Use of weaning protocols for reducing duration of mechanical ventilation in critically ill adult patients: Cochrane systematic review and meta-analysis

Tailoring ventilation and respiratory management in pediatric critical care: optimizing care with precision medicine

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Critically ill children admitted to the intensive care unit frequently need respiratory care to support the lung function. Mechanical ventilation is a complex field with multiples parameters to set. The development of precision medicine will allow clinicians to personalize respiratory care and improve patients' outcomes.

RECENT FINDINGS

Lung and diaphragmatic ultrasound, electrical impedance tomography, neurally adjusted ventilatory assist ventilation, as well as the use of monitoring data in machine learning models are increasingly used to tailor care. Each modality offers insights into different aspects of the patient's respiratory system function and enables the adjustment of treatment to better support the patient's physiology. Precision medicine in respiratory care has been associated with decreased ventilation time, increased extubation and ventilation wean success and increased ability to identify phenotypes to guide treatment and predict outcomes. This review will focus on the use of precision medicine in the setting of pediatric acute respiratory distress syndrome, asthma, bronchiolitis, extubation readiness trials and ventilation weaning, ventilation acquired pneumonia and other respiratory tract infections.

SUMMARY

Precision medicine is revolutionizing respiratory care and will decrease complications associated with ventilation. More research is needed to standardize its use and better evaluate its impact on patient outcomes.

Multidisciplinary collaborative approach to cardiopulmonary rehabilitation in cancer patients with intensive care unit-acquired weakness: a clinical efficacy and safety analysis

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the efficacy and safety of a multidisciplinary team (MDT)-based cardiopulmonary rehabilitation model in patients with intensive care unit-acquired weakness (ICU-AW).

METHODS

Between January 2020 and June 2023, 80 ICU patients were enrolled: 40 received standard cardiopulmonary rehabilitation (control group), and 40 underwent MDT-based rehabilitation (observation group). Outcome measures included ICU-AW incidence, muscle strength Medical Research Council (MRC) scores, upper/lower limb strength, Barthel Index Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation (APACHE) II scores, duration of ICU and hospital stay, mechanical ventilation time, complications, and patient satisfaction. Predictive variables for ICU-AW were also analyzed.

RESULTS

On days 4 and 7 post-intervention, ICU-AW incidence was significantly lower in the observation group (both P < 0.05). MRC scores, limb muscle strength, Barthel Index, and satisfaction were significantly higher in the observation group (all P < 0.05), while SOFA, APACHE II scores, ICU stay, hospital stay, and ventilation duration were significantly lower (all P < 0.05). SOFA scores declined from day 5, with lower values in the observation group (P < 0.05). The risk of ICU-AW in the observation group was a significant reduction in risk than in the control group (OR = 0.067, 95% CI: 0.005-0.606, P = 0.017). No significant differences in complications were observed (P > 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

MDT-based cardiopulmonary rehabilitation significantly improves muscle strength, functional status, and patient satisfaction, while reducing ICU-AW incidence, ICU and hospital stay, and ventilation duration. These findings support its broader clinical application in ICU-AW management.

A nurse-driven protocol for early weaning from mechanical ventilation in patients with acute respiratory failure: A pilot study

OBJECTIVES

To assess the compliance and acceptance of a nurse-driven early weaning protocol from the initiation of spontaneous ventilation (SV) to extubation in patients with acute respiratory failure (ARF) in the intensive care unit (ICU).

METHODS

This monocentric, prospective pilot study included patients admitted to the ICU with ARF and requiring invasive mechanical ventilation (IMV) for more than 48 h, between February 2021 and April 2024. The weaning protocol (WP) was initiated after a successful 30-minute SV trial with pressure support (PS). Every 3 h, nurses reduced PS by 2 cmH2O, fraction of inspired oxygen (FiO2) by 5%, and positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) according to a predefined protocol. When minimum PS and PEEP levels were reached, the patient was extubated after a successful T-tube test. The primary outcome was compliance with the WP assessed by the percentage of time spent in agreement with WP. The secondary outcome was nurse acceptance, assessed by an anonymous survey on a visual analogue scale from 0 to 10.

RESULTS

Of the 50 patients enrolled, 30 (60 %) had COVID-19 pneumonia. The median duration of IMV was 21 days per patient [IQR: 10-34], with a median WP duration of 11 days [IQR: 4-21.5]. Protocol compliance was 76 %. Thirty-two of 37 nurses (86 %) completed the survey and rated the acceptance of the WP as 8/10 [IQR: 7.75-9]. Workload was identified as a barrier to compliance with a median score of 5/10 [IQR: 2-7]. We reported 9/50 (18 %) extubation failures.

CONCLUSIONS

This nurse-driven protocol for early weaning of patients with ARF had good compliance and acceptance by the nurse team despite the COVID-19 pandemic health crisis.

IMPLICATIONS FOR CLINICAL PRACTICE

It is essential to incorporate nursing feedback if we are to improve the protocols for ventilatory weaning patients in ICU.

Prediction of Spontaneous Breathing Trial Outcome in Critically Ill-Ventilated Patients Using Deep Learning: Development and Verification Study

BACKGROUND

Long-term ventilator-dependent patients often face problems such as decreased quality of life, increased mortality, and increased medical costs. Respiratory therapists must perform complex and time-consuming ventilator weaning assessments, which typically take 48-72 hours. Traditional disengagement methods rely on manual evaluation and are susceptible to subjectivity, human errors, and low efficiency.

OBJECTIVE

This study aims to develop an artificial intelligence-based prediction model to predict whether a patient can successfully pass a spontaneous breathing trial (SBT) using the patient's clinical data collected before SBT initiation. Instead of comparing different SBT strategies or analyzing their impact on extubation success, this study focused on establishing a data-driven approach under a fixed SBT strategy to provide an objective and efficient assessment tool. Through this model, we aim to enhance the accuracy and efficiency of ventilator weaning assessments, reduce unnecessary SBT attempts, optimize intensive care unit resource usage, and ultimately improve the quality of care for ventilator-dependent patients.

METHODS

This study used a retrospective cohort study and developed a novel deep learning architecture, hybrid CNN-MLP (convolutional neural network-multilayer perceptron), for analysis. Unlike the traditional CNN-MLP classification method, hybrid CNN-MLP performs feature learning and fusion by interleaving CNN and MLP layers so that data features can be extracted and integrated at different levels, thereby improving the flexibility and prediction accuracy of the model. The study participants were patients aged 20 years or older hospitalized in the intensive care unit of a medical center in central Taiwan between January 1, 2016, and December 31, 2022. A total of 3686 patients were included in the study, and 6536 pre-SBT clinical records were collected before each SBT of these patients, of which 3268 passed the SBT and 3268 failed.

RESULTS

The model performed well in predicting SBT outcomes. The training dataset's precision is 99.3% (2443/2460 records), recall is 93.5% (2443/2614 records), specificity is 99.3% (2597/2614 records), and F1-score is 0.963. In the test dataset, the model maintains accuracy with a precision of 89.2% (561/629 records), a recall of 85.8% (561/654 records), a specificity of 89.6% (586/654 records), and an F1-score of 0.875. These results confirm the reliability of the model and its potential for clinical application.

CONCLUSIONS

This study successfully developed a deep learning-based SBT prediction model that can be used as an objective and efficient ventilator weaning assessment tool. The model's performance shows that it can be integrated into clinical workflow, improve the quality of patient care, and reduce ventilator dependence, which is an important step in improving the effectiveness of respiratory therapy.

Improving weaning and liberation from mechanical ventilation for tracheostomy patients: a quality improvement initiative

For patients in the intensive care unit (ICU), prolonged mechanical ventilation is associated with poor outcomes. A quality improvement (QI) initiative with the aim of reducing median time on the ventilator for tracheostomy patients was undertaken at a tertiary care ICU in Toronto, Canada. A QI team was formed, and using QI methodology, a deep understanding of our local process was achieved. Based on this information and on the latest evidence on weaning, a standard tracheostomy weaning protocol was designed. The protocol was refined through three developmental and two testing plan-do-study-act cycles. This study was a prospective time series showing the effect of the implementation of our intervention on tracheotomy patients' time on the ventilator. The baseline median number of days on the ventilator after tracheostomy insertion was 17. Within 12 months of the introduction of the intervention, a shift in the data showing a reduction in the median time on the ventilator to 10.6 days had developed. Length of stay in the ICU was reduced by 4.3 days. Adherence and compliance to the protocol also improved over time. A standard tracheostomy weaning protocol was successfully developed, tested and implemented in a tertiary care ICU. Using strategies such as frequent communication with key stakeholders and incorporating a tracheostomy weaning progress sheet to document and track tracheostomy patients and their outcomes, this QI intervention has become engrained in the local culture at our centre. This weaning protocol has successfully reduced the median time on the ventilator for tracheostomy patients by over 6 days.

Mechanical Power to Predict Ventilator Liberation in Patients With a Tracheostomy

Background: Mechanical power (MP) is useful for predicting the outcomes of attempts to liberate patients from mechanical ventilation. MP is computed based on measured variables derived to determine the power in joules required to breathe while receiving mechanical ventilation. The main objectives of this study were to calculate a cutoff value of MP that would predict successful liberation and to determine the prediction rate of liberation success based on this cutoff value. Methods: This was a single-center retrospective study. Data from 110 tracheostomized subjects receiving mechanical ventilation were analyzed. We divided subjects into two groups based on ventilator liberation outcome. Confounding factors in subject background were adjusted using propensity score matching (PSM). Statistically significant differences in MP at tracheostomy and liberation success between liberation success and failure groups were examined. We calculated the MP cutoff value for successful liberation using the area under the curve of the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) and its corresponding prediction rate of liberation success. Results: The number of subjects in the successful liberation group was 79 and that of the failed liberation group was 31. The MP cutoff value and corresponding prediction rate for liberation success were 256.5 J/min (area under the curve-ROC = 0.839) and 92.2%, respectively. After PSM, the low MP group (n = 36), divided based on the MP cutoff value, had a significantly higher liberation success rate than the high MP group (n = 36), with an odds ratio of 19.95 (CI 3.95, 91.23, P < .001). Conclusion: MP at tracheostomy was a strong predictor of successful ventilator liberation, and the prediction rate of liberation success based on the MP cutoff value was shown to be very high. We recommend that patients with low MP be actively considered for liberation. In contrast, those with high MP should continue weaning while simultaneously making early transfer arrangements if liberation is unsuccessful.

Physicians' decision making when weaning patients from mechanical ventilation: A qualitative content analysis

BACKGROUND

Weaning from mechanical ventilation is a complex and central intensive care process. This complexity indicates that the challenges of weaning must be explored from different perspectives. Furthermore, physicians' experiences and the factors influencing their decision-making regarding weaning are unclear.

