Efficacy, safety, and biomarker analysis of nivolumab in combination with abemaciclib plus endocrine therapy in patients with HR-positive HER2-negative metastatic breast cancer: a phase II study (WJOG11418B NEWFLAME trial)

PIV and PILE scores predict the clinical outcome in patients with metastatic breast cancer treated with CDK4/6 inhibitors

AIMS AND OBJECTIVES

Cyclin-dependent kinase 4/6 inhibitor (CDK4/6i) therapy, the standard of care for metastatic hormone receptor-positive (HR +)/human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) negative breast cancer (BC), has profoundly affected many cell types, including tumor cells, Tregs, cytotoxic T cells, and stem and progenitor cells. Therefore, it is reasonable to assume that the pretreatment status of tumor immunity may have predictive value in CDK4/6i efficacy.

METHODS

A total of 404 patients were included in the analysis. The scores of the panimmune-inflammatory values (PIV) and PILE (PIV-LDH-ECOG), a candidate PIV-based scoring system, were calculated within one week before the initiation of CDK4/6i plus endocrine therapy (ET).

RESULTS

The median overall survival (OS) was 69.0 months (95% CI 51.1-86.8). The low-PIV subgroup had significantly longer progression-free survival (PFS) [23.9 vs. 18.8 months; HR = 1.817, 95% CI = 1.113-2.965, p = 0.017] and OS [73.6 vs. 37.7 months; HR = 2.338, 95% CI = 1.122-4.871, p = 0.023] than the high-PIV subgroup. In the low-risk PILE subgroup, PFS [37.0 vs. 15.8 months; HR = 2.751, 95% CI = 1.736-4.361, p < 0.001] and OS [73.6 vs. 35.1 months; HR = 3.854, 95% CI = 1.855-8.005, p < 0.001] were greater than in the high-risk PILE subgroup. The low-risk PILE subgroup was associated with a significantly better disease control rate (DCR) than the high-risk PILE subgroup (87.2% and 75.0%, p = 0.004). In the analysis of 112 patients treated with ET in the metastatic stage before CDK4/6i as a control group, PIV and PILE were not independent prognostic indicators.

CONCLUSIONS

Our study demonstrated that PIV and PILE scores could be predictive biomarkers for the treatment efficacy of CDK4/6is.

Immunomodulation on tumor immune microenvironment in acquired targeted therapy resistance and implication for immunotherapy resistance

The emergence of molecularly targeted therapies and immunotherapies has revolutionized cancer treatment, yet the optimal sequencing of these modalities remains debated. While targeted therapies often induce initial immunostimulatory effects, the development of resistance is accompanied by dynamic alterations in the tumor-immune microenvironment. These changes can promote tumor growth, hinder immune surveillance, and contribute to subsequent immunotherapy resistance. This review focuses on solid tumors and summarizes the immunomodulatory effects arising in the context of targeted therapy resistance, highlighting the challenges they pose for the subsequent immunotherapy efficacy.

Immunotherapy and its racial specificity for breast cancer treatment in Asia: a narrative review

Immunotherapy, including immune checkpoint inhibitors, adoptive cell therapy, cancer vaccines, and other modalities, represents a significant advancement in cancer treatment. Breast cancer, traditionally considered less amenable to immunotherapy, has demonstrated responsiveness to immunotherapy when combined with conventional treatment options. These integrative strategies enhance the effectiveness of immunotherapy, bringing hope to patients. Furthermore, precision therapies guided by predictive biomarkers refine the scope of breast cancer immunotherapy and broaden its advantages. Notably, it is essential to recognise the differences in breast cancer epidemiology, clinical outcomes, and molecular signatures between Asian populations and those in Europe and North America. These include a higher proportion of premenopausal patients and variation in subtype distribution and gene mutation profiles, underscoring the importance of considering racial specificity in immunotherapy. Clinical efforts in Asia, supported by ethnicity-specific studies, indigenous immunotherapeutic agents, and precision medicine informed by predictive biomarkers, provide tailored treatment options. This review aims to present an overview of breast cancer immunotherapy while address the racial specificity to inform its application for Asian patients.

