Opposing regulatory functions of positive and negative elements in UASG control transcription of the yeast GAL genes

SCARECROW-LIKE15 interacts with HISTONE DEACETYLASE19 and is essential for repressing the seed maturation programme

Epigenetic regulation of gene expression is critical for controlling embryonic properties during the embryo-to-seedling phase transition. Here we report that a histone deacetylase19 (HDA19)-associated regulator, scarecrow-like15 (SCL15), is essential for repressing the seed maturation programme in vegetative tissues. SCL15 is expressed in and GFP-tagged SCL15 predominantly localizes to, the vascular bundles particularly in the phloem companion cells and neighbouring specialized cells. Mutation of SCL15 leads to a global shift in gene expression in seedlings to a profile resembling late embryogenesis in seeds. In scl15 seedlings, many genes involved in seed maturation are markedly derepressed with concomitant accumulation of seed 12S globulin; this is correlated with elevated levels of histone acetylation at a subset of seed-specific loci. SCL15 physically interacts with HDA19 and direct targets of HDA19-SCL15 association are identified. These studies reveal that SCL15 acts as an HDA19-associated regulator to repress embryonic traits in seedlings.

Steady-state analysis of glucose repression reveals hierarchical expression of proteins under Mig1p control in Saccharomyces cerevisiae

Glucose repression is a global transcriptional regulatory mechanism commonly observed in micro-organisms for the repression of enzymes that are not essential for glucose metabolism. In Saccharomyces cerevisiae, Mig1p, a homologue of Wilms' tumour protein, is a global repressor protein dedicated to glucose repression. Mig1p represses genes either by binding directly to the upstream repression sequence of structural genes or by indirectly repressing a transcriptional activator, such as Gal4p. In addition, some genes are repressed by both of the above mechanisms. This raises a fundamental question regarding the physiological relevance of the varied mechanisms of repression that exist involving Mig1p. We address this issue by comparing two well-known glucose-repression systems, that is, SUC2 and GAL gene expression systems, which encompass all the above three mechanisms. We demonstrate using steady-state analysis that these mechanisms lead to a hierarchical glucose repression profile of different family of genes. This switch over from one carbon source to another is well-calibrated as a function of glucose concentration through this hierarchical transcriptional response. The mechanisms prevailing in this repression system can achieve amplification and sensitivity, as observed in the well-characterized MAPK (mitogen-activated protein kinase) cascade system, albeit through a different structure. A critical feature of repression predicted by our steady-state model for the mutant strain of S. cerevisiae lacking Gal80p agrees well with the data reported here as well as that available in the literature.

Gal80-Gal80 interaction on adjacent Gal4p binding sites is required for complete GAL gene repression

Regulation of the GAL genes of Saccharomyces cerevisiae is determined by the interplay of the transcriptional activator Gal4p and the repressor Gal80p, which binds and masks the activation domain of Gal4p under non-inducing conditions. Here we demonstrate that Gal80p dimerizes with high affinity and that this dimerization appears to stabilize the Gal4p-Gal80p interaction and also, indirectly, the Gal4p-DNA interaction in a (Gal4p)2(Gal80p)2DNA complex. In addition, Gal80 dimers transiently interact with each other to form higher order multimers. We provide evidence that adjacent Gal4p binding sites, when correctly spaced, greatly stabilize Gal80p dimer-dimer interactions and that this stabilization results in the complete repression of GAL genes with multiple Gal4p binding sites. In contrast, GAL genes under the control of a single Gal4p binding site do not stabilize Gal80p multimers, resulting in significant and biologically important transcriptional leakage. Cooperative binding experiments indicate that Gal80p dimer-dimer interaction probably does not lead to a stronger Gal4p-Gal80p interaction, but most likely to a more complete shielding of the Gal4p activation domain.

