1
|
Fernandes ADC, Supriyanto S, Wahyuni CU, Notobroto HB, Gregory A, Wild K. Adoption of policies to improve respectful maternity care in Timor-Leste. PLoS One 2024; 19:e0289394. [PMID: 38527016 PMCID: PMC10962841 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0289394] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/16/2023] [Accepted: 01/18/2024] [Indexed: 03/27/2024] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION There are now well-established global standards for supporting improvement in women's experience of maternity services, including frameworks for the prevention of mistreatment during childbirth. To support initiatives to improve the quality of care in maternal health services in Timor-Leste, we examine the adoption of global respectful maternity care standards in the national intrapartum care policy and in three urban birth facilities in Dili. METHODS From May to July 2022, we conducted a desk review of the Timor-Leste National Intrapartum Care Standards and Clinical Protocols for Referral Facilities and Community Health Centres. This was followed by a health-facility audit of policies, guidelines and procedures in three main maternity facilities in the capital, Dili to examine the extent to which the WHO (2016) standards for women's experiences of care have been adopted. RESULTS Despite the availability of global guidelines, key standards to improve women's experience of care have not been included in the National Intrapartum Care guidelines in Timor-Leste. There was no mention of avoiding mistreatment of women, needing informed consent for procedures, or strengthening women's own capability and confidence. In the policy wording, women tended to be distanced from the care 'procedures' and the protocols could be improved by taking a more woman-centred approach. The results of the health facility assessment showed extremely low use of standards that improve women's experiences of care. Health Facility 1 and 2 met two of the 21 quality measures, while Health Facility 3 met none of them. CONCLUSION The discourse communicated through policy fundamentally affects how health care issues are framed and how policies are enacted. Given the findings of this study, combined with previously documented issues around quality of care and low satisfaction with maternal health services, there is a need for a fundamental shift in the culture of care for women. This will require an immediate focus on leadership, training and policy-frameworks to increase respectful care for women in health facilities. It will also require longer-term effort to address the power imbalances that drive mistreatment of women within and across social systems, and to support models of care that inherently foster understanding and compassion.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | | | - Alexandra Gregory
- Centre for Child Development and Education, Menzies School of Health Research, Charles Darwin University, Northern Territory, Australia
| | - Kayli Wild
- Centre for Child Development and Education, Menzies School of Health Research, Charles Darwin University, Northern Territory, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Vyas H, Mariam OJ, Bhardwaj P. Quality of maternal and newborn health services and their impact on maternal-neonatal outcome at a primary health center. J Family Med Prim Care 2024; 13:505-511. [PMID: 38605802 PMCID: PMC11006057 DOI: 10.4103/jfmpc.jfmpc_843_23] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/22/2023] [Revised: 07/03/2023] [Accepted: 07/04/2023] [Indexed: 04/13/2024] Open
Abstract
Introduction The utilization of the maternal and newborn health services has increased, but mere increase in utilization of services does not ensure that quality services are being provided. The aim of the study was to assess the quality of maternal and newborn services and their impact on maternal and neonatal outcome at a primary health center of Western Rajasthan in India. Materials and Methods An exploratory study was undertaken at a conveniently selected primary health center providing 24-hour delivery services. Information regarding the availability of services was collected from the available medical officer in charge using an Indian Public Health Standards (IPHS) Proforma. Assessment of quality of services was performed by using WHO standards of care based on assessment of quality of maternal and newborn services tool by the perspectives of the provider as well as the mothers utilizing the services. 36 mothers who delivered at the selected PHC were interviewed. Results All basic obstetric care services were available at the selected primary health centers including the 24 × 7 delivery services. The assessment of quality by provider's perspective revealed that the system of referral could be improved. Quality of maternal and newborn services assessment revealed that the practice of skin to skin contact between the mother and newborn just after the delivery was not being followed and few (30%) mothers informed that they could not start breastfeeding within 1 hours of birth. 47% mothers reported that they were not given the freedom to ask questions during delivery. Maternal and newborn outcome revealed that all mothers (100%) had a normal vaginal delivery, and 22% mothers had an episiotomy. All (100%) newborns cried immediately after birth, and average birthweight was 2.89 kg. Conclusion PHCs are the first point of contact of mothers and healthcare delivery system. Assessment of quality of services is an important tool for quality assurance. Inclusion of evidence-based practices like skin-to-skin contact and early initiation of breastfeeding is important to improve the maternal and newborn well-being.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Himanshu Vyas
- College of Nursing, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Jodhpur, Rajasthan, India
| | | | - Pankaj Bhardwaj
- Department of CMFM, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Jodhpur, Rajasthan, India
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Manu A, Pingray V, Billah SM, Williams J, Kilima S, Yeji F, Gohar F, Wobil P, Karim F, Muganyizi P, Mogela D, El Arifeen S, Vandenent M, Matin Z, Janda I, Zaka N, Hailegebriel TD. Implementing maternal and newborn health quality of care standards in healthcare facilities to improve the adoption of respectful maternity care in Bangladesh, Ghana and Tanzania: a controlled before and after study. BMJ Glob Health 2023; 8:e012673. [PMID: 37963610 PMCID: PMC10649771 DOI: 10.1136/bmjgh-2023-012673] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/25/2023] [Accepted: 10/07/2023] [Indexed: 11/16/2023] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Many women worldwide cannot access respectful maternity care (RMC). We assessed the effect of implementing maternal and newborn health (MNH) quality of care standards on RMC measures. METHODS We used a facility-based controlled before and after design in 43 healthcare facilities in Bangladesh, Ghana and Tanzania. Interviews with women and health workers and observations of labour and childbirth were used for data collection. We estimated difference-in-differences to compare changes in RMC measures over time between groups. RESULTS 1827 women and 818 health workers were interviewed, and 1512 observations were performed. In Bangladesh, MNH quality of care standards reduced physical abuse (DiD -5.2;-9.0 to -1.4). The standards increased RMC training (DiD 59.0; 33.4 to 84.6) and the availability of policies and procedures for both addressing patient concerns (DiD 46.0; 4.7 to 87.4) and identifying/reporting abuse (DiD 45.9; 19.9 to 71.8). The control facilities showed greater improvements in communicating the delivery plan (DiD -33.8; -62.9 to -4.6). Other measures improved in both groups, except for satisfaction with hygiene. In Ghana, the intervention improved women's experiences. Providers allowed women to ask questions and express concerns (DiD 37.5; 5.9 to 69.0), considered concerns (DiD 14.9; 4.9 to 24.9), reduced verbal abuse (DiD -8.0; -12.1 to -3.8) and physical abuse (DiD -5.2; -11.4 to -0.9). More women reported they would choose the facility for another delivery (DiD 17.5; 5.5 to 29.4). In Tanzania, women in the intervention facilities reported improvements in privacy (DiD 24.2; 0.2 to 48.3). No other significant differences were observed due to improvements in both groups. CONCLUSION Institutionalising care standards and creating an enabling environment for quality MNH care is feasible in low and middle-income countries and may facilitate the adoption of RMC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alexander Manu
- Epidemiology and Disease Control, University of Ghana School of Public Health, Accra, Ghana
| | - Veronica Pingray
- Maternal, Newborn and Adolescents Health, UNICEF HQ consultant, New York, New York, USA
- Department of Mother and Child Health Research, Institute for Clinical Effectiveness and Health Policy, Buenos Aires, Argentina
| | - Sk Masum Billah
- Maternal and Child Health Division, ICDDRB, Dhaka, Bangladesh
- School of Public Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - John Williams
- Department of Clinical Sciences, Dodowa Health Research Centre, Ghana Health Service, Accra, Ghana
| | - Stella Kilima
- Research Publication and Documentation Section, National Institute for Medical Research, Dar es Salaam, United Republic of Tanzania
| | - Francis Yeji
- Planning, Policy, Monitoring, and Evaluation Division (PPMED), Ghana Health Service, HQ, Accra, Ghana
| | - Fatima Gohar
- Health Section, UNICEF Eastern and Southern Africa Regional Office, Nairobi, Kenya
| | | | - Farhana Karim
- Maternal and Child Health Division, ICDDRB, Dhaka, Bangladesh
| | - Projestine Muganyizi
- Department of Obstetrics & Gynaecology, University of Dar es Salaam Mbeya College of Health and Allied Sciences (UDSM MCHAS), Mbeya, United Republic of Tanzania
| | - Deus Mogela
- National Blood Transfusion Unit, Ministry of Health, Social Development, Gender, Elderly and Children, Dar es Salaam, United Republic of Tanzania
| | | | | | - Ziaul Matin
- Health, UNICEF Bangladesh, Dhaka, Bangladesh
| | - Indeep Janda
- Maternal, Newborn and Adolescents Health, UNICEF, New York, New York, USA
| | - Nabila Zaka
- Health, UNICEF Pakistan, Islamabad, Pakistan
| | | |
Collapse
|
4
|
Lazzerini M, Valente EP, Covi B, Rozée V, Costa R, Otelea MR, Abderhalden-Zellweger A, Węgrzynowska M, Linden K, Arendt M, Brigidi S, Miani C, Pumpure E, Radetic J, Drandic D, Cerimagic A, Nedberg IH, Liepinaitienė A, Rodrigues C, de Labrusse C, Baranowska B, Zaigham M, Castañeda LM, Batram-Zantvoort S, Jakovicka D, Ruzicic J, Juciūtė S, Santos T, Gemperle M, Tataj-Puzyna U, Elden H, Mizgaitienė M, Lincetto O, Sacks E, Mariani I. Rates of instrumental vaginal birth and cesarean and quality of maternal and newborn health care in private versus public facilities: Results of the IMAgiNE EURO study in 16 countries. Int J Gynaecol Obstet 2022; 159 Suppl 1:22-38. [PMID: 36530007 PMCID: PMC10108180 DOI: 10.1002/ijgo.14458] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/23/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To explore the quality of maternal and newborn care (QMNC) during the COVID-19 pandemic by facility type among 16 European countries, comparing rates of instrumental vaginal birth and cesarean. METHODS Women who gave birth in the WHO European Region from March 1, 2020, to February 7, 2022, answered a validated online questionnaire. Rates of instrumental birth, instrumental vaginal birth, and cesarean, and a QMNC index were calculated for births in public versus private facilities. RESULTS Responses from 25 206 participants were analyzed. Women giving birth in private compared with public facilities reported significantly more frequent total cesarean (32.5% vs 19.0%; aOR 1.70; 95% CI 1.52-1.90), elective cesarean (17.3% vs 7.8%; aOR 1.90; 95% CI 1.65-2.19), and emergency cesarean before labor (7.4% vs 3.9%; aOR 1.39; 95% CI 1.14-1.70) (P < 0.001 for all comparisons), with analyses by country confirming these results. QMNC index results were heterogeneous across countries and regions in the same country and were largely affected by geographical distribution of regions rather than by type of facility alone. CONCLUSION The study confirms that births in private facilities have higher odds of cesarean. It also suggests that QMNC should be closely monitored in all facilities to achieve high-quality care, independent of facility type or geographical distribution. CLINICALTRIALS GOV IDENTIFIER NCT04847336.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marzia Lazzerini
- WHO Collaborating Centre for Maternal and Child Health, Institute for Maternal and Child Health IRCCS "Burlo Garofolo", Trieste, Italy
| | - Emanuelle Pessa Valente
- WHO Collaborating Centre for Maternal and Child Health, Institute for Maternal and Child Health IRCCS "Burlo Garofolo", Trieste, Italy
| | - Benedetta Covi
- WHO Collaborating Centre for Maternal and Child Health, Institute for Maternal and Child Health IRCCS "Burlo Garofolo", Trieste, Italy
| | - Virginie Rozée
- Sexual and Reproductive Health and Rights Research Unit, Institut National d'Études Démographiques (INED), Paris, France
| | - Raquel Costa
- Epidemiology Research Unit (EPIUnit), Instituto de Saúde Pública, Universidade do Porto, Porto, Portugal.,Laboratory for Integrative and Translational Research in Population Health (ITR), Porto, Portugal.,Lusófona University/HEI-Lab: Digital Human-environment Interaction Labs, Lisbon, Portugal
| | - Marina Ruxandra Otelea
- University of Medicine and Pharmacy Carol Davila, Bucharest, Romania.,SAMAS Association, Bucharest, Romania
| | - Alessia Abderhalden-Zellweger
- School of Health Sciences (HESAV), HES-SO University of Applied Sciences and Arts Western Switzerland, Lausanne, Switzerland
| | - Maria Węgrzynowska
- Department of Midwifery, Centre of Postgraduate Medical Education, Warsaw, Poland
| | - Karolina Linden
- Institute of Health and Care Sciences, Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden
| | - Maryse Arendt
- Beruffsverband vun de Laktatiounsberoderinnen zu Lëtzebuerg asbl (Professional Association of Lactation Consultants in Luxembourg), Luxembourg, Luxembourg
| | - Serena Brigidi
- Department of Anthropology, Philosophy and Social Work, Medical Anthropology Research Center (MARC), Rovira i Virgili University (URV), Tarragona, Spain
| | - Céline Miani
- Department of Epidemiology and International Public Health, School of Public Health, Bielefeld University, Bielefeld, Germany
| | - Elizabete Pumpure
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Riga Stradins University, Rīga, Latvia.,Riga Maternity Hospital, Rīga, Latvia
| | | | | | | | | | | | - Carina Rodrigues
- Epidemiology Research Unit (EPIUnit), Instituto de Saúde Pública, Universidade do Porto, Porto, Portugal.,Laboratory for Integrative and Translational Research in Population Health (ITR), Porto, Portugal
| | - Claire de Labrusse
- School of Health Sciences (HESAV), HES-SO University of Applied Sciences and Arts Western Switzerland, Lausanne, Switzerland
| | - Barbara Baranowska
- Department of Midwifery, Centre of Postgraduate Medical Education, Warsaw, Poland
| | - Mehreen Zaigham
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Institution of Clinical Sciences Lund, Lund University, Lund and Skåne University Hospital, Malmö, Sweden
| | | | - Stephanie Batram-Zantvoort
- Department of Epidemiology and International Public Health, School of Public Health, Bielefeld University, Bielefeld, Germany
| | | | | | - Simona Juciūtė
- Kaunas University of Applied Sciences, Kaunas, Lithuania
| | - Teresa Santos
- Universidade Europeia, Lisbon, Portugal.,Plataforma CatólicaMed/Centro de Investigação Interdisciplinar em Saúde (CIIS) da Universidade Católica Portuguesa, Lisbon, Portugal
| | - Michael Gemperle
- Research Institute of Midwifery, School of Health Sciences, ZHAW Zurich University of Applied Sciences, Winterthur, Switzerland
| | - Urszula Tataj-Puzyna
- Department of Midwifery, Centre of Postgraduate Medical Education, Warsaw, Poland
| | - Helen Elden
- Institute of Health and Care Sciences, Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden.,Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Region Västra Götaland, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Gothenburg, Sweden
| | - Marija Mizgaitienė
- Kaunas Hospital of the Lithuanian University of Health Sciences, Kaunas, Lithuania
| | - Ornella Lincetto
- Department of Maternal, Newborn, Child and Adolescent Health and Ageing, World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland
| | - Emma Sacks
- Department of International Health, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Ilaria Mariani
- WHO Collaborating Centre for Maternal and Child Health, Institute for Maternal and Child Health IRCCS "Burlo Garofolo", Trieste, Italy
| | | |
Collapse
|
5
|
Valente EP, Mariani I, Covi B, Lazzerini M. Quality of Informed Consent Practices around the Time of Childbirth: A Cross-Sectional Study in Italy. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH AND PUBLIC HEALTH 2022; 19:ijerph19127166. [PMID: 35742415 PMCID: PMC9222941 DOI: 10.3390/ijerph19127166] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/29/2022] [Revised: 05/27/2022] [Accepted: 06/01/2022] [Indexed: 12/10/2022]
Abstract
Background: Few studies have explored consent request practices during childbirth. Objective: We explored consent request practices during childbirth in a referral hospital and research centre in Italy, capturing both women and health workers’ perspectives. Methods: Data were collected using self-administrated questionnaires between December 2016 and September 2018. Nine key maternal and newborn procedures were analysed. Associations between consent requests and women characteristics were explored by multiple logistic regression. Results: Among 1244 women, the rate of consent requests varied widely, with caesarean section (CS) showing the highest rate (89.1%) and neonatal conjunctivitis prophylaxis presenting the lowest rate (11.4%). Information provided on “risks/benefits” and “reasons” for procedures by health staff was most often not comprehensive for procedures of interest (range 18.6–87.4%). The lack of informed consent is not specifically linked to any pattern of women characteristics. According to 105 health workers, adequate protocols and standard forms for consent requests were available in 67.6% and 78.1% of cases, respectively, while less than one third (31.4%) reported having received adequate training and supportive supervision on how to deliver informed consent. Conclusions: Study findings align with previous evidence showing that consent request practices during childbirth need to be largely improved. More research is needed to investigate effective strategies for improvement.
