Aetiology of colorectal cancer and relevance of monogenic inheritance

IL-34, IL-36 and IL-38 in colorectal cancer-key immunoregulators of carcinogenesis

Colorectal cancer (CRC) is still a big killer nowadays, but the precise underlying mechanism remains to be explored. It is believed that imbalance of host immunity in the local microenvironment plays a critical role in the tumorigenesis of CRC. IL-34 is inversely correlated with overall survival in CRC patients, perhaps via regulating terminal differentiation of a subset of macrophages (M2). It is believed that the recruitment/differentiation of M2 macrophages within the cancer simply represents an increase in number, but the function of these M2 macrophages may be compromised. IL-36s (IL-36α, β and γ) are constitutively expressed in non-cancer colon tissue, but colonic IL-36α, IL-36β and IL-36γ are substantially reduced in the CRC tissues (~ 80%). IL-36α is an independent factor affecting the survival of CRC patients. The level of IL-36α and/or IL-36γ in CRC tissue could potentially be used as biomarkers for predicting the prognosis of CRC at both the later or early stages of CRC. IL-38 is also an anti-inflammatory cytokine. Colonic IL-38 is ~ 95% lower in CRC compared to non-CRC colonic tissue, consistent with the positive correlation between differentiation of CRC, and colonic tumour expression of IL-38. IL-38 is a reliable/sensitive biomarker for distinguishing between CRC and non-cancer colonic tissue. There is a positive correlation between colonic IL-38 in CRC and prognosis and/or overall survival, particularly in advanced CRC, supporting IL-38 probably being a reliable and consistent independent factor in predicting the prognosis of CRC. The findings above may be useful in exploring therapeutic targeting for precision medicine.

Mutation Spectrum of Cancer-Associated Genes in Patients With Early Onset of Colorectal Cancer

Background: Colorectal cancer (CRC) incidence is rising worldwide, as well as in the Republic of Kazakhstan, while its occurrence is also increasing in the younger population. Hereditary forms associated with the development of colon and rectal cancer and early-onset CRC have never been studied in the population of Kazakhstan. The aim of this research was to investigate the spectrum of CRC-related gene mutations to determine which mutations cause early onset of CRC in the Kazakhstan population.

Methods: The study included 125 unrelated patients from Kazakhstan (range 17–50 years in age) with early onset CRC. Genomic DNA was obtained from peripheral blood of the patients. Next-generation sequencing was performed using the TruSightCancer Kit on the MiSeq platform. The Studio Variant was used to annotate and interpret genetic variants.

Results: Bioinformatics analysis of Next-generation sequencing data revealed 11,152 variants from 85 genes, of them, 3,790 missense, 6,254 synonymous variants, 44 3′UTR variants, 10 frameshift variants, five stop-gain variants, four in-frame deletions, two splice donors, one splice acceptor variant, and 1,042 intron or non-coding variants. APC, BRCA2/1, ALK, BRIP1, EGFR, FANCA, FANCD2, FANCI, HNF1A, MEN1, NSD1, PMS2, RECQL4, RET, SLX4, WRN, and XPC genes mutated most often. According to the ACMG guidelines and LOVD/ClinVar databases, 24 variants were pathogenic (10 frameshifts, five missenses, five stop-gain, one in-frame deletion, and three splice-site mutations), and 289 were VUS with population frequency <1%, 131 of them were attributed as deleterious. In the study, 50% of all pathogenic mutations found in Kazakhstani patients with early CRC onset were identified in the subgroups with a family history of CRC and primary multiple tumors. In APC, pathogenic mutations were most often (21%).

Conclusion: Pathogenic and likely pathogenic mutations were found in 20 (16%) out of 125 patients. Eight novel pathogenic mutations detected in FANCI, APC, BMPR1, ATM, and DICER1 genes have not been reported in previous literature. Given the high frequency and wide spectrum of mutations, NGS analysis must be carried out in families with a history of CRC/CRC-related cancers with the purpose to identify cause-effective mutations, clarify the clinical diagnosis, and prevent the development of the disease in other family members.

