Glucocorticoid dose-dependent risk of type 2 diabetes in six immune-mediated inflammatory diseases: a population-based cohort analysis

High-Dose Steroids, Treatment Escalation, and Healthcare Burden in Myasthenia Gravis: A US Claims-Based Cohort Study

INTRODUCTION

Myasthenia gravis (MG) is a rare neuromuscular autoimmune disease, characterized by chronic, fluctuating muscle weakness and fatigability. Despite established therapies, many patients have inadequately controlled MG. We describe treatment escalation patterns and outcomes for patients with MG between 2010 and 2018.

METHODS

We conducted a retrospective cohort analysis of medical and pharmacy claims data. Patients aged ≥ 18 years at MG diagnosis were included from two US Merative™ MarketScan® databases. MG treatment escalation was defined as an increase of the administered prednisolone-equivalent corticosteroid dose, use of add-on treatments, or treatment switches.

RESULTS

The cohort included 4925 adults with newly diagnosed MG (1102 aged 18-49 and 3823 aged ≥ 50 at first MG diagnosis) from January 1, 2010 to December 31, 2018. Median follow-up was 30.0 months (18-49 group) and 27.5 months (≥ 50 group). Overall, 71.5% (3521/4925) of patients had ≥ 1 MG treatment escalation; escalation with high-dose corticosteroids was the most common type (64.8% [18-49 group] and 58.5% [≥ 50 group]). In the first year post-diagnosis, median (range) maximal daily prednisolone-equivalent corticosteroid dose was 40.0 (20.0-75.0) mg/day (18-49 group) and 40.0 (20.0-70.0) mg/day (≥ 50 group). Treatment breaks and de-escalation led to rescue treatment or treatment re-escalation in most patients. Exacerbations occurred in 26.3% (n = 290; 18-49 group) and 21.6% (n = 825; ≥ 50 group). Healthcare resource utilization (HCRU) and costs were highest in Year 1, with mean MG-related costs per patient between $24,982 (≥ 50 group) and $33,023 (18-49 group).

CONCLUSION

The study findings highlight that MG is inadequately controlled in a substantial proportion of patients despite conventional treatment and high reliance on corticosteroids. Earlier treatment with targeted therapies and improved safety profiles may reduce patient burden, HCRU, and costs.

Improved diagnostic accuracy for polymyalgia rheumatica using FDG-PET/CT with clinical diagnosis or 2012 ACR/EULAR classification criteria

OBJECTIVE

In routine care, clinicians may employ 2-[18F]fluoro-2-deoxy-D-glucose (FDG)-PET/CT to validate their initial clinical diagnosis of PMR. Nevertheless, the diagnostic utility of combining FDG-PET/CT findings with clinical presentation has not been explored. Therefore, this study aimed to investigate whether the diagnostic accuracy for PMR could be enhanced by combining FDG-PET/CT findings with the clinical baseline diagnosis or the 2012 ACR/EULAR clinical classification criteria for PMR.

METHODS

An investigation and a validation cohort were included from two countries, encompassing 66/27 and 36/21 PMR/non-PMR patients, respectively. The cohorts comprised treatment-naïve patients suspected of PMR, who initially received a clinical baseline diagnosis and underwent FDG-PET/CT scans. The FDG-PET/CT Leuven score was applied to classify patients as either PMR or non-PMR and combined with the clinical baseline diagnosis. Final diagnoses were established through clinical follow-up after 12 or six months in the investigation and validation cohorts, respectively.

RESULTS

In the investigation cohort, a clinical baseline diagnosis yielded a sensitivity/specificity of 94%/82%, compared with 78%/70% using the ACR/EULAR criteria. Combining the clinical baseline diagnosis with a positive Leuven score showed a sensitivity/specificity of 80%/93%, compared with 80%/82% for an ACR/EULAR-Leuven score. In the validation cohort, the baseline diagnosis revealed a sensitivity/specificity of 100%/91%, compared with 92%/76% using the ACR/EULAR criteria. Combining FDG-PET/CT with the baseline diagnosis demonstrated a sensitivity/specificity of 83%/95% compared with 89%/81% for the ACR/EULAR-Leuven score.

CONCLUSION

Combining FDG-PET/CT findings with the clinical baseline diagnosis or ACR/EULAR clinical classification criteria can improve the diagnostic specificity for PMR.

Association between asthma and type 2 diabetes in a Swedish adult population: a register-based cross-sectional study

OBJECTIVE

Asthma and type 2 diabetes are two important causes of morbidity globally. We examined both the association of type 2 diabetes with asthma in Swedish adults and the familial co-aggregation of the diseases.

METHODS

We conducted a cross-sectional study of all adults aged 25-85 in Sweden between 2009 and 2013. Asthma and type 2 diabetes status were ascertained from the health registers. Models were adjusted for sex, age, education level, income and country of birth and in a subset, for body mass index (BMI). We further conducted a familial coaggregation analysis to determine if shared familial factors could explain any observed findings.

RESULTS

The study included 5 299 245 participants, 25 292 (0.5%) had both asthma and type 2 diabetes. In the total population, the OR for the association between type 2 diabetes and asthma was 1.47 (95% CI 1.45 to 1.49); in the population of men (1.30 (95% CI 1.27 to 1.32)) and women (1.63 (95% CI 1.60 to 1.66)). The ORs were slightly higher among men (1.51 (95% CI 1.45 to 1.56)) and women (2.04 (95% CI 1.96 to 2.11)) for whom BMI measurements were available but attenuated with adjustment for BMI (1.45 (95% CI 1.40 to 1.51)) and (1.76 (95% CI 1.68 to 1.84)). Diabetes was more likely if a full sibling had asthma than if the sibling did not (1.13 (95% CI 1.10 to 1.15)).

CONCLUSIONS

We found an association between asthma and type 2 diabetes that was sustained after adjusting for BMI, indicating that BMI alone does not explain this relationship. We also found that the two conditions coaggregate in siblings, indicating that the association is partly due to shared familial genetic and environmental risk factors.

Etrasimod Corticosteroid-Free Efficacy, Impact of Concomitant Corticosteroids on Efficacy and Safety, and Corticosteroid-Sparing Effect in Ulcerative Colitis: Analyses of the ELEVATE UC Clinical Program

BACKGROUND

Etrasimod is an oral, once-daily, selective sphingosine 1-phosphate (S1P)1,4,5 receptor modulator for the treatment of moderately to severely active ulcerative colitis (UC). This post hoc analysis reports the efficacy and safety of etrasimod based on baseline corticosteroid (CS) use in the ELEVATE UC clinical program.

METHODS

Patients with UC received etrasimod 2 mg or placebo for up to 52 weeks. CS use was permitted; tapering was recommended from Week 12. Efficacy was assessed at Weeks 12 and 52 in ELEVATE UC 52, and Week 12 in ELEVATE UC 12, for patients in the CS and no-CS subgroups. CS-free efficacy at Week 52 was assessed in patients with baseline CS use.

