gut of many mammals and causes infectious diarrhea. C. difficile is able to survive outside of the gut and transmit to new hosts by forming dormant spores. It is known that the pH of the intestine and the nutrients available both affect the growth and sporulation of C. diffiicile, but the specific conditions that result in sporulation in the host are not clear. In this study, we investigated how pH and the metabolite acetoin affect the ability of C. difficile to grow, proliferate, and form spores. We found that a mutant lacking the predicted acetoin metabolism pathway form more spores, but their growth is not impacted. These results show that C. difficile uses acetoin differently than many other species and that acetoin has an important role as an environmental metabolite that influences spore formation.

Activity of the Bacillus thuringiensis NprR-NprX cell-cell communication system is co-ordinated to the physiological stage through a complex transcriptional regulation

NprR is a quorum sensor of the RNPP family found in bacteria of the Bacillus cereus group. In association with its cognate peptide NprX, NprR controls the expression of genes essential for survival and sporulation of Bacillus thuringiensis during its necrotrophic development in insects. Here, we report that the nprR-nprX genes are not autoregulated and are co-transcribed from a σ(A) -dependent promoter (PA ) located upstream from nprR. The transcription from PA starts at the onset of the stationary phase and is controlled by two transcriptional regulators: CodY and PlcR. The nutritional repressor CodY represses nprR-nprX transcription during the exponential growth phase and the quorum sensor PlcR activates nprR-nprX transcription at the onset of stationary phase. We show that nprX is also transcribed independently of nprR from two promoters, PH and PE , dependent on the sporulation-specific sigma factors, σ(H) and σ(E) respectively. Both promoters ensure nprX transcription during late stationary phase while transcription from PA has decreased. These results show that the activity of the NprR-NprX quorum sensing system is tightly co-ordinated to the physiological stage throughout the developmental process of the Bacillus.

An A257V mutation in the bacillus subtilis response regulator Spo0A prevents regulated expression of promoters with low-consensus binding sites

In Bacillus species, the master regulator of sporulation is Spo0A. Spo0A functions by both activating and repressing transcription initiation from target promoters that contain 0A boxes, the binding sites for Spo0A. Several classes of spo0A mutants have been isolated, and the molecular basis for their phenotypes has been determined. However, the molecular basis of the Spo0A(A257V) substitution, representative of an unusual phenotypic class, is not understood. Spo0A(A257V) is unusual in that it abolishes sporulation; in vivo, it fails to activate transcription from key stage II promoters yet retains the ability to repress the abrB promoter. To determine how Spo0A(A257V) retains the ability to repress but not stimulate transcription, we performed a series of in vitro and in vivo assays. We found unexpectedly that the mutant protein both stimulated transcription from the spoIIG promoter and repressed transcription from the abrB promoter, albeit twofold less than the wild type. A DNA binding analysis of Spo0A(A257V) showed that the mutant protein was less able to tolerate alterations in the sequence and arrangement of its DNA binding sites than the wild-type protein. In addition, we found that Spo0A(A257V) could stimulate transcription of a mutant spoIIG promoter in vivo in which low-consensus binding sites were replaced by high-consensus binding sites. We conclude that Spo0A(A257V) is able to bind to and regulate the expression of only genes whose promoters contain high-consensus binding sites and that this effect is sufficient to explain the observed sporulation defect.

Promoter activation by repositioning of RNA polymerase

Spo0A, a classical two-component-type response regulator in Bacillus subtilis, binds to a specific DNA sequence found in many promoters to repress or activate the transcription of over 100 genes. On the spoIIG promoter, one of the Spo0A binding sites, centered at position -40, overlaps a consensus -35 element that may also interact with region 4 of the sigma A (sigma(A)) subunit of RNA polymerase. Molecular modeling corroborated by genetic evidence led us to propose that the binding of Spo0A to this site repositions sigma(A) region 4 on the promoter. Therefore, we used a chemical nuclease, p-bromoacetamidobenzyl-EDTA-Fe, that was covalently tethered to a single cysteine in region 4 of sigma(A) to map the position of sigma(A) on the promoter. The results indicated that in the absence of Spo0A, sigma(A) region 4 of the RNA polymerase was located near the -35 element sequence centered at position -40. However, in the presence of Spo0A, sigma(A) region 4 was displaced downstream from the -35 element by 4 bp. These and other results support the model in which the binding of Spo0A to the spoIIG promoter stimulates promoter utilization by repositioning prebound RNA polymerase and stabilizing the repositioned RNA polymerase-promoter complex at a new position that aligns sigma(A) region 2 with the -10 region sequences of the promoter, thus facilitating open complex formation.

