Talimogene laherparepvec in combination with ipilimumab versus ipilimumab alone for advanced melanoma: 5-year final analysis of a multicenter, randomized, open-label, phase II trial

Regional Therapies for Melanoma and Merkel Cell Carcinoma

Melanoma and Merkel cell carcinoma (MCC) have the potential to develop into advanced, regionally metastatic disease that is not always amenable to resection and is associated with a worse survival. Intralesional therapies, including oncolytic vaccines, xanthene dyes, immune modulating cytokines, and regional perfusions such as isolated limb infusion and perfusion, including isolated limb and hepatic perfusion and percutaneous hepatic perfusion, have been used in the treatment of advanced cutaneous and uveal melanoma and MCC. These therapies are effective and have a role in the multimodality treatment of these patients and may be synergistically used with conventional immune and targeted therapies.

Efficacy and safety of cancer vaccine therapy in malignant melanoma: a systematic review

INTRODUCTION

Malignant melanoma is a cancer that develops from melanocytes in the skin and mucous membranes. Surgery, and chemotherapy, radiation therapy, or immunotherapy are also used in cases of distant metastasis. Immunotherapy includes immune checkpoint inhibitors and cancer vaccine therapy; however, their efficacy remains limited.

METHODS

A systematic review and meta-analysis of cancer vaccine therapies were conducted. PubMed was used to search the literature up to December 2023, and clinical trials were also identified for the same period. RCTs involving patients with resectable or unresectable malignant melanoma were included. The primary outcome was OS, and secondary outcomes were PFS, DFS, and RFS. Safety was assessed based on AEs. Integrated results were presented as risk ratio and risk difference.

RESULTS

The initial search identified 418 studies on cancer vaccine therapy and 44 studies on effector T-cell therapy. We supplemented this with our PubMed search, extracting 149 studies. After database searches and screening, 611 studies were initially considered. Following exclusions based on eligibility criteria, 20 RCTs using cancer vaccines remained. For the primary outcome, OS, the pooled RR was 1.11 (95% CI, 0.97-1.32, I2 = 59.0%), and the pooled RD was 0.02 (-0.01 to 0.06, I2 = 74.0%) at 12 months. PFS, DFS, and RFS did not show statistically significant differences, and AEs did not increase significantly.

CONCLUSION

Cancer vaccine therapy, neither alone, or in combination with other agents for malignant melanoma did not show a significant improvement in OS, PFS, DFS, or RFS nor did it significantly increase AEs.

Intratumoral Immunotherapy in Breast Cancer

Breast cancer remains the most frequently diagnosed cancer and the second highest cause of cancer death in females. Metastatic recurrence that is resistant to traditional therapies presents a major challenge, necessitating the development of an innovative treatment strategy. Immunotherapy has gained popularity in the treatment of cancer, particularly melanoma, lung cancer, and more recently breast cancer. Major developments in immunotherapy have been made with a better understanding of the tumor microenvironment and how the microenvironment can be manipulated to induce an anti-tumor immune response. Intratumorally delivered immunotherapy can be used to create a local immune response. This review provides a comprehensive overview of intratumoral immunotherapy for breast cancer and its resultant changes in the tumor microenvironment. The discussed immunotherapeutics include oncolytic viruses, nucleic acids, innate immune agonists, bacteria, chimeric antigen receptor T cells, and dendritic cells. The review also evaluates completed clinical trials using these therapies. Lastly, the review offers future perspectives in the development of breast cancer immunotherapy.

Ferroptosis enhances the therapeutic potential of oncolytic adenoviruses KD01 against cancer

Oncolytic virotherapy has emerged as a promising strategy for cancer treatment by selectively targeting and lysing tumor cells. However, its efficacy is often limited in certain tumor types due to multiple factors. This study explores the combination of oncolytic adenoviruses with Erastin, a potent ferroptosis inducer, to enhance antitumor efficacy in oncolytic virus-insensitive cancer cell lines. In vitro experiments demonstrated that Erastin significantly increased the cytotoxicity of oncolytic virotherapy, leading to greater inhibition of cell proliferation and elevated rates of cell death compared to monotherapies. The combination treatment further promoted ferroptosis, as evidenced by increased reactive oxygen species (ROS) levels, enhanced lipid peroxidation, and disrupted redox homeostasis. RNA sequencing identified the downregulation of Dickkopf-1 (DKK1) as a key mediator of the enhanced ferroptotic effect. Restoring the expression of DKK1 partially mitigated the cytotoxic effects of the combination therapy, highlighting its crucial role in mediating the enhanced ferroptosis-induced oncolytic virotherapy efficacy. In vivo studies further validated these findings, demonstrating that the combined treatment significantly reduced tumor growth without inducing notable toxicity. This novel therapeutic approach has great potential to enhance the efficacy of oncolytic virotherapy in cancers resistant to oncolytic viruses by inducing ferroptosis. Further investigation in clinically relevant models is warranted to fully elucidate the underlying mechanisms and to optimize this combination strategy for potential clinical applications.

