Treating axial spondyloarthritis and peripheral spondyloarthritis, especially psoriatic arthritis, to target: 2017 update of recommendations by an international task force

Global research trends in biological therapy for ankylosing spondylitis: A comprehensive visualization and bibliometric study (2004-2023)

Ankylosing spondylitis (AS) is a chronic inflammatory disease primarily affecting the spine and pelvic bones. Recently, many researchers have confirmed that biological therapy is effective for AS patients, which provides a new perspective for the treatment of AS. This study aimed to evaluate the characteristics of scientific research on AS and biological therapy worldwide and investigate research hotspots and the direction of future trends. Global literature on AS and biological therapy published from 2004 to 2023 was searched in the Web of Science, Scopus, and PubMed databases. Visualization and bibliometric analysis were carried out using the VOSviewer and CiteSpace software with the retrieved data regarding countries, institutions, journals, authors, and keywords. A total of 2,243 related articles were included, showing that the number of articles in this field has increased annually. The highest number of articles were from the USA (24.39%), followed by Italy (14.36%), England (12.19%), Germany (10.66%), and Spain (7.86%). Braun J was the most prolific author, with a h-index of 16. The institution with the most articles was Charite Universitatsmedizin Berlin, and the Rheumatology journal had the highest number of publications. "janus kinase inhibitor" and "secukinumab" displayed a notable citation burst in recent years, indicating IL-17i and JAKi are research hotspots. More and more attention has been paid to the association between AS and biological therapy in the past two decades. The USA plays a leading role, and China has made remarkable progress. This study has provided a valuable reference for future research in this field.

Association of clinical variables with methotrexate response in patients with psoriatic arthritis

OBJECTIVE

Methotrexate (MTX) is widely used as first-line treatment in psoriatic arthritis (PsA). Despite the variable efficacy of MTX in PsA compared to newer therapeutic agents, its affordability and availability make it crucial, especially in resource-limited healthcare settings. Identification of factors associated with MTX non-response could facilitate early redirection to more effective therapy. This study aimed to identify baseline clinical, demographic, and psychosocial variables associated with non-response 3 months after MTX initiation in a real-world, treatment-naïve PsA patient cohort.

METHOD

Recently diagnosed, disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drug-naïve PsA patients were included. Treatment response was defined by attaining minimal disease activity 3 months after initiation of MTX monotherapy. A multivariate logistic regression analysis was performed, including sensitivity analysis. Missing variables were imputed through multiple imputations.

RESULTS

In total, 287 patients were included, of whom 199 (69%) were non-responders. The median dose of MTX was 19.5 (interquartile range 15-25) mg/week. Worse baseline functioning (Health Assessment Questionnaire) [odds ratio (OR) 0.28, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.13-0.60], higher tender joint count in 68 joints (OR 0.91, 95% CI 0.84-0.97), and higher depression scores (Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale) (OR 0.88, 95% CI 0.78-0.99) were associated with a lower response rate to MTX at 3 months.

CONCLUSION

Our findings highlight the need for a comprehensive approach to managing patients with PsA. This involves addressing modifiable risk factors, such as depression, alongside controlling PsA disease activity. Further research is warranted to evaluate whether this integrated strategy could improve treatment efficacy and overall patient outcomes.

Psoriatic arthritis: A comprehensive review for the dermatologist-Part II: Screening and management

Psoriatic arthritis (PsA) is a common comorbidity of psoriasis occurring in up to one-third of patients. Dermatologists hold an essential role in screening patients with psoriasis for PsA, since as many as 85% of patients develop psoriasis before PsA. Early detection and treatment of PsA are important for both short- and long-term patient outcomes and quality of life. Many factors must be weighed when selecting the appropriate therapy for PsA. One must consider the 'domains of disease' that are manifested, the disease severity, patient comorbidities, patient preferences (routes of dosing or frequency, as examples) as well as factors often outside of patient-physician control, such as access to medications based on insurance coverage and formularies. As many patients will have involvement of multiple domains of psoriatic disease, selecting the therapy that best captures the patient's disease is required. In this review, we will address PsA screening, diagnosis, therapeutic approach to psoriatic disease, comorbidity considerations, and comanagement.

The VITACORA- 19 and PsAID questionnaires are equally valid for assessing the impact of psoriatic arthritis on patients' quality of life

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

Health-related quality of life (HRQoL) is an often-underestimated aspect in psoriatic arthritis (PsA). We aimed to compare the VITACORA-19 and PsAID (Psoriatic Arthritis Impact of Disease) questionnaires to assess QoL in routine PsA management.

METHODS

Cross-sectional analysis of a randomly selected PsA population. Disease activity was estimated using the DAPSA (Disease Activity score for PsA) index and HRQoL using the VITACORA-19 and PsAID. The construct validity of VITACORA-19 was analysed (Pearson correlation and ROC curves).

RESULTS

Forty-five patients were included, 24 men and 21 women, mean age 55 ± 13 years, mean disease duration 8.2 ± 6.1 years. Most patients showed adequate disease control, median DAPSA 11.3 (IQR: 8.0-19.3), median PsAID 2.7 (IQR: 1.1-5.0). VITACORA-19 scores ranged from 6 to 94. The correlation between VITACORA-19 and PsAID was high, r: -0.7 (95%CI: -0.84 to -0.46), p < 0.0001. A VITACORA-19 score in the range of 6-29 corresponded to high DAPSA disease activity, a range of 30-44 corresponded to moderate DAPSA activity and a range of 45-95 corresponded to low DAPSA activity. The cut-off for an acceptable symptomatic state (PsAID < 4) corresponded to a VITACORA-19 score ≥ 66 with an area under the ROC curve of 0.85 (95%CI: 0.71-0.98).

CONCLUSIONS

This is the first study comparing the VITACORA-19 and PsAID questionnaires. Either of the two questionnaires could be used to assess HRQoL in PsA. For the first time, VITACORA-19 thresholds are defined that identify the different DAPSA activity categories. A VITACORA-19 score ≥ 66 could be an appropriate treatment target. Key Points • Health-related quality of life (HRQoL) is an often-underestimated aspect in psoriatic arthritis (PsA). • The PsAID and VITACORA-19 questionnaires offer similar performance for assessing HRQoL in PsA. • A VITACORA-19 ≥ 66 identifies the low disease impact state according to the PsAID. • VITACORA-19 thresholds identifying DAPSA categories are reported.

Chasing the target: reports from the Advances in Targeted Therapies meeting, 2024

OBJECTIVES

The Advances in Targeted Therapies annual meeting brings together experts within the field of rheumatology and immunology to highlight and discuss the latest scientific developments and needs in the field. The objective is to highlight unmet scientific needs in the field of rheumatology.

METHODS

The 24th annual Advances in Targeted Therapies meeting convened with more than 100 international clinicians and scientific researchers in rheumatology, immunology, and other specialities relating to all aspects of immune-mediated inflammatory diseases. During the meeting, we held 5 rheumatologic disease-specific discussion sections consisting of experts in each field. These groups included rheumatoid arthritis (RA), psoriatic arthritis (PsA), axial spondyloarthritis (axSpA), osteoarthritis (OA), and systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE). In each group, experts were asked to identify the top 2 to 3 most important overarching and disease-specific scientific unmet needs to be addressed in the next 5 years.

RESULTS

The overarching themes across disciplines included the need for precision medicine, improved classification of disease states, and the further identification of targets and associated therapies, including the potential role of chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T cell therapies. Within RA, the group highlighted the lack of precision medicine and the need for better biomarkers. Further, the lack of targeted therapies against fibroblasts in RA was discussed, with the potential impact of targeting fibroblasts early in the disease as an unmet need. For PsA, there is a continued need for a better definition of disease endotypes and for the categorisation of those with complex and difficult-to-treat (D2T) diseases. The development of bispecific molecules and combination therapeutic approaches remain a high priority. For axSpA, the disease-modifying characteristics of nonsteroid anti-inflammatory drugs need further evaluation, as does the treatment of residual pain and fatigue frequently in the disease. In OA, new therapeutic targets remain an unmet need, and the discussion group prioritised potential experimental strategies that could lead to innovative therapeutic targets. Elucidating the specific signalling and target cells responsible for, or inhibiting, repair will be essential for developing targeted therapies. SLE experts emphasised the need to identify the most predictive biological contributions to disease progression in patients with early clinical precursors of SLE. The role of CAR T cell therapy must be further investigated, along with ancillary biologic studies (eg, immune system profiling) that provide critical insights into disease pathogenesis. Further, there is a need to determine the relationship of patient-relevant symptoms to the pathophysiology of SLE and identify new therapeutic targets for these symptoms.

CONCLUSIONS

There remain many unmet needs on the road to precision medicine with regard to identifying disease endotypes and biomarkers for disease progression or therapeutic response. For most diseases discussed, a strong unmet need remains with regard to identifying new targets and therapies for those with refractory or D2T disease. The ability to prevent or cure rheumatic disease remains the ultimate unmet need in rheumatology.

The Impact of IL-17A Inhibition in Rheumatic and Musculoskeletal Diseases: Current Insights and Future Prospects

Interleukin-17A (IL-17A) plays a pivotal role in many rheumatic immune-mediated inflammatory diseases. Targeting the IL-17 pathway has transformed the way psoriatic arthritis (PsA) and axial spondyloarthritis (axSpA) are managed, with a number of IL-17A inhibitors now available for treating rheumatic and musculoskeletal diseases. This narrative review will describe the opportunities presented by novel imaging techniques in understanding the metabolic and mechanical changes that characterize the pathogenesis of PsA and axSpA. It will look at the current consensus definitions of early disease in PsA and axSpA, present evidence for the benefit of early treatment, and highlight the gaps in current knowledge. Finally, it will describe novel treatment targets to address the unmet needs in giant cell arteritis (GCA) and polymyalgia rheumatica (PMR) and discuss the potential role of IL-17A inhibition in treating GCA and PMR.

The concept of difficult-to-treat disease in rheumatology: where next?

New pathogenesis-based therapeutics and evidence-based consensus treatment recommendations, often with predefined treatment goals, have remarkably improved outcomes across many chronic diseases. However, a clinically significant subgroup of patients responds poorly to interventions and show a progressive decline in the disease trajectory, which poses an increasing health-care challenge. Difficult-to-treat approaches exist in several areas of medicine and the need for similar definitions has recently also emerged in rheumatology. The term difficult-to-treat refers not only to patients with pathology-driven, treatment-refractory disease, but also implicates multiple other factors that can contribute to patients being in this state, including having few treatment options, misdiagnosis, and coincident psychosocial factors. Therefore, the difficult-to-treat state requires a comprehensive, holistic, multidisciplinary approach that considers the specific characteristics of each disease and the personalised needs of the patient. In this Personal View, we provide an overview of the different aspects of the concept of difficult-to-treat disease, highlight its advantages, and propose the importance of incorporating this concept more widely in the design of rheumatological treatment strategies.

