Immunoglobulin replacement treatment by rapid subcutaneous infusion

Anti-Inflammatory and Immunomodulatory Effect of High-Dose Immunoglobulins in Children: From Approved Indications to Off-Label Use

BACKGROUND

The large-scale utilization of immunoglobulins in patients with inborn errors of immunity (IEIs) since 1952 prompted the discovery of their key role at high doses as immunomodulatory and anti-inflammatory therapy, in the treatment of IEI-related immune dysregulation disorders, according to labelled and off-label indications. Recent years have been dominated by a progressive imbalance between the gradual but constant increase in the use of immunoglobulins and their availability, exacerbated by the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic.

OBJECTIVES

To provide pragmatic indications for a need-based application of high-dose immunoglobulins in the pediatric context.

SOURCES

A literature search was performed using PubMed, from inception until 1st August 2023, including the following keywords: anti-inflammatory; children; high dose gammaglobulin; high dose immunoglobulin; immune dysregulation; immunomodulation; immunomodulatory; inflammation; intravenous gammaglobulin; intravenous immunoglobulin; off-label; pediatric; subcutaneous gammaglobulin; subcutaneous immunoglobulin. All article types were considered.

IMPLICATIONS

In the light of the current imbalance between gammaglobulins' demand and availability, this review advocates the urgency of a more conscious utilization of this medical product, giving indications about benefits, risks, cost-effectiveness, and administration routes of high-dose immunoglobulins in children with hematologic, neurologic, and inflammatory immune dysregulation disorders, prompting further research towards a responsible employment of gammaglobulins and improving the therapeutical decisional process.

Subcutaneous immunoglobulin 16.5% for the treatment of pediatric patients with primary antibody immunodeficiency

INTRODUCTION

Human immunoglobulin (IG) administered intravenously (IVIG) or subcutaneously (SCIG) is used to prevent infections in patients with primary immunodeficiency diseases (PIDDs) such as primary antibody immunodeficiencies.

AREAS COVERED

This review provides an overview of PIDD with a focus on SCIG treatment, including the properties and clinical trial results of a new SCIG 16.5% (Cutaquig, Octapharma) in pediatric patients. We also discuss the various benefits of SCIG including stable serum immunoglobulin G levels, high tolerability with fewer systemic side effects, and the flexibility of self-administration.

EXPERT OPINION

Individualized treatment for PIDD in children is necessary given the different factors that affect administration of SCIG. Variables such as the dose, dosing interval, administration sites, and ancillary equipment can be adjusted to impact the long-term satisfaction with SCIG administration in pediatric patients. The successful work that has been conducted by both professional and patient organizations to increase awareness of PIDD, especially in pediatric patients, is substantial and ongoing. The importance of early diagnosis and treatment in the pediatric patient population cannot be overstated. The safety, efficacy, and tolerability of SCIG 16.5% have been demonstrated in pediatric patients with PIDDs providing an additional therapeutic option in this vulnerable population.

Subcutaneous immunoglobulin use in immunoglobulin-naive patients with primary immunodeficiency: a systematic review

Aim: Identify and describe published literature on the use of subcutaneous immunoglobulin (SCIG) as initial immunoglobulin (IG)-replacement therapy for patients with primary immunodeficiency diseases (PID). Methods: We systematically identified and summarized literature in MEDLINE, Embase, BioSciences Information Service and Cochrane Library assessing efficacy/effectiveness, safety/tolerability, health-related quality-of-life (HRQoL) and dosing regimens of SCIG for IG-naive patients with PID. Results: Sixteen studies were included. In IG-naive patients, SCIG managed/reduced infections and demonstrated similar pharmacokinetic parameters to IG-experienced patients; adverse events were mostly minor injection-site pain or discomfort. Three studies reported improvements in HRQoL. Quality of studies was difficult to assess due to limited reporting. Conclusion: Although studies were lacking, available data suggest IG-naive and IG-experienced patients initiating SCIG likely have similar outcomes.

Subcutaneous Gammanorm® by pump or rapid push infusion: Impact of the device on quality of life in adult patients with primary immunodeficiencies

Many patients with immunodeficiencies require lifelong immunoglobulin replacement therapy (IgRT). In a multicenter, randomized, open-label, crossover, non-inferiority 3-month-trial, we compared the impact of the subcutaneous immunoglobulin Gammanorm® administered via pump or syringe (rapid push). Primary endpoint was the life quality index (LQI), secondary endpoints were QoL (SF36v2), satisfaction (TSQM-11), disease and treatment burden (PRISM), incidence of infections and adverse events (AE), treatment costs, and IgG levels. 28/30 patients completed the study. Most of the endpoints were comparable. Drug administrations with rapid push were more frequent, but reduced total time expenditure and some costs. Of the TSQM-11/LQI/SF36 components only "treatment interference with daily activities" was superior with pump and two QoL domains with rapid push. Both delivery devices showed favorable safety. Rapid push was preferred by 34.5% of patients. It proved to be an efficacious and cost-effective alternative to pumps adding to patient choice and increasing flexibility during long-term IgRT.

Overview of subcutaneous immunoglobulin 16.5% in primary and secondary immunodeficiency diseases

Most primary immunodeficiency diseases, and select secondary immunodeficiency diseases, are treated with immunoglobulin (IG) therapy, administered intravenously or subcutaneously (SCIG). The first instance of IG replacement for primary immunodeficiency disease was a 16.5% formulation administered subcutaneously in 1952. While most SCIG products are now a 10 or 20% concentration, this review will focus on SCIG 16.5% products with a historical overview of development, including the early pioneers who initiated and refined IG replacement therapy, as well as key characteristics, manufacturing and clinical studies. In determining an appropriate IG regimen, one must consider specific patient needs, characteristics and preferences. There are advantages to SCIG, such as stable serum immunoglobulin G levels, high tolerability and the flexibility of self-administered home treatment.