Polyphenols in Colorectal Cancer: Current State of Knowledge including Clinical Trials and Molecular Mechanism of Action

Polyphenols have been reported to have wide spectrum of biological activities including major impact on initiation, promotion, and progression of cancer by modulating different signalling pathways. Colorectal cancer is the second most major cause of mortality and morbidity among females and the third among males. The objective of this review is to describe the activity of a variety of polyphenols in colorectal cancer in clinical trials, preclinical studies, and primary research. The molecular mechanisms of major polyphenols related to their beneficial effects on colorectal cancer are also addressed. Synthetic modifications and other future directions towards exploiting of natural polyphenols against colorectal cancer are discussed in the last section.

Truncation of the MSH2 C-terminal 60 amino acids disrupts effective DNA mismatch repair and is causative for Lynch syndrome

Missense variants of DNA mismatch repair (MMR) genes pose a problem in clinical genetics as long as they cannot unambiguously be assigned as the cause of Lynch syndrome (LS). To study such variants of uncertain clinical significance, we have developed a functional assay based on direct measurement of MMR activity in mouse embryonic stem cells expressing mutant protein from the endogenous alleles. We have applied this protocol to a specific truncation mutant of MSH2 that removes 60 C-terminal amino acids and has been found in suspected LS families. We show that the stability of the MSH2/MSH6 heterodimer is severely perturbed, causing attenuated MMR in in vitro assays and cancer predisposition in mice. This mutation can therefore unambiguously be considered as deleterious and causative for LS.

Study on the Mechanism Underlying the Regulation of the NMDA Receptor Pathway in Spinal Dorsal Horns of Visceral Hypersensitivity Rats by Moxibustion

Visceral hypersensitivity is enhanced in irritable bowel syndrome (IBS) patients. Treatment of IBS visceral pain by moxibustion methods has a long history and rich clinical experience. In the clinic, moxibustion on the Tianshu (ST25) and Shangjuxu (ST37) acupoints can effectively treat bowel disease with visceral pain and diarrhea symptoms. To investigate the regulatory function of moxibustion on the Tianshu (ST25) and Shangjuxu (ST37) acupoints on spinal cord NR1, NR2B, and PKCε protein and mRNA expression in irritable bowel syndrome (IBS) visceral hypersensitivity rats, we did some research. In the study, we found that moxibustion effectively relieved the IBS visceral hyperalgesia status of rats. Analgesic effect of moxibustion was similar to intrathecal injection of Ro 25-6981. The expression of NR1, NR2B, and PKCε in the spinal dorsal horns of IBS visceral hyperalgesia rats increased. Moxibustion on the Tianshu and Shangjuxu acupoints might inhibit the visceral hypersensitivity, simultaneously decreasing the expression of NR1, NR2B, and PKCε in spinal cord of IBS visceral hyperalgesia rats. Based on the above experimental results, we hypothesized NR1, NR2B, and PKCε of spinal cord could play an important role in moxibustion inhibiting the process of central sensitization and visceral hyperalgesia state.

Association between human Papillomavirus and colorectal adenocarcinoma and its influence on tumor staging and degree of cell differentiation

Background

Colorectal cancer is one of the most common types of neoplasia among the worldwide adult population. Among neoplasms of the gastrointestinal tract, it is ranked second in relation to prevalence and mortality, but its etiology is only known in around 5% of the cases. It is believed that 15% of malignant diseases are related to viral oncogenesis.

Aim

To correlate the presence of HPV with the staging and degree of cell differentiation among patients with colorectal adenocarcinoma.

Methods

A retrospective case-control study was conducted on 144 patients divided between a test group of 79 cases of colorectal cancer and a control group to analyze 144 patients aged 25 to 85 years (mean, 57.85 years; standard deviation, 15.27 years and median, 58 years). Eighty-six patients (59.7%) were male. For both groups, tissue samples from paraffin blocks were subjected to DNA extraction followed by the polymerase chain reaction using generic and specific primers for HPV 16 and 18. Dot blot hybridization was also performed with the aim of identifying HPV DNA.

Results

The groups were shown to be homogenous regarding sex, age and site of HPV findings in the samples analyzed. Out of the 41 patients with HPV, 36 (45.6%) were in the cases and five (7.7%) were in the control group (p<0.001). All the HPV cases observed comprised HPV 16, and HPV 18 was not shown in any of the cases studied. There were no significant differences in comparisons of sex, age and site regarding the presence of HPV in either of the groups. It was not observe any significant difference in relation to staging or degree of cell differentiation among the patients with colorectal cancer.

Conclusion

Human papillomavirus type 16 is present in individuals with colorectal carcinoma. However, its presence was unrelated to staging or degree of differentiation.