RESULTS

In ELEVATE UC 52 and ELEVATE UC 12, 93 of 289 (32.2%) and 65 of 238 (27.3%) patients receiving etrasimod and 42 of 144 (29.2%) and 34 of 116 (29.3%) patients receiving placebo, respectively, had concomitant CS use at baseline. In the CS and no-CS subgroups, higher proportions of patients who received etrasimod vs placebo achieved clinical remission (p < 0.05) in ELEVATE UC 52 at Week 12 (CS: 32.3% vs 16.7%; no-CS: 26.0% vs 4.9%) and Week 52 (CS: 31.2% vs 9.5%; no-CS: 33.2% vs 6.9%). In the CS subgroup, significantly more patients receiving etrasimod achieved CS-free clinical remission at Week 52 (31.2% vs 7.1%) compared with those receiving placebo. No increases in infection rates were observed with baseline CS use. Safety was comparable between subgroups.

CONCLUSIONS

Etrasimod demonstrated efficacy in inducing and maintaining remission in both subgroups. CS-free remission was achieved in the CS subgroup. Safety was consistent, with no increase in infections.

CLINICAL TRIAL IDENTIFIERS

NCT03945188; NCT03996369.

Cardiovascular and metabolic outcomes associated with moderate-to-severe atopic dermatitis: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Background

Chronic systemic inflammation in individuals with moderate-to-severe atopic dermatitis (AD) potentially predisposes them to metabolic and cardiovascular diseases. Nevertheless, evidence with regard to such association is limited.

Objective

To assess the association between metabolic and cardiovascular outcomes and moderate-to-severe AD.

Methods

A systematic search was performed through PubMed, Scopus, EMBASE, and Cochrane for population-based studies that addressed the effects of moderate-to-severe AD on metabolic and cardiovascular outcomes compared with the general population from inception to August 31, 2023. Meta-analysis was performed using the random effects model. The pooled odds ratio (OR) and certainty of evidence for each outcome were reported.

Results

We included 11 studies, 4 retrospective cohorts, 1 prospective cohort, 4 cross-sectional, and 2 case-control studies involving 405,170 moderate-to-severe AD patients compared to 4,591,478 unaffected controls. Moderate-to-severe AD was associated with a higher risk of myocardial infarction with an OR (95% CI) of 1.33 (1.07, 1.65), angina 1.33 (1.06, 1.66), heart failure 1.56 (1.28, 1.90), stroke 1.45 (1.21, 1.74), hypertension 1.38 (1.18, 1.63), dyslipidemia 1.27 (1.15, 1.41), and metabolic syndrome 1.24 (1.05, 1.42) with very low certainty of evidence. No significantly increased risk of cardiovascular death with an odds ratio (95% CI) of 1.81 (0.96, 3.44) and diabetes of 1.24 (0.91, 1.68) was observed. High heterogeneity was observed in most studies for all of the outcomes.

Conclusion

Our meta-analysis demonstrated a modest but significant association between moderate-to-severe AD and increased susceptibility to metabolic and cardiovascular diseases. Initial assessment of cardiovascular and metabolic risk for patients with moderate-to-severe AD should be considered to enable early management strategies.

Saudi National Clinical Practice Guidelines for Management of Adult Systemic Lupus Erythematosus

OBJECTIVE

To provide evidence-based clinical practice recommendations for managing Systemic Lupus Erythematosus (SLE) in Saudi Arabia.

METHODS

This EULAR-adapted national guideline in which a multidisciplinary task force utilized the modified Delphi method to develop 31 clinical key questions. A systematic literature review was conducted to update the evidence since the EULAR publication. After reaching a consensus agreement, two rounds of voting and group discussion were conducted to generate consolidated recommendations/ statements.

RESULTS

A significant number of patients in Saudi Arabia experience delays in accessing rheumatologists, highlighting the significance of timely referral to SLE specialists or rheumatologists to ensure accurate diagnosis and prompt treatment. The primary goal of Glucocorticoid (GC) therapy in SLE patients is to establish disease control with a minimum dose and duration. Steroid-sparing agent utilization facilitates steroid-sparing goals. Hydroxychloroquine is recommended for all SLE patients, though physicians must carefully monitor toxicity and prioritize regular medication adherence assessment. SLE management during pregnancy starts from preconception time by assessing disease activity, major organ involvement, hypercoagulability status, and concomitant diseases that may negatively impact maternal and fetal outcomes. Multidisciplinary care with close monitoring may optimize both maternal and fetal outcomes. For patients with antiphospholipid antibodies, low-dose aspirin prophylaxis is recommended. Also, Long-term anticoagulant medications are fundamental to prevent secondary antiphospholipid syndrome due to high thrombosis recurrence.

CONCLUSION

This Saudi National Clinical Practice guidelines for SLE management provide evidence- based recommendations and guidance for healthcare providers in Saudi Arabia who are managing patients with SLE. These guidelines will help to standardize healthcare service, improve provider education, and perhaps lead to better treatment outcomes for SLE patients.

Metabolic stress in patients with acute severe ulcerative colitis - a single-center cohort study

Background and aims

Acute severe ulcerative colitis (ASUC) is characterized by systemic inflammation, which may initiate an acute-phase response leading to hypercatabolism. Patients with ASUC are usually treated with high-dose steroids that may further accelerate the metabolic response and lead to hyperglycemia and insulin resistance. Nevertheless, the degree of synergy between inflammation and steroid treatment and their influence on the insulin resistance remains unknown. We aimed to measure the degree of metabolic stress including insulin resistance in patients with ASUC during admission and three weeks after discharge.

Methods

This single-center cohort study was conducted in adult patients with ASUC, defined and assessed by Truelove and Witt's criteria. Indirect calorimetry, bioelectrical impedance analysis, and the Homeostatic Model Assessment for Insulin Resistance (HOMA-IR) were applied at baseline and at follow-up three weeks after discharge.

Results

Among the 22 patients admitted during the project period, 15 provided consent for participation in the study. Median C-reactive protein at inclusion was 37.6 [4; 154.7]. Both median HOMA-IR and fasting plasma glucose were markedly increased at inclusion (median 8.6 [3.8; 14.1] and 7.1 [6; 8.7], respectively), and both had decreased significantly three weeks after discharge (p=0.0036 and p=0.0039, respectively). No significant differences were observed in resting energy expenditure or anthropometric measurements from baseline to follow-up.

Conclusion

Patients with ASUC presented with marked insulin resistance, indicating that the days following admission and high-dose steroid treatment are particularly vulnerable. Despite improvement at three-week follow-up, patients still exhibited insulin resistance compared with relevant control groups.

Clinical trial registration

ClinicalTrials.gov, identifier NCT0527183.

Neuropsychiatric involvement in systemic lupus erythematosus contributes to organ damage beyond the nervous system: a post-hoc analysis of 5 phase III randomized clinical trials

OBJECTIVE

To investigate the association between neuropsychiatric systemic lupus erythematosus (NPSLE) and SLICC/ACR damage index (SDI) items, especially non-neuropsychiatric items.