Collapse
|
6
|
Valente EP, Covi B, Mariani I, Morano S, Otalea M, Nanu I, Nanu MI, Elden H, Linden K, Zaigham M, Vik ES, Kongslien S, Nedberg I, Costa R, Rodrigues C, Dias H, Drandić D, Kurbanović M, Sacks E, Muzigaba M, Lincetto O, Lazzerini M. WHO Standards-based questionnaire to measure health workers' perspective on the quality of care around the time of childbirth in the WHO European region: development and mixed-methods validation in six countries. BMJ Open 2022; 12:e056753. [PMID: 35396296 PMCID: PMC8995570 DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-056753] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/12/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVES Develop and validate a WHO Standards-based online questionnaire to measure the quality of maternal and newborn care (QMNC) around the time of childbirth from the health workers' perspective. DESIGN Mixed-methods study. SETTING Six countries of the WHO European Region. PARTICIPANTS AND METHODS The questionnaire is based on lessons learnt in previous studies, and was developed in three sequential phases: (1) WHO Quality Measures were prioritised and content, construct and face validity were assessed through a Delphi involving a multidisciplinary board of experts from 11 countries of the WHO European Region; (2) translation/back translation of the English version was conducted following The Professional Society for Health Economics and Outcomes Research guidelines; (3) internal consistency, intrarater reliability and acceptability were assessed among 600 health workers in six countries. RESULTS The questionnaire included 40 items based on WHO Standards Quality Measures, equally divided into four domains: provision of care, experience of care, availability of human and physical resources, organisational changes due to COVID-19; and its organised in six sections. It was translated/back translated in 12 languages: Bosnian, Croatian, French, German, Italian, Norwegian, Portuguese, Romanian, Russian, Slovenian, Spanish and Swedish. The Cronbach's alpha values were ≥0.70 for each questionnaire section where questions were hypothesised to be interrelated, indicating good internal consistence. Cohen K or Gwet's AC1 values were ≥0.60, suggesting good intrarater reliability, except for one question. Acceptability was good with only 1.70% of health workers requesting minimal changes in question wording. CONCLUSIONS Findings suggest that the questionnaire has good content, construct, face validity, internal consistency, intrarater reliability and acceptability in six countries of the WHO European Region. Future studies may further explore the questionnaire's use in other countries, and how to translate evidence generated by this tool into policies to improve the QMNC. TRAIL REGISTRATION NUMBER NCT04847336.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Emanuelle Pessa Valente
- WHO Collaborating Centre for Maternal and Child Health, Institute for Maternal and Child Health - IRCCS "Burlo Garofolo", Trieste, Italy
| | - Benedetta Covi
- WHO Collaborating Centre for Maternal and Child Health, Institute for Maternal and Child Health - IRCCS "Burlo Garofolo", Trieste, Italy
| | - Ilaria Mariani
- WHO Collaborating Centre for Maternal and Child Health, Institute for Maternal and Child Health - IRCCS "Burlo Garofolo", Trieste, Italy
| | - Sandra Morano
- Medical School and Midwifery School, Genoa University, Genoa, Italy
| | - Marina Otalea
- University of Medicine and Pharmacy Carol Davila, Bucharest, Romania
- SAMAS Association, Bucharest, Romania
| | - Ioana Nanu
- National Institute for Mother and Child Health "Alessandrescu - Rusescu", Bucharest, Romania
| | - Micaela Iuliana Nanu
- National Institute for Mother and Child Health "Alessandrescu - Rusescu", Bucharest, Romania
| | - Helen Elden
- Institute of Health and Care Sciences, Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden
- Region Västra Götaland, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Gothenburg, Sweden
| | - Karolina Linden
- Institute of Health and Care Sciences, Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden
| | - Mehreen Zaigham
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology - Institution of Clinical Sciences Lund, Lund University, Lund and Skåne University Hospital, Malmö, Sweden
| | - Eline Skirnisdottir Vik
- Department of Health and Caring Sciences, Western Norway University of Applied Sciences, Bergen, Norway
| | - Sigrun Kongslien
- Department of Health and Care Sciences, Faculty of Health Sciences, UiT The Arctic University of Norway, Tromsø, Norway
| | - Ingvild Nedberg
- Department of Health and Care Sciences, Faculty of Health Sciences, UiT The Arctic University of Norway, Tromsø, Norway
| | - Raquel Costa
- EPIUnit - Institute of Public Health, University of Porto, Porto, Portugal
- Laboratory for Integrative and Translational Research in Population Health (ITR), Porto, Portugal
- Human-Environment Interaction Lab, Universidade Lusófona, Porto, Portugal
| | - Carina Rodrigues
- EPIUnit - Institute of Public Health, University of Porto, Porto, Portugal
- Laboratory for Integrative and Translational Research in Population Health (ITR), Porto, Portugal
| | - Heloísa Dias
- Regional Health Administration of the Algarve, IP (ARS - Algarve), Albufeira, Portugal
| | | | | | - Emma Sacks
- Department of International Health, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
| | - Moise Muzigaba
- Department of Maternal, Newborn, Child and Adolescent Health and Ageing, World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland
| | - Ornella Lincetto
- Department of Maternal, Newborn, Child and Adolescent Health and Ageing, World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland
| | - Marzia Lazzerini
- WHO Collaborating Centre for Maternal and Child Health, Institute for Maternal and Child Health - IRCCS "Burlo Garofolo", Trieste, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Lazzerini M, Mariani I, de Melo E Lima TR, Felici E, Martelossi S, Lubrano R, Lucarelli A, Trobia GL, Cogo P, Peri F, Nisticò D, Were WM, Baltag V, Muzigaba M, Barbi E. WHO standards-based tools to measure service providers' and service users' views on the quality of hospital child care: development and validation in Italy. BMJ Open 2022; 12:e052115. [PMID: 35301202 PMCID: PMC8932272 DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-052115] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/23/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVES Evidence showed that, even in high-income countries, children and adolescents may not receive high quality of care (QOC). We describe the development and initial validation, in Italy, of two WHO standards-based questionnaires to conduct an assessment of QOC for children and young adolescents at inpatient level, based on the provider and user perspectives. DESIGN Multiphase, mixed-methods study. SETTING, PARTICIPANTS AND METHODS The two questionnaires were developed in four phases equally conducted for each tool. Phase 1 which included the prioritisation of the WHO Quality Measures according to predefined criteria and the development of the draft questionnaires. In phase 2 content face validation of the draft questionnaires was assessed among both experts and end-users. In phase 3 the optimised questionnaires were field tested to assess acceptability, perceived utility and comprehensiveness (N=163 end-users). In phase 4 intrarater reliability and internal consistency were evaluated (N=170 and N=301 end-users, respectively). RESULTS The final questionnaires included 150 WHO Quality Measures. Observed face validity was excellent (kappa value of 1). The field test resulted in response rates of 98% and 76% for service users and health providers, respectively. Among respondents, 96.9% service users and 90.4% providers rated the questionnaires as useful, and 86.9% and 93.9%, respectively rated them as comprehensive. Intrarater reliability was good, with Cohen's kappa values exceeding 0.70. Cronbach alpha values ranged from 0.83 to 0.95, indicating excellent internal consistency. CONCLUSIONS Study findings suggest these tools developed have good content and face validity, high acceptability and perceived utility, and good intrarater reliability and internal consistency, and therefore could be used in health facilities in Italy and similar contexts. Priority areas for future research include how tools measuring paediatric QOC can be more effectively used to help health professionals provide the best possible care.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marzia Lazzerini
- WHO Collaborating Centre for Maternal and Child Health, Institute for Maternal and Child Health IRCCS Burlo Garofolo, Trieste, Italy
| | - Ilaria Mariani
- WHO Collaborating Centre for Maternal and Child Health, Institute for Maternal and Child Health IRCCS Burlo Garofolo, Trieste, Italy
| | | | - Enrico Felici
- Pediatric and Pediatric Emergency Unit, The Children Hospital, AO SS Antonio e Biagio e Cesare Arrigo, Alessandria, Italy
| | | | - Riccardo Lubrano
- Department of Pediatrics, "La Sapienza" University -Hospital "Santa Maria Goretti" of Latina, Roma, Italy
| | - Annunziata Lucarelli
- Pediatric Emergency Department, Giovanni XXIII Pediatric Hospital, University of Bari, Bari, Italy
| | - Gian Luca Trobia
- Pediatric and Pediatric Emergency Room Unit, "Cannizzaro" Emergency Hospital, Catania, Italy
| | - Paola Cogo
- Division of Paediatrics, Department of Medicine DAME, Academic Hospital Santa Maria della Misericordia, University of Udine, Udine, Italy
| | | | | | - Wilson Milton Were