The history of ankylosing spondylitis/axial spondyloarthritis - what is the driving force of new knowledge?

The history of (axial) spondyloarthritis has started several centuries ago. Since the end of the 19th century major achievements have been made. This historical review tries to show how closely the advances in clinical medicine in rheumatology have been related to advances made in basic sciences.

Characteristics associated with patient-reported treatment success in psoriatic arthritis

OBJECTIVES

To determine characteristics associated with patient-reported treatment success in psoriatic arthritis (PsA).

METHODS

Rheumatologist-diagnosed PsA patients fulfilling the CASPAR classification were recruited from a single center. PsA outcome measures included: 66/68 swollen/tender joint counts, Leeds/SPARCC dactylitis/enthesitis indices, psoriasis body surface area (BSA), and patient-reported outcomes (PROs) including PROMIS. The primary outcome was a patient-reported item: 'Today, considering the level of control of your psoriatic arthritis and psoriasis, do you consider your treatment has been successful?'. Descriptive and multivariate logistic regression analyses identified clinical predictors of patient-reported treatment success. Patient-reported reasons for lack of treatment success were explored.

RESULTS

A total of 178 participants had a baseline visit. Mean (SD) CASPAR score was 3.7 (0.9), age 51.7 (13.5) years, and BMI 31.3 (7.2) kg/m2. Fifty-two percent were women, and 86.0% white. Treatment success was reported by 116/178 (65%) patients in the analytic cohort. Among 76 patients who reported treatment failure, the most frequently selected reasons for lack of success were pain (n = 55, 72.4%), fatigue (n = 46, 60.5%), inflamed joints (n = 40, 52.6%) and stiffness (n = 40, 52.6%). Overall, 105 participants had complete data across variables in the logistic regression models. Patient-reported treatment success was independently associated with the 66-swollen/68-tender joint counts, psoriasis BSA, PROs (pain interference, physical function, fatigue) and TNF-inhibitor therapy, after controlling for BMI and demographics.

CONCLUSION

Patient-reported treatment success in PsA may be achieved through improvement of inflammatory arthritis, psoriasis, pain, physical function, fatigue and the use of TNF-inhibitors. Patients reported treatment failure was most commonly due to symptoms of pain, fatigue and stiffness.

Tumor necrosis factor (TNF) inhibitors for psoriatic arthritis

BACKGROUND

Psoriatic arthritis (PsA) is a chronic arthritis affecting people with psoriasis. If untreated, it may lead to disability. Recommended drugs are non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs), corticosteroids, conventional synthetic disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs (csDMARDs), biologic DMARDs (bDMARDs), and targeted synthetic DMARDs (tsDMARDs). Tumour necrosis factor inhibitors (TNFi) are the first choice bDMARDs.

OBJECTIVES

To assess the benefits and harms of TNFi in adults with psoriatic arthritis.

SEARCH METHODS

We searched CENTRAL, MEDLINE, Embase, ClinicalTrials.gov and the World Health Organization trials portal up to 28 March 2024.

SELECTION CRITERIA

We included randomized controlled trials (RCTs) in adults with PsA, comparing TNFi to placebo, physiotherapy, NSAIDs, corticosteroids, and cs/b/tsDMARDs. Major outcomes included clinical improvement, minimal disease activity, physical function, health-related quality of life, radiographic progression, serious adverse events, and withdrawals due to adverse events.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

We used standard Cochrane methods. The primary comparison was TNFi versus placebo. The primary time point was 12 weeks for clinical improvement; 24 weeks for minimal disease activity, function, quality of life, and radiographic progression; and the end of the trial period for serious adverse events and withdrawals due to adverse events.

MAIN RESULTS

We included 25 RCTs randomizing 7857 participants. Four studies compared TNFi to methotrexate and one to ustekinumab in DMARD-naïve participants. In csDMARD-inadequate responders, 11 studies compared TNFi to placebo; four studies compared TNFi to placebo and ixekizumab, bimekizumab, tofacitinib, or upadacitinib; and three studies compared TNFi to ixekizumab, secukinumab, and ustekinumab. Two studies compared different TNFi. We found no studies with b/tsDMARD-inadequate responders (b/tsDMARD-IR). No studies compared TNFi to NSAIDs, corticosteroids, or physiotherapy. Performance (32%), detection (56%) and reporting (80%) biases were at high or unclear risk across studies. Only one study had a low risk of bias in all domains. We limit reporting to the primary comparison, TNFi versus placebo. DMARD-naïve We found no studies comparing TNFi with placebo in DMARD-naïve participants. csDMARD-inadequate responders TNFi probably result in a large clinical improvement compared to placebo. At 12 weeks, 149/1926 (8%) participants in the placebo group showed a clinical improvement (ACR50) compared to 784/2141 (37%) participants in the TNFi group (risk ratio (RR) 5.63, 95% confidence interval (CI) 3.98 to 7.96; I2 = 65%; 14 studies, 4067 participants; moderate-certainty evidence). TNFi probably result in a higher proportion of participants in minimal disease activity. At 24 weeks, 95/1017 (9%) participants in the placebo group were in minimal disease activity compared to 428/1336 (32%) participants in the TNFi group (RR 3.76, 95% CI 2.39 to 5.92; I2 = 72%; 5 studies, 2353 participants; moderate-certainty evidence). At 24 weeks, TNFi may improve function compared to placebo. The mean change in function from baseline (assessed with the Health Assessment Questionnaire; score from 0 to 3, 0 = no disability; minimal clinically important difference (MCID) = 0.35) was -0.14 points with placebo and 0.33 points lower (0.41 lower to 0.25 lower) with TNFi (I2 = 72%; 8 studies, 2949 participants; low-certainty evidence). TNFi probably result in a clinically important improvement in health-related quality of life. The mean change in quality of life from baseline (assessed with the Short Form 36-item Mental Component Summary questionnaire; score from 0 to 100, 100 = best score; MCID = 1.7) was 2.4 points with placebo and 3.29 points higher (2.18 points higher to 4.40 points higher) with TNFi (I2 = 52%; 8 studies, 2928 participants; moderate-certainty evidence). TNFi probably slightly reduce radiographic progression. The mean change in radiographic progression (assessed with the Sharp/Van der Heijde-PsA score; scale from 0 to 528, 0 = no damage) was 0.25 points with placebo and 0.37 points lower with TNFi (0.48 lower to 0.25 lower) (I2 = 32%; 7 studies, 2478 participants; moderate-certainty evidence) at 24 weeks. We downgraded the evidence to moderate certainty for clinical improvement, minimal disease activity, quality of life, and radiographic progression due to risk of bias. For function, we downgraded the evidence to low certainty for risk of bias and imprecision. TNFi may result in little to no difference in serious adverse events, but may slightly increase withdrawals due to adverse events, compared to placebo. At the end of follow-up: 56/1826 participants (3%) given placebo and 69/1900 (4%) participants given TNFi experienced serious adverse events (RR 1.00, 95% CI 0.70 to 1.42; I2 = 0%; 13 studies, 3866 participants; low-certainty evidence); and 35/1926 (2%) participants given placebo and 65/2140 (3%) given TNFi withdrew due to adverse events (RR 1.53, 95% CI 1.01 to 2.33; I2 = 0%; 14 studies, 4066 participants; low-certainty evidence). We downgraded the evidence to low certainty for risk of bias and imprecision.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

In csDMARD-inadequate responders, moderate-certainty evidence showed that TNFi probably result in a large clinical improvement, lower disease activity, small decrease in radiographic progression, and better quality of life compared to placebo. Low-certainty evidence showed that TNFi may lead to a slight improvement in physical function compared to placebo. Low-certainty evidence suggested that TNFi may lead to a slight increase in withdrawals due to adverse events, whereas they may result in little to no difference in serious adverse events compared to placebo. No trials assessed TNFi compared to placebo in DMARD-naïve participants or in b/tsDMARD-IR.

Prevalence, influencing factors, and prediction model construction of anemia in ankylosing spondylitis based on real-world data: An exploratory study

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to explore the prevalence and influencing factors of anemia in patients with ankylosing spondylitis (AS) using real-world data and to construct a predictive model for anemia in AS.

METHODS

In November 2023, we accessed the database from China Rheumatoid Arthritis Registry of Patients with Chinese Medicine (CERTAIN). Clinical data of AS collected from the CERTAIN between March 2022 and September 2023 were analyzed. Demographic information, clinical assessment scales, and laboratory test results of the patients were collected. According to the anemia diagnostic criteria established by the World Health Organization (WHO) in 2018, patients were divided into anemia group and non-anemia group. Statistical analyses were performed using SPSS 25.0 software, including χ2 tests, independent sample t-tests to compare differences between the two groups, and multivariate stepwise logistic regression analysis to explore the influencing factors of anemia in AS. The predictive efficacy of the model was evaluated by plotting receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves. Calibration was assessed through the Hosmer-Lemeshow goodness-of-fit test, and a calibration curve was plotted to comprehensively evaluate the predictive capability of the model.

RESULTS

A total of 251 patients were included in this study, among which 58 cases had anemia (23.1%). There were significant differences in gender, ossification, C-reactive protein (CRP), erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR) indicators, and clinical assessment scale results between the two groups (P < 0.05). The results of multivariate stepwise logistic regression analysis showed that female gender, underweight, ossification, abnormal CRP and ESR were independent risk factors for anemia in AS (P < 0.05). Based on the results of multivariate stepwise logistic regression analysis, a predictive model for anemia in AS was established as Logit(P) = -5.02 + 2.041 × gender -1.11 × BMI(body mass index) category + 1.103 × ossification category + 0.942 × CRP category + 1.476 × ESR category. The ROC curve analysis showed that the area under the curve of the model for predicting anemia in AS was 0.857 (95% CI: 0.808 ~ 0.906). The Omnibus test of model coefficients yielded χ2 = 85.265, P < 0.001. The Hosmer-Lemeshow test showed χ2 = 7.005, P = 0.536 (P > 0.05).

CONCLUSION

Analysis of real-world AS diagnosis and treatment data showed that the prevalence of anemia in Chinese AS was 23.1%. The occurrence of anemia was closely related to female gender, underweight, ossification, and abnormal CRP and ESR. The logistic model constructed based on these indicators for predicting the risk of anemia in AS demonstrated good efficacy.

Barriers and facilitators to treat-to-target in axial spondyloarthritis in clinical practice: a mixed methods study

This study aimed to explore the perceptions of patients and rheumatologists about a treat-to-target (T2T) strategy in axial spondyloarthritis (axSpA) and identify the barriers and facilitators to its implementation in clinical practice. A mixed methods design was applied. Patients with axSpA who visited the outpatient clinic with active disease (AxSpA Disease Activity Score [ASDAS] ≥ 2.1), but did not receive a treatment adjustment, were identified. These patient cases were discussed in individual semi-structured interviews with the respective treating rheumatologists, and a subgroup of these patients was also interviewed. In parallel, all interviewed participants completed a quantitative survey. Qualitative and quantitative data were analysed thematically and descriptively, respectively. Twenty-three patients were discussed with 11 rheumatologists, and 16 of these patients were interviewed personally. Barriers to T2T included challenges in the measurement of inflammatory disease activity using the ASDAS, and numerous patient-related factors such as concern about treatment adaptations. The limited number of viable treatment options and scarce amount of evidence supporting T2T in axSpA, as well as logistical challenges, were additional obstacles. Facilitators included patients' broad knowledge about axSpA, rheumatologists' awareness of T2T recommendations, and positive doctor-patient relationships with the application of shared decision-making. Moreover, a supporting infrastructure, such as one with high accessibility to the outpatient clinic between scheduled visits, was considered necessary for the application of a T2T strategy. In conclusion, numerous barriers and facilitators to the implementation of a T2T strategy in axSpA are present, which need to be considered when applying this treatment approach in clinical practice.

BASDAI and ASDAS disease states in relationship to ASAS40 response: post hoc analysis of ixekizumab in radiographic axial spondyloarthritis

Objectives

To explore the relationship between Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Index (BASDAI) and Axial Spondyloarthritis Disease Activity Score (ASDAS) used in clinical practice and the Assessment of SpondyloArthritis international Society 40% (ASAS40) response, the primary endpoint in clinical trials in axial spondyloarthritis (axSpA).

Methods

Data from COAST-V, a phase 3 trial of ixekizumab vs placebo in biologic-naïve radiographic axSpA (r-axSpA) patients, were analysed. Patients treated with ixekizumab every 4 weeks were categorized using the ASAS40 response at week 16 and 52. The association between BASDAI and ASDAS disease states, respectively, and ASAS40 response achieved/not achieved was investigated. Additionally, back pain, fatigue, Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Functional Index, ASAS Health Index and 36-item Short Form Health Survey Physical Component Summary scores corresponding to these states were assessed. Results were reported descriptively.

Results

After 16  weeks, 48.1% (39/81) of patients achieved an ASAS40 response. Among them, 71.8% (n = 28) and 43.6% (n = 17) achieved BASDAI <3 and BASDAI <2, respectively; 76.9% (n = 30) and 33.3% (n = 13) attained ASDAS <2.1 and ASDAS <1.3, respectively. Among ASAS40 responders at week 52 [53.1% (43/81)], 83.8% (n = 36) and 51.2% (n = 22) of patients achieved BASDAI <3 and BASDAI <2, respectively; 93.1% (n = 40) and 41.9% (n = 18) attained ASDAS <2.1 and ASDAS <1.3. Lower BASDAI and ASDAS disease states corresponded well with less back pain, fatigue and functioning impairment and better health-related quality of life.

Conclusions

More than 70% of biologic-naïve r-axSpA patients who achieved an ASAS40 response, also attained low disease activity or inactive disease as measured by the BASDAI or ASDAS. Findings may help clinicians translate results from clinical trials into daily practice.

Association between resolution of MRI-detected inflammation and improved clinical outcomes in axial spondyloarthritis under long-term anti-TNF therapy

OBJECTIVES

In this post-hoc analysis of ESTHER trial, we aimed to investigate the longitudinal relationship between inflammation on MRI and the achievement of inactive disease/low disease activity in patients with axial spondyloarthritis (axSpA) treated with long-term tumor necrosis factor (TNF) inhibitor etanercept.

METHODS

Of the 76 patients with active axSpA in the ESTHER trial, we included all patients treated with etanercept for at least 6 months for main analysis. All clinical and MRI data from 4.5 years of follow-up were used in the analysis. MRIs of the spine and sacroiliac (SI) joints were performed at baseline, week 24, week 48 and yearly thereafter and were evaluated for active inflammatory lesions according to the Berlin MRI score.

RESULTS

Longitudinal analysis showed that higher SI joint osteitis score was associated with higher Axial Spondyloarthritis Disease Activity Score (ASDAS) at the same time point (β=0.08, 95% CI (0.05; 0.11)) and at the next time point 6 months later (β=0.05, 95% CI (0.02; 0.07)). Furthermore, resolution of osteitis in the SI joint (Berlin MRI osteitis score of ≤1) was associated with lower ASDAS at the next time point (β=-0.26, 95% CI (-0.42; -0.09)), higher odds of achieving ASDAS low disease activity (OR=5.61, 95% CI (1.06; 29.67)) and inactive disease status (OR=2.23, 95% CI (1.01; 4.94)) at the next time point.

CONCLUSIONS

The presence of inflammation on SI joints-MRI is associated with higher disease activity in axSpA. Resolution of inflammation on MRI is associated with better clinical outcomes in the long-term follow-up. Thus, achieving complete resolution of inflammation is favourable for meeting the treatment goals in axSpA.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

NCT00844142.

Factors associated with treatment intensification in patients with axial spondyloarthritis and high disease activity in clinical practice

OBJECTIVE

To investigate which factors are associated with treatment intensification (TI) in axial SpA (axSpA) patients with high disease activity (HDA).

METHODS

Patients with axSpA and HDA [Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Score (ASDAS) ≥2.1] from the Dutch SpA-Net registry were included. TI was defined as: (i) higher dose or shorter interval of the same drug, (ii) switch from current drug to another due to inefficacy or (iii) addition of a new drug. Only anti-inflammatory drugs were considered. Primary determinants considered were ASDAS, Assessment of SpondyloArthritis international Society Health Index (ASAS HI) and physician global assessment (PhGA). Acceptable symptom state according to patient (PASS-patient) or physician (PASS-physician) were included in sensitivity analyses. Patient-centred and physician-centred logistic regression models were used to investigate the association between potential determinants and TI.

RESULTS

In total, 121 patients with HDA were included. TI was conducted in a minority (41/121, 33.9%), and mainly involved a switch or addition of a drug. In multivariable regression analyses, a higher ASDAS was associated with TI in the patient-centred model [odds ratio (OR)ASDAS = 1.94 (95% CI 1.00-3.74)]. However, in the physician-centred model, this association attenuated, and PhGA or PASS-physician were the primary factors associated with TI [ORPhGA = 1.71 (1.24-2.34); ORPASS-physician = 94.95]. Interestingly, patient-centred factors (ASAS HI/PASS-patient/education level) did not contribute to TI.

CONCLUSION

In practice, treatment is intensified in a minority of axSpA patients with HDA. Physician-centred factors are associated with the decision to change treatment, independently of disease activity or patient perspective. Further research is needed to better understand these decisions.

Subclinical psoriatic arthritis and disease interception-where are we in 2024?

Psoriatic arthritis (PsA) is a chronic rheumatic disease that usually appears in patients with skin psoriasis, making it a model for detection of joint disease in the pre-clinical phases in a setting where therapy for cutaneous disease may ameliorate or prevent arthritis development. Such PsA prevention appears credible due to the increasingly recognized closely shared immunopathology between the skin and joints, especially the entheses. Recently, several initiatives have explored the concept of pre-clinical PsA, and nomenclatures have been developed with the recent EULAR nomenclature proposing a simplified three stages from psoriasis to clinical PsA development, namely at risk of PsA, subclinical PsA and early PsA. A better comprehension of early PsA and the identification of individuals predisposed to its development could enable interventions to 'prevent' the appearance of PsA. Several recent retrospective observational studies have demonstrated disease interception feasibility, i.e. treatment of people with psoriasis may prevent the appearance of PsA, in particular using biologic disease-modifying drugs. However, further data are urgently required due to unexpected findings in some studies where TNF inhibition for psoriasis does not reduce the rate of PsA development. In this review we address the current challenges in early PsA, including comparisons of pre-PsA nomenclature sets, its risk factors and the potential for disease interception.

Digital health technologies to strengthen patient-centred outcome assessment in clinical trials in inflammatory arthritis

Common to all inflammatory arthritides, namely rheumatoid arthritis, psoriatic arthritis, axial spondyloarthritis, and juvenile idiopathic arthritis, is a potential for reduced mobility that manifests through joint pain, swelling, stiffness, and ultimately joint damage. Across these conditions, consensus has been reached on the need to capture outcomes related to mobility, such as functional capacity and physical activity, as core domains in randomised controlled trials. Existing endpoints within these core domains rely wholly on self-reported questionnaires that capture patients' perceptions of their symptoms and activities. These questionnaires are subjective, inherently vulnerable to recall bias, and do not capture the granularity of fluctuations over time. Several early adopters have integrated sensor-based digital health technology (DHT)-derived endpoints to measure physical function and activity in randomised controlled trials for conditions including Parkinson's disease, Duchenne's muscular dystrophy, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, and heart failure. Despite these applications, there have been no sensor-based DHT-derived endpoints in clinical trials recruiting patients with inflammatory arthritis. Borrowing from case studies across medicine, we outline the opportunities and challenges in developing novel sensor-based DHT-derived endpoints that capture the symptoms and disease manifestations most relevant to patients with inflammatory arthritis.

Perceived effects of health status on sexual activity in patients with axial spondyloarthritis: a 5-year follow-up study

Axial spondyloarthritis (ax-SpA) causes pain, fatigue, stiffness, loss of physical function, and poor health status, which can influence sexual activity and enjoyment. To explore whether patients with ax-SpA perceive that their health status effects their sexual activity and to identify predictors of these perceived effects on sexual activity after a 5-year follow-up. Data about demographics, disease, medication, health-related quality of life (HRQOL), and sexual quality of life (SQOL) were collected at the baseline and 5-year follow-up. The perceived effect of health status on sexual activity was measured by question 15 in the 15D questionnaire. Data were analysed using the McNemar and independent paired t tests and logistic regression. In the 244 patients with ax-SpA (30% women, 70% men; mean age, 46 years), measures reflecting disease activity decreased and comorbidities increased, and more patients were treated with biological drugs at 5 years. Compared with patients whose health status had little/no effect on sexual activity (n = 200), those who perceived that their health status had a large effect on sexual activity (n = 44) were older, exercised less, fewer were employed, had more comorbidities, higher disease activity, and lower HRQOL and SQOL. The baseline predictors of a negative effect of health status on sexual activity were old age and low SQOL. Patients reporting that their health status had a large effect on sexual activity at 5 years were older, had more disease activity, and lower HRQOL and SQOL.

Association of validated patient reported outcome measures with patients' self-reported disease status in axial spondyloarthritis

OBJECTIVE

In axSpA, validated PROs are well-established in clinical trials, but it remains unclear whether they comprehensively reflect patients' discomfort and disease status. We aimed to investigate how patients' self-reported disease status does compare to validated clinical trial measures during routine clinical visits.

