NSAIDs: the emperor's new dogma?

Orally administered indomethacin acutely reduces cellular prion protein in the small intestine and modestly increases survival of mice exposed to infectious prions

OBJECTIVE

The oral uptake of infectious prions represents a common way to acquire a prion disease; thus, host factors, such as gut inflammation and intestinal "leakiness", have the potential to influence infectivity. For example, the ingestion of nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) is known to induce intestinal inflammation and increase intestinal permeability. Previously, we reported that normal cellular prion protein (PrP(C)) expression was increased in experimental colitis, and since the level of PrP(C) expressed is a determinant of prion disease propagation, we hypothesized that NSAID administration prior to the oral inoculation of mice with infectious prions would increase intestinal PrP(C) expression and accelerate the onset of neurological disease.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

In the long-term experiments, one group of mice was gavaged with indomethacin, followed by a second gavage with brain homogenate containing mouse-adapted scrapie (ME7). Control mice received ME7 brain homogenate alone. Brain and splenic tissues were harvested at several time points for immunoblotting, including at the onset of clinical signs of disease. In a second series of experiments, mice were gavaged with indomethacin to assess the acute effects of this treatment on intestinal PrP(C) expression.

RESULTS

Acutely, NSAID treatment reduced intestinal PrP(C) expression, and chronically, there was a modest delay in the onset of neurological disease.

CONCLUSION

In contrast to our hypothesis, brief exposure to an NSAID decreased intestinal PrP(C) expression and led to a modest survival advantage following oral ingestion of infectious prions.

The role of mitochondria-derived reactive oxygen species in the pathogenesis of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug-induced small intestinal injury

Non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) have been implemented in clinical settings for a long time for their anti-inflammatory effects. With the number of NSAID users increasing, gastroenterological physicians and researchers have worked hard to prevent and treat NSAID-induced gastric mucosal injury, an effort that has for the large part being successful. However, the struggle against NSAID-induced mucosal damage has taken on a new urgency due to the discovery of NSAID-induced small intestinal mucosal injury. Although the main mechanism by which NSAIDs induce small intestinal mucosal injury has been thought to depend on the inhibitory effect of NSAIDs on cyclooxygenase (COX) activity, recent studies have revealed the importance of mitochondria-derived reactive oxygen species (ROS) production, which occurs independently of COX-inhibition. ROS production is an especially important factor in the increase of small intestinal epithelial cell permeability, an early stage in the process of small intestinal mucosal injury. By clarifying the precise mechanism, together with its clinical features using novel endoscopy, effective strategies for preventing NSAID-induced small intestinal damage, especially targeting mitochondria-derived ROS production, may be developed.

The impact of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs on the small intestinal epithelium

The small intestine has been called as a dark continent of digestive tract and it had been very difficult to diagnose or treat the disease of small intestine. However recent technological development including video capsule endoscopy or balloon-assisted endoscopy has made us to aware the various diseases of small intestine. By using capsule endoscopy, many researchers reported that more than 70% of patients treated continuously with non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAID) exhibit the mucosal damage of small intestine. In some cases, NSAID not only causes mucosal damage but also results in life threatening bleeding from small intestine, which had not been prevented or cured by gastro-protective drug or anti-gastric acid secretion drug administration. Therefore to investigate and identify the effective drug that protects small intestine from mucosal damage is urgently expected. In spite of extensive investigation in clinical field, only a few drugs such as misoprostol, a synthetic prostaglandin E₁ analogue, has been reported as an effective one but is not satisfactory enough to fulfill the requirement of patients who suffer from NSAID-induced mucosal damage of small intestine. And now, extensive study is being performed using several gastro-mucoprotective drugs by many researchers. In this review, we introduce the current clinical situation in small intestinal injury of patients under NSAID treatment, and to summarize the molecular mechanism by which NSAID, including acetyl salicylic acid, cause small intestinal damage. In addition, we present results of clinical trials performed so far, and refer the possible preventive method or treatment in the near future.

Aspirin-associated small intestinal ulcer with severe anemia as the first manifestation: A case report

Non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) are the most widely used medications for treating inflammatory conditions. Recently, they are also used to prevent the progression of cardiovascular disease and the pain of muscle, bones and arthrosis. However, long-term and generous use of NSAIDs may cause mucosal injury in the stomach and duodenum. Investigation of the correlation between NSAIDs and bowel enteropathy reveals that long-term application of NSAIDs play an important role in the development of small intestinal ulcers. Here we report a case of small intestinal ulcer with severe anemia as the first manifestation in a patient with long-term aspirin use. Blood and bone marrow examinations revealed megaloblastic anemia, and capsule endoscopy demonstrated small intestinal ulcer. Clinicians should improve the diagnosis and treatment of similar cases to avoid misdiagnosis.