OBJECTIVES

This study aimed to explore and describe the factors influencing physicians' decision-making when weaning patients from invasive mechanical ventilation in Swedish intensive care units (ICUs).

METHODS

This qualitative study used an exploratory and descriptive design with qualitative content analysis. Sixteen physicians from five ICUs across Sweden were purposively included and interviewed regarding their weaning experiences.

FINDINGS

The physicians expressed that prioritising the patient's well-being was evident, and there was agreement that both the physical and mental condition of the patient had a substantial impact on decision-making. Furthermore, there was a lack of agreement on whether patients should be involved in the weaning process and how their resources, needs, and wishes should be included in decision-making. In addition, there were factors not directly linked to the patient but which still influenced decision-making, such as the available resources and teamwork. Sometimes, it was difficult to point out the basis for decisions; in that decisions were made by gut feeling, intuition, or clinical experience.

CONCLUSION

Physicians' decision-making regarding weaning was a dynamic process influenced by several factors. These factors were related to the patient's condition and the structure for weaning. Increased understanding of weaning from the physicians' and ICU teams' perspectives may improve the weaning process by broadening the knowledge about the aspects influencing the decision-making.

Clinical predictive models for recurrence and survival in treated laryngeal and hypopharyngeal cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Background

The limitations of the traditional TNM system have spurred interest in multivariable models for personalized prognostication in laryngeal and hypopharyngeal cancers (LSCC/HPSCC). However, the performance of these models depends on the quality of data and modelling methodology, affecting their potential for clinical adoption. This systematic review and meta-analysis (SR-MA) evaluated clinical predictive models (CPMs) for recurrence and survival in treated LSCC/HPSCC. We assessed models' characteristics and methodologies, as well as performance, risk of bias (RoB), and applicability.

Methods

Literature searches were conducted in MEDLINE (OVID), Embase (OVID) and IEEE databases from January 2005 to November 2023. The search algorithm used comprehensive text word and index term combinations without language or publication type restrictions. Independent reviewers screened titles and abstracts using a predefined Population, Index, Comparator, Outcomes, Timing and Setting (PICOTS) framework. We included externally validated (EV) multivariable models, with at least one clinical predictor, that provided recurrence or survival predictions. The SR-MA followed PRISMA reporting guidelines, and PROBAST framework for RoB assessment. Model discrimination was assessed using C-index/AUC, and was presented for all models using forest plots. MA was only performed for models that were externally validated in two or more cohorts, using random-effects model. The main outcomes were model discrimination and calibration measures for survival (OS) and/or local recurrence (LR) prediction. All measures and assessments were preplanned prior to data collection.

Results

The SR-MA identified 11 models, reported in 16 studies. Seven models for OS showed good discrimination on development, with only one excelling (C-index >0.9), and three had weak or poor discrimination. Inclusion of a radiomics score as a model parameter achieved relatively better performance. Most models had poor generalisability, demonstrated by worse discrimination performance on EV, but they still outperformed the TNM system. Only two models met the criteria for MA, with pooled EV AUCs 0.73 (95% CI 0.71-0.76) and 0.67 (95% CI 0.6-0.74). RoB was high for all models, particularly in the analysis domain.

Conclusions

This review highlighted the shortcomings of currently available models, while emphasizing the need for rigorous independent evaluations. Despite the proliferation of models, most exhibited methodological limitations and bias. Currently, no models can confidently be recommended for routine clinical use.

Systematic review registration

https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/display_record.php?ID=CRD42021248762, identifier CRD42021248762.

Weaning-associated interventions for ventilated intensive care patients: A scoping review

BACKGROUND

Mechanical ventilation is a core intervention in critical care, but may also lead to negative consequences. Therefore, ventilator weaning is crucial for patient recovery. Numerous weaning interventions have been investigated, but an overview of interventions to evaluate different foci on weaning research is still missing.

AIM

To provide an overview of interventions associated with ventilator weaning.

STUDY DESIGN

We conducted a scoping review. A systematic search of the Medline, CINAHL and Cochrane Library databases was carried out in May 2023. Interventions from studies or reviews that aimed to extubate or decannulate mechanically ventilated patients in intensive care units were included. Studies concerning children, outpatients or non-invasive ventilation were excluded. Screening and data extraction were conducted independently by three reviewers. Identified interventions were thematically analysed and clustered.

RESULTS

Of the 7175 records identified, 193 studies were included. A total of six clusters were formed: entitled enteral nutrition (three studies), tracheostomy (17 studies), physical treatment (13 studies), ventilation modes and settings (47 studies), intervention bundles (42 studies), and pharmacological interventions including analgesic agents (8 studies), sedative agents (53 studies) and other agents (15 studies).

CONCLUSIONS

Ventilator weaning is widely researched with a special focus on ventilation modes and pharmacological agents. Some aspects remain poorly researched or unaddressed (e.g. nutrition, delirium treatment, sleep promotion).

RELEVANCE TO CLINICAL PRACTICE

This review compiles studies on ventilator weaning interventions in thematic clusters, highlighting the need for multidisciplinary care and consideration of various interventions. Future research should combine different interventions and investigate their interconnection.

Position Statement of ISCCM Committee on Weaning from Mechanical Ventilator

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

Weaning from a mechanical ventilator is a milestone in the recovery of seriously ill patients in Intensive care. Failure to wean and re-intubation adversely affects the outcome. The method of mechanical ventilation (MV) varies between different ICUs and so does the practice of weaning. Therefore, updated guidelines based on contemporary literature are designed to guide intensivists in modern ICUs. This is the first ISCCM Consensus Statement on weaning complied by a committee on weaning. The recommendations are intended to be used by all the members of the ICU (Intensivists, Registrars, Nurses, and Respiratory Therapists).

METHODS

A Committee on weaning from MV, formed by the Indian Society of Critical Care Medicine (ISCCM) has formulated this statement on weaning from mechanical ventilators in intensive care units (ICUs) after a review of the literature. Literature was first circulated among expert committee members and allotted sections to each member. Sections of the statement written by sectional authors were peer-reviewed on multiple occasions through virtual meetings. After the final manuscript is accepted by all the committee members, it is submitted for peer review by central guideline committee of ISCCM. Once approved it has passed through review by the Editorial Board of IJCCM before it is published here as "ISCCM consensus statement on weaning from mechanical ventilator". As per the standard accepted for all its guidelines of ISCCM, we followed the modified grading of recommendations assessment, development and evaluation (GRADE) system to classify the quality of evidence and strength of recommendation. Cost-benefit, risk-benefit analysis, and feasibility of implementation in Indian ICUs are considered by the committee along with the strength of evidence. Type of ventilators and their modes, ICU staffing pattern, availability of critical care nurses, Respiratory therapists, and day vs night time staffing are aspects considered while recommending for or against any aspect of weaning.

RESULT

This document makes recommendation on various aspects of weaning, namely, definition, timing, weaning criteria, method of weaning, diagnosis of failure to wean, defining difficult to wean, Use of NIV, HFOV as adjunct to weaning, role of tracheostomy in weaning, weaning in of long term ventilated patients, role of physiotherapy, mobilization in weaning, Role of nutrition in weaning, role of diaphragmatic ultrasound in weaning prediction etc. Out of 42 questions addressed; the committee provided 39 recommendations and refrained from 3 questions. Of these 39; 32 are based on evidence and 7 are based on expert opinion of the committee members. It provides 27 strong recommendations and 12 weak recommendations (suggestions).

CONCLUSION

This guideline gives extensive review on weaning from mechanical ventilator and provides various recommendations on weaning from mechanical ventilator. Though all efforts are made to make is as updated as possible one needs to review any guideline periodically to keep it in line with upcoming concepts and standards.

HOW TO CITE THIS ARTICLE

Clerk AM, Shah RJ, Kothari J, Sodhi K, Vadi S, Bhattacharya PK, et al. Position Statement of ISCCM Committee on Weaning from Mechanical Ventilator. Indian J Crit Care Med 2024;28(S2):S233-S248.

AARC Clinical Practice Guideline: Spontaneous Breathing Trials for Liberation From Adult Mechanical Ventilation

Despite prior publications of clinical practice guidelines related to ventilator liberation, some questions remain unanswered. Many of these questions relate to the details of bedside implementation. We, therefore, formed a guidelines committee of individuals with experience and knowledge of ventilator liberation as well as a medical librarian. Using Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) methodology, we make the following recommendations: (1) We suggest that calculation of a rapid shallow breathing index is not needed to determine readiness for a spontaneous breathing trial (SBT) (conditional recommendation; moderate certainty); (2) We suggest that SBTs can be conducted with or without pressure support ventilation (conditional recommendation, moderate certainty); (3) We suggest a standardized approach to assessment and, if appropriate, completion of an SBT before noon each day (conditional recommendation, very low certainty); and (4) We suggest that FIO2 should not be increased during an SBT (conditional recommendation, very low certainty). These recommendations are intended to assist bedside clinicians to liberate adult critically ill patients more rapidly from mechanical ventilation.

Ventilator Weaning in Prolonged Mechanical Ventilation-A Narrative Review

Patients requiring mechanical ventilation (MV) beyond 21 days, usually referred to as prolonged MV, represent a unique group with significant medical needs and a generally poor prognosis. Research suggests that approximately 10% of all MV patients will need prolonged ventilatory care, and that number will continue to rise. Although we have extensive knowledge of MV in the acute care setting, less is known about care in the post-ICU setting. More than 50% of patients who were deemed unweanable in the ICU will be liberated from MV in the post-acute setting. Prolonged MV also presents a challenge in care for medically complex, elderly, socioeconomically disadvantaged and marginalized individuals, usually at the end of their life. Patients and their families often rely on ventilator weaning facilities and skilled nursing homes for the continuation of care, but home ventilation is becoming more common. The focus of this review is to discuss recent advances in the weaning strategies in prolonged MV, present their outcomes and provide insight into the complexity of care.

Effectiveness of interprofessional tracheostomy teams: A systematic review

AIM(S)

To systematically locate, evaluate and synthesize evidence regarding effectiveness of interprofessional tracheostomy teams in increasing speaking valve use and decreasing time to speech and decannulation, adverse events, lengths of stay (intensive care unit (ICU) and hospital) and mortality. In addition, to evaluate facilitators and barriers to implementing an interprofessional tracheostomy team in hospital settings.

DESIGN

Systematic review using Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) and Johns Hopkins Nursing Evidence-Based Practice Model's guidance.

METHODS

Our clinical question: Do interprofessional tracheostomy teams increase speaking valve use and decrease time to speech and decannulation, adverse events, lengths of stay and mortality? Primary studies involving adult patients with a tracheostomy were included. Eligible studies were systematically reviewed by two reviewers and verified by another two reviewers.

DATA SOURCES

MEDLINE, CINAHL and EMBASE.

RESULTS

Fourteen studies met eligibility criteria; primarily pre-post intervention cohort studies. Percent increase in speaking valve use ranged 14%-275%; percent reduction in median days to speech ranged 33%-73% and median days to decannulation ranged 26%-32%; percent reduction in rate of adverse events ranged 32%-88%; percent reduction in median hospital length of stay days ranged 18-40 days; no significant change in overall ICU length of stay and mortality rates. Facilitators include team education, coverage, rounds, standardization, communication, lead personnel and automation, patient tracking; barrier is financial.

CONCLUSION

Patients with tracheostomy who received care from a dedicated interprofessional team showed improvements in several clinical outcomes.

IMPLICATIONS FOR PATIENT CARE

Additional high-quality evidence from rigorous, well-controlled and adequately powered studies are necessary, as are implementation strategies to promote broader adoption of interprofessional tracheostomy team strategies. Interprofessional tracheostomy teams are associated with improved safety and quality of care.

IMPACT

Evidence from review provides rationale for broader implementation of interprofessional tracheostomy teams.

REPORTING METHOD

PRISMA and Synthesis Without Meta-analysis (SWiM).

PATIENT/PUBLIC CONTRIBUTION

None.

Weaning from mechanical ventilation in intensive care units across 50 countries (WEAN SAFE): a multicentre, prospective, observational cohort study

BACKGROUND

Current management practices and outcomes in weaning from invasive mechanical ventilation are poorly understood. We aimed to describe the epidemiology, management, timings, risk for failure, and outcomes of weaning in patients requiring at least 2 days of invasive mechanical ventilation.

METHODS

WEAN SAFE was an international, multicentre, prospective, observational cohort study done in 481 intensive care units in 50 countries. Eligible participants were older than 16 years, admitted to a participating intensive care unit, and receiving mechanical ventilation for 2 calendar days or longer. We defined weaning initiation as the first attempt to separate a patient from the ventilator, successful weaning as no reintubation or death within 7 days of extubation, and weaning eligibility criteria based on positive end-expiratory pressure, fractional concentration of oxygen in inspired air, and vasopressors. The primary outcome was the proportion of patients successfully weaned at 90 days. Key secondary outcomes included weaning duration, timing of weaning events, factors associated with weaning delay and weaning failure, and hospital outcomes. This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT03255109.

FINDINGS

Between Oct 4, 2017, and June 25, 2018, 10 232 patients were screened for eligibility, of whom 5869 were enrolled. 4523 (77·1%) patients underwent at least one separation attempt and 3817 (65·0%) patients were successfully weaned from ventilation at day 90. 237 (4·0%) patients were transferred before any separation attempt, 153 (2·6%) were transferred after at least one separation attempt and not successfully weaned, and 1662 (28·3%) died while invasively ventilated. The median time from fulfilling weaning eligibility criteria to first separation attempt was 1 day (IQR 0-4), and 1013 (22·4%) patients had a delay in initiating first separation of 5 or more days. Of the 4523 (77·1%) patients with separation attempts, 2927 (64·7%) had a short wean (≤1 day), 457 (10·1%) had intermediate weaning (2-6 days), 433 (9·6%) required prolonged weaning (≥7 days), and 706 (15·6%) had weaning failure. Higher sedation scores were independently associated with delayed initiation of weaning. Delayed initiation of weaning and higher sedation scores were independently associated with weaning failure. 1742 (31·8%) of 5479 patients died in the intensive care unit and 2095 (38·3%) of 5465 patients died in hospital.

INTERPRETATION

In critically ill patients receiving at least 2 days of invasive mechanical ventilation, only 65% were weaned at 90 days. A better understanding of factors that delay the weaning process, such as delays in weaning initiation or excessive sedation levels, might improve weaning success rates.

FUNDING

European Society of Intensive Care Medicine, European Respiratory Society.

Effects of Mechanical Ventilator Weaning Education on ICU Nurses and Patient Outcomes: A Scoping Review

BACKGROUND

Assessment of mechanical ventilator (MV) weaning is a complex process that requires education for nurses. This scoping review aimed to clarify the effects of MV weaning education on intensive care unit nurses and patient outcomes.

METHOD

Four databases were searched. The inclusion criteria were studies on MV weaning education for nurses, outcome measures for patients or nurses, and quantitative research.

RESULTS

In total, 663 studies were identified. The criteria for a full review (n = 15) were educational protocols (n = 13) and the Burns Wean Assessment Program (n = 2). Patient outcomes determined the MV duration. The weaning protocol was convenient for nurses. Nevertheless, their clinical judgment skills must be improved, regardless of the availability of a protocol. Education is crucial for producing positive outcomes.

CONCLUSION

Education for nurses on MV weaning showed shortened MV duration. No significant effects were found for other outcomes. [J Contin Educ Nurs. 2023;54(4):185-192.].

How do I wean a patient with acute hypercapnic respiratory failure from noninvasive ventilation?

Noninvasive ventilation (NIV) has been increasingly used for the management of different etiologies of acute hypercapnic respiratory failure (AHRF). Although NIV implementation has been framed well by the guidelines, limited number of studies evaluated the NIV weaning strategies, including a gradual decrease in the level of ventilator support and/or duration of NIV as well as abrupt discontinuation, once respiratory acidosis and distress have resolved. None of the methods have yet been established to be superior to the other in terms of the success rate of weaning and duration of NIV; as well as mortality, length of stay (LOS) in hospital, respiratory ICU (RICU), and ICU.  Patient-derived factors, such as etiology of AHRF, disease severity, history of prior NIV use, and clinical status can help to predict NIV weaning outcome and eventually choose the best method for each individual. In this paper, we have described the strategies for weaning a patient with AHRF from NIV and provided a quick guide for implementation of these data into daily practice based on our experience in and the current scientific evidence.

Protocol-directed weaning versus conventional weaning from mechanical ventilation for neurocritical patients in an intensive care unit: a nonrandomized quasi-experimental study

OBJECTIVE

To investigate whether protocol-directed weaning in neurocritical patients would reduce the rate of extubation failure (as a primary outcome) and the associated complications (as a secondary outcome) compared with conventional weaning.

METHODS

A quasi-experimental study was conducted in a medical-surgical intensive care unit from January 2016 to December 2018. Patients aged 18 years or older with an acute neurological disease who were on mechanical ventilation > 24 hours were included. All patients included in the study were ready to wean, with no or minimal sedation, Glasgow coma score ≥ 9, spontaneous ventilatory stimulus, noradrenaline ≤ 0.2μgr/kg/ minute, fraction of inspired oxygen ≤ 0.5, positive end-expiratory pressure ≤ 5cmH2O, maximal inspiratory pressure < -20cmH2O, and occlusion pressure < 6cmH2O.

RESULTS

Ninety-four of 314 patients admitted to the intensive care unit were included (50 in the Intervention Group and 44 in the Control Group). There was no significant difference in spontaneous breathing trial failure (18% in the Intervention Group versus 34% in the Control Group, p = 0.12). More patients in the Intervention Group were extubated than in the Control Group (100% versus 79%, p = 0.01). The rate of extubation failure was not signifiantly diffrent between the groups (18% in the Intervention Group versus 17% in the Control Group; relative risk 1.02; 95%CI 0.64 - 1.61; p = 1.00). The reintubation rate was lower in the Control Group (16% in the Intervention Group versus 11% in the Control Group; relative risk 1.15; 95%CI 0.74 - 1.82; p = 0.75). The need for tracheotomy was lower in the Intervention Group [4 (8%) versus 11 (25%) in the Control Group; relative risk 0.32; 95%CI 0.11 - 0.93; p = 0.04]. At Day 28, the patients in the Intervention Group had more ventilator-free days than those in the Control Group [28 (26 - 28) days versus 26 (19 - 28) days; p = 0.01]. The total duration of mechanical ventilation was shorter in the Intervention Group than in the Control Group [5 (2 - 13) days versus 9 (3 - 22) days; p = 0.01]. There were no diffrences in the length of intensive care unit stay, 28-day free from mechanical ventilation, hospital stay or 90-day mortality.

CONCLUSION

Considering the limitations of our study, the application of a weaning protocol for neurocritical patients led to a high percentage of extubation, a reduced need for tracheotomy and a shortened duration of mechanical ventilation. However, there was no reduction in extubation failure or the 28-day free of from mechanical ventilation compared with the Control Group.ClinicalTrials.gov Registry: NCT03128086.

Factors Affecting Mechanical Ventilator Weaning Success and 28-Day Survival Among Patients With Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome Secondary to COVID-19

Introduction

The process of weaning patients off mechanical ventilation (MV) is difficult and complex. Critical care nurses must maintain continuity of care for patients undergoing MV weaning, assess patients' overall condition, and meet patients' needs.

Objectives

The study aimed to explore clinical factors of MV weaning success and 28-day survival among patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome secondary to COVID-19.

Methods

This prospective observational study was conducted on 90 newly admitted patients in the general intensive care unit Assiut Univeristy Main Hospital in Egypt from October 2021 to March 2022. The researchers applied a standard weaning protocol for all of the patients in this study and then assessed the outcome variables: success or failure of weaning trials from a mechanical ventilator, and 28-day survival.

Results

In total, 50 (55.6%) patients were successfully weaned from MV, and 45 (50%) patients survived at 28 days. In a multivariate regression analysis, dynamic compliance (OR, 1.115; 95% CI, 1.010-1.230, p = .031*), lymphocyte count (OR, 3.025; 95% CI, 1.322-6.923, p = .009*), urine output (OR, 1.002; 95% CI, 1.001-1.004, p = .002*), and alanine aminotransferase (ALT; OR, 0.993; 95% CI, 0.988-0.999, p = .017*) were significantly associated with weaning success. In addition, age (OR, 1.058; 95% CI, 1.015-1.102; p = .007*), lymphocyte count (OR, 3.304; 95% CI, 1.348-8.100; p = .009*), urine output (OR, 1.003; 95% CI, 1.001-1.004; p = .001*), and ALT (OR, 0.994; 95% CI, 0.989-0.99, p = .015*) were significantly associated with survival at 28 days.

Conclusion

Dynamic lung compliance, lymphocyte count, urine output, and ALT were found to be predictive parameters that may affect the success of weaning off MV. Additionally, it was found that age, lymphocyte count, urine output, and ALT are predictors of survival at 28 days. We recommend further studies with larger, more systematic samples and complete follow-up, focusing on pulmonary function and quality of life in postweaning patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome.