Incidence, clinical features and possible etiology of early onset (≤40 years) colorectal neoplasms

The aim of the study was to investigate the clinical features, including survival, of patients with colorectal malignancies developed at a very early age (≤40 years), together with possible factors involved in the pathogenesis of these rare neoplasms. The study took advantage of the existence of a specialized colorectal cancer Registry active from 1984. 57 patients met the criteria of early onset cancer; main epidemiological data, morphology, stage, familial aggregation, possible role of inheritance and survival were analyzed. Despite the relevant increase over time of all registered patients, joiningpoint analysis of crude incidence rate of early onset colorectal neoplasms revealed a certain stability of these tumors (EAPC: 2.4, CI 14-22) with a constant prevalence of the male sex. Stage at diagnosis did not show significant variations between early onset and maturity onset colorectal neoplasms. Hereditary as well as familial cases were significantly (P < 0.005 and 0.03) more frequent among patients with early onset tumors, although in the majority of them no specific etiological factor could be identified. Survival was more favorable in patients with early onset tumors, though this had to be attributed to the higher presence of some histological types in early onset cases. Survival was significantly more favorable for patients of all ages registered in the last decade. Incidence of early onset colorectal cancer was relatively stable between 1984 and 2008. A male preponderance was evident through the registration period. Hereditary and familial cases were significantly more frequent among early onset case. A well defined etiology could be observed in 16% of the cases (versus 2-3% in older individuals). Five-year survival showed a significant improvement over time.

Epidemiology of colorectal cancer: the 21-year experience of a specialised registry

Cancer registries can be viewed as one of the main strategies for improving our understanding of cancer, as they may reveal the importance of specific trends in cancer incidence and survival; in addition, the information obtained from the registries can be translated into preventive measures that might lead to a better control of neoplasms. A colorectal cancer registry was instituted in Northern Italy in 1984. The purpose of this study is to provide a description of the main findings observed in a 21-year period of continuous registration.

RESULTS

A total of 3951 malignancies of the large bowel were registered in 3817 patients, for a crude incidence rate of 75.1/100 000/year in men and 59.0 in women. Overall incidence (crude and age-adjusted) of colorectal tumours increased remarkably throughout the registration period. This increase was mainly due to early (Stage I and II) tumours and to lesions with lymph nodal involvement (Stage III). There was a tendency over time towards a progressive increase of colonic tumours, whereas the fraction of rectal neoplasms tended to decline. Colorectal cancer-specific survival increased significantly over time in each of the main TNM/Dukes classes (p<0.006 and <0.001 for Stage II and III tumours). Finally, surgery for colorectal tumours showed a tendency towards large operations (colectomy and hemicolectomy), which was parallel to a definite improvement of pathological staging.

CONCLUSIONS

Despite the increasing incidence of colorectal cancer, there are several reasons for cautious optimism. Most of the lesions are now diagnosed at an early stage, and this is associated with a significant increase of survival. The disease is undoubtedly cured better than in the past; the main challenge for future years is to achieve a sustained reduction of mortality for colorectal neoplasms.

Identification and classification of hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancer (Lynch syndrome): adapting old concepts to recent advancements. Report from the Italian Association for the study of Hereditary Colorectal Tumors Consensus Group

Knowledge about hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancer (HNPCC)/Lynch syndrome clearly evolved during the last 10 to 15 years much more rapidly than in the past century. Consequently, long-established concepts and attitudes that held for many years should now be changed or updated. With regard to classification, we suggest maintaining the eponym "Lynch syndrome" for families that have a well-documented deficiency of the DNA mismatch repair system, whereas "clinical hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancer" should be reserved for those families that meet the Amsterdam criteria but without evidence of mismatch repair impairment. Any family (or individual) meeting one or more of the Bethesda criteria can be considered as suspected HNPCC. For the identification of hereditary colorectal cancer molecular screening or the pedigree analysis show advantages and disadvantages; the ideal would be to combine the two approaches. Diffusion of the microsatellite instability test and of immunohistochemistry in the pathology laboratories might render in the immediate future molecular screening more realistic. Strict endoscopic surveillance of family members at risk (with first colonoscopy at age 20-25 years and then every 2-3 years) is needed only in families with documented alterations of the DNA mismatch repair. To a certain extent, our conclusions were similar to the recently proposed "European guidelines for the clinical management of HNPCC," although we prefer the term "clinical hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancer," instead of familial colorectal cancer, for families meeting the Amsterdam criteria but not having evidence of mismatch repair impairment.

