Transcription factor TFIIH is required for promoter melting in vivo

PARylation During Transcription: Insights into the Fine-Tuning Mechanism and Regulation

Transcription is a multistep, tightly regulated process. During transcription initiation, promoter recognition and pre-initiation complex (PIC) formation take place, in which dynamic recruitment or exchange of transcription activators occur. The precise coordination of the recruitment and removal of transcription factors, as well as chromatin structural changes, are mediated by post-translational modifications (PTMs). Poly(ADP-ribose) polymerases (PARPs) are key players in this process, since they can modulate DNA-binding activities of specific transcription factors through poly-ADP-ribosylation (PARylation). PARylation can regulate the transcription at three different levels: (1) by directly affecting the recruitment of specific transcription factors, (2) by triggering chromatin structural changes during initiation and as a response to cellular stresses, or (3) by post-transcriptionally modulating the stability and degradation of specific mRNAs. In this review, we principally focus on these steps and summarise the recent findings, demonstrating the mechanisms through which PARylation plays a potential regulatory role during transcription and DNA repair.

A DNA-sensing-independent role of a nuclear RNA helicase, DHX9, in stimulation of NF-κB-mediated innate immunity against DNA virus infection

DExD/H-box helicase 9 (DHX9), or RNA helicase A (RHA), is an abundant multifunctional nuclear protein. Although it was previously reported to act as a cytosolic DNA sensor in plasmacytoid dendritic cells (pDCs), the role and molecular mechanisms of action of DHX9 in cells that are not pDCs during DNA virus infection are not clear. Here, a macrophage-specific knockout and a fibroblast-specific knockdown of DHX9 impaired antiviral innate immunity against DNA viruses, leading to increased virus replication. DHX9 enhanced NF-κB–mediated transactivation in the nucleus, which required its ATPase-dependent helicase (ATPase/helicase) domain, but not the cytosolic DNA-sensing domain. In addition, DNA virus infection did not induce cytoplasmic translocation of nuclear DHX9 in macrophages and fibroblasts. Nuclear DHX9 was associated with a multiprotein complex including both NF-κB p65 and RNA polymerase II (RNAPII) in chromatin containing NF-κB–binding sites. DHX9 was essential for the recruitment of RNAPII rather than NF-κB p65, to the corresponding promoters; this function also required its ATPase/helicase activity. Taken together, our results show a critical role of nuclear DHX9 (as a transcription coactivator) in the stimulation of NF-κB–mediated innate immunity against DNA virus infection, independently of DHX9’s DNA-sensing function.

TFIIE orchestrates the recruitment of the TFIIH kinase module at promoter before release during transcription

In eukaryotes, the general transcription factors TFIIE and TFIIH assemble at the transcription start site with RNA Polymerase II. However, the mechanism by which these transcription factors incorporate the preinitiation complex and coordinate their action during RNA polymerase II transcription remains elusive. Here we show that the TFIIEα and TFIIEβ subunits anchor the TFIIH kinase module (CAK) within the preinitiation complex. In addition, we show that while RNA polymerase II phosphorylation and DNA opening occur, CAK and TFIIEα are released from the promoter. This dissociation is impeded by either ATP-γS or CDK7 inhibitor THZ1, but still occurs when XPB activity is abrogated. Finally, we show that the Core-TFIIH and TFIIEβ are subsequently removed, while elongation factors such as DSIF are recruited. Remarkably, these early transcriptional events are affected by TFIIE and TFIIH mutations associated with the developmental disorder, trichothiodystrophy.

The general transcription factors TFIIE and TFIIH assemble at the transcription start site with RNA Polymerase II. Here the authors provide evidence that the TFIIEα and TFIIEβ subunits anchor the TFIIH kinase module within the preinitiation complex before their release during transcription.