Update on immune-mediated therapies for myasthenia gravis

With the exception of thymectomy, immune modulatory treatment strategies and clinical trials in myasthenia gravis over the past 50 y were mainly borrowed from experience in other nonneurologic autoimmune disorders. The current experimental therapy paradigm has significantly changed such that treatments directed against the pathological mechanisms specific to myasthenia gravis are being tested, in some cases as the initial disease indication. Key advances have been made in three areas: (i) the expanded role and long-term benefits of thymectomy, (ii) complement inhibition to prevent antibody-mediated postsynaptic membrane damage, and (iii) neonatal Fc receptor (FcRn) inhibition as in vivo apheresis, removing pathogenic antibodies. Herein, we discuss these advances and the potential for these newer therapies to significantly influence the current treatment paradigms. While these therapies provide exciting new options with rapid efficacy, there are anticipated challenges to their use, especially in terms of a dramatic increase in cost of care for some patients with myasthenia gravis.

Delivery of subcutaneous immunoglobulin by rapid "push" infusion for primary immunodeficiency patients in Manitoba: a retrospective review

Background

Both intravenous and subcutaneous human immune globin G (IgG) replacement (IVIG and SCIG, respectively) reduce severe infection and increase serum IgG levels in primary immune deficiency disorder (PIDD) patients who require replacement. SCIG can be administered either with the aid of an infusion pump, or by patients or caregivers themselves, using butterfly needles and a syringe (“SCIG push”). SCIG offers advantages over IVIG, including higher steady state IgG levels, improved patient quality of life indicators, and decreased cost to the healthcare system, and for these reasons, SCIG has been increasingly used in Manitoba starting in 2007. We sought to determine the effectiveness of SCIG push in our local adult PIDD population.

Methods

We conducted a retrospective chart review of all adult patients enrolled in the SCIG push program in Manitoba, Canada from its inception in November 2007 through September 2018. We included patients who were naïve to IgG replacement prior to SCIG, and those who had received IVIG immediately prior. We collected data regarding serum IgG levels, antibiotic prescriptions, hospital admissions, and adverse events during a pre-defined period prior to and following SCIG initiation. Statistical significance was determined via two-tailed t-test.

Results

62 patients met inclusion criteria, of whom 35 were on IVIG prior and 27 were IgG replacement naïve. SCIG push resulted in an increase in serum IgG levels in those naïve to IgG replacement, as well as in those who received IVIG prior. SCIG push also resulted in a statistically significant reduction in number of antibiotic prescriptions filled in the naïve subgroup, and no significant change in antibiotics filled in the IVIG prior group. 8/62 PIDD patients (12.9%) left the SCIG program during our review period for varying reasons, including side-effects.

Conclusions

In a real-life setting, in the Manitoba adult PIDD population, SCIG push is an effective method of preventing severe infections, with most patients preferring to continue this therapy once initiated.

Quality of Life Differences for Primary Immunodeficiency Patients on Home SCIG versus IVIG

Background

Patients with primary immunodeficiency disease (PIDD) and antibody deficiency require lifelong immunoglobulin replacement therapy. While both subcutaneous immunoglobulin (SCIG) and intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIG) replacement therapy are effective in preventing infection, patients with PIDD still experience worse health-related quality of life (hrQOL) outcomes.

Objective

Assess differences in hrQOL for PIDD patients receiving home SCIG versus IVIG.

Methods

SF-36 surveys were administered by a specialty pharmacy to 630 PIDD patients receiving home SCIG and IVIG at baseline and then every 3 months between 2014 and 2016. Results were analyzed using two-sample t tests and linear mixed effects model. Analysis was repeated for different age categories and trended over time.

Results

Patients receiving SCIG reported statistically significant higher energy fatigue scores (+ 9 points, p < 0.001) but lower perceived role limitations due to physical health scores (− 14 points, p < 0.001). These differences were only observed in patients > 36 years of age. There were no differences in the composite SF-36 score for patients receiving SCIG versus IVIG (+ 1, p = 0.66). Immunoglobulin-naïve patients all improved their hrQOL, but a larger improvement was seen in those initiating SCIG versus IVIG.

Conclusion

Patients with PIDD on home IVIG versus SCIG have similar composite hrQOL scores as measured by the SF-36. In the adult population, initiating immunoglobulin replacement with SCIG may result in more hrQOL improvement compared with IVIG, although personal preferences should also be considered.

Clinical Implications

Patients with PIDD on home IVIG versus SCIG have similar composite health-related quality of life scores as measured by the SF-36.

Capsule Summary

Patients with primary immune-deficiency on home IVIG versus SCIG have similar composite health-related quality of life scores as measured by the SF-36. Personal preferences are important in deciding whether to treat with IVIG or SCIG.

Electronic supplementary material

The online version of this article (10.1007/s10875-019-00705-5) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

Impact of IVIG vs. SCIG on IgG trough level and infection incidence in primary immunodeficiency diseases: A systematic review and meta-analysis of clinical studies

Background

Monthly intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIG) and weekly subcutaneous immunoglobulin (SCIG) have been regarded as therapeutically equivalent treatments for primary immunodeficiency diseases (PIDD). Immunoglobulin G (IgG) trough level is used as a monitoring measure for infection prevention.

Objective

A systematic review and meta-analysis were performed to elucidate the relationship between IgG dosing, trough IgG levels with overall infection incidence in patients with PIDD receiving IVIG and SCIG therapy.

Methods

Medline, EMBASE, Cochrane, Central, and Scopus were searched for studies published from Jan 2010-June 2018, fulfilling the inclusion criteria. DerSimonian and Laird random-effects method were used to pool the difference of IgG trough levels. Random-effect meta-regression was used to evaluate infection incidence per 100 mg/dl IgG trough increase though IVIG and SCIG.

Results

Out of 24 observational studies included, 11 compared IgG trough levels among SCIG and IVIG (mean difference: 73.4 mg/dl, 95% CI: 31.67-119.19 mg/dl, I2 = 45%, p = 0.05), favoring weekly SCIG. For every 100 mg/dl increase in the trough, a linear trend of decreased incidence rates of infection was identified in SCIG patients (p = 0.03), but no similar trend was identified in trough levels vs. infection rates for patients receiving IVIG (p = 0.67).

Conclusion

In our study, weekly SCIG attained a higher trough level in comparison to monthly IVIG. Higher SCIG troughs were associated with lower infection rates, while IVIG troughs demonstrated no relationship.

Primary immunodeficiency diseases in lung disease: warning signs, diagnosis and management

Background

Pulmonary complications are common in primary immunodeficiency diseases (PID) and contribute to morbidity and mortality in these patients. However, their varied presentation and a general lack of awareness of PID in this setting make early diagnosis and treatment difficult. The aim of this study was to define the warning signs of PID in patients with respiratory manifestations, the necessary diagnostic tests, and the therapeutic management of both children and adults.

