TFIIA induces conformational changes in TFIID via interactions with the basic repeat

Disruption of the interaction between TFIIAαβ and TFIIA recognition element inhibits RNA polymerase II gene transcription in a promoter context-dependent manner

General transcription factors and core promoter elements play a pivotal role in RNA polymerase II (Pol II)-mediated transcription initiation. In the previous work, we have defined a TFIIA recognition element (IIARE) that modulates Pol II-directed gene transcription in a promoter context-dependent manner. However, how TFIIA interacts with the IIARE and whether the interaction between TFIIA and the IIARE is involved in the regulation of gene transcription by Pol II are not fully understood. In the present study, we confirm that both K348 and K350 residues in TFIIAαβ are required for the interaction between TFIIAαβ and the IIARE. Disruption of the interaction between them by gene mutations dampens TFIIAαβ binding to the AdML-IIARE promoter and the transcriptional activation of the promoter containing a IIARE in vitro and in vivo. Stable expression of the TFIIAαβ mutant containing both K348A and K350A in the cell line with endogenous TFIIAαβ silence represses endogenous gene expression by reducing the occupancies of TFIIAαβ, TBP, p300, and Pol II at the promoters containing a IIARE. The findings from this study provide a novel insight into the regulatory mechanism of gene transcription mediated by TFIIA and the IIARE.

Herpesvirus Late Gene Expression: A Viral-Specific Pre-initiation Complex Is Key

During their productive cycle, herpesviruses exhibit a strictly regulated temporal cascade of gene expression that can be divided into three general stages: immediate-early (IE), early (E), and late (L). This expression program is the result of a complex interplay between viral and cellular factors at both the transcriptional and post-transcriptional levels, as well as structural differences within the promoter architecture for each of the three gene classes. Since the cellular enzyme RNA polymerase II (RNAP-II) is responsible for the transcription of herpesvirus genes, most viral promoters contain DNA motifs that are common with those of cellular genes, although promoter complexity decreases from immediate-early to late genes. Immediate-early and early promoters contain numerous cellular and viral cis-regulating sequences upstream of a TATA box, whereas late promoters differ significantly in that they lack cis-acting sequences upstream of the transcription start site (TSS). Moreover, in the case of the β- and γ-herpesviruses, a TATT box motif is frequently found in the position where the consensus TATA box of eukaryotic promoters usually localizes. The mechanisms of transcriptional regulation of the late viral gene promoters appear to be different between α-herpesviruses and the two other herpesvirus subfamilies (β and γ). In this review, we will compare the mechanisms of late gene transcriptional regulation between HSV-1, for which the viral IE transcription factors – especially ICP4 – play an essential role, and the two other subfamilies of herpesviruses, with a particular emphasis on EBV, which has recently been found to code for its own specific TATT-binding protein.

Full trans-activation mediated by the immediate-early protein of equine herpesvirus 1 requires a consensus TATA box, but not its cognate binding sequence

The immediate-early protein (IEP) of equine herpesvirus 1 (EHV-1) has extensive homology to the IEP of alphaherpesviruses and possesses domains essential for trans-activation, including an acidic trans-activation domain (TAD) and binding domains for DNA, TFIIB, and TBP. Our data showed that the IEP directly interacted with transcription factor TFIIA, which is known to stabilize the binding of TBP and TFIID to the TATA box of core promoters. When the TATA box of the EICP0 promoter was mutated to a nonfunctional TATA box, IEP-mediated trans-activation was reduced from 22-fold to 7-fold. The IEP trans-activated the viral promoters in a TATA motif-dependent manner. Our previous data showed that the IEP is able to repress its own promoter when the IEP-binding sequence (IEBS) is located within 26-bp from the TATA box. When the IEBS was located at 100 bp upstream of the TATA box, IEP-mediated trans-activation was very similar to that of the minimal IE(nt -89 to +73) promoter lacking the IEBS. As the distance from the IEBS to the TATA box decreased, IEP-mediated trans-activation progressively decreased, indicating that the IEBS located within 100 bp from the TATA box sequence functions as a distance-dependent repressive element. These results indicated that IEP-mediated full trans-activation requires a consensus TATA box of core promoters, but not its binding to the cognate sequence (IEBS).

High-resolution structure of TBP with TAF1 reveals anchoring patterns in transcriptional regulation

The general transcription factor TFIID provides a regulatory platform for transcription initiation. Here we present the crystal structure (1.97 Å) and NMR analysis of yeast TAF1 N-terminal domains TAND1 and TAND2 when bound to yeast TBP, together with mutational data. The yTAF1-TAND1, which in itself acts as a transcriptional activator, binds into the DNA-binding TBP concave surface by presenting similar anchor residues to TBP as E. coli Mot1 but from a distinct structural scaffold. Furthermore, we show how yTAF1-TAND2 employs an aromatic and acidic anchoring pattern to bind a conserved yTBP surface groove traversing the basic helix region, and we find highly similar TBP-binding motifs also presented by the structurally distinct TFIIA, Mot1 and Brf1 proteins. Our identification of these anchoring patterns, which can be easily disrupted or enhanced, provides compelling insight into the competitive multiprotein TBP interplay critical to transcriptional regulation.

Molecular characterization of ScTFIIAgamma, encoding the putative TFIIA small subunit from sugarcane

Transcription mediated by RNA polymerase II depends on a set of different transcription factors to form the pre-initiation complex. TFIIA is involved in the construction of this complex and increases the affinity of TBP for the DNA union region in vitro. In this study, we characterized the ScTFIIAgamma gene, which encodes a homolog of the smaller subunit (gamma) of transcription factor TFIIA in sugarcane. RNA blot analysis showed that ScTFIIAgamma transcripts accumulate in all tissues evaluated, with higher levels in leaf roll and flowers. In situ hybridization showed that ScTFIIAgamma was expressed in different cells of the reproductive meristem. In sugarcane plantlets, methyl jasmonate and absicic acid treatments as well as phosphate starvation had no influence on ScTFIIAgamma transcript accumulation. The subcelullar localization assay demonstrates that ScTFIIAgamma protein is directed to the cell nucleus. The phylogenetic analysis, the expression in several tissues and under different treatments and the nuclear localization are in line with the putative role of ScTFIIAgamma as a subunit of basal transcription factor.

