Gastric neuroendocrine neoplasms and related precursor lesions

Risk factors for positive resection margins after endoscopic resection for gastrointestinal neuroendocrine tumors

BACKGROUND

In recent years, the incidence of gastrointestinal neuroendocrine tumors (GI-NETs) has remarkably increased due to the widespread use of screening gastrointestinal endoscopy. Currently, the most common treatments are surgery and endoscopic resection. Compared to surgery, endoscopic resection possesses a higher risk of resection margin residues for the treatment of GI-NETs.

METHODS

A total of 315 patients who underwent surgery or endoscopic resection for GI-NETs were included. We analyzed their resection modality (surgery, ESD, EMR), margin status, Preoperative marking and Prognosis.

RESULTS

Among 315 patients included, 175 cases underwent endoscopic resection and 140 cases underwent surgical treatment. A total of 43 (43/175, 24.57%) and 10 (10/140, 7.14%) patients exhibited positive resection margins after endoscopic resection and surgery, respectively. Multivariate regression analysis suggested that no preoperative marking and endoscopic treatment methods were risk factors for resection margin residues. Among the patients with positive margin residues after endoscopic resection, 5 patients underwent the radical surgical resection and 1 patient underwent additional ESD resection. The remaining 37 patients had no recurrence during a median follow-up of 36 months.

CONCLUSIONS

Compared with surgery, endoscopic therapy has a higher margin residual rate. During endoscopic resection, preoperative marking may reduce the rate of lateral margin residues, and endoscopic submucosal dissection may be preferred than endoscopic mucosal resection. Periodical follow-up may be an alternative method for patients with positive margin residues after endoscopic resection.

Type 3 gastric neuroendocrine neoplasms: the rising promise of conservative endoscopic management

Gastric neuroendocrine neoplasms (g-NENs) are rare tumors arising from the gastric enterochromaffin-like cells. Recent data suggests an increased detection rate, attributed to more frequent esophagogastroduodenoscopies. While type 3 g-NENs were historically deemed aggressive, emerging research indicates potential for conservative management, especially endoscopic resection, in well-differentiated, small tumors. European guidelines now advocate for endoscopic intervention in selected cases, but North American guidelines remain more conservative. Key factors influencing outcomes are tumor size, grading, and depth of gastric wall infiltration. Endoscopic resection has shown promise for tumors confined to submucosal layers without lymphovascular invasion. Given the complexities, a multidisciplinary team approach is essential for management decisions. Current insights are largely based on retrospective studies, underscoring the need for prospective research to optimize endoscopic approaches.

Current understanding of pathogenetic mechanisms in neuroendocrine neoplasms

INTRODUCTION

Despite the fact that important advances in research on neuroendocrine neoplasms (NENs) have been made, consistent data about their pathogenetic mechanism are still lacking. Furthermore, different primary sites may recognize different pathogenetic mechanisms.

AREAS COVERED

This review analyzes the possible biological and molecular mechanisms that may lead to NEN onset and progression in different organs. Through extensive research of the literature, risk factors including hypercholesterolemia, inflammatory bowel disease, chronic atrophic gastritis are evaluated as potential pathogenetic mechanisms. Consistent evidence is available regarding sporadic gastric NENs and MEN1 related duodenopancreatic NENs precursor lesions, and genetic-epigenetic mutations may play a pivotal role in tumor development and bone metastases onset. In lung neuroendocrine tumors (NETs), diffuse proliferation of neuroendocrine cells on the bronchial wall (DIPNECH) has been proposed as a premalignant lesion, while in lung neuroendocrine carcinoma nicotine and smoke could be responsible for carcinogenic processes. Also, rare primary NENs such as thymic (T-NENs) and Merkel cell carcinoma (MCC) have been analyzed, finding different possible pathogenetic mechanisms.

EXPERT OPINION

New technologies in genomics and epigenomics are bringing new light to the pathogenetic landscape of NENs, but further studies are needed to improve both prevention and treatment in these heterogeneous neoplasms.

Combined tubular adenocarcinoma, neuroendocrine carcinoma and adenocarcinoma with enteroblastic differentiation arising in Barrett esophagus

Adenocarcinoma (AC) with neuroendocrine carcinoma (NEC) or enteroblastic (ENT) differentiation rarely develops in Barrett's esophagus (BE). A 76-year-old man was diagnosed with Barrett's AC (cT1bN0M0) and underwent thoracoscopic esophagectomy. A type 0-IIc + 0-Is lesion measuring 26 × 21 mm was macroscopically observed on a background of long segment BE (pT1bN0M0). The tumor comprised three different histological types of carcinoma (NEC, AC with ENT differentiation and moderately differentiated AC). NEC showed positivity for synaptophysin, chromogranin A and insulinoma-associated protein 1 with a Ki-67 index of 60.6%. ENT tumors were immunopositive for AFP and sal-like protein 4, and focally immunopositive for human chorionic gonadotrophin. The amounts of NEC, ENT and AC were 40%, 40% and 20%, respectively. p53 expression was positive throughout the tumor. Rb expression was negative at the NEC, but positive at the ENT and AC. CD4 and CD8 densities were lower in the NEC segment than in the AC and ENT segments, and PD-L1 expression was negative throughout the tumor. Early cancer arising in BE with a combination of tubular AC, ENT tumors and NEC is very rare. Our observations might contribute to understanding the carcinogenetic pathways and tumor microenvironment of NEC and ENT tumors.

Somatostatin Receptor 2 in 10 Different Types of Human Non-Neoplastic Gastrointestinal Neuroendocrine Cells

