1
|
Jo EA, Ahn S, Mo H, Jung IM, Kim HK, Ko H, Han A, Min S, Ha J, Min SK. A 20-Year Analysis of Ruptured Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm Outcomes and Associated Factors in Korea. Ann Vasc Surg 2024; 102:152-159. [PMID: 38307230 DOI: 10.1016/j.avsg.2023.10.033] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/08/2023] [Revised: 10/09/2023] [Accepted: 10/30/2023] [Indexed: 02/04/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Unlike western countries, which have reported distinct decreases in incidence of ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysm (rAAA) over the last few decades, epidemiologic studies in Korea have not shown significant changes in incidence or mortality of rAAA. The purpose of this study was to analyze the changes in rAAA treatment outcomes and various associated risk factors over the past 2 decades. METHODS A 20-year retrospective multicenter review for rAAA cases from the period of January 2000 to December 2020 was undertaken. Preoperative, intraoperative and postoperative clinical data were extracted for patients diagnosed with rAAA. For analysis, outcomes from the early era, defined as patients treated between January 1, 2000, and December 31, 2010, were compared with outcomes from the late era, defined as patients treated between January 1, 2011, and December 31, 2020. RESULTS The total in-hospital mortality was 34.1% in the early era compared to 44.8% in the late era. Patients in the late era were older than those in the early era (75.2 ± 10.3 years vs. 70.3 ± 8.9 years; P = 0.009). Treatment with rAAA endovascular aneurysm repair increased from 2.3% in early to 13.8% in late era (P = 0.031). In the early era, more patients were operated by experienced surgeons than the late era (78.1% vs. 45.9%; P = 0.002). The emergency room to operating room time did not show improvement over the 20 years. CONCLUSIONS The results indicate that mortality rate of rAAA in Korea has not changed over the last 2 decades. The study suggests the need for national preventive strategies, improved systemic coordination, and potential centralization of vascular services to enhance survival rates for rAAA.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Eun-Ah Jo
- Department of Surgery, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea; Department of Surgery, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Seongnam-si, Korea
| | - Sanghyun Ahn
- Department of Surgery, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.
| | - Hyejin Mo
- Department of Surgery, Seoul Metropolitan Government-Seoul National University Boramae Medical Center, Seoul, Korea
| | - In-Mok Jung
- Department of Surgery, Seoul Metropolitan Government-Seoul National University Boramae Medical Center, Seoul, Korea
| | - Hyo Kee Kim
- Department of Surgery, Korea University Guro Hospital, Seoul, Korea
| | - Hyunmin Ko
- Department of Surgery, Kyung Hee University Medical Center, Seoul, Korea
| | - Ahram Han
- Department of Surgery, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Sangil Min
- Department of Surgery, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Jongwon Ha
- Department of Surgery, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Seung-Kee Min
- Department of Surgery, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Zhang Y, Lai J. Spatiotemporal trends in the burden of aortic aneurysms caused by high sodium intake from 1990 to 2019: A global, regional, and national analysis. Nutr Metab Cardiovasc Dis 2024; 34:1207-1216. [PMID: 38331643 DOI: 10.1016/j.numecd.2023.12.020] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/13/2023] [Revised: 12/19/2023] [Accepted: 12/21/2023] [Indexed: 02/10/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND AIMS This study, drawing on Global Burden of Disease (GBD) data, examines spatiotemporal trends in mortality and disability-adjusted life years (DALYs) linked to aortic aneurysm (AA) from high sodium intake. The aim is a comprehensive analysis globally, regionally, and nationally spanning 1990 to 2019. METHODS AND RESULTS Quantifying AA deaths and DALYs due to high sodium intake, incorporating age-standardized mortality rate (ASMR) and age-standardized DALYs rate (ASDR), revealed a global surge. Deaths rose by 86.09 %, DALYs by 74.02 % from 1990 to 2019. EAPC for ASMR and ASDR displayed negative trends (-0.72 and -0.77). High/middle-high Socio-demographic Index (SDI) regions bore higher burdens than lower SDI regions. Males consistently had higher burdens across SDI regions, with both genders showing a slight downward trend. Age-wise, AA deaths and DALYs rose with age, followed by decline. A positive correlation existed between SDI and global burden, inversely related to EAPC for ASMR and ASDR. CONCLUSION AA burden from high sodium intake is pronounced in high SDI regions, necessitating targeted interventions. The global data highlights a significant increase in AA deaths and DALYs due to high sodium intake, urging prompt and effective control measures.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yu Zhang
- General Surgery, Cancer Center, Department of Vascular Surgery, Zhejiang Provincial People's Hospital, Affiliated People's Hospital, Hangzhou Medical College, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, 310000, China
| | - Jifu Lai
- General Surgery, Cancer Center, Department of Vascular Surgery, Zhejiang Provincial People's Hospital, Affiliated People's Hospital, Hangzhou Medical College, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, 310000, China.
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
He Y, Wang X, Li D, Zhu Q, Xiang Y, He Y, Zhang H. ALAS2 overexpression alleviates oxidative stress-induced ferroptosis in aortic aneurysms via GATA1 activation. J Thorac Dis 2024; 16:2510-2527. [PMID: 38738239 PMCID: PMC11087628 DOI: 10.21037/jtd-24-370] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/06/2024] [Accepted: 04/18/2024] [Indexed: 05/14/2024]
Abstract
Background Aortic aneurysm, characterized by abnormal dilation of the aorta, poses significant health risks. This study aims to investigate the interaction between 5-aminolevulinate synthase 2 (ALAS2) and GATA-binding protein 1 (GATA1) in ferroptosis and oxidative stress responses in aortic aneurysm. Methods A weighted gene co-expression network analysis (WGCNA) was performed on the differentially expressed genes (DEGs) within the GSE9106 dataset to identify the key module. Subsequently, protein-protein interaction (PPI) network analysis was performed on the key module. Mouse aortic vascular smooth muscle cells (MOVAS) were treated with hydrogen peroxide (H2O2) to induce oxidative stress, and ferroptosis inducers and inhibitors were added to evaluate their effects on iron content and oxidative stress markers. Through a series of in vitro cellular experiments, we assessed cell viability, expression levels of GATA1 and iron mutation-associated proteins, as well as cellular phenotypes such as inflammatory responses and apoptosis rates. Results Three candidate genes (ALAS2, GYPA, and GYPB) were upregulated in the thoracic aortic aneurysm (TAA) samples of the GSE9106 dataset. The H2O2 treatment increased the MOVAS cells' iron content and oxidative stress, upregulated ALAS2 protein levels, and decreased the ferroptosis-related protein levels. ALAS2 overexpression reversed H2O2-induced apoptosis and increased the inflammatory cytokine levels. Additionally, the knockdown of GATA1 partially reversed the protective mechanism of overexpressed ALAS2 on H2O2-induced ferroptosis. Conclusions ALAS2 overexpression reduced H2O2-induced oxidative damage and iron-induced apoptosis in MOVAS cells, and GATA1 knockdown partially reversed this protective effect. These findings suggested that the ALAS2 and GATA1 regulatory pathways may be potential therapeutic targets in aortic aneurysms.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yunjun He
- Department of the Vascular Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, China
| | - Xiaohui Wang
- Department of the Vascular Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, China
| | - Donglin Li
- Department of the Vascular Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, China
| | - Qianqian Zhu
- Department of the Vascular Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, China
| | - Yilang Xiang
- Department of the Vascular Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, China
| | - Yangyan He
- Department of the Vascular Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, China
| | - Hongkun Zhang
- Department of the Vascular Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, China
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Ogino H, Isogai N, Kume N, Shibutani S, Yashiro H, Takahara M, Fujimura N. Evaluating the Effectiveness and Clinical Outcomes of Endovascular Aneurysm Repair-First Approach for Ruptured Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm in Japan. J Endovasc Ther 2024:15266028241248337. [PMID: 38659330 DOI: 10.1177/15266028241248337] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 04/26/2024]
Abstract
PURPOSE To verify the validity of an endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR)-first strategy for treating patients with ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysm (rAAA) in Japan. MATERIALS AND METHODS This study was conducted on 2 groups of patients with rAAA who underwent surgical treatment at 3 hospitals in the Kanagawa Prefecture, Japan, between January 2007 and September 2016. The open surgical treatment group comprised patients with rAAA who underwent open surgical treatment before January 2012; their data were retrospectively collected from their medical records. The EVAR-first strategy group comprised patients with rAAA who underwent treatment based on the Shonan rAAA protocol (SRAP; the standard protocol-based EVAR-first strategy) in or after February 2012; their data were collected prospectively. The short- and long-term treatment outcomes of both groups were compared. In addition, a risk score-based sensitivity analysis (one-to-one matching) was conducted on both groups using a caliper with 0.2 standard deviations of the score. RESULTS Of the 163 patients with rAAA, the open surgical and EVAR-first strategy groups comprised 53 and 110 patients, respectively (EVAR: 91.8%, open repair: 8.2%). The 30-day postoperative mortality rate differed significantly, being 42% for the open surgery group and 25% for the EVAR-first strategy group (odds ratio: 0.44, 95% confidence interval: 0.20-0.97). The postoperative survival rates at 6 months, 1 year, and 3 years were 66%, 48%, and 58% for the EVAR-first group, respectively, and 51%, 66%, and 48% for the open surgery group, respectively (p=0.072). In a matched cohort analysis (n=50), the 30-day postoperative mortality rate was 22% for the EVAR-first group and 44% for the open surgery group (odds ratio: 0.35, 95% confidence interval: 0.14-0.90). The postoperative survival rates at 6 months, 1 year, and 3 years were 76%, 76%, and 63% for the EVAR-first group, respectively, and 48%, 45%, and 45% for the open surgery group, respectively (p=0.003). CONCLUSION The SRAP-based EVAR-first strategy for rAAA yielded significantly better treatment outcomes than the open surgical strategy. These findings suggest that EVAR should be considered the primary treatment option for rAAA, given its potential to reduce early mortality rates. CLINICAL IMPACT Multicenter retrospective analysis of prospectively collected registry data was done to compare treatment outcomes of two groups of ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysm patients open surgery and endovascular-aneurysm-repair (EVAR)-first strategy (Shonan ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysm protocol). EVAR-first group showed better outcomes: lower 30-day mortality (25% vs. 42%), higher survival rates at 6 months, 1 year, and 3 years. Take home Message: The study supports the use of the EVAR-first strategy with the Shonan Protocol for treating ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysms in Japan, showing improved outcomes, reduced 30-day postoperative mortality, and better long-term survival rates compared to the conventional approach.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hidemitsu Ogino
- Department of Vascular Surgery, Narita Tomisato Tokushukai Hospital, Chiba, Japan
| | - Naoko Isogai
- Department of Vascular Surgery, Shonan Kamakura General Hospital, Kamakura, Japan
| | - Nao Kume
- Department of Vascular Surgery, Narita Tomisato Tokushukai Hospital, Chiba, Japan
| | - Shintaro Shibutani
- Department of Vascular Surgery, Kawasaki Tsurumi Vascular Surgery Clinic, Kawasaki, Japan
| | - Hideki Yashiro
- Department of Radiology, Hiratsuka City Hospital, Hiratsuka, Japan
| | - Mitsuyoshi Takahara
- Department of Metabolic Medicine, Graduate School of Medicine, Osaka University, Suita, Japan
| | - Naoki Fujimura
- Division of Vascular Surgery, Tokyo Saiseikai Central Hospital, Tokyo, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Png CYM, Pendleton AA, Altreuther M, Budtz-Lilly JW, Gunnarsson K, Kan CD, Khashram M, Laine MT, Mani K, Pederson CC, Srivastava SD, Eagleton MJ. Effect of EVAR on International Ruptured AAA Mortality-Sex and Geographic Disparities. J Clin Med 2024; 13:2464. [PMID: 38730993 PMCID: PMC11084331 DOI: 10.3390/jcm13092464] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/02/2024] [Revised: 04/04/2024] [Accepted: 04/12/2024] [Indexed: 05/13/2024] Open
Abstract
Background: We sought to investigate the differential impact of EVAR (endovascular aneurysm repair) vis-à-vis OSR (open surgical repair) on ruptured AAA (abdominal aortic aneurysm) mortality by sex and geographically. Methods: We performed a retrospective study of administrative data on EVAR from state statistical agencies, vascular registries, and academic publications, as well as ruptured AAA mortality rates from the World Health Organization for 14 14 states across Australasia, East Asia, Europe, and North America. Results: Between 2011-2016, the proportion of treatment of ruptured AAAs by EVAR increased from 26.1 to 43.8 percent among females, and from 25.7 to 41.2 percent among males, and age-adjusted ruptured AAA mortality rates fell from 12.62 to 9.50 per million among females, and from 34.14 to 26.54 per million among males. The association of EVAR with reduced mortality was more than three times larger (2.2 vis-à-vis 0.6 percent of prevalence per 10 percentage point increase in EVAR) among females than males. The association of EVAR with reduced mortality was substantially larger (1.7 vis-à-vis 1.1 percent of prevalence per 10 percentage point increase in EVAR) among East Asian states than European+ states. Conclusions: The increasing adoption of EVAR coincided with a decrease in ruptured AAA mortality. The relationship between EVAR and mortality was more pronounced among females than males, and in East Asian than European+ states. Sex and ethnic heterogeneity should be further investigated.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- C Y Maximilian Png
- Division of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, Department of Surgery, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA 02114, USA
| | - A Alaska Pendleton
- Division of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, Department of Surgery, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA 02114, USA
| | - Martin Altreuther
- Department of Vascular Surgery, St. Olavs Hospital, 7030 Trondheim, Norway
| | - Jacob W Budtz-Lilly
- Cardio-Thoracic and Vascular Surgery, Aarhus University Hospital, Skejby, 8200 Aarhus, Denmark
| | - Kim Gunnarsson
- Department of Surgical Sciences, Uppsala University, 75237 Uppsala, Sweden
| | - Chung-Dann Kan
- Department of Surgery, National Cheng Kung University Hospital, College of Medicine, National Cheng Kung University, Tainan City 701, Taiwan
| | - Manar Khashram
- Department of Surgery, University of Auckland, Auckland 1010, New Zealand
| | - Matti T Laine
- Department of Vascular Surgery, University of Helsinki and Helsinki University Hospital, 00029 Helsinki, Finland
| | - Kevin Mani
- Department of Surgical Sciences, Uppsala University, 75237 Uppsala, Sweden
| | - Christian C Pederson
- Department of Vascular Surgery, Aalborg University Hospital, 9000 Aalborg, Denmark
| | - Sunita D Srivastava
- Division of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, Department of Surgery, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA 02114, USA
| | - Matthew J Eagleton
- Division of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, Department of Surgery, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA 02114, USA
