Modulation of the Leishmania donovani peroxin 5 quaternary structure by peroxisomal targeting signal 1 ligands

Versatile allosteric properties in Pex5-like tetratricopeptide repeat proteins to induce diverse downstream function

Proteins composed of tetratricopeptide repeat (TPR) arrays belong to the α-solenoid tandem-repeat family that have unique properties in terms of their overall conformational flexibility and ability to bind to multiple protein ligands. The peroxisomal matrix protein import receptor Pex5 comprises two TPR triplets that recognize protein cargos with a specific C-terminal Peroxisomal Targeting Signal (PTS) 1 motif. Import of PTS1-containing protein cargos into peroxisomes through a transient pore is mainly driven by allosteric binding, coupling and release mechanisms, without a need for external energy. A very similar TPR architecture is found in the functionally unrelated TRIP8b, a regulator of the hyperpolarization-activated cyclic nucleotide-gated (HCN) ion channel. TRIP8b binds to the HCN ion channel via a C-terminal sequence motif that is nearly identical to the PTS1 motif of Pex5 receptor cargos. Pex5, Pex5-related Pex9, and TRIP8b also share a less conserved N-terminal domain. This domain provides a second protein cargo-binding site and plays a distinct role in allosteric coupling of initial cargo loading by PTS1 motif-mediated interactions and different downstream functional readouts. The data reviewed here highlight the overarching role of molecular allostery in driving the diverse functions of TPR array proteins, which could form a model for other α-solenoid tandem-repeat proteins involved in translocation processes across membranes.

The hydrophobic region of the Leishmania peroxin 14: requirements for association with a glycosome mimetic membrane

Protein import into the Leishmania glycosome requires docking of the cargo-loaded peroxin 5 (PEX5) receptor to the peroxin 14 (PEX14) bound to the glycosome surface. To examine the LdPEX14–membrane interaction, we purified L. donovani promastigote glycosomes and determined the phospholipid and fatty acid composition. These membranes contained predominately phosphatidylethanolamine, phosphatidylcholine, and phosphatidylglycerol (PG) modified primarily with C18 and C22 unsaturated fatty acid. Using large unilamellar vesicles (LUVs) with a lipid composition mimicking the glycosomal membrane in combination with sucrose density centrifugation and fluorescence-activated cell sorting technique, we established that the LdPEX14 membrane-binding activity was dependent on a predicted transmembrane helix found within residues 149–179. Monolayer experiments showed that the incorporation of PG and phospholipids with unsaturated fatty acids, which increase membrane fluidity and favor a liquid expanded phase, facilitated the penetration of LdPEX14 into biological membranes. Moreover, we demonstrated that the binding of LdPEX5 receptor or LdPEX5–PTS1 receptor–cargo complex was contingent on the presence of LdPEX14 at the surface of LUVs.

Protein transport into peroxisomes: Knowns and unknowns

Peroxisomal matrix proteins are synthesized on cytosolic ribosomes and rapidly transported into the organelle by a complex machinery. The data gathered in recent years suggest that this machinery operates through a syringe-like mechanism, in which the shuttling receptor PEX5 - the "plunger" - pushes a newly synthesized protein all the way through a peroxisomal transmembrane protein complex - the "barrel" - into the matrix of the organelle. Notably, insertion of cargo-loaded receptor into the "barrel" is an ATP-independent process, whereas extraction of the receptor back into the cytosol requires its monoubiquitination and the action of ATP-dependent mechanoenzymes. Here, we review the main data behind this model.