Somatostatin is known to inhibit the secretion of various hormones by acting on endocrine cells through the somatostatin receptor 2 (SSTR2). Immunohistochemical evaluation of SSTR2 has become increasingly important in clinical practice to determine treatment strategies for patients with a neuroendocrine tumor (NET). Gastrointestinal (GI) tracts contain various neuroendocrine cells that constitute a diffuse endocrine system and some NETs are derived from those cells. In addition, NETs have been well known to express a variable spectrum of proteins shared by their normal cell counterparts of the specific anatomical sites. Thus, we may derive the kinetics of SSTR2 expression of NETs, including de novo expression, from the SSTR2 expression of the corresponding normal neuroendocrine cells. Therefore, a detailed study on the distribution of SSTR2 in normal human neuroendocrine cells may contribute to understanding the expression of SSTR2 in GI-NETs. However, the detailed cellular localization of SSTR2 in non-neoplastic neuroendocrine cells remains unknown. Therefore, we immunolocalized SSTR2 in neuroendocrine cells of normal human GI tracts, including the stomach, duodenum, ileum, and rectum, obtained from 41 surgically resected tissue specimens. Double immunohistochemistry of SSTR2 and hormones or hormone-associated proteins was performed. In all GI neuroendocrine cells, cell types other than D- and EC-cells demonstrated a high percentage of SSTR2-positive cases or a high double-positive ratio. In particular, EC-cells showed lower SSTR2-positive ratios in all sites. Midgut NETs, which often produce serotonin, are excellent targets for somatostatin analogs and are positive for SSTR2. Thus, we speculated that EC-cell NETs might lead to the de novo expression of SSTR2. In addition, a previous report showed high SSTR2 expression in ECL-cell NETs and gastrinomas, which could be because they are derived from neuroendocrine cells with high SSTR2 expression. This study may contribute to understanding the expression of SSTR2 in GI-NETs.

Long-term surgical outcomes of gastric neuroendocrine carcinoma and mixed neuroendocrine-non-neuroendocrine neoplasms

Background

Neuroendocrine carcinoma (NEC) and mixed neuroendocrine-non-neuroendocrine neoplasm (MiNEN) are extremely rare subtypes of gastric cancer. MiNEN is a mix of carcinomatous components and neuroendocrine neoplasm in the same lesion. NEC and MiNEN have a poor prognosis, are difficult to diagnose, and have no established treatment. Herein, we assessed the clinicopathological characteristics and long-term surgical outcomes of gastric NEC and MiNEN patients in our hospital.

Methods

We retrospectively assessed 1538 patients pathologically diagnosed with gastric cancer and who underwent curative surgical resection at our institution between January 1999 and October 2021. Of these patients, 25 (1.6%) were pathologically diagnosed with neuroendocrine neoplasms. From these 25 patients, we retrospectively analyzed the clinicopathological characteristics and surgical outcomes of 13 (0.8%) patients pathologically diagnosed with NEC or MiNEN.

Results

The NEC and MiNEN patients consisted of 11 men and 2 women [mean age, 74 (62–84) years]. The preoperative histological diagnoses were NEC (n = 4) and adenocarcinoma (n = 9). The final pathological diagnoses were large cell neuroendocrine carcinoma (LCNEC; n = 7) and MiNEN (n = 6). Total gastrectomy was the most common surgical procedure (9/13, 69.2%), followed by distal gastrectomy (3/13, 23.1%) and proximal gastrectomy (1/13, 7.7%). Immunohistochemical staining showed 8 CD56-positive patients. All 13 patients were positive for chromogranin A and synaptophysin. The mean Ki-67 value was 64.8 (0–95)%, and the mean mitotic score was 107.9 (0–400). Nine patients survived without recurrence postresection. The median postresection overall survival time was 68.7 (8.0–129) months. The 5-year survival rate was 0.75 ([95% CI] 0.408–0.912).

Conclusion

The surgical treatment outcomes of NEC and MiNEN patients were relatively favorable. Although evidence concerning the effectiveness of surgery alone is meager, radical resection as part of multidisciplinary treatment including chemotherapy can potentially improve prognosis.

Case Report: Two Is Not (Always) Better Than One: Pyloric Gland Adenoma of the Gastric Cardia and Concurrent Neuroendocrine Cell Dysplasia Arising From Autoimmune Gastritis

Autoimmune gastritis is a chronic immune-mediated disorder characterized by varied clinical manifestations and that should be endoscopically managed over time, as the gastric atrophy contributes to microenvironmental alterations of the stomach milieu, and an increased cancer risk has been linked to this condition. Here, we report the unusual case of a woman who developed a cardiac high-grade pyloric adenoma in a context of previously undiagnosed autoimmune gastritis with synchronous neuroendocrine cell hyperplastic and dysplastic lesions.

New insights in diagnosis and treatment of gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasms

Gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasms (GEP-NENs) are rare epithelial neoplasms derived from pluripotent endocrine cells along the gastrointestinal tract and pancreas. GEP-NENs are classified into well-differentiated neuroendocrine tumors and poorly differentiated neuroendocrine carcinomas. Despite overlapping morphological features, GEP-NENs vary in molecular biology, epigenetic, clinical behavior, treatment response, and prognosis features and remain an unmet clinical challenge. In this review, we introduce recent updates on the histopathologic classification, including the tumor grading and staging system, molecular genetics, and systemic evaluation of the diagnosis and treatment of GEP-NENs at different anatomic sites, together with some insights into the diagnosis of challenging and unusual cases. We also discuss the application of novel therapeutic approaches for GEP-NENs, including peptide receptor radionuclide therapy, targeted therapy, and immunotherapy with immune checkpoint inhibitors. These findings will help improve patient care with precise diagnosis and individualized treatment of patients with GEP-NENs.

A rare gastric lesion: diminutive, well-differentiated, Grade 3, type 3 gastric neuroendocrine tumor with extremely high ki-67 index removed en bloc under endoscopy

Grade 3, type 3 gastric neuroendocrine tumor (g-NET) shows specific features of clinical interest and the therapeutic management of the lesion is not yet completely standardized. We present the unusual case of a 34-year-old male patient with a diminutive (less than 0.5 cm), well-differentiated, G3, type 3g-NET with extremely high Ki-67 index (higher than 80%). The lesion was subsequently removed en bloc via endoscopic submucosal dissection. Regarding the proliferation rate, Ki-67 index values usually range from 21 to 50%, and less commonly above 55%, in G3 NET. To our knowledge, this lesion represents a small size with the highest Ki-67 index diagnosed with G3 g-NET. However, as g-NET might recur even after a long duration, we recommend a long-term follow-up, such as 10 years after complete resection in patients to evaluate the endoscopic resection approach.

