Prognostic implications of mismatch repair deficiency in patients with nonmetastatic colorectal and endometrial cancer

Clinicopathological Implications of Mismatch Repair Status in Endometrioid Endometrial Cancer in Duhok City

BACKGROUND

DNA mismatch repair (MMR) is a specialized system that corrects errors in DNA replication, namely, base substitution mismatches and minor insertion-deletion mismatches. The deficient mismatch repair (d-MMR) protein plays a vital role in predicting the prognosis of endometrioid carcinoma. The study aimed to determine the prevalence of MMR errors in endometrial cancer (EC) and their correlation with clinicopathological features.

METHODS

We examined the immunohistochemistry presence of four MMR proteins in 50 samples of EC tissues that were preserved in formalin and embedded in paraffin. The proteins identified were MutL homolog 1 (MLH1), post-meiotic segregation increased 2 (PMS2), MutS homolog 2 (MSH2), and MutS homolog 6 (MSH6). The study examined several clinicopathological characteristics and conducted MMR phenotyping.

RESULTS

The findings revealed that among the 50 cases of EC, 40% of patients had grade I disease and 78% had stage I malignancy. Furthermore, among the 50 individuals evaluated, 56% exhibited competence in MMR, whereas 44% displayed loss in nuclear expression of MMR. The rate of MLH1 and PMS2 protein loss was recorded as the greatest, at 18%, while the loss of MSH2 and MSH6 was documented at 6%. Within the same range, the majority of patients with d-MMR were above the age of 50 years.

CONCLUSION

The majority of the recruited EC patients in this study showed advanced age and a high percentage of d-MMR status.

Dostarlimab: From preclinical investigation to drug approval and future directions

Immune checkpoint blockers (ICB) act by reverting the immunosuppressive phenotype of cancer cells, thus allowing host immune system to generate an immune response to the tumor. One of the key mechanisms targeted by ICB is the PD-1/PD-L1 axis, which lies onto the interaction between the programmed-cell death protein 1 and its ligand, overexpressed in several tumor types. This interaction leads to the inhibition of T-cell proliferation and their apoptosis and exhaustion. Anti-PD-1/PD-L1 monoclonal antibodies are now the mainstay of treatment for several advanced stage tumors. Dostarlimab is a novel IgG4 anti-PD-1 antibody which has yielded remarkable results in mismatch-repair deficient endometrial cancer and locally advanced rectal cancer. This product review will illustrate the preclinical development of dostarlimab and its pharmacological characteristics, the clinical trials published so far and the ongoing clinical investigations.

Association of mismatch repair deficiency in endometrial cancer with 18F-FDG PET/CT and clinicopathological features and their prognostic value

PURPOSE

Identification of the mismatch repair (MMR) deficiency in endometrial cancer (EC) may aid in the screening of patients who may benefit from immunotherapy. Our goal was to investigate the relationship between MMR status and 18F-FDG PET/CT metabolic parameters and clinicopathological features in patients with EC, as well as to explore their prognostic value.

METHODS

This retrospective study included 106 EC patients who were classified as MMR deficient (dMMR) or MMR proficient (pMMR) group based on MMR protein expression status evaluated by immunohistochemistry. Clinicopathological characteristics and PET metabolic parameters were compared between the dMMR and pMMR groups, and their relationships with MMR status and prognosis were evaluated.

RESULTS

Of 106 EC patients, 30 patients (28.1%) had dMMR, while 76 (71.7%) had pMMR. Compared with the pMMR group, the dMMR group showed a lower prevalence of overweight (BMI ≥ 25) (17.2% vs. 43.9%, P = 0.019) and more lymph vascular space invasion (43.3% vs. 21.1%, P = 0.029). Although no relationship between glucometabolism parameters and MMR status was observed in all enrolled patients, higher SUVmax was observed in the endometrioid type of EC with MMR deficiency (P = 0.047). Additionally, SUVmax related to MMR status was found in EC patients with advanced FIGO stage (P = 0.026) or deep myometrial invasion (P = 0.026). Multivariate Cox regression analysis revealed that lymph node metastasis was independently predictive of PFS, while advanced FIGO stage was an independent predictor of OS. No significant association between MMR status and prognosis was found in EC.

CONCLUSION

Higher SUVmax was associated with MMR deficiency in EC patients with endometrioid type, advanced stage, or deep myometrial invasion, which may be useful for predicting the MMR status and thus aiding in determination of immunotherapy for patients with EC.

Mismatch Repair Protein Deficiency Does Not Affect Disease Free Survival in Type I Endometrial Carcinoma

BACKGROUND

This study aimed to analyze the correlation between the 3-year disease-free survival (DFS) and mismatch repair (MMR) protein levels in patients with type 1 endometrial carcinoma. Many studies have reported different results regarding the role of MMR in the prognosis of endometrial carcinoma; therefore, we aimed to identify this association in our hospital.

METHODS

This observational study employed a historical cohort design and included patients with type 1 endometrial carcinoma who underwent surgery at Dr. Soetomo Hospital between January 2017 and December 2019. Medical records and paraffin blocks meeting these criteria were obtained. MMR proteins (MLH1 and MSH2) were assessed using immunohistochemistry.

RESULTS

A total of 46 patients with type 1 endometrial carcinoma were analyzed. We observed MMR deficiency (dMMR) in 12 patients (26.1%) and MMR proficiency (pMMR) in 34 patients (73.9%). Of the 12 patients with dMMR, nine cases (75%) were diagnosed as stage I and 7 (58.33%) as low grade. The 3-year DFS in patients with dMMR and pMMR was 83.3% and 67.6%, respectively (Hazard Ratio 2.31, 95% CI 0.5135-10.475, p=0.27). Higher stages had a 5.42 times increased risk of recurrence (95% CI 1.3378-21.9358, p=0.018). Higher histopathological grades were also associated with 8.65 times increased risk of recurrence (95% CI 2.5020-29.8738, p=0.001).

CONCLUSION

Patients with dMMR had a better DFS compared to those with pMMR; however, the difference was not statistically significant. The tumor stage and histopathological grade were independent risk factors for recurrence.

