Adjuvant therapy in completely resected, EGFR-mutant non-small cell lung cancer: a comparative analysis of treatment efficacy between EGFR-TKI and anti-PD-1/PD-L1 immunotherapy

Persist or resist: Immune checkpoint inhibitors in EGFR-mutated NSCLC

Although epidermal growth factor receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitors (EGFR-TKIs), especially third-generation TKIs, have significantly improved the progression-free survival and overall survival of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients with EGFR mutation, TKI resistance is inevitable for most patients. Over the past few years, immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have significantly improved the survival for EGFR-wild type NSCLC patients. However, no significantly improved benefits were observed with ICI monotherapy in EGFR-mutated patients. EGFR-mutated NSCLC shows more heterogeneity in tumor mutational burden (TMB), programmed cell death-ligand 1 (PD-L1), and immune microenvironment characteristics. Whether ICIs are suitable for EGFR-mutated NSCLC patients remains to be elucidated. In this review, we summarized clinical trials of ICIs or combined therapy in EGFR-mutated NSCLC patients. We further discussed the factors determining the efficacy of ICIs in EGFR-mutated NSCLC patients, the mutation subtypes and microenvironment characteristics of potential responders. More importantly, we provided insights into areas worth further investigation in the future.

Advances in adjuvant therapy for operable N2 non-small cell lung cancer: a narrative review

Non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) is still the disease with the highest incidence rate among malignant tumors, in which NSCLC under N2 stage has obvious survival differences among different patients due to its high heterogeneity. For NSCLC under this stage, the current treatment options are: preoperative neoadjuvant therapy, surgical treatment, postoperative adjuvant chemotherapy, postoperative adjuvant radiotherapy (PORT), Postoperative adjuvant targeted therapy and postoperative adjuvant immunotherapy. Whether postoperative adjuvant radiotherapy is routinely administered to patients with pN2 remains controversial in clinical application. Meanwhile, the booming development of adjuvant targeted therapy and adjuvant immunotherapy also provides newer therapeutic options for the prognosis of postoperative pN2 stage NSCLC, and some new markers will guide the adaptive application of immune drugs in the future. This article analyzes the current stage of therapeutic advances in operable stage N2 non-small cell lung cancer, and discusses in detail in this article the therapeutic controversy of postoperative adjuvant radiotherapy in pN2 stage non-small cell lung cancer, so as to explore a more reasonable treatment mode for future patients with stage N2 non-small cell lung cancer.

Association of prognostic nutritional index with long-term survival in lung cancer receiving immune checkpoint inhibitors: A meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

This meta-analysis aimed to identify the association of prognostic nutritional index (PNI) with long-term survival in lung cancer patients who received the immune checkpoint inhibitors.

METHODS

The Medline, CNKI, EMBASE, and Web of Science databases were searched up to August 20, 2023. Progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were main outcomes and hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence intervals were combined. Subgroup analysis stratified by the pathological type [non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) vs small cell lung cancer (SCLC)], previous treatment history and combination of other treatment was performed.

RESULTS

Twenty-two available studies with 2550 patients were included. Pooled results demonstrated that lower PNI was related to worse PFS (HR = 0.51, P<.001) and OS (HR = 0.43, P<.001). Furthermore, subgroup analysis based on the pathological type (non-small cell lung cancer: HR = 0.52, P<.001 for PFS, HR = 0.41, P<.001 for OS; small cell lung cancer: HR = 0.41, P = .007 for PFS, HR = 0.44, P = .007 for OS), previous treatment history (first-line treatment: HR = 0.67, P<.001 for PFS, HR = 0.52, P<.001 for OS) and combination of other treatment (No: HR = 0.54, P<.001 for PFS, HR = 0.43, P<.001 for OS; Yes: HR = 0.63, P<.001 for PFS, HR = 0.51, P<.001) showed similar findings.

CONCLUSION

PNI is significantly associated with long-term survival in immune checkpoint inhibitors treated lung cancer and patients with lower PNI are more likely to experience poorer prognosis.

The opportunities and challenges of using PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors for leukemia treatment

Leukemia poses a significant clinical challenge due to its swift onset, rapid progression, and treatment-related complications. Tumor immune evasion, facilitated by immune checkpoints like programmed death receptor 1/programmed death receptor ligand 1 (PD-1/PD-L1), plays a critical role in leukemia pathogenesis and progression. In this review, we summarized the research progress and therapeutic potential of PD-L1 in leukemia, focusing on targeted therapy and immunotherapy. Recent clinical trials have demonstrated promising outcomes with PD-L1 inhibitors, highlighting their role in enhancing treatment efficacy. This review discusses the implications of PD-L1 expression levels on treatment response and long-term survival rates in leukemia patients. Furthermore, we address the challenges and opportunities in immunotherapy, emphasizing the need for personalized approaches and combination therapies to optimize PD-L1 inhibition in leukemia management. Future research prospects include exploring novel treatment strategies and addressing immune-related adverse events to improve clinical outcomes in leukemia. Overall, this review provides valuable insights into the role of PD-L1 in leukemia and its potential as a therapeutic target in the evolving landscape of leukemia treatment.

Perioperative immunotherapy for stage II-III non-small cell lung cancer: a meta-analysis base on randomized controlled trials

Background

In recent years, we have observed the pivotal role of immunotherapy in improving survival for patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). However, the effectiveness of immunotherapy in the perioperative (neoadjuvant + adjuvant) treatment of resectable NSCLC remains uncertain. We conducted a comprehensive analysis of its antitumor efficacy and adverse effects (AEs) by pooling data from the KEYNOTE-671, NADIM II, and AEGEAN clinical trials.

Methods

For eligible studies, we searched seven databases. The randomized controlled trials (RCTs) pertaining to the comