A database on dyspepsia

A symptom severity questionnaire for patients suffering from functional gastrointestinal disorder: FGI-Checklist

BACKGROUND AND AIM

A well-validated, comprehensive checklist of functional gastrointestinal (FGI) disorder (FGID) symptom severity for tracking symptom profile changes over time is lacking. We aim to develop and validate a comprehensive symptom severity checklist for FGID.

METHODS

A 20-item scale, including both upper and lower gastrointestinal symptoms, was generated to measure the symptom severity commonly found in FGID. Patients who experienced at least monthly symptoms of FGID with negative endoscopy findings were invited to complete the FGI-Checklist, Patient Health Questionaire-9 for assessing depressive symptoms, and Patient Health Questionnaire-15 for assessing somatic symptoms at baseline. A subset of patients who met Rome III diagnostic criteria of gastroesophageal reflux disease, functional dyspepsia, and irritable bowel syndrome received medication treatment for 8-12 weeks and completed the FGI-Checklist again at a follow-up visit. Exploratory factor analysis was performed for subscales formation and psychometric properties were measured.

RESULTS

Six hundred and forty-one patients were recruited for current study and 108 (16.8%) of them completed the FGI-Checklist again at follow-up. Exploratory factor analysis identified a five-factor solution accounting for 66.8% of the total variance. The five factors are named esophageal syndrome, reflux syndrome, functional dyspepsia syndrome, nausea and vomiting syndrome, and abdominal and bowel syndrome. The FGI-Checklist total score correlated with Patient Health Questionaire-9 and Patient Health Questionnaire-15 (all P < 0.001), which demonstrated good construct validity. Good item-internal consistency was found (Cronbach's alphas: 0.69-0.87). Responsiveness for reflux syndrome subscale, functional dyspepsia syndrome subscale, and abdominal and bowel syndrome subscale after medication treatment was significant (paired-t-test: all P < 0.01).

CONCLUSION

The instrument, Checklist, is valid and reliable.

Definition, Pathogenesis, and Management of That Cursed Dyspepsia

Dyspepsia is an umbrella term used to encompass a number of symptoms thought to originate from the upper gastrointestinal tract. These symptoms are relatively nonspecific; not surprisingly, therefore, a myriad of conditions may present with any one or a combination of these symptoms. Therein lays the clinician's first challenge: detecting the minority who may have a potentially life-threatening disorder, such as gastric cancer, from a population whose symptoms are, for the most part, considered functional in origin. The second challenge lies in the definition and management of those individuals with functional dyspepsia (FD); the major focus of this review. The Rome process has addressed the issue of FD definition and a look back at the evolution of Rome criteria for this disorder illustrates the complexities that have so frustrated us. There has been no shortage of hypotheses to explain symptom pathogenesis in FD; initially focused on gastric sensorimotor dysfunction, these have now strayed well into the duodenum and have come to entertain such factors as immune responses and the microbiome. FD has proven to be an equally challenging area for therapeutics; while the staple approaches of acid suppression and eradication of Helicobacter pylori have some limited efficacy in select populations, strategies to ameliorate symptoms in the majority of sufferers based on presumed pathophysiology have largely foundered. Lacking a validated biomarker(s) FD continues to be an elusive target and is likely to remain so until we can better define the various phenotypes that it must surely contain.

The role of smoking and alcohol behaviour in management of functional gastrointestinal disorders

Functional gastrointestinal disorders (FGIDs) are common disorders in the population. Lifestyle habits have been suspected to influence the presence and degree of symptoms, and many studies have examined the role of food components and physical activity on the disease development. The role of smoking and alcohol intake on FGID has been less thoroughly examined. This systematic literature review, of a large amount of studies from different countries around the world with different design and application of FGID criteria, shows that smoking seems to be associated with a significant 50% increased risk of FD for current compared with never smokers. The associations between smoking and other FGIDs are weak, if present at all. A moderate alcohol intake is not associated with FGIDs. On the other hand, a high alcohol intake may lead to development and aggravation of FGID symptoms, especially functional dyspepsia.

Overlap between irritable bowel syndrome and functional dyspepsia including subtype analyses

BACKGROUND AND AIM

Coexistent gastrointestinal symptom profiles and prevalence or associated factors for the overlap between each functional dyspepsia (FD) and irritable bowel syndrome (IBS) group remain unclear. Thus, the aim of the present study was to evaluate the clinicodemographic features of FD, IBS, and IBS-FD overlap and assess the risk factors thereof, including subtype and genetic polymorphisms for IBS-FD.

METHODS

Consecutive patients were enrolled from the outpatient Gastroenterology clinics of Bundang Seoul National University Hospitals in Korea. All gastrointestinal symptoms occurring at least once per week in the previous 3 months were recorded. Diagnostic criteria of functional gastrointestinal disorders were based on the Rome III criteria. Risk factors including genetic polymorphisms of 5-HTTLPR and ADRA2A 1291 G alleles and CCK-1R intron 779T>C were assessed using a multivariate logistic regression model.

RESULTS

A total of 632 subjects (278 control subjects, 308 FD, 156 IBS, and 110 who met the criteria for both FD and IBS) were included in this study. Patients with IBS-FD overlap had more severe symptoms (such as bloating, nausea, vomiting, hard or lumpy stools, defecation straining, and a feeling of incomplete bowel movement) and higher depression scores compared with non-overlap patients. Single/divorced or widowed marital status, nausea, bloating, and a feeling of incomplete emptying after bowel movements were independent risk factors for IBS-FD overlap among IBS patients. In contrast, young age, depression, bloating, and postprandial distress syndrome were positively associated with IBS-FD overlap among FD patients. 5-HTTLPR L/L was a risk factor for the co-occurrence of IBS-C among FD patients (OR: 12.47; 95% CI: 2.00-77.75; P = 0.007).

CONCLUSIONS

Bloating was a risk factor for IBS-FD overlap. Patients with postprandial distress syndrome have a higher risk of coexisting IBS, particularly constipation-dominant IBS.

Prevalence of irritable bowel syndrome and functional dyspepsia, overlapping symptoms, and associated factors in a general population of Bangladesh

BACKGROUND

This community-based survey aimed to find out the prevalence of irritable bowel syndrome (IBS), functional dyspepsia (FD), overlapping symptoms, and associated factors for overlap.

METHOD

By cluster sampling method, 3,000 (1,523 male) randomly selected adult subjects in the Sylhet district of Bangladesh were interviewed by a questionnaire based on ROME III criteria. Multivariate logistic regression analyses were done to find out the factors for overlap with significance level set at ≤0.05.

RESULTS

The mean age of the study population was 33.9 ± 16.4 years. Prevalence of IBS and FD and IBS-FD were 12.9 % (n = 387), 8.3 % (n = 249), and 3.5 % (n = 105), respectively. Approximately 27.1 % of IBS patients and 42.1 % of FD patients had overlapping IBS-FD. The odds ratio for IBS-FD overlap was 6.3 (95 % CI, 4.8-8.4). Mean age (p = 0.011) and epigastric pain (p = 0.002) were more in overlap patients than FD alone, whereas epigastric pain syndrome subtype (p < 0.009) was more prevalent in lone FD subjects. In the multivariate logistic analysis, early satiety (OR, 3.0; 95 % CI, 1.2-7.5; p = 0.018) and epigastric pain (OR, 14.5; 95 % CI, 5.0-42.1; p = 0.000) in FD patients appeared as independent risk factors for overlap. Bloating (p = 0.026), <3 stools per week (p = 0.050), abdominal pain reduced by defecation (p = 0.002), abdominal pain severity score (p = 0.004), and overall symptom frequency score (p = 0.000) were more in overlap patients than IBS-alone patients. In IBS patients, bloating (OR, 3.6; CI, 2.0-6.5; p = 0.000) was found as potential symptom associated with IBS-FD overlap.