Prediction of Prognosis, Immunotherapy and Chemotherapy with an Immune-Related Risk Score Model for Endometrial Cancer

Endometrial cancer (EC) is the most common gynecologic cancer. The overall survival remains unsatisfying due to the lack of effective treatment screening approaches. Immunotherapy as a promising therapy has been applied for EC treatment, but still fails in many cases. Therefore, there is a strong need to optimize the screening approach for clinical treatment. In this study, we employed co-expression network (GCN) analysis to mine immune-related GCN modules and key genes and further constructed an immune-related risk score model (IRSM). The IRSM was proved effective as an independent predictor of poor prognosis. The roles of IRSM-related genes in EC were confirmed by IHC. The molecular basis, tumor immune microenvironment and clinical characteristics of the IRSM were revealed. Moreover, the IRSM effectiveness was associated with immunotherapy and chemotherapy. Patients in the low-risk group were more sensitive to immunotherapy and chemotherapy than those in the high-risk group. Interestingly, the patients responding to immunotherapy were also more sensitive to chemotherapy. Overall, we developed an IRSM which could be used to predict the prognosis, immunotherapy response and chemotherapy sensitivity of EC patients. Our analysis not only improves the treatment of EC but also offers targets for personalized therapeutic interventions.

Dostarlimab for Primary Advanced or Recurrent Endometrial Cancer

BACKGROUND

Dostarlimab is an immune-checkpoint inhibitor that targets the programmed cell death 1 receptor. The combination of chemotherapy and immunotherapy may have synergistic effects in the treatment of endometrial cancer.

METHODS

We conducted a phase 3, global, double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled trial. Eligible patients with primary advanced stage III or IV or first recurrent endometrial cancer were randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio to receive either dostarlimab (500 mg) or placebo, plus carboplatin (area under the concentration-time curve, 5 mg per milliliter per minute) and paclitaxel (175 mg per square meter of body-surface area), every 3 weeks (six cycles), followed by dostarlimab (1000 mg) or placebo every 6 weeks for up to 3 years. The primary end points were progression-free survival as assessed by the investigator according to Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST), version 1.1, and overall survival. Safety was also assessed.

RESULTS

Of the 494 patients who underwent randomization, 118 (23.9%) had mismatch repair-deficient (dMMR), microsatellite instability-high (MSI-H) tumors. In the dMMR-MSI-H population, estimated progression-free survival at 24 months was 61.4% (95% confidence interval [CI], 46.3 to 73.4) in the dostarlimab group and 15.7% (95% CI, 7.2 to 27.0) in the placebo group (hazard ratio for progression or death, 0.28; 95% CI, 0.16 to 0.50; P<0.001). In the overall population, progression-free survival at 24 months was 36.1% (95% CI, 29.3 to 42.9) in the dostarlimab group and 18.1% (95% CI, 13.0 to 23.9) in the placebo group (hazard ratio, 0.64; 95% CI, 0.51 to 0.80; P<0.001). Overall survival at 24 months was 71.3% (95% CI, 64.5 to 77.1) with dostarlimab and 56.0% (95% CI, 48.9 to 62.5) with placebo (hazard ratio for death, 0.64; 95% CI, 0.46 to 0.87). The most common adverse events that occurred or worsened during treatment were nausea (53.9% of the patients in the dostarlimab group and 45.9% of those in the placebo group), alopecia (53.5% and 50.0%), and fatigue (51.9% and 54.5%). Severe and serious adverse events were more frequent in the dostarlimab group than in the placebo group.

CONCLUSIONS

Dostarlimab plus carboplatin-paclitaxel significantly increased progression-free survival among patients with primary advanced or recurrent endometrial cancer, with a substantial benefit in the dMMR-MSI-H population. (Funded by GSK; RUBY ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT03981796.).

Prognosis of resectable colorectal liver metastases after surgery associated with pathological features of primary tumor

Background

Surgery is an important means for patients with colorectal liver metastases (CRLM) to improve their long-term survival, and accurate screening of high-risk factors is crucial to guiding postoperative monitoring and treatment. With this in mind, the aim of this study was to investigate the expression levels and prognostic roles of Mismatch Repair (MMR), Ki67, and Lymphovascular invasion(LVI) in the tumor tissues of colorectal of CRLM.

Methods

85 Patients with CRLM who received surgical treatment for liver metastases after colorectal cancer resection from June, 2017 and Jan, 2020 were included in this study. Independent risk factors affecting the survival of patients with CRLM were investigated using a Cox regression model and the Kaplan-Meier method, and a nomogram for predicting the OS of patients with CRLM was established according to a Cox multivariate regression model. Calibration plots and Kaplan-Meier curves were used to assess the performance of the nomogram.

Results

The median survival time was 39 months (95% CI: 32.05-45.950), and MMR, Ki67 and LVI were significantly correlated with prognosis. Univariate analysis indicated that larger metastasis size (p=0.028), more than one liver metastases (p=0.001),higher serum CA199 (p<0.001), N1-2 stage (p<0.001), the presence of LVI (p=0.001), higher Ki67 (p<0.001), and pMMR predicted worse OS. In addition, synchronous liver metastasis (p = 0.008), larger metastasis size (p=0.02), more than one liver metastases (p<0.001),higher serum CA199 (p<0.001), the presence of LVI (p=0.001), nerve invasion (p=0.042) higher Ki67 (p=0.014), and pMMR (p=0.038) were each associated with worse DFS. Multivariate analysis indicated that higher serum CA199 (HR = 2.275, 95%CI: 1.302-3.975 p=0.004), N1-2 stage(HR = 2.232, 95%CI: 1.239-4.020 p=0.008), the presence of LVI (HR = 1.793, 95%CI: 1.030-3.121 p=0.039), higher Ki67 (HR = 2.700, 95%CI: 1.388-5.253\ p=0.003), and pMMR (HR = 2.213, 95%CI: 1.181-4.993 p=0.046) all predicted worse OS. Finally, synchronous liver metastasis (HR = 2.059, 95%CI: 1.087-3.901 p=0.027), more than one liver metastases ((HR =2.025, 95%CI: 1.120-3.662 p=0.020),higher serum CA199 (HR =2.914, 95%CI: 1.497-5.674 p=0.002), present LVI (HR = 2.055, 95%CI: 1.183-4.299 p=0.001), higher Ki67 (HR = 3.190, 95%CI: 1.648-6.175 p=0.001) and pMMR(HR = 1.676, 95%CI: 1.772-3.637 p=0.047) predicted worse DFS, and the nomogram achieved an effective level of predictive ability.

Conclusion

This study showed that MMR, Ki67, and Lymphovascular invasion were independent risk factors for the postoperative survival of CRLM patients, and a nomogram model was constructed to predict the OS of these patients after liver metastasis surgery. These results can help surgeons and patients to develop more accurate and individualized follow-up strategies and treatment plans after this surgery.

