Budgetary impact of using BPaL for treating extensively drug-resistant tuberculosis

The catastrophic cost of TB care: Understanding costs incurred by individuals undergoing TB care in low-, middle-, and high-income settings - A systematic review

Eliminating the burden of catastrophic costs experienced by individuals undergoing tuberculosis (TB) treatment is one of the World Health Organization (WHO) End TB Strategy targets. To help inform decisions on TB patient burden and cost-effective TB care, we conducted a systematic review to summarize current evidence around the burden of catastrophic costs incurred by individuals undergoing TB treatment and identified the main drivers of costs to aid in developing mitigation strategies. A literature search was performed in August 2024 using Embase, Web of Science, Scopus and Medline targeting studies using WHO, or WHO adapted patient costing questionnaires to measure direct (medical and non-medical) and indirect costs associated with TB care. Key cost data and patient baseline characteristics were extracted. The study protocol was registered in PROSPERO (Registration number: CRD42021293600). The systematic review included 76 studies; with 70% published over the last 5 years. Total mean costs per person for TB care ranged from $7.13 - $11,329 USD; pre-diagnostic costs ranged from $30.37 - $1,442 USD; and post-diagnostic costs ranged from $33.64 - $5,194 USD. Costs were consistently higher amongst persons with drug resistant TB (DR-TB) and those identified through passive case finding (PCF). Hospitalization and loss of income were the largest drivers of cost. Despite many countries offering free TB treatment, patients still incurred significant catastrophic costs. Our review suggests that active case finding, improving access to DR-TB testing, and adopting social protection interventions may help mitigate the burden of out-of-pocket expenditures incurred by people suffering with TB.

24-week, all-oral regimens for pulmonary rifampicin-resistant tuberculosis in TB-PRACTECAL trial sites: an economic evaluation

BACKGROUND

New 6-month rifampicin-resistant tuberculosis treatment regimens containing bedaquiline, pretomanid, and linezolid (BPaL) with or without moxifloxacin or clofazimine, could improve treatment efficacy, safety, and tolerability, and free up resources within the health system. Following a change to WHO rifampicin-resistant tuberculosis treatment guidelines, countries are facing difficult decisions about when and how to incorporate new drug regimens into national guidelines. We aimed to assess the probability of BPaL-based regimens being cost-saving using data collected in the TB-PRACTECAL trial.

METHODS

This economic evaluation using a cost-utility analysis was embedded in five TB-PRACTECAL trial sites in Belarus, Uzbekistan, and South Africa. Between Nov 19, 2020, and Sept 27, 2022, we collected detailed primary unit cost data in six hospitals and four ambulatory health facilities and collected data on patient-incurred costs from 73 trial participants. The primary efficacy endpoint of the main trial, a composite of unfavourable outcomes (death, disease recurrence, treatment failure, early discontinuation of therapy, withdrawal, or loss to follow-up) and clinically important safety outcomes by 72 weeks of follow-up were incorporated into the analysis. Societal perspective cost data and effect outcome data were input into a Markov model to estimate the cost per disability-adjusted life-year (DALY) averted by BPaL-based regimens compared with the standard of care over a 20-year time horizon. We conducted a range of univariate and probabilistic sensitivity analyses to test our findings.

FINDINGS

BPaL-based regimens averted a mean of 1·28 DALYs and saved a mean of US$14 868 (SD 291) per person from the provider perspective compared with standard-of-care regimens over 20 years. Patient-incurred costs were reduced by a mean of $172 (SD 0·84) in BPaL-based regimen groups compared with standard of care. The main cost drivers for both providers and patients were inpatient bed-days; the duration of the inpatient period varied across countries. Varying a range of model parameters affected the degree of cost savings but did not change the finding that BPaL-based regimens are cost-saving compared with standard of care.

INTERPRETATION

This trial-based evidence adds to consistent indications from modelling studies that BPaL-based regimens are cost-saving for both the patient and health system. Urgent implementation of BPaL-based regimens in countries with a high burden of tuberculosis could improve treatment of rifampicin-resistant tuberculosis, reduce pill burden, and free up desperately needed resources within the health system.

