1
|
Swanton C, Bachtiar V, Mathews C, Brentnall AR, Lowenhoff I, Waller J, Bomb M, McPhail S, Pinches H, Smittenaar R, Hiom S, Neal RD, Sasieni P. NHS-Galleri trial: Enriched enrolment approaches and sociodemographic characteristics of enrolled participants. Clin Trials 2025; 22:227-238. [PMID: 39862108 PMCID: PMC11986080 DOI: 10.1177/17407745241302477] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/27/2025]
Abstract
BACKGROUND/AIMS Certain sociodemographic groups are routinely underrepresented in clinical trials, limiting generalisability. Here, we describe the extent to which enriched enrolment approaches yielded a diverse trial population enriched for older age in a randomised controlled trial of a blood-based multi-cancer early detection test (NCT05611632). METHODS Participants aged 50-77 years were recruited from eight Cancer Alliance regions in England. Most were identified and invited from centralised health service lists; a dynamic invitation algorithm was used to target those in older and more deprived groups. Others were invited by their general practice surgery (GP-based Participant Identification Centres in selected regions); towards the end of recruitment, specifically Asian and Black individuals were invited via this route, as part of a concerted effort to encourage enrolment among these individuals. Some participants self-referred, often following engagement activities involving community organisations. Enrolment took place in 11 mobile clinics at 151 locations that were generally more socioeconomically deprived and ethnically diverse than the England average. We reduced logistical barriers to trial participation by offering language interpretation and translation and disabled access measures. After enrolment, we examined (1) sociodemographic distribution of participants versus England and Cancer Alliance populations, and (2) number needed to invite (NNI; the number of invitations sent to enrol one participant) by age, sex, index of multiple deprivation (IMD) and ethnicity, and GP surgery-level bowel screening participation. RESULTS Approximately 1.5 million individuals were invited and 142,924 enrolled (98% via centralised health service lists/invitation algorithm) in 10.5 months. The enrolled population was older and more deprived than the England population aged 50-77 years (73.3% vs 56.8% aged 60-77 years; 42.3% vs 35.3% in IMD groups 1-2). Ethnic diversity was lower in the trial than the England population (1.4% vs 2.8% Black; 3.3% vs 5.3% Asian). NNI was highest in Black (32.8), Asian (28.2) and most-deprived (21.5) groups, and lowest in mixed ethnicity (8.1) and least-deprived (4.6) groups. CONCLUSIONS Enrolment approaches used in the NHS-Galleri trial enabled recruitment of an older, socioeconomically diverse participant population relatively rapidly. Compared with the England and Cancer Alliance populations, the enrolled population was enriched for those in older age and more deprived groups. Better ethnicity data availability in central health service records could enable better invitation targeting to further enhance ethnically diverse recruitment. Future research should evaluate approaches used to facilitate recruitment from underrepresented groups in clinical trials.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | | | | | - Jo Waller
- King’s College London, London, UK
- Queen Mary University of London, London, UK
| | | | | | | | | | - Sara Hiom
- GRAIL Bio UK Ltd., GRAIL, Inc., London, UK
| | - Richard D Neal
- University College London, London, UK
- University of Exeter, Exeter, UK
| | - Peter Sasieni
- King’s College London, London, UK
- Queen Mary University of London, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Kandeel M, Morsy MA, Al Khodair KM, Alhojaily S. A bibliometric analysis of disability research in Saudi Arabia: Evolving trends, thematic mapping, and gaps. Saudi Med J 2025; 46:406-417. [PMID: 40254322 PMCID: PMC12010485 DOI: 10.15537/smj.2025.46.4.20240591] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/06/2024] [Accepted: 03/12/2025] [Indexed: 04/22/2025] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVES To identify key trends and influential authors and institutions, provide thematic mapping, and determine recent evolutions and gaps in the disability research in Saudi Arabia. METHODS The study started in June 2024 and the data was analyzed during July 2024 in Al-Ahsa, Saudi Arabia. The analysis employed bibliometric techniques such as bibliometric coupling, and thematic mapping using VOSviewer and RStudio with the Bibliometrix package. RESULTS The bibliometric analysis identified a total of 3080 publications and showed that the annual growth rate in the number of publications was 13.5%. Emerging themes included intellectual disabilities, quality of life, rehabilitation, and mental health. Additionally, there was a significant increase over the years in studies incorporating modern technologies such as machine learning and artificial intelligence. International collaborations were significant, at 59.2% of the publications. Density visualization highlighted central themes such as multiple sclerosis and quality of life. Emerging themes such as machine learning and virtual reality reflected recent trends that integrated advanced technologies into disability research. Several gaps were found, particularly in foundational themes and information on the practical applications of the emerging technologies for disabled people. CONCLUSION The bibliometric analysis highlighted a diverse landscape of disability research in Saudi Arabia. Future research should explore the practical applications of advanced technologies in the Saudi context to improve the quality of life for individuals with disabilities.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mahmoud Kandeel
- From the Department of Biomedical Sciences (Kandeel, Alhojaily); from the Department of Anatomy (Al Khodair), College of Veterinary Medicine; from the Department of Pharmaceutical Sciences (Morsy), College of Clinical Pharmacy, King Faisal University, Al-Ahsa, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia.