Role of integrative structural biology in understanding transcriptional initiation

Integrative structural biology combines data from multiple experimental techniques to generate complete structural models for the biological system of interest. Most commonly cross-linking data sets are employed alongside electron microscopy maps, crystallographic structures, and other data by computational methods that integrate all known information and produce structural models at a level of resolution that is appropriate to the input data. The precision of these modelled solutions is limited by the sparseness of cross-links observed, the length of the cross-linking reagent, the ambiguity arisen from the presence of multiple copies of the same protein, and structural and compositional heterogeneity. In recent years integrative structural biology approaches have been successfully applied to a range of RNA polymerase II complexes. Here we will provide a general background to integrative structural biology, a description of how it should be practically implemented and how it has furthered our understanding of the biology of large transcriptional assemblies. Finally, in the context of recent breakthroughs in microscope and direct electron detector technology, where increasingly EM is capable of resolving structural features directly without the aid of other structural techniques, we will discuss the future role of integrative structural techniques.

Genome-wide uniformity of human 'open' pre-initiation complexes

Transcription of protein-coding and noncoding DNA occurs pervasively throughout the mammalian genome. Their sites of initiation are generally inferred from transcript 5' ends and are thought to be either locally dispersed or focused. How these two modes of initiation relate is unclear. Here, we apply permanganate treatment and chromatin immunoprecipitation (PIP-seq) of initiation factors to identify the precise location of melted DNA separately associated with the preinitiation complex (PIC) and the adjacent paused complex (PC). This approach revealed the two known modes of transcription initiation. However, in contrast to prevailing views, they co-occurred within the same promoter region: initiation originating from a focused PIC, and broad nucleosome-linked initiation. PIP-seq allowed transcriptional orientation of Pol II to be determined, which may be useful near promoters where sufficient sense/anti-sense transcript mapping information is lacking. PIP-seq detected divergently oriented Pol II at both coding and noncoding promoters, as well as at enhancers. Their occupancy levels were not necessarily coupled in the two orientations. DNA sequence and shape analysis of initiation complex sites suggest that both sequence and shape contribute to specificity, but in a context-restricted manner. That is, initiation sites have the locally "best" initiator (INR) sequence and/or shape. These findings reveal a common core to pervasive Pol II initiation throughout the human genome.

Transcription factors that influence RNA polymerases I and II: To what extent is mechanism of action conserved?

In eukaryotic cells, nuclear RNA synthesis is accomplished by at least three unique, multisubunit RNA polymerases. The roles of these enzymes are generally partitioned into the synthesis of the three major classes of RNA: rRNA, mRNA, and tRNA for RNA polymerases I, II, and III respectively. Consistent with their unique cellular roles, each enzyme has a complement of specialized transcription factors and enzymatic properties. However, not all transcription factors have evolved to affect only one eukaryotic RNA polymerase. In fact, many factors have been shown to influence the activities of multiple nuclear RNA polymerases. This review focuses on a subset of these factors, specifically addressing the mechanisms by which these proteins influence RNA polymerases I and II.

RNA polymerase II pausing as a context-dependent reader of the genome

The RNA polymerase II (Pol II) transcribes all mRNA genes in eukaryotes and is among the most highly regulated enzymes in the cell. The classic model of mRNA gene regulation involves recruitment of the RNA polymerase to gene promoters in response to environmental signals. Higher eukaryotes have an additional ability to generate multiple cell types. This extra level of regulation enables each cell to interpret the same genome by committing to one of the many possible transcription programs and executing it in a precise and robust manner. Whereas multiple mechanisms are implicated in cell type-specific transcriptional regulation, how one genome can give rise to distinct transcriptional programs and what mechanisms activate and maintain the appropriate program in each cell remains unclear. This review focuses on the process of promoter-proximal Pol II pausing during early transcription elongation as a key step in context-dependent interpretation of the metazoan genome. We highlight aspects of promoter-proximal Pol II pausing, including its interplay with epigenetic mechanisms, that may enable cell type-specific regulation, and emphasize some of the pertinent questions that remain unanswered and open for investigation.

Archaeal TFEα/β is a hybrid of TFIIE and the RNA polymerase III subcomplex hRPC62/39

Transcription initiation of archaeal RNA polymerase (RNAP) and eukaryotic RNAPII is assisted by conserved basal transcription factors. The eukaryotic transcription factor TFIIE consists of α and β subunits. Here we have identified and characterised the function of the TFIIEβ homologue in archaea that on the primary sequence level is related to the RNAPIII subunit hRPC39. Both archaeal TFEβ and hRPC39 harbour a cubane 4Fe-4S cluster, which is crucial for heterodimerization of TFEα/β and its engagement with the RNAP clamp. TFEα/β stabilises the preinitiation complex, enhances DNA melting, and stimulates abortive and productive transcription. These activities are strictly dependent on the β subunit and the promoter sequence. Our results suggest that archaeal TFEα/β is likely to represent the evolutionary ancestor of TFIIE-like factors in extant eukaryotes.