Yeast PKA represses Msn2p/Msn4p-dependent gene expression to regulate growth, stress response and glycogen accumulation

Yeast cAMP-dependent protein kinase (PKA) activity is essential for growth and antagonizes induction of the general stress response as well as accumulation of glycogen stores. Previous studies have suggested that the PKA effects on the two latter processes result in part from transcription repression. Here we show that transcription derepression that accompanies PKA depletion is dependent upon the presence of two redundant Zn2+-finger transcription factors, Msn2p and Msn4p. The Msn2p and Msn4p proteins were shown previously to act as positive transcriptional factors in the stress response pathway, and our results suggest that Msn2p and Msn4p also mediate PKA-dependent effects on stress response as well as glycogen accumulation genes. Interestingly, PKA activity is dispensable in a strain lacking Msn2p and Msn4p activity. Thus, Msn2p and Msn4p may antagonize PKAdependent growth by stimulating expression of genes that inhibit growth. In agreement with this model, Msn2p/Msn4p function is required for expression of a gene, YAK1, previously shown to antagonize PKA-dependent growth. These results suggest that Msn2p/Msn4p-dependent gene expression may account for all, or at least most, of the pleiotropic effects of yeast PKA, including growth regulation, response to stress and carbohydrate store accumulation.

Derivation and functional characterization of a consensus DNA binding sequence for the tas transcriptional activator of simian foamy virus type 1

Although DNA binding sites specific for the Bel-1 and Tas transcriptional activators, encoded, respectively, by the human and simian foamy viruses, have been mutationally defined, they show little evident sequence identity. As a result, the sequence determinants for DNA binding by both Bel-1 and Tas have remained unclear. Here, we report the use of a novel in vivo randomization and selection strategy to identify a Tas DNA binding site consensus. This approach takes advantage of the fact that Tas can effectively activate gene expression in yeast cells via a Tas DNA binding site derived from the simian foamy virus type 1 (SFV-1) internal promoter. The defined Tas DNA binding site consensus extends over approximately 25 bp and contains a critical core sequence of approximately 5 bp. Positions adjacent to this core sequence, while clearly also subject to selection, show a significantly higher level of sequence variation. Surprisingly, the wild-type SFV-1 internal promoter Tas DNA binding site fails to conform to the consensus at several positions. Further analysis demonstrated that the consensus sequence bound Tas more effectively than did the wild-type sequence in vitro and could mediate an enhanced Tas response in vivo when substituted into the SFV-1 internal promoter context. These findings explain the limited sequence identity observed for mutationally defined Tas or Bel-1 response elements and should facilitate the identification of Tas DNA target sites located elsewhere in the SFV-1 genome.

Identification and functional characterization of a high-affinity Bel-1 DNA binding site located in the human foamy virus internal promoter

The transcription of genes carried by primate foamy viruses is dependent on two distinct promoter elements. These are the long terminal repeat (LTR) promoter, which regulates expression of the viral structural proteins, and a second internal promoter, located towards the 3' end of the env gene, that directs expression of the viral auxiliary proteins. One of these auxiliary proteins is a potent transcriptional transactivator, termed Bel-1 in human foamy virus (HFV) and Tas or Taf in the related simian foamy viruses, that is critical for foamy virus replication. Previously, it has been demonstrated that the LTR promoter element of HFV contains a DNA binding site for Bel-1 that is critical for transcriptional activation (F. He, W. S. Blair, J. Fukushima, and B. R. Cullen, J. Virol. 70:3902-3908, 1996). Here, we extended this earlier work by using methylation interference analysis to identify and characterize the Bel-1 DNA binding sites located in the HFV LTR and internal promoter elements. Based on these data, we propose a minimal, 25-bp DNA binding site for Bel-1, derived from the HFV internal promoter element, and show that this short DNA sequence mediates efficient Bel-1 binding both in vitro and in vivo. We further demonstrate that, as determined by both in vitro and in vivo assays, the Bel-1 target site located within the HFV internal promoter binds Bel-1 with a significantly higher affinity than the cap-proximal Bel-1 target site located in the LTR promoter. This result may provide a mechanistic explanation for the observation that the internal promoter is activated significantly earlier than the LTR promoter during the foamy virus life cycle.

A yeast TATA-binding protein mutant that selectively enhances gene expression from weak RNA polymerase II promoters

We describe a unique gain-of-function mutant of the TATA-binding protein (TBP) subunit of Saccharomyces cerevisiae TFIID that, at least in part, renders transcriptional transactivators dispensable for efficient mRNA expression. The yTBPN69S mutant enhances transcription from weaker yeast promoter elements by up to 50-fold yet does not significantly increase gene expression directed by highly active promoters. Therefore, this TBP mutant and transcriptional transactivators appear to affect a common rate-limiting step in transcription initiation. Consistent with the hypothesis that this step is TFIID recruitment, tethering of TBP to a target promoter via a heterologous DNA binding domain, which is known to bypass the need for transcriptional transactivators, also nullifies the enhancing effect exerted by the N69S mutation. These data provide genetic support for the hypothesis that TFIID recruitment represents a rate-limiting step in the initiation of mRNA transcription that is specifically enhanced by transcriptional transactivators.