| | - Mohamed A. Morsy
- From the Department of Biomedical Sciences (Kandeel, Alhojaily); from the Department of Anatomy (Al Khodair), College of Veterinary Medicine; from the Department of Pharmaceutical Sciences (Morsy), College of Clinical Pharmacy, King Faisal University, Al-Ahsa, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia.
| | - Khalid M. Al Khodair
- From the Department of Biomedical Sciences (Kandeel, Alhojaily); from the Department of Anatomy (Al Khodair), College of Veterinary Medicine; from the Department of Pharmaceutical Sciences (Morsy), College of Clinical Pharmacy, King Faisal University, Al-Ahsa, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia.
| | - Sameer Alhojaily
- From the Department of Biomedical Sciences (Kandeel, Alhojaily); from the Department of Anatomy (Al Khodair), College of Veterinary Medicine; from the Department of Pharmaceutical Sciences (Morsy), College of Clinical Pharmacy, King Faisal University, Al-Ahsa, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia.
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Anderson AM, Martin RA, DeCormier Plosky W, Ned L, Swenor BK, Bailie J, Mathias K, Maggo JK, Omino MA, Russell AM, Lawson AMM, Brown AE, Bierer BE, Shariq S, Mwifadhi M, Deane KHO, Philip S, Shepherd V, Walsh NE, McHugh GA. A global call to action for disability inclusion in health research. Nat Med 2025:10.1038/s41591-025-03587-w. [PMID: 40140620 DOI: 10.1038/s41591-025-03587-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 03/28/2025]
Affiliation(s)
- Anna M Anderson
- Leeds Institute of Health Sciences, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK.
- Leeds Institute of Rheumatic and Musculoskeletal Medicine, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK.
- National Institute for Health and Care Research (NIHR) HealthTech Research Centre in Accelerated Surgical Care, Leeds, UK.
| | - Rachelle A Martin
- Rehabilitation Teaching and Research Unit, University of Otago, Wellington, New Zealand
| | | | - Lieketseng Ned
- Division of Disability and Rehabilitation Studies, Department of Global Health, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Stellenbosch University, Cape Town, South Africa
| | - Bonnielin K Swenor
- Johns Hopkins Disability Health Research Center, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Jodie Bailie
- Centre for Disability Research and Policy and University Centre for Rural Health, University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Kaaren Mathias
- Faculty of Health, University of Canterbury, Christchurch, New Zealand
| | - Jasjot K Maggo
- Rehabilitation Teaching and Research Unit, University of Otago, Wellington, New Zealand
| | - Mildred A Omino
- Disability Liaison Office, University of Nairobi, Nairobi, Kenya
| | - Amy M Russell
- Leeds Institute of Health Sciences, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK
| | | | - Anna E Brown
- Toi Āria, Design for Public Good, Toi Rauwhārangi, College of Creative Arts, Massey University, Wellington, New Zealand
| | - Barbara E Bierer
- Multi-Regional Clinical Trials Center of Brigham and Women's Hospital and Harvard, Cambridge, MA, USA
- Department of Medicine, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Sameed Shariq
- School of Public Health, Imperial College London, London, UK
| | - Mrisho Mwifadhi
- Department of Health Systems, Impact Evaluation, and Policy, Ifakara Health Institute, Dar es Salaam, Tanzania
| | | | - Sharad Philip
- Department of Psychiatry, Clinical Neurosciences, and Addiction Medicine, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Guwahati, India
| | | | - Nicola E Walsh
- Centre for Health and Clinical Research, University of the West of England, Bristol, UK
- NIHR ARC-West, Bristol, UK
| | | |
Collapse
|
4
|
Anderson AM, Brading L, Swaithes L, Evans N, Fedorowicz SE, Murinas D, Atkinson E, Moult A, Yip T, Ayub P, Dziedzic K, Conaghan PG, McHugh GA, Rebane A, Kingsbury SR. Building trust and inclusion with under-served groups: a public involvement project employing a knowledge mobilisation approach. RESEARCH INVOLVEMENT AND ENGAGEMENT 2024; 10:122. [PMID: 39529198 PMCID: PMC11555807 DOI: 10.1186/s40900-024-00647-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/05/2024] [Accepted: 10/11/2024] [Indexed: 11/16/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Certain groups are commonly under-served by health research due to exclusionary models of research design/delivery. Working in partnership with under-served groups is key to improving inclusion. This project aimed to explore the use of a knowledge mobilisation approach to start building partnerships with under-served groups based on trust and mutual understanding. METHODS This co-produced public involvement project employed a knowledge mobilisation approach. The project team involved public contributors from four community organisations and staff from two Universities. A series of 'community conversations' were co-produced. These involved open discussions with local people in community settings. The conversations provide an informal