METHODS

Baseline data from five phase III trials (BLISS-52, BLISS-76, BLISS-SC, BLISS-NEA, EMBRACE) were analysed. NPSLE involvement was defined as NP BILAG A/B/C/D (n = 272); NP BILAG E denoted non-neuropsychiatric SLE (n = 3273). We employed multivariable logistic regression analysis adjusting for age, sex, disease duration, and ethnicity.

RESULTS

The median (IQR) and mean ± SD SDI scores were 0 (0-1) and 0.62 ± 1.09. Compared with the non-neuropsychiatric SLE group, NPSLE patients were more likely to develop damage (adjusted (a)OR = 2.86; 95% CI = 2.28-3.59). This held true also after suppression of the NP SDI items (aOR = 1.70; 95% CI = 1.36-2.12). Beyond the neuropsychiatric domain, NPSLE was associated with damage in the cardiovascular (aOR = 2.63; 95% CI = 1.75-3.95), musculoskeletal (aOR = 1.90; 95% CI = 1.43-2.52), and skin (aOR = 1.54; 95% CI = 1.06-2.22) SDI domains. Dissecting domains into items, NPSLE was associated with coronary artery disease (aOR = 3.08; 95% CI = 1.44-6.58), myocardial infraction (aOR = 3.11; 95% CI = 1.54-6.27), muscle atrophy (aOR = 3.34; 2.16-5.16), scarring alopecia (aOR = 1.79; 95% CI = 1.19-2.70), bowel infarction (aOR = 1.98; 95% CI = 1.20-3.26), retinopathy (aOR = 2.23; 95% CI = 1.15-4.32), and premature gonadal failure (aOR = 2.10; 95% CI = 1.11-3.90).

CONCLUSION

The intricate association between NPSLE and damage accrual extends beyond the nervous system to also comprise the musculoskeletal, skin, and cardiovascular organ systems.

Risk of diabetes mellitus in systemic lupus erythematosus: systematic review and meta-analysis

OBJECTIVE

To investigate the risk of DM and evaluate the impact of SLE therapies on the risk of developing DM in patients with SLE.

METHODS

Electronic database searches of PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library and Web of Science were performed from inception to February 2023. Cohort and cross-sectional studies that analysed the risk of DM in patients with SLE were included. The associations between diabetes and antirheumatic agents, such as antimalarials and glucocorticoids, were analysed in cohort studies. Data were pooled using fixed- or random-effects meta-analysis to estimate pooled odd ratios (OR), relative risks (RR) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs). This study was registered with PROSPERO (CRD42023402774).

RESULTS

A total of 37 studies (23 cross-sectional and 14 cohort studies) involving 266 537 patients with SLE were included. The pooled analyses from cross-sectional studies and cohort studies did not show an increased risk of DM in SLE patients (OR = 1.05, 95% CI 0.87-1.27; P = 0.63 and RR = 1.32, 95% CI 0.93-1.87; P = 0.12, respectively). However, several cohort studies consistently demonstrated a reduced risk of diabetes with antimalarials, while glucocorticoid use has been associated with an increased risk of developing diabetes. Age, sex, hypertension and immunosuppressants have not been identified as risk factors for DM in SLE patients.

CONCLUSION

Although there was no increased risk of DM in patients with SLE compared with controls, HCQ users or adherents had a decreased risk, whereas glucocorticoid users had an increased risk.

Causal effects of inflammatory bowel disease on risk of type 2 diabetes: a two-sample multivariable Mendelian randomization study

AIM

This study aimed to explore the causal association between inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) and the risk of type 2 diabetes (T2D) based on a two-sample Mendelian randomization (MR) study.

METHODS

Summary single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP)-phenotype association data were obtained from published two genome-wide association studies (GWAS) including SNPs related to IBD, UC, or CD in European participants (n = 71,997) and East Asian participants (n = 16,805). Two GWAS including SNPs associated with T2D included 655,666 Europeans and 433,540 East Asians. A series of screening processes were performed to select qualified instrumental SNPs strongly related to exposure. We applied the inverse variance weighted (IVW), the MR-Egger regression, and the weighted median to estimate the causal effects of IBD, ulcerative colitis (UC) or Crohn' disease (CD) on T2D. Cochran's Q test was conducted to evaluate the statistical heterogeneity between SNPs in the IVW method. The leave-one-out analysis was employed to assess whether the results were caused by any single SNP associated with IBD, UC, or CD. Odds ratio (OR) and 95% confidence interval (CI) were calculated.

RESULTS

The IVW results demonstrated that IBD could increase the risk of T2D in the European population (OR = 1.0230, 95%CI: 1.0073-1.0390). UC was positively associated with the risk of T2D according to the weighted median (OR = 1.0274, 95%CI: 1.0009-1.0546) and IVW (OR = 1.0244, 95%CI: 1.0071-1.0421) results in the European population. The IVW results indicated that the CD was positively associated with the risk of T2D in the European population (OR = 1.0187, 95%CI: 1.0045-1.0330). In the East Asian population, there are no associations between the IBD, UC, or CD and the risk of T2D (all P > 0.05). MVMR results revealed that the causal effect UC on T2D was still statistically significant after including body mass index (BMI) or low-density lipoprotein (LDL).

CONCLUSION

IBD, UC, or CD had causal effects on the risk of T2D in the European population, which might provide evidence for the prevention of T2D in patients with IBD, UC, or CD.

Prednisone use, disease activity and the occurrence of hyperglycaemia and diabetes in patients with early rheumatoid arthritis: a 10-year subanalysis of the BeSt study

OBJECTIVES

To assess whether prednisone use and/or disease activity score (DAS) are associated with the development of hyperglycaemia and diabetes in rheumatoid arthritis (RA).

METHODS

We included 504 non-diabetic early RA patients from the BeSt study (Dutch acronym for treatment strategies). Patients were randomised to four DAS-steered treatment arms and followed for 10 years. The associations between DAS and prednisone use with glucose levels and the occurrence of hyperglycaemia over time were assessed with linear and logistic mixed effects regression models. Development of diabetes was analysed with Cox regression. Sensitivity analyses were performed in patients who had a first episode of hyperglycaemia.

RESULTS

31 of 504 patients (6.2%) with a mean age of 54 years developed diabetes during follow-up; 11 of these (35%) had received prior treatment with prednisone. Prednisone use was not associated with development of hyperglycaemia or diabetes after correction for multiple testing in main or sensitivity analyses. In the main analyses, DAS was significantly associated with development of diabetes (HR 1.802 per 1 point DAS increase, 95% CI 1.284 to 2.529) but not with glucose levels nor hyperglycaemia. In patients with previous hyperglycaemia, DAS was associated with glucose levels, recurrence of hyperglycaemia and diabetes.

CONCLUSIONS

In non-diabetic early RA patients, the use of prednisone was not associated with developing hyperglycaemia or diabetes. However, high DAS increased the risk of diabetes. Potential risks associated with prednisone use may have been mitigated by its effect on DAS.

