Neoadjuvant immunoradiotherapy results in high rate of complete pathological response and clinical to pathological downstaging in locally advanced head and neck squamous cell carcinoma

De-escalated surgery following neoadjuvant chemoimmunotherapy for locally advanced oral squamous cell carcinoma: A retrospective cohort study

BACKGROUND

There remains considerable debate regarding whether the extent of surgery can be reduced in oral squamous cell carcinoma (OSCC) with significant tumor shrinkage after neoadjuvant chemoimmunotherapy. This study aims to report the feasibility and oncological safety of de-escalated surgery (DES) following neoadjuvant chemoimmunotherapy in locally advanced OSCC.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We collected clinical data of patients with locally advanced OSCC (T3-4 N0-3 M0) treated at our cancer center between November 2019 and July 2023 who received platinum-based doublet chemotherapy combined with a PD-1 inhibitor followed by DES. DES was defined as surgery performed according to the extent of residual tumor after neoadjuvant therapy. Tumor response, flap reconstruction/mandibulectomy exemption rates, event-free survival (EFS), and overall survival (OS) were assessed.

RESULTS

A total of 111 patients were included, with tumors located in the tongue (73/111, 65.8 %), buccal-lip mucosa (15/111, 13.5 %), mandibular gingiva - floor of mouth (15/111, 13.5 %), and maxillary gingiva - hard palate (8/111, 7.2 %). The objective response rate (ORR) was 77.5 %, with a pathological complete response (pCR) rate of 40.5 %. Flap reconstruction was exempted in 80 (72.1 %) of patients. Among the 96 patients initially planned for mandibulectomy, 68 patients (70.8 %) were exempted from mandibulectomy. With a median follow-up of 27 months, the estimated 1-, 2-, and 3-year EFS rates were 90.1 %, 84.4 %, and 80.9 %, respectively. The estimated 1-, 2-, and 3-year OS rates were 97.3 %, 93.1 %, and 91.3 %, respectively.

CONCLUSION

Opting for DES after neoadjuvant chemoimmunotherapy appears to be feasible, with satisfactory oncological safety in OSCC patients.

Histological tumor necrosis predicts decreased survival after neoadjuvant chemotherapy in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma

OBJECTIVE

Despite growing interest in neoadjuvant therapies, there are no methods to predict radio- (RT) or chemoradiotherapy (CRT) response in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC). The aim of this research was to study the effect of neoadjuvant RT or CRT on the tumor immune landscape and patient survival in HNSCC.

METHODS

All HNSCC patients treated with neoadjuvant RT or CRT (n = 53) were identified from a retrospective cohort of 1033 patients. Pre- and post-neoadjuvant cancer samples from the same patient were analyzed with biomarkers related to cancer immunology: tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes (CD8), tumor-associated macrophages (CD68, CD206, Clever-1), immune response regulator (PD-L1) and histologic tumor necrosis. Outcomes of interest were individual immune landscape profiling and its impact on 5-year overall survival (OS) in HNSCC patients treated with neoadjuvant RT/CRT.

RESULTS

Results from 588 whole-section stainings revealed multiple statistically significant alterations in immune landscape in response to RT/CRT. Pretreatment tumor necrosis was the most useful biomarker in predicting poor outcome, as the OS was 14.3% with necrosis and 48.5% without necrosis (HR 2.87; 95% CI: 1.23 to 6.66, p=0.014). In addition, an artificial intelligence-based (AI) deep learning method for identifying tumor necrosis from histopathological specimens was successfully developed. The predictive role of histological necrosis in neoadjuvant RT/CRT was validated in additional samples from 171 HNSCC patients untreated with neoadjuvant therapy.

CONCLUSIONS

Detection of tumor necrosis and AI-driven deep learning effectively predict neoadjuvant RT/CRT responses in HNSCC.

High pathological tumor response associates with enhanced overall survival in HNSCC patients following neoadjuvant immunochemotherapy and surgery

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to evaluate the impact of the postoperative pathological remission status on the prognosis of patients who underwent surgery after neoadjuvant immunochemotherapy in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC).

METHODS

This study retrospectively analyzed patients who participated in a clinical trial at our hospital. These patients received neoadjuvant pembrolizumab combined with platinum and taxane followed by surgery from March 1, 2021, to November 1, 2024. Clinical and pathological characteristics were collected. Cox regression analysis was used to analyze clinical and pathological characteristics by univariate and multivariate analysis, and Kaplan Meier (KM) survival curves were plotted to evaluate the associations of clinical and pathological characteristics with the progression free survival (PFS) and overall survival(OS). Propensity score matching (PSM) was used to level the baseline of clinical characteristics.

RESULTS

The study cohort consisted of a total of 62 patients. the PFS rate of the patients was 85.5%, and the OS rate was 87.1%. The follow-up period of the patients ranged from 4 to 41 months, with an mean follow-up time of 23.7 months. However, high pathological tumor response (PTR) was significantly associated with better OS (97.2% vs 70.8%) and was an independent prognostic factor ( hazard ratio 0.153; 95% Confidence interval 0.018 - 1.307, p = 0.046). Before and after PSM, patients with high PTR had a significantly longer OS than those without high PTR (p = 0.0258,0.0053).

CONCLUSION

Our study showed a strong OS improvement in patients who achieved high PTR after neoadjuvant immunochemotherapy.

Re-evaluating Lymph Node Yield, Lymph Node Ratio, and the number of metastatic nodes as prognostic factors in oral cavity squamous cell carcinoma

OBJECTIVE

Previous studies of Lymph Node Yield (LNY) for neck dissection in Oral Cavity Squamous Cell Carcinoma (OCSCC) have shown LNY of 18 or more lymph nodes to be of prognostic value. This study aims to evaluate the prognostic implications of LNY, number of metastatic nodes, and Lymph Node Ratio (LNR) in clinical N0 OCSCC.

METHODS

We retrospectively analyzed 118 patients who underwent elective neck dissection for OCSCC at Rabin Medical Center (2000-2020). Demographic, clinical, pathological, and surgical data were collected. We examined the prognostic significance of LNY cutoffs (18 and 13), number of positive nodes, and LNR on disease-free and overall survival.

RESULTS

The mean LNY was 19.5 ± 11.3 nodes, with a lymph node metastasis rate of 31.3 %. Statistical analysis showed that neither 18 nor 13 lymph nodes had significant prognostic value for recurrence or survival. The mean LNR was 4.52 % ± 11.3 %, with higher LNR values (>3.4 %) significantly associated with increased recurrence (p = 0.003) and reduced survival intervals (p = 0.003). Cox regression analysis further confirmed that both elevated LNR and the presence of more than two metastatic lymph nodes were independently associated with increased mortality.

CONCLUSIONS

Our findings challenge the commonly cited LNY threshold of 18, as no specific LNY cutoff conferred significant survival benefits. Instead, LNR emerged as a superior prognostic marker, correlating strongly with overall survival and locoregional control. Incorporating LNR into prognostic models may enhance risk stratification and guide clinical decision-making in OCSCC management.

Neoadjuvant with low-dose radiotherapy, tislelizumab, albumin-bound paclitaxel, and cisplatin for resectable locally advanced head and neck squamous cell carcinoma: phase II single-arm trial

Although pathological complete response (pCR) and major pathological response (MPR) rates of neoadjuvant immunotherapy combined with chemotherapy in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) trials remain suboptimal, emerging evidence highlights the synergistic potential of combining low-dose radiotherapy with immunotherapy to promote the efficacy of immunotherapy. This phase II, open-label, single-arm, multicenter trial (NCT05343325) enrolled 28 patients with untreated stage III-IVB HNSCC (NeoRTPC02). Patients received neoadjuvant low-dose radiotherapy, the programmed death-1 (PD-1) inhibitor tislelizumab, albumin-bound paclitaxel, and cisplatin for two cycles, followed by radical resection ~4 weeks after treatment completion. The primary endpoint, pCR rate, was achieved in 14 of 23 patients (60.9%; 23/28, 82.1% of the total cohort underwent surgery). Secondary endpoints included MPR rate (21.7%, 5/23), R0 resection rate (100%), and objective response rate (64.3%; 18/28). Treatment-related adverse events were manageable, with grade 3 or 4 treatment-related adverse events occurring in 10 (35.7%) patients. No surgical delays were observed. Single-cell RNA sequencing revealed remodeling of the HNSCC tumor microenvironment, which may correlate with improved clinical outcomes. This trial met the pre-specified primary endpoint, demonstrating a high pCR rate with promising efficacy and manageable toxicity in locally advanced HNSCC.

Neoadjuvant toripalimab plus nimotuzumab combined with taxol-based chemotherapy in locally advanced penile squamous cell carcinoma

The conventional neoadjuvant chemotherapy regimen for locally advanced penile squamous cell carcinoma (La-PSCC) has shown moderate response rates and survival benefits. This single-arm, phase II trial (NCT04475016) evaluated a neoadjuvant regimen of four cycles of toripalimab (anti-PD-1 antibody), nimotuzumab (anti-EGFR antibody), and taxol-based chemotherapy (TNT), followed by consolidative surgery. The primary endpoint was the pathological complete response (pCR) rate. Among 29 enrolled patients, 24 (82.8%) underwent consolidative surgery, with 14 (48.3%, 95% confidence interval [CI], 29.4-67.5%) achieving pCR. The objective response rate (ORR) was 82.8% (95% CI, 64.2-94.2). Median follow-up was 39.97 months, with two-year overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) rates of 72.4% and 65.5%. Grade 3-4 treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs) occurred in 12 (41.4%) patients, with no treatment-related deaths. Biomarker analysis identified PD-L1 expression, TP53 mutation status, and CD8+ T cell density as potential predictive markers. Therefore, neoadjuvant TNT shows promising anti-tumor activity and acceptable toxicity.

Tumor-draining lymph nodes - friend or foe during immune checkpoint therapy?

The pivotal role of tumor-draining lymph nodes (TDLNs) in supporting antitumor immunity and serving as sites for cancer metastasis presents a clinical challenge: eliminate tumors while preserving antitumor immune responses. In this article, we explore the initiation of tumor-specific immune responses within lymph nodes (LNs), the immunocompromised microenvironment induced by tumors within LNs, and the crucial involvement of TDLNs in immunotherapy. Additionally, we examine the clinical prospects of modifying surgical procedures or therapy sequences to enhance the efficacy of cancer treatment.

Neoadjuvant immunochemotherapy versus neoadjuvant immunoradiotherapy in locally advanced oral squamous cell carcinoma

Objective

To juxtapose the efficacy and safety profiles of neoadjuvant immunochemotherapy (NAIC) and neoadjuvant immunoradiotherapy (NAIR) in the management of locally advanced oral squamous cell carcinoma (SCC).

Methods

A retrospective analysis of prospectively gathered data was conducted. The study evaluated the impact of NAIC versus NAIR on various parameters, including pathologic complete response (pCR), major pathologic response (mPR), clinical to pathological downstaging, surgical site infection, quality of life, pathologic adverse features, and prognostic outcomes.

Results

The study encompassed a total of 120 patients, with 73 undergoing NAIC. The pCR and mPR rates in the NAIR group were 25.5% and 63.8%, respectively, closely mirroring the 31.5% and 69.9% observed in the NAIC cohort. A propensity for clinical to pathological downstaging and a reduced incidence of pathologic adverse features was noted in the NAIC population. However, both groups exhibited similar distributions in surgical site infection rates, quality of life metrics, grade 3/4 adverse events, and overall survival. In the Cox proportional hazards model, patients receiving NAIC demonstrated a hazard ratio of 0.87 (95% confidence interval: 0.65-0.98) for 3-year locoregional control, relative to the NAIR group.

Conclusion

In the context of locally advanced oral SCC, both NAIC and NAIR exhibited robust efficacy and safety profiles. Nevertheless, NAIC provided superior locoregional control compared to NAIR, thereby emerging as the more favorable initial therapeutic option over NAIR.

Impact of radiation therapy dose, fractionation, and immunotherapeutic partner in a mouse model of hormone receptor-positive mammary carcinogenesis

BACKGROUND

Hormone receptor-positive (HR+) breast cancer responds poorly to immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs). In some settings, radiation therapy (RT) has been shown to mediate immunostimulatory effects and promote ICI sensitivity.

METHODS

We investigated whether hypofractionated RT may be successfully combined with ICIs in a mouse model of multifocal, metachronous HR+ mammary carcinogenesis. We hypothesized that focal RT targeting the first detectable (primary) tumor combined with ICIs may generate effective immunity, delaying the development of new lesions.

RESULTS

Focal RT in various doses and fractionations limited primary tumor growth, with an optimum for a 20-Gy × 2 regimen (ablative in approximately 90% of mice). The degree of primary disease control, however, did not necessarily correlate with overall survival extension because of changes in the development of new neoplastic lesions contributing to global tumor burden. Adding a PD-1 blocker to focal RT delivered in a 10-Gy × 3, 20-Gy × 2, or 8-Gy × 6 regimen failed to alter overall survival extension enabled by RT alone. Similar results were obtained with a CTLA4 blocker, an IL-1β inhibitor, and a PD-1 blocker plus recombinant FLT3LG when combined with the 10-Gy × 3 regimen.

CONCLUSIONS

In this model of HR+ mammary carcinogenesis, RT to the primary tumor ameliorates overall survival (to an extent based on dose and fractionation). Increasing local control through RT alone or RT plus immunotherapy beyond a hitherto undefined threshold, however, does not necessarily inhibit the development of subsequent nonirradiated neoplasms and hence does not necessarily provide extra overall survival benefits.

Current Progress and Future Directions of Immunotherapy in Head and Neck Squamous Cell Carcinoma: A Narrative Review

Importance

For decades, the 3 therapeutic pillars for head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) have been radiation therapy, chemotherapy, and surgery. In recent years, a fourth pillar, immunotherapy, has shifted the existing paradigm of oncologic care by improving survival outcomes. This narrative review highlights key completed and ongoing clinical trials that have led to new therapeutic approaches and are aiming to further alter the current standard of care.

Observations

Immunotherapy in HNSCC first saw success in phase 3 clinical trials with immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) for programmed cell death 1 protein in patients with recurrent or metastatic (R/M) disease. However, only approximately 15% to 20% of patients with R/M HNSCC achieve durable responses. Subsequent trials aimed to broaden ICIs to the definitive or curative setting, in combination with established chemoradiation modalities. These studies have yielded disappointing results, raising concerns that concurrent administration of ICI with chemoradiation- or radiation-induced attenuation of immune responses may contribute to lack of efficacy. Therefore, recent studies have attempted to introduce ICI sequentially, either prior to standard of care surgery in the neoadjuvant setting or following definitive treatment in the adjuvant or maintenance setting. These trials have demonstrated mixed results but with promising initial results from early phase neoadjuvant trials demonstrating early signals of response. Further trials are currently underway with various combinatorial approaches in the neoadjuvant and adjuvant settings to assess response rates and survival.

Conclusions and Relevance

The introduction of ICIs has brought a dramatic shift in the treatment landscape of HNSCC. Completed trials have provided new hope for patients, but failures in several settings suggest that further studies based on a biologic understanding of immune responses are required to expand immunotherapeutic approaches.

Predictive value of CPS combined with inflammatory markers for pathological remission of locally advanced head and neck squamous cell carcinoma after adjuvant immunochemotherapy

Objective

To explore the predictive value of the combined positive score (CPS) and the neutrophil-to- platelet count ratio (NPR) for surgical pathological remission in patients with locally advanced head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (LAHNSCC) who have undergone neoadjuvant immunotherapy combined with chemotherapy (NICC).

Method

Patients with LAHNSCC who underwent NICC and surgery from May 2021 to September 2023 were retrospectively analyzed. CPS, NPR and other clinically relevant parameters were collected, which includes gender, age, tumor types, multiple cancer, differentiation, T staging, N staging, immunotherapy cycles and postoperative pathological remission degree.

Result

Patients with a higher CPS were significantly associated with a higher pathological complete response (PCR) of the primary site (PPCR) (P = 0.034) and a higher PCR of the lymph nodes (LPCR) (P = 0.085). Specifically, patients with a CPS of ≥20 demonstrated a higher rate of severe pathologic tumor response (PTR), with values of 80.8% compared to 66.7% and 50%. Notably, even patients with a CPS <1 had a relatively high severe PTR rate of 66.7%. Moreover, patients with NPR <0.024 exhibited a higher severe PTR, regardless of the CPS subgroups (P < 0.05).

Conclusion

Higher CPS can be considered a good predictor of higher PCR after NICC in patients with LAHNSCC. Patients with CPS <1 can still achieve a higher PTR. Patients with NPR <0.024 can help achieve a higher severe PTR in patients with LAHNSCC regardless of the CPS.CPS combined with NPR may have a better predicted value for surgical PTR of HNSCC after NICC.

Efficacy, safety and single-cell analysis of neoadjuvant immunochemotherapy in locally advanced oral squamous cell carcinoma: a phase II trial

The clinical activity of neoadjuvant immunochemotherapy (NAIC) for treating locally advanced oral squamous cell carcinoma (LA-OSCC) remains uncertain. This single-arm, phase II trial (ChiCTR2200066119) tested 2 cycles of NAIC with camrelizumab plus nab-paclitaxel and cisplatin in LA-OSCC patients. For primary endpoint, the major pathological response (MPR) rate was 69.0% (95% confidence interval (CI): 49.2%-84.7%). The treatment was well-tolerated, with only 2 patients (6.45%) having grade 3 or 4 treatment-related adverse events during neoadjuvant treatment. For secondary endpoints, the pathological complete response rate was 41.4% (95%CI: 23.5%-61.1%) and the objective response rate was 82.8% (24/29, 95%CI: 64.2%-94.2%). The 18-month overall survival and disease-free survival probabilities were 96.77% (95%CI: 79.23%-99.54%) and 85.71% (95%CI: 53.95%-96.22%), respectively. Exploratory analysis showed that patients with MPR exhibited higher density of baseline CD4_Tfh_CXCL13 cells, and increased density of tertiary lymphoid structures after NAIC. Baseline CD4_Tfh_CXCL13 cells might be potential predictive biomarker of efficacy. The interaction between CXCL13 on CD4_Tfh_CXCL13 cells and CXCR5 on B cells may play a role in treatment response. These findings suggest the potential of NAIC as a promising treatment for LA-OSCC and offer preliminary insights into responsive biomarkers.