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Kontopodis N, Kehagias E, Chronis C, Nasis N, Tsetis D, Ioannou CV. Technical challenges during emergent endovascular aneurysm repair with the ALTO system. Expert Rev Med Devices 2024; 21:269-275. [PMID: 38571391 DOI: 10.1080/17434440.2024.2339416] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/05/2024] [Accepted: 04/02/2024] [Indexed: 04/05/2024]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysms (AAAs) pose an immediate threat for patient's life and endovascular repair (EVAR) is currently the preferred treatment modality in the presence of suitable anatomy. This is determined based on the requirements of each endograft as described in the instructions for use (IFU). The new ALTO system (Endologix, Irvin, CA, U.S.A.), can accommodate a great range of anatomies such as short necks and/or narrow access, but its unique design requires specific technical modifications during treatment of ruptured AAAs. AREAS COVERED The standard double balloon technique has long been described and it is used to provide circulatory support during EVAR for ruptured AAA. While this technique is straightforward with the use of endografts with a traditional design, this would not be the case if one uses the ALTO system. In that case specific maneuvers would be required to treat AAA patients in an acute setting. EXPERT OPINION The ALTO system although being able to treat AAAs with adverse anatomy, it may not be appropriate during treatment of ruptured AAA patients with profound hemodynamic instability. A careful evaluation of the individual's patient anatomy and hemodynamic condition is mandatory in order to decide the best endograft for each case.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nikolaos Kontopodis
- Vascular Surgery Unit, Department of Vascular and Cardiothoracic Surgery, University of Crete, Heraklion, Crete, Greece
| | - Elias Kehagias
- Interventional Radiology Unit, Department of Medical Imaging, University of Crete, Heraklion, Crete, Greece
| | - Christos Chronis
- Vascular Surgery Unit, Department of Vascular and Cardiothoracic Surgery, University of Crete, Heraklion, Crete, Greece
| | - Nikolaos Nasis
- Interventional Radiology Unit, Department of Medical Imaging, University of Crete, Heraklion, Crete, Greece
| | - Dimitrios Tsetis
- Interventional Radiology Unit, Department of Medical Imaging, University of Crete, Heraklion, Crete, Greece
| | - Christos V Ioannou
- Vascular Surgery Unit, Department of Vascular and Cardiothoracic Surgery, University of Crete, Heraklion, Crete, Greece
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Javidan A, Benipal H, Vi L, Li A, Lee Y, Feridooni T, Alaichi J, Naji F. Assessing the robustness of positive vascular surgery randomized controlled trials using their fragility index. J Vasc Surg 2024; 79:148-158.e3. [PMID: 37315910 DOI: 10.1016/j.jvs.2023.05.051] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/06/2021] [Revised: 05/15/2023] [Accepted: 05/17/2023] [Indexed: 06/16/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE The fragility index (FI) measures the robustness of statistically significant findings in randomized controlled trials (RCTs) by quantifying the minimum number of event conversions required to reverse a dichotomous outcome's statistical significance. In vascular surgery, many clinical guidelines and critical decision-making points are informed by a handful of key RCTs, especially regarding open surgical versus endovascular treatment. The objective of this study is to evaluate the FI of RCTs with statistically significant primary outcomes that compared open vs endovascular surgery in vascular surgery. METHODS In this meta-epidemiological study and systematic review, MEDLINE, Embase, and CENTRAL were searched for RCTs comparing open versus endovascular treatments for abdominal aortic aneurysms, carotid artery stenosis, and peripheral arterial disease to December 2022. RCTs with statistically significant primary outcomes were included. Data screening and extraction were conducted in duplicate. The FI was calculated by adding an event to the group with the smaller number of events while subtracting a nonevent to the same group until Fisher's exact test produced a nonstatistically significant result. The primary outcome was the FI and proportion of outcomes where the loss to follow-up was greater than the FI. The secondary outcomes assessed the relationship of the FI to disease state, presence of commercial funding, and study design. RESULTS Overall, 5133 articles were captured in the initial search with 21 RCTs reporting 23 different primary outcomes being included in the final analysis. The median FI (first quartile, third quartile) was 3 (3, 20) with 16 outcomes (70%) reporting a loss to follow-up greater than its FI. Mann-Whitney U test revealed that commercially funded RCTs and composite outcomes had greater FIs (median, 20.0 [5.5, 24.5] vs median, 3.0 [2.0, 5.5], P = .035; median, 21 [8, 38] vs median, 3.0 [2.0, 8.5], P = .01, respectively). The FI did not vary between disease states (P = .285) or between index and follow-up trials (P = .147). There were significant correlations between the FI and P values (Pearson r = 0.90; 95% confidence interval, 0.77-0.96), and the number of events (r = 0.82; 95% confidence interval, 0.48-0.97). CONCLUSIONS A small number of event conversions (median, 3) are needed to alter the statistical significance of primary outcomes in vascular surgery RCTs evaluating open surgical and endovascular treatments. Most studies had loss to follow-up greater than its FI, which can call into question trial results, and commercially funded studies had a greater FI. The FI and these findings should be considered in future trial design in vascular surgery.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Arshia Javidan
- Division of Vascular Surgery, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
| | - Harsukh Benipal
- Temerty Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Lisa Vi
- Temerty Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Allen Li
- Faculty of Medicine/The Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
| | - Yung Lee
- Division of General Surgery, Department of Surgery, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada; Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Harvard University, Boston, MA
| | - Tiam Feridooni
- Division of Vascular Surgery, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Jacob Alaichi
- Division of Vascular Surgery, Department of Surgery, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
| | - Faysal Naji
- Division of Vascular Surgery, Department of Surgery, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
de Mattos ABM, Ribeiro-Silva JC, Fonseca-Alaniz MH, Valadão IC, da Silva ES, Krieger JE, Miyakawa AA. Cysteine and glycine-rich protein 3 (Crp3) as a critical regulator of elastolysis, inflammation, and smooth muscle cell apoptosis in abdominal aortic aneurysm development. Front Physiol 2023; 14:1252470. [PMID: 38173933 PMCID: PMC10762791 DOI: 10.3389/fphys.2023.1252470] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/03/2023] [Accepted: 12/05/2023] [Indexed: 01/05/2024] Open
Abstract
Abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) is a life-threatening vascular disease for which surgical or endovascular repair are the only currently available therapeutic strategies. The development of AAA involves the breakdown of elastic fibers (elastolysis), infiltration of inflammatory cells, and apoptosis of smooth muscle cells (SMCs). However, the specific regulators governing these responses remain unknown. We previously demonstrated that Cysteine and glycine-rich protein 3 (Crp3) sensitizes SMCs to apoptosis induced by stretching. Building upon this finding, we aimed to investigate the influence of Crp3 on elastolysis and apoptosis during AAA development. Using the elastase-CaCl2 rat model, we observed an increase in Crp3 expression, aortic diameter, and a reduction in wall thickness in wild type rats. In contrast, Crp3-/- rats exhibited a decreased incidence of AAA, with minimal or no changes in aortic diameter and thickness. Histopathological analysis revealed the absence of SMC apoptosis and degradation of elastic fibers in Crp3-/- rats, accompanied by reduced inflammation and diminished proteolytic capacity in Crp3-/- SMCs and bone marrow-derived macrophages. Collectively, our findings provide evidence that Crp3 plays a crucial role in AAA development by modulating elastolysis, inflammation, and SMC apoptosis. These results underscore the potential significance of Crp3 in the context of AAA progression and offer new insights into therapeutic targets for this disease.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ana Barbosa Marcondes de Mattos
- Laboratorio de Genética e Cardiologia Molecular, Instituto do Coração (InCor), Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade de São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil
| | - Joao Carlos Ribeiro-Silva
- Laboratorio de Genética e Cardiologia Molecular, Instituto do Coração (InCor), Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade de São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil
| | - Miriam Helena Fonseca-Alaniz
- Laboratorio de Genética e Cardiologia Molecular, Instituto do Coração (InCor), Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade de São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil
| | - Iuri Cordeiro Valadão
- Laboratorio de Genética e Cardiologia Molecular, Instituto do Coração (InCor), Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade de São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil
| | - Erasmo Simão da Silva
- Divisão de Cirurgia Vascular e Endovascular, Departamento de Cirurgia, Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade de São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil
| | - Jose Eduardo Krieger
- Laboratorio de Genética e Cardiologia Molecular, Instituto do Coração (InCor), Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade de São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil
| | - Ayumi Aurea Miyakawa
- Laboratorio de Genética e Cardiologia Molecular, Instituto do Coração (InCor), Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade de São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Cirillo-Penn NC, Zheng X, Mao J, Johnston LE, D’Oria M, Scali S, Goodney PP, DeMartino RR. Long-term Mortality and Reintervention After Repair of Ruptured Abdominal Aortic Aneurysms Using VQI-matched Medicare Claims. Ann Surg 2023; 278:e1135-e1141. [PMID: 37057613 PMCID: PMC10576015 DOI: 10.1097/sla.0000000000005876] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 04/15/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE The objective of this study was to compare endovascular aortic aneurysm repair (EVAR) versus open aortic repair (OAR) on mortality and reintervention after ruptured infrarenal abdominal aortic aneurysm (rAAA) repair in the Vascular Quality Initiative (VQI). BACKGROUND The optimal treatment modality for rAAA remains debated, with little data on long-term comparisons. METHODS VQI rAAA repairs (2004-2018) were matched with Medicare claims (VQI-VISION). Primary outcomes were in-hospital and long-term mortality. Secondary outcome was reintervention. Inverse probability weighting was used to adjust for treatment selection, and Cox Proportional Hazards models and negative binomial regressions were used for analysis. Landmark analysis was performed among patients surviving hospital discharge. RESULTS Among 1885 VQI/Medicare rAAA patients, 790 underwent OAR, and 1095 underwent EVAR. Median age was 76 years; 73% were male. Inverse probability weighting produced comparable groups. In-hospital mortality was lower after EVAR versus OAR (21% vs 37%, odds ratio: 0.52, 95% CI, 0.4-0.7). One-year mortality rates were lower for EVAR versus OAR [hazard ratio (HR) 0.74, 95% CI, 0.6-0.9], but not statistically different after 1 year (HR: 0.95, 95% CI, 0.8-1.2). This implies additional benefits to EVAR in the short term. Reintervention rates were higher after EVAR than OAR at 2 and 5 years (rate ratio: 1.79 95% CI, 1.2-2.7 and rate ratio:2.03 95% CI, 1.4-3.0), but not within the first year. Reintervention was associated with higher mortality risk for both OAR (HR: 1.66 95% CI, 1.1-2.5) and EVAR (HR: 2.14 95% CI, 1.6-2.9). Long-term mortality was similar between repair types (HR: 0.99, 95% CI, 0.8-1.2). CONCLUSIONS Within VQI/Medicare patients undergoing rAAA repair, the perioperative mortality rate favors EVAR but equalizes after 1 year. Reinterventions were more common after EVAR and were associated with higher mortality regardless of treatment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Xinyan Zheng
- Department of Healthcare Policy and Research, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, NY
| | - Jialin Mao
- Department of Healthcare Policy and Research, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, NY
| | - Lily E. Johnston
- Division of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester MN, USA
| | - Mario D’Oria
- Division of Vascular and Endovascular, Cardiovascular Department, Trieste University Hospital ASUIGI, Trieste, Italy
| | - Salvatore Scali
- Division of Vascular Surgery and Endovascular Therapy, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL
| | - Philip P. Goodney
- Section of Vascular Surgery, Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical Center, Lebanon, NH
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
10
|
Nasir IT, Shoab SS, Bani-Hani MG. Conservative Treatment of Ruptured Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm. Vasc Specialist Int 2023; 39:32. [PMID: 37905386 PMCID: PMC10616691 DOI: 10.5758/vsi.230073] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/24/2023] [Revised: 09/19/2023] [Accepted: 10/01/2023] [Indexed: 11/02/2023] Open
Abstract
Although nonsurgical management of ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysm (rAAA) is still used among a significant number of patients, survival after conservative treatment is extremely rare. We report a case of an 86-year-old female who presented with an rAAA that was confirmed clinically and radiologically via computed tomography angiography. Although the patient was not deemed a candidate for surgery owing to significant comorbidities and poor baseline function, she survived the episode with no surgical intervention. Given the growing aging and frail population, it is vital to explore this further, with the aim of improving both mortality and advanced care planning in the nonsurgical management of rAAA.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Imama Taiba Nasir
- Department of Vascular Surgery, Lancashire Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Preston, United Kingdom
| | - Sulaiman Syed Shoab
- Department of Vascular Surgery, Lancashire Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Preston, United Kingdom
| | - Mohamed Ghaleb Bani-Hani
- Department of Vascular Surgery, Lancashire Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Preston, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Mulatti GC, Joviliano EE, Pereira AH, Fioranelli A, Pereira AA, Brito-Queiroz A, Von Ristow A, Freire LMD, Ferreira MMDV, Lourenço M, De Luccia N, Silveira PG, Yoshida RDA, Fidelis RJR, Boustany SM, de Araujo WJB, de Oliveira JCP. Brazilian Society for Angiology and Vascular Surgery guidelines on abdominal aortic aneurysm. J Vasc Bras 2023; 22:e20230040. [PMID: 38021279 PMCID: PMC10648059 DOI: 10.1590/1677-5449.202300402] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/13/2023] [Accepted: 06/15/2023] [Indexed: 12/01/2023] Open
Abstract
The Brazilian Society of Angiology and Vascular Surgery, through the Guidelines Project, presents new Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm Guidelines, on the subject of care for abdominal aortic aneurysm patients. Its development prioritized descriptive guidelines, using the EMBASE, LILACS, and PubMed databases. References include randomized controlled trials, systematic reviews, meta-analyses, and cohort studies. Quality of evidence was evaluated by a pair of coordinators, aided by the RoB 2 Cochrane tool and the Newcastle Ottawa Scale forms. The subjects include juxtarenal aneurysms, infected aneurysms, and new therapeutic techniques, especially endovascular procedures. The current version of the guidelines include important recommendations for the primary topics involving diagnosis, treatment, and follow-up for abdominal aortic aneurysm patients, providing an objective guide for medical practice, based on scientific evidence and widely available throughout Brazil.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Grace Carvajal Mulatti
- Universidade de São Paulo - USP, Faculdade de Medicina, Hospital das Clínicas, São Paulo, SP, Brasil.
| | - Edwaldo Edner Joviliano
- Universidade de São Paulo - USP, Faculdade de Medicina de Ribeirão Preto - FMRP, Ribeirão Preto, SP, Brasil.
| | - Adamastor Humberto Pereira
- Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul - UFRGS, Hospital de Clínicas de Porto Alegre - HCPA, Porto Alegre, RS, Brasil.
| | | | - Alexandre Araújo Pereira
- Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul - UFRGS, Hospital de Clínicas de Porto Alegre - HCPA, Porto Alegre, RS, Brasil.
| | - André Brito-Queiroz
- Universidade Federal da Bahia - UFBA, Hospital Ana Nery, Salvador, BA, Brasil.
| | - Arno Von Ristow
- Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Rio de Janeiro - PUC-Rio, Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brasil.
| | | | | | | | - Nelson De Luccia
- Universidade de São Paulo - USP, Faculdade de Medicina, São Paulo, SP, Brasil.
| | | | - Ricardo de Alvarenga Yoshida
- Universidade Estadual Paulista “Júlio de Mesquita Filho” - UNESP, Faculdade de Medicina de Botucatu, Botucatu, SP, Brasil.
| | | | - Sharbel Mahfuz Boustany
- Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul - UFRGS, Hospital de Clínicas de Porto Alegre - HCPA, Porto Alegre, RS, Brasil.
