Predictors of adverse outcome in patients with arrhythmogenic right ventricular dysplasia/cardiomyopathy: long term experience of a tertiary care centre

Quantitative assessment of cardiac 123iodo-metaiodobenzylguanidine SPECT/CT in patients with arrhythmogenic right ventricular cardiomyopathy: Novel insight in disease monitoring

BACKGROUND

The heart-to-mediastinum ratio (H/M-Ratio) of 123iodo-metaiodobenzylguanidine (123I-MIBG) represents state-of-the-art assessment for sympathetic dysfunction in patients with arrhythmogenic right ventricular cardiomyopathy (ARVC). This study aims to evaluate quantitative reconstruction of 123I-MIBG uptake and to demonstrate its correlation with echocardiographic parameters.

METHODS

Cardiac innervation was assessed in 23 patients diagnosed with definite ARVC or borderline ARVC and 12 patients with other cardiac disease presenting arrhythmia, using quantitative 123I-MIBG Single Photon Emission Computed Tomography/Computed Tomography (SPECT/CT) imaging. Tracer uptake was evaluated in the left (LV) and right ventricle (RV) based on a CT scan after quantitative image reconstruction. The relationship between tracer uptake and echocardiographic parameter data was examined.

RESULTS

Absolute quantification of 123I-MIBG uptake in the LV and RV is feasible and correlates accurately with the gold standard H/M Ratio. When comparing sensitivity and specificity, the area under the curve (AUC) favors standardized uptake value (SUV) of the RV over the right-ventricle-to-mediastinum-ratio (RV/M-Ratio) for diagnosing ARVC. A reduced RV-SUV in patients with definite ARVC is associated with reduced RV function. RV polar maps revealed globally reduced 123I-MIBG uptake without segment-specific reduction in the RV.

CONCLUSIONS

Quantitative 123I-MIBG SPECT in ARCV patients offers robust potential for clinical reporting and demonstrates a significant correlation with RV function. Segmental RV analysis needs to be evaluated in larger samples. In summary, cardiac 123I-MIBG imaging using SUV could facilitate image-guided therapy in patients diagnosed with ARVC.

The pivotal role of compelling high-risk electrocardiographic markers in prediction of ventricular arrhythmic risk in arrhythmogenic right ventricular cardiomyopathy: A systematic review and meta-analysis

INTRODUCTION

Several investigations have shown that existing risk stratification processes remain insufficient for stratifying sudden cardiac death risk in arrhythmogenic right ventricular cardiomyopathy (ARVC). Multiple auxiliary parameters are investigated to offer a more precise prognostic model. Our aim was to assess the association between several ECG markers (epsilon waves, prolonged terminal activation duration (TAD) of QRS, fragmented QRS (fQRS), late potentials on signal-averaged electrocardiogram (SA-ECG), T-wave inversion (TWI) in right precordial leads, and extension of TWI in inferior leads) with the risk of developing poor outcomes in ARVC.

METHODS

A systematic literature search from several databases was conducted until September 9th, 2023. Studies were eligible if it investigated the relationship between the ECG markers with the risk of developing ventricular arrhythmic events.

RESULTS

This meta-analysis encompassed 25 studies with a total of 3767 participants. Our study disclosed that epsilon waves, prolonged TAD of QRS, fQRS, late potentials on SA-ECG, TWI in right precordial leads, and extension of TWI in inferior leads were associated with the incremental risk of ventricular arrhythmias, implantable cardioverter-defibrillator shock, and sudden cardiac death, with the risk ratios ranging from 1.46 to 2.11. In addition, diagnostic test accuracy meta-analysis stipulated that the extension of TWI in inferior leads had the uppermost overall area under curve (AUC) value amidst other ECG markers apropos of our outcomes of interest.

CONCLUSION

A multivariable risk assessment strategy based on the previously stated ECG markers potentially enhances the current risk stratification models in ARVC patients, especially extension of TWI in inferior leads.

Management Strategies in Arrhythmogenic Cardiomyopathy across the Spectrum of Ventricular Involvement

Improved disease recognition through family screening and increased life expectancy with appropriate sudden cardiac death prevention has increased the burden of heart failure in arrhythmogenic cardiomyopathy (ACM). Heart failure management guidelines are well established but primarily focus on left ventricle function. A significant proportion of patients with ACM have predominant or isolated right ventricle (RV) dysfunction. Management of RV dysfunction in ACM lacks evidence but requires special considerations across the spectrum of heart failure regarding the initial diagnosis, subsequent management, monitoring for progression, and end-stage disease management. In this review, we discuss the unique aspects of heart failure management in ACM with a special focus on RV dysfunction.

Antiarrhythmic Drug Therapy in Arrhythmogenic Right Ventricular Cardiomyopathy

Arrhythmogenic right ventricular cardiomyopathy (ARVC) is a heritable progressive myocardial disorder that predisposes patients to ventricular arrhythmias and sudden cardiac death. Antiarrhythmic medications have an important role in reducing the frequency of ventricular arrhythmias and the morbidity associated with recurrent implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) shocks. Although several studies have examined the use of antiarrhythmic drugs in ARVC, these have been mostly retrospective in nature and inconsistent in their methodology, patient population and endpoints. Thus, current prescribing practices are largely based on expert opinion and extrapolation from other diseases. Herein, we discuss the major studies of the use of antiarrhythmics in ARVC, present the current approach employed at the Johns Hopkins Hospital and identify areas where further research is needed. Most notably, there is a great need for high-quality studies with consistent methodology and randomized controlled trial data into the use of antiarrhythmic drugs in ARVC. This would improve management of the condition and ensure antiarrhythmic prescribing is based on robust evidence.