CONCLUSION

FD was a less prevalent disorder than IBS in our community, and significant overlap existed between the two disorders. Early satiety, epigastric pain, and bloating were important factors associated with overlap.

Prevalence and characteristics of dyspepsia among college students in Zhejiang Province

AIM: To investigate the prevalence and characteristics of uninvestigated dyspepsia among college students in Zhejiang Province.

METHODS: Young adult students attending undergraduate (within the 4-year program) and graduate (only first-year students) colleges in Zhejiang Province were recruited between November 2010 and March 2011 to participate in the self-report survey study. The questionnaire was designed to collect data regarding demographics (sex and age), general health [weight and height, to calculate body mass index (BMI)], and physical episodes related to gastrointestinal disorders. Diagnosis of dyspepsia and irritable bowel syndrome (IBS) was made according to the Rome III criteria. Gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) was defined by episodes of heartburn and/or acid reflux that occurred at least once a week, according to the Montreal definition.

RESULTS: Of 2520 students recruited for survey participation, only 1870 (males: 967; age range: 17-32 years, mean age: 21.3 years) returned a completed questionnaire. One hundred and eight (5.67%) of the student participants fit the criteria for dyspepsia diagnosis. Stratification analysis of dyspepsia and non-dyspepsia cases showed no statistically significant differences in age or BMI; however, the prevalence of dyspepsia was significantly higher in women than in men (7.53% vs 4.14%, P < 0.05). Stratification analysis of dyspepsia by grade level showed that year 4 undergraduate students had a significantly higher prevalence of dyspepsia (10.00% vs undergraduate year 1: 5.87%, year 2: 3.53% and year 3: 7.24%, and graduate year 1: 3.32%). Nearly all (95.37%) students with dyspepsia reported symptoms of postprandial distress syndrome, but only a small portion (4.63%) reported symptoms suggestive of abdominal pain syndrome. The students with dyspepsia also showed significantly higher rates of IBS (16.67% vs non-dyspepsia students: 6.30%, P < 0.05) and GERD (11.11% vs 0.28%, P < 0.05).

CONCLUSION: Although the prevalence of dyspepsia among Zhejiang college students is low, the significantly higher rates of concomitant IBS and GERD suggest common pathophysiological disturbances.

Risk factors for un-investigated dyspepsia among primary care patients in northern Nigeria

BACKGROUND

Many risk factors have been speculated to be associated with uninvestigated dyspepsia amongst different population groups. Some of which have been subjected to epidemiological survey while others remain unevaluated.

OBJECTIVE

We evaluated some of the documented risk factors amongst patient presenting with uninvestigated dyspepsia and compared with a matched group without dyspepsia in a primary care setting.

METHODS

The study was a matched case controlled study. 103 consecutive patient aged between 18 and 50 years that presented with dyspepsia (cases) were enrolled. These were matched by age and sex with the same number of subjects without dyspepsia (controls). Data were collated using a structured questionnaire Odds ratios and p-values were used to determine the significance of documented categorical risk factors associated with dyspepsia using two by two tables. For risk factors that were continuous variables the means, standard deviations and p-values were used. Risk factors with their p-values <0.2 were entered into logistic regression to identify those independently associated with dyspepsia.

RESULT

H.pylori seropositivity was 22.3% and 13.6% among cases and controls respectively (p = 0.10). Pepper intake (p <0.0001) and tea intake (p = 0.0002) and greater years of education (p = 0.0065) were significantly associated with dyspepsia. H. pylori seropositivity was not related to the risk of developing dyspepsia.

CONCLUSION

Helicobacter pylori seropositivity was not found to be a significant contributor to risk of developing dyspepsia among the studied population contrary to general belief. Pepper intake, tea intake and greater years of education were found to significant contributors to dyspepsia.

Prevalence of Helicobacter pylori infection and the effect of its eradication on symptoms of functional dyspepsia in Kashmir, India

BACKGROUND AND AIM

Epidemiology of Helicobacter pylori infection has regional variation. Effect of eradication of H. pylori on symptoms of functional dyspepsia is uncertain, and the data in Asian scenario are scanty. The study aimed to see H. pylori positivity rate in patients of functional dyspepsia and the effect of its eradication on symptoms.

METHODS

Randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study was the study design used. Patients of functional dyspepsia defined as per Rome 2 criteria were tested for H. pylori infection by rapid urease test and gastric biopsy. H. pylori-positive patients were randomly allocated to triple therapy (20 mg of omeprazole, 500 mg of clarithromycin, and 1000 mg of amoxicillin orally two times daily) and omeperazole plus identical placebo for 2 weeks. Symptoms were assessed with the weekly Likert scale.

RESULTS

H. pylori positivity rate in functional dyspepsia was 1160/2000 (58%). At 6 weeks, the eradication rate for H. pylori in triple therapy and placebo group was (181/259 [69.8%] and 13/260 [5.0%], P = 0.001), respectively. On intention-to-treat analysis, the symptom resolution at 1 month was (157/259 [60.7%] and 136/260 [52.3%], P = 0.38), respectively. At 12 months, H. pylori eradication and healing of gastritis in triple therapy and placebo group were (116/174 [66.7%] and 12/180 [6.7%], P = 0.001) and (132/174 [75.9%] and 11/180 [6.1%], P = 0.001), respectively. On intension to treat, the resolution of symptoms in triple therapy and placebo group was (95/217 [43.7%] and 72/195 [36.9%], P = 0.13).

CONCLUSION

There is high H. pylori positivity rate in patients of functional dyspepsia. The eradication of H. pylori does not resolve the symptoms despite healing of gastritis.

Open access upper gastrointestinal endoscopy: a 2-year experience from 2001 to 2003

BACKGROUND

The role of open access endoscopy in detecting serious diseases like malignancy and peptic ulcers is debated. We participated in an open access endoscopy service and this study details our experience.

METHODS

The Cancer Society of Kashmir provided an open access upper gastrointestinal (GI) endoscopy service in Kashmir between 2001 and 2003. The records of patients who underwent endoscopy were analyzed.

RESULTS

A total of 1,000 endoscopies were performed over a two-year period (average >40 endoscopies per month). Two-thirds of endoscopies were normal. Gastric (n = 30) and esophageal (n = 42) tumors were seen in 7.2 % of patients. The other common abnormality detected was peptic ulcer. No complications were reported during or immediately after the procedure.

CONCLUSION

Open access upper GI endoscopy is a viable service option that can become more widely available.

Irritable bowel syndrome, gastro-oesophageal reflux disease and dyspepsia: overlap analysis using loglinear models

BACKGROUND AND STUDY AIMS

Irritable bowel syndrome (IBS), gastro-oesophageal reflux disease (GERD) and dyspepsia are three most important gastrointestinal disorders which occur frequently together in patients. This study aims to assess the association between IBS, GERD and dyspepsia by using loglinear model analysis.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

This cross-sectional household survey, the purpose of which was to find the prevalence of gastrointestinal symptoms, disorders and the related factors, has been done from May 2006 to December 2007 in Tehran province, Iran. Subjects were interviewed by trained personnel. GERD was diagnosed as the experience of heartburn and/or acid regurgitation at least once a week for the last 3 months. IBS and dyspepsia were diagnosed according to the Rome III criteria. Loglinear models were applied to investigate the simultaneous association between IBS, GERD and dyspepsia.

RESULTS

77.9% of IBS patients had dyspepsia symptoms and 74.7% had GERD symptoms as well at the same time. As for the other two symptoms, 66% of GERD patients were also suffering from dyspepsia.

CONCLUSIONS

These three symptoms frequently overlap; the overlap is systematic and not by chance or random.

Psychopathological features of irritable bowel syndrome patients with and without functional dyspepsia: a cross sectional study

Background

Irritable bowel syndrome (IBS) and functional dyspepsia (FD) show considerable overlap and are both associated with psychiatric comorbidity. The present study aimed to investigate whether IBS patients with FD show higher levels of psychopathology than those without FD. As a preliminary analysis, it also evaluated the psychopathological differences, if any, between IBS patients featuring the two Rome III-defined FD subtypes, i.e. postprandial distress syndrome (PDS) and epigastric pain syndrome (EPS).

Methods

Consecutive outpatients (n = 82, F = 67, mean age 41.6 ± 12.7 years) referred to our third level gastroenterological centre, matching the Rome III criteria for IBS and, if present, for concurrent FD, were recruited. They were asked to complete a 90-item self-rating questionnaire, the Symptom Checklist 90 Revised (SCL-90-R), in order to assess the psychological status. Comparisons between groups were carried out using the non-parametric Mann-Whitney U test.

Results

Patients with IBS only were 56 (68.3%, F = 43, mean age 41.6 ± 13.3 years) and patients with both IBS and FD were 26 (31.7%, F = 24, mean age 41.8 ± 11.5 years), 17 of whom had PDS and 9 EPS. Patients with both IBS and FD scored significantly higher on the SCL-90-R GSI and on eight out of the nine subscales than patients with IBS only (P ranging from 0.000 to 0.03). No difference was found between IBS patients with PDS and IBS patients with EPS (P ranging from 0.07 to 0.97), but this result has to be considered provisional, given the small sample size of the two subgroups.

Conclusions

IBS-FD overlap is associated with an increased severity of psychopathological features. This finding suggests that a substantial subset of patients of a third level gastroenterological centre with both IBS and FD may benefit from psychological assessment and treatment.

Psychopathological features of irritable bowel syndrome patients with and without functional dyspepsia: a cross sectional study

BACKGROUND

Irritable bowel syndrome (IBS) and functional dyspepsia (FD) show considerable overlap and are both associated with psychiatric comorbidity. The present study aimed to investigate whether IBS patients with FD show higher levels of psychopathology than those without FD. As a preliminary analysis, it also evaluated the psychopathological differences, if any, between IBS patients featuring the two Rome III-defined FD subtypes, i.e. postprandial distress syndrome (PDS) and epigastric pain syndrome (EPS).

METHODS

Consecutive outpatients (n = 82, F = 67, mean age 41.6 ± 12.7 years) referred to our third level gastroenterological centre, matching the Rome III criteria for IBS and, if present, for concurrent FD, were recruited. They were asked to complete a 90-item self-rating questionnaire, the Symptom Checklist 90 Revised (SCL-90-R), in order to assess the psychological status. Comparisons between groups were carried out using the non-parametric Mann-Whitney U test.

RESULTS

Patients with IBS only were 56 (68.3%, F = 43, mean age 41.6 ± 13.3 years) and patients with both IBS and FD were 26 (31.7%, F = 24, mean age 41.8 ± 11.5 years), 17 of whom had PDS and 9 EPS. Patients with both IBS and FD scored significantly higher on the SCL-90-R GSI and on eight out of the nine subscales than patients with IBS only (P ranging from 0.000 to 0.03). No difference was found between IBS patients with PDS and IBS patients with EPS (P ranging from 0.07 to 0.97), but this result has to be considered provisional, given the small sample size of the two subgroups.

CONCLUSIONS

IBS-FD overlap is associated with an increased severity of psychopathological features. This finding suggests that a substantial subset of patients of a third level gastroenterological centre with both IBS and FD may benefit from psychological assessment and treatment.

Influence of organic and functional dyspepsia on work productivity: the HEROES-DIP study

OBJECTIVES

Dyspepsia is defined as persistent or recurrent abdominal pain or discomfort centered in the upper abdomen. Dyspepsia represents up to 8.3% of all primary care physician visits and causes huge economic costs to patients and to the economy as a whole. The aim of this study was to measure the influence of dyspepsia on work productivity of people within the Brazilian workforce.

METHODS

Adult patients were enrolled if they met the Roma III criteria for uninvestigated dyspepsia. All patients answered a demographic questionnaire. Productivity impairment was measured by the Work Productivity and Activity Impairment questionnaire. Subjects underwent upper gastrointestinal endoscopy and were classified as having functional or organic dyspepsia. The study protocol was approved by the Ethics Committee of Hospital de Clínicas de Porto Alegre, Brazil.

RESULTS

Eight hundred fifty patients with dyspepsia were evaluated: 628 were women (73.9%); mean age was 46.4 ± 12.9 years; 387 (45.5%) were active workers. Among active workers, 32.2% mentioned that dyspepsia had caused absenteeism from work during the preceding week and 78% reported a reduction of the work productivity (presenteeism). The lost work productivity score was 35.7% among all employed patients. The affect on work productivity was similar between patients with functional or organic dyspepsia.

CONCLUSIONS

Our study showed an important influence of dyspepsia on work productivity. We did not find any statistically significant difference on the influence on work between patients with organic dyspepsia and functional dyspepsia. The social impact of these findings is underscored by taking into account the prevalence (up to 40%) of this condition in Brazil.

Effects of acute alcohol intoxication on eating-related urges among women with bulimia nervosa

OBJECTIVE

To investigate the effects of acute alcohol intoxication on eating-related urges among women with bulimia nervosa (BN).

METHOD

Participants included women with BN or normal-weight eating disorder NOS with regular binge/purge symptoms (N = 13), and normal-eater control women (N = 17). Tested individually, the women reported on their mood state as well as on urges to binge eat and engage in various compensatory behaviors, prior to consuming alcohol, and again at 60 and 180 min following the consumption of 1.0 ml kg(-1) alcohol.

RESULTS

Both groups reported feeling less clearheaded after drinking, as well as initial subjective mood stimulation followed by subsequent mood lowering. In addition, BN participants reported reductions in their urges to binge eat, exercise compulsively, and restrict food intake following alcohol consumption-the urge to purge was not significantly affected.

DISCUSSION

Among women with BN, alcohol consumption appeared to reduce select eating-related urges with concomitant reductions in attention or concentration.

Clinical characteristics of Japanese dyspeptic patients: is the Rome III classification applicable?

OBJECTIVE

While the Rome III classification seems logical, some aspects need further evaluation. The aim of this study was to evaluate the clinical characteristics of Japanese dyspeptic patients and to determine whether this classification could be applied to them.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

A total of 364 consecutive patients with a mean age of 54.5 years who had chronic symptoms occurring at least several times per week that could be attributed to the upper gastrointestinal tract were recruited. All of them underwent blood tests, ultrasonography, and endoscopy, which revealed no organic, systemic, or metabolic diseases. They also answered a questionnaire about their symptoms.

RESULTS

The subjects were divided into a postprandial distress symptom (PDS) group, epigastric pain symptom (EPS) group, and chronic idiopathic nausea symptom group. There was considerable overlap among these groups (109/198, 55.1%), and patients with non-erosive reflux disease accounted for 52.0% (103/198) of all subjects. The Rome III classification could not be applied to 62.7% of the PDS group and 61.3% of the EPS group because the onset of symptoms occurred less than 6 months before diagnosis (4.6 +/- 0.4 months for PDS and 4.6 +/- 0.5 months for EPS).

CONCLUSIONS

The current Rome III criteria for functional dyspepsia dose not adequately identify a large proportion of Japanese dyspeptic patients, primarily due to earlier presentation for medical evaluation. Therefore, the 6-month period after onset of dyspeptic symptoms should be shortened at least in the Japanese population experiencing dyspeptic symptoms.

