Clinicopathological significance of HER2/neu genetic heterogeneity in HER2/neu non-amplified invasive breast carcinomas and its concurrent axillary metastasis

Targeting HER2 heterogeneity in breast and gastrointestinal cancers

About 20% of breast and gastric cancers and 3% of colorectal carcinomas overexpress the human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) and are sensitive to HER2-directed agents. The expression of HER2 may differ within the same tumoral lesion (spatial intralesional heterogeneity), from different tumor locations (spatial interlesional heterogeneity), and throughout treatments (temporal heterogeneity). Spatial and temporal heterogeneity may impact on response and resistance to HER2-targeting agents and its prevalence and predictive role changes across HER2-overexpressing solid tumors. Therefore, the definition and the characterization of HER2 heterogeneity pose many challenges and its implementation as a reproducible predictive biomarker would help in guiding treatment modulation.

Emerging Landscape of Targeted Therapy of Breast Cancers With Low Human Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor 2 Protein Expression

CONTEXT.—

Human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) status in breast cancer is currently classified as negative or positive for selecting patients for anti-HER2 targeted therapy. The evolution of the HER2 status has included a new HER2-low category defined as an HER2 immunohistochemistry score of 1+ or 2+ without gene amplification. This new category opens the door to a targetable HER2-low breast cancer population for which new treatments may be effective.

OBJECTIVE.—

To review the current literature on the emerging category of breast cancers with low HER2 protein expression, including the clinical, histopathologic, and molecular features, and outline the clinical trials and best practice recommendations for identifying HER2-low-expressing breast cancers by immunohistochemistry.

DATA SOURCES.—

We conducted a literature review based on peer-reviewed original articles, review articles, regulatory communications, ongoing and past clinical trials identified through ClinicalTrials.gov, and the authors' practice experience.

CONCLUSIONS.—

The availability of new targeted therapy potentially effective for patients with breast cancers with low HER2 protein expression requires multidisciplinary recognition. In particular, pathologists need to recognize and identify this category to allow the optimal selection of patients for targeted therapy.

HER2-low metastases of HER2-negative primary tumors: a single institution analysis of intertumoral and internodal heterogeneity in node-positive breast cancer

Objective

HER2 status in breast cancer is an essential parameter in individual therapeutic decision-making and is routinely assessed in primary tumors in accordance with international recommendations. Reports of HER2 heterogeneity raise the question of basing treatment decisions on HER2 status in metastases, if present. We investigated the degree and clinical implications of HER2 heterogeneity in lymph node-positive breast cancer. Because of recent recognition of therapeutic opportunities in this group of tumors, we especially focused on cases involving low-level HER2 expression.

Methods

The HER2 status of primary tumors and of corresponding lymph node metastases was determined in archived material at the protein and gene levels using the gene- protein assay and interpreted in accordance with 2018 ASCO/CAP criteria. HER2-low status was defined as protein expression levels 1+ or 2+ with negative amplification status.

Results

We analyzed a series of 43 cases of primary infiltrating breast cancer, each with at least two axillary nodes harboring macrometastases (>2 mm), in total 206 such nodes. In 7% of cases, we detected intertumoral HER2 heterogeneity. Three of nine HER2-positive primary tumors were associated with HER2-negative metastases. No cases with HER2-negative primary tumors had HER2-positive metastases, but 55% (6/11) of HER2 0 primary tumors had HER2 1+ and/or 2+ metastases, and 19% (3/16) HER2 1+ cases had exclusively HER2 0 metastases. All metastases in HER2 2+ cases showed HER2-low protein expression levels. Internodal HER2 heterogeneity at low protein expression levels (presence of HER2 0, HER2 1+, and/or HER2 2+ metastatic deposits within the same axilla) was seen in 40% (17/43) of cases. We found no statistically significant association between HER2 heterogeneity and other tumor-related parameters. Survival data indicated worse outcomes in the HER2-low group compared with the rest of the cohort.

Conclusion

Our results indicate a substantial instability of HER2 protein expression, leading to considerable intertumoral and internodal HER2 heterogeneity in lymph node-positive breast carcinomas. This heterogeneity is particularly relevant in HER2-low tumors in which the corrective effects of HER2 gene copy number analysis definitionally is absent. Our findings suggest that determining HER2 status in metastatic lymph nodes may generate relevant information for therapeutic decision-making.