Advancing Breast Cancer Treatment: The Role of Immunotherapy and Cancer Vaccines in Overcoming Therapeutic Challenges

Breast cancer (BC) remains a significant global health challenge due to its complex biology, which complicates both diagnosis and treatment. Immunotherapy and cancer vaccines have emerged as promising alternatives, harnessing the body's immune system to precisely target and eliminate cancer cells. However, several key factors influence the selection and effectiveness of these therapies, including BC subtype, tumor mutational burden (TMB), tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs), PD-L1 expression, HER2 resistance, and the tumor microenvironment (TME). BC subtypes play a critical role in shaping treatment responses. Triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) exhibits the highest sensitivity to immunotherapy, while HER2-positive and hormone receptor-positive (HR+) subtypes often require combination strategies for optimal outcomes. High TMB enhances immune responses by generating neoantigens, making tumors more susceptible to immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs); whereas, low TMB may indicate resistance. Similarly, elevated TIL levels are associated with better immunotherapy efficacy, while PD-L1 expression serves as a key predictor of checkpoint inhibitor success. Meanwhile, HER2 resistance and an immunosuppressive TME contribute to immune evasion, highlighting the need for multi-faceted treatment approaches. Current breast cancer immunotherapies encompass a range of targeted treatments. HER2-directed therapies, such as trastuzumab and pertuzumab, block HER2 dimerization and enhance antibody-dependent cellular cytotoxicity (ADCC), while small-molecule inhibitors, like lapatinib and tucatinib, suppress HER2 signaling to curb tumor growth. Antibody-drug conjugates (ADCs) improve tumor targeting by coupling monoclonal antibodies with cytotoxic agents, minimizing off-target effects. Meanwhile, ICIs, including pembrolizumab, restore T-cell function, and CAR-macrophage (CAR-M) therapy leverages macrophages to reshape the TME and overcome immunotherapy resistance. While immunotherapy, particularly in TNBC, has demonstrated promise by eliciting durable immune responses, its efficacy varies across subtypes. Challenges such as immune-related adverse events, resistance mechanisms, high costs, and delayed responses remain barriers to widespread success. Breast cancer vaccines-including protein-based, whole-cell, mRNA, dendritic cell, and epitope-based vaccines-aim to stimulate tumor-specific immunity. Though clinical success has been limited, ongoing research is refining vaccine formulations, integrating combination therapies, and identifying biomarkers for improved patient stratification. Future advancements in BC treatment will depend on optimizing immunotherapy through biomarker-driven approaches, addressing tumor heterogeneity, and developing innovative combination therapies to overcome resistance. By leveraging these strategies, researchers aim to enhance treatment efficacy and ultimately improve patient outcomes.

Enhancing pancreatic cancer treatment: the role of H101 oncolytic virus in irreversible electroporation

Background

Irreversible Electroporation (IRE) offers a promising treatment for pancreatic cancer by using high-voltage pulses to kill tumor cells. But variations in tumor size and shape can lead to uneven electric fields, causing some cells to undergo only reversible electroporation (RE) and survive. However, RE can temporarily increase the permeability of the cell membrane, allowing small molecules to enter. H101 virus is an oncolytic adenovirus with deleted E1B-55kD and E3 regions that selectively targets and kills tumor cells. This study aimed to investigate whether the H101 oncolytic virus can serve as a supplementary therapeutic approach to kill tumors combined with RE.

Methods

We first explored how RE and the H101 oncolytic virus, both individually and together, affected tumor cell proliferation and migration in cellular experiments. Subsequent in vitro studies further assessed the effects of different treatments on tumor growth. To understand the mechanisms of pathway changes in tumors from different treatment groups, we analyzed tumor samples from each group using bulk RNA sequencing (bulk RNA-seq) and single-cell RNA sequencing (scRNA-seq). Additional biochemical techniques were used to validate key molecular changes.

Results

The combination of RE with the H101 oncolytic virus effectively inhibited pancreatic cancer cell proliferation and migration. Experiments using mouse subcutaneous tumor models confirmed that the combination therapy significantly reduced tumor growth. Further analysis bulk RNA-seq and scRNA-seq revealed that this combined approach activates the JNK-MAPK pathway, inducing apoptosis and enhancing therapeutic effects.

Conclusions

This combination boosts therapeutic effectiveness by activating the JNK-MAPK pathway and promoting tumor cell apoptosis. These findings suggest that the H101 oncolytic virus could serve as a valuable adjunct to improve the efficacy of IRE treatment.

Cancer vaccines: current status and future directions

Cancer continues to be a major global health burden, with high morbidity and mortality. Building on the success of immune checkpoint inhibitors and adoptive cellular therapy, cancer vaccines have garnered significant interest, but their clinical success remains modest. Benefiting from advancements in technology, many meticulously designed cancer vaccines have shown promise, warranting further investigations to reach their full potential. Cancer vaccines hold unique benefits, particularly for patients resistant to other therapies, and they offer the ability to initiate broad and durable T cell responses. In this review, we highlight the antigen selection for cancer vaccines, introduce the immune responses induced by vaccines, and propose strategies to enhance vaccine immunogenicity. Furthermore, we summarize key features and notable clinical advances of various vaccine platforms. Lastly, we delve into the mechanisms of tumor resistance and explore the potential benefits of combining cancer vaccines with standard treatments and other immunomodulatory approaches to improve vaccine efficacy.

Tumor microbiome: roles in tumor initiation, progression, and therapy

Over the past few years, the tumor microbiome is increasingly recognized for its multifaceted involvement in cancer initiation, progression, and metastasis. With the application of 16S ribosomal ribonucleic acid (16S rRNA) sequencing, the intratumoral microbiome, also referred to as tumor-intrinsic or tumor-resident microbiome, has also been found to play a significant role in the tumor microenvironment (TME). Understanding their complex functions is critical for identifying new therapeutic avenues and improving treatment outcomes. This review first summarizes the origins and composition of these microbial communities, emphasizing their adapted diversity across a diverse range of tumor types and stages. Moreover, we outline the general mechanisms by which specific microbes induce tumor initiation, including the activation of carcinogenic pathways, deoxyribonucleic acid (DNA) damage, epigenetic modifications, and chronic inflammation. We further propose the tumor microbiome may evade immunity and promote angiogenesis to support tumor progression, while uncovering specific microbial influences on each step of the metastatic cascade, such as invasion, circulation, and seeding in secondary sites. Additionally, tumor microbiome is closely associated with drug resistance and influences therapeutic efficacy by modulating immune responses, drug metabolism, and apoptotic pathways. Furthermore, we explore innovative microbe-based therapeutic strategies, such as engineered bacteria, oncolytic virotherapy, and other modalities aimed at enhancing immunotherapeutic efficacy, paving the way for microbiome-centered cancer treatment frameworks.