Varied Presentation of Arrhythmogenic Right Ventricular Dysplasia/Cardiomyopathy (ARVD/C): A Case Series

Arrhythmogenic right ventricular dysplasia (ARVD) is a genetically predisposed form of cardiomyopathy that mainly affects young individuals resulting in fatal ventricular arrhythmias leading to sudden cardiac death. ARVD has 50% of cases that involve both the right ventricle (RV) and left ventricle (LV), but only a small number of cases involve an isolated left ventricle. In this case series, five patients (four males and one female) with a diagnosis of ARVD presented to our center with varied clinical presentations across a wide range of age groups. The MRI of all five cases showed dilated right atrium (RA)/RV with right ventricular free wall dyskinesia. Two-dimensional (2D) MRI showed aneurysmal outpouching with diffuse free wall enhancement. Automated implantable cardioverter defibrillator (AICD) was implanted uneventfully in all five patients, and the patients were discharged with oral medications such as low-dose diuretics, beta-blockers, spironolactone, angiotensin-converting enzymes (ACE) inhibitors, amiodarone, and anxiolytics. Until now, the patients were doing well on follow-up visits. The therapeutic management of patients with arrhythmogenic right ventricular dysplasia/cardiomyopathy (ARVD/C) has evolved over the years and continues to be an important challenge. To further improve risk stratification and treatment of patients, more information is needed on natural history, long-term prognosis, and risk assessment. Special attention should be focused on the identification of patients who would benefit from implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) implantation in comparison to pharmacological and other nonpharmacological approaches.

Tissue Doppler echocardiography and outcome in arrhythmogenic right ventricular cardiomyopathy

AIMS

This study aimed at investigating whether tissue Doppler imaging (TDI) is associated with adverse events in arrhythmogenic right ventricular cardiomyopathy (ARVC).

METHODS AND RESULTS

Transthoracic echocardiography was performed in 72 patients with definite (n = 63) or borderline (n = 9) ARVC diagnosed according to the 2010 Task Force Criteria and included in the prospective Zurich ARVC registry. Myocardial peak systolic tissue velocity (S') was measured by TDI at lateral tricuspid (tricuspid S'), medial mitral (septal S'), and lateral mitral annulus (lateral S'). Association of echocardiographic parameters with outcome was assessed by univariable Cox regression. During a median follow-up of 4.9 ± 2.6 years, 6 (8.3%) patients died of cardiovascular cause or received heart transplantation and 21 (29.2%) patients developed sustained ventricular arrhythmia. Tricuspid, septal, and lateral S' were lower in patients who died (p = 0.001; p < 0.001; p = 0.008; respectively), while tricuspid and septal S' were lower in those with ventricular arrhythmia (p = 0.001; p = 0.008; respectively). There was a significant association of tricuspid, septal, and lateral S' with mortality (HR = 1.61, p = 0.011; HR = 2.15, p = 0.007; HR = 1.67, p = 0.017; respectively), while tricuspid and septal S' were associated with ventricular arrhythmia (HR = 1.20, p = 0.022; HR = 1.37, p = 0.004; respectively). Kaplan-Meier analyses demonstrated a higher freedom from mortality with tricuspid S' >8 cm/s (p = 0.001) and from ventricular arrhythmia with S' >10.5 cm/s (p = 0.021).

CONCLUSIONS

This study demonstrates that TDI provides information on the ARVC phenotype, is associated with adverse events in ARVC patients, and differentiates between patients with and without adverse events.

Novel Risk Prediction Model to Determine Adverse Heart Failure Outcomes in Arrhythmogenic Right Ventricular Cardiomyopathy

Background

Patients with arrhythmogenic right ventricular cardiomyopathy are at risk for life‐threatening ventricular tachyarrhythmias, but progressive heart failure (HF) may occur in later stages of disease. This study aimed to characterize potential risk predictors and develop a model for individualized assessment of adverse HF outcomes in arrhythmogenic right ventricular cardiomyopathy.

Methods and Results

Longitudinal and observational cohorts with 290 patients with arrhythmogenic right ventricular cardiomyopathy from the Fuwai Hospital in Beijing, China, and 99 patients from the University Heart Center in Zurich, Switzerland, with follow‐up data were studied. The primary end point of the study was heart transplantation or death attributable to HF. The model was developed by Cox regression analysis for predicting risk and was internally validated. During 4.92±3.03 years of follow‐up, 48 patients reached the primary end point. The determinants of the risk prediction model were left ventricular ejection fraction, serum creatinine levels, moderate‐to‐severe tricuspid regurgitation, and atrial fibrillation. Implantable cardioverter‐defibrillators did not reduce the occurrence of adverse HF outcomes.

Conclusions

A novel risk prediction model for arrhythmogenic right ventricular cardiomyopathy has been developed using 2 large and well‐established cohorts, incorporating common clinical parameters such as left ventricular ejection fraction, serum creatinine levels, tricuspid regurgitation, and atrial fibrillation, which can identify patients who are at risk for terminal HF events, and may guide physicians to assess individualized HF risk and to optimize management strategies.

Clinical Significance of Structural Remodeling Concerning Substrate Characteristics and Outcomes in Arrhythmogenic Right Ventricular Cardiomyopathy

Background

The substrate and ablation outcome in arrhythmogenic right ventricular cardiomyopathy (ARVC) with or without right ventricular (RV) dysfunction is unclear.

Objective

We aimed to investigate ablation outcome and substrate in ARVC patients with or without RV dysfunction.

Methods

We retrospectively studied ARVC patients with (group 1) or without RV dysfunction (group 2) undergoing substrate mapping/ablation. Baseline characteristics and electrophysiological features were compared. The RV was divided into 7 prespecified segments. The scarred segment was defined as more than 50% of the area with bipolar scar. A multivariate regression analysis was performed to predict the risk of ventricular tachycardia (VT) recurrence.

