Mapping and mutagenesis of the amino-terminal transcriptional repression domain of the Drosophila Krüppel protein

Cyclic AMP-response element modulator inhibits the promoter activity of the sodium iodide symporter gene in thyroid cancer cells

BACKGROUND

Comprehension of the regulatory mechanism involved in the sodium iodide symporter (NIS) expression is of great relevance for thyroid cancer. In fact, restoration of NIS expression would be a strategy to treat undifferentiated thyroid cancer. Previous in vitro findings suggest that the cyclic AMP-response element (CRE) modulator (CREM) is involved in control of NIS expression. In this work, we examined the expression of CREM in a series of thyroid cancer tissues and its action on NIS promoter in human thyroid cancer cells.

METHODS

Expression of mRNA levels for CREM, PAX8 and NIS was measured by quantitative reverse transcriptase-polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) in 6 normal thyroid tissues, 22 papillary, 12 follicular and 4 anaplastic thyroid cancers. The effect of CREM on transcriptional activity of the NIS promoter was investigated by transient transfection of human thyroid cell lines.

RESULTS

Compared to normal tissues, NIS and PAX8 mRNA levels were significantly reduced in all types of thyroid cancer. As expected, the maximal decrease was detected in anaplastic thyroid cancer. Conversely, CREM mRNA levels were increased in all types of thyroid cancer, reaching statistical significance for follicular and anaplastic thyroid carcinoma (p=0.0157 and 0.0045, respectively). Transfection experiments showed an inhibitory effect of CREM on NIS promoter activity in various thyroid cancer cell lines.

CONCLUSIONS

These data demonstrate that CREM expression is increased in thyroid cancer tissue and may play a role in the downregulation of NIS expression in thyroid cancer acting at the transcriptional level.

FOXE1 polyalanine tract length screening by MLPA in idiopathic premature ovarian failure

BACKGROUND

FOXE1 is one of the candidate genes for genetic predisposition to premature ovarian failure (POF) and it contains an alanine tract. Our purpose is to assess the influence of length of the alanine tract of FOXE1 on genetic susceptibility to POF.

METHODS

The group studied consisted of 110 Chinese patients with idiopathic POF and 110 women from normal controls. The polyalanine tract and flanking sequence of FOXE1 was screened using the Multiple Ligation-dependent Probe Amplification (MLPA) technique and directly sequenced.

RESULTS

Three variants of FOXE1-polyalanine length, containing 12, 14, or 16 alanine residues, and 5 different genotypes were identified. There were significantly lower frequencies of the 14/14 genotypes in cases with POF (X2 = 119.73, P = 0.001), as compared with the controls. The incidence of 16/16 genotypes of FOXE1-polyalanine was significantly higher in patients with POF (X2 = 3.403, P = 0.001) in comparison to the controls. The FOXE1 14 alanine allele was significantly less common in the POF patient group (186/220) than the controls (216/220) (X2 = 25.923, P = 0.0001). The FOXE1 16 alanine allele was significantly more common in the POF patient group (28/220) than the controls (4/220) (X2 = 19.412, P = 0.0001).

CONCLUSION

This finding provides evidence that polyalanine repeat expansions in FOXE1 may be responsible for the genetic aetiology of POF in Chinese women.

The gap gene network

Gap genes are involved in segment determination during the early development of the fruit fly Drosophila melanogaster as well as in other insects. This review attempts to synthesize the current knowledge of the gap gene network through a comprehensive survey of the experimental literature. I focus on genetic and molecular evidence, which provides us with an almost-complete picture of the regulatory interactions responsible for trunk gap gene expression. I discuss the regulatory mechanisms involved, and highlight the remaining ambiguities and gaps in the evidence. This is followed by a brief discussion of molecular regulatory mechanisms for transcriptional regulation, as well as precision and size-regulation provided by the system. Finally, I discuss evidence on the evolution of gap gene expression from species other than Drosophila. My survey concludes that studies of the gap gene system continue to reveal interesting and important new insights into the role of gene regulatory networks in development and evolution.

Genome-wide analysis of ethylene-responsive element binding factor-associated amphiphilic repression motif-containing transcriptional regulators in Arabidopsis