Fluorescently labeled recombinant RNAP system to probe archaeal transcription initiation

The transcriptional apparatus is one of the most complex cellular machineries and in order to fully appreciate the behavior of these protein-nucleic acid assemblies one has to understand the molecular details of the system. In addition to classical biochemical and structural studies, fluorescence-based techniques turned out as an important--and sometimes the critical--tool to obtain information about the molecular mechanisms of transcription. Fluorescence is not only a multi-modal parameter that can report on molecular interactions, environment and oligomerization status. Measured on the single-molecule level it also informs about the heterogeneity of the system and gives access to distances and distance changes in the molecular relevant nanometer regime. A pre-requisite for fluorescence-based measurements is the site-specific incorporation of one or multiple fluorescent dyes. In this respect, the archaeal transcription system is ideally suited as it is available in a fully recombinant form and thus allows for site-specific modification via sophisticated labeling schemes. The application of fluorescence based approaches to the archaeal transcription apparatus changed our understanding of the molecular mechanisms and dynamics that drive archaeal transcription and unraveled the architecture of transcriptional complexes not amenable to structural interrogation.

Structural basis of transcription initiation by RNA polymerase II

Transcription of eukaryotic protein-coding genes commences with the assembly of a conserved initiation complex, which consists of RNA polymerase II (Pol II) and the general transcription factors, at promoter DNA. After two decades of research, the structural basis of transcription initiation is emerging. Crystal structures of many components of the initiation complex have been resolved, and structural information on Pol II complexes with general transcription factors has recently been obtained. Although mechanistic details await elucidation, available data outline how Pol II cooperates with the general transcription factors to bind to and open promoter DNA, and how Pol II directs RNA synthesis and escapes from the promoter.

Global regulation of promoter melting in naive lymphocytes

Lymphocyte activation is initiated by a global increase in messenger RNA synthesis. However, the mechanisms driving transcriptome amplification during the immune response are unknown. By monitoring single-stranded DNA genome wide, we show that the genome of naive cells is poised for rapid activation. In G0, ∼90% of promoters from genes to be expressed in cycling lymphocytes are polymerase loaded but unmelted and support only basal transcription. Furthermore, the transition from abortive to productive elongation is kinetically limiting, causing polymerases to accumulate nearer to transcription start sites. Resting lymphocytes also limit the expression of the transcription factor IIH complex, including XPB and XPD helicases involved in promoter melting and open complex extension. To date, two rate-limiting steps have been shown to control global gene expression in eukaryotes: preinitiation complex assembly and polymerase pausing. Our studies identify promoter melting as a third key regulatory step and propose that this mechanism ensures a prompt lymphocyte response to invading pathogens.

Mouse model of endemic Burkitt translocations reveals the long-range boundaries of Ig-mediated oncogene deregulation

Human Burkitt lymphomas are divided into two main clinical variants: the endemic form, affecting African children infected with malaria and the Epstein-Barr virus, and the sporadic form, distributed across the rest of the world. However, whereas sporadic translocations decapitate Myc from 5' proximal regulatory elements, most endemic events occur hundreds of kilobases away from Myc. The origin of these rearrangements and how they deregulate oncogenes at such distances remain unclear. We here recapitulate endemic Burkitt lymphoma-like translocations in plasmacytomas from uracil N-glycosylase and activation-induced cytidine deaminase-deficient mice. Mapping of translocation breakpoints using an acetylated histone H3 lysine 9 chromatin immunoprecipitation sequencing approach reveals Igh fusions up to ∼350 kb upstream of Myc or the related oncogene Mycn. A comprehensive analysis of epigenetic marks, PolII recruitment, and transcription in tumor cells demonstrates that the 3' Igh enhancer (Eα) vastly remodels ∼450 kb of chromatin into translocated sequences, leading to significant polymerase occupancy and constitutive oncogene expression. We show that this long-range epigenetic reprogramming is directly proportional to the physical interaction of Eα with translocated sites. Our studies thus uncover the extent of epigenetic remodeling by Ig 3' enhancers and provide a rationale for the long-range deregulation of translocated oncogenes in endemic Burkitt lymphomas. The data also shed light on the origin of endemic-like chromosomal rearrangements.