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
12
|
Kim H, Kwon TW, Cho YP, Gwon JG, Han Y, Lee SA, Kim YJ, Kim S. Treatment Outcomes of Patients With Ruptured Abdominal Aortic Aneurysms. J Korean Med Sci 2023; 38:e321. [PMID: 37821088 PMCID: PMC10562185 DOI: 10.3346/jkms.2023.38.e321] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/07/2023] [Accepted: 06/26/2023] [Indexed: 10/13/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysm (rAAA) is a serious complication of abdominal aortic aneurysm associated with high operative mortality and morbidity rates. The present study evaluated the perioperative and long-term outcomes of Korean patients with rAAA based on national health insurance claims data. METHODS The National Health Insurance Service (NHIS) database was searched retrospectively to identify patients with rAAA who underwent endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR) and open surgical repair (OSR) from 2009 to 2018. Perioperative (≤ 30 days), early postoperative (≤ 3 month), and long-term (> 3 month) survival, reinterventions, and complications were assessed. RESULTS The search identified 1,034 patients with rAAA, including 594 who underwent EVAR and 440 who underwent OSR. When the study period was divided into two, the total numbers of patients with rAAA, patients who underwent EVAR, and octogenarians were higher during the second half. The perioperative mortality rate was 29.8% in the EVAR and 35.0% in the OSR group (P = 0.028). Hartmann's procedure for bowel infarction was performed more frequently in the OSR than in the EVAR group (adjusted odds ratio, 6.28; 95% confidence interval [CI], 2.33-21.84; P = 0.001), but other complication rates did not differ significantly. All-cause mortality during the entire observation period did not differ significantly in the EVAR and OSR groups (adjusted hazard ratio, 1.17; 95% CI, 0.98-1.41; P = 0.087). Abdominal aortic aneurysm-related reintervention rate was significantly lower in the OSR group (adjusted hazard ratio, 0.31; 95% CI, 0.14-0.70; P = 0.005). CONCLUSION Although EVAR showed somewhat superior perioperative outcomes for rAAA, the long-term outcomes of EVAR after excluding initial 3 months were significantly worse than OSR. When anatomically feasible for both treatments, the perioperative mortality risk and reasonable prospects of long-term survival should be considered in rAAA.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hyangkyoung Kim
- Department of Surgery, College of Medicine, Ewha Womans University, Seoul, Korea
| | - Tae-Won Kwon
- Division of Vascular Surgery, Department of Surgery, College of Medicine, University of Ulsan, Asan Medical Center, Seoul, Korea.
| | - Yong-Pil Cho
- Division of Vascular Surgery, Department of Surgery, College of Medicine, University of Ulsan, Asan Medical Center, Seoul, Korea
| | - Jun Gyo Gwon
- Division of Vascular Surgery, Department of Surgery, College of Medicine, University of Ulsan, Asan Medical Center, Seoul, Korea
| | - Youngjin Han
- Division of Vascular Surgery, Department of Surgery, College of Medicine, University of Ulsan, Asan Medical Center, Seoul, Korea
| | - Sang Ah Lee
- Division of Vascular Surgery, Department of Surgery, College of Medicine, University of Ulsan, Asan Medical Center, Seoul, Korea
| | - Ye-Jee Kim
- Department of Clinical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Seonok Kim
- Department of Clinical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Ogino H, Iida O, Akutsu K, Chiba Y, Hayashi H, Ishibashi-Ueda H, Kaji S, Kato M, Komori K, Matsuda H, Minatoya K, Morisaki H, Ohki T, Saiki Y, Shigematsu K, Shiiya N, Shimizu H, Azuma N, Higami H, Ichihashi S, Iwahashi T, Kamiya K, Katsumata T, Kawaharada N, Kinoshita Y, Matsumoto T, Miyamoto S, Morisaki T, Morota T, Nanto K, Nishibe T, Okada K, Orihashi K, Tazaki J, Toma M, Tsukube T, Uchida K, Ueda T, Usui A, Yamanaka K, Yamauchi H, Yoshioka K, Kimura T, Miyata T, Okita Y, Ono M, Ueda Y. JCS/JSCVS/JATS/JSVS 2020 Guideline on Diagnosis and Treatment of Aortic Aneurysm and Aortic Dissection. Circ J 2023; 87:1410-1621. [PMID: 37661428 DOI: 10.1253/circj.cj-22-0794] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 09/05/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- Hitoshi Ogino
- Department of Cardiovascular Surgery, Tokyo Medical University
| | - Osamu Iida
- Cardiovascular Center, Kansai Rosai Hospital
| | - Koichi Akutsu
- Cardiovascular Medicine, Nippon Medical School Hospital
| | - Yoshiro Chiba
- Department of Cardiology, Mito Saiseikai General Hospital
| | | | | | - Shuichiro Kaji
- Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, Kansai Electric Power Hospital
| | - Masaaki Kato
- Department of Cardiovascular Surgery, Morinomiya Hospital
| | - Kimihiro Komori
- Division of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, Department of Surgery, Nagoya University Graduate School of Medicine
| | - Hitoshi Matsuda
- Department of Cardiovascular Surgery, National Cerebral and Cardiovascular Center
| | - Kenji Minatoya
- Department of Cardiovascular Surgery, Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto University
| | | | - Takao Ohki
- Division of Vascular Surgery, Department of Surgery, The Jikei University School of Medicine
| | - Yoshikatsu Saiki
- Division of Cardiovascular Surgery, Graduate School of Medicine, Tohoku University
| | - Kunihiro Shigematsu
- Department of Vascular Surgery, International University of Health and Welfare Mita Hospital
| | - Norihiko Shiiya
- First Department of Surgery, Hamamatsu University School of Medicine
| | | | - Nobuyoshi Azuma
- Department of Vascular Surgery, Asahikawa Medical University
| | - Hirooki Higami
- Department of Cardiology, Japanese Red Cross Otsu Hospital
| | | | - Toru Iwahashi
- Department of Cardiovascular Surgery, Tokyo Medical University
| | - Kentaro Kamiya
- Department of Cardiovascular Surgery, Tokyo Medical University
| | - Takahiro Katsumata
- Department of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, Osaka Medical College
| | - Nobuyoshi Kawaharada
- Department of Cardiovascular Surgery, Sapporo Medical University School of Medicine
| | | | - Takuya Matsumoto
- Department of Vascular Surgery, International University of Health and Welfare
| | | | - Takayuki Morisaki
- Department of General Medicine, IMSUT Hospital, the Institute of Medical Science, the University of Tokyo
| | - Tetsuro Morota
- Department of Cardiovascular Surgery, Nippon Medical School Hospital
| | | | - Toshiya Nishibe
- Department of Cardiovascular Surgery, Tokyo Medical University
| | - Kenji Okada
- Department of Surgery, Division of Cardiovascular Surgery, Kobe University Graduate School of Medicine
| | | | - Junichi Tazaki
- Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto University
| | - Masanao Toma
- Department of Cardiology, Hyogo Prefectural Amagasaki General Medical Center
| | - Takuro Tsukube
- Department of Cardiovascular Surgery, Japanese Red Cross Kobe Hospital
| | - Keiji Uchida
- Cardiovascular Center, Yokohama City University Medical Center
| | - Tatsuo Ueda
- Department of Radiology, Nippon Medical School
| | - Akihiko Usui
- Department of Cardiac Surgery, Nagoya University Graduate School of Medicine
| | - Kazuo Yamanaka
- Cardiovascular Center, Nara Prefecture General Medical Center
| | - Haruo Yamauchi
- Department of Cardiac Surgery, The University of Tokyo Hospital
| | | | - Takeshi Kimura
- Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto University
| | | | - Yutaka Okita
- Department of Surgery, Division of Cardiovascular Surgery, Kobe University Graduate School of Medicine
| | - Minoru Ono
- Department of Cardiac Surgery, Graduate School of Medicine, The University of Tokyo
| | | |
Collapse
|
14
|
Takei Y, Tezuka M, Saito S, Ogasawara T, Seki M, Kato T, Kanno Y, Hirota S, Shibasaki I, Fukuda H. A protocol-based treatment for ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysm contributed to improving aorta-related mortality: a retrospective cohort study. BMC Cardiovasc Disord 2023; 23:436. [PMID: 37658328 PMCID: PMC10474727 DOI: 10.1186/s12872-023-03473-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/17/2023] [Accepted: 08/25/2023] [Indexed: 09/03/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Recent guidelines state that improving the survival rate of patients with ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysm (rAAA) requires a protocol or algorithm for the emergency management of these patients. We aimed to investigate whether introducing a protocol treatment for rAAA improves clinical outcomes compared with the pre-protocol strategy. METHODS At our institution, 92 patients treated for rAAA between June 2008 and August 2022 were retrospectively analyzed. In 2014, the protocol-based treatment was introduced comprising a transfer algorithm to shorten the time to proximal control, use of an endovascular occlusion balloon, strict indications for endovascular aortic aneurysm repair (EVAR) or open surgical repair, and perioperative care, including for abdominal compartment syndrome (ACS). Clinical outcomes were compared between the protocol and pre-protocol group, including operative status, all-cause mortality, and rAAA-related death at 30-day, in-hospital, and 1-year postoperative follow-ups. RESULTS Overall, 52 and 40 patients received the protocol-based and pre-protocol treatments, respectively. EVAR was more frequently performed in the protocol group. The rate of achieving time to proximal control was significantly faster, and the transfusion volume was lower in the protocol group. ACS occurred more frequently in the protocol group with a higher EVAR. No difference was found in all-cause mortality between the two groups. The protocol group exhibited fewer rAAA-related deaths than the pre-protocol group during the following time points: 30 days (9.6% vs. 22.5%), during the hospital stay (11.5% vs. 30.0%), and 1 year (14.5% vs. 31.5%). CONCLUSIONS The protocol-based treatment improved the survival rate of patients with rAAA.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yusuke Takei
- Department of Cardiac and Vascular Surgery, Dokkyo Medical University Graduate School of Medicine, 880 Kitakobayashi, Mibu-Machi, Simotuga-gun, Tochigi, 321-0293, Japan.
| | - Masahiro Tezuka
- Department of Cardiac and Vascular Surgery, Dokkyo Medical University Graduate School of Medicine, 880 Kitakobayashi, Mibu-Machi, Simotuga-gun, Tochigi, 321-0293, Japan
| | - Shunsuke Saito
- Department of Cardiac and Vascular Surgery, Dokkyo Medical University Graduate School of Medicine, 880 Kitakobayashi, Mibu-Machi, Simotuga-gun, Tochigi, 321-0293, Japan
| | - Takeshi Ogasawara
- Mathematics and Statistics Section, Department of Fundamental Education, Dokkyo Medical University, 880 Kitakobayashi, Mibu-Machi, Simotuga-gun, Tochigi, 321-0293, Japan
| | - Masahiro Seki
- Department of Cardiac and Vascular Surgery, Dokkyo Medical University Graduate School of Medicine, 880 Kitakobayashi, Mibu-Machi, Simotuga-gun, Tochigi, 321-0293, Japan
| | - Takashi Kato
- Department of Cardiac and Vascular Surgery, Dokkyo Medical University Graduate School of Medicine, 880 Kitakobayashi, Mibu-Machi, Simotuga-gun, Tochigi, 321-0293, Japan
| | - Yasuyuki Kanno
- Department of Cardiac and Vascular Surgery, Dokkyo Medical University Graduate School of Medicine, 880 Kitakobayashi, Mibu-Machi, Simotuga-gun, Tochigi, 321-0293, Japan
| | - Shotaro Hirota
- Department of Cardiac and Vascular Surgery, Dokkyo Medical University Graduate School of Medicine, 880 Kitakobayashi, Mibu-Machi, Simotuga-gun, Tochigi, 321-0293, Japan
| | - Ikuko Shibasaki
- Department of Cardiac and Vascular Surgery, Dokkyo Medical University Graduate School of Medicine, 880 Kitakobayashi, Mibu-Machi, Simotuga-gun, Tochigi, 321-0293, Japan
| | - Hirotsugu Fukuda
- Department of Cardiac and Vascular Surgery, Dokkyo Medical University Graduate School of Medicine, 880 Kitakobayashi, Mibu-Machi, Simotuga-gun, Tochigi, 321-0293, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Hofmann AG, Klosz FR, Mlekusch I, Wickenhauser G, Walter C, Assadian A, Taher F. Endoleak Detection after Endovascular Aortic Repair via Coded-Excitation Ultrasound-A Feasibility Study. J Clin Med 2023; 12:jcm12113775. [PMID: 37297970 DOI: 10.3390/jcm12113775] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/24/2023] [Revised: 05/20/2023] [Accepted: 05/30/2023] [Indexed: 06/12/2023] Open
Abstract
Endoleaks are the most common complication after endovascular aortic repair (EVAR). Their correct identification is one of the main objectives of surveillance protocols after EVAR. So far, computed tomography angiography (CTA), contrast-enhanced (CEUS) and Duplex ultrasound (DUS), as well as magnetic resonance angiography, have been investigated for their ability to detect endoleaks. In general, all technologies have distinct benefits and disadvantages, with CTA and CEUS emerging as the reference standard for surveillance after EVAR. However, they are both contrast-enhancer-dependent, and CTA additionally exposes patients to ionizing radiation. In the present study, we investigated B-Flow, a type of coded-excitation ultrasound that was specifically designed to optimize the visualization of blood flow, for its ability to detect endoleaks, and compared its performance to CEUS, CTA, and DUS. In total, 34 patients were included in the analysis that accumulated in 43 distinct B-Flow investigations. They underwent a total of 132 imaging investigations. Agreement between B-Flow and other imaging modalities was high (>80.0%), while inter-method reliability can be interpreted as good. However, with B-Flow, six and one endoleaks would have been missed compared to CEUS and CTA, respectively. Regarding endoleak classification, all metrics were lower but retained an adequate level of comparison. In a subset of patients requiring intervention, B-Flow had 100% accuracy regarding both endoleak detection and classification. Ultrasonography enables endoleak detection and classification without the need for pharmaceutical contrast enhancement or radiation. Ultrasound coded-excitation imaging in the application of B-Flow could further simplify surveillance after EVAR by offering adequate accuracy without requiring intravenous contrast enhancement. Our findings may promote subsequent investigations of coded-excitation imaging for endoleak detection and classification in the surveillance after EVAR.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Amun G Hofmann
- Department of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, Klinik Ottakring, 1160 Vienna, Austria
| | - Fabian R Klosz
- Department of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, Klinik Ottakring, 1160 Vienna, Austria
| | - Irene Mlekusch
- Department of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, Klinik Ottakring, 1160 Vienna, Austria
| | - Georg Wickenhauser
- Department of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, Klinik Ottakring, 1160 Vienna, Austria
| | - Corinna Walter
- Department of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, Klinik Ottakring, 1160 Vienna, Austria
| | - Afshin Assadian
- Department of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, Klinik Ottakring, 1160 Vienna, Austria
| | - Fadi Taher
- Department of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, Klinik Ottakring, 1160 Vienna, Austria
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Svidlova Y, Epple J, Lingwal N, Schmitz-Rixen T, Boeckler D, Grundmann RT. [Long-term Results after Endovascular and Open Repair of Ruptured Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm - a Propensity Score Matched Analysis]. Zentralbl Chir 2023. [PMID: 36977467 DOI: 10.1055/a-2044-0780] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 03/30/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND This retrospective propensity score matched study presents the perioperative mortality and long-term survival up to 9 years after endovascular (EVAR) and open (OAR) repair of patients with ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysm (rAAA) in Germany using health insurance data. MATERIALS AND METHODS 2170 patients treated between January 1st, 2010 and December 31st, 2016, for rAAA within 24 hours of hospital admission and receiving blood transfusions were enrolled in the study and tracked until December 31st, 2018. For better comparability of EVAR and OAR, a 1:1 propensity score matching with 624 pairs according to patient age, sex and comorbidities was carried out using the R program (Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria). RESULTS In the unadjusted groups, 29.1% (631/2170) of the patients were treated with EVAR and 70.9% (1539/2170) with OAR. EVAR patients had a significantly higher overall rate of comorbidities. After adjustment, EVAR patients showed significantly better perioperative survival (EVAR 35.7%, OAR 51.0%, p = 0.000). Perioperative complications occurred in 80.4% of EVAR patients and 80.3% of OAR patients (p = 1.000). At the end of follow-up, Kaplan-Meier estimated that 15.2% of patients survived after EVAR vs. 19.5% after OAR (p = 0.027). In the multivariate Cox regression analysis, OAR, age ≥ 80 years, diabetes mellitus type 2 and renal failure stages 3 to 5 had a negative impact on overall survival. Patients treated on weekdays had a significantly lower perioperative mortality than patients treated during the weekend (perioperative mortality on weekdays 40.6% vs. 53.4% during the weekend; p = 0.000) and a better overall survival as estimated by Kaplan-Meier. CONCLUSION Significantly better perioperative and overall survival was observed with EVAR than with OAR in patients with rAAA. The perioperative survival benefit of EVAR was also found in patients older than 80 years. Female gender had no significant influence on perioperative mortality and overall survival. Patients treated on weekends had a significantly poorer perioperative survival than patients treated on weekdays, and this lasted through the end of follow-up. The extent to which this was dependent on hospital structure was unclear.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yuliya Svidlova
- Klinik für Gefäß- und Endovaskularchirurgie, Goethe-Universität Frankfurt am Main, Frankfurt am Main, Deutschland
| | - Jasmin Epple
- Klinik für Gefäß- und Endovaskularchirurgie, Goethe-Universität Frankfurt am Main, Frankfurt am Main, Deutschland
| | - Neelam Lingwal
- Institut für Biostatistik und mathematische Modellierung, Goethe-Universität Frankfurt am Main, Frankfurt am Main, Deutschland
| | - Thomas Schmitz-Rixen
- Klinik für Gefäß- und Endovaskularchirurgie, Goethe-Universität Frankfurt am Main, Frankfurt am Main, Deutschland
| | - Dittmar Boeckler
- Klinik für Gefäßchirurgie und Endovaskuläre Chirurgie, Universitätsklinikum Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Deutschland
| | - Reinhart T Grundmann
- Deutsches Institut für Gefäßmedizinische Gesundheitsforschung (DIGG gGmbH) der DGG, Berlin, Deutschland
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Jo EA, Seong S, Ahn S, Mo H, Jung IM, Kim HK, Ko H, Han A, Min S, Min SK. Validation of I71.3 code for ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysm in Korea: misplaced diagnosis in claims data. Ann Surg Treat Res 2023; 104:170-175. [PMID: 36910559 PMCID: PMC9998958 DOI: 10.4174/astr.2023.104.3.170] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/30/2022] [Revised: 12/19/2022] [Accepted: 01/05/2023] [Indexed: 03/09/2023] Open