Moon-like Facies by Glucocorticoid Is Associated With the Development of Diabetes and Body Image Disturbance

Context

Moon-like facies (MLF) are a typical side effect of glucocorticoid (GC) therapy; however, its predisposing factors, relationship with GC-induced complications, and effects on body image are not well understood.

Objective

This study aimed to determine the predisposing factors for MLF during GC therapy; its association with GC-induced diabetes, hypertension, and dyslipidemia; and its effects on body image.

Methods

This prospective observational study spanned 24 weeks and targeted patients who received GC therapy at the University of Yamanashi Hospital from June 2020 to August 2022. The MLF was defined based on the following 3 factors: (1) an increase in facial measurement lengths, (2) subjective facial changes by patients' self-assessment using a visual analog scale; (3) objective and qualitative facial changes assessed by physicians. We examined the predisposing factors for MLF and the association of MLF with GC-induced diabetes, hypertension, dyslipidemia, and body image.

Results

The cumulative incidence rate of MLF at 24 weeks was 37.6%. Predisposing factors for MLF were an initial oral prednisolone dosage of ≥ 30 mg/day [odds ratio (OR) 63.91, 95% confidence interval (CI) 5.82-701.81] and female (OR 6.66, 95% CI 1.35-32.79). MLF showed a significant association with the onset of GC-induced diabetes (OR 6.58, 95% CI 1.25-34.74). MLF was also an independent factor contributing to body image disturbance (β = -18.94, P = .01).

Conclusion

MLF contributes to body image disturbance and is associated with the development of GC-induced diabetes; therefore, it is clinically important as a physical manifestation of GC therapy.

Impact of subcutaneous belimumab on disease activity, patient satisfaction, and metabolic profile in long-lasting systemic lupus erythematosus

OBJECTIVE

Atherosclerosis is a major complication of systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) and is exacerbated by the disease itself, drug toxicity, and metabolic syndrome. Although belimumab (BEL) can ameliorate disease activity and reduce prednisolone (PSL) dose in SLE, its effect on metabolic profiles is obscure. We aimed to assess the effects of subcutaneous BEL on disease activity and metabolic profiles.

METHODS

A total of 106 patients with SLE who received subcutaneous BEL were included, and 76 patients who started BEL treatment at least 1 year prior were evaluated. Clinical information, including retention rate, disease activity, renal outcome, patient satisfaction, and metabolic profiles, were retrospectively analysed.

RESULTS

The retention rate of BEL was > 80% after 2 years, and ineffectiveness and pain were the major reasons for discontinuation of BEL treatment. Satisfaction with side effects was higher in the BEL group than that in the PSL group. Belimumab significantly improved disease activity, lupus nephritis, and PSL dosage, with a median reduction of 4 mg/day. These effects were observed in active disease and positive C1q-binding immune complex, and PSL reduction ≥ 5 mg was achievable in such cases. Patients with PSL reduction of ≥ 5 mg showed significantly lower blood low-density lipoprotein and triglyceride by 13 and 17 mg/dL, respectively, while those with PSL reduction of < 5 mg remained unaltered.

CONCLUSION

Subcutaneous BEL was effective in improving disease activity and proteinuria in patients with chronic disease while reducing PSL. Reduction in PSL by BEL also improved lipid status, which could synergistically reduce cardiovascular risk in SLE. Key Points • Significant reduction of disease activity, proteinuria, and prednisolone was observed in patients using subcutaneous belimumab. • Patient satisfaction was higher in terms of side effects in subcutaneous belimumab compared with prednisolone. • Reduction in prednisolone by belimumab contributed to the improvement of lipid status and would reduce the cardiovascular risk.

The effect of different types of oral or intravenous corticosteroids on capillary blood glucose levels in hospitalized inpatients with and without diabetes

PURPOSE

This study investigated: (1) the type of corticosteroid associated with the greatest degree of hyperglycemia, assessed using bedside capillary blood glucose monitoring, in hospitalized patients; and (2) the pattern of hyperglycemia throughout the day with the use of each type of corticosteroid.

METHODS

This single-center, retrospective study used data from 964 adult inpatients receiving oral or IV corticosteroids. Data on capillary blood glucose concentrations and time taken over 7 days were collected. A mixed model for repeated measures was applied to investigate changes in glucose concentration over time with the use of four different corticosteroids. An autoregressive covariance structure was used to model correlations between repeated measurements.

FINDINGS

Across all 7 days, the mean blood glucose concentration was greater with dexamethasone compared to that with hydrocortisone (mean difference, 16.6 mg/dL [95% CI, 8.1-24.8] [0.92 mmol/L (95% CI, 0.45-1.38)]) or prednisolone (mean difference, 20.0 mg/dL [95% CI, 14.2-25.7] [1.11 mmol/L (95% CI, 0.79-1.43)]). The mean blood glucose concentration was greater with methylprednisolone compared to that with hydrocortisone (mean difference, 23.9 mg/dL [95% CI, 11.3-36.4] [1.33 mmol/L (95% CI, 0.63-2.02)]), and with methylprednisolone versus prednisolone (mean difference, 27.4 mg/dL [95% CI, 16.4-38.3] [1.52 mmol/L (95% CI, 0.91-2.13)]). There were no significant differences in the patterns of hyperglycemia at six time points of the day with each type of corticosteroid.

IMPLICATIONS

Treatment with oral or IV dexamethasone or methylprednisolone was associated with greater hyperglycemia in comparison to prednisolone and hydrocortisone. More vigorous monitoring and intervention, when necessary, are suggested in adult inpatients receiving corticosteroids, in particular dexamethasone and methylprednisolone.

Early referral of patients with suspected polymyalgia rheumatica - A systematic review

INTRODUCTION

Prompt diagnosis and treatment of polymyalgia rheumatica (PMR) is crucial to prevent long-term complications and improve patient outcomes. However, there is currently no standardized approach to referral of suspected PMR patients to rheumatologists, leading to inconsistent management practices. The objective of this systematic review was to clarify the existing evidence regarding the following aspects of early management strategies in patients with suspected PMR: diagnostic strategies, GCA screening, glucocorticoid initiation prior to referral, value of shared care and value of fast track clinic.

METHODS

Two authors performed a systematic literature search, data extraction and risk of bias assessment independently. The literature search was conducted in Embase, MEDLINE (PubMed) and Cochrane. Studies were included if they contained cohorts of suspected PMR patients and evaluated the efficacy of different diagnostic strategies for PMR, screening for giant cell arteritis (GCA), starting glucocorticoids before referral to secondary care, shared care, or fast-track clinics.

RESULTS

From 2,437 records excluding duplicates, 14 studies met the inclusion criteria. Among these, 10 studies investigated the diagnostic accuracy of various diagnostic strategies with the majority evaluating different clinical approaches, but none of them showed consistently high performance. However, 4 studies on shared care and fast-track clinics showed promising results, including reduced hospitalization rates, lower starting doses of glucocorticoids, and faster PMR diagnosis.