The ethylene-responsive element binding factor-associated amphiphilic repression (EAR) motif is a transcriptional regulatory motif identified in members of the ethylene-responsive element binding factor, C2H2, and auxin/indole-3-acetic acid families of transcriptional regulators. Sequence comparison of the core EAR motif sites from these proteins revealed two distinct conservation patterns: LxLxL and DLNxxP. Proteins containing these motifs play key roles in diverse biological functions by negatively regulating genes involved in developmental, hormonal, and stress signaling pathways. Through a genome-wide bioinformatics analysis, we have identified the complete repertoire of the EAR repressome in Arabidopsis (Arabidopsis thaliana) comprising 219 proteins belonging to 21 different transcriptional regulator families. Approximately 72% of these proteins contain a LxLxL type of EAR motif, 22% contain a DLNxxP type of EAR motif, and the remaining 6% have a motif where LxLxL and DLNxxP are overlapping. Published in vitro and in planta investigations support approximately 40% of these proteins functioning as negative regulators of gene expression. Comparative sequence analysis of EAR motif sites and adjoining regions has identified additional preferred residues and potential posttranslational modification sites that may influence the functionality of the EAR motif. Homology searches against protein databases of poplar (Populus trichocarpa), grapevine (Vitis vinifera), rice (Oryza sativa), and sorghum (Sorghum bicolor) revealed that the EAR motif is conserved across these diverse plant species. This genome-wide analysis represents the most extensive survey of EAR motif-containing proteins in Arabidopsis to date and provides a resource enabling investigations into their biological roles and the mechanism of EAR motif-mediated transcriptional regulation.

CtBP is required for proper development of peripheral nervous system in Drosophila

C-terminal binding protein (CtBP) is an evolutionarily and functionally conserved transcriptional corepressor known to integrate diverse signals to regulate transcription. Drosophila CtBP (dCtBP) regulates tissue specification and segmentation during early embryogenesis. Here, we investigated the roles of dCtBP during development of the peripheral nervous system (PNS). Our study includes a detailed quantitative analysis of how altered dCtBP activity affects the formation of adult mechanosensory bristles. We found that dCtBP loss-of-function resulted in a series of phenotypes with the most prevalent being supernumerary bristles. These dCtBP phenotypes are more complex than those caused by Hairless, a known dCtBP-interacting factor that regulates bristle formation. The emergence of additional bristles correlated with the appearance of extra sensory organ precursor (SOP) cells in earlier stages, suggesting that dCtBP may directly or indirectly inhibit SOP cell fates. We also found that development of a subset of bristles was regulated by dCtBP associated with U-shaped through the PxDLS dCtBP-interacting motif. Furthermore, the double bristle with sockets phenotype induced by dCtBP mutations suggests the involvement of this corepressor in additional molecular pathways independent of both Hairless and U-shaped. We therefore propose that dCtBP is part of a gene circuitry that controls the patterning and differentiation of the fly PNS via multiple mechanisms.

Direct interaction between Teashirt and Sex combs reduced proteins, via Tsh's acidic domain, is essential for specifying the identity of the prothorax in Drosophila

teashirt (tsh) encodes a zinc-finger protein that is thought to be part of a network that contributes to regionalization of the Drosophila embryo and establishes the domains of Hox protein function. tsh and the Hox gene Sex combs reduced (Scr) are essential to establish the identity of the first thoracic segment. We used the development of the first thoracic segment as a paradigm for Scr dependent regional morphological distinctions. In this specific context, we asked whether Tsh protein could have a direct influence on Scr activity. Here we present evidence that Tsh interacts directly with Scr and this interaction depends in part on the presence of a short domain located in the N-terminal half of Teashirt called "acidic domain". In vivo, expression of full length Tsh can rescue the tsh null phenotype throughout the trunk whereas Tsh lacking the Scr interacting domain rescues all the trunk defects except in the prothorax. We suggest this provides insights into the mechanism by which Tsh, in concert with Scr, specifies the prothoracic identity.

An investigation into FOXE1 polyalanine tract length in premature ovarian failure

Premature ovarian failure (POF) is a common condition affecting 1% of women worldwide. There is strong evidence for genetic involvement in POF as many cases are familial, and mutations in several genes have been associated with POF. We investigated variation in FOXE1 polyalanine tract length, following the observation that polyalanine tract deletions are seen in the closely related FOXL2 in patients with POF. In addition, polyalanine tract expansions in FOXL2 are often seen in patients with blepharophimosis-ptosis-epicanthus inversus syndrome (BPES), a rare eyelid disorder often associated with POF. The FOXE1 polyalanine tract shows marked variation in its length between POF patients and normal controls, existing as an allele of 12, 14, 16, 17 or 19 alanine residues. We found evidence to suggest that variation in FOXE1 polyalanine tract length predisposes to POF.

Repressor domain and nuclear localization signal of the murine Hoxa-11 protein are located in the homeodomain: no evidence for role of poly alanine stretches in transcriptional repression

Hoxa-11 is a member of the homeodomain class of transcription factors, which play important roles in metazoan development. Hoxa-11 is particularly interesting because it is involved in a major mammalian innovation, uterus development and gestation. We are interested in the molecular changes underlying this evolutionary innovation. Although phenotypes resulting from loss of functions are well investigated (e.g., female sterility), little is known about the domains contributing to Hoxa-11 protein function. We therefore mapped the domains mediating two essential transcription factor functions, nuclear localization and transcriptional activity in the mouse Hoxa-11 protein. Our results show that the mammal-specific alanine repeat does not contribute to repressor activity, as has been hypothesized based on amino acid composition and analogy with other repressor domains. Interestingly, both the repressor domain as well as the nuclear localization signal (NLS) are located within the homeodomain, adding to the growing evidence that the homeodomain is a multifunctional domain which fulfills essential transcription factor functions beyond DNA binding. It is proposed that the high degree of conservation of the homeodomain is due to the multiple functional constraints that result from the various conserved functions accommodated in the homeodomain.