Advanced progress in the genetic modification of the oncolytic HSV-1 virus

The use of replication-competent viruses for selective tumor oncolysis while sparing normal cells marks a significant advancement in cancer treatment. HSV-1 presents several advantages that position it as a leading candidate for oncolytic virotherapies. Its large genome can accommodate insertions over 30 kb or deletions of multiple virulence genes without compromising lytic replication in tumor cells. Additionally, anti-herpes drugs can inhibit its replication during accidental infections. Importantly, HSV-1 does not integrate into the host genome and cause mutations. The HSV-1 genome can be modified through genetic engineering in two main ways: first, by reducing infectivity and toxicity to normal cells via limited replication and assembly, altered protein-virus receptor binding, and minimized immune evasion; second, by enhancing anticancer activity through disruption of tumor cell metabolism, induction of autophagy, improved immune recognition, and modification of the tumor microenvironment. In this mini-review, we systematically examine genetic modification strategies for oncolytic HSV-1 while highlighting advancements from these modifications. Certain genetic alterations have shown efficacy in improving clinical outcomes for HSV-1-based therapies. These modifications include silencing specific genes and inserting exogenous genes into the HSV-1 genome. The insertion of exogenous genes has increasingly been used to develop new oncolytic HSV-1 variants. Finally, we discuss limitations associated with oncolytic virotherapy at the conclusion of this review. As more clinical trials explore newly engineered therapies, they are likely to yield breakthroughs and promote broader adoption for cancer treatment.

Current trends in sensitizing immune checkpoint inhibitors for cancer treatment

Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have dramatically transformed the treatment landscape for various malignancies, achieving notable clinical outcomes across a wide range of indications. Despite these advances, resistance to immune checkpoint blockade (ICB) remains a critical clinical challenge, characterized by variable response rates and non-durable benefits. However, growing research into the complex intrinsic and extrinsic characteristics of tumors has advanced our understanding of the mechanisms behind ICI resistance, potentially improving treatment outcomes. Additionally, robust predictive biomarkers are crucial for optimizing patient selection and maximizing the efficacy of ICBs. Recent studies have emphasized that multiple rational combination strategies can overcome immune checkpoint resistance and enhance susceptibility to ICIs. These findings not only deepen our understanding of tumor biology but also reveal the unique mechanisms of action of sensitizing agents, extending clinical benefits in cancer immunotherapy. In this review, we will explore the underlying biology of ICIs, discuss the significance of the tumor immune microenvironment (TIME) and clinical predictive biomarkers, analyze the current mechanisms of resistance, and outline alternative combination strategies to enhance the effectiveness of ICIs, including personalized strategies for sensitizing tumors to ICIs.

Synergistic anti-tumor effects of oncolytic virus and anti-programmed cell death protein 1 antibody combination therapy: For suppression of lymph node and distant metastasis in a murine melanoma model

It is believed that oncolytic viruses (OVs) exert both direct anti-tumor effects by intratumoral injection as well as indirect anti-tumor effects by activating systemic immunity. In phase III clinical trials, OV and anti-programmed cell death-1 (aPD-1) antibody combination therapy showed no significant differences in overall survival and progression-free survival in patients with unresectable advanced melanoma. In the study, OVs can exert only indirect anti-tumor effects in non-injected, systemic lesions. If the tumor is at a stage where both direct and indirect anti-tumor effects of OVs can be expected, OVs may further enhance the therapeutic effect, in addition to the clinically expected therapeutic effect. Therefore, we investigated whether canerpaturev (C-REV) and aPD-1 antibody combination therapy suppresses tumor progression in a murine melanoma model. Our findings showed that the C-REV and aPD-1 antibody combination therapy suppressed tumor progression in a murine melanoma model. The combination therapy stimulated systemic immunity in lymphoid tissues by activating helper T cells and B cells to enhance adaptive and humoral immunity, as well as by increasing effector/memory T cell fractions. Synergistically enhanced systemic anti-tumor effects suppressed lymph node and lung metastases. These findings suggest that direct anti-tumor effects by infecting and destroying cancer cells from within and indirect anti-tumor effects enhanced by the combination therapy worked simultaneously to suppress tumor progression. Our results may provide evidence to support the usefulness of OV and aPD-1 antibody combination therapy as a neoadjuvant therapy in the surgical treatment of melanoma.

Local treatment of HVJ-E with T cell costimulatory molecule stimulation elicits systemic anti-tumor effects

The tumor-infiltrating lymphocyte (TIL) is a crucial factor in controlling tumor growth. A therapeutic method activating TIL is desired for treating patients with metastatic tumors. Here, we show that treating a local tumor with a combination therapy of UV-irradiated hemagglutinating virus of Japan envelope (HVJ-E) plus agonist antibodies, including OX40, against T cell costimulatory molecules induces systemic anti-tumor effects in a T cell-dependent manner in multiple cancer cell lines. Transcriptome and T cell receptor repertoire analyses revealed that HVJ-E + anti-OX40 antibody treatment activates CD4 and CD8 T cells and promotes T cell trafficking between tumors. These systemic anti-tumor effects required an association between Nkg2d and Nkg2d ligands. Our findings provide insights into how systemic anti-tumor effects are induced and may help the development of therapeutic strategies for eliciting such effects.

Comparison of differences in immune cells and immune microenvironment among different kinds of oncolytic virus treatments

Oncolytic viruses are either naturally occurring or genetically engineered viruses that can activate immune cells and selectively replicate in and destroy cancer cells without damaging healthy tissues. Oncolytic virus therapy (OVT) represents an emerging treatment approach for cancer. In this review, we outline the properties of oncolytic viruses and then offer an overview of the immune cells and tumor microenvironment (TME) across various OVTs. A thorough understanding of the immunological mechanisms involved in OVTs could lead to the identification of novel and more effective therapeutic targets for cancer treatment.