Usefulness of 68-Gallium PET in Type I Gastric Neuroendocrine Neoplasia: A Case Series

Background: Type I gastric neuroendocrine neoplasia (gNEN) is a rare and low-grade tumor in which the therapeutic strategy is almost always endoscopic. For this reason, the use of radiology or nuclear medicine imaging is not recommended by guidelines. Conversely, in a small number of cases, locoregional or distant metastases may develop, thus suggesting a role for imaging techniques. This retrospective study was performed to explore the usefulness of [68Ga]Ga-DOTA-SST PET/CT in the management of patients with T1gNENs. Patients and Method: Single-center retrospective analysis, in an ENETS Center of Excellence, of patients with type I gNEN who underwent [68Ga]Ga-DOTA-SST PET/CT. The indication for performing [68Ga]Ga-DOTA-SST PET/CT was generally based on the presence of at least one of the following criteria: (1) polyps > 10 mm; (2) endoscopic positive (R1) margin after previous endoscopic resection; and (3) Ki-67 > 3%. Results: A total of 120 patients with T1gNEN were evaluated. Overall, 15 out of 120 (13%) patients had performed [68Ga]Ga-DOTA-SST PET/CT. The median Ki-67 value was 6% (IQR 1−9): 9 out of 15 (60%) were G1 tumors, and 6 out of 15 (40%) were G2 tumors. Ninety-three percent of patients were treated by tumor endoscopic resection, whereas surgery was performed in two patients (13%) after incomplete endoscopic resection; the remaining patients (6.6%) received somatostatin analogs due to the presence of multiple recurrent tumors. Overall, [68Ga]Ga-DOTA-SST PET/CT was positive in 8 out of 15 patients (53%). Following the [68Ga]Ga-DOTA-SST PET/CT findings, the clinical management was modified in 6 out of 15 (40%) patients. Conclusion: [68Ga]Ga-DOTA-SST PET/CT can be useful in a restricted and selected group of patients with gastric neuroendocrine neoplasia with relevant risk factors to establish the most appropriate therapeutic strategy.

Gastric neuroendocrine neoplasms and precursor lesions: Case reports and literature review

RATIONALE

Gastric neuroendocrine neoplasms (g-NENs) represent a distinctive group of gastric tumors, stratified into different prognostic categories according to different histological characteristics, put forth in the 2018 World Health Organization classification system. The clinical presentations, as well as pathological features, represent important data in establishing the type of the tumor, in estimating the tumor behavior, and in selecting the best therapeutic strategy. In our case series we presented different clinical scenarios that may be encountered in practice regarding gastric NENs. We performed a literature review and discussed diagnostic strategy, current classification system, precursor lesions, and therapeutic options in g-NENs.

PATIENT CONCERNS

The first patient was a 41-year-old female with weight loss, persistent dyspeptic complaints and a history of pernicious anemia. In the second clinical case a 61-year-old man was admitted with heartburn, abdominal pain, diarrhea and mild iron deficiency anemia. The third patient was a 56-year-old male with a history of neoplasia, admitted for weight loss, dyspeptic complaints, and liver metastases.

DIAGNOSIS

All the 3 patients underwent upper endoscopy with targeted biopsies. Histopathological and laboratory evaluation, together with imagistic evaluation (abdominal ultrasound, endoscopic ultrasound, and magnetic resonance imaging) allowed the distinction between 3 different types of gastric tumors: type 1 enterochromaffin-like-cell G1 NET, type 2 enterochromaffin-like-cell G2 NET, and type 3 G2 NET with liver metastases.

INTERVENTIONS

Endoscopic polypectomy of the largest lesion was performed in patient with type 1 g-NET and autoimmune chronic atrophic gastritis, followed by regular endoscopic surveillance with biopsies. In type 2 g-NET associated with pancreatic gastrinoma, pancreaticoduodenectomy with total gastrectomy were performed. In type 3 g-NET, detected in metastatic stage, oncologic therapy was performed.

OUTCOMES

The patients follow-up was selected according to tumor behavior, from regular endoscopic surveillance to oncology follow-up. The prognosis was good in case 1, whilst poorer outcomes were associated with more aggressive tumors in case 2 and case 3.

LESSONS

g-NENs are rare tumors with distinct clinical and histological features. Our case series emphasized the role of close collaboration between clinician and pathologist, as well as the importance of a detailed pathology report.

Pathogenic ATM Variant-Harbouring Well-Differentiated Aggressive Type 1 Gastric Neuroendocrine Tumour with High-grade Features (G3 NET): a New Addition to the Clinical and Pathological Spectrum of Gastric Neuroendocrine Neoplasms

Gastric type 1 neuroendocrine tumours are considered to have low rates of proliferation and a good prognosis. We report here a patient with an aggressive well-differentiated high-grade gastric neuroendocrine tumour (gastric grade 3 NET), in a context of autoimmune gastritis. Consistent with grade 3 disease, the tumour had a Ki-67 proliferation index of 30%. Targeted next-generation sequencing identified variants of four genes, including a pathogenic ATM variant underlying the differentiation and metastatic potential of the tumour. Liver metastasis was diagnosed during follow-up, and the patient died after 6 years, due to disease progression.

Chronic Autoimmune Gastritis: Modern Diagnostic Principles

This article summarizes and systematizes the available data from the literature on chronic autoimmune gastritis (CAG) in order to increase the awareness of specialists about the modern possibilities for diagnosing the disease, including its early stages. The clinical manifestation of the disease includes possible variants such as gastrointestinal, hematological (first of all, the formation of iron deficiency and B12-deficiency anemia), and neurological variants. Patients with chronic autoimmune gastritis are characterized by comorbidity with other autoimmune diseases. In this paper, data on the most informative serological markers for the diagnosis of CAG, as well as laboratory tests to detect micronutrient deficiencies, information on the characteristic changes in the gastric mucosa, and the prognosis of the disease, are presented. The diagnosis of CAG should be based on a multidisciplinary approach that combines a thorough analysis of a patient's complaints with a mandatory assessment of nutritional status, as well as the results of serological, endoscopic, and histological research methods.

Gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasms G3: Novel insights and unmet needs

According to the 2019 WHO pathology grading system, high-grade gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasms (GEP-NENs) can be divided into well differentiated neuroendocrine tumors G3 (NETs G3) and poorly differentiated neuroendocrine carcinomas (NECs). GEP-NETs G3 and GEP-NECs present significant differences in driver genes and disease origin. NETs G3 and NECs have been confirmed to be two distinct diseases with different genetic backgrounds, however, this issue remains controversial. The prognosis of NETs G3 is significantly better than that of NECs. The differential diagnosis of GEP-NETs G3 and GEP-NECs should be combined with the patient's medical history, tumor histopathology, Ki-67 index, DAXX/ATRX, TP53 and Rb expression as well as other immunohistochemical indicators. In addition, the treatment strategies of these two subgroups are very different. Here, we summarize recent findings focused on the genomics, clinical manifestations, diagnosis, treatment and other aspects of high-grade GEP-NENs (G3). This review may help further our understanding of the carcinogenesis, diagnosis and treatment of GEP-NENs G3.