Biomarkers for chemotherapy and drug resistance in the mismatch repair pathway

Drugs targeting DNA repair have developed rapidly in cancer therapy, and numerous inhibitors have already been utilized in preclinical and clinical stages. To optimize the selection of patients for treatment, it is essential to discover biomarkers to anticipate chemotherapy response. The DNA mismatch repair (MMR) pathway is closely correlated with cancer susceptibility and plays an important role in the occurrence and development of cancers. Here, we give a concise introduction of the MMR genes and focus on the potential biomarkers of chemotherapeutic response and resistance. It has been clarified that the status of MMR may affect the outcome of chemotherapy. However, the specific underlying mechanisms as well as contradictory results continue to raise considerable controversy and concern. In this review, we summarize the current literature to provide a general overview.

Anti-tumor effect of Wasabi component, 6-(methylsulfinyl) hexyl isothiocyanate, against endometrial carcinoma cells

PURPOSE

Wasabi is a traditional plant seasoning with an anti-septic function. Recent studies revealed several functions of Wasabi, such as anti-inflammation; however, the anti-tumor effect against endometrial carcinoma (EMC) cells has not been examined. In the present study, we investigated the anti-tumor effect of 6-(methylsulfinyl) hexyl isothiocyanate (6-MITC), a major chemical compound of Wasabi, against various EMC cell lines in vitro and in vivo.

METHODS

The effect of 6-MITC on cell viability was measured by the WST-1 assay in EMC and HUVEC cells. The impact of 6-MITC oral administration in nude mice was measured to assess the growth of the EMC xenograft and natural killer (NK) cell activity in the spleen.

RESULTS

The addition of 6-MITC suppressed the proliferation of EMC cells (Ishikawa, HEC265, HEC108, KLE, and HEC1B) dose-dependently, but not HUVEC cells. 6-MITC (5 µM) enhanced the cisplatin sensitivity of EMC cells. 6-MITC induced apoptosis in a dose-dependent fashion in EMC cells other than HEC1B cells and was associated with increased expression of cleaved-caspase3 and decreased expression of BCL2. Oral administration of 6-MITC (2 and 4 µmol/kg) to Ishikawa and HEC1B xenografting mice resulted in a reduced tumor volume compared with the control (P < 0.05, 4 µmol/kg). Immunohistochemical staining of resected tumors revealed increased expression of Ki-67 and reduced cleaved-caspase3. Furthermore, 6-MITC treatment enhanced NK cell activity, especially when administered before tumor xenografting.

CONCLUSION

These results indicate that 6-MITC has a marked anti-tumor effect against EMC cells and a novel effect to enhance NK cell activity. These effects suggest the therapeutic potential of 6-MITC.

Epigenetic MMR defect identifies a risk group not accounted for through traditional risk stratification algorithms in endometrial cancer

Purpose

We sought to evaluate the contribution of mismatch repair (MMR) status to traditional risk stratification algorithms used to predict nodal involvement and recurrence in a large single-institution cohort.

Methods

Endometrioid endometrial cancer (EC) cases from 2014-2020 were evaluated. MMR immunohistochemistry (IHC) was performed universally. Uterine factors assessed in the Mayo criteria were used to retrospectively classify patients as low or high risk for lymphatic spread. Patients were classified according to risk for recurrence using GOG 99 and PORTEC criteria. Associations were evaluated using chi-square and t-tests and contributing factors assessed using logistic regression models.

Results

1,514 endometrioid EC were evaluated; 392 (25.9%) were MMR (MMR) deficient of which 80.4% of MMR defects were associated with epigenetic silencing of MLH1. Epigenetic MMR defects were significantly more likely to be high risk for lymph node (LN) metastasis based on Mayo criteria (74.9% vs 60.6%, p=<0.001) and with the presence of LN metastasis (20.3 vs 10.5%, p=0.003) compared to MMR proficient tumors. Tumors with epigenetic MMR defects were significantly more likely to be classified as high or high intermediate risk using GOG99 and PORTEC criteria. Furthermore, cases with epigenetic MMR defects classified as low or low intermediate risk were significantly more likely to recur (GOG99 p=0.013; PORTEC p=0.008) and independently associated with worse disease-free survival (DFS). MMR status was found to be independently associated with worse DFS (HR 1.90; 95% CI 1.34-2.70; p=0.003) but not overall survival.

Conclusion

While MMR deficient EC has been associated with poor prognostic features in prior reports; we demonstrate that only epigenetic MMR defects have poorer outcomes. Epigenetic MMR defect were independently associated with lymph node metastasis after controlling for risk criteria. Epigenetic MMR deficiency was found to be an independent predictor of recurrence beyond the factors considered in traditional risk stratification algorithms. Traditional uterine-based risk stratification algorithms may not fully reflect the risk for recurrence in MMR deficient tumors. Consideration should be given to implementing MMR status and MLH1 hypermethylation alongside traditional risk stratification algorithms. Performing MMR IHC on preoperative pathologic specimens may aid in risk stratification and patient counseling.

High MutS homolog 2 expression predicts poor prognosis and is related to immune infiltration in endometrial carcinoma

Several studies have shown that MutS homolog 2 (MSH2) is highly expressed in many cancer tissues. Transcriptome expression data were collected from the Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) database. We analyzed the expression of MSH2 in normal and tumor tissues, the relationship between MSH2 expression and various prognostic factors, and the relationship between MSH2 expression and overall survival, disease specific survival, and progression free interval. We also examined MSH2 promoter methylation between endometrial cancer and normal endometrial tissues, and identified the prognostic value of MSH2 methylation in endometrial cancer. MSH2 was highly expressed in endometrial cancer tumor tissues compared with normal tissues. High MSH2 expression might be an independent prognostic factor for OS, DSS, and PFI. Further, high MSH2 expression was correlated with age and histological type, but not with BMI, clinical stage, tumor invasion, or other clinical features. MSH2 promoter methylation in endometrial cancer was significantly lower than in normal tissues. Additionally, MSH2 levels, OS, DSS, and PFI were associated with BMI, age, tumor invasion, and histological type. ssGSEA showed that MSH2 expression was positively correlated with the infiltration of Th2 cells, Tcm cells, T helper cells, and Tgd cells, whereas it was negatively correlated with NK CD56 bright cells, pDC cells, iDC cells, cytotoxic cells, and neutrophils. Increased MSH2 expression and reduced MSH2 methylation in endometrial cancer predicts poor prognosis. MSH2 may be used as a biomarker for the diagnosis and prognosis of endometrial cancer and as an immunotherapy target.