Weaning Outcomes in Patients with Brain Injury

BACKGROUND

Despite the need for specific weaning strategies in neurological patients, evidence is generally insufficient or lacking. We aimed to describe the evolution over time of weaning and extubation practices in patients with acute brain injury compared with patients who are mechanically ventilated (MV) due to other reasons.

METHODS

We performed a secondary analysis of three prospective, observational, multicenter international studies conducted in 2004, 2010, and 2016 in adults who had need of invasive MV for more than 12 h. We collected data on baseline characteristics, variables related to management ventilator settings, and complications while patients were ventilated or until day 28.

RESULTS

Among the 20,929 patients enrolled, we included 12,618 (60%) who started the weaning from MV, of whom 1722 (14%) were patients with acute brain injury. In the acutely brain-injured cohort, 538 patients (31%) did not undergo planned extubation, defined as the need for a tracheostomy without an attempt of extubation, accidental extubation, and death. Among the 1184 planned extubated patients with acute brain injury, 202 required reintubation (17%). Patients with acute brain injury had a higher odds for unplanned extubation (odds ratio [OR] 1.35, confidence interval for 95% [CI 95%] 1.19-1.54; p < 0.001), a higher odds of failure after the first attempt of weaning (spontaneous breathing trial or gradual reduction of ventilatory support; OR 1.14 [CI 95% 1.01-1.30; p = 0.03]), and a higher odds for reintubation (OR 1.41 [CI 95% 1.20-1.66; p < 0.001]) than patients without brain injury. Patients with hemorrhagic stroke had the highest odds for unplanned extubation (OR 1.47 [CI 95% 1.22-1.77; p < 0.001]), of failed extubation after the first attempt of weaning (OR 1.28 [CI 95% 1.06-1.55; p = 0.009]), and for reintubation (OR 1.49 [CI 95% 1.17-1.88; p < 0.001]). In relation to weaning evolution over time in patients with acute brain injury, the risk for unplanned extubation showed a downward trend; the risk for reintubation was not associated to time; and there was a significant increase in the percentage of patients who underwent extubation after the first attempt of weaning from MV.

CONCLUSIONS

Patients with acute brain injury, compared with patients without brain injury, present higher odds of undergoing unplanned extubated after weaning was started, lower odds of being extubated after the first attempt, and a higher risk of reintubation.

Machine learning for predicting successful extubation in patients receiving mechanical ventilation

Ventilator liberation is one of the most critical decisions in the intensive care unit; however, prediction of extubation failure is difficult, and the proportion thereof remains high. Machine learning can potentially provide a breakthrough in the prediction of extubation success. A total of seven studies on the prediction of extubation success using machine learning have been published. These machine learning models were developed using data from electronic health records, 8–78 features, and algorithms such as artificial neural network, LightGBM, and XGBoost. Sensitivity ranged from 0.64 to 0.96, specificity ranged from 0.73 to 0.85, and area under the receiver operating characteristic curve ranged from 0.70 to 0.98. The features deemed most important included duration of mechanical ventilation, PaO₂, blood urea nitrogen, heart rate, and Glasgow Coma Scale score. Although the studies had limitations, prediction of extubation success by machine learning has the potential to be a powerful tool. Further studies are needed to assess whether machine learning prediction reduces the incidence of extubation failure or prolongs the duration of ventilator use, thereby increasing tracheostomy and ventilator-related complications and mortality.

New integrated weaning indices from mechanical ventilation: A derivation-validation observational multicenter study

Background

To develop ten new integrated weaning indices that can predict the weaning outcome better than the traditional indices.

Methods

This retrospective-prospective derivation-validation observational multicenter clinical trial (Clinical Trial.Gov, NCT 01779297), was conducted on 1,175 adult patients admitted at 9 academic affiliated intensive care units (ICUs; 4 surgical and 5 medical), from Jan 2013 to Dec 2018. All patients, intubated and mechanically ventilated for at least 24 h and ready for weaning were enrolled. The study had two phases: at first, the threshold values of each index that best discriminate between a successful and an unsuccessful weaning outcome was determined among 208 patients in the derivation group. In the second phase, the predictive performance of these values was prospectively tested in 967 patients in the validation group. In the prospective-validation set we used Bayes’ theorem to assess the probability of each test in predicting weaning.

Results

In the prospective validation group, sensitivity, specificity, diagnostic accuracy, positive and negative predictive values, and finally area under the receiver operator characteristic curves and standard errors for each index (ten formulae) were calculated. Statistical values of ten formulae for aforesaid variables were higher than 87% (0.87–0.99).

Conclusion

The new indices can be used for hospitalized patients in intensive care settings for accurate prediction of the weaning outcome.

Respiratory Therapist-Driven Extubation Readiness Testing in a Single Pediatric ICU

BACKGROUND

There is currently no standardized way to determine suitability for extubation of pediatric ICU (PICU) patients, potentially resulting in prolonged duration of mechanical ventilation. We aimed to design and implement a protocol for screening all intubated PICU patients for extubation readiness.

METHODS

We adopted the quality improvement (QI) Model for Improvement with Plan-Do-Study-Act (PDSA) cycles to achieve this aim. This QI project was conducted over 11 months in a multidisciplinary PICU. Outcome measures included the (1) development of a standardized extubation readiness test (ERT) that was acceptable and safe; (2) performance of ERT on > 80% of all mechanically ventilated subjects; and (3) maintenance or reduction in mechanical ventilation duration, extubation failure (non-elective re-intubation within 48 h of extubation), and need for rescue noninvasive ventilation (NIV). Balancing measures were to ensure (1) no compromise of the subject's clinical status; and (2) acceptability of the ERT workflow by medical, nursing, and respiratory therapist (RT) teams.

RESULTS

Four PDSA cycles were necessary to achieve the aims of this study. During the QI period, 438 subjects were admitted to the PICU. The ERT was championed by the RTs who conducted the test during office hours. ERT performance increased from 0% (baseline) to 90% (fourth PDSA cycle). Extubation failure rate after implementing ERT was reduced compared to baseline (4/31 [12.9%] vs 3/127 [2.4%], P = .01), whereas need for rescue NIV (3/31 [9.7%] vs 10/127 [7.9%], P = .74) and duration of mechanical ventilation (2 [1-7] d vs 1 [1-3] d, P = .09) were unchanged. PICU length of stay was reduced after implementing ERT (5 [3-10] d vs 3 [1-6] d, P = .01). No subject was destabilized as a result of ERT, and PICU staff found the workflow acceptable.

CONCLUSIONS

An acceptable and safe ERT protocol was implemented and found to improve outcomes in PICU subjects on mechanical ventilation.

Quantitative EEG may predict weaning failure in ventilated patients on the neurological intensive care unit

Neurocritical patients suffer from a substantial risk of extubation failure. The aim of this prospective study was to analyze if quantitative EEG (qEEG) monitoring is able to predict successful extubation in these patients. We analyzed EEG-monitoring for at least six hours before extubation in patients receiving mechanical ventilation (MV) on our neurological intensive care unit (NICU) between November 2017 and May 2019. Patients were divided in 2 groups: patients with successful extubation (SE) versus patients with complications after MV withdrawal (failed extubation; FE), including reintubation, need for non-invasive ventilation (NIV) or death. Bipolar six channel EEG was applied. Unselected raw EEG signal underwent automated artefact rejection and Short Time Fast Fourier Transformation. The following relative proportions of global EEG spectrum were analyzed: relative beta (RB), alpha (RA), theta (RT), delta (RD) as well as the alpha delta ratio (ADR). Coefficient of variation (CV) was calculated as a measure of fluctuations in the different power bands. Mann-Whitney U test and logistic regression were applied to analyze group differences. 52 patients were included (26 male, mean age 65 ± 17 years, diagnosis: 40% seizures/status epilepticus, 37% ischemia, 13% intracranial hemorrhage, 10% others). Successful extubation was possible in 40 patients (77%), reintubation was necessary in 6 patients (12%), 5 patients (10%) required NIV, one patient died. In contrast to FE patients, SE patients showed more stable EEG power values (lower CV) considering all EEG channels (RB: p < 0.0005; RA: p = 0.045; RT: p = 0.045) with RB as an independent predictor of weaning success in logistic regression (p = 0.004). The proportion of the EEG frequency bands (RB, RA RT, RD) of the entire EEG power spectrum was not significantly different between SE and FE patients. Higher fluctuations in qEEG frequency bands, reflecting greater fluctuation in alertness, during the hours before cessation of MV were associated with a higher rate of complications after extubation in this cohort. The stability of qEEG power values may represent a non-invasive, examiner-independent parameter to facilitate weaning assessment in neurocritical patients.

Performance Assessment of Medical Professionals in Prevention of Ventilator Associated Pneumonia in Intensive Care Units

PURPOSE

Ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP) is one of the most common infections in intensive care units (ICU) with a 6-52% incidence. The VAP mortality rate is 50% to 70%. Medical professionals (MPs) working in the ICU are expected to follow the guidelines to prevent VAP. The study aimed to assess the performance of MPs in preventing VAP and to associate the performance with the baseline information.

METHODS

An observational cross-sectional study was conducted in the ICUs of selected hospitals in eastern Saudi Arabia. A total of 152 MPs were selected by random sampling. A structured questionnaire including baseline information, knowledge and performance-related questions was used to collect the data. Frequency, mean, and chi-square tests were used for analysis.

RESULTS

Out of 152 MPs, 40.8% had adequate and 7.9% had inadequate knowledge. A high mean score of 12.9 ± 2.2 was obtained by physicians, followed by 11.3 ± 1.6 by nurses, 9.8 ± 2.2 by RTs, and 8.6 ± 2.1 by interns. Overall, 52.6% had satisfactory performance. Approximately 57.9% and 67.8% of MPs cleaned their hands before touching the patient and the ventilator, respectively. Many (79.6%) MPs used personal protective equipment in the ICU. Some (47.4%) of the MPs changed the patient's position regularly. About 77.6% of MPs followed the sterile technique when suctioning the airway. There was a significant association found between the performance of MPs on the prevention of VAP with age (p < 0.001), designation (p < 0.05), professional experience (p < 0.05), managing chronic obstructive pulmonary disease conditions (p < 0.05) and training attended (p < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

Although some of the MPs had satisfactory performance regarding VAP prevention in the ICU, more attention should be paid to training them on clinical guidelines to improve health care quality and reduce the rate of VAP.

Weaning critically ill patients from mechanical ventilation: a protocol from a multicenter retrospective cohort study

BACKGROUND

Mechanical ventilation (MV) is an important lifesaving method in intensive care unit (ICU). Prolonged MV is associated with ventilator associated pneumonia (VAP) and other complications. However, premature weaning from MV may lead to higher risk of reintubation or mortality. Therefore, timely and safe weaning from MV is important. In addition, identification of the right patient and performing a suitable weaning process is necessary. Although several guidelines about weaning have been reported, compliance with these guidelines is unknown. Therefore, the aim of this study is to explore the variation of weaning in China, associations between initial MV reason and clinical outcomes, and factors associated with weaning strategies using a multicenter cohort.