- Department of Maternal, Newborn, Child and Adolescent Health and Ageing, World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland
| | - Valentina Baltag
- Department of Maternal, Newborn, Child and Adolescent Health and Ageing, World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland
| | - Moise Muzigaba
- Department of Maternal, Newborn, Child and Adolescent Health and Ageing, World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland
| | - Egidio Barbi
- University of Trieste, Trieste, Italy
- Institute for Maternal and Child Health IRCCS Burlo Garofolo, Trieste, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Lazzerini M, Argentini G, Mariani I, Covi B, Semenzato C, Lincetto O, Muzigaba M, Valente EP. WHO standards-based tool to measure women's views on the quality of care around the time of childbirth at facility level in the WHO European region: development and validation in Italy. BMJ Open 2022; 12:e048195. [PMID: 35172991 PMCID: PMC8852667 DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-048195] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/30/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVES A comprehensive WHO standards-based tool to measure women's perceived quality of maternal and newborn care (QMNC) in health facilities is needed to allow for comparisons of data across settings and over time. This paper describes the development of such a tool, and its validation in Italy. DESIGN A multiphase, mixed-methods study involving qualitative and quantitative research methods. SETTING Nine health facilities in Italy. METHODS The questionnaire was developed in six phases: (1) Defining the scope, characteristics and a potential list of measures for the tool; (2) initial content and construct validation; (3) first field testing to assess acceptability and perceived utility for end-users (1244 women, 35 decision makers) and further explore construct validity; (4) content optimisation and score development; (5) assessment of face validity, intrarater reliability and internal consistency and (6) second field testing in nine maternity hospitals (4295 women, 78 decision-makers). RESULTS The final version of the tool included 116 questions accounting for 99 out of the 350 of the extended lists of WHO Quality Measures. Observed face validity was very good, with 100% agreement for 101 (87%) questions and Kappa exceeding 0.60 for remaining ones. Reliability was good, with either high agreement or Kappa exceeding 0.60 for all items. Cronbach alpha values ranged from 0.84 to 0.88, indicating very good internal consistency. Acceptability across seven hospitals was good (mean response rate: 57.4%, 95% CI 44.4% to 70.5%). The questionnaire proved to be useful, driving the development of actions plan to improve the QMNC in each facility. CONCLUSIONS Study findings suggest that the tool has good content, construct, face validity, intrarater reliability and internal consistency, while being acceptable and useful. Therefore, it could be used in health facilities in Italy and similar context. More research should investigate how effectively use the tool in different countries for improving the QMNC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marzia Lazzerini
- WHO Collaborating Centre for Maternal and Child Health, Institute for Maternal and Child Health IRCCS Burlo Garofolo, Trieste, Italy
| | - Giorgia Argentini
- WHO Collaborating Centre for Maternal and Child Health, Institute for Maternal and Child Health IRCCS Burlo Garofolo, Trieste, Italy
| | - Ilaria Mariani
- WHO Collaborating Centre for Maternal and Child Health, Institute for Maternal and Child Health IRCCS Burlo Garofolo, Trieste, Italy
| | - Benedetta Covi
- WHO Collaborating Centre for Maternal and Child Health, Institute for Maternal and Child Health IRCCS Burlo Garofolo, Trieste, Italy
| | - Chiara Semenzato
- WHO Collaborating Centre for Maternal and Child Health, Institute for Maternal and Child Health IRCCS Burlo Garofolo, Trieste, Italy
| | - O Lincetto
- Department of Maternal, Newborn, Child and Adolescent Health and Ageing, World Health Organization, Geneve, Switzerland
| | - Moise Muzigaba
- Department of Maternal, Newborn, Child and Adolescent Health and Ageing, World Health Organization, Geneve, Switzerland
| | - Emanuelle Pessa Valente
- WHO Collaborating Centre for Maternal and Child Health, Institute for Maternal and Child Health IRCCS Burlo Garofolo, Trieste, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Lazzerini M, Covi B, Mariani I, Drglin Z, Arendt M, Nedberg IH, Elden H, Costa R, Drandić D, Radetić J, Otelea MR, Miani C, Brigidi S, Rozée V, Ponikvar BM, Tasch B, Kongslien S, Linden K, Barata C, Kurbanović M, Ružičić J, Batram-Zantvoort S, Castañeda LM, Rochebrochard EDL, Bohinec A, Vik ES, Zaigham M, Santos T, Wandschneider L, Viver AC, Ćerimagić A, Sacks E, Valente EP. Quality of facility-based maternal and newborn care around the time of childbirth during the COVID-19 pandemic: online survey investigating maternal perspectives in 12 countries of the WHO European Region. THE LANCET REGIONAL HEALTH. EUROPE 2022; 13:100268. [PMID: 34977838 PMCID: PMC8703114 DOI: 10.1016/j.lanepe.2021.100268] [Citation(s) in RCA: 34] [Impact Index Per Article: 17.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/26/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Multi-country studies assessing the quality of maternal and newborn care (QMNC) during the COVID-19 pandemic, as defined by WHO Standards, are lacking. METHODS Women who gave birth in 12 countries of the WHO European Region from March 1, 2020 - March 15, 2021 answered an online questionnaire, including 40 WHO Standard-based Quality Measures. FINDINGS 21,027 mothers were included in the analysis. Among those who experienced labour (N=18,063), 41·8% (26·1%- 63·5%) experienced difficulties in accessing antenatal care, 62% (12·6%-99·0%) were not allowed a companion of choice, 31·1% (16·5%-56·9%) received inadequate breastfeeding support, 34·4% (5·2%-64·8%) reported that health workers were not always using protective personal equipment, and 31·8% (17·8%-53·1%) rated the health workers' number as "insufficient". Episiotomy was performed in 20·1% (6·1%-66·0%) of spontaneous vaginal births and fundal pressure applied in 41·2% (11·5% -100%) of instrumental vaginal births. In addition, 23·9% women felt they were not treated with dignity (12·8%-59·8%), 12·5% (7·0%-23·4%) suffered abuse, and 2·4% (0·1%-26·2%) made informal payments. Most findings were significantly worse among women with prelabour caesarean birth (N=2,964). Multivariate analyses confirmed significant differences among countries, with Croatia, Romania, Serbia showing significant lower QMNC Indexes and Luxemburg showing a significantly higher QMNC Index than the total sample. Younger women and those with operative births also reported significantly lower QMNC Indexes. INTERPRETATION Mothers reports revealed large inequities in QMNC across countries of the WHO European Region. Quality improvement initiatives to reduce these inequities and promote evidence-based, patient-centred respectful care for all mothers and newborns during the COVID-19 pandemic and beyond are urgently needed. FUNDING The study was financially supported by the Institute for Maternal and Child Health IRCCS Burlo Garofolo, Trieste, Italy. STUDY REGISTRATION ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT04847336.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marzia Lazzerini
- WHO Collaborating Centre for Maternal and Child Health, Institute for Maternal and Child Health IRCCS Burlo Garofolo, Trieste, Italy
| | - Benedetta Covi
- WHO Collaborating Centre for Maternal and Child Health, Institute for Maternal and Child Health IRCCS Burlo Garofolo, Trieste, Italy
| | - Ilaria Mariani
- WHO Collaborating Centre for Maternal and Child Health, Institute for Maternal and Child Health IRCCS Burlo Garofolo, Trieste, Italy
| | - Zalka Drglin
- National Institute of Public Health, Ljubljana, Slovenia
| | - Maryse Arendt
- Beruffsverband vun de Laktatiounsberoderinnen zu Lëtzebuerg asbl (Professional association of the Lactation Consultants in Luxembourg), Luxembourg, Luxembourg
| | | | - Helen Elden
- Institute of Health and Care sciences, Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden
- Region Västra Götaland, Sahlgrenska university hospital, Dept of Obstetrics & Gynecology, Gothenburg, Sweden
| | - Raquel Costa
- EPIUnit, Institute of Public Health, University of Porto, Porto, Portugal
- Laboratory for Integrative and Translational Research in Population Health (ITR), Porto, Portugal
- Hei-Lab:Digital Human-Environment Interaction Lab. Faculty of Psychology, Education and Sports, Lusófona University, Porto, Portugal
| | | | | | - Marina Ruxandra Otelea
- University of Medicine and Pharmacy Carol Davila, Bucharest, Romania
- SAMAS Association, Bucharest, Romania
| | - Céline Miani
- Department of Epidemiology and International Public Health, School of Public Health, Bielefeld University, Bielefeld, Germany
| | - Serena Brigidi
- Department of Anthropology, Philosophy and Social Work. Medical Anthropology Research Center (MARC). Rovira i Virgili University (URV), Tarragona, Spain
| | - Virginie Rozée
- Sexual and Reproductive Health and Rights Research Unit, Institut National d’Études Démographiques (INED), Paris, France
| | | | - Barbara Tasch
- Beruffsverband vun de Laktatiounsberoderinnen zu Lëtzebuerg asbl (Professional association of the Lactation Consultants in Luxembourg), Luxembourg, Luxembourg
- Neonatal intensive care unit, KannerKlinik, Centre Hospitalier de Luxembourg, Luxembourg, Luxembourg
| | - Sigrun Kongslien
- Department of health and care sciences, UiT The Arctic University of Norway