HER2 Intratumoral Heterogeneity in Breast Cancer, an Evolving Concept

Amplification and/or overexpression of human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) in breast cancer is associated with an adverse prognosis. The introduction of anti-HER2 targeted therapy has dramatically improved the clinical outcomes of patients with HER2-positive breast cancer. Unfortunately, a significant number of patients eventually relapse and develop distant metastasis. HER2 intratumoral heterogeneity (ITH) has been reported to be associated with poor prognosis in patients with anti-HER2 targeted therapies and was proposed to be a potential mechanism for anti-HER2 resistance. In this review, we described the current definition, common types of HER2 ITH in breast cancer, the challenge in interpretation of HER2 status in cases showing ITH and the clinical applications of anti-HER2 agents in breast cancer showing heterogeneous HER2 expression. Digital image analysis has emerged as an objective and reproducible scoring method and its role in the assessment of HER2 status with ITH remains to be demonstrated.

HER2 Low Breast Cancer: A New Subtype or a Trojan for Cytotoxic Drug Delivery?

Despite the great progress made in the understanding of the biological behavior of certain types of invasive breast cancer, there is still no single histological or molecular classification that encompasses such diversity and accurately predicts the clinical course of distinct breast cancer subtypes. The long-lasting classification of breast cancer as HER2-positive vs. HER2-negative has recently come into question with the discovery of new antibody drug conjugates (ADC), which are proven to be remarkably efficient in treating HER2-low breast cancer. The HER2-low paradigm has challenged the traditional understanding of HER2 overexpression and emphasized the need for more robust HER2 testing in order to encompass HER2 intratumoral heterogeneity and spatial distribution more accurately. It is yet to be seen if low HER2 will remain merely a marker of HER2-equipped tumors targetable with ADCs or if distinctive molecular and phenotypic groups within HER2-low tumors will eventually be discerned.

Digital image analysis and assisted reading of the HER2 score display reduced concordance: pitfalls in the categorisation of HER2-low breast cancer

AIMS

Digital image analysis (DIA) is used increasingly as an assisting tool to evaluate biomarkers, including human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) in invasive breast cancer (BC). DIA can assist pathologists in HER2 evaluation by presenting quantitative information about the HER2 staining in APP assisted reading (AR). Concurrently, the HER2-low category (HER2-1+/2+ without HER2 gene amplification) has gained prominence due to newly developed antibody-drug conjugates. However, major inter- and intraobserver variability have been observed for the entity. The present quality assurance study investigated the concordance between DIA and AR in clinical use, especially concerning the HER2-low category.

METHODS AND RESULTS

HER2 immunohistochemistry (IHC) in 761 tumours from 727 patients was evaluated in tissue microarray (TMA) cores by DIA (Visiopharm HER2-CONNECT) and AR. Overall concordance between HER2-scores were 73% (n = 552, weighted-κ: 0.66), and 88% (n = 669, weighted-κ: 0.70), when combining HER2-0/1+. A total of 205 scores were discordant by one category, while four were discordant by two categories. A heterogeneous HER2 pattern was relatively common in the discordant cases and a pitfall in the categorisation of HER2-low BC. AR more commonly reassigned a lower HER2 score (from HER2-1+ to HER2-0) within the HER2-low subgroup (n = 624) compared with DIA.

CONCLUSION

DIA and AR display moderate agreement with heterogeneous and aberrant staining, representing a source of discordance and a pitfall in the evaluation of HER2.

Novel markers in breast pathology

Breast pathology is an ever-expanding database of information which includes markers, or biomarkers, that detect or help treat the disease as prognostic or predictive information. This review focuses on these aspects of biomarkers which are grounded in immunohistochemistry, liquid biopsies and next-generation sequencing.

HER2-low breast cancer: Novel detections and treatment advances

Breast cancer (BC), which has the highest cancer incidence in women, seriously threatens women's health. Since human epidermal growth factor receptor-2 (HER2) characterization, breast cancer treatment has entered an era of individualized targeted therapy. With the emergence of anti-HER2 targeting agents, monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) and tyrosine kinase inhibitors have considerably improved the prognosis of HER2-positive BC. However, HER2-low BC, accounting for 45-55% of BC patients, is less likely to benefit from conventional HER2-targeting mAbs. The growing success of the new generation of drugs, especially promising HER2-directed antibody-drug conjugates, has changed the treatment landscape for patients with HER2-low BC, leading to a research boom. HER-2-low BC is a heterogeneous entity, and there many areas remain to be explored. In this article, we review the literature on HER2-low BC, mainly focusing on its detection assays, clinicopathological profiles and treatment landscape, and hopefully provide insight into future perspectives.