Overlapping gastroesophageal reflux disease and irritable bowel syndrome: Increased dysfunctional symptoms

AIM: To investigate the association of gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) and irritable bowel syndrome (IBS) in Iranian patients and examine the prevalence of functional symptoms of the gastrointestinal tract in patients presenting with either IBS, GERD or both.

METHODS: Six thousand four hundred and seventy six patients presented to the Gastro-intestinal (GI) clinic with symptoms of functional dysfunction of GI tract, 1419 patients (62.0% women, 38.0% men; mean age: 37.4 ± 11.5 years) met Rome II or Rome III criteria (depending on the year of diagnosis) for IBS. 2658 patients were diagnosed with GERD based on clinical presentation and endoscopic findings. We assessed other functional symptoms (epigastric pain, nausea, vomiting, belching, constipation and diarrhea) in patients suffering from GERD, IBS or both.

RESULTS: Among IBS subjects, 63.6% (69.0% women, 31.0% men; mean age: 36.4 ± 10.3 years) also had GERD, whereas 34.7% of the non-IBS patients had GERD [odds ratio (OR) = 3.2, 95% confidence interval (CI): 2.9-3.7, P < 0.0001]. Among patients with GERD, 33.9% of subjects met Rome criteria compared to 13.5% of non-GERD patients (OR = 3.6, 95% CI: 3.1-4.3, P < 0.0001). Prevalence of all functional symptoms was higher in overlapping GERD and IBS subjects, when compared with their prevalence in the IBS subjects without GERD or GERD only subjects (P < 0.05).

CONCLUSION: This finding shows that in overlapping GERD and IBS, other functional abnormalities of the GI tract are also highly prevalent, suggesting a common underlying dysfunction.

Mandatory and optional function tests for biliary disorders

Function tests in gastroenterology and hepatology aim to provide criteria for diagnosis of specific disorders and for prediction of patient responses to therapy. This review focuses on the utility of function tests in the management of gallstone disease and functional biliary disorders. In gallstone disease, function tests may be considered in the selection of candidates for nonsurgical therapy of gallbladder stones only. In cases of suspected functional biliary disorders, experts have advocated the use of classical noninvasive tests such as hepatobiliary scintigraphy. However, unequivocal evidence for their utility in diagnosis or patient selection for invasive treatment is yet to be provided. Recently, more advanced noninvasive tests such as real-time ultrasonography or secretin-stimulated magnetic resonance cholangiopancreaticography have been described. Controlled trials using these novel techniques may provide a rationale for the use of function tests in clinical management of calculous and acalculous biliary diseases, but are currently not available.

The clinical overlap between functional dyspepsia and irritable bowel syndrome based on Rome III criteria

BACKGROUND

Epidemiological studies suggest considerable overlap between functional dyspepsia (FD) and irritable bowel syndrome (IBS). To date, no surveys have been performed to investigate the clinical overlap between these two disorders using Rome III criteria. Our aim was to investigate the prevalence and risk factors for the overlap of FD and IBS based on Rome III criteria in a large clinical sample.

METHODS

Consecutive patients at the general gastroenterology outpatient clinic were requested to complete a self-report questionnaire. FD and IBS were defined by Rome III criteria.

RESULTS

Questionnaires were returned by 3014 patients (52.8% female, 89% response rate). FD-IBS overlap was observed in 5.0% of the patients, while 15.2% and 10.9% of the patients were classified as FD alone and IBS alone, respectively. Compared with non-IBS patients, the odds ratio of having FD among IBS patients was 2.09 (95% CI: 1.68-2.59). Patients with FD-IBS overlap had higher severity scores for the postprandial fullness symptom (2.35 +/- 1.49 vs. 1.72 +/- 1.59, P < 0.001) and overall FD symptom (6.65 +/- 2.88 vs. 5.82 +/- 2.76, P = 0.002) than those with FD alone. The only independent risk factor for FD-IBS overlap vs. FD alone was the presence of postprandial fullness symptom (OR 2.67, 95% CI: 1.34-5.31).

CONCLUSION

Clinical overlap of FD and IBS according to Rome III criteria is very common. One risk factor for FD-IBS overlap is the presence of postprandial fullness symptom. This study provides clues for future pathophysiological studies of FD and IBS.

The clinical overlap between functional dyspepsia and irritable bowel syndrome based on Rome III criteria

Background

Epidemiological studies suggest considerable overlap between functional dyspepsia (FD) and irritable bowel syndrome (IBS). To date, no surveys have been performed to investigate the clinical overlap between these two disorders using Rome III criteria. Our aim was to investigate the prevalence and risk factors for the overlap of FD and IBS based on Rome III criteria in a large clinical sample.

Methods

Consecutive patients at the general gastroenterology outpatient clinic were requested to complete a self-report questionnaire. FD and IBS were defined by Rome III criteria.

Results

Questionnaires were returned by 3014 patients (52.8% female, 89% response rate). FD-IBS overlap was observed in 5.0% of the patients, while 15.2% and 10.9% of the patients were classified as FD alone and IBS alone, respectively. Compared with non-IBS patients, the odds ratio of having FD among IBS patients was 2.09 (95% CI: 1.68–2.59). Patients with FD-IBS overlap had higher severity scores for the postprandial fullness symptom (2.35 ± 1.49 vs. 1.72 ± 1.59, P < 0.001) and overall FD symptom (6.65 ± 2.88 vs. 5.82 ± 2.76, P = 0.002) than those with FD alone. The only independent risk factor for FD-IBS overlap vs. FD alone was the presence of postprandial fullness symptom (OR 2.67, 95% CI: 1.34–5.31).

Conclusion

Clinical overlap of FD and IBS according to Rome III criteria is very common. One risk factor for FD-IBS overlap is the presence of postprandial fullness symptom. This study provides clues for future pathophysiological studies of FD and IBS.

Biliary events and an increased risk of new onset irritable bowel syndrome: a population-based cohort study

BACKGROUND

Prospective data are lacking to determine if irritable bowel syndrome (IBS) is a risk factor for cholecystectomy, or if biliary disease and cholecystectomy predisposes to the development of IBS.

AIM

To test the hypothesis that IBS and biliary tract disease are associated.

METHODS

Validated symptom surveys sent to cohorts of Olmsted County, MN, (1988-1994) with follow-up in 2003. Medical histories were reviewed to determine any 'biliary events' (defined by gallstones or cholecystectomy). Analyses examined were: (i) time to a biliary event post-initial survey and separately and (ii) risk of IBS (Rome II) in those with vs. without a prior biliary event.

RESULTS

A total of 1908 eligible subjects were mailed a follow-up survey. For analysis (i) of the 726 without IBS at initial survey, 44 (6.1%) had biliary events during follow up, in contrast to 5 of 93 (5.4%) with IBS at initial survey (HR 0.8, 95% CI 0.3-2.1). For analysis (ii) of the 59 subjects with a biliary event at initial survey, 10 (17%) reported new IBS on the follow-up survey, while in 682 without a biliary event up to 1.5 years prior to the second survey, 58 (8.5%) reported IBS on follow-up (OR = 2.2, 95% CI 1.1-4.6, P = 0.03).

CONCLUSION

There is an increased risk of new IBS in community subjects who have been diagnosed as having a biliary event.

Systematic review: the effectiveness of hypnotherapy in the management of irritable bowel syndrome

AIM

To systematically review the literature evaluating hypnotherapy in the management of irritable bowel syndrome (IBS).

METHODS

Electronic databases were searched (Cochrane Library, Medline, CINAHL, AMED, Embase, PsycINFO, CISCOM, TRIP and the Social Science Citation index), bibliographic references scanned and main authors contacted. No restrictions were placed on language or publication year. Eligible studies involved adults with IBS using single-component hypnotherapy. All studies, except single case or expert opinion, were sought and all patient-related outcomes eligible.