| | - Karolina Linden
- Institute of Health and Care sciences, Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden
| | - Catarina Barata
- Instituto de Ciências Sociais, Universidade de Lisboa, Lisboa, Portugal
| | | | | | - Stephanie Batram-Zantvoort
- Department of Epidemiology and International Public Health, School of Public Health, Bielefeld University, Bielefeld, Germany
| | | | - Elise de La Rochebrochard
- Sexual and Reproductive Health and Rights Research Unit, Institut National d’Études Démographiques (INED), Paris, France
| | - Anja Bohinec
- National Institute of Public Health, Ljubljana, Slovenia
| | - Eline Skirnisdottir Vik
- Department of health and caring sciences, Western Norway University of Applied Sciences, Norway
| | - Mehreen Zaigham
- Obstetrics & Gynecology, Department of Clinical Sciences Lund, Lund University, Skåne University Hospital, Lund, Sweden
| | - Teresa Santos
- Universidade Europeia, Lisboa, Portugal
- Centro de Investigação Interdisciplinar em Saúde (CIIS) da Universidade Católica Portuguesa, Lisbon, Portugal
| | - Lisa Wandschneider
- Department of Epidemiology and International Public Health, School of Public Health, Bielefeld University, Bielefeld, Germany
| | | | | | - Emma Sacks
- Department of International Health, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland, United States of America
| | - Emanuelle Pessa Valente
- WHO Collaborating Centre for Maternal and Child Health, Institute for Maternal and Child Health IRCCS Burlo Garofolo, Trieste, Italy
| | - IMAgiNE EURO study group
- WHO Collaborating Centre for Maternal and Child Health, Institute for Maternal and Child Health IRCCS Burlo Garofolo, Trieste, Italy
- National Institute of Public Health, Ljubljana, Slovenia
- Beruffsverband vun de Laktatiounsberoderinnen zu Lëtzebuerg asbl (Professional association of the Lactation Consultants in Luxembourg), Luxembourg, Luxembourg
- Department of community medicine, UiT The Arctic University of Norway
- Institute of Health and Care sciences, Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden
- Region Västra Götaland, Sahlgrenska university hospital, Dept of Obstetrics & Gynecology, Gothenburg, Sweden
- EPIUnit, Institute of Public Health, University of Porto, Porto, Portugal
- Laboratory for Integrative and Translational Research in Population Health (ITR), Porto, Portugal
- Hei-Lab:Digital Human-Environment Interaction Lab. Faculty of Psychology, Education and Sports, Lusófona University, Porto, Portugal
- Roda – Parents in Action, Zagreb, Croatia
- Centar za mame, Belgrade, Serbia
- University of Medicine and Pharmacy Carol Davila, Bucharest, Romania
- SAMAS Association, Bucharest, Romania
- Department of Epidemiology and International Public Health, School of Public Health, Bielefeld University, Bielefeld, Germany
- Department of Anthropology, Philosophy and Social Work. Medical Anthropology Research Center (MARC). Rovira i Virgili University (URV), Tarragona, Spain
- Sexual and Reproductive Health and Rights Research Unit, Institut National d’Études Démographiques (INED), Paris, France
- Neonatal intensive care unit, KannerKlinik, Centre Hospitalier de Luxembourg, Luxembourg, Luxembourg
- Department of health and care sciences, UiT The Arctic University of Norway
- Instituto de Ciências Sociais, Universidade de Lisboa, Lisboa, Portugal
- Faculty of Health Studies, University of Rijeka, Rijeka, Croatia
- Institut Català de la Salut, Generalitat de Catalunya, Spain
- Department of health and caring sciences, Western Norway University of Applied Sciences, Norway
- Obstetrics & Gynecology, Department of Clinical Sciences Lund, Lund University, Skåne University Hospital, Lund, Sweden
- Universidade Europeia, Lisboa, Portugal
- Centro de Investigação Interdisciplinar em Saúde (CIIS) da Universidade Católica Portuguesa, Lisbon, Portugal
- Institut Català d'Antropologia (ICA), Barcelona, Spain
- NGO Baby Steps, Sarajevo, Bosnia-Herzegovina
- Department of International Health, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland, United States of America
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Lazzerini M, Covi B, Mariani I, Giusti A, Valente EP, Ćerimagić A, Drandić D, Kurbanović M, Virginie R, Rochebrochard E, Löfgren K, Miani C, Batram‐Zantvoort S, Wandschneider L, Verardi G, Zanin B, Morano S, Chertok I, Artzi‐Medvedik R, Pumpure E, Rezeberga D, Vaska A, Jakovicka D, Rudzīte P, Ērmane E, Vilcāne KP, Arendt M, Tasch B, Nedberg IH, Kongslien S, Vik ES, Baranowska B, Tataj‐Puzyna U, Węgrzynowska M, Costa R, Barata C, Santos T, Rodrigues C, Dias H, Otelea MR, Yarotskaya E, Radetić J, Ružičić J, Drglin Z, Ponikvar BM, Bohinec A, Brigidi S, Castañeda LM, Viver AC, Elden H, Linden K, Zaigham M, Sengpiel V, De Labrusse C, Abderhalden A, Pfund A, Thorn H. Quality of care at childbirth: findings of IMAgiNE EURO in Italy during the first year of the COVID‐19 pandemic. Int J Gynaecol Obstet 2022; 157:405-417. [PMID: 35092692 PMCID: PMC9087757 DOI: 10.1002/ijgo.14119] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/29/2021] [Revised: 10/25/2021] [Accepted: 10/26/2021] [Indexed: 11/29/2022]
Abstract
Objective Investigate the quality of maternal and newborn care (QMNC) during childbirth in the first year of COVID‐19 pandemic in Italy, from the mothers' perspective, as key service users. Methods Women who gave birth in an Italian facility from March 1, 2020 to February 29, 2021 answered an online questionnaire including 40 WHO Standard‐based Quality Measures. Descriptive and multivariate quantile regression analyses were performed. Results In total, 4824 women were included, reporting heterogeneity of practices across regions: among 3981 women who underwent labour 78.4% (63.0%–92.0%) were not allowed a companion of choice, 44.6% (28.9%–53.3%) had difficulties in attending routine antenatal visits, 36.3% (24.9%–61.1%) reported inadequate breastfeeding support, 39.2% (23.3%–62.2%) felt not involved in medical choices, 33.0% (23.9%–49.3%) experienced unclear communication from staff, 24.8% (15.9%–39.4%) were not always treated with dignity and 12.7% (10.1%–29.3%) reported abuses. Findings in the group of women who did not experience labour were substantially similar. Multivariate analyses confirmed a significant lower QMNC index for regions in southern Italy compared to North and Central regions. Conclusion Mothers reported substantial inequities in the QMNC across Italian regions. Future studies should monitor QMNC over time. Meanwhile, actions to ensure high QMNC for all mothers and newborns across Italy are urgently required. Mothers giving birth in the first year of the COVID‐19 pandemic reported substantial inequities across Italian regions in the QMNC around the time of childbirth.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marzia Lazzerini
- Institute for Maternal and Child Health ‐ IRCCS “Burlo Garofolo” ‐ WHO Collaborating Centre for Maternal and Child Health Trieste Italy
| | - Benedetta Covi
- Institute for Maternal and Child Health ‐ IRCCS “Burlo Garofolo” ‐ WHO Collaborating Centre for Maternal and Child Health Trieste Italy
| | - Ilaria Mariani
- Institute for Maternal and Child Health ‐ IRCCS “Burlo Garofolo” ‐ WHO Collaborating Centre for Maternal and Child Health Trieste Italy
| | - Angela Giusti
- National Centre for Diseases Prevention and Health Promotion National Institute of Health Rome Italy
| | - Emanuelle Pessa Valente
- Institute for Maternal and Child Health ‐ IRCCS “Burlo Garofolo” ‐ WHO Collaborating Centre for Maternal and Child Health Trieste Italy
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
11
|
Kankaria A, Duggal M, Chauhan A, Sarkar D, Dalpath S, Kumar A, Dhanjal GS, Kumar V, Suri V, Kumar R, Kumar P, Litch JA. Readiness to Provide Antenatal Corticosteroids for Threatened Preterm Birth in Public Health Facilities in Northern India. GLOBAL HEALTH: SCIENCE AND PRACTICE 2021; 9:575-589. [PMID: 34593583 PMCID: PMC8514043 DOI: 10.9745/ghsp-d-20-00716] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/24/2020] [Accepted: 05/13/2021] [Indexed: 11/15/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION In 2014, the Government of India (GOI) released operational guidelines on the use of antenatal corticosteroids (ACS) in preterm labor. However, without ensuring the quality of childbirth and newborn care at facilities, the use of ACS in low- and middle-income countries is potentially harmful. This study assessed the readiness to provide ACS at primary and secondary care public health facilities in northern India. METHODS A cross-sectional study was conducted in 37 public health facilities in 2 districts of Haryana, India. Facility processes and program implementation for ACS delivery were assessed using pretested study tools developed from the World Health Organization (WHO) quality of care standards and WHO guidelines for threatened preterm birth. RESULTS Key gaps in public health facilities' process of care to provide ACS for threatened preterm birth were identified, particularly concerning evidence-based practices, competent workforce, and actionable health information system. Emphasis on accurate gestational age estimation, quality of childbirth care, and quality of preterm care were inadequate. Shortage of trained staff was widespread, and a disconnect was found between knowledge and attitudes regarding ACS use. ACS administration was provided only at district or subdistrict hospitals, and these facilities did not uniformly record ACS-specific indicators. All levels lacked a comprehensive protocol and job aids for identifying and managing threatened preterm birth. CONCLUSIONS ACS operational guidelines were not widely disseminated or uniformly implemented. Facilities require strengthened supervision and standardization of threatened preterm birth care. Facilities need greater readiness to meet required conditions for ACS use. Increasing uptake of a single intervention without supporting it with adequate quality of maternal and newborn care will jeopardize improvement in preterm birth outcomes. We recommend updating and expanding the existing GOI ACS operational guidelines to include specific actions for the safe and effective use of ACS in line with recent scientific evidence.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ankita Kankaria
