The rRNA enhancer regulates rRNA transcription in Saccharomyces cerevisiae

Functional and mechanistic diversity of distal transcription enhancers

Biological differences among metazoans and between cell types in a given organism arise in large part due to differences in gene expression patterns. Gene-distal enhancers are key contributors to these expression patterns, exhibiting both sequence diversity and cell type specificity. Studies of long-range interactions indicate that enhancers are often important determinants of nuclear organization, contributing to a general model for enhancer function that involves direct enhancer-promoter contact. However, mechanisms for enhancer function are emerging that do not fit solely within such a model, suggesting that enhancers as a class of DNA regulatory element may be functionally and mechanistically diverse.

Identification of a multifunctional domain in autonomously replicating sequence-binding factor 1 required for transcriptional activation, DNA replication, and gene silencing

Autonomously replicating sequence-binding factor 1 (ABF1) is a multifunctional, site-specific DNA binding protein that is essential for cell viability in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. ABF1 plays a direct role in transcriptional activation, stimulation of DNA replication, and gene silencing at the mating-type loci. Here we demonstrate that all three activities of ABF1 are conferred by the C terminus of the protein (amino acids [aa] 604 to 731). Furthermore, a detailed mutational analysis has revealed two important clusters of amino acid residues in the C terminus (C-terminal sequence 1 [CS1], aa 624 to 628; and CS2, aa 639 to 662). While both regions play a pivotal role in supporting cell viability, they make distinct contributions to ABF1 functions in various nuclear processes. CS1 specifically participates in transcriptional silencing and/or repression in a context-dependent manner, whereas CS2 is universally required for all three functions of ABF1. When tethered to specific regions of the genome, a 30-aa fragment that contains CS2 alone is sufficient for activation of transcription and chromosomal replication. In addition, CS2 is responsible for ABF1-mediated chromatin remodeling. Based on these results, we suggest that ABF1 may function as a chromatin-reorganizing factor to increase accessibility of the local chromatin structure, which in turn facilitates the action of additional factors to establish either an active or repressed chromatin state.

In vivo binding and hierarchy of assembly of the yeast RNA polymerase I transcription factors

Transcription by RNA polymerase I in Saccharomyces cerevisiae requires a series of transcription factors that have been genetically and biochemically identified. In particular, the core factor (CF) and the upstream activation factor (UAF) have been shown in vitro to bind the core element and the upstream promoter element, respectively. We have analyzed in vivo the DNAse I footprinting of the 35S promoter in wild-type and mutant strains lacking one specific transcription factor at the time. In this way we were able to unambiguously attribute the protections by the CF and the UAF to their respective putative binding sites. In addition, we have found that in vivo a binding hierarchy exists, the UAF being necessary for CF binding. Because the CF footprinting is lost in mutants lacking a functional RNA polymerase I, we also conclude that the final step of preinitiation-complex assembly affects binding of the CF, stabilizing its contact with DNA. Thus, in vivo, the CF is recruited to the core element by the UAF and stabilized on DNA by the presence of a functional RNA polymerase I.

Survey and summary: transcription by RNA polymerases I and III

The task of transcribing nuclear genes is shared between three RNA polymerases in eukaryotes: RNA polymerase (pol) I synthesizes the large rRNA, pol II synthesizes mRNA and pol III synthesizes tRNA and 5S rRNA. Although pol II has received most attention, pol I and pol III are together responsible for the bulk of transcriptional activity. This survey will summarise what is known about the process of transcription by pol I and pol III, how it happens and the proteins involved. Attention will be drawn to the similarities between the three nuclear RNA polymerase systems and also to their differences.

Transcriptional activity and chromatin structure of enhancer-deleted rRNA genes in Saccharomyces cerevisiae

We used the psoralen gel retardation assay and Northern blot analysis in an in vivo yeast system to analyze effects of rDNA enhancer deletions on the chromatin structure and the transcription of tagged rDNA units. We found that upon deletion of a single enhancer element, transcription of the upstream and downstream rRNA gene was reduced by about 50%. Although removing both flanking enhancers of an rRNA gene led to a further reduction in transcription levels, a significant amount of transcriptional activity remained, either resulting from the influence of more distantly located enhancer elements or reflecting the basal activity of the polymerase I promoter within the nucleolus. Despite the reduction of transcriptional activity upon enhancer deletion, the activation frequency (proportion of nonnucleosomal to nucleosomal gene copies in a given cell culture) of the tagged rRNA genes was not significantly altered, as determined by the psoralen gel retardation assay. This is a strong indication that, within the nucleolus, the yeast rDNA enhancer functions by increasing transcription rates of active rRNA genes and not by activating silent transcription units.