Covalent Label Transfer between Peroxisomal Importomer Components Reveals Export-driven Import Interactions

Peroxisomes are vital metabolic organelles found in almost all eukaryotic organisms, and they rely exclusively on import of their matrix protein content from the cytosol. In vitro import of proteins into isolated peroxisomal fractions has provided a wealth of knowledge on the import process. However, the common method of protease protection garnered no information on the import of an N-terminally truncated PEX5 (PEX5C) receptor construct or peroxisomal malate dehydrogenase 1 (pMDH1) cargo protein into sunflower peroxisomes because of high degrees of protease susceptibility or resistance, respectively. Here we present a means for analysis of in vitro import through a covalent biotin label transfer and employ this method to the import of PEX5C. Label transfer demonstrates that the PEX5C construct is monomeric under the conditions of the import assay. This technique was capable of identifying the PEX5-PEX14 interaction as the first interaction of the import process through competition experiments. Labeling of the peroxisomal protein import machinery by PEX5C demonstrated that this interaction was independent of added cargo protein, and, strikingly, the interaction between PEX5C and the import machinery was shown to be ATP-dependent. These important mechanistic insights highlight the power of label transfer in studying interactions, rather than proteins, of interest and demonstrate that this technique should be applied to future studies of peroxisomal in vitro import.

Structural insights into cargo recognition by the yeast PTS1 receptor

The peroxisomal matrix protein import is facilitated by cycling import receptors that shuttle between the cytosol and the peroxisomal membrane. The import receptor Pex5p mediates the import of proteins harboring a peroxisomal targeting signal of type I (PTS1). Purified recombinant Pex5p forms a dimeric complex with the PTS1-protein Pcs60p in vitro with a KD of 0.19 μm. To analyze the structural basis for receptor-cargo recognition, the PTS1 and adjacent amino acids of Pcs60p were systematically scanned for Pex5p binding by an in vitro site-directed photo-cross-linking approach. The cross-linked binding regions of the receptor were subsequently identified by high resolution mass spectrometry. Most cross-links were found with TPR6, TPR7, as well as the 7C-loop of Pex5p. Surface plasmon resonance analysis revealed a bivalent interaction mode for Pex5p and Pcs60p. Interestingly, Pcs60p lacking its C-terminal tripeptide sequence was efficiently cross-linked to the same regions of Pex5p. The KD value of the interaction of truncated Pcs60p and Pex5p was in the range of 7.7 μm. Isothermal titration calorimetry and surface plasmon resonance measurements revealed a monovalent binding mode for the interaction of Pex5p and Pcs60p lacking the PTS1. Our data indicate that Pcs60p contains a second contact site for its receptor Pex5p, beyond the C-terminal tripeptide. The physiological relevance of the ancillary binding region was supported by in vivo import studies. The bivalent binding mode might be explained by a two-step concept as follows: first, cargo recognition and initial tethering by the PTS1-receptor Pex5p; second, lock-in of receptor and cargo.

Revisiting the intraperoxisomal pathway of mammalian PEX7

Newly synthesized peroxisomal proteins containing a cleavable type 2 targeting signal (PTS2) are transported to the peroxisome by a cytosolic PEX5-PEX7 complex. There, the trimeric complex becomes inserted into the peroxisomal membrane docking/translocation machinery (DTM), a step that leads to the translocation of the cargo into the organelle matrix. Previous work suggests that PEX5 is retained at the DTM during all the steps occurring at the peroxisome but whether the same applies to PEX7 was unknown. By subjecting different pre-assembled trimeric PEX5-PEX7-PTS2 complexes to in vitro co-import/export assays we found that the export competence of peroxisomal PEX7 is largely determined by the PEX5 molecule that transported it to the peroxisome. This finding suggests that PEX7 is also retained at the DTM during the peroxisomal steps and implies that cargo proteins are released into the organelle matrix by DTM-embedded PEX7. The release step does not depend on PTS2 cleavage. Rather, our data suggest that insertion of the trimeric PEX5-PEX7-PTS2 protein complex into the DTM is probably accompanied by conformational alterations in PEX5 to allow release of the PTS2 protein into the organelle matrix.

PEX14 binding to Arabidopsis PEX5 has differential effects on PTS1 and PTS2 cargo occupancy of the receptor

•

The interaction between Arabidopsis PEX5 and PEX14N is independent of cargo binding.

•

The affinity of a PTS1 peptide for PEX5 is unaffected by PEX14N binding.