What is New in the 2019 World Health Organization (WHO) Classification of Tumors of the Digestive System: Review of Selected Updates on Neuroendocrine Neoplasms, Appendiceal Tumors, and Molecular Testing

CONTEXT.—

The 5th edition of the World Health Organization classification of digestive system tumors discusses several advancements and developments in understanding the etiology, pathogenesis, and diagnosis of several digestive tract tumors.

OBJECTIVE.—

To provide a summary of the updates with a focus on neuroendocrine neoplasms, appendiceal tumors, and the molecular advances in tumors of the digestive system.

DATA SOURCES.—

English literature and personal experiences.

CONCLUSIONS.—

Some of the particularly important updates in the 5th edition are the alterations made in the classification of neuroendocrine neoplasms, understanding of pathogenesis of appendiceal tumors and their precursor lesions, and the expanded role of molecular pathology in establishing an accurate diagnosis or predicting prognosis and response to treatment.

Enterochromaffin-like Cell Hyperplasia-Associated Gastric Neuroendocrine Tumors May Arise in the Setting of Proton Pump Inhibitor Use: The Need for a New Clinicopathologic Category

CONTEXT.—

Hypergastrinemia states such as achlorhydria from gastric mucosal atrophy or a gastrin-producing tumor in humans have been associated with the development of enterochromaffin-like (ECL) cell hyperplasia and gastric neuroendocrine tumors (GNETs). Whether drugs that can elevate serum gastrin levels, such as proton pump inhibitors (PPIs), can produce the same tissue effect is not known and there is no concrete evidence linking the use of PPIs to GNETs outside animal models and case reports.

OBJECTIVE.—

To explore the clinicopathologic association for GNETs of presumed ECL cell origin that cannot be reliably placed into any of the 3 established categories currently recognized by the World Health Organization.

DESIGN.—

This is a retrospective clinicopathologic study of GNETs in the body/fundus of a period of 15 years (2005-2019).

RESULTS.—

Of a total of 87 cases, 57 (65.5%) were associated with atrophic gastritis, 2 (2.3%) were associated with Zollinger-Ellison syndrome, and 28 (32.2%) were unclassified. Of the latter, 11 were consistent with true sporadic/type 3 GNETs, while 17 had background mucosal changes of parietal cell and ECL cell hyperplasia but without underlying detectable gastrinoma, and 88.2% (15 of 17) of patients from this group had documented long-term PPI use. This subtype of GNETs was more commonly multifocal, and of higher grade (P = .03) than "true" sporadic GNETs.

CONCLUSIONS.—

A subset of GNETs arises in the background of gastric mucosal changes suggestive of hypergastrinemia, but without underlying gastrinoma, and could be linked to long-term PPI use.

Molecular Pathology of Well-Differentiated Gastro-entero-pancreatic Neuroendocrine Tumors

Well differentiated neuroendocrine tumors (NETs) arising in the gastrointestinal and pancreaticobiliary system are the most common neuroendocrine neoplasms. Studies of the molecular basis of these lesions have identified genetic mutations that predispose to familial endocrine neoplasia syndromes and occur both as germline events and in sporadic tumors. The mutations often involve epigenetic regulators rather than the oncogenes and tumor suppressors that are affected in other malignancies. Somatic copy number alterations and miRNAs have also been implicated in the development and progression of some of these tumors. The molecular profiles differ by location, but many are shared by tumors in other sites, including those outside the gastroenteropancreatic system. The approach to therapy relies on both the neuroendocrine nature of these tumors and the identification of specific alterations that can serve as targets for precision oncologic approaches.

Neuroendocrine neoplasms of the esophagus and stomach

Esophageal neuroendocrine neoplasms (E-NENs) are much rarer than other gastro-entero-pancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasms, the majority showing aggressive behavior with early dissemination and poor prognosis. Among E-NENs, exceptionally rare well differentiated neuroendocrine tumors (E-NET) and more frequent esophageal poorly differentiated neuroendocrine carcinomas (E-NEC) and mixed neuroendocrine-non neuroendocrine neoplasms (MiNEN) can be recognized. E-NECs usually exhibit a small cell morphology or mixed small and large cells. Esophageal MiNEN are composed of NEC component admixed with adenocarcinoma or squamous cell carcinoma. Gastric (G) NENs encompass a wide spectrum of entities ranging from indolent G-NETs to highly aggressive G-NECs and MiNENs. Among G-NETs, ECL-cell NETs are the most common and, although composed of histamine-producing cells, are a heterogeneous group of neoplastic proliferations showing different clinical and prognostic features depending on the patient’s clinico-pathological background including the morphology of the peri-tumoral mucosa, gastrin serum levels, presence or absence of antral G-cell hyperplasia, and presence or absence of MEN1 syndrome. In general, NET associated with hypergastrinemia show a better outcome than NET not associated with hypergastrinemia. G-NECs and MiNENs are aggressive neoplasms more frequently observed in males and associated with a dismal prognosis.

Spontaneous regression of gastric gastrinoma after resection of metastases to the lesser omentum: A case report and review of literature

BACKGROUND

Gastric gastrinoma and spontaneous tumor regression are both very rarely encountered. We report the first case of spontaneous regression of gastric gastrinoma.

CASE SUMMARY

A 37-year-old man with a 9-year history of chronic abdominal pain was referred for evaluation of an 8 cm mass in the lesser omentum discovered incidentally on abdominal computed tomography. The tumor was diagnosed as grade 2 neuroendocrine neoplasm (NEN) on endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration. Screening esophagogastroduodenoscopy revealed a 7 mm red polypoid lesion with central depression in the gastric antrum, also confirmed to be a grade 2 NEN. Laparoscopic removal of the abdominal mass confirmed it to be a metastatic gastrinoma lesion. The gastric lesion was subsequently diagnosed as primary gastric gastrinoma. Three months later, the gastric lesion had disappeared without treatment. The patient remains symptom-free with normal fasting serum gastrin and no recurrence of gastrinoma during 36 mo of follow-up.

CONCLUSION

Gastric gastrinoma may arise as a polypoid lesion in the gastric antrum. Spontaneous regression can rarely occur after biopsy.

