Intravenous myocardial contrast echocardiography predicts regional and global left ventricular remodelling after acute myocardial infarction: comparison with low dose dobutamine stress echocardiography

Multimodality imaging of myocardial viability: an expert consensus document from the European Association of Cardiovascular Imaging (EACVI)

In clinical decision making, myocardial viability is defined as myocardium in acute or chronic coronary artery disease and other conditions with contractile dysfunction but maintained metabolic and electrical function, having the potential to improve dysfunction upon revascularization or other therapy. Several pathophysiological conditions may coexist to explain this phenomenon. Cardiac imaging may allow identification of myocardial viability through different principles, with the purpose of prediction of therapeutic response and selection for treatment. This expert consensus document reviews current insight into the underlying pathophysiology and available methods for assessing viability. In particular the document reviews contemporary viability imaging techniques, including stress echocardiography, single photon emission computed tomography, positron emission tomography, cardiovascular magnetic resonance, and computed tomography and provides clinical recommendations for how to standardize these methods in terms of acquisition and interpretation. Finally, it presents clinical scenarios where viability assessment is clinically useful.

Updated knowledge and practical implementations of stress echocardiography in ischemic and non-ischemic cardiac diseases: an expert consensus of the Working Group of Echocardiography of the Hellenic Society of Cardiology

Stress echocardiography (SE) is a well-established and valid technique, widely-used for the diagnostic evaluation of patients with ischemic and non-ischemic cardiac diseases. This statement of the Echocardiography Working Group of the Hellenic Society of Cardiology summarizes the consensus of the writing group regarding the applications of SE, based on the expertise of their members and on a critical review of current medical literature. The main objectives of the consensus document include a comprehensive review of SE methodology and training, focusing on the preparation, the protocols used and the analysis of the SE images and an updated, evidence-based knowledge about SE applications on ischemic and non-ischemic heart diseases, such as in cardiomyopathies, heart failure and valvular heart disease.

Clinical practice of contrast echocardiography: recommendation by the European Association of Cardiovascular Imaging (EACVI) 2017

Contrast echocardiography is widely used in cardiology. It is applied to improve image quality, reader confidence and reproducibility both for assessing left ventricular (LV) structure and function at rest and for assessing global and regional function in stress echocardiography. The use of contrast in echocardiography has now extended beyond cardiac structure and function assessment to evaluation of perfusion both of the myocardium and of the intracardiac structures. Safety of contrast agents have now been addressed in large patient population and these studies clearly established its excellent safety profile. This document, based on clinical trials, randomized and multicentre studies and published clinical experience, has established clear recommendations for the use of contrast in various clinical conditions with evidence-based protocols.

Clinical usefulness of low-dose dobutamine stress real-time myocardial contrast echocardiography for detection of viable myocardium

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate and compare the diagnostic accuracy of semi-quantitative and quantitative real-time myocardial contrast echocardiography (RT-MCE) with low-dose dobutamine stress echocardiography (LD-DSE) in detecting viable myocardium.

METHODS

Thirty in-patients with coronary artery disease and regional wall motion abnormalities underwent RT-MCE without and with LD-DSE. Percutaneous coronary intervention was performed within 1 week after RT-MCE in all patients. Myocardial perfusion was evaluated from A, β, and A × β indices from microbubble replenishment curves. The motion of each myocardium segment was observed by routine echocardiography 1, 3, and 6 months after percutaneous coronary intervention and its improvement over time was the criterion of viable myocardium.

RESULTS

RT-MCE sensitivity and specificity for the assessment of viable myocardium were 71.7% and 69.8%, rising to 81.3% and 76.7% (p < 0.05) when combined with LD-DSE. Using quantitative RT-MCE with cutoff values of A, β, and A × β, the sensitivity and specificity were 75.6%, 78.8%, 82.1%, and 82.4%, 77.9%, 78.6%, respectively. When combined with LD-DSE, the sensitivity and specificity were 86.0%, 83.2%; 88.9% and 84.1%; 89.6%, 79.9%, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Quantitative RT-MCE analysis yielded higher sensitivity and specificity than semi-quantitative RT-MCE with or without LD-DSE for the detection of viable myocardium.