Abstract
Purpose Studies in western countries have shown a decline in the incidence of ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysm (rAAA) with advancements in endovascular repair and screening. However, according to health insurance data in Korea based on rAAA code (I71.3), overall rAAA has been increasing. This study aimed to validate the I71.3 code for rAAA and attempt to define the true incidence of rAAA in Korea. Methods A 20-year multicenter retrospective review of rAAA was undertaken from the period of January 1, 2000 to December 31, 2020. All patients were diagnosed with the rAAA code I71.3 in each of the 4 hospitals. The CT images and surgical records of these patients were reviewed to differentiate true rAAA and misdiagnosis. Further data on true rAAA patient outcomes including mortality and treatment success were also collected. Results A total of 305 rAAA (I71.3) codes were identified in the 4 centers. However, medical record review showed true rAAA in only 131 (43.0%). The remaining 174 cases (57.0%) were misdiagnosed. Impending ruptures were the most common misdiagnoses (37.9%). The total in-hospital mortality including deaths before treatment was 38.9% (n = 51), while mortality of treated patients was 24.4% (n = 15). Conclusion The analysis of I71.3 code for rAAA showed that only 43.0% were true rAAA and the remaining 57.0% were misdiagnosed. This indicates that the I71.3 code is overestimated in National Health Insurance-based data and that the true incidence of rAAA could be much lower.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Eun-Ah Jo
- Department of Surgery, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Sujeong Seong
- Department of Surgery, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Sanghyun Ahn
- Department of Surgery, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Hyejin Mo
- Department of Surgery, Seoul Metropolitan Government-Seoul National University Boramae Medical Center, Seoul, Korea
| | - In-Mok Jung
- Department of Surgery, Seoul Metropolitan Government-Seoul National University Boramae Medical Center, Seoul, Korea
| | - Hyo Kee Kim
- Department of Surgery, Korea University Guro Hospital, Seoul, Korea
| | - Hyunmin Ko
- Department of Surgery, Kyung Hee University Medical Center, Seoul, Korea
| | - Ahram Han
- Department of Surgery, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Sangil Min
- Department of Surgery, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Seung-Kee Min
- Department of Surgery, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Boucher N, Dreksler H, Hooper J, Nagpal S, MirGhassemi A, Miller E. Anaesthesia for vascular emergencies - a state of the art review. Anaesthesia 2023; 78:236-246. [PMID: 36308289 DOI: 10.1111/anae.15899] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 10/12/2022] [Indexed: 01/11/2023]
Abstract
In this state-of-the-art review, we discuss the presenting symptoms and management strategies for vascular emergencies. Although vascular emergencies are best treated at a vascular surgical centre, patients may present to any emergency department and may require both immediate management and safe transport to a vascular centre. We describe the surgical and anaesthetic considerations for management of aortic dissection, aortic rupture, carotid endarterectomy, acute limb ischaemia and mesenteric ischaemia. Important issues to consider in aortic dissection are extent of the dissection and surgical need for bypasses in addition to endovascular repair. From an anaesthetist's perspective, aortic dissection requires infrastructure for massive transfusion, smooth management should an endovascular procedure require conversion to an open procedure, haemodynamic manipulation during stent deployment and prevention of spinal cord ischaemia. Principles in management of aortic rupture, whether open or endovascular treatment is chosen, include immediate transfer to a vascular care centre; minimising haemodynamic changes to reduce aortic shear stress; permissive hypotension in the pre-operative period; and initiation of massive transfusion protocol. Carotid endarterectomy for carotid stenosis is managed with general or regional techniques, and anaesthetists must be prepared to manage haemodynamic, neurological and airway issues peri-operatively. Acute limb ischaemia is a result of embolism, thrombosis, dissection or trauma, and may be treated with open repair or embolectomy, under either general or local anaesthesia. Due to hypercoagulability, there may be higher numbers of acutely ischaemic limbs among patients with COVID-19, which is important to consider in the current pandemic. Mesenteric ischaemia is a rare vascular emergency, but it is challenging to diagnose and associated with high morbidity and mortality. Several peri-operative issues are common to all vascular emergencies: acute renal injury; management of transfusion; need for heparinisation and reversal; and challenging postoperative care. Finally, the important development of endovascular techniques for repair in many vascular emergencies has improved care, and the availability of transoesophageal echocardiography has improved monitoring as well as aids in surgical placement of endovascular grafts and for post-procedural evaluation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- N Boucher
- Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, University of Ottawa, ON, Canada
| | - H Dreksler
- Division of Vascular Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of Ottawa, ON, Canada
| | - J Hooper
- Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, University of Ottawa, ON, Canada.,Department of Critical Care, The Ottawa Hospital, University of Ottawa, ON, Canada
| | - S Nagpal
- Division of Vascular Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of Ottawa, ON, Canada
| | - A MirGhassemi
- Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, University of Ottawa, ON, Canada
| | - E Miller
- Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, University of Ottawa, ON, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Individual Patient Data Meta-Analysis of 10-Year Follow-Up after Endovascular and Open Repair for Ruptured Abdominal AorticAneurysms. Ann Vasc Surg 2023:S0890-5096(23)00032-8. [PMID: 36690248 DOI: 10.1016/j.avsg.2023.01.020] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/27/2022] [Revised: 01/15/2023] [Accepted: 01/16/2023] [Indexed: 01/22/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Endovascular aortic repair (EVAR) has conferred an early survival advantage compared to an open surgical repair (OSR) in patients with ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysms (rAAA). However, the long-term survival benefit after EVAR was not displayed among randomized controlled trials (RCTs), whereas many non-RCTs have provided conflicting results. We conducted a time-to-event individual patient data (IPD) meta-analysis on long-term rAAA data. METHODS All studies comparing mortality after EVAR versus OSR for rAAA were included. We used restricted mean survival times (RMSTs) as a measure of life expectancy for EVAR and OSR. RESULTS A total of 21 studies, including 12,187 patients (4952 EVAR and 7235 OSR) were finally deemed eligible. A secondary IPD analysis included 725 (372 EVAR and 353 OSR) patients only from the 3 RCTs (Immediate Management of the Patient With Rupture : Open Versus Endovascular Repair, Endovasculaire ou Chirurgie dans les Anévrysmes aorto-iliaques Rompus and Amsterdam Acute Aneurysm Trial trials). Among all studies, the median survival was 4.20 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 3.70-4.58) years for EVAR and 1.91 (95% CI: 1.57-2.39) years for OSR. Although EVAR presented with increased hazard risk from 4 to 7 years, which peaked at 6 years after the operation, the RMST difference was 0.54 (95% CI: 0.35-0.73; P < 0.001) years gained with EVAR at the end of the 10-year follow-up. IPD meta-analysis of RCTs did not demonstrate significant differences. CONCLUSIONS At 10-years follow-up, EVAR was associated with a 6.5 month increase in life expectancy when compared to OSR after analyzing all eligible studies. Evidence from our study suggests that a strict follow-up program would be desirable, especially for patients with long-life expectancy.
Collapse
|
20
|
Hyun S, Kim H, Mok SK, Yun SS, Park SC, Kim JY. Anatomical feasibility of fenestrated stent graft to treat complex abdominal aortic aneurysms from a Korean single institute database. Ann Surg Treat Res 2023; 104:34-42. [PMID: 36685774 PMCID: PMC9830046 DOI: 10.4174/astr.2023.104.1.34] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/12/2022] [Revised: 10/12/2022] [Accepted: 10/27/2022] [Indexed: 01/04/2023] Open
Abstract
Purpose This study aims to investigate the feasibility of Zenith Fenestrated AAA Endovascular Graft (Z-FEN, Cook Medical) from a single Korean institution database by evaluating the vascular anatomy of Korean abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) patients with hostile aortic neck. Methods This is a retrospective study on patients with AAA who underwent endovascular aortic repair (EVAR) and open surgery repair between January 2012 and December 2021 (n = 211). The anatomic characteristics of the aortic neck were evaluated using 3-dimensional reconstructed computed tomographic scans. For the juxtarenal AAA patients (n = 39), feasibility of fenestrated stent graft was evaluated under the protocol of fenestrated EVAR. For those who were not suitable for the application of Z-FEN, the reasons for unsuitability were analyzed. Results Among 211 AAA patients, 108 patients (51.2%) had complex aortic neck, and 39 (18.5%) had insufficient aortic neck length (<15 mm) for conventional EVAR. Of the 39 patients with juxtarenal AAAs, 13 (33.3%) were determined feasible for Z-FEN. Twenty-six patients (66.7%) were noncandidate for Z-FEN due to severe neck angulation, short aortic neck length, inadequate iliac artery anatomy, large aortic neck diameter, and severe calcification and thrombosis. Proximal aortic neck length of the non-feasible group was significantly shorter than that of the feasible group (P = 0.002). Conclusion Z-FEN was applicable to 33.3% of the juxtarenal AAA patients. As recent studies confirm, the effectiveness and safety of fenestrated EVAR, Z-FEN can be an option for AAA patients with short aortic neck.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sangho Hyun
- Department of Vascular and Transplant Surgery, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul St. Mary’s Hospital, Seoul, Korea
| | - Hojung Kim
- Department of Vascular and Transplant Surgery, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul St. Mary’s Hospital, Seoul, Korea
| | - Sang Kyun Mok
- Department of Vascular and Transplant Surgery, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul St. Mary’s Hospital, Seoul, Korea
| | - Sang Seob Yun
- Department of Vascular and Transplant Surgery, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul St. Mary’s Hospital, Seoul, Korea
| | - Sun Cheol Park
- Department of Vascular and Transplant Surgery, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul St. Mary’s Hospital, Seoul, Korea
| | - Jang Yong Kim
- Department of Vascular and Transplant Surgery, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul St. Mary’s Hospital, Seoul, Korea
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Leung T, Ronellenfitsch U, Partsakhashvili J, John E, Sekulla C, Krug S, Rosendahl J, Michl P, Ukkat J, Kleeff J. Postoperative Sigmoidoscopy and Biopsy After Elective Endovascular and Open Aortic Surgery for Preventing Mortality by Colonic Ischemia (PSB-Aorta-CI): Protocol for a Prospective Study. JMIR Res Protoc 2022; 11:e39071. [PMID: 36512391 PMCID: PMC9795394 DOI: 10.2196/39071] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/27/2022] [Revised: 09/17/2022] [Accepted: 09/24/2022] [Indexed: 12/31/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Endovascular aortic repair is considered the standard procedure in treating patients diagnosed with pathologies of the abdominal aorta with suitable anatomy. Open surgery remains an option mostly for patients not suitable for endovascular surgery. Colonic ischemia is an important and life-threatening postoperative complication of these procedures. OBJECTIVE The aim of this study is to evaluate the clinical value and safety of performing a planned sigmoidoscopy and biopsy for detection of colonic ischemia in patients undergoing elective aortic surgery. We also aim to develop prediction scores which could identify patients at risk for colonic ischemia and facilitate their timely treatment. METHODS The trial is designed as a prospective study. The decision for aortic surgery and eligibility for these procedures will be ascertained according to current guidelines. Afterward, screening of the patient for the remaining inclusion and exclusion criteria will occur. If eligibility for study inclusion is confirmed, the patient will be informed about the aims of the study and all study-specific procedures (sigmoidoscopy and biopsy) and asked to provide informed consent. RESULTS The primary end point is the proportion of patients diagnosed endoscopically with subclinical and clinically relevant colonic ischemia among all patients undergoing aortic surgery. Patient recruitment started on June 2021. The final patient is expected to be treated by the end of June 2023. Institutional Review Board review has been completed at the University of Halle (Saale; reference #052-2021). CONCLUSIONS this shows that sigmoidoscopy can be performed safely and is effective for the timely diagnosis of colonic ischemia in these patients, this could result in its routine implementation in both elective and emergency settings. TRIAL REGISTRATION German Clinical Trials Register DRKS00025587; https://www.drks.de/drks_web/navigate.do?navigationId =trial.HTML&TRIAL_ID=DRKS00025587. INTERNATIONAL REGISTERED REPORT IDENTIFIER (IRRID) DERR1-10.2196/39071.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Ulrich Ronellenfitsch
- Department of Visceral, Vascular and Endocrine Surgery, Universitätsklinikum Halle, Halle, Germany
| | - Jumber Partsakhashvili
- Department of Visceral, Vascular and Endocrine Surgery, Universitätsklinikum Halle, Halle, Germany
| | - Endres John
- Department of Visceral, Vascular and Endocrine Surgery, Universitätsklinikum Halle, Halle, Germany
| | - Carsten Sekulla
- Department of Visceral, Vascular and Endocrine Surgery, Universitätsklinikum Halle, Halle, Germany
| | - Sebastian Krug
- Department of Gastroenterology, Universitätsklinikum Halle, Halle, Germany
| | - Jonas Rosendahl
- Department of Gastroenterology, Universitätsklinikum Halle, Halle, Germany
| | - Patrick Michl
- Department of Gastroenterology, Universitätsklinikum Halle, Halle, Germany
| | - Jörg Ukkat
- Department of Visceral, Vascular and Endocrine Surgery, Universitätsklinikum Halle, Halle, Germany
| | - Jörg Kleeff
- Department of Visceral, Vascular and Endocrine Surgery, Universitätsklinikum Halle, Halle, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Isselbacher EM, Preventza O, Hamilton Black J, Augoustides JG, Beck AW, Bolen MA, Braverman AC, Bray BE, Brown-Zimmerman MM, Chen EP, Collins TJ, DeAnda A, Fanola CL, Girardi LN, Hicks CW, Hui DS, Schuyler Jones W, Kalahasti V, Kim KM, Milewicz DM, Oderich GS, Ogbechie L, Promes SB, Gyang Ross E, Schermerhorn ML, Singleton Times S, Tseng EE, Wang GJ, Woo YJ. 2022 ACC/AHA Guideline for the Diagnosis and Management of Aortic Disease: A Report of the American Heart Association/American College of Cardiology Joint Committee on Clinical Practice Guidelines. Circulation 2022; 146:e334-e482. [PMID: 36322642 PMCID: PMC9876736 DOI: 10.1161/cir.0000000000001106] [Citation(s) in RCA: 338] [Impact Index Per Article: 169.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/07/2022]
Abstract
AIM The "2022 ACC/AHA Guideline for the Diagnosis and Management of Aortic Disease" provides recommendations to guide clinicians in the diagnosis, genetic evaluation and family screening, medical therapy, endovascular and surgical treatment, and long-term surveillance of patients with aortic disease across its multiple clinical presentation subsets (ie, asymptomatic, stable symptomatic, and acute aortic syndromes). METHODS A comprehensive literature search was conducted from January 2021 to April 2021, encompassing studies, reviews, and other evidence conducted on human subjects that were published in English from PubMed, EMBASE, the Cochrane Library, CINHL Complete, and other selected databases relevant to this guideline. Additional relevant studies, published through June 2022 during the guideline writing process, were also considered by the writing committee, where appropriate. Structure: Recommendations from previously published AHA/ACC guidelines on thoracic aortic disease, peripheral artery disease, and bicuspid aortic valve disease have been updated with new evidence to guide clinicians. In addition, new recommendations addressing comprehensive care for patients with aortic disease have been developed. There is added emphasis on the role of shared decision making, especially in the management of patients with aortic disease both before and during pregnancy. The is also an increased emphasis on the importance of institutional interventional volume and multidisciplinary aortic team expertise in the care of patients with aortic disease.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | - Bruce E Bray
- AHA/ACC Joint Committee on Clinical Data Standards liaison
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | - Y Joseph Woo
- AHA/ACC Joint Committee on Clinical Practice Guidelines liaison
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
A 12-year experience of endovascular repair for ruptured Abdominal Aortic Aneurysms in all patients. J Vasc Surg 2022. [DOI: 10.1016/j.jvs.2022.10.032] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/21/2022]
|
24
|
Torsello GF. [Endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR) : Update D]. RADIOLOGIE (HEIDELBERG, GERMANY) 2022; 62:580-585. [PMID: 35759019 DOI: 10.1007/s00117-022-01020-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 05/24/2022] [Indexed: 06/15/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Abdominal aortic aneurysms can either be treated by open surgery or endovascular repair. In both cases, prostheses are implanted to prevent potentially lethal aortic ruptures. OBJECTIVES Studies seeking to identify the optimal treatment came to diverging conclusions. The goal of this article is to shed light on the discussion of which treatment option is to be preferred. MATERIALS AND METHODS This article summarizes the relevant studies on elective and emergency abdominal aortic aneurysm repair. The presented studies are discussed, and results are interpreted and compared. RESULTS While most studies indicate lower short-term mortality rates in endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR), mortality rates converged in multiple trials and even showed a lower mortality rate for open repair in mid-term analyses. Most recent studies indicate long-term equivalence in terms of mortality and a higher rate of secondary interventions in EVAR patients. CONCLUSIONS The current body of literature indicates no real advantage of one therapy over another. The choice of therapy should depend on anatomic, clinical, and logistic criteria.