A Review of Anti-Inflammatory Drug-Induced Gastrointestinal Injury: Focus on Prevention of Small Intestinal Injury

Capsule endoscopy and balloon endoscopy, advanced modalities that allow full investigation of the entire small intestine, have revealed that nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) can cause a variety of abnormalities in the small intestine. Recently, several reports show that traditional NSAIDs (tNSAIDs) and acetylsalicylic acid (ASA) can induce small intestinal injuries. These reports have shown that the preventive effect of proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) does not extend to the small intestine, suggesting that concomitant therapy may be required to prevent small intestinal side effects associated with tNSAID/ASA use. Recently, several randomized controlled trials used capsule endoscopy to evaluate the preventive effect of mucoprotective drugs against tNSAID/ASA-induced small intestinal injury. These studies show that misoprostol and rebamipide reduce the number and types of tNSAID-induced small intestinal mucosal injuries. However, those studies were limited to a small number of subjects and tested short-term tNSAID/ ASA treatment. Therefore, further extensive studies are clearly required to ascertain the beneficial effect of these drugs.

Effects and mechanism of aspirin on enterocyte injury

AIM: To investigate the effect and mechanism of aspirin on proliferation of enterocytes.

METHODS: After co-culture of aspirin solution with Caco-2 cells for 24 h and 48 h, the proliferation of Caco-2 cells in each group was examined using MTT. Caco-2 monolayer cells model was established. After treatment with different concentrations of aspirin , Transepithelial resistance (TER) of cells was measured by EVOM voltohmmeter.

RESULTS: After 24 h, the cell survival rates were 96.67% ± 1.13%, 84.32% ± 1.29%, 62.33% ± 2.02% and 42.99% ± 2.09% in groups with aspirin of 0, 0.1, 1, 10 mmol/L, respectively; after 48 h, the cell survival rates were respectively 96.45% ± 1.21%, 76.89% ± 2.28%, 50.28% ± 0.98% and 32.66% ± 1.99%. The TER in the group with aspirin of 10 mmol/L was reduced to 50.1% after 72 h. Multiple factors chi square test showed that the influence of aspirin on the proliferation of Caco-2 cells and the epithelial barrier was dose-dependent and time-dependent.

CONCLUSION: Aspirin could inhibit the proliferation of enterocyte and affect the epithelial barrier, in a dose-dependent and time-dependent manner.

Non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs and the enteropathy

Non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) are the most widely used anti-inflammatory agents in clinic. Recently, they are also used to prevent the progression of cardiovascular disease and the pain of muscle, bone and arthrosis. However, long-term and generous use may cause mucosal damages of the stomach and duodenum. With the improvement of clinical diagnostic and therapeutic approaches, it has been found that more and more damages of the intestinal mucosa were being identified. This article reviews the enteropathy caused by NSAIDs and its pathogenic mechanism, prevention and treatment.

Clinical safety and efficacy of NG440: a novel combination of rho iso-alpha acids from hops, rosemary, and oleanolic acid for inflammatory conditions

In this report, we examine the clinical safety and efficacy of NG440, a phytochemical-based antiinflammatory formula consisting of a combination of rho iso-alpha acids from hops, rosemary, and oleanolic acid. In a previous study, we demonstrated that NG440 significantly decreased pain by 50% in patients with osteoarthritis. Consistent with these data, results from a multicentre trial indicate that NG440 reduced pain scores in patients with joint discomfort, as measured by VAS (visual analog scale) methodology. As demonstrated in an ex vivo clinical study, these effects on pain relief may be due to reduced inflammatory cytokine production including lower prostaglandin E2 formation. Finally, strong data exist to suggest that NG440 is a safe formula for human consumption. Animal toxicity data revealed no adverse effects of NG440 at dosages < or =250 mg.kg-1.day-1 for 21 days. Furthermore, human trial data suggest that NG440 does not negatively impact cardiovascular and gastrointestinal markers normally affected by selective COX-2 enzyme inhibitors, including platelet function, blood pressure, blood cell count, or fecal calprotectin, a measure of gastrointestinal injury. In conclusion, NG440 may serve as a safe and efficacious alternative in some areas where specific COX-2 inhibitors have been traditionally used.

Nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drugs and the small intestine

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

The small intestine may be a more common site for nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drug toxicity than the gastroduodenal mucosa. Two-thirds of regular nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drug users develop subclinical small bowel enteropathy. This review highlights this emerging issue in patients requiring antiinflammatory drugs.

RECENT FINDINGS

Nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drug enteropathy is a stepwise process involving direct mucosal toxicity, mitochondrial damage, breakdown of intercellular integrity, enterohepatic recirculation and neutrophil activation by luminal contents including bacteria. Unlike upper gastrointestinal toxicity, cyclooxygenase-mediated mechanisms are probably less important. Newer imaging modalities such as capsule endoscopy studies demonstrate nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drug-induced small bowel erosions, but the clinical implications are unclear.

SUMMARY

Nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drug toxicity to the small intestine is common. Useful research tools have been developed to indirectly measure intestinal inflammation and permeability, but these are not generally available to the clinician, although enteroscopy and capsule endoscopy can be illuminating. Anaemia or hypoalbuminaemia are useful indications of nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drug enteropathy. Cessation of the drug would be the preferred option, alternatively there are experimental data to support the use of sulphasalazine and metronidazole. Animal models are unravelling new mechanisms for mucosal toxicity beyond the cyclooxygenase model, including mucosal oxidative injury and nitric oxide mediated pathways.

Gastroprotective action of glucocorticoid hormones during NSAID treatment

In this article we present an overview of the results of our studies suggesting that endogenous glucocorticoid hormones play a role as natural defensive factors in maintaining the integrity of the gastric mucosa during treatment with non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs). In-domethacin and aspirin at ulcerogenic doses induce a rise in corticosterone, which helps the gastric mucosa to resist the harmful actions of these ulcerogenic agents. The gastroprotective action of glucocorticoids during NSAID treatment may be mediated by multiple actions, including maintenance of glucose homeostasis, mucus production and attenuation of enhanced gastric motility and microvascular permeability. According to our findings, glucocorticoid hormones also participate in the healing processes of NSAID-induced gastric injury. It was demonstrated that there is some cooperative interaction between glucocorticoids and prostaglandins (PGs) in gastroprotection, in a way that a deficiency of one protective factor can lead to an apparently compensatory increase of the other. The gastric mucosa becomes more susceptible to injury during deficiency of both glucocorticoids and PGs.

[NSAID-colonopathy]

The pain-relief properties of NSAID/ASA preparations have been known for a long time. In particular, the gastrointestinal tract shows side effects such as: erosion, ulceration, and even perforation. In the upper gastrointestinal tract, our group has shown that a correct histological diagnosis of NSAID/ASA induced lesions can be made in a high percentage of cases on the basis of recognition of ischemic necrosis. NSAID/ASA induced lesions are less commonly found in the lower gastrointestinal tract. We could also demonstrate a correct histological diagnosis of NSAID-colonopathy on the basis of finding ischemic necrosis. Besides the known complications, another typical complication is diaphragm-like stenosis, which must not be mistaken for tumor stenosis. The differential diagnosis of NSAID-colonopathy includes ischemic colitis, which cannot be distinguished histologically if the exact endoscopic description is not available. Sometimes NSAID/ASA induced lesions are misdiagnosed as Crohn's disease due to the focal character of the lesions. Since all of our analyses are retrospective, the criteria developed by our group should be checked prospectively.

Strictures, diaphragms, erosions or ulcerations of ischemic type in the colon should always prompt consideration of nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug-induced lesions

AIM: To investigate whether NSAIDs/ASA lesions in the colon can histologically be diagnosed on the basis of ischemic necrosis similar to biopsy-based diagnosis of NSAIDs/ASA-induced erosions and ulcers of the stomach.

METHODS: In the period between 1997 and 2002, we investigated biopsy materials obtained from 611 patients (415 women, 196 men, average age 60.5 years) with endoscopic focal erosions, ulcerations, strictures or diaphr-agms in the colon. In the biopsies obtained from these lesions, we always established the suspected diagnosis of NSAID-induced lesions whenever necroses of the ischemic type were found. Together with the histological report, we enclosed a questionnaire to investigate the use of medication. The data provided by the questionnaire were then correlated with the endoscopic findings, the location, number and nature of the lesions, and the histological findings.