space to engage in a multi-directional dialogue about health research and incorporated approaches such as prompt questions, live illustrations, and themed boards. The findings were reviewed collectively. Dissemination/feedback activities and lessons learned for future engagement with community organisations and under-served groups were also co-produced. RESULTS Over 100 people attended the community conversations. Attendees varied widely in their sociodemographic characteristics (e.g., socioeconomic status and ethnicity) and brought diverse lived experiences (e.g., experiences of homelessness and disability). A strong appetite for change and desire to mobilise public knowledge were evident. Attendees reported wide-ranging barriers to inclusion in health research and suggested ways to address them. Three inter-related take-home messages were identified: ensure relevance, appreciation, and trust; prioritise language and accessibility needs; and maximise flexibility in all research-related activities. Feedback about the community conversations and dissemination activities was largely positive, with all parties planning to continue the partnership building. The lessons learned provide practical suggestions for promoting inclusion in research and highlight the importance of addressing research teams' training/support needs. CONCLUSIONS Knowledge mobilisation was a valuable approach for facilitating multi-directional dialogues and relationship building between local communities and university teams. This approach enabled co-creation of new knowledge related to inclusion and partnership working in health research. The project has provided a firm foundation to build upon. However, creating sustainable, inclusive public partnerships is likely to require systemic changes, such as weighting of fundings schemes to projects that prioritise inclusion of under-served groups throughout the research cycle.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anna M Anderson
- Leeds Institute of Health Sciences, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK.
| | - Lucy Brading
- Leeds Institute of Rheumatic and Musculoskeletal Medicine, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK
| | | | - Nicola Evans
- Impact Accelerator Unit, Keele University, Keele, UK
| | | | | | | | - Alice Moult
- Impact Accelerator Unit, Keele University, Keele, UK
| | | | | | | | - Philip G Conaghan
- Leeds Institute of Rheumatic and Musculoskeletal Medicine, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK
- NIHR Leeds Biomedical Research Centre, Leeds, UK
| | | | - Amy Rebane
- NIHR Leeds Biomedical Research Centre, Leeds, UK
| | - Sarah R Kingsbury
- Leeds Institute of Rheumatic and Musculoskeletal Medicine, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK
- NIHR Leeds Biomedical Research Centre, Leeds, UK
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Bannink Mbazzi F, Hameed S, Ganle JK, Shakespeare T, Polack S. Participatory research with youth with disabilities: Experiences from sub-Saharan Africa. Afr J Disabil 2024; 13:1491. [PMID: 39507007 PMCID: PMC11538200 DOI: 10.4102/ajod.v13i0.1491] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/31/2024] [Accepted: 08/26/2024] [Indexed: 11/08/2024] Open
Abstract
Background Disability inclusive youth research, involving youth with disabilities in the design, implementation and dissemination of study data, is still limited in Africa. Objectives To describe and reflect on the experiences of involving youth with disabilities in an exploratory research study, focused on disability-inclusive education and employment in 7 African countries. Method 12 youths with different impairments, aged 18 to 35, were employed as researchers in Ethiopia, Ghana, Kenya, Nigeria, Rwanda, Senegal and Uganda. Youth researchers contributed to the data collection and analysis of interviews with 210 youth with disabilities. 24 youth advisors with disabilities formed two youth advisory groups (YAG) of 12 advisors each in the regional hub countries Ghana and Uganda. The YAGs met 4 times during the project and contributed to the study design, data collection, data analysis and dissemination activities. In addition, 4 workshops were held with the Ugandan YAG to develop a participatory film. Results Together with the youth participants, we reflected on the experiences of involving youth with disabilities and conducting research with, by and on youth with disabilities. We highlighted ethics and safeguarding, recruitment and representation, exploring experiences and data quality, participatory dissemination, accessibility, capacity building and networking as key areas of consideration and benefit in this project. Conclusion Participatory research with youth with disabilities is feasible, enriching, and key to inclusive research that informs education and employment policy and practices. Contribution Lessons learned from youth involvement in a disability inclusive research programme, focused on education and employment in 7 African countries.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Femke Bannink Mbazzi