Yeast histone H3 and H4 N termini function through different GAL1 regulatory elements to repress and activate transcription

Previous work has shown that N-terminal deletions of yeast histone H3 cause a 2- to 4-fold increase in the induction of GAL1 and a number of other genes involved in galactose metabolism. In contrast, deletions at the H4 N terminus cause a 10- to 20-fold decrease in the induction of these same GAL genes. However, H3 and H4 N-terminal deletions each decrease PHO5 induction only 2- to 4-fold. To define the GAL1 gene regulatory elements through which the histone N termini activate or repress transcription, fusions were made between GAL1 and PHO5 promoter elements attached to a beta-galactosidase reporter gene. We show here that GAL1 hyperactivation caused by the H3 N-terminal deletion delta 4-15 is linked to the upstream activation sequence. Conversely, the relative decrease in GAL1 induction caused by the H4N-terminal deletion delta 4-28 is linked to the downstream promoter which contains the TATA element. These data indicate that the H3 N terminus is required for the repression of the GAL1 upstream element, whereas the H4N terminus is required for the activation of the GAL1 downstream promoter element.

Upstream tRNA genes are essential for expression of small nuclear and cytoplasmic RNA genes in trypanosomes

An interesting feature of trypanosome genome organization involves genes transcribed by RNA polymerase III. The U6 small nuclear RNA (snRNA), U-snRNA B (the U3 snRNA homolog), and 7SL RNA genes are closely linked with different, divergently oriented tRNA genes. To test the hypothesis that this association is of functional significance, we generated deletion and block substitution mutants of all three small RNA genes and monitored their effects by transient expression in cultured insect-form cells of Trypanosoma brucei. In each case, two extragenic regulatory elements were mapped to the A and B boxes of the respective companion tRNA gene. In addition, the tRNA(Thr) gene, which is upstream of the U6 snRNA gene, was shown by two different tests to be expressed in T. brucei cells, thus confirming its identity as a gene. This association between tRNA and small RNA genes appears to be a general phenomenon in the family Trypanosomatidae, since it is also observed at the U6 snRNA loci in Leishmania pifanoi and Crithidia fasciculata and at the 7SL RNA locus in L. pifanoi. We propose that the A- and B-box elements of small RNA-associated tRNA genes serve a dual role as intragenic promoter elements for the respective tRNA genes and as extragenic regulatory elements for the linked small RNA genes. The possible role of tRNA genes in regulating small RNA gene transcription is discussed.

Upstream tRNA genes are essential for expression of small nuclear and cytoplasmic RNA genes in trypanosomes

An interesting feature of trypanosome genome organization involves genes transcribed by RNA polymerase III. The U6 small nuclear RNA (snRNA), U-snRNA B (the U3 snRNA homolog), and 7SL RNA genes are closely linked with different, divergently oriented tRNA genes. To test the hypothesis that this association is of functional significance, we generated deletion and block substitution mutants of all three small RNA genes and monitored their effects by transient expression in cultured insect-form cells of Trypanosoma brucei. In each case, two extragenic regulatory elements were mapped to the A and B boxes of the respective companion tRNA gene. In addition, the tRNA(Thr) gene, which is upstream of the U6 snRNA gene, was shown by two different tests to be expressed in T. brucei cells, thus confirming its identity as a gene. This association between tRNA and small RNA genes appears to be a general phenomenon in the family Trypanosomatidae, since it is also observed at the U6 snRNA loci in Leishmania pifanoi and Crithidia fasciculata and at the 7SL RNA locus in L. pifanoi. We propose that the A- and B-box elements of small RNA-associated tRNA genes serve a dual role as intragenic promoter elements for the respective tRNA genes and as extragenic regulatory elements for the linked small RNA genes. The possible role of tRNA genes in regulating small RNA gene transcription is discussed.

