Interactions between methicillin and vancomycin in methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus strains displaying different phenotypes of vancomycin susceptibility

Escalation of antimicrobial resistance among MRSA part 2: focus on infections and treatment

INTRODUCTION

MRSA is associated with causing a variety of infections including skin and skin structure infections, catheter and device-related (e.g. central venous catheter, prosthetic heart valve) infections, infectious endocarditis, blood stream infections, bone, and joint infections (e.g. osteomyelitis, prosthetic joint, surgical site), central nervous system infections (e.g. meningitis, brain/spinal cord abscess, ventriculitis, hydrocephalus), respiratory tract infections (e.g. hospital-acquired pneumonia, ventilator-associated pneumonia), urinary tract infections, and gastrointestinal infections. The emergence and spread of multidrug resistant (MDR) MRSA clones has limited therapeutic options. Older agents such as vancomycin, linezolid and daptomycin and a variety of newer MRSA antimicrobials and combination therapy are available to treat serious MRSA infections.

AREAS COVERED

The authors discuss infections caused by MRSA as well as common older and newer antimicrobials and combination therapy for MRSA infections. A literature search of MRSA was performed via PubMed (up to September 2022), using the keywords: antimicrobial resistance; β-lactams; multidrug resistance, Staphylococcus aureus, vancomycin; glycolipopeptides.

EXPERT OPINION

Innovation, discovery, and development of new and novel classes of antimicrobial agents are critical to expand effective therapeutic options. The authors encourage the judicious use of antimicrobials in accordance with antimicrobial stewardship programs along with infection-control measures to minimize the spread of MRSA.

Antibiotic sensitivity profile of bacterial pathogens in postoperative wound infections at a tertiary care hospital in Gujarat, India

Objective:

To find out the most common bacterial pathogens responsible for post-operative wound infection and their antibiotic sensitivity profile.

Materials and Methods:

This prospective, observational study was carried out in patients of postoperative wound infection. Samples from wound discharge were collected using a sterile swab and studied for identification of isolates by Gram stains and culture growth followed by in vitro antibiotic susceptibility testing performed by disc diffusion method on Mueller Hinton agar.

Results:

Out of 183 organisms, 126 (68.85%) isolated organisms were gram negative. Staphylococcus aureus, 48 (26.23%), was the predominant organism. S. aureus was sensitive to rifampicin (89.58%), levofloxacin (60.42%), and vancomycin (54.17%). Pseudomonas aeruginosa was sensitive to ciprofloxacin (83.78%), gatifloxacin (51.35%), and meropenem (51.35%). Escherichia coli was sensitive to levofloxacin (72.41%) and ciprofloxacin (62.07%). Klebsiella pneumoniae was sensitive to ciprofloxacin (63.16%), levofloxacin (63.16%), gatifloxacin (63.16%), and linezolid (56.52%). Proteus mirabilis was sensitive to ciprofloxacin (75%) and linezolid (62.50). Proteus vulgaris was sensitive to ampicillin+sulbactam (57.14%) followed by levofloxacin (50%).

Conclusions:

There is an alarming increase of infections caused by antibiotic-resistant bacteria, particularly in the emergence of VRSA/VISA, meropenem, and third generation cephalosporin resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Linezolid showing sensitivity against Gram negative bacteria.

In vivo synergism of ceftobiprole and vancomycin against experimental endocarditis due to vancomycin-intermediate Staphylococcus aureus

The efficacy of ceftobiprole combined with vancomycin was tested against two vancomycin-intermediate Staphylococcus aureus (VISA) strains, PC3 and Mu50, in rats with experimental endocarditis. Animals with infected aortic vegetations were treated for 3 days with doses simulating the kinetics after intravenous administration in humans of (i) the standard dose of ceftobiprole of 500 mg every 12 h (b.i.d.) (SD-ceftobiprole), (ii) a low dose of ceftobiprole of 250 mg b.i.d. (LD-ceftobiprole), (iii) a very low dose of ceftobiprole of 125 mg b.i.d. (VLD-ceftobiprole), (iv) SD-vancomycin of 1 g b.i.d., or (v) LD- or VLD-ceftobiprole combined with SD-vancomycin. Low dosages of ceftobiprole were purposely used to highlight positive drug interactions. Treatment with SD-ceftobiprole sterilized 12 of 14 (86%) and 10 of 13 (77%) vegetations infected with PC3 and Mu50, respectively (P < 0.001 versus controls). In comparison, LD-ceftobiprole sterilized 10 of 11 (91%) vegetations infected with PC3 (P < 0.01 versus controls) but only 3 of 12 (25%) vegetations infected with Mu50 (P > 0.05 versus controls). VLD-ceftobiprole and SD-vancomycin alone were ineffective against both strains (≤8% sterile vegetations). In contrast, the combination of VLD-ceftobiprole and SD-vancomycin sterilized 7 of 9 (78%) and 6 of 14 (43%) vegetations infected with PC3 and Mu50, respectively, and the combination of LD-ceftobiprole and SD-vancomycin sterilized 5 of 6 (83%) vegetations infected with Mu50 (P < 0.05 versus controls and monotherapy). Thus, ceftobiprole monotherapy simulating standard therapeutic doses was active against VISA experimental endocarditis. Moreover, subtherapeutic LD- and VLD-ceftobiprole synergized with ineffective vancomycin to restore efficacy. Hence, combining ceftobiprole with vancomycin broadens the therapeutic margin of these two compounds against VISA infections.

