Pain in young children attending an accident and emergency department

Pain Assessment in Children Younger Than 8 Years in Out-of-Hospital Emergency Medicine: Reliability and Validity of EVENDOL Score

OBJECTIVE

Pain in children is underestimated and undertreated in out-of-hospital emergency medicine. In this setting, caregivers need a reliable pain scale, but none has been validated. A single observational pain scale for all children younger than 8 years, EVENDOL, has been validated in emergency pediatric units. We study the feasibility of EVENDOL score in an out-of-hospital emergency setting.

METHODS

This prospective multicenter study included all conscious children younger than 8 years transported by a mobile intensive care unit between October 2008 and May 2010. The emergency physician and nurse independently assessed the child's pain using first a numeric rating scale (score 0-10), then the 5-item EVENDOL scale (verbal/vocal expression, facial expression, movements, postures, and relationship with entourage) (score 0-3/item) at 3 time points (at rest, during examination, and after analgesia). We studied the scale's internal validity, interrater reliability, discriminant ability (influence of fever and anxiety), and face validity.

RESULTS

Of the 422 included children, 82 and 62 (29%-39%) were in pain according to the emergency physician and nurses (numeric rating scale >3/10). All EVENDOL scale attributes were satisfied at all 3 time points, for all population subsets. Values for the first assessment (entire study population) were as follows: internal validity (0.78-0.89), interrater reliability (r = 0.63-0.76, weighted κ = 0.49-0.65), construct validity, and discriminant ability (r = 0.6-0.7). Fever did not impact on EVENDOL score. Anxiety level and pain were correlated. Completion time was fast (mean, 2.3-3.4 minutes). Face validity was good.

CONCLUSION

EVENDOL is a quick, easy-to-use, discriminant instrument to assess pain in young children in out-of-hospital emergency settings.

Nursing management of children's pain: Current evidence and future directions for research

This critical literature review discusses the research evidence underpinning each of the pain standards in the National Service Framework for Children: Standard for hospital services. Relevant evidence-based reviews and clinical practice guidelines are highlighted, and aspects of children's pain management where the research evidence is particularly strong or weak are identified. Priorities are suggested for nurse-led research aimed at generating new knowledge to improve pain management for children.

The use of the faces, legs, activity, cry and consolability scale to assess procedural pain and distress in young children

INTRODUCTION

Young children frequently undergo diagnostic and therapeutic procedures in the emergency department (ED). Although developed and validated for postoperative pain, Face, Legs, Activity, Cry, Consolability (FLACC) behavioral pain scores have been recommended and used for the assessment of procedural pain as well. We set out to assess if FLACC scores can differentiate pain and distress and establish a hierarchy of FLACC scores experienced during common ED procedures.

METHODS

Prospective observational study at an urban tertiary children's hospital ED. We aimed to recruit 30 children each aged 6 to 42 months undergoing intravenous cannula (IV) insertion, nasogastric tube (NGT) insertion, metered dose inhaler (MDI) use and oxygen saturation (SpO(2)) measurement. Based on videotapes, 2 independent observers assessed pain and distress using FLACC scores during all procedural phases.

RESULTS

A total of 125 patients were recruited and filmed for IV (33), NGT (30), MDI (34), and SpO2 (28). Median FLACC scores were as follows: NGT, 10 (interquartile range [IQR] 8.75-10); IV, 6.5 (IQR, 4.5-9.75); MDI, 6.5 (IQR, 0-9); and SpO(2), 0 (IQR, 0-0.5). The FLACC scores increased during each of the 3 phases, before the procedure, during restraint, and during the procedure. Procedural distress decreased with age except for NGT insertions, which remained very high irrespective of age.

CONCLUSIONS

FLACC scores can be high during nonpainful procedures and the during restraint phase of painful procedures. This indicates that FLACC measures a composite of pain and distress in young children. This study identified substantial levels of pain and distress in young children by FLACC during commonly performed ED procedures, with nasogastric tube insertion having very high and intravenous cannulation/venepuncture and MDI having high FLACC scores.

Paediatric pain assessment and management in the emergency setting: the impact of a paediatric pain bundle

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the impact of a paediatric pain bundle on pain assessment and management of children with fractured forearms who presented to an Emergency Department (ED).

METHODS

A descriptive, comparative pilot study was conducted at a large regional hospital ED to describe differences in pain assessment, management and documentation in the 4months before and after the implementation of a paediatric pain bundle.

RESULTS

A total of 242 children with fractured forearms visited the ED over two separate 4-month periods during 2009. Compared to the pre time period, children in the post time period did not differ significantly regarding pain assessment score documentation (13.5% vs. 20.7%, p=0.14), administration rate of analgesia (58.7% vs. 65.5%, p=0.28) or time to analgesia (28min vs. 35min, p=0.22).

CONCLUSIONS

In this pilot study, findings indicated clinical significance but not statistical significance. The assessment and management of pain in the ED paediatric population is challenging due to difficulties interpreting responsiveness and to organisational and system imperatives that delay time critical aspects such as time to analgesia. Further focus on documentation, assessment and management practices is required in larger populations across a number of sites.

Prevalence of morphine use and time to initial analgesia in an Australian emergency department

OBJECTIVE

To explore the association of morphine use with factors influencing time to initial analgesia (T-A).