Collapse
|
25
|
Maier-Hasselmann A, Modica F, Helmberger T. [Abdominal aortic aneurysms-open vs. endovascular treatment : Decision-making from the perspective of the vascular surgeon]. RADIOLOGIE (HEIDELBERG, GERMANY) 2022; 62:570-579. [PMID: 35737000 DOI: 10.1007/s00117-022-01021-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 05/24/2022] [Indexed: 06/15/2023]
Abstract
CLINICAL/METHODICAL ISSUE In the last 20 years, the treatment of abdominal aortic aneurysms has essentially evolved from surgical to minimally invasive endovascular treatment. ACHIEVEMENTS There are still a number of clinical situations that make surgical intervention useful or even necessary. This underlines the importance of interdisciplinary vascular centers for the treatment of complex aortic pathologies and their sequelae. PRACTICAL RECOMMENDATIONS In the following article, the arguments for the choice of procedure for the treatment of infrarenal aortic aneurysms are discussed and the recommendations of various guidelines are compared.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Andreas Maier-Hasselmann
- Klinik für Gefäßchirurgie, vaskuläre und endovaskuläre Chirurgie, München Klinik Bogenhausen, 81925, München, Deutschland.
| | - Filippo Modica
- Klinik für Gefäßchirurgie, vaskuläre und endovaskuläre Chirurgie, München Klinik Bogenhausen, 81925, München, Deutschland
| | - Thomas Helmberger
- Institut für Radiologie, Neuroradiologie und minimal-invasive Therapie, München Klinik Bogenhausen, München, Deutschland
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
Lim S, Kwan S, Colvard BD, d'Audiffret A, Kashyap VS, Cho JS. Impact of Interfacility Transfer of Ruptured Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm Patients. J Vasc Surg 2022; 76:1548-1554.e1. [PMID: 35752382 DOI: 10.1016/j.jvs.2022.05.020] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/22/2021] [Revised: 04/12/2022] [Accepted: 05/01/2022] [Indexed: 10/17/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES Interfacility transfer (IT) of patients with ruptured (r) abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) occurs not infrequently for a higher level of care. This study evaluates using contemporary administrative database the impact of IT on mortality after rAAA repair. METHODS Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project Database for NY (2016) and NJ/MD/FL (2016-2017) were queried using ICD-10th edition to identify patients who underwent open and endovascular repair of AAA. Hospitals were categorized into quartiles (Q) per overall volume. Mortality rates of IT vs non-transferred (NT) rAAA patients per treatment modality (open [rOAR] vs. endovascular [rEVAR]) were compared. Cox proportional hazard model was used to estimate hazard ratios (HR) for mortality. RESULTS 1475 patients presented with rAAA of whom 672 (45.6%) were not treated. Of the remaining 803 patients, 226 (28.1%) were transferred; 50 (22.1%) died without a repair after IT. The remaining 752 patients (176 IT + 576 NT) underwent 491 rEVARs and 261 rOARs. Baseline characteristics were similar between IT and NT patients except for higher proportion of Blacks (P=.03), lower-income families (P=.049) and rOAR (45.5% vs 31.4%, p=.001) in IT patients. Overall mortality rates were similar between NT (30.2%) and IT (27.3%, P=.46). On sub-group analysis, operative mortality rates after rEVAR were similar between NT and IT patients, without differences among hospital quartiles. After rOAR, however, operative mortality rates were lower in IT patients, largely due to improved outcomes in Q4 hospitals (P=.001, Q4 vs Q1, 2 & 3). Cox regression analysis demonstrated age (HR 1.03, CI 1.00-1.06, P=.02) and low-volume hospitals (Q1-3) (HR 1.89, CI 1.02-3.51, P=.04) are predictors of mortality. Total charges were similar ($286,727 IT vs $265,717 NT, P=.38). CONCLUSIONS Less than 30% of rAAA patients deemed to be a candidate for repair are transferred. IT does not affect mortality rates after rEVAR, irrespective of hospital volume. For rOAR candidates, however, regionalization of care with prompt transfer to a high-volume center improves the survival benefits without increased health care cost.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sungho Lim
- Division of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, Department of Cardiovascular and Thoracic Surgery, Rush Medical College/Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, IL
| | - Stephen Kwan
- Division of Vascular Surgery and Endovascular Therapy, Department of Surgery, Case Western Reserve University School of Medicine/University Hospitals, Cleveland Medical Center, Cleveland, OH
| | - Benjamin D Colvard
- Division of Vascular Surgery and Endovascular Therapy, Department of Surgery, Case Western Reserve University School of Medicine/University Hospitals, Cleveland Medical Center, Cleveland, OH
| | - Alexandre d'Audiffret
- Division of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, Department of Cardiovascular and Thoracic Surgery, Rush Medical College/Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, IL
| | - Vikram S Kashyap
- Division of Vascular Surgery and Endovascular Therapy, Department of Surgery, Case Western Reserve University School of Medicine/University Hospitals, Cleveland Medical Center, Cleveland, OH
| | - Jae S Cho
- Division of Vascular Surgery and Endovascular Therapy, Department of Surgery, Case Western Reserve University School of Medicine/University Hospitals, Cleveland Medical Center, Cleveland, OH.
| |
Collapse
|
27
|
Alnefaie SA, Alzahrani YA, Alzahrani BS. A Comparison of Endovascular Aneurysm Repair and Open Repair for Ruptured Aortic Abdominal Aneurysms. Cureus 2022; 14:e25672. [PMID: 35812617 PMCID: PMC9255951 DOI: 10.7759/cureus.25672] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 06/03/2022] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
Management modalities of ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) include ruptured open aneurysm repair (rOAR) and ruptured endovascular aneurysm repair (rEVAR). In this study, we aim to systematically review all the previously published randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that compared rOAR and rEVAR. A systematic search was performed in the following databases: PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, Google Scholar, Clinical trials, and others with all the potentially relevant keywords that were adjusted to meet the search strategy for each database to collect all the relevant studies that were published up to January 2021. A total of 11 studies were identified through our comprehensive search. Among these studies, seven represented the IMPROVE trial, two represented the AJAX trial, and two represented the Nottingham and ECAR trials, each, while the remaining four studies were not RCTs; however, these were included in the discussion as they obtained data from the IMPROVE trial. The IMPROVE trials preferred EVAR use due to the potential survival benefit and improved quality of life, although the EVAR and OAR had similar mortality rates. In the AJAX and ECAR, the mortality rates favored EVAR over OAR with no significance while the opposite was noticed in the Nottingham trial with no significance also. Similar rates of re-interventions and complications were also noticed and some studies reported that EVAR is cost-effective. Overall evidence slightly favors EVAR over OAR and further studies are needed.
Collapse
|
28
|
Pratesi C, Esposito D, Apostolou D, Attisani L, Bellosta R, Benedetto F, Blangetti I, Bonardelli S, Casini A, Fargion AT, Favaretto E, Freyrie A, Frola E, Miele V, Niola R, Novali C, Panzera C, Pegorer M, Perini P, Piffaretti G, Pini R, Robaldo A, Sartori M, Stigliano A, Taurino M, Veroux P, Verzini F, Zaninelli E, Orso M. Guidelines on the management of abdominal aortic aneurysms: updates from the Italian Society of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery (SICVE). THE JOURNAL OF CARDIOVASCULAR SURGERY 2022; 63:328-352. [PMID: 35658387 DOI: 10.23736/s0021-9509.22.12330-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/15/2023]
Abstract
The objective of these Guidelines was to revise and update the previous 2016 Italian Guidelines on Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm Disease, in accordance with the National Guidelines System (SNLG), to guide every practitioner toward the most correct management pathway for this pathology. The methodology applied in this update was the GRADE-SIGN version methodology, following the instructions of the AGREE quality of reporting checklist as well. The first methodological step was the formulation of clinical questions structured according to the PICO (Population, Intervention, Comparison, Outcome) model according to which the Recommendations were issued. Then, systematic reviews of the Literature were carried out for each PICO question or for homogeneous groups of questions, followed by the selection of the articles and the assessment of the methodological quality for each of them using qualitative checklists. Finally, a Considered Judgment form was filled in for each clinical question, in which the features of the evidence as a whole are assessed to establish the transition from the level of evidence to the direction and strength of the recommendations. These guidelines outline the correct management of patients with abdominal aortic aneurysm in terms of screening and surveillance. Medical management and indication for surgery are discussed, as well as preoperative assessment regarding patients' background and surgical risk evaluation. Once the indication for surgery has been established, the options for traditional open and endovascular surgery are described and compared, focusing specifically on patients with ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysms as well. Finally, indications for early and late postoperative follow-up are explained. The most recent evidence in the Literature has been able to confirm and possibly modify the previous recommendations updating them, likewise to propose new recommendations on prospectively relevant topics.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Carlo Pratesi
- Department of Vascular Surgery, Careggi University Hospital, Florence, Italy
| | - Davide Esposito
- Department of Vascular Surgery, Careggi University Hospital, Florence, Italy -
| | | | - Luca Attisani
- Department of Vascular Surgery, Poliambulanza Foundation Hospital, Brescia, Italy
| | - Raffaello Bellosta
- Department of Vascular Surgery, Poliambulanza Foundation Hospital, Brescia, Italy
| | - Filippo Benedetto
- Department of Vascular Surgery, AOU Policlinico Martino, Messina, Italy
| | | | | | - Andrea Casini
- Department of Intensive Care, Careggi University Hospital, Florence, Italy
| | - Aaron T Fargion
- Department of Vascular Surgery, Careggi University Hospital, Florence, Italy
| | - Elisabetta Favaretto
- Department of Angiology and Blood Coagulation, S. Orsola-Malpighi University Hospital, Bologna, Italy
| | - Antonio Freyrie
- Department of Vascular Surgery, Parma University Hospital, Parma, Italy
| | - Edoardo Frola
- Department of Vascular Surgery, AO S. Croce e Carle, Cuneo, Italy
| | - Vittorio Miele
- Department of Diagnostic Imaging, Careggi University Hospital, Florence, Italy
| | - Raffaella Niola
- Department of Vascular and Interventional Radiology, AORN Cardarelli, Naples, Italy
| | - Claudio Novali
- Department of Vascular Surgery, GVM Maria Pia Hospital, Turin, Italy
| | - Chiara Panzera
- Department of Vascular Surgery, AOU Sant'Andrea, Rome, Italy
| | - Matteo Pegorer
- Department of Vascular Surgery, Poliambulanza Foundation Hospital, Brescia, Italy
| | - Paolo Perini
- Department of Vascular Surgery, Parma University Hospital, Parma, Italy
| | | | - Rodolfo Pini
- Department of Vascular Surgery, S. Orsola-Malpighi University Hospital, Bologna, Italy
| | - Alessandro Robaldo
- Department of Vascular Surgery, Ticino Vascular Center - Lugano Regional Hospital, Lugano, Switzerland
| | - Michelangelo Sartori
- Department of Angiology and Blood Coagulation, S. Orsola-Malpighi University Hospital, Bologna, Italy
| | | | | | | | - Fabio Verzini
- Department of Vascular Surgery, AOU Città della Salute e della Scienza, Turin, Italy
| | - Erica Zaninelli
- Department of General Medical Practice, ATS Bergamo - ASST Papa Giovanni XXIII, Bergamo, Italy
| | - Massimiliano Orso
- Istituto Zooprofilattico Sperimentale dell'Umbria e delle Marche, Perugia, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
29
|
Safir SR, Tadros RO. Endovascular Aortic Aneurysm Repair. Interv Cardiol 2022. [DOI: 10.1002/9781119697367.ch76] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/08/2022] Open
|
30
|
LaFontaine S, Goriacko P, Carnevale M, Shukla H, Phair J, Indes J, Lipsitz E, Koleilat I. Acute Kidney Injury Risk and Contrast Volume in Intact Versus Ruptured Endovascular Aneurysm Repair in the Vascular Quality Initiative. Vasc Endovascular Surg 2022; 56:581-589. [DOI: 10.1177/15385744221098820] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/15/2022]
Abstract
Objective Renal impairment after repair of ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysm has been associated with post-operative mortality. Acute kidney injury (AKI) risk specifically related to contrast administration in endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR) for intact vs ruptured aneurysms has not been previously described. It was our objective to evaluate the risk of AKI and the association with contrast administration in EVAR for ruptured (rEVAR) and intact (iEVAR) aneurysm repair in the Vascular Quality Initiative (VQI). Methods Adult patients less than 90 years old undergoing EVAR in the VQI without prior abdominal aortic surgery or who were not actively on dialysis preoperatively were included. Patients immediately converted to an open repair were excluded. Patients were grouped by repair urgency, and patient and operative characteristics and outcomes compared. Univariable and multivariable analyses were performed to identify factors associated with the primary outcome of AKI. Survival was evaluated by Kaplan-Meier analysis. Results Of 38,775 EVAR patients identified, 86.5% underwent elective surgery for an intact aneurysm, 8.4% had urgent surgery for a symptomatic, intact aneurysm, and 5.1% had emergent repair for a ruptured aneurysm. Significant risk factors for AKI included contrast volume, a preoperative eGFR <30 mL/min, procedure urgency, COPD, congestive heart failure (CHF), and total procedure time. The factor most associated with AKI was aneurysm rupture prior to repair (OR 8.6, CI 7.2-10.3, P <.01). The association of contrast volume with the outcome was the least strong with a 4% increase in risk per 25 mL of contrast (OR 1.04, 95% CI 1.01-1.07). With the development of AKI, postoperative survival was reduced regardless of indication. Conclusions Of all factors assessed, aneurysm rupture was the most and contrast volume the least associated with AKI after EVAR. Further studies should evaluate methods of preventing post-EVAR AKI.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Samantha LaFontaine
- Department of Cardiothoracic and Vascular Surgery, Montefiore Medical Center/Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, NY, USA
| | - Pavel Goriacko
- Department of Pharmacy, Montefiore Medical Center, Bronx, NY, USA
| | - Matthew Carnevale
- Department of Cardiothoracic and Vascular Surgery, Montefiore Medical Center/Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, NY, USA
| | - Harshal Shukla
- Department of Pharmacy, Montefiore Medical Center, Bronx, NY, USA
| | - John Phair
- Division of Vascular Surgery, Department of Surgery, The Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA
| | - Jeffrey Indes
- Department of Cardiothoracic and Vascular Surgery, Montefiore Medical Center/Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, NY, USA
| | - Evan Lipsitz
- Department of Cardiothoracic and Vascular Surgery, Montefiore Medical Center/Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, NY, USA
| | - Issam Koleilat
- Department of Surgery, Community Medical Center, RWJ/Barnabas Health, Tom’s River, NJ, USA
| |
Collapse
|
31
|
Hou X, Zhang F, Ye Z, Xu Q, Huang L, Guo Q, Liu W, Wang L, Zhou M, Yin P, Zhu M. The burden of aortic aneurysm in China from 1990 to 2019: findings from the Global Burden of Disease Study 2019. BMC Public Health 2022; 22:782. [PMID: 35436885 PMCID: PMC9016999 DOI: 10.1186/s12889-022-13221-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/29/2021] [Accepted: 04/12/2022] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Aortic aneurysm (AA) is a global public health concern. However, little is known about the disease burden of AA in China. METHODS Following the general analytic strategy used in the Global Burden of Disease Study (GBD) 2019, we analyzed the mortality and years of life lost (YLLs) due to AA, stratified by sex, age, and province-level region in China from 1990 to 2019. The temporal trend of AA burden in China was analyzed and the main attributable risk factors for AA in China were also explored. RESULTS In China, the total AA deaths were 17,038 (95% UI: 14,392-19,980) in 2019, an increase of 136.1% compared with that in 1990, with an age-standardized death rate (ASDR) of 0.93 (95% UI: 0.79-1.08) per 100,000 person-years in 2019, a decrease of 6.8%. Meanwhile AA caused 378,578 (95% UI: 315,980-450,479) YLLs in 2019, an increase of 102.6% compared with that in 1990, with a crude YLL rate of 26.6 (95% UI: 22.2-31.7) per 100,000 person-years, an increase of 68.6%. The AA mortality and YLLs were higher in males than in females. AA caused most YLLs in the 65- to 75-year-old age group. The AA mortality and YLLs varied significantly among provinces in China, and the change in ASDR showed a negative correlation with the sociodemographic index of different provinces, namely, more decline of ASDR in developed provinces. High systolic blood pressure was shown to be the most significant attributable risk factor for AA burden in both males and females, and smoking was another major attributable risk factor, especially in males. CONCLUSIONS The disease burden of AA increased significantly from 1990 to 2019 in China, with higher mortality and YLLs in males, senior populations, and among residents of most western provinces in China. High systolic blood pressure and smoking were two major attributable risk factors for AA mortality in China.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Xinran Hou
- Department of Anesthesiology, Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha, Hunan, P.R. China, 410008
| | - Fan Zhang
- Department of Anesthesiology, Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha, Hunan, P.R. China, 410008
| | - Zhi Ye
- Department of Anesthesiology, Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha, Hunan, P.R. China, 410008
| | - Qian Xu
- Department of Cardiovascular Surgery, Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha, Hunan, P.R. China, 410008
| | - Lingjin Huang
- Department of Cardiovascular Surgery, Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha, Hunan, P.R. China, 410008
| | - Qulian Guo
- Department of Anesthesiology, Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha, Hunan, P.R. China, 410008
| | - Wei Liu
- National Center for Chronic and Noncommunicable Disease Control and Prevention, Chinese Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Beijing, 100050, China
| | - Lijun Wang
- National Center for Chronic and Noncommunicable Disease Control and Prevention, Chinese Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Beijing, 100050, China
| | - Maigeng Zhou
- National Center for Chronic and Noncommunicable Disease Control and Prevention, Chinese Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Beijing, 100050, China
| | - Peng Yin
- National Center for Chronic and Noncommunicable Disease Control and Prevention, Chinese Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Beijing, 100050, China.