Bacillus subtilis RNA Polymerase Recruits the Transcription Factor Spo0A∼P to Stabilize a Closed Complex during Transcription Initiation

The Bacillus subtilis response regulator Spo0A approximately P activates transcription from the spoIIG promoter by stimulating a rate-limiting transition between the initial interaction of RNA polymerase with the promoter and initiation of RNA synthesis. Previous work showed that Spo0A exerts its effect on RNA polymerase prior to the formation of an open complex in which the DNA strands at the initiation site have been separated. To isolate the effect of Spo0A approximately P on events prior to DNA strand separation at spoIIG we studied RNA polymerase binding to DNA fragments that were truncated to contain only promoter sequences 5' to the -10 element by electrophoretic mobility shift assays. RNA polymerase bound to these fragments readily though highly reversibly, and polymerase-promoter complexes recruited Spo0A approximately P. Sequence-independent interactions between the RNA polymerase and the DNA upstream of the core promoter were important for RNA polymerase binding and essential for Spo0A approximately P recruitment, while sequence-specific Spo0A approximately P-DNA interactions positioned and stabilized RNA polymerase binding to the DNA. Spo0A approximately P decreased the dissociation rate of the complexes formed with truncated promoter templates which could contribute to the means by which Spo0A approximately P stimulates spoIIG expression.

Spo0A-dependent activation of an extended -10 region promoter in Bacillus subtilis

At the onset of endospore formation in Bacillus subtilis the DNA-binding protein Spo0A directly activates transcription from promoters of about 40 genes. One of these promoters, Pskf, controls expression of an operon encoding a killing factor that acts on sibling cells. AbrB-mediated repression of Pskf provides one level of security ensuring that this promoter is not activated prematurely. However, Spo0A also appears to activate the promoter directly, since Spo0A is required for Pskf activity in a DeltaabrB strain. Here we investigate the mechanism of Pskf activation. DNase I footprinting was used to determine the locations at which Spo0A bound to the promoter, and mutations in these sites were found to significantly reduce promoter activity. The sequence near the -10 region of the promoter was found to be similar to those of extended -10 region promoters, which contain a TRTGn motif. Mutational analysis showed that this extended -10 region, as well as other base pairs in the -10 region, is required for Spo0A-dependent activation of the promoter. We found that a substitution of the consensus base pair for the nonconsensus base pair at position -9 of Pskf produced a promoter that was active constitutively in both deltaabrB and deltaspo0A deltaabrB strains. Therefore, the base pair at position -9 of Pskf makes its activity dependent on Spo0A binding, and the extended -10 region motif of the promoter contributes to its high level of activity.

Contributions of protein structure and gene position to the compartmentalization of the regulatory proteins sigma(E) and SpoIIE in sporulating Bacillus subtilis

At an early stage in endospore formation Bacillus subtilis partitions itself into two dissimilar compartments with unique developmental fates. Transcription appropriate to each compartment is initiated by the activation of compartment-specific RNA polymerase sigma subunits, sigma(E) in the mother cell and sigma(F) in the forespore. Among the possible factors contributing to the compartment specificity of sigma(E) and sigma(F) is the selective accumulation of the sigma(E) protein in the mother cell and that of SpoIIE, a regulatory phosphatase essential to the activation of sigma(F), in the forespore. In the current work, fluorescent microscopy is used to investigate the contributions of sigma(E) and SpoIIE's protein structures, expression and the genetic asymmetry that develops during chromosome translocation into the forespore on their abundance in each compartment. Time of entry of the spoIIE and sigE genes into the forespore was found to have a significant effect on the enrichment of their products in one or the other compartment. In contrast, the structures of the proteins themselves do not appear to promote their transfer to a particular compartment, but nonetheless contribute to compartmentalization by facilitating degradation in the compartment where each protein's activity would be inappropriate.