Lifestyle-related factors and environmental agents causing cancer: an overview

The increasing incidence of a variety of cancers after the Second World War confronts scientists with the question of their origin. In Western countries, expansion and ageing of the population as well as progress in cancer detection using new diagnostic and screening tests cannot fully account for the observed growing incidence of cancer. Our hypothesis is that environmental factors play a more important role in cancer genesis than it is usually agreed. (1) Over the last 2-3 decades, alcohol consumption and tobacco smoking in men have significantly decreased in Western Europe and North America. (2) Obesity is increasing in many countries, but the growing incidence of cancer also concerns cancers not related to obesity nor to other known lifestyle-related factors. (3) There is evidence that the environment has changed over the time period preceding the recent rise in cancer incidence, and that this change, still continuing, included the accumulation of many new carcinogenic factors in the environment. (4) Genetic susceptibility to cancer due to genetic polymorphism cannot have changed over one generation and actually favours the role of exogenous factors through gene-environment interactions. (5) Age is not the unique factor to be considered since the rising incidence of cancers is seen across all age categories, including children, and adolescents. (6) The fetus is specifically vulnerable to exogenous factors. A fetal exposure during a critical time window may explain why current epidemiological studies may still be negative in adults. We therefore propose that the involuntary exposure to many carcinogens in the environment, including microorganisms (viruses, bacteria and parasites), radiations (radioactivity, UV and pulsed electromagnetic fields) and many xenochemicals, may account for the recent growing incidence of cancer and therefore that the risk attributable to environmental carcinogen may be far higher than it is usually agreed. Of major concern are: outdoor air pollution by carbon particles associated with polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons; indoor air pollution by environmental tobacco smoke, formaldehyde and volatile organic compounds such as benzene and 1,3 butadiene, which may particularly affect children and food contamination by food additives and by carcinogenic contaminants such as nitrates, pesticides, dioxins and other organochlorines. In addition, carcinogenic metals and metalloids, pharmaceutical medicines and some ingredients and contaminants in cosmetics may be involved. Although the risk fraction attributable to environmental factors is still unknown, this long list of carcinogenic and especially mutagenic factors supports our working hypothesis according to which numerous cancers may in fact be caused by the recent modification of our environment.

Genotype-phenotype correlations in individuals with a founder mutation in the MLH1 gene and hereditary non-polyposis colorectal cancer

OBJECTIVE

A unique mutation of the MLH1 gene was recently reported in six families living in a small area of Northern Italy. The mutation consists in the insertion of a T base between nucleotides 2269 and 2270 (2269-2270insT), causing the synthesis of an unstable polypeptide. The mutation was not reported by other investigators or outside this small geographic area, thus suggesting a possible founder effect. The main purpose of this investigation was to investigate whether patients (and families) with the 2260-2270insT mutation show relevant clinical differences when compared with individuals with other MLH1 or MSH2 gene alterations.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

We identified hereditary non-polyposis colorectal cancer (HNPCC) families through the specialized colorectal cancer registry following a previously described multistep approach. In all, 58 HNPCC families were identified; of these, 38 were detected through the registry, and 20 were referred from other areas in Italy.

RESULTS

Small differences were found in the main clinical and pathologic features; however, tumour burden per family tended to be higher in kindred sharing the founder mutation; in addition, multiple primaries (four or five different tumours in some subjects) were significantly more frequent in patients with the 2269-2270insT than in individuals with MSH2, MLH1 gene mutations or sporadic colorectal neoplasms. No significant difference in prognosis was found between patients with the founder mutation and those with other MLH1 or MSH2 mutations. Regardless of the type of mutation, neoplasms of the colon-rectum, stomach and endometrium represented nearly 80% of the tumour burden in families with HNPCC.

CONCLUSIONS

A proclivity to multiple tumours arising in the same subject and a higher tumour burden per family were the most relevant findings observed in affected patients with the founder mutation compared with other MLH1 or MSH2 mutations. In general, the results of the study underline the difficulty in discriminating between Lynch I and Lynch II syndromes on the basis of specific molecular changes.