| | - Maoen Zhu
- Department of Anesthesiology, Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha, Hunan, P.R. China, 410008.
| |
Collapse
|
32
|
de Boer M, Shiraev T, Waller J, Qasabian R. Has EVAR changed the outcomes of ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysms? A decades worth of experience in an Australian Teaching Hospital. ANZ J Surg 2022; 92:730-735. [PMID: 35170179 DOI: 10.1111/ans.17554] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/23/2021] [Revised: 02/03/2022] [Accepted: 02/03/2022] [Indexed: 11/28/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysms (rAAA) are associated with significant mortality, and equipoise remains as to whether patients managed with endovascular stent grafts (rEVAR) demonstrate better outcomes when compared to traditional open repair (OR). This study sought to examine the outcomes of patients presenting with rAAA to our institution and assess the perioperative outcomes and outpatient mortality of patients over the past decade. METHODS A retrospective analysis was conducted. Patients treated for rAAA between 2010 and 2019 were identified from a search of the hospital database for ACHI and ICD-10 codes for repair of AAA. Demographic, operative and post-operative variables were collected from electronic medical records of identified patients. RESULTS Eighty patients were identified, 51 of whom presented with a rAAA. The majority of repairs were rEVARs (59%). Median age was 76 years. Median length of admission to ICU was 3 days, and median length of hospital admission was 10 days. Overall in-patient mortality was 26%, with rates of 39% at 3 years and 47% at 5 years. No significant difference in outpatient mortality was found in patients undergoing rEVAR compared to OR, with rates of 61% at 5 years compared to 65% at 5 years, respectively (p = 0.8). CONCLUSION Perioperative outcomes of our cohort of patients undergoing endovascular repair compared to open repair for ruptured and symptomatic AAAs are comparable over the past decade. Given equipoise remains between repair methods, further observational studies are required to quantify benefits of OR and endovascular repairs for ruptured and symptomatic AAAs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Madeleine de Boer
- Department of Vascular Surgery, Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, Camperdown, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Timothy Shiraev
- Department of Vascular Surgery, Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, Camperdown, New South Wales, Australia.,School of Medicine, University of Notre Dame, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Jacob Waller
- Department of Vascular Surgery, Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, Camperdown, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Raffi Qasabian
- Department of Vascular Surgery, Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, Camperdown, New South Wales, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
33
|
Hakovirta H, Jalkanen J, Saimanen E, Kukkonen T, Romsi P, Suominen V, Vikatmaa L, Valtonen M, Karvonen MK, Venermo M. Induction of CD73 prevents death after emergency open aortic surgery for a ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysm: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study. Sci Rep 2022; 12:1839. [PMID: 35115574 PMCID: PMC8813993 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-022-05771-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/23/2021] [Accepted: 01/18/2022] [Indexed: 11/09/2022] Open
Abstract
Mortality remains high after emergency open surgery for a ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysm (RAAA). The aim of the present study was to assess, if intravenous (IV) Interferon (IFN) beta-1a improve survival after surgery by up-regulating Cluster of differentiation (CD73). This is a multi-center phase II double-blind, 2:1 randomized, parallel group comparison of the efficacy and safety of IV IFN beta-1a vs. placebo for the prevention of death after open surgery for an infra-renal RAAA. All study patients presented a confirmed infra-renal RAAA, survived the primary emergency surgery and were treated with IFN beta-1a (10 μg) or matching placebo for 6 days after surgery. Major exclusion criteria included fatal hemorrhagic shock, chronic renal replacement therapy, diagnosed liver cirrhosis, severe congestive heart failure, advanced malignant disease, primary attempt of endovascular aortic repair (EVAR), and per-operative suprarenal clamping over 30 min. Main outcome measure was all-cause mortality at day 30 (D30) from initial emergency aortic reconstruction. The study was pre-maturely stopped due to a reported drug-drug interaction and was left under-powered. Out of 40 randomized patients 38 were included in the outcome analyses (27 IFN beta-1a and 11 placebo). There was no statistically significant difference between treatment groups at baseline except more open-abdomen and intestinal ischemia was present in the IFN beta-1a arm. D30 all-cause mortality was 22.2% (6/27) in the IFN beta-1a arm and 18.2% (2/11) in the placebo arm (OR 1.30; 95% CI 0.21-8.19). The most common adverse event relating to the IFN beta-1a was pyrexia (20.7% in the IFN beta-1a arm vs. 9.1% in the placebo arm). Patients with high level of serum CD73 associated with survival (P = 0.001) whereas the use of glucocorticoids and the presence of IFN beta-1a neutralizing antibodies associated with a poor CD73 response and survival. The initial aim of the trial, if postoperative INF beta-1a treatment results on better RAAA survival, could not be demonstrated. Nonetheless the anticipated target mechanism up-regulation of CD73 was associated with 100% survival. According to present results the INF beta-1a induced up-regulation of serum CD73 was blocked with both use of glucocorticoids and serum IFN beta-1a neutralizing antibodies. The study was pre-maturely stopped due to interim analysis after a study concerning the use if IV IFN beta-1a in ARDS suggested that the concomitant use of glucocorticoids and IFN beta-1a block the CD73 induction. Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT03119701. Registered 19/04/2017 (retrospectively registered).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Harri Hakovirta
- Turku University, Kiinanmyllynkatu 4-8, 20520, Turku, Finland. .,Satasairaala, Pori, Finland. .,Department of Vascular Surgery, Turku University Hospital, Turku, Finland.
| | | | - Eija Saimanen
- Department of Surgery, South Karelia Central Hospital, Lappeenranta, Finland
| | - Tiia Kukkonen
- Department of Vascular Surgery, Hospital Nova of Central Finland, Jyvaskyla, Finland
| | - Pekka Romsi
- Department of Vascular Surgery, Oulu University Hospital, Oulu, Finland
| | - Velipekka Suominen
- Department of Vascular Surgery, Tampere University Hospital, Tampere, Finland
| | - Leena Vikatmaa
- Department of Anesthesiology, Intensive Care, and Pain Medicine, Helsinki University Hospital, Helsinki, Finland
| | - Mika Valtonen
- Department of Perioperative Services, Intensive Care and Pain Management, Turku University Hospital, Turku, Finland
| | | | - Maarit Venermo
- Department of Vascular Surgery, University of Helsinki and Helsinki University Hospital, Helsinki, Finland
| | | |
Collapse
|
34
|
Li B, Prabhudesai V, Wheatcroft M, Qadura M. Myocardial ischaemia secondary to ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysm. BMJ Case Rep 2022; 15:e248271. [PMID: 35115331 PMCID: PMC8814742 DOI: 10.1136/bcr-2021-248271] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 12/31/2021] [Indexed: 11/04/2022] Open
Abstract
A 63-year-old man presented to an outside hospital with presyncope, back pain, hypotension and inferior ST segment elevations. He received aspirin, ticagrelor and heparin and was transferred to our institution as a Code STEMI (ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction). A coronary angiogram demonstrated multivessel disease but no occlusive lesion for acute intervention. The following day, he developed worsening abdominal/back pain. A CT angiogram (CTA) showed a ruptured infrarenal abdominal aortic aneurysm. He underwent urgent percutaneous endovascular aneurysm repair. CTA on postoperative day (POD) 10 demonstrated a patent stent graft with no endoleak. The patient was discharged on POD 12 in stable condition.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ben Li
- Division of Vascular Surgery, St. Michael's Hospital, Unity Health Toronto, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Vikramaditya Prabhudesai
- Division of Interventional Radiology, St. Michael's Hospital, Unity Health Toronto, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Mark Wheatcroft
- Division of Vascular Surgery, St. Michael's Hospital, Unity Health Toronto, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Mohammad Qadura
- Division of Vascular Surgery, St. Michael's Hospital, Unity Health Toronto, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
- Keenan Research Centre for Biomedical Science, Li Ka Shing Knowledge Institute of St. Michael's Hospital, Unity Health Toronto, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
35
|
Kessler V, Klopf J, Eilenberg W, Neumayer C, Brostjan C. AAA Revisited: A Comprehensive Review of Risk Factors, Management, and Hallmarks of Pathogenesis. Biomedicines 2022; 10:94. [PMID: 35052774 PMCID: PMC8773452 DOI: 10.3390/biomedicines10010094] [Citation(s) in RCA: 28] [Impact Index Per Article: 14.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/29/2021] [Accepted: 12/30/2021] [Indexed: 01/27/2023] Open
Abstract
Despite declining incidence and mortality rates in many countries, the abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) continues to represent a life-threatening cardiovascular condition with an overall prevalence of about 2-3% in the industrialized world. While the risk of AAA development is considerably higher for men of advanced age with a history of smoking, screening programs serve to detect the often asymptomatic condition and prevent aortic rupture with an associated death rate of up to 80%. This review summarizes the current knowledge on identified risk factors, the multifactorial process of pathogenesis, as well as the latest advances in medical treatment and surgical repair to provide a perspective for AAA management.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | | | - Christine Brostjan
- Department of General Surgery, Division of Vascular Surgery, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna General Hospital, 1090 Vienna, Austria; (V.K.); (J.K.); (W.E.); (C.N.)
| |
Collapse
|
36
|
Maze Y, Tokui T, Murakami M, Kawaguchi T, Inoue R, Nakamura B, Hirano K, Chino S, Nakajima K, Kato N. Treatment Strategies for Improving the Surgical Outcomes of Ruptured Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm: Single-Center Experience in Japan. Ann Vasc Dis 2022; 15:8-13. [PMID: 35432648 PMCID: PMC8958394 DOI: 10.3400/avd.oa.21-00086] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/01/2021] [Accepted: 11/20/2021] [Indexed: 12/16/2022] Open
Abstract
Objective: We aimed to examine the surgical outcomes of ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysm cases at our hospital and considered strategies for improvement. Material and Methods: We examined the preoperative characteristics of hospital mortality, postoperative complications, and long-term outcomes of 91 surgical cases of ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysm performed between January 2009 and December 2020 at our hospital. Results: Of the 91 cases, 24 died at the hospital (mortality, 26.3%). Mortality was mostly due to hemorrhage/disseminated intravascular coagulation and intestinal necrosis. Ten patients required preoperative aortic clamp by thoracotomy or insertion of intra-aortic balloon occlusion, and eight of them died. Ten patients required open abdominal management due to abdominal compartment syndrome, and five of them died. There was no significant difference between the two groups in terms of the long-term results of the open repair and abdominal endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR). Conclusion: To improve the surgical outcomes of ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysms, it is necessary to start surgery immediately. Therefore, the choice of surgical method (open surgery or EVAR) should be based on the resources and discretion of the hospital. To prevent postoperative intestinal necrosis, risk factors for acute compartment syndrome should be considered, and open abdominal management should be introduced.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yasumi Maze
- Department of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, Ise Red Cross Hospital
| | - Toshiya Tokui
- Department of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, Ise Red Cross Hospital
| | - Masahiko Murakami
- Department of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, Ise Red Cross Hospital
| | - Teruhisa Kawaguchi
- Department of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, Ise Red Cross Hospital
| | - Ryosai Inoue
- Department of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, Ise Red Cross Hospital
| | - Bun Nakamura
- Department of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, Ise Red Cross Hospital
| | - Koji Hirano
- Department of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, Ise Red Cross Hospital
| | - Shuji Chino
- Department of Radiology, Ise Red Cross Hospital
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
37
|
Nguyen J, Li A, Tam DY, Forbes TL. ANALYSIS OF SPIN IN VASCULAR SURGERY RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIALS WITH NONSIGNIFICANT OUTCOMES. J Vasc Surg 2021; 75:1074-1080.e17. [PMID: 34923067 DOI: 10.1016/j.jvs.2021.09.051] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/05/2021] [Accepted: 09/25/2021] [Indexed: 12/17/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES Spin is the manipulation of language that distorts the interpretation of objective findings. The purpose of this study is to describe the characteristics of spin found in statistically nonsignificant randomized controlled trials (RCT) comparing carotid endarterectomy (CEA) to carotid artery stenting (CAS) for carotid stenosis (CS), and endovascular repair (EVAR) to open repair (OR) for abdominal aortic aneurysms (AAA). METHODS A search of MEDLINE, EMBASE, and the Cochrane Controlled Register of Trials was performed in June 2020 for studies published describing AAA or CS. All phase three RCTs with nonsignificant primary outcomes comparing OR to EVAR or CEA to CAS were included. Studies were appraised for the characteristics and severity of spin using a validated tool. Binary logistic regression was performed to assess the association of spin grade to (1) funding source (commercial vs non-commercial) and (2) the publishing journal's impact factor. RESULTS Thirty-one of 355 articles captured were included for analysis. Spin was identified in nine abstracts (9/18) and 13 main texts (13/18) of AAA articles and seven abstracts (7/13) and ten main texts (10/13) of CS articles. For both AAA and CS articles, spin was most commonly found in the manuscript discussion section, with the most commonly employed strategy being the interpretation of statistically nonsignificant primary results to show treatment equivalence or rule out adverse treatment effects. Increasing journal impact factor was associated with a statistically significant lower likelihood of spin in the study title or abstract conclusion (βOR = 0.96, 95% CI: 0.94 - 0.98, p < 0.01) while no significant association could be found with funding source (βOR = 1.33, 95% CI: 0.30-5.92, p = 0.71). CONCLUSIONS A large proportion of statistically nonsignificant RCTs contain interpretations that are inconsistent with their results. These findings should prompt authors and readers to appraise study findings independently and to limit the use of spin in study interpretations.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Allen Li
- University of Ottawa, Faculty of Medicine
| | - Derrick Y Tam
- Division of Cardiac Surgery, University of Toronto; Department of Surgery, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Thomas L Forbes
- Division of Vascular Surgery, Peter Munk Cardiac Centre, University Health Network; Department of Surgery, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.