RESULTS

Out of 299 unique references identified, 20 studies (18 trials of which four were randomized, two controlled and 12 uncontrolled) and two case series were eligible. These tended to demonstrate hypnotherapy as being effective in the management of IBS. Numbers of patients included were small. Only one trial scored more than four out of eight on internal validity.

CONCLUSION

The published evidence suggests that hypnotherapy is effective in the management of IBS. Over half of the trials (10 of 18) indicated a significant benefit. A randomized placebo-controlled trial of high internal validity is necessary to establish the effectiveness of hypnotherapy in the management of IBS. Until such a trial is undertaken, this form of treatment should be restricted to specialist centres caring for the more severe forms of the disorder.

Limited value of alarm features in the diagnosis of upper gastrointestinal malignancy: systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND & AIMS

Alarm features such as dysphagia, weight loss, or anemia raise concern of an upper gastrointestinal malignancy in patients with dyspepsia. The aim of this study was to determine the diagnostic accuracy of alarm features in predicting malignancy by performing a metaanalysis based on the published literature.

METHODS

English-language studies were identified by searching MEDLINE, EMBASE, Cochrane Controlled Trials Register, and CINAHL. Cohort studies that measured alarm features and compared them with the endoscopic findings were included. Studies were screened for inclusion by 2 authors who independently extracted the data. Sensitivity, specificity, and likelihood ratios were calculated by comparing the alarm feature with the endoscopic diagnosis. The summary receiver operating characteristic curve method was used to summarize test characteristics across studies. Individual alarm features were also assessed when the study report permitted.

RESULTS

Eighty-three of 2600 studies met the initial screening criteria; 15 met inclusion criteria after detailed review. These 15 studies evaluated a total of 57,363 patients, of whom 458 (.8%) had cancer. The sensitivity of alarm symptoms varied from 0% to 83% with considerable heterogeneity between studies. The specificity also varied significantly from 40% to 98%. A clinical diagnosis made by a physician was very specific (range, 97%-98%) but not very sensitive (range, 11%-53%).

CONCLUSIONS

Alarm features have limited predictive value for an underlying malignancy. Their use in dyspepsia management strategies needs further refinement and study.

Functional dyspepsia and irritable bowel syndrome, are they different entities and does it matter

A high prevalence of overlap between functional dyspepsia and irritable bowel syndrome has been consistently and universally reported. Recent studies demonstrating shared common pathophysiological disturbances including delayed gastric emptying and visceral hypersensitivity involving more than one region, suggest that these patients have a generalised rather than regional, disorder of the gut. Furthermore, a study of the natural history of dyspepsia suggests that with time, a substantial proportion will evolve into IBS. The recognition of IBS in dyspeptic patients has potentially profound therapeutic importance. It could help to reduce the risk of unnecessary cholecystectomy in IBS patients. The ability to appreciate the extent of involvement could allow us to address the disturbances more comprehensively, and thereby achieve greater patient satisfaction with their treatment.

Definition and epidemiology of functional gastrointestinal disorders

The term 'functional gastrointestinal disorder (FGID)' is used to define several variable combinations of chronic or recurrent gastrointestinal (GI) symptoms that do not have an identified underlying pathophysiology. In the absence of any objective marker, the identification and classification of FGIDs are based on symptoms. The most widely accepted classification is based on the 'Rome diagnostic criteria,' which have classified 24 FGIDs into oesophageal, gastroduodenal, bowel, biliary, anorectal and abdominal pain subcategories. Classification into mutually exclusive categories has been useful for performing epidemiological studies in homogeneous populations, but has inevitably lead to disregarding subjects with overlapping FGIDs, or with a not sufficiently standardised symptom presentation. The epidemiology of FGID is still in its infancy, as indicated by the lack of epidemiological data for many FGIDs and the widely different incidence and prevalence rates reported for the most frequently occurring and investigated FGIDs: irritable bowel syndrome (IBS), dyspepsia, constipation and oesophageal disorders. Epidemiological studies and the definitions of the various FGIDs need to be further improved and standardised.

Impact of coexisting irritable bowel syndrome on symptoms and pathophysiological mechanisms in functional dyspepsia

Epidemiological studies suggest considerable overlap between functional dyspepsia (FD) and irritable bowel syndrome (IBS).

AIM

The aim of the present study was to investigate whether coexisting IBS is also associated with symptom pattern or pathophysiology in FD.

METHODS

In 309 consecutive FD patients (207 women, age 42 +/- 0.8 yr), questionnaires were used to assess the dyspepsia symptom pattern and the Rome II criteria for IBS. The overall symptom severity was calculated adding the severity score (0-3, 0 = absent, 3 = severe) of eight dyspepsia symptoms. All patients underwent Helicobacter pylori testing, gastric barostat to determine sensitivity to distention and accommodation to a meal, and gastric emptying breath test.

RESULTS

Fifty-four percent of the patients had FD alone, whereas 46% had FD + IBS. FD + IBS patients were more likely to be female (75%vs 60%, p < 0.01) and to have a greater weight loss (5.4 +/- 0.6 vs 3.5 +/- 0.4 kg, p < 0.05). Coexisting IBS did not increase the risk of having any of the dyspeptic symptoms but the overall symptom severity was significantly higher in FD + IBS (12.4 +/- 0.4 vs 9.8 +/- 0.3, p < 0.01). FD + IBS patients had a lower threshold for first perception (2.9 +/- 0.3 vs 3.8 +/- 0.3 mmHg, p < 0.05) and for discomfort (7.9 +/- 0.4 vs 9.5 +/- 0.5 mmHg, p < 0.05) and a greater prevalence of hypersensitivity to gastric distention (44%vs 28%, p < 0.05). Gastric emptying, accommodation to a meal, and prevalence of H. pylori infection did not differ in the two groups.

CONCLUSION

About half of the FD patients fulfill the Rome II criteria for IBS. FD + IBS is more prevalent in female patients and is associated with a higher weight loss, with greater overall symptom severity, and with hypersensitivity to distention.

Gallbladder contractility and volume characteristics in gallstone dyspepsia

AIM: It is difficult to differentiate gallstone dyspepsia and functional dyspepsia by clinical symptoms and signs. We hypothesized that gallstone dyspepsia was related to abnormal gallbladder motility. We aimed to differentiate gallstone dyspepsia from functional dyspepsia by measuring gallbladder motility.

METHODS: We measured gallbladder volume changes in response to gastric distension (saline 500 mL) and fatty meal in 10 normal volunteers (controls) and 62 patients with gallstones and dyspepsia before cholecystectomy. Forty cholecystectomized patients were symptom free or had improvement (group I), while the remaining 22 patients had persistent dyspepsia (group II). Gallbladder volume change and ejection fraction were analyzed and compared among the three groups.

RESULTS: In group I, there were significant decreases in gallbladder volumes 5-25 min after gastric distension, compared to fasting volumes. Compared to normal volunteers and group II, group I had significantly decreased gallbladder volumes 10-20 min after drinking 500 mL of normal saline and 10 to 50 min after eating fatty meal.

CONCLUSION: Our results support the hypothesis that increased gallbladder contraction after gastric distension or fatty meal may be related to dyspeptic symptoms in uncomplicated gallstone disease. These findings may be useful in differentiating functional dyspepsia from gallstone dyspepsia, patients with the latter disease may benefit from laparoscopic cholecystectomy.

Dyspeptic symptoms and gastric emptying in the irritable bowel syndrome

OBJECTIVES

Irritable bowel syndrome (IBS) and dyspepsia often overlap. Delayed gastric emptying has been reported in IBS patients, although conflicting results exist. Whether overlapping dyspepsia correlates with gastric emptying abnormalities in IBS patients has not been clarified. This study aimed to evaluate gastric emptying of solids and its relationship with dyspeptic symptoms in IBS patients.