Refining the definition of HER2-low class in invasive breast cancer

BACKGROUND

Emerging evidence indicates that breast cancer (BC) patients whose tumours express HER2 protein without HER2 gene amplification (HER2-low), can benefit from antibody-drug conjugates (ADC). However, the current definition of HER2-low BC remains incomplete with low rates of concordance. This study aims to refine HER2-low definition with emphasis on distinguishing HER2 score 0 from score 1+ to identify patients who are eligible for ADC.

METHODS

A BC cohort (n = 363) with HER2 IHC scores 0, 1+ and 2+ (without HER2 gene amplification) and available HER2 mRNA was included. HER2 staining intensity, pattern and subcellular localisation were reassessed. Artificial neural network analysis was applied to cluster the cohort and to distinguish HER2 score 0 from 1+. Reproducibility and reliability of the refined criteria were tested.

RESULTS

HER2 IHC score 1+ was refined as membranous staining in invasive cells as either: (1) faint intensity in ≥ 20% of cells regardless the circumferential completeness, (2) weak complete staining in ≤ 10%, (3) weak incomplete staining in > 10% and (4) moderate incomplete staining in ≤ 10%. Based on this, 63% of the HER2-negative cases were reclassified as positive (HER2-low). The refined score showed perfect observer agreement compared to the moderate agreement in the original clinical scores. Similar results were generated when the refined score was applied on the independent BC cohorts. A proposal to refine the definition of other HER2 classes is presented.

CONCLUSION

This study refined the definition of HER2-low BC based on correlation with HER2 mRNA and distinguished between HER2 IHC score 1+ and score 0 tumours.

Digital Imaging Correlation of Immunohistochemistry and Fluorescence in Situ Hybridization in Breast Carcinoma Cases with HER2 Genetic Heterogeneity

Genetic Heterogeneity (GH) is a rare but important event in evaluation of HER2 amplification status. We investigated whether HER2 FISH Genetic Heterogeneity (GH) correlated with increased protein expression by immunohistochemistry (IHC) and/or morphologic features using image analyses. Retrospective search of HER2 FISH GH cases 2016-2020 was performed. Cases with both FISH and IHC slides available were considered eligible and were digitally imaged. Additional demographic, histological, and treatment information was compiled from pathology and medical records when available. Overall, 11/15 (73.3%) of the cases had HER2 FISH GH that matched to areas of HER2 over-expression or focally different morphology. Nine cases with areas of gene amplification overlapped with <10% of intense circumferential protein expression ("Mini 3+,"), and one case with focal micropapillary features. Clinical information was available on 6 (40%) patients, all were alive with no evidence of disease (mean follow up 30. 5 months; range 12-65 months). One patient with GH and a lymph node metastasis showed non-amplified population in the nodal tumor. GH when defined as discrete clusters of amplified cells following 2013 ASCO/CAP guidelines, -even when less than 10 % of the tumor cells-frequently has morphologic correlates such as focal intense protein overexpression or micropapillary morphology. Clinical significance of these focal gene amplification and protein over-expression needs to be further investigated.

Unusual Patterns of HER2 Expression in Breast Cancer: Insights and Perspectives

The biomarker human epidermal growth factor receptor-2 (HER2) has represented the best example of successful targeted therapy in breast cancer patients. Based on the concept of "oncogene addiction," we have learnt how to identify patients likely benefitting from anti-HER2 agents. Since HER2 gene amplification leads to marked overexpression of the HER2 receptors on the cell membrane, immunohistochemistry with clinically validated antibodies and scoring system based on intensity and completeness of the membranous expression constitute the screening method to separate negative (score 0/1+) and positive (score 3+) carcinomas and to identify those tumours with complete yet only moderate HER2 expression (score 2+, equivocal carcinomas), which need to be investigated further in terms of gene status to confirm the presence of a loop of oncogene addiction. This process has demanded quality controls and led to recommendations by Scientific Societies, which pathologists routinely need to follow to guarantee reproducibility. In this review, we will span from the description of classical HER2 evaluation to the discussion of those scenarios in which HER2 expression is unusual and/or difficult to define. We will dissect HER2 heterogeneity, HER2 conversion from primary to relapsed/metastatic breast cancer, and we will introduce the new category of HER2-low breast carcinomas.