Methods

A review of the literature was performed, and 43 PID interdisciplinary specialists were consulted.

Results

This document identifies the pulmonary and extrapulmonary manifestations that should prompt a suspicion of PID, the immunological and respiratory tests that should be included in the diagnostic process according to the level of care, recommendations regarding the use of immunoglobulin replacement therapy according to the specific immunodeficiency, and the minimum recommended immunological and pulmonary monitoring in these patients.

Conclusions

This document is the first to combine scientific evidence with the opinion of a broad panel of experts specializing in the treatment of patients with immunodeficiencies. It aims to provide a useful tool for all practitioners who are regularly involved in the management of these patients.

Psychological burden of pediatric primary immunodeficiency

BACKGROUND

Primary immunodeficiency disorder (PID), being a chronic disorder, may increase the prevalence of psychopathologies, but there are few studies on the effect of disease-related factors on psychopathology in this population. The aim of this study was therefore to assess and compare three groups: children with PID who receive i.v. immunoglobulin treatment; children with juvenile idiopathic arthritis (JIA); and healthy controls with respect to their mental health status.

METHODS

Forty-four children with PID, 32 children with JIA and 30 healthy controls, underwent psychiatric evaluation. The Childhood Depression Inventory and the screen for child anxiety-related emotional disorders questionnaire were completed by the participants. The child behavior checklist was completed by the mothers of the participants. In addition, disease-related factors were identified.

RESULTS

The frequency of mood disorders between the three groups differed. There was no difference between the PID and JIA groups with respect to the prevalence of mood disorders and other psychopathologies. The disease-related factors were associated with the frequency of mood disorder in PID patients.

CONCLUSION

The rate of psychopathology was similar in patients with PID and JIA and higher than the controls. Some of the disease-related factors were associated with the frequency of mood disorders in the PID patients.

II Brazilian Consensus on the use of human immunoglobulin in patients with primary immunodeficiencies

In the last few years, new primary immunodeficiencies and genetic defects have been described. Recently, immunoglobulin products with improved compositions and for subcutaneous use have become available in Brazil. In order to guide physicians on the use of human immunoglobulin to treat primary immunodeficiencies, based on a narrative literature review and their professional experience, the members of the Primary Immunodeficiency Group of the Brazilian Society of Allergy and Immunology prepared an updated document of the 1^st Brazilian Consensus, published in 2010. The document presents new knowledge about the indications and efficacy of immunoglobulin therapy in primary immunodeficiencies, relevant production-related aspects, mode of use (routes of administration, pharmacokinetics, doses and intervals), adverse events (major, prevention, treatment and reporting), patient monitoring, presentations available and how to have access to this therapeutic resource in Brazil.

Home-Based Subcutaneous Infusion of Immunoglobulin for Primary and Secondary Immunodeficiencies: A Health Technology Assessment

BACKGROUND

There are currently two methods used to administer immunoglobulin: intravenous (IV) infusion, the conventional method, and subcutaneous (SC) infusion, a newer alternative. The aim of this assessment was to compare administration of SC immunoglobulin at home with IV immunoglobulin in hospital with respect to benefits, harm, and costs. We also investigated the lived experiences of patients, looking at their quality of life, satisfaction, opinions, and preferences.

METHODS

We searched the literature for studies that compared home-based SC infusion with hospital- or clinic-based IV infusion of immunoglobulin in the treatment of primary and secondary immunodeficiency in adults and children. Two review authors reviewed the abstracts and full text of the relevant studies, and abstracted the data.We also performed a review of the economic literature comparing SC infusion at home versus IV infusion of immunoglobulin in a hospital or outpatient clinic in patients with primary or secondary immunodeficiency disorders. We also performed a budget impact analysis to estimate the 5-year cost burden of funding home-based SC infusion programs. All costs were reported in 2017 Canadian dollars.This health technology assessment followed a consultation plan for public engagement. We focused on interviews to examine the lived experience of patients with immunodeficiency, including those having experience of intravenous and/or subcutaneous immunoglobulin treatment.

RESULTS

Sixteen studies met the inclusion criteria. The annual rate of serious bacterial infection per patient did not differ. The annual rate of all infections per patient was relatively lower with home-based SC infusion than with hospital-based IV infusion. Both methods provided an adequate blood (serum) level of immunoglobulin and the pooled mean difference in immunoglobulin level favoured home-based SC infusion. Severe adverse reactions were rare with either method. The risk of adverse events such as fever or headache were higher with IV, while SC infusion sometimes caused infusion site reactions such as swelling, redness, or pain. Where reported, incidence of hospitalization, antibiotic use, and missed days from work or school either did not differ or were lower for SC infusion. The Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) of evidence for these outcomes was determined to be low.The scores for quality of life and treatment satisfaction either did not differ between the two methods or were significantly higher for some domains with home-based SC infusion. The three important concerns of patients in Ontario regarding home-based programs are loss of supervision, cost, and frequent injections.We identified four economic studies with six analyses (five cost-minimization and one cost-utility). All six analyses suggested that home-based infusion has lower costs, with one also showing greater effectiveness. Results of the budget impact analysis suggest that funding home-based SC infusion program would yield savings of about $0.4 million in the first year, and about $1.6 million by year 5. The total savings from funding home-based SC infusion are approximately $5.0 million over 5 years. Greater savings are indicated when the analysis is conducted from the societal perspective.In speaking directly with patients and their caregivers we found that immunodeficiency reduces quality of life. Intravenous treatment was said to be effective but consumed time and induced side-effects.

CONCLUSIONS

The best available evidence suggests that home-based SC infusion is safe and effective, with clinical outcomes that are comparable to the clinical outcomes of hospital IV infusion. The quality of evidence is low, however, meaning that we cannot be certain about these findings. The shift from hospital-based IV to home-based SC has the potential to reduce the health care costs due to savings in nursing time in Ontario. Patients and caregivers expressed preference for home-based SC treatment as it reduces treatment burden and improves overall quality of life.

A cohort of French pediatric patients with primary immunodeficiencies: are patient preferences regarding replacement immunotherapy fulfilled in real-life conditions?