In vivo analyses of RNA polymerase I termination in Schizosaccharomyces pombe

Recent studies on the termination of rDNA transcription by RNA polymerase I in Saccharomyces cerevisiae and Schizosaccharomyces pombe have suggested a more complex mechanism then previously described in higher eukaryotes. Termination appears to occur when a DNA-bound Reb1 protein molecule induces polymerase to pause in the context of a release element [see Reeder,R.H. and Lang,W. (1994) Mol. Microbiol ., 12, 11-15]. Because these conclusions in yeast were based entirely on in vitro analyses, we have examined the same termination process in S.pombe by expressing targeted mutations in vivo . S1nuclease protection studies indicate three tandemly arranged termination sites with most transcripts very efficiently terminated at the first site, 267 nt after the 3' end of the mature 25S rRNA sequence. Termination at each site is mediated by conserved terminator elements which bear limited sequence homology with that of mouse and also can be identified in S.cerevisiae . Removal of the first terminator element transfers dominance to the second site and construction of a new single terminator element at +150 still results in efficient termination and rRNA processing without a need for an additional upstream element. Genomic 'footprint' analyses and gel retardation assays confirm a process mediated by a strongly interacting protein factor but implicate an alternate binding site. Removal of the 5' flanking sequence or structure also had no effect on the site or efficiency of termination. Taken together the results in vivo suggest that the termination process in this fission yeast more strongly resembles the single element-mediated mechanism initially reported in mouse and is not dependent on additional upstream sequence as first reported in S.cerevisiae and postulated to function in general.

Molecular cloning and analysis of Schizosaccharomyces pombe Reb1p: sequence-specific recognition of two sites in the far upstream rDNA intergenic spacer

The coding sequences for a Schizosaccharomyces pombe sequence-specific DNA binding protein, Reb1p, have been cloned. The predicted S. pombe Reb1p is 24-29% identical to mouse TTF-1 (transcription termination factor-1) and Saccharomyces cerevisiae REB1 protein, both of which direct termination of RNA polymerase I catalyzed transcripts. The S.pombe Reb1 cDNA encodes a predicted polypeptide of 504 amino acids with a predicted molecular weight of 58.4 kDa. The S. pombe Reb1p is unusual in that the bipartite DNA binding motif identified originally in S.cerevisiae and Klyveromyces lactis REB1 proteins is uninterrupted and thus S.pombe Reb1p may contain the smallest natural REB1 homologous DNA binding domain. Its genomic coding sequences were shown to be interrupted by two introns. A recombinant histidine-tagged Reb1 protein bearing the rDNA binding domain has two homologous, sequence-specific binding sites in the S. pomber DNA intergenic spacer, located between 289 and 480 nt downstream of the end of the approximately 25S rRNA coding sequences. Each binding site is 13-14 bp downstream of two of the three proposed in vivo termination sites. The core of this 17 bp site, AGGTAAGGGTAATGCAC, is specifically protected by Reb1p in footprinting analysis.

Activated levels of rRNA synthesis in fission yeast are driven by an intergenic rDNA region positioned over 2500 nucleotides upstream of the initiation site

RNA polymerase I-catalyzed synthesis of the Schizosaccharomyces pombe approximately 37S pre-rRNAs was shown to be sensitive to regulatory sequences located several kilobases upstream of the initiation site for the rRNA gene. An in vitro transcription system for RNA polymerase I-catalyzed RNA synthesis was established that supports correct and activated transcription from templates bearing a full S. pombe rRNA gene promoter. A 780 bp region starting at -2560 significantly stimulates transcription of ac is-located rDNA promoter and competes with an rDNA promoter in trans, thus displaying some of the activities of rDNA transcriptional enhancers in vitro. Deletion of a 30 bp enhancer-homologous domain in this 780 bp far upstream region blocked its cis-stimulatory effect. The sequence of the S. pombe 3.5 kb intergenic spacer was determined and its organization differs from that of vertebrate, Drosophila, Acanthamoeba and plant intergenic rDNA spacers: it does not contain multiple, imperfect copies of the rRNA gene promoter nor repetitive elements of 140 bp, as are found in vertebrate rDNA enhancers.