Comprehensive Clinicopathologic Analysis for Mismatch Repair Protein Expression in Unselected Endometrial Carcinoma Patients With an Emphasis on the Role of MLH1 Deficiency

Screening for mismatch repair (MMR) deficiency in unselected patients with endometrial carcinoma (EC) and the clinicopathologic descriptions of ECs with MMR deficiency have been well demonstrated in Western populations, but studies on Asian populations are relatively scarce. In this study, we described the clinicopathologic features of ECs according to MMR status in unselected Taiwanese patients. We also conducted subgroup analysis of MMR-deficient (dMMR) cases according to the presence or absence of MLH1. Patients diagnosed with ECs between January 2017 and February 2020 at our institution were included. Immunohistochemistry analysis of MLH1, PMS2, MSH2, and MSH6 proteins on endometrial primary tumors and clinicopathologic variables were assessed retrospectively. A total of 231 EC patients were enrolled, of whom 50 (21.6%) had dMMR tumors. Of these 50 cases, 39 had tumors that lacked MLH1 expression and 11 were positive for MLH1. The overall dMMR group was significantly related to older age, parity, and high histologic grade compared with the MMR-proficient (pMMR) group. ECs with MLH1 deficiency were obviously associated with several poor pathologic features, including high histologic grade, lymph node metastasis, and lymphovascular space invasion. Moreover, we first reported that parity and the late age at menopause are strongly correlated with MLH1-related dMMR EC group compared with pMMR group. In conclusion, triaging EC patients into pMMR, MLH1-related dMMR and non-MLH1-related dMMR groups by immunohistochemistry analysis may help clinicians to predict disease behavior and guide further management. The strong association between parity and MLH1-related dMMR ECs warrants further investigation on the underlying mechanism.

Clinicopathologic significance of DNA mismatch repair protein status in endometrial cancer

OBJECTIVE

The prognostic implications of DNA mismatch repair protein (MMRP) have not been determined in endometrial cancer. Therefore, in this study, we aimed to evaluate the clinicopathologic characteristics of DNA MMRP deficiency in endometrial cancer.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We examined the MMRP status of 206 patients with endometrial carcinomas, using immunohistochemistry, and analyzed their clinicopathologic factors and survival outcomes stratified by MMRP status using the Kaplan-Meier method and Cox regression analysis.

RESULTS

Forty-three cases were deficient for at least one MMRP (20.9%). Loss of MLH1 was the most common (13.1%), followed by MSH6 (7.8%). MMRP deficiency was significantly associated with lympho-vascular space invasion, deep myometrial invasion, and adjuvant treatment (P = 0.032, 0.041, and 0.047, respectively). MMRP-deficient patients had a better overall survival (OS), particularly at advanced cancer stages (III/IV) (100% vs. 73.7%, P = 0.170) or if they had received adjuvant treatment (100% vs. 86.7%, P = 0.087).

CONCLUSION

Although MMRP deficiency was associated with unfavorable prognostic risk factors in endometrial cancer, we found a trend in favor of OS in MMRP-deficient patients. More studies are needed to confirm its prognostic implication.

Safety and antitumor activity of dostarlimab in patients with advanced or recurrent DNA mismatch repair deficient/microsatellite instability-high (dMMR/MSI-H) or proficient/stable (MMRp/MSS) endometrial cancer: interim results from GARNET—a phase I, single-arm study

Background

Dostarlimab is a humanized monoclonal antibody that binds with high affinity to PD-1, resulting in inhibition of binding to PD-L1 and PD-L2. We report interim data from patients with endometrial cancer (EC) participating in a phase I trial of single-agent dostarlimab.

Methods

GARNET, an ongoing, single-arm, open-label, phase I trial of intravenous dostarlimab in advanced solid tumors, is being undertaken at 123 sites. Two cohorts of patients with EC were recruited: those with dMMR/MSI-H disease (cohort A1) and those with proficient/stable (MMRp/MSS) disease (cohort A2). Patients received dostarlimab 500 mg every 3 weeks for 4 cycles, then dostarlimab 1000 mg every 6 weeks until disease progression. The primary endpoints were objective response rate (ORR) and duration of response (DOR) per RECIST V.1.1, as assessed by blinded independent central review.

Results

Screening began on April 10, 2017, and 129 and 161 patients with advanced EC were enrolled in cohorts A1 and A2, respectively. The median follow-up duration was 16.3 months (IQR 9.5–22.1) for cohort A1 and 11.5 months (IQR 11.0–25.1) for cohort A2. In cohort A1, ORR was 43.5% (95% CI 34.0% to 53.4%) with 11 complete responses and 36 partial responses. In cohort A2, ORR was 14.1% (95% CI 9.1% to 20.6%) with three complete responses and 19 partial responses. Median DOR was not reached in either cohort. In the combined cohorts, the majority of treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs) were grade 1–2 (75.5%), most commonly fatigue (17.6%), diarrhea (13.8%), and nausea (13.8%). Grade≥3 TRAEs occurred in 16.6% of patients, and 5.5% discontinued dostarlimab because of TRAEs. No deaths were attributable to dostarlimab.

Conclusion

Dostarlimab demonstrated durable antitumor activity in both dMMR/MSI-H (ORR 43.5%) and MMRp/MSS EC (ORR 14.1%) with a manageable safety profile.

Trial registration number

NCT02715284.

Screening of Lynch syndrome in endometrial cancer in Iranian population with mismatch repair protein by immunohistochemistry

BACKGROUND

Lynch syndrome (LS) is one of the commonest genetic cancer syndromes, with an incidence rate of 1 per 250-1000 population. The aim of this study was to evaluate the frequency and characteristics of MMR deficiency in endometrial cancer in Iranian women.

METHODS

One hundred endometrial carcinoma cases who referred to the gynecological oncology clinic of Imam Hossein Medical Center located in Tehran, Iran, from 2018 to 2020 were included in the study. Immunohistochemistry (IHC) evaluation was performed mainly on the hysterectomy specimens of all endometrial cancer (EC) patients to assess MMR proteins (MLH1, MSH2, MSH6, and PMS2) expression.