The Bacillus subtilis response regulator Spo0A stimulates sigmaA-dependent transcription prior to the major energetic barrier

At the spoIIG promoter phosphorylated Spo0A (Spo0A approximately P) binds 0A boxes overlapping the -35 element, interacting with RNA polymerase to facilitate open complex formation. We have compared in vitro transcription from a series of heteroduplex templates containing denatured regions within the promoters. Transcription from heteroduplex templates with 12, 8, or 6 base pairs denatured was independent of Spo0A approximately P, but heteroduplexes with 4 or 2 base pairs denatured required Spo0A approximately P for maximal levels of transcription. Investigation of the thermal dependence of transcription suggested that strand separation was the primary thermodynamic barrier to transcription initiation but indicated that Spo0A approximately P does not reduce this energetic barrier. Kinetic assays revealed that Spo0A approximately P stimulated both the rate of formation of initiated complexes as well as increasing the number of complexes capable of initiating transcription. These results imply that Spo0A approximately P stimulates transcription at least in part by stabilizing the RNA polymerase-spoIIG complex until contacts between RNA polymerase and the -10 element induce strand separation.

Surfaces of Spo0A and RNA polymerase sigma factor A that interact at the spoIIG promoter in Bacillus subtilis

In Bacillus subtilis, the DNA binding protein Spo0A activates transcription from two classes of promoters, those used by RNA polymerase containing the primary sigma factor, sigma(A) (e.g., spoIIG), and those used by RNA polymerase containing the secondary sigma factor, sigma(H) (e.g., spoIIA). Several single amino acid substitutions in region 4 of sigma(A) define positions in sigma(A) that are specifically required for Spo0A-dependent promoter activation. Similarly, several single amino acid substitutions in Spo0A define positions in Spo0A that are required for sigma(A)-dependent promoter activation but not for other functions of Spo0A. It is unknown whether these amino acids in Spo0A interact directly with those in region 4 of sigma(A) or whether they interact with another subunit of RNA polymerase to effect promoter activation. Here we report the identification of a new amino acid in region 4 of sigma(A), arginine at position 355 (R355), that is involved in Spo0A-dependent promoter activation. To further investigate the role of R355, we used the coordinates of Spo0A and sigma region 4, each in complex with DNA, to build a model for the interaction of sigma(A) and Spo0A at the spoIIG promoter. We tested the model by examining the effects of amino acid substitutions in the putative interacting surfaces of these molecules. As predicted by the model, we found genetic evidence for interaction of R355 of sigma(A) with glutamine at position 221 of Spo0A. These results appear to define the surfaces of Spo0A and sigma(A) that directly interact during activation of the spoIIG promoter.

A mutation in GerE that affects cotC promoter activation in Bacillus subtilis

The DNA-binding protein GerE acts as both a repressor and an activator of transcription of genes transcribed by sigma(K)-RNA polymerase (RNA-P) during the later stages of endospore formation in Bacillus subtilis. GerE represses transcription from the sigK promoter, and activates transcription from other promoters, including cotC and cotX. Two different regions of GerE (AR1 and AR2) are required for activation of cotC and cotX, respectively. We used a genetic screen to seek mutations that would define additional regions of GerE required for promoter activation. We found that a substitution of proline for leucine at position 12 of GerE (L12P) decreased cotC promoter activity but did not interfere with GerE-dependent repression of the sigK promoter or with activation of the cotX promoter in vivo. We also found that the L12P substitution had no effect on binding to cotC in vitro. However, the L12P-substituted GerE failed to stimulate cotC transcription in vitro, whereas it stimulated transcription from PcotX. The crystal structure of GerE suggests that L12 is not exposed on the surface of the molecule. Therefore, we propose that the L12P substitution reduces the flexibility of the N-terminal arm, preventing an interaction of AR1 with RNA-P that is essential for activation of the cotC promoter.

