Tumour necrosis factor blockade for the treatment of erosive osteoarthritis of the interphalangeal finger joints: a double blind, randomised trial on structure modification

Blockade of the vaspin-AP-1 axis inhibits arthritis development

The trapping of pathogenic ligands can potentially be used to prevent signal transduction mediated by catabolic factor expression in osteoarthritis (OA). Although vaspin is known to function as a pathogenic ligand and represents a novel adipokine, little is known about its function and the impact of its nebulization-based administration in OA. Here we provide a report on the function of vaspin in articular chondrocytes and OA model mice. RNA sequencing analysis and ingenuity pathway analysis demonstrated that vaspin upregulation in chondrocytes triggers OA development-related signaling. Vaspin is upregulated in the injured cartilage of patients with OA and DMM (Destabilization of the Medial Meniscus) mice, and its overexpression induces catabolic factor expression in vitro under OA-mimicked conditions. Col2a1-vaspin Tg (Transgenic) animals showed extensive cartilage degradation, whereas vaspin-/- (knockout) mice exhibited decreased OA development. Furthermore, in silico and biochemical analyses showed that vaspin activates the p38 and JNK signaling pathways to regulate AP-1-driven catabolic factor production and cartilage breakdown. Finally, we identified and characterized a vaspin-targeting nanobody, vas nanobody, and showed that intraarticularly injected vas nanobody could effectively block the vaspin-AP-1 axis to treat OA in DMM mice. Together, our results suggest that blockade of the vaspin-AP-1 axis could be an effective therapeutic approach for preventing OA development.

BCLAF1 Regulates Osteoarthritic Cartilage Degradation Through Interaction with LAMTOR2

Osteoarthritis (OA) is a progressive degenerative joint disorder with cartilage degradation as the primary cause of joint pain and loss of joint function. B-cell lymphoma-2-associated transcription factor 1 (BCLAF1) is a key regulator of apoptosis and serves as a signal transducer of the NFκB and Hif-1α pathways, both of which are involved in osteoarthritic cartilage degradation. However, whether BCLAF1 contributes to the pathogenesis of OA remains unclear. The present study aims to elucidate the role of BCLAF1 in osteoarthritic cartilage degradation and the underlying mechanisms. We found that BCLAF1 levels were increased in cartilage tissue from OA patients, elder and surgery-induced OA mice, and primary chondrocytes treated with inflammatory cytokines. Knockdown of Bclaf1 in chondrocytes inhibited the expression of catabolic factors and apoptosis rate, while promoting the expression of anabolic factors and enhancing chondrocyte functions such as viability and migration. Conversely, overexpression of Bclaf1 produced the opposite effects. Furthermore, intra-articular injection of adenovirus containing shRNA targeting Bclaf1 attenuated cartilage degradation and osteophytosis in a mouse OA model, while overexpression of BCLAF1 further aggravated cartilage degradation and osteophytosis in vivo. Through immunoprecipitation and protein mass spectrometry, we identified LAMTOR2 as a key mediator of BCLAF1 by regulating the translocation of BCLAF1 into the nucleus. Our findings reveal the critical role and key mechanisms of BCLAF1 in regulating cartilage degradation, representing a novel molecular target for the therapeutic development of OA.

Efficacy and safety of non-pharmacological, pharmacological and surgical treatments for hand osteoarthritis in 2024: a systematic review

BACKGROUND

We aimed to update the 2018 systematic literature review on the efficacy and safety of treatments for hand osteoarthritis (OA), which was based on 126 studies.

METHODS

We performed a systematic literature search on randomised controlled trials from June 2017 up to 31 December 2023. Risk of bias was assessed using the RoB2 tool. Meta-analyses of previous and new studies regarding the efficacy for pain, function, grip strength and OMERACT/OARSI responders were performed. Certainty of evidence was judged using the GRADE (Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation) tool.

RESULTS

Sixty-five new studies were included. For non-pharmacological interventions, there was low-certainty evidence for a small long-term effect of hand exercises and a moderate long-term effect of thumb orthoses for pain, and moderate-certainty evidence that assistive devices had a moderate long-term effect on function. Concerning pharmacological interventions, there was low-certainty evidence for a moderate short-term effect of oral non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) on pain, high- and moderate-certainty evidence for a small short-term effect of topical NSAIDs and oral glucocorticoids on function, respectively, and low-certainty evidence that oral glucocorticoids had a small short-term effect on function. Further, there was low-certainty evidence that methotrexate had a small long-term effect on pain. The heterogeneity of studies did not allow for any meta-analyses on surgery.

CONCLUSION

The results largely support current treatment recommendations. However, there is a lack of interventions that efficiently improve grip strength, and the evidence for most current treatments is still limited. To better understand action mechanism of different treatments, future trials should include hand OA subtyping and be powered for subgroup analyses.

Synovitis scoring in hand osteoarthritis with ultrasonography: the performance of the Global OMERACT/EULAR Ultrasound Synovitis Score (GLOESS) is comparable to synovial thickening alone

BACKGROUND

Inflammation is increasingly recognised as a treatment target in hand osteoarthritis, and therefore correct measurement of local inflammation is essential. This study aimed to assess ultrasound scoring of synovitis and the additional value of the Global OMERACT/EULAR Ultrasound Synovitis Score (GLOESS) in hand osteoarthritis.

METHODS

Data from the randomised, double-blinded Hand Osteoarthritis Prednisolone Efficacy (HOPE) trial were used. The HOPE trial included patients with painful, inflammatory hand OA, treated with prednisolone or placebo (1:1). Ultrasound was performed in 30 hand joints at weeks 0, 6 and 14. Effusion, synovial thickening and Doppler signal were measured, the GLOESS was calculated from the latter two. Joint tenderness on palpation was assessed semiquantitatively (0-3), soft swelling as present/absent. Changes in ultrasound scores, and their association with change in joint tenderness or soft swelling, were investigated using generalised estimating equations. Effect sizes were calculated.

RESULTS

Of 92 included patients 79% were women, with mean (SD) age 63.9 (8.8) and body mass index 27.2 (4.6). Synovial thickening was the most prevalent. All ultrasound scores were strongly associated with joint tenderness and soft swelling cross-sectionally. There was no association of change in ultrasound scores with change in tenderness, but there was with change in soft tissue swelling. Synovial thickening and the GLOESS responded to treatment (effect size -0.39 (-0.72 to -0.07), -0.39 (-0.71 to -0.07), respectively).

DISCUSSION

Various ultrasound scores were associated with joint tenderness and soft swelling. The GLOESS and synovial thickening were both responsive to treatment, but GLOESS was not superior to synovial thickening alone.

Effect of heated mittens on physical hand function in people with hand osteoarthritis: randomised controlled trial

OBJECTIVE

To assess the effect of electrically heated mittens on physical hand function in people with osteoarthritis of the hands compared with control mittens.

DESIGN

Randomised controlled trial.

SETTING

Osteoarthritis outpatient clinic, Copenhagen, Denmark.

PARTICIPANTS

200 people with hand osteoarthritis aged 42-90 years. 100 participants were assigned to the intervention group and 100 to the control group.

INTERVENTIONS

Electrically heated mittens or control mittens (heating elements disconnected) worn for at least 15 minutes daily for six weeks.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

The primary outcome was change in hand function measured on the function subscale of the Australian/Canadian hand osteoarthritis index (AUSCAN; score 0-100 points) at six weeks. Key secondary outcomes included changes in the AUSCAN hand pain subscale (score 0-100 points), global rating of hand osteoarthritis related problems (0-100 visual analogue scale), and grip strength (newtons) at six weeks. Analysis of secondary outcomes was performed using a hierarchical gatekeeping approach.

RESULTS

91 participants in the intervention group and 95 in the control group completed the trial. The mean age of participants was 71 years, 87% (n=173) were women, and mean body mass index was 24.9 (SD 4.4). Median disease duration was 10 years (interquartile range 5-15 years). The between group difference for change in AUSCAN function at week 6 was 3.0 points (95% confidence interval (CI) -0.4 to 6.3; P=0.09) in favour of heated mittens. For the key secondary outcome, change in AUSCAN hand pain score from baseline, a group difference was observed of 5.9 points (95% CI 2.2 to 9.5) in favour of heated mittens. Changes in global rating of hand osteoarthritis related problems and grip strength did not differ between the groups with an observed difference between groups of 2.8 points (95% CI -3.7 to 9.2) and 2.3 newtons (95% CI -16.3 to 21.0) in favour of heated mittens, respectively.