RESULTS

A total of 23 out of 100 (23%) cases were identified through IHC screening to be MMR-deficient. The most common types were loss of MLH1/PMS2 (17.4%) and solitary MSH2 (17.4%) expressions followed by PMS2/MSH2 loss (13%). MMR deficiency (dMMR) histopathology was significantly overrepresented in patients with family history of cancer or Lynch syndrome (LS) associated cancers (p-values of 0.016 and 0.005, respectively). The rate of myometrial invasion and lower uterine segment involvement were also significantly higher in dMMR EC patients compared to MMR-intact EC (p-value of 0.021 and 0.018, respectively).

CONCLUSION

MMR deficiency, observed in 23% of endometrial cancer cases, was associated with higher rates of poor prognostic factors including myometrial invasion and lower uterine segment involvement. The presence of positive family history of cancer and family history of LS-associated cancer increased the probability of MMR-deficiency in endometrioid endometrial cancer to 47% and 70%, respectively.

Doxorubicin plus lurbinectedin in patients with advanced endometrial cancer: results from an expanded phase I study

Objective

Second-line treatment of endometrial cancer is an unmet medical need. We conducted a phase I study evaluating lurbinectedin and doxorubicin intravenously every 3 weeks in patients with solid tumors. The aim of this study was to characterise the efficacy and safety of lurbinectedin and doxorubicin for patients with endometrial cancer.

Methods

Thirty-four patients were treated: 15 patients in the escalation phase (doxorubicin 50 mg/m² and lurbinectedin 3.0–5.0 mg) and 19 patients in the expansion cohort (doxorubicin 40 mg/m² and lurbinectedin 2.0 mg/m²). All histological subtypes were eligible and patients had received one to two prior lines of chemotherapy for advanced disease. Antitumor activity was evaluated every two cycles according to the Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors version 1.1. Adverse events were graded according to the National Cancer Institute-Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events version 4.

Results

Median age (range) was 65 (51–78) years. Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status was up to 1 in 97% of patients. In the escalation phase, 4 (26.7%) of 15 patients had confirmed response: two complete and two partial responses (95% CI 7.8% to 55.1%). Median duration of response was 19.5 months. Median progression-free survival was 7.3 (2.5 to 10.1) months. In the expansion cohort, confirmed partial response was reported in 8 (42.1%) of 19 patients (95% CI 20.3% to 66.5%). Median duration of response was 7.5 (6.4 to not reached) months, median progression-free survival was 7.7 (2.0 to 16.7) months and median overall survival was 14.2 (4.5 to not reached) months. Fatigue (26.3% of patients), and transient and reversible myelosuppression (neutropenia, 78.9%; febrile neutropenia, 21.1%; thrombocytopenia, 15.8%) were the main grade 3 and higher toxicities in the expanded cohort.

Conclusions

In patients with recurrent advanced endometrial cancer treated with doxorubicin and lurbinectedin, response rates (42%) and duration of response (7.5 months) were favorable. Further evaluation of doxorubicin and lurbinectedin is warranted in this patient population.

Long-Term Survival and Clinicopathological Implications of DNA Mismatch Repair Status in Endometrioid Endometrial Cancers in Hong Kong Chinese Women

To investigate the role of DNA mismatch repair status (MMR) in survival of endometrioid endometrial cancer in Hong Kong Chinese women and its correlation to clinical prognostic factors, 238 patients with endometrioid endometrial cancer were included. Tumor MMR status was evaluated by immunohistochemistry. Clinical characteristics and survival were determined. Association of MMR with survival and clinicopathological parameters were assessed. MMR deficiency (dMMR) was found in 43 cases (16.5%). dMMR was associated with poor prognostic factors including older age, higher stage, higher grade, larger tumor size and more radiotherapy usage. Long-term survival was worse in dMMR compared to the MMR proficient group. The dMMR group had more deaths, shorter disease-specific survival (DSS), shorter disease-free survival (DFS), less 10-year DSS, less 10-year DFS, and more recurrence. The 5-year DSS and 5-year DFS in the dMMR group only showed a trend of worse survival but did not reach statistical significance. In conclusion, dMMR is present in a significant number of endometrioid endometrial cancers patients and is associated with poorer clinicopathological factors and survival parameters in the long run. dMMR should be considered in the risk stratification of endometrial cancer to guide adjuvant therapy and individualisation for longer follow up plan.

Landscape of Current Targeted Therapies for Advanced Colorectal Cancer

Colorectal cancer (CRC) is one of the most frequent and lethal cancer types worldwide. While surgery with chemotherapy and radiotherapy remains the only curative approach for localized CRC, for metastatic disease the therapeutic landscape has significantly evolved over the last years. Development and approval of novel targeted therapies, such as monoclonal antibodies against EGFR and VEGF, have significantly increased the median survival of patients with metastatic disease, with some trials reporting a benefit over 40 months. Increasing accessibility of high throughput sequencing has unraveled several new therapeutic targets. Actionable alterations, such as HER2 overexpression, BRAF mutations, and NTRK fusions, are currently available in metastatic disease, providing significant therapeutic opportunities for these patients, while new emerging agents, as immune checkpoint inhibitors, promise better treatment options in the near future. In this chapter, an overview of established and future CRC targeted therapies in the clinical setting is provided, as well as their mechanism of action, limitations, and future applicability.

Mismatch repair deficiency and clinicopathological characteristics in endometrial carcinoma: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Background

Loss of mismatch repair (MMR) occurs frequently in endometrial carcinoma (EC) and is an important prognostic marker. However, the frequency of MMR deficiency (D-MMR) in EC remains inconclusive. This systematic review and meta-analysis addressed this inconsistency and evaluated related clinicopathology.

Methods

Electronic databases were searched for articles: PubMed, Science Direct, Web of Science, EMBASE, and the Wiley Online Library. Data were extracted from 25 EC studies of D-MMR to generate a clinical dataset of 7,459 patients. A random-effects model produced pooled estimates of D-MMR EC frequency with 95% confidence interval (CI) for meta-analysis.

Results

The overall pooled proportion of D-MMR was 24.477% (95% CI, 21.022 to 28.106) in EC. The Lynch syndrome subgroup had 22.907% pooled D-MMR (95% CI, 14.852 to 32.116). D-MMR was highest in type I EC (25.810) (95% CI, 22.503 to 29.261) compared to type II (13.736) (95% CI, 8.392 to 20.144). Pooled D-MMR was highest at EC stage and grades I–II (79.430% and 65.718%, respectively) and lowest in stages III–IV and grade III (20.168% and 21.529%). The pooled odd ratios comparing D-MMR to proficient MMR favored low-stage EC disease (1.565; 0.894 to 2.740), lymphovascular invasion (1.765; 1.293 to 2.409), and myometrial invasion >50% (1.271; 0.871 to 1.853).