Nonradioactive, ultrasensitive site-specific protein-protein photocrosslinking: interactions of alpha-helix 2 of TATA-binding protein with general transcription factor TFIIA and transcriptional repressor NC2

We have developed an approach that enables nonradioactive, ultrasensitive (attamole sensitivity) site-specific protein–protein photocrosslinking, and we have applied the approach to the analysis of interactions of α-helix 2 (H2) of human TATA-element binding protein (TBP) with general transcription factor TFIIA and transcriptional repressor NC2. We have found that TBP H2 can be crosslinked to TFIIA in the TFIIA–TBP–DNA complex and in higher order transcription–initiation complexes, and we have mapped the crosslink to the ‘connector’ region of the TFIIA α/β subunit (TFIIAα/β). We further have found that TBP H2 can be crosslinked to NC2 in the NC2–TBP–DNA complex, and we have mapped the crosslink to the C-terminal ‘tail’ of the NC2 α-subunit (NC2α). Interactions of TBP H2 with the TFIIAα/β connector and the NC2α C-terminal tail were not observed in crystal structures of TFIIA–TBP–DNA and NC2–TBP–DNA complexes, since relevant segments of TFIIA and NC2 were not present in truncated TFIIA and NC2 derivatives used for crystallization. We propose that interactions of TBP H2 with the TFIIAα/β connector and the NC2α C-terminal tail provide an explanation for genetic results suggesting importance of TBP H2 in TBP–TFIIA interactions and TBP–NC2 interactions, and provide an explanation—steric exclusion—for competition between TFIIA and NC2.

Computer-based screening of functional conformers of proteins

A long-standing goal in biology is to establish the link between function, structure, and dynamics of proteins. Considering that protein function at the molecular level is understood by the ability of proteins to bind to other molecules, the limited structural data of proteins in association with other bio-molecules represents a major hurdle to understanding protein function at the structural level. Recent reports show that protein function can be linked to protein structure and dynamics through network centrality analysis, suggesting that the structures of proteins bound to natural ligands may be inferred computationally. In the present work, a new method is described to discriminate protein conformations relevant to the specific recognition of a ligand. The method relies on a scoring system that matches critical residues with central residues in different structures of a given protein. Central residues are the most traversed residues with the same frequency in networks derived from protein structures. We tested our method in a set of 24 different proteins and more than 260,000 structures of these in the absence of a ligand or bound to it. To illustrate the usefulness of our method in the study of the structure/dynamics/function relationship of proteins, we analyzed mutants of the yeast TATA-binding protein with impaired DNA binding. Our results indicate that critical residues for an interaction are preferentially found as central residues of protein structures in complex with a ligand. Thus, our scoring system effectively distinguishes protein conformations relevant to the function of interest.

Proteins participate in most of the doings of the cells through a variety of interactions. There is an intimate relationship between the function of a protein and its three-dimensional structure, but understanding this relationship remains an unsolved problem, in part due to the limited information on protein structures bound to other biological molecules. On the other hand, thousands of protein structures in the unbound or free form, are made public every year and these differ from those of the bound structures. How to predict the protein structure in the bound form may assist researchers in understanding the structure/function relationship. Here we report that protein structures bound to other molecules tend to present, as central amino acids, those that are critical for binding other molecules. This feature allowed us to identify the protein structures known to be involved in protein interactions from a screening of thousands of structures derived from the free form.

Global analysis of functional surfaces of core histones with comprehensive point mutants

The core histones are essential components of the nucleosome that act as global negative regulators of DNA-mediated reactions including transcription, DNA replication and DNA repair. Modified residues in the N-terminal tails are well characterized in transcription, but not in DNA replication and DNA repair. In addition, roles of residues in the core globular domains are not yet well characterized in any DNA-mediated reactions. To comprehensively understand the functional surface(s) of a core histone, we constructed 320 yeast mutant strains, each of which has a point mutation in a core histone, and identified 42 residues responsible for the suppressor of Ty (Spt(-)) phenotypes, and 8, 30 and 61 residues for sensitivities to 6-azauracil (6AU), hydroxyurea (HU) and methyl-methanesulfonate (MMS), respectively. In addition to residues that affect one specific assay, residues involved in multiple reactions were found, and surprisingly, about half of them were clustered at either the nucleosome entry site, the surface required for nucleosome-nucleosome interactions in crystal packing or their surroundings. This comprehensive mutation approach was proved to be powerful for identification of the functional surfaces of a core histone in a variety of DNA-mediated reactions and could be an effective strategy for characterizing other evolutionarily conserved hub-like factors for which surface structural information is available.

The general transcription machinery and general cofactors

In eukaryotes, the core promoter serves as a platform for the assembly of transcription preinitiation complex (PIC) that includes TFIIA, TFIIB, TFIID, TFIIE, TFIIF, TFIIH, and RNA polymerase II (pol II), which function collectively to specify the transcription start site. PIC formation usually begins with TFIID binding to the TATA box, initiator, and/or downstream promoter element (DPE) found in most core promoters, followed by the entry of other general transcription factors (GTFs) and pol II through either a sequential assembly or a preassembled pol II holoenzyme pathway. Formation of this promoter-bound complex is sufficient for a basal level of transcription. However, for activator-dependent (or regulated) transcription, general cofactors are often required to transmit regulatory signals between gene-specific activators and the general transcription machinery. Three classes of general cofactors, including TBP-associated factors (TAFs), Mediator, and upstream stimulatory activity (USA)-derived positive cofactors (PC1/PARP-1, PC2, PC3/DNA topoisomerase I, and PC4) and negative cofactor 1 (NC1/HMGB1), normally function independently or in combination to fine-tune the promoter activity in a gene-specific or cell-type-specific manner. In addition, other cofactors, such as TAF1, BTAF1, and negative cofactor 2 (NC2), can also modulate TBP or TFIID binding to the core promoter. In general, these cofactors are capable of repressing basal transcription when activators are absent and stimulating transcription in the presence of activators. Here we review the roles of these cofactors and GTFs, as well as TBP-related factors (TRFs), TAF-containing complexes (TFTC, SAGA, SLIK/SALSA, STAGA, and PRC1) and TAF variants, in pol II-mediated transcription, with emphasis on the events occurring after the chromatin has been remodeled but prior to the formation of the first phosphodiester bond.

Self-association of the amino-terminal domain of the yeast TATA-binding protein

The amino-terminal domain of yeast TATA-binding protein has been proposed to play a crucial role in the self-association mechanism(s) of the full-length protein. Here we tested the ability of this domain to self-associate under a variety of solution conditions. Escherichia coli two-hybrid assays, in vitro pull-down assays, and in vitro cross-linking provided qualitative evidence for a limited and specific self-association. Sedimentation equilibrium analysis using purified protein was consistent with a monomer-dimer equilibrium with an apparent dissociation constant of approximately 8.4 microM. Higher stoichiometry associations remain possible but could not be detected by any of these methods. These results demonstrate that the minimal structure necessary for amino-terminal domain self-association must be present even in the absence of carboxyl-terminal domain structures. On the basis of these results we propose that amino-terminal domain structures contribute to the oligomerization interface of the full-length yeast TATA-binding protein.