Results

A total of 106 patients were enrolled (57 in group 1 and 49 in group 2). There were more men (73.7% vs 32.7%, P < .05) in group 1 than group 2. Group 1 patients demonstrated larger abnormal substrate in both the endocardium (13.4 ± 14.7 cm² vs 7.8 ± 5.4 cm², P = .014) and in the epicardium (40.3 ± 27.7 cm² vs 14.2 ± 12.6 cm², P = .002) and had more scar in the inferior portion/tricuspid valve (TV) than group 2 patients. Twenty-five patients had recurrences of VT/ventricular fibrillation. After multivariate analysis, the presence of a superior TV scar in the endocardium predicted the recurrence in patients with sustained VT.

Conclusion

The presence of RV dysfunction was associated with a larger abnormal substrate in the endocardium and epicardium of the RV. A scar involving the inferior portion and TV is associated with RV dysfunction. Scarring in the superior TV of the endocardium can predict recurrence despite catheter ablation.

Left Ventricular Longitudinal Dyssynchrony by CMR Feature Tracking Is Related to Adverse Prognosis in Advanced Arrhythmogenic Cardiomyopathy

Objectives: Left ventricular (LV) involvement has been associated with unfavorable prognosis in arrhythmogenic cardiomyopathy (ACM). We aim to evaluate LV mechanics by cardiovascular magnetic resonance-feature tracking (CMR-FT) in ACM patients with right ventricular (RV) dysfunction. Methods: We retrospectively recruited ACM patients diagnosed according to the revised Task Force Criteria (rTFC) from January 2015 to July 2017. All patients underwent CMR examinations and collections of clinical, electrocardiographic data. The strain and dyssynchrony parameters of LV and RV were analyzed. These patients were followed, and primary study outcome was defined as a composite of cardiovascular events (arrhythmic events and heart transplantation), secondary study outcome included arrhythmic events. Results: Eighty-nine ACM patients (40.40 ± 13.98 years, 67.42% male) were included. LV and RV ejection fractions were 49.12 ± 12.02% and 22.28 ± 10.11%, respectively. During a median (IQR) follow-up for 18.20 (11.60-30.04) months, 30 patients experienced cardiovascular events which included 22 patients who experienced arrhythmic events. Patients with cardiovascular events had impaired LV global longitudinal strain (-10.82 ± 2.77 vs. -12.61 ± 3.18%, p = 0.010), impaired LV global circumferential strain (-11.81 ± 2.40 vs. -13.04 ± 2.83%, p = 0.044), and greater LV longitudinal dyssynchrony (LVLD) (80.98 ± 30.98 vs. 64.23 ± 25.51 ms, p = 0.012) than those without. After adjusting for age, sex, and other confounding factors, LVLD ≥89.15 ms was an independent risk factor for cardiovascular events (HR: 4.50, 95% CI: 1.94 to 10.42; p = 0.001) and for arrhythmic events (HR: 4.79, 95% CI: 1.74 to 13.20; p = 0.003). Conclusions: LVLD by CMR-FT was an independent risk factor for cardiovascular and arrhythmic events in ACM patients in advanced stage, which could provide prognostic value for this subtype.

Heart Failure in Patients with Arrhythmogenic Cardiomyopathy

Arrhythmogenic cardiomyopathy (ACM) is a rare inherited cardiomyopathy characterized as fibro-fatty replacement, and a common cause for sudden cardiac death in young athletes. Development of heart failure (HF) has been an under-recognized complication of ACM for a long time. The current clinical management guidelines for HF in ACM progression have nowadays been updated. Thus, a comprehensive review for this great achievement in our understanding of HF in ACM is necessary. In this review, we aim to describe the research progress on epidemiology, clinical characteristics, risk stratification and therapeutics of HF in ACM.

Desmoplakin cardiomyopathy and arrhythmogenic right ventricular cardiomyopathy: two distinct forms of cardiomyopathy?

The confirmation of a hypothesis that desmoplakin-related (DSP) cardiomyopathy could represent a distinct clinical entity from the classical, RV-dominant, form of arrhythmogenic cardiomyopathy (ACM), most frequently caused by PKP2 mutations, would without any shadow of doubt signify a turning point in the history of this disease. The concept of gene-specific diseases underneath the umbrella diagnosis of ACM would bring fundamental changes not only in the clinical, diagnostic and therapeutic approach, but also in terms of risk stratification, pushing the scientific community towards a more patient-centred view of the disease, similarly to what has already been done in other inherited arrhythmogenic disease (e.g., Long QT Syndrome; LQTS). We provide a state-of-the-art review, starting with a brief historical framework to give the necessary context and better focus the question. Then, we proceed with a novel, genotype-tophenotype-based comparison of the most important aspects of DSP-related cardiomyopathy with the classical, RV-dominant ACM: this allows us to ascertain not only that the differences between the forms exist, but are also clinically relevant and actionable, leading to the underrecognition of the atypical, DSP-related, LV-dominant forms when applying the current diagnostic criteria. These findings will usher an exciting era, in which the scientific community will try to answer a range of questions, starting from the reasons why different desmosomal mutations cause such different phenotypes.