•

Arabidopsis PEX5 complexes PTS1 and PTS2 cargoes.

•

PEX5 and 7 co-isolate with PEX14N, but the PTS2 cargo thiolase does not.

•

PEX14N does not unload canonical PTS1 cargo peptide in vitro but may play a role in PTS2 release.

PEX5 acts as a cycling receptor for import of PTS1 proteins into peroxisomes and as a co-receptor for PEX7, the PTS2 receptor, but the mechanism of cargo unloading has remained obscure. Using recombinant protein domains we show PEX5 binding to the PEX14N-terminal domain (PEX14N) has no effect on the affinity of PEX5 for a PTS1 containing peptide. PEX5 can form a complex containing both recombinant PTS1 cargo and endogenous PEX7-thiolase simultaneously but isolation of the complex via the PEX14 construct resulted in an absence of thiolase, suggesting a possible role for PEX14 in the unloading of PTS2 cargos.

pMDH1physically interacts with PEX5 by pull down (View interaction)

PEX5Cbinds to PEX14N by filter binding (View interaction)

PEX14Nbinds to PEX5C by pull down (View interaction)

PEX14Nphysically interacts with PEX7 by pull down (View interaction)

PEX5physically interacts with PEX7 by pull down (View interaction)

DCI1physically interacts with PEX5 by pull down (View interaction)

PEX5physically interacts with thiolase PTS2-cargo by pull down (View interaction)

pMDH1physically interacts with PEX7 by pull down (View interaction)

DCI1physically interacts with thiolase PTS2-cargo by pull down (View interaction)

DCI1physically interacts with PEX7 by pull down (View interaction)

PEX14Nphysically interacts with PEX5 by pull down (View interaction)

Redox-regulated cargo binding and release by the peroxisomal targeting signal receptor, Pex5

In its role as a mobile receptor for peroxisomal matrix cargo containing a peroxisomal targeting signal called PTS1, the protein Pex5 shuttles between the cytosol and the peroxisome lumen. Pex5 binds PTS1 proteins in the cytosol via its C-terminal tetratricopeptide domains and delivers them to the peroxisome lumen, where the receptor·cargo complex dissociates. The cargo-free receptor is exported to the cytosol for another round of import. How cargo release and receptor recycling are regulated is poorly understood. We found that Pex5 functions as a dimer/oligomer and that its protein interactions with itself (homo-oligomeric) and with Pex8 (hetero-oligomeric) control the binding and release of cargo proteins. These interactions are controlled by a redox-sensitive amino acid, cysteine 10 of Pex5, which is essential for the formation of disulfide bond-linked Pex5 forms, for high affinity cargo binding, and for receptor recycling. Disulfide bond-linked Pex5 showed the highest affinity for PTS1 cargo. Upon reduction of the disulfide bond by dithiothreitol, Pex5 transitioned to a noncovalent dimer, concomitant with the partial release of PTS1 cargo. Additionally, dissipation of the redox balance between the cytosol and the peroxisome lumen caused an import defect. A hetero-oligomeric interaction between the N-terminal domain (amino acids 1-110) of Pex5 and a conserved motif at the C terminus of Pex8 further facilitates cargo release, but only under reducing conditions. This interaction is also important for the release of PTS1 proteins. We suggest a redox-regulated model for Pex5 function during the peroxisomal matrix protein import cycle.

Peroxisome Dynamics: Molecular Players, Mechanisms, and (Dys)functions

Peroxisomes are remarkably versatile cell organelles whose size, shape, number, and protein content can vary greatly depending on the organism, the developmental stage of the organism’s life cycle, and the environment in which the organism lives. The main functions usually associated with peroxisomes include the metabolism of lipids and reactive oxygen species. However, in recent years, it has become clear that these organelles may also act as intracellular signaling platforms that mediate developmental decisions by modulating extraperoxisomal concentrations of several second messengers. To fulfill their functions, peroxisomes physically and functionally interact with other cell organelles, including mitochondria and the endoplasmic reticulum. Defects in peroxisome dynamics can lead to organelle dysfunction and have been associated with various human disorders. The purpose of this paper is to thoroughly summarize and discuss the current concepts underlying peroxisome formation, multiplication, and degradation. In addition, this paper will briefly highlight what is known about the interplay between peroxisomes and other cell organelles and explore the physiological and pathological implications of this interorganellar crosstalk.