XPB induces C1D expression to counteract UV-induced apoptosis

Although C1D has been shown to be involved in DNA double-strand break repair, how C1D expression was induced and the mechanism(s) by which C1D facilitates DNA repair in mammalian cells remain poorly understood. We and others have previously shown that expression of xeroderma pigmentosum B (XPB) protein efficiently compensated the UV irradiation-sensitive phenotype of 27-1 cells, which lack functional XPB. To further explore XPB-regulated genes that could be involved in UV-induced DNA repair, differential display analysis of mRNA levels from CHO-9, 27-1, and 27-1 complemented with wild-type XPB was done and C1D gene was identified as one of the major genes whose expression was significantly upregulated by restoring XPB function. We found that XPB is essential to induce C1D transcription after UV irradiation. The increase in C1D expression effectively compensates for the UV-induced proteolysis of C1D and thus maintains cellular C1D level to cope with DNA damage inflicted by UV irradiation. We further showed that although insufficient to rescue 27-1 cells from UV-induced apoptosis by itself, C1D facilitates XPB DNA repair through direct interaction with XPB. Our findings provided direct evidence that C1D is associated with DNA repair complex and may promote repair of UV-induced DNA damage.

The general transcription machinery and general cofactors

In eukaryotes, the core promoter serves as a platform for the assembly of transcription preinitiation complex (PIC) that includes TFIIA, TFIIB, TFIID, TFIIE, TFIIF, TFIIH, and RNA polymerase II (pol II), which function collectively to specify the transcription start site. PIC formation usually begins with TFIID binding to the TATA box, initiator, and/or downstream promoter element (DPE) found in most core promoters, followed by the entry of other general transcription factors (GTFs) and pol II through either a sequential assembly or a preassembled pol II holoenzyme pathway. Formation of this promoter-bound complex is sufficient for a basal level of transcription. However, for activator-dependent (or regulated) transcription, general cofactors are often required to transmit regulatory signals between gene-specific activators and the general transcription machinery. Three classes of general cofactors, including TBP-associated factors (TAFs), Mediator, and upstream stimulatory activity (USA)-derived positive cofactors (PC1/PARP-1, PC2, PC3/DNA topoisomerase I, and PC4) and negative cofactor 1 (NC1/HMGB1), normally function independently or in combination to fine-tune the promoter activity in a gene-specific or cell-type-specific manner. In addition, other cofactors, such as TAF1, BTAF1, and negative cofactor 2 (NC2), can also modulate TBP or TFIID binding to the core promoter. In general, these cofactors are capable of repressing basal transcription when activators are absent and stimulating transcription in the presence of activators. Here we review the roles of these cofactors and GTFs, as well as TBP-related factors (TRFs), TAF-containing complexes (TFTC, SAGA, SLIK/SALSA, STAGA, and PRC1) and TAF variants, in pol II-mediated transcription, with emphasis on the events occurring after the chromatin has been remodeled but prior to the formation of the first phosphodiester bond.

TFIIH XPB mutants suggest a unified bacterial-like mechanism for promoter opening but not escape

DNA helicases open the duplex during DNA replication, repair and transcription. However, RNA polymerase II is the only member of its family with this requirement; RNA polymerases I and III and bacterial RNA polymerases open DNA without a helicase. In this report, characterization of XPB mutants indicates that its helicase activity is not used for RNA polymerase II promoter opening, which is instead driven by its ATPase activity. The mutants have parallels in sigma(54) bacterial transcription and this suggests a similar mode of opening DNA for both RNA polymerases, involving ATP-dependent enzyme conformational changes. Promoter escape is defective in these XPB mutants, suggesting that the XPB helicase acts as an ATP-driven motor to reorganize the tightly wrapped multiprotein eukaryotic preinitiation complex during the remodeling that precedes elongation and the coupling to RNA processing events.