Coding repeats and evolutionary "agility"

The rapid generation of new shapes observed in the living world is the result of genetic variation, especially in "morphological" developmental genes. Many of these genes contain coding tandem repeats. Fondon and Garner have shown that expansions and contractions of these repeats are associated with the great diversity of morphologies observed in the domestic dog, Canis familiaris. In particular, they found that the repeat variations in two genes were significantly associated with changes in limb and skull morphology. These results open the possibility that such a mechanism contributes to the diversity of life.

Polymorphism, shared functions and convergent evolution of genes with sequences coding for polyalanine domains

Mutations causing expansions of polyalanine domains are responsible for nine hereditary diseases. Other GC-rich sequences coding for some polyalanine domains were found to be polymorphic in human. These observations prompted us to identify all sequences in the human genome coding for polyalanine stretches longer than four alanines and establish their degree of polymorphism. We identified 494 annotated human proteins containing 604 polyalanine domains. Thirty-two percent (31/98) of tested sequences coding for more than seven alanines were polymorphic. The length of the polyalanine-coding sequence and its GCG or GCC repeat content are the major predictors of polymorphism. GCG codons are over-represented in human polyalanine coding sequences. Our data suggest that GCG and GCC codons play a key role in polyalanine-coding sequence appearance and polymorphism. The grouping by shared function of polyalanine-containing proteins in Homo sapiens, Drosophila melanogaster and Caenorhabditis elegans shows that the majority are involved in transcriptional regulation. Phylogenetic analyses of HOX, GATA and EVX protein families demonstrate that polyalanine domains arose independently in different members of these families, suggesting that convergent molecular evolution may have played a role. Finally polyalanine domains in vertebrates are conserved between mammals and are rarer and shorter in Gallus gallus and Danio rerio. Together our results show that the polymorphic nature of sequences coding for polyalanine domains makes them prime candidates for mutations in hereditary diseases and suggests that they have appeared in many different protein families through convergent evolution.

Functional analysis of RF2a, a rice transcription factor

RF2a is a bZIP transcription factor that regulates expression of the promoter of rice tungro bacilliform badnavirus. RF2a is predicted to include three domains that contribute to its function. The results of transient assays with mutants of RF2a from which one or more domains were removed demonstrated that the acidic domain was essential for the activation of gene expression, although the proline-rich and glutamine-rich domains each played a role in this function. Studies using fusion proteins of different functional domains of RF2a with the 2C7 synthetic zinc finger DNA-binding domain showed that the acidic region is a relatively strong activation domain, the function of which is dependent on the context in which the domain is placed. Data from transgenic plants further supported the conclusion that the acidic domain was important for maintaining the biological function of RF2a. RF2a and TBP (TATA-binding protein) synergistically activate transcription in vitro (Zhu, Q., Ordiz, M. I., Dabi, T., Beachy, R. N., and Lamb, C. (2002) Plant Cell 14, 795-803). In vitro and in vivo assays showed that RF2a interacts with TBP through the glutamine-rich domain but not the acidic domain. Functional analysis of such interactions indicates that the acidic domain activates transcription through mechanisms other than via the direct recruitment of TBP.

Limb malformations and the human HOX genes

HOX genes encode a family of transcription factors of fundamental importance for body patterning during embryonic development. Humans, like most vertebrates, have 39 HOX genes organized into four clusters, with major roles in the development of the central nervous system, axial skeleton, gastrointestinal and urogenital tracts, external genitalia, and limbs. The first two limb malformations shown to be caused by mutations in the human HOX genes were synpolydactyly and hand-foot-genital syndrome, which result from mutations in HOXD13 and HOXA13, respectively. This review describes a variety of limb malformations now known to be caused by specific different mutations in these two genes, including polyalanine tract expansions, nonsense mutations, and missense mutations, many with phenotypic consequences that could not have been predicted from previous knowledge of mouse models or HOX protein function. Limb malformations may also result from chromosomal deletions involving the HOXD and HOXA clusters, and from regulatory mutations affecting single or multiple HOX genes.