Interactions between glycopeptides and beta-lactams against isogenic pairs of teicoplanin-susceptible and -resistant strains of Staphylococcus haemolyticus

Four isogenic derivatives with stably increased glycopeptide MICs (all become resistant to teicoplanin) were obtained from four glycopeptide-susceptible clinical isolates of Staphylococcus haemolyticus. All strains were extensively analyzed and compared for a number of distinctive features. In particular, the results provided insights into the puzzling issue of antistaphylococcal interactions between glycopeptides and beta-lactams, especially the paradox of double zones around beta-lactam disks and the relationships between autolysis rate and type of interaction.

Experimental study on the efficacy of combinations of glycopeptides and β-lactams against Staphylococcus aureus with reduced susceptibility to glycopeptides

OBJECTIVES

The combination of glycopeptides and beta-lactams has been proposed as an alternative therapy against infections due to Staphylococcus aureus with reduced susceptibility to glycopeptides, though its role is still controversial. Our aim was to evaluate the efficacy (decrease in bacterial concentration after 24 h therapy) of these combinations both in vitro and in vivo.

METHODS

Four strains of S. aureus with different glycopeptide susceptibility (MICs of vancomycin from 1 to 8 mg/L) were used. In vitro experiments were performed by means of time-kill curves while we used the mouse peritonitis model for in vivo evaluation.

RESULTS

Combinations of glycopeptides and beta-lactams showed synergy in in vitro time-kill curves against the four staphylococcal strains, the highest efficacy being detected against the glycopeptide-intermediate S. aureus (GISA) strain (MIC = 8 mg/L) (Deltalog 24 h = -3.19 cfu/mL for vancomycin at 1/2 x MIC and oxacillinat 1/64 x MIC versus -0.56 cfu/mL for vancomycin alone at 1/2 x MIC). On the other hand, no significant increase in efficacy was observed in vivo in the experimental model. The efficacy of the combinations decreased in correlation to the decreasing susceptibility of the strains to glycopeptides, showing only residual activity against the GISA strain (Deltalog 24 h = -1.42 cfu/mL for vancomycin and cloxacillin versus -1.22 cfu/mL for vancomycin).

CONCLUSIONS

In the in vivo setting we were unable to demonstrate the synergism between glycopeptides and beta-lactams observed in vitro; nor did combinations show antagonism against any of the strains. Though the usefulness of these combinations cannot be totally ruled out in highly specific clinical conditions, it seems unlikely that they will provide a serious therapeutic alternative in most hGISA and GISA infections in the coming years.

Investigation of beta-lactam antibiotic-induced vancomycin-resistant MRSA (BIVR)

We could not detect hetero-vancomycin-intermediate resistant Staphylococcus aureus (hetero-VISA), according to the definition of hetero-VISA, from the clinical isolates of 140 methicillin-resistant S. aureus (MRSA) strains. However, 15 beta-lactam antibiotic-induced vancomycin-resistant MRSA (BIVR) strains were detected from the same strains. We screened 1882 MRSA clinical isolates obtained in 2002 from 21 institutes throughout Japan. The detection rate of blood-isolated BIVR was 12.6% (19/151), and that of nonblood-isolated BIVR was 4.9% (85/1731; P < 0.001; chi2 test). Uridine-diphosphate-N-acetylmuramyl-L: -alanyl-D: -isoglutamyl-L: -lysine, used as the peptidoglycan material of S. aureus, showed the same results as beta-lactam antibiotics in BIVR.