Conclusions

Almost one-quarter of EC patients present with D-MMR tumors. The majority has less aggressive endometrioid histology. D-MMR presents at lower tumor stages compared to MMR-proficient cases in EC. However other metastatic parameters are comparatively higher in the D-MMR disease setting.

The utility of evaluating mismatch repair proteins in endometrial carcinoma: an experience from a tertiary referral centre in North India

Background

Endometrial cancer (EC) is a common gynecological malignancy. Around 25-30% patients have mismatch repair deficiency (MMRd). Lynch syndrome is caused by germline mutations in MMR genes. Lynch-associated tumours have better prognosis, however implications for prognosis and survival is less known. Microsatellite insufficiency (MSI) is associated with high neoantigen loads and number of tumor infiltrating lymphocytes, which overexpresses PD-1 and PD-L1 and are excellent candidates for PD-1-targeted immunotherapies. In this study, we aim to evaluate the utility of MMR in patients with EC and its clinico-pathological correlation.

Methods

Eighty-two cases of EC which underwent MMR evaluation over a period of five years at our centre were included. Demographics, clinical details including family history, histopathological and immunohistochemical (IHC) parameters were recorded. Tumors with loss-of at least one protein were considered MMR deficient (MMRd) and those with intact expression were MMR proficient (MMRp).

Results

Of 82 cases tested, 27 (33%) were MMRd. Frequencies of IHC MMR loss of expression were: MLH1/PMS2: 17 (21%), MSH6 loss only: 3 (4%), MSH2/MSH6 loss: 3 (4%), PMS2 loss: 2 (2%). In MMRd cases, most common histologic tumor type was endometrioid adenocarcinoma (70%). Loss of expression was significantly (p < 0.001) more frequent in lower uterine segment involvement and positive family history.

Conclusions

MSI plays an important role in the progression of endometrial cancer. Lower uterine segment involvement and positive family history are significant predictor of MMR loss. Routine testing of MMR proteins in endometrial cancer can contribute to screening of Lynch syndrome families and make immunotherapy available as a treatment option.

Managing Difficulties of Microsatellite Instability Testing in Endometrial Cancer-Limitations and Advantages of Four Different PCR-Based Approaches

Microsatellite instability (MSI), a common alteration in endometrial cancers (EC) is known as a biomarker for immune checkpoint therapy response alongside screening for Lynch Syndrome (LS). However, former studies described challenging MSI profiles in EC hindering analysis by using MSI testing methods intensively validated for colorectal cancer (CRC) only. In order to reduce false negatives, this study examined four different PCR-based approaches for MSI testing using 25 EC samples already tested for mismatch repair deficiency (dMMR). In a follow up validation set of 75 EC samples previously tested both for MMR and MSI, the efficiency of a seven-marker system corresponding to the Idylla system was further analyzed. Both Bethesda and Promega marker panels require trained operators to overcome interpretation complexities caused by either hardly visible additional peaks of one and two nucleotides, or small shifts in microsatellite repeat length. Using parallel sequencing adjustment of bioinformatics is needed. Applying the Idylla MSI assay, an evaluation of input material is more crucial for reliable results and is indispensable. Following MMR deficiency testing as a first-line screening procedure, additional testing with a PCR-based method is necessary if inconclusive staining of immunohistochemistry (IHC) must be clarified.

UGT1A1 Polymorphism for Irinotecan Dose Escalation in Patients with BRAF-Mutated Metastatic Colorectal Cancer Treated with First-Line Bevacizumab and FOLFIRI

Background

Patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) and BRAF V600E mutation have a poor prognosis, with a median progression-free survival (PFS) of only 5–7 months after initial therapy. The current standard first-line chemotherapy for these patients includes FOLFOX or FOLFIRI plus bevacizumab. In this study, we explored the effects and oncological outcomes of UGT1A1 polymorphism for irinotecan escalation in patients with BRAF-mutated mCRC. Patients and Methods. This retrospective study included 17 patients with BRAF-mutated mCRC between April 2016 and December 2019. UGT1A1 genotyping was performed on all patients prior to initiating bevacizumab plus FOLFIRI chemotherapy. The primary endpoint was PFS, and the secondary endpoints were toxicity, response rate, disease control rate, and overall survival (OS).

Results

Fifteen and two patients had UGT1A1 1∗/1∗ and 1∗/28∗, respectively. Eight underwent irinotecan dose escalation with tolerable adverse effects (AEs), and nine maintained an irinotecan dose of 180 mg/m² or required deescalation to 150 mg/m² due to intolerable AEs. After a median follow-up period of 15.7 (range, 3–54) months, the median PFS and OS were 9.4 and 15.7 months, respectively. Grade 3/4 AEs were observed in three (6%) patients. The disease control and partial response rates were 64.7% and 11.8%, respectively, indicating that most patients (14, 82.3%) could maintain this as a first-line line therapy with stable disease or proceed to second-line therapy if disease progression occurred, thereby maintaining acceptable performance status.

Conclusions

The oncological outcomes of patients with BRAF-mutated mCRC treated using FOLFIRI plus bevacizumab with irinotecan dose escalation as a first-line therapy are acceptable with tolerable AEs; this may be a feasible treatment option in such patients. Pretherapeutic UGT1A1 genotyping-guided dose adjustment can achieve favorable outcomes.

Understanding the clinical implication of mismatch repair deficiency in endometrioid endometrial cancer through a prospective study

OBJECTIVES

Findings on impact of mismatch repair deficiency (MMRd) on patient outcomes in endometrial cancer (EC) have been inconsistent to date. The objective of this study was to compare the oncologic outcomes and recurrence patterns between MMRd and MMR-intact (MMRi) endometrioid EC (EEC).

METHODS

Between 2015 and 2018, we prospectively recruited 492 EEC cases from three cancer centers in Ontario, Canada. Tumors were reflexively assessed for MMR protein expression by immunohistochemistry (IHC). Clinicopathological, survival and recurrence patterns were compared between MMRd and MMRi cases.