CONCLUSION

Use of electrically heated mittens for six weeks was not related to a positive change in physical hand function compared with control mittens. Heated mittens provided no additional benefits on global rating of hand osteoarthritis related problems and grip strength. A small benefit was detected for hand pain, but this could have been overestimated.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

ClinicalTrials.gov NCT04576403.

Cellular and molecular mechanisms underlying obesity in degenerative spine and joint diseases

Degenerative spine and joint diseases, including intervertebral disc degeneration (IDD), ossification of the spinal ligaments (OSL), and osteoarthritis (OA), are common musculoskeletal diseases that cause pain or disability to the patients. However, the pathogenesis of these musculoskeletal disorders is complex and has not been elucidated clearly to date. As a matter of fact, the spine and joints are not independent of other organs and tissues. Recently, accumulating evidence demonstrates the association between obesity and degenerative musculoskeletal diseases. Obesity is a common metabolic disease characterized by excessive adipose tissue or abnormal adipose distribution in the body. Excessive mechanical stress is regarded as a critical risk factor for obesity-related pathology. Additionally, obesity-related factors, mainly including lipid metabolism disorder, dysregulated pro-inflammatory adipokines and cytokines, are reported as plausible links between obesity and various human diseases. Importantly, these obesity-related factors are deeply involved in the regulation of cell phenotypes and cell fates, extracellular matrix (ECM) metabolism, and inflammation in the pathophysiological processes of degenerative spine and joint diseases. In this study, we systematically discuss the potential cellular and molecular mechanisms underlying obesity in these degenerative musculoskeletal diseases, and hope to provide novel insights for developing targeted therapeutic strategies.

Repurposing drugs for the treatment of osteoarthritis

OBJECTIVE

Currently, no disease-modifying therapies for osteoarthritis (OA) exist, and attempts to identify novel cellular targets have been challenging. Risk factors for OA include advanced age, obesity, and metabolic syndrome. This creates an attractive opportunity to repurpose existing drugs that are used to treat comorbidities commonly encountered in patients with OA, if those drugs possess OA disease modifying properties.

METHODS

This narrative review incorporates findings from knee or hand OA randomized clinical trials, post-hoc clinical trial analyses, prospective cohort studies, and observational data.

RESULTS

Drugs used for the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis (methotrexate; TNFa, IL-1, and IL-6 pathway inhibitors; hydroxychloroquine), atopic/allergic disease (anti-histamines), osteoporosis (bisphosphonates and vitamin D), type 2 diabetes (metformin and GLP-1 agonists), and cardiovascular disease (atorvastatin, fish oil, and beta blockers) were reviewed for their potential benefit in OA. This review outlines the successful attributes of repurposed drugs, the challenges in repurposing drugs, and strategies for future clinical trials to support OA drug repurposing. Potential drug candidates for OA may be identified through the use of existing datasets and via collaborations with researchers in other fields to include OA endpoints in future clinical trials.

CONCLUSION

Given the association of OA with several commonly treated comorbidities, drug repurposing is an appealing approach that could provide a favorable benefit-to-risk ratio for chronic OA treatment.

Inflammation as a therapeutic target for osteoarthritis: A literature review of clinical trials

The burden of osteoarthritis (OA) is rapidly increasing with population aging, but there are still no approved disease-modifying drugs available. Accumulating evidence has shown that OA is a heterogeneous disease with multiple phenotypes, and it is unlikely to respond to one-size-fits-all treatments. Inflammation is recognized as an important phenotype of OA and is associated with worse pain and joint deterioration. Therefore, it is believed that anti-inflammatory treatments may be more effective for OA with an inflammatory phenotype. In this review, we summarized clinical trials that evaluated anti-inflammatory treatments for OA and discussed whether these treatments are more effective in inflammatory OA phenotypes compared to general OA patients.

Hand osteoarthritis: A fresh look

Hand osteoarthritis (OA) has been the subject of numerous publications in recent years, particularly in the fields of imaging and therapeutics. The imaging studies revealed a good correlation between the presence of synovitis and/or subchondral edema and arthritic joint pain. Several randomized controlled trials (RCTs) have assessed the efficacy of biologics and conventional DMARDs in patients with symptomatic hand OA. No less than six RCTs have evaluated the symptomatic and, in some cases, structural efficacy of anti-IL-1, anti-TNF or anti-IL-6 drugs. Overall, the results of these trials were disappointing - none of them demonstrated superiority over placebo. There were also two negative trials with hydroxychloroquine. In the end, the only trial that was positive evaluated 10mg oral prednisone versus placebo for 6 weeks in patients with flares of hand OA and synovitis visible on ultrasound. While that trial confirms the role of inflammation in hand OA, it should obviously not encourage the long-term use of corticosteroids as a symptomatic treatment.

The Role of MicroRNAs in the Pathophysiology of Osteoarthritis

Worldwide, osteoarthritis (OA) is the most common cause of joint pain in older people. Many factors contribute to osteoarthritis' development and progression, including secondary osteoarthritis' underlying causes. It is important to note that osteoarthritis affects all four tissues: cartilage, bone, joint capsule, and articular apparatus. An increasingly prominent area of research in osteoarthritis regulation is microRNAs (miRNAs), a small, single-stranded RNA molecule that controls gene expression in eukaryotes. We aimed to assess and summarize current knowledge about the mechanisms of the action of miRNAs and their clinical significance. Osteoarthritis (OA) is affected by the interaction between miRNAs and inflammatory processes, as well as cartilage metabolism. MiRNAs also influence cartilage cell apoptosis, contributing to the degradation of the cartilage in OA. Studies have shown that miRNAs may have both an inhibitory and promoting effect on osteoporosis progression through their influence on molecular mechanisms. By identifying these regulators, targeted treatments for osteoarthritis may be developed. In addition, microRNA may also serve as a biomarker for osteoarthritis. By using these biomarkers, the disease could be detected faster, and early intervention can be instituted to prevent mobility loss and slow deterioration.

Fibrotic pathways and fibroblast-like synoviocyte phenotypes in osteoarthritis

Osteoarthritis (OA) is the most common form of arthritis, characterized by osteophyte formation, cartilage degradation, and structural and cellular alterations of the synovial membrane. Activated fibroblast-like synoviocytes (FLS) of the synovial membrane have been identified as key drivers, secreting humoral mediators that maintain inflammatory processes, proteases that cause cartilage and bone destruction, and factors that drive fibrotic processes. In normal tissue repair, fibrotic processes are terminated after the damage has been repaired. In fibrosis, tissue remodeling and wound healing are exaggerated and prolonged. Various stressors, including aging, joint instability, and inflammation, lead to structural damage of the joint and micro lesions within the synovial tissue. One result is the reduced production of synovial fluid (lubricants), which reduces the lubricity of the cartilage areas, leading to cartilage damage. In the synovial tissue, a wound-healing cascade is initiated by activating macrophages, Th2 cells, and FLS. The latter can be divided into two major populations. The destructive thymocyte differentiation antigen (THY)1─ phenotype is restricted to the synovial lining layer. In contrast, the THY1+ phenotype of the sublining layer is classified as an invasive one with immune effector function driving synovitis. The exact mechanisms involved in the transition of fibroblasts into a myofibroblast-like phenotype that drives fibrosis remain unclear. The review provides an overview of the phenotypes and spatial distribution of FLS in the synovial membrane of OA, describes the mechanisms of fibroblast into myofibroblast activation, and the metabolic alterations of myofibroblast-like cells.