Novel interactions between the components of human and yeast TFIIA/TBP/DNA complexes

RNA polymerase II-dependent transcription requires the assembly of a multi-protein, preinitiation complex on core promoter elements. Transcription factor IID (TFIID) comprising the TATA box-binding protein (TBP) and TBP-associated factors (TAFs) is responsible for promoter recognition in this complex. Subsequent association of TFIIA and TFIIB provides enhanced complex stability. TFIIA is required for transcriptional stimulation by certain viral and cellular activators, and favors formation of the preinitiation complex in the presence of repressor NC2. The X-ray structures of human and yeast TBP/TFIIA/DNA complexes at 2.1A and 1.9A resolution, respectively, are presented here and seen to resemble each other closely. The interactions made by human TFIIA with TBP and DNA within and upstream of the TATA box, including those involving water molecules, are described and compared to the yeast structure. Of particular interest is a previously unobserved region of TFIIA that extends the binding interface with TBP in the yeast, but not in the human complex, and that further elucidates biochemical and genetic results.

TFIIA abrogates the effects of inhibition by HMGB1 but not E1A during the early stages of assembly of the transcriptional preinitiation complex

Successful assembly of the transcriptional preinitiation complex (PIC) is prerequisite to transcriptional initiation. At each stage of PIC assembly, regulation may occur as repressors and activators compete with and influence the incorporation of general transcription factors (GTFs). Both TFIIA and HMGB1 bind individually to the TATA-binding protein (TBP) to increase the rate of binding and to stabilize TBP binding to the TATA element. The competitive binding between these two cofactors for TBP/TATA was examined to show that TFIIA binds preferentially to TBP and inhibits HMGB1 binding. TFIIA can also readily dissociate HMGB1 from the preestablished HMGB1/TBP/TATA complex. This suggests that TFIIA and HMGB1 may bind to the same or overlapping sites on TBP and/or compete for similar DNA sites that are 5' to the TATA element. In addition, EMSA studies show that adenovirus E1A(13S) oncoprotein is unable to disrupt either the preestablished TFIIA/TBP/TATA or TFIIA/TFIIB/TBP/TATA complexes, but does inhibit complex formation when all transcription factors were simultaneously added. The inhibitory effect of E1A(13S) on the assembly of the PIC is overcome when excess TBP is added back in the reaction, while addition of either excess TFIIA or TFIIB were ineffective. This shows that the main target for E1A(13S) is free TBP and emphasizes the primary competition between E1A and the TATA-element for unbound TBP. This may be the principal point, if not the only point, at which E1A can target TBP to exert its inhibitory effect. This work, coupled with previous findings in our laboratory, indicates that TFIIA is much more effective than TFIIB in reversing the inhibitory effect of HMGB1 binding in the early stages of PIC assembly, which is consistent with the in vitro transcription results.

The transcriptional activator GAL4-VP16 regulates the intra-molecular interactions of the TATA-binding protein

Binding characteristics of yeast TATA-binding protein (yTBP) over five oligomers having different TATA variants and lacking a UASGAL, showed that TATA-binding protein (TBP)-TATA complex gets stabilized in the presence of the acidic activator GAL4-VP16. Activator also greatly suppressed the non-specific TBP-DNA complex formation. The effects were more pronounced over weaker TATA boxes. Activator also reduced the TBP dimer levels both in vitro and in vivo, suggesting the dimer may be a direct target of transcriptional activators. The transcriptional activator facilitated the dimer to monomer transition and activated monomers further to help TBP bind even the weaker TATA boxes stably. The overall stimulatory effect of the GAL4-VP16 on the TBP-TATA complex formation resembles the known effects of removal of the N-terminus of TBP on its activity, suggesting that the activator directly targets the N-terminus of TBP and facilitates its binding to the TATA box.

Expression of human TFIIA subunits in Saccharomyces cerevisiae identifies regions with conserved and species-specific functions

The transcription factor TFIIA stabilizes the interaction between the TATA-binding protein (TBP) and promoter DNA and facilitates activator function. In yeast, TFIIA is composed of large (TOA1) and small (TOA2) subunits that interact to form a beta-barrel domain and a helix bundle domain. Here we report plasmid shuffle experiments showing that the human subunits (TFIIAalpha/beta, ALF, and TFIIAgamma) are not able to support growth in yeast and that the failure is associated with morphological abnormalities related to cell division. To determine the regions responsible for species specificity, we examined a series of chimeric yeast-human subunits. The results showed that yeast-human hybrids that contained the N-termini of TFIIAgamma or TFIIAalpha/beta were viable, presumably because they could form a functional interspecies alpha-helical bundle. Likewise, a TOA1 hybrid that contained the nonconserved internal region from TFIIAalpha/beta also had no effect on TFIIA function. However, hybrids that contained the acidic region III or C-terminal region IV from TFIIAalpha/beta grew more slowly than the wild-type TOA1 subunit, and if both regions were exchanged, this effect was far more severe. Although these hybrids exchanged sequences which are involved in beta-barrel formation and interactions with TBP, they were all active in a TBP-dependent mobility shift assay. The results suggest that the growth phenotypes of these hybrids might be due to a failure to interact with components of the yeast transcription machinery other than TBP. Finally, we show that sequences from region III of TFIIA large subunits fall into classes that are either highly acidic or that are divergent and nonacidic, and provide the first evidence to suggest that, at least in yeast, this region is important for TFIIA function.

The germ cell-specific transcription factor ALF. Structural properties and stabilization of the TATA-binding protein (TBP)-DNA complex

The assembly and stability of the RNA polymerase II transcription preinitiation complex on a eukaryotic core promoter involves the effects of TFIIA on the interaction between TATA-binding protein (TBP) and DNA. To extend our understanding of these interactions, we characterized properties of ALF, a germ cell-specific TFIIA-like factor. ALF was able to stabilize the binding of TBP to DNA, but it could not stabilize TBP mutants A184E, N189E, E191R, and R205E nor could it facilitate binding of the TBP-like factor TRF2/TLF to a consensus TATA element. However, phosphorylation of ALF with casein kinase II resulted in the partial restoration of complex formation using mutant TBPs. Studies of ALF-TBP complexes formed on the Adenovirus Major Late (AdML) promoter revealed protection of the TATA box and upstream sequences from -38 to -20 (top strand) and -40 to -22 (bottom strand). The half-life and apparent K(D) of this complex was determined to be 650 min and 4.8 +/- 2.7 nm, respectively. The presence of ALF or TFIIA did not significantly alter the ability of TBP to bind TATA elements from several testis-specific genes. Finally, analysis of the distinct, nonhomologous internal regions of ALF and TFIIAalpha/beta using circular dichroism spectroscopy provided the first evidence to suggest that these domains are unordered, a result consistent with other genetic and biochemical properties. Overall, the results show that while the sequence and regulation of the ALF gene are distinct from its somatic cell counterpart TFIIAalpha/beta, the TFIIAgamma-dependent interactions of these factors with TBP are nearly indistinguishable in vitro. Thus, a role for ALF in the assembly and stabilization of initiation complexes in germ cells is likely to be similar or identical to the role of TFIIA in somatic cells.