Control ofDrosophilaimaginal disc development byrotundandroughened eye: differentially expressed transcripts of the same gene encoding functionally distinct zinc finger proteins

The Drosophila rotund gene is required in the wings, antenna, haltere, proboscis and legs. A member of the Rac family of GTPases, denoted the rotund racGAP gene, was previously identified in the rotund region. However, previous studies indicated that rotund racGAP was not responsible for the rotund phenotypes and that the rotund gene had yet to be identified. We have isolated the rotund gene and show that it is a member of the Krüppel family of zinc finger genes. The adjacent roughened eye locus specifically affects the eye and is genetically separable from rotund. However, roughened eye and rotund are tightly linked, and we have therefore also isolated the roughened eye transcript. Intriguingly, we show that roughened eye is part of the rotund gene but is represented by a different transcript. The rotund and roughened eye transcripts result from the utilization of two different promoters that direct expression in non-overlapping domains in the larval imaginal discs. The predicted Rotund and Roughened Eye proteins share the same C-terminal region, including the zinc finger domain, but differ in their N-terminal regions. Each cDNA can rescue only the corresponding mutation and show negative effects when expressed in each others domain of expression. These results indicate that in addition to the differential expression of rotund and roughened eye, their proteins have distinct activities. rotund and roughened eye act downstream of early patterning genes such as dachshund and appear to be involved in Notch signaling by regulating Delta, scabrous and Serrate.

Characterization of a New Subfamily of Winged-helix/Forkhead (Fox) Genes That Are Expressed in the Lung and Act as Transcriptional Repressors

Epithelial gene expression in the lung is thought to be regulated by the coordinate activity of several different families of transcription factors including the Fox family of winged-helix/forkhead DNA-binding proteins. In this report, we have identified and characterized two members of this Fox gene family, Foxp1 and Foxp2, and show that they comprise a new subfamily of Fox genes expressed in the lung. Foxp1 and Foxp2 are expressed at high levels in the lung as early as E12.5 of mouse development with Foxp2 expression restricted to the airway epithelium. In addition, Foxp1 and Foxp2 are expressed at lower levels in neural, intestinal, and cardiovascular tissues during development. Upon differentiation of the airway epithelium along the proximal-distal axis, Foxp2 expression becomes restricted to the distal alveolar epithelium whereas Foxp1 expression is observed in the distal epithelium and mesenchyme. Foxp1 and Foxp2 can regulate epithelial lung gene transcription as was demonstrated by their ability to dramatically repress the mouse CC10 promoter and, to a lesser extent, the human surfactant protein C promoter. In addition, GAL4 fusion proteins encoding subdomains of Foxp1 and Foxp2 demonstrate that an independent and homologous transcriptional repression domain lies within the N-terminal end of the proteins. Together, these studies suggest that Foxp1 and Foxp2 are important regulators of lung epithelial gene transcription.

Biological activity of mammalian transcriptional repressors

Research on the regulation of transcription in mammals has focused in recent years mainly on the mechanism of transcriptional activation. However, transcriptional repression mediated by repressor proteins is a common regulatory mechanism in mammals and might play an important role in many biological processes. To understand the molecular mechanism of transcriptional repression, the activity of eight mammalian repressors or repressor domains was investigated using a set of model promoters in combination with two different transcriptional detection methods. The repressors studied were: REST, the thyroid hormone receptors alpha and beta, the zinc finger protein NK10 containing a 'krüppel-associated box' (KRAB), repressor domains derived from the proteins Egr-1, Oct2A and Dr1 and the repressor/activator protein YY1. Here we show that the repressor domains of REST, Egr-1, the thyroid hormone receptors alpha< and beta and NK10 were transferable to a heterologous DNA-binding domain and repressed transcription from proximal and distal positions. Moreover, these repressor domains also blocked the activity of a strong viral enhancer in a 'remote position'. Thus, these domains are 'general' transcriptional repressor domains. The 'krüppel-associated box' was the most powerful repressor domain tested. In contrast, the repressor domains derived from Oct2A and Dr1 were inactive when fused to a heterologous DNA-binding domain. The repressor domain of YY1 exhibited transcriptional repression activity only in one of the transcriptional assay systems. The recruitment of histone deacetylases to the proximity of the basal transcriptional apparatus was recently discussed as a mechanism for some mammalian transcriptional repressor proteins. Here we show here that histone deacetylase 2, targeted to the reporter gene via DNA-protein interaction, functions as a transcriptional repressor protein regardless of the location of its binding site within the transcription unit.

Human HOX gene mutations

HOX genes play a fundamental role in the development of the vertebrate central nervous system, axial skeleton, limbs, gut, urogenital tract and external genitalia, but it is only in the last 4 years that mutations in two of the 39 human HOX genes have been shown to cause congenital malformations; HOXD13, which is mutated in synpolydactyly, and HOXA13, which is mutated in Hand-Foot-Genital syndrome. Here we review the mutations already identified in these two genes, consider how these mutations may act, and discuss the possibility that further mutations remain to be discovered both in developmental disorders and in cancer.