METHODS

This multicenter retrospective cohort study will be conducted at 17 adult ICUs in China, that included patients who were admitted in this 17 ICUs between October 2020 and February 2021. Patients under 18 years of age and patients without the possibility for weaning will be excluded. The questionnaire information will be registered by a specific clinician in each center who has been evaluated and qualified to carry out the study.

DISCUSSION

In a previous observational study of weaning in 17 ICUs in China, weaning practices varies nationally. Therefore, a multicenter retrospective cohort study is necessary to be conducted to explore the present weaning methods used in China.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

Chinese Clinical Trial Registry (ChiCTR) (No. ChiCTR2100044634).

Lizhong Decoction () Ameliorates Ulcerative Colitis in Mice via Regulation of Plasma and Urine Metabolic Profiling

OBJECTIVE

To elucidate the mechanism of Lizhong Decoction (LZD, ) in treating dextran sodium sulfate (DSS)-induced colitis in mice based on metabonomics.

METHODS

Thirty-six mice were randomly divided into 6 groups, including normal, model, low- (1.365 g/kg), medium- (4.095 g/kg) and high dose (12.285 g/kg) LZD and salazosulfadimidine (SASP) groups, 6 mice in each group. Colitis model mice were induced by DSS admistration for 7 days, and treated with low, medium and high dose LZD extract and positive drug SASP. Metabolic comparison of DSS-induced colitis and normal mice was investigated by using ultra-performance liquid chromatography coupled to quadrupole time-of-flight mass (UPLC-Q-TOF/MS) combined with Metabolynx™ software.

RESULTS

The metabolic profiles of plasma and urine in colitis mice were distinctly ameliorated after LZD treatment (P<0.05). Potential biomarkers (9 in serum and 4 in urine) were screened and tentatively identified. The endogenous metabolites were mainly involved in primary bile acid, sphingolipid, linoleic acid, arachidonic acid, amino acids (alanine, aspartate, and glutamate), butanoate and glycerophospholipid metabolism in plasma, and terpenoid backbone biosynthesis, glycerophospholipid and tryptophan metabolism in urine. After LZD treatment, these markers notably restored to normal levels.

CONCLUSIONS

The study revealed the underlying mechanism of LZD on amelioration of ulcerative colitis based on metabonomics, which laid a foundation for further exploring the pathological and physiological mechanism, early diagnosis, and corresponding drug development of colitis.

Effect of different levels of PEEP on mortality in ICU patients without acute respiratory distress syndrome: systematic review and meta-analysis with trial sequential analysis

OBJECTIVE

To determine whether higher positive end- expiratory pressure (PEEP) could provide a survival advantage for patients without acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) compared with lower PEEP.

METHODS

Eligible studies were identified through searches of Embase, Cochrane Library, Web of Science, Medline, and Wanfang database from inception up to 1 June 2021. Trial sequential analysis (TSA) was used in this meta-analysis.

DATA SYNTHESIS

Twenty-seven randomized controlled trials (RCTs) were identified for further evaluation. Higher and lower PEEP arms included 1330 patients and 1650 patients, respectively. A mean level of 9.6±3.4 cmH₂O was applied in the higher PEEP groups and 1.9±2.6 cmH₂O was used in the lower PEEP groups. Higher PEEP, compared with lower PEEP, was not associated with reduction of all-cause mortality (RR 1.03; 95% CI 0.91-1.18; P =0.627), and 28-day mortality (RR 1.07 ; 95% CI 0.92-1.24; P =0.365). In terms of risk of ARDS (RR 0.43; 95% CI 0.24-0.78; P =0.005), duration of intensive care unit (MD -1.04; 95%CI-1.36 to -0.73; P < 0.00001), and oxygenation (MD 40.30; 95%CI 0.94 to 79.65; P = 0.045), higher PEEP was superior to lower PEEP. Besides, the pooled analysis showed no significant differences between groups both in the duration of mechanical ventilation (MD 0.00; 95%CI-0.13 to 0.13; P = 0.996) and hospital stay (MD -0.66; 95%CI-1.94 to 0.61; P = 0.309). More importantly, lower PEEP did not increase the risk of pneumonia, atelectasis, barotrauma, hypoxemia, or hypotension among patients compared with higher PEEP. The TSA analysis showed that the results of all-cause mortality and 28-day mortality might be false-negative results.

CONCLUSIONS

Our results suggest that a lower PEEP ventilation strategy was non-inferior to a higher PEEP ventilation strategy in ICU patients without ARDS, with no increased risk of all-cause mortality and 28-day mortality. Further high-quality RCTs should be performed to confirm these findings.

The Relationship between Frailty and Mechanical Ventilation: A Population-based Cohort Study

RATIONALE

Frailty in critically ill patients is associated with higher mortality and prolonged length of stay, however little is known about the impact on the duration of mechanical ventilation.

OBJECTIVES

To identify the relationship between frailty and total duration of mechanical ventilation and the interaction with patients' age.

METHODS

This retrospective population-based cohort study was performed using data submitted to the Australian and New Zealand Intensive Care Society Adult Patient Database between 2017 and 2020. We analyzed adult critically ill patients who received invasive mechanical ventilation within the first 24 hours of intensive care unit admission.

RESULTS

Of 59319 available patients receiving invasive mechanical ventilation, 8331 (14%) were classified as frail. Patients with frailty had longer duration of mechanical ventilation compared to patients without frailty. Duration of mechanical ventilation increased with higher frailty score. Patients with frailty had longer intensive care unit and hospital stay with higher mortality than non-frail patients. After adjustment for relevant covariates in multivariate analyses, frailty was significantly associated with a reduced probability of cessation of invasive mechanical ventilation (adjusted hazard ratio 0.57 [95% CI: 0.51-0.64]; p<0.001). Sensitivity and subgroup analyses suggested that frailty could prolong mechanical ventilation in survivors and the relationship was especially strong in younger patients.

CONCLUSIONS

Frailty score was independently associated with longer duration of mechanical ventilation and contributed to identify patients who were less likely to be liberated from mechanical ventilation. The impact of frailty on ventilation time varied with age and was most apparent for younger patients.

Discordances Between Factors Associated With Withholding Extubation and Extubation Failure After a Successful Spontaneous Breathing Trial

OBJECTIVES

To identify whether factors associated with withholding extubation in the ICU also predict the risk of extubation failure.

DESIGN

Retrospective cohort study.

SETTING

Eight medical-surgical ICUs in Toronto.

PATIENTS

Adult patients receiving invasive mechanical ventilation, with a first successful spontaneous breathing trial within 28 days of initial ICU admission.

INTERVENTIONS

None.

MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS

The primary end point had three mutually exclusive levels, including: 1) withholding extubation after a successful spontaneous breathing trial, 2) extubation failure within 48 hours, and 3) successful extubation. Among 9,910 patients, 38% of patients were not extubated within 24 hours of their first successful spontaneous breathing trial. A total of 12.9% of patients who were promptly extubated failed within the next 48 hours. Several discrepancies were evident in the association of factors with risk of withholding extubation and extubation failure. Specifically, both age and female sex were associated with withholding extubation (odds ratio, 1.07; 95% CI, 1.03-1.11; and odds ratio, 1.13; 95% CI, 1.02-1.26, respectively) but not a higher risk of failed extubation (odds ratio, 0.99; 95% CI, 0.93-1.05; and odds ratio, 0.93; 95% CI, 0.77-1.11, respectively). Conversely, both acute cardiovascular conditions and intubation for hypoxemic respiratory failure were associated with a higher risk of failed extubation (odds ratio, 1.32; 95% CI, 1.06-1.66; and odds ratio, 1.46; 95% CI, 1.16-1.82, respectively) but not a higher odds of a withheld extubation attempt (odds ratio, 0.79; 95% CI, 0.68-0.91; and odds ratio, 1.07; 95% CI, 0.93-1.23, respectively).

CONCLUSIONS

Several factors showed discordance between the decision to withhold extubation and the risk of extubation failure. This discordance may lead to longer duration of mechanical ventilation or higher reintubation rates. Improving the decision-making behind extubation may help to reduce both exposure to invasive mechanical ventilation and extubation failure.

Premature, Opportune, and Delayed Weaning in Mechanically Ventilated Patients: A Call for Implementation of Weaning Protocols in Low- and Middle-Income Countries

OBJECTIVES

Weaning protocols establish readiness-to-wean criteria to determine the opportune moment to conduct a spontaneous breathing trial. Weaning protocols have not been widely adopted or evaluated in ICUs in low- and middle-income countries. We sought to compare clinical outcomes between participants whose weaning trials were retrospectively determined to have been premature, opportune, or delayed based on when they met readiness-to-wean criteria.

DESIGN

Prospective, multicenter observational study.

SETTING

Five medical ICUs in four public hospitals in Lima, Perú.

SUBJECTS

Adults with acute respiratory failure and at least 24 hours of invasive mechanical ventilation (n = 1,657).

INTERVENTIONS

None.

MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS

We established six readiness-to-wean criteria and retrospectively categorized our sample into three weaning groups: 1) premature: if the weaning trial took place before fulfilling all criteria, 2) opportune: if the weaning trial took place within 24 hours after fulfilling the criteria, and 3) delayed: if the weaning trial took place over 24 hours after fulfilling criteria. We compared 90-day mortality, ventilator-free days, ICU-free days, and hospital-free days between premature, opportune, and delayed weaning groups. In our sample, 761 participants (60.8%) were classified as having a premature weaning trial, 196 underwent opportune weaning (15.7%), and 295 experienced delayed weaning (23.6%). There was no significant difference in 90-day mortality between the groups. Both the premature and delayed weaning groups had poorer clinical outcomes with fewer ventilator-free days (-2.18, p = 0.008) and (-3.49, p < 0.001), ICU-free days (-2.25, p = 0.001) and (-3.72, p < 0.001), and hospital-free days (-2.76, p = 0.044) and (-4.53, p = 0.004), respectively, compared with the opportune weaning group.

CONCLUSIONS

Better clinical outcomes occur with opportune weaning compared with premature and delayed weaning. If readiness-to-wean criteria can be applied in resource-limited settings, it may improve ICU outcomes associated with opportune weaning.

Use of a Multidisciplinary Mechanical Ventilation Weaning Protocol to Improve Patient Outcomes and Empower Staff in a Medical Intensive Care Unit

BACKGROUND

Prolonged duration of mechanical ventilation is associated with higher mortality and increased patient complications; conventional physician-directed weaning methods are highly variable and permit significant time that weaning is inefficient and ineffective.