- Post Graduate Institute of Medical Education and Research Chandigarh, India.,All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Bathinda, Punjab, India
| | - Mona Duggal
- Post Graduate Institute of Medical Education and Research Chandigarh, India
| | - Anshul Chauhan
- Post Graduate Institute of Medical Education and Research Chandigarh, India
| | - Debarati Sarkar
- Post Graduate Institute of Medical Education and Research Chandigarh, India
| | | | - Akash Kumar
- Post Graduate Institute of Medical Education and Research Chandigarh, India
| | | | - Vijay Kumar
- Survival for Women and Children (SWACH) Foundation, Panchkula, Haryana, India
| | - Vanita Suri
- Post Graduate Institute of Medical Education and Research Chandigarh, India
| | - Rajesh Kumar
- Post Graduate Institute of Medical Education and Research Chandigarh, India
| | - Praveen Kumar
- Post Graduate Institute of Medical Education and Research Chandigarh, India
| | - James A Litch
- Global Alliance to Prevent Prematurity and Stillbirth (GAPPS), Lynnwood, WA, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
de Souza KCR, da Silva TPR, Damasceno AKDC, Manzo BF, Souza KVD, Filipe MML, Matozinhos FP. Coexistence and prevalence of obstetric interventions: an analysis based on the grade of membership. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth 2021; 21:618. [PMID: 34503471 PMCID: PMC8431849 DOI: 10.1186/s12884-021-04092-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/18/2021] [Accepted: 08/29/2021] [Indexed: 01/19/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Obstetric interventions performed during delivery do not reflect improvements in obstetric care. Several practices routinely performed during childbirth, without any scientific evidence or basis - such as Kristeller maneuver, routine episiotomy, and movement or feeding restriction - reflect a disrespectful assistance reality that, unfortunately, remains in place in Brazil. The aims of the current study are to assess the coexistence and prevalence of obstetric interventions in maternity hospitals in Belo Horizonte City, based on the Grade of Membership (GoM) method, as well as to investigate sociodemographic and obstetric factors associated with coexistence profiles generated by it. METHODS Observational study, based on a cross-sectional design, carried out with data deriving from the study "Nascer em Belo Horizonte: Inquérito sobre o Parto e Nascimento" (Born in Belo Horizonte: Survey on Childbirth and Birth). The herein investigated interventions comprised practices that are clearly useful and should be encouraged; practices that are clearly harmful or ineffective and should be eliminated; and practices that are inappropriately used, in contrast to the ones recommended by the World Health Organization. The analyzed interventions comprised: providing food to parturient women, allowing them to have freedom to move, use of partogram, adopting non-pharmacological methods for pain relief, enema, perineal shaving, lying patients down for delivery, Kristeller maneuver, amniotomy, oxytocin infusion, analgesia and episiotomy. The current study has used GoM to identify the coexistence of the adopted obstetric interventions. Variables such as age, schooling, skin color, primigravida, place-of-delivery financing, number of prenatal consultations, gestational age at delivery, presence of obstetric nurse at delivery time, paid work and presence of companion during delivery were taken into consideration at the time to build patients' profile. RESULTS Results have highlighted two antagonistic obstetric profiles, namely: profile 1 comprised parturient women who were offered diet, freedom to move, use of partogram, using non-pharmacological methods for pain relief, giving birth in lying position, patients who were not subjected to Kristeller maneuver, episiotomy or amniotomy, women did not receive oxytocin infusion, and analgesia using. Profile 2, in its turn, comprised parturient women who were not offered diet, who were not allowed to have freedom to move, as well as who did not use the partograph or who were subjected to non-pharmacological methods for pain relief. They were subjected to enema, perineal shaving, Kristeller maneuver, amniotomy and oxytocin infusion. In addition, they underwent analgesia and episiotomy. This outcome emphasizes the persistence of an obstetric care model that is not based on scientific evidence. Based on the analysis of factors that influenced the coexistence of obstetric interventions, the presence of obstetric nurses in the healthcare practice has reduced the likelihood of parturient women to belong to profile 2. In addition, childbirth events that took place in public institutions have reduced the likelihood of parturient women to belong to profile 2. CONCLUSION(S) Based on the analysis of factors that influenced the coexistence of obstetric interventions, financing the hospital for childbirth has increased the likelihood of parturient women to belong to profile 2. However, the likelihood of parturient women to belong to profile 2 has decreased when hospitals had an active obstetric nurse at the delivery room. The current study has contributed to discussions about obstetric interventions, as well as to improve childbirth assistance models. In addition, it has emphasized the need of developing strategies focused on adherence to, and implementation of, assistance models based on scientific evidence.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Karina Cristina Rouwe de Souza
- Graduate Nursing Program, Nursing School, Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais, Belo Horizonte City, Minas Gerais State, Brazil
- Health Sciences, Child and Adolescent Health, Medical School, Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais, Belo Horizonte City, Minas Gerais State, Brazil
| | - Thales Philipe Rodrigues da Silva
- Health Sciences, Child and Adolescent Health, Medical School, Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais, Belo Horizonte City, Minas Gerais State, Brazil
| | | | - Bruna Figueiredo Manzo
- Maternal and Child Nursing and Public Health Department, Nursing School, Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais, Belo Horizonte City, Minas Gerais State, Brazil
| | - Kleyde Ventura de Souza
- Maternal and Child Nursing and Public Health Department, Nursing School, Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais, Belo Horizonte City, Minas Gerais State, Brazil
| | | | - Fernanda Penido Matozinhos
- Maternal and Child Nursing and Public Health Department, Nursing School, Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais, Belo Horizonte City, Minas Gerais State, Brazil.
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Farrington E, Connolly M, Phung L, Wilson AN, Comrie-Thomson L, Bohren MA, Homer CSE, Vogel JP. The prevalence of uterine fundal pressure during the second stage of labour for women giving birth in health facilities: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Reprod Health 2021; 18:98. [PMID: 34006288 PMCID: PMC8132352 DOI: 10.1186/s12978-021-01148-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/30/2020] [Accepted: 05/05/2021] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Uterine fundal pressure involves a birth attendant pushing on the woman's uterine fundus to assist vaginal birth. It is used in some clinical settings, though guidelines recommend against it. This systematic review aimed to determine the prevalence of uterine fundal pressure during the second stage of labour for women giving birth vaginally at health facilities. METHODS The population of interest were women who experienced labour in a health facility and in whom vaginal birth was anticipated. The primary outcome was the use of fundal pressure during second stage of labour. MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL and Global Index Medicus databases were searched for eligible studies published from 1 January 2000 onwards. Meta-analysis was conducted to determine a pooled prevalence, with subgroup analyses to explore heterogeneity. RESULTS Eighty data sets from 76 studies (n = 898,544 women) were included, reporting data from 22 countries. The prevalence of fundal pressure ranged from 0.6% to 69.2% between studies, with a pooled prevalence of 23.2% (95% CI 19.4-27.0, I2 = 99.97%). There were significant differences in prevalence between country income level (p < 0.001, prevalence highest in lower-middle income countries) and method of measuring use of fundal pressure (p = 0.001, prevalence highest in studies that measured fundal pressure based on women's self-report). CONCLUSIONS The use of uterine fundal pressure on women during vaginal birth in health facilities is widespread. Efforts to prevent this potentially unnecessary and harmful practice are needed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Elise Farrington
- Maternal, Child and Adolescent Health Program, Burnet Institute, 85 Commercial Road, Melbourne, VIC, 3004, Australia.