OBJECTIVE

To assess quality of life and satisfaction regarding immunoglobulin-replacement therapy (IgRT) treatment according to the route (intravenous Ig [IVIg] or subcutaneous Ig [SCIg]) and place of administration (home-based IgRT or hospital-based IgRT).

SUBJECTS AND METHODS

Children 5-15 years old treated for primary immunodeficiency disease (PIDD) with IgRT for ≥3 months were included in a prospective, noninterventional cohort study and followed over 12 months. Quality of life was assessed with the Child Health Questionnaire - parent form (CHQ-PF)-50 questionnaire. Satisfaction with IgRT was measured with a three-dimensional scale (Life Quality Index [LQI] with three components: factor I [F_I], treatment interference; F_II, therapy-related problems; F_III, therapy settings).

RESULTS

A total of 44 children (9.7±3.2 years old) receiving IgRT for a mean of 5.6±4.5 years (median 4.1 years) entered the study: 18 (40.9%) were receiving hospital-based IVIg, two (4.6%) were receiving home-based IVIg, and 24 (54.6%) were treated by home-based SCIg. LQI F_III was higher for home-based SCIg than for hospital-based IVIg (P=0.0003), but there was no difference for LQI F_I or LQI F_II. LQI F_III significantly improved in five patients who switched from IVIg to SCIg during the follow-up when compared to patients who pursued the same regimen (either IVIg or SCIg). No difference was found on CHQ-PF50 subscales, LQI F_I, or LQI F_II.

CONCLUSION

Home-based SCIg gave higher satisfaction regarding therapy settings than hospital-based IVIg. No difference was found on other subscales of the LQI or CHQ-PF50 between hospital-based IVIG and home-based SCIG.

Update on the use of immunoglobulin in human disease: A review of evidence

Human immunoglobulin preparations for intravenous or subcutaneous administration are the cornerstone of treatment in patients with primary immunodeficiency diseases affecting the humoral immune system. Intravenous preparations have a number of important uses in the treatment of other diseases in humans as well, some for which acceptable treatment alternatives do not exist. We provide an update of the evidence-based guideline on immunoglobulin therapy, last published in 2006. Given the potential risks and inherent scarcity of human immunoglobulin, careful consideration of its indications and administration is warranted.

Improving Quality of Life at Home for Pediatric Patients and Families With Primary Immune Deficiencies Using Subcutaneous Immune Globulin Infusions

Pediatric patients diagnosed with primary antibody deficiencies often require lifelong immune globulin replacement to help protect them from life-threatening infections. Although this is not a cure or a treatment for the disorder, replacement therapy is necessary to maintain health. The two current viable routes for immune globulin replacement are intravenous or subcutaneous. For many patients, subcutaneous infusions improve quality of life by offering greater independence and better control of the therapy situation and daily life. Subcutaneous infusions have been shown to be easy for both adult patients and children and their parents and to be safe, with minimal or no systemic reactions and no transmission of the hepatitis C virus. All of these factors are very important when considering replacement therapy. Home nursing care and support can also help provide additional support to improve treatment outcomes to enhance quality of life.

Clinical experiences in primary and secondary immunodeficiencies and immune-mediated conditions using Gammanorm(®)

Treatment for primary and secondary immunodeficiency disorders focuses on prevention and management of infections, using immunoglobulin G (IgG) replacement therapy with regular intravenous or subcutaneous IgG (SCIG) infusions. SCIG therapy has many advantages including improved efficacy and tolerability, enhanced patient satisfaction and lower costs. A number of SCIG preparations are available, including Gammanorm(®) (Octapharma AG), a ready-to-use 16.5% liquid preparation of IgG, with low viscosity, well suited to self-administration and a long history of use. Clinical experience with Gammanorm has shown that it is effective and well tolerated in children and adults, including pregnant women, for primary and secondary immunodeficiency disorders. Recent data also suggest SCIG may have a role in the treatment of certain immune-mediated conditions.

A Comparative Study of Intravenous Immunoglobulin and Subcutaneous Immunoglobulin in Adult Patients with Primary Immunodeficiency Diseases: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Subcutaneous immunoglobulin (SCIG) is a new therapeutic procedure for patients with primary immunodeficiency (PI). This research is a systematic review of studies on the efficacy and safety of intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIG) and SCIG in adult patients with PI. This study includes a systematic review of cohorts and randomized clinical trials (24 articles) from 5 databases with no time limits. Random effects meta-analysis was performed for outcomes such as efficacy and safety. Standard mean difference (SMD) of serum immunoglobulin level was equal to 0.336 (P <0.01; 0.205-0.467) and the odds ratio (OR) of side effects was 0.497 (P=0.1; 0.180-1.371). The results indicate that SCIG leads to a higher level of immunoglobulin and a reduction in side effects but shows the same infection rate as IVIG. Our analysis shows that shifting from IVIG to SCIG therapy can have clinical benefits for PI patients.

Health-related quality of life in patients with primary immunodeficiency disease

Primary immunodeficiency disease (PIDD) with hypogammaglobulinemia is characterized by recurrent and severe bacterial infections and IgG replacement is the standard of care in many of these patients. Health-related quality of life (HRQOL) is becoming increasingly recognized as a factor that affects patient well-being and treatment preferences. In an effort to better understand what factors affect HRQOL in patients with PIDD, we reviewed the published literature that used standardized instruments for the measurement of HRQOL. We investigated HRQOL in PIDD patients compared with normal controls and patients with other chronic diseases; we also investigated the impact of treatment administration on patient satisfaction. The most commonly encountered health-related quality of life instruments were the child heath questionnaire parental form 50, short form 36, PedsQL 4.0, Lansky's play performance scale, and Life Quality Index. Patients with PIDD scored significantly lower on many of the instruments compared with normal controls. Also, while it appears that many patients appreciate home-based and subcutaneous IgG replacement therapy, patient satisfaction ultimately involves various clinical factors and individual patient preferences. By further analyzing what factors impact HRQOL, therapy adjustments can be made to maximize patient well-being and minimize disease impact on daily functioning.