Multiple mechanisms provide rapid and stringent glucose repression of GAL gene expression in Saccharomyces cerevisiae

Expression of the GAL genes of Saccharomyces cerevisiae is induced during growth on galactose by a well-characterized regulatory mechanism that relieves Gal80p inhibition of the Gal4p transcriptional activator. Growth on glucose overrides induction by galactose. Glucose repression acts at three levels to reduce GAL1 expression: (i) it reduces the level of functional inducer in the cell; (ii) it lowers cellular levels of Gal4p by repressing GAL4 transcription; and (iii) it inhibits Gal4p function through a repression element in the GAL1 promoter. We quantified the amount of repression provided by each mechanism by assaying strains with none, one, two, or all three of the repression mechanisms intact. In a strain lacking all three repression mechanisms, there was almost no glucose repression of GAL1 expression, suggesting that these are the major, possibly the only, mechanisms of glucose repression acting upon the GAL genes. The mechanism of repression that acts to reduce Gal4p levels in the cell is established slowly (hours after glucose addition), probably because Gal4p is stable. By contrast, the repression acting through the upstream repression sequence element in the GAL1 promoter is established rapidly (within minutes of glucose addition). Thus, these three mechanisms of repression collaborate to repress GAL1 expression rapidly and stringently. The Mig1p repressor is responsible for most (possibly all) of these repression mechanisms. We show that for GAL1 expression, mig1 mutations are epistatic to snf1 mutations, indicating that Mig1p acts after the Snf1p protein kinase in the glucose repression pathway, which suggests that Snf1p is an inhibitor of Mig1p.

Multiple mechanisms provide rapid and stringent glucose repression of GAL gene expression in Saccharomyces cerevisiae

Expression of the GAL genes of Saccharomyces cerevisiae is induced during growth on galactose by a well-characterized regulatory mechanism that relieves Gal80p inhibition of the Gal4p transcriptional activator. Growth on glucose overrides induction by galactose. Glucose repression acts at three levels to reduce GAL1 expression: (i) it reduces the level of functional inducer in the cell; (ii) it lowers cellular levels of Gal4p by repressing GAL4 transcription; and (iii) it inhibits Gal4p function through a repression element in the GAL1 promoter. We quantified the amount of repression provided by each mechanism by assaying strains with none, one, two, or all three of the repression mechanisms intact. In a strain lacking all three repression mechanisms, there was almost no glucose repression of GAL1 expression, suggesting that these are the major, possibly the only, mechanisms of glucose repression acting upon the GAL genes. The mechanism of repression that acts to reduce Gal4p levels in the cell is established slowly (hours after glucose addition), probably because Gal4p is stable. By contrast, the repression acting through the upstream repression sequence element in the GAL1 promoter is established rapidly (within minutes of glucose addition). Thus, these three mechanisms of repression collaborate to repress GAL1 expression rapidly and stringently. The Mig1p repressor is responsible for most (possibly all) of these repression mechanisms. We show that for GAL1 expression, mig1 mutations are epistatic to snf1 mutations, indicating that Mig1p acts after the Snf1p protein kinase in the glucose repression pathway, which suggests that Snf1p is an inhibitor of Mig1p.

Proline isomerases function during heat shock

The cyclophilins (CYPs) and FK506 binding proteins (FKBPs) are two families of distinct proline isomerases that are targets for a number of clinically important immunosuppressive drugs. Members of both families catalyze cis/trans isomerization of peptidyl-prolyl bonds, which can be a rate-limiting step during protein folding in vitro and in vivo. We demonstrate in Saccharomyces cerevisiae that heat shock causes a 2- to 3-fold increase in the level of mRNA encoded by the major cytoplasmic CYP gene, CYP1. The cloned CYP1 promoter confers heat-inducible expression upon a reporter gene, and transcriptional induction is mediated through sequences similar to the consensus heat shock response element. Disruption of CYP1 decreases survival of cells following exposure to high temperatures, indicating that CYP1 plays a role in the stress response. A second CYP gene, CYP2, encodes a cyclophilin that is located within the secretory pathway. Its expression is also stimulated by heat shock, and cells containing a disrupted CYP2 allele are more sensitive than wild-type cells to heat. By contrast, expression of the FKB1 gene, which encodes a cytoplasmic member of the yeast FKBP family, is neither heat responsive nor necessary for survival after exposure to heat stress.