A focused immune response targeting the homotypic binding domain of the carcinoembryonic antigen blocks the establishment of tumor foci in vivo

Metastatic forms of cancers remain the main cause of death in cancer patients. In this study, we demonstrate that directing a sustained antibody response towards the homotypic binding function of CEA interferes with the implantation and development of tumor foci in CEA-expressing transgenic (CEA.Tg) mice. Specifically, vaccinating CEA.Tg mice with a recombinant, altered self-form of the CEA Ig V-like N domain led to the production of circulating IgG1 and IgG2a antibodies that inhibited CEA-mediated adhesion of murine carcinoma expressing CEA (MC38.CEA) and mediated antibody-dependent lysis of tumor cells. Moreover, vaccinated CEA.Tg mice were resistant to the development of tumor nodules in the lungs and the peritoneal cavity, suggesting that mounting a focused antibody response to the CEA N domain may represent a simple therapeutic strategy to control the establishment of metastatic foci in cancer patients.

PEX5 protein binds monomeric catalase blocking its tetramerization and releases it upon binding the N-terminal domain of PEX14

Newly synthesized peroxisomal matrix proteins are targeted to the organelle by PEX5. PEX5 has a dual role in this process. First, it acts as a soluble receptor recognizing these proteins in the cytosol. Subsequently, at the peroxisomal docking/translocation machinery, PEX5 promotes their translocation across the organelle membrane. Despite significant advances made in recent years, several aspects of this pathway remain unclear. Two important ones regard the formation and disruption of the PEX5-cargo protein interaction in the cytosol and at the docking/translocation machinery, respectively. Here, we provide data on the interaction of PEX5 with catalase, a homotetrameric enzyme in its native state. We found that PEX5 interacts with monomeric catalase yielding a stable protein complex; no such complex was detected with tetrameric catalase. Binding of PEX5 to monomeric catalase potently inhibits its tetramerization, a property that depends on domains present in both the N- and C-terminal halves of PEX5. Interestingly, the PEX5-catalase interaction is disrupted by the N-terminal domain of PEX14, a component of the docking/translocation machinery. One or two of the seven PEX14-binding diaromatic motifs present in the N-terminal half of PEX5 are probably involved in this phenomenon. These results suggest the following: 1) catalase domain(s) involved in the interaction with PEX5 are no longer accessible upon tetramerization of the enzyme; 2) the catalase-binding interface in PEX5 is not restricted to its C-terminal peroxisomal targeting sequence type 1-binding domain and also involves PEX5 N-terminal domain(s); and 3) PEX14 participates in the cargo protein release step.

Peroxisome assembly: matrix and membrane protein biogenesis

The biogenesis of peroxisomal matrix and membrane proteins is substantially different from the biogenesis of proteins of other subcellular compartments, such as mitochondria and chloroplasts, that are of endosymbiotic origin. Proteins are targeted to the peroxisome matrix through interactions between specific targeting sequences and receptor proteins, followed by protein translocation across the peroxisomal membrane. Recent advances have shed light on the nature of the peroxisomal translocon in matrix protein import and the molecular mechanisms of receptor recycling. Furthermore, the endoplasmic reticulum has been shown to play an important role in peroxisomal membrane protein biogenesis. Defining the molecular events in peroxisome assembly may enhance our understanding of the etiology of human peroxisome biogenesis disorders.