The Schizosaccharomyces pombe open promoter bubble: mammalian-like arrangement and properties

The fission yeast Schizosaccharomyces pombe is often used as a genetic system to model processes that apply to higher cells. Here S.pombe was used to study promoter DNA opening and transcription initiation by RNA polymerase II. The melted region within the adh promoter is about 20 bp in size and has the start site near its center. This arrangement is similar to that at the AdML promoter but different from that in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Although expression of human TFIIB shifts the start site to the nearby human position, it does not change the location of the bubble. The start site shift is directed by the C terminus of human TFIIB, in contrast to expectations from S.cerevisiae. The creation of the bubble requires the ATPase motifs of XPB. Overall, the data show that promoter melting and initiation in fission yeast is much more similar to humans than to budding yeast.

Cdk7 is required for full activation of Drosophila heat shock genes and RNA polymerase II phosphorylation in vivo

TFIIH has been implicated in several fundamental cellular processes, including DNA repair, cell cycle progression, and transcription. In transcription, the helicase activity of TFIIH functions to melt promoter DNA; however, the in vivo function of the Cdk7 kinase subunit of TFIIH, which has been hypothesized to be involved in RNA polymerase II (Pol II) phosphorylation, is not clearly understood. Using temperature-sensitive and null alleles of cdk7, we have examined the role of Cdk7 in the activation of Drosophila heat shock genes. Several in vivo approaches, including polytene chromosome immunofluorescence, nuclear run-on assays, and, in particular, a protein-DNA cross-linking assay customized for adults, revealed that Cdk7 kinase activity is required for full activation of heat shock genes, promoter-proximal Pol II pausing, and Pol II-dependent chromatin decondensation. The requirement for Cdk7 occurs very early in the transcription cycle. Furthermore, we provide evidence that TFIIH associates with the elongation complex much longer than previously suspected.

A model of repression: CTD analogs and PIE-1 inhibit transcriptional elongation by P-TEFb

The positive transcription elongation factor b (P-TEFb) contains cyclin T1 (CycT1) and cyclin-dependent kinase 9 (Cdk9). For activating the expression of eukaryotic genes, the histidine-rich sequence in CycT1 binds the heptapeptide repeats in the C-terminal domain (CTD) of RNA polymerase II (RNAPII), whereupon Cdk9 phosphorylates the CTD. We found that alanine-substituted heptapeptide repeats that cannot be phosphorylated also bind CycT1. When placed near transcription units, these CTD analogs block effects of P-TEFb. Remarkably, the transcriptional repressor PIE-1 from Caenorhabditis elegans behaves analogously. It binds CycT1 via an alanine-containing heptapeptide repeat and inhibits transcriptional elongation. Thus, our findings reveal a new mechanism by which repressors inhibit eukaryotic transcription.

Attenuation of a phosphorylation-dependent activator by an HDAC-PP1 complex

The second messenger cAMP stimulates transcription with burst-attenuation kinetics that mirror the PKA-dependent phosphorylation and subsequent protein phosphatase 1 (PP1)-mediated dephosphorylation of the cAMP responsive element binding protein (CREB) at Ser133. Phosphorylation of Ser133 promotes recruitment of the co-activator histone acetylase (HAT) paralogs CBP and P300, which in turn stimulate acetylation of promoter-bound histones during the burst phase. Remarkably, histone deacetylase (HDAC) inhibitors seem to potentiate CREB activity by prolonging Ser133 phosphorylation in response to cAMP stimulus, suggesting a potential role for HDAC complexes in silencing CREB activity. Here we show that HDAC1 associates with and blocks Ser133 phosphorylation of CREB during pre-stimulus and attenuation phases of the cAMP response. HDAC1 promotes Ser133 dephosphorylation via a stable interaction with PP1, which we detected in co-immunoprecipitation and co-purification studies. These results illustrate a novel mechanism by which signaling and chromatin-modifying activities act coordinately to repress the activity of a phosphorylation-dependent activator.