Neuroendocrine carcinoma arising from Barrett's esophageal adenocarcinoma: a case report

Neuroendocrine carcinoma in Barrett's esophagus is rare and its developmental mechanisms remain unclear. Neuroendocrine carcinoma arising in Barrett's esophagus with adenocarcinoma was detected at an early stage and resected by endoscopic submucosal dissection. Detailed pathological examination revealed that the neuroendocrine carcinoma originated via differentiation of the preexisting adenocarcinoma. A 79-year-old man presented with a flat protruding lesion in the esophagogastric junction. Esophagogastroduodenoscopy revealed a red flat 10-mm protruding lesion in the Barrett's epithelium and a shallow depression at the distal end. Narrow band imaging with magnification showed that the blood vessels in the protrusion were dilated and meandered irregularly, while those in the depression were small and did not form a network; the blood vessels were missing in some parts of the depression. Well-differentiated adenocarcinoma was diagnosed after analysis of the biopsy specimen of the protrusion, and endoscopic submucosal dissection was performed. The pathological diagnosis was neuroendocrine carcinoma with an adenocarcinoma component.

Prognostic value of the 2017 World Health Organization Classification System for gastric neuroendocrine tumors: A single-center experience

BACKGROUND/AIMS

Gastric neuroendocrine tumors (G-NETs) are rare tumors, but their incidence is gradually increasing. Despite the existence of many classification systems, determining prognosis and planning treatment in patients with G-NETs remains a clinical challenge. In this study, the prognostic value of the World Health Organization (WHO) 2017 grading system and the effect of surgery on survival in low grade neuroendocrine tumors were investigated.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

G-NETs who were diagnosed between January 2000 and May 2017 were included in the study. Patients' demographic characteristics, treatment details, and survival data were obtained from medical charts. Pathological samples were re-classified according to the WHO 2017 grading system.

RESULTS

Of the total 94 evaluated patients, 50 (53.2%) were classified with G1 NETs, 37(39.4%) with G2 NETs, 4(4.2%) with well-differentiated G3 NETs, and the remaining 3 patients with poorly differentiated G3 neuroendocrine carcinoma (NEC). The median follow-up time was 83.2 months. There was a statistically significant difference in 5-year progression free survival (PFS) between G1 tumors (100%) and G2 tumors (76%) (p<0.001). However, there was no statistically significant deference in 5-year overall survival rate (OS) for G1 (97%) and G2 (82%) tumors (p=0.141). When G2 and G1 NETs were compared according to their surgical approach, radical surgery was more frequently performed in patients with G2 tumors (p<0.001). However, radical surgery did not improve PFS in G1 and G2 NETs.

CONCLUSION

The WHO 2017 NET classification system may have low prognostic value for determining the prognosis of patients with G1 and G2 tumors. Radical surgery for G1 and G2 NETs did not improve PFS in our study.

Do neuroendocrine carcinomas and mixed neuroendocrine-non-neuroendocrine neoplasm of the gastrointestinal tract have the same prognosis? A SEER database analysis of 12,878 cases

BACKGROUND

Neuroendocrine carcinomas (NECs) and mixed neuroendocrine-non-neuroendocrine neoplasm (MiNEN) in the gastrointestinal (GI) tract are both rare and malignant; however, it is unclear whether their prognosis is the same.

METHODS

In this cross-sectional study, a total of 12,878 patients with NEC or MiNEN in the GI tract were reviewed retrospectively by searching the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) program database. Next, we compared the characteristics and survival between patients with NEC or MiNEN and further analyzed the prognostic factors for the patients.

RESULTS

The data showed that patients with MiNEN had a worse prognosis as compared with patients with pure NEC in the small intestine (SI) and appendix, whereas there was no significant survival difference between NEC and MiNEN in the other parts of the GI system. On the whole, age ⩾55 years (p < 0.0001), male (p = 0.002), being diagnosed at TNM Stage II-IV (p < 0.0001) or not receiving surgical treatment (p < 0.0001) were the independent negative prognostic factors for NEC patients, whereas age ⩾55 years (p = 0.003), being diagnosed at TNM Stage III-IV (p < 0.001) or not receiving surgical treatment (p < 0.001) were identified as the independent negative prognostic factors for the MiNEN patients. Furthermore, when NECs or MiNENs were classified based on the primary tumor site, the results showed that the prognostic factors for NEC and MiNEN varied between the tumor sites.

CONCLUSION

The prognostic differences between NECs and MiNENs in the GI tract are heterogeneous and site-related. Patients with appendiceal or SI MiNEN have a poorer prognosis than patients with pure appendiceal or SI NEC. Therefore, we should pay more attention to patients with MiNEN in the SI and appendix and monitor them more closely.

[Gastric neuroendocrine tumors]

Gastrointestinal neuroendocrine tumors are rare neoplasms. Currently, incidence of gastric neuroendocrine tumors (gNETs) is being significantly increased. There are 3 groups of gNETs: types I, II and III. Each type has important features regarding clinical picture, prognosis and treatment strategy. Type I is the most common (70-80%) and associated with chronic atrophic gastritis including autoimmune gastritis and Helicobacter associated atrophic gastritis. Type II (5-6%) is associated with multiple endocrine neoplasia type I and Zollinger-Ellison syndrome (MEN I - ZES). Both types are characterized by hypergastrinemia and small tumor dimension. These neoplasms are multiple and mostly benign. On the contrary, NETs type III (10-15%) is not associated with hypergastrinemia and represented by single large neoplasms. Tumors are malignant as a rule. Therefore, surgical resection and chemotherapy are preferred for these tumors. Endoscopic surgery followed by observation is acceptable for almost all NETS type I and II. At the same time, this approach is advisable only for small and highly differentiated neoplasms type III.

Natural history of autoimmune atrophic gastritis: a prospective, single centre, long-term experience

BACKGROUND

Autoimmune atrophic gastritis (AAG) is an immune-mediated disorder characterised by destruction of gastric oxyntic mucosa AIM: To explore gastric histopathological evolution in a cohort of AAG patients over a prolonged follow-up METHODS: Single centre prospective study enrolling consecutive patients with histologically confirmed AAG between 2000 and 2018. All AAG patients undergoing endoscopic follow-up every 1-3 years were classified as having stages 1, 2 or 3 according to atrophy severity (mild, moderate and severe). AAG patients with either glandular or neuroendocrine dysplasia/neoplasia were classified as having stage 4. Disease stage progression, and changes in serum anti-parietal cell antibody (PCA), chromogranin A and gastrin-17 were assessed.