Comparison of the peroxisomal matrix protein import system of different organisms. Exploration of possibilities for developing inhibitors of the import system of trypanosomatids for anti-parasite chemotherapy

In recent decades, research on peroxisome biogenesis has been particularly boosted since the role of these organelles in metabolism became unraveled. Indeed in plants, yeasts and fungi, peroxisomes play an important role in the adaptation of metabolism during developmental processes and/or altered environmental conditions. In mammals their importance is illustrated by the fact that several severe human inherited diseases have been identified as peroxisome biogenesis disorders (PBD). Particularly interesting are the glycosomes - peroxisome-like organelles in trypanosomatids where the major part of the glycolytic pathway is sequestered - because it was demonstrated that proper compartmentalization of matrix proteins inside glycosomes is essential for the parasite. Although the overall process of peroxisome biogenesis seems well conserved between species, careful study of the literature reveals nonetheless many differences at various steps. In this review, we present a comparison of the first two steps of peroxisome biogenesis - receptor loading and docking at the peroxisomal membrane - in yeasts, mammals, plants and trypanosomatids and highlight major differences in the import process between species despite the conservation of (some of) the proteins involved. Some of the unique features of the process as it occurs in trypanosomatids will be discussed with regard to the possibilities for exploiting them for the development of compounds that could specifically disturb interactions between trypanosomatid peroxins. This strategy could eventually lead to the discovery of drugs against the diseases caused by these parasites.

Getting a camel through the eye of a needle: the import of folded proteins by peroxisomes

Peroxisomes are a family of organelles which have many unusual features. They can arise de novo from the endoplasmic reticulum by a still poorly characterized process, yet possess a unique machinery for the import of their matrix proteins. As peroxisomes lack DNA, their function, which is highly variable and dependent on developmental and/or environmental conditions, is determined by the post-translational import of specific metabolic enzymes in folded or oligomeric states. The two classes of matrix targeting signals for peroxisomal proteins [PTS1 (peroxisomal targeting signal 1) and PTS2] are recognized by cytosolic receptors [PEX5 (peroxin 5) and PEX7 respectively] which escort their cargo proteins to, or possibly across, the peroxisome membrane. Although the membrane translocation mechanism remains unclear, it appears to be driven by thermodynamically favourable binding interactions. Recycling of the receptors from the peroxisome membrane requires ATP hydrolysis for two linked processes: ubiquitination of PEX5 (and the PEX7 co-receptors in yeast) and the function of two peroxisome-associated AAA (ATPase associated with various cellular activities) ATPases, which play a role in recycling or turnover of the ubiquitinated receptors. This review summarizes and integrates recent findings on peroxisome matrix protein import from yeast, plant and mammalian model systems, and discusses some of the gaps in our understanding of this remarkable protein transport system.

Peroxisome matrix and membrane protein biogenesis

Peroxisomes play an important role in lipid metabolic pathways and are implicated in many human disorders. Their biogenesis has been studied over the last two decades using many uni and multi-cellular model systems and many aspects of the mechanisms and proteins involved in peroxisome biogenesis are conserved from yeast to humans. In this manuscript we review the recent progress made in our understanding of the mechanisms by which matrix and membrane proteins are sorted to and assembled into peroxisomes.

Peroxisomes, glyoxysomes and glycosomes (Review)

Peroxisomes, glyoxysomes and glycosomes are related organelles found in different organisms. The morphology and enzymic content of the different members of this organelle family differ considerably, and may also be highly dependent on the cell's environmental conditions or life cycle. However, all peroxisome-like organelles have in common a number of characteristic enzymes or enzyme systems, notably enzymes dealing with reactive oxygen species. All organelles of the family follow essentially the same route of biogenesis, but with species-specific differences. Sets of proteins called peroxins are involved in different aspects of the formation and proliferation of peroxisomes such as import of proteins in the organellar matrix, insertion of proteins in the membrane, etc. In different eukaryotic lineages these functions are carried out by often--but not always--homologous yet poorly conserved peroxins. The process of biogenesis and the nature of the proteins involved suggest that all members of the peroxisome family evolved from a single organelle in an ancestral eukaryotic cell. This original peroxisome was possibly derived from a cellular membrane system such as the endoplasmic reticulum. Most of the organism-specific functions of the extant organelles have been acquired later in evolution.