The binding interaction of HMG-1 with the TATA-binding protein/TATA complex

High mobility protein-1 (HMG-1) has been shown to regulate transcription by RNA polymerase II. In the context that it acts as a transcriptional repressor, it binds to the TATA-binding protein (TBP) to form the HMG-1/TBP/TATA complex, which is proposed to inhibit the assembly of the preinitiation complex. By using electrophoretic mobility shift assays, we show that the acidic C-terminal domain of HMG-1 and the N terminus of human TBP are the domains that are essential for the formation of a stable HMG-1/TBP/TATA complex. HMG-1 binding increases the affinity of TBP for the TATA element by 20-fold, which is reflected in a significant stimulation of the rate of TBP binding, with little effect on the dissociation rate constant. In support of the binding target of HMG-1 being the N terminus of hTBP, the N-terminal polypeptide of human TBP competes with and inhibits HMG-1/TBP/TATA complex formation. Deletion of segments of the N terminus of human TBP was used to map the region(s) where HMG-1 binds. These findings indicate that interaction of HMG-1 with the Q-tract (amino acids 55-95) in hTBP is primarily responsible for stable complex formation. In addition, HMG-1 and the monoclonal antibody, 1C2, specific to the Q-tract, compete for the same site. Furthermore, calf thymus HMG-1 forms a stable complex with the TBP/TATA complex that contains TBP from either human or Drosophila but not yeast. This is again consistent with the importance of the Q-tract for this stable interaction and shows that the interaction extends over many species but does not include yeast TBP.

The stability of the TFIIA-TBP-DNA complex is dependent on the sequence of the TATAAA element

To determine the mechanistic differences between canonical and noncanonical TATA elements, we compared the functional activity of two sequences: TATAAA (canonical) and CATAAA (noncanonical). The TATAAA element can support high levels of transcription in vivo, whereas the CATAAA element is severely defective for this function. This dramatic functional difference is not likely to be due to a difference in TBP (TATA-binding protein) binding efficiency because protein-DNA complex studies in vitro indicate little difference between the two DNA sequences in the formation and stability of the TBP-DNA complex. In addition, the binding and stability of the TFIIB-TBP-DNA complex is similar for the two elements. In striking contrast, the TFIIA-TBP-DNA complex is significantly less stable on the CATAAA element when compared with the TATAAA element. A role for TFIIA in distinguishing between TATAAA and CATAAA in vivo was tested by fusing a subunit of TFIIA to TBP. We found that fusion of TFIIA to TBP dramatically increases transcription from CATAAA in yeast cells. Taken together, these results indicate that the stability of the TFIIA-TBP complex depends strongly on the sequence of the core promoter element and that the TFIIA-TBP complex plays an important function in recognizing optimal promoters in vivo.

Taf(II) 250 phosphorylates human transcription factor IIA on serine residues important for TBP binding and transcription activity

Transcription factor IIA (TFIIA) is a positive acting general factor that contacts the TATA-binding protein (TBP) and mediates an activator-induced conformational change in the transcription factor IID (TFIID) complex. Previously, we have found that phosphorylation of yeast TFIIA stimulates TFIIA.TBP.TATA complex formation and transcription activation in vivo. We now show that human TFIIA is phosphorylated in vivo on serine residues that are partially conserved between yeast and human TFIIA large subunits. Alanine substitution mutation of serine residues 316 and 321 in TFIIA alphabeta reduced TFIIA phosphorylation significantly in vivo. Additional alanine substitutions at serines 280 and 281 reduced phosphorylation to undetectable levels. Mutation of all four serine residues reduced the ability of TFIIA to stimulate transcription in transient transfection assays with various activators and promoters, indicating that TFIIA phosphorylation is required globally for optimal function. In vitro, holo-TFIID and TBP-associated factor 250 (TAF(II)250) phosphorylated TFIIA on the beta subunit. Mutation of the four serines required for in vivo phosphorylation eliminated TFIID and TAF(II)250 phosphorylation in vitro. The NH(2)-terminal kinase domain of TAF(II)250 was sufficient for TFIIA phosphorylation, and this activity was inhibited by full-length retinoblastoma protein but not by a retinoblastoma protein mutant defective for TAF(II)250 interaction or tumor suppressor activity. TFIIA phosphorylation had little effect on the TFIIA.TBP.TATA complex in electrophoretic mobility shift assay. However, phosphorylation of TFIIA containing a gamma subunit Y65A mutation strongly stimulated TFIIA.TBP.TATA complex formation. TFIIA-gammaY65A is defective for binding to the beta-sheet domain of TBP identified in the crystal structure. These results suggest that TFIIA phosphorylation is important for strengthening the TFIIA.TBP contact or creating a second contact between TFIIA and TBP that was not visible in the crystal structure.

Multiple functions of the nonconserved N-terminal domain of yeast TATA-binding protein

The TATA-binding protein (TBP) is composed of a highly conserved core domain sufficient for TATA-element binding and preinitiation complex formation as well as a highly divergent N-terminal region that is dispensable for yeast cell viability. In vitro, removal of the N-terminal region domain enhances TBP-TATA association and TBP dimerization. Here, we examine the effects of truncation of the N-terminal region in the context of yeast TBP mutants with specific defects in DNA binding and in interactions with various proteins. For a subset of mutations that disrupt DNA binding and the response to transcriptional activators, removal of the N-terminal domain rescues their transcriptional defects. By contrast, deletion of the N-terminal region is lethal in combination with mutations on a limited surface of TBP. Although this surface is important for interactions with TFIIA and Brf1, TBP interactions with these two factors do not appear to be responsible for this dependence on the N-terminal region. Our results suggest that the N-terminal region of TBP has at least two distinct functions in vivo. It inhibits the interaction of TBP with TATA elements, and it acts positively in combination with a specific region of the TBP core domain that presumably interacts with another protein(s).

Influence of HMG-1 and adenovirus oncoprotein E1A on early stages of transcriptional preinitiation complex assembly

The TATA-binding protein (TBP) in the TFIID complex binds specifically to the TATA-box to initiate the stepwise assembly of the preinitiation complex (PIC) for RNA polymerase II transcription. Transcriptional activators and repressors compete with general transcription factors at each step to influence the course of the assembly. To investigate this process, the TBP.TATA complex was titrated with HMG-1 and the interaction monitored by electrophoretic mobility shift assays. The titration produced a ternary HMG-1.TBP. TATA complex, which exhibits increased mobility relative to the TBP. TATA complex. The addition of increasing levels of TFIIB to this complex results in the formation of the TFIIB.TBP.TATA complex. However, in the reverse titration, with very high mole ratios of HMG-1 present, TFIIB is not dissociated off and a complex is formed that contains all factors. The simultaneous addition of E1A to a mixture of TBP and TATA; or HMG-1, TBP, and TATA; or TFIIB, TBP, and TATA inhibits complex formation. On the other hand, E1A added to the pre-established complexes shows a significantly reduced capability to disrupt the complex. In add-back experiments with all complexes, increased levels of TBP re-established the complexes, indicating that the primary target for E1A in all complexes is TBP.