METHODS

A retrospective cohort review was conducted. Morphine data were collected from a register for restricted drugs located in the ED. T-A was the time interval between triage and signing out of morphine's first dose. Statistical analyses were performed to determine the association between morphine use and patient volume.

RESULTS

In total, 8% of ED attendees received at least one dose of morphine sulphate in the ED. Prevalence of morphine use significantly (P < 0.05) varied by patient's age, Australasian Triage Scale category, time of arrival and type of illness. The median time of T-A was 79 min (95% CI 71-85) with substantially longer (median 107 min) for those who arrived during the afternoon and triaged as less urgent (median 127 min). Patients who arrived late at night (median 47 min), triaged as immediately/imminently life-threatening (median 58 min) and diagnosed as renal colic (median 27 min) or fractures/injuries (median 67 min) were more likely to receive i.v. morphine faster than other patients. The findings confirmed that large volume of patients in ED was associated with longer T-A. Patient volume in the ED showed a significant positive association with T-A (r = 0.568, 32% variation explained, P < 0.01).

CONCLUSION

T-A is an important indicator of the quality of ED services. Severity of illness and patient volume were significant factors associated with extended T-A. Strategies for improving pain management in the complex ED environment are discussed.

Analysis of the validation of existing behavioral pain and distress scales for use in the procedural setting

BACKGROUND

Assessing procedural pain and distress in young children is difficult. A number of behavior-based pain and distress scales exist which can be used in preverbal and early-verbal children, and these are validated in particular settings and to variable degrees.

METHODS

We identified validated preverbal and early-verbal behavioral pain and distress scales and critically analysed the validation and reliability testing of these scales as well as their use in procedural pain and distress research. We analysed in detail six behavioral pain and distress scales: Children's Hospital of Eastern Ontario Pain Scale (CHEOPS), Faces Legs Activity Cry Consolability Pain Scale (FLACC), Toddler Preschooler Postoperative Pain Scale (TPPPS), Preverbal Early Verbal Pediatric Pain Scale (PEPPS), the observer Visual Analog Scale (VASobs) and the Observation Scale of Behavioral Distress (OSBD).

RESULTS

Despite their use in procedural pain studies none of the behavioral pain scales reviewed had been adequately validated in the procedural setting and validation of the single distress scale was limited.

CONCLUSIONS

There is a need to validate behavioral pain and distress scales for procedural use in preverbal or early-verbal children.

Emergency care for children--the next steps

Recommended steps for improved medical services to children and those needing urgent medical attention

Validation of the Alder Hey Triage Pain Score

AIMS

To describe the validation and reliability of a new pain tool (the Alder Hey Triage Pain Score, AHTPS) for children at triage in the accident and emergency (A&E) setting.

METHODS

A new behavioural observational pain tool was developed because of dissatisfaction with available tools and a lack of confidence in self-assessment scores at triage. The study was conducted in a large paediatric A&E department; 575 children (aged 0-16 years) were included. Inter-rater reliability and various aspects of validity were assessed. In addition this tool was compared to the Wong-Baker self-assessment tool. The children were concurrently scored by a research nurse and triage nurses to assess inter-rater reliability. Construct validity was assessed by comparing the research nurse's triage score with the research nurse reassessment score after intervention and/or analgesia. Known group construct validity was assessed by comparing the research nurse's score at triage with the level of pain of the condition as judged by the discharge diagnosis. Predictive validity was assessed by comparing the research nurse's AHTPS with the level of analgesia needed by each patient. The AHTPS was also compared to a self-assessment score.

RESULTS

A high level of inter-rater reliability, kappa statistic 0.84 (95% CI 0.80 to 0.88), was shown. Construct validity was well demonstrated; known group construct validity and predictive validity were also demonstrated to a varying degree.

CONCLUSIONS

Results support the use of this observational pain scoring tool in the triage of children in A&E.

Validating the Derbyshire Children's Hospital Pain Tool: a pilot study

BACKGROUND

The Derbyshire Children's Hospital Paediatric Pain Chart (DPC) is the current pain assessment tool used at the Derbyshire Children's Hospital. It was originally devised as a simple pain tool for use in the clinical area, and it is applicable for use in children of all ages within the postoperative setting. The pain assessment chart encompasses pain assessment by utilizing facial expression, body movement and verbal expression. An exploratory study was performed to define its reliability and validity.

METHODS

The research nurse (V.P.) assessed 40 children aged 1-5 undergoing minor and intermediate surgery comparing the Toddler Preschooler Postoperative Pain Scale and the DPC. Assessments were performed preoperatively and for 4 h postoperatively. Any analgesia administered postoperatively was recorded.

RESULTS

All the children scored 0 preoperatively with both pain scales, thus demonstrating known groups validity. There were 116 dual assessments by the research nurse using both pain scales. There was a strong correlation (r = 0.89) demonstrating convergent validity. There was a significant correlation between 182 joint assessments by the research nurse (V.P.) and the nursing staff using the DPC (Spearmans rank correlation, 0.81) and the Cronbach alpha coefficient ranged from 0.83 to 0.98. Construct validity was demonstrated by a fall in the mean pain scores from 1.8 to 0.1 following analgesia in 19 children.

CONCLUSIONS

This exploratory study suggests the DPC holds construct, convergent and known groups validity and is a reliable pain assessment tool for children aged 1-5 years undergoing minor and intermediate surgery.