Beyond failure of endocrine-based therapies in HR+/HER2 negative advanced breast cancer: What before chemotherapy? A glimpse into the future

Despite the impressive improvements achieved by endocrine therapy and CDK4/6 inhibitors (CDK4/6i) and the forthcoming availability of alternative endocrine manipulations and targeted therapies, hormone-receptor positive/HER2 negative (HR+/HER2-) advanced breast cancer (ABC) is almost inevitably destined to become endocrine- refractory. At this time chemotherapy has been recently challenged and partly replaced by new targeted options as antibody-drug conjugated (ADCs). Trastuzumab-deruxtecan has been proven meaningfully superior to chemotherapy either in 1st and later lines after progression to CDK4/6i in HER2-low ABC and results with other ADCs as Sacituzumab Govitecan and Datopotamab-deruxtecan are promising, but the definition of cross-resistance between these drugs sharing either antibody or payload is crucial before implementing them in a useful sequence. While PARP inhibitors are the standard 2nd line in patients with gBRCA mutation, it is not still known whether patients with mutations of PALB2 or of other homologous recombinant defect (HRD)-related genes will benefit of the same treatment. On the other hand, the results obtained with immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) in HR+ /HER2-ABC contrarily to the early setting are disappointing up to now, but investigations of ICIs in combination with other targeted drugs which may increase immune response and the search for better markers of activity are under way. Moreover the anticipation in upfront treatment of ADCs or PARPi in patients with features of putative endocrine resistance and/or of less sensitiviy to CDK4/6i and the choice of therapy in patients recurring during or soon after adjuvant CDK4/6i and olaparib represent further challenges for the future.

Post-progression treatment options after CDK4/6 inhibitors in hormone receptor-positive, HER2-negative metastatic breast cancer

The combination of cyclin-dependent kinase 4/6 inhibitors (CDK4/6i) and endocrine therapy (ET) is the standard first-line treatment for hormone receptor-positive (HR + ) and HER2-negative metastatic breast cancer (mBC). Despite their efficacy, resistance inevitably develops, necessitating alternative therapeutic strategies post-progression. This review explores current and emerging treatment options following progression on CDK4/6i, focusing on endocrine therapies, targeted therapies, combination approaches, and the continued use of CDK4/6i. Endocrine therapies, including fulvestrant and novel oral selective estrogen receptor degraders (SERDs) like elacestrant, show promise, especially in patients with ESR1 mutations. Targeted therapies such as PI3K/AKT/mTOR inhibitors, exemplified by alpelisib and capivasertib, offer potential by addressing downstream signaling pathways involved in resistance. Additionally, FGFR inhibitors like erdafitinib are under investigation for their role in overcoming specific resistance mechanisms. Combination strategies involving CDK4/6 inhibitors with immune checkpoint inhibitors or other targeted agents are also being explored, with early trials suggesting possible synergistic effects, although further validation is required. Continuation of CDK4/6 inhibitors beyond progression has shown potential benefits in selected patients, but the data are heterogeneous, and further studies are needed to clarify their role. While chemotherapy remains a standard option for patients who progress on these treatments, the goal is to delay its use through the effective utilization of endocrine and targeted therapies. Understanding resistance mechanisms and tailoring treatment to individual patient profiles is crucial for optimizing outcomes. Ongoing clinical trials are expected to provide deeper insights, guiding the development of more effective post-progression therapeutic strategies. This evolving landscape highlights the need for continuous research and individualized patient care to improve survival and quality of life in HR + mBC patients.

Phase I study of ribociclib (CDK4/6 inhibitor) with spartalizumab (PD-1 inhibitor) with and without fulvestrant in metastatic hormone receptor-positive breast cancer or advanced ovarian cancer

BACKGROUND

Preclinical evidence suggests that cyclin-dependent kinases 4 and 6 (CDK4/6) inhibitors enhance antitumor immunity. We conducted a phase I trial of ribociclib (CDK4/6 inhibitor) plus spartalizumab (PD-1 inhibitor) in patients with hormone receptor (HR)-positive/HER2-negative metastatic breast cancer (MBC) or advanced ovarian cancer (AOC). The combination was also evaluated with fulvestrant in MBC.

METHODS

In Cohort A, ribociclib was administered on Days 1-21 (28-day cycle) starting at 400 mg, and spartalizumab at 400 mg on Day 1. Dose escalation was followed by expansion in AOC. Fulvestrant was added (Cohort B) with a safety run-in followed by expansion in MBC. Primary objectives were to determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) and recommended phase 2 dose (RP2D), and safety and tolerability of the combinations.