Expression and function of the homeodomain-containing protein Hex in thyroid cells

The homeodomain-containing protein Hex (also named Prh) is expressed in primitive endoderm (during the early phases of development), in some endoderm-derived tissues and in endothelial and hematopoietic precursors. Hex expression is exting-uished during terminal differentiation of endothelial and hematopoietic cells as well as in adult lung. Previous investigations have demonstrated that Hex is expressed during early thyroid gland development. No information has been reported on Hex expression in adult thyroid gland or on the function of this protein in follicular thyroid cells. These issues represent the focus of the present study. We demonstrate that Hex mRNA is present in rat and human adult thyroid gland as well as in differentiated follicular thyroid cell lines. In FRTL-5 cells TSH reduces Hex expression. In thyroid cell lines transformed by several oncogenes Hex expression is completely abolished. By using co-transfection assays we demonstrate that Hex is a repressor of the thyroglobulin promoter and that it is able to abolish the activating effects of both TTF-1 and Pax8. These data would suggest that Hex may play an important role in thyroid cell differentiation. Protein-DNA interaction experiments indicate that Hex is able to bind sites of the thyroglobulin promoter containing either the core sequence 5'-TAAT-3' or 5'-CAAG-3'. The DNA binding specificity of the Hex homeodomain, therefore, is more 'relaxed' than that observed in the majority of other homeo-domains.

Restructured transactivation domain in hamster AH receptor

Hamsters and Han/Wistar (Kuopio; H/W) rats show peculiarly selective responsiveness to 2,3,7,8-tetrachlorodibenzo-p-dioxin (TCDD). They are extremely resistant to its acute lethality but sensitive to, e.g. , enzyme induction. The biological effects of TCDD are mediated by the AH receptor (AHR). Recent studies on H/W rat AHR discovered a remodelled transactivation domain which appears to be critical for the TCDD resistance of these animals. Here, molecular cloning and sequencing of hamster AHR reveals another type of restructured transactivation domain. In hamsters, the functionally pivotal Q-rich region is substantially expanded and enriched in glutamine compared with all other AHRs cloned to date. By contrast, the amino-terminal end is highly conserved, which is in agreement with the H/W rat AHR. Because of the additional material in the transactivation domain, hamster AHR protein is larger than that in rats or mice, but the pattern of AHR mRNA expression in tissues is similar.

hairy stripe 7 element mediates activation and repression in response to different domains and levels of Krüppel in the Drosophila embryo

The Drosophila gap gene Krüppel (Kr) encodes a zinc finger-type transcription factor required for controlling the spatial expression of other segmentation genes during early blastoderm stage. Here we show that two independent and transferable repressor domains of Krüppel act to control expression of the pair-rule gene hairy, and that the minimal cis-acting element of hairy stripe7 (h7) mediates either Krüppel-dependent activation or repression in different regions of the blastoderm embryo. The C-terminal region of Krüppel which encompasses the predominant repressor domain is not essential for activation, but is required to fully suppress h7-mediated transcription in response to high levels of Krüppel activity. This domain contains an interaction motif for dCtBP, a homologue of the human co-repressor CtBP. dCtBP activity is, however, dispensable for Krüppel-mediated repression in the embryo since Krüppel-mediated repression functions in the absence of dCtBP. Possible modes of h7-mediated gene regulation in response to the different domains and levels of Krüppel are discussed.

Adjacent proline residues in the inhibitory domain of the Oct-2 transcription factor play distinct functional roles

A 40 amino acid region of Oct-2 from amino acids 142 to 181 functions as an active repressor domain capable of inhibiting both basal activity and activation of promoters containing a TATA box, but not of those that contain an initiator element. Based on our observation that the equivalent region of the closely related Oct-1 factor does not act as an inhibitory domain, we have mutated specific residues in the Oct-2 domain in an attempt to probe their importance in repressor domain function. Although mutations of several residues have no or minimal effect, mutation of proline 175 to arginine abolishes the ability to inhibit both basal and activated transcription. In contrast, mutation of proline 174 to arginine confers upon the domain the ability to repress activation of an initiator-containing promoter by acidic activation domains, and also suppresses the effect of the proline 175 mutation. Hence, adjacent proline residues play key roles in the functioning of the inhibitory domain and in limiting its specificity to TATA-box-containing promoters.