CONCLUSION

This review emphasizes the sparse evidence of early management and referral strategies for patients with suspected PMR. Additionally, screening and diagnostic strategies for differentiating PMR from other diseases, including concurrent GCA, require clarification. Fast-track clinics may have potential to aid patients with PMR in the future, but studies will be needed to determine the appropriate pre-referral work-up.

Treating the Side Effects of Exogenous Glucocorticoids; Can We Separate the Good From the Bad?

It is estimated that 2% to 3% of the population are currently prescribed systemic or topical glucocorticoid treatment. The potent anti-inflammatory action of glucocorticoids to deliver therapeutic benefit is not in doubt. However, the side effects associated with their use, including central weight gain, hypertension, insulin resistance, type 2 diabetes (T2D), and osteoporosis, often collectively termed iatrogenic Cushing's syndrome, are associated with a significant health and economic burden. The precise cellular mechanisms underpinning the differential action of glucocorticoids to drive the desirable and undesirable effects are still not completely understood. Faced with the unmet clinical need to limit glucocorticoid-induced adverse effects alongside ensuring the preservation of anti-inflammatory actions, several strategies have been pursued. The coprescription of existing licensed drugs to treat incident adverse effects can be effective, but data examining the prevention of adverse effects are limited. Novel selective glucocorticoid receptor agonists and selective glucocorticoid receptor modulators have been designed that aim to specifically and selectively activate anti-inflammatory responses based upon their interaction with the glucocorticoid receptor. Several of these compounds are currently in clinical trials to evaluate their efficacy. More recently, strategies exploiting tissue-specific glucocorticoid metabolism through the isoforms of 11β-hydroxysteroid dehydrogenase has shown early potential, although data from clinical trials are limited. The aim of any treatment is to maximize benefit while minimizing risk, and within this review we define the adverse effect profile associated with glucocorticoid use and evaluate current and developing strategies that aim to limit side effects but preserve desirable therapeutic efficacy.

Common co-morbidities in polymyalgia rheumatica and giant cell arteritis: cross-sectional study in UK Biobank

Objective

The aim was to determine prevalent co-morbidities in cases with PMR or GCA compared with matched controls.

Methods

This was a nested, cross-sectional case-control study within the UK Biobank, which recruited participants aged 40-69 years. Case status was defined as self-reported prior diagnosis of PMR or GCA. Ten controls per case were matched for age, sex, ethnicity and assessment centre. Associations with selected self-reported co-morbidities were studied using conditional logistic regression.

Results

Of PMR (n = 1036) or GCA (n = 102) cases, 72% were female, 98% White, and 58% reported current use of glucocorticoids. Mean age was 63 years. At the time of the assessment visit, compared with controls, PMR/GCA cases were more likely to report poor general health and at least several days of low mood in the past 2 weeks. PMR was associated with hypothyroidism [odds ratio (OR) = 1.34; 95% CI = 1.07, 1.67] and ever-use of HRT (OR = 1.26; 95% CI = 1.07, 1.47). Regarding common co-morbidities, PMR and GCA were both associated with hypertension (PMR: OR = 1.21; 95% CI = 1.06, 1.39; GCA: OR = 1.86; 95% CI = 1.23, 2.81) and cataract (PMR: OR = 1.51; 95% CI = 1.19, 1.93; GCA: OR = 3.84; 95% CI = 2.23, 6.60). Additionally, GCA was associated with depression (OR = 3.05; 95% CI = 1.59, 5.85). Neither condition was associated with diabetes.

Conclusion

Participants with a history of PMR/GCA, including those not currently taking glucocorticoids, rated their health as poorer than matched controls. Some previously described disease associations (hypothyroidism and early menopause) were replicated. Hypertension and cataract, both of which can be exacerbated by long-term glucocorticoid therapy, were over-represented in both diseases, particularly GCA.

Severe COVID-19 associated hyperglycemia is caused by beta cell dysfunction: a prospective cohort study

BACKGROUND

COVID-19, an infectious disease caused by SARS-CoV-2, was shown to be associated with an increased risk of new-onset diabetes. Mechanisms contributing to the development of hyperglycemia are still unclear. We aimed to study whether hyperglycemia is related to insulin resistance and/or beta cell dysfunction.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Survivors of severe COVID-19 but without a known history of diabetes were examined at baseline (T0) and after 3 (T3) and 6 (T6) months: corticosteroids use, indirect calorimetry, and OGTT. Insulin response and sensitivity (IS) were expressed as insulinogenic (IGI), disposition (DI), and Matsuda insulin sensitivity index (ISI). Resting energy expenditure (REE) and respiratory quotient (RQ) was calculated from the gas exchange and nitrogen losses.

RESULTS

26 patients (out of 37) with complete outcome data were included in the analysis (age ~59.0 years; BMI ~ 30.4, 35% women). Patients were hypermetabolic at T0 (30.3 ± 4.0 kcal/kg lean mass/day, ~120% predicted) but REE declined over 6 months (ΔT6-T0 mean dif. T6-T0 (95% CI): -5.4 (-6.8, -4.1) kcal/kg FFM/day, p < 0.0001). 17 patients at T0 and 13 patients at T6 had hyperglycemia. None of the patients had positive islet autoantibodies. Insulin sensitivity in T0 was similarly low in hyperglycemic (H) and normoglycemic patients (N) (T0 ISI_H = 3.12 ± 1.23, ISI_N = 3.47 ± 1.78, p = 0.44), whereas insulin response was lower in the H group (DI_H = 3.05 ± 1.79 vs DI_N = 8.40 ± 5.42, p = 0.003). Over 6 months ISI (ΔT6-T0 mean dif. T6-T0 for ISI (95% CI): 1.84 (0.45, 3.24), p = 0.01)) increased in the H group only.

CONCLUSIONS

Patients with severe COVID-19 had increased REE and insulin resistance during the acute phase due to the infection and corticosteroid use, but these effects do not persist during the follow-up period. Only patients with insufficient insulin response developed hyperglycemia, indicating that beta cell dysfunction, rather than insulin resistance, was responsible for its occurrence.

New-onset type 1 diabetes and severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 infection

Type 1 diabetes (T1D) is a condition characterized by an absolute deficiency of insulin. Loss of insulin-producing pancreatic islet β cells is one of the many causes of T1D. Viral infections have long been associated with new-onset T1D and the balance between virulence and host immunity determines whether the viral infection would lead to T1D. Herein, we detail the dynamic interaction of pancreatic β cells with severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) and the host immune system with respect to new-onset T1D. Importantly, β cells express the crucial entry receptors and multiple studies confirmed that β cells are infected by SARS-CoV-2. Innate immune system effectors, such as natural killer cells, can eliminate such infected β cells. Although CD4⁺ CD25⁺ FoxP3⁺ regulatory T (T_REG ) cells provide immune tolerance to prevent the destruction of the islet β-cell population by autoantigen-specific CD8⁺ T cells, it can be speculated that SARS-CoV-2 infection may compromise self-tolerance by depleting T_REG -cell numbers or diminishing T_REG -cell functions by repressing Forkhead box P3 (FoxP3) expression. However, the expansion of β cells by self-duplication, and regeneration from progenitor cells, could effectively replace lost β cells. Appearance of islet autoantibodies following SARS-CoV-2 infection was reported in a few cases, which could imply a breakdown of immune tolerance in the pancreatic islets. However, many of the cases with newly diagnosed autoimmune response following SARS-CoV-2 infection also presented with significantly high HbA_1c (glycated hemoglobin) levels that indicated progression of an already set diabetes, rather than new-onset T1D. Here we review the potential underlying mechanisms behind loss of functional β-cell mass as a result of SARS-CoV-2 infection that can trigger new-onset T1D.