A phase II randomized trial of talimogene laherparepvec oncolytic immunotherapy with or without radiotherapy for patients with cutaneous metastases from solid tumors

BACKGROUND

Cutaneous metastases (CMs) are a manifestation of advanced cancer and can be treated with oncolytic immunotherapy. Laboratory studies suggest radiotherapy (RT) may facilitate response to immunotherapy. We hypothesized that oncolytic immunotherapy with talimogene lapherparepvec (T-VEC, an oncolytic immunotherapy that expresses granulocyte-macrophage colony stimulating factor) and RT would produce response in non-targeted metastases.

METHODS

A randomized phase 2 trial of T-VEC+/-RT was conducted. Eligible patients had ≥1 CM from a solid tumor amenable to T-VEC and RT and another measurable metastasis. Tumor and overall response was assessed using modified World Health Organization (mWHO) criteria. Adverse events (AEs) and quality of life (QOL) were characterized using CTCAE v4.0 and Skindex-16, respectively. Correlative analyses of tumor genomics and the immune system were performed.

RESULTS

19 patients were randomized to receive T-VEC (n = 9) or T-VEC+RT (n = 10). One patient in each arm demonstrated complete response in the largest non-targeted metastasis. The trial was closed after the first stage of enrollment because of no overall mWHO responses, slow accrual and the COVID-19 pandemic. AEs were consistent with prior reports of T-VEC. Skin related QOL was poor before and after treatment. Median progression free survival was 1.2 and 2.5 months in the T-VEC and T-VEC+RT arms; median overall survival was 4.9 and 17.3 months in the T-VEC and T-VEC+RT arms. Analyses of peripheral blood cells and cytokines demonstrated responders exhibited several outlying lymphocyte and cytokine parameters.

CONCLUSIONS

Low overall response rate, slow accrual, and the COVID-19 pandemic led to closure of this trial. Responses in non-injected and non-irradiated metastases were infrequent.

Virus nanotechnology for intratumoural immunotherapy

Viruses can be designed to be tools and carrier vehicles for intratumoural immunotherapy. Their nanometre-scale size and shape allow for functionalization with or encapsulation of medical cargoes and tissue-specific ligands. Importantly, immunotherapies may particularly benefit from the inherent immunomodulatory properties of viruses. For example, mammalian viruses have already been tested for oncolytic virotherapy, and bacteriophages and plant viruses can be engineered for immunotherapeutic treatment approaches. In this Review, we discuss how viruses - including oncolytic viruses, immunomodulatory plant viruses and bacteriophages - and virus-like particles can be designed for intratumoural immunotherapy to elicit anti-tumour immunity and induce systemic anti-tumour responses at distant non-injected sites. We further highlight the engineering of viruses and virus-like particles as drug-delivery systems, and outline key translational challenges and clinical opportunities.

Current and emerging intralesional immunotherapies in cutaneous oncology

Immunotherapies have revolutionized the management of advanced cutaneous malignancies. However, some patients fail to respond to these therapies, others are ineligible because of comorbidities, and a minority of patients experience treatment-limiting systemic immune-related adverse events. To address these issues and expand treatment options for patients with early-stage disease, a variety of immunotherapies are being developed for direct intratumoral administration. Agents including oncolytic viruses, monoclonal antibodies, cytokines, peptides, and pattern-recognition receptor agonists have been engineered to evoke a local immune response while minimizing systemic toxicity and have shown favorable results in preclinical and early clinical testing. This review covers the current landscape of intratumoral immunotherapies for the treatment of cutaneous melanoma, squamous cell carcinoma, and basal cell carcinoma, highlighting the diverse array of agents being explored and their potential benefits and challenges.

Cold and hot tumors: from molecular mechanisms to targeted therapy

Immunotherapy has made significant strides in cancer treatment, particularly through immune checkpoint blockade (ICB), which has shown notable clinical benefits across various tumor types. Despite the transformative impact of ICB treatment in cancer therapy, only a minority of patients exhibit a positive response to it. In patients with solid tumors, those who respond well to ICB treatment typically demonstrate an active immune profile referred to as the "hot" (immune-inflamed) phenotype. On the other hand, non-responsive patients may exhibit a distinct "cold" (immune-desert) phenotype, differing from the features of "hot" tumors. Additionally, there is a more nuanced "excluded" immune phenotype, positioned between the "cold" and "hot" categories, known as the immune "excluded" type. Effective differentiation between "cold" and "hot" tumors, and understanding tumor intrinsic factors, immune characteristics, TME, and external factors are critical for predicting tumor response and treatment results. It is widely accepted that ICB therapy exerts a more profound effect on "hot" tumors, with limited efficacy against "cold" or "altered" tumors, necessitating combinations with other therapeutic modalities to enhance immune cell infiltration into tumor tissue and convert "cold" or "altered" tumors into "hot" ones. Therefore, aligning with the traits of "cold" and "hot" tumors, this review systematically delineates the respective immune characteristics, influencing factors, and extensively discusses varied treatment approaches and drug targets based on "cold" and "hot" tumors to assess clinical efficacy.