Myocardial perfusion imaging with contrast ultrasound

This report reviews the development and clinical application of myocardial perfusion imaging with myocardial contrast echocardiography (MCE). This includes the development of microbubble formulations that permit the detection of left ventricular contrast from venous injection and the imaging techniques that have been invented to detect the transit of these microbubbles through the microcirculation. The methods used to quantify myocardial perfusion during a continuous infusion of microbubbles are described. A review of the clinical studies that have examined the clinical utility of myocardial perfusion imaging with MCE during rest and stress echocardiography is then presented. The limitations of MCE are also discussed.

Rest and low-dose dobutamine Tc-99m-mibi gated-SPECT for early prediction of left ventricular remodeling after a first reperfused myocardial infarction

BACKGROUND

Left ventricular (LV) remodeling after myocardial infarction (MI) occurs frequently despite successful percutaneaous coronary intervention (PCI) but cannot be predicted by simple clinical parameters.

METHODS AND RESULTS

This prospective study tested the value of rest and low-dose dobutamine (LDD) Tc-99m-mibi gated-SPECT for early prediction of LV remodeling in patients treated by PCI in the acute phase of a first MI. Infarct size, infarct severity, regional wall motion abnormality (RWMA), and wall thickening score (WTs) were assessed at rest and on LDD by SPECT 6 +/- 2 days after MI in 40 patients. LV remodeling was defined as 20% increase at 6 months in LV end-diastolic volume assessed by MRI. Infarct severity at rest showed the best predictive values for left remodeling (PPV: 86%, NPV: 88%, accuracy: 88%; AUC: 0.750). Functional parameters at neither rest nor LDD study further improved predictive values of the SPECT imaging.

CONCLUSIONS

Infarct severity assessed by Tc-99m-sestamibi gated-SPECT performed in the subacute phase of a first STEMI predicts LV remodeling with high accuracy without incremental value nor of functional parameters nor of LDD. Therefore, our results suggest that LDD should not be used in this setting.

Contrast echocardiography: an update

Despite the advent of tissue harmonic imaging, echocardiography fails to produce diagnostically useful images in a significant proportion of patients. This often leads to inaccurate assessment of left ventricular function, necessitating the use of other, more expensive and laborious imaging techniques, purely for diagnostic purposes. This has facilitated the development of microbubbles, which together with ultrasound, produce opacification of the left ventricular cavity, thus enabling clear visualization and accurate quantification of left ventricular function. Contrast agents have also facilitated the development of myocardial contrast echocardiography. This allows assessment of cardiac anatomy, function, and perfusion, all in one sitting, by the bedside. Contrast ultrasound imaging also has now been applied to newer techniques (eg, real-time three-dimensional echocardiography) and is also showing promise in other cardiovascular scans (eg, carotid ultrasound for intima-media thickness). Thus, contrast agents play a pivotal role in noninvasive cardiovascular imaging and its use worldwide is likely to increase.

Evaluation of the left ventricular remodeling in patients with myocardial infarction after revascularization with intravenous real-time myocardial contrast echocardiography