Mutational analysis of conserved residues in the putative DNA-binding domain of the response regulator Spo0A of Bacillus subtilis

The Spo0A protein of Bacillus subtilis is a DNA-binding protein that is required for the expression of genes involved in the initiation of sporulation. Spo0A binds directly to and both activates and represses transcription from the promoters of several genes required during the onset of endospore formation. The C-terminal 113 residues are known to contain the DNA-binding activity of Spo0A. Previous studies identified a region of the C-terminal half of Spo0A that is highly conserved among species of endospore-forming Bacillus and Clostridium and which encodes a putative helix-turn-helix DNA-binding domain. To test the functional significance of this region and determine if this motif is involved in DNA binding, we changed three conserved residues, S210, E213, and R214, to Gly and/or Ala by site-directed mutagenesis. We then isolated and analyzed the five substitution-containing Spo0A proteins for DNA binding and sporulation-specific gene activation. The S210A Spo0A mutant exhibited no change from wild-type binding, although it was defective in spoIIA and spoIIE promoter activation. In contrast, both the E213G and E213A Spo0A variants showed decreased binding and completely abolished transcriptional activation of spoIIA and spoIIE, while the R214G and R214A variants completely abolished both DNA binding and transcriptional activation. These data suggest that these conserved residues are important for transcriptional activation and that the E213 residue is involved in DNA binding.

The trans-activation domain of the sporulation response regulator Spo0A revealed by X-ray crystallography

Sporulation in Bacillus involves the induction of scores of genes in a temporally and spatially co-ordinated programme of cell development. Its initiation is under the control of an expanded two-component signal transduction system termed a phosphorelay. The master control element in the decision to sporulate is the response regulator, Spo0A, which comprises a receiver or phosphoacceptor domain and an effector or transcription activation domain. The receiver domain of Spo0A shares sequence similarity with numerous response regulators, and its structure has been determined in phosphorylated and unphosphorylated forms. However, the effector domain (C-Spo0A) has no detectable sequence similarity to any other protein, and this lack of structural information is an obstacle to understanding how DNA binding and transcription activation are controlled by phosphorylation in Spo0A. Here, we report the crystal structure of C-Spo0A from Bacillus stearothermophilus revealing a single alpha-helical domain comprising six alpha-helices in an unprecedented fold. The structure contains a helix-turn-helix as part of a three alpha-helical bundle reminiscent of the catabolite gene activator protein (CAP), suggesting a mechanism for DNA binding. The residues implicated in forming the sigmaA-activating region clearly cluster in a flexible segment of the polypeptide on the opposite side of the structure from that predicted to interact with DNA. The structural results are discussed in the context of the rich array of existing mutational data.

Identification of a second region of the Spo0A response regulator of Bacillus subtilis required for transcription activation

Deletion of the 10 C-terminal amino acids of the Bacillus subtilis response regulator Spo0A or valine substitution at D258 and L260 resulted in a sporulation-negative phenotype and loss of in vivo activation of the spoIIG and spoIIA operon promoters. Repression of the abrB promoter was not affected by the mutations. In combination with the previously characterized mutation (A257V), the results identify amino acids at positions 257, 258, and 260 as being required for transcription activation by Spo0A.

A role for Asp75 in domain interactions in the Bacillus subtilis response regulator Spo0A

Spo0A is a two-domain response regulator required for sporulation initiation in Bacillus subtilis. Studies on response regulators have focused on the activity of each domain, but very little is known about the mechanism by which the regulatory domain inhibits the activator domain. In this study, we created a single amino acid substitution in the regulatory domain, D75S, which resulted in a dramatic decrease in sporulation in vivo. In vitro studies with the purified Spo0AD75S protein demonstrated that phosphorylation and DNA binding were comparable with wild type Spo0A. However, the mutant was unable to stimulate transcription by final sigma(A)-RNA polymerase from the Spo0A-dependent spoIIG operon promoter. We suggest that the amino acid Asp(75) and/or the region within which it resides, the alpha3-beta4 loop, are involved in the inhibitory interaction between the regulatory and activator domains of Spo0A.