| |
Collapse
|
38
|
Koleilat I, Nussenblatt B, Freidmann P, Lipsitz E, Indes J. Physician-Modified Endografts Versus Chimney/Snorkel for Ruptured and Symptomatic Juxtarenal and Paravisceral Aneurysms in the Vascular Quality Initiative. Ann Vasc Surg 2021; 82:249-257. [PMID: 34890756 DOI: 10.1016/j.avsg.2021.10.062] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/24/2021] [Revised: 10/16/2021] [Accepted: 10/22/2021] [Indexed: 11/18/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES Ruptured and symptomatic juxtarenal and paravisceral aneurysms present technical challenges during endovascular repair. We sought to compare physician modification and fenestrated (PMEG) versus chimney/periscope/snorkel (CHIMPS) repair techniques for the treatment of ruptured and symptomatic paravisceral and juxtarenal aortic aneurysms (r/sPJAA). METHODS Patients in the thoracic and complex endovascular aneurysm module of the Vascular Quality Initiative (VQI) national registry undergoing CHIMPS and PMEG for r/sPJAA were included. Patients who underwent thoracic aneurysm repair with only celiac intervention or who had coverage or occlusion only of one renal or visceral branch vessel were excluded. One-year mortality was the primary outcome. Secondary outcomes included peri- and postoperative endoleak, hospital and ICU length of stay, reintervention, and other local and systemic complications. RESULTS A total of 81 CHIMPS and 47 PMEG patients were identified. Patients undergoing PMEG were more frequently symptomatic, had a history of CHF and were taking aspirin, statin and P2Y12 antiplatelet medications. Patients undergoing CHIMPS presented more frequently with rupture. There was no significant survival advantage for CHIMPS over PMEG patients (P = 0.5). There were no apparent long-term differences in the numbers of endoleaks or in the rates of subsequent reinterventions between the two groups. CONCLUSIONS It does not appear that the procedure type (CHIMPS versus PMEG) is associated with postoperative survival in patients with r/sPJAA. Not surprisingly, survival is associated with postoperative complications, particularly myocardial infarction and intestinal ischemia. Further research should evaluate reasons for failure to rescue from and the impact of postoperative complications on the postoperative survival after endovascular repair of r/sPJAA.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Issam Koleilat
- Department of Surgery, Community Medical Center, RWJ/Barnabas Health, Tom's River, NJ.
| | - Brandon Nussenblatt
- Department of Cardiothoracic and Vascular Surgery, Montefiore Medical Center/Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, NY
| | - Patricia Freidmann
- Department of Cardiothoracic and Vascular Surgery, Montefiore Medical Center/Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, NY; Department of Surgery, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, NY
| | - Evan Lipsitz
- Department of Cardiothoracic and Vascular Surgery, Montefiore Medical Center/Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, NY
| | - Jeffrey Indes
- Department of Cardiothoracic and Vascular Surgery, Montefiore Medical Center/Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, NY
| |
Collapse
|
39
|
Quality-adjusted life year comparison at medium term follow-up of endovascular versus open surgical repair for abdominal aortic aneurysm in young patients. PLoS One 2021; 16:e0260690. [PMID: 34855851 PMCID: PMC8639078 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0260690] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/25/2021] [Accepted: 11/16/2021] [Indexed: 11/21/2022] Open
Abstract
Objectives This study aimed to compare the quality of life and cost effectiveness between endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR) and open surgical repair (OSR) in young patients with abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA). Design This was a single-center, observational, and retrospective study. Materials and methods A retrospective analysis was conducted of patients with AAA, who were <70 years old and underwent EVAR or OSR between January 2012 and October 2016. Only patients with aortic morphology that was suitable for EVAR were enrolled. Data on the complication rates, medical expenses, and expected quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) were collected, and the cost per QALY at three years was compared. Results Among 90 patients with aortic morphology who were eligible for EVAR, 37 and 53 patients underwent EVAR and OSR, respectively. No significant differences were observed in perioperative cardiovascular events and death between the two groups. However, during the follow-up period, patients undergoing OSR showed a significantly lower complication rate (hazard ratio [HR] = 0.11; P = .021). From the three-year cost-effectiveness analysis, the total sum of costs was significantly lower in the OSR group (P < .001) than that in the EVAR group, and the number of QALYs was superior in the OSR group (P = .013). The cost per QALY at three years was significantly lower in the OSR group than that in the EVAR group (mean: $4038 vs. $10 137; respectively; P < .001) Conclusions OSR had lower complication rates and better cost-effectiveness than EVAR Among young patients with feasible aortic anatomy.
Collapse
|
40
|
Kapila V, Jetty P, Wooster D, Vucemilo V, Dubois L. Screening for abdominal aortic aneurysms in Canada: 2020 review and position statement of the Canadian Society for Vascular Surgery. Can J Surg 2021; 64:E461-E466. [PMID: 34467750 PMCID: PMC8526155 DOI: 10.1503/cjs.009120] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/01/2022] Open
Abstract
Abdominal aortic aneurysms (AAAs) remain a major risk to patients, despite level 1 evidence for screening to prevent rupture events and decrease mortality. In 2007, the Canadian Society for Vascular Surgery (CSVS) published a review and position statement for AAA screening in Canada. Since that publication, there have been a number of updates in the published literature affecting screening recommendations. In this paper, we present a review of some of the controversies in the AAA screening literature to help elucidate differences in the various published screening guidelines. This article represents a review of the data and updated recommendations for AAA screening in the Canadian population on behalf of the CSVS. Les anévrismes de l’aorte abdominale (AAA) continuent de poser un risque majeur pour les patients, malgré des données probantes de niveau 1 à l’appui du dépistage pour prévenir les ruptures et réduire la mortalité. En 2007, la Société canadienne de chirurgie vasculaire (SCCV) a publié une revue et un énoncé de position sur le dépistage de l’AAA au Canada. Depuis lors, plusieurs mises à jour ont paru dans la littérature et elles ont un impact sur les recommandations relatives au dépistage. Dans le présent article, nous présentons une synthèse de quelques controverses soulevées dans la littérature sur le dépistage de l’AAA afin d’expliquer les différences entre les diverses lignes directrices publiées à ce sujet. Cet article propose au nom de la SCCV une revue des données probantes et des recommandations à jour sur le dépistage de l’AAA dans la population canadienne.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Varun Kapila
- From the William Osler Health System, Brampton, Ont. (Kapila); the University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ont. (Jetty); the University of Toronto, Toronto, Ont. (Wooster); Trillium Health Partners, Mississauga, Ont. (Vucemilo); and Western University, London, Ont. (Dubois)
| | - Prasad Jetty
- From the William Osler Health System, Brampton, Ont. (Kapila); the University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ont. (Jetty); the University of Toronto, Toronto, Ont. (Wooster); Trillium Health Partners, Mississauga, Ont. (Vucemilo); and Western University, London, Ont. (Dubois)
| | - Doug Wooster
- From the William Osler Health System, Brampton, Ont. (Kapila); the University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ont. (Jetty); the University of Toronto, Toronto, Ont. (Wooster); Trillium Health Partners, Mississauga, Ont. (Vucemilo); and Western University, London, Ont. (Dubois)
| | - Vic Vucemilo
- From the William Osler Health System, Brampton, Ont. (Kapila); the University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ont. (Jetty); the University of Toronto, Toronto, Ont. (Wooster); Trillium Health Partners, Mississauga, Ont. (Vucemilo); and Western University, London, Ont. (Dubois)
| | - Luc Dubois
- From the William Osler Health System, Brampton, Ont. (Kapila); the University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ont. (Jetty); the University of Toronto, Toronto, Ont. (Wooster); Trillium Health Partners, Mississauga, Ont. (Vucemilo); and Western University, London, Ont. (Dubois)
| | | |
Collapse
|
41
|
Choo SJ, Jeon YB, Oh SS, Shinn SH. Outcomes of emergency endovascular versus open repair for abdominal aortic aneurysm rupture. Ann Surg Treat Res 2021; 100:291-297. [PMID: 34012947 PMCID: PMC8103156 DOI: 10.4174/astr.2021.100.5.291] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/21/2020] [Revised: 01/19/2021] [Accepted: 02/16/2021] [Indexed: 11/30/2022] Open
Abstract
Purpose Ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysm (rAAA) is one of the most common aortic emergencies in vascular surgery and is associated with high operative mortality and morbidity rates despite recent treatment advances. We evaluated operative mortality risks for the outcomes of emergency endovascular aneurysm repair (eEVAR) vs. open repair in rAAA. Methods Twenty patients underwent eEVAR (n = 12) or open repair (n = 8) for rAAA between 2016 and 2020. We adopted the EVAR first strategy since 2018. Primary endpoints included in-hospital mortality and 1-year survival. The outcome variables were analyzed with Fisher exact, Mann-Whitney test, and linear by linear association. The Kaplan-Meier method was used to estimate survival. Results There were 13 males (65.0%) and the median age of the study cohort was 78.0 years (range, 49–88 years). In-hospital mortality occurred in 7 patients (35.0%); 5 (50.0%) in the early period and 2 (20.0%) in the later period of this series. According to the procedure type, 4 (50.0%) and 3 (25.0%) in-hospital mortalities occurred in the open repair and eEVAR patients, respectively. In 6 patients (50.0%), eEVAR was performed on unfavorable anatomy. The 1-year survival of eEVAR vs. open repair group was 75% ± 12.5% and 50% ± 17.7%, respectively. On univariate analysis, preoperative high-risk indices, postoperative acute renal failure requiring dialysis, pulmonary complications, and prolonged mechanical ventilation were associated with higher operative mortality. Conclusion The current data showed relatively superior outcomes with eEVAR vs. open repair for rAAA, even in some patients with unfavorable anatomy supporting the feasibility, efficacy, and safety of EVAR first strategy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Suk Jung Choo
- Department of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Yang-Bin Jeon
- Department of Traumatology, Gachon University Gil Medical Center, Gachon University College of Medicine, Incheon, Korea
| | - Sam-Sae Oh
- Department of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, Kangbuk Samsung Hospital, Sungkyunkwan University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Sung Ho Shinn
- Department of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, Cheju Halla General Hospital, Jeju, Korea
| |
Collapse
|
42
|
Nana P, Spanos K, Kouvelos G, Stamoulis K, Rountas C, Arnaoutoglou E, Matsagkas M, Giannoukas AD. Ten-year single center experience in elective standard endovascular abdominal aortic aneurysm repair. INT ANGIOL 2021; 40:240-247. [PMID: 33739077 DOI: 10.23736/s0392-9590.21.04648-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/08/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR) has become the treatment of choice for abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA), demonstrating excellent early outcomes. However, EVAR durability has been questioned in the long-term period. The aim of this study was to assess EVAR outcomes in terms of survival and freedom from re-intervention during a long-term period. METHODS All consecutive patients being treated, with elective standard EVAR, in a single tertiary center, were included between 2008 and 2018. Outcomes were defined as survival and freedom from re-intervention and were reported using Kaplan-Meyer lifetables. In subgroup analyses, sex, age (threshold at 65 and 80 years), neck diameter>28mm and type of fixation were also analyzed. Type of re-intervention and endoleak type I (ETIa) were also reported. RESULTS Five hundred and eight patients (94% males, mean age 72±7.3, mean AAA diameter 59±9mm) were included. The median follow-up was 3 years (range 0-10 years). The survival rate was 92.8% (SE 1.5%), 76.5% (SE 3.1%) and 41.6% (SE 6%), at 2, 5 and 10 years of follow-up, respectively. In total, 78 patients died; 8 deaths (8/75, 10%) were aneurysm related. In multivariate regression analysis, age (CI. 1.02-1.14; p=0.006) and ever tobacco use (CI. 1.02-6.12, P=0.045) were associated with the long-term mortality. Freedom from re-intervention was 96% (SE 1.1%), 93% (SE 1.8%), 85.5% (SE 5%) at 2, 5 and 9 years of follow-up. Limb occlusion was a common complication (n/n; 30% of re-intervention), particularly within the first 2 postoperative years. Six patients presented with rupture and were treated with open conversion. EVAR cases with supra-renal fixation graft presented lower rates of ETIa (CI. 76-87.27, P<0.001). CONCLUSIONS Elective standard EVAR is associated with good long-term survival showing low aneurysm-related mortality. Common risk factors such as advanced age and smoking are associated to higher mortality. The procedure presents low re-intervention rates, while limb occlusion is a complication presented within the first 2 postoperative years.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Petroula Nana
- School of Health Sciences, Department of Vascular Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, University of Thessaly, University Hospital of Larissa, Larissa, Greece -
| | - Konstantinos Spanos
- School of Health Sciences, Department of Vascular Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, University of Thessaly, University Hospital of Larissa, Larissa, Greece
| | - George Kouvelos
- School of Health Sciences, Department of Vascular Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, University of Thessaly, University Hospital of Larissa, Larissa, Greece
| | - Konstantinos Stamoulis
- School of Health Sciences, Department of Anesthesiology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Thessaly, University Hospital of Larissa, Larissa, Greece
| | - Christos Rountas
- School of Health Sciences, Department of Radiology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Thessaly, University Hospital of Larissa, Larissa, Greece
| | - Elena Arnaoutoglou
- School of Health Sciences, Department of Anesthesiology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Thessaly, University Hospital of Larissa, Larissa, Greece
| | - Miltiadis Matsagkas
- School of Health Sciences, Department of Vascular Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, University of Thessaly, University Hospital of Larissa, Larissa, Greece
| | - Athanasios D Giannoukas
- School of Health Sciences, Department of Vascular Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, University of Thessaly, University Hospital of Larissa, Larissa, Greece
| |
Collapse
|
43
|
Debono S, Nash J, Tambyraja AL, Newby DE, Forsythe RO. Endovascular repair for abdominal aortic aneurysms. Heart 2021; 107:1783-1789. [PMID: 33674354 DOI: 10.1136/heartjnl-2020-318288] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/02/2020] [Revised: 02/09/2021] [Accepted: 02/15/2021] [Indexed: 11/04/2022] Open
Abstract
Management of abdominal aortic aneurysms has been the subject of rigorous scientific scrutiny. Prevalence studies have directed the formation of screening programmes, and observational studies and randomised controlled trials have defined aneurysm growth and treatment thresholds. Pre-emptive intervention with traditional open surgical repair has been the bedrock of improving long-term outcome and survival in patients with abdominal aortic aneurysms but it is associated with a significant procedural morbidity and mortality. Endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR) has substantially reduced these early complications and has been associated with promising results in both elective and emergency aneurysm repair. However, the technique has brought its own unique complications, endoleaks. An endoleak is the presence of blood flow within the aneurysm sac but outside the EVAR graft. Although in randomised control trials EVAR was associated with a reduced early mortality compared with open repair, its longer-term morbidity and mortality was higher because endoleak development is associated with a higher risk of rupture. These endoleak complications have necessitated the development of postoperative imaging surveillance and re-intervention. These contrasting benefits and risks inform the selection of the mode of repair and are heavily influenced by individual patient factors. An improved strategy to predict endoleak development could further help direct treatment choice for patients and improve both early and late outcomes. This article reviews current EVAR practice, recent updates in clinical practice guidelines and the potential future developments to facilitate the selection of mode of aneurysm repair.Trial registration number: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT04577716.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Samuel Debono
- British Heart Foundation Centre for Cardiovascular Science, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK
| | - Jennifer Nash
- British Heart Foundation Centre for Cardiovascular Science, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK
| | - Andrew L Tambyraja
- The Edinburgh Vascular Service, Royal Infirmary of Edinburgh, NHS Lothian, Edinburgh, UK
| | - David E Newby
- British Heart Foundation Centre for Cardiovascular Science, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK
| | - Rachael O Forsythe
- British Heart Foundation Centre for Cardiovascular Science, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK
| |
Collapse
|
44
|
Reite A, Søreide K, Kvaløy JT, Vetrhus M. Long-Term Outcomes After Open Repair for Ruptured Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm. World J Surg 2021; 44:2020-2027. [PMID: 32152740 PMCID: PMC7223706 DOI: 10.1007/s00268-020-05457-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/30/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Early mortality in ruptured abdominal aneurysm (rAAA) is high, but data on long-term outcome are scarce. The aim of this study was to investigate the long-term outcome in survivors after open surgery for rAAA in well-defined population. METHODS This is a population-based, observational long-term follow-up (beyond 30-day mortality) study of patients surgically treated for rAAA from 2000 through 2014. Long-term survival was analysed using Kaplan-Meier estimates and compared to the general population by analyses of relative survival. RESULTS Out of 178 patients operated for rAAA, 95 patients (55%) either died in the perioperative period, were referred from other hospitals or were lost to follow-up (two patients). Altogether 83 patients were eligible for long-term outcomes: 72 men and 11 women. Estimated median crude survival time was 6.5 years [95% confidence interval (CI) 4.8-8.2]. Men had a median survival of 7.3 years (95% CI 5.1-9.4) versus 5.4 years in females (95% CI 3.5-7.3) (P = 0.082). Reinterventions during follow-up occurred in 31 (37%). Relative survival demonstrated a slightly higher risk of death in the rAAA population compared to the general age- and gender-matched population. Age, but not comorbidities, had a significant influence on long-term survival. CONCLUSION For survivors beyond 30 days after surgery for rAAA, long-term survival compares well to that of an age- and sex-matched population. A high frequency of cardiovascular comorbidities did not seem to affect long-term survival.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Andreas Reite
- Department of Mathematics and Physics, University of Stavanger, Stavanger, Norway.