RANKL blockade for erosive hand osteoarthritis: a randomized placebo-controlled phase 2a trial

Erosive hand osteoarthritis (OA) is a prevalent and disabling disease with limited treatment options. Here we present the results of a monocentric, placebo-controlled, double-blind, randomized phase 2a clinical trial with denosumab, a receptor activator of nuclear factor-κB ligand inhibitor, evaluating the effects on structure modification in erosive hand OA. Patients were randomized to 48 weeks treatment with denosumab 60 mg every 3 months (n = 51, 41 females) or placebo (n = 49, 37 females). The primary (radiographic) endpoint was the change in the total Ghent University Scoring System (GUSS) at week 24, where positive changes correspond to remodeling and negative changes to erosive progression. Secondary endpoints were the change in the GUSS at week 48 and the number of new erosive joints at week 48 by the anatomical phase scoring system. Baseline mean GUSS (standard deviation) of target joints was 155.9 (69.3) in the denosumab group and 158.7 (46.8) in the placebo group. The primary endpoint was met with an estimated difference between groups of 8.9 (95% confidence interval (CI) 1.0 to 16.9; P = 0.024) at week 24. This effect was confirmed at week 48 (baseline adjusted GUSS (standard error of the mean) denosumab and placebo were 163.5 (2.9) and 149.2 (3.9), respectively; with an estimated difference between groups of 14.3 (95% CI 4.6 to 24.0; P = 0.003)). At patient level, more new erosive joints were developed in the placebo group compared with denosumab at week 48 (odds ratio 0.24 (95% CI 0.08 to 0.72); P = 0.009). More adverse events occurred in the placebo group (125 events in 44 patients (90%)) compared with the denosumab group (97 events in 41 patients (80%)). These results demonstrate that denosumab has structure modifying effects in erosive hand OA by inducing remodeling and preventing new erosive joints. EU Clinical Trials Register identifier 2015-003223-53 .

Synovial inflammation in osteoarthritis. A treatable target?

Synovial inflammation is present in osteoarthritis and associated with pain and structural damage, so it is hypothesized that anti-inflammatory drugs might be of use in osteoarthritis. However, nine randomized clinical trials targeting pro-inflammatory cytokines, especially IL-1 and TNFα, did not show an effect on short-term pain relief (as primary end-points). These results were rather disappointing. The questions is whether the results reflect a true lack of effect of anti-inflammatory drugs in osteoarthritis, or whether there are alternative explanations. Currently, we lack insight in the pathobiology of the synovitis-driven endotype and in cross-talk between tissues in the osteoarthritic joint, complicating identification of the appropriate patients for trials and of the best outcome measures. Furthermore we lack classification criteria to define inflammatory osteoarthritis complicating selection of patients. We do know that anti-inflammatory corticosteroids alleviate pain in osteoarthritis, warranting further investigation of other mediators than IL-1 and TNFα. Now, trials are set up with short follow-up aiming for short-term pain alleviation. For investigation of pain alleviation in the context of disease modification, trials with at least one year follow-up should be performed.

Role of Apoptosis in the Pathogenesis of Osteoarthritis: An Explicative Review

Apoptosis is a complex regulatory, active cell death process that plays a role in cell development, homeostasis, and ageing. Cancer, developmental defects, and degenerative diseases are all pathogenic disorders caused by apoptosis dysregulation. Osteoarthritis (OA) is by far the most frequently diagnosed joint disease in the aged, and it is characterized by the ongoing breakdown of articular cartilage, which causes severe disability. Multiple variables regulate the anabolic and catabolic pathways of the cartilage matrix, which either directly or indirectly contribute to cartilage degeneration in osteoarthritis. Articular cartilage is a highly specialized tissue made up of an extracellular matrix of cells that are tightly packed together. As a result, chondrocyte survival is crucial for the preservation of an optimal cartilage matrix, and chondrocyte characteristics and survival compromise may result in articular cartilage failure. Inflammatory cytokines can either promote or inhibit apoptosis, the process of programmed cell death. Pro-apoptotic cytokines like TNF-α can induce cell death, while anti-apoptotic cytokines like IL-4 and IL-10 protect against apoptosis. The balance between these cytokines plays a critical role in determining cell fate and has implications for tissue damage and disease progression. Similarly, they contribute to the progression of OA by disrupting the metabolic balance in joint tissues by promoting catabolic and anabolic pathways. Their impact on cell joints, as well as the impacts of cell signalling pathways on cytokines and inflammatory substances, determines their function in osteoarthritis development. Apoptosis is evident in osteoarthritic cartilage; however, determining the relative role of chondrocyte apoptosis in the aetiology of OA is difficult, and the rate of apoptotic chondrocytes in osteoarthritic cartilage is inconsistent. The current study summarises the role of apoptosis in the development of osteoarthritis, the mediators, and signalling pathways that trigger the cascade of events, and the other inflammatory features involved.

Efficacy of tumor necrosis factor inhibitors in hand osteoarthritis: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

Objectives

This study aimed at systematically review the evidence for the efficacy of Tumor Necrosis Factor (TNF) inhibitors on symptoms and structural outcomes in hand osteoarthritis.

Methods

Three databases were searched for randomized controlled trials examining the efficacy of TNF inhibitors in hand osteoarthritis. Two authors extracted data and assessed the risk of bias. The mean difference (MD) was calculated, and a random-effects meta-analysis was performed.

Results

Four studies were identified involving 276 participants. Meta-analysis showed that TNF inhibitors had no effect on pain at 4-6 weeks (MD -0.93, 95%CI -7.41 to 5.55; 2 studies) and 24-26 weeks (MD -3.82, 95%CI -11.46 to 3.83; 2 studies) and no effect on grip strength at 12 months (MD -0.35, 95%CI -1.08 to 0.37; 2 studies). There was limited evidence for the effect of TNF inhibitors on structural outcomes at 12 months. Subgroup analysis from 2 studies showed beneficial effect of TNF inhibitors on reducing the progression of structural outcomes in hand OA patients with signs of inflammation but not in those without inflammation. The certainty of the evidence was low for the effect of TNF inhibitor on pain and moderate for the effect on grip strength.

Conclusion

This study found no effect of TNF inhibitors on clinical outcomes in hand osteoarthritis over the short term (<6 weeks) and within one year, with some evidence for beneficial effect on structural outcomes.

Comparative validation of the knee inflammation MRI scoring system and the MRI osteoarthritis knee score for semi-quantitative assessment of bone marrow lesions and synovitis-effusion in osteoarthritis: an international multi-reader exercise

Background

Bone marrow lesions (BMLs) and synovitis on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) are associated with symptoms and predict degeneration of articular cartilage in osteoarthritis (OA). Validated methods for their semiquantitative assessment on MRI are available, but they all have similar scoring designs and questionable sensitivity to change. New scoring methods with completely different designs need to be developed and compared to existing methods.

Objectives

To compare the performance of new web-based versions of the Knee Inflammation MRI Scoring System (KIMRISS) with the MRI OA Knee Score (MOAKS) for quantification of BMLs and synovitis-effusion (S-E).

Design

Retrospective follow-up cohort.

Methods

We designed web-based overlays outlining regions in the knee that are scored for BML in MOAKS and KIMRISS. For KIMRISS, both BML and S-E are scored on consecutive sagittal slices. The performance of these methods was compared in an international reading exercise of 8 readers evaluating 60 pairs of scans conducted 1 year apart from cases recruited to the OA Initiative (OAI) cohort. Interobserver reliability for baseline status and baseline to 1 year change in BML and S-E was assessed by intra-class correlation coefficient (ICC) and smallest detectable change (SDC). Feasibility was assessed using the System Usability Scale (SUS).

Results

Mean change in BML and S-E was minimal over 1 year. Pre-specified targets for acceptable reliability (ICC ⩾ 0.80 and ⩾ 0.70 for status and change scores, respectively) were achieved more frequently for KIMRISS for both BML and synovitis. Mean (95% CI) ICC for change in BML was 0.88 (0.83-0.92) and 0.69 (0.60-0.78) for KIMRISS and MOAKS, respectively. KIMRISS mean SUS usability score was 85.7 and at the 95th centile of ranking for usability versus a score of 55.4 and 20th centile for MOAKS.

Conclusion

KIMRISS had superior performance metrics to MOAKS for quantification of BML and S-E. Both methods should be further compared in trials of new therapies for OA.

Latest insights in disease-modifying osteoarthritis drugs development

Osteoarthritis (OA) is a prevalent and severely debilitating disease with an unmet medical need. In order to alleviate OA symptoms or prevent structural progression of OA, new drugs, particularly disease-modifying osteoarthritis drugs (DMOADs), are required. Several drugs have been reported to attenuate cartilage loss or reduce subchondral bone lesions in OA and thus potentially be DMOADs. Most biologics (including interleukin-1 (IL-1) and tumor necrosis factor (TNF) inhibitors), sprifermin, and bisphosphonates failed to yield satisfactory results when treating OA. OA clinical heterogeneity is one of the primary reasons for the failure of these clinical trials, which can require different therapeutic approaches based on different phenotypes. This review describes the latest insights into the development of DMOADs. We summarize in this review the efficacy and safety profiles of various DMOADs targeting cartilage, synovitis, and subchondral bone endotypes in phase 2 and 3 clinical trials. To conclude, we summarize the reasons for clinical trial failures in OA and suggest possible solutions.