Metabolic features and glucocorticoid-induced comorbidities in patients with giant cell arteritis and polymyalgia rheumatica in a Dutch and Danish cohort

OBJECTIVES

Giant cell arteritis (GCA) and polymyalgia rheumatica (PMR) are age-associated inflammatory diseases that frequently overlap. Both diseases require long-term treatment with glucocorticoids (GCs), often associated with comorbidities. Previous population-based cohort studies reported that an unhealthier metabolic profile might prevent the development of GCA. Here, we report metabolic features before start of treatment and during treatment in patients with GCA and PMR.

METHODS

In the Dutch GCA/PMR/SENEX (GPS) cohort, we analysed metabolic features and prevalence of comorbidities (type 2 diabetes, hypercholesterolaemia, hypertension, obesity and cataract) in treatment-naïve patients with GCA (n=50) and PMR (n=42), and compared those with the population-based Lifelines cohort (n=91). To compare our findings in the GPS cohort, we included data from patients with GCA (n=52) and PMR (n=25) from the Aarhus cohort. Laboratory measurements, comorbidities and GC use were recorded for up to 5 years in the GPS cohort.

RESULTS

Glycated haemoglobin levels tended to be higher in treatment-naïve patients with GCA, whereas high-density lipoprotein, low-density lipoprotein and cholesterol levels were lower compared with the Lifelines population. Data from the Aarhus cohort were aligned with the findings obtained in the GPS cohort. Presence of comorbidities at baseline did not predict long-term GC requirement. The incidence of diabetes, obesity and cataract among patients with GCA increased upon initiation of GC treatment.

CONCLUSION

Data from the GCA and PMR cohorts imply a metabolic dysregulation in treatment-naïve patients with GCA, but not in patients with PMR. Treatment with GCs led to the rise of comorbidities and an unhealthier metabolic profile, stressing the need for prednisone-sparing targeted treatment in these vulnerable patients.

Efficacy, duration of use and safety of glucocorticoids: a systematic literature review informing the 2022 update of the EULAR recommendations for the management of rheumatoid arthritis

This systematic literature review (SLR) regarding the efficacy, duration of use and safety of glucocorticoids (GCs), was performed to inform the 2022 update of the EULAR recommendations for the management of rheumatoid arthritis (RA). Studies on GC efficacy were identified from a separate search on the efficacy of disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (DMARDs). A combined search was performed for the duration of use and safety of GCs in RA patients. Dose-defined and time-defined GC treatment of any dose and duration (excluding intra-articular GCs) prescribed in combination with other DMARDs were considered. Results are presented descriptively. Two included studies confirmed the efficacy of GC bridging as initial therapy, with equal efficacy after 2 years of initial doses of 30 mg/day compared with 60 mg/day prednisone. Based on a recently performed SLR, in clinical trials most patients starting initial GC bridging are able to stop GCs within 12 (22% patients continued on GCs) to 24 months (10% patients continued on GCs). The safety search included 12 RCTs and 21 observational studies. Well-known safety risks of GC use were confirmed, including an increased risk of osteoporotic fractures, serious infections, diabetes and mortality. Data on cardiovascular outcomes were Inconsistent. Overall, safety risks increased with increasing dose and/or duration, but evidence on which dose is safe was conflicting. In conclusion, this SLR has confirmed the efficacy of GCs in the treatment of RA. In clinical trials, most patients have shown to be able to stop GCs within 12-24 months. Well-known safety risks of GC use have been confirmed, but with heterogeneity between studies.

Increased risk of type 2 diabetes in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus: A nationwide cohort study in Taiwan

Data on the risk of developing diabetes in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) are limited and have yielded mixed results. We conducted a nationwide cohort study to investigate the risk of subsequent type 2 diabetes in patients with SLE compared with matched non-SLE controls. Data were collected from the Taiwan National Health Insurance Research Database. Adult patients newly diagnosed with SLE between 2003 to 2010 were identified as the study cohort. The non-SLE group was matched for age, gender, and date of initial diagnosis as the comparison cohort. A total of 6159 SLE patients (87.90% female, mean age 38.79 years) were identified during this period. Of these, 206 (3.34%) developed type 2 diabetes. The 3-year incidence of type 2 diabetes was significantly higher in the SLE cohort than in the control group (130.26 vs 101.18 cases per 10,000 person-years), with an adjusted hazard ratio of 1.22 (95% confidence interval [CI] 1.04-1.44), after adjusting for age, gender, underlying comorbidities, and monthly income. Stratified analyses showed that women with SLE and low-income SLE patients (monthly income < 20,000 New Taiwan Dollar) had a higher risk of type 2 diabetes than non-SLE controls, with adjusted hazard ratios of 1.21 (95% CI 1.01-1.45) and 1.36 (95% CI 1.10-1.69), respectively. Patients with newly diagnosed SLE had a 22% increased risk of developing type 2 diabetes during the 3-year follow-up period compared with matched controls.

A methodological framework for AI-assisted diagnosis of active aortitis using radiomic analysis of FDG PET-CT images: Initial analysis

BACKGROUND

The aim of this study was to explore the feasibility of assisted diagnosis of active (peri-)aortitis using radiomic imaging biomarkers derived from [18F]-Fluorodeoxyglucose Positron Emission Tomography-Computed Tomography (FDG PET-CT) images.

METHODS

The aorta was manually segmented on FDG PET-CT in 50 patients with aortitis and 25 controls. Radiomic features (RF) (n = 107), including SUV (Standardized Uptake Value) metrics, were extracted from the segmented data and harmonized using the ComBat technique. Individual RFs and groups of RFs (i.e., signatures) were used as input in Machine Learning classifiers. The diagnostic utility of these classifiers was evaluated with area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) and accuracy using the clinical diagnosis as the ground truth.

RESULTS

Several RFs had high accuracy, 84% to 86%, and AUC scores 0.83 to 0.97 when used individually. Radiomic signatures performed similarly, AUC 0.80 to 1.00.

CONCLUSION

A methodological framework for a radiomic-based approach to support diagnosis of aortitis was outlined. Selected RFs, individually or in combination, showed similar performance to the current standard of qualitative assessment in terms of AUC for identifying active aortitis. This framework could support development of a clinical decision-making tool for a more objective and standardized assessment of aortitis.