Emerging roles of intratumor microbiota in cancer: tumorigenesis and management strategies

The intricate interplay between the host and its microbiota has garnered increasing attention in the past decade. Specifically, the emerging recognition of microorganisms within diverse cancer tissues, previously presumed sterile, has ignited a resurgence of enthusiasm and research endeavors. Four potential migratory routes have been identified as the sources of intratumoral microbial "dark matter," including direct invasion of mucosal barriers, spreading from normal adjacent tissue, hematogenous spread, and lymphatic drainage, which contribute to the highly heterogeneous features of intratumor microbiota. Importantly, multitudes of studies delineated the roles of intratumor microbiota in cancer initiation and progression, elucidating underlying mechanisms such as genetic alterations, epigenetic modifications, immune dysfunctions, activating oncogenic pathways, and inducing metastasis. With the deepening understanding of intratumoral microbial composition, novel microbiota-based strategies for early cancer diagnosis and prognostic stratification continue to emerge. Furthermore, intratumor microbiota exerts significant influence on the efficacy of cancer therapeutics, particularly immunotherapy, making it an enticing target for intervention in cancer treatment. In this review, we present a comprehensive discussion of the current understanding pertaining to the developmental history, heterogeneous profiles, underlying originations, and carcinogenic mechanisms of intratumor microbiota, and uncover its potential predictive and intervention values, as well as several inevitable challenges as a target for personalized cancer management strategies.

Therapeutic Treatment Options for In-Transit Metastases from Melanoma

In-transit metastases (ITM) in melanoma present a significant therapeutic challenge due to their advanced stage and complex clinical nature. From traditional management with surgical resection, ITM treatment has evolved with the advent of systemic therapies such as immune checkpoint inhibitors and targeted therapies, which have markedly improved survival outcomes. This study aims to review and highlight the efficacy of both systemic and locoregional treatment approaches for ITM. Methods include a comprehensive review of clinical studies examining the impact of treatments like immune checkpoint inhibitors, targeted therapies, Isolated Limb Perfusion, and electrochemotherapy. The results indicate that combining systemic therapies with locoregional treatments enhances both local disease control and overall survival rates. The introduction of modern immunotherapies has not diminished the effectiveness of locoregional therapies but rather improved patient outcomes when used in conjunction. The conclusions emphasize that a multidisciplinary approach integrating systemic and locoregional therapies offers a promising strategy for optimizing the management of ITM in melanoma patients. This integrated treatment model not only improves survival rates but also enhances the quality of life for patients, suggesting a shift in standard care practices toward more comprehensive therapeutic regimens.

Tutorial: design, production and testing of oncolytic viruses for cancer immunotherapy

Oncolytic viruses (OVs) represent a novel class of cancer immunotherapy agents that preferentially infect and kill cancer cells and promote protective antitumor immunity. Furthermore, OVs can be used in combination with established or upcoming immunotherapeutic agents, especially immune checkpoint inhibitors, to efficiently target a wide range of malignancies. The development of OV-based therapy involves three major steps before clinical evaluation: design, production and preclinical testing. OVs can be designed as natural or engineered strains and subsequently selected for their ability to kill a broad spectrum of cancer cells rather than normal, healthy cells. OV selection is further influenced by multiple factors, such as the availability of a specific viral platform, cancer cell permissivity, the need for genetic engineering to render the virus non-pathogenic and/or more effective and logistical considerations around the use of OVs within the laboratory or clinical setting. Selected OVs are then produced and tested for their anticancer potential by using syngeneic, xenograft or humanized preclinical models wherein immunocompromised and immunocompetent setups are used to elucidate their direct oncolytic ability as well as indirect immunotherapeutic potential in vivo. Finally, OVs demonstrating the desired anticancer potential progress toward translation in patients with cancer. This tutorial provides guidelines for the design, production and preclinical testing of OVs, emphasizing considerations specific to OV technology that determine their clinical utility as cancer immunotherapy agents.

Next-generation cancer vaccines and emerging immunotherapy combinations

Therapeutic cancer vaccines have been a subject of research for several decades as potential new weapons to tackle malignancies. Their goal is to induce a long-lasting and efficient antitumour-directed immune response, capable of mediating tumour regression, preventing tumour progression, and eradicating minimal residual disease, while avoiding major adverse effects. Development of new vaccine technologies and antigen prediction methods has led to significant improvements in cancer vaccine efficacy. However, for their successful clinical application, certain obstacles still need to be overcome, especially tumour-mediated immunosuppression and escape mechanisms. In this review, we introduce therapeutic cancer vaccines and subsequently discuss combination approaches of next-generation cancer vaccines and existing immunotherapies, particularly immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) and adoptive cell transfer/cell-based immunotherapies.

Exploring treatment options in cancer: Tumor treatment strategies

Traditional therapeutic approaches such as chemotherapy and radiation therapy have burdened cancer patients with onerous physical and psychological challenges. Encouragingly, the landscape of tumor treatment has undergone a comprehensive and remarkable transformation. Emerging as fervently pursued modalities are small molecule targeted agents, antibody-drug conjugates (ADCs), cell-based therapies, and gene therapy. These cutting-edge treatment modalities not only afford personalized and precise tumor targeting, but also provide patients with enhanced therapeutic comfort and the potential to impede disease progression. Nonetheless, it is acknowledged that these therapeutic strategies still harbour untapped potential for further advancement. Gaining a comprehensive understanding of the merits and limitations of these treatment modalities holds the promise of offering novel perspectives for clinical practice and foundational research endeavours. In this review, we discussed the different treatment modalities, including small molecule targeted drugs, peptide drugs, antibody drugs, cell therapy, and gene therapy. It will provide a detailed explanation of each method, addressing their status of development, clinical challenges, and potential solutions. The aim is to assist clinicians and researchers in gaining a deeper understanding of these diverse treatment options, enabling them to carry out effective treatment and advance their research more efficiently.

Recent advances in immunotherapy and its combination therapies for advanced melanoma: a review

The incidence of melanoma is increasing year by year and is highly malignant, with a poor prognosis. Its treatment has always attracted much attention. Among the more clinically applied immunotherapies are immune checkpoint inhibitors, bispecific antibodies, cancer vaccines, adoptive cell transfer therapy, and oncolytic virotherapy. With the continuous development of technology and trials, in addition to immune monotherapy, combinations of immunotherapy and radiotherapy have shown surprising efficacy. In this article, we review the research progress of immune monotherapy and combination therapy for advanced melanoma, with the aim of providing new ideas for the treatment strategy for advanced melanoma.