Mutations in the RING domain of TFB3, a subunit of yeast transcription factor IIH, reveal a role in cell cycle progression

The RNA polymerase II general transcription factor TFIIH is composed of 9 known subunits and possesses DNA helicase and protein kinase activities. The kinase subunits of TFIIH in animal cells, Cdk7, cyclin H, and MAT1, were independently isolated as an activity termed CAK (Cdk-activating kinase), which phosphorylates and activates cell cycle kinases. However, CAK activity of TFIIH subunits could not be demonstrated in budding yeast. TFB3, the 38-kDa subunit of yeast TFIIH, is the homolog of mammalian MAT1. By random mutagenesis we have isolated a temperature-sensitive mutation in the conserved RING domain. The mutant Tfb3 protein associates less efficiently with the kinase moiety of TFIIH than the wild type protein. In contrast to lethal mutants in other subunits of TFIIH, this mutation does not impair general transcription. Transcription of CLB2, and possibly other genes, is reduced in the mutant. At the restrictive temperature, the cells display a defect in cell cycle progression, which is manifest at more than one phase of the cycle. To conclude, in the present study we bring another demonstration of the multifunctional nature of TFIIH.

Elongation by RNA polymerase II: structure-function relationship

RNA polymerase II is the eukaryotic enzyme that transcribes all the mRNA in the cell. Complex mechanisms of transcription and its regulation underlie basic functions including differentiation and morphogenesis. Recent evidence indicates the process of RNA chain elongation as a key step in transcription control. Elongation was therefore expected and found to be linked to human diseases. For these reasons, major efforts in determining the structures of RNA polymerases from yeast and bacteria, at rest and as active enzymes, were undertaken. These studies have revealed much information regarding the processes involved in transcription. Eukaryotic RNA polymerases and their homologous bacterial counterparts are flexible enzymes with domains that separate DNA and RNA, prevent the escape of nucleic acids during transcription, allow for extended pausing or "arrest" during elongation, allow for translocation of the DNA and more. Structural studies of RNA polymerases are described below within the context of the process of transcription elongation, its regulation and function.

Marking the start site of RNA polymerase III transcription: the role of constraint, compaction and continuity of the transcribed DNA strand

The effects of breaks in the individual strands of an RNA polymerase III promoter on initiation of transcription have been examined. Single breaks have been introduced at 2 bp intervals in a 24 bp segment that spans the transcriptional start site of the U6 snRNA gene promoter. Their effects on transcription are asymmetrically distributed: transcribed (template) strand breaks downstream of bp-14 (relative to the normal start as +1) systematically shift the start site, evidently by disrupting the normal mechanism that measures distance from DNA-bound TBP. Breaks placed close to the normal start site very strongly inhibit transcription. Breaks in the non-transcribed strand generate only minor effects on transcription. A structure-based model interprets these observations and explains how the transcribed strand is used to locate the transcriptional start site.

NF-kappaB binds P-TEFb to stimulate transcriptional elongation by RNA polymerase II

To stimulate transcriptional elongation of HIV-1 genes, the transactivator Tat recruits the positive transcription elongation factor b (P-TEFb) to the initiating RNA polymerase II (RNAPII). We found that the activation of transcription by RelA also depends on P-TEFb. Similar to Tat, RelA activated transcription when tethered to RNA. Moreover, TNF-alpha triggered the recruitment of P-TEFb to the NF-kappaB-regulated IL-8 gene. While the formation of the transcription preinitiation complex (PIC) remained unaffected, DRB, an inhibitor of P-TEFb, prevented RNAPII from elongating on the IL-8 gene. Remarkably, DRB inhibition sensitized cells to TNF-alpha-induced apoptosis. Thus, NF-kappaB requires P-TEFb to stimulate the elongation of transcription and P-TEFb plays an unexpected role in regulating apoptosis.