- Disability Research Group, MRC/UVRI & LSHTM Uganda Research Group, Entebbe, Uganda
- International Centre for Evidence in Disability, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, United Kingdom
| | - Shaffa Hameed
- International Centre for Evidence in Disability, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, United Kingdom
| | - John K. Ganle
- School of Public Health, University of Ghana, Accra, Ghana
| | - Tom Shakespeare
- International Centre for Evidence in Disability, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, United Kingdom
| | - Sarah Polack
- International Centre for Evidence in Disability, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Lanzi RG, Modi RA, Rimmer J. A Disability-Inclusive Healthcare-to-Well-Being Translational Science Framework. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH AND PUBLIC HEALTH 2023; 21:18. [PMID: 38248483 PMCID: PMC10815666 DOI: 10.3390/ijerph21010018] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/16/2023] [Revised: 12/14/2023] [Accepted: 12/15/2023] [Indexed: 01/23/2024]
Abstract
The recent World Health Organization report on disability noted that people with disabilities (PWD) have many unmet health and rehabilitation needs, face numerous barriers to accessing healthcare and specialized services, and have overall worse health than people without disability. In view of this urgency to better identify and address health inequities systematically, we convened an expert panel of 14 stakeholders to develop a strategic plan that addresses this issue. The panel identified two major obstacles to quality healthcare services for PWD: (1) lack of coordination between the various healthcare sectors and community well-being programs and (2) substantial challenges finding and accessing healthcare services that meet their specific needs. The expert stakeholder panel noted that well-being self-management programs (both online and in person) that are easily accessible to PWD are critically needed. PWD must transition from being cared for as patients to individuals who are able to self-manage and self-advocate for their own health and well-being plans and activities. The proposed strategic plan offers providers and local communities a framework to begin addressing accessible and appropriate healthcare-to-well-being services and programs for PWD in managing their health in partnership with their healthcare providers.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Robin G. Lanzi
- School of Public Health—Health Behavior, The University of Alabama at Birmingham, 1665 University Blvd., Birmingham, AL 35294, USA;
| | - Riddhi A. Modi
- School of Public Health—Health Behavior, The University of Alabama at Birmingham, 1665 University Blvd., Birmingham, AL 35294, USA;
| | - James Rimmer
- School of Health Professions—Occupational Therapy, National Center on Health, Physical Activity and Disability (NCHPAD), The University of Alabama at Birmingham, 3810 Ridgeway Drive, Birmingham, AL 35209, USA;
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Fortune N, Bailie J, Gordon J, Plunkett K, Hargrave J, Madden R, Llewellyn G. Developing self-report disability questions for a voluntary patient registration form for general practice in Australia. Aust N Z J Public Health 2023; 47:100032. [PMID: 37001218 DOI: 10.1016/j.anzjph.2023.100032] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/27/2022] [Revised: 10/25/2022] [Accepted: 11/03/2022] [Indexed: 03/31/2023] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE This article reports on research undertaken to develop self-report disability questions for a patient registration form that may be implemented in general practices across Australia as part of a voluntary patient registration program. METHODS There were four research components: rapid review of approaches for capturing disability information; expert informant interviews (n=19); stakeholder consultation via virtual focus groups (n=65); and online survey (n=35). Findings from each component informed development of materials for subsequent components in an iterative research process. RESULTS Three disability questions were developed: two alternative questions for identifying disability, conceptually aligned with the operational definition of disability in Australia's national disability survey; one question to determine the patient's disability group/s. CONCLUSIONS Knowledge and perspectives from a variety of sources informed the development of self-report questions to identify patients with disability. Implementing these questions represents an opportunity to test new ways of capturing disability information suited to mainstream service provision contexts. It will be essential to evaluate the quality of the data produced during the initial period of implementation. IMPLICATIONS FOR PUBLIC HEALTH The collection of self-report patient disability information within general practice, using standard and conceptually-sound questions, has the potential to support improved provision of health care to patients with disability.
Collapse
|