RESULTS

33 patients enrolled (n=18, Cohort A; n=15, Cohort B). The RP2D of ribociclib in both cohorts was 600 mg. Treatment-related adverse events in >20% of patients in either cohort were neutropenia, fatigue, anemia, thrombocytopenia, hypertransaminasemia, maculopapular rash, fatigue, and nausea. Hypertransaminasemia occurred in 66.7% (AST) and 46.7% (ALT) of patients in Cohort B, including 46.7% and 40.0%, respectively, of grade 3 or 4 events. Two confirmed partial responses were observed (13.3%) in Cohort B, in patients with low baseline serum thymidine kinase activity, coupled with an increase on-treatment. Peripheral blood flow cytometry across patients demonstrated on-target drug binding with increases in PD-1 occupancy and activated CD8+ T cells during treatment, irrespective of response. PD-L1-positivity, tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes, or tumor mutational burden did not correlate with progression-free survival (PFS). Several copy-number variations detected with next-generation sequencing correlated with PFS.

CONCLUSIONS

Ribociclib with spartalizumab and fulvestrant showed limited efficacy and elevated hepatotoxicity, precluding further development. Correlative analyses revealed treatment-induced immunological effects, and genomic alterations associated with PFS.

Exploring the Potential of Adjuvant CDK4/6 Inhibitors in Hormone Receptor-Positive Early Breast Cancer: A Consistent Approach for All

BACKGROUND/OBJECTIVES

Hormone receptor-positive, HER2-negative breast cancer is the most common subtype, with endocrine therapy as the standard treatment. Despite the advancements in adjuvant endocrine therapy, recurrence remains a challenge, particularly in high-risk patients. Recent trials on cyclin D kinase 4/6 (CDK4/6) inhibitors in adjuvant therapy have shown promise in reducing early recurrence and improving survival.

METHODS

This review analyzes the clinical evidence supporting the use of CDK4/6 inhibitors, focusing on the NATALEE and monarchE trials, which demonstrate comparable efficacy and manageable safety profiles for ribociclib and abemaciclib.

RESULTS AND CONCLUSIONS

Ribociclib, with its broader applicability and impact on the decision making for axillary lymph node surgery, may be the preferred option in high-risk populations. The review also addresses unanswered clinical questions and highlights the need for ongoing research to optimize the adjuvant therapy strategies.

Neoadjuvant nivolumab and chemotherapy in early estrogen receptor-positive breast cancer: a randomized phase 3 trial

Patients with estrogen receptor-positive (ER+), human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative (HER2-) primary breast cancer (BC) have low pathological complete response (pCR) rates with neoadjuvant chemotherapy. A subset of ER+/HER2- BC contains dense lymphocytic infiltration. We hypothesized that addition of an anti-programmed death 1 agent may increase pCR rates in this BC subtype. We conducted a randomized, multicenter, double-blind phase 3 trial to investigate the benefit of adding nivolumab to neoadjuvant chemotherapy in patients with newly diagnosed, high-risk, grade 3 or 2 (ER 1 to ≤10%) ER+/HER2- primary BC. In total, 510 patients were randomized to receive anthracycline and taxane-based chemotherapy with either intravenous nivolumab or placebo. The primary endpoint of pCR was significantly higher in the nivolumab arm compared with placebo (24.5% versus 13.8%; P = 0.0021), with greater benefit observed in patients with programmed death ligand 1-positive tumors (VENTANA SP142 ≥1%: 44.3% versus 20.2% respectively). There were no new safety signals identified. Of the five deaths that occurred in the nivolumab arm, two were related to study drug toxicity; no deaths occurred in the placebo arm. Adding nivolumab to neoadjuvant chemotherapy significantly increased pCR rates in high-risk, early-stage ER+/HER2- BC, particularly among patients with higher stromal tumor-infiltrating lymphocyte levels or programmed death ligand 1 expression, suggesting a new treatment paradigm that emphasizes the role of immunotherapy and T cell immunosurveillance in luminal disease. Clinical trials.gov identifier: NCT04109066.