Solution structure of human Pex5.Pex14.PTS1 protein complexes obtained by small angle X-ray scattering

The Pex5p receptor recognizes newly synthesized peroxisomal matrix proteins which have a C-terminal peroxisomal targeting signal to the peroxisome. After docking to protein complexes on the membrane, these proteins are translocated across the membrane. The docking mechanism remains unclear, as no structural data on the multicomponent docking complex are available. As the interaction of the cargo-loaded Pex5p receptor and the peroxisomal membrane protein Pex14p is the essential primary docking step, we have investigated the solution structure of these complexes by small angle x-ray scattering and static light scattering. Titration studies yielded a 1:6 stoichiometry for the Pex5p.Pex14p complex, and low resolution structural models were reconstructed from the x-ray scattering data. The free full-length human Pex5p is monomeric in solution, with an elongated, partially unfolded N-terminal domain. The model of the complex reveals that the N terminus of Pex5p remains extended in the presence of cargo and Pex14p, the latter proteins being significantly intermingled with the Pex5p moiety. These results suggest that the extended structure of Pex5p may play a role in interactions with other substrates such as lipids and membrane proteins during the formation of functional multiprotein complexes.

Leishmania donovani peroxin 14 undergoes a marked conformational change following association with peroxin 5

The import of PTS1 proteins into the glycosome or peroxisome requires binding of a PTS1-laden PEX5 receptor to the membrane-associated protein PEX14 to facilitate translocation of PTS1 proteins into the lumen of these organelles. Quaternary structure analysis of protozoan parasite Leishmania donovani PEX14 (LdPEX14) revealed that this protein forms a homomeric complex with a size > 670 kDa. Moreover, deletion mapping indicated that disruption of LdPEX14 oligomerization correlated with the elimination of the hydrophobic region and coiled-coil motif present in LdPEX14. Analysis of the LdPEX5-LdPEX14 interaction by isothermal titration calorimetry revealed a molar binding stoichiometry of 1:4 (LdPEX5: LdPEX14) and an in-solution dissociation constant (K(d)) of approximately 74 nm. Calorimetry, circular dichroism, intrinsic fluorescence, and analytical ultracentrifugation experiments showed that binding of LdPEX5 resulted in a dramatic conformational change in the LdPEX14 oligomeric complex that involved the reorganization of the hydrophobic segment in LdPEX14. Finally, limited tryptic proteolysis assays established that in the presence of LdPEX5, LdPEX14 became more susceptible to proteolytic degradation consistent with this protein interaction triggering a significant conformational change in the recombinant and native LdPEX14 structures. These structural changes provide essential clues to how LdPEX14 functions in the translocation of folded proteins across the glycosomal membrane.

Characterization of the role of the receptors PEX5 and PEX7 in the import of proteins into glycosomes of Trypanosoma brucei

Peroxins 5 and 7 are receptors for protein import into the peroxisomal matrix. We studied the involvement of these peroxins in the biogenesis of glycosomes in the protozoan parasite Trypanosoma brucei. Glycosomes are peroxisome-like organelles in which a major part of the glycolytic pathway is sequestered. We here report the characterization of the T. brucei homologue of PEX7 and provide several data strongly suggesting that it can bind to PEX5. Depletion of PEX5 or PEX7 by RNA interference had a severe effect on the growth of both the bloodstream-form of the parasite, that relies entirely on glycolysis for its ATP supply, and the procyclic form representative of the parasite living in the tsetse-fly midgut and in which also other metabolic pathways play a prominent role. The role of the two receptors in import of glycosomal matrix proteins with different types of peroxisome/glycosome-targeting signals (PTS) was analyzed by immunofluorescence and subcellular fractionation studies. Knocking down the expression of either receptor gene resulted, in procyclic cells, in the mislocalization of proteins with both a type 1 or 2 targeting motif (PTS1, PTS2) located at the C- and N-termini, respectively, and proteins with a sequence-internal signal (I-PTS) to the cytosol. Electron microscopy confirmed the apparent integrity of glycosomes in these procyclic cells. In bloodstream-form trypanosomes, PEX7 depletion seemed to affect only the subcellular distribution of PTS2-proteins. Western blot analysis suggested that, in both life-cycle stages of the trypanosome, the levels of both receptors are controlled in a coordinated fashion, by a mechanism that remains to be determined. The observation that both PEX5 and PEX7 are essential for the viability of the parasite indicates that the respective branches of the glycosome-import pathway in which each receptor acts might be interesting drug targets.