Current innovations in head and neck cancer: From diagnostics to therapeutics

Background

Head and neck cancers (HNC) account for a significant global health burden, with increasing incidence rates and complex treatment requirements. Traditional diagnostic and therapeutic approaches, while effective, often result in substantial morbidity and limitations in personalized care. This review provides a comprehensive overview of the latest innovations in diagnostics and therapeutic strategies for HNC from 2015 to 2024.

Methods

A review of literature focused on pe-reviewed journals, clinical trial databases, and oncology conference proceedings. Key areas include molecular diagnostics, imaging technologies, minimally invasive surgeries, and innovative therapeutic strategies.

Results

Technologies like liquid biopsy next-generation sequencing (NGS) have greatly improved diagnostic accuracy and personalization in HNC care. These advancements have improved survival rates and enhanced patients' quality of life. Personalized therapeutic approaches, including immune checkpoint inhibitors, precision radiation therapy, and surgery, have led to enhanced treatment efficacy while reducing side effects. The integration of AI and machine learning into diagnostics and treatment planning shows promise in optimizing clinical decision-making and predicting treatment outcomes.

Conclusion

The current innovations in diagnostics and therapeutics are reshaping the management of head and neck cancer, offering more tailored and effective approaches to care. Overall, the continuous integration of these innovations in clinical practice is reshaping HNC treatment and improving patient outcomes and survival rates. Future research should focus on further refining these technologies, addressing challenges related to accessibility, and exploring their long-term clinical benefits in diverse patient populations.

Immunotherapeutic strategies in head and neck cancer: challenges and opportunities

HNSCC remains a substantial health issue, with treatment options including surgery, radiation, and platinum-based chemotherapy. Unfortunately, despite progress in research, only modest gains have been made in disease control, with existing treatments resulting in significant functional and quality-of-life issues. The introduction of immunotherapy in the treatment of HNSCC has resulted in some improvements in outlook for patients and is now standard of care for populations with both recurrent and metastatic disease. However, despite the early successes, responses to immune checkpoint inhibition (ICI) remain modest to low, approaching 14%-22% objective response rates. Challenges to the effectiveness of ICI and other immunotherapies are complex, including the diverse and dynamic molecular plasticity and heterogeneity of HNSCCs; lack of immunogenic antigens; accumulated suppressive immune populations such as myeloid cells and dysfunctional T cells; nutrient depletion; and metabolic dysregulation in the HNSCC tumor microenvironment. In this Review, we explore the mechanisms responsible for immunotherapy resistance, dissect these challenges, and discuss potential opportunities for overcoming hurdles to the development of successful immunotherapy for HNSCC.

Predictors of Radiation Resistance and Novel Radiation Sensitizers in Head and Neck Cancers: Advancing Radiotherapy Efficacy

Radiation resistance in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC), driven by intrinsic and extrinsic factors, poses a significant challenge in radiation oncology. The key contributors are tumor hypoxia, cancer stem cells, cell cycle checkpoint activation, and DNA repair processes (homologous recombination and non-homologous end-joining). Genetic modifications such as TP53 mutations, KRAS mutations, EGFR overexpression, and abnormalities in DNA repair proteins like BRCA1/2 additionally affect radiation sensitivity. Novel radiosensitizers targeting these pathways demonstrate the potential to overcome resistance. Hypoxia-activated drugs and gold nanoparticles enhance the efficacy of radiotherapy and facilitate targeted distribution. Integrating immunotherapy, especially immune checkpoint inhibitors, with radiation therapy, enhances anti-tumor responses and reduces resistance. Epigenetic alterations, such as DNA methylation and histone acetylation, significantly influence radiation response, with the potential for sensitization through histone deacetylase inhibitors and non-coding RNA regulators. Metabolic changes linked to glucose, lipid, and glutamine metabolism influence radiosensitivity, uncovering new targets for radiosensitization. Human papillomavirus (HPV)-associated malignancies exhibit increased radiosensitivity relative to other tumors due to impaired DNA repair mechanisms and heightened immunogenicity. Furthermore, understanding the interplay between HPV oncoproteins and p53 functionality can enhance treatment strategies for HPV-related cancers. Using DNA damage response inhibitors (PARP, ATM/ATR), cell cycle checkpoint inhibitors (WEE1, CHK1/2), and hypoxia-targeted agents as radiosensitizing strategies exhibit considerable promise. Immunomodulatory approaches, including PD-1 and CTLA-4 inhibitors in conjunction with radiation, enhance anti-tumor immunity. Future directions emphasize personalized radiation therapy using genetics, sophisticated medication delivery systems, adaptive radiotherapy, and real-time monitoring. These integrated strategies seek to diminish radiation resistance and improve therapeutic efficacy in HNSCC.

Hypofractionated Radiation Therapy in the Definitive Management of Head and Neck Cancer

The use of hypofractionated radiation therapy has increased among many cancers, although its use in head and neck cancers remains limited due to concerns regarding acute and late toxicities. Recent retrospective and prospective studies demonstrate the preliminary safety and efficacy of hypofractionation in the definitive, postoperative, and preoperative settings for head and neck treatment. This article seeks to comprehensively review the rationale and data for novel fractionation schemes in this disease site. We also provide practical clinical and dosimetric insights based on our institutional experiences with hypofractionation in head and neck cancers.

Principles and Paradigms of De-Escalated Elective Nodal Irradiation: Boldly Going Towards an Inflection Point in Head and Neck Radiotherapy

Fundamental axioms of elective nodal irradiation (ENI) for head and neck cancers merit re-examination in contemporary practice. Standard ENI doses to volumes bordering critical organs-at-risk increased during the transition from two-dimensional radiation planning to intensity-modulated radiotherapy, despite improvements in detection of occult nodal metastases with modern imaging, use of concurrent chemotherapy, and identification of human papillomavirus (HPV)-related radiosensitivity. Historical large ENI volumes covering low-risk nodal regions continue to be commonly used even as awareness grows regarding the predominant pattern-of-failure within existing gross disease. In this review, we outline principles for de-escalating head and neck ENI dose and volume and highlight the emerging paradigm of ENI omission. We also propose a three-part approach to ENI de-escalation, the rationale for early adoption of de-escalated ENI in the absence of level-one evidence, and strategies to promote early adoption in light of modest equipoise and an inflection point towards changing the status quo.

Neoadjuvant Immunotherapy in Resectable HNSCC: An Updated Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Immunotherapy is a recently recognised FDA-approved treatment for R/M HNSCC. Our goal is to explore the safety profile and the efficacy of immunotherapy in the neoadjuvant setting before surgery in mucosal head and neck cancer.

METHODS

Three electronic databases had been systematically searched through March 2024. Demographic and tumour characteristics were extracted. Primary outcomes obtained were disease-free survival (DFS), progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), complete pathological response (cPR), which was defined as no residual tumour, and major pathological response (MPR), which as defined as <10% residual viable tumour. Safety outcomes examined were grade 3 and above adverse event, median time to surgery, delays to surgery, and death related to neoadjuvant treatment.

RESULTS

A total of 459 patients from 15 studies were included in the analysis. The pooled estimate of cPR for all the studies was 14.9% (95% confidence interval [CI] 8.0-26.2). Subgroup analysis showed chemoimmunotherapy had a higher cPR 30.1% (95% CI 22.8-38.62) compared with immunotherapy alone 1.4% (95% CI 0.3-5.2). There was no treatment-related death. Chemoimmunotherapy had a higher pooled estimate of adverse events 22.9% (95% CI 11.0-41.5) compared with immunotherapy alone 8.5% (95% CI 2.6-24.3). Subgroup analysis demonstrated that chemoimmunotherapy had a higher DFS compared with immunotherapy alone: 89.8% (95% CI 81.4-94.7) versus 80.44% (95% CI 73.9-85.7), respectively. Neoadjuvant immunoradiotherapy had conflicting results.

CONCLUSIONS

Neoadjuvant immunotherapy was well tolerated. Neoadjuvant chemoimmunotherapy may be more effective in treating LAHNSCC over immunotherapy alone; however, TRAEs were higher.