METHODS

Data from axSpA patients' initial and last five visits were retrospectively analyzed. ASDAS, BASDAI, ASAS20, ASAS40 and ASAS partial remission were assessed at each visit and compared with patients' self-reported disease status, categorized into very good (status satisfaction), mild, severe, and very severe based on patient's self-reported opinion on the level of severity of symptoms' burden related to axSpA. The association of these PROs with patients' self-reported disease status was analyzed using mixed models.

RESULTS

3,120 visits over a median follow-up of 4.7 years from 557 axSpA patients were analyzed. Very good or mild self-reported disease status was reported in 98.7% and 90.9% of visits with inactive or low ASDAS, compared with 67.9% and 39.3% with high or very high ASDAS.Severe or very severe self-reported disease status was reported in 15.1% of visits with ASAS20 achievement, in 7.2% with ASAS40 achievement, and in 0.6% with achievement of ASAS partial remission, compared with 26.0% without ASAS20 achievement, 25.1% without ASAS40 achievement, and 30.1% without achievement of ASAS partial remission.

CONCLUSIONS

Patientś self-reported disease status was well captured by ASDAS and BASDAI in most clinical visits. Other investigated measures used in clinical trials failed to capture patientś self-reported disease status in a large proportion of visits.

Adherence, Fears, and Beliefs about Biologic Drugs in Rheumatoid Arthritis Patients: A North African Pilot Study

Purpose

To investigate the impact of beliefs in adherence to biologic drugs among patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA).

Methods

This was a cross-sectional study, including RA patients who were on biologic disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (bDMARDs). Therapeutic adherence was evaluated arbitrarily using a self-reported method by asking them the following question: "Do you regul arly take your biologic drug as prescribed by your doctor?". The Beliefs about Medicines Questionnaire (BMQ) was used to evaluate medication beliefs [general overuse, general harm, specific necessity, specific concerns].

Results

Seventy-five RA patients were included (80.0% females, 33.3% illiterate, and 68.0% unemployed, mean age: 57±9 years, mean disease activity score: 3.94±1.32). Adherence to the current biologic drug was reported by 71 patients (94.7%). The means ± standard deviation scores for general overuse, general harm, specific necessity, and specific concerns were 14.0±2.4, 10.8±4.4, 20.6±5.7, and 10.3±3.3, respectively. Compared to the adherent group (n=71), the non-adherent group (n=4) had a lower specific necessity score (21.0±5.4 vs. 13.5±7.5, respectively, p=0.009), a higher specific concern score (10.1±3.13 vs. 15.0±2.8, respectively, p=0.036), and similar scores for general overuse and general harm (10.0±2.3 vs. 9.5±1.9, p=0600; 13.3±4.4 vs. 11.5±4.1, p=0.400, respectively). In logistic regression, specific necessity and specific concerns scores were significantly associated with adherence (Odds-ratio (OR)= 0.855, 95% confidence interval (CI) [0.726-1.006], and 1.438, 95% CI [1.004-1.980], respectively).

Conclusion

Our study showed that RA patients have strong beliefs about the necessity to take biologic drugs which significantly influence the adherent behaviour therapy.

Patient-initiated follow-up supported by asynchronous telemedicine versus usual care in spondyloarthritis (TeleSpA-study): a randomised controlled trial of clinical and cost-effectiveness

BACKGROUND

With rising health-care expenditures and workforce shortages, sustainable alternatives to traditional outpatient follow-up strategies are required to optimise care efficiency. We aimed to investigate the cost-effectiveness and clinical effectiveness of patient-initiated follow-up (PIFU) supported by asynchronous telemedicine for patients with spondyloarthritis compared with usual care in daily practice.

METHODS

TeleSpA was a multicentre, pragmatic, open-label, randomised controlled trial. Patients with spondyloarthritis and stable disease were randomly assigned (1:1) to either the PIFU and asynchronous telemedicine group or usual care group. All patients received a scheduled outpatient visit at baseline and after 1 year. Patients were monitored remotely at 6 months (PIFU and asynchronous telemedicine) or at the discretion of the treating rheumatologist (usual care). The primary outcome was the number of rheumatology visits within a 1-year period. A trial-based 1-year health-economic evaluation from a Dutch health-care perspective (only including health-care costs) and societal perspective (also including travel costs and work productivity losses), per the Dutch guidelines was used to estimate cost-effectiveness. The safety analysis was done in the intention-to-treat population and was based on spontaneous reports of adverse events and serious adverse events or as observed by the research team. The primary analysis was in the intention-to-treat population. Individuals with relevant lived experience were involved in the study design. This trial was registered with the Dutch National Trial Register (NL71041.068.19) and ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT04673825) and is completed.

FINDINGS

Between Dec 2, 2020, and June 20, 2022, 200 patients were randomly assigned to PIFU and asynchronous telemedicine (n=100) or usual care (n=100). 79 (40%) of 200 participants were women, 121 (60%) were men, and the mean age was 55·0 years (SD 11·9). After 1 year, the mean number of rheumatology visits was 1·9 (SD 1·5) for the PIFU and asynchronous telemedicine group and 2·6 (1·3) in the usual care group (mean difference -0·7 [95% CI -1·0 to -0·3]; 25·4% reduction; p<0·0001). PIFU and asynchronous telemedicine was cost-effective from a health-care perspective, saving health-care costs (-€180 [95% CI -921 to 560]) without a loss in quality-adjusted life-years (0·004 [95 % CI -0·022 to 0·030]). Seven non-trial-related adverse events occurred in the PIFU and asynchronous telemedicine group and eight in usual care group (including one death).

INTERPRETATION

PIFU and asynchronous telemedicine resulted in significant and clinically meaningful reductions in rheumatology visits. This was not at the expense of health outcomes and saved health-care costs.

FUNDING

Dutch Arthritis Society.

Barriers and facilitators to application of treat-to-target management in psoriatic arthritis and axial spondyloarthritis in practice: A systematic literature review

OBJECTIVE

To review the evidence on barriers and facilitators to application of treat-to-target (T2T) in axial spondyloarthritis (axSpA) and psoriatic arthritis (PsA) in daily practice.

METHODS

A systematic search was conducted in MEDLINE/Embase up to December 2023, focusing on axSpA/PsA. Any type of quantitative/qualitative original research was eligible for inclusion if barriers or facilitators to application of T2T were explored. In a qualitative synthesis, barriers/facilitators were classified by the level to which they apply (healthcare provider [HCP], patient, organisation).

RESULTS

Of 28 included studies, most focused on PsA (n = 21/28). Studies included patients (n = 23/28), HCP (n = 4/28) or both (n = 1/28). In total, over 25 barriers and 15 facilitators to application of T2T were identified. At the HCP level, most studies focused on the measurement of the target, especially in PsA, highlighting that agreement among instruments was suboptimal. At the patient level, the role of patient-reported outcomes (PROs), while deemed relevant, was shown to act as a barrier to achieve targets that included PRO components. At the organisational level, the increased time and resources needed for T2T were considered a barrier, although it was noted that T2T could also reduce healthcare use and sick leave. Notably, for several components, no facilitators were identified at all.

CONCLUSION

Various barriers and facilitators were identified, acting on several levels. Data in axSpA were scarce, as was evidence on certain components of T2T. Future research should address these knowledge gaps and explore how these barriers and facilitators could be targeted to improve application of T2T in practice.

Early Improvements with Guselkumab Associate with Sustained Control of Psoriatic Arthritis: Post hoc Analyses of Two Phase 3 Trials

INTRODUCTION

Patterns of treatment response can inform clinical decision-making. This study assessed the course and impact of achieving minimal clinically important improvement (MCII) in clinical measures and patient-reported outcomes (PROs) with guselkumab in patients with active psoriatic arthritis (PsA).

METHODS

Post hoc analyses evaluated 1120 patients with PsA receiving guselkumab every 4 or 8 weeks (Q4W/Q8W) or placebo from DISCOVER-1 (31% tumor necrosis factor inhibitor-experienced) and DISCOVER-2 (biologic-naïve). Achievement of MCII in clinical Disease Activity Index for PsA (cDAPSA), patient global assessment (PtGA) of arthritis, PtGA of psoriasis, patient-reported pain, Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy-Fatigue, Health Assessment Questionnaire-Disability Index, 36-item Short-Form Health Survey Physical Component Summary score, PtGA Arthritis + Psoriasis, and PsA Disease Activity Score (PASDAS) was compared between the guselkumab and placebo groups using Cox regression. Logistic regression adjusting for baseline factors evaluated associations between early (W4/W8) MCII achievement and stringent response (≥%50/%70 improvement in American College of Rheumatology response criteria, cDAPSA low disease activity [LDA], PASDAS LDA, and minimal disease activity) at W24/W52 among guselkumab-randomized patients.

RESULTS

Among patients with highly active PsA (baseline cDAPSA = 44.1-45.0, PASDAS = 6.4-6.5), times to MCII were significantly faster for guselkumab vs. placebo (hazard ratios 1.3-2.5; P < 0.05). Across measures, at first timepoint assessed, MCII rates were significantly higher with guselkumab (Q4W/Q8W 28-68%/29-65%) vs. placebo (19-47%; both P < 0.05). Early (W4/W8) MCII with guselkumab associated with higher odds of achieving stringent responses at W24/W52 (odds ratios 1.4-17.2/1.4-5.4).

CONCLUSIONS

In a mixed PsA population, significant proportions of patients treated with guselkumab achieved early (W4/W8) MCII across clinical and PRO measures, which associated with a higher likelihood of attaining clinically relevant improvements and low levels of disease activity at W24/W52.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

DISCOVER-1 (NCT03162796). DISCOVER-2 (NCT03158285).

Difficult-to-Manage Axial Spondyloarthritis

Axial spondyloarthritis (axSpA) is a multifaceted disease with a wide range of manifestations and associated comorbidities. Despite an expanding arsenal of disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs (DMARDs) in the treatment landscape of axSpA, a substantial number of patients remains resistant to multiple therapeutic interventions, posing a clinical challenge. This resistance may originate from both inflammatory and non-inflammatory factors. The term "difficult-to-manage" (D2M) axSpA, which was recently proposed by the Assessment of Spondyloarthritis international Society (ASAS), indicates the persistence of symptoms and/or signs despite treatment with ≥2 different classes of biologic/targeted synthetic DMARDs and requires a variety of factors leading to inadequate treatment response. Meanwhile, the term "treatment refractory" disease, implying a frank biologically active inflammatory process, was also defined as a subtype of the D2M group. Literature in this field is restricted, while definitions applied are diverse and often used interchangeably. Medline/PubMed, Scopus, and Google Scholar databases were searched for relevant full-text articles. This short review overviews the current concept and evidence regarding D2M axSpA, including its definition, prevalence, and associated key factors. Furthermore, current management is discussed, and possible therapeutic strategies are suggested for this special subgroup of axSpA patients.