FUNDING

Médecins Sans Frontières.

Cost-effectiveness of targeted next-generation sequencing (tNGS) for detection of tuberculosis drug resistance in India, South Africa and Georgia: a modeling analysis

Background

Targeted next-generation sequencing (tNGS) is promising alternative to phenotypic drug susceptibility testing (pDST) for detecting drug-resistant tuberculosis (DRTB). This study explored the potential cost-effectiveness of tNGS for the diagnosis of DR-TB across 3 settings: India, South Africa and Georgia.

Methods

To inform WHO guideline development group (GDG) on tNGS we developed a stochastic decision analysis model and assessed cost-effectiveness of tNGS for DST among rifampicin resistance individuals. We also assessed tNGS as initial test for TB drug resistance in bacteriologically confirmed TB. Diagnostic accuracy and cost data were sourced from a systematic review conducted for GDG, covering studies published until September 2022. The primary outcome was incremental cost (2021 US$) per disability-adjusted life year (DALY) averted.

Findings

tNGS when compared with in-country DST, tNGS proved cost-effective in South Africa (ICER: $15,619/DALY averted, WTP: $21,165) but not in Georgia (ICER: $18,375/DALY averted, WTP: $15,069). In India, tNGS dominated in-country DST practice, providing greater health impact at lower cost. When comparing tNGS with universal pDST, tNGS was dominated by pDST in all three countries. In Georgia, using tNGS as initial test for TB drug-resistance compared to Xpert MTB/Rif followed by pDST appeared cost-effective. Scenario with 50% reduction in tNGS test kit costs made tNGS cost-effective across all three countries, while a high Bedaquiline resistance prevalence (30%) led to a worsening cost-effectiveness.

Interpretation

tNGS may be cost-effective in India, South Africa and Georgia when comprehensive DST is not routinely performed. Thus, existing DST practice and healthcare infrastructure should be considered before implementation and scale-up of tNGS.

Funding

Global Tuberculosis Program, World Health Organization (2022/1249364-0).

Update in tuberculosis treatment: a scoping review of current practices

Background

Tuberculosis (TB) remains a significant global health challenge despite ongoing control efforts, particularly in the context of drug-resistant TB (DR-TB), where treatment success rates remain low, underscoring the need for new therapeutic options. This review synthesises current evidence, since the publication of the World Health Organization guidelines in 2022, on the safety and efficacy of existing and new regimens for drug-susceptible TB (DS-TB) and DR-TB in adults and children.

Methods

A comprehensive search was performed across three databases for studies published between January 2022 and February 2024, focusing on current and new TB treatment regimens. Additional backward and forward citation searches were conducted to identify relevant literature.

Results

35 studies were included, evaluating the efficacy, safety and economic impact of new oral regimens for DS-TB and DR-TB. Regimens based on bedaquiline or delamanid demonstrated high success rates and good tolerability. The BPaLM (bedaquiline, pretomanid, linezolid and moxifloxacin) regimen was more effective and safer than the standard care, while shorter DR-TB regimens reduced costs and increased success rates. However, shorter regimens for DS-TB were associated with increased drug costs. Though limited, paediatric studies suggest that shorter, safer regimens may benefit children.

Conclusion

Evidence supports the adoption of shorter treatment regimens for both DR-TB and DS-TB to improve safety, effectiveness and cost-effectiveness, particularly in resource-limited settings.

Introducing BPaL: Experiences from countries supported under the LIFT-TB project

BACKGROUND

Previously, drug-resistant tuberculosis (DR-TB) patients were treated with long, toxic, and relatively ineffective regimens. However, in recent years, there have been major improvements made. The 2020 World Health Organization DR-TB Treatment guidelines recommended the use of a 6-months all-oral BPaL (bedaquiline, pretomanid and linezolid) regimen under operational research (OR) conditions for selected DR-TB patients.