The characterization of tumor immune microenvironment after neoadjuvant immunotherapy in head and neck squamous cell cancer using multiplex immunohistochemistry

OBJECTIVE

Optimizing clinical decision-making in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) is challenging due to the ambiguous understanding of the immune cell dynamics and immune checkpoints regulation in the disease after the administration of neoadjuvant immunotherapy (NIT).

METHODS

HNSCC biopsy samples collected before and after the neoadjuvant treatment are classified into the pathologic response (PR) and the non-pathologic response (NPR) groups according to treatment responses and the expression of immune cells and checkpoints was labeled using multiplex immunohistochemistry (m-IHC).

RESULTS

The populations of CD4+ T cells, CD8+ T cells, regulatory T cells (Treg), PD-1, and PD-L1 were particularly higher in the PR group than the NPR group in pre-treatment tissues, with the p-values of log-transformed positive cell density <0.05. Almost all markers showed a lower expression in the PR patients after treatment, resulting lower post/pre-treatment ratios of positive cell densities in the PR patients relative to the NPR patients. Following treatment, TIM3+ T cells and LAG3+ T cells exhibited significantly diminished levels in the PR cohort relative to the NPR cohort, with post/pre-treatment expression ratios showing significant differences (P < 0.05). Tumor infiltration lymphocyte analysis revealed that the PR group exhibited a considerably higher average density of CD8+ T cells infiltrating in the tumor marginal zone.

CONCLUSION

The presence of T cells demonstrated significant predictive capability for responses to neoadjuvant immunotherapy in HNSCC patients. Furthermore, TIM3+ T cells and LAG3+ T cells were found to be remarkably lower in the partial response (PR) cohort than in the non-partial response (NPR) cohort post-treatment. This research contributes critical understanding of the physiological changes occurring in immune cell responses.

Discordant Responses Between Imaging Examination and Surgical Pathology of Head and Heck Squamous Cell Carcinoma After Neoadjuvant Immunotherapy Combined With Chemotherapy

Background

We here investigated the value of imaging examination in evaluating tumor remission-based surgery in patients with head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC), who had undergone neoadjuvant immunotherapy combined with chemotherapy (NICC).

Methods

HNSCC patients who underwent NICC and surgery from May 2021 to September 2023 were retrospectively analyzed. All patients had to undergo imaging examination evaluation, including enhanced computed tomography (CT) and enhanced magnetic resonance (MR) imaging before and after NICC. Data related to clinical parameters, complete response of the primary site (PrCR), complete response of the primary site and the lymph node (PLCR), complete response of the lymph node (LCR), and tumor response (TR), were gathered. The paired Chi-square test and t-test were conducted to analyze the differences in responses between imaging examination and pathology. Binary logistic regression was applied to analyze the relevant clinical factors of differences in responses.

Results

In total, data of 41 patients were included in this study. Significant discordant responses were observed between enhanced CT, magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), and pathology in PrCR (4.9%, 7.3% vs. 41.5%), LCR (12.2%, 7.3% vs. 53.7%), PLCR (0%, 0% vs. 31.7%), and TR (severe 29.3%,17.1% vs. 25.61%) (P < 0.05). Patients with hypopharyngeal cancer (odds ratio (OR): 7.04), oral cancer (OR: 3.64), higher neutrophil to lymphocyte ratio (NLR) (OR: 2.05), and earlier T stage (OR: 0.71) exhibited a larger response difference between enhanced CT and pathology. Patients with younger age (OR: 0.79) hypopharyngeal cancer (OR: 22.81), oral cancer (OR: 2.65), higher NLR (OR: 19.47), and earlier T stage (OR: 0.29) exhibited a larger response difference between enhanced MR and pathology.

Conclusions

Discordant responses were noted between the imaging examination and surgical pathology of HNSCC after NICC. Hypopharyngeal cancer, higher NLR, and earlier T stage may predict a higher response difference.

T cell dynamics with neoadjuvant immunotherapy in head and neck cancer

Immune-checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) are being tested as neoadjuvant therapies in various solid tumours, including in patients with head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC), with promising results. Key findings thus far include that this approach is well-tolerated with favourable clinical outcomes including promising pathological response rates in initial studies. Pathological responses are likely to be increased by combining other agents with anti-PD-(L)1 antibodies. Comparisons of baseline biopsy samples with post-treatment surgical specimens have enabled correlative studies utilizing multiomic and immunogenomic methods. Data from these studies suggest that pretreatment intratumoural tissue-resident memory CD8+ T cells are key drivers of tumour regression and give rise to both local and systemic antitumour immune responses. Analyses of systemic responses have defined a PD-1+KLRG1- circulating CD8+ T cell subpopulation that is highly predictive of response, and revealed the interrelationships between intratumoural clones and circulating CD8+ T cells. Lastly, interrogation of T cell populations within lymph nodes is beginning to delineate the immune crosstalk between the primary tumour and tumour-draining lymph nodes and how this relationship might be disrupted with tumour infiltration of the latter. In this Review, we examine data from trials testing neoadjuvant ICIs in patients with HNSCC, focusing on human papillomavirus-unrelated disease, and highlight correlative immunogenomic findings from these trials.

Neoadjuvant immunotherapy and oncolytic virotherapy in HPV positive and HPV negative skin cancer: A comprehensive review

Skin cancer is the most common new cancer among Caucasians. This cancer has different types, of which non-melanoma skin cancer is the most common type. Various factors affect this disease, one of which is viral infections, including HPV. This virus plays an important role in skin cancer, especially cSCCs. There are various options for the treatment of skin cancer, and today special attention has been paid to treatments based on therapeutic goals, immunotherapy and combination therapy. In this study, we have investigated treatments based on immunotherapy and virotherapy and the effect of HPV virus on the effectiveness of these treatments in skin cancer. Treatments based on virotherapy are performed for a long time in combination with other common treatments such as radiotherapy and chemotherapy in order to have a greater effect and lower its side effects, which include: shortness of breath, tachycardia, lowering blood pressure in the patient. Also, the most important axis of immunotherapy is to focus on PD1-PDL1, despite abundant evidence on the importance of immunotherapy, many studies investigate the use of immunotherapy inhibitors in the adjuvant and neoadjuvant setting in various cancers. Also, previous findings show conflicting evidence of the effect of HPV status on the response to immunotherapy.

The ending is not the end: Lymph node metastasis in oral squamous cell carcinoma

Lymph node metastasis is an important biological feature of oral squamous cell carcinoma, bearing poorly prognostic implications. However, the role of lymph node metastasis in cancer progression remains inconclusive. On the one hand, lymph nodes are pivotal sites for initiating specific immunity, which is crucial for maintaining antitumor immune response. On the other hand, they also serve as primary conduits for tumor metastasis, with lymph node colonization potentially inducing systemic immune dysfunction, thereby further promoting tumor progression. Considering this paradoxical role of lymph nodes, comprehending their impact on the primary tumor and immunity becomes paramount. Furthermore, leveraging these distinctive attributes of lymph nodes presents novel avenues for enhancing current therapeutic strategies against oral squamous cell carcinoma. This review summarizes the anatomical and molecular profiles of lymph node metastasis in oral squamous cell carcinoma, elucidating how lymphatic involvement compromises antitumor immunity, thus facilitating primary tumor and distant metastases. Additionally, it explores avenues for harnessing these mechanisms to optimize clinical interventions.

Current status and future prospects of combined immunotherapy and epidermal growth factor receptor inhibitors in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma

Head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) is a malignancy with a poor prognosis, and the majority of patients with HNSCC are diagnosed at later stages owing to its hidden anatomical location and atypical clinical symptoms. It is notably prone to recurrence and metastasis. The traditional treatments include surgery, radiotherapy, chemotherapy, and targeted therapy. Although multiple treatment strategies have been established, the prognosis remains poor because most patients develop resistance to traditional treatments. In recent years, epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) inhibitors and immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have been shown to provide clinical benefits to these patients. Based on the promising results of both anti-EGFR therapy and immunotherapy, as well as the biological rationale for combining immunotherapy with anti-EGFR drugs, numerous preclinical and ongoing or completed clinical trials have explored the use of their synergistic effects. This review summarizes the feasibility of combining immunotherapy with EGFR inhibitors for HNSCC treatment and analyses the relevant biomarkers. It also summarizes the strategies for clinical applications. We found that immunotherapy and EGFR inhibitor combination therapy showed promise in treating patients with HNSCC and exhibited safety with acceptable adverse events. This review may provide valuable insights for the future development of treatments and formulation of therapeutic strategies for HNSCC, as well as useful information for the future design of clinical trials.

Neoadjuvant immunotherapy plus chemotherapy for squamous cell carcinoma of the paranasal sinus: a case report

Background

Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) such as pembrolizumab and nivolumab are recommended as first-line therapies for recurrent and metastatic head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC). However, their efficacy in neoadjuvant therapy remains uncertain.