Difficult-to-Treat Axial Spondyloarthritis: A New Challenge

Axial spondyloarthritis is a common form of chronic inflammatory rheumatic disease in adults, the treatment of which is based on non-pharmacological elements on the one hand, and pharmacological options on the other, such as non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs in the first line, followed by biological or targeted synthetic treatments. The therapeutic objective is remission or a low level of disease activity; if this objective is not achieved, the treatment is rotated or changed. Multiple changes is one factor illustrating the inability to achieve disease control and may lead to the notion of a difficult-to-treat disease (D2T). This requires a consensual definition including, beyond the number or therapeutic changes, the assessment of all the dimensions of the disease (objective signs of inflammation, residual pain, degenerative changes, psychosocial context). Recognising D2T patients will enable us to identify a particular population and the factors associated with this condition. When faced with a D2T disease, we need to analyse the causes of treatment failure and take into account the different components of the disease and the patient. In the absence of any prospect of new therapeutic targets in the short term for this disease, patient management may involve intensification of non-pharmacological means and evaluation of new therapeutic strategies such as combinations of targeted treatments.

Unmet Needs in Spondyloarthritis: Pathogenesis, Clinical Trial Design, and Nonpharmacologic Therapy

A program focused on pathogenesis, clinical trial design, and nonpharmacologic mind-body therapy for spondyloarthritis (SpA) was presented at the Spondylitis Association of America Unmet Needs Conference IV. SpA pathogenesis is incompletely understood but involves a complex set of drivers, including genetics, biomechanical stress, and microbial factors. Affected tissues may include axial and peripheral joints, entheses, skin, uvea, and intestines. The specific role of key cytokines like interleukin (IL)-23, IL-17, and tumor necrosis factor in the phases of this inflammatory process remains unclear. New insights into pathogenesis will continue to generate targets for novel therapeutics. How to optimally evaluate those therapeutics in clinical trials, and for the various manifestations of SpA, remains less clear. Future trials need better generalizability, robust subgroup analyses to assess differential responses for distinct disease manifestations, a focus on comparative efficacy, and outcomes relevant to the clinician and the patient. Additionally, study designs need to leverage available technology to facilitate subject participation in trials. In view of the interplay between biologic, physical, and psychological aspects of disease, there is increasing attention to nonpharmacologic agents, with the aim of maximizing long-term health-related quality of life through the control of symptoms and inflammation. Recent studies provide encouraging evidence that mind-body interventions such as tai chi, qigong, yoga, and meditation have benefits for patients with SpA, particularly those with pain. The advances in our understanding of pathogenesis, novel therapeutics, and nonpharmacologic interventions have revolutionized the management of SpA, but numerous questions around optimal management remain.

SOX-5 Transcription Factor: a Novel Psoriatic Autoantigen Preferentially Found in Women

OBJECTIVE

Adaptive immunity mediates psoriatic disease pathogenesis. We aimed to identify novel psoriatic autoantigens and their phenotypic associations in deeply characterized patient cohorts.

METHODS

Sera from psoriatic arthritis (PsA) patients were used for autoantibody discovery. Immunoprecipitations performed with cell lysates were on-bead digested, and autoantigens were identified by mass spectrometry. Prevalence and clinical features associated with anti-SRY-Box transcription factor-D (SOX-D) antibodies were determined by screening discovery cohorts of patients with PsA (n = 135), patients with psoriasis without PsA (n = 24), and healthy controls (n = 41). A PsA validation cohort (n = 325) and disease control samples of individuals with rheumatoid arthritis (RA; n = 66) and systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE, n = 66) were assayed for anti-SOX5 antibodies. Disease characteristics were compared by antibody status. Longitudinal data were analyzed using linear mixed-effects models with patient-specific intercept to ascertain associations. We also tested PsA sera for the recently described anti-ADAMTS-L5 autoantibody in PsA.

RESULTS

The novel autoantigens identified were SOX-D transcription factors, with SOX-5 being the focus of this analysis. Anti-SOX5 antibodies were present in 8.9% (12 of 135) and 4.3% (14 of 323) of patients in the PsA discovery and validation cohorts, respectively, 12.5% of patients (3 of 24) in the psoriasis group, 2.4% (1 of 41) of healthy controls, and 7.6% (5 of 66) each of patients in the RA and SLE groups. Anti-SOX5 were associated with female sex in both PsA cohorts (discovery: 15.7% women, 2.6% men, P = 0.006; validation: 6.3% women, 1.4% men, P = 0.049). In a longitudinal analysis adjusted for sex, anti-SOX5 associated with biologic disease-modifying antirheumatic drug treatment (95% vs 61%; P = 0.001; n = 96) and with differences in estimated treatment effects by mechanism of action. Anti-ADAMTS-L5 autoantibodies were identified in 8 of 124 patients (6.5%) in the PsA group.

CONCLUSION

SOX-D transcription factors are novel psoriatic autoantigens. Anti-SOX5 antibodies were preferentially found in women with PsA and associated with specific clinical and treatment characteristics, suggesting that anti-SOX5 antibodies may identify mechanistic subgroups. We independently validated anti-ADAMTS-L5 autoantibodies in PsA.

Advances in the management of psoriatic arthritis in adults

Psoriatic arthritis is an inflammatory arthritis that affects around 30% of patients with psoriasis. The disease spectrum includes peripheral arthritis, enthesitis, tenosynovitis, dactylitis, axial involvement, and skin and nail psoriasis in most patients. In addition to the cutaneous and musculoskeletal manifestations, several comorbidities can complicate the disease course, including cardiovascular disease, diabetes mellitus, metabolic syndrome, gout, anxiety, and depression. The management of patients with psoriatic arthritis begins with a careful assessment of the skin and joints and screening for comorbidities. This review describes the assessment tools and outcome measures used in the evaluation of patients with psoriatic arthritis. It summarizes the approach to therapy, including non-medicinal interventions such as education, lifestyle changes, physiotherapy, and occupational therapy. It discusses the evidence on pharmacologic treatments, including drugs used for symptomatic relief such as non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, and those used to control the disease process; this last group comprises conventional synthetic disease modifying anti-rheumatic drugs (DMARDs), including methotrexate, leflunomide, and sulfasalazine, and biologic and targeted DMARDs, including anti-tumor necrosis factor (TNFα), anti-interleukin-17 (IL-17), anti-IL-12/23, and anti-IL-23 agents, as well as Janus kinase (JAK) inhibitors and phosphodiesterase 4 (PDE4) antagonists. Although these drugs are usually tailored to the clinical profile of the patient, biomarkers predictive of response to therapy are needed so that a more personalized approach can be followed.

Impact of patient characteristics on ASDAS disease activity state cut-offs in axial spondyloarthritis: results from nine European rheumatology registries

OBJECTIVES

To re-evaluate cut-offs for disease activity states according to the Axial Spondyloarthritis Disease Activity Score (ASDAS), and study the impact of sex, age, calendar time, disease and symptom duration on ASDAS and ASDAS cut-offs in a large contemporary cohort.

METHODS

Data from 2939 patients with axial spondyloarthritis (axSpA) starting their first tumour necrosis factor inhibitor in nine European registries were pooled and analysed. Receiver operating characteristic analyses were performed to identify cut-offs against external criteria. Six-month data including patient and physician global assessments, both ≤1 (0-10 integer scale), and Assessment of SpondyloArthritis International Society partial remission were used for separation of inactive disease (ID) from low disease activity (LDA), while patient and physician global ≤3 were applied as external criteria to separate LDA from high disease activity (HDA). Patient and physician global ≥6 were applied to separate HDA from very high disease activity in baseline data.

RESULTS

The three ASDAS cut-offs identified to separate the four disease activity states in the overall patient population were <1.3, <2.0 and >3.5. Cut-offs for ID and LDA in women were higher (<1.5 and <2.0, respectively) than in men (<1.3 and <1.9), as were cut-offs in patients ≥45 years (<1.5 and <2.2) versus ≤34 years (<1.2 and <1.9) and 35-44 years (<1.3 and <1.8). Cut-offs were independent of calendar time and disease duration.

CONCLUSIONS

Re-evaluation of ASDAS cut-offs for disease activity states in a large multi-national axSpA cohort resulted in cut-offs similar to those currently endorsed. Differences in cut-offs between sex and age groups for ID and LDA were observed, but the differences were minor.

Treatment controversies in spondyloarthritis and psoriatic arthritis: focus on biologics and targeted therapies

INTRODUCTION

There are several treatment controversies that have emerged in spondyloarthritis and psoriatic arthritis. These are related to the nature of the conditions as well as to the use of medications.

AREAS COVERED

This review, which included a search of PubMed database as well as the references within the articles provides an overview of the nature of spondyloarthritis, controversy over the inclusion of psoriatic arthritis (PsA) as a peripheral spondyloarthritis, and a summary of current treatments for both PsA and axial spondyloarthritis (axSpA), with special emphasis on targeted therapy. The review highlights the differences in response to certain medications, particularly biologic therapy and summarizes the randomized controlled trials in psoriatic arthritis and axial spondyloarthritis providing data about the responses in table format.

EXPERT OPINION

There is a need for better outcome measures in axSpA. Currently, the measures are subjective. Imaging may be more appropriate but there is a need for research into the reliability and responsiveness of imaging techniques. In PsA, there may also be better response measures and research into the reliability and responsiveness of available measures is underway. There is also a need for novel therapies as well as biomarkers for response in both diseases.

When Usual Care Is Not So Usual: Protocol Violations and Generalizability in a Treat-to-Target Strategy Trial in Patients With Axial Spondyloarthritis

OBJECTIVE

The objective of this study was to evaluate the impact of protocol violations in the treat-to-target group in the Tight Control in Spondyloarthritis (TICOSPA) trial and to compare the proportion of patients optimally treated according to the Assessment of Spondyloarthritis International Society (ASAS)/EULAR 2016 recommendations for patients with axial spondyloarthritis (axSpA) between the treat-to-target versus usual care (UC) arms.

METHODS

This study was a cluster-randomized, controlled 48-week trial including patients with axSpA who fulfilled the ASAS criteria, had an Axial Spondyloarthritis Disease Activity Score >2.1, and were biologic disease-modifying antirheumatic drug naive. Eighteen axSpA expert centers were randomly allocated to one treatment arm: (a) treat-to-target prespecified management strategy (four-week visits), and (b) UC treatment decisions at the rheumatologist's discretion (12-week visits). Protocol violations in the treat-to-target arm and the fulfillment of the 2016 ASAS/EULAR recommendations in both arms were evaluated at every visit. ASAS Health Index (ASAS-HI) and disease activity outcomes at 48 weeks were compared between treat-to-target violators versus nonviolators. Patients treated according to the ASAS/EULAR recommendations were compared between both arms.

RESULTS

A total of 160 patients initiated the trial (80 patients with treat to target; 80 patients with UC). In the treat-to-target arm, 51.2% patients violated the protocol at least once (62.2% of violations resulting in maintenance/reduction of treatment against protocol). After 48 weeks, treat-to-target violators versus nonviolators showed similar ratios of ASAS-HI improvement. The proportion of patients managed according to the ASAS/EULAR recommendations after the first 12 weeks were 63.9% versus 61.8% for the treat-to-target and UC arms, respectively.