RESULTS

Of 492 EEC, 348 were MMRi (71%) and 144 were MMRd (29%) with median follow-up of 16.8 months (0-69.6). MMRd tumors tended to be grade 2 or 3 (56% vs. 29%, p < 0.001), with propensity for lymphovascular space invasion (28% vs. 18%, p = 0.024), lymph node involvement (7% vs. 5%, p < 0.001) and received more adjuvant treatment (46% vs. 33%, p = 0.027). This group also had significantly lower 3-year recurrence-free survival (78% vs. 90%, p = 0.014) although there was no difference in OS (p = 0.603). MMRd cases were more likely to recur in retroperitoneal lymph nodes (p = 0.045). Upon subgroup analysis, MLH1 methylated tumors had the worst prognostic features and survival outcomes.

CONCLUSIONS

MLH1 methylated EECs exhibit more aggressive features compared to other MMRd and MMRi EECs. This may indicate an inherent difference in tumor biology, suggesting the importance of individualized management based on EC molecular phenotype.

Genome-wide mutation analysis in precancerous lesions of endometrial carcinoma

Clinicopathological evidence supports endometrial atypical hyperplasia (AH) or endometrial intraepithelial neoplasia as the precursor of uterine endometrioid carcinoma (EC), the most common gynecologic malignancy. However, the pathogenic progression from AH to EC remains unclear. Here, we employed whole-exome sequencing to identify somatic mutations and copy number changes in micro-dissected lesions from 30 pairs of newly diagnosed AH and EC. We found that all but one pair of AHs shared the same DNA mismatch repair status as their corresponding ECs. The percentage of common mutations between AH lesions and corresponding ECs varied significantly, ranging from 0.1% to 82%. Microsatellite stable AHs had fewer cancer driver mutations than ECs (5 versus 7, p = 0.017), but among microsatellite unstable AHs and ECs there was no difference in mutational numbers (36 versus 38, p = 0.65). As compared to AH specimens, 19 (79%) of 24 microsatellite stable EC tumors gained new cancer driver mutations, most of which involved PTEN, ARID1A, PIK3CA, CTNNB1, or CHD4. Our results suggest that some AH lesions are the immediate precursor of ECs, and progression depends on acquisition of additional cancer driver mutations. However, a complex clonal relationship between AH and EC can also be appreciated, as in some cases both lesions diverge very early or arise independently, thus co-developing with distinct genetic trajectories. Our genome-wide profile of mutations in AH and EC shines new light on the molecular landscape of tumor progression. © 2020 The Pathological Society of Great Britain and Ireland. Published by John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Genotype-phenotype associations in colorectal adenocarcinomas and their matched metastases

Although primary colorectal carcinomas (CRCs) frequently share genetic alterations with their metastases, morphologic surrogates reflecting the genotype contexture of metastases remain largely unknown. We investigated phenotype/genotype associations in paired primary and metastatic colorectal adenocarcinomas from 75 patients. Thirty-three (44%) metastatic lesions were synchronous and 42 (56%) were metachronous. Tumor budding, micronecrosis, and tumor-infiltrating lymphocyte (TIL) density were compared with matched next-generation sequencing genotypes. Micronecrosis in the primary were significantly associated with nodal status (P = 0.0054) and with micronecrosis in metastatic sites (P = 0.0216), particularly in metachronous metastases (P = 0.0033). With a 57-gene panel, one or more mutations were identified in 64 (85.3%) cases. In metastases, high (brisk) TILs were associated with overall mutational burden (P = 0.0058) and with mutations in EGF (P = 0.0325), RAS genes (P = 0.0043), and MMR genes (P = 0.0069), whereas high-level micronecrosis correlated with mutations in APC (P = 0.0004) and MSH6 (P = 0.0385) genes. Genomic alterations were shared in 90.1% of primary/metastatic pairs, but clonality of the same mutation was shared in only 57.1% of paired lesions. Compared with synchronous, metachronous metastases had more private clonal alterations (P = 0.0291); in this group, clonal alterations coincided with brisk TILs (P = 0.0334) and high micronecrosis (P = 0.0133). High TILs in metastatic lesions were predictive of favorable overall survival (log-rank P = 0.044). The observed phenotype/genotype associations favor the clonal evolution model in CRC metastases that seems accompanied by intense host immune response. If the role of micronecrosis and brisk TILs in metachronous metastases is validated in larger studies, these histologic parameters will be worth adding in the armamentarium for the evaluation of metastatic CRC.

Clinical Activity and Safety of the Anti-Programmed Death 1 Monoclonal Antibody Dostarlimab for Patients With Recurrent or Advanced Mismatch Repair-Deficient Endometrial Cancer: A Nonrandomized Phase 1 Clinical Trial

Question

What is the clinical antitumor activity and safety of dostarlimab for patients with deficient mismatch repair endometrial cancer?

Findings

In this nonrandomized phase 1 clinical trial, the confirmed objective response rate was 42%; 13% of patients had a confirmed complete response, and 30% of patients had a confirmed partial response. Anemia (3%), colitis (2%), and diarrhea (2%) were the most common grade 3 or higher treatment-related adverse events.

Meaning

Dostarlimab was associated with clinically meaningful and durable antitumor activity with an acceptable safety profile for patients with deficient mismatch repair endometrial cancers that have progressed after prior platinum-based chemotherapy.

Importance

Deficient mismatch mutation repair mechanisms may sensitize endometrial cancers to anti–programmed death 1 (PD-1) therapies. Dostarlimab (TSR-042) is an investigational anti–PD-1 antibody that binds with high affinity to the PD-1 receptor.

Objective

To assess the antitumor activity and safety of dostarlimab for patients with deficient mismatch repair endometrial cancer.

Design, Setting, and Participants

This ongoing, open-label, single-group, multicenter study began part 1 on March 7, 2016, and began enrolling patients with deficient mismatch mutation repair endometrial cancer on May 8, 2017. Median follow-up was 11.2 months (range, 0.03 [ongoing] to 22.11 [ongoing] months; based on radiological assessments). Statistical analysis was performed July 8 to August 9, 2019.

Interventions

Patients received 500 mg of dostarlimab intravenously every 3 weeks for 4 doses, then 1000 mg every 6 weeks until disease progression, treatment discontinuation, or withdrawal.

Main Outcomes and Measures

The primary end point was objective response rate and duration of response by blinded independent central review using Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors, version 1.1.

Results

As of the data cutoff, 104 women (median age, 64.0 years [range, 38-80 years]) with deficient mismatch mutation repair endometrial cancers were enrolled and treated with dostarlimab. Of these, 71 had measurable disease at baseline and at 6 months or more of follow-up and were included in the analysis. There was a confirmed response in 30 patients (objective response rate, 42.3%; 95% CI, 30.6%-54.6%); 9 patients (12.7%) had a confirmed complete response, and 21 patients (29.6%) had a confirmed partial response. Responses were durable; the median duration of response was not reached (median follow-up was 11.2 months). The estimated likelihood of maintaining a response was 96.4% at 6 months and 76.8% at 12 months. Anemia (3 of 104 [2.9%]), colitis (2 of 104 [1.9%]), and diarrhea (2 of 104 [1.9%]) were the most common grade 3 or higher treatment-related adverse events.