Phylogeny and functional conservation of sigma(E) in endospore-forming bacteria

Conservation of the sporulation processes between Bacillus spp. and Clostridium spp. was investigated through evolutionary and complementation analyses of sigma(E). Alignment of partial predicted sigma(E) amino acid sequences from three Bacillus spp., Paenibacillus polymyxa and five Clostridium spp. revealed that amino acid residues previously reported to be involved in promoter utilization (M124, E119 and N120) and strand opening (C117) are conserved among all these species. Phylogenetic analyses of various sigma factor sequences from endospore-forming bacteria revealed that homologues of sigma(E), sigma(K) and sigma(G) clustered together regardless of genus, suggesting a common origin of sporulation sigma factors. The functional equivalence between Clostridium acetobutylicum sigma(E) and Bacillus subtilis sigma(E) was investigated by complementing a non-polar B. subtilis sigma(E) null mutant with the spoIIG operon from either B. subtilis (spoIIG(Bs)) or C. acetobutylicum (spoIIG(Ca)). Single-copy integration of spoIIG(Bs) into the amyE locus of the sigma(E) null mutant completely restored the wild-type sporulation phenotype, while spoIIG(Ca) only partially restored sporulation. Maximal expression of spoIIG(Ca)-lacZ occurred approximately 12 h later than maximal expression of spoIIG(Bs)-lacZ. Differences in temporal expression patterns for spoIIG(Ca) and spoIIG(Bs) in the B. subtilis background may at least partially explain the observed sporulation complementation phenotypes. This study suggests a common phylogenetic ancestor for sigma(E) in Bacillus spp. and Clostridium spp., although regulation of sigma(E) expression may differ in these two genera.

A region of sigmaK involved in promoter activation by GerE in Bacillus subtilis

During endospore formation in Bacillus subtilis, the DNA binding protein GerE stimulates transcription from several promoters that are used by RNA polymerase containing sigmaK. GerE binds to a site on one of these promoters, cotX, that overlaps its -35 region. We tested the model that GerE interacts with sigmaK at the cotX promoter by seeking amino acid substitutions in sigmaK that interfered with GerE-dependent activation of the cotX promoter but which did not affect utilization of the sigmaK-dependent, GerE-independent promoter gerE. We identified two amino acid substitutions in sigmaK, E216K and H225Y, that decrease cotX promoter utilization but do not affect gerE promoter activity. Alanine substitutions at these positions had similar effects. We also examined the effects of the E216A and H225Y substitutions in sigmaK on transcription in vitro. We found that these substitutions specifically reduced utilization of the cotX promoter. These and other results suggest that the amino acid residues at positions 216 and 225 are required for GerE-dependent cotX promoter activity, that the histidine at position 225 of sigmaK may interact with GerE at the cotX promoter, and that this interaction may facilitate the initial binding of sigmaK RNA polymerase to the cotX promoter. We also found that the alanine substitutions at positions 216 and 225 of sigmaK had no effect on utilization of the GerE-dependent promoter cotD, which contains GerE binding sites that do not overlap with its -35 region.

The Spo0A sof mutations reveal regions of the regulatory domain that interact with a sensor kinase and RNA polymerase

Spo0A is a two-domain response regulator required for the initiation of sporulation in Bacillus subtilis. Spo0A is activated by phosphorylation of its regulatory domain by a multicomponent phosphorelay. To define the role of the regulatory domain in the activation of Spo0A, we have characterized four of the sof mutations in vitro. The sof mutations were identified previously as suppressors of the sporulation-negative phenotype resulting from a deletion of the gene for one of the phosphorelay components, spo0F. Like wild-type Spo0A, the transcription stimulation properties of all of the Sof proteins were dependent upon phosphorylation. Sof mutants from two classes were improved substrates for direct phosphorylation by the KinA sensor kinase, providing an explanation for their suppression properties. Two other Sof proteins showed a phosphorylation-dependent enhancement of the stability of the Sof approximately P-RNA polymerase-DNA complex. One of these mutants, Sof114, increased the stability of the Sof114 approximately P-RNAP-DNA complex without increasing its own affinity for the spoIIG promoter. A comparison of the location of the sof mutations with mutations in CheY suggests that phosphorylation of Spo0A results in the exposure of a region in the regulatory domain that interacts with RNA polymerase, thereby contributing to the signal transduction mechanism.