Recognition of a functional peroxisome type 1 target by the dynamic import receptor pex5p

Peroxisomes require the translocation of folded and functional target proteins of various sizes across the peroxisomal membrane. We have investigated the structure and function of the principal import receptor Pex5p, which recognizes targets bearing a C-terminal peroxisomal targeting signal type 1. Crystal structures of the receptor in the presence and absence of a peroxisomal target, sterol carrier protein 2, reveal major structural changes from an open, snail-like conformation into a closed, circular conformation. These changes are caused by a long loop C terminal to the 7-fold tetratricopeptide repeat segments. Mutations in residues of this loop lead to defects in peroxisomal import in human fibroblasts. The structure of the receptor/cargo complex demonstrates that the primary receptor-binding site of the cargo is structurally and topologically autonomous, enabling the cargo to retain its native structure and function.

Peroxin 5-peroxin 14 association in the protozoan Leishmania donovani involves a novel protein-protein interaction motif

Import of proteins with a PTS1 (peroxisomal targeting signal 1) into the Leishmania glycosomal organelle involves docking of a PTS1-laden LdPEX5 [Leishmania donovani PEX5 (peroxin 5)] receptor to LdPEX14 on the surface of the glycosomal membrane. In higher eukaryotes, the PEX5-PEX14 interaction is mediated by a conserved diaromatic WXXXY/F motif. Site-directed and deletion mutageneses of the three WXXXY/F repeats in LdPEX5 did not abolish the LdPEX5-LdPEX14 association. Analysis of the equilibrium dissociation constant (K(d)) revealed that ldpex5-W53A (Trp53-->Ala), ldpex5-W293A, ldpex5-W176,293A and ldpex5-W53,176,293A mutant receptors were capable of binding LdPEX14 with affinities comparable with wild-type LdPEX5. That the diaromatic motifs were not required for the LdPEX5-LdPEX14 interaction was further verified by deletion analysis that showed that ldpex5 deletion mutants or ldpex5 fragments lacking the WXXXY/F motifs retained LdPEX14 binding activity. Mapping studies of LdPEX5 indicated that the necessary elements required for LdPEX14 association were localized to a region between residues 290 and 323. Finally, mutational analysis of LdPEX14 confirmed that residues 23-63, which encompass the conserved signature sequence AX2FLX7SPX6FLKGKGL/V present in all PEX14 proteins, are essential for LdPEX5 binding.

Identification and characterization of three peroxins--PEX6, PEX10 and PEX12--involved in glycosome biogenesis in Trypanosoma brucei

Protozoan Kinetoplastida such as the pathogenic trypanosomes compartmentalize several important metabolic systems, including the glycolytic pathway, in peroxisome-like organelles designated glycosomes. Genes for three proteins involved in glycosome biogenesis of Trypanosoma brucei were identified. A preliminary analysis of these proteins, the peroxins PEX6, PEX10 and PEX12, was performed. Cellular depletion of these peroxins by RNA interference affected growth of both mammalian bloodstream-form and insect-form (procyclic) trypanosomes. The bloodstream forms, which rely entirely on glycolysis for their ATP supply, were more rapidly killed. Both by immunofluorescence studies of intact procyclic T. brucei cells and subcellular fractionation experiments involving differential permeabilization of plasma and organellar membranes it was shown that RNAi-dependent knockdown of the expression of each of these peroxins resulted in the partial mis-localization of different types of glycosomal matrix enzymes to the cytoplasm: proteins with consensus motifs such as the C-terminal type 1 peroxisomal targeting signal PTS1 or the N-terminal signal PTS2 and a protein for which the sorting information is present in a polypeptide-internal fragment not containing an identifiable consensus sequence.