Conclusions and Relevance

In this nonrandomized trial, dostarlimab was associated with clinically meaningful and durable antitumor activity with an acceptable safety profile for patients with deficient mismatch mutation repair endometrial cancers after prior platinum-based chemotherapy.

Trial Registration

ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT02715284

Evaluation of 3 molecular-based assays for microsatellite instability detection in formalin-fixed tissues of patients with endometrial and colorectal cancers

Microsatellite instability (MSI) status is routinely assessed in patients with colorectal and endometrial cancers as it contributes to Lynch syndrome initial screening, tumour prognosis and selecting patients for immunotherapy. Currently, standard reference methods recommended for MSI/dMMR (deficient MisMatch Repair) testing consist of immunohistochemistry and pentaplex PCR-based assays, however, novel molecular-based techniques are emerging. Here, we aimed to evaluate the performance of a custom capture-based NGS method and the Bio-Rad ddPCR and Idylla approaches for the determination of MSI status for theranostic purposes in 30 formalin-fixed paraffin embedded (FFPE) tissue samples from patients with endometrial (n = 15) and colorectal (n = 15) cancers. All samples were previously characterised using IHC and Promega MSI Analysis System and these assays set as golden standard. Overall agreement, sensitivity and specificity of our custom-built NGS panel were 93.30%, 93.75% and 92.86% respectively. Overall agreement, sensitivity and specificity were 100% with the Idylla MSI system. The Bio-Rad ddPCR MSI assay showed a 100% concordance, sensitivity and specificity. The custom capture-based NGS, Bio-Rad ddPCR and Idylla approaches represent viable and complementary options to IHC and Promega MSI Analysis System for the detection of MSI. Bio-Rad ddPCR and Idylla MSI assays accounts for easy and fast screening assays while the NGS approach offers the advantages to simultaneously detect MSI and clinically relevant genomic alterations.

Race-driven survival differential in women diagnosed with endometrial cancers in the USA

OBJECTIVE

African American women are increasingly being diagnosed with advanced and type II histology endometrial cancers. Outcomes have been observed to be worse in African American women, but whether or not race itself is a factor is unclear. We sought to evaluate the rates of diagnosis and outcomes on a stage-by-stage basis with respect to race using a large national cancer registry database.

METHODS

The National Cancer Data Base was searched for patients with surgically staged non-metastatic endometrial cancer between 2004 and 2015. Women were excluded if surgical stage/histology was unknown, there was no follow-up, or no information on subsequent treatment. Pairwise comparison was used to determine temporal trends and Cox hazards tests with Bonferroni correction were used to determine overall survival.

RESULTS

A total of 286 920 women were diagnosed with endometrial cancer and met the criteria for analysis. Median follow-up was 51 months (IQR 25.7-85.3). In multivariable models, in women with stage I disease, African American women had a higher risk of death than Caucasian women (HR 1.262, 95% CI 1.191 to 1.338, p<0.001) and Asian/Pacific Islander women had a lower risk of death than Caucasian women (HR 0.742, 95% CI 0.689 to 0.801, p<0.001). This held for African American women with stage II type I and type II disease (HR 1.26, 95% CI 1.109 to 1.444, p<0.001 and HR 1.235, 95% CI 1.098 to 1.388, p<0.001) but not for Asian/Pacific Islander women. African American women with stage IIIA-B disease also had a higher risk of death for type I and type II disease versus Caucasian women (HR 1.221, 95% CI 1.045 to 1.422, p=0.010 and HR 1.295, 95% CI 1.155 to 1.452, p<0.001). Asian/Pacific Islander women had a lower risk of death than Caucasian women with type I disease (HR 0.783, 95% CI 0.638 to 0.960, p=0.019) and type II disease (HR 0.790, 95% CI 0.624 to 0.999, p=0.05). African American women with stage IIIC1-2 had a higher risk of death with type I disease (HR 1.343, 95% CI 1.207 to 1.494, p<0.001) and type II disease (HR 1.141, 95% CI 1.055 to 1.233, p=0.001) whereas there was no significant difference between Caucasian women and Asian/Pacific Islander women.

CONCLUSION

Race appears to play an independent role in survival from endometrial cancer in the USA, with African American women having worse survival on a stage-for-stage basis compared with Caucasian women.

The clinicopathological characteristics and survival outcomes of endometrial carcinoma coexisting with or arising in adenomyosis: A pilot study

Little is known about the epidemiological and clinicopathological characteristics of endometrial endometrioid carcinoma (EEC) coexisting with or arising in adenomyosis (EEC-A or EEC-AIA) due to their rarity. This study compared EEC-A and EEC-AIA with endometrial carcinoma without adenomyosis. Cases of endometrial cancer treated at the study center from June 1, 2010, to June 1, 2017, were reviewed. The epidemiological, clinicopathological characteristics and survival outcomes were compared among three groups of endometrioid subtypes: group A, stage IA endometrial carcinoma patients without coexisting adenomyosis; group B, patients with EEC-A; and group C, patients with EEC-AIA. Among the 2080 patients reviewed, groups A, B, and C included 1043, 230 and 28 patients, respectively. Patients in group A and group B had similar clinicopathological and survival outcomes. Patients in group C were significantly younger and had less gravidity and parity than patients in groups A and B. More tumors from group C were grade 1, and they had a smaller maximum diameter and less mismatch repair deficiency than those from groups A and B. After a median follow-up of 57.0 months, the 5-year disease-free survival (DFS) rates of groups A, B and C were 96%, 91% and 100% (p = 0.045), respectively; the 5-year overall survival (OS) rates were 98%, 93% and 100%, respectively (p = 0.001), in the Kaplan-Meier analysis. However, these difference disappeared in a subgroup of stage IA patients in univariate and multivariate analysis. Cox regression analysis in stage IA patients also revealed no significant differences in survival outcome across the three groups. In conclusion, EEC-AIA exhibited specific clinicopathological characteristics that were probably associated with favorable survival outcomes. The characteristics and survival outcomes of EEC-A were similar to those of EEC without adenomyosis in stage IA patients.