Neuroblastoma-A Review of Combination Immunotherapy

Neuroblastoma is the most common extracranial solid tumor found in childhood and is responsible for 15% of deaths among children with cancer. Although multimodal therapies focused on surgery, chemotherapy, radiotherapy, and stem cell transplants have favorable results in many cases, the use of conventional therapies has probably reached the limit their possibility. Almost half of the patients with neuroblastoma belong to the high-risk group. Patients in this group require a combination of several therapeutic approaches. It has been shown that various immunotherapies combined with conventional methods can work synergistically. Due to the development of such therapeutic methods, we present combinations and forms of combining immunotherapy, focusing on their mechanisms and benefits but also their limitations and potential side effects.

Systemic delivery of oncolytic herpes virus using CAR-T cells enhances targeting of antitumor immuno-virotherapy

Recent studies have indicated that combining oncolytic viruses with CAR-T cells in therapy has shown superior anti-tumor effects, representing a promising approach. Nonetheless, the localized delivery method of intratumoral injection poses challenges for treating metastatic tumors or distal tumors that are difficult to reach. To address this obstacle, we employed HSV-1-infected CAR-T cells, which systemically delivery HSV into solid tumors. The biological function of CAR-T cells remained intact after loading them with HSV for a period of three days. In both immunocompromised and immunocompetent GBM orthotopic mouse models, B7-H3 CAR-T cells effectively delivered HSV to tumor lesions, resulting in enhanced T-cell infiltration and significantly prolonged survival in mice. We also employed a bilateral subcutaneous tumor model and observed that the group receiving intratumoral virus injection exhibited a significant reduction in tumor volume on the injected side, while the group receiving intravenous infusion of CAR-T cells carrying HSV displayed suppressed tumor growth on both sides. Hence, CAR-THSV cells offer notable advantages in the systemic delivery of HSV to distant tumors. In conclusion, our findings emphasize the potential of CAR-T cells as carriers for HSV, presenting significant advantages for oncolytic virotherapy targeting distant tumors.

Immune landscape and response to oncolytic virus-based immunotherapy

Oncolytic virus (OV)-based immunotherapy has emerged as a promising strategy for cancer treatment, offering a unique potential to selectively target malignant cells while sparing normal tissues. However, the immunosuppressive nature of tumor microenvironment (TME) poses a substantial hurdle to the development of OVs as effective immunotherapeutic agents, as it restricts the activation and recruitment of immune cells. This review elucidates the potential of OV-based immunotherapy in modulating the immune landscape within the TME to overcome immune resistance and enhance antitumor immune responses. We examine the role of OVs in targeting specific immune cell populations, including dendritic cells, T cells, natural killer cells, and macrophages, and their ability to alter the TME by inhibiting angiogenesis and reducing tumor fibrosis. Additionally, we explore strategies to optimize OV-based drug delivery and improve the efficiency of OV-mediated immunotherapy. In conclusion, this review offers a concise and comprehensive synopsis of the current status and future prospects of OV-based immunotherapy, underscoring its remarkable potential as an effective immunotherapeutic agent for cancer treatment.

Intralesional and Infusional Updates for Metastatic Melanoma

Locoregionally advanced and metastatic melanoma represent a challenging clinical problem, but in the era of immune checkpoint blockade and intralesional and infusional therapies, more options are available for use. Isolated limb infusion (ILI) was first introduced in the 1990s for the management of advanced melanoma, followed by the utilization of isolated extremity perfusion (ILP). Following this, intralesional oncolytic viruses, xanthene dyes, and cytokines were introduced for the management of in-transit metastases as well as unresectable, advanced melanoma. In 2015, the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approved the first oncolytic intralesional therapy, talimogene laherparepvec (T-VEC), for the treatment of advanced melanoma. Additionally, immune checkpoint inhibition has demonstrated efficacy in the management of advanced melanomas, and this improvement in outcomes has been extrapolated to aid in the management of in-transit metastatic disease. Finally, percutaneous hepatic perfusion (PHP), also approved by the FDA, has been reported to have a significant impact on the treatment of hepatic disease in uveal melanoma. While some of these treatments have less utility due to inferior outcomes as well as higher toxicity profiles, there are selective patient profiles for which these therapies carry a role. This review highlights intralesional and infusional therapies for the management of metastatic melanoma.

Preliminary efficacy and safety of YSCH-01 in patients with advanced solid tumors: an investigator-initiated trial

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the safety and preliminary efficacy of YSCH-01 (Recombinant L-IFN adenovirus) in subjects with advanced solid tumors.

METHODS

In this single-center, open-label, investigator-initiated trial of YSCH-01, 14 patients with advanced solid tumors were enrolled. The study consisted of two distinct phases: (1) the dose escalation phase and (2) the dose expansion phase; with three dose groups in the dose escalation phase based on dose levels (5.0×109 viral particles (VP)/subject, 5.0×1010 VP/subject, and 5.0×1011 VP/subject). Subjects were administered YSCH-01 injection via intratumoral injections. The safety was assessed using National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events V.5.0, and the efficacy evaluation was performed using Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumor V.1.1.