Systematic Review of Non-surgical Therapies for Osteoarthritis of the Hand: An Update

Hand osteoarthritis is a common disease with significant morbidity. This review aimed to update our earlier systematic reviews which included all published randomized controlled trials evaluating pharmacological and non-pharmacological therapies in patients with hand osteoarthritis. A total of 133 randomized controlled trials evaluating pharmacological and nonpharmacological therapies in hand osteoarthritis were reviewed. Overall, the methodological quality of randomized controlled trials has improved since the last update. Almost all new studies described their methods for randomization, blinding, and allocation concealment. However, studies continued to underreport features specific to hand osteoarthritis, such as pattern of joint involvement and number of affected joints. Standardized outcome assessments for pain and function were commonly presented, but measures of other hand osteoarthritis specific outcomes, such as health-related quality of life and patient global assessments, continued to be underreported. Future trials should consistently report on hand osteo arthritis specific features and outcome assessments in order to make clinically relevant conclusions about the efficacy of the diverse treatment options available.

Soluble and EV-Associated Diagnostic and Prognostic Biomarkers in Knee Osteoarthritis Pathology and Detection

Osteoarthritis (OA) is the most common degenerative disease of the connective tissue of the human musculoskeletal system. Despite its widespread prevalence, there are many limitations in its diagnosis and treatment. OA diagnosis currently relies on the presence of clinical symptoms, sometimes accompanied by changes in joint X-rays or MRIs. Biomarkers help not only to diagnose early disease progression but also to understand the process of OA in many ways. In this article, we briefly summarize information on articular joints and joint tissues, the pathogenesis of OA and review the literature about biomarkers in the field of OA, specifically inflammatory cytokines/chemokines, proteins, miRNA, and metabolic biomarkers found in the blood, synovial fluid and in extracellular vesicles.

An update on the use of conventional and biological disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs in hand osteoarthritis

Osteoarthritis (OA) is a highly prevalent condition worldwide associated with pain, progressive disability, reduced participation in social activities, and impaired quality of life. Despite its growing burden, the therapeutic options are still limited and almost exclusively addressed to symptoms' management, while no disease-modifying OA drugs able to prevent or retard disease progression are actually available. For these reasons, in the last decades, relevant efforts to find new potential therapeutic targets in OA have been made and a number of existing conventional and biological disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs (DMARDs), including hydroxychloroquine (HCQ), methotrexate (MTX), tumor necrosis factor (TNF)-α, interleukin (IL)-1, and IL-6 inhibitors, commonly used to treat inflammatory rheumatic diseases, have been repurposed for the treatment of OA and explored also in hand osteoarthritis (HOA). The current narrative review was aimed to provide a comprehensive and updated understanding of the possibilities and the criticisms related to the treatment of HOA with conventional and biological DMARDs. Unfortunately, therapy with conventional and biologic drugs in HOA has not achieved the expected success, despite a rationale for their use exists. Thus, our findings outline the urgent need to enhance the exploration of HOA basic molecular mechanisms to find new potential therapeutic targets, personalized for each patient, and appropriate for the different subsets of HOA and for the different phases of disease.

Biologic principles of minced cartilage implantation: a narrative review

Cartilage tissue has a very limited ability to regenerate. Symptomatic cartilage lesions are currently treated by various cartilage repair techniques. Multiple treatment techniques have been proposed in the last 30 years. Nevertheless, no single technique is accepted as a gold standard. Minced cartilage implantation is a newer technique that has garnered increasing attention. This procedure is attractive because it is autologous, can be performed in a single surgery, and is therefore given it is cost-effective. This narrative review provides an overview of the biological potential of current cartilage regenerative repair techniques with a focus on the translational evidence of minced cartilage implantation.

Targeting Inflammation and Regeneration: Scaffolds, Extracellular Vesicles, and Nanotechnologies as Cell-Free Dual-Target Therapeutic Strategies

Osteoarthritis (OA) affects over 250 million people worldwide and despite various existing treatment strategies still has no cure. It is a multifactorial disease characterized by cartilage loss and low-grade synovial inflammation. Focusing on these two targets together could be the key to developing currently missing disease-modifying OA drugs (DMOADs). This review aims to discuss the latest cell-free techniques applied in cartilage tissue regeneration, since they can provide a more controllable approach to inflammation management than the cell-based ones. Scaffolds, extracellular vesicles, and nanocarriers can be used to suppress inflammation, but they can also act as immunomodulatory agents. This is consistent with the latest tissue engineering paradigm, postulating a moderate, controllable inflammatory reaction to be beneficial for tissue remodeling and successful regeneration.

Effect of disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs in osteoarthritis: A meta-analysis

OBJECTIVE

Osteoarthritis (OA) displays features of systemic and local inflammation, suggesting that DMARDs used in rheumatoid arthritis could potentially also be effective in OA. However, studies of the effects of DMARDs in OA have yielded conflicting data, and have been insufficiently large to draw conclusions. In this meta-analysis, we aimed to estimate the effect of DMARDs - such as methotrexate, hydroxychloroquine, TNF, and IL-1 inhibitors - on OA.

METHODS

We searched for relevant articles of randomized controlled trials published up to March 2022, using Pubmed, EMBASE, and the Cochrane Library. Studies were reviewed in accordance with PRISMA 2020 guidelines. The effects of DMARDs on OA outcomes (symptoms, quality of life, ESR) were expressed as the standardized mean difference.

RESULTS

We retrieved 29 references. Among these, 23 randomized controlled trials compared the effects of DMARDs versus placebo or other treatments on disease activity, including 1143 DMARD-treated OA patients and 1155 OA patients in the control group. We found statistically significant improvement of pain and stiffness with methotrexate, especially in knee OA. TNF inhibitors improved the swollen joint count in hand OA, and inflammation parameters, without change in pain, stiffness, or function. Hydroxychloroquine and IL-1 inhibitors were not effective.

CONCLUSION

Overall, the presently available data regarding the effects of DMARDs on OA symptoms intensity are disappointing. Only methotrexate might have an analgesic effect, especially in knee OA, which warrants further investigation.

Dorso-ventral osteophytes of interphalangeal joints correlate with cartilage damage and synovial inflammation in hand osteoarthritis: a histological/radiographical study

Objective

To detect dorsally located osteophytes (OP) on lateral x-ray views and to correlate their presence with the extent of structural joint damage, determined by histologic grading (cartilage damage and synovial inflammation) and radiographic scoring in hand osteoarthritis (HOA).

Methods

Distal interphalangeal (DIP) and proximal interphalangeal (PIP) joints were obtained from post mortem specimens (n = 40). Multiplanar plain x-rays were taken (dorso/palmar (dp) and lateral views). Radiographic OA was determined by the Kellgren and Lawrence classification. Joint samples were prepared for histological analysis and cartilage damage was graded according to the Mankin scoring system. Inflammatory changes of the synovial membrane were scored using the general synovitis score (GSS). Spearman’s correlation was applied to examine the relationship between histological and radiographical changes. Differences between groups were determined by Mann-Whitney test.

Results

Bony proliferations that were only detectable on lateral views but reminiscent of OPs on dp images were termed dorso-ventral osteophytes (dvOPs). All joints displaying dvOPs were classified as OA and the presence of dvOPs in DIP and PIP joints correlated with the extent of histological and radiographic joint damage, as well as with patient age. Joint damage in osteoarthritic DIP and PIP joints without any dvOPs was less severe compared to joints with dvOPs. Synovial inflammation was mainly present in joints displaying dvOPs and correlated with joint damage.

Conclusion

dvOPs are associated with increasing structural alterations in DIP and PIP joints and can be seen as markers of advanced joint damage. Detecting dvOPs can facilitate the diagnosis process and improve damage estimation in HOA.

Relative Efficacy and Safety of Anti-Inflammatory Biologic Agents for Osteoarthritis: A Conventional and Network Meta-Analysis

Previous studies have consistently revealed that both local and systemic inflammations are the key to the onset and progression of osteoarthritis (OA). Thus, anti-inflammatory biologic agents could potentially attenuate the progression of OA. We conducted this meta-analysis to examine the efficacy and safety of ant-inflammatory biologic agents among OA patients.

METHODS

Five databases were searched for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing biologics with placebo or each other in OA patients. Data of pain, physical function, stiffness, and adverse events (AEs) were extracted for a conventional and a Bayesian network meta-analysis.