New-Onset Diabetes Mellitus, Hypertension, Dyslipidaemia as Sequelae of COVID-19 Infection-Systematic Review

As the population recovers from the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic, a subset of individuals is emerging as post-coronavirus disease (post-COVID) patients who experience multifactorial long-term symptoms several weeks after the initial recovery from severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection. The aim of this systematic review is to present the latest scientific reports that evaluate changes in glucose levels, blood pressure readings and lipid profiles after recovery from COVID-19 to verify the hypothesis that new-onset diabetes mellitus, arterial hypertension and dyslipidaemia are a possible sequela of a COVID-19 infection. The open access databases PubMed and Google Scholar were searched. Articles investigating patients with residual clinical signs and biochemical alteration indicating diabetes, hypertension and dyslipidaemia at least a month after recovering from COVID-19 were included. It has been shown that a select number of patients were diagnosed with new-onset diabetes, arterial hypertension and dyslipidaemia after COVID-19 infection. Alterations in glucose levels, blood pressure and lipid profiles months after initial infection shows the importance of considering diabetes mellitus, arterial hypertension and dyslipidaemia as part of the multifactorial diagnostic criteria post-COVID to better provide evidence-based clinical care.

Fresh insights into glucocorticoid-induced diabetes mellitus and new therapeutic directions

Glucocorticoid hormones were discovered to have use as potent anti-inflammatory and immunosuppressive therapeutics in the 1940s and their continued use and development have successfully revolutionized the management of acute and chronic inflammatory diseases. However, long-term use of glucocorticoids is severely hampered by undesirable metabolic complications, including the development of type 2 diabetes mellitus. These effects occur due to glucocorticoid receptor activation within multiple tissues, which results in inter-organ crosstalk that increases hepatic glucose production and inhibits peripheral glucose uptake. Despite the high prevalence of glucocorticoid-induced hyperglycaemia associated with their routine clinical use, treatment protocols for optimal management of the metabolic adverse effects are lacking or underutilized. The type, dose and potency of the glucocorticoid administered dictates the choice of hypoglycaemic intervention (non-insulin or insulin therapy) that should be provided to patients. The longstanding quest to identify dissociated glucocorticoid receptor agonists to separate the hyperglycaemic complications of glucocorticoids from their therapeutically beneficial anti-inflammatory effects is ongoing, with selective glucocorticoid receptor modulators in clinical testing. Promising areas of preclinical research include new mechanisms to disrupt glucocorticoid signalling in a tissue-selective manner and the identification of novel targets that can selectively dissociate the effects of glucocorticoids. These research arms share the ultimate goal of achieving the anti-inflammatory actions of glucocorticoids without the metabolic consequences.

Stationäre Patienten mit der Nebendiagnose Diabetes mellitus: klinische Relevanz

In deutschen Krankenhäusern werden jährlich etwa 3 Mio. Patienten mit Diabetes stationär behandelt, davon 93 % nicht wegen, sondern mit dieser Erkrankung. In einzelnen Fachabteilungen liegt bei bis zu 40 % der Patienten die Nebendiagnose Diabetes vor. Sie haben oft eine relevante Komorbidität und im Vergleich zu Krankenhauspatienten ohne Diabetes eine längere stationäre Verweildauer, entwickeln deutlich häufiger Komplikationen und müssen öfter kurzfristig wieder aufgenommen werden. In dieser Übersicht wird die klinische Relevanz der Nebendiagnose Diabetes mellitus für Krankenhauspatienten besprochen.

Endocrine Follow-up During Post-Acute COVID-19: Practical Recommendations Based on Available Clinical Evidence

OBJECTIVE

COVID-19 affects multiple endocrine organ systems during the disease course. However, follow-up data post-COVID-19 is scarce; hitherto available limited data suggest that most of the biochemical endocrine dysfunctions observed during acute phase of COVID-19 tend to improve after recovery. Hence, we aim to provide a rational approach toward endocrine follow-up of patients during post-acute COVID-19.

METHODS

We performed a literature review across PubMed/MEDLINE database looking into the effects of COVID-19 on endocrine system and subsequent long-term endocrine sequelae. Accordingly, we have presented a practical set of recommendations regarding endocrine follow-up post-acute COVID-19.

RESULTS

COVID-19 can lead to new-onset hyperglycemia/diabetes mellitus or worsening of dysglycemia in patients with preexisting diabetes mellitus. Hence, those with preexisting diabetes mellitus should ensure optimum glycemic control in the post-COVID-19 period. New-onset diabetes mellitus has been described post-acute COVID-19; hence, a selected group of patients (aged <70 years and those requiring intensive care unit admission) may be screened for the same at 3 months. Thyroid dysfunction (euthyroid sick syndrome and atypical thyroiditis) and adrenal insufficiency have been described in COVID-19; however, thyroid/adrenal functions usually normalize on follow-up; hence, widespread screening post-acute COVID-19 should not be recommended. Pituitary apoplexy and male hypogonadism have rarely been documented in COVID-19; therefore, appropriate follow-up may be undertaken as per clinical context. Hypocalcemia during COVID-19 is not uncommon; however, routine estimation of serum calcium post-COVID-19 is not warranted.

CONCLUSION

The recommendations herein provide a rational approach that would be expected to guide physicians to better delineate and manage the endocrine sequelae during post-acute COVID-19.

Even low doses of steroids increase the risk of cardiovascular disease in people with inflammatory diseases

The studyPujades-Rodríguez M, Morgan AW, Cubbon RM, Wu J. Dose-dependent oral glucocorticoid cardiovascular risks in people with immune-mediated inflammatory diseases: a population-based cohort study. PLoS Med 2020;17:e1003432.To read the full NIHR Alert, go to: https://evidence.nihr.ac.uk/alert/low-doses-steroids-increase-cardiovascular-risks-in-inflammatory-diseases/.

Changes in the pharmacological management of rheumatoid arthritis over two decades

Objectives

To assess whether modern management of RA has reduced the prescription of oral corticosteroids and NSAIDs and to evaluate use of pharmacological prophylaxis strategies.

Methods

Using the Clinical Practice Research Datalink, we explored long-term (≥3/12 months; ≥6/12 in sub-analyses) DMARD, corticosteroid and NSAID prescribing (annually, in the year post-diagnosis and across the patient’s life course to 15 years post-diagnosis), annual proportion with co-prescribing for prophylaxis of associated bone (corticosteroids, women only) and gastrointestinal (NSAIDs) comorbidity.

Results

Reported incidence of RA was 5.98 (0.37) per 10 000 person-years and prevalence was 0.91% (0.014) in 2017. In 71 411 RA patients, long-term DMARD prescribing initially rose post-diagnosis from 41.6% in 1998 to 67.9% in 2009. Corticosteroid prescribing changed little, overall [22.2% in 1998, 19.1% in 2016; incident risk ratio (IRR) 0.92, 95% CI: 0.82, 1.03] and across the life course from the first to fifteenth year (22.2% to 16.9%). NSAID prescribing declined from 57.7% in 1998, and significantly so from 2008, to 27.1% in 2016 (IRR 0.50, 95% CI: 0.44, 0.56). This continued across the life course (41.2% to 28.4%). Bone prophylaxis increased to 68.1% in 2008 before declining to 56.4% in 2017; gastrointestinal prophylaxis increased from 11.5% in 1998 to 62.6% in 2017. Sub-analyses showed consistent patterns.