Vancomycin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus: no apocalypse now

The number of reports concerning vancomycin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus is much higher than the number of true resistant strains or unexpected clinical failures. Many confounding factors, including inadequate serum levels, severely ill patients, foreign devices or undrained abscesses, are more likely to be responsible for the clinical failures than resistance to vancomycin.

Epidemiological and microbiological characterization of infections caused by Staphylococcus aureus with reduced susceptibility to vancomycin, United States, 1997-2001

Infections caused by Staphylococcus aureus with reduced vancomycin susceptibility (SA-RVS; minimum inhibitory concentration [MIC], >or=4 microg/mL), including vancomycin-intermediate S. aureus (VISA; MIC, 8 microg/mL), are a new clinical and public health dilemma. Prospective surveillance and a nested case-control study of patients in the United States infected with SA-RVS was conduced from March 1999 through December 2000. Control patients were persons infected with oxacillin-resistant S. aureus (MIC of vancomycin, <or=2 microg/mL). Among 19 case patients, 4 infections were due to VISA and 15 were due to non-VISA SA-RVS. Case patients with and those without VISA infection had similar clinical presentations and outcomes; the overall attributable mortality rate was 63%. Isolates recovered from case patients had heterogeneous pulsed-field gel electrophoresis banding patterns, regardless of the MIC of vancomycin. Neither dialysis nor chronic renal failure were predictive of case status compared with control status. Independent risk factors for being a case patient included antecedent vancomycin use and prior oxacillin-resistant S. aureus infection 2 or 3 months before the current infection.

The prevalence and mechanisms of vancomycin resistance in Staphylococcus aureus

The emergence of Staphylococcus aureus resistant to vancomycin has caused considerable concern. Such strains are currently rare, although they have been isolated from many areas of the world. Considerable controversy surrounds strains of S. aureus displaying heterogeneous resistance to vancomycin regarding their definition and methods for detection. This has led to considerable variance in estimates of prevalence (0-1.3%-20% in Japan) and has hindered efforts to define the clinical relevance of these strains. The mechanism of resistance involves a complex reorganization of cell wall metabolism, leading to a grossly thickened cell wall with reduced peptidoglycan cross-linking. There may be many different ways in which strains achieve this endpoint. Current knowledge and theories are summarized.

Nosocomial spread of a Staphylococcus capitis strain with heteroresistance to vancomycin in a neonatal intensive care unit

A premature infant in a neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) developed a bloodstream infection caused by coagulase-negative staphylococci (CoNS) sensitive to vancomycin. The infection persisted for 3 weeks, despite therapy with vancomycin and replacement of all intravenous catheters. The neonate died due to necrotizing enterocolitis which developed during the ongoing sepsis. We screened this strain and 216 other strains of CoNS from cultures of blood obtained from neonates between 1997 and 2000 for heteroresistance to vancomycin. Forty-eight isolates, including the strain that caused ongoing sepsis, proved heteroresistant. All isolates were identified as Staphylococcus capitis and were identical, just as their resistant stable subcolonies were, when they were genetically fingerprinted by amplified-fragment length polymorphism analysis. The heteroresistant phenotype of this endemic strain was confirmed by population analysis. We conclude that heteroresistance to vancomycin occurs in S. capitis and might be the cause of therapeutic failures in NICUs. Moreover, heteroresistant strains can become endemic in such units.

The VISA/GISA problem: therapeutic implications

The emergence of vancomycin intermediate resistant Staphylococcus aureus (VISA) isolates in Japan, USA, France, Hong Kong and Korea among methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) clinical isolates, is of great concern. Vancomycin has been the drug of choice for the treatment of multiresistant MRSA infections in the last three decades, but the management of invasive MRSA infections will become a serious problem if VISA strains become widespread. VISA isolates reported to date have a vancomycin MIC of 8 mg/L, and were isolated from patients with underlying diseases whose long-term vancomycin treatment apparently failed. Since many VISA isolates also have been resistant to teicoplanin, the term glycopeptide-intermediate S. aureus (GISA) is more appropriate. The frequency of GISA isolates appears to be extremely low; to date, only 10 GISA infections have been reported worldwide. However, heterogeneous resistance to glycopeptides (h-GISA) have been reported in Japan, Europe and Thailand. These h-GISA strains showed vancomycin MICs ranging from 1 to 4 mg/L, but had subpopulations that could grow on agar plates containing 4-8 mg/L, which may represent the first step in the development of GISA strains. Although GISA isolates have shown resistance to many antimicrobials, all GISA isolates remain susceptible to co-trimoxazole and some of them to other common antimicrobials. Currently, there are no recommended therapy guidelines for GISA infections, although in recent studies, several new drugs have shown promising activity against GISA strains. In addition, synergy between glycopeptides and beta-lactams against GISA strains was observed in some in vivo and in vitro studies. Specific MRSA/GISA control programs, rational antibiotic policies, including the reduction of glycopeptide use, and rapid laboratory detection of GISA and h-GISA strains are the key measures in preventing the spread of these strains.