Case presentation

We report the case of a 68-year-old male diagnosed with HNSCC who received neoadjuvant nivolumab (anti-PD-1 inhibitor) plus nab-paclitaxel and carboplatin. Biomarkerswere assessed by immunohistochemistry, and apoptosis-related molecules were analyzed via Western blotting. The patient achieved significant tumor regression and major pathological response (MPR) without severe adverse events. Post-treatment analyses revealed PD-L1 expression increased from 30% to 50% in tumor cells, CD8+ lymphocyte infiltration significantly improved, and Ki-67 expression was markedly reduced.

Conclusions

This case highlights the potential of combining ICIs with chemotherapy in neoadjuvant settings for HNSCC, providing mechanistic insights and clinical evidence for this emerging approach. Further studies are needed to establish the optimal neoadjuvant treatment regimen and identify patient populations most likely to benefit.

Neoadjuvant chemoimmunotherapy for laryngeal preservation in locally advanced hypopharyngeal cancer

OBJECTIVES

To retrospectively investigate the pathological response rate, laryngeal preservation surgery (LPS) rate and progression free survival (PFS) of neoadjuvant chemoimmunotherapy in the treatment of locally advanced hypopharyngeal cancer (LAHPC).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

In this study, LAHPC patients, who were first diagnosed and underwent surgery at the First Affiliated Hospital of Naval Medical University between January 2021 and January 2024, preoperatively administered PD-1 inhibitor and TP induction regimen (albumin-bound paclitaxel 260 mg/m2 and cisplatin 80 mg/m2). The primary endpoint was major pathological response (MPR), with ORR rate, LPS rate and PFS as the secondary endpoints. Then, the correlation between MPR and overall response rate (ORR) was further validated.

RESULTS

A total of 46 patients satisfied the inclusion criteria, with the median follow-up period of 10.5 months. After neoadjuvant chemoimmunotherapy, the ORR was observed to be 71.9 %, and the LPS rate reached 80.4 % (76.5 % in stage IV patients). The pathological response indicated a favorable response, with the MPR ratio at 52.2 % and pathological complete response (pCR) ratio at 32.6 %. The imaging score highly correlated with pathological response (Kappa = 0.058, P<0.001), while the MPR and ORR shared a strong positive linear relationship (r = 0.753, P<0.001). The 1-year and 2-year PFS rates were 97.1 % and 93.8 % for all patients, with stage IV patients having a 1-year PFS of 92.2 %. Patients who achieved MPR demonstrated a significant prognostic advantage (P=0.008), with no recurrence instances or mortality reported. Grade 3 adverse events were observed in 8.7 % of the cohort. The most common Grade 1-2 adverse events were alopecia, reactive telangiosis and loss of appetite, and no delayed surgery occurred.

CONCLUSION

Neoadjuvant therapy of PD-1 inhibitor combined with TP effectively improved the MPR and LPS rates of LAHPC patients, especially in those at clinical stage IV.

Anti-PD-(L)1-Based Neoadjuvant Therapy in Head and Neck Carcinoma: a Meta-analysis of Prospective Clinical Trials

OBJECTIVE

This meta-analysis aims to evaluate the efficacy and safety of antiprogressive disease (PD)-(L)1-based neoadjuvant therapy in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) patients and identify potential prognostic biomarkers.

DATA SOURCES

Databases were systematically searched for prospective clinical trials evaluating the efficacy and safety of anti-PD-(L)1-based neoadjuvant therapy for HNSCC before January 12, 2024.

REVIEW METHODS

We estimated the efficacy and safety of neoadjuvant immune checkpoint inhibitors. Subgroup and sensitivity analyses were further performed.

RESULTS

A total of 570 patients from 20 studies were included. The pooled major pathological response (MPR), pathological complete response (pCR), and partial pathological response (PPR) rates were 30.7%, 15.3%, and 68.2%, respectively. Surgical complications, surgical delayed rate, all grade treatment-related adverse effects (TRAEs) and ≥Grade 3 TRAEs were 0.6%, 0.3%, 82.6%, and 9.7%, respectively. Best MPR or pCR rate was detected in patients receiving neoadjuvant anti-PD-(L)1 therapy + radiotherapy (with MPR rate of 75.5% and pCR rate of 51.1%) and neoadjuvant anti-PD-(L)1 therapy + chemotherapy groups (with MPR rate of 57.5% and pCR rate of 26.7%). No differences were detected in subgroups stratified by neoadjuvant treatment cycles, human papillomavirus (HPV) status, and tumor location. Patients with baseline Combined Positive Score (CPS) ≥ 20 have higher MPR and pCR rates compared to patients with CPS < 20. High Tumor Cell Proportion Score was also associated with MPR and pCR. Objective response rate is a strong predictor of MPR (odds ratio [OR] = 7.78, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 3.20%-18.91%) and pCR (OR = 3.24, 95% CI = 1.40%-7.48%).

CONCLUSION

Anti-PD-(L)1-based neoadjuvant therapy was effective and safe for HNSCC patients.

Cell Identity and Spatial Distribution of PD-1/PD-L1 Blockade Responders

The programmed death 1 (PD-1)/programmed death ligand 1 (PD-L1) axis inhibits T cell activity, impairing anti-tumor immunity. Blocking this axis with therapeutic antibodies is one of the most promising anti-tumor immunotherapies. It has long been recognized that PD-1/PD-L1 blockade reinvigorates exhausted T (TEX) cells already present in the tumor microenvironment (TME). However, recent advancements in high-throughput gene sequencing and bioinformatic tools have provided researchers with a more granular and dynamic insight into PD-1/PD-L1 blockade-responding cells, extending beyond the TME and TEX populations. This review provides an update on the cell identity, spatial distribution, and treatment-induced spatiotemporal dynamics of PD-1/PD-L1 blockade responders. It also provides a synopsis of preliminary reports of potential PD-1/PD-L1 blockade responders other than T cells to depict a panoramic picture. Important questions to answer in further studies and the translational and clinical potential of the evolving understandings are also discussed.

Hallmarks of a genomically distinct subclass of head and neck cancer

Cancer is caused by an accumulation of somatic mutations and copy number alterations (CNAs). Besides mutations, these copy number changes are key characteristics of cancer development. Nonetheless, some tumors show hardly any CNAs, a remarkable phenomenon in oncogenesis. Head and neck squamous cell carcinomas (HNSCCs) arise by either exposure to carcinogens, or infection with the human papillomavirus (HPV). HPV-negative HNSCCs are generally characterized by many CNAs and frequent mutations in CDKN2A, TP53, FAT1, and NOTCH1. Here, we present the hallmarks of the distinct subgroup of HPV-negative HNSCC with no or few CNAs (CNA-quiet) by genetic profiling of 802 oral cavity squamous cell carcinomas (OCSCCs). In total, 73 OCSCC (9.1%) are classified as CNA-quiet and 729 as CNA-other. The CNA-quiet group is characterized by wild-type TP53, frequent CASP8 and HRAS mutations, and a less immunosuppressed tumor immune microenvironment with lower density of regulatory T cells. Patients with CNA-quiet OCSCC are older, more often women, less frequently current smokers, and have a better 5-year overall survival compared to CNA-other OCSCC. This study demonstrates that CNA-quiet OCSCC should be considered as a distinct, clinically relevant subclass. Given the clinical characteristics, the patient group with these tumors will rapidly increase in the aging population.

Neoadjuvant Immunotherapy in Head and Neck Cancers: A Paradigm Shift in Treatment Approach

Checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have demonstrated substantial efficacy in the treatment of numerous solid tumors, including head and neck cancer. Their inclusion in the therapeutic paradigm in metastatic lines of treatment has certainly improved the outcomes of these patients. Starting from this assumption, numerous studies have been conducted on ICIs in other earlier disease settings, including studies conducted in patients in neoadjuvant settings. However, how many and which studies are truly significant? Can they lay concrete foundations for further future studies and therefore allow us to continue to have this interesting future perspective? Through a review of the existing literature, coupled with insights gleaned from clinical practice and from the main recently published studies, we aim to examine the therapeutic potential of ICIs in patients affected by head and neck cancer in a neoadjuvant treatment setting and encourage researchers to set up successful future clinical trials.

Human papillomavirus-encoded circular RNA circE7 promotes immune evasion in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma

Immune evasion represents a crucial milestone in the progression of cancer and serves as the theoretical foundation for tumor immunotherapy. In this study, we reveal a negative association between Human Papillomavirus (HPV)-encoded circular RNA, circE7, and the infiltration of CD8+ T cells in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC). Both in vitro and in vivo experiments demonstrate that circE7 suppresses the function and activity of T cells by downregulating the transcription of LGALS9, which encodes the galectin-9 protein. The molecular mechanism involves circE7 binding to acetyl-CoA carboxylase 1 (ACC1), promoting its dephosphorylation and thereby activating ACC1. Activated ACC1 reduces H3K27 acetylation at the LGALS9 gene promoter, leading to decreased galectin-9 expression. Notably, galectin-9 interacts with immune checkpoint molecules TIM-3 and PD-1, inhibiting the secretion of cytotoxic cytokines by T cells and promoting T cell apoptosis. Here, we demonstrate a mechanism by which HPV promotes immune evasion in HNSCC through a circE7-driven epigenetic modification and propose a potential immunotherapy strategy for HNSCC that involves the combined use of anti-PD-1 and anti-TIM-3 inhibitors.