- Melbourne Medical School, Faculty of Medicine, Dentistry and Health Sciences, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, VIC, 3010, Australia.
| | - Mairead Connolly
- Maternal, Child and Adolescent Health Program, Burnet Institute, 85 Commercial Road, Melbourne, VIC, 3004, Australia
- Melbourne Medical School, Faculty of Medicine, Dentistry and Health Sciences, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, VIC, 3010, Australia
| | - Laura Phung
- Maternal, Child and Adolescent Health Program, Burnet Institute, 85 Commercial Road, Melbourne, VIC, 3004, Australia
- Melbourne Medical School, Faculty of Medicine, Dentistry and Health Sciences, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, VIC, 3010, Australia
| | - Alyce N Wilson
- Maternal, Child and Adolescent Health Program, Burnet Institute, 85 Commercial Road, Melbourne, VIC, 3004, Australia
| | - Liz Comrie-Thomson
- Maternal, Child and Adolescent Health Program, Burnet Institute, 85 Commercial Road, Melbourne, VIC, 3004, Australia
| | - Meghan A Bohren
- Gender and Women's Health Unit, School of Population and Global Health, Centre for Health Equity, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, VIC, 3010, Australia
| | - Caroline S E Homer
- Maternal, Child and Adolescent Health Program, Burnet Institute, 85 Commercial Road, Melbourne, VIC, 3004, Australia
| | - Joshua P Vogel
- Maternal, Child and Adolescent Health Program, Burnet Institute, 85 Commercial Road, Melbourne, VIC, 3004, Australia
- School of Population and Global Health, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, VIC, 2010, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Rishard M, Fahmy FF, Senanayake H, Ranaweera AKP, Armocida B, Mariani I, Lazzerini M. Correlation among experience of person-centered maternity care, provision of care and women's satisfaction: Cross sectional study in Colombo, Sri Lanka. PLoS One 2021; 16:e0249265. [PMID: 33831036 PMCID: PMC8031099 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0249265] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/19/2020] [Accepted: 03/15/2021] [Indexed: 11/19/2022] Open
Abstract
Person-centered maternity care (PCMC) is defined as care which is respectful of and responsive to women's and families' preferences, needs, and values. In this cross-sectional study we aimed to evaluate the correlations among the degree of PCMC implementation, key indicators of provision of care, and women's satisfaction with maternity care in Sri Lanka. Degree of PCMC implementation was assessed using a validated questionnaire. Provision of good key practices was measured with the World Health Organization (WHO) Bologna Score, whose items include: 1) companionship in childbirth; 2) use of partogram; 3) absence of labor stimulation; 4) childbirth in non-supine position; 5) skin-to-skin contact. Women's overall satisfaction was assessed on a 1-10 Likert scale. Among 400 women giving birth vaginally, 207 (51.8%) had at least one clinical risk factor and 52 (13.0%) at least one complication. The PCMC implementation mean score was 42.3 (95%CI 41.3-43.4), out of a maximum score of 90. Overall, while 367 (91.8%) women were monitored with a partogram, and 293 (73.3%) delivered non-supine, only 19 (4.8%) did not receive labour stimulation, only 38 (9.5%) had a companion at childbirth, and 165 (41.3%) had skin-to-skin contact immediately after birth. The median total satisfaction score was 7 (IQR 5-9). PCMC implementation had a moderate correlation with women's satisfaction (r = 0.58), while Bologna score had a very low correlation both with satisfaction (r = 0.12), and PCMC (r = 0.20). Factors significantly associated with higher PCMC score were number of pregnancies (p = 0.015), ethnicity (p<0.001), presence of a companion at childbirth (p = 0.037); absence of labor stimulation (p = 0.019); delivery in non-supine position (p = 0.016); and skin-to-skin contact (p = 0.005). Study findings indicate evidence of poor-quality care across several domains of mistreatment in childbirth in Sri Lanka. In addition, patient satisfaction as an indicator of quality care is inadequate to inform health systems reform.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mohamed Rishard
- University Obstetrics Unit, De Soysa Hospital for Women, Colombo, Sri Lanka
- Department of Obstetrics & Gynaecology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Colombo, Colombo, Sri Lanka
- * E-mail:
| | - Fathima Fahila Fahmy
- Department of Obstetrics & Gynaecology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Colombo, Colombo, Sri Lanka
| | - Hemantha Senanayake
- University Obstetrics Unit, De Soysa Hospital for Women, Colombo, Sri Lanka
- Department of Obstetrics & Gynaecology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Colombo, Colombo, Sri Lanka
| | | | - Benedetta Armocida
- Institute for Maternal and Child Health—IRCCS “Burlo Garofolo”—Trieste, Italy
| | - Ilaria Mariani
- Institute for Maternal and Child Health—IRCCS “Burlo Garofolo”—Trieste, Italy
| | - Marzia Lazzerini
- Institute for Maternal and Child Health—IRCCS “Burlo Garofolo”—Trieste, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Ayenew A, Abebe M, Ewnetu M. Essential Newborn Care and Associated Factors Among Obstetrical Care Providers in Awi Zone Health Facilities, Northwest Ethiopia: An Institutional-Based Cross-Sectional Study. PEDIATRIC HEALTH MEDICINE AND THERAPEUTICS 2020; 11:449-458. [PMID: 33204205 PMCID: PMC7667187 DOI: 10.2147/phmt.s276698] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/13/2020] [Accepted: 10/16/2020] [Indexed: 12/13/2022]
Abstract
Background Each year, millions of newborns die as a result of birth asphyxia, infections, and complications of preterm birth. This burden of death is disproportionately concentrated in low-income countries including Ethiopia. As a result, the care given immediately after birth is crucial for making a successful transition from intrauterine to extrauterine function and to reduce neonatal mortality. Methods Facility-based cross-sectional study design was carried out on a sample size of 208 obstetrical care providers. A simple random sampling technique was used to select the study subjects. The data were collected through Interview-administered questionnaires and observational checklists. The data were entered into Epi-info version 7 and exported to SPSS 23 for analysis. Results A total of 201 obstetric care providers participated in the study, making a response rate of (96.6%). This study revealed that 62.7% of obstetric care providers practiced essential newborn care properly. The factors significantly associated were received in-service training (AOR = 2.7, 95% CI: 1.35, 5.51), level of education (AOR = 0.46, 95% CI: 0.22, 0.96), midwifery profession (AOR = 3.1, 95% CI: 1.35, 7.39), having good knowledge of essential newborn care (AOR = 2.1, 95% CI: 1.03, 4.49), availability of drugs for essential newborn care (AOR = 2.3, 95% CI: 1.16, 4.72), and availability of medical equipment to perform essential newborn care (AOR = 2, 95% CI: 1.01, 3.96). Conclusion The practice of essential newborn care was generally low. Having in-service training, midwifery profession, a good knowledge of essential newborn care, availability of drugs, level of education, and availability of medical equipment for essential newborn care were the determinant factors for essential newborn care practice. Improvement in essential newborn care practices could be attained through modifiable proven interventions like provision of in-service training, availed drugs, and medical equipment for essential newborn care.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Asteray Ayenew
- Department of Midwifery, School of Health Sciences, College of Medicine and Health Sciences, Bahir Dar University, Bahir Dar, Ethiopia
| | - Mahlet Abebe
- Department of Midwifery, School of Health Sciences, College of Medicine and Health Sciences, Mizan Tepi University, Mizan Teferi, Ethiopia
| | - Mesafint Ewnetu
- Department of Midwifery, School of Health Sciences, College of Medicine and Health Sciences, Bahir Dar University, Bahir Dar, Ethiopia
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Lazzerini M, Mariani I, Semenzato C, Valente EP. Association between maternal satisfaction and other indicators of quality of care at childbirth: a cross-sectional study based on the WHO standards. BMJ Open 2020; 10:e037063. [PMID: 32928854 PMCID: PMC7490935 DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-037063] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/16/2020] [Revised: 07/09/2020] [Accepted: 07/22/2020] [Indexed: 11/09/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVES This study aimed to explore the association between maternal satisfaction and other indicators of quality of care (QoC) at childbirth, as defined by WHO standards. DESIGN Cross-sectional study. SETTING Referral hospital in Northeast Italy. PARTICIPANTS 1244 consecutive mothers giving birth in the hospital participated in a survey. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS Univariate analyses were performed to evaluate the association between maternal satisfaction and 61 variables, including measures of 'provision of care', 'experience of care', 'availability of resources' and other maternal characteristics. Exploratory factor analysis was performed to create groups of correlated variables, which were used in multivariate analysis. RESULTS Overall, 509 (40.9%) of women were >35 years of age, about half (52.7%) were highly educated, most (95.2%) were married/living with partner and employed (79.3%) and about half (52.9%) were primiparous. Overall, 189 (15.2%) were not born in Italy and 111 (8.9%) did not have Italian citizenship. Most women (84.2%) were highly satisfied (score ≥7/10) with the care received. Among the 61 variables explored, 46 (75.4%) were significantly associated with women's satisfaction, 33 with higher satisfaction and 13 with lower satisfaction. Multivariate analysis largely confirmed univariate findings, with six out of eight groups of correlated variables being statistically significantly associated with women's satisfaction. Factors most strongly associated with women's satisfaction were 'effective communication, involvement, listening to women's needs, respectful and timely care' (OR 16.84, 95% CI 9.90 to 28.61, p<0.001) and 'physical structure' (OR 6.51, 95% CI 4.08 to 10.40, p<0.001). Additionally, 'victim of abuse, discrimination, aggressiveness' was inversely associated with the wish to return to the facility or to recommend it to a friend (OR 0.35, 95% CI 0.17 to 0.70, p<0.003). CONCLUSION This study suggested that many variables are strongly associated with women's satisfaction with care during childbirth and support the use of multiple measures to monitor the QoC at childbirth.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marzia Lazzerini