METHODS

A total of 146 IBS outpatients seen in a referral center were evaluated for dyspeptic symptoms using a validated questionnaire. Gastric emptying of solids was evaluated scintigraphically in all patients and in 50 healthy controls.

RESULTS

Overlapping dyspepsia was diagnosed in 96 (66%) IBS patients. On average, gastric emptying rates were lower in IBS patients (mean +/- SEM, 33% +/- 1%/h) compared with controls (40% +/- 2%/h; p < 0.01). Specifically, gastric emptying was delayed in IBS patients with overlapping dyspepsia (31% +/- 1%/h; p < 0.01), whereas IBS patients without dyspeptic complaints showed gastric emptying rates (37% +/- 2%/h) that were similar to those of healthy controls (40% +/- 2%/h). Relevant postprandial fullness (OR = 4.7, 95% CI = 1.8-12.5) and relevant nausea (OR = 3.3, 95% CI 1.2-9.3) were independently associated with delayed gastric emptying.

CONCLUSIONS

IBS patients without overlapping dyspepsia have normal gastric emptying of solids. A significant association exists in IBS patients between delayed gastric emptying and overlapping relevant postprandial fullness and nausea.

Role of endoscopy and biopsy in the work up of dyspepsia

Endoscopy is recommended as the first investigation in the work up of a patient with dyspeptic symptoms and is essential in the classification of the patient's condition as organic or functional dyspepsia. Although the correlation between mucosal alterations and symptom pattern is difficult, endoscopy will remain the initial investigation of choice for clinically relevant abnormalities that need proper detection and biopsy.

A prospective study of dyspepsia in primary care

Dyspepsia is a common complaint, but its course and associated resource utilization have not been well described. In this study, 288 adult, primary care patients with dyspepsia treated at ambulatory clinics were followed prospectively for one year. Medical chart, utilization, and baseline and one-year follow-up survey data were collected. These patients had 13.3 medical visits (sex- and age-standardized) during the follow-up period, 55% above standardized mean visits for a comparison group of nondyspepsia patients. Standardized mean charges of $3542 for dyspeptics was 126% above nondyspepsia patient charges. Over half had gastrointestinal-related follow-up visits; 61% used gastrointestinal drugs; and 43% had gastrointestinal procedures. NSAID users had higher gastrointestinal-related utilization than did nonusers, recording an additional gastrointestinal visit (P < 0.001) and $678 more in charges (P = 0.03). Eighty-six percent of the 189 follow-up survey respondents experienced gastrointestinal symptoms at some time during the follow-up year. This study showed that most primary care dyspepsia patients remained symptomatic after one year and were intensive users of medical care.

Systematic review of the comorbidity of irritable bowel syndrome with other disorders: what are the causes and implications?

BACKGROUND & AIMS

Comorbid or extraintestinal symptoms occur frequently with irritable bowel syndrome and account for up to three fourths of excess health care visits. This challenges the assumption that irritable bowel is a distinct disorder. The aims of this study were to (1) assess comorbidity in 3 areas: gastrointestinal disorders, psychiatric disorders, and nongastrointestinal somatic disorders; and (2) evaluate explanatory hypotheses.

METHODS

The scientific literature since 1966 in all languages cited in Medline was systematically reviewed.

RESULTS

Comorbidity with other functional gastrointestinal disorders is high and may be caused by shared pathophysiological mechanisms such as visceral hypersensitivity. Psychiatric disorders, especially major depression, anxiety, and somatoform disorders, occur in up to 94%. The nongastrointestinal nonpsychiatric disorders with the best-documented association are fibromyalgia (median of 49% have IBS), chronic fatigue syndrome (51%), temporomandibular joint disorder (64%), and chronic pelvic pain (50%).

CONCLUSIONS

Multivariate statistical analyses suggest that these are distinct disorders and not manifestations of a common somatization disorder, but their strong comorbidity suggests a common feature important to their expression, which is most likely psychological. Some models explain the comorbidity of irritable bowel with other disorders by suggesting that each disorder is the manifestation of varying combinations of interacting physiological and psychological factors. An alternative hypothesis is that the irritable bowel diagnosis is applied to a heterogeneous group of patients, some of whom have a predominantly psychological etiology, whereas others have a predominantly biological etiology, and that the presence of multiple comorbid disorders is a marker for psychological influences on etiology.

Testing for Helicobacter pylori in dyspeptic patients suspected of peptic ulcer disease in primary care: cross sectional study

OBJECTIVES

To develop an easily applicable diagnostic scoring method to determine the presence of peptic ulcers in dyspeptic patients in a primary care setting; to evaluate whether Helicobacter pylori testing adds value to history taking.

DESIGN

Cross sectional study.

SETTING

General practitioners' offices in the Utrecht area of the Netherlands.

PARTICIPANTS

565 patients consulting a general practitioner about dyspeptic symptoms of at least two weeks' duration.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

The presence or absence of peptic ulcer; independent predictors of the presence of peptic ulcer as obtained from history taking and the added value of H pylori testing were quantified by using multivariate logistic regression analyses.

RESULTS

A history of peptic ulcer, pain on an empty stomach, and smoking were strong and independent diagnostic determinants of peptic ulcer disease, with odds ratios of 5.5 (95% confidence interval 2.6 to 11.8), 2.8 (1.0 to 4.0), and 2.0 (1.4 to 6.0) respectively. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (ROC area) of these determinants together was 0.71. Adding the H pylori test increased the ROC area only to 0.75. However, in a group of patients at high risk, identified by means of a simple scoring rule based on history taking, the predictive value for the presence of peptic ulcer increased from 16% to 26% after a positive H pylori test.

CONCLUSIONS

In the total group of dyspeptic patients in primary care, H pylori testing has no value in addition to history taking for diagnosing peptic ulcer disease. In a subgroup of patients at high risk of having peptic ulcer disease, however, it might be useful to test for and treat H pylori infections.

Review article: the continuing dilemma of dyspepsia

Dyspepsia drains a substantial proportion of healthcare resources in industrialized countries and an appropriate management strategy is needed. An aetiological role for Helicobacter pylori infection has been demonstrated in a number of pathological conditions associated with dyspepsia, such as peptic ulcer and gastric malignancies, but not in functional dyspepsia. Endoscopy and diagnosis-based treatment, H. pylori testing and eradication therapy, history taking and empirical therapy, are the main tools that are currently available for managing patients with upper gastrointestinal symptoms. Endoscopy identifies malignancies and organic diseases of the proximal gut and therefore provides reassurance to both doctors and patients. It should be recommended in older patients with suspicious symptoms and it has proven to be more cost-effective than empirical H2-receptor antagonists in patients with ulcer-like symptoms. Empirical eradication in all dyspeptics without suspicious symptoms is a cost-effective approach that cures the majority of peptic ulcers. Nevertheless, it does not control symptoms in the majority of patients, it may exacerbate gastro-oesophageal reflux disease, and it encourages antibiotic resistance. The realities of current clinical practice require empirical therapy in most, if not all, the dyspeptics seen by general practitioners. A detailed history taking can help to diagnose gastro-oesophageal reflux disease and to identify suspicious symptoms. Furthermore, identification of dyspepsia subgroups may provide guidance for empirical therapy. Nevertheless, even analysis of individual symptoms does not provide a sufficient diagnostic yield to differentiate functional from organic dyspepsia and appropriate investigations are needed in patients with poor response to short-term therapy or frequent relapses.