RESULTS: At the time of their colonoscopy, 86.1% of the patients had indeed been taking NSAID/ASA medication for years (43.9%) or months (29.5%). The most common indication for the use of these drugs was pain (64.3%), and the most common indication for colonoscopy was bleeding (55.5%). Endoscopic inspection revealed multiple erosions and/or ulcers in 60.6%, strictures in 15.8%, and diaphragms in 3.0% of the patients. The lesions were located mainly in the right colon including the transverse colon (79.9%). A separate analysis of age and sex distribution, endoscopic and histological findings for NSAIDs alone, ASA alone, combined NSAID/ASA, and for patients denying the use of such drugs, revealed no significant differences among the groups.

CONCLUSION: This uncontrolled retrospective study based on the histological finding of an ischemic necrosis shows that the histologically suspected diagnosis of NSAID-induced lesions in the colon is often correct. The true diagnostic validity of this finding and the differentiation from ischemic colitis should, however, be investigated in a prospective controlled study.

Differential expression of COX-1 and COX-2 in the gastrointestinal tract of the rat

The aim of this study was to use immunohistochemistry with morphometry to investigate COX-1 and COX-2 expression in the normal rat gastrointestinal (GI) tract and examine if sites of ulceration previously observed with long-term COX-2 inhibitor administration in mice correlate with differential COX-1/COX-2 expression. COX-2 positive cells were observed predominantly in the apical lamina propria of intestinal villi with fewer cells in the mucosal epithelium. The highest level of COX-2 expression was observed at the ileocaecal junction (ICJ). COX-2 expression was also present in parasympathetic ganglia of the submucosa and muscularis. In the stomach, the highest grade of COX-2 expression was observed in the apical lamina propria of the fundus adjacent to the junctional ridge. In contrast, COX-1 positive cells within the lamina propria were evenly distributed along the GI tract but were present in higher numbers than COX-2 positive cells. The mean level of COX-1 expression at the ICJ was not significantly different from the ileum and caecum. Evidence that the highest level of COX-2 expression in normal rats is located on the ileal side of the ICJ provides the first mechanism to explain spontaneous ulceration and perforation of the distal ileum in COX-2 -/- animals.

Role of cyclooxygenase-2 inhibitors in postoperative pain management

Cyclooxygenase (COX)-2 inhibitors are as efficacious as nonselective nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs for the treatment of postoperative pain but have the advantages of a better gastrointestinal side-effect profile as well as a lack of antiplatelet effects. There have been recent concerns regarding the cardiovascular side effects of COX-2 inhibitors. Nonetheless, they remain a valuable option for postoperative pain management. The pharmacology of these agents and available studies are reviewed.

Cyclodextrin-based pharmaceutics: past, present and future

Cyclodextrins are cyclic oligomers of glucose that can form water-soluble inclusion complexes with small molecules and portions of large compounds. These biocompatible, cyclic oligosaccharides do not elicit immune responses and have low toxicities in animals and humans. Cyclodextrins are used in pharmaceutical applications for numerous purposes, including improving the bioavailability of drugs. Current cyclodextrin-based therapeutics are described and possible future applications discussed. Cyclodextrin-containing polymers are reviewed and their use in drug delivery presented. Of specific interest is the use of cyclodextrin-containing polymers to provide unique capabilities for the delivery of nucleic acids.

Is no NSAID a good NSAID? Approaches to NSAID-associated upper gastrointestinal disease

Upper gastrointestinal disease induced by use of nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) remains a major problem that affects a broad segment of the population, given the frequent use of these drugs by prescription and over the counter. The emergence of the cyclooxygenase (COX)-2 selective inhibitors (coxibs) has introduced a new option that may result in less upper gastrointestinal disease. Recent large studies have demonstrated this advantage, with the caveat that concurrent use of low-dose aspirin may mitigate this benefit. Unfortunately, the relatively high cost of the coxibs makes them not cost-effective unless confined to certain higher-risk populations. Finally, even newer versions of NSAIDs, such as nitric oxide (NO)-releasing aspirin and the COX-inhibiting NO donors, are potential alternatives to traditional NSAIDs with less upper gastrointestinal toxicity.

New dogmas or old?

Recent experimental studies may undermine our understanding of the gastrointestinal side effects of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs and cast a shadow on the original concept that underpins the development of the recent addition to the clinical anti-inflammatory armamentarium, the COX-2 selective inhibitors. But is this just a passing cloud or a total eclipse of the COX theory?