METHODS

The processes, challenges, and interim results of introducing BPaL under OR conditions in 7 countries supported under the Korea International Cooperation Agency/TB Alliance-funded "Leveraging Innovation for Faster Treatment of Tuberculosis (LIFT-TB)" project are described here. The OR objectives were to explore the feasibility of introducing the BPaL regimen, and to estimate its effectiveness and safety in a select group of DR-TB patients.

RESULTS

Between November 2020 and the end of March 2023, a total of 574 patients had been enrolled. Interim treatment success stands at an encouraging 90.9% (280/308). Although adverse events of special interest (AESI) were common, they were manageable, and only 1 patient had to discontinue the complete BPaL treatment regimen. In addition, no unexpected adverse events (AE) were seen.

CONCLUSION

With careful advocacy, frequent communication with partners, and following steps to strengthen essential aspects of the delivery system, the project's experiences show that BPaL OR was feasible across different country settings. Project documents were constantly updated. The sharing of information, experiences, and interim results had a significant positive and motivating effect within and across countries. Interim OR results show excellent patient responses and are comparable to those seen under trial conditions. Although common, the observed AEs and AESIs were manageable, and no unexpected AEs were seen.

Patient and provider costs of the new BPaL regimen for drug-resistant tuberculosis treatment in South Africa: A cost-effectiveness analysis

BACKGROUND

Drug-resistant (DR) tuberculosis (TB) is typically characterized by resistance to a single or combination of first- and/or second-line anti-TB agents and commonly includes rifampicin-resistant (RR)-TB, multidrug-resistant (MDR)-TB, pre-extensively drug-resistant (pre-XDR)-TB and XDR-TB. Historically, all variations of DR-TB required treatment with second-line drugs which are less effective and more toxic than first-line options, have a longer treatment duration and are more expensive to both patients and providers. The World Health Organization (WHO) now recommends a new second-line 3-drug 6-month all-oral regimen consisting of bedaquiline, pretomanid, and linezolid referred to as BPaL. We estimate patient and provider costs of DR-TB treatment with BPaL compared to the current standard of care in South Africa.

METHODS AND FINDINGS

In coordination with South Africa's BPaL clinical access programme (CAP) we conducted an economic evaluation of A) patient costs through a cross-sectional patient cost survey and B) provider costs through a bottom-up costing analysis consisting of a retrospective medical record review (patient resource-use) and top-down financial record review (fixed/shared costs such as overhead). Across both costing perspectives, we compare costs of 1) BPaL, to current standard of care options including the 2) 9-11-month standard short oral regimen (SSOR) and 3) 18-21-month standard long oral regimen (SLOR). Eligible patients included those ≥14 years old with confirmed sputum pulmonary RR/MDR-TB, pre-XDR or XDR-TB. All costs are reported in 2022 United States Dollar (US$). A total of 72 patients were enrolled and completed the patient cost survey (41.7% on BPaL, 16.7% on the SSOR and 41.7% on the SLOR). Mean on-treatment patient costs were lowest among those on BPaL ($56.6) and increased four-fold among those on the SSOR ($228.1) and SLOR ($224.7). Direct medical patient costs were negligible across all treatment regimens, while direct non-medical patient and guardian costs for travel, food and nutritional supplementation accounted for the largest proportion of total costs ($54.6, $227.8 and $224.3 for BPaL, the SSOR and SLOR respectively). In assessing provider costs, a total of 112 medical records were reviewed (37.5%, 41.1% and 21.4% on BPaL, the SSOR and SLOR respectively). Total provider costs for producing a favorable treatment outcome (cured/completed treatment) were similar among those on BPaL ($4,948.7 per patient) and the SSOR ($4,905.6 per patient) with costs increasing substantially among those on the SLOR ($8,919.9 per patient). Based on incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICERs), at even the lowest willingness to pay (WTP) threshold, treatment with the new BPaL regimen was more cost-effective than current standard of care treatment options (ICER: $311.4 < WTP: $3,341).