Arrhythmogenic Left Ventricular Cardiomyopathy: Genotype-Phenotype Correlations and New Diagnostic Criteria

Arrhythmogenic cardiomyopathy (ACM) is an inherited heart muscle disease characterized by loss of ventricular myocardium and fibrofatty replacement, which predisposes to scar-related ventricular arrhythmias and sudden cardiac death, particularly in the young and athletes. Although in its original description the disease was characterized by an exclusive or at least predominant right ventricle (RV) involvement, it has been demonstrated that the fibrofatty scar can also localize in the left ventricle (LV), with the LV lesion that can equalize or even overcome that of the RV. While the right-dominant form is typically associated with mutations in genes encoding for desmosomal proteins, other (non-desmosomal) mutations have been showed to cause the biventricular and left-dominant variants. This has led to a critical evaluation of the 2010 International Task Force criteria, which exclusively addressed the right phenotypic manifestations of ACM. An International Expert consensus document has been recently developed to provide upgraded criteria (“the Padua Criteria”) for the diagnosis of the whole spectrum of ACM phenotypes, particularly left-dominant forms, highlighting the use of cardiac magnetic resonance. This review aims to offer an overview of the current knowledge on the genetic basis, the phenotypic expressions, and the diagnosis of left-sided variants, both biventricular and left-dominant, of ACM.

Left ventricular involvement assessed by LGE-CMR in predicting the risk of adverse outcomes of arrhythmogenic cardiomyopathy with ICDs

BACKGROUND

Arrhythmogenic cardiomyopathy (ACM) is characterized by a high incidence of ventricular tachyarrhythmia and sudden death. Implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) implantation is the cornerstone of management.

OBJECTIVE

This study aims to reveal the prognostic value of the contrast-enhanced cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) with late gadolinium enhancement (LGE) amount in predicting varying lethal outcomes among ACM patients with ICDs.

METHODS

The 88 patients with definite ACM who were all referred for contrast-enhanced CMR received an ICD and were followed up for a median of 4.0 years.

RESULTS

Fifty-four patients had no left ventricular (LV) involvement and sixteen had an LV LGE amount > 15%. During the follow-up time, appropriate ICD therapy was seen in 57, electrical storm (ES) in 19, and cardiac death in 9 patients. Compared with those without LV involvement, patients with LV LGE amount > 15% had a higher risk of cardiac death (log-rank P = 0.021). LV LGE amount was associated with an increased risk of ICD therapy [adjusted hazard ratio (HR) 1.035, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.008-1.062, P = 0.010], and cardiac death (adjusted HR 1.082, 95% 1.006-1.164, P = 0.034), independently of LV ejection fraction. LV LGE mass of >15% demonstrated an over 2-fold increase in ICD therapy (adjusted HR 2.180, 95%CI 1.058-4.488, P = 0.035) and an over 7-fold increase in cardiac death (unadjusted HR 7.198, 95%CI 1.399-37.043, P = 0.018) than those without LV involvement, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

The LV LGE-CMR in ACM shows a dose-dependent association with ICD therapy and cardiac death. And LV LGE amount of >15% is a strong predictor.

Multimodality imaging predictors of sudden cardiac death

Sudden cardiac death (SCD) is the worst clinical event occurring in the clinical context of cardiomyopathies. Current guidelines recommend using LV ejection fraction as the only imaging-derived parameter to identify patients who may benefit from ICD implantation in cardiomyopathies with reduced ejection fraction; however, a relevant proportion of high-risk population is left with unmet therapeutic goal. In case of dilated, hypertrophic, or arrhythmogenic cardiomyopathies, there is still a room for more sensitive and specific risk markers for identifying a cluster at higher risk of SCD. In this paper, we reviewed the evidence supporting the use of advanced echocardiography, CMR, and nuclear cardiology for SCD stratification in patients with the most common cardiomyopathies. The added value of these modalities may be explained on the basis of tissue characterization, especially scar detection, a central player in the pathogenesis of arrhythmias. Therefore, integration of these modalities to our everyday clinical practice may help in dealing with the gray zones where current guidelines are still ineffective for patient selection.

Prevalence of atrial arrhythmia in patients with arrhythmogenic right ventricular cardiomyopathy: a systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND/OBJECTIVES

Little is known about atrial involvement in patients with arrhythmogenic right ventricular cardiomyopathy (ARVC). Recent studies have suggested that atrial arrhythmia, including atrial fibrillation, atrial flutter (AFL), and atrial tachycardia, was common among these patients although the reported prevalence varied considerably across the studies. The current systematic review and meta-analysis was conducted with the aim of comprehensively investigating the prevalence of overall atrial arrhythmia and each atrial arrhythmia subtype in the setting of ARVC by identifying all relevant studies and combining their results together.

METHODS

A comprehensive literature review was conducted by searching for published articles indexed in MEDLINE and EMBASE databases from inception through to 22 September 2019 to identify cohort studies of patients with ARVC that described the prevalence of atrial arrhythmia among the participants. The pooled prevalence across studies was calculated using a random-effect, generic inverse variance method of DerSimonian and Laird with a double arcsine transformation.

RESULTS

A total of 16 cohort studies with 1986 patients with ARVC were included in this meta-analysis. The pooled prevalence of overall atrial arrhythmia among patients with ARVC was 17.9% [95% confidence interval (CI), 13.0-24.0%; I 88%], the pooled prevalence of atrial fibrillation of 12.9% (95% CI, 9.6-17.0%; I 78%), the pooled prevalence of AFL of 5.9% (95% CI, 3.7-9.2%; I 70%), and the pooled prevalence of atrial tachycardia of 7.1% (95% CI, 3.7-13.0%; I 49%).

CONCLUSION

Atrial arrhythmia is common among patients with ARVC with the pooled prevalence of approximately 18%, which is substantially higher than the reported prevalence of atrial arrhythmia in the general population.