Efficacy and Safety of CDK4/6 Inhibitors: A Focus on HR+/HER2- Early Breast Cancer

Cyclin-dependent kinase 4/6 inhibitors (CDK4/6i) have revolutionized the treatment of hormone-receptor positive (HR+), HER2 negative (HER2-) metastatic breast cancer, and are now also established agents in the treatment of high-risk and intermediate-risk HR+ early breast cancer. Several strategies regarding CDK4/6i combinations or continuation beyond progression have been successfully evaluated in the metastatic setting, and are considered a standard of care. Mechanism of action of and resistance mechanisms against CDK4/6i in addition to endocrine resistance represent an important research topic, important for the treatment of HR+ breast cancer. Clinically, CDK4/6i are efficient substances that are usually well tolerated. However, side effects differing between the substances have been reported, and might lead to treatment discontinuation, including in the early disease setting. In the adjuvant setting, the addition of palbociclib to standard endocrine treatment has not improved outcomes, whereas large randomized phase III trials have demonstrated significant disease-free survival benefit for the addition of ribociclib (NATALEE trial) and abemaciclib (monarchE trial). Patient selection, treatment duration, endocrine backbone therapy, and other study details differ between these pivotal trials. This review focuses on both the scientific background as well as all available clinical data of CDK4/6i, with particular emphasis on their use in early breast cancer.

Targeting CDK4/6 in breast cancer

Dysregulation of the cell cycle machinery, particularly the overactivation of cyclin-dependent kinases 4 and 6 (CDK4/6), is a hallmark of breast cancer pathogenesis. The introduction of CDK4/6 inhibitors has transformed the treatment landscape for hormone receptor-positive breast cancer by effectively targeting abnormal cell cycle progression. However, despite their initial clinical success, drug resistance remains a significant challenge, with no reliable biomarkers available to predict treatment response or guide strategies for managing resistant populations. Consequently, numerous studies have sought to investigate the mechanisms driving resistance to optimize the therapeutic use of CDK4/6 inhibitors and improve patient outcomes. Here we examine the molecular mechanisms regulating the cell cycle, current clinical applications of CDK4/6 inhibitors in breast cancer, and key mechanisms contributing to drug resistance. Furthermore, we discuss emerging predictive biomarkers and highlight potential directions for overcoming resistance and enhancing therapeutic efficacy.

Pembrolizumab and chemotherapy in high-risk, early-stage, ER+/HER2- breast cancer: a randomized phase 3 trial

Addition of pembrolizumab to neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by adjuvant pembrolizumab improved outcomes in patients with high-risk, early-stage, triple-negative breast cancer. However, whether the addition of neoadjuvant pembrolizumab to chemotherapy would improve outcomes in high-risk, early-stage, estrogen receptor-positive/human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative (ER+/HER2-) breast cancer remains unclear. We conducted a double-blind, placebo-controlled phase 3 study (KEYNOTE-756) in which patients with previously untreated ER+/HER2- grade 3 high-risk invasive breast cancer (T1c-2 (≥2 cm), cN1-2 or T3-4, cN0-2) were randomly assigned (1:1) to neoadjuvant pembrolizumab 200 mg or placebo Q3W given with paclitaxel QW for 12 weeks, followed by four cycles of doxorubicin or epirubicin plus cyclophosphamide Q2W or Q3W. After surgery (with/without adjuvant radiation therapy), patients received adjuvant pembrolizumab or placebo for nine cycles plus adjuvant endocrine therapy. Dual primary endpoints were pathological complete response and event-free survival in the intention-to-treat population. In total, 635 patients were assigned to the pembrolizumab-chemotherapy arm and 643 to the placebo-chemotherapy arm. At the study's prespecified first interim analysis, the pathological complete response rate was 24.3% (95% confidence interval (CI), 21.0-27.8%) in the pembrolizumab-chemotherapy arm and 15.6% (95% CI, 12.8-18.6%) in the placebo-chemotherapy arm (estimated treatment difference, 8.5 percentage points; 95% CI, 4.2-12.8; P = 0.00005). Event-free survival was not mature in this analysis. During the neoadjuvant phase, treatment-related adverse events of grade ≥3 were reported in 52.5% and 46.4% of patients in the pembrolizumab-chemotherapy and placebo-chemotherapy arms, respectively. In summary, the addition of pembrolizumab to neoadjuvant chemotherapy significantly improved the pathological complete response rate in patients with high-risk, early-stage ER+/HER2- breast cancer. Safety was consistent with the known profiles of each study treatment. Follow-up continues for event-free survival. ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT03725059 .