A role of the C-terminal part of p44 in the promoter escape activity of transcription factor IIH

The p44 subunit plays a crucial role in the overall activity of the transcription/DNA repair factor TFIIH: on the one hand its N-terminal domain interacts with and regulates the XPD helicase (, ); on the other hand, as shown in the present study, it participates with the promoter escape reaction. Mutagenesis along with recombinant technology using the baculovirus/insect cells expression system allowed us to define the function of the two structural motifs of the C-terminal moiety of p44: mutations within the C4 zinc finger motif (residues 291-308) prevent incorporation of the p62 subunit within the core TFIIH. Double mutations in the RING finger motif (residues 345-385) allow the synthesis of the first phosphodiester bond by RNA polymerase II, but prevent its escape from the promoter. This highlights the role of transcription factor IIH in the various steps of the transcription initiation process.

RNA polymerase II and TBP occupy the repressed CYC1 promoter

Saccharomyces cerevisiae CYC1 gene expression has been studied in great detail with regard to the response to oxygen availability and carbon source. In the absence of oxygen and the presence of glucose, the CYC1 gene is completely repressed. Chromatin structure is thought to play an important role in CYC1 gene regulation, as nucleosome depletion results in 94-fold derepression. In addition, the CYC1 core promoter has been used extensively in hybrid constructs to study activation by heterologous transcription factors. Therefore, we set out to map the chromatin structure of the CYC1 promoter and determine its role in CYC1 gene regulation. We report here that the repressed CYC1 promoter contains no positioned nucleosomes over the core promoter. However, we did find TFIID and RNA polymerase II bound in a complex on the repressed promoter. These results indicate that recruitment of TFIID and RNA polymerase II are not rate-limiting steps in CYC1 activation.

Transcription of eukaryotic protein-coding genes

The past decade has seen an explosive increase in information about regulation of eukaryotic gene transcription, especially for protein-coding genes. The most striking advances in our knowledge of transcriptional regulation involve the chromatin template, the large complexes recruited by transcriptional activators that regulate chromatin structure and the transcription apparatus, the holoenzyme forms of RNA polymerase II involved in initiation and elongation, and the mechanisms that link mRNA processing with its synthesis. We describe here the major advances in these areas, with particular emphasis on the modular complexes associated with RNA polymerase II that are targeted by activators and other regulators of mRNA biosynthesis.

Defective interplay of activators and repressors with TFIH in xeroderma pigmentosum

Inherited mutations of the TFIIH helicase subunits xeroderma pigmentosum (XP) B or XPD yield overlapping DNA repair and transcription syndromes. The high risk of cancer in these patients is not fully explained by the repair defect. The transcription defect is subtle and has proven more difficult to evaluate. Here, XPB and XPD mutations are shown to block transcription activation by the FUSE Binding Protein (FBP), a regulator of c-myc expression, and repression by the FBP Interacting Repressor (FIR). Through TFIIH, FBP facilitates transcription until promoter escape, whereas after initiation, FIR uses TFIIH to delay promoter escape. Mutations in TFIIH that impair regulation by FBP and FIR affect proper regulation of c-myc expression and have implications in the development of malignancy.

Functional connections between mediator components and general transcription factors of Saccharomyces cerevisiae

The yeast Gal11 protein is an important component of the Mediator complex in RNA polymerase II-directed transcription. Gal11 and the general transcription factor (TF) IIE are involved in regulation of the protein kinase activity of TFIIH that phosphorylates the carboxyl-terminal domain of RNA polymerase II. We have previously shown that Gal11 binds the small and large subunits of TFIIE at two Gal11 domains, A and B, respectively, which are important for normal function of Gal11 in vivo. Here we demonstrate that Gal11 binds directly to TFIIH through domain A in vitro. A null mutation in GAL11 caused lethality of cells when combined with temperature-sensitive mutations in the genes encoding TFIIE or the carboxyl-terminal domain kinase, indicating the presence of genetic interactions between Gal11 and these proteins. Mutational depletion of Gal11 or TFIIE caused inefficient opening of the transcription initiation region, but had no significant effect on TATA-binding protein occupancy of the TATA sequence in vivo. These results suggest that the functions of Gal11 and TFIIE are necessary after recruitment of TATA-binding protein to the TATA box presumably at the step of stable preinitiation complex formation and/or promoter melting. We illustrate genetic interactions between Gal11 and other Mediator components such as Med2 and Pgd1/Hrs1/Med3.