RESULTS

15 studies with data for 1566 patients were analyzed. In the conventional meta-analysis, etanercept (SMD -0.47; 95% CI -0.89, -0.05) and infliximab (SMD -2.04; CI -2.56, -1.52) were superior to placebo for knee pain. In the network meta-analysis, infliximab was superior to all the other biologic agents in improving pain (vs. hyaluronic acid (SMD -22.95; CI -34.21, -10.43), vs. adalimumab (SMD -21.71; CI -32.65, -11.00), vs. anakinra (SMD -24.63; CI -38.79, -10.05), vs. canakinumab (SMD -32.83; CI -44.45, -20.68), vs. etanercept (SMD -18.40; CI -29.93, -5.73), vs. lutikizumab (SMD -25.11; CI -36.47, -14.78), vs. naproxen (SMD -30.16; CI -41.78, -17.38), vs. tocilizumab (SMD -24.02; CI -35.63, -11.86) and vs. placebo (SMD -25.88; CI -34.87, -16.60)). No significant differences were observed between biologics and placebo regarding physical function, stiffness, and risk of AEs.

CONCLUSIONS

The findings suggest that infliximab may relieve pain more than other biological agents in OA patients. No significant differences were observed between biologics and placebo regarding physical function, stiffness, and risk of AEs. The results must be interpreted cautiously; therefore, further randomized controlled trials are warranted.

The management of hand osteoarthritis: The rheumatologist's perspective

Hand osteoarthritis (OA) is treated by several medical professionals. In this review the rheumatologist's perspective will be conveyed. The rheumatologist tasks are to diagnose hand OA, exclude other causes of patient's complaints, and provide treatment. The rheumatologist therefore has a distinctive and important role in hand OA treatment. Although no disease modifying treatment exists, there are multiple options for managing hand OA in rheumatology practice, with the goal of achieving symptom relief and optimizing hand function. These treatments can be non-pharmacological or pharmacological. In this review we will provide a summary of evidence-based management options based on existing guidelines. Furthermore, we will describe common practice among rheumatologists for hand OA management. In order to do so, we performed a literature review of studies addressing treatment modality usage for hand OA. The review comprised 25 studies, which were heterogeneous in terms of treatment modality usage. In addition, a detailed description of care usage by patients in a Rheumatology outpatient clinic is given, based on data of our Hand OSTeoArthritis in Secondary care primary hand OA cohort. The large majority of these patients used any form of hand OA treatment (83%). Non-pharmacological treatment was less frequently used (47%) than pharmacological treatment (77%).

Assessment of joint pharmacokinetics and consequences for the intraarticular delivery of biologics

Intraarticular (IA) injections provide the opportunity to deliver biologics directly to their site of action for a local and efficient treatment of osteoarthritis. However, the synovial joint is a challenging site of administration since the drug is rapidly eliminated across the synovial membrane and has limited distribution into cartilage, resulting in unsatisfactory therapeutic efficacy. In order to rationally develop appropriate drug delivery systems, it is essential to thoroughly understand the unique biopharmaceutical environments and kinetics in the joint to adequately simulate them in relevant experimental models. This review presents a detailed view on articular kinetics and drug-tissue interplay of IA administered drugs and summarizes how these can be translated into reasonable formulation strategies by identification of key factors through which the joint residence time can be prolonged and specific structures can be targeted. In this way, pros and cons of the delivery approaches for biologics will be evaluated and the extent to which biorelevant models are applicable to gain mechanistic insights and ameliorate formulation design is discussed.

Co-formulations of adalimumab with hyaluronic acid / polyvinylpyrrolidone to combine intraarticular drug delivery and viscosupplementation

Polymer-based formulations present an attractive strategy in intraarticular drug-delivery to refrain biologicals from early leakage from the joint. In this study, co-formulations of hyaluronic acid and polyvinylpyrrolidone were investigated for their potential as viscosupplements and their influence on the transsynovial loss of adalimumab. For this purpose, polymer mixtures were evaluated for their viscosity and elasticity behavior while their influence on the permeation of adalimumab across a porcine ex-vivo synovial membrane was determined. Hyaluronic acid showed strong shear thinning behavior and exhibited high viscosity and elasticity at low motions, while combinations with polyvinylpyrrolidone provided absorption and stiffness at high mechanical stress, so that they can potentially restore the rheological properties of the synovial fluid over the range of joint motion. In addition, the formulations showed significant influence on transsynovial permeation kinetics of adalimumab and hyaluronic acid, which could be decelerated up to 5- and 3-fold, respectively. Besides viscosity effects, adalimumab was retained primarily by an electrostatic interaction with hyaluronic acid, as detected by isothermal calibration calorimetry. Furthermore, polymer-mediated stabilization of the antibody activity was detected. In summary, hyaluronic acid - polyvinylpyrrolidone combinations can be efficiently used to prolong the residence of adalimumab in the joint cavity while simultaneously supplying viscosupplementation.

Prescription-grade crystalline glucosamine sulfate as an add-on therapy to conventional treatments in erosive osteoarthritis of the hand: results from a 6-month observational retrospective study

Objective

To evaluate the efficacy of prescription-grade Crystalline Glucosamine Sulfate (pCGS) as an add-on treatment to conventional therapy, compared to usual therapy alone, in patients with erosive osteoarthritis of the hand (EHOA).

Methods

This 6-month retrospective case–control study included patients with concomitant knee osteoarthritis and symptomatic EHOA. Participants were stratified into two groups based on whether or not pCGS (1500 mg/day) was added to the conventional therapy (education and training in ergonomic principles, exercise and use on-demand of symptomatic drugs) for hand osteoarthritis. Patients were evaluated at baseline, after 3 and 6 months. Primary outcomes were the change from baseline to month 6 in Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) hand pain and in Functional Index for Hand Osteoarthritis (FIHOA) score. A set of secondary parameters was also evaluated.

Results

123 patients were included as follows: 67 treated with pCGS in addition to conventional therapy (pCGS Group) and 56 with conventional therapy alone (Control Group). After 6 months a significant difference in VAS and in FIHOA score (p < 0.01 and p < 0.001, respectively) was observed in favor of pCGS Group. Similar results were found for morning stiffness duration (p < 0.05), health assessment questionnaire (p < 0.01) and physical and mental component score of 36-item short form (p < 0.05 and p < 0.001, respectively). A significant reduction of symptomatic drug consumption at 3 and 6 months was reported in the pCGS Group (p < 0.001). No serious adverse event was recorded in both groups.

Conclusions

Despite all the limitations inherent to an observational study, our results suggest the potential effectiveness of pCGS, when used in combination with conventional therapy in EHOA. Further randomized placebo-controlled trials are needed to confirm these positive findings.

Trial Registration

ClinicalTrials.gov, http://www.clinicaltrials.gov, date of registration: February 2, 2022, NCT05237596. The present trial was retrospectively registered.

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s40520-022-02151-7.

Efficacy and safety of biologic agents for the treatment of osteoarthritis: a meta-analysis of randomized placebo-controlled trials

Background:

We aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of biologic agents targeting three main cytokines, that is, nerve growth factor (NGF), interleukin-1 (IL-1), and tumor necrosis factor-α (TNF-α), for osteoarthritis (OA) treatment.

Methods:

Databases (PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library) and ClinicalTrials.gov were systematically searched for randomized placebo-controlled trials (RCTs) of biologic agents from inception to November 15, 2020. The outcomes were the mean change in pain, function scores, and the risk of adverse effects (AEs).

Results:

Out of the 28 studies with 29 RCTs (8555 individuals) included, biologic agents were superior to placebo in pain relief (standardized mean difference [SMD] = 0.28, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.17–0.38, p < 0.001) and function improvement (SMD = 0.30, 95% CI = 0.18–0.43, p < 0.001). The incidence of any AEs (risk ratio [RR] = 1.09, 95% CI = 1.05–1.14, p < 0.001) and discontinuations due to AEs (RR = 1.39, 95% CI = 1.05–1.83, p = 0.021) were higher following treatment with biologic agents while no significant difference was found in serious AEs. Subgroup analyses showed that NGF inhibitors provided superior pain relief (SMD = 0.36, 95% CI = 0.26–0.47, p < 0.001) and function improvement (SMD = 0.41, 95% CI = 0.30–0.51, p < 0.001), whereas IL-1 inhibitors and TNF-α inhibitors did not. Meanwhile, NGF inhibitors increased the incidence of any AEs (RR = 1.12, 95% CI = 1.07–1.17, p < 0.001) and discontinuations due to AEs (RR = 1.48, 95% CI = 1.07–2.06, p = 0.018). IL-1 inhibitors and TNF-α inhibitors showed no difference in safety compared with placebo.