HER2-Low Breast Cancers

OBJECTIVES

Recent clinical trials have demonstrated significant clinical benefits from novel therapeutic compounds in breast cancer patient with human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) immunohistochemical (IHC) score of 1+ or 2+ and negative in situ hybridization (ISH) result. A new concept of "HER2-low" breast cancer has been proposed and applied in the recent and ongoing clinical trials. In this article, we review the literature on the topic of HER2-low breast cancer.

METHODS

A literature search in PubMed was performed using key words related to HER2-low breast cancer. Major relevant studies that were presented in international breast cancer conferences were also included.

RESULTS

HER2-low breast cancer is currently defined as breast cancer with HER2 IHC score of 1+ or 2+ and negative ISH result. It likely represents a group of tumors with significant biological heterogeneity. Reports of clinical activity using the next generation of HER2-targeting antibody-drug conjugates in HER2-low breast cancers suggest that some strategies of targeting HER2 might be effective in this patient population while raising considerable concerns over limitations in our current testing methodologies and our ability to accurately identify such patients.

CONCLUSIONS

The promising efficacy of novel HER2-targeted therapy in advanced HER2-low breast cancers has raised the possibility for changing the clinical interpretation of HER2 status in breast cancer to include a HER2-low category; however, the definition of HER2-low breast cancer, the corresponding reliable and accurate quantitative HER2 testing methodology, and the biology of HER2-low breast cancer remain poorly defined.

Targeting HER2 heterogeneity in breast cancer

The identification of Human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) as a target in breast cancer and the subsequent development of HER2-targeted therapies has revolutionized the treatment of patients with HER2-positive breast cancer. However, there is an increasing awareness of how frequently tumors have low or heterogeneous expression of HER2. It is now recognized that this impacts the degree of benefit from HER2-targeted therapies. With the advent of novel and more potent antibody drug conjugates, targeting HER2 in traditional HER2-negative tumors with "HER2-low" expression is becoming possible. It is essential to refine the nomenclature around HER2 expression to enable clinicians to optimize treatment for patients across the HER2 expression spectrum in breast cancer. HER2 heterogeneity can be detected by conventional IHC, gene expression profiling or other methods and numerous studies have documented the correlation between the presence of HER2 heterogeneity and shorter disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS). Validation of techniques to identify HER2 heterogeneity in the clinic and concurrent development of agents to effectively treat tumors with non-uniform HER2 expression is needed.

The Exciting New Field of HER2-Low Breast Cancer Treatment

Since human epidermal growth factor receptor-2 (HER2) characterization, going through clinical research and regulatory approval of HER2-targeted therapies, much has elapsed and is still unfolding. Hitherto, only breast cancer (BC) patients with HER2 immunohistochemistry 3+ or with HER2 gene fluorescence in-situ hybridization (FISH) amplification (a.k.a., HER2-positive BC) have benefited from anti-HER2 agents. In recent years, however, much of the research effort has been expanded, with positive outcomes being reached for formerly known HER2-negative BC that yet express HER2 to some degree (HER2 immunohistochemistry 1+ or 2+, but FISH negative) and are currently being classified as HER2-low BC for the purpose of trial enrollment. In this sense, our aim is to review the body of evidence of HER2-low BC that led to the study of first-generation anti-HER2 agents, like trastuzumab, and how they have failed to achieve any clinical applicability in this setting. In addition, we review new data that is leading to the growing success of the new generation of drugs, especially the promising HER2-directed antibody-drug conjugates. A narrative review is also performed regarding the rationale behind the consolidated and ongoing clinical trials studying anti-HER2 agents in combination with unrelated agents, such as immunotherapy, endocrine therapy, and CDK4/6 inhibitors. Hopefully, all this ongoing research effort will be able to extend the survival benefits seen with anti-HER2 agents in HER2-positive disease, at least to some degree, to the greater proportion of patients with HER2-low BC.