HIV Tat protein requirements for transactivation and repression of transcription are separable

The HIV Tat protein, primarily characterized as a transcriptional activator of the viral long terminal repeat (LTR), is also a potent repressor of major histocompatibility complex (MHC) class I transcription. In the present study, we demonstrate that these two functional activities are distinct and mediated by discrete, but overlapping, structural domains of Tat. Tat repressor activity depends on C-terminal sequences, whereas transactivation depends on N-terminal sequences; both functions require core sequences. The repressor activity requires a domain encompassing the region encoded by the second exon of the Tat gene, beginning at amino acid 73, with a C-terminal limit between amino acids 80 and 83. Tat repressor function also depends on the presence of a lysine at position 41, located within the core of the protein. Tat repressor activity is independent of two N-terminal domains essential for transactivation: the acidic segment and the cysteine-rich region. Conversely, Tat transactivation is independent of the second exon-encoded region of Tat. As further support for this novel model of separable Tat functions, we show that in murine fibroblasts, Tat represses class I promoter activity, but does not transactivate the HIV LTR. We propose that distinct structural domains mediate the two functionally distinct activities associated with the Tat protein.

Sequence-specific DNA binding and transcriptional regulation by the promyelocytic leukemia zinc finger protein

Chromosomal translocation t(11;17)(q23;21) is associated with a retinoic acid-resistant form of acute promyelocytic leukemia. The translocation fuses the RARalpha gene to the PLZF gene, resulting in the formation of reciprocal fusion proteins, hypothesized to play prominent roles in leukemogenesis. Promyelocytic leukemia zinc finger (PLZF) encodes a transcription factor with nine Krüppel-like zinc fingers, seven of which are retained in the t(11;17) fusion protein RARalpha-PLZF. We identified a specific DNA-binding site for the PLZF protein and showed that PLZF binds to this site through its most carboxyl seven zinc fingers. In co-transfection experiments, PLZF repressed transcription through its cognate binding site. This repression function of PLZF was mapped to two regions on the protein, including the evolutionarily conserved POZ domain. In contrast, the RARalpha-PLZF protein activated transcription of a promoter containing a PLZF response element. These results suggest that RARalpha-PLZF, generated in acute promyelocytic leukemia, is an aberrant transcription factor that can deregulate the expression of PLZF target genes and contribute to leukemogenesis.

FKHL15, a new human member of the forkhead gene family located on chromosome 9q22

FKHL15 was isolated from a cDNA library enriched for transcripts from 9q22. Isolation and sequencing of a 3.5-kb cDNA clone identified a putative 376-amino-acid protein with greater than 80% homology over a 100-amino-acid stretch to the forkhead DNA-binding domain. The FKHL15 gene contains a region rich in alanine residues, frequently associated with transcriptional repression. The forkhead genes are believed to play important roles in development and differentiation in many different organisms and have also been implicated in the development of some tumors. The map position of FKHL15 on 9q22 places the gene within the candidate regions for the cancer predisposition syndrome multiple self-healing squamous epitheliomata and the degenerative neurological disorder hereditary sensory neuropathy type I. This is a region frequently lost in squamous cell cancer.

Net (ERP/SAP2) one of the Ras-inducible TCFs, has a novel inhibitory domain with resemblance to the helix-loop-helix motif

The three ternary complex factors (TCFs), Net (ERP/ SAP-2), ELK-1 and SAP-1, are highly related ets oncogene family members that participate in the response of the cell to Ras and growth signals. Understanding the different roles of these factors will provide insights into how the signals result in coordinate regulation of the cell. We show that Net inhibits transcription under basal conditions, in which SAP-1a is inactive and ELK-1 stimulates. Repression is mediated by the NID, the Net Inhibitory Domain of about 50 amino acids, which autoregulates the Net protein and also inhibits when it is isolated in a heterologous fusion protein. Net is particularly sensitive to Ras activation. Ras activates Net through the C-domain, which is conserved between the three TCFs, and the NID is an efficient inhibitor of Ras activation. The NID, as well as more C-terminal sequences, inhibit DNA binding. Net is more refractory to DNA binding than the other TCFs, possibly due to the presence of multiple inhibitory elements. The NID may adopt a helix-loop-helix (HLH) structure, as evidenced by homology to other HLH motifs, structure predictions, model building and mutagenesis of critical residues. The sequence resemblance with myogenic factors suggested that Net may form complexes with the same partners. Indeed, we found that Net can interact in vivo with the basic HLH factor, E47. We propose that Net is regulated at the level of its latent DNA-binding activity by protein interactions and/or phosphorylation. Net may form complexes with HLH proteins as well as SRF on specific promotor sequences. The identification of the novel inhibitory domain provides a new inroad into exploring the different roles of the ternary complex factors in growth control and transformation.