Pharmacotherapy of gastroparesis

The evaluation and management of gastric motor dysfunction continues to represent a significant clinical challenge. The very definition of what constitutes a clinically relevant disturbance of gastric motility remains unclear. The spectrum of gastroparesis extends from those with classical symptoms and severe delay of gastric emptying to those with dyspepsia and a mild delay in emptying rate. Indeed, for many patients with dyspepsia, the role of gastric emptying delay in the pathogenesis of symptoms, remains unclear. Any assessment of the efficacy of any therapeutic class in gastroparesis must be mindful, therefore, of these variations in definition. For those individuals with severe established gastroparesis, therapeutic success often remains elusive and i.v. erythromycin and oral dopamine antagonists, or substituted benzamides, remain the best options for acute severe exacerbations and chronic maintenance therapy, respectively. Alternatives, currently under investigation, include a number of 5-HT4 agonists, macrolides devoid of antibiotic activity, CCK antagonists and gastric electrical stimulation. Other novel approaches include strategies to address some of the regional abnormalities in gastric motor function that have been identified in some patients with dyspepsia.

Irritable bowel syndrome in general practice: prevalence, characteristics, and referral

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

Little is known about the prevalence, symptoms, diagnosis, attitude, and referral to specialists of patients with irritable bowel syndrome (IBS) in general practice. This study aimed to determine these characteristics.

METHODS

3111 patients attending 36 general practitioners (GPs) at six varied locations in and near Bristol, UK, were screened to identify those with a gastrointestinal problem. These patients (n=255) and their doctors were given questionnaires. Six months later the case notes were examined to reach criteria based diagnoses of functional bowel disorders.

RESULTS

Of 255 patients with a gastrointestinal complaint, 30% were judged to have IBS and 14% other functional disorders. Compared with 100 patients with an "organic" diagnoses, those with IBS were more often women and more often judged by their GP to be polysymptomatic and to have unexplained symptoms. The majority of patients with IBS (58%) were diagnosed as such by the GP; 22% had other functional diagnoses. Conversely, among 54 patients diagnosed as having IBS by the GPs, the criteria based diagnosis was indeed functional in 91%; only one patient had organic disease (proctitis). More patients with IBS than those with organic disease feared cancer. In most some fear remained after the visit to the doctor. On logistic regression analysis, predictors of referral to a specialist (29% referred) were denial of a role for stress, multiple tests, and frequent bowel movements.

CONCLUSIONS

Half the patients with gut complaints seen by GPs have functional disorders. These are usually recognised, and few patients are referred. In IBS, cancer fears often remain, suggesting unconfident diagnosis or inadequate explanation.

Management of uninvestigated and functional dyspepsia: a Working Party report for the World Congresses of Gastroenterology 1998

BACKGROUND

The management of dyspepsia is controversial.

METHODS

An international Working Party was convened in 1998 to review management strategies for dyspepsia and functional dyspepsia, based on a review of the literature and best clinical practice.

RESULTS

Dyspepsia, defined as pain or discomfort centred in the upper abdomen, can be managed with reassurance and over-the-counter therapy if its duration is less than 4 weeks on initial presentation. For patients with chronic symptoms, clinical evaluation depends on alarm features including patient age. The age cut off selected should depend on the age specific incidence when gastric cancer begins to increase, but in Western nations 50 years is generally an acceptable age threshold. In younger patients without alarm features, Helicobacter pylori test and treatment is the approach recommended because of its value in eliminating the peptic ulcer disease diathesis. If, after eradication of H. pylori, symptoms either are not relieved or rapidly recur, then an empirical trial of therapy is recommended. Similarly, in H. pylori-negative patients without alarm features, an empirical trial (with antisecretory or prokinetic therapy depending on the predominant symptom) for up to 8 weeks is recommended. If drugs fail, endoscopy should be considered because of its reassurance value although the yield will be low. In older patients or those with alarm features, prompt endoscopy is recommended. If endoscopy is non-diagnostic, gastric biopsies are recommended to document H. pylori status unless already known. While treatment of H. pylori is unlikely to relieve the symptoms of functional dyspepsia, the long-term benefits probably outweigh the risks and treatment can be considered on a case-by-case basis. In H. pylori-negative patients with documented functional dyspepsia, antisecretory or prokinetic therapy, depending on the predominant symptom, is reasonable, assuming reassurance and explanation are insufficient, unless patients have already failed this approach. Other treatment options include antidepressants, antispasmodics, visceral analgesics such as serotonin type 3 receptor antagonists, and behavioural or psychotherapy although these are all of uncertain efficacy. Long-term drug treatment in functional dyspepsia should be avoided; intermittent short courses of treatment as needed is preferred.

CONCLUSION

The management of dyspepsia recommended is based on current best evidence but must be tailored to local factors such as practice setting, the background prevalence of H. pylori and structural disease, and costs.

Octreotide in refractory functional epigastric pain with nutritional impairment--an open study

AIM

To test the therapeutic efficacy of octreotide administered subcutaneously for the relief of chronic refractory epigastric pain severe enough to provoke nutritional impairment.

SUBJECTS AND METHODS

Seventeen patients were enrolled in an open trial. Epigastric pain had lasted from 1 to 8 years (median: 5 years), following anti-reflux surgery in eight patients. Median weight loss was 10% (range 10-15). The initial dose of octreotide was 50 microgram b.d, adjusted during the follow-up visits which were scheduled for months 1, 3, 6, 8, 10, 12 and every 3 months. At each visit, overall symptomatic improvement, frequency and intensity of symptoms were checked on a 10-cm visual analogic scale.

RESULTS

At month 1, a progressive improvement of pain intensity was reported in 15 of the 17 patients, while octreotide was a therapeutic failure in two. In four out of 15, the daily dose of octreotide was increased to 100 microgram b.d. In these 15 patients, median follow-up was 7 months (3-27). The symptomatic benefit was maintained in each patient at month 3, with a median weight gain of 3.5 kg.2-5 An attempt to stop octreotide led to recurrence of symptoms in 2-3 days which were as intense as before the treatment. The 11 patients followed-up for at least 6 months reported persistent improvement of symptoms with octreotide and a median weight gain of 4 kg.3-7 Four patients were followed up for more 11-27 months: octreotide was withdrawn gradually in two who remained asymptomatic. Six of the 17 patients experienced minor side-effects, but none developed biliary sludge.

CONCLUSIONS

This open study suggests that octreotide could be a promising alternative treatment when all others fail in refractory chronic functional epigastric pain severe enough to limit food intake and to induce nutritional impairment. These results must be tested by a placebo-controlled study.

Is functional dyspepsia just a subset of the irritable bowel syndrome?

To determine whether functional dyspepsia and irritable bowel syndrome are different entities, epidemiological data, factor analysis studies, physiological data and associated psychological symptoms were reviewed. Between 30% and 60% of patients with either diagnosis also meet the criteria for the other diagnosis, a level greater than expected to occur by chance but not sufficient to infer an identity. Most factor analysis studies identify independent clusters of symptoms corresponding to functional dyspepsia and irritable bowel syndrome. Visceral hypersensitivity is seen throughout the gastrointestinal tract in both disorders, but the motility patterns seen in association with functional dyspepsia (principally antral hypomotility and delayed gastric emptying) differ from the motility patterns seen in irritable bowel syndrome. Psychological symptoms are similar in these two disorders but are not believed to be aetiological for either of them. Thus, based on a factor analysis of gastrointestinal symptoms and differences in intestinal motility, functional dyspepsia and irritable bowel syndrome appear to be different entities.