Experience with Subgam, a Subcutaneously Administered Human Normal Immunoglobulin (ClinicalTrials.gov--NCT02247141)

Background and Objectives

A multi-centre, non-comparative study examining the efficacy and safety of Subgam, a normal immunoglobulin (IgG) given weekly as a rapid subcutaneous infusion to patients with primary immune deficiency (PID), is reported. Also included is a summary of adverse drug reactions associated with the use of marketed Subgam in the UK.

Materials and Methods

50 patients with stable PID on IgG therapy were enrolled: Stage 1 included three infusions with prior IgG product followed by 6 months with Subgam, Stage 2 involved long-term Subgam therapy up to 4 years.

Results

Stage 1, 85% of the subjects aged >12 years and 93% of the subjects aged <12 years achieved IgG levels ≥6 and ≥4 g/L, respectively at all observations. There were 3.62 infections/patient/year during Subgam treatment. The most common product-related events were infusion site reactions (50% of patients). Recent post-hoc pharmacokinetics analysis of the post-infusion serum total IgG concentration indicated that the mean dose-normalised incremental IgG AUCτ following intravenous dosing (120.5 g.day/L) was 1.64-fold that of the dose-normalised mean incremental IgG AUCτ following subcutaneous dosing (73.6 g.day/L), corresponding to an estimated IgG bioavailability for subcutaneous dosing of 61%. Only 34 post-licensing adverse reactions have been received in 30 patients over a period of 10 years; fourteen were classed as serious as defined by the ICH guidelines on good clinical practice. The most common post-licensing adverse reaction was infusion site reaction (7 reports). There were 7 reports of flu-like symptoms (pyrexia/shivering/rigors/feeling hot or cold), 2 other reports of combined flu-like symptoms and infusion site reactions, 5 reports of generalised skin reactions, and 3 reports of combined infusion site and skin reactions. There were also reports of anaphylaxis (2 reports) and 8 other adverse events (including headache). In conclusion, Subgam is effective and well tolerated in the treatment of PID.

Trial Registration

ClinicalTrials.gov NCT02247141

Overview of recombinant human hyaluronidase-facilitated subcutaneous infusion of IgG in primary immunodeficiencies

Subcutaneous administration of immunoglobulin (IGSC) in a home setting, compared with intravenous administration, can improve patient quality of life. During IGSC, however, the subcutaneous extracellular matrix inhibits flow and fluid entry into the vascular compartment, which limits the amount of drug delivered. Recombinant human hyaluronidase (rHuPH20) increases the absorption and dispersion of infused fluids and drugs. Results from a Phase III, prospective, open-label, noncontrolled study of patients with primary immunodeficiencies indicated that IGSC infusion, facilitated by rHuPH20, is well tolerated and delivers infusion volumes at treatment intervals and rates equivalent to intravenous administration. This drug evaluation provides an overview of rHuPH20 and results of clinical studies of IGSC infusion facilitated by rHuPH20 in patients with primary immunodeficiencies.

Intravenous and subcutaneous immunoglobulin replacement: a two-way road. Optimizing healthcare quality in patients with primary immunodeficiencies

PURPOSE

To evaluate the alternate use of subcutaneous immunoglobulin (SCIG) and intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIG) in patients with primary immunodeficiencies (PID) in a third-level Pediatric University Hospital.

METHODS

Retrospective study of all patients receiving SCIG from 2006 to 2012. Data collected included demographics, date SCIG was started, date of switch to IVIG and reasons, administration tolerance, and related adverse events. Effectiveness was defined as the lack of severe infections.

RESULTS

Twenty-three patients (15 male, 8 female) with PID were studied. SCIG was initiated at a median age of 14.2 years (8.4 months-25.7 years) and median duration on SCIG treatment was 41 months (4-68). Nine patients (39.1%) temporarily switched from SCIG to IVIG for the following reasons: vacation (8), administration issues (1), and transient need for immunomodulatory therapy (1). A mean of 5.2 IVIG infusions/patient (SD=2.86) was administered while on SCIG. IVIG-related adverse events were documented in 3 patients with 6 infusions. Eight (34.8%) patients definitively discontinued SCIG use for the following reasons: convenience (5), adverse effects (1), coagulopathy (1), and autoimmune thrombocytopenia (1). There were no severe infections requiring hospital admission in any patient during the study period.

CONCLUSIONS

Alternating SCIG and IVIG use in patients with PID was associated with considerable advantages in terms of convenience for the patients and their caregivers, while maintaining the effectiveness and safety of this therapy. Healthcare units treating these patients should show flexibility with this dual therapy in order to optimize patients' quality of life.

Home gammaglobulin therapy: a patient survey of intravenous and subcutaneous options in Canada

Introduction: For close to half a century immunoglobulin replacement therapy has been the main therapy for patients unable to produce functioning antibodies. To date, both subcutaneous (SC) and intravenous delivery methods have been successful at effectively and safely replacing immunoglobulin. Home intravenous and SC therapy programs have been established and have gained attention, but the true motivation and frequency of switching from traditional hospital-based treatment to these alternatives remains unknown. This study aims to determine the willingness of patients in Canada to switch to a home-based gammaglobulin treatment program by quantifying related experiences and preferences.

Methods: A cohort of 169 patients in Ontario currently on hospital-based intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIG) replacement therapy (referral centers or community hospitals) were sent a 2.5 page survey consisting of 25 questions. Data were collected and statistically analyzed using Fisher, χ2, and McNemar tests, where P < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.

Results: Ninety-one patients responded and most agreed to consider home therapy regardless of the administration route, based on recommendations from an immunologist (IVIG, P = 0.006; SC, P < 0.001). Patients preferred switching to home IVIG rather than to SC (P = 0.01), but their concerns regarding home healthcare costs were more prominent with IVIG (P = 0.01). The main concern with current intravenous therapy was the overall loss of time (P = 0.0001), whereas for home therapy it was the loss of supervision (P = 0.0009) and possible associated costs. Patients considered home treatment more convenient, as it is less time consuming (P = 0.01), and this was perceived as an improvement in quality of life (P = 0.001). It was considered less convenient because it may be unsafe and (or) more expensive.

Conclusion: This survey demonstrates that home intravenous therapy maybe the preferred option for patients with antibody deficiency in Ontario, provided this decision was supported by a specialist in the field, secured supervision was available, and it was not associated with personal expenses.

Statement of novelty: The first study to examine patient willingness to try a new route of gammaglobulin administration at home.