Conclusions:

The efficacy and safety of biologic agents vary by mechanism of action. NGF inhibitors can relieve OA-related pain and improve function but involve safety concerns. IL-1 inhibitors and TNF-α inhibitors are relatively safe options but with limited efficacy.

Erosive hand osteoarthritis: latest findings and outlook

Osteoarthritis (OA) most commonly affects knee joints, and the next most commonly affected sites are the hands and hips. Three distinct hand OA phenotypes have been described: erosive hand OA (EHOA), nodal hand OA - also known as non-erosive hand OA (non-EHOA) - and first carpometacarpal joint OA. EHOA predominantly affects women and is the most aggressive form of hand OA, characterized by a severe clinical onset and progression, leading to joint damage, disability and reduction of quality of life. Clinical signs of inflammation associated with EHOA include the acute onset of pain, swelling and redness. Moreover, EHOA is characterized by radiographic features such as central erosion, saw-tooth and gull-wing lesions and, rarely, ankylosis. The aim of this Review is to report the latest findings on epidemiology, clinical features, pathology and aetiopathogenesis, biomarkers, imaging modalities and treatments for EHOA. The ongoing development of new hand OA classification criteria should facilitate standardization between studies.

Prevention of Osteoarthritis Progression by Statins, Targeting Metabolic and Inflammatory Aspects: A Review

Background and purpose:

Several traditional risk factors of atherosclerosis such as age, obesity, and altered lipid metabolism are shared with osteoarthritis (OA). Metabolic abnormalities and atheromatous vascular disease are linked with systemic inflammation and progression of OA. Hence, treatment of OA with statins is expected to improve metabolic abnormalities and prevent OA progression. Many studies which have addressed this issue found inconsistent results. This review aims to elucidate the effect of statins in OA by summarizing the existing data.

Methods:

Potential studies in English language published in Medline/PubMed, Scopus and Google Scholar since 2000 were searched by using keywords such as osteoarthritis, statins, progression, treatment, prevalence, synovitis, pain. Fourteen papers were found to be relevant and were summarised.

Results:

Data regarding symptomatic effect of statins in OA are scarce and the results varied from no effect to a small improvement or even increased risk of pain in knee OA. However, most studies on the incidence and progression of OA found a significant decreased risk of incident OA, as well as reduced risk of radiographic progression in statin users vs. non-users. Factors such as patient adherence, duration of treatment, and higher cumulative statin doses were associated with greater efficacy.

Conclusion:

Existing data indicate a preventing effect of statin therapy on OA progression. However, unless a formal meta-analysis with weight analysis is made, a conclusion cannot be drawn.

METHODS - A randomised controlled trial of METhotrexate to treat Hand Osteoarthritis with Synovitis: study protocol for a randomised controlled trial

Background

Hand osteoarthritis is a common and disabling problem without effective therapies. Accumulating evidence suggests the role of local inflammation in causing pain and structural progression in hand osteoarthritis, and hand osteoarthritis with synovitis is a commonly encountered clinical phenotype. Methotrexate is a well-established, low-cost, and effective treatment for inflammatory arthritis with a well-described safety profile. The aim of this multicentre, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial is to determine whether methotrexate reduces pain over 6 months in patients with hand osteoarthritis and synovitis.

Methods

Ninety-six participants with hand osteoarthritis and synovitis will be recruited through the Osteoarthritis Clinical Trial Network (Melbourne, Hobart, Adelaide, and Perth), and randomly allocated in a 1:1 ratio to receive either methotrexate 20 mg or identical placebo once weekly for 6 months. The primary outcome is pain reduction (assessed by 100 mm visual analogue scale) at 6 months. The secondary outcomes include changes in physical function and quality of life assessed using Functional Index for Hand Osteoarthritis, Australian Canadian Osteoarthritis Hand Index, Health Assessment Questionnaire, Michigan Hand Outcomes Questionnaire, Short-Form-36, tender and swollen joint count, and grip strength, and structural progression assessed using progression of synovitis and bone marrow lesions from magnetic resonance imaging and radiographic progression at 6 months. Adverse events will be recorded. The primary analysis will be by intention to treat, including all participants in their randomised groups.

Discussion

This study will provide high-quality evidence to address whether methotrexate has an effect on reducing pain over 6 months in patients with hand osteoarthritis and synovitis, with major clinical and public health importance. While a positive trial will inform international clinical practice guidelines for the management of hand osteoarthritis, a negative trial would be highly topical and change current trends in clinical practice.

Trial registration

Australian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry (ANZCTR), ACTRN12617000877381. Registered 15 June 2017, https://www.anzctr.org.au/Trial/Registration/TrialReview.aspx?id=373124

Increased radiographic progression of distal hand osteoarthritis occurring during biologic DMARD monotherapy for concomitant rheumatoid arthritis

OBJECTIVES

A considerable proportion of patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) also suffer from hand osteoarthritis (OA). We here assess the association between conventional synthetic (cs) and biological (b) disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (DMARDs) and radiographic distal interphalangeal-(DIP) OA in patients with RA.

METHODS

Adult RA patients from a longitudinal Swiss registry of rheumatic diseases who had ≥ 2 hand radiographs were included at the first radiograph and followed until the outcome or the last radiograph. Patients were grouped into two cohorts based on whether DIP OA was present or absent at cohort entry (cohorts 1 and 2, respectively). Modified Kellgren-Lawrence scores (KLS) were obtained by evaluating DIP joints for the severity of osteophytes, joint space narrowing, subchondral sclerosis, and erosions. KLS ≥ 2 in ≥ 1 DIP joint indicated incident or existing OA, and increase of ≥ 1 in KLS in ≥ 1 DIP joint indicated progression in existing DIP OA. Time-varying Cox regression and generalized estimating equation (GEE) analyses were performed. We estimated hazard ratios (HRs) and odds ratios (ORs) with 95% confidence intervals (CI) of DIP OA incidence (cohort 2), or progression (cohort 1), in bDMARD monotherapy, bDMARD/csDMARD combination therapy, and past or never DMARD use, when compared to csDMARD use. In post hoc analyses, we descriptively and analytically assessed the individual KLS features in cohort 1.

RESULTS

Among 2234 RA patients with 5928 radiographs, 1340 patients had DIP OA at baseline (cohort 1). Radiographic progression of DIP OA was characterized by new or progressive osteophyte formation (666, 52.4%), joint space narrowing (379, 27.5%), subchondral sclerosis (238, 17.8%), or erosions (62, 4.3%). bDMARD monotherapy had an increased risk of radiographic DIP OA progression compared to csDMARD monotherapy (adjusted HR 1.34 [95% CI 1.07-1.69]). The risk was not significant in csDMARD/bDMARD combination users (HR 1.12 [95% CI 0.96-1.31]), absent in past DMARD users (HR 0.96 [95% CI 0.66-1.41]), and significantly lower among never DMARD users (HR 0.54 [95% CI 0.33-0.90]). Osteophyte progression (HR 1.74 [95% CI 1.11-2.74]) was the most significantly increased OA feature with bDMARD use compared to csDMARD use. In 894 patients without initial DIP OA (cohort 2), the risk of incident OA did not differ between the treatment groups. The results from GEE analyses corroborated all findings.

CONCLUSIONS

These real-world RA cohort data indicate that monotherapy with bDMARDs is associated with increased radiographic progression of existing DIP OA, but not with incident DIP OA.

Prospects for Therapies in Osteoarthritis

Osteoarthritis (OA) is a chronic, debilitating disease affecting millions of people worldwide. Management of OA involves pharmacological and non-pharmacological approaches. Conventional pharmacological treatments have limited efficacy and are associated with a number of side-effects, restricting the number of patients who can use them. New pharmacological therapies for managing OA are required and a number have been developed targeting different tissues in OA: bone and cartilage, synovium and nerves. However, there has been overall limited success. Disease-modifying osteoarthritis drugs (DMOADs) are a putative class of therapies aimed at improving OA structural pathologies and consequent symptoms. Recent DMOAD studies have demonstrated some promising therapies but also provided new considerations for future trials.