CONCLUSIONS

When using the newly recommended BPaL regimen, cost to patients decreased by 75% compared to current standard of care treatment options in South Africa. Due in part to higher resource-use within the BPaL CAP offsetting the shorter treatment duration, cost of treatment provision through BPaL and the 9-11-month SSOR were similar. However, when considering cost and treatment outcomes, BPaL was more cost-effective than other standard of care regimens currently available for DR-TB in South Africa.

Breaking barriers: The potential of nanosystems in antituberculosis therapy

Tuberculosis (TB), caused by Mycobacterium tuberculosis, continues to pose a significant threat to global health. The resilience of TB is amplified by a myriad of physical, biological, and biopharmaceutical barriers that challenge conventional therapeutic approaches. This review navigates the intricate landscape of TB treatment, from the stealth of latent infections and the strength of granuloma formations to the daunting specters of drug resistance and altered gene expression. Amidst these challenges, traditional therapies often fail, contending with inconsistent bioavailability, prolonged treatment regimens, and socioeconomic burdens. Nanoscale Drug Delivery Systems (NDDSs) emerge as a promising beacon, ready to overcome these barriers, offering better drug targeting and improved patient adherence. Through a critical approach, we evaluate a spectrum of nanosystems and their efficacy against MTB both in vitro and in vivo. This review advocates for the intensification of research in NDDSs, heralding their potential to reshape the contours of global TB treatment strategies.

Trends in the availability and prices of quality-assured tuberculosis drugs: a systematic analysis of Global Drug Facility Product Catalogs from 2001 to 2024

BACKGROUND

The Global Drug Facility (GDF) of the Stop TB Partnership was launched in 2001 with the goal of increasing access to quality-assured tuberculosis (TB) drugs and products. We aimed to describe the TB drugs and prices available from the GDF over time and to assess trends.

METHODS

We searched the internet, including an internet archive, for past and recent GDF Product Catalogs and extracted the listed TB drugs and prices. We calculated the lowest price for the most common drug formulations assuming drugs with similar active pharmaceutical ingredients (APIs) are substitutes for each other. We assessed time trends in the TB drugs and prices offered by the GDF in univariable regressions over the longest possible period.

RESULTS

We identified 43 different GDF Product Catalogs published between November 2001 and May 2024. These product catalogs included 122 single medicines (31 APIs), 28 fixed-dose combinations (9 API combinations), and 8 patient kits (8 API regimens and other materials). The number of TB drugs listed in the GDF Product Catalog increased from 9 (8 APIs) to 55 (32 APIs). The price decreased for 17, increased for 19, and showed no trend for 12 APIs. The price of 15 (53.6%) of 28 APIs used against drug-resistant TB decreased, including the price of drugs used in new treatment regimens. The decreasing price trend was strongest for linezolid (-16.60 [95% CI: -26.35 to -6.85] percentage points [pp] per year), bedaquiline (-12.61 [95% CI: -18.00 to -7.22] pp per year), cycloserine (-11.20 [95% CI: -17.40 to -4.99] pp per year), pretomanid (-10.47 [95% CI: -15.06 to -5.89] pp per year), and rifapentine (-10.46 [95% CI: -12.86 to -8.06] pp per year). The prices of 16 (61.5%) of 23 APIs for standard drug-susceptible TB treatment increased, including rifampicin (23.70 [95% CI: 18.48 to 28.92] pp per year), isoniazid (20.95 [95% CI: 18.96 to 22.95] pp per year), ethambutol (9.85 [95% CI: 8.83 to 10.88] pp per year), and fixed-dose combinations thereof.

CONCLUSIONS

The number of TB drugs available from the GDF has substantially increased during its first 23 years of operation. The prices of most APIs for new TB treatments decreased or remained stable. The prices of most APIs for standard drug-sensitive TB treatment increased.

Determining cost and placement decisions for moderate complexity NAATs for tuberculosis drug susceptibility testing

BACKGROUND

Access to drug resistant testing for tuberculosis (TB) remains a challenge in high burden countries. Recently, the World Health Organization approved the use of several moderate complexity automated nucleic acid amplification tests (MC-NAAT) that have performance profiles suitable for placement in a range of TB laboratory tiers to improve drug susceptibility tests (DST) coverage.