Subcutaneous immunoglobulin replacement therapy: the European experience

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Rapid subcutaneous immunoglobulin (SCIg) infusions have been used as an important method of delivering replacement immunoglobulin (Ig) to patients with primary immune deficiencies (PIDs) in Europe over the last 25 years. This review provides a comprehensive interpretation of the literature relating to the administration of SCIg and the services that have been developed alongside.

RECENT FINDINGS

Using rates of at least 20 ml/h per infusion site and simultaneous sites, the infusion time once per week is short (1-2 h in adults) and using small portable pumps, the child or adult is free for other activities during the therapy. The rapid SCIg infusions have been documented as well tolerated, efficacious and acceptable to infants and their parents, children, adults and elderly patients, and more recently to patients with autoimmunity requiring immunomodulatory Ig doses.

SUMMARY

As part of PID diagnostic and management services, educational programmes for self-infusion of both intravenous Ig and SCIg at home have been developed throughout Europe, resulting in increased patient compliance and patient empowerment as well as cost-savings for healthcare providers.

Comparative study of subcutaneous versus intravenous IgG replacement therapy in pediatric patients with primary immunodeficiency diseases: a multicenter study in Argentina

PURPOSE

Several studies have shown that subcutaneous immunoglobulin (SCIG) infusions demonstrate similar efficacy to intravenous Ig (IVIG) in preventing infections in patients with primary immunodeficiency diseases (PID), and are safe and well tolerated in this population. This open, prospective/retrospective, multicenter study was designed to compare the effectiveness, safety and tolerability of a 16 % liquid human IgG preparation (Beriglobina P), administered SC, with previous IVIG treatment in PID pediatric patients in Argentina.

METHODS

Fifteen subjects were enrolled in the study, and a total of 13 subjects (aged 6-18 years) completed the 36-week SCIG treatment period. All children had previously received IVIG treatment. The dose of SCIG equaled the previous IVIG dose and subjects received an average weekly dose of 139 mg/kg (range 105-181) during the SCIG period.

RESULTS

Significantly higher serum IgG trough levels were recorded on SCIG treatment at 16, 24, and 36 weeks, when compared with previous IgG trough levels on steady-state IVIG treatment. The annualized infection rate was 1.4 infections/subject/year during the IVIG administration period compared with 0.4 infections/subject/year during the SCIG period. All subjects who completed the study chose to continue administering SCIG at home after the study had ended.

CONCLUSIONS

These data confirm that self-administered SCIG therapy is a well-tolerated and effective alternative to IVIG therapy for children with PID.

Pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics and physiologically-based pharmacokinetic modelling of monoclonal antibodies

Development of monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) and their functional derivatives represents a growing segment of the development pipeline in the pharmaceutical industry. More than 25 mAbs and derivatives have been approved for a variety of therapeutic applications. In addition, around 500 mAbs and derivatives are currently in different stages of development. mAbs are considered to be large molecule therapeutics (in general, they are 2-3 orders of magnitude larger than small chemical molecule therapeutics), but they are not just big chemicals. These compounds demonstrate much more complex pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic behaviour than small molecules. Because of their large size and relatively poor membrane permeability and instability in the conditions of the gastrointestinal tract, parenteral administration is the most usual route of administration. The rate and extent of mAb distribution is very slow and depends on extravasation in tissue, distribution within the particular tissue, and degradation. Elimination primarily happens via catabolism to peptides and amino acids. Although not definitive, work has been published to define the human tissues mainly involved in the elimination of mAbs, and it seems that many cells throughout the body are involved. mAbs can be targeted against many soluble or membrane-bound targets, thus these compounds may act by a variety of mechanisms to achieve their pharmacological effect. mAbs targeting soluble antigen generally exhibit linear elimination, whereas those targeting membrane-bound antigen often exhibit non-linear elimination, mainly due to target-mediated drug disposition (TMDD). The high-affinity interaction of mAbs and their derivatives with the pharmacological target can often result in non-linear pharmacokinetics. Because of species differences (particularly due to differences in target affinity and abundance) in the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of mAbs, pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic modelling of mAbs has been used routinely to expedite the development of mAbs and their derivatives and has been utilized to help in the selection of appropriate dose regimens. Although modelling approaches have helped to explain variability in both pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic properties of these drugs, there is a clear need for more complex models to improve understanding of pharmacokinetic processes and pharmacodynamic interactions of mAbs with the immune system. There are different approaches applied to physiologically based pharmacokinetic (PBPK) modelling of mAbs and important differences between the models developed. Some key additional features that need to be accounted for in PBPK models of mAbs are neonatal Fc receptor (FcRn; an important salvage mechanism for antibodies) binding, TMDD and lymph flow. Several models have been described incorporating some or all of these features and the use of PBPK models are expected to expand over the next few years.

Subcutaneous immunoglobulin: rapid push vs. infusion pump in pediatrics

BACKGROUND

Subcutaneous immunoglobulin (SCIG) therapy is gaining favor for the management of primary immunodeficiency disease (PIDD) in adults and children.

METHODS

A retrospective chart review captured data on 96 pediatric patients with PIDD using SCIG (16% or 20%) delivered by infusion pump or SC rapid push over 620 clinic visits. Patients previously using intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIG) were converted to SCIG dosing on a 1:1 basis. Patients/caregivers voluntarily chose an administration technique.

RESULTS

Although mean SCIG dosing was lower on a g/kg/month basis compared with prior IVIG dosing, mean steady-state serum IgG levels during SCIG administration were about 100-200 mg/dl higher than IVIG trough values. On average, much more rapid infusion was achieved with the SC rapid push method, with 49% of patients reporting infusion times of 9 min or less; median duration of infusion pump administration was 45 min. The use of 20% SCIG increased dosing efficiency compared with 16% SCIG, allowing for a smaller weekly mean SCIG volume and fewer dosing days per week. Adverse event (AE) rates were lower in the pediatric subgroup compared with adults (15.8% vs. 18.8% of visits), and the majority of AEs were local. SC rapid push was reported most frequently for patients under age 2; its use decreased between ages 2 and <10 yr and then increased in adolescence and into adulthood. Only one of the pediatric patients returned to IVIG use.

CONCLUSIONS

Administration of replacement Ig via SC rapid push is a safe and viable option in pediatric patients with PIDD.