Cytokines and Chemokines Involved in Osteoarthritis Pathogenesis

Osteoarthritis is a common cause of disability worldwide. Although commonly referred to as a disease of the joint cartilage, osteoarthritis affects all joint tissues equally. The pathogenesis of this degenerative process is not completely understood; however, a low-grade inflammation leading to an imbalance between anabolic and katabolic processes is a well-established factor. The complex network of cytokines regulating these processes and cell communication has a central role in the development and progression of osteoarthritis. Concentrations of both proinflammatory and anti-inflammatory cytokines were found to be altered depending on the osteoarthritis stage and activity. In this review, we analyzed individual cytokines involved in the immune processes with an emphasis on their function in osteoarthritis.

Has the incidence of total joint arthroplasty in rheumatoid arthritis decreased in the era of biologics use? A population-based cohort study

OBJECTIVES

To determine whether the introduction of biological disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs (bDMARDs) was associated with reduced incidences of total hip and knee arthroplasty (THA/TKA) among patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) compared with osteoarthritis (OA).

METHODS

Using a population-based cohort in British Columbia, Canada, RA and OA patients diagnosed between 1995-2007 were divided into semi-annual cohorts according to diagnosis date. For each cohort, we calculated 8-year incidence rates of THA and TKA. We compared levels and trends of THA/TKA incidence in RA/OA patients diagnosed during pre-bDMARDs (1995-2001) and post-bDMARDs (2003-2007) periods using interrupted time-series analysis, adjusting for baseline characteristics. Adjusted 8-year TJA incidence estimated for RA/OA cohorts diagnosed five years after bDMARDs introduction were compared with expected rates assuming no bDMARDs introduction, based on extrapolation of pre-bDMARDs trends.

RESULTS

We identified 60,227 RA and 288,260 OA incident cases. For cohorts diagnosed pre-bDMARDs, 8-year THA/TKA incidence rates increased over time in both RA and OA. For cohorts diagnosed post-bDMARDs, these rates decreased over time in RA but continued to increase for OA. For RA, differences between the post- and pre-bDMARDs secular trends in incidence rates were -0.49 (p = 0.002) for THA and -0.36 (p = 0.003) for TKA, compared to + 0.40 (p = 0.006) and +0.54 (p < 0.001), respectively, for OA. For RA cohorts diagnosed five years after bDMARDs introduction, 8-year incidence were 26.9% and 12.6% lower for THA and TKA, respectively, than expected rates. In contrast, corresponding rates in OA were higher by 11.7% and 16.6%, respectively.

CONCLUSION

Arthritis onset after bDMARDs introduction is associated with a significant reduction in THA/TKA incidence in RA, but not in OA. The reduction reflects a significant improvement in RA treatment during the biological era.

The Development of Disease-Modifying Therapies for Osteoarthritis (DMOADs): The Evidence to Date

Osteoarthritis (OA) is a complex heterogeneous articular disease with multiple joint tissue involvement of varying severity and no regulatory-agency-approved disease-modifying drugs (DMOADs). In this review, we discuss the reasons necessitating the development of DMOADs for OA management, the classifications of clinical phenotypes or molecular/mechanistic endotypes from the viewpoint of targeted drug discovery, and then summarize the efficacy and safety profile of a range of targeted drugs in Phase 2 and 3 clinical trials directed to cartilage-driven, bone-driven, and inflammation-driven endotypes. Finally, we briefly put forward the reasons for failures in OA clinical trials and possible steps to overcome these barriers.

Synovitis and bone marrow lesions associate with symptoms and radiographic progression in hand osteoarthritis: a systematic review and meta-analysis of observational studies

AIMS

To systematically review observational studies for the association between features detected on ultrasound (US) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and, symptoms, signs and radiographic progression of hand osteoarthritis (OA).

METHODS

Medline, Web of Science, EMBASE, CINAHL and AMED were searched from inception to 14^th January 2020 to identify relevant studies. Quality of studies was assessed using the Newcastle-Ottawa scales and data were extracted. Odds ratios (OR) and linear regression coefficients and 95% confidence intervals (CI) were pooled using the random-effects model (METAN package, Stata v16.1). Heterogeneity and publication bias were assessed.

RESULTS

Thirty-two studies using US and MRI comprising 1,350 and 638 participants respectively were included. While only grey-scale synovitis (GSS) associated with AUSCAN-pain (pooled Regression coefficient (95% CI): 0.46 (0.13-0.79); 0-20 scale for AUSCAN-pain), US-detected osteophytes, GSS and power Doppler (PD) [pooled ORs (95% CI): 2.68(2.16-3.33), 2.38(1.74-3.26) and 2.04 (1.45-2.88)] as well as MRI-detected bone marrow lesions (BMLs), synovitis, osteophytes, and central bone erosions (CBEs) associated with joint tenderness [pooled ORs (95% CI): 2.59(2.12-3.18), 2.17(1.85-2.54), 2.15(1.55-2.99), and 2.41 (1.45-4.02)] respectively. US-detected GSS and PD associated with radiographic progression of CBEs [pooled ORs 5.37, 5.08], osteophytes [pooled ORs 5.17, 6.45], and joint space narrowing (pooled ORs 4.28, 4.36) whilst MRI-detected synovitis and BMLs associated with increasing KL grades with pooled ORs 2.92, 2.54 respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

US and MRI-detected structural and inflammatory changes associate with tenderness, whilst articular inflammation and subchondral bone damage associate with radiographic hand OA progression. There was inconsistent relationship between these changes and pain.

Synovium-Synovial Fluid Axis in Osteoarthritis Pathology: A Key Regulator of the Cartilage Degradation Process

Failure of conventional anti-inflammatory therapies in osteoarthritis (OA) underlines the insufficient knowledge about inflammatory mechanisms, patterns and their relationship with cartilage degradation. Considering non-linear nature of cartilage loss in OA, a better understanding of inflammatory milieu and MMP status at different stages of OA is required to design early-stage therapies or personalized disease management. For this, an investigation based on a synovium-synovial fluid (SF) axis was planned to study OA associated changes in synovium and SF along the progressive grades of OA. Gene expressions in synovial-biopsies from different grades OA patients (N = 26) revealed a peak of IL-1β, IL-15, PGE2 and NGF in early OA (Kellgren-Lawrence (KL) grade-I and II); the highest MMP levels were found in advanced stages (KL grade-III and IV). MMPs (MMP-1, 13, 2 and 9) abundance and FALGPA activity estimated in forty SFs of progressive grades showed the maximum protein levels and activity in KL grade-II and III. In an SF challenge test, SW982 and THP1 cells were treated with progressive grade SFs to study the dynamics of MMPs modulation in inflammatory microenvironment; the test yielded a result pattern, which matched with FALGPA and the protein-levels estimation. Inflammatory mediators in SFs served as steering factor for MMP up-regulation. A correlation-matrix of IL-1β and MMPs revealed expressional negative correlation.

Hand Erosive Osteoarthritis and Distal Interphalangeal Involvement in Psoriatic Arthritis: The Place of Conservative Therapy

Hand erosive osteoarthritis (HEOA) and Psoriatic Arthritis (PsA) with DIP involvement are common diseases affecting the hand. Both of them evolve with a progressive limitation in grip due to limited range of motion of the affected joints and stenosing tenosynovitis. Pharmacological options currently available (corticosteroids and clodronate or Idrossicloroquine) for the treatment of EHOA are mostly symptomatic and currently there are no effective drugs able to modify the course of the disease. In addition, data on drug effectiveness of PsA with DIP involvement are lacking. Conservative therapy should be considered in order to reduce pain and improve hand functionality. There are many studies debating a wide range of non-pharmacological intervention in the management of HEOA: joint protection program, range of motion and strengthening exercise, hand exercise with electromagnetic therapy, application of heat with paraffin wax or balneotherapy, occupational therapy and education. Concerning conservative treatment strategies to treat PsA, on the contrary, current evidence is still weak. Further research is needed to find the correct place of physical therapy to prevent stiffness and ankylosis due to the vicious circle of inflammation-pain-immobility-rigidity.

Methotrexate treatment in hand osteoarthritis refractory to usual treatments: A randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial

OBJECTIVE

To examine the effect of methotrexate (MTX) on pain and structural progression in symptomatic erosive hand osteoarthritis (HOA).