- WHO Collaborating Center for Maternal and Child Health, Institute for Maternal and Child Health IRCCS Burlo Garofolo, Trieste, Friuli-Venezia Giulia, Italy
| | - Ilaria Mariani
- WHO Collaborating Center for Maternal and Child Health, Institute for Maternal and Child Health IRCCS Burlo Garofolo, Trieste, Friuli-Venezia Giulia, Italy
| | - Chiara Semenzato
- WHO Collaborating Center for Maternal and Child Health, Institute for Maternal and Child Health IRCCS Burlo Garofolo, Trieste, Friuli-Venezia Giulia, Italy
| | - Emanuelle Pessa Valente
- WHO Collaborating Center for Maternal and Child Health, Institute for Maternal and Child Health IRCCS Burlo Garofolo, Trieste, Friuli-Venezia Giulia, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Bulto GA, Demissie DB, Tasu TL, Demisse GA. Mother's satisfaction with the existing labor and delivery care services at public health facilities in West Shewa zone, Oromia region, Ethiopia. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth 2020; 20:303. [PMID: 32429878 PMCID: PMC7236095 DOI: 10.1186/s12884-020-02998-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/16/2020] [Accepted: 05/07/2020] [Indexed: 11/17/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Mothers' satisfaction with care during childbirth is indicators of the quality care which affects skilled birth attendance. Negative client's experiences at health facilities cause them to delay or avoid seeking care, which highlights services providers should consider and act on the expectations and experiences of women and their families. Though there are few studies conducted in Ethiopia on maternal satisfaction with Labor and Delivery (LAD) services, there is no study conducted in the study area. Therefore the study aims to assess the mother's satisfaction with existing LAD services and associated factors at all levels of health care in the West Shewa zone. METHODS An institution-based cross-sectional study was conducted at public health facilities in West Shewa zone, Central Ethiopia. A systematic sampling technique was used to select 560 respondents by using their delivery registration number and data were collected through face to face interview. Mothers were considered satisfied if they responded satisfied/very satisfied with 75% or more of the questions assessing satisfaction. Binary and multivariable logistic regression analysis was used to identify associated factors. RESULTS The overall proportion of mothers who were satisfied with the current LAD care services were 60.8%. The main areas of dissatisfaction were; accessibility and cleanness of toilets/shower 72.6%, overall cleanness of the facility/including waiting-area 40.1% and presence of support a person during birth 38.0%. The presence of cultural practices (AOR = 2.5), discussion on the place of delivery with health worker during ANC (AOR = 1.75), providers asks for consent before procedure (AOR = 2.77), encouraging companion to remain with mother (AOR = 2.22), never leave mother alone or unattended (AOR = 2.56), giving periodic updates on status and progress of labor (AOR = 2.04) and explaining what is being done and to expect during LAD (AOR = 2.20) were factors identified to be significantly associated with satisfaction on LAD services. CONCLUSION The overall satisfaction of mothers with LAD services at public health facilities in the West-Shewa zone was relatively low. Presence of cultural practices, discussion on the place of delivery, asking for consent before the procedure, encouraging companion to remain with mothers and explaining what is being done were factors identified. Therefore, all stakeholders have to emphatically work on those identified factors to improve mothers' satisfaction with LAD services.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Gizachew Abdissa Bulto
- Department of Midwifery, College of Medicine and Health Sciences, Ambo University, Ambo, Ethiopia
| | - Dereje Bayissa Demissie
- Department of Neonatal Nursing, St. Paul’s Hospital Millennium Medical College, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia
| | - Tefera Likasa Tasu
- Department of Nursing, College of Medicine and Health Sciences, Ambo University, Ambo, Ethiopia
| | - Getu Alemu Demisse
- Department of Public Health, College of Medicine and Health Sciences, Ambo University, Ambo, Ethiopia
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Lazzerini M, Semenzato C, Kaur J, Covi B, Argentini G. Women's suggestions on how to improve the quality of maternal and newborn hospital care: a qualitative study in Italy using the WHO standards as framework for the analysis. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth 2020; 20:200. [PMID: 32252686 PMCID: PMC7137280 DOI: 10.1186/s12884-020-02893-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/29/2019] [Accepted: 03/24/2020] [Indexed: 01/13/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND A recent systematic review identified very few studies on women's views on how to improve the quality of maternal and newborn care (QMNC). This study aimed at exploring the suggestions provided by women, after hospital delivery in Italy, on how to improve the QMNC. METHODS A questionnaire, containing open questions to capture suggestions on how to improve QMNC, was used to collect suggestions of mothers who gave birth a tertiary care referral hospital in Northeast Italy, between December 2016 and September 2018. Two authors independently used thematic analysis to analyse women's comments, using the WHO Standards for improving the QMNC as framework for the analysis. RESULTS Overall 392 mothers provided a total of 966 comments on how to improve the QMNC. Overall 45 (11.5%) women made suggestions pertinent to "provision of care", 222 (56.6%) to the "experience of care", 217 (55.4%) to "physical or to human resources". The top five suggestions were: 1) increase presence of a companion during the whole hospitalization (28.3% of women); 2) improve bathrooms and showers (18.4%); 3) improve effective communication from staff (14.0%); 4) improve staff professionalism, empathy, and kindness (13.5%); 5) increase support and information on how to provide care to the newborn (11.2%). Overall, 158 (16.4%) suggestions could not be classified in any WHO Standards, and among these most (72.1%) were related to physical structures, such as: decrease the number of patients per room; create areas for visitors; avoid case mixing in the same room; reduce rooming-in/better support the mother. Overall 62 (15.8%) women expressed appreciations. CONCLUSIONS Collecting the women's views on how to improve the QMNC after hospital delivery highlighted critical inputs on aspects of care that should be improved in the opinion of service-users. More investments should be made for establishing routine systems for monitoring patients experience of care. Data collected should be used to improve QMNC. WHO Standards may be further optimized by adding items emerging as relevant for women in high-income countries.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marzia Lazzerini
- WHO Collaborating Centre for Maternal and Child Health, Institute for Maternal and Child Health IRCCS Burlo Garofolo, Via dell’Istria 65/1, 34137 Trieste, Italy
| | - Chiara Semenzato
- WHO Collaborating Centre for Maternal and Child Health, Institute for Maternal and Child Health IRCCS Burlo Garofolo, Via dell’Istria 65/1, 34137 Trieste, Italy
| | - Jaspreet Kaur
- WHO Collaborating Centre for Maternal and Child Health, Institute for Maternal and Child Health IRCCS Burlo Garofolo, Via dell’Istria 65/1, 34137 Trieste, Italy
| | - Benedetta Covi
- WHO Collaborating Centre for Maternal and Child Health, Institute for Maternal and Child Health IRCCS Burlo Garofolo, Via dell’Istria 65/1, 34137 Trieste, Italy
| | - Giorgia Argentini
- WHO Collaborating Centre for Maternal and Child Health, Institute for Maternal and Child Health IRCCS Burlo Garofolo, Via dell’Istria 65/1, 34137 Trieste, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Lazzerini M, Chhaganlal K, Macome AC, Putoto G. Nutritional services for children in Beira, Mozambique: a study reporting on participatory use of data to generate quality improvement recommendations. BMJ Open Qual 2019; 8:e000758. [PMID: 31750405 PMCID: PMC6830467 DOI: 10.1136/bmjoq-2019-000758] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/21/2019] [Revised: 08/28/2019] [Accepted: 10/06/2019] [Indexed: 11/03/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Existing literature suggest frequent gaps in the quality of care (QoC) provided to children with malnutrition in low-income and middle-income countries. Beira is the second largest city in Mozambique. This study included two phases: phase 1 was a systematic assessment of the QoC provided to malnourished children in Beira; phase 2 aimed at using findings of the assessment to develop recommendations, with a participatory approach, to improve QoC. Methods In phase 1, all facilities offering nutritional care to children in Beira were included, and exit health outcomes were reviewed against international SPHERE standards. A sample of four (66%) facilities was randomly selected for a comprehensive assessment of all areas contributing to QoC using an adapted WHO tool. In phase 2, key stakeholders were identified, and using a participatory approach, a list of actions for improving the QoC for malnourished children was agreed. Results In phase 1, outcomes of 1428 children with either severe acute malnutrition or moderate acute malnutrition (MAM) were reviewed. In-hospital recovery rate (70.1%) was almost in line with the SPHERE standard (75%), while at outpatient level, it was significantly lower (48.2%, risk ratio (RR) 0.68, p<0.0001). Recovery rate was significantly lower in HIV seropositive compared with seronegative (39.2% vs 52.8%, RR 1.34, p=0.005). High heterogeneity in MAM recovery rate was detected among facilities (range 32.5%-61.0%). Overall, out of all domains contributing to QoC in the sample, 28/46 (60.8%) indicated suboptimal care with significant health hazards and 13/46 (28.2%) indicated totally inadequate care with severe health hazards. In phase 2, a list of 38 actions to improve QoC for malnourished children was agreed among 33 local and national stakeholders. Conclusions Large heterogeneity in QoC for malnourished children in Beria was detected. The study documents a concrete example of using data proactively, for agreeing actions to improve QoC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marzia Lazzerini
- Institute for Maternal and Child Health IRCCS Burlo Garofolo, WHO Collaborating Center for Maternal and Child Health, Trieste, Italy
| | - Kajal Chhaganlal
- Research Centre, Faculty of Health Science, Catholic University of Mozambique, Beira, Mozambique
| | | | | |
Collapse
|