CONCLUSION

Protocol violations in the treat-to-target arm in the TICOSPA trial were frequent, although they did not have an impact on the rate of the primary outcome. The groups with UC was optimally treated, partly explaining the nonachievement of the primary objective in the TICOSPA trial.

Combining patient-reported outcome measures to screen for active disease in rheumatoid arthritis and psoriatic arthritis

OBJECTIVES

To investigate whether a combination of general health (Visual Analogue Scale (VAS)), Health Assessment Questionnaire-Disability Index (HAQ-DI), pain (VAS/Numerical Rating Scale (NRS)), quality of life (EQ-5D), fatigue (VAS/NRS) and presenteeism (0%-100% productivity loss) could aid as a screening tool to detect active disease in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) and psoriatic arthritis (PsA).

METHODS

RA patients from the tREACH trial and TARA trial (n=683) and PsA patients from the DEPAR cohort (n=525) were included. The association of a deterioration in the aforementioned patient-reported outcome measure (PROM) scores between two consecutive visits and having active disease was assessed. Active disease was defined as a change from disease activity score (DAS) ≤2.4 to DAS >2.4 in RA or Disease Activity Index in Psoriatic Arthritis (DAPSA) ≤14 to DAPSA >14 in PsA. The area under the curve (AUC) of the sum score of deteriorated PROMs was evaluated.

RESULTS

4594 RA and 1154 PsA visits were evaluated and active disease occurred in 358 (8%) RA and 177 (15%) PsA visits. In both RA and PsA, a deterioration in general health (VAS), HAQ-DI, EQ-5D and pain (VAS/NRS) was significantly associated with active disease. The combination of these PROMs showed acceptable to excellent discriminative ability (RA AUC=0.76, PsA AUC=0.85). If a cut-point of ≥1 deteriorated PROMs is used, 40% of the visits in which RA patients have remission or low disease activity are correctly specified (specificity of 40%), while 10% of visits with active disease are overlooked (sensitivity of 90%). In PsA, these percentages are 41% and 4%, respectively.

CONCLUSION

A combination of general health, HAQ-DI, EQ-5D and pain could aid as a screening tool for active disease in patients with RA and PsA. These data could help facilitate remote monitoring of RA and PsA patients in the future.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBERS

ISRCTN26791028, NTR2754.

Minimally invasive interventional procedures for osteoarthritis and inflammatory arthritis: A systematic review and meta-analysis

OBJECTIVE

to summarize the evidence on the efficacy of minimally invasive interventional procedures such as radiofrequency ablation (RFA) and transcatheter arterial embolization (TAE) in patients with osteoarthritis or inflammatory arthritis.

METHODS

a literature search was conducted in PubMed and Web of Science databases. Both randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and non-randomized studies of interventions (NRSI) were included. The results were organized according to the treated anatomical site: knee, hip, foot and ankle, shoulder, hand and wrist, sacroiliac joints. Data about treatment efficacy were extracted. The main outcome was change in pain intensity using the 0-10 visual analog scale (VAS) from baseline to 1 month. Additional timepoints at 3, 6 and 12 months were assessed. Change in functional status was evaluated. Pooled estimates were calculated as the mean difference (MD) and 95 % confidence interval relative to baseline. The meta-analyses of RCTs and NRSI were conducted separately.

RESULTS

of the 4599 retrieved articles, 164 were included in the review and, considering all the established timepoints, 111 (38 RCTs and 73 NRSI) were selected for the meta-analysis. Only one article described patients with inflammatory arthritis. In the meta-analysis of RCTs, one month after the procedure, MD in VAS was -3.98 (-4.41 to -3.55; k = 21) for knee RFA, and -3.18 (-3.96 to -2.39; k = 8) for sacroiliac joints RFA. In the meta-analysis of NRSI, MD in VAS was -4.12 (-4.63 to -3.61; k = 23) for knee RFA, -3.84 (-4.77 to -2.92; k = 7) for knee TAE, -4.34 (-4.96 to -3.71; k = 2) for hip RFA, -3.83 (-4.52 to -3.15; k = 3) for shoulder RFA and -4.93 (-5.58 to -4.28; k = 14) for sacroiliac joints RFA. Significant decrease in pain intensity was found also at 3, 6 and 12 months. Additionally, functional status improved at all the assessed timepoints.

CONCLUSION

minimally invasive interventional procedures can improve pain and functional status of patients affected by OA or chronic sacroiliac pain of degenerative origin. Further research is warranted in the field of inflammatory rheumatic diseases.

Filling the "GAP" in Real-World Assessment of Psoriatic Arthritis Disease Activity: Performance Characteristics of a Global/Pain Composite Endpoint

INTRODUCTION

Some retrospective data sources, such as electronic health records in the USA, report composite outcome measures not fully validated in psoriatic arthritis (PsA). However, they often contain global assessments, such as a Physician Global Assessment (PhGA) and Patient Global Assessment (PatGA), along with patient-reported pain scores, which individually are considered validated in PsA. This research described the performance characteristics of a 3-item global assessment and pain (GAP) composite endpoint using data from the ixekizumab phase 3 PsA clinical trial program.

METHODS

Discrimination of GAP was assessed by comparing placebo to active treatment arms. The magnitude of treatment effect and responsiveness were compared to Disease Activity Index for PsA (DAPSA), clinical DAPSA, DAPSA28, and Psoriatic Arthritis Disease Activity Score (PASDAS) using effect size (ES) and standardized response mean (SRM), respectively. Construct validity was evaluated through correlation among the composite endpoints, and with other physician- and patient-reported outcomes. Change in GAP was compared in patients who reached low disease activity (LDA) levels based on DAPSA, cDAPSA, and PASDAS vs those who did not.

RESULTS

GAP discriminated between active treatment and placebo with statistically significant separation as early as week 1. The largest ES/SRM was seen with GAP (2.29/1.74) and PASDAS (2.47/1.68). GAP had the strongest correlation with PASDAS (0.81-0.92) and showed moderate correlations with patient-assessed physical function, low correlations with physician-assessed skin and nail psoriasis, and low to moderate correlation with physician-assessed enthesitis. A significantly greater improvement in GAP was seen in the groups achieving LDA states compared to those not (p < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

The GAP composite, an abbreviated endpoint comprising measures common in electronic health records, has promising performance characteristics and could be used to address important clinical questions regarding outcomes and impact of PsA in existing datasets. CLINTRIALS.

GOV IDENTIFIER

NCT01695239; NCT02349295.

Treatment strategies for Spondyloarthritis: Implementation of precision medicine - Or "one size fits all" concept?

Spondyloarthritis (SpA) is a term to describe a group of chronic inflammatory rheumatic diseases, which have common pathophysiological, genetic, and clinical features. Under the umbrella term SpA, two main groups are subsumed: axial SpA (radiographic axSpA and non-radiographic axSpA) and peripheral SpA (with the leading representative being psoriatic arthritis (PsA) but also arthritis associated with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD), reactive arthritis, and undifferentiated pSpA). The key clinical symptom in axSpA is chronic back pain, typically with inflammatory characteristics, which starts in early adulthood, while the leading clinical manifestations of peripheral SpA (pSpA) are arthritis, enthesitis, and/or dactylitis. Furthermore, extra-musculoskeletal manifestations (EMMs) (acute anterior uveitis, psoriasis, and IBD) can accompany axial or peripheral symptoms. All these factors need to be taken into account when making treatment decisions in SpA patients. Despite the major advances in the treatment landscape over the past two decades with the introduction of biological disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs (bDMARDs) and most recently targeted synthetic DMARDs (tsDMARDs), a relevant proportion of patients still does not achieve the desired state of remission (=absence of disease activity). With this implementation of new treatment modalities, clinicians now have more choices to make in the treatment algorithms. However, despite generalized treatment recommendations, all factors need to be carefully considered when deciding on the optimal treatment strategy for an individual patient in clinical practice, aiming at an important first step towards personalized treatment strategies in SpA. In this narrative review, we focus on the efficacy of approved and emerging treatment options in axSpA and PsA as the main representative of pSpA and discuss their selective effect on the different manifestations associated with SpA to provide guidance on drivers of treatment decisions in specific situations.

Composite Outcome Measures for Psoriatic Arthritis: OMERACT and 3 and 4 Visual Analog Scale Progress in 2023

The Group for Research and Assessment of Psoriasis and Psoriatic Arthritis (GRAPPA)-Outcome Measures in Rheumatology (OMERACT) psoriatic arthritis (PsA) working group provided updates at the GRAPPA 2023 annual meeting on its work to evaluate composite outcome measures for PsA. An ongoing systematic literature review is in progress to evaluate psychometric measurement properties using the OMERACT filter 2.2 for a list of candidate composite outcome measures, which include minimal disease activity (MDA), Disease Activity for Psoriatic Arthritis (DAPSA), American College of Rheumatology (ACR) response criteria, Psoriatic Arthritis Disease Activity Score (PASDAS), Composite Psoriatic Disease Activity Index (CPDAI), 3 visual analog scale (3VAS), and 4VAS. The performance of the 3VAS and 4VAS in clinical practice and a synthesis of new data were presented, including estimates for minimal clinically important differences and thresholds of meaning, discrimination and construct validity, and longitudinal construct validity. Numeric rating scale (NRS) versions of the VAS have also been tested. Performance characteristics and psychometric properties are similar to the ASSESS study, a UK multicenter study, indicating that the VAS scales may be feasible tools for routine clinical care with a preference for the 4VAS because of superior face validity and clinical utility.

Early psoriatic arthritis: clinical and therapeutic challenges

INTRODUCTION

Psoriatic arthritis (PsA) is a chronic immunoinflammatory disease of the enthesis and adjacent synovium, skin, and nail, which early diagnosis may be crucial for starting a prompt therapeutic intervention. Theoretically, early treatment offers the advantage of acting on the reduction of the articular damage progression since initial phases of the disease.

AREAS COVERED

This review explores the challenges of clinical-diagnostic aspects and the underlying pathophysiology of early PsA phases, as well as the evidence evaluating the impact of early intervention on disease outcomes.

EXPERT OPINION

Main instruments for early PsA diagnosis include recognizing synovial-entheseal inflammatory signs at onset, improving screening PsA high-risk subjects, and increasing disease knowledge of physicians and patients with psoriasis or familial history. PsA continues to significantly impact on the Quality of Life of patients affected by the disease, making necessary to deeply study clinical manifestations, risk factors, and underlying immunoinflammatory mechanisms, as well as to identify biomarkers for early identification. Additionally, it remains a need to increase more evidence on understanding how early treatment of PsA and of psoriasis might influence the course of the disease.