OBJECTIVES

The primary objective of this quality improvement project was to implement a registered nurse (RN)- and respiratory therapist (RT)-driven mechanical ventilation weaning protocol in a medical intensive care unit (ICU) at a tertiary care academic medical center.

METHODS

This quality improvement project used a quasi-experimental design with a retrospective usual care group who underwent physician-directed (conventional) weaning (n = 51) and a prospective intervention group who underwent protocol-directed weaning (n = 54). Outcomes included duration of mechanical ventilation, ICU length of stay, reintubation rates, and RN and RT satisfaction with the weaning protocol.

RESULTS

Patients in the RN- and RT-driven mechanical ventilation weaning protocol group had significantly lower duration of mechanical ventilation (74 vs 152 hours; P = .002) and ICU length of stay (6.7 vs 10.2 days; P = .031). There was no significant difference in reintubation rates between groups. Staff surveys indicate that both RN and RTs were satisfied with the process change.

DISCUSSION

Implementation of a multidisciplinary mechanical ventilation weaning protocol is a safe and effective way to improve patient outcomes and empower ICU staff.

Machine learning for the prediction of successful extubation among patients with mechanical ventilation in the intensive care unit: A retrospective observational study

BACKGROUND

Ventilator weaning protocols are commonly implemented for patients receiving mechanical ventilation. However, the rate of extubation failure remains high despite the protocols. This study investigated the usefulness and accuracy of ventilator weaning through machine learning to predict successful extubation.

METHODS

We retrospectively evaluated the data of patients who underwent intubation for respiratory failure and received mechanical ventilation in the intensive care unit (ICU). Data on 57 factors including patient demographics, vital signs, laboratory data, and data from ventilator were extracted. Extubation failure was defined as re-intubation within 72 hours of extubation. For supervised learning, the data were labeled requirement of intubation or not. We used three learning algorithms (Random Forest, XGBoost, and LightGBM) to predict successful extubation. We also analyzed important features and evaluated the area under curve (AUC) and prediction metrics.

RESULTS

Overall, 13 of the 117 included patients required re-intubation. LightGBM had the highest AUC (0.950), followed by XGBoost (0.946) and Random Forest (0.930). The accuracy, precision, and recall performance were 0.897, 0.910, and 0.909, for Random Forest; 0.910, 0.912, and 0.931 for XGBoost; and 0.927, 0.915, and 0.960 for LightGBM, respectively. The most important feature was the duration of mechanical ventilation followed by the fraction of inspired oxygen, positive end-expiratory pressure, maximum and mean airway pressures, and Glasgow Coma Scale.

CONCLUSIONS

Machine learning could predict successful extubation among patients on mechanical ventilation in the ICU. LightGBM has the highest overall performance. The duration of mechanical ventilation was the most important feature in all models.

The Effect of Reconnection to Mechanical Ventilation for 1 Hour After Spontaneous Breathing Trial on Reintubation Among Patients Ventilated for More Than 12 Hours: A Randomized Clinical Trial

BACKGROUND

The resting of the respiratory musculature after undergoing the spontaneous breathing trial (SBT) to prevent extubation failures in critically ill patients needs to be studied further.

RESEARCH QUESTION

Is the reconnection to mechanical ventilation (MV) for 1 h after a successful SBT able to reduce the risk of reintubation?

STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS

Randomized clinical trial conducted in four ICUs between August 2018 and July 2019. Candidates for tracheal extubation who met all screening criteria for weaning were included. After achieving success in the SBT using a T-tube, the patients were randomized to the following groups: direct extubation (DE) or extubation after reconnection to MV for 1 h (R1h). The primary outcome was reintubation within 48 h.

RESULTS

Among the 336 patients studied (women, 41.1%; median age, 59 years [interquartile range, 45-70 years]), 12.9% (22/171) in the R1h group required reintubation within 48 h vs 18.2% (30/165) in the DE group (risk difference, 5.3 [95% CI, -2.49 to 13.12]; P = .18). No differences were found in mortality, length of ICU or hospital stay, causes of reintubation, or signs of extubation failure. A prespecified exploratory analysis showed that among the 233 patients (69.3%) who were ventilated for more than 72 h, the incidence of reintubation was 12.7% (15/118) in the R1h group compared with 22.6% (26/115) observed in the DE group (P = .04).

INTERPRETATION

Reconnection to MV after a successful SBT, compared with DE, did not result in a statistically significant reduction in the risk of reintubation in mechanically ventilated patients. Subgroup exploratory findings suggest that the strategy may benefit patients who were ventilated for more than 72 h, which should be confirmed in further studies.

TRIAL REGISTRY

Brazilian Clinical Trials Registry; No.: RBR-3x8nxn; URL: www.ensaiosclinicos.gov.br.

Evaluation of the Perceived Barriers and Facilitators to Timely Extubation of Critically Ill Adults: An Interprofessional Survey

BACKGROUND

Spontaneous breathing trials (SBTs) are an evidence-based way of identifying patients ready for mechanical ventilation (MV) liberation. Despite their effectiveness, global SBT performance rates remain suboptimal, and many patients who demonstrate the ability to breathe on their own remain on MV. The factors that influence clinicians' decision to discontinue MV following a successful SBT remain unclear.

AIMS

The aim of this study was to explore the underlying causes of extubation delays in the intensive care unit (ICU) from an interprofessional perspective.

METHODS

An exploratory, descriptive, cross-sectional design was used. An online survey was administered in December 2019 to clinicians practicing in three ICUs at a single medical center in the U.S. Survey questions focused on clinicians' perceptions of current MV liberation practices and perceived barriers or facilitators to timely extubation after a successful SBT.

RESULTS

Of 425 eligible clinicians, 135 completed the survey (31.7% response rate). The majority of clinicians believed the current SBT and extubation process took too long (n = 108; 80.0%) and that this delay negatively affected patient outcomes. While professional groups differed in their rankings of importance, factors perceived to contribute to extubation delays most commonly included SBT timing, low provider confidence levels in making extubation decisions, and patient-specific factors. Potential strategies to overcome these barriers included developing an automated extubation protocol, performing SBTs when the provider responsible for final extubation decisions is physically present, and decreasing clinician perception of reprimand or condemnation for failed extubations.

LINKING EVIDENCE TO ACTION

The MV liberation process is complex and dependent on the decisions of various ICU professionals. Clinicians perceive a number of potentially modifiable provider- and organizational-level factors that cause extubation delays in everyday practice. Understanding and addressing these barriers is essential for improving ICU quality and patient outcomes. Future research should explore the effect of nurse and respiratory therapist-driven extubation protocols on MV liberation rates.

Diaphragmatic activity and neural breathing variability during a 5-min endotracheal continuous positive airway pressure trial in extremely preterm infants

BACKGROUND

Extremely preterm infants are often exposed to endotracheal tube continuous positive airway pressure (ETT-CPAP) trials to assess extubation readiness. The effects of ETT-CPAP trial on their diaphragmatic activity (Edi) and breathing variability is unknown.

METHODS

Prospective observational study enrolling infants with birth weight ≤1250 g undergoing their first extubation attempt. Diaphragmatic activity, expressed as the absolute minimum (Edi min) and maximum values (Edi max), area under the Edi signal, and breath-by-breath analyses for breath areas, amplitudes, widths, and neural inspiratory and expiratory times, were analyzed during mechanical ventilation (MV) and ETT-CPAP. Neural breathing variability of each of these parameters was also calculated and compared between MV and ETT-CPAP.

RESULTS

Thirteen infants with median (interquartile range) birth weight of 800 g [610-920] and gestational age of 25.4 weeks [24.4-26.3] were included. Diaphragmatic activity significantly increased during ETT-CPAP when compared to MV:Edi max (44.2 vs. 38.1 μV), breath area (449 vs. 312 μV·s), and amplitude (10.12 vs. 7.46 μV). Neural breathing variability during ETT-CPAP was characterized by increased variability for amplitude and area under the breath, and decreased for breath time and width.

CONCLUSIONS

A 5-min ETT-CPAP in extremely preterm infants undergoing extubation imposed significant respiratory load with changes in respiratory variability.

IMPACT

ETT-CPAP trials are often used to assess extubation readiness in extremely preterm infants, but its effects upon their respiratory system are not well known. Diaphragmatic activity analysis demonstrated that these infants are able to mount an important response to a short trial. A 5-min trial imposed a significant respiratory load evidenced by increased diaphragmatic activity and changes in breathing variability. Differences in breathing variability were observed between successful and failed extubations, which should be explored further in extubation readiness investigations. This type of trial cannot be recommended for preterm infants in clinical practice until clear standards and accuracy are established.

AARC Clinical Practice Guideline: Management of Adult Patients with Tracheostomy in the Acute Care Setting

Management of patients with a tracheostomy tube includes many components of care provided by clinicians from various health care disciplines. In recent years, clinicians worldwide have demonstrated a renewed interest in the management of patients with tracheostomy due to the recognition that more effective and efficient management of this patient population is necessary to decrease morbidity and mortality and to optimize the value of the procedure. Commensurate with the goal of enhancing the care of patients with tracheostomy, we conducted a systematic review to facilitate the development of recommendations relevant to the care of adult patients with tracheostomy in the acute care setting. From our systematic review, clinical practice guidelines were developed to address questions regarding the impact of tracheostomy bundles, tracheostomy teams, and protocol-directed care on time to decannulation, length of stay, tracheostomy-related cost, tracheostomy-related adverse events, and other tracheostomy-related outcomes in tracheostomized adult patients in the acute care setting. Using a modification of the RAND/UCLA Appropriateness Method, 3 recommendations were developed to assist clinicians with tracheostomy management of adult patients in the acute care setting: (1) evidence supports the use of tracheostomy bundles that have been evaluated and approved by a team of individuals experienced in tracheostomy management to decrease time to decannulation, tracheostomy-related adverse events, and other tracheostomy-related outcomes, namely, improved tolerance of oral diet; (2) evidence supports the addition of a multidisciplinary tracheostomy team to improve time to decannulation, length of stay, tracheostomy-related adverse events, and other tracheostomy-related outcomes, namely, increased speaking valve use; (3) evidence supports the use of a weaning/decannulation protocol to guide weaning and removal of the tracheostomy tube to improve time to decannulation.

Algera AG, Pisani L, Serpa Neto A, den Boer SS, Bosch FFH, Bruin K, Klooster PM, Van der Meer NJM, Nowitzky RO, Purmer IM, Slabbekoorn M, Spronk PE, van Vliet J, Weenink JJ, Gama de Abreu M, Pelosi P, Schultz MJ, Paulus F. Effect of a Lower vs Higher Positive End-Expiratory Pressure Strategy on Ventilator-Free Days in ICU Patients Without ARDS: A Randomized Clinical Trial

IMPORTANCE

It is uncertain whether invasive ventilation can use lower positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) in critically ill patients without acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS).