The impact of elective cervical lymph node treatment on the tumour immune response in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma: time for a change in treatment strategy?

The elective ablation of cervical lymph nodes, via surgery or irradiation, is a mainstay in the treatment of head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC). In this setting, the decision to treat the clinically node negative neck is based upon risk analysis of various factors, primarily derived from tumour features. However, the impact of ablation of tumour-draining lymph nodes upon the tumour-immune response and immunocompetence is largely unknown. In this review we highlight recent evidence of the communication between tumour and tumour-draining lymph nodes and the fundamental importance of this axis. We will provide a perspective of how recent cancer biology discoveries may juxtapose with current treatment pathways, with potential translational line of site for future research. In particular, neo-adjuvant therapy or biomarkers from tumour-draining lymph nodes may present opportunities to preserve lymphatics and harness improved immunocompetence in HNSCC patients.

Current status of neoadjuvant immunotherapy for the treatment of gastric cancer

Gastric cancer is one of the most prevalent malignant tumors worldwide, characterized by high incidence and mortality rates. At present, comprehensive surgical treatment has enhanced the prognosis of locally advanced gastric cancer patients significantly. However, the postoperative recurrence rate remains high, and the long-term survival for patients is sub-optimal. In recent years, immunotherapy has garnered extensive attention as an innovative approach to the treatment of gastric cancer. Indeed, multiple studies have validated its therapeutic effects in advanced gastric cancer patients, leading to its incorporation into treatment guidelines. Currently, researchers are exploring the application of immunotherapy in the neoadjuvant setting globally in order to further adjust and refine neoadjuvant immunotherapy regimens for gastric cancer. This article summarizes the research progress and controversies associated with neoadjuvant immunotherapy in gastric cancer, aiming to optimize clinical benefits for gastric cancer patients undergoing this treatment approach. The retrieval methods of this study encompassed databases such as PubMed, Google Scholar, Web of Science, clinicaltrials.gov, etc. The retrieved articles included guidelines, consensus, meta-analyses, clinical trials, and reviews related to locally advanced gastric cancer published up to January 2024.

Evaluating the efficacy and safety of different neoadjuvant immunotherapy combinations in locally advanced HNSCC: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Background

Immune checkpoint inhibitors have demonstrated promising therapeutic outcomes in recurrent/metastatic (R/M) Head and Neck Squamous Cell Carcinoma (HNSCC), prompting numerous clinical trials to investigate the safety and efficacy of this approach in neoadjuvant therapy. This systematic review aims to consolidate and analyze the findings from various clinical trials combining neoadjuvant immunotherapy for HNSCC, with the goal of identifying the most effective neoadjuvant immunotherapy regimen.

Methods

The system conducted searches across electronic databases including PubMed, Embase, the Cochrane Library and Web of science from their inception to July 1, 2024. The primary focus was on evaluating efficacy (particularly pathological complete response (pCR), major pathological response (MPR), and overall response rate (ORR)) and safety (primarily assessed by grade 3-4 treatment-related adverse reactions).

Results

A total of 1943 patients from 32 studies were analyzed. Combining neoadjuvant immunotherapy with chemotherapy or radiotherapy demonstrated superiority over neoadjuvant immunotherapy alone in terms of the MPR rate, while showing no statistically significant difference in the pCR rate. Furthermore, the combination of neoadjuvant immunotherapy with chemotherapy or radiotherapy exhibited a lower CR rate compared to neoadjuvant immunotherapy with radiotherapy alone, but a higher PR rate and SD rate. Apart from the neoadjuvant immunotherapy group in isolation, there were no statistically significant differences in grade ≥3 treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs) and immune-related adverse events (irAEs) among the other three combination therapy groups.

Conclusion

This systematic review and meta-analysis indicate that patients with locally advanced HNSCC might benefit from neoadjuvant immunotherapy, particularly when used in conjunction with chemotherapy or radiotherapy. Nonetheless, additional data is required to definitively confirm its efficacy.

Systematic Review Registration

https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO/display_record.php?RecordID=553753, identifier CRD42024553753.

Less is more: Exploring neoadjuvant immunotherapy as a de-escalation strategy in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma treatment

Head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) constitutes a significant global cancer burden, given its high prevalence and associated mortality. Despite substantial progress in survival rates due to the enhanced multidisciplinary approach to treatment, these methods often lead to severe tissue damage, compromised function, and potential toxicity. Thus, there is an imperative need for novel, effective, and minimally damaging treatment modalities. Neoadjuvant treatment, an emerging therapeutic strategy, is designed to reduce tumor size and curtail distant metastasis prior to definitive intervention. Currently, neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT) has optimized the treatment approach for a subset of HNSCC patients, yet it has not produced a noticeable enhancement in overall survival (OS). In the contemporary cancer therapeutics landscape, immunotherapy is gaining traction at an accelerated pace. Notably, neoadjuvant immunotherapy (NAIT) has shown promising radiological and pathological responses, coupled with encouraging efficacy in several clinical trials. This potentially paves the way for a myriad of possibilities in treatment de-escalation of HNSCC, which warrants further exploration. This paper reviews the existing strategies and efficacies of neoadjuvant immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs), along with potential de-escalation strategies. Furthermore, the challenges encountered in the context of the de-escalation strategies of NAIT are explored. The aim is to inform future research directions that strive to improve the quality of life (QoL) for patients battling HNSCC.

Predicting radiotherapy efficacy and prognosis in tongue squamous cell carcinoma through an in-depth analysis of a radiosensitivity gene signature

Background

Tongue squamous cell carcinoma (TSCC) is a prevalent tumor that affects many people worldwide. Radiotherapy is a common treatment option, but its efficacy varies greatly. This study seeks to validate the identified gene signature associated with radiosensitivity in TSCC, and its potential in predicting radiotherapy response and prognosis.

Methods

We analyzed 122 TSCC patients from TCGA database using the radiosensitivity signature and classified them into radiosensitive (RS) and radioresistant (RR) groups. Immune infiltration analysis methods were applied to investigate the immune status between different subgroups. Immunophenotype Score (IPS) and pRRophetic algorithm were employed to estimate the efficiency of treatment. A radioresistant TSCC cell line was established by gradually increasing radiation doses. Cell radiosensitivity was evaluated using the CCK-8 and colony formation assays. The expression of radiosensitivity-related genes was validated by qRT-PCR.

Results

Our study validated the predictive capacity of a previously identified "31-gene signature" in the TCGA-TSCC cohort, which effectively stratified patients into RS and RR groups. We observed that the RS group exhibited superior overall survival and progression-free survival rates relative to the RR group when treated with radiotherapy. The RS group was significantly enriched in most immune-related hallmark pathways, and may therefore benefit from immune checkpoint inhibitors. However, the RS group displayed lower sensitivity to first-line chemotherapy. A radioresistant TSCC cell line (CAL-27R) exhibited increased clonogenic potential and cell viability following irradiation, accompanied by downregulation of three radiosensitivity-related genes compared to its parental non-resistant cell (CAL-27). In addition, we constructed and validated a radiosensitivity-related prognostic index (PI) using 4 radiosensitivity-related genes associated with TSCC prognosis.

Conclusion

We assessed the ability of the radiosensitivity gene signature to predict outcomes in TSCC patients. our research provided valuable insights into the molecular pathways associated with radiosensitivity in TSCC and offered clinicians a practical tool to predict patient radiotherapy effectiveness and prognosis.

Precision Medicine and Clinical Trials in Advanced and Metastatic Oral Cancer

Purpose

Oral cancer is a significant global health concern, with high morbidity and mortality rates, particularly in regions with prevalent tobacco usage such as Asia. Majority of oral cancers are detected at an advanced stage resulting in poor survival outcomes. Moreover, the treatment modalities of oral cancers have remained constant with surgery and concurrent chemoradiotherapy being mainstays of the treatment. This review provides a significant progress made in understanding the molecular landscape of oral cancers and the evolution of therapeutic strategies toward precision medicine.

Methods

A comprehensive literature review was conducted to gather recent studies on the molecular landscape of oral cancers, genomic insights, and clinical trials.

Results

Firstly, genomic insights into oral cancers, including key driver mutations and copy number alterations, are discussed in the context of personalized medicine approaches. Subsequently, advancements in therapeutic strategies, particularly focusing on clinical trials investigating immunotherapy and targeted agents, are highlighted.

Conclusion

Despite promising results, challenges persist in identifying reliable biomarkers for treatment response and resistance. Continued research efforts are warranted to validate biomarkers and optimize therapeutic interventions, with the goal of enhancing patient outcomes and reducing the global burden of oral cancer.