Axial Spondyloarthritis: an overview of the disease

Axial Spondyloarthritis (axSpA) is a chronic, inflammatory, immune-mediated rheumatic disease that comprises two subsets, non-radiographic and radiographic axSpA, and belongs to a heterogeneous group of spondyloarthritides (SpA). Over the years, the concept of SpA has evolved significantly, as reflected in the existing classification criteria. Considerable progress has been made in understanding the genetic and immunological basis of axSpA, in studying the processes of chronic inflammation and pathological new bone formation, which are pathognomonic for the disease. As a result, new medication therapies were developed, which bring more effective ways for disease control. This review presents a brief overview of the literature related to these aspects of disease after summarising the available information on the topic that we considered relevant. Specifically, it delves into recent research illuminating the primary pathological processes of enthesitis and associated osteitis in the context of inflammation in axSpA. The exploration extends to discussion of inflammatory pathways, with a particular focus on Th1/Th17-mediated immunity and molecular signaling pathways of syndesmophyte formation. Additionally, the review sheds light on the pivotal role of cytokine dysregulation, highlighting the significance of the IL-23/17 axis and TNF-α in this intricate network of immune responses which is decisive for therapeutic approaches in the disease.

Imaging of Sacroiliac Pain: The Current State-of-the-Art

Pain in the sacroiliac (SI) region is a common clinical manifestation, often caused by diseases involving the SI joints. This is typically due to inflammation or degenerative changes, while infections or cancer are less frequent causes. The SI joint is challenging to image accurately because of its distinct anatomical characteristics. For an accurate diagnosis, conventional radiography often needs to be supplemented with more precise methods such as magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) or computed tomography (CT). Sacroiliitis, a common presenting feature of axial spondyloarthritis (axial SpA), manifests as bone marrow edema, erosions, sclerosis, and joint space narrowing. Septic sacroiliitis and repetitive stress injuries in sports can also cause changes resembling inflammatory sacroiliitis. Other conditions, such as osteitis condensans ilii (OCI), can mimic the radiologic characteristics of sacroiliitis. Inflammatory lesions are diagnosed by concurrent erosions, hyperostosis, and ankylosis. Ligament ossifications or mechanical stress can also result in arthritic disorders. Determining the exact diagnosis can be aided by the distribution of the lesions. Inflammatory lesions can affect any part of the articulation, including the inferior and posterior portions. Mechanical lesions, such as those seen in OCI, often occur in the anterior middle region of the joint. In cases of idiopathic skeletal hyperostosis, ligament ossification is found at the joint borders. This pictorial essay describes common SI joint problems, illustrated with multimodal imaging data. We, also, discuss strategies for selecting the best imaging modalities, along with imaging pitfalls, key points, and approaches for treating patients with suspected inflammatory back pain.

Additional Value of Ultrasound in Patients with Psoriatic Arthritis within Treatment Target

Background: In psoriatic arthritis (PsA), musculoskeletal ultrasound is a complementary tool to physical examination, useful even in patients in remission to detect subclinical activity. Objectives: The objective of the study was to assess the ultrasound prevalence of active enthesitis and synovitis in patients who reached the therapeutic target. Methods: This cross-sectional study included patients with at least 6 months of therapy with a targeted synthetic or biological disease-modifying antirheumatic drug who were in treatment target (i.e., DAPSA < 14). Patients underwent bilateral clinical and ultrasound examination of the elbow lateral epicondyle, quadriceps insertion, distal patellar tendon insertion, and Achilles enthesis for assessing enthesitis, and hand and foot joints for assessing synovitis. Enthesitis and synovitis were considered active if the power Doppler signal showed at least a score of one. Results: The study included 51 PsA patients, women (52.9%), with an average age of 55 years. Although the patients were within the DAPSA treatment target, 21.6% had at least one painful enthesis at clinical examination, 19.6% had ultrasound evidence of at least one active enthesitis and 15.7% had ultrasound signs of at least one active synovitis. Conclusions: Among PsA patients thought to be within the therapeutic target, ultrasound detected a non-negligible percentage of active enthesitis and synovitis.

Foot involvement in psoriatic arthritis: Prevalence, clinical and radiological features

BACKGROUND

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the prevalence of foot involvement in psoriatic arthritis and to describe its different clinical and radiological features.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

We conducted a cross sectional study including 40 patients with psoriatic arthritis over a period of 12 months. Anamnesis, clinical examination of feet, podoscopic examination, X-rays of feet and heels, and ultrasound in B mode and power Doppler mode were done for each patient.

RESULTS

Foot involvement was found in 95% of cases. It was symptomatic in 70% and inaugural of the disease in 20% of cases. The hindfoot and the forefoot were the sites most affected (77.5% and 47.5% respectively). The involvement of the midfoot was rarer (25%). Dactylitis was found in 17.5% and deformities of forefoot were found in 22.5% of cases. Antalgic gait was noted in 17.5% and static disorders of foot at podoscopic examination were identified in 35% of cases. Feet dermatological manifestations were found in 45% of cases. Diagnosis of different rheumatological manifestations was based on clinical findings and caracteristic radiological images on X-rays. We demonstrate he sensitivity of ultrasound in the detection and the diagnosis of different foot lesions including enthesitis, synovitis and tenosynovitis, dactylitis, bone erosions and psoriatic nail dystrophy.

Efficacy and safety of treat-to-target strategy studies in rheumatic diseases: A systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

The concept of treat-to-target (T2T), a treatment strategy in which treatment is directed to reach and maintain a defined goal such as remission or low disease activity (LDA), has been explored for several diseases including rheumatic diseases such as rheumatoid arthritis (RA). However, a comprehensive review of T2T in all rheumatic diseases has not recently been undertaken.

OBJECTIVE

To perform a systematic review and meta-analysis of the efficacy and safety of a T2T strategy in the management of adult patients with inflammatory rheumatic diseases.

METHODS

PUBMED, EMBASE and CINAHL were searched from January 1990 to December 2023 using key words related to a T2T strategy and rheumatic diseases; T2T strategy clinical trials or observational studies were included. Clinical, physical function and radiologic outcomes, cost-effectiveness, and adverse events (AEs) of the T2T strategies were investigated and a random-effect meta-analysis was conducted for the most commonly used outcomes in RA studies.

RESULTS

The search identified 7896 studies, of which 66 fit inclusion criteria, including 50 in RA, 3 in psoriatic arthritis (PsA), 1 in spondyloarthritis (SpA) and 12 in gout. For the studies comparing a T2T strategy with usual care (UC) in RA, 83.3% (20/24) showed a T2T strategy could achieve significantly better clinical outcomes, and the meta-analysis showed that patients treated with a T2T strategy were more likely to be in remission (pooled RR: 1.68 (1.47-1.92), p<0.001] and achieve DAS-28 response (pooled standardised mean difference (SMD): 0.47 (0.26-0.69), P<0.001] at 1 year than patients treated with UC. Sensitivity analyses showed that a T2T strategy with a predefined treatment protocol had better clinical efficacy than that without protocol. In terms of improving physical function and health-related quality of life (HRQoL), 11/19 (57.9%) studies found a T2T strategy was significantly more likely to achieve these than UC, with the meta-analysis for the mean change of HAQ score supporting this conclusion (pooled SMD: 1.48 (0.46-2.51), p=0.004). Five out of 9 studies (55.6%) demonstrated greater benefit regarding radiographic progression from a T2T strategy. In terms of cost-effectiveness and AEs, 2/2 studies found a T2T strategy was more cost-effective than UC and 8/8 studies showed no tendency for AEs to occur more often with a T2T strategy. For the studies in PsA and SpA, a T2T strategy was also demonstrated to be more effective than UC in clinical and functional benefits, but not in radiologic outcomes. All gout studies showed that sUA level could be controlled more effectively with a T2T strategy, and 2 studies revealed that the T2T strategy could inhibit erosion development or crystal deposition.

CONCLUSIONS

For patients with active RA, a T2T strategy has been shown in mulitple studies to increase the likelihood of achieving clinical response and improving HRQoL without increasing economic costs and AEs. Limited studies have shown clinical and functional benefits from T2T strategies in active PsA and SpA. A T2T strategy has also been found to improve clinical and radiologic outcomes in gout. T2T trials in other rheumatic diseases are lacking.

Clinical performance of the ASAS health index in chinese patients with ankylosing spondylitis and its influencing factors

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to investigate the status of health-related quality of life in Chinese patients with ankylosing spondylitis (AS) and to analyze factors associated with the Assessment of SpondyloArthritis international Society Health Index (ASAS-HI) in AS and its relationship with disease activity and psychological status.

METHODS

A cross-sectional study of 484 patients with AS attending 10 hospitals in China from March 2021 to September 2023 was recruited. The ASAS-HI assessed general health and functional status; the Depression Anxiety Stress Scales (DASS-21) assessed psychological disorders such as anxiety, depression, and stress; and the Functional Assessment of Chronic illness Therapy-Fatigue Scale (FACIT-F) assessed patients' fatigue symptoms; the Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Score-C-Reactive Protein (ASDAS-CRP), Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Index (BASDAI), Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Functional Index (BASFI), and Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Measurement Index (BASMI) were used to assess patients' disease activity and functional impairment. The correlation between ASAS-HI and the ASDAS, poor psychological status, and fatigue symptoms was observed. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses were used to explore the relevant influencing factors of ASAS-HI.

RESULTS

A total of 484 patients were included in this study of whom 162 were in poor health, 139 in moderate health, and 183 in good health. On univariate analysis, disease activity is an important factor affecting ASAS-HI. People with extremely high disease activity (ASDAS ≥ 3.5) had a 12 times elevated risk of having poor health status (OR = 12.53; P < 0.001). Other significant covariates included age ≥ 36 (OR = 1.58; P = 0.015), BMI ≥ 24 kg/m2 (OR = 2.93; P = 0.013), smoke (OR = 1.96; P = 0.002), BASFI (OR = 1.49; P < 0.001), BASMI (OR = 1.22; P < 0.001), fatigue (OR = 6.28; P < 0.001), and bad psychological conditions such as depression (OR = 10.86; P < 0.001), anxiety (OR = 3.88; P < 0.001), and stress (OR = 4.65; P < 0.001). The use of bMARDs is inversely associated with the appearance of adverse health status (OR = 0.54; P = 0.012). There was no significant relationship between HLA-B27 and sex. Multivariable logistic regression showed that higher disease activity (ASDAS ≥ 3.5) (OR = 5.14; P = 0.005), higher scores of BASMI (OR = 1.10; P = 0.009), self-reported depression (OR = 3.68; P = 0.007), and fatigue (OR = 2.76; P < 0.001) were factors associated with adverse health status.

CONCLUSION

The health status of AS patients is related to age, BMI, smoking, disease activity, poor psychological status, and fatigue and is influenced by a combination of multiple factors such as emotional state, economic level, pain, and dysfunction. Therefore, clinicians should pay attention to the early assessment of ASAS-HI in order to improve the prognosis of the disease. Key Points •Ankylosing spondylitis (AS) is a chronic inflammatory autoimmune disease with a long course and heavy disease burden, which greatly affects patients' quality of life. Therefore, this study aims to evaluate the health status of ankylosing spondylitis in the Chinese population and its influencing factors. •This is a multi-center cross-sectional study in China, which can better reflect the overall situation of the Chinese population.

The management of axial spondyloarthritis with cutting-edge therapies: advancements and innovations

INTRODUCTION

Axial involvement in spondyloarthritis has significantly evolved from the original 1984 New York criteria for ankylosing spondylitis, leading to an improved understanding of axial spondyloarthritis (axSpA) as a disease continuum encompassing non- radiographic axSpA (nr-axSpA) and radiographic axSpA (r-axSpA). A clear definition for early axSpA has been established, underscoring the need for early intervention with biological and targeted synthetic drugs to mitigate pain, reduce functional impairment, and prevent radiographic progression.

AREAS COVERED

This review explores therapeutic strategies in axSpA management, focusing on biological and targeted synthetic therapies and recent advancements. Biologics targeting TNFα or IL-17 and targeted synthetic disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (DMARDs) are primary treatment options. These therapies significantly impact clinical outcomes, radiographic progression, and patient-reported functional improvement.

EXPERT OPINION

AxSpA treatment has evolved significantly, offering various therapeutic options. Biological DMARDs, particularly TNFα inhibitors, have transformed treatment, significantly enhancing patient outcomes. However, challenges persist for patients unresponsive or intolerant to existing therapies. Emerging therapeutic targets promise to address these challenges. Comprehensive management strategies and personalized approaches, considering extra-articular manifestations and individual patient factors, are crucial for achieving optimal outcomes in axSpA management.

The role of bDMARDs in the prevention and treatment of inflammatory-related comorbidities in Psoriatic Arthritis

INTRODUCTION

Psoriatic arthritis (PsA) is an immune-inflammatory disease that affects both joints and entheses, and with diverse extra-articular manifestations (psoriasis, inflammatory bowel disease (IBD), and uveitis). A wide range of comorbid conditions, including cardiovascular diseases, obesity, metabolic syndrome (MetS), nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD), mental health disorders (depression/anxiety), and osteoporosis are highly prevalent in course of PsA.Biological DMARDs (bDMARD), including TNF-inhibitors (TNFi), Interleukin (IL-17i) and IL-23i represent the cornerstone of the management of active disease. The use of these therapies obviously requires considering comorbidities presence, safety aspects and contraindications.

AREAS COVERED

The aim of this review is to describe the inflammatory mechanisms behind PsA comorbidities, and the role of bDMARDs in the prevention and treatment of these conditions in course of PsA.

EXPERT OPINION

Tailoring therapeutic strategies to the individual characteristics of each PsA patient can be an effective approach to manage comorbidities, maximizing the efficacy of bDMARDs, and reducing the incidence of AEs. Identifying targets within disease pathways can guide research into therapeutics that address both PsA and comorbidities simultaneously, but more studies are advocated for clarifying the potential prevention and management of bDMARDs used for PsA.

Axial Disease in Psoriatic Arthritis: A Challenging Domain in Clinical Practice

Psoriatic arthritis (PsA) is a chronic inflammatory condition affecting about one-third of individuals with psoriasis. Defining axial involvement in PsA (axPsA) remains debated. While rheumatologists guide clinical practice, consensus on axPsA is still lacking. This paper explores historical and upcoming definitions from the Axial Involvement in Psoriatic Arthritis (AXIS) study, which aims to establish a validated axPsA definition. Epidemiological data reveal diverse axPsA prevalence rates, emphasizing its complex relationship with peripheral arthritis and enthesitis. Unique genetic, clinical, and radiological features differentiate axPsA from ankylosing spondylitis (AS), necessitating refined classification criteria. The recommendations from the Assessment of Spondylarthritis international Society (ASAS) provide valuable guidance due to the limited direct evidence. Emerging therapies, including interleukin-23 (IL-23) inhibitors or Janus kinase (JAK) inhibitors, are under investigation for axPsA. Currently, secukinumab, an interleukin-17 (IL-17) inhibitor, is an evidence-based option for axPsA management. However, given the variability in individual patient responses and disease manifestations, personalized, evidence-based treatment approaches remain essential for optimizing patient outcomes. In the final section, two real-life cases illustrate the challenges in managing axPsA, emphasizing the importance of tailored therapies. Achieving precision in defining axPsA remains a formidable task, making detailed criteria essential for effective strategies and improving patient outcomes.

No difference in clinical parameters and drug retention in PsA patients receiving b/tsDMARD monotherapy versus combination with methotrexate: data from the RABBIT-SpA registry

BACKGROUND

The potential benefit of methotrexate (MTX) in combination with biologic (b) and targeted synthetic (ts) disease modifying anti-rheumatic drugs (DMARDs) in psoriatic arthritis (PsA) is still a matter of debate.

OBJECTIVES

To compare clinical and patient reported characteristics as well as drug retention rates in PsA patients receiving b/tsDMARD monotherapy or in combination with MTX.

METHODS

RABBIT-SpA is a prospective longitudinal cohort study including axSpA and PsA patients. In this analysis, PsA patients were stratified into two groups: starting b/tsDMARD as monotherapy or in combination with MTX. Treatment retention was compared by drug survival analysis.

RESULTS

69% of the patients (n=900) started b/tsDMARD as monotherapy while 31% were treated in combination with MTX (n=405). At baseline, clinical domains like skin, nail and joint affection, dactylitis, enthesitis and axial involvement were similar between the groups. Only the patients' satisfaction concerning tolerability of the previous treatment was significantly better in the combination group at treatment start. Drug retention rates did not differ between the groups (p=0.4). At 6/12 months, 66%/48% of patients in monotherapy and 67%/48% in the combination group were still on their original treatment.

CONCLUSIONS

We did not identify any clinical parameters with notable influence on the choice of b/tsDMARD mono or MTX-combination therapy in PsA. Drug retention rates are similar between mono and combination therapy. It seems that the decision to continue MTX at initiation of b/tsDMARDs is mostly based on the subjective tolerability of MTX treatment.

Early clinical response associates with long-term outcomes with ixekizumab in radiographic axial spondyloarthritis

BACKGROUND

The Assessment of SpondyloArthritis international Society-European Alliance of Associations for Rheumatology recommendations for axial spondyloarthritis (axSpA) management include patient assessment for biological disease-modifying antirheumatic drug (bDMARD) treatment response after at least 12 weeks of treatment. The current treat-to-target strategy for axSpA is to achieve inactive disease (ID; Axial Spondyloarthritis Disease Activity Score (ASDAS) <1.3) or at least low disease activity (LDA; 1.3≤ASDAS<2.1).To investigate the association between treatment response at week 12 and/or week 24 and attainment of the ASDAS<2.1 treat-to-target recommendation at week 52 in bDMARD-naïve patients with radiographic (r-)axSpA treated with ixekizumab (IXE).

METHODS

This post hoc analysis included patients randomly assigned to IXE 80 mg every 4 weeks from COAST-V (NCT02696785), a phase 3 trial in bDMARD-naïve patients with r-axSpA. The proportion of patients who achieved ASDAS<2.1 at week 52 was measured among those who attained or not clinically important improvement (CII, ∆ASDAS≥1.1) response, and among those with ID, LDA and high or very high disease activity at week 12 and/or week 24. Non-response was assumed for missing data.

RESULTS

Amongst 81 patients, 47 (58.0%) achieved ASDAS CII at week 12, with 70.2% (n=33) achieving ASDAS<2.1 at week 52. At week 24, 52 (64.2%) patients achieved ASDAS CII, with 71.2% (n=37) achieving ASDAS<2.1 at week 52. Of the 24 patients who did not achieve ASDAS CII at either week 12 or week 24, 5 (20.8%) achieved ASDAS<2.1 at week 52.

CONCLUSION

This analysis reinforces the current recommendation that continuing treatment in those achieving ASDAS CII at week 12 and/or week 24 increases the likelihood of obtaining ID/LDA at week 52.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

NCT02696785.

Artificial intelligence and machine learning in axial spondyloarthritis

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

To evaluate the current applications and prospects of artificial intelligence and machine learning in diagnosing and managing axial spondyloarthritis (axSpA), focusing on their role in medical imaging, predictive modelling, and patient monitoring.

RECENT FINDINGS

Artificial intelligence, particularly deep learning, is showing promise in diagnosing axSpA assisting with X-ray, computed tomography (CT) and MRI analyses, with some models matching or outperforming radiologists in detecting sacroiliitis and markers. Moreover, it is increasingly being used in predictive modelling of disease progression and personalized treatment, and could aid risk assessment, treatment response and clinical subtype identification. Variable study designs, sample sizes and the predominance of retrospective, single-centre studies still limit the generalizability of results.

SUMMARY

Artificial intelligence technologies have significant potential to advance the diagnosis and treatment of axSpA, providing more accurate, efficient and personalized healthcare solutions. However, their integration into clinical practice requires rigorous validation, ethical and legal considerations, and comprehensive training for healthcare professionals. Future advances in artificial intelligence could complement clinical expertise and improve patient care through improved diagnostic accuracy and tailored therapeutic strategies, but the challenge remains to ensure that these technologies are validated in prospective multicentre trials and ethically integrated into patient care.

Defining the Minimal Important Change and Meaningful Change Value of the Disease Activity Index for Psoriatic Arthritis: A Chinese Longitudinal Study

OBJECTIVE

To determine the minimal important change (MIC) and meaningful change value (MCV) of the Disease Activity Index for Psoriatic Arthritis (DAPSA) and the effect size (ES) of DAPSA.

METHODS

This was a retrospective cohort study, recruiting 106 patients who agreed to participate in the research from the Department of Dermatology, Xiangya Hospital, between November 1, 2019, and April 1, 2023. An anchor-based method using linear regression analyses was used to determine the MICs and MCVs of the DAPSA. The anchor question assessed whether the patient's well-being had changed since their previous visit, employing a 5-point Likert scale that ranged from "much improved" to "much deteriorated."

RESULTS

The overall MIC value was 8.4 (95% CI 0.01-16.75). The MIC improvement was 9.5 (95% CI 0.89-18.14) and MIC deterioration was 1.1 (95% CI -9.81 to 12.05). The overall MCV was 10.5 (95% CI 4.34-16.72). MCV improvement was 11.4 (95% CI 5.95-16.95) and MCV deterioration was 1.1 (95% CI -9.81 to 12.05). The ES was 0.6.

CONCLUSION

A change in DAPSA of 8.4 is indicative of an MIC, offering physicians an additional means to contextualize the patient's perception of disease activity during treatment, and a change in DAPSA of 10.5 is likely to be regarded as MCV. These values can enhance the utility of DAPSA in psoriatic arthritis clinical trials.