Nutritional and growth control of ribosomal protein mRNA and rRNA in Neurospora crassa

The effects of changing growth rates on the levels of 40S pre-rRNA and two r-protein mRNAs were examined to gain insight into the coordinate transcriptional regulation of ribosomal genes in the ascomycete fungus Neurospora crassa. Growth rates were varied either by altering carbon nutritional conditions, or by subjecting the isolates to inositol-limiting conditions. During carbon up- or down-shifts, r-protein mRNA levels were stoichiometrically coordinated. Changes in 40S pre-rRNA levels paralleled those of the r-protein mRNAs but in a non-stoichiometric manner. Comparison of crp-2 mRNA levels with those of a crp-2::qa-2 fusion gene indicated no major effect from changes in crp-2 mRNA stability. Crp-2 promoter mutagenesis experiments revealed that two elements of the crp-2 promoter, -95 to -83 bp (Dde box) and -74 to -66 bp (CG repeat) important for transcription under constant growth conditions, are also critical for transcriptional regulation by a carbon source. Ribosomal protein mRNA and rRNA levels were unaffected by changes in growth rates when the cultures were grown under inositol-limiting conditions, suggesting that, under these conditions, transcription of the ribosomal genes in N.crassa was regulated independently of growth rate.

Transcription in the yeast rRNA gene locus: distribution of the active gene copies and chromatin structure of their flanking regulatory sequences

In growing yeast cells, about half of the 150 tandemly repeated rRNA genes are transcriptionally active and devoid of nucleosomes. By using the intercalating drug psoralen as a tool to mark accessible sites along chromatin DNA in vivo, we found that the active rRNA gene copies are rather randomly distributed along the ribosomal rRNA gene locus. Moreover, results from the analysis of a single, tagged transcription unit in the tandem array are not consistent with the presence of a specific subset of active genes that is stably maintained throughout cell divisions. In the rRNA intergenic spacers of yeast cells, an enhancer is located at the 3' end of each transcription unit, 2 kb upstream of the next promoter. Analysis of the chromatin structure along the tandem array revealed a structural link between transcription units and adjacent, 3' flanking enhancer sequences: each transcriptionally active gene is flanked by a nonnucleosomal enhancer, whereas inactive, nucleosome-packed gene copies are followed by enhancers regularly packaged in nucleosomes. From the fact that nucleosome-free enhancers were also detected in an RNA polymerase I mutant strain, we interpret these open chromatin structures as being the result of specific protein-DNA interactions that can occur before the onset of transcription. In contrast, in this mutant strain, all of the rRNA coding sequences are packaged in nucleosomal arrays. This finding indicates that the establishment of the open chromatin conformation on the activated gene copies requires elongating RNA polymerase I molecules advancing through the template.

Chromatin structure and transcriptional activity around the replication forks arrested at the 3' end of the yeast rRNA genes

Replication intermediates containing forks arrested at the replication fork barrier near the 3' end of the yeast rRNA genes were analyzed at the chromatin level by using in vivo psoralen cross-linking as a probe for chromatin structure. These specific intermediates were purified from preparative two-dimensional agarose gels, and the extent of cross-linking in the different portions of the branched molecules was examined by electron microscopy and by using a psoralen gel retardation assay. The unreplicated section corresponding to the rRNA coding region upstream of the arrested forks appeared mostly heavily cross-linked, characteristic of transcriptionally active rRNA genes devoid of nucleosomes, whereas the replicated daughter strands representing newly synthesized spacer sequences showed a nucleosomal organization typical for bulk chromatin. The failure to detect replication forks arrested at the 3' end of inactive rRNA gene copies and the fact that most DNA encoding rRNA (rDNA) is replicated in the same direction as transcription suggest that replication forks seldom originate from origins of replication located immediately downstream of inactive genes.

Chromatin structure and transcriptional activity around the replication forks arrested at the 3' end of the yeast rRNA genes

Replication intermediates containing forks arrested at the replication fork barrier near the 3' end of the yeast rRNA genes were analyzed at the chromatin level by using in vivo psoralen cross-linking as a probe for chromatin structure. These specific intermediates were purified from preparative two-dimensional agarose gels, and the extent of cross-linking in the different portions of the branched molecules was examined by electron microscopy and by using a psoralen gel retardation assay. The unreplicated section corresponding to the rRNA coding region upstream of the arrested forks appeared mostly heavily cross-linked, characteristic of transcriptionally active rRNA genes devoid of nucleosomes, whereas the replicated daughter strands representing newly synthesized spacer sequences showed a nucleosomal organization typical for bulk chromatin. The failure to detect replication forks arrested at the 3' end of inactive rRNA gene copies and the fact that most DNA encoding rRNA (rDNA) is replicated in the same direction as transcription suggest that replication forks seldom originate from origins of replication located immediately downstream of inactive genes.

Chromatin structures and transcription of rDNA in yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae

The chromatin structure of yeast ribosomal DNA was analyzed in vivo by crosslinking intact cells with psoralen. We found that in exponentially growing cultures the regions coding for the 35S rRNA precursor fall into two distinct classes. One class was highly accessible to psoralen and associated with nascent RNAs, characteristic for transcriptionally active rRNA genes devoid of nucleosomes, whereas the other class showed a crosslinking pattern indistinguishable from that of bulk chromatin and was interpreted to represent the inactive rRNA gene copies. By crosslinking the same strain growing in complex or minimal medium, we have shown that yeast cells can modulate the proportion of active (non-nucleosomal) and inactive (nucleosomal) rRNA gene copies in response to variations in environmental conditions which suggests that yeast can regulate rRNA synthesis by varying the number of active gene copies, in contrast to the vertebrate cells studied so far. Whereas intergenic spacers flanking inactive rRNA gene copies are packaged in a regular nucleosomal array, spacers flanking active genes show an unusual crosslinking pattern suggesting a complex interaction of regulatory factors and histones with DNA.

In vitro definition of the yeast RNA polymerase I enhancer

In vitro conditions are reported under which an EcoRI-HpaI fragment of the Saccharomyces cerevisiae ribosomal gene spacer will enhance transcription from an adjacent RNA polymerase I promoter. Enhancement is largely independent of orientation and distance and is proportional to copy number. Mapping experiments reveal that two separate regions of the EcoRI-HpaI fragment are independently capable of promoter stimulation. These regions appear to correspond to elements which have been shown by previous workers to cause enhancement in vivo. Using the detergent Sarkosyl to limit the number of rounds of transcription from each promoter, we found that the degree of enhancement is similar whether one or many rounds of transcription occur. This finding supports a model in which the enhancer increases the number of stable promoter complexes but does not alter the loading of polymerase on an active promoter. Once the stable promoter complex is formed, the enhancer can be physically severed from the promoter with no loss of enhancement. Likewise, the upstream activation region of the promoter can be severed from the core promoter domain once the stable complex has been formed. These results are interpreted to mean that the enhancer functions only to assist stable complex formation and, once that is accomplished, the enhancer is dispensable.

In vitro definition of the yeast RNA polymerase I enhancer

In vitro conditions are reported under which an EcoRI-HpaI fragment of the Saccharomyces cerevisiae ribosomal gene spacer will enhance transcription from an adjacent RNA polymerase I promoter. Enhancement is largely independent of orientation and distance and is proportional to copy number. Mapping experiments reveal that two separate regions of the EcoRI-HpaI fragment are independently capable of promoter stimulation. These regions appear to correspond to elements which have been shown by previous workers to cause enhancement in vivo. Using the detergent Sarkosyl to limit the number of rounds of transcription from each promoter, we found that the degree of enhancement is similar whether one or many rounds of transcription occur. This finding supports a model in which the enhancer increases the number of stable promoter complexes but does not alter the loading of polymerase on an active promoter. Once the stable promoter complex is formed, the enhancer can be physically severed from the promoter with no loss of enhancement. Likewise, the upstream activation region of the promoter can be severed from the core promoter domain once the stable complex has been formed. These results are interpreted to mean that the enhancer functions only to assist stable complex formation and, once that is accomplished, the enhancer is dispensable.