OBJECTIVE

To determine whether a lower PEEP strategy is noninferior to a higher PEEP strategy regarding duration of mechanical ventilation at 28 days.

DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS

Noninferiority randomized clinical trial conducted from October 26, 2017, through December 17, 2019, in 8 intensive care units (ICUs) in the Netherlands among 980 patients without ARDS expected not to be extubated within 24 hours after start of ventilation. Final follow-up was conducted in March 2020.

INTERVENTIONS

Participants were randomized to receive invasive ventilation using either lower PEEP, consisting of the lowest PEEP level between 0 and 5 cm H2O (n = 476), or higher PEEP, consisting of a PEEP level of 8 cm H2O (n = 493).

MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES

The primary outcome was the number of ventilator-free days at day 28, with a noninferiority margin for the difference in ventilator-free days at day 28 of -10%. Secondary outcomes included ICU and hospital lengths of stay; ICU, hospital, and 28- and 90-day mortality; development of ARDS, pneumonia, pneumothorax, severe atelectasis, severe hypoxemia, or need for rescue therapies for hypoxemia; and days with use of vasopressors or sedation.

RESULTS

Among 980 patients who were randomized, 969 (99%) completed the trial (median age, 66 [interquartile range {IQR}, 56-74] years; 246 [36%] women). At day 28, 476 patients in the lower PEEP group had a median of 18 ventilator-free days (IQR, 0-27 days) and 493 patients in the higher PEEP group had a median of 17 ventilator-free days (IQR, 0-27 days) (mean ratio, 1.04; 95% CI, 0.95-∞; P = .007 for noninferiority), and the lower boundary of the 95% CI was within the noninferiority margin. Occurrence of severe hypoxemia was 20.6% vs 17.6% (risk ratio, 1.17; 95% CI, 0.90-1.51; P = .99) and need for rescue strategy was 19.7% vs 14.6% (risk ratio, 1.35; 95% CI, 1.02-1.79; adjusted P = .54) in patients in the lower and higher PEEP groups, respectively. Mortality at 28 days was 38.4% vs 42.0% (hazard ratio, 0.89; 95% CI, 0.73-1.09; P = .99) in patients in the lower and higher PEEP groups, respectively. There were no statistically significant differences in other secondary outcomes.

CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE

Among patients in the ICU without ARDS who were expected not to be extubated within 24 hours, a lower PEEP strategy was noninferior to a higher PEEP strategy with regard to the number of ventilator-free days at day 28. These findings support the use of lower PEEP in patients without ARDS.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03167580.

Prolonged Weaning: S2k Guideline Published by the German Respiratory Society

Mechanical ventilation (MV) is an essential part of modern intensive care medicine. MV is performed in patients with severe respiratory failure caused by respiratory muscle insufficiency and/or lung parenchymal disease; that is, when other treatments such as medication, oxygen administration, secretion management, continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP), or nasal high-flow therapy have failed. MV is required for maintaining gas exchange and allows more time to curatively treat the underlying cause of respiratory failure. In the majority of ventilated patients, liberation or "weaning" from MV is routine, without the occurrence of any major problems. However, approximately 20% of patients require ongoing MV, despite amelioration of the conditions that precipitated the need for it in the first place. Approximately 40-50% of the time spent on MV is required to liberate the patient from the ventilator, a process called "weaning". In addition to acute respiratory failure, numerous factors can influence the duration and success rate of the weaning process; these include age, comorbidities, and conditions and complications acquired during the ICU stay. According to international consensus, "prolonged weaning" is defined as the weaning process in patients who have failed at least 3 weaning attempts, or require more than 7 days of weaning after the first spontaneous breathing trial (SBT). Given that prolonged weaning is a complex process, an interdisciplinary approach is essential for it to be successful. In specialised weaning centres, approximately 50% of patients with initial weaning failure can be liberated from MV after prolonged weaning. However, the heterogeneity of patients undergoing prolonged weaning precludes the direct comparison of individual centres. Patients with persistent weaning failure either die during the weaning process, or are discharged back to their home or to a long-term care facility with ongoing MV. Urged by the growing importance of prolonged weaning, this Sk2 Guideline was first published in 2014 as an initiative of the German Respiratory Society (DGP), in conjunction with other scientific societies involved in prolonged weaning. The emergence of new research, clinical study findings and registry data, as well as the accumulation of experience in daily practice, have made the revision of this guideline necessary. The following topics are dealt with in the present guideline: Definitions, epidemiology, weaning categories, underlying pathophysiology, prevention of prolonged weaning, treatment strategies in prolonged weaning, the weaning unit, discharge from hospital on MV, and recommendations for end-of-life decisions. Special emphasis was placed on the following themes: (1) A new classification of patient sub-groups in prolonged weaning. (2) Important aspects of pulmonary rehabilitation and neurorehabilitation in prolonged weaning. (3) Infrastructure and process organisation in the care of patients in prolonged weaning based on a continuous treatment concept. (4) Changes in therapeutic goals and communication with relatives. Aspects of paediatric weaning are addressed separately within individual chapters. The main aim of the revised guideline was to summarize both current evidence and expert-based knowledge on the topic of "prolonged weaning", and to use this information as a foundation for formulating recommendations related to "prolonged weaning", not only in acute medicine but also in the field of chronic intensive care medicine. The following professionals served as important addressees for this guideline: intensivists, pulmonary medicine specialists, anaesthesiologists, internists, cardiologists, surgeons, neurologists, paediatricians, geriatricians, palliative care clinicians, rehabilitation physicians, intensive/chronic care nurses, physiotherapists, respiratory therapists, speech therapists, medical service of health insurance, and associated ventilator manufacturers.

Actualización de la Declaración de consenso en medicina critica para la atención multidisciplinaria del paciente con sospecha o confirmación diagnóstica de COVID-19

Antecedentes y objetivos

La enfermedad por coronavirus de 2019 (COVID-19) es una enfermedad ocasionada por el nuevo coronavirus del síndrome respiratorio agudo grave (SARS-CoV-2). Se identificó por primera vez en diciembre de 2019 en la ciudad de Wuhan, en los meses siguientes se expandió rápidamente a todos los continentes y la Organización Mundial de la Salud (OMS) la reconoció como una pandemia global el 11 de marzo de 2020. La mayoría de los individuos son asintomáticos pero una baja proporción ingresan a cuidados intensivos con una alta morbimortalidad. Este consenso tiene como objetivo actualizar la declaratoria inicial emitida por la Asociación Colombiana de Medicina Crítica (AMCI) para el manejo del paciente críticamente enfermo con COVID-19, dentro de las áreas críticas de las instituciones de salud.

Métodos

Este estudio utilizó dos técnicas de consenso formal para construir las recomendaciones finales: Delphi modificada y grupos nominales. Se construyeron preguntas por la estrategia PICO. 10 grupos nominales desarrollaron recomendaciones para cada unidad temática. El producto del consenso fue evaluado y calificado en una ronda Delphi y se discutió de forma virtual por los relatores de cada núcleo y los representantes de sociedades médicas científicas afines al manejo del paciente con COVID-19.

Resultados

80 expertos nacionales participaron en la actualización del consenso AMCI, especialistas en Medicina Critica y Cuidados Intensivos, Nefrología, Neurología, Neumología, bioeticistas, Medicina interna, Anestesia, Cirugía General, Cirugía de cabeza y cuello, Cuidados Paliativos, Enfermeras Especialistas en Medicina crítica, Terapeutas respiratorias especialistas en medicina crítica y Fisioterapia, con experiencia clínica en la atención del paciente críticamente enfermo. La declaratoria emite recomendaciones en los ámbitos más relevantes para la atención en salud de los casos de COVID-19, al interior de las unidades de cuidados intensivos, en el contexto nacional de Colombia.

Conclusiones

Un grupo significativo multidisciplinario de profesionales expertos en medicina crítica emiten, mediante técnicas de consenso formal, recomendaciones sobre la mejor práctica para la atención del paciente críticamente enfermo con COVID-19. Las recomendaciones deben ser adaptadas a las condiciones específicas, administrativas y estructurales de las distintas unidades de cuidados intensivos del país.

The Effectiveness of Workshop and Multimedia Training Methods on the Nurses' Decision-Making Skills Regarding Weaning From Mechanical Ventilation

BACKGROUND

Nurses can safely and effectively wean patients from mechanical ventilation (MV) by the use of proper instruments and planning.

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to compare the effectiveness of 2 training methods on the decision-making skill of intensive critical care (ICU) nurses with regard to weaning from MV.

METHODS

In this quasi-experimental study, 80 nurses working in ICUs participated in 1 of 2 educational groups in 2016. The interventions were workshop and multimedia training for decision-making skill regarding weaning from MV. The data were gathered from a questionnaire based on the Burns Weaning Assessment Program tool before and 1 month after the intervention. Data were analyzed by independent t test, the χ test, and the Fisher exact test using the software SPSS v. 17.

RESULTS

The decision-making skill with regard to awareness of weaning factors (physiological and respiratory) increased in both groups after the intervention (P ≤ .001), but the difference between the 2 groups was not statistically meaningful. Considering the mean scores before and after the intervention, the general skill of decision-making regarding weaning from MV was higher in the multimedia training group compared with the workshop training group (P ≤ .001).

CONCLUSION

The multimedia training method, which has been more successful, is recommended owing to its characteristics of virtual education, such as accessibility, flexibility, learner centeredness, and expansibility, as well as nurses' lack of time.

Intensive Care Weaning (iCareWean) protocol on weaning from mechanical ventilation: a single-blinded multicentre randomised control trial comparing an open-loop decision support system and routine care, in the general intensive care unit

INTRODUCTION

Automated systems for ventilator management to date have been either fully heuristic rule-based systems or based on a combination of simple physiological models and rules. These have been shown to reduce the duration of mechanical ventilation in simple to wean patients. At present, there are no published studies that evaluate the effect of systems that use detailed physiological descriptions of the individual patient.The BEACON Caresystem is a model-based decision support system that uses mathematical models of patients' physiology in combination with models of clinical preferences to provide advice on appropriate ventilator settings. An individual physiological description may be particularly advantageous in selecting the appropriate therapy for a complex, heterogeneous, intensive care unit (ICU) patient population.

METHODS AND ANALYSIS

Intenive Care weaning (iCareWean) is a single-blinded, multicentre, prospective randomised control trial evaluating management of mechanical ventilation as directed by the BEACON Caresystem compared with that of current care, in the general intensive care setting. The trial will enrol 274 participants across multiple London National Health Service ICUs. The trial will use a primary outcome of duration of mechanical ventilation until successful extubation.

ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION

Safety oversight will be under the direction of an independent committee of the study sponsor. Study approval was obtained from the regional ethics committee of the Health Research Authority (HRA), (Research Ethic Committee (REC) reference: 17/LO/0887. Integrated Research Application System (IRAS) reference: 226610. Results will be disseminated through international critical care conference/symposium and publication in peer-reviewed journal.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

ClinicalTrials.gov under NCT03249623. This research is registered with the National Institute for Health Research under CPMS ID: 34831.

COVID-19 scenario modelling for the mitigation of capacity-dependent deaths in intensive care

Managing healthcare demand and capacity is especially difficult in the context of the COVID-19 pandemic, where limited intensive care resources can be overwhelmed by a large number of cases requiring admission in a short space of time. If patients are unable to access this specialist resource, then death is a likely outcome. In appreciating these 'capacity-dependent' deaths, this paper reports on the clinically-led development of a stochastic discrete event simulation model designed to capture the key dynamics of the intensive care admissions process for COVID-19 patients. With application to a large public hospital in England during an early stage of the pandemic, the purpose of this study was to estimate the extent to which such capacity-dependent deaths can be mitigated through demand-side initiatives involving non-pharmaceutical interventions and supply-side measures to increase surge capacity. Based on information available at the time, results suggest that total capacity-dependent deaths can be reduced by 75% through a combination of increasing capacity from 45 to 100 beds, reducing length of stay by 25%, and flattening the peak demand to 26 admissions per day. Accounting for the additional 'capacity-independent' deaths, which occur even when appropriate care is available within the intensive care setting, yields an aggregate reduction in total deaths of 30%. The modelling tool, which is freely available and open source, has since been used to support COVID-19 response planning at a number of healthcare systems within the UK National Health Service.

Role of Bedside Ultrasonography in Assessment of Diaphragm Function as a Predictor of Success of Weaning in Mechanically Ventilated Patients

Background

Weaning failure is common in mechanically ventilated patients, and if ultrasound can predict weaning outcome remains controversial. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the diaphragmatic function (thickness and excursion) measured by ultrasound as a predictor of the extubation outcome.

Methods

We included 62 mechanically ventilated patients from the chest intensive care unit in this study. Sixty-two patients who successfully passed the spontaneous breathing trial (SBT) were enrolled. The transthoracic ultrasound of the diaphragm was performed during an SBT to the assess diaphragmatic function (excursion and thickness), and they were classified into the successful extubation group and the failed extubation group.

Results

There was a statistically significant increase in the successful extubation group in the diaphragmatic excursion and thickness fraction (p<0.001), a statistically significant negative correlation between the diaphragmatic function and the duration of the mechanical ventilation, and a statistically significant negative correlation between the diaphragmatic excursion and the Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation II. The diaphragmatic excursion cut-off value predictive of weaning was 1.25 cm, with a specificity of 82.1% and a sensitivity of 97.1% respectively, and the diaphragmatic thickness cut-off value predictive of weaning was 21.5%, with a specificity of 60.7% and a sensitivity of 91.2%, respectively.

Conclusion

The diaphragmatic ultrasonography was found to be a promising tool for predicting the extubation outcome for mechanically ventilated patients.

Value of modified Burns Wean Assessment Program scores in the respiratory intensive care unit: an Egyptian study

Background

There is no consensus on the most useful predictive indicator for weaning patients from mechanical ventilation (MV). We aimed to evaluate the utility of the modified Burns Wean Assessment Program (m-BWAP) in predicting the weaning success in patients with respiratory disorders admitted to the respiratory intensive care unit (RICU).

Methods

Patients with respiratory failure requiring MV for longer than 48 hours were included. They were weaned by pressure support ventilation and spontaneous breathing trails. Patients were divided into successful and unsuccessful weaning groups according to their outcomes.

Results

A total of 91 patients were enrolled. The majority had chronic obstructive pulmonary diseases (COPD): 40%, overlap syndrome (24%), and obesity hypoventilation syndrome (OHS): 15%. The successful group had significantly higher m-BWAP scores than that in the unsuccessful group (median 65; range 35 to 80 vs. median 45; range 30 to 65; p=0.000), with area under the curve (AUC) of 0.854; 95% CI 0.766 to 0.919), p<0.001. At cut-off value of ≥55, the sensitivity and specificity of m-BWAP to predict successful weaning were 73.77% and 84.85%, respectively. The AUC for m-BWAP was significantly higher than that for rapid shallow breathing index (RSBI).

Conclusion

We conclude that m-BWAP scores represent a good predictor of weaning success among patients with chronic respiratory disorders in the RICU. The m-BWAP checklist has many factors that are closely related to the weaning outcomes of patients with chronic respiratory disorders. Further, large-scale, multicenter studies are warranted.

Positioning immobile critically ill patients who are at risk of pressure injuries using a purpose-designed positioning device and usual care equipment: An observational feasibility study

The prevalence of pressure injuries in the intensive care unit (ICU) setting is high with rates ranging from 13.1% to 45.5%. Evaluation of interventions to prevent pressure injuries should be informed by preliminary research to identify factors that should be considered during the design of future trials. The study objectives were to evaluate the process of participant recruitment and monitoring in the ICU; measure the maintenance of body angle (in the side-lying lateral tilt position) and head and neck alignment angle (in the supine position) among immobile critically ill patients when using a purpose-designed positioning device and usual care equipment, and; ascertain the time required to position patients with the purpose-designed positioning device and the usual care equipment. A prospective, observational, feasibility study was conducted in an ICU in Victoria, Australia. The sample was immobile critically ill adults at high-risk of developing pressure injuries. The usual care interventions were pillows, foam wedges, and rolled towels, and the intervention device was the Z-Flo Fluidized Positioner. The body angle and head and neck alignment were measured on six occasions (at baseline, 1 hour, and 2 hours). The time required for positioning was also measured. The sample was predominately male (n = 5, 62%) with a mean age of 59 years. The majority of patients (n = 106, 92.2%) were not immobile and therefore were ineligible to participate. A total of 48 turning and positioning interventions were observed. For the side-lying lateral tilt position, the degree of difference from baseline to 2 hours was no more than three degrees for all the devices (the Fluidized Positioner 25°-26°, the foam wedge 29°-27°, and the pillow 23°-21°). For the head and neck position, the degree of difference from baseline to 2 hours was the greatest for the pillow and rolled towel (78°-71°, a difference of 7°) and the pillow alone (79°-74°, a difference of 5°). The degree of difference was the lowest for the Fluidized Positioner (84°-86°, a difference of 2°). Future research to evaluate positioning equipment in the ICU should consider patient eligibility characteristics, particularly immobility. The conduct of preliminary studies to inform the design of larger pressure injury prevention trials is recommended.

Comparison between a nurse-led weaning protocol and a weaning protocol based on physician's clinical judgment in ICU patients

PURPOSE

The purpose of this study was to compare a nurse-led weaning protocol with a physician-driven weaning protocol in mechanically ventilated (MV) patients.

METHODS

In this quasi-experimental study with a one-group design, a total of 65 ICU patients, requiring MV for more than 72 h, were selected via convenience sampling. In routine practice, the physician's clinical judgment is needed to determine the patient's readiness for liberation from MV. A physician-driven weaning protocol was compared with a nurse-led protocol, using Burn's Weaning Scale (BWS) in three working phases. Descriptive and inferential statistics were measured for data analysis using SPSS version 16.

RESULTS

Based on BWS, the mean MV duration was 111.75±33.46 h in the nurse-led weaning group and 125.12±43.43 h in the physician-driven weaning group. There was a significant difference in terms of MV duration between the two groups (P = 0.000).

CONCLUSION

The present findings showed that nurses' assessment of patient's readiness for weaning from MV (BWS) is a safe approach during the day, which can reduce MV duration more than other typical methods in ICUs.

The Effect of Sedation Protocol Using Richmond Agitation-Sedation Scale (RASS) on Some Clinical Outcomes of Mechanically Ventilated Patients in Intensive Care Units: a Randomized Clinical Trial

Introduction: Providing for patients’ comfort and reducing their pain is one of the important tasks of health care professionals in the Intensive Care Unit (ICU). The current study was conducted to determine the effect of a protocol using a Richmond Agitation-Sedation Scale (RASS) on some clinical outcomes of patients under mechanical ventilation (MV) in 2017.

Methods: This single-blind clinical trial was conducted on 79 traumatic patients in the ICU who were randomly allocated into the intervention (N=40) and the control groups (N=39). The sedation was achieved, using a sedation protocol in the intervention group and the routine care in the control group. The clinical outcomes of the patients (duration of MV, length of staying in ICU, final outcome) were measured. As the participants had different lengths of MV and staying in ICU, the data were restructured, and were analyzed, using proper statistical methods.

Results: The patients’ level of sedation in the intervention group was significantly closer to the ideal score of RASS (-1 to +1). The duration of MV was significantly reduced in the intervention group, and the length of stay in the ICU was also significantly shorter. There was no difference in terms of final outcome. The ICU cost in the control group was twice as high as the cost in of the intervention group.

Conclusion: The applied sedation protocol in this study would provide better sedation and could consequently lead to significantly better clinical outcomes, and the cost of caring as a result.

Ketamine Infusion in Post-Surgical Pain Management after Head and Neck Surgery: A Retrospective Observational Study

Background:

Head and neck cancer affects approximately 382,000 new patients per year worldwide with a significant portion undergoing surgical treatment. During postoperative period key elements in the Intensive Care Unit (ICU) are airway management and pain control.

Objective:

We evaluated the average change of inpatient pain control using a Numerical Rating Score (NRS). We also evaluated the time of extubation after ICU admission recording the incidence of desaturation and the necessity of re-intubation. Secondary outcomes were the incidence of postoperative complications, included those narcotics-related, and the use of rescue analgesics.

Methods:

In this retrospective observational study, we analyzed data of registry before and after we have changed our postoperative analgesic protocol from remifentanil infusion to ketamine infusion.

Results:

Medical records of 20 patients were examined. 10 patients received 0.5 mg/kg ketamine bolus at the end of surgery, followed by a continuous infusion of 0.25 mg/kg/h. All patients presented a significant decrease in pain intensity from the 4th to 48th postoperative hour (p < 0.05), but statically not a significant difference in NRS score was recorded between the two groups. Time to extubation was shorter in ketamine group compared to the remifentanil group (112.30 min ± 16.78 vs. 78 min ± 14.17; p < 0.05). Desaturation rate was 10% in the remifentanil group, while no case was recorded in the ketamine group.

Conclusion:

The level of analgesia provided by ketamine and remifentanil was comparable. Ketamine was superior in ventilatory management of the patient with more rapid extubation and with no case of desaturation.