METHODS

This 1-year prospective, single-centre, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled study (www.ClinicalTrial.gov, NCT01068405) followed up patients with symptomatic erosive HOA. Patients were randomised into two groups based on the drug that was administered: 10 mg methotrexate (MTX) per week or a placebo. The primary endpoint was the change in pain (determined using a visual analogue scale [VAS]) from baseline to 3 months. The secondary endpoints were pain VAS score at 12 months, clinical features (pain VAS score and function), radiographic features (the anatomical radiographic Verbruggen-Veys [VV] score and Gent University Score System), and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) at 12 months.

RESULTS

Sixty-four patients with HOA were randomised into either the placebo or MTX group. At 3 months, there was no significant difference in the mean decrease in the pain VAS score (mm) (MTX: 21.1 [standard deviation, 27.4], placebo: 11.7 [24.3]; p = 0.2). At 12 months, according to the VV score, erosive joints progressed significantly more to a remodelling phase in the MTX group than in the placebo group (27% vs 15%; p = 0.03). Joints with space loss appeared to be eroding less in the MTX group compared to the placebo group (8% vs 29%; p = 0.2). Synovitis on MRI at baseline could be associated with the erosive structural evolution of non-erosive joints (p = 0.02).

CONCLUSIONS

Weekly doses of 10-mg MTX showed no superiority over the placebo in terms of pain relief at 3 or 12 months.

CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

This study was registered at www.ClinicalTrial.gov (NCT01068405).

Peripheral pain mechanisms in osteoarthritis

There is a well-established historical observation that structural joint damage by plain X-ray correlates poorly with symptomatic disease in osteoarthritis (OA). This is often attributed to the inability to visualise soft-tissue pathology within the joint and the recognition of heterogeneous patient factors that drive central pain sensitisation. A major issue is the relative paucity of mechanistic studies in which molecular pathogenesis of pain is interrogated in relation to tissue pathology. Nonetheless, in recent years, three broad approaches have been deployed to attempt to address this: correlative clinical studies of peripheral and central pain outcomes using magnetic resonance imaging, where soft-tissue processes can be visualised; molecular studies on tissue from patients with OA; and careful molecular interrogation of preclinical models of OA across the disease time course. Studies have taken advantage of established clinical molecular targets such as nerve growth factor. Not only is the regulation of nerve growth factor within the joint being used to explore the relationship between tissue pathology and the origins of pain in OA, but it also provides a core model on which other molecules present within the joint can modulate the pain response. In this narrative review, how molecular and pathological tissue change relates to joint pain in OA will be discussed. Finally, a model for how tissue damage may lead to pain over the disease course will be proposed.

Choice of control group treatments in hand osteoarthritis trials: A systematic review and meta-analysis

OBJECTIVES

To assess how patient characteristics and study design influence the effectiveness of control interventions in hand OA trials.

METHODS

The study protocol was registered in PROSPERO (CRD42020163473). Two authors independently searched four electronic databases from their inception to December 31, 2019. Randomized and non-randomized controlled hand OA trials were included if pain intensity was assessed using a validated scale. We allocated control groups into one of the following: placebo, add-on treatment, no treatment, or active treatment. The standardized mean differences (d) of pain, as well as subjective function and hand strength, were pooled with 95% confidence intervals (CI) and 90% prediction intervals using random-effects models. Meta-regression and post-hoc subgroup analyses were performed to investigate which factors potentially impacted placebo analgesia and between-study heterogeneity.

RESULTS

Thirty-one placebo, 11 add-on, 12 no-treatment, and 10 active-treatment controls were included in meta-analyses. Effective pain relief was observed in placebo (d = -0.50, 95% CI -0.63 to -0.37), add-on (d = -0.35, 95% CI -0.59 to -0.12), and active-treatment (d = -0.92, 95% CI -1.35 to -0.48) groups. In subjective function, these treatments had smaller but beneficial effects; hand strength, contrastingly, was not improved. Placebo effects were larger when flare designs were used (d = -0.96) and more homogeneous when minimum pain thresholds were set (d = -0.46, 90% prediction intervals -0.79 to -0.14).

CONCLUSION

Placebo, add-on, and active control treatments were more effective than the no treatment control in relieving hand pain and improving subjective function. By choosing minimum pain thresholds and flare requirements at patient enrollment, moderate pain relief may be replicated among control participants in future randomized placebo-controlled trials.

New Trends in Pharmacological Treatments for Osteoarthritis

Osteoarthritis (OA) is the leading cause of function loss and disability among the elderly, with significant burden on the individual and society. It is a severe disease for its high disability rates, morbidity, costs, and increased mortality. Multifactorial etiologies contribute to the occurrence and development of OA. The heterogeneous condition poses a challenge for the development of effective treatment for OA; however, emerging treatments are promising to bring benefits for OA management in the future. This narrative review will discuss recent developments of agents for the treatment of OA, including potential disease-modifying osteoarthritis drugs (DMOADs) and novel therapeutics for pain relief. This review will focus more on drugs that have been in clinical trials, as well as attractive drugs with potential applications in preclinical research. In the past few years, it has been realized that a complex interaction of multifactorial mechanisms is involved in the pathophysiology of OA. The authors believe there is no miracle therapeutic strategy fitting for all patients. OA phenotyping would be helpful for therapy selection. A variety of potential therapeutics targeting inflammation mechanisms, cellular senescence, cartilage metabolism, subchondral bone remodeling, and the peripheral nociceptive pathways are expected to reshape the landscape of OA treatment over the next few years. Precise randomized controlled trials (RCTs) are expected to identify the safety and efficacy of novel therapies targeting specific mechanisms in OA patients with specific phenotypes.

Erosive Hand Osteoarthritis: Incidence and Predictive Characteristics among Participants in the Osteoarthritis Initiative

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate age, sex, race, osteoarthritis severity, metabolic factors, and bone health as risk factors for incident erosive hand osteoarthritis (EHOA) at baseline and over 48-month period.

METHODS

This study was a longitudinal cohort design including participants from the Osteoarthritis Initiative with complete hand radiographs from baseline and 48-month visits who were eligible at baseline for incident EHOA. Individuals were classified as having EHOA if they had Kellgren-Lawrence (KL) grade≥2 in at least one interphalangeal joint on two different fingers and central erosion in at least one joint.

RESULTS

Of the 3365 individuals identified without prevalent EHOA at baseline, 86 (2.6%) developed EHOA during the 48-month period. Risk factors included being older [relative risk (RR) per standard deviation=0.76 (95% confidence interval 0.59, 0.98)], female [RR=1.73 (1.05, 2.85)], greater osteoarthritis severity (sum of KL grade 13.9 vs. 5.3, p<0.001) and less cortical width (1.38 vs 1.52 mm, p<0.001). After 48 months, people who developed EHOA were characterized by greater progressions of radiographic osteoarthritis (i.e., joint space narrowing, KL grade progression [RRs = 1.35 to 1.9] and loss of cortical thickness [RR = 1.23], adjusted for age, sex, race, body mass index, and baseline osteoarthritis severity (sum KL scores).

CONCLUSION

These findings present EHOA as a disorder of advanced age and female sex, strongly associated with severity of articular structural damage and its progression. Individuals who develop EHOA have thinner bones prior to EHOA development and as it progresses, suggesting EHOA as a disorder of skeletal frailty.

Serum C-reactive protein metabolite (CRPM) is associated with incidence of contralateral knee osteoarthritis

The heterogeneous nature of osteoarthritis (OA) and the need to subtype patients is widely accepted in the field. The biomarker CRPM, a metabolite of C-reactive protein (CRP), is released to the circulation during inflammation. Blood CRPM levels have shown to be associated with disease activity and response to treatment in rheumatoid arthritis (RA). We investigated the level of blood CRPM in OA compared to RA using data from two phase III knee OA and two RA studies (N = 1591). Moreover, the association between CRPM levels and radiographic progression was investigated. The mean CRPM levels were significantly lower in OA (8.5 [95% CI 8.3–8.8] ng/mL, n = 781) compared to the RA patients (12.8 [9.5–16.0] ng/mL, n = 60); however, a significant subset of OA patients (31%) had CRPM levels (≥ 9 ng/mL) comparable to RA. Furthermore, OA patients (n = 152) with CRPM levels ≥ 9 ng/mL were more likely to develop contra-lateral knee OA assessed by X-ray over a two-year follow-up period with an odds ratio of 2.2 [1.0–4.7]. These data suggest that CRPM is a blood-based biochemical marker for early identification OA patients with an inflammatory phenotype.