TSF3, a global regulatory protein that silences transcription of yeast GAL genes, also mediates repression by alpha 2 repressor and is identical to SIN4

TSF3 encodes one of six (TSF1 to TSF6) recently identified global negative regulators of transcription in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Mutant tsf3 strains exhibit defects in transcriptional silencing of the GAL1 promoter, allow expression from upstream activation sequence-less promoters, and exhibit pleiotropic defects in cell growth and development. Here we show that TSF3 is involved in transcriptional silencing mediated by the alpha 2 repressor and demonstrate that specific systems of transcriptional silencing may depend on the more global role of TSF3. Cloning and sequencing of TSF3 allowed us to predict a 974-amino-acid gene product identical to SIN4, a negative regulator of transcription of the HO (homothallism) mating type switching endonuclease. TSF3 disruptions are not lethal but result in phenotypes similar to those of the originally isolated alleles. Our results, together with those of Y. W. Jiang and D. J. Stillman (Mol. Cell. Biol. 12:4503-4514, 1992), suggest that TSF3 (SIN4) affects the function of the basal transcription apparatus, and this effect in turn alters the manner in which the latter responds to upstream regulatory proteins.

TSF3, a global regulatory protein that silences transcription of yeast GAL genes, also mediates repression by alpha 2 repressor and is identical to SIN4

TSF3 encodes one of six (TSF1 to TSF6) recently identified global negative regulators of transcription in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Mutant tsf3 strains exhibit defects in transcriptional silencing of the GAL1 promoter, allow expression from upstream activation sequence-less promoters, and exhibit pleiotropic defects in cell growth and development. Here we show that TSF3 is involved in transcriptional silencing mediated by the alpha 2 repressor and demonstrate that specific systems of transcriptional silencing may depend on the more global role of TSF3. Cloning and sequencing of TSF3 allowed us to predict a 974-amino-acid gene product identical to SIN4, a negative regulator of transcription of the HO (homothallism) mating type switching endonuclease. TSF3 disruptions are not lethal but result in phenotypes similar to those of the originally isolated alleles. Our results, together with those of Y. W. Jiang and D. J. Stillman (Mol. Cell. Biol. 12:4503-4514, 1992), suggest that TSF3 (SIN4) affects the function of the basal transcription apparatus, and this effect in turn alters the manner in which the latter responds to upstream regulatory proteins.

Glucose repression of lactose/galactose metabolism in Kluyveromyces lactis is determined by the concentration of the transcriptional activator LAC9 (K1GAL4) [corrected]

In the budding yeast Kluyveromyces lactis glucose repression of genes involved in lactose and galactose metabolism is primarily mediated by LAC9 (or K1GAL4) the homologue of the well-known Saccharomyces cerevisiae transcriptional activator GAL4. Phenotypic difference in glucose repression existing between natural strains are due to differences in the LAC9 gene (Breunig, 1989, Mol.Gen.Genet. 261, 422-427). Comparison between the LAC9 alleles of repressible and non-repressible strains revealed that the phenotype is a result of differences in LAC9 gene expression. A two-basepair alteration in the LAC9 promoter region produces a promoter-down effect resulting in slightly reduced LAC9 protein levels under all growth conditions tested. In glucose/galactose medium any change in LAC9 expression drastically affects expression of LAC9 controlled genes e.g. those encoding beta-galactosidase or galactokinase revealing a strong dependence of the kinetics of induction on the LAC9 concentration. We propose that in tightly repressible strains the activator concentration drops below a critical threshold that is required for induction to occur. A model is presented to explain how small differences in activator levels are amplified to produce big changes in expression levels of metabolic genes.