Safety and Utility of Cardiopulmonary Exercise Testing in Arrhythmogenic Right Ventricular Cardiomyopathy/Dysplasia

Background

Arrhythmogenic right ventricular cardiomyopathy/dysplasia (ARVC/D) is characterized by high arrhythmic burden and progressive heart failure, which can prompt referral for heart transplantation. Cardiopulmonary exercise testing (CPET) has an established role in risk stratification for advanced heart failure therapies, but has not been described in ARVC/D. This study sought to determine the safety and prognostic utility of CPET in patients with ARVC/D.

Methods and Results

Using the Johns Hopkins ARVC/D Registry, we examined patients with ARVC/D undergoing CPET. Baseline characteristics and transplant‐free survival were compared on the basis of peak oxygen consumption (pVO2) (≤14 or >14 mL/kg per minute) and ventilatory efficiency (Ve/VCO₂ slope ≤34 or >34). Thirty‐eight patients underwent 50 CPETs. There were no sustained arrhythmic events. Twenty‐nine patients achieved a maximal test. Patients with pVO2 ≤14 mL/kg per minute were more often men (P=0.042) compared with patients with pVO2 >14 mL/kg per minute. Patients with Ve/VCO₂ slope >34 tended to have more moderate/severe right ventricular dilation (7/9 [78%] versus 10/26 [38%]; P=0.060) and clinical heart failure (8/9 [89%] versus 13/26 [50%]; P=0.056) compared with patients with Ve/VCO₂ slope ≤34. Patients who underwent heart transplantation were more likely to have clinical heart failure (10/10 [100%] versus 13/28 [46%]; P=0.003). Patients with Ve/VCO₂ slope >34 had worse transplant‐free survival compared with patients with Ve/VCO₂ slope ≤34 (n=35; hazard ratio, 6.57 [95% CI, 1.28–33.72]; log‐rank P=0.010), whereas transplant‐free survival was similar on the basis of pVO2 groups (n=29; hazard ratio, 3.38 [95% CI, 0.75–15.19]; log‐rank P=0.092).

Conclusions

CPET is safe to perform in patients with ARVC/D. Ve/VCO₂ slope may be used for risk stratification and guide referral for heart transplantation in ARVC/D.

Risk stratification for ventricular arrhythmias and sudden cardiac death in arrhythmogenic right ventricular cardiomyopathy: an update

Introduction: Arrhythmogenic right ventricular cardiomyopathy (ARVC) is a genetically determined disease associated with a significant risk of ventricular arrhythmias and sudden cardiac death (SCD). Implantable cardioverter-defibrillators (ICDs) are the only effective preventive measure. Over the past 30 years, much effort has been invested in determining predictors of adverse arrhythmic events in these patients. Areas covered: This review summarizes available evidence on risk stratification for ARVC, with an emphasis on recent research findings. While efforts are ongoing to define risk predictors, several recent publications have synthetized and built on this knowledge base. A recently published meta-analysis has clarified the strongest predictors of ventricular arrhythmias in ARVC, which vary depending on the population included. Three management guidelines/expert consensus documents have integrated the previously described risk predictors into proposed ICD recommendations. Furthermore, a risk prediction model has allowed the integration of multiple risk factors to provide individualized risk prediction and to inform shared-decision making regarding ICD implantation. Expert opinion: Over the past few years, knowledge of risk prediction in ARVC has been consolidated and refined. Further improvements may be made by the considering additional predictors such as exercise and by targeting more specific surrogate outcomes for SCD.

Primary Prevention of Sudden Cardiac Death With Implantable Cardioverter-Defibrillator Therapy in Patients With Arrhythmogenic Right Ventricular Cardiomyopathy

Implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) therapy remains a corner stone of sudden cardiac death (SCD) prevention in patients with arrhythmogenic right ventricular cardiomyopathy (ARVC). We aimed to assess predictors of appropriate ICD therapies in the Scandinavian cohort of ARVC patients who received ICD for primary prevention of SCD. Study group comprised of 79 definite ARVC patients by 2010 Task Force criteria (60% male, age at ICD implant 39 ± 14 years) who were enrolled in the Nordic ARVC Registry and received an ICD for primary SCD prevention. The primary end point of appropriate ICD shock or death from any cause was assessed and compared with 137 definite ARVC patients who received ICD for secondary SCD prevention (74% male, age at ICD implant 42 ± 15 years). In the study group, 38% were ≤35 years of age at baseline, 25% had nonsustained ventricular tachycardia, and 29% had syncope at baseline. Major repolarization abnormality (hazard ratio = 4.00, 95% confidence interval 1.30 to 12.30, p = 0.015) and age ≤35 years (hazard ratio = 4.21, 95% confidence interval 1.49 to 11.85, p = 0.001) independently predicted the primary end point. The outcome did not differ between the primary prevention patients with either of these risk factors and the secondary prevention cohort (2% to 4% annual event rate) whereas patients without risk factors did not have any appropriate ICD shocks during follow-up. In conclusion, young age at ARVC diagnosis and major repolarization abnormality independently predict ICD shocks or death in the primary prevention ICD recipients and associated with the event rate similar to the one observed in the secondary prevention cohort. Our data indicate the benefit of ICD for primary prevention in patients with any of these risk factors.