Nursing guidelines for administration of immunoglobulin replacement therapy

Immunoglobulin (Ig) replacement therapy, given as regular infusions of pooled human Ig, is the recognized treatment of humoral immunodeficiencies characterized by hypogammaglobulinemia and impaired antibody responses. It is a safe, effective therapy when delivered by nurses who have been educated to oversee and/or provide these infusions. Guidelines for administration have been developed by the Immune Deficiency Foundation Nurse Advisory Committee to provide a framework and guidance to those nurses administering this therapy.

Subcutaneous immunoglobulin therapy: a new option for patients with primary immunodeficiency diseases

Since the 1950s, replacement of immunoglobulin G using human immunoglobulin has been the standard treatment for primary immunodeficiency diseases with defects in antibody production. These patients suffer from recurrent and severe infections, which cause lung damage and shorten their life span. Immunoglobulins given intravenously (IVIG) every 3-4 weeks are effective in preventing serious bacterial infections and improving the quality of life for treated patients. Administration of immunoglobulin subcutaneously (SCIG) is equally effective in preventing infections and has a lower incidence of serious adverse effects compared to IVIG. The tolerability and acceptability of SCIG has been demonstrated in numerous studies showing improvements in quality of life and a preference for subcutaneous immunoglobulin therapy in patients with antibody deficiencies.

Polyclonal immunoglobulins and hyperimmune globulins in prevention and management of infectious diseases

Immunoglobulin therapy has a rich history of use in preventing and treating infectious diseases; however, clinical data on the efficacy of immunoglobulin is lacking for many infectious diseases. Immunoglobulin therapy is routinely used in postexposure prophylaxis for bacterial infections, including tetanus, botulism, and diphtheria, and viral infections, including hepatitis A and B and varicella. Immunoglobulin therapy has also been used in many severe and life-threatening infections where treatments are limited, including toxic shock syndrome, respiratory syncytial virus infection, and cytomegalovirus infection. The authors review the evidence for the use of immunoglobulin therapy in common adult infectious diseases.

Modern management of primary B-cell immunodeficiencies

B-cell defects constitute the majority of primary immunodeficiencies. Although a heterogeneous group of diseases, all are characterized by the reduction in or absence of immunoglobulins and/or specific antimicrobial antibodies. Substitution of immunoglobulin G (IgG) is therefore the mainstay of treatment. While from the late 1970s, the intravenous route of administration was the most common, in the past decades, subcutaneous immunoglobulin replacement therapy has become more popular among patients and physicians. Independently of the optimal route of administration, dosage and IgG trough level remain subjects of debate. Higher IgG trough levels seem to improve the protection against recurrent infections and thus better prevent complications such as bronchiectasis. Some patients, however, achieve protection with IgG trough levels on the lower IgG limit of healthy persons. Therefore, an individual protective IgG trough level needs to be defined for each patient. Use of additional prophylactic antibiotics and immunosuppressive drugs differs amongst specialized immunodeficiency centres and clearly requires future investigation in multi-centre trials. Haematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) is to date indicated as curative treatment in certain patients with B-cell defects associated with cell deficiencies, for example in two class-switch recombination defects and in selected severe forms of common variable immunodeficiency.

Subcutaneous immunoglobulin replacement therapy with Hizentra, the first 20% SCIG preparation: a practical approach

To reduce the risk of infection in adults and children with primary immunodeficiencies, replacement therapy with IgG, which can be administered to patients intravenously or subcutaneously, is required. Although intravenous administration of IgG (IVIG) has been the therapy of choice in the US and widely used in Europe for many years, subcutaneous administration of IgG (SCIG) has recently gained considerable acceptance among patients and doctors. SCIG therapy achieves high and stable serum IgG levels, is well tolerated, and can be self-administered. Hizentra (IgPro20; CSL Behring, Berne, Switzerland) is the first, ready-to-use 20% liquid preparation of human IgG specifically formulated for subcutaneous infusions. The high concentration (20%) might allow shorter infusion times due to smaller infusion volumes, with potential improvement in the convenience of SCIG therapy. Hizentra is well tolerated and has been shown to protect adult and pediatric primary immunodeficiency patients against serious bacterial infections. In addition, it is easy to handle and can be stored at a temperature up to 25°C. In summary, Hizentra is an advance in the field of immunoglobulin replacement therapy, which might offer benefits for home therapy patients.

Diagnosis and treatment of primary immunodeficiency disease: the role of the otolaryngologist

OBJECTIVE

The objective of the study was to review the diagnosis and treatment of primary immunodeficiency disease (PID) and the role of otolaryngologists in the management of PID.

METHODS

A search was conducted of PubMed and the Web sites of organizations for PID patients for literature pertaining to the diagnosis and treatment of PID, with an emphasis on the role of otolaryngologists. The reference lists of selected articles were reviewed for additional articles.

RESULTS

Patients with PID commonly present with respiratory tract infections (eg, recurrent ear, nose, or throat infections) and chest disease. Diagnostic delays or inadequate treatment of PID may lead to significant morbidity and premature mortality. Immunoglobulin (Ig) replacement is the cornerstone of therapy for most patients with PID. Although intravenous Ig is the most popular route of administration in the United States, subcutaneous Ig administration may be appropriate for patients with poor venous access, those who are unable to tolerate intravenous Ig, or those who prefer the independence and flexibility of self-administration.

CONCLUSIONS

Recognition and diagnosis of PID by otolaryngologists are critical to optimizing patient outcomes. Several therapeutic regimens for Ig replacement are now available that offer patients increased flexibility and independence.

Efficacy and safety of hizentra®, a new 20% immunoglobulin preparation for subcutaneous administration, in pediatric patients with primary immunodeficiency

Subcutaneous IgG treatment for primary immunodeficiencies (PI) is particularly well suited for children because it does not require venous access and is mostly free of systemic adverse events (AEs). In a prospective, open-label, multicenter, single-arm, Phase III study, 18 children and five adolescents with PI were switched from previous intravenous (IVIG) or subcutaneous (SCIG) IgG treatment to receive dose-equivalent, weekly subcutaneous infusions of Hizentra^® for 40 weeks. Mean IgG trough levels were maintained in patients previously on SCIG, or increased in those previously on IVIG, regardless of age. No serious bacterial infections were reported during the efficacy period of the study. The rates of non-serious infections were 4.77 (children) and 5.18 (adolescents) infections per patient per year. Related AEs were observed in seven children (38.9%) and two adolescents (40%). Three serious AEs and two AEs leading to discontinuation (all unrelated) were reported in children. Hizentra^® is an effective and well-tolerated treatment for pediatric patients.