RESULTS

In total, 282 AAG patients (mean age 60.3 years; F:M ratio 2.4:1; median follow-up 3 years, interquartile range 1-7) were enrolled. All patients with stages 1 or 2 progressed to stage 2 or 3 over time with a steady trend (P = .243) and regression from a severe to a milder stage was never noticed. Disease progression of patients with stages 1 or 2 occurred within the first 3 years. PCA positivity rate did not change over time. Stage 3 patients had higher gastrin-17 levels compared to patients with stages 1 and 2 (median 606 vs 295 pg/mL; P < .001). In stage 3, the hazard ratio for the risk of developing stage 4 was 6.6 (95% CI 1.5-29; P = .001).

CONCLUSIONS

AAG is a steadily progressive disease, in which stages 1 and 2 always progress to stage 3. The risk of developing a complicated disease stage is greater in patients with more severe gastric lesions.

CDK5RAP3 inhibits angiogenesis in gastric neuroendocrine carcinoma by modulating AKT/HIF-1α/VEGFA signaling

Background

Angiogenesis plays critical roles in the progression and metastasis of malignant tumors. Gastric neuroendocrine carcinoma is an uncommon stomach cancer that is rich in blood vessels and exhibits highly malignant biological behavior with a poor prognosis. The role of CDK5RAP3 in GNEC has not been reported to date.

Methods

Immunohistochemistry was used to assess the expression of CDK5RAP3 in GNEC tissues and adjacent non-tumor tissues. Cell lines with stable overexpression or knockdown of CDK5RAP3 were constructed using lentiviral transfection. Wound-healing assays, invasion and metastasis assays, tube formation assays, and tumor xenograft transplantation assays were performed to evaluate the effect of CDK5RAP3 on GNEC angiogenesis in vitro and in vivo. Real-time PCR, ELISA, western blot analysis, and confocal-immunofluorescence staining were used to explore the molecular mechanism of CDK5RAP3′s effect on angiogenesis.

Results

Compared with their respective adjacent non-tumor tissues, protein levels of CDK5RAP3 were significantly decreased in GNEC tissues. Furthermore, low expression of CDK5RAP3 was correlated with more advanced TNM stage, increased tumor microvessel density, and poor prognosis. Functionally, we found that GNEC cells with CDK5RAP3 knockdown promoted human umbilical vein endothelial cells migration and tube formation via activation of AKT/HIF-1α/VEGFA signaling, resulting in increased levels of VEGFA in GNEC cell supernatant. In addition, CDK5RAP3 overexpression in GNEC cells caused the opposing effect. Consistent with these results, nude mouse tumorigenicity assays showed that CDK5RAP3 expression downregulated angiogenesis in vivo. Lastly, patients with low CDK5RAP3 expression and high VEGFA expression exhibited the worst prognosis.

Conclusions

This study demonstrated that CDK5RAP3 inhibits angiogenesis by downregulating AKT/HIF-1α/VEGFA signaling in GNEC and improves patient prognosis, suggesting that CDK5RAP3 could be a potential therapeutic target for GNEC.

Immunohistochemical Biomarkers of Gastrointestinal, Pancreatic, Pulmonary, and Thymic Neuroendocrine Neoplasms

Neuroendocrine neoplasms (NENs) are a heterogeneous group of epithelial neoplastic proliferations that irrespective of their primary site share features of neural and endocrine differentiation including the presence of secretory granules, synaptic-like vesicles, and the ability to produce amine and/or peptide hormones. NENs encompass a wide spectrum of neoplasms ranging from well-differentiated indolent tumors to highly aggressive poorly differentiated neuroendocrine carcinomas. Most cases arise in the digestive system and in thoracic organs, i.e., the lung and thymus. A correct diagnostic approach is crucial for the management of patients with both digestive and thoracic NENs, because their high clinical and biological heterogeneity is related to their prognosis and response to therapy. In this context, immunohistochemistry represents an indispensable diagnostic tool that pathologists need to use for the correct diagnosis and classification of such neoplasms. In addition, immunohistochemistry is also useful in identifying prognostic and theranostic markers. In the present article, the authors will review the role of immunohistochemistry in the routine workup of digestive and thoracic NENs.

Incidence and survival trends for gastric neuroendocrine neoplasms: An analysis of 3523 patients in the SEER database

BACKGROUND

The aim of this study is to investigate trends in the incidence and survival of patients with gastric neuroendocrine neoplasms (g-NENs).

METHODS

and methods: Patients diagnosed with g-NENs (n = 3523) were identified from the Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Results (SEER) database. Patients diagnosed with g-NENs (n = 199) in our department were designated as a validation dataset. Nomograms were adopted to predict disease-specific survival (DSS) and overall survival (OS).

RESULTS

The incidence of g-NENs is steadily increasing over time at a rate higher than any other cancer [annual percentage change (APC) = 6.3%, 95% confidence interval (CI) 5.6-7.0]. The 1-, 3-, and 5-year DSS rates were 87%, 78.6% and 70.6%, respectively, and the corresponding OS rates were 84.3%, 71.9%, and 53.7%, respectively. The multivariate analysis identified age, sex, T stage, M stage, and histological type as independent prognostic factors for both DSS and OS (all P < .05). The concordance indexes of the nomograms for DSS and OS in the training dataset were superior to those of the traditional tumor-node-metastasis (TNM) staging system [0.899 and 0.849 versus 0.864 and 0.783]. Calibration plots of the nomograms showed that the probability of DSS and OS closely corresponded to the actual observations in both the SEER-based training dataset and our inpatient validation dataset.

CONCLUSION

The incidence of g-NENs has been steadily increasing at a rapid rate over the past four decades. The nomograms based on the analysis of the SEER database were superior to the TNM staging system in predicting the clinical outcomes for g-NEN patients.

Autoimmune Gastritis in the Pediatric Age: An Underestimated Condition Report of Two Cases and Review

Background: Diagnosis of pediatric autoimmune gastritis (AIG) in children is important due to poor outcome and risk of malignancy. This condition is often underestimated in the clinico-pathologic diagnostic work-up, leading to delayed time-to-diagnosis. To increase the awareness of this condition in the pediatric population, we present two cases encountered at our institution, discuss their clinical, biological, and histological presentations in relation with evidence from the literature, and propose an algorithm for diagnosis and follow-up of AIG in children. Case presentation: Two patients (12 and 17 years old) presented with iron deficiency anemia and negative family history for autoimmune disorders. In both cases, the final diagnosis of autoimmune gastritis was delayed until pathological examination of endoscopic gastric biopsies showed atrophy of oxyntic glands. Helicobacter pylori search was negative. Follow up biopsies revealed persistent disease. Literature review on this condition shows unclear etiology and poor long term outcome in some patients because of increased risk of malignancy. Conclusions: AIG should be considered in the differential diagnosis of iron deficiency anemia in the pediatric population.Standardized clinico-pathologic work-up is mandatory. Endoscopic follow-up should be performed due to the risk of malignancy.