Predictors of Adverse Outcomes in Patients With Arrhythmogenic Right Ventricular Cardiomyopathy: A Meta-Analysis of Observational Studies

Arrhythmogenic cardiomyopathy (AC) is a hereditary disorder characterized by degeneration of cardiac myocytes and their subsequent replacement by fat and fibrous tissue primarily in the right ventricle. Our study aimed to systematically evaluate the impact of significant demographic, clinical, electrocardiographic, and echocardiographic factors in arrhythmic events in AC patients. MEDLINE and Cochrane library databases were manually searched without year or language restriction or any other limits until July 31, 2017. A pooled odds ratio with 95% confidence intervals was calculated for each of the risk factors. Our search retrieved 26 studies (n = 2680 patients, mean age: 37.9 years old, males: 51.9%) which were included in the quantitative synthesis. The most reliable predicting factors/parameters are the following: (1) male gender, (2) presyncope, (3) left ventricular dysfunction, (4) T-wave inversions in inferior leads, (5) proband status, (6) late potentials, (7) syncope, (8) inducibility at electrophysiological study, (9) right ventricular dysfunction, (10) epsilon waves, and (11) premature ventricular contractions greater than 1000/24 h. On the contrary, family history of sudden cardiac death, palpitations, premature ventricular contractions greater than 500/24 h, and T-wave inversions in right precordial leads fail to determine the outcome in this meta-analysis. In conclusion, multiple risk factors have been associated with arrhythmic events in AC patients. However, larger studies are needed to discriminate those patients who will benefit from implantable cardioverter defibrillators.

A Rare Desmoglein-2 Gene Mutation in Arrhythmogenic Right Ventricular Cardiomyopathy Inciting Incessant Ventricular Fibrillation

A case of a 51-year-old female with history of hypertension and a significant family history of premature coronary artery disease presented to the hospital after cardiac arrest. She successfully completed a targeted temperature management therapy with full neurologic recovery. Her hospital course was complicated by several bouts of ventricular fibrillation (VF) arrest which was rescued by timely defibrillation, high quality cardiorespiratory resuscitation, and administration of antiarrhythmic medications and inotropic agents. An automatic implantable cardioverter defibrillator (AICD) was inserted for secondary prevention of sudden cardiac death (SCD). A targeted genetic testing for idiopathic ventricular fibrillation revealed a mutation in the desmoglein-2 (DSG2) gene involved in arrhythmogenic right ventricular cardiomyopathy (ARVC). Eventually, a ventricular fibrillation radiofrequency ablation prevented recurrence of fatal arrhythmia and its associated symptoms.

Case report of familial sudden cardiac death caused by a DSG2 p.F531C mutation as genetic background when carrying with heterozygous KCNE5 p.D92E/E93X mutation

Background

Sudden cardiac death (SCD) induced by malignant ventricular tachycardia (MVT) among young adults with right ventricular cardiomyopathy/dysplasia (ARVC/D) is a devastating event. Parts of ARVC/D patients have a mutation in genes encoding components of cardiac desmosomes, such as desmoglein-2 (DSG2), plakophilin-2 and desmoplakin.

Case presentation

Here we report a potentially pathogenic mutation in the DSG2 gene, which was identified in a family with ARVC/D using Whole Exome Sequencing (WES) and Sanger Sequencing. In all, Patient III:1 with ARVC/D carried the compound heterozygous mutations of DSG2 p.F531C and KCNE5 p.D92E/E93X, which were both inherited from her mother (II:2), who died of SCD. Carriers of DSG2p.F531C showed various phenotypes, such as ARVC/D, SCD, MVT and dilated cardiomyopathy. For III:1, there were significant low-voltage regions in the inferior-apical, inferior-lateral wall of the right ventricular epicardium and outflow tracts of the right ventricle. Under the guidance of a three-dimensional mapping system, MVT was successfully ablated with an epicardial–endocardial approach targeting for late, double or fragmental potentials after implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) electrical storms. No VT recurrence was observed during the one year of follow-up.

Conclusions

When coexisting with heterozygous KCNE5 p.D92E/E93X, heterozygous DSG2 p.F531C as a genetic background was found to predispose to ARVC/D, SCD and MVT, which were successfully ablated using an epicardial–endocardial approach.

Electronic supplementary material

The online version of this article (10.1186/s12881-018-0580-2) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

Sudden Cardiac Death in Genetic Cardiomyopathies

Sudden cardiac death (SCD) caused by ventricular arrhythmias is common in patients with genetic cardiomyopathies (CMs) including dilated CM, hypertrophic CM, and arrhythmogenic right ventricular CM (ARVC). Phenotypic features can identify individuals at high enough risk to warrant placement of an implantable cardioverter-defibrillator, although risk stratification schemes remain imperfect. Genetic testing is valuable for family cascade screening but with few exceptions (eg, LMNA mutations) do not identify higher risk for SCD. Although randomized trials are lacking, observational data suggest that ICDs can be beneficial. Vigorous exercise can exacerbate ARVC disease progression and increase likelihood of ventricular arrhythmias.

Arrhythmogenic Right Ventricular Cardiomyopathy: Risk Stratification and Indications for Defibrillator Therapy

Arrhythmogenic right ventricular cardiomyopathy (ARVC) is a genetically determined disease which predisposes to life-threatening ventricular arrhythmias. The main goal of ARVC therapy is prevention of sudden cardiac death (SCD). Implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD) is the most effective therapy for interruption of potentially lethal ventricular tachyarrhythmias. Despite its life-saving potential, ICD implantation is associated with a high rate of complications and significant impact on quality of life. Accurate risk stratification is needed to identify individuals who most benefit from the therapy. While there is general agreement that patients with a history of cardiac arrest or hemodynamically unstable ventricular tachycardia are at high risk of SCD and needs an ICD, indications for primary prevention remain a matter of debate. The article reviews the available scientific evidence and guidelines that may help to stratify the arrhythmic risk of ARVC patients and guide ICD implantation. Other therapeutic strategies, either alternative or additional to ICD, will be also addressed.

Arrhythmogenic right ventricular cardiomyopathy: ECG progression over time and correlation with long-term follow-up

AIMS

Arrhythmogenic right ventricular cardiomyopathy (ARVC) is an inherited heart muscle disease primarily affecting the right ventricle and potentially causing sudden death in young people. Our aims are to analyse the progression over time of electrocardiographic (ECG) findings and to investigate their prognostic impact.