Gynecological tumors revealing hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancer: analysis of a large Lebanese pedigree

The objective of this study was to evaluate the aggregation of colorectal cancer (CRC) and hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancer (HNPCC)-related extracolonic cancers in an extended Lebanese family with HNPCC. This was a pedigree analysis and a prospective follow-up over an 8-year period. The causative germ line mutation was detected using denaturing high-performance liquid chromatography, polymerase chain reaction (PCR) of short fluorescent fragments, and direct DNA sequencing of purified PCR products. The penetrance of CRC is high and accounts for approximately two thirds of risk carriers with an early age of onset (21 years). The extracolonic cancer spectrum includes ovary, endometrium, small bowel, skin, and brain, with an age of onset as early as 30 years. The causative mismatch repair gene mutation is an MSH2 point mutation involving the splice donor site of intron 3 (G-->A). Scrutinized in genomic DNA from 35 consented members, it was found in 18 of them and cosegregates with the cancer phenotype in the family. Early-onset ovarian and endometrial carcinomas may reveal HNPCC families in the Middle Eastern region, with MSH2 germ line mutation. We propose a biannual screening program, starting around the age of 20-25 years, pending additional data on this topic.

Hereditary non-polyposis colorectal cancer: The rise and fall of a confusing term

The term Hereditary Non-Polyposis Colorectal Cancer (HNPCC) is a poor descriptor of the syndrome described by Lynch. Over the last decade, the term has been applied to heterogeneous groups of families meeting limited clinical criteria, for example the Amsterdam criteria. It is now apparent that not all Amsterdam criteria-positive families have the Lynch syndrome. The term HNPCC has also been applied to clinical scenarios in which CRCs with DNA microsatellite instability are diagnosed but in which there is no vertical transmission of an altered DNA mismatch repair (MMR) gene. A term that has multiple, mutually incompatible meanings is highly problematic, particularly when it may influence the management of an individual family. The Lynch syndrome is best understood as a hereditary predisposition to malignancy that is explained by a germline mutation in a DNA MMR gene. The diagnosis does not depend in an absolute sense on any particular family pedigree structure or age of onset of malignancy. Families with a strong family history of colorectal cancer that do not have Lynch syndrome have been grouped as ‘Familial Colorectal Cancer Type-X’. The first step in characterizing these cancer families is to distinguish them from Lynch syndrome. The term HNPCC no longer serves any useful purpose and should be phased out.

A comparison of esomeprazole and lansoprazole for control of intragastric pH in patients with symptoms of gastro-oesophageal reflux disease

BACKGROUND

Intragastric acid suppression is the most direct measure of the pharmacodynamic efficacy of proton pump inhibitors, which are the most effective drugs for acid-related diseases.

AIM

To compare the effectiveness of once and twice daily dosing of lansoprazole and esomeprazole in controlling intragastric acidity (target gastric pH > 4.0) over a 24-hour period.

METHODS

In an open-label, two-way crossover study, 45 Helicobacter pylori-negative patients with gastro-oesophageal reflux disease were randomized to receive one of two regimens: 30 mg lansoprazole or esomeprazole 40 mg once daily. Intragastric pH was assessed by 24-hour pH monitoring on day 5 of each regimen. Dosing was increased to twice daily and pH was reassessed on day 10. Following a 14-day washout, patients were crossed over to the other medication and the dosage regimens and pH assessments were repeated.

RESULTS

Data were analysed from 35 patients who completed all scheduled assessments and had 24-hour monitoring for each end-point. Mean time pH > 4.0 and mean 24-hour pH were highest for esomeprazole 40 mg twice daily, followed by lansoprazole 30 mg twice daily, esomeprazole 40 mg once daily and lansoprazole 30 mg once daily. Esomeprazole 40 mg twice daily provided superior control of intragastric pH compared with either once or twice daily dosing of lansoprazole and once daily dosing of esomeprazole (P < 0.01). Esomeprazole 40 mg once daily was comparable with lansoprazole 30 mg twice daily and both were superior to lansoprazole 30 mg once daily (P < 0.01).

CONCLUSIONS

Response to acid suppression treatment depends on the treatment selected. Esomeprazole 40 mg twice daily provided better control of intragastric pH than all other regimens evaluated. Esomeprazole 40 mg daily, however, was comparable with lansoprazole 30 mg twice daily and superior to lansoprazole 30 mg once daily.