Pex5p, the peroxisomal cycling receptor, is a monomeric non-globular protein

In mammals, targeting of newly synthesized peroxisomal matrix proteins to the organelle requires Pex5p, the peroxisomal cycling receptor. Pex5p is a multidomain protein involved in a complex network of transient protein-protein interactions. Besides interacting directly with most peroxisomal proteins en route to the organelle, Pex5p has also binding domains for several components of the peroxisomal docking/translocation machinery. However, our knowledge of how binding of a cargo protein to Pex5p influences its properties is still rather limited. Here, we describe a protease assay particularly useful for identifying and characterizing protein-protein interactions involving human Pex5p. Binding of a PTS1-containing peptide/protein to Pex5p as well as the interaction of this peroxin with the Src homology domain 3 of Pex13p could be easily demonstrated using this assay. To address the possible effects of these Pex5p-interacting peptides/proteins on the assumed quaternary structure of Pex5p, we have analyzed the hydrodynamic properties of human Pex5p using size exclusion chromatography, sucrose gradient centrifugation, and sedimentation equilibrium centrifugation. Our results show that Pex5p is a monomeric protein with an abnormal shape. The implications of these findings on current models of protein translocation across the peroxisomal membrane are discussed.

Biogenesis of peroxisomes

Genetic and proteomic approaches have led to the identification of 32 proteins, collectively called peroxins, which are required for the biogenesis of peroxisomes. Some are responsible for the division and inheritance of peroxisomes; however, most peroxins have been implicated in the topogenesis of peroxisomal proteins. Peroxisomal membrane and matrix proteins are synthesized on free ribosomes in the cytosol and are imported post-translationally into pre-existing organelles (Lazarow PB & Fujiki Y (1985) Annu Rev Cell Biol1, 489-530). Progress has been made in the elucidation of how these proteins are targeted to the organelle. In addition, the understanding of the composition of the peroxisomal import apparatus and the order of events taking place during the cascade of peroxisomal protein import has increased significantly. However, our knowledge on the basic principles of peroxisomal membrane protein insertion or translocation of peroxisomal matrix proteins across the peroxisomal membrane is rather limited. The latter is of particular interest as the peroxisomal import machinery accommodates folded, even oligomeric, proteins, which distinguishes this apparatus from the well characterized translocons of other organelles. Furthermore, the origin of the peroxisomal membrane is still enigmatic. Recent observations suggest the existence of two classes of peroxisomal membrane proteins. Newly synthesized class I proteins are directly targeted to and inserted into the peroxisomal membrane, while class II proteins reach their final destination via the endoplasmic reticulum or a subcompartment thereof, which would be in accord with the idea that the peroxisomal membrane might be derived from the endoplasmic reticulum.

Survey of the year 2004 commercial optical biosensor literature

The year 2004 represents a milestone for the biosensor research community: in this year, over 1000 articles were published describing experiments performed using commercially available systems. The 1038 papers we found represent an approximately 10% increase over the past year and demonstrate that the implementation of biosensors continues to expand at a healthy pace. We evaluated the data presented in each paper and compiled a 'top 10' list. These 10 articles, which we recommend every biosensor user reads, describe well-performed kinetic, equilibrium and qualitative/screening studies, provide comparisons between binding parameters obtained from different biosensor users, as well as from biosensor- and solution-based interaction analyses, and summarize the cutting-edge applications of the technology. We also re-iterate some of the experimental pitfalls that lead to sub-optimal data and over-interpreted results. We are hopeful that the biosensor community, by applying the hints we outline, will obtain data on a par with that presented in the 10 spotlighted articles. This will ensure that the scientific community at large can be confident in the data we report from optical biosensors.