CDK4/6 Inhibitor Resistance in ER+ Breast Cancer

The cyclin-dependent kinases 4 and 6 inhibitors are the mainstay of treatment for patients with hormone receptor-positive and HER2-negative breast cancer. The ability of these drugs to improve the outcome of patients both in the metastatic and the early setting has been largely demonstrated. However, resistance, either de novo or acquired, represents a major clinical challenge. In the past years, efforts have been made to identify biomarkers that might help in a better selection of patients or to unravel the mechanisms leading to resistance in order to develop new therapeutic strategies to overcome it. Alterations of cell cycle-related genes and proteins are among the best characterized markers of resistance, and pathways impacting the cell cycle, including nuclear and growth factor receptors signaling, have been thoroughly investigated. Despite this, to date, cyclin-dependent kinases 4 and 6 inhibitors are administered based only on the hormone receptor and HER2 status of the tumor, and patients progressing on therapy are managed with currently available treatments. Here we summarize present knowledge on the cyclin-dependent kinases 4 and 6 inhibitors' mechanisms of action, efficacy data, and mechanisms of resistance.

Current trends in sensitizing immune checkpoint inhibitors for cancer treatment

Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have dramatically transformed the treatment landscape for various malignancies, achieving notable clinical outcomes across a wide range of indications. Despite these advances, resistance to immune checkpoint blockade (ICB) remains a critical clinical challenge, characterized by variable response rates and non-durable benefits. However, growing research into the complex intrinsic and extrinsic characteristics of tumors has advanced our understanding of the mechanisms behind ICI resistance, potentially improving treatment outcomes. Additionally, robust predictive biomarkers are crucial for optimizing patient selection and maximizing the efficacy of ICBs. Recent studies have emphasized that multiple rational combination strategies can overcome immune checkpoint resistance and enhance susceptibility to ICIs. These findings not only deepen our understanding of tumor biology but also reveal the unique mechanisms of action of sensitizing agents, extending clinical benefits in cancer immunotherapy. In this review, we will explore the underlying biology of ICIs, discuss the significance of the tumor immune microenvironment (TIME) and clinical predictive biomarkers, analyze the current mechanisms of resistance, and outline alternative combination strategies to enhance the effectiveness of ICIs, including personalized strategies for sensitizing tumors to ICIs.

Current and future immunotherapy for breast cancer

Substantial therapeutic advancement has been made in the field of immunotherapy in breast cancer. The immune checkpoint inhibitor pembrolizumab in combination with chemotherapy received FDA approval for both PD-L1 positive metastatic and early-stage triple-negative breast cancer, while ongoing clinical trials seek to expand the current treatment landscape for immune checkpoint inhibitors in hormone receptor positive and HER2 positive breast cancer. Antibody drug conjugates are FDA approved for triple negative and HER2+ disease, and are being studied in combination with immune checkpoint inhibitors. Vaccines and bispecific antibodies are areas of active research. Studies of cellular therapies such as tumor infiltrating lymphocytes, chimeric antigen receptor-T cells and T cell receptor engineered cells are promising and ongoing. This review provides an update of recent major clinical trials of immunotherapy in breast cancer and discusses future directions in the treatment of breast cancer.

The landscape of combining immune checkpoint inhibitors with novel Therapies: Secret alliances against breast cancer

This review focuses on the immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) in the context of breast cancer (BC) management. These innovative treatments, by targeting proteins expressed on both tumor and immune cells, aim to overcome tumor-induced immune suppression and reactivate the immune system. The potential of this approach is the subject of numerous clinical studies. Here, we explore the key studies and emerging therapies related to ICIs providing a detailed analysis of their specific and combined use in BC treatment.

Double-Faced Immunological Effects of CDK4/6 Inhibitors on Cancer Treatment: Challenges and Perspectives

Cyclin-dependent kinases (CDKs) are generally involved in the progression of cell cycle and cell division in normal cells, while abnormal activations of CDKs are deemed to be a driving force for accelerating cell proliferation and tumorigenesis. Therefore, CDKs have become ideal therapeutic targets for cancer treatment. The U.S FDA has approved three CDK4/6 inhibitors (CDK4/6is) for the treatment of patients with hormone receptor-positive (HR+) or human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative (HER2-) advanced or metastatic breast cancer, and these drugs showed impressive results in clinics. Besides cell-cycle arrest, there is growing evidence that CDK4/6is exert paradoxical roles on cancer treatment by altering the immune system. Indeed, clinical data showed that CDK4/6is could change the immune system to exert antitumor effects, while these changes also caused tumor resistance to CDK4/6i. However, the molecular mechanism for the regulation of the immune system by CDK4/6is is unclear. In this review, we comprehensively discuss the paradoxical immunological effects of CDK4/6is in cancer treatment, elucidating their anticancer mechanisms through immunomodulatory activity and induction of acquired drug resistance by dysregulating the immune microenvironment. More importantly, we suggest a few strategies including combining CDK4/6is with immunotherapy to overcome drug resistance.