Evaluation of current methods for detection of staphylococci with reduced susceptibility to glycopeptides

The sensitivity and specificity of seven methods (agar dilution, broth microdilution, Etest at 0.5 and 2.0 McFarland (McF) inocula, two agar screening methods, and population studies [PS]) were evaluated in a double-blind study involving 284 methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) strains and 45 Staphylococcus strains with reduced susceptibilities to vancomycin (SRSV). The results were compared to the population analysis profile-area under the curve ratio method (PAP-AUC ratio compared to that of Mu3) as described by Wootton et al. The agar screening method using brain heart infusion agar (6 microg of vancomycin per ml) gave a sensitivity of 22% and a specificity of 97%. A similar method using Mueller-Hinton agar (5 microg of vancomycin per ml) gave a sensitivity of 20% and a specificity of 99%. The PS method detected 34 false positives (12%) and gave a sensitivity of 71% and a specificity of 88%. Etest using 0.5 and 2.0 McF inocula gave sensitivities and specificities of 82 and 93% and of 96 and 97%, respectively. The best Etest interpretative criteria for the 2.0 McF inoculum was > or =8 mg of vancomycin per liter and > or =8 microg teicoplanin per ml or > or =12 microg of teicoplanin per ml. The direct colony suspension inoculum for this method was found to be equally accurate in detecting (hetero-)glycopeptide-intermediate S. aureus compared to the overnight broth inoculum preparation method. Agar dilution and broth microdilution using the NCCLS breakpoint criteria for vancomycin gave sensitivities and specificities of 20 and 100% and of 11 and 100%, respectively. Using the Etest with a 2.0 McF inoculum, six different media were assessed against a selection of SRSV (n = 48) and MRSA (n = 12). Brain heart infusion agar yielded the highest sensitivity and specificity values: 88 and 88%, respectively.

Combination effect of vancomycin and beta-lactams against a Staphylococcus aureus strain, Mu3, with heterogeneous resistance to vancomycin

We tested the combined activity of vancomycin and seven beta-lactam antibiotics against Staphylococcus aureus clinical strain Mu3, which displays heterogeneous resistance to vancomycin. When combined with vancomycin, four of the seven tested beta-lactams exhibited an additive effect at or near their MICs, while all showed an antagonistic effect at lower, sub-MIC levels. This study implicated the unpredictable nature of combination therapy of beta-lactams and vancomycin against S. aureus with reduced susceptibility to vancomycin.

Vancomycin-intermediate and -resistant Staphylococcus aureus: what the infectious disease specialist needs to know

Ever since the first strain of Staphylococcus aureus with reduced susceptibility to vancomycin and teicoplanin was reported from Japan, there has been a lot of confusion regarding the laboratory and clinical approach to patients with infections due to S. aureus with reduced susceptibility to vancomycin. To date, 6 clinical infections with vancomycin-intermediate S. aureus (VISA) have been reported in the United States. Intermediate resistance appears to develop from preexisting strains of methicillin-resistant S. aureus in the presence of vancomycin, and all but 1 infection occurred in patients with exposure to dialysis for renal insufficiency. Detection of VISA is difficult in the laboratory, and special inquiries about susceptibility testing methods may be needed. These VISA-infected patients had underlying illnesses, and their infections did not appear to respond well to conventional treatment. Prevention strategies have been outlined. Without continued vigilance in enforcing infection-control measures, improved use of antimicrobials, and coordination of efforts among public health authorities, increasing levels of vancomycin resistance in S. aureus are likely to be encountered.

Retrospective screening for heterogeneous vancomycin resistance in diverse Staphylococcus aureus clones disseminated in French hospitals

Twenty-five different Staphylococcus aureus strains that are widespread in France were screened by various methods for heterogeneous and low-level resistance to vancomycin. Population analysis on brain-heart infusion agar containing 4 mg/L of the drug detected resistant cells at frequencies of 10-7 to 10-6 in five multiply resistant strains. There was no antagonism between vancomycin and beta-lactam antibiotics. One of the five strains, isolated in 1993, was considered a putative progenitor of a French nosocomial S. aureus strain isolated in 1998 and for which the vancomycin MIC was 8 mg/L.