RESULTS

14 subjects were enrolled in the study, including 9 subjects in the dose escalation phase and 5 subjects in the dose expansion phase. Of the 13 subjects included in the full analysis set, 4 (30.8%) were men and 9 (69.2%) were women. The most common tumor type was lung cancer (38.5%, 5 subjects), followed by breast cancer (23.1%, 3 subjects) and melanoma (23.1%, 3 subjects). During the dose escalation phase, no subject experienced dose-limiting toxicities. The content of recombinant L-IFN adenovirus genome and recombinant L-IFN protein in blood showed no trend of significant intergroup changes. No significant change was observed in interleukin-6 and interferon-gamma. For 11 subjects evaluated for efficacy, the overall response rate with its 95% CI was 27.3% (6.02% to 60.97%) and the disease control rate with its 95% CI was 81.8% (48.22% to 97.72%). The median progression-free survival was 4.97 months, and the median overall survival was 8.62 months. In addition, a tendency of decrease in the sum of the diameters of target lesions was observed. For 13 subjects evaluated for safety, the overall incidence of adverse events (AEs) was 92.3%, the overall incidence of adverse drug reactions (ADRs) was 84.6%, and the overall incidence of >Grade 3 AEs was 7.7%, while no AEs/ADRs leading to death occurred. The most common AEs were fever (69.2%), nausea (30.8%), vomiting (30.8%), and hypophagia (23.1%).

CONCLUSIONS

The study shows that YSCH-01 injections were safe and well tolerated and exhibited preliminary efficacy in patients with advanced solid tumors, supporting further investigation to evaluate its efficacy and safety.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

NCT05180851.

Development of Personalized Strategies for Precisely Battling Malignant Melanoma

Melanoma is the most severe and fatal form of skin cancer, resulting from multiple gene mutations with high intra-tumor and inter-tumor molecular heterogeneity. Treatment options for patients whose disease has progressed beyond the ability for surgical resection rely on currently accepted standard therapies, notably immune checkpoint inhibitors and targeted therapies. Acquired resistance to these therapies and treatment-associated toxicity necessitate exploring novel strategies, especially those that can be personalized for specific patients and/or populations. Here, we review the current landscape and progress of standard therapies and explore what personalized oncology techniques may entail in the scope of melanoma. Our purpose is to provide an up-to-date summary of the tools at our disposal that work to circumvent the common barriers faced when battling melanoma.

The golden key to open mystery boxes of SMARCA4-deficient undifferentiated thoracic tumor: focusing immunotherapy, tumor microenvironment and epigenetic regulation

SMARCA4-deficient undifferentiated thoracic tumor is extremely invasive. This tumor with poor prognosis is easily confused with SMARCA4-deficent non-small cell lung cancer or sarcoma. Standard and efficient treatment has not been established. In this review, we summarized the etiology, pathogenesis and diagnosis, reviewed current and proposed innovative strategies for treatment and improving prognosis. Immunotherapy, targeting tumor microenvironment and epigenetic regulator have improved the prognosis of cancer patients. We summarized clinicopathological features and immunotherapy strategies and analyzed the progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) of patients with SMARCA4-UT who received immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs). In addition, we proposed the feasibility of epigenetic regulation in the treatment of SMARCA4-UT. To our knowledge, this is the first review that aims to explore innovative strategies for targeting tumor microenvironment and epigenetic regulation and identify potential benefit population for immunotherapy to improve the prognosis.

Activated B-Cells enhance epitope spreading to support successful cancer immunotherapy

Immune checkpoint therapies (ICT) have transformed the treatment of cancer over the past decade. However, many patients do not respond or suffer relapses. Successful immunotherapy requires epitope spreading, but the slow or inefficient induction of functional antitumoral immunity delays the benefit to patients or causes resistances. Therefore, understanding the key mechanisms that support epitope spreading is essential to improve immunotherapy. In this review, we highlight the major role played by B-cells in breaking immune tolerance by epitope spreading. Activated B-cells are key Antigen-Presenting Cells (APC) that diversify the T-cell response against self-antigens, such as ribonucleoproteins, in autoimmunity but also during successful cancer immunotherapy. This has important implications for the design of future cancer vaccines.

Oncolytic vaccinia virus immunotherapy antagonizes image-guided radiotherapy in mouse mammary tumor models

Ionizing radiation (IR) and oncolytic viruses are both used to treat cancer, and the effectiveness of both agents depends upon stimulating an immune response against the tumor. In this study we tested whether combining image guided ionizing radiation (IG-IR) with an oncolytic vaccinia virus (VACV) could yield a better therapeutic response than either treatment alone. ΔF4LΔJ2R VACV grew well on irradiated human and mouse breast cancer cells, and the virus can be combined with 4 or 8 Gy of IR to kill cells in an additive or weakly synergistic manner. To test efficacy in vivo we used immune competent mice bearing orthotopic TUBO mammary tumors. IG-IR worked well with 10 Gy producing 80% complete responses, but this was halved when the tumors were treated with VACV starting 2 days after IG-IR. VACV monotherapy was ineffective in this model. The antagonism was time dependent as waiting for 21 days after IG-IR eliminated the inhibitory effect but without yielding any further benefits over IR alone. In irradiated tumors, VACV replication was also lower, suggesting that irradiation created an environment that did not support infection as well in vivo as in vitro. A study of how four different treatment regimens affected the immune composition of the tumor microenvironment showed that treating irradiated tumors with VACV altered the immunological profiles in tumors exposed to IR or VACV alone. We detected more PD-1 and PD-L1 expression in tumors exposed to IR+VACV but adding an αPD-1 antibody to the protocol did not change the way VACV interferes with IG-IR therapy. VACV encodes many immunosuppressive gene products that may interfere with the ability of radiotherapy to induce an effective anti-tumor immune response through the release of danger-associated molecular patterns. These data suggest that infecting irradiated tumors with VACV, too soon after exposure, may interfere in the innate and linked adaptive immune responses that are triggered by radiotherapy to achieve a beneficial impact.