Nomenclature of dyspepsia, dyspepsia subgroups and functional dyspepsia: clarifying the concepts

There is international agreement that dyspepsia refers to pain or discomfort centered in the upper abdomen. However, the term 'discomfort' has been variably defined. While other symptoms may often be simultaneously present, gastro-oesophageal reflux disease can usually be clearly distinguished by the presence of predominant heartburn. Dyspepsia is a frequent reason for consultation in primary care and in gastrointestinal practice. With the widespread availability and utilization of endoscopy, it has become evident that a structural (or organic) explanation is found in only a minority of patients presenting with dyspepsia. Operationally, functional dyspepsia is defined as persistent or recurrent dyspepsia for 3 or more months in the absence of a clinically identifiable structural disease causing the symptoms. It has been proposed, based on symptoms, that functional dyspepsia be subdivided into symptom subgroups to promote patient homogeneity. The initially proposed 'clustering' of symptoms into ulcer-like and dysmotility-like functional dyspepsia has proved a dismal failure because of the considerable overlap observed, the lack of stability over time and the failure to identify robust pathophysiological abnormalities or responses to therapy. A subcategorization based upon the most bothersome symptom is theoretically more attractive but needs to be prospectively and rigorously tested.

Estimating the cost of lost productivity in dyspepsia

BACKGROUND

In the field of gastrointestinal disease, productivity costs are highly relevant because work loss is substantial in dyspeptic patients. Productivity costs are normally calculated by multiplying days absent valued by gross earnings. This, however, might lead to an overestimation.

AIM

To use a conservative approach to calculating productivity costs, taking absence compensating mechanisms into account.

METHODS

Patients who visited their general practitioner for the first time with dyspeptic complaints and patients who were known to have persistent dyspeptic complaints were enrolled in two studies. In total, 136 patients completed a questionnaire about their employment situation, absence from work and absence compensating mechanisms.

RESULTS

Sixty-six of the respondents had a paid job, of which 25 (38%) reported absence from work during the previous 4 weeks (average 3.0 days, 1.9 days related to dyspeptic complaints). More than 50% of the employed respondents answered that absence could be compensated for by colleagues, and only in 8% of the cases was absence compensated for by overtime. Using our conservative approach, only one-quarter of the productivity costs remained, compared to the current approach of valuing each day absent as a loss of productivity.

CONCLUSIONS

We suggest using both the current and the conservative approaches, analogous to the principles of sensitivity analysis, to avoid overestimation of productivity costs.

Managing dyspepsia: what do we know and what do we need to know?

OBJECTIVE

The conceptual revolution concerning the role of Helicobacter pylori in the pathogenesis of peptic ulcer disease has raised the larger question of how to integrate this new information into the management of patients with dyspepsia. The aim of this research was to critically evaluate current knowledge about dyspepsia and its management.

METHODS

Relevant articles on dyspepsia were identified from MEDLINE searches and from the bibliographies of identified articles. Studies that contained information on the prevalence of dyspepsia, endoscopic findings, and evaluations of alternative management strategies were reviewed.

RESULTS

By coupling H. pylori serological testing with clinical factors such as age and nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drug use, strategies have been developed that identify patients with organic disease. Although the use of these strategies can reduce the volume of endoscopies, their effects on dyspepsia symptoms are unknown. Computerized decision analysis models have been used to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of alternative strategies. The indirect evidence obtained from these models suggests that empiric therapy, guided by H. pylori testing, may be the preferred approach. However, the models have been hampered by the lack of information concerning dyspepsia symptoms, the primary health outcome of the majority of patients seen in primary practice settings.

CONCLUSIONS

Currently, the knowledge needed to integrate H. pylori tests and antimicrobial therapies into the management of patients with dyspepsia in primary practice settings has not been developed. A pressing need exists for a randomized controlled trial to evaluate alternative management strategies. In conducting such a trial, valid, reliable instruments for measuring dyspepsia will be needed.

Clinical economics review: functional (non-ulcer) dyspepsia

Dyspepsia is common within the general population and it imposes a significant burden on health-care resources. Calculation of the economic implications of functional dyspepsia is constrained by the fact that it is only possible to make this diagnosis in a minority of individuals with the disorder, because many do not seek medical attention and investigation is not appropriate for all who do. Studies which attempt to assess the effectiveness or cost-effectiveness of therapy may be further constrained by the fact that there is now good evidence that many patients with dyspepsia seek medical attention not so much because of the severity of symptoms, but because they fear that the symptoms signal the presence of some serious underlying disease. In this situation, effective well-founded reassurance that no serious disease is present is an important outcome of medical intervention and one which should be included in an economic appraisal of dyspepsia management. For obvious reasons, it is sensible to compare the cost-effectiveness of various clinical management strategies applicable in dyspepsia. Decision-tree analyses are currently fashionable but suffer from the major defect that there is no theoretical basis from which patient satisfaction with treatment options can be assessed. It is suggested that for disorders such as functional dyspepsia, which are non-lethal and non-progressive, recommendations about acceptable clinical management strategies require that account be taken of patient satisfaction with the strategies being reviewed. Cost-effectiveness calculations which take no account of this aspect of outcome are of limited relevance to clinical practice.

Management of dyspepsia in general practice. A critical assessment

The International Gastro Primary Care Group (IGPCG) Upper Gastrointestinal Disease Management Plan is mainly characterised by the proposal that management of patients with upper gastrointestinal syndromes be based on the predominant symptom, rather than on symptom clusters. Although no study has directly tested this hypothesis in general practice, some data indirectly support the proposal. Classification based on the relevance of specific symptoms could identify distinct subgroups of patients with functional dyspepsia with at least partially different features. Data obtained from the literature are discussed and evaluated in relation to the suggested algorithm. Overall, this management plan for patients with dyspepsia seems to be both safe and effective. However, there is a need for prospective studies evaluating its actual validity.

Chronic upper abdominal pain due to duodenal ulcer and other structural and functional causes: its localization and nocturnal occurrence

The aim of the present study was to determine the degree of pain localization and frequency of nocturnal pain in duodenal ulcer and other causes of chronic upper abdominal pain. These parameters were prospectively recorded in a consecutive series of 1615 patients with chronic upper abdominal pain presenting to one gastroenterologist. The proportion of patients who were able to localize the site of their pain using a single finger was 13% for duodenal ulcer, 5% for gastric ulcer, 17% for biliary disease, 7% for functional dyspepsia and 8% for irritable bowel syndrome. The numbers of subjects with the above diagnoses who experienced nocturnal pain were 63, 63, 51, 41 and 58%, respectively. The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value and negative predictive value for duodenal ulcer were 13, 92, 14 and 91%, respectively, for localized pain; 63, 50, 11 and 93%, respectively, for nocturnal pain occurrence; and 9, 96, 20 and 90%, respectively, if the pain was both localized and nocturnal. If the pain was neither localized nor nocturnal, the corresponding values for the absence of duodenal ulcer disease were 49, 68, 93 and 13%, respectively. The pain of duodenal ulcer was therefore more likely to be nocturnal and well localized compared with pain from other causes. However, while the absence of these features made duodenal ulcer unlikely, their presence was less helpful in the diagnostic process.

Gastric and small intestinal motility in health and disease

Although symptoms possibly related to motor dysfunction appear to be common, primary disorders of the foregut motor apparatus, defined on the basis of a discrete myoneural pathology, are notably rare. This phenomenon may as much reflect the relatively primitive nature of diagnostic methods as the true rarity of such disorders. Although diagnostic methodologies increase in sophistication and availability, their clinical impact has been limited by an imperfect relationship between symptoms and dysfunction and by a relatively poor ability of such tests to predict response to available therapeutic strategies. An ever-increasing understanding of the complex, often interrelated motor and sensory phenomena that contribute to symptoms, together with the development of consensus on the use and interpretation of motility tests and the more widespread application of sophisticated histologic, immunologic, biochemical, and molecular biologic methodologies to the study of these disorders, should lead, in the years to come, to much needed progress in this area.