METHODS

We conducted cost analysis of two MC-NAATs with different testing throughput: Lower Throughput (LT, < 24 tests per run) and Higher Throughput (HT, upto 90+ tests per run) for placement in a hypothetical laboratory in a resource limited setting. We used per-test cost as the main indicator to assess 1) drivers of cost by resource types and 2) optimized levels of annual testing volumes for the respective MC-NAATs.

RESULTS

The base-case per test cost of $18.52 (range: $13.79 - $40.70) for LT test and $15.37 (range: $9.61 - $37.40) for HT test. Per test cost estimates were most sensitive to the number of testing days per week, followed by equipment costs and TB-specific workloads. In general, HT NAATs were cheaper at all testing volume levels, but at lower testing volumes (less than 2,000 per year) LT tests can be cheaper if the durability of the testing system is markedly better and/or procured equipment costs are lower than that of HT NAAT.

CONCLUSION

Assuming equivalent performance and infrastructural needs, placement strategies for MC-NAATs need to be prioritized by laboratory system's operational factors, testing demands, and costs.

The Cost-Effectiveness of the BEAT-TB Regimen for Pre-Extensively Drug-Resistant TB

OBJECTIVE

To measure the economic impacts of the longer pre-XDR-TB treatment regimen and the shorter BEAT-TB India regimen.

METHODS

In the current study, the economic impacts of the current 18-month pre-XDR-TB treatment regimen and the 6-9 month BEAT-TB regimen were evaluated using an economic model via a decision tree analysis from a societal perspective. The incremental costs and quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) gained from the introduction of the BEAT-TB regimen for pre-XDR-TB patients were estimated.

RESULTS

For a cohort of 1000 pre-XDR-TB patients, we found that the BEAT-TB India regimen yielded higher undiscounted life years (40,548 vs. 21,009) and more QALYs gained (27,633 vs. 15,812) than the 18-month regimen. The BEAT-TB India regimen was found to be cost-saving, with an incremental cost of USD -128,651 when compared to the 18-month regimen. The current analysis did not consider the possibility of reduced TB recurrence after use of the BEAT-TB regimen, so it might have under-estimated the benefits.

CONCLUSION

As a lower-cost intervention with improved health outcomes, the BEAT-TB India regimen is dominant when compared to the 18-month regimen.

Yes, we have the power to end TB!

Robust efforts are essential to sustain and increase the advancements made in battling TB, as well as to tackle persistent issues that have caused the fight against the disease to be uneven. The End TB Strategy proposes that new technologies are to be developed by 2025 to encourage a quick growth in TB occurrence diminishment. This calls for a cross-sectoral focus on creating and distributing suitable medical and programmatic modernizations in a fair manner. However, many difficulties and differences still exist in the realms of research and development regarding vaccines, drugs, technical advances, and services related to TB. Therefore, priority needs to be given to overcoming these difficulties and discrepancies for a better future. On World TB Day 2023, SEAR Union, TB Alliance, the National Institute of Advanced Studies (NIAS) and Open Source Pharma Foundation (OSPF) gathered to discuss an important topic under the heading: "YES, WE HAVE THE POWER TO END TB!" With a commitment to putting the patient first and increasing their collective efforts, the organizations recognized that it is possible to make this goal a reality. The organizations involved in the discussion have declared their commitment to engaging in collaborative efforts to end TB globally. They advocate for strengthening access to TB services, controlling and preventing TB, improving surveillance and drug resistance management, and investing in research and development. Furthermore, they recognize the importance of reducing stigma and integrating patient voices in this endeavour. This Round Table serves as a framework to build on and ensure that the goal of ending TB is achievable.

Updated considerations in the diagnosis and management of tuberculosis infection and disease: integrating the latest evidence-based strategies

INTRODUCTION

Tuberculosis (TB) is a leading infectious cause of global morbidity and mortality, affecting nearly a quarter of the human population and accounting for over 10 million deaths each year. Over the past several decades, TB incidence and mortality have gradually declined, but 2021 marked a threatening reversal of this trend highlighting the importance of accurate diagnosis and effective treatment of all forms of TB.