Identification of a contact site for different transcription activators in region 4 of the Escherichia coli RNA polymerase sigma70 subunit

The sigma subunit of RNA polymerase orchestrates basal transcription by first binding to core RNA polymerase and then recognizing promoters. Using a series of 16 alanine-substitution mutations, we show that residues in a narrow region of Escherichia coli sigma70 (590 to 603) are involved in transcription activation by a mutationally altered CRP derivative, FNR and AraC. Homology modeling of region 4 of sigma70 to the closely related NarL or 434 Cro proteins, suggests that the five basic residues implicated in activation are either in the C terminus of a long recognition helix that includes residues recognizing the -35 hexamer region of the promoter, or in the subsequent loop, and are ideally positioned to permit interaction with activators. The only substitution that has a significant effect on activator-independent transcription is at R603, indicating that this residue of sigma70 may play a distinct role in transcription initiation.

Contributions of the domains of the Bacillus subtilis response regulator Spo0A to transcription stimulation of the spoIIG operon

Spo0A is a response regulator that controls entry into sporulation by specifically stimulating or repressing transcription of critical developmental genes. Response regulators have at least two domains: an output transcription regulation domain and a receiver domain that inhibits the output domain. Phosphorylation of the receiver domain relieves the inhibition. We examined the in vitro transcription activation mechanism for Spo0A, phosphorylated Spo0A (Spo0A approximately P), and a deletion mutant that consists solely of the C-terminal output domain (Spo0ABD). Both Spo0A approximately P and Spo0ABD stimulated transcription from the spoIIG promoter 10-fold more efficiently than Spo0A. Spo0A approximately P and Spo0ABD induced DNA denaturation by RNA polymerase in the -10 recognition region, whereas Spo0A did not. DNase I footprint assays revealed that phosphorylation enhanced binding of intact Spo0A to the 0A boxes, while the binding of Spo0ABD was similar to that of Spo0A. Thus, activation of Spo0A by phosphorylation is not primarily due to enhanced DNA binding. The presence of a phosphorylated N terminus increased the stability of the ternary complex at the spoIIG promoter. We propose that the primary effect of phosphorylation is to expose an RNA polymerase interaction domain to promote transcription from PspoIIG.

Transcriptional activation of the Bacillus subtilis spoIIG promoter by the response regulator Spo0A is independent of the C-terminal domain of the RNA polymerase alpha subunit

In vitro transcription from the spoIIG promoter by Bacillus subtilis RNA polymerase reconstituted with wild-type alpha subunits and with C-terminal deletion mutants of the alpha subunit was equally stimulated by the response regulator Spo0A. Some differences in the structure of open complexes formed by RNA polymerase containing alpha subunit mutants were noted, although the wild-type and mutant polymerases appeared to use the same initiation mechanism.

A region in Bacillus subtilis sigmaH required for Spo0A-dependent promoter activity

Spo0A activates transcription in Bacillus subtilis from promoters that are used by two types of RNA polymerase, RNA polymerase containing the primary sigma factor, sigmaA, and RNA polymerase containing a secondary sigma factor, known as sigmaH. The region of sigmaA near positions 356 to 359 is required for Spo0A-dependent promoter activation, possibly because Spo0A interacts with this region of sigmaA at these promoters. To determine if the amino acids in the corresponding region of sigmaH are also important in Spo0A-dependent promoter activation, we examined the effects of single alanine substitutions at 10 positions in sigmaH (201 to 210). Two alanine substitutions in sigmaH, at glutamine 201 (Q201A) and at arginine 205 (R205A), significantly decreased activity from the Spo0A-dependent, sigmaH-dependent promoter spoIIA but did not affect expression from the sigmaH-dependent, Spo0A-independent promoters citGp2 and spoVG. Therefore, promoter activation by Spo0A requires homologous regions in sigmaA and sigmaH. A mutant form of Spo0A, S231F, that suppresses the sporulation defect caused by several amino acid substitutions in sigmaA did not suppress the sporulation defects caused by the Q201A and R205A substitutions in sigmaH. This result and others indicate that different surfaces of Spo0A probably interact with sigmaA and sigmaH RNA polymerases.