High-resolution localization of Drosophila Spt5 and Spt6 at heat shock genes in vivo: roles in promoter proximal pausing and transcription elongation

Recent studies have demonstrated roles for Spt4, Spt5, and Spt6 in the regulation of transcriptional elongation in both yeast and humans. Here, we show that Drosophila Spt5 and Spt6 colocalize at a large number of transcriptionally active chromosomal sites on polytene chromosomes and are rapidly recruited to endogenous and transgenic heat shock loci upon heat shock. Costaining with antibodies to Spt6 and to either the largest subunit of RNA polymerase II or cyclin T, a subunit of the elongation factor P-TEFb, reveals that all three factors have a similar distribution at sites of active transcription. Crosslinking and immunoprecipitation experiments show that Spt5 is present at uninduced heat shock gene promoters, and that upon heat shock, Spt5 and Spt6 associate with the 5' and 3' ends of heat shock genes. Spt6 is recruited within 2 minutes of a heat shock, similar to heat shock factor (HSF); moreover, this recruitment is dependent on HSF. These findings provide support for the roles of Spt5 in promoter-associated pausing and of Spt5 and Spt6 in transcriptional elongation in vivo.

The glucocorticoid receptor inhibits NFkappaB by interfering with serine-2 phosphorylation of the RNA polymerase II carboxy-terminal domain

Glucocorticoids repress NFkappaB-mediated activation of proinflammatory genes such as interleukin-8 (IL-8) and ICAM-1. Our experiments suggest that the glucocorticoid receptor (GR) confers this effect by associating through protein-protein interactions with NFkappaB bound at each of these genes. That is, we show that the GR zinc binding region (ZBR), which includes the DNA binding and dimerization functions of the receptor, binds directly to the dimerization domain of the RelA subunit of NFkappaB in vitro and that the ZBR is sufficient to associate with RelA bound at NFkappaB response elements in vivo. Moreover, we demonstrate in vivo and in vitro that GR does not disrupt DNA binding by NFkappaB. In transient transfections, we found that the GR ligand binding domain is essential for repression of NFkappaB but not for association with it and that GR can repress an NFkappaB derivative bearing a heterologous activation domain. We used chromatin immunoprecipitation assays in untransfected A549 cells to infer the mechanism by which the tethered GR represses NFkappaB-activated transcription. As expected, we found that the inflammatory signal TNFalpha stimulated preinitiation complex (PIC) assembly at the IL-8 and ICAM-1 promoters and that the largest subunit of RNA polymerase II (pol II) in those complexes became phosphorylated at serines 2 and 5 in its carboxy-terminal domain (CTD) heptapeptide repeats (YSPTSPS); these modifications are required for transcription initiation. Remarkably, GR did not inhibit PIC assembly under repressing conditions, but rather interfered with phosphorylation of serine 2 of the pol II CTD.

Snapshots of RNA polymerase II transcription initiation

Several papers published within the last year utilize innovative techniques for characterizing intermediates in RNA polymerase II transcription. Structural studies of polymerase and its associated factors provide a detailed picture of the transcription machinery, and studies of transcription complex assembly both in vitro and in vivo provide insights into the mechanism of gene expression. A high resolution picture of the transcription complex is likely to be available within the foreseeable future. The challenge is to determine the roles of individual proteins within this surprisingly large molecular machine.

Rad25p, a DNA helicase subunit of yeast transcription factor TFIIH, is required for promoter escape in vivo

The general transcription factor TFIIH is required for initial DNA unwinding and promoter escape by RNA polymerase II in vitro. We examined whether Rad25p, a DNA helicase subunit of TFIIH, mediates promoter opening and promoter escape in the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae. DNA unwinding was probed with an in vivo permanganate reactivity assay, in a temperature-sensitive mutant of RAD25. The consequences of Rad25p inactivation were promoter-specific. Whereas in the TDH2 promoter permanganate reactivity was entirely abolished, the reactivity at the GAL1 and GAL10 promoter regions was only moderately affected. In the GAL genes permanganate reactivity uniformly decreased downstream of the transcription start site, indicating that progression of RNA polymerase II to this region was impaired. Our results suggest that in yeast cells, promoter opening is not sufficient for productive initiation and that Rad25p-mediated promoter escape may be a limiting step in the transcription of some promoters.