| | - Kjetil Søreide
- Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Stavanger University Hospital, Stavanger, Norway.,Department of Clinical Medicine, University of Bergen, Bergen, Norway
| | - Jan Terje Kvaløy
- Research Department, Stavanger University Hospital, Stavanger, Norway.,Department of Mathematics and Physics, University of Stavanger, Stavanger, Norway
| | - Morten Vetrhus
- Department of Surgery, Vascular Surgery Unit, Stavanger University Hospital, PO Box 8100, 4068, Stavanger, Norway.,Department of Clinical Science, University of Bergen, Bergen, Norway
| |
Collapse
|
45
|
Schmitz-Rixen T, Böckler D, J. Vogl T, T. Grundmann R. Endovascular and Open Repair of Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm. DEUTSCHES ARZTEBLATT INTERNATIONAL 2020; 117:813-819. [PMID: 33568258 PMCID: PMC8005839 DOI: 10.3238/arztebl.2020.0813] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/28/2020] [Revised: 04/28/2020] [Accepted: 07/24/2020] [Indexed: 12/11/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND This review presents the surgical indications, surgical procedures, and results in the treatment of asymptomatic and ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysms (AAA). METHODS An updated search of the literature on screening, diagnosis, treatment, and follow-up of AAA, based on the German clinical practice guideline published in 2018. RESULTS Surgery is indicated in men with an asymptomatic AAA ≥ 5.5 cm and in women, ≥ 5.0 cm. The indication in men is based on four randomized trials, while in women the data are not conclusive. The majority of patients with AAA (around 80%) meanwhile receive endovascular treatment (endovascular aortic repair, EVAR). Open surgery (open aneurysm repair, OAR) is reserved for patients with longer life expectancy and lower morbidity. The pooled 30-day mortality is 1.16% (95% confidence interval [0.92; 1.39]) following EVAR, 3.27% [2.7; 3.83] after OAR. Women have higher operative/interventional mortality than men (odds ratio 1.67%). The mortality for ruptured AAA is extremely high: around 80% of women and 70% of men die after AAA rupture. Ruptured AAA should, if possible, be treated via the endovascular approach, ideally with the patient under local anesthesia. Treatment at specialized centers guarantees the required expertise and infrastructure. Long-term periodic monitoring by mean of imaging (duplex sonography, plus computed tomography if needed) is essential, particularly following EVAR, to detect and (if appropriate) treat endoleaks, to document stable diameter of the eliminated aneurysmal sac, and to determine whether reintervention is necessary (long-term reintervention rate circa 18%). CONCLUSION Vascular surgery now offers a high degree of safety in the treatment of patients with asymptomatic AAA. Endovascular intervention is preferred.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Thomas Schmitz-Rixen
- Department of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery and the University Wound Center, Hospital of the Goethe University, Frankfurt/Main, Germany
- Institute of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Hospital of the Goethe University, Frankfurt/Main, Germany
| | - Dittmar Böckler
- Department of Vascular Surgery and Endovascular Surgery, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Thomas J. Vogl
- Department of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery and the University Wound Center, Hospital of the Goethe University, Frankfurt/Main, Germany
| | - Reinhart T. Grundmann
- German Institute for Vascular Health Research (DIGG) of the German Society for Vascular Surgery and Vascular Medicine (DGG), Berlin, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
46
|
Bellamkonda KS, Yousef S, Zhang Y, Dardik A, Geirsson A, Chaar CIO. Endograft type and anesthesia mode are associated with mortality of endovascular aneurysm repair for ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysms. Vascular 2020; 29:155-162. [PMID: 32787557 DOI: 10.1177/1708538120947859] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/17/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Endovascular aneurysm repair has become the primary treatment modality for ruptured infrarenal abdominal aortic aneurysm. This study examines the impact of endograft type on perioperative outcomes for ruptured infrarenal abdominal aortic aneurysm. METHOD The targeted endovascular aneurysm repair files of the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program database (2012-2017) were used. Only patients treated for ruptured infrarenal abdominal aortic aneurysm were included. All patients requiring concomitant stenting of the visceral arteries or aneurysmal iliac arteries or open abdominal surgery were excluded. The characteristics of patients treated with the different endografts and the corresponding outcomes were compared using Stata software. RESULTS There were 479 patients treated with the three most common endografts: Cook Zenith (n = 127), Gore Excluder (n = 239), and Medtronic Endurant (n = 113). The number of other endografts was too small for statistical analysis. Compared to patients treated with Excluder or Endurant, the patients treated with Zenith had significantly lower body mass index (P < .001) and were less likely to be white (P < .001). On the other hand, patients treated with Endurant were less likely to be smoker (P = .016). Patients treated with Zenith had significantly larger ruptured infrarenal abdominal aortic aneurysm diameter (P = .045). The overall mortality was 18% and morbidity 74.3%. There was a statistically significant difference in overall mortality (Zenith = 11.8%, Excluder = 18%, Endurant = 24.8%, P = .033) but not morbidity (P = .808) between the three groups. Post hoc analysis for overall mortality showed only significant difference between Zenith and Endurant. The difference in mortality was not significant in patients presenting with ruptured infrarenal abdominal aortic aneurysm without hypotension (P = .065). On multivariable analysis, treatment with the Endurant endograft was associated with increased mortality compared to Zenith (odds ratio = 3.0 [confidence interval 1.31-6.7]). General anesthesia (odds ratio = 2.67 [confidence interval 1.02-7.02]), rupture with hypotension (odds ratio = 4.49 [confidence interval 2.54-7.95]), and dependent functional status (odds ratio = 5.7 [confidence interval 1.96-16.59]) were independently associated with increased mortality while increasing body mass index (odds ratio = 0.97 [confidence interval 0.95-0.99]) was associated with reduced risk of mortality. CONCLUSIONS This study highlights contemporary outcomes of endovascular aneurysm repair for ruptured infrarenal abdominal aortic aneurysm with relatively low mortality. Endograft type and anesthesia technique are modifiable factors that can potentially improve outcomes. Significant variation in the outcomes of the different endografts warrants further research.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Sameh Yousef
- Section of Cardiac Surgery, Department of Surgery, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, USA
| | - Yawei Zhang
- Department of Surgery, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, USA
| | - Alan Dardik
- Section of Vascular Surgery, Department of Surgery, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, USA
| | - Arnar Geirsson
- Section of Cardiac Surgery, Department of Surgery, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, USA
| | - Cassius I Ochoa Chaar
- Section of Vascular Surgery, Department of Surgery, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, USA
| |
Collapse
|
47
|
Guéroult AM, Khan FA, Stather PW, Harrison SC, Boyle JR. Long-term Outcomes Following Endovascular Aneurysm Repair for Ruptured Abdominal Aortic Aneurysms. J Endovasc Ther 2020; 27:428-435. [PMID: 32517557 DOI: 10.1177/1526602820919901] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/16/2023]
Abstract
Purpose: To investigate the long-term outcomes of endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR) for ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysm (rAAA) from a single center over an 11-year period. Materials and Methods: A retrospective analysis was conducted of 121 patients (median age 78 years; 100 men) with rAAA who underwent emergency EVAR at a single tertiary vascular center from January 2006 to December 2016. The study included only ruptures confirmed by evidence of hematoma on preoperative computed tomography; both iliac and aortic aneurysm ruptures were eligible. The primary outcome measures included mortality and reintervention rates. Kaplan-Meier estimates of survival and freedom from reintervention are reported with the 95% confidence interval (CI). Results: In-hospital and 30-day mortality rates for emergency EVAR were 16.5%; 90-day mortality was 24.0%. The mortality estimates were 27.3% (95% CI 20% to 36%) at 1 year and 61.7% (95% CI 51% to 72%) at 5 years. In the observation period to 2017, 63 reinterventions were performed on 37 patients (30.6%). Median time to the first reintervention was 3.2 years. Freedom from reintervention in surviving patients at 1 year was 86% (95% CI 72% to 94%) and 51% (95% CI 26% to 71%) at 5 years. Four patients (3.3%) had a secondary sac rupture over the study period. Conclusion: Emergency EVAR for ruptured AAA can be performed with acceptable short-term outcomes; however, long-term surveillance is necessary, and reintervention is common.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Aurélien M Guéroult
- Cambridge Vascular Unit, Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Trust, Addenbrooke's Hospital, Cambridge, UK
| | - Farhaan A Khan
- Cambridge Vascular Unit, Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Trust, Addenbrooke's Hospital, Cambridge, UK
| | - Philip W Stather
- Cambridge Vascular Unit, Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Trust, Addenbrooke's Hospital, Cambridge, UK
| | - Seamus C Harrison
- Cambridge Vascular Unit, Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Trust, Addenbrooke's Hospital, Cambridge, UK
| | - Jonathan R Boyle
- Cambridge Vascular Unit, Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Trust, Addenbrooke's Hospital, Cambridge, UK
| |
Collapse
|
48
|
Sultan S, Veith FJ, Ascher E, Ouriel K, Hynes N. NICE Guidelines for AAA Repair: An Enigma. J Endovasc Ther 2020; 27:869-870. [DOI: 10.1177/1526602820941163] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/17/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Sherif Sultan
- National University of Ireland Galway, Galway University Hospital and Galway Clinic, Galway, Ireland
| | - Frank J. Veith
- The Cleveland Clinic Lerner College of Medicine, Cleveland, OH, USA
- The William J. von Liebig Chair in Vascular Surgery, New York University Medical Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Enrico Ascher
- New York University and Division of Vascular Surgery, NYU Langone Brooklyn, New York, NY, USA
| | | | - Niamh Hynes
- Western Vascular Institute, Department of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, Galway University Hospital, Galway Clinic, Galway, Ireland
| |
Collapse
|
49
|
Karthaus EG, Lijftogt N, Vahl A, van der Willik EM, Amodio S, van Zwet EW, Hamming JF. Patients with a Ruptured Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm Are Better Informed in Hospitals with an "EVAR-preferred" Strategy: An Instrumental Variable Analysis of the Dutch Surgical Aneurysm Audit. Ann Vasc Surg 2020; 69:332-344. [PMID: 32554198 DOI: 10.1016/j.avsg.2020.06.015] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/17/2020] [Revised: 05/28/2020] [Accepted: 06/01/2020] [Indexed: 10/24/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND While several observational studies suggested a lower postoperative mortality after minimal invasive endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR) in patients with a ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysm (RAAA) compared to conventional open surgical repair (OSR), landmark randomized controlled trials have not been able to prove the superiority of EVAR over OSR. Randomized controlled trials contain a selected, homogeneous population, influencing external validity. Observational studies are biased and adjustment of confounders can be incomplete. Instrumental variable (IV) analysis (pseudorandomization) may help to answer the question if patients with an RAAA have lower postoperative mortality when undergoing EVAR compared to OSR. METHODS This is an observational study including all patients with an RAAA, registered in the Dutch Surgical Aneurysm Audit between 2013 and 2017. The risk difference (RD) in postoperative mortality (30 days/in-hospital) between patients undergoing EVAR and OSR was estimated, in which adjustment for confounding was performed in 3 ways: linear model adjusted for observed confounders, propensity score model (multivariable logistic regression analysis), and IV analysis (two-stage least square regression), adjusting for observed and unobserved confounders, with the variation in percentage of EVAR per hospital as the IV instrument. RESULTS 2419 patients with an RAAA (1489 OSR and 930 EVAR) were included. Unadjusted postoperative mortality was 34.9% after OSR and 22.6% after EVAR (RD 12.3%, 95% CI 8.5-16%). The RD adjusted for observed confounders using linear regression analysis and propensity score analysis was, respectively, 12.3% (95% CI 9.6-16.7%) and 13.2% (95%CI 9.3-17.1%) in favor of EVAR. Using IV analysis, adjusting for observed and unobserved confounders, RD was 8.9% (95% CI -1.1-18.9%) in favor of EVAR. CONCLUSIONS Adjusting for observed confounders, patients with an RAAA undergoing EVAR had a significant better survival than OSR in a consecutive large cohort. Adjustment for unobserved confounders resulted in a clinical relevant RD. An "EVAR preference strategy" in patients with an RAAA could result in lower postoperative mortality.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Eleonora G Karthaus
- Department of Surgery, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands; Dutch Institute for Clinical Auditing, Leiden, The Netherlands.
| | - Niki Lijftogt
- Department of Surgery, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands; Dutch Institute for Clinical Auditing, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - Anco Vahl
- Department of Surgery, OLVG, Amsterdam, The Netherlands; Department of Clinical Epidemiology, OLVG, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Esmee M van der Willik
- Dutch Institute for Clinical Auditing, Leiden, The Netherlands; Department of Clinical Epidemiology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - Sonia Amodio
- Department of Medical Statistics and Bioinformatics, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - Erik W van Zwet
- Department of Medical Statistics and Bioinformatics, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - Jaap F Hamming
- Department of Surgery, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | | |
Collapse
|
50
|
Wong DJ, Chaikof EL. Safety in numbers as administrative data supports the use of endovascular aneurysm repair in ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysms. J Vasc Surg 2020; 71:1879-1880. [PMID: 32446506 DOI: 10.1016/j.jvs.2019.07.071] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/10/2019] [Accepted: 07/27/2019] [Indexed: 10/24/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Daniel J Wong
- Department of Surgery, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Mass
| | - Elliot L Chaikof
- Department of Surgery, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Mass
| |
Collapse
|