In order to evaluate the left ventricular remodeling in patients with myocardial infarction after revascularization with intravenous real-time myocardial contrast echocardiography (RT-MCE), intravenous RT-MCE was performed on 20 patients with myocardial infarction before coronary revascularization. Follow-up echocardiography was performed 3 months after coronary revascularization. Segmental wall motion was assessed using 18-segment LV model and classified as normal, hypokinesis, akinesis and dyskinesis. Myocardial perfusion was assessed by visual interpretation and divided into 3 conditions: homogeneous opacification=1; partial or reduced opacification or subendocardial contrast defect=2; contrast defect=3. Myocardial perfusion score index (MPSI) was calculated by dividing the total sum of contrast score by the total number of segments with abnormal wall motion. Twenty patients were classified into 2 groups according to the MPSI: MPSI<or=1.5 as good myocardial perfusion, MPSI>1.5 as poor myocardial perfusion. To assess the left ventricular remodeling, the following comparisons were carried out: (1) Comparisons of left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF), left ventricular end-systolic volume (LVESV) and left ventricular end-diastolic volume (LVEDV) before and 3 months after revascularization in two groups; (2) Comparisons of LVEF, LVESV and LVEDV pre-revascularization between two groups and comparisons of these 3 months post-revascularization between two groups; (3) Comparisons of the differences in LVEF, LVESV and LVEDV between 3 months post-and pre-revascularization (DeltaLVEF, DeltaLVESV and DeltaLVEDV) between two groups; (4) The linear regression analysis between DeltaLVEF, DeltaLVESV, DeltaLVEDV and MPSI. The results showed that the LVEF obtained 3 months after revascularization in patients with MPSI>1.5 was obviously lower than that in those with MPSI<or=1.5. The LVEDV obtained 3 months post-revascularization in patients with MPSI>1.5 was obviously larger than that in those with MPSI<or=1.5 (P=0.002 and 0.04). The differences in DeltaLVEF and DeltaLVEDV between patients with MPSI>1.5 and those with MPSI<or=1.5 were significant (P=0.002 and 0.001, respectively). Linear regression analysis revealed that MPSI had a negative correlation with DeltaLVEF and a positive correlation with DeltaLVESV, DeltaLVEDV (P=0.004, 0.008, and 0.016, respectively). It was concluded that RT-MCE could accurately evaluate the left ventricular remodeling in patients with myocardial infarction after revascularization.

Contrast echocardiography: evidence for clinical use

The failure of echocardiography to give diagnostically useful information in a significant proportion of patients has led to the development of specific contrast agents to enhance imaging. Suitable contrast media must have the ability to modify ultrasound characteristics, be capable of crossing the pulmonary capillary bed, show stability over the duration of a procedure, offer low blood solubility with low toxicity and be rapidly eliminated. The current generation of ultrasound contrast agents comprises microbubbles of a high molecular-weight gas encapsulated in a shell of phospholipid or protein. A review of the clinical evidence shows that these agents are clinically effective in enhancing echocardiographic imaging. They enable the rescue of failed procedures, often sparing patients from invasive tests, but appear not to add to the burden of side effects. Indeed, the benefits of using contrast agents in stress echocardiography have been recommended in recently published American Society of Echocardiography guidelines. Myocardial contrast echocardiography has now developed to the stage where assessment of myocardial perfusion for the detection of coronary artery disease is possible with the same diagnostic accuracy as radionuclide imaging. However, in comparison with the latter technique, it is less expensive, is more portable, and avoids the use of ionizing radiation. It is precisely the ability of myocardial contrast echocardiography to simultaneously assess function and perfusion at the bedside that has given it a unique role in clinical practice. This review provides an overview of the clinical evidence supporting the efficacy of contrast echocardiography in the assessment of myocardial structure, function, and perfusion.

Myocardial Contrast Echocardiography Evolving as a Clinically Feasible Technique for Accurate, Rapid, and Safe Assessment of Myocardial Perfusion

Intravenous myocardial contrast echocardiography (MCE) is a recently developed technique for assessment of myocardial perfusion. Up to now, many studies have demonstrated that the sensitivity and specificity of qualitative assessment of myocardial perfusion by MCE in patients with acute and chronic ischemic heart disease are comparable with other techniques such as cardiac scintigraphy and dobutamine stress echocardiography. Furthermore, quantitative parameters of myocardial perfusion derived from MCE correlate well with the current clinical standard for this purpose, positron emission tomography. Myocardial contrast echocardiography provides a promising and valuable tool for assessment of myocardial perfusion. Although MCE has been primarily performed for medical research, its implementation in routine clinical care is evolving. This article is intended to give an overview of the current status of MCE.