Multiple mechanisms mediate glucose repression of the yeast GAL1 gene

Several mechanisms contribute to the glucose repression of the GAL1 gene in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. We show that one mechanism involves the transcriptional down-regulation of the GAL4 gene and a second requires the GAL80 gene. We also examine the contribution of cis-acting negative elements in the GAL1 promoter to glucose repression. In an otherwise wild-type strain disruption of any one of these three mechanisms alleviates repression of GAL1 only 2- to 4-fold. However, in the absence of the other two mechanisms the transcriptional down-regulation of GAL4 is sufficient to repress GAL1 expression 40- to 60-fold and the GAL80-dependent mechanism is sufficient to repress GAL1 expression 20- to 30-fold. These first two mechanisms constitute a functionally redundant system of repression and both must be disrupted in order to abolish glucose repression of GAL1. In contrast, negative elements in the GAL1 promoter are effective in repressing GAL1 expression 2- to 4-fold in glucose medium only when at least one of the other two mechanisms of repression is present. Thus, glucose repression of GAL1 is mediated primarily by the first two mechanisms, whereas the third mechanism supplements repression severalfold.

Nucleosome loss activates CUP1 and HIS3 promoters to fully induced levels in the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae

We have previously shown that nucleosome loss, obtained by repressing histone H4 mRNA synthesis, activates otherwise inactive PHO5, GAL1, and CYC1 gene promoters (fused to the bacterial beta-galactosidase [lacZ] reporter gene) to moderate levels of activity (approximately 2 to 15% of fully induced levels). We now report that nucleosome loss activates the expression of two additional promoters that are normally induced by independent mechanisms: CUP1 (induced by heavy-metal toxicity) and HIS3 (induced by amino acid starvation). Surprisingly, the level of CUP1-lacZ and HIS3-lacZ activation by nucleosome loss approximates fully induced levels of transcription. These CUP1 and HIS3 promoter activities are increased similarly from either episomal or genomic constructs. Our results emphasize the universality of the mechanism by which nucleosome loss activates yeast promoters. Moreover, a comparison of absolute levels of activation for different promoters suggests that activation by nucleosome loss results in a relatively constant level of activation, while levels obtained by normal induction vary considerably. These data argue that nucleosome loss may play a uniquely dominant role in the regulation of certain promoters.

Nucleosome loss activates CUP1 and HIS3 promoters to fully induced levels in the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae

We have previously shown that nucleosome loss, obtained by repressing histone H4 mRNA synthesis, activates otherwise inactive PHO5, GAL1, and CYC1 gene promoters (fused to the bacterial beta-galactosidase [lacZ] reporter gene) to moderate levels of activity (approximately 2 to 15% of fully induced levels). We now report that nucleosome loss activates the expression of two additional promoters that are normally induced by independent mechanisms: CUP1 (induced by heavy-metal toxicity) and HIS3 (induced by amino acid starvation). Surprisingly, the level of CUP1-lacZ and HIS3-lacZ activation by nucleosome loss approximates fully induced levels of transcription. These CUP1 and HIS3 promoter activities are increased similarly from either episomal or genomic constructs. Our results emphasize the universality of the mechanism by which nucleosome loss activates yeast promoters. Moreover, a comparison of absolute levels of activation for different promoters suggests that activation by nucleosome loss results in a relatively constant level of activation, while levels obtained by normal induction vary considerably. These data argue that nucleosome loss may play a uniquely dominant role in the regulation of certain promoters.

A damage-responsive DNA binding protein regulates transcription of the yeast DNA repair gene PHR1

The PHR1 gene of Saccharomyces cerevisiae encodes the DNA repair enzyme photolyase. Transcription of PHR1 increases in response to treatment of cells with 254-nm radiation and chemical agents that damage DNA. We report here the identification of a damage-responsive DNA binding protein, termed photolyase regulatory protein (PRP), and its cognate binding site, termed the PHR1 upstream repression sequence, that together regulate induction of PHR1 transcription after DNA damage. PRP activity, monitored by electrophoretic-mobility-shift assay, was detected in cells during normal growth but disappeared within 30 min after irradiation. Copper-phenanthroline footprinting of PRP-DNA complexes revealed that PRP protects a 39-base-pair region of PHR1 5' flanking sequence beginning 40 base pairs upstream from the coding sequence. A prominent feature of the foot-printed region is a 22-base-pair palindrome. Deletion of the PHR1 upstream repression sequence increased the basal level expression of PHR1 in vivo and decreased induction after exposure of cells to UV radiation or methyl methanesulfonate, whereas insertion of the PRP binding site between the CYC1 upstream activation sequence and "TATA" sequence reduced basal level expression and conferred damage responsiveness upon a reporter gene. Thus these observations establish that PRP is a damage-responsive repressor of PHR1 transcription.