AREAS COVERED

This review summarizes advances in TB diagnostics, addresses the treatment of people with TB infection and TB disease including recent evidence for treatment regimens for drug-susceptible and drug-resistant TB, and draws attention to special considerations in children and during pregnancy.

EXPERT OPINION

Improvements in diagnosis and management of TB have expanded the available options for TB control. Molecular testing has enhanced the detection of TB disease, but better diagnostics are still needed, particularly for certain populations such as children. Novel treatment regimens have shortened treatment and improved outcomes for people with TB. However, important questions remain regarding the optimal management of TB. Work must continue to ensure the potential of the latest developments is realized for all people affected by TB.

Shorter regimens improved treatment outcomes of multidrug-resistant tuberculosis patients in Tanzania in 2018 cohort

OBJECTIVE

In 2018, shorter treatment regimens (STR) for people with drug-resistant tuberculosis (DR-TB) were introduced in Tanzania and included kanamycin, high-dose moxifloxacin, prothionamide, high-dose isoniazid, clofazimine, ethambutol and pyrazinamide. We describe treatment outcomes of people diagnosed with DR-TB in a cohort initiating treatment in 2018 in Tanzania.

METHODS

This was a retrospective cohort study conducted at the National Centre of Excellence and decentralised DR-TB treatment sites for the 2018 cohort followed from January 2018 to August 2020. We reviewed data from the National Tuberculosis and Leprosy Program DR-TB database to assess clinical and demographic information. The association between different DR-TB regimens and treatment outcome was assessed using logistic regression analysis. Treatment outcomes were described as treatment complete, cure, death, failure or lost to follow-up. A successful treatment outcome was assigned when the patient achieved treatment completion or cure.

RESULTS

A total of 449 people were diagnosed with DR-TB of whom 382 had final treatment outcomes: 268 (70%) cured; 36 (9%) treatment completed; 16 (4%) lost to follow-up; 62 (16%) died. There was no treatment failure. The treatment success rate was 79% (304 patients). The 2018 DR-TB treatment cohort was initiated on the following regimens: 140 (46%) received STR, 90 (30%) received the standard longer regimen (SLR), 74 (24%) received a new drug regimen. Normal nutritional status at baseline [adjusted odds ratio (aOR) = 6.57, 95% CI (3.33-12.94), p < 0.001] and the STR [aOR = 2.67, 95% CI (1.38-5.18), p = 0.004] were independently associated with successful DR-TB treatment outcome.

CONCLUSION

The majority of DR-TB patients on STR in Tanzania achieved a better treatment outcome than on SLR. The acceptance and implementation of STR at decentralised sites promises greater treatment success. Assessing and improving nutritional status at baseline and introducing new shorter DR-TB treatment regimens may strengthen favourable treatment outcomes.

A five-year review of prevalence and treatment outcomes of pre-extensively drug-resistant plus additional drug-resistant tuberculosis in the Henan Provincial Tuberculosis Clinical Medicine Research Centre

OBJECTIVES

This study investigated the prevalence and significant clinical outcomes of pre-extensively drug-resistant plus additional drug-resistant tuberculosis (pre-XDR-plus) in Henan Provincial Chest Hospital between 2017 and 2021.

METHODS

We analysed and summarized the drug sensitivity test (DST) results of clinical Mycobacterium tuberculosis (MTB) strains in TB patients seeking care in the Tuberculosis Clinical Medical Research Centre of Henan Province between 2017 and 2021. Medical records of pre-extensively drug-resistant plus additional drug-resistant TB patients were statistically analysed, including demographic characteristics, regimens, and outcomes.