TFIIA has activator-dependent and core promoter functions in vivo

The physiological role of TFIIA was investigated by analyzing transcription in a yeast strain that contains a TATA-binding protein (TBP) mutant (N2-1) defective for interacting with TFIIA. In cells containing N2-1, transcription from a set of artificial his3 promoters dependent on different activators is generally reduced by a similar extent, indicating that TFIIA function is largely nonselective for activators. In addition, TATA element utilization, a core promoter function, is altered at his3 promoters dependent on weak activators. Genomic expression analysis reveals that 3% of the genes are preferentially affected by a factor of 4 or more. Chimeras of affected promoters indicate that the sensitivity to the TFIIA-TBP interaction can map either to the upstream or core promoter region. Unlike wild-type TBP or TFIIA, the N2-1 derivative does not activate transcription when artificially recruited to the promoter via a heterologous DNA binding domain, indicating that TFIIA is important for transcription even in the absence of an activation domain. Taken together, these results suggest that TFIIA plays an important role in both activator-dependent and core promoter functions in vivo. Further, they suggest that TFIIA function may not be strictly related to the recruitment of TBP to promoters but may also involve a step after TBP recruitment.

TFIIA-TAF regulatory interplay: NMR evidence for overlapping binding sites on TBP

TATA box binding protein (TBP)-promoter interaction nucleates assembly of the RNA polymerase II transcription initiation complex. Transcription factor IIA (TFIIA) stabilizes the TBP-promoter complex whereas the N-terminal domain of the largest TAF(II) inhibits TBP-promoter interaction. We have mapped the interaction sites on TBP of Drosophila TAF(II)230 and yeast TFIIA (comprising two subunits, TOA1 and TOA2), using nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR), and also report structural evidence that subdomain II of the TAF(II)230 N-terminal inhibitory domain and TFIIA have overlapping binding sites on the convex surface of TBP. Together with previous mutational and biochemical data, our NMR results indicate that subdomain II augments subdomain I-mediated inhibition of TBP function by blocking TBP-TFIIA interaction.

The TATA motif specifies the differential activation of minimal promoters by varicella zoster virus immediate-early regulatory protein IE62

The immediate-early IE62 protein of varicella zoster virus is an acidic transcriptional activator capable of up-regulating many viral and cellular promoters with varying efficiencies. We demonstrate that, in the context of a minimal promoter, a TATA element is both sufficient and essential for IE62-mediated transcriptional activation. Differential levels of activation by IE62 in this context were conferred by a panel of naturally occurring sequence variations within the TATA motif itself. TATA motif-specific, differential induction was not obtained when the IE62 acidic activation domain was targeted as a GAL4 fusion protein to the same panel. The prototype acidic transactivator, VP16 of herpes simplex virus, failed to discriminate between these different TATA motifs when they were placed into an appropriate responsive promoter context. Nonetheless, a chimeric IE62 polypeptide substituted with the VP16 activation domain retained the ability to differentially modulate minimal promoters with various TATA motifs. Taken together with its binding to TATA box-binding protein (TBP) and transcription factor IIB in vitro, we suggest that IE62 has the unusual ability to achieve differential levels of transcriptional activation through different TATA motifs, which may be accomplished either directly or indirectly by recognizing conformational variations in DNA-bound TBP, TBP-transcription factor IIA/B, or TBP-TATA-associated factor complexes.

Identification of a general transcription factor TFIIAalpha/beta homolog selectively expressed in testis

In this paper we describe the isolation of a cDNA that encodes a human TFIIAalpha/beta-like factor (ALF). The open reading frame of ALF predicts a protein of 478 amino acids that contains characteristic N- and C-terminal conserved domains separated by an internal nonconserved domain. In addition, a rare ALF-containing cDNA, which possesses an extended N terminus (Stoned B/TFIIAalpha/beta-like factor; SALF) has also been identified. The results of Northern and dot blot analyses show that ALF is expressed almost exclusively in testis; in contrast, TFIIAalpha/beta and TFIIAgamma are enriched in testis but are also widely expressed in other human tissues. Recombinant ALF (69 kDa) and TFIIAgamma (12 kDa) polypeptides produced in Escherichia coli form an ALF/gamma complex that can stabilize TBP-TATA interactions in an electrophoretic mobility shift assay. The ALF/gamma complex is also able to restore transcription from the adenovirus major late promoter using HeLa cell nuclear extracts that have been depleted of TFIIA. Overall, the data show that ALF is a functional homolog of human general transcription factor TFIIAalpha/beta that may be uniquely important to testis biology.

The TATA-binding protein from Saccharomyces cerevisiae oligomerizes in solution at micromolar concentrations to form tetramers and octamers

Equilibrium analytical ultracentrifugation has been used to determine the stoichiometry and energetics of the self-assembly of the TATA-binding protein of Saccharomyces cerevisiae at 30 degreesC, in buffers ranging in salt concentration from 60 mM KCl to 1 M KCl. The data are consistent with a sequential association model in which monomers are in equilibrium with tetramers and octamers at protein concentrations above 2.6 microM. Association is highly cooperative, with octamer formation favored by approximately 7 kcal/mol over tetramers. At high [KCl], the concentration of tetramers becomes negligible and the data are best described by a monomer-octamer reaction mechanism. The equilibrium association constants for both monomer <--> tetramer and tetramer <--> octamer reactions change with [KCl] in a biphasic manner, decreasing with increasing [KCl] from 60 mM to 300 mM, and increasing with increasing [KCl] from 300 mM to 1 M. At low [KCl], approximately 3 mole equivalents of ions are released at each association step, while at high [KCl], approximately 3 mole equivalents of ions are taken up at each association step. These results suggest that there is a salt concentration-dependent change in the assembly mechanism, and that the mechanistic switch takes place near 300 mM KCl. The possibility that this self-association reaction may play a role in the activity of the TATA-binding protein in vivo is discussed.

High mobility group protein 1 interacts specifically with the core domain of human TATA box-binding protein and interferes with transcription factor IIB within the pre-initiation complex

The high mobility group (HMG) box domain has defined a family of proteins, mostly transcription factors, that specifically interacts with DNA on the minor groove and sharply bends it. The founding member of the family, HMG1, does not specifically recognize regular B-DNA but is recruited to DNA by interaction with other transcription factors and TATA box-binding protein (TBP). However, conflicting effects of HMG1 on transcription have been reported. We show that the interaction between HMG1 and TBP is species-specific. This interaction in turn affects the interaction of TBP with transcription factor (TF) IIB and is competed by TFIIA. A primary binding site was mapped to the H2' alpha-helix in the highly conserved core domain of human TBP. On HMG1, the primary binding site was only in the HMG box A, and HMG box A was also sufficient to interact with native TFIID. Both HMG boxes efficiently repressed transcription in vitro as fusions to the Gal4-DNA binding domain. Additionally, HMG box B showed a weak level of activation at very low amounts. These results suggest a general involvement of HMG1 at the early stages of polymerase II transcription that may result in subtle activation or repression of individual genes.