Advances in the mechanism of CDK4/6 inhibitor resistance in HR+/HER2- breast cancer

Among women, breast cancer is the most prevalent form of a malignant tumour. Among the subtypes of breast cancer, hormone receptor (HR) positive and human epidermal growth factor receptor (HER2) negative kinds make up the biggest proportion. The advent of cyclin-dependent kinase 4 and 6 (CDK4/6) inhibitors, which are dependent on cell cycle proteins, has greatly enhanced the prognosis of patients with advanced HR+/HER2- breast cancer. This is a specific treatment that stops the growth of cancer cells by preventing them from dividing. Nevertheless, the drug resistance of the disease unavoidably impacts the effectiveness of treatment and the prognosis of patients. This report provides a thorough analysis of the current research advancements about the resistance mechanism of CDK4/6 inhibitors in HR+/HER2- breast cancer. It presents an in-depth discussion from numerous viewpoints, such as aberrant cell cycle regulation and changes in signalling pathways. In response to the drug resistance problem, subsequent treatment strategies are also being explored, including switching to other CDK4/6 inhibitor drugs, a combination of novel endocrine therapeutic agents, an optimal combination of targeted therapies and switching to chemotherapy. An in-depth study of the resistance mechanism can assist in identifying creative tactics that can overcome or postpone drug resistance, alleviate the problem of restricted treatment strategies following drug resistance and enhance the prognosis of patients.

Genomic and molecular alterations associated with primary resistance to immune checkpoint inhibitors

The clinical response to immune checkpoint inhibitors may vary by tumor type and many tumors present with either primary or acquired resistance to immunotherapy. Improved understanding of the molecular and immunologic mechanisms underlying immunotherapy resistance is essential for developing biomarkers and for guiding the optimum approach to selecting treatment regimens and sequencing. This is increasingly important for tumors with primary resistance as effective biomarkers in this setting can guide clinicians about appropriate treatment regimen selection in the first-line setting. Multiple potential biological mechanisms of primary resistance have been proposed but most are yet to be validated in prospective clinical cohorts. Individual biomarkers have poor specificity and sensitivity, and the development of validated and integrated predictive models may guide which patient will benefit from monotherapy versus combination therapy. In this review, we discuss the emerging data identifying the molecular mechanisms of primary resistance to immunotherapy and explore potential therapeutic strategies to target these.

Recent progress of CDK4/6 inhibitors' current practice in breast cancer

Dysregulated cellular proliferation represents a hallmark feature across all cancers. Aberrant activation of the cyclin-dependent kinase 4 and 6 (CDK4/6) pathway, independent of mitogenic signaling, engenders uncontrolled breast cancer cell proliferation. Consequently, the advent of CDK4/6 inhibition has constituted a pivotal milestone in the realm of targeted breast cancer therapy. The combination of CDK4/6 inhibitors (CDK4/6i) with endocrine therapy (ET) has emerged as the foremost therapeutic modality for patients afflicted with hormone receptor-positive (HR + )/HER2-negative (HER2-) advanced breast cancer. At present, the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has sanctioned various CDK4/6i for employment as the primary treatment regimen in HR + /HER2- breast cancer. This therapeutic approach has demonstrated a substantial extension of progression-free survival (PFS), often amounting to several months, when administered alongside endocrine therapy. Within this comprehensive review, we systematically evaluate the utilization strategies of CDK4/6i across various subpopulations of breast cancer and explore potential therapeutic avenues following disease progression during application of CDK4/6i therapy.