RESULTS

Of the 3689 Mycobacterium tuberculosis strains, 639 (17.32%), 353 (9.56%), and 109 (2.95%), multidrug-resistant tuberculosis (MDR-TB), pre-extensively drug-resistant tuberculosis (pre-XDR), and pre-XDR-plus, respectively. The proportion of MDR decreased from 19.1% in 2017 to 17.5% in 2021 (χ² = 0.686, P = 0.407), the proportion of pre-XDR from 11.4% in 2017 to 9.0% in 2021 (χ² = 2.39, P = 0.122), and pre-XDR-plus from 4.7% in 2017 to 1.8% in 2020, with the declining trend was significant (χ² = 9.348, P = 0.002). The most commonly used anti-TB drugs were pyrazinamide (PZA, 37/46, 80.43%) and cycloserine (CS, 32/46, 69.57%), followed by linezolid (LZD, 25/46, 54.35%), protionamide (TH, 25/46, 54.35%), and para-aminosalicylic acid (PAS, 23/46, 50.00%). Patients receiving the LZD regimen were 5 times more likely to have a favourable outcome than those not receiving LZD (OR = 6.421, 95% CI 2.101-19.625, P = 0.001). Patients receiving a regimen containing CS were 4 times more likely to have a favourable outcome compared to those not taking CS (OR = 5.444, 95% CI 1.650-17.926, P = 0.005).

CONCLUSIONS

Our data suggest that the population of pre-XDR-plus had significantly decreased over the past five years in the Henan Provincial Chest Hospital. The COVID-19 and flood disaster affect TB patients' selection of medical services. In addition, the pre-XDR-plus patients whose regimens contain LZD or CS were more likely to have favourable outcomes.

Effect of Digital Medication Event Reminder and Monitor-Observed Therapy vs Standard Directly Observed Therapy on Health-Related Quality of Life and Catastrophic Costs in Patients With Tuberculosis: A Secondary Analysis of a Randomized Clinical Trial

Importance

Little is known about whether digital adherence technologies are economical for patients with tuberculosis (TB) in resource-constrained settings.

Objective

To test the hypothesis that for patients with TB, a digital medication event reminder monitor (MERM)-observed therapy provides higher health-related quality of life (HRQoL) and lower catastrophic costs compared with standard directly observed therapy (DOT).

Design, Setting, and Participants

This study was a secondary analysis of a randomized, 2-arm, open-label trial conducted in 10 health care facilities in Ethiopia. Eligible participants were adults with new or previously treated, bacteriologically confirmed, drug-sensitive pulmonary TB who were eligible to start first-line anti-TB therapy. Participants were enrolled between June 2, 2020, and June 15, 2021, with the last participant completing follow-up on August 15, 2021.

Interventions

Participants were randomly assigned (1:1) to receive a 15-day TB medication supply dispensed with a MERM device to self-administer and return every 15 days (intervention arm) or the standard in-person DOT (control arm). Both groups were observed throughout the standard 2-month intensive treatment phase.

Main Outcomes and Measures

Prespecified secondary end points of the original trial were HRQoL using the EuroQoL 5-dimension 5-level (EQ-5D-5L) tool and catastrophic costs, direct (out-of-pocket) and indirect (guardian and coping) costs from the individual patient perspective using the World Health Organization's Tool to Estimate Patient Costs, and common factors associated with lower HRQoL and higher catastrophic costs.