Affinity, stability and polarity of binding of the TATA binding protein governed by flexure at the TATA Box

The TATA binding protein (TBP), which plays a central role in gene regulation as an essential component of all three nuclear transcription systems, sharply kinks the TATA box at two sites and severely contorts the intervening DNA segment. DNA constructs with precisely localized flexure have been used to investigate the special repertoire of mechanisms and properties that arise from TBP interacting with the TATA box. DNA flexure precisely localized to the sites of TBP-mediated DNA kinking increases the affinity of TBP more than 100-fold; unexpectedly, this increase in affinity is achieved almost exclusively by increasing the stability of the TBP-DNA complex rather than the rate of its formation. In vitro transcription with RNA polymerase III provides a first demonstration that the orientation of TBP on the TATA box is governed by DNA deformability, its C-proximal repeat contacting the more flexible end of the TATA box. Exceptionally stable TBP-DNA complexes reach their orientational equilibrium very slowly; in these circumstances, assembly of stable ("committed") transcription initiation complexes can freeze far-from-equilibrium orientations of TBP on the TATA box, causing transcription polarity to be determined by a kinetic trapping mechanism.

Transcription factor IIA derepresses TATA-binding protein (TBP)-associated factor inhibition of TBP-DNA binding

The interaction of the general transcription factor (TF) IIA with TFIID is required for transcription activation in vitro. TFIID consists of the TATA-binding protein (TBP) and TBP associated factors (TAFIIs). TFIIA binds directly to TBP and stabilizes its interaction with TATA-containing DNA. In this work, we present evidence that TAFIIs inhibit TBP-DNA and TBP-TFIIA binding, and that TFIIA stimulates transcription, in part, by overcoming this TAFII-mediated inhibition of TBP-DNA binding. TFIIA mutants modestly compromised for interaction with TBP were found to be significantly more defective in forming complexes with TFIID. Subtle changes in the stability or conformation of the TFIIA-TBP complex resulted in a failure of TFIIA to overcome TAFII-mediated inhibition of TBP-DNA binding and transcription function. Inhibition of TBP-DNA binding by TAFIIs could be partially relieved by limited proteolysis of TFIID. Proteolysis significantly stimulated TFIIA-TFIID-TATA binding in both electrophoresis mobility shift assay and DNase I footprinting but had little effect on complexes formed with TBP. Recombinant TAFII250 inhibits TBP-DNA binding, whereas preincubation of TFIIA with TBP prevents this inhibition. Thus, TFIIA competes with TAFII250 for access to TBP and alters the TATA binding properties of the resulting complex. Transcriptional activation by Zta was enhanced by temperature shift inactivation of TAFII250 in the ts13 cell line, suggesting that TAFII250 has transcriptional inhibitory activity in vivo. Together, these results suggest that TAFIIs may regulate transcription initiation by inhibiting TBP-TFIIA and TBP-DNA complex formation.

Transcription properties of a cell type-specific TATA-binding protein, TRF

Eukaryotic cells are thought to contain a single TATA-binding protein (TBP) that directs transcription by cellular RNA polymerases. Here we report a cell type-specific TBP-related factor (TRF) that can form a stable TRF/IIA/IIB TATA DNA complex and substitute for TBP in directing RNA polymerase II transcription in vitro. Transfection studies reveal that TRF can differentially mediate activation by some enhancer proteins but not others. Like TBP, TRF forms a stable complex containing multiple novel subunits, nTAFs. Antibody staining of embryos and polytene chromosomes reveals cell type-specific expression and gene-selective properties consistent with the shaker/male sterile phenotype of trf mutants. These findings suggest TRF is a homolog of TBP that functions to direct tissue- and gene-specific transcription.

Dynamic interplay of TFIIA, TBP and TATA DNA

The TATA binding protein (TBP) binds to the -30 region of eukaryotic and archaea promoters, where it assembles a transcription complex. For those genes transcribed by RNA polymerase II, transcription factor TFIIA binds TBP and positively regulates its activity, including enhancing TBP/ TATA interactions. Since little is known about the dynamic interplay among TFIIA, TBP and DNA, we set out to examine the stability of these interactions. Using the nitrocellulose filter binding assay, the koff of recombinant human TBP from TATA and non-specific DNA was determined to be 5.5(+/-0.1) x 10(-5) s-1 (t1/2 = 210 minutes) and 5.8(+/-0.1) x 10(-4) s-1 (t1/2 = 20 minutes), respectively. TFIIA/TBP complexes, containing either HeLa-derived or recombinant human TFIIA, possessed a nearly tenfold lower koff when bound to TATA. Interactions of TFIIA with DNA upstream of the TATA box did not appear to play a major role in stabilizing TBP/TATA interactions. Instead, the upstream DNA contacts appeared to be important for stabilizing the association of TFIIA with the TBP/TATA complex as measured in electrophoretic mobility shift assays: koff of TFIIA decreased from 1.4(+/-0.1) x 10(-3) s-1 (t1/2 = eight minutes) to 2.4(+/-0.2) x 10(-4) s-1 (t1/2 = 49 minutes) when upstream DNA contacts were allowed. The stability of TFIIA/TBP interactions was measured using a rapid "pull-down" assay, which employed-nickel agarose and polyhistidine-tagged TFIIA. In the absence of DNA, TFIIA dissociated from TBP with a koff = 4.9(+/-0.6) x 10(-3) s-1 (t1/2 = 2.4 minutes), which varied with solution conditions.

[Activation of transcription in eukaryotic cells: interactions between transcription factors and components of the basal transcriptional mechanism]

Regulation of transcription in eucaryotes is achieved by two classes of transcription factors, GTFs (general transcription factors), which are components of the basal machinery, and sequence- and tissue-specific transcription factors. In this review, recent insights into the structure and function of components from the basal transcriptional machinery are discussed. The mechanisms of transcriptional activation involving direct interactions between trans-activators and the basal machinery are also presented.