Breaking through therapeutic barriers: Insights into CDK4/6 inhibition resistance in hormone receptor-positive metastatic breast cancer

The therapeutic landscape for hormone receptor-positive (HR+) breast carcinoma has undergone a significant transformation with the advent of cyclin-dependent kinase (CDK)4/6 inhibitors, particularly in combination with endocrine therapy as the primary regimen. However, the evolution of resistance mechanisms in response to CDK4/6 inhibitors in HR+ metastatic breast cancer presents substantial challenges in managing the disease. This review explores the diverse genomic landscape underlying resistance, including disturbances in the cell cycle, deviations in oncogenic signaling pathways, deficiencies in DNA damage response (DDR) mechanisms, and changes in the tumor microenvironment (TME). Additionally, it discusses potential strategies to surmount resistance, including advancements in endocrine therapy, targeted inhibition of cell cycle components, suppression of AKT/mTOR activation, exploration of the FGFR pathway, utilization of antibody-drug conjugates (ADCs), and integration of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) with endocrine therapy and CDK4/6 inhibitors, providing pathways for enhancing patient outcomes amidst treatment challenges.

CDK4/6 inhibitors: The Devil is in the Detail

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Update on the most recent clinical evidence on CDK4/6 inhibitors (CDK4/6i) in the treatment of hormone receptor (HR)-positive, human epidermal growth factor receptor (HER)2-negative breast cancer.

RECENT FINDINGS

Over the past decade, CDK4/6i have become part of the standard of care treatment of patients with both metastatic and high-risk early HR + /HER2- breast cancers. The three available CDK4/6i (palbociclib, ribociclib and abemaciclib) have been extensively studied in combination with endocrine therapy (ET) in metastatic breast cancer (mBC) with consistent prolongation of progression free survival; however, ribociclib has emerged as the preferred first line agent in mBC given overall survival benefit over endocrine monotherapy. In early BC, abemaciclib is the only currently approved agent while ribociclib has early positive clinical trial data. Toxicities and financial burden limit the use of CDK4/6i in all patients and resource-poor settings, and optimal timing of their use in mBC remains unclear. There is considerable evidence for the use of CDK4/6i in metastatic and early HR + /HER2- breast cancer, but knowledge gaps remain, and further research is necessary to better define their optimal use.

Checkpoint inhibition for early-stage hormone receptor-positive breast cancer

INTRODUCTION

Most patients with breast cancer have early-stage hormone receptor (HR)-positive, human epidermal growth factor receptor-2 (HER2)-negative disease. Even though the prognosis for most of these patients is good, there is a need to identify patients at risk for poor outcomes and to develop strategies to mitigate this risk.

AREAS COVERED

The addition of immunotherapy to standard neoadjuvant chemotherapy represents a promising option for select patients with HR-positive early breast cancer. Three randomized clinical trials have shown favorable results to date. In this review, we discuss the findings of I-SPY2, CheckMate 7FL (NCT04109066), and KEYNOTE-756 (NCT03725059).

EXPERT OPINION

Despite the promising results of these trials, there are unanswered questions that need to be considered before incorporating neo/adjuvant immunotherapy in the treatment paradigm of early-stage HR-positive breast cancer. One example of an unanswered question is patient selection. Because the regimens used in these protocols are associated with long-term toxicities, identifying the patients who are more likely to derive a benefit from these agents, such as through the use of biomarkers, is critical. A second example is the optimal integration of adjuvant therapies that improve invasive disease-free survival, such as abemaciclib and ribociclib, which are not safely administered concurrently with immunotherapy.

Current Status and Future Perspectives of Antibody-Drug Conjugates in Hormone Receptor-Positive Breast Cancer

Breast cancer is the most common cancer type in women. The vast majority of breast cancer patients have hormone receptor-positive (HR+) tumors. In advanced HR+ breast cancer, the combination of endocrine therapy with cyclin-dependent kinase 4/6 (CDK4/6) inhibitors is considered the standard of care in the front-line setting. Nevertheless, resistance to hormonal therapy and CDK4/6 inhibitors eventually occurs, leading to progression of the disease. Antibody-drug conjugates (ADCs) comprise a promising therapeutic choice with significant efficacy in patients with HR+ breast cancer, which is resistant to endocrine treatment. ADCs typically consist of a cytotoxic payload attached by a linker to a monoclonal antibody that targets a specific tumor-associated antigen, offering the advantage of a more selective delivery of chemotherapy to cancer cells. In this review, we focus on the ADC mechanisms of action, their toxicity profile and therapeutic uses as well as on related biomarkers and future perspectives in advanced HR+ breast cancer.