Investigational Approaches for Treatment of Melanoma Patients Progressing After Standard of Care

ABSTRACT

The advent of effective immunotherapy, specifically cytotoxic T-lymphocyte associated protein 4 and programmed cell death 1 inhibitors, as well as targeted therapy including BRAF/MEK inhibitors, has dramatically changed the prognosis for metastatic melanoma patients. Up to 50% of patients may experience long-term survival currently. Despite these advances in melanoma treatment, many patients still progress and die of their disease. As such, there are many studies aimed at providing new treatment options for this population. Therapies currently under investigation include, but are not limited to, novel immunotherapies, targeted therapies, tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes and other cellular therapies, oncolytic viral therapy and other injectables, and fecal microbiota transplant. In this review, we discuss the emerging treatment options for metastatic melanoma patients who have progressed on standard of care treatments.

Enhanced gene transfection and induction of apoptosis in melanoma cells by branched poly(β-amino ester)s with uniformly distributed branching units

Melanoma, one of the most devastating forms of skin cancer, currently lacks effective clinical treatments. Delivery of functional genes to modulate specific protein expression to induce melanoma cell apoptosis could be a promising therapeutic approach. However, transfecting melanoma cells using non-viral methods, particularly with cationic polymers, presents significant challenges. In this study, we synthesized three branched poly(β-amino ester)s (HPAEs) with evenly distributed branching units but varying space lengths through a two-step "oligomer combination" strategy. The unique topological structure enables HPAEs to condense DNA to form nano-sized polyplexes with favorable physiochemical properties. Notably, HPAEs, especially HPAE-2 with intermediate branching unit space length, demonstrated significantly higher gene transfection efficiency than the leading commercial gene transfection reagent, jetPRIME, in human melanoma cells. Furthermore, HPAE-2 efficiently delivered the Bax-encoding plasmid into melanoma cells, leading to a pronounced pro-apoptotic effect without causing noticeable cytotoxicity. This study establishes a potent non-viral platform for gene transfection of melanoma cells by harnessing the distribution of branching units, paving the way for potential clinical applications of gene therapy in melanoma treatment.

Oncolytic Virotherapy: A New Paradigm in Cancer Immunotherapy

Oncolytic viruses (OVs) are emerging as potential treatment options for cancer. Natural and genetically engineered viruses exhibit various antitumor mechanisms. OVs act by direct cytolysis, the potentiation of the immune system through antigen release, and the activation of inflammatory responses or indirectly by interference with different types of elements in the tumor microenvironment, modification of energy metabolism in tumor cells, and antiangiogenic action. The action of OVs is pleiotropic, and they show varied interactions with the host and tumor cells. An important impediment in oncolytic virotherapy is the journey of the virus into the tumor cells and the possibility of its binding to different biological and nonbiological vectors. OVs have been demonstrated to eliminate cancer cells that are resistant to standard treatments in many clinical trials for various cancers (melanoma, lung, and hepatic); however, there are several elements of resistance to the action of viruses per se. Therefore, it is necessary to evaluate the combination of OVs with other standard treatment modalities, such as chemotherapy, immunotherapy, targeted therapies, and cellular therapies, to increase the response rate. This review provides a comprehensive update on OVs, their use in oncolytic virotherapy, and the future prospects of this therapy alongside the standard therapies currently used in cancer treatment.

Efficacy of Different Oncolytic Vaccinia Virus Strains for the Treatment of Murine Peritoneal Mesothelioma

Effective treatment options for peritoneal surface malignancies (PSMs) are scarce. Oncolytic virotherapy with recombinant vaccinia viruses might constitute a novel treatment option for PSM. We aimed to identify the most effective oncolytic vaccinia virus strain in two murine mesothelioma cell lines and the oncolytic potential in a murine model of peritoneal mesothelioma. Cell lines AB12 and AC29 were infected in vitro with vaccinia virus strains Lister (GLV-1h254), Western Reserve (GLV-0b347), and Copenhagen (GLV-4h463). The virus strain GLV-0b347 was shown most effective in vitro and was further investigated by intraperitoneal (i.p.) application to AB12 and AC29 mesothelioma-bearing mice. Feasibility, safety, and effectiveness of virotherapy were assessed by evaluating the peritoneal cancer index (PCI), virus detection in tumor tissues and ascites, virus growth curves, and comparison of overall survival. After i.p. injection of GLV-0b347, virus was detected in both tumor cells and ascites. In comparison to mock-treated mice, overall survival was significantly prolonged, ascites was less frequent and PCI values declined. However, effective treatment was only observed in animals with limited tumor burden at the time point of virus application. Nonetheless, intraperitoneal virotherapy with GLV-0b347 might constitute a novel therapeutic option for the treatment of peritoneal mesothelioma. Additional treatment modifications and combinational regimes will be investigated to further enhance treatment efficacy.

Immunological Assessment of Recent Immunotherapy for Colorectal Cancer

Colorectal cancer (CRC) is the third most prevalent malignancy with increased incidence and mortality rates worldwide. Traditional treatment approaches have attempted to efficiently target CRC; however, they have failed in most cases, owing to the cytotoxicity and non-specificity of these therapies. Therefore, it is essential to develop an effective alternative therapy to improve the clinical outcomes in heterogeneous CRC cases. Immunotherapy has transformed cancer treatment with remarkable efficacy and overcomes the limitations of traditional treatments. With an understanding of the cancer-immunity cycle and tumor microenvironment evolution, current immunotherapy approaches have elicited enhanced antitumor immune responses. In this comprehensive review, we outline the latest advances in immunotherapy targeting CRC and provide insights into antitumor immune responses reported in landmark clinical studies. We focused on highlighting the combination approaches that synergistically induce immune responses and eliminate immunosuppression. This review aimed to understand the limitations and potential of recent immunotherapy clinical studies conducted in the last five years (2019-2023) and to transform this knowledge into a rational design of clinical trials intended for effective antitumor immune responses in CRC.