Restoration of TATA-dependent transcription in a heat-inactivated extract of tobacco nuclei by recombinant TATA-binding protein (TBP) from tobacco

We isolated a complementary DNA (cDNA) that encoded a TATA-binding protein (TBP) from a cDNA library of tobacco (Nicotiana tabacum) suspension-cultured cells (BY-2). A comparison among deduced amino acid sequences of plant TBPs revealed the presence of a long conserved region within the amino acid sequence of the TBP. Genomic Southern analysis revealed that tobacco TBP (tTBP) is encoded by only a small number of copies of a gene in the tobacco genome. Addition of recombinant tTBP to an extract of tobacco nuclei (TNE) enhanced the basal transcriptional activity in vitro. This result indicates that the level of tTBP is a rate-limiting factor for basal transcriptional activity in TNE. We subsequently succeeded in the functional complementation of TATA-dependent initiation of transcription that was associated with a plant promoter in a homologous plant system. Addition of bacterially expressed recombinant tTBP to a heat-inactivated TNE restored transcriptional activity, as did the addition of human TBP. Moreover, heating of the recombinant tTBP eliminated its ability to restore transcriptional activity. It appears that the heat inactivation of TNE was caused by the heat inactivation of tTBP in TNE.

Protease footprinting analysis of ternary complex formation by human TFIIA

Transcription factor (TF) IIA performs two important regulatory functions during RNA polymerase II transcription: it is required for efficient binding of TFIID to a core promoter and it mediates the effects of upstream activators, both through direct interaction with the TATA box binding protein (TBP). To begin studying how TFIIA mediates these effects, we used a highly sensitive protease footprinting methodology to identify surfaces of human TFIIA participating in TFIIA x TBP x TATA ternary complex formation. Chymotrypsin and proteinase K cleavage patterns of TFIIA bearing a 32P-end-labeled gamma subunit revealed that amino acids 59-73 were protected from cleavage both in the context of an immobilized ternary complex and in a binary complex with TBP alone. In contrast, amino acids 341-367 in the beta portion of a 32P-labeled alpha-beta subunit were protected in the ternary but not in the binary complex, implying that those residues interact with promoter DNA. The regions of human TFIIA identified by protease footprinting are homologous to and encompass the yeast TFIIA residues that contact TBP and DNA in the recently solved crystal structure of the yeast ternary complex. The conservation of the regions and residues mediating complex formation implies that yeast and human TFIIA employ the same mechanism to stabilize the binding of TFIID to a core promoter.

Mechanisms of transcriptional activation in vivo: two steps forward

Transcriptional activation involves the regulated assembly of multiprotein complexes on promoter DNA in the context of the repressive effects of chromatin. How do activators orchestrate this complicated phenomenon in vivo? Recent genetic and biochemical advancements suggest that activator-dependent formation of the transcription machinery on the promoter involves at least two steps. First, the activator facilitates the recruitment of TFIID to the TATA element of the promoter. TFIID binding is then followed by the recruitment of the remainder of the transcriptional apparatus in the form of the RNA polymerase II holoenzyme.

Cloning and functional characterization of the gene encoding the TFIIIB90 subunit of RNA polymerase III transcription factor TFIIIB

The yeast RNA polymerase III (pol III) general transcription factor TFIIIB is composed of three subunits; the TATA-binding protein (TBP)1, the TFIIB-related factor (BRF1), and a third factor termed TFIIIB90 or B". Here we report the purification of yeast TFIIIB90, cloning of the gene encoding TFIIIB90, and reconstitution of TFIIIB from recombinant polypeptides. The TFIIIB90 open reading frame encodes a 68-kDa polypeptide and has no obvious similarity to any other known protein sequences. The gene encoding TFIIIB90 is essential for viability of yeast. Using recombinant TFIIIB subunits, we found that TFIIIB90 interacts weakly with TBP in the absence of BRF1, and that this interaction is enhanced at least 25-fold by BRF1. In addition, TFIIIB90 showed pol III specificity as it could not interact with the pol II-specific TFIIB-TBP-DNA complex. To localize the regions of the TBP-DNA complex that interact with BRF1 and TFIIIB90, we tested whether the pol II factors TFIIA and TFIIB interfered with the binding of BRF1 and TFIIIB90 to TBP-DNA. Our results suggest that the binding sites for BRF1 and TFIIIB90 on TBP-DNA both overlap the binding sites for TFIIA and TFIIB.

Transcription factor IIA mutations show activator-specific defects and reveal a IIA function distinct from stimulation of TBP-DNA binding

The general transcription factor IIA (TFIIA) binds to the TATA binding protein (TBP) and mediates transcriptional activation by distinct classes of activators. To elucidate the function of TFIIA in transcriptional activation, point mutants were created in the human TFIIA-gamma subunit at positions conserved with the yeast homologue. We have identified a class of TFIIA mutants that stimulate TBP-DNA binding (T-A complex) but fail to support transcriptional activation by several different activators, suggesting that these mutants are defective in their ability to facilitate an activation step subsequent to TBP promoter binding. Point mutations of the hydrophobic core of conserved residues from 65 to 74 resulted in various activation-defective phenotypes. These residues were found to be important for TFIIA gamma-gamma interactions, suggesting that gamma-gamma interactions are critical for TFIIA function as a coactivator. A subset of these TFIIA-gamma mutations disrupted transcriptional activation by all activators tested, except for the Epstein-Barr virus-encoded Zta protein. The gamma Y65F, gamma W72A, and gamma W72F mutants mediate Zta activation, but not GAL4-AH, AP-1, GAL4-CTF, or GAL4-VP16 activation. The gamma W72A mutant failed to stimulate TFIID-DNA binding (D-A complex) but was able to form a complex with TFIID and DNA in the presence of Zta (Z-D-A complex). Thus, the ability of Zta to activate transcription with gamma W72A appears to result from a unique ability to form the stable Z-D-A complex with this mutant. Our results show that different activators utilize the general factor TFIIA in unique ways and that TFIIA contributes transcription activation functions in addition to the facilitation of TBP-DNA binding.

Crystal structure of a yeast TFIIA/TBP/DNA complex

The X-ray crystal structure of the transcription factor IIA (TFIIA) in complex with the TATA-box-binding protein (TBP) and TATA-element DNA is presented at 2.5 A resolution. TFIIA is composed of a beta-barrel and a four-helix bundle motif that together have a boot-like appearance. The beta-barrel extends the TBP beta-sheet and bridges over the DNA major groove immediately upstream of the TATA box. The four-helix bundle contributes substantially to the surface of the complex available for interaction with additional transcription factors.

Crystal structure of a TFIIB-TBP-TATA-element ternary complex

The crystal structure of the transcription factor IIB (TFIIB)/TATA box-binding protein (TBP)/TATA-element ternary complex is described at 2.7 A resolution. Core TFIIB resembles cyclin A, and recognizes the preformed TBP-DNA complex through protein-protein and protein-DNA interactions. The amino-terminal domain of core TFIIB forms the downstream surface of the ternary complex, where it could fix the transcription start site. The remaining surfaces of TBP and the TFIIB can interact with TBP-associated factors, other class II initiation factors, and transcriptional activators and coactivators.