METHODS

Sixty-eight patients (69% men; age 31 ± 19 years) with ARVC diagnosis were followed up for a mean of 17 ± 8 years. Follow-up included baseline ECG, 24-h Holter ECG, signal-averaged ECG, stress test, echocardiography, cardiac magnetic resonance and electrophysiologic study.

RESULTS

During follow-up 12 (18%) patients died: three of sudden cardiac death (SCD), four of end-stage heart failure and five of noncardiac causes. Aborted SCD occurred in 7 (10%) patients, syncope in 31 (46%), sustained ventricular tachycardia in 43 (63%), heart failure in 18 (26%), atrial fibrillation in 16 (24%) and 3 (4%) patients underwent heart transplant. Twenty-four (35%) patients had implantable cardiac defibrillator (15 and 5 of them received both appropriate and inappropriate interventions, respectively and 7 experienced device-related complications). Of the ECG parameters registered at the enrolment, left anterior fascicular block (P = 0.001), QRS duration in lead 1 (P < 0.001), Epsilon wave (P < 0.001), T wave inversion in V4-V5-V6 (P = 0.012, P = 0.001 and P = 0.006) and low QRS voltages (P = 0.001) progressed over time. At multivariate analysis Epsilon wave (odds ratio 20.9, confidence interval 95% 1.8-239.8, P = 0.015) was the only predictor of the composite endpoint of SCD, heart failure-related death or heart transplant.

CONCLUSION

Apart from playing a pivotal role in ARVC diagnosis, a simple ECG feature such as Epsilon wave is a marker of poor prognosis.

Arrhythmogenic cardiomyopathy

Arrhythmogenic cardiomyopathy (AC) is a heart muscle disease clinically characterized by life-threatening ventricular arrhythmias and pathologically by an acquired and progressive dystrophy of the ventricular myocardium with fibro-fatty replacement. Due to an estimated prevalence of 1:2000-1:5000, AC is listed among rare diseases. A familial background consistent with an autosomal-dominant trait of inheritance is present in most of AC patients; recessive variants have also been reported, either or not associated with palmoplantar keratoderma and woolly hair. AC-causing genes mostly encode major components of the cardiac desmosome and up to 50 % of AC probands harbor mutations in one of them. Mutations in non-desmosomal genes have been also described in a minority of AC patients, predisposing to the same or an overlapping disease phenotype. Compound/digenic heterozygosity was identified in up to 25 % of AC-causing desmosomal gene mutation carriers, in part explaining the phenotypic variability. Abnormal trafficking of intercellular proteins to the intercalated discs of cardiomyocytes and Wnt/beta catenin and Hippo signaling pathways have been implicated in disease pathogenesis.

AC is a major cause of sudden death in the young and in athletes. The clinical picture may include a sub-clinical phase; an overt electrical disorder; and right ventricular or biventricular pump failure. Ventricular fibrillation can occur at any stage. Genotype-phenotype correlation studies led to identify biventricular and dominant left ventricular variants, thus supporting the use of the broader term AC.

Since there is no “gold standard” to reach the diagnosis of AC, multiple categories of diagnostic information have been combined and the criteria recently updated, to improve diagnostic sensitivity while maintaining specificity. Among diagnostic tools, contrast enhanced cardiac magnetic resonance is playing a major role in detecting left dominant forms of AC, even preceding morpho-functional abnormalities. The main differential diagnoses are idiopathic right ventricular outflow tract tachycardia, myocarditis, sarcoidosis, dilated cardiomyopathy, right ventricular infarction, congenital heart diseases with right ventricular overload and athlete heart. A positive genetic test in the affected AC proband allows early identification of asymptomatic carriers by cascade genetic screening of family members. Risk stratification remains a major clinical challenge and antiarrhythmic drugs, catheter ablation and implantable cardioverter defibrillator are the currently available therapeutic tools. Sport disqualification is life-saving, since effort is a major trigger not only of electrical instability but also of disease onset and progression. We review the current knowledge of this rare cardiomyopathy, suggesting a flowchart for primary care clinicians and geneticists.

Pharmacotherapy and other therapeutic modalities for managing Arrhythmogenic Right Ventricular Cardiomyopathy

Arrhythmogenic Right Ventricular Cardiomyopathy (ARVC) is a genetically determined rare cardiomyopathy (1 in 5000 to 1 in 2000 in the general population), which can lead to ventricular arrhythmias and sudden death (SD). The classic form of the disease has a predilection for the right ventricle (RV), but recognition of left-dominant and biventricular variants led to the broader term "Arrhythmogenic Cardiomyopathy". The disease affects men more frequently than women and becomes clinically overt usually from the second to the fourth decade of life. Treatment consists of restriction of physical exercise, antiarrhythmic drugs, catheter ablation and ICD implantation. These treatments have the potential to change the natural history of the disease by protecting against SD and offering a good-quality and nearly normal life-expectancy. Antiarrhythmic drugs play an important role in terms of reduction of both the number and the complexity of arrhythmias, but they do not reduce the risk of SD. The results of catheter ablation are poor because of the high rate of VT recurrence. ICD should be reserved to selected patients after an accurate risk stratification. The clinical challenge is to improve risk stratification for better identification of those patients who most benefit from the above therapies. Unfortunately, a curative therapy is not yet available.