Prognostic Evaluations Tailored to Specific Gastric Neuroendocrine Neoplasms: Analysis Of 200 Cases with Extended Follow-Up

BACKGROUND

Gastric neuroendocrine neoplasms (NENs) are very heterogeneous, ranging from mostly indolent, atrophic gastritis-associated, type I neuroendocrine tumors (NETs), through highly malignant, poorly differentiated neuroendocrine carcinomas (pdNECs), to sporadic type III NETs with intermediate prognosis, and various rare tumor types. Histologic differentiation, proliferative grade, size, level of gastric wall invasion, and local or distant metastases are used as prognostic markers. However, their value remains to be tailored to specific gastric NENs.

METHODS

Series of type I NETs (n = 123 cases), type III NETs (n = 34 cases), and pdNECs (n = 43 cases) were retrospectively collected from four pathology centers specializing in endocrine pathology. All cases were characterized clinically and histopathologically. During follow-up (median 93 months) data were recorded to assess disease-specific patient survival.

RESULTS

Type I NETs, type III NETs, and pdNECs differed markedly in terms of tumor size, grade, invasive and metastatic power, as well as patient outcome. Size was used to stratify type I NETs into subgroups with significantly different invasive and metastatic behavior. All 70 type I NETs < 0.5 cm (micro-NETs) were uneventful. Ki67-based grading proved efficient for the prognostic stratification of type III NETs; however, grade 2 (G2) was not associated with tumor behavior in type I NETs. Although G3 NETs (2 type I and 9 type III) had a very poor prognosis, it was found that patient survival was longer with type III G3 NETs compared to pdNECs.

CONCLUSIONS

Given the marked, tumor type-related behavior differences, evaluation of gastric NEN prognostic parameters should be tailored to the type of neoplastic disease.

Ki67 labeling index: assessment and prognostic role in gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasms

In 1983, a monoclonal antibody, Ki67, was generated, that labeled the nuclei of proliferating non-neoplastic and neoplastic cells. The name Ki67 derived from the city of Kiel (Ki) where the antibody was produced in the university department of pathology and refers to the number of the original clone (67). Systematic assessment of the proliferative activity of tumors using Ki67 started in the 1990s, when Ki67, which only worked on frozen tissue, was complemented by the antibody MIB-1 that also worked in formalin-fixed tissues. Pancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasms (PanNENs) were the first endocrine tumors whose proliferative activity was assessed with Ki67. This approach was so successful that Ki67 was included as prognostic marker in the 2000 and 2004 WHO classifications of gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasms (GEP-NENs). In 2010, the WHO classification of GEP-NENs introduced a three-tiered grading, originally proposed by ENETS in 2006 that was mainly based on the Ki67 index. As it has subsequently been shown that the Ki67 index is the most reliable factor in the prognostic evaluation of GEP-NENs, especially of PanNENs, the 2017 WHO classification of PanNENs requires its use and strongly recommends exact assessment of the proportion Ki67-labeled cells as basis for the calculation of the Ki67 index. Problems in assessing the Ki67 index include intertumoral and intratumoral staining heterogeneity and counting methods. Despite such problems, the Ki67 index has emerged as indispensable for the prognostic and therapeutic stratification of the majority of GEP-NENs and can barely be replaced by counting mitoses. In future, however, it can be anticipated that the Ki67 cut-offs experience refinement in relation to the type of tumor, its location, and its response to therapy. It is also possible that the prognostic risk of an individual tumor is calculated for each Ki67 unit and not for an "a priori" fixed Ki67 class.

Recent Updates on Neuroendocrine Tumors From the Gastrointestinal and Pancreatobiliary Tracts

CONTEXT

-Gastrointestinal (GI) and pancreatobiliary tracts contain a variety of neuroendocrine cells that constitute a diffuse endocrine system. Neuroendocrine tumors (NETs) from these organs are heterogeneous tumors with diverse clinical behaviors. Recent improvements in the understanding of NETs from the GI and pancreatobiliary tracts have led to more-refined definitions of the clinicopathologic characteristics of these tumors. Under the 2010 World Health Organization classification scheme, NETs are classified as grade (G) 1 NETs, G2 NETs, neuroendocrine carcinomas, and mixed adenoneuroendocrine carcinomas. Histologic grades are dependent on mitotic counts and the Ki-67 labeling index. Several new issues arose after implementation of the 2010 World Health Organization classification scheme, such as issues with well-differentiated NETs with G3 Ki-67 labeling index and the evaluation of mitotic counts and Ki-67 labeling. Hereditary syndromes, including multiple endocrine neoplasia type 1 syndrome, von Hippel-Lindau syndrome, neurofibromatosis 1, and tuberous sclerosis, are related to NETs of the GI and pancreatobiliary tracts. Several prognostic markers of GI and pancreatobiliary tract NETs have been introduced, but many of them require further validation.

OBJECTIVE

-To understand clinicopathologic characteristics of NETs from the GI and pancreatobiliary tracts.

DATA SOURCES

-PubMed (US National Library of Medicine) reports were reviewed.

CONCLUSIONS

-In this review, we briefly summarize recent developments and issues related to NETs of the GI and pancreatobiliary tracts.

Surgical treatment and prognosis of gastric neuroendocrine neoplasms: a single-center experience

Background

Gastric neuroendocrine neoplasms (G-NENs) are uncommon, and data on their management is limited. We here investigated the clinicopathological characteristics, surgical and survival outcomes in G-NENs among Chinese. Moreover, we will discuss their prognostic value.

Methods

From existing databases of the West China Hospital, we retrospectively identified 135 consecutive patients who were surgically treated and pathologically diagnosed as G-NENs from January 2009 to August 2015.