Model for binding of transcription factor TFIIB to the TBP-DNA complex

Transcription factor TFIIB is essential for the formation of RNA polymerase II initiation complexes where it binds to the TATA-binding protein (TBP) complex with DNA and recruits RNA polymerase II. TFIIB is probably a target for various activators. Several models have been proposed for the position of TFIIB in the TFIIB-TBP-DNA complex. Here we examine the structure of this complex using gel mobility-shift assays and hydroxyl-radical footprinting. TFIIB requires at least seven base pairs of DNA on either side of the TATA box to form a stable TFIIB-TBP-DNA complex. The sugar residues protected from hydroxyl-radical cleavage by the TFIIB-TBP complex were mapped on the crystal-structure model of the TBP-DNA complex. This analysis suggests that TFIIB binds beneath the concave surface of TBP, contacting DNA both upstream and downstream of the TATA box. Our model predicts that TFIIB binds close to the C-terminal stirrup of TBP and provides one explanation for why TBP needs to bend DNA.

Yeast TATA binding protein interaction with DNA: fluorescence determination of oligomeric state, equilibrium binding, on-rate, and dissociation kinetics

A combination of steady-state, stopped-flow, and time-resolved fluorescence of intrinsic tryptophan and extrinsically labeled fluorescent DNA is utilized to examine the interaction of yeast TATA binding protein (TBP) with DNA. TBP is composed of two structural domains, the carboxy domain (residues 61-240), which is responsible for DNA binding and initiation of basal level transcription, and an amino terminal domain (residues 1-60), whose function is currently unknown. The steady-state fluorescence emission spectrum of the single tryptophan in the amino terminal domain of TBP undergoes a huge (30-40 nm) red-shift upon interaction with stoichiometric amounts of TATA box containing DNA. From time-resolved tryptophan fluorescence anisotropy studies, we demonstrate that, in the absence of DNA, the protein exists as a multimer in solution and it contains (at least) two primary conformations, one with the amino terminus associated tightly with the protein(s) in a hydrophobic environment and one with the amino terminus decoupled away from the rest of the protein and solvent-exposed. Upon binding DNA, the protein dissociates into a monomeric complex, upon which only the solvent-exposed amino terminus conformation remains. Kinetic and equilibrium binding studies were performed on TATA box containing DNA which was extrinsically labeled with a fluorescent probe Rhodamine-X at the 5'-end. This "fluorescent" DNA allowed for the collection of quantitative spectroscopic binding, kinetic on-rate, and kinetic off-rate data at physiological concentrations. Global analysis of equilibrium binding studies performed from 500 pM to 50 nM DNA reveals a single dissociation constant (Kd) of approximately 5 nM. Global analysis of stopped-flow anisotropy on-rate experiments, with millisecond timing resolution and TBP concentrations ranging from 20 to 600 nM (20 nM DNA), can be perfectly described by a single second-order rate constant of 1.66 x 10(5) M(-1) s(-1). These measurements represent the very first stopped-flow anisotropy study of a protein/DNA interaction. Stopped-flow anisotropy off-rate experiments reveal a single exponential k(off) of 4.3 x 10(-2) min-1 (1/k(off) = 23 min) From the ratio of on-rate to off-rate, a predicted Kd of 4.3 nM is obtained, revealing that the kinetic and equilibrium studies are internally consistent. Deletion of the amino terminal domain of TBP decreases the k(on) of TBP approximately 45-fold and eliminates classic second-order behavior.

TATA-binding protein residues implicated in a functional interplay between negative cofactor NC2 (Dr1) and general factors TFIIA and TFIIB

The TATA-binding protein (TBP) plays a key role in transcription initiation. Several negative cofactors (NC1, NC2, and Dr1) are known to interact with TBP in a manner that prevents productive interactions of transcription factors TFIIA and TFIIB with promoter-bound TBP. To gain insights into the regulatory interplay on the surface of TBP, we have employed mutant forms of TBP to identify amino acid residues important for interactions with the negative regulatory cofactor NC2 and the general factor TFIIB. The results show the involvement of distinct domains of TBP in these interactions. Residues (Lys-133, Lys-145, and Lys-151) in the basic repeat region are important for interactions with NC2, as well as with TFIIA (Buratowski, S., and Zhou, H. (1992) Science 255, 1130-1132; Lee, D. K., DeJong, J., Hashimoto, S., Horikoshi, M., and Roeder, R. G. (1992) Mol. Cell. Biol. 12, 5189-5196), whereas a residue (Leu-189) in the second stirrup-like loop spanning S2' and S3' is required for interaction with TFIIB. In addition, we demonstrate that NC2 is identical to the previously cloned negative cofactor Dr1. The implications of these results for TBP structure and function are discussed.

2.1 A resolution refined structure of a TATA box-binding protein (TBP)

The three-dimensional structure of a TATA box-binding protein (TBP2) from Arabidopsis thaliana has been refined at 2.1 A resolution. TBPs are general eukaryotic transcription factors that participate in initiation of RNA synthesis by all three eukaryotic RNA polymerases. The carboxy-terminal portion of TBP is a unique DNA-binding motif/protein fold, adopting a highly symmetric alpha/beta structure that resembles a molecular saddle with two stirrup-like loops. A ten-stranded, antiparallel beta-sheet provides a concave surface for recognizing class II nuclear gene promoters, while the four amphipathic alpha-helices on the convex surface are available for interaction with other transcription factors. The myriad interactions of TBP2 with components of the transcription machinery are discussed.

1.9 A resolution refined structure of TBP recognizing the minor groove of TATAAAAG

The three-dimensional structure of a TATA box-binding protein (TBP) from Arabidopsis thaliana complexed with a fourteen base pair oligonucleotide bearing the Adenovirus major late promoter TATA element has been refined at 1.9 A resolution, giving a final crystallographic R-factor of 19.4%. Binding of the monomeric, saddle-shaped alpha/beta protein induces an unprecedented conformational change in the DNA. A detailed structural and functional analysis of this unusual protein-DNA complex is presented, with particular emphasis on the mechanisms of DNA deformation, TATA element recognition, and preinitiation complex assembly.

Effects of activation-defective TBP mutations on transcription initiation in yeast

Transcription initiation by RNA polymerase II is effected by an ordered series of general factor interactions with core promoter elements (leading to basal activity) and further regulated by gene-specific factors acting from distal elements. Both the general factor TFIID (refs 2,3), including the constituent TBP (TATA-binding polypeptide) and associated factors, and the interacting factor TFIIB (refs 9-11) have been implicated as targets for various activators. Towards an understanding of the basis for activator function, including the multiplicity of TBP interactions, we have now identified mutations in yeast TBP that selectively block activator (GAL4-VP16)-dependent but not basal transcription. We further show an effect of GAL4-VP16 on TFIIB recruitment to early preinitiation complexes, and that recruitment is disrupted by TBP mutations that impair its interactions with VP16 (L114K), TFIIB (L189K) or an unidentified component (K211L). Thus, GAL4-VP16 function seems to involve both direct interactions with TBP and a corresponding induction (or stabilization) of an activation-specific TBP-TFIIB-promoter complex.