Assessment of resting perfusion defects in patients with acute myocardial infarction: comparison of myocardial contrast echocardiography, combined first-pass/delayed contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging and 99mTC-sestamibi SPECT

BACKGROUND

Information on the accuracy of both magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and myocardial contrast echocardiography (MCE) for the identification of perfusion defects in patients with acute myocardial infarction is limited. We evaluated the accuracy of MRI and MCE, using Single Photon Emission Computed Tomography (SPECT) imaging as reference technique.

METHODS

Fourteen consecutive patients underwent MCE, MRI and 99mTc-MIBI SPECT after acute myocardial infarction to assess myocardial perfusion. MCE was performed by Harmonic Power Angio Mode, with end-systolic triggering 1:4, using i.v. injection of Levovist. First-pass and delayed enhancement MRI was obtained after i.v administration of Gadolinium-DTPA. At MCE, homogeneous perfusion was considered as normal and absent or "patchy" perfusion as abnormal. At MRI, homogenous contrast enhancement was defined as normal whereas hypoenhancement at first-pass followed by hyperenhancement or persisting hypoenhancement in delayed images was defined as abnormal.

RESULTS

At MCE 153 (68%) of segments were suitable for analysis compared to 220 (98%) segments at MRI (p<0.001). Sensitivity, specificity and accuracy of MCE for segmental perfusion defects in these 153 segments were 83, 73 and 77%, respectively. Sensitivity, specificity and accuracy of MRI were 63, 82, and 77%, respectively. MCE and MRI showed a moderate agreement with SPECT (k: 0.52 and 0.46, respectively). The agreement between MCE and MRI was better (k: 0.67) that the one of each technique with SPECT.

CONCLUSION

MCE and MRI may be clinically useful in the assessment of perfusion defects in patients with acute myocardial infarction, even thought MCE imaging may be difficult to obtain in a considerable proportion of segments when the Intermittent Harmonic Angio Mode is used.

Assessment of myocardial perfusion with real-time myocardial contrast echocardiography: methodology and clinical applications

Real-time myocardial contrast perfusion imaging (RTMCI) with echocardiography is a promising technique for evaluation of patients with known or suspected coronary artery disease. The technique is based on the utilization of small (<10 mum) microbubbles, which are capable of crossing the pulmonary circulation after intravenous injection. Unlike radioactive isotopes, which are taken actively or diffuse passively in the myocytes, myocardial contrast agents remain extracellularly in the capillaries and present a measure of the myocardial capillary blood volume and microvascular integrity. RTMCI has been shown to be a safe and feasible method for the assessment of myocardial perfusion at rest and with pharmacologic stress. Recent studies have shown the value of RTMCI with dobutamine stress in improving overall and regional detection of coronary artery disease and detecting of abnormalities at submaximal stress, therefore improving sensitivity in patients who are unable to achieve the target heart rate. The advantages of the technique include the ability to assess perfusion at bedside in one setting, simultaneous assessment of myocardial function, shorter imaging time, no need for ionizing irradiation, immediate availability of the results, and the ability to determine the ischemic threshold. Recent studies have shown that RTMCI improves the prognostic utility of standard dobutamine stress in addition to wall motion analysis. Patients with normal perfusion had a better outcome than those with normal wall motion. The combination of abnormal wall motion and perfusion identified patients at greatest risk of death and nonfatal myocardial infarction. Perfusion abnormalities were also shown to predict short-term cardiac events in patients presenting to the emergency department with chest pain and no ST-segment elevation. Refinement of imaging techniques is expected to improve the specificity of RTMCI, particularly in differentiating true perfusion defects from artifacts. This review will discuss the physiologic basis, methodology, clinical utility, and limitations of RTMCI in the assessment of patients with known or suspected coronary artery disease.