A region in the Bacillus subtilis transcription factor Spo0A that is important for spoIIG promoter activation

Spo0A is a DNA binding protein in Bacillus subtilis required for the activation of spoIIG and other promoters at the onset of endospore formation. Activation of some of these promoters may involve interaction of Spo0A and the sigmaA subunit of RNA polymerase. Previous studies identified two single-amino-acid substitutions in sigmaA, K356E and H359R, that specifically impaired Spo0A-dependent transcription in vivo. Here we report the identification of an amino acid substitution in Spo0A (S231F) that suppressed the sporulation deficiency due to the H359R substitution in sigmaA. We also found that the S231F substitution partially restored use of the spoIIG promoter by the sigmaA H359R RNA polymerase in vitro. Alanine substitutions in the 231 region of Spo0A revealed an additional amino acid residue important for spoIIG promoter activation, I229. This amino acid substitution in Spo0A did not affect repression of abrB transcription, indicating that the alanine-substituted Spo0A was not defective in DNA binding. Moreover, the alanine-substituted Spo0A protein activated the spoIIA promoter; therefore, this region of Spo0A is probably not required for Spo0A-dependent, sigmaH-directed transcription. These and other results suggest that the region of Spo0A near position 229 is involved in sigmaA-dependent promoter activation.

Spo0A mutants of Bacillus subtilis with sigma factor-specific defects in transcription activation

The transcription factor Spo0A of Bacillus subtilis has the unique ability to activate transcription from promoters that require different forms of RNA polymerase holoenzyme. One class of Spo0A-activated promoter, which includes spoIIEp, is recognized by RNA polymerase associated with the primary sigma factor, sigma A (sigmaA); the second, which includes spoIIAp, is recognized by RNA polymerase associated with an early-sporulation sigma factor, sigma H (sigmaH). Evidence suggests that Spo0A probably interacts directly with RNA polymerase to activate transcription from these promoters. To identify residues of Spo0A that may be involved in transcriptional activation, we used PCR mutagenesis of the entire spo0A gene and designed a screen using two distinguishable reporter fusions, spoIIE-gus and spoIIA-lacZ. Here we report the identification and characterization of five mutants of Spo0A that are specifically defective in activation of sigmaA-dependent promoters while maintaining activation of sigmaH-dependent promoters. These five mutants identify a 14-amino-acid segment of Spo0A, from residue 227 to residue 240, that is required for transcriptional activation of sigmaA-dependent promoters. This region may define a surface or domain of Spo0A that makes direct contacts with sigmaA-associated holoenzyme.

DNA strand separation during activation of a developmental promoter by the Bacillus subtilis response regulator Spo0A

Spo0A is the central regulator of commitment to sporulation in Bacillus subtilis. Spo0A is a member of the response regulator family of proteins and both represses and stimulates transcription from promoters when activated. In vivo Spo0A activation takes place by phosphorylation and in vitro activation can be accomplished by phosphorylation or removal of the N-terminal domain of the protein. We have examined the mechanism of Spo0A stimulation of transcription from the promoter of the spoIIG operon. This operon encodes one of the first compartment specific sigma factors whose appearance regulates sporulation development. When activated Spo0A was incubated with RNA polymerase and a DNA fragment containing the spoIIG promoter, bases between -13 and -3, relative to the start site of transcription, were denatured. Addition of activated Spo0A or RNA polymerase alone did not induce denaturation. Heteroduplex templates that contained the nontemplate sequence of the wild-type promoter on both strands between positions -3 and -13 were efficiently transcribed without activated Spo0A. These data suggest that DNA strand separation is a two-step process and that the activation of Spo0A creates a form that interacts with the polymerase to induce the first of the two steps.