Conclusion

Despite modern treatment strategies, corticosteroid prescribing in RA patients remains substantial and persists beyond 6 months once initiated. Rheumatologists need to determine causes and develop strategies to reduce corticosteroid use to minimize adverse event occurrence.

Effect of inflammatory bowel disease treatments on patients with diabetes mellitus

As medical care progresses and the number of patients with chronic conditions increases there is the inevitable challenge of managing patients with multiple co-morbidities. Inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) is an umbrella term for are inflammatory conditions affecting the gastrointestinal tract, the two most common forms being Ulcerative Colitis and Crohn’s disease. These diseases, usually diagnosed in young adults, exhibit a relapsing and remitting course and usually require long-term treatment. IBD can be treated with a number of topical and systemic treatments. We conducted a review of the current published evidence for the effects these medications can have on diabetes mellitus (DM) and glycaemic control. Searches were conducted on medline and embase with a timeframe from 1947 (the date from which studies on embase are recorded) to November 2020. Suitable publications were selected and reviewed. Current evidence of the impact of aminosalicylates, corticosteroids, thiopurines, and biologic agents was reviewed. Though there was limited evidence for certain agents, IBD medications have been shown to have an effect of DM and these effects should be considered in managing patients with dual pathologies. The effects of steroids on blood sugar control is well documented, but consideration of other agents is also important. In patients requiring steroids for Ulcerative Colitis, locally acting steroid agents delivered rectally may be preferred to minimise side effects in those with distal bowel Ulcerative Colitis. A switch to other agents should be considered as soon as possible in people with diabetes to limit the impact on glycaemic control. 5-aminosalicylates appear to play a role in the reduction of hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c), although the literature suggests these may be falsely low readings. Consequently, monitoring of people with diabetes on these agents may require daily monitoring of capillary blood sugars rather than relying simply on HbA1c; for example fructosamine performed 3-6 monthly, although this risks missing the rise in readings. There is only limited evidence of the effects of thiopurines on diabetes and further investigation is needed into the possible relationship between them. However, given the current available evidence it may be preferable to commence patients with diabetes on thiopurines as soon as possible, whilst also monitoring for side effects such as pancreatitis. There appears to be more evidence supporting a link between tumor necrosis factor-α inhibitors and DM. Both infliximab and adalimumab have evidence suggesting that both can cause reduced blood sugar levels. Further studies on the effects of the various biological agents mentioned are required alongside any novel biologic therapy and the impact of dual biologic therapy in the future.

A Practical Guide for the Management of Steroid Induced Hyperglycaemia in the Hospital

Glucocorticoids represent frequently recommended and often indispensable immunosuppressant and anti-inflammatory agents prescribed in various medical conditions. Despite their proven efficacy, glucocorticoids bear a wide variety of side effects among which steroid induced hyperglycaemia (SIHG) is among the most important ones. SIHG, potentially causes new-onset hyperglycaemia or exacerbation of glucose control in patients with previously known diabetes. Retrospective data showed that similar to general hyperglycaemia in diabetes, SIHG in the hospital and in outpatient settings detrimentally impacts patient outcomes, including mortality. However, recommendations for treatment targets and guidelines for in-hospital as well as outpatient therapeutic management are lacking, partially due to missing evidence from clinical studies. Still, SIHG caused by various types of glucocorticoids is a common challenge in daily routine and clinical guidance is needed. In this review, we aimed to summarize clinical evidence of SIHG in inpatient care impacting clinical outcome, establishment of diagnosis, diagnostic procedures and therapeutic recommendations.

Dose-dependent oral glucocorticoid cardiovascular risks in people with immune-mediated inflammatory diseases: A population-based cohort study

BACKGROUND

Glucocorticoids are widely used to reduce disease activity and inflammation in patients with a range of immune-mediated inflammatory diseases. It is uncertain whether or not low to moderate glucocorticoid dose increases cardiovascular risk. We aimed to quantify glucocorticoid dose-dependent cardiovascular risk in people with 6 immune-mediated inflammatory diseases.

METHODS AND FINDINGS

We conducted a population-based cohort analysis of medical records from 389 primary care practices contributing data to the United Kingdom Clinical Practice Research Datalink (CPRD), linked to hospital admissions and deaths in 1998-2017. We estimated time-variant daily and cumulative glucocorticoid prednisolone-equivalent dose-related risks and hazard ratios (HRs) of first all-cause and type-specific cardiovascular diseases (CVDs). There were 87,794 patients with giant cell arteritis and/or polymyalgia rheumatica (n = 25,581), inflammatory bowel disease (n = 27,739), rheumatoid arthritis (n = 25,324), systemic lupus erythematosus (n = 3,951), and/or vasculitis (n = 5,199), and no prior CVD. Mean age was 56 years and 34.1% were men. The median follow-up time was 5.0 years, and the proportions of person-years spent at each level of glucocorticoid daily exposure were 80% for non-use, 6.0% for <5 mg, 11.2% for 5.0-14.9 mg, 1.6% for 15.0-24.9 mg, and 1.2% for ≥25.0 mg. Incident CVD occurred in 13,426 (15.3%) people, including 6,013 atrial fibrillation, 7,727 heart failure, and 2,809 acute myocardial infarction events. One-year cumulative risks of all-cause CVD increased from 1.4% in periods of non-use to 8.9% for a daily prednisolone-equivalent dose of ≥25.0 mg. Five-year cumulative risks increased from 7.1% to 28.0%, respectively. Compared to periods of non-glucocorticoid use, those with <5.0 mg daily prednisolone-equivalent dose had increased all-cause CVD risk (HR = 1.74; 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.64-1.84; range 1.52 for polymyalgia rheumatica and/or giant cell arteritis to 2.82 for systemic lupus erythematosus). Increased dose-dependent risk ratios were found regardless of disease activity level and for all type-specific CVDs. HRs for type-specific CVDs and <5.0-mg daily dose use were: 1.69 (95% CI 1.54-1.85) for atrial fibrillation, 1.75 (95% CI 1.56-1.97) for heart failure, 1.76 (95% CI 1.51-2.05) for acute myocardial infarction, 1.78 (95% CI 1.53-2.07) for peripheral arterial disease, 1.32 (95% CI 1.15-1.50) for cerebrovascular disease, and 1.93 (95% CI 1.47-2.53) for abdominal aortic aneurysm. The lack of hospital medication records and drug adherence data might have led to underestimation of the dose prescribed when specialists provided care and overestimation of the dose taken during periods of low disease activity. The resulting dose misclassification in some patients is likely to have reduced the size of dose-response estimates.

CONCLUSIONS

In this study, we observed an increased risk of CVDs associated with glucocorticoid dose intake even at lower doses (<5 mg) in 6 immune-mediated diseases. These results highlight the importance of prompt and regular monitoring of cardiovascular risk and use of primary prevention treatment at all glucocorticoid doses.