Evolving concepts in HER2 evaluation in breast cancer: Heterogeneity, HER2-low carcinomas and beyond

The human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) is a well-known negative prognostic factor in breast cancer and a target of the monoclonal antibody trastuzumab as well as of other anti-HER2 compounds. Pioneering works on HER2-positive breast cancer in the 90s' launched a new era in clinical research and oncology practice that has reshaped the natural history of this disease. In diagnostic pathology the HER2 status is routinely assessed by using a combination of immunohistochemistry (IHC, to evaluate HER2 protein expression levels) and in situ hybridization (ISH, to assess HER2 gene status). For this purpose, international recommendations have been developed by a consensus of experts in the field, which have changed over the years according to new experimental and clinical data. In this review article we will document the changes that have contributed to a better evaluation of the HER2 status in clinical practice, furthermore we will discuss HER2 heterogeneity defined by IHC and ISH as well as by transcriptomic analysis and we will critically describe the complexity of HER2 equivocal results. Finally, we will introduce the clinical impact of HER2 mutations and we will define the upcoming category of HER2-low breast cancer with respect to emerging clinical data on the efficacy of specific anti-HER2 agents in subgroups of breast carcinomas lacking the classical oncogene addition dictated by HER2 amplification.

HER2 Genetic Heterogeneity in Gastric Cancer: Evaluation According to the College of American Pathologists Breast Cancer Criteria

Gastric and gastroesophageal junction (GEJ) adenocarcinomas have been shown to display significant HER2 genetic heterogeneity (GH). This is typically seen as a cluster of HER2-positive cells but can also take the form of intermingled cells, referred to a "mosaic" pattern. GH is not well defined in gastric/GEJ tumors and the "mosaic" pattern has never been studied. We sought to evaluate the frequency and distribution of the "mosaic" pattern of GH in gastric/GEJ tumors using the College of American Pathologists-endorsed breast criteria of 5% to <50% amplified nuclei. We also postulated that the lower limit of this GH definition might be seen by chance in normal gastric epithelium. A total of 360 consecutive gastric/GEJ tumors were tested for HER2 by immunohistochemistry and in situ hybridization. Individual tumor cell HER2:CEP17 ratios were calculated for each case and the percentage of tumor cells with a ratio ≥2.0 determined. In addition, 300 normal gastric epithelial cells were scored for HER2 and CEP17 signals. Overall, 265 cases (73.4%) showed GH. The percentage of amplified cells in GH cases linearly correlated with the overall HER2:CEP17 ratio. In normal gastric epithelium, a cell with an "amplified" 2:1 ratio was seen in 9.7% (29/300) of cells, thus reaching GH. The chance of "GH" in scoring 20 normal epithelial cells was 87%. We conclude that GH is very common in gastric/GEJ tumors when College of American Pathologists breast criteria are applied and the lower threshold is likely of little clinical significance due to the finding "amplified" 2:1 nuclei in normal cells.

HER2 intratumoral heterogeneity analyses by concurrent HER2 gene and protein assessment for the prognosis of HER2 negative invasive breast cancer patients

HER2 gene-protein assay (GPA) is a new method for the simultaneous evaluation of HER2 immunohistochemistry (IHC) and HER2 dual in situ hybridization (DISH) on single tissue sections of breast cancer. We investigated the presence of HER2 gene and protein discrepancy and HER2-heterogeneity using HER2-GPA. HER2 status was analyzed for the correlation between the presence of HER2-heterogeneity and patient prognosis. Consecutive 280 invasive breast cancer were examined. Statuses of HER2 protein and gene were evaluated in whole tumor sections of HER2 GPA slides. HER2 protein and gene combination patterns were classified to six phenotypic and genotypic types for each case, as well as at individual cell levels: (A) IHC and DISH positive; (B) IHC positive and DISH negative; (C) IHC equivocal and DISH positive; (D) IHC equivocal and DISH negative; (E) IHC negative and DISH positive; and (F) IHC and DISH negative. The presence of HER2-heterogeneity was determined by the existence of at least two of six types within one tumor. HER2-IHC positive patients had significantly worse survival than IHC negative patients and HER2-DISH positive patients had significantly worse survival than DISH negative patients. HER2 IHC negative and DISH positive patients had significantly worse recurrence-free survival than IHC and DISH negative patients. In the HER2 IHC and DISH negative group, the HER2 heterogeneous group had significantly worse survival than the nonheterogeneous group. Notably, among triple negative breast cancer (TNBC), the HER2 heterogeneous group had significantly worse survival than the nonheterogeneous group. Our study suggests that the presence of HER2-heterogeneity might be a prognostic factor in HER2 negative breast cancer patients, especially in TNBC.

Detecting intratumoral heterogeneity in routine breast-HER2 testing: low yield of testing multiple blocks

BACKGROUND

Intratumoral heterogeneity can lead to uncertainty in breast carcinoma HER2 testing, both with respect to pathology reporting and clinical significance. The standard practice is to perform breast biomarker testing on a single representative section of tumor; however, concern over heterogeneity often leads to testing on additional tissue blocks. Our objective was to assess the diagnostic yield of testing multiple blocks of a single invasive breast carcinoma.