Vaccine a promising immunotherapy option for head and neck cancer patients

Head and neck cancer (HNC) is a diversified group of tumors arising from the upper aerodigestive tract, encompassing the oral cavity, larynx, and pharynx. Globally, this particular cancer ranks sixth in prevalence, resulting in an annual mortality rate above 325,000 individuals. Surgery, radiation, and chemotherapy are the primary therapeutic options for HNC, which are frequently used in combination. Despite their extensive use, these treatments are typically unsuccessful and can significantly impair patient quality of life. Therapeutic vaccinations are administered to cancer patients instead of preventative immunizations administered to a healthy population. The efficacy of this modality has considerably transformed the application and success of cancer management by providing an additional and effective therapeutic option for patients. Cancer treatment has been revolutionized by introducing Immune Checkpoint receptors inhibitors (ICR), such as anti-CTLA4, anti-PD-1, and anti-PD-L1.3. ICR have also established immunity against self-generated cancerous cells. Cancer vaccines have shown extraordinary synergistic potential with checkpoint inhibitors to maximize tumor-specific CD8+ expansion and activity, which detects and destroys tumor cells. Personalized neoantigen vaccination therapies can potentially combat the heterogeneity of each patient's tumor. The findings of this review suggest that recent advances in cancer immunology and genetics imply that cancer vaccination can be a promising alternative treatment for head and neck cancer patients. This review conducted a comprehensive literature search to identify relevant studies on immunotherapy options for head and neck cancer patients. The search strategy was designed to capture a wide range of peer-reviewed articles, conference proceedings, and grey literature from 2013 to 2023. The databases searched to ensure comprehensive coverage of the literature included PubMed, Web of Science, and Google Scholar; to include grey literature and articles not indexed in traditional databases.

Survival Outcomes of Temporal Bone Squamous Cell Carcinoma: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

OBJECTIVE

Temporal bone squamous cell carcinoma (TBSCC) is a rare malignancy with poor prognosis, and optimal treatment for advanced cases is uncertain. Our systematic literature review aimed to assess 5-year survival outcomes for advanced TBSCC across different treatment modalities.

DATA SOURCES

EMBASE, Medline, PubMed, and Web of Science.

REVIEW METHODS

A systematic literature review was conducted according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines for articles published between January 1989 and June 2023.

RESULTS

The review yielded 1229 citations of which 31 provided 5-year survival data for TBSCC. The final analysis included 1289 patients. T classification data was available for 1269 patients and overall stage for 1033 patients. Data for 5-year overall survival (OS) was 59.6%. Five-year OS was 81.9% for T1/2 and 47.5% for T3/4 (P < .0001). OS for T1/T2 cancers did not significantly differ between surgery and radiation (100% vs 81.3%, P  = .103). For advanced-stage disease (T3/T4), there was no statistical difference in OS when comparing surgery with postoperative chemoradiotherapy (CRT) (OS 50.0%) versus surgery with postoperative radiotherapy (XRT) (OS 53.3%) versus definitive CRT (OS 58.1%, P  = .767-1.000). There was not enough data to assess the role of neoadjuvant CRT.

CONCLUSION

Most patients will present with advanced-stage disease, and nodal metastasis is seen in nearly 22% of patients. This study confirms the prognostic correlation of the current T classification system. Our results suggest that OS did not differ significantly between surgery and XRT for early stage disease, and combined treatment modalities yield similar 5-year OS for advanced cancers.

Immune checkpoint inhibitor use in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma: the current landscape and future perspectives

Immune checkpoint inhibitors are licensed for use in patients with unresectable, recurrent or metastatic head and neck squamous cell carcinoma. Multiple published and ongoing trials are assessing efficacy in the curative management of patients in the concomitant, neoadjuvant and/or adjuvant settings, as well as part of multimodality treatment in patients with metastatic disease. This review evaluates the evidence for use of immune checkpoint inhibitors in all stages of head and neck squamous cell carcinoma and considers future approaches.

Advancements in neoadjuvant immune checkpoint inhibitor therapy for locally advanced head and neck squamous Carcinoma: A narrative review

The prevalent treatment paradigm for locally advanced head and neck squamous carcinoma (HNSCC) typically entails surgery followed by adjuvant radiotherapy and chemotherapy. Despite this, a significant proportion of patients experience recurrence and metastasis. Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs), notably pembrolizumab and nivolumab, have been established as the first and second lines of treatment for recurrent and metastatic HNSCC (R/M HNSCC). The application of ICIs as neoadjuvant immunotherapy in this context is currently under rigorous investigation. This review synthesizes data from clinical trials focusing on neoadjuvant ICIs, highlighting that the pathological responses elicited by these treatments are promising. Furthermore, it is noted that the safety profiles of both monotherapy and combination therapies with ICIs are manageable, with no new safety signals identified. The review concludes by contemplating the future direction and challenges associated with neoadjuvant ICI therapy, encompassing aspects such as the refinement of imaging and pathological response criteria, selection criteria for adjuvant therapies, evaluation of the efficacy and safety of various combination treatment modalities, and the identification of responsive patient cohorts.

Prediction of pathological complete response in locally advanced head and neck squamous cell carcinoma treated with neoadjuvant chemo-immunotherapy using volumetric multisequence MRI histogram analysis

PURPOSE

This study aimed to develop a multisequence MRI-based volumetric histogram metrics model for predicting pathological complete response (pCR) in advanced head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) patients undergoing neoadjuvant chemo-immunotherapy (NCIT) and compare its predictive performance with AJCC staging and RECIST 1.1 criteria.

METHODS

Twenty-four patients with locally advanced HNSCC from a prospective phase II trial were enrolled for analysis. All patients underwent pre- and post-NCIT MRI examinations from which whole-tumor histogram features were extracted, including T1WI, T2WI, enhanced T1WI (T1Gd), diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) sequences, and their corresponding apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) maps. The pathological results divided the patients into pathological complete response (pCR) and non-pCR (N-pCR) groups. Delta features were calculated as the percentage change in histogram features from pre- to post-treatment. After data reduction and feature selection, logistic regression was used to build prediction models. ROC analysis was performed to assess the diagnostic performance.

RESULTS

Eleven of 24 patients achieved pCR. Pre_T2_original_firstorder_Minimum, Post_ADC_original_firstorder_MeanAbsoluteDeviation, and Delta_T1Gd_original_firstorder_Skewness were associated with achieving pCR after NCIT. The Combined_Model demonstrated the best predictive performance (AUC 0.95), outperforming AJCC staging (AUC 0.52) and RECIST 1.1 (AUC 0.72). The Pre_Model (AUC 0.83) or Post-Model (AUC 0.83) had a better predictive ability than AJCC staging.

CONCLUSION

Multisequence MRI-based volumetric histogram analysis can non-invasively predict the pCR status of HNSCC patients undergoing NCIT. The use of histogram features extracted from pre- and post-treatment MRI exhibits promising predictive performance and offers a novel quantitative assessment method for evaluating pCR in HNSCC patients receiving NCIT.

Surgical margins in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma: A narrative review

Head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC), a prevalent and frequently recurring malignancy, often necessitates surgical intervention. The surgical margin (SM) plays a pivotal role in determining the postoperative treatment strategy and prognostic evaluation of HNSCC. Nonetheless, the process of clinical appraisal and assessment of the SMs remains a complex and indeterminate endeavor, thereby leading to potential difficulties for surgeons in defining the extent of resection. In this regard, we undertake a comprehensive review of the suggested surgical distance in varying circumstances, diverse methods of margin evaluation, and the delicate balance that must be maintained between tissue resection and preservation in head and neck surgical procedures. This review is intended to provide surgeons with pragmatic guidance in selecting the most suitable resection techniques, and in improving patients' quality of life by achieving optimal functional and aesthetic restoration.