Application of fluorocarbon nanoparticles of 131I-fulvestrant as a targeted radiation drug for endocrine therapy on human breast cancer

BACKGROUND

Breast cancer is the most prevalent malignant tumor among women, with hormone receptor-positive cases constituting 70%. Fulvestrant, an antagonist for these receptors, is utilized for advanced metastatic hormone receptor-positive breast cancer. Yet, its inhibitory effect on tumor cells is not strong, and it lacks direct cytotoxicity. Consequently, there's a significant challenge in preventing recurrence and metastasis once cancer cells develop resistance to fulvestrant.

METHOD

To address these challenges, we engineered tumor-targeting nanoparticles termed 131I-fulvestrant-ALA-PFP-FA-NPs. This involved labeling fulvestrant with 131I to create 131I-fulvestrant. Subsequently, we incorporated the 131I-fulvestrant and 5-aminolevulinic acid (ALA) into fluorocarbon nanoparticles with folate as the targeting agent. This design facilitates a tri-modal therapeutic approach-endocrine therapy, radiotherapy, and PDT for estrogen receptor-positive breast cancer.

RESULTS

Our in vivo and in vitro tests showed that the drug-laden nanoparticles effectively zeroed in on tumors. This targeting efficiency was corroborated using SPECT-CT imaging, confocal microscopy, and small animal fluorescence imaging. The 131I-fulvestrant-ALA-PFP-FA-NPs maintained stability and showcased potent antitumor capabilities due to the synergism of endocrine therapy, radiotherapy, and CR-PDT. Throughout the treatment duration, we detected no notable irregularities in hematological, biochemical, or histological evaluations.

CONCLUSION

We've pioneered a nanoparticle system loaded with radioactive isotope 131I, endocrine therapeutic agents, and a photosensitizer precursor. This system offers a combined modality of radiotherapy, endocrine treatment, and PDT for breast cancer.

Ipilimumab and nivolumab combined with anthracycline-based chemotherapy in metastatic hormone receptor-positive breast cancer: a randomized phase 2b trial

BACKGROUND

Immune checkpoint inhibitors have shown minimal clinical activity in hormone receptor-positive metastatic breast cancer (HR+mBC). Doxorubicin and low-dose cyclophosphamide are reported to induce immune responses and counter regulatory T cells (Tregs). Here, we report the efficacy and safety of combined programmed cell death protein-1/cytotoxic T-lymphocyte-associated protein 4 blockade concomitant with or after immunomodulatory chemotherapy for HR+mBC.

METHODS

Patients with HR+mBC starting first-/second- line chemotherapy (chemo) were randomized 2:3 to chemotherapy (pegylated liposomal doxorubicin 20 mg/m2 every second week plus cyclophosphamide 50 mg by mouth/day in every other 2-week cycle) with or without concomitant ipilimumab (ipi; 1 mg/kg every sixth week) and nivolumab (nivo; 240 mg every second week). Patients in the chemo-only arm were offered cross-over to ipi/nivo without chemotherapy. Co-primary endpoints were safety in all patients starting therapy and progression-free survival (PFS) in the per-protocol (PP) population, defined as all patients evaluated for response and receiving at least two treatment cycles. Secondary endpoints included objective response rate, clinical benefit rate, Treg changes during therapy and assessment of programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1), mutational burden and immune gene signatures as biomarkers.

RESULTS

Eighty-two patients were randomized and received immune-chemo (N=49) or chemo-only (N=33), 16 patients continued to the ipi/nivo-only cross-over arm. Median follow-up was 41.4 months. Serious adverse events occurred in 63% in the immune-chemo arm, 39% in the chemo-only arm and 31% in the cross-over-arm. In the PP population (N=78) median PFS in the immune-chemo arm was 5.1 months, compared with 3.6 months in the chemo-only arm, with HR 0.94 (95% CI 0.59 to 1.51). Clinical benefit rates were 55% (26/47) and 48% (15/31) in the immune-chemo and chemo-only arms, respectively. In the cross-over-arm (ipi/nivo-only), objective responses were observed in 19% of patients (3/16) and clinical benefit in 25% (4/16). Treg levels in blood decreased after study chemotherapy. High-grade immune-related adverse events were associated with prolonged PFS. PD-L1 status and mutational burden were not associated with ipi/nivo benefit, whereas a numerical PFS advantage was observed for patients with a high Treg gene signature in tumor.

CONCLUSION

The addition of ipi/nivo to chemotherapy increased toxicity without improving efficacy. Ipi/nivo administered sequentially to chemotherapy was tolerable and induced clinical responses.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03409198.