A mechanism for repression of class II gene transcription through specific binding of NC2 to TBP-promoter complexes via heterodimeric histone fold domains

Negative co-factor 2 (NC2) regulates transcription of the class II genes through binding to TFIID and inhibition of pre-initiation complex formation. We have isolated and cloned NC2, and investigated the molecular mechanism underlying repression of transcription. NC2 consists of two subunits, termed NC2alpha and NC2beta, the latter of which is identical to Dr1. The NC2 subunits dimerize and bind to TATA binding protein (TBP)-promoter complexes via histone fold domains of the H2A-H2B type. Repression of basal transcription requires the histone fold and carboxy-terminal domains of the NC2 subunits. Several mechanisms probably contribute to transcriptional repression. Binding of NC2 inhibits association of TFIIB with TBP-promoter complexes. NC2 binds directly to DNA, and binding of NC2 to TBP-promoter complexes affects the conformation of DNA, which could be one cause for the inhibition of TFIIB. In addition, multimerization of repressor-TBP complexes on DNA might inhibit the assembly of the pre-initiation complex. We suggest that binding of the repressor to TRP-promoter complexes establishes a mechanism that controls the rate of transcription by RNA polymerase II.

Mapping of the transcriptional repression domain of the lymphoid-specific transcription factor oct-2A

The lymphoid-specific transcription factor Oct-2a is implicated in B cell-specific transcriptional activity via the octamer motif. Structure/function analysis of various Oct-2a effector regions in the context of the GAL4 DNA-binding domain revealed that Oct-2a contains two functionally different activation domains at the N and the C termini. The transcriptional activity of both domains is strongly potentiated by interactions with distinct B cell-specific coactivators. Recently, we have identified a repression domain located within the N terminus of Oct-2a (amino acids 2-99). When this domain was transferred to a potent activator, transcription was strongly inhibited. In this study we present a deletion analysis of the N-terminal region of Oct-2a to determine the minimal repression domain. We identified a stretch of 23 amino acids, rich in serine and threonine residues, which was responsible for most of the repression activity. We show that repression is strongly dependent on the type of enhancer present in the reporter plasmid as well as on the cell line tested. The possibility that Oct-2a can act as an activator and/or a repressor may have important consequences for the function of Oct-2a in B cell differentiation and other developmental processes.

Active repression mechanisms of eukaryotic transcription repressors

Regulators of transcription and, in particular, transcriptional repressors, play central roles in vital biological processes, such as development and the regulation of cell growth. A major class of transcriptional repressors consists of DNA-binding proteins that interact with specific promoter elements and repress transcription via small, portable repression 'domains'. Such transcriptional inhibition, first identified only five years ago, has been termed active repression, because it is not mediated simply by steric hindrance mechanisms. It is unknown how interaction(s) between such a repressor and the RNA polymerase II basal or regulatory transcription machinery can derail the formation or competency of a transcription complex at a promoter. However, the recent progress toward identification of molecular targets suggests several specific mechanisms for achieving active repression.

Epstein-Barr virus nuclear antigen 3C is a powerful repressor of transcription when tethered to DNA

The expression of Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) nuclear antigen 3C (EBNA3C) is essential for the activation and immortalization of human B lymphocytes by EBV. EBNA3C consists of 992 amino acids and includes a potential bZIP motif and regions rich in acidic, proline, and glutamine residues. Thus, EBNA3C resembles several trans regulators of gene expression. It has recently been shown that a fragment of EBNA3C can activate reporter gene expression when fused to the DNA-binding domain of GAL4 (D. Marshall and C. Sample, J. Virol. 69:3624-3630,1995). Although EBNA3C binds DNA, a specific site for EBNA3C binding has not been identified; to test the ability of full-length EBNA3C to regulate transcription, EBNA3C (amino acids 11 to 992) was fused to the DNA-binding domain of GAL4. We show that this fusion protein does not transactivate but rather is a potent repressor of reporter gene expression. Repression is dependent on the dose of GAL4-EBNA3C and on the presence of GAL4-binding sites within reporter plasmids. Repression is not restricted to B cells nor is it species or promoter specific. Repression is independent of the location of the GAL4-binding sites relative to the transcription start site. A fragment of EBNA3C (amino acids 280 to 525) which represses expression in a manner which is nearly identical to that of the full-length protein has been identified; this fragment is rich in acidic and proline residues. A second, less potent repressor region located C terminal to amino acids 280 to 525 has also been identified; this domain is rich in proline and glutamine residues. We also show binding of EBNA3C, in vitro, to the TATA-binding protein component of TFIID, and this suggests a mechanism by which EBNA3C may communicate with the basal transcription complex.

Characterization of functional domains within the multifunctional transcription factor, YY1

YY1 is a multifunctional transcription factor capable of either activation or repression of transcription. Using a series of mutant proteins, we have characterized domains responsible for activation or repression. We found that the YY1 transcriptional activation domain lies near the amino terminus and requires amino acids 16-29 and 80-100 for maximal activity. The region between residues 16 and 29 has the potential to form an acidic amphipathic helix, whereas residues between 80 and 100 are rich in proline and glutamine. The YY1 repression domain lies near the carboxyl terminus and is embedded within the YY1 zinc finger region necessary for binding to DNA. Deletion of YY1 amino acids, which include zinc fingers 3 and 4, abolishes repression. However, site-directed mutagenesis, progressive deletion, and internal deletion mutant analyses indicate that the normal structures of zinc fingers 3 and 4 are not required for repression.