Efficacy and safety of home-based subcutaneous immunoglobulin replacement therapy in paediatric patients with primary immunodeficiencies

Subcutaneous immunoglobulin infusions are effective, safe and well tolerated in the treatment of primary immunodeficiencies, but only limited data on the treatment of children are available. We investigated the efficacy, safety and pharmacokinetics of home therapy with a 16% liquid human immunoglobulin G preparation (Vivaglobin®) when administered subcutaneously in children with primary immunodeficiencies. Data were analysed from 22 children (2-<12 years) who participated in two prospective, open-label studies (one in Europe/Brazil, one in North America). All children had previously received intravenous immunoglobulins. They started weekly subcutaneous immunoglobulin infusions with an approximately 3-month wash-in/wash-out period, followed by a 6-month (Europe/Brazil) or 12-month (North America) efficacy evaluation period. In Europe/Brazil, subcutaneous doses generally equalled the previous weekly equivalent intravenous doses. In North America, subcutaneous doses during the efficacy evaluation period were 126% (median) of the previous weekly equivalent intravenous doses. Efficacy end-points in both studies included the occurrence of serious bacterial infections and any infections, and serum immunoglobulin G trough levels. Median serum immunoglobulin G trough levels exceeded those during previous intravenous therapy by 13% (North America) and 16% (Europe/Brazil). During the efficacy evaluation period of both studies, none of the children had a serious bacterial infection; the mean overall infection rate/patient year was 4·7 in Europe/Brazil and 5·6 in North America, concurring with previous reports in adults. The adverse event profile was comparable to previous reports in adults. Both studies confirmed the efficacy and safety of subcutaneous immunoglobulin therapy with Vivaglobin in children with primary immunodeficiencies.

Malignancies in the setting of primary immunodeficiency: Implications for hematologists/oncologists

Many primary immunodeficiency disorders (PIDD) are associated with elevated risks for different types of cancer. Defective immunosurveillance mechanisms in PIDD and infection with oncogenic viruses (eg, Epstein Barr, herpesvirus 8) seem to have significant contributory roles in many cases. Non-Hodgkin lymphoma and Hodgkin disease are two of the most common PIDD-associated malignancies. The impact of PIDD-associated malignancy has increased in recent years in parallel with improved patient with PIDD survival and longevity, due largely to effective immunoglobulin replacement therapy. Epidemiologic data, clinical patterns, and management considerations of the common PIDD-associated cancers are reviewed.

Home-based subcutaneous immunoglobulin G replacement therapy under real-life conditions in children and adults with antibody deficiency

Background

Subcutaneous immunoglobulin (SCIG) therapy is an alternative to intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIG) therapy.

Methods

We evaluated the efficacy and safety of the SCIG Vivaglobin^® (formerly known as Beriglobin^® SC) under real-life conditions in a post-marketing observational study in 82 patients with primary or secondary antibody deficiencies. Health-related quality of life (HRQoL) was evaluated in a subset of 30 patients previously treated with IVIG (including 11 children < 14 years) using the Short Form 36 (SF-36) for patients ≥ 14 years of age (adults) and the Child Health Questionnaire - Parental Form 50 (CHQ-PF50) for children < 14 years of age. Treatment preferences were assessed in adults.

Results

The mean serum immunoglobulin G (IgG) trough level during SCIG treatment (7.5 g/L) was higher than during previous IVIG treatment (6.6 g/L; p < 0.01). The investigators assessed the efficacy of SCIG therapy as "excellent" in 89% of patients. No systemic adverse drug reactions were observed. Improvements by ≥ 5 points were observed in 5 of 8 SF36 subscales and in 6 of 12 CHQ-PF50 subscales. Statistically significant improvements (p ≤ 0.05) were observed for the SF-36 subscales of bodily pain, general health perceptions, and vitality (adults), and for the CHQ-PF50 subscales of general health perceptions, parental impact - time, parental impact - emotional, and family activities (children). Patients preferred SCIG over IVIG therapy (92%) and home therapy over therapy at the clinic/physician (83%).

Conclusion

This study confirms that therapy with Vivaglobin^® at home is effective, safe, well tolerated, and improves quality of life in patients with antibody deficiency.

Subcutaneous immunoglobulin replacement therapy in the treatment of patients with primary immunodeficiency disease

Antibody deficiency is the most frequently encountered primary immunodeficiency disease (PIDD) and patients who lack the ability to make functional immunoglobulin require life-long replacement therapy to prevent serious bacterial infections. Human serum immunoglobulin manufactured from pools of donated plasma can be administered intramuscularly, intravenously or subcutaneously. With the advent of well-tolerated preparations of intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIg) in the 1980s, the suboptimal painful intramuscular route of administration is no longer used. However, some patients continued to experience unacceptable adverse reactions to the intravenous preparations, and for others, vascular access remained problematic. Subcutaneously administered immunoglobulin (SCIg) provided an alternative delivery method to patients experiencing difficulties with IVIg. By 2006, immunoglobulin preparations designed exclusively for subcutaneous administration became available. They are therapeutically equivalent to intravenous preparations and offer patients the additional flexibility for the self-administration of their product at home. SCIg as replacement therapy for patients with primary antibody deficiencies is a safe and efficacious method to prevent serious bacterial infections, while maximizing patient satisfaction and improving quality of life.

Subcutaneous immunoglobulin therapy in pediatric primary antibody deficiency

Subcutaneous immunoglobulin (SCIG) therapy is recognized as a standard treatment for primary antibody deficiency. SCIG is efficacious for the prevention of infections and is associated with a lower risk of systemic side effects, improved quality of life for patients and families and is preferred by children when compared with intravenous immunoglobulin replacement. For pediatric patients, SCIG is an ideal treatment modality that affords children and families more freedom and less disruption of important childhood activities. This article reviews the characteristics of SCIG to provide the pediatric practitioner with an understanding of the experiences their patients receiveing SCIG may encounter.