Arrhythmogenic Right Ventricular Cardiomyopathy - Antiarrhythmic Therapy

Arrhythmogenic right ventricular cardiomyopathy is an inherited disorder characterised by progressive replacement of ventricular myocardium by fibrofatty tissue that predisposes patients to ventricular arrhythmias, heart failure and sudden death. Treatment focuses on slowing disease progression, decreasing the burden of arrhythmias and preventing sudden cardiac death through placement of implantable cardioverter-defibrillators (ICDs), catheter ablation and the use of antiarrhythmic medication. Although only ICDs have been demonstrated to affect patient mortality, antiarrhythmic medications are important adjuncts in reducing patient morbidity and inappropriate ICD therapy. Of the individual antiarrhythmic agents available, sotalol, beta-blockers and amiodarone appear to be most effective in arrhythmia suppression. Calcium-channel blockers may be effective in selected patients. For patients who are refractory to single agent therapy, combination therapy may be considered with the most effective combinations being sotalol + flecainide and amiodarone + beta-blockers.

The spectrum of epidemiology underlying sudden cardiac death

Sudden cardiac death (SCD) from cardiac arrest is a major international public health problem accounting for an estimated 15%-20% of all deaths. Although resuscitation rates are generally improving throughout the world, the majority of individuals who experience a sudden cardiac arrest will not survive. SCD most often develops in older adults with acquired structural heart disease, but it also rarely occurs in the young, where it is more commonly because of inherited disorders. Coronary heart disease is known to be the most common pathology underlying SCD, followed by cardiomyopathies, inherited arrhythmia syndromes, and valvular heart disease. During the past 3 decades, declines in SCD rates have not been as steep as for other causes of coronary heart disease deaths, and there is a growing fraction of SCDs not due to coronary heart disease and ventricular arrhythmias, particularly among certain subsets of the population. The growing heterogeneity of the pathologies and mechanisms underlying SCD present major challenges for SCD prevention, which are magnified further by a frequent lack of recognition of the underlying cardiac condition before death. Multifaceted preventative approaches, which address risk factors in seemingly low-risk and known high-risk populations, will be required to decrease the burden of SCD. In this Compendium, we review the wide-ranging spectrum of epidemiology underlying SCD within both the general population and in high-risk subsets with established cardiac disease placing an emphasis on recent global trends, remaining uncertainties, and potential targeted preventive strategies.

Treatment of Arrhythmogenic Right Ventricular Cardiomyopathy/Dysplasia: An International Task Force Consensus Statement

Supplemental Digital Content is available in the text.

Clinical Presentation, Long-Term Follow-Up, and Outcomes of 1001 Arrhythmogenic Right Ventricular Dysplasia/Cardiomyopathy Patients and Family Members

Background—

Arrhythmogenic right ventricular dysplasia/cardiomyopathy (ARVD/C) is a progressive cardiomyopathy. We aimed to define long-term outcome in a transatlantic cohort of 1001 individuals.

Methods and Results—

Clinical and genetic characteristics and follow-up data of ARVD/C index-patients (n=439, fulfilling of 2010 criteria in all) and family members (n=562) were assessed. Mutations were identified in 276 index-patients (63%). Index-patients presented predominantly with sustained ventricular arrhythmias (268; 61%). During a median follow-up of 7 years, 301 of the 416 index-patients presenting alive (72%) experienced sustained ventricular arrhythmias. Sudden cardiac death during follow-up occurred more frequently among index-patients without an implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (10/63, 16% versus 2/335, 0.6%). Overall, cardiac mortality and the need for cardiac transplantation were low (6% and 4%, respectively). Clinical characteristics and outcomes were similar in index-patients with and without mutations, as well as in those with familial and nonfamilial ARVD/C. ARVD/C was diagnosed in 207 family members (37%). Symptoms at first evaluation correlated with disease expression. Family members with mutations were more likely to meet Task Force Criteria for ARVD/C (40% versus 18%), experience sustained ventricular arrhythmias (11% versus 1%), and die from a cardiac cause (2% versus 0%) than family members without mutations.

Conclusions—

Long-term outcome was favorable in diagnosed and treated ARVD/C index-patients and family members. Outcome in index-patients was modulated by implantable cardioverter-defibrillator implantation, but not by mutation status and familial background of disease. One third of family members developed ARVD/C. Outcome in family members was determined by symptoms at first evaluation and mutations.

Electrocardiographic features of disease progression in arrhythmogenic right ventricular cardiomyopathy/dysplasia

BACKGROUND

Arrhythmogenic right ventricular cardiomyopathy/dysplasia (ARVC/D) is considered a progressive cardiomyopathy. However, data on the clinical features of disease progression are limited. The aim of this study was to assess 12-lead surface electrocardiographic (ECG) changes during long-term follow-up, and to compare these findings with echocardiographic data in our large cohort of patients with ARVC/D.

METHODS

Baseline and follow-up ECGs of 111 patients from three tertiary care centers in Switzerland were systematically analyzed with digital calipers by two blinded observers, and correlated with findings from transthoracic echocardiography.

RESULTS

The median follow-up was 4 years (IQR 1.9-9.2 years). ECG progression was significant for epsilon waves (baseline 14% vs. follow-up 31%, p = 0.01) and QRS duration (111 ms vs. 114 ms, p = 0.04). Six patients with repolarization abnormalities according to the 2010 Task Force Criteria at baseline did not display these criteria at follow-up, whereas in all patients with epsilon waves at baseline these depolarization abnormalities also remained at follow-up. T wave inversions in inferior leads were common (36% of patients at baseline), and were significantly associated with major repolarization abnormalities (p = 0.02), extensive echocardiographic right ventricular involvement (p = 0.04), T wave inversions in lateral precordial leads (p = 0.05), and definite ARVC/D (p = 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

Our data supports the concept that ARVC/D is generally progressive, which can be detected by 12-lead surface ECG. Repolarization abnormalities may disappear during the course of the disease. Furthermore, the presence of T wave inversions in inferior leads is common in ARVC/D.