METHODS

We performed a retrospective review of 139 consecutive cases (between 2006 and 2012) in which clinical HER2 testing was performed in multiple blocks. Tumor characteristics and HER2 studies (both immunohistochemistry and data from in situ hybridization) were reviewed. Regional differences in morphology and HER2 immunoreactivity were recorded. In situ hybridization was performed in 25 of 139 of the cases; patterns of genetic heterogeneity were reviewed. We audited discordances in HER2 result between blocks.

RESULTS

Testing of multiple blocks yielded no additional HER2 information in 134 (96.4%) of 139 cases. Morphologic differences or heterogeneity in HER2 expression was observed in 22 (15.8%) of 139 of cases. Only 5 of these showed differences in HER2 between blocks, of which 4 were associated with equivocal HER2 immunohistochemistry, and 4 were high-grade.

CONCLUSIONS

In the vast majority of cases, even those with heterogeneity, testing of a single block is sufficient for an accurate HER2 determination. High-grade tumors with equivocal HER2 status and observable heterogeneity are more likely to yield a different result on testing of additional blocks.

HER2 in solid tumors: more than 10 years under the microscope; where are we now?

HER2 is a well-recognized mediator of the cancerogenic process. It is dysregulated in a wide range of solid tumors, mainly via protein overexpression and/or gene amplification, thus making HER2 an attractive target for tailored treatment. The anti-HER2 therapy trastuzumab was approved for the treatment of HER2-positive metastatic breast cancer patients more than 10 years ago. Since then, trastuzumab and other HER2-inhibitors have been entered into clinical practice for the treatment of breast cancer and, more recently, have been approved to treat HER2-positive metastatic gastric cancers. Currently, HER2-targeted therapies are under evaluation in other tumor types. Due to the relevance of proper patient selection, the accurate assessment of HER2 status is fundamental. This review will discuss the established knowledge and novel insights into the HER2 story, mainly focusing on breast, gastric and colorectal cancers, as well as providing a brief overview of salivary gland, bladder, ovarian and lung tumors.

Positron emission tomography imaging with 18F-labeled ZHER2:2891 affibody for detection of HER2 expression and pharmacodynamic response to HER2-modulating therapies

PURPOSE

Expression of HER2 has profound implications on treatment strategies in various types of cancer. We investigated the specificity of radiolabeled HER2-targeting ZHER2:2891 Affibody, [(18)F]GE-226, for positron emission tomography (PET) imaging.

EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN

Intrinsic cellular [(18)F]GE-226 uptake and tumor-specific tracer binding were assessed in cells and xenografts with and without drug treatment. Specificity was further determined by comparing tumor localization of a fluorescently labeled analogue with DAKO HercepTest.

RESULTS

[(18)F]GE-226 uptake was 11- to 67-fold higher in 10 HER2-positive versus HER2-negative cell lines in vitro independent of lineage. Uptake in HER2-positive xenografts was rapid with net irreversible binding kinetics making possible the distinction of HER2-negative [MCF7 and MCF7-p95HER2: NUV60 (%ID/mL) 6.1 ± 0.7; Ki (mL/cm(3)/min) 0.0069 ± 0.0014] from HER2-positive tumors (NUV60 and Ki: MCF7-HER2, 10.9 ± 1.5 and 0.015 ± 0.0035; MDA-MB-361, 18.2 ± 3.4 and 0.025 ± 0.0052; SKOV-3, 18.7 ± 2.4 and 0.036 ± 0.0065) within 1 hour. Tumor uptake correlated with HER2 expression determined by ELISA (r(2) = 0.78), and a fluorophore-labeled tracer analogue colocalized with HER2 expression. Tracer uptake was not influenced by short-term or continuous treatment with trastuzumab in keeping with differential epitope binding, but reflected HER2 degradation by short-term NVP-AUY922 treatment in SKOV-3 xenografts (NUV60: 13.5 ± 2.1 %ID/mL vs. 9.0 ± 0.9 %ID/mL for vehicle or drug, respectively).

CONCLUSIONS

[(18)F]GE-226 binds with high specificity to HER2 independent of cell lineage. The tracer has potential utility for HER2 detection, irrespective of prior trastuzumab treatment, and to discern HSP90 inhibitor-mediated HER2 degradation.