Results

Among 337 patients screened for eligibility, 114 were randomly assigned, and 109 were included in the final complete-case intention-to-treat analysis (57 control and 52 intervention participants). The mean (SD) age was 33.1 (11.1) years; 72 participants (66.1%) were men, and 15 (13.9%) had HIV coinfection. EQ-5D-5L overall median (IQR) index value was 0.964 (0.907-1). The median (IQR) value was significantly higher in intervention (1 [0.974-1]) vs control (.908 [0.891-0.964]) (P < .001). EQ-5D-5L minimum and maximum health state utility values in intervention were 0.906 and 1 vs 0.832 and 1 in control. Patients' overall median (IQR) postdiagnosis cost was Ethiopian birr (ETB) 80 (ETB 16-ETB 480) (US $1.53). The median cost was significantly lower in intervention (ETB 24 [ETB 16-ETB 48]) vs control (ETB 432 [ETB 210-ETB 1980]) (P < .001), with median possible cost savings of ETB 336 (ETB 156-ETB 1339) (US $6.44) vs the control arm. Overall, 42 participants (38.5%; 95% CI, 29.4%-48.3%) faced catastrophic costs, and this was significantly lower in the intervention group (11 participants [21.2%]; 95% CI, 11.1%-34.7%) vs control (31 participants [54.4%]; 95% CI, 40.7%-67.6%) (P < .001). Trial arm was the single most important factor in low HRQoL (adjusted risk ratio [ARR], 1.49; 95% CI, 1.35-1.65; P < .001), while trial arm (ARR, 2.55; 95% CI, 1.58-4.13; P < .001), occupation (ARR, 2.58; 95% CI, 1.68-3.97; P < .001), number of cohabitants (ARR, 0.64; 95% CI, 0.43-0.95; P = .03), and smoking (ARR, 2.71; 95% CI, 1.01-7.28; P = .048) were the most important factors in catastrophic cost.

Conclusions and Relevance

In patients with TB, MERM-observed therapy was associated with higher HRQoL and lower catastrophic costs compared with standard DOT. Patient-centered digital health technologies could have the potential overcoming structural barriers to anti-TB therapy.

Trial Registration

ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT04216420.

Cost-effectiveness of short, oral treatment regimens for rifampicin resistant tuberculosis

Current options for treating tuberculosis (TB) that is resistant to rifampicin (RR-TB) are few, and regimens are often long and poorly tolerated. Following recent evidence from the TB-PRACTECAL trial countries are considering programmatic uptake of 6-month, all-oral treatment regimens. We used a Markov model to estimate the incremental cost-effectiveness of three regimens containing bedaquiline, pretomanid and linezolid (BPaL) with and without moxifloxacin (BPaLM) or clofazimine (BPaLC) compared with the current mix of long and short standard of care (SOC) regimens to treat RR-TB from the provider perspective in India, Georgia, Philippines, and South Africa. We estimated total costs (2019 USD) and disability-adjusted life years (DALYs) over a 20-year time horizon. Costs and DALYs were discounted at 3% in the base case. Parameter uncertainty was tested with univariate and probabilistic sensitivity analysis. We found that all three regimens would improve health outcomes and reduce costs compared with the current programmatic mix of long and short SOC regimens in all four countries. BPaL was the most cost-saving regimen in all countries, saving $112-$1,173 per person. BPaLM was the preferred regimen at a willingness to pay per DALY of 0.5 GDP per capita in all settings. Our findings indicate BPaL-based regimens are likely to be cost-saving and more effective than the current standard of care in a range of settings. Countries should consider programmatic uptake of BPaL-based regimens.

Pretomanid for tuberculosis treatment: an update for clinical purposes

Coronavirus disease (COVID-19) pandemic determined a 10 years-set back in tuberculosis (TB) control programs. Recent advances in available therapies may help recover the time lost. While Linezolid (LZD) and Bedaquiline (BDQ), previously Group D second line drugs (SLDs) for TB, have been relocated to Group A, other drugs are currently being studied in regimens for drug resistant TB (DR-TB). Among these, Pretomanid (PA), a recently introduced antimycobacterial drug derived from nitroimidazole with both solid bactericidal and bacteriostatic effect, and with an excellent effectiveness and tolerability profile, is in the spotlight. Following promising data obtained from recently published and ongoing randomized controlled trials (RCTs), the World Health Organization (WHO) determined to include PA in its guidelines for the treatment of rifampicin-resistant (RR), multi drug resistant (MDR) and pre-extensively drug resistant TB (pre-XDR-TB) with BDQ, LZD and Moxifloxacine (MFX) in a 6-month regimen. Although further studies on the subject are needed, PA may also represent a treatment option for drug-susceptible TB (DS-TB), latent TB infection (LTBI) and non tuberculous mycobacteria (NTM). This narrative review aims to examine current implementation options and future possibilities for PA in the never-ending fight against TB.