Results

This entire cohort comprised 98 males and 37 females, with a median age of 60 years. Twenty-five patients underwent endoscopic resection, while 110 patients underwent open/laparoscopic surgery. Thirty-nine patients had neuroendocrine tumor G1 (NET G1), seven patients had neuroendocrine tumor G2 (NET G2), 69 patients had neuroendocrine carcinoma G3 (NEC G3) and 20 patients had mixed adenoneuroendocrine carcinoma (MANEC). The median survival was not achieved for both NET G1 and NET G2 versus 19 months (range 3–48) for NEC G3 and 10.5 months (range 3–45) for MANEC. The 3-year survival rates for stage I, II, III, and IV were 91.1 %, 78.6 %, 51.1 % and 11.8 %, respectively (P < 0.001). As for the prognostic analysis, both surgical margin and the newly updated World Health Organization (WHO) classification were independent predictors of overall survival (OS).

Conclusions

G-NENs are a kind of rare tumors, and patients with NET G3 and MANEC have unfavorable prognosis even surgically treated. Moreover, surgical margin and the new 2010 WHO criteria are closely associated with OS for G-NENs.

Management of gastric and duodenal neuroendocrine tumors

Gastrointestinal neuroendocrine tumors (GI-NETs) are rare neoplasms, like all NETs. However, the incidence of GI-NETS has been increasing in recent years. Gastric NETs (G-NETs) and duodenal NETs (D-NETs) are the common types of upper GI-NETs based on tumor location. G-NETs are classified into three distinct subgroups: type I, II, and III. Type I G-NETs, which are the most common subtype (70%-80% of all G-NETs), are associated with chronic atrophic gastritis, including autoimmune gastritis and Helicobacter pylori associated atrophic gastritis. Type II G-NETs (5%-6%) are associated with multiple endocrine neoplasia type 1 and Zollinger-Ellison syndrome (MEN1-ZES). Both type I and II G-NETs are related to hypergastrinemia, are small in size, occur in multiple numbers, and are generally benign. In contrast, type III G-NETs (10%-15%) are not associated with hypergastrinemia, are large-sized single tumors, and are usually malignant. Therefore, surgical resection and chemotherapy are generally necessary for type III G-NETs, while endoscopic resection and follow-up, which are acceptable for the treatment of most type I and II G-NETs, are only acceptable for small and well differentiated type III G-NETs. D-NETs include gastrinomas (50%-60%), somatostatin-producing tumors (15%), nonfunctional serotonin-containing tumors (20%), poorly differentiated neuroendocrine carcinomas (< 3%), and gangliocytic paragangliomas (< 2%). Most D-NETs are located in the first or second part of the duodenum, with 20% occurring in the periampullary region. Therapy for D-NETs is based on tumor size, location, histological grade, stage, and tumor type. While endoscopic resection may be considered for small nonfunctional D-NETs (G1) located in the higher papilla region, surgical resection is necessary for most other D-NETs. However, there is no consensus regarding the ideal treatment of D-NETs.

Giant type III well-differentiated neuroendocrine tumor of the stomach: A case report

INTRODUCTION

We describe a case of a large type III neuroendocrine tumor of the stomach. Management and current literature are reviewed.

PRESENTATION OF CASE

A 37year old female presented with upper gastrointestinal bleed and epigastric pain. Further workup demonstrated a large ulcerated gastric mass near the GE junction. Computer tomography scan and endoscopic ultrasound showed a 10cm mass with no evidence of distant disease. Fine needle aspiration pathology was consistent with a well differentiated neuroendocrine tumor (Ki67 index<2%), with elevated levels of chromogranin A and serotonin levels but normal gastrin. The patient underwent an uneventful total gastrectomy. Final pathology analysis reported a higher KI67 index (7.54%) and a final pathology of grade 2 type III, T3 N3, neuroendocrine tumor of the stomach. The chromogranin levels normalized and no recurrent disease has been detected in one year follow up.

DISCUSSION

Gastric neuroendocrine tumors are extremely rare, accounting for 4% of all neuroendocrine tumors of the body and 1% of all neoplasms of the stomach. Based on histomorphologic characteristics and pathogenesis, gastric neuroendocrine tumors are classified into four types with differing prognosis and behavior. Current literature describes type 3 gastric neuroendocrine tumors as larger than 2cm. However, there is no precedent in the literature for a tumor of this size.

CONCLUSION

The incidence of gastric neuroendocrine tumors has been increasing during the last decade, underscoring the need to improve our understanding of their biology and behavior. When identified histologically, patient outcomes depend on appropriate determination of tumor biology and subsequent choice of treatment.

Clinicopathological features of primary gastric neuroendocrine neoplasms: A single-center analysis

OBJECTIVE

To assess the clinical characteristics, diagnosis and therapeutic modalities for gastric neuroendocrine neoplasms (GNENs) among the Chinese population in a single institution.

METHODS

A total of 57 patients with histologically confirmed GNENs, who were diagnosed between 1995 and 2015 at the Peking Union Medical College Hospital were retrospectively reviewed. The clinical, imaging and histopathologic characteristics as well as the treatments of GNENs were collected and analyzed.

RESULTS

Patients with GNENs mostly presented with non-specific symptoms. Gastric body was the most common site of involvement. The choice of imaging modality, such as endoscopy and computed tomography depended on the tumor subtype. Chromogranin A (CgA) and synaptophysin were indispensable immunohistochemical markers for diagnosis. Significant inter-group differences in the positivity rate of CD56 were observed among the three grades (G1, G2 and G3). Therapeutic modalities included endoscopic intervention, surgical resection and pharmacotherapy, which were largely guided by the tumor subtype and the presence or absence of distant metastasis or tumor recurrence.

CONCLUSIONS

Routine endoscopic examination is recommended for the early diagnosis of GNENs. Histopathological examination can make the definite diagnosis of GNENs and clarify the nature of gastric polyps. A multidisciplinary approach is important in the management of patients with GNENs.

Clinical features and management of type I gastric carcinoids

Type I gastric carcinoids (TIGCs) are related to chronic atrophic gastritis and are characterized by hypergastrinemia and hyperplasia of enterochromaffin-like cells. TIGCs are the most frequently diagnosed of all gastric carcinoids, accounting for about 70-80 %. Endoscopically, TIGCs are present as small (<10 mm), polypoid lesions or, more frequently, as smooth, rounded submucosal lesions. Histologically, TIGCs arise in the deep mucosa, with some invading the submucosa. Most TIGCs are well-differentiated tumors, with metastasis being rare. Therefore, patients with TIGCs generally have an excellent prognosis. Among the currently available treatment options are total gastrectomy, partial resection, antrectomy, endoscopic resection, and endoscopic surveillance, although no consensus has been reached on their optimal management. Further studies are needed to develop better management options for patients with TIGC.