The transcriptional effect of WT1 is modulated by choice of expression vector

The WT1 Wilms' tumor suppressor gene encodes a zinc finger transcription factor which plays a critical role in renal and genitourinary development. The WT1 protein was reported to both activate and repress transcription. We found that the transcriptional effect of WT1 on the Egr1 promoter could be modulated by the use of expression vectors containing different promoters. WT1 activated the Egr1 promoter when expression of WT1 was driven by the Rous sarcoma virus promoter. In contrast, a cytomegalovirus (CMV) promoter-containing WT1 expression vector repressed the Egr1 promoter. However, WT1 activated transcription of a simple test promoter, EGR3tkCAT, regardless of the expression vector used. Co-transfection of the parental CMV-based vector strongly depressed the basal activity of the Egr1-CAT reporter, suggesting that the CMV promoter competes with the Egr1 promoter for transcription factors or co-factors which may be required for activation by WT1. In support of this hypothesis, WT1 was converted from an activator to a repressor by co-transfection of an excess of the parental CMV-based vector. These results provide an important caveat to the interpretation of co-transfection studies and confirm the bi-functional nature of the WT1 transcription factor.

Transcriptional activation and repression, two properties of the lymphoid-specific transcription factor Oct-2a

The lymphoid-specific transcription factor Oct-2a contains two transcriptional activation domains which are located within the N-terminal and C-terminal regions. To study their differential activation properties, we linked the isolated effector domains to the GAL4 DNA-binding domain. We have shown that both activating regions of Oct-2a, isolated from their natural context, can activate transcription as promoter factors. In contrast to the C-terminus, activation by the N-terminal domain is dependent on a yet unidentified factor(s) binding to the simian virus 40 enhancer. The results obtained by duplication of activation domains or their mixed combination suggest that the domains are functionally independent. However, activation from a remote position could only be achieved with the C-terminus of Oct-2a in B cells. In lymphoid cells, higher activation levels were observed, suggesting that distinct B-cell-specific cofactors in concert with the effector domains of Oct-2a might be involved in mediating transcription from proximal and remote positions. Furthermore, we identified a repression domain at the N-terminus of Oct-2a. When transferred to a potent activator, transcriptional stimulation was inhibited efficiently. These results underscore the modular structure of Oct-2a with separable domains for activation and repression and suggest that Oct-2a might have complex regulatory functions in vivo.

Ligand-independent repression by the thyroid hormone receptor mediated by a nuclear receptor co-repressor

Thyroid-hormone and retinoic-acid receptors exert their regulatory functions by acting as both activators and repressors of gene expression. A nuclear receptor co-repressor (N-CoR) of relative molecular mass 270K has been identified which mediates ligand-independent inhibition of gene transcription by these receptors, suggesting that the molecular mechanisms of repression by thyroid-hormone and retinoic-acid receptors are analogous to the co-repressor-dependent transcriptional inhibitory mechanisms of yeast and Drosophila.

Transcriptional activation domains of the Ah receptor and Ah receptor nuclear translocator

The Ah receptor (AhR) and Ah receptor nuclear translocator (Arnt) heterodimer bind the xenobiotic-responsive element (XRE) sequence in the upstream region of the genes for some drug-metabolizing enzymes, such as P4501A1 and glutathione S-transferase Ya, to activate their transcription. This paper describes transcriptional activation domains of the AhR and Arnt as examined in vivo by DNA transfection experiments using GAL4-AhR or GAL4-Arnt chimeric plasmids and a reporter plasmid containing five GAL4 DNA binding sites. The major activation domain of Arnt was localized in a short segment of the C-terminal 34 amino acids, while the glutamine-rich domain of Arnt showed no transcriptional activity. This activation domain of Arnt could be further divided into two subdomains with some sequence similarity. Point mutation analysis of one of the subdomains revealed that bulky hydrophobic amino acids and neighboring acidic amino acids were necessary for the transcription-enhancing activity of Arnt. The C-terminal half of the AhR showed a strong transcription-stimulating activity, apparently five times as strong as that of Arnt. Further analysis of the activity revealed that the C-terminal transcriptional activity was distributed in several activation domains, one of which is rich in glutamine residues. These results indicate that the glutamine-rich domains of the AhR and Arnt function differently in the heterodimer regulatory complex. Previously, we showed that the enhancer activity of XRE was repressed by E1A proteins, especially the 12S form of E1A. Cotransfection experiments using an E1A12S expression plasmid and a GAL4-AhR or GAL4-Arnt expression plasmid demonstrated that E1A protein rather predominantly inhibited the transcriptional activity of Arnt.