Neoadjuvant immunotherapy for head and neck squamous cell carcinoma

The neoadjuvant immunotherapy approach marks a significant shift in the treatment paradigm of potentially curable HNSCC. Here, current therapies, despite being highly individualized and advanced, often fall short in achieving satisfactory long-term survival rates and are frequently associated with substantial morbidity.The primary advantage of this approach lies in its potential to intensify and enhance treatment regimens, offering a distinct modality that complements the existing triad of surgery, radiotherapy, and chemotherapy. Checkpoint inhibitors have been at the forefront of this evolution. Demonstrating moderate yet significant survival benefits in the recurrent-metastatic setting with a relatively better safety profile compared to conventional treatments, these agents hold promise when considered for earlier stages of HNSCC.On the other hand, a significant potential benefit of introducing immunotherapy in the neoadjuvant phase is the possibility of treatment de-escalation. By reducing the tumor burden before surgery, this strategy could lead to less invasive surgical interventions. The prospect of organ-sparing protocols becomes a realistic and highly valued goal in this context. Further, the early application of immunotherapy might catalyze a more effective and durable immune response. The induction of an immune memory may potentially lead to a more effective surveillance of residual disease, decreasing the rates of local, regional, and distant recurrences, thereby enhancing overall and recurrence-free survival.However, neoadjuvant immunotherapy is not without its challenges. One of the primary concerns is the safety and adverse events profile. While data suggest that adverse events are relatively rare and manageable, the long-term safety profile in the neoadjuvant setting, especially in the context of curative intent, remains a subject for ongoing research. Another unsolved issue lies in the accurate assessment of treatment response. The discrepancy between radiographic assessment using RECIST criteria and histological findings has been noted, indicating a gap in current imaging techniques' ability to accurately reflect the true efficacy of immunotherapy. This gap underscores the necessity for improved imaging methodologies and the development of new radiologic and pathologic criteria tailored to evaluate the response to immunotherapy accurately.Treatment combinations and timing represent another layer of complexity. There is a vast array of possibilities in combining immunotherapy agents with conventional chemotherapy, targeted therapy, radiation, and other experimental treatments. Determining the optimal treatment regimen for individual patients becomes an intricate task, especially when comparing small, single-arm, non-randomized trials with varying regimens and outcome measures.Moreover, one needs to consider the importance of pre- and intraoperative decision-making in the context of neoadjuvant immunotherapy. As experience with this treatment paradigm grows, there is potential for more tailored surgical approaches based on the patient's remaining disease post-neoadjuvant treatment. This consideration is particularly relevant in extensive surgeries, where organ-sparing protocols could be evaluated.In practical terms, the multi-modal nature of this treatment strategy introduces complexities, especially outside clinical trial settings. Patients face challenges in navigating the treatment landscape, which involves coordination across multiple medical disciplines, highlighting the necessity for streamlined care pathways at specialized centers to facilitate effective treatment management if the neoadjuvant approach is introduced to the real-world.These potential harms and open questions underscore the critical need for meticulously designed clinical trials and correlational studies to ensure patient safety and efficacy. Only these can ensure that this new treatment approach is introduced in a safe way and fulfils the promise it theoretically holds.

Neoadjuvant nivolumab plus bevacizumab therapy improves the prognosis of triple-negative breast cancer in humanized mouse models

BACKGROUND

The combination of immune checkpoint inhibitors and anti-angiogenic agents has been proposed as a promising strategy to improve the outcome of advanced triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC). However, further investigation is warranted to elucidate the specific mechanisms underlying the effects of combination therapy and its potential as neoadjuvant therapy for early-stage TNBC.

METHODS

In this study, we constructed humanized mouse models by engrafting the human immune system into severely immunodeficient mice and subsequently implanting TNBC cells into the model. The mice were treated with neoadjuvant combination therapy (bevacizumab combined with nivolumab), followed by in vivo imaging system to assess tumor recurrence and metastasis after surgery. The immune microenvironment of tumors was analyzed to investigate the potential mechanisms. Furthermore, we verified the impact of extending the interval before surgery or administering adjuvant therapy after neoadjuvant therapy on the prognosis of mice.

RESULTS

Neoadjuvant combination therapy significantly inhibited tumor growth, prevented recurrence and metastasis by normalizing tumor vessels and inducing robust CD8+ T cell infiltration and activation in primary tumors (p < 0.001). In vivo experiments demonstrated that prolonging the interval before surgery or administering adjuvant therapy after neoadjuvant therapy did not enhance its efficacy.

CONCLUSION

The preclinical study has demonstrated the therapeutic efficacy and mechanism of neoadjuvant combination therapy (nivolumab plus bevacizumab) in treating early TNBC.

Neoadjuvant chemoimmunotherapy shows major pathological response and low recurrence in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma

BACKGROUND

The study aimed to investigate the efficacy and survival outcomes of neoadjuvant chemotherapy combined with programmed cell death protein 1 (PD-1) blockade (neoadjuvant chemoimmunotherapy) for patients with resectable head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC).

METHODS

A retrospective analysis was conducted. Patients with initially diagnosed, resectable HNSCCs who received the neoadjuvant chemoimmunotherapy and radical surgery were included. Correlation analysis between patients' clinical characteristics and pathological responses, and survival analysis were performed.

RESULTS

A total of 79 patients were included. The majority of patients (55, 69.6%) were diagnosed at locally advanced stages and most of them (58, 73.4%) had tumor located at the oral cavity. Nearly half of patients (35, 44.3%) received two cycles of neoadjuvant chemoimmunotherapy and the rest had three or more cycles. The R0 resection rate was 98.7%. In the pathological evaluation, 53.1% of patients reached pathological complete responses or major pathological responses. After a median follow-up of 17.0 months, the 1-year disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS) rates were 87.2% and 97.4%, respectively. The pathological response showed a significantly positive association with survival benefits (p < 0.001). Patients with human papillomavirus (HPV)-positive oropharyngeal cancer had the best pathological response and survival outcomes. Besides, history of radiation at head and neck region and poor pathological response were found to be independent risk factors of DFS for patients receiving such treatments.

CONCLUSION

Neoadjuvant chemoimmunotherapy of HNSCC showed high rate of pathological response and low recurrence rate, holding promise for becoming the new standard of care for resectable HNSCC.

Neoadjuvant immune checkpoint blockade enhances local and systemic tumor immunity in head and neck cancer

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Neoadjuvant (presurgical) immune checkpoint blockade (ICB) has shown promising clinical activity in head and neck cancer and other cancers, including FDA approvals for neoadjuvant approaches for triple-negative breast cancer and nonsmall cell lung cancer. Here we will review recent data from clinical trials in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC), including mechanistic studies highlighting local and systemic effects on T cell-mediated immunity.

RECENT FINDINGS

A series of clinical trials of neoadjuvant ICB have documented evidence of clinical activity, including clinical to pathologic downstaging and pathologic response in a subset of patients. Also, emerging data suggest improved survival outcomes for patients with tumors responsive to neoadjuvant ICB. In depth mechanistic studies have documented intra-tumoral expansion of CD8 T cell populations characterized by tissue residency and cytotoxicity programs. Treatment also leads to expansion of activated CD8 T cells in the blood, many of which share TCR sequences with tumor-infiltrating T cells. The frequency of activated circulating CD8 T cell populations is correlated with the degree of pathologic response within tumors.

SUMMARY

Even a short duration of neoadjuvant immunotherapy can enhance local and systemic tumor-reactive T cell populations. Downstaging induced by neoadjuvant ICB can reduce the extent of surgical resection in this anatomically sensitive location.

Radiation Therapy With Combination Therapy of Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors and Antiangiogenic Therapy for Hepatocellular Carcinoma

PURPOSE

Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) combined with antiangiogenic therapy have limited efficacy in treating advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). The synergistic effect of systemic therapy and radiation therapy (RT) might resolve this problem. We aimed to investigate the effect of RT on the treatment outcomes of ICIs and antiangiogenic combination therapy in patients with advanced-stage HCC.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

This retrospective observational study analyzed the medical records of 194 patients with Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer stage C HCC who were admitted to our center from August 2018 to June 2022 and received ICIs combined with antiangiogenic therapy as the first-line treatment. Patients who were administered RT for tumor thrombus or symptomatic metastases within 8 weeks of the commencement of combination therapy were allocated to the RT group, whereas those who did not receive RT were assigned to the non-radiation therapy (NRT) group. Propensity score matching was used to mitigate selection bias. The primary endpoints were progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS). The secondary endpoints included objective response rate, disease control rate (DCR), local PFS, out-of-field PFS, and treatment-related adverse events.

RESULTS

A total of 76 patients diagnosed with advanced-stage HCC and treated with ICIs and antiangiogenic therapy were included in the study, with 33 patients in the RT group and 43 patients in the non-RT group. After propensity score matching, 29 matched patient pairs were generated. The median follow-up was 15.5 months, and the RT sites were mainly located on the tumor thrombus (55.2%) and extrahepatic metastatic lesions (48.3%). The median PFS was 8.3 months (95% CI, 5.4-11.3) in the RT group and 4.2 months (95% CI, 3.4-5.0) in the NRT group (P < .001). The median OS was not reached in the RT group and was 9.7 months (95% CI, 4.1-15.3) in the NRT group (P = .002). The objective response rate was 75.9% (95% CI, 56.5-89.7) in the RT group and 24.1% (95% CI, 10.3-43.5) in the NRT group (P < .001). The DCR was 100% in the RT group and 75.9% (95% CI, 56.5-89.7) in the NRT group (P = .005). The median local PFS and out-of-field PFS were 13.2 months (95% CI, 6.3-20.1) and 10.8 months (95% CI, 7.0-14.7), respectively. RT was an independent prognostic factor for PFS (hazard ratio = 0.33; 95% CI, 0.17-0.64; P < .001) and OS (hazard ratio = 0.28; 95% CI, 0.11-0.68; P = .005), respectively. The rates of any grade treatment-related adverse events were similar between the 2 groups.

CONCLUSIONS

In comparison to the combination of ICIs and antiangiogenic therapy, the inclusion of RT has been observed to improve the DCR and survival outcomes in patients with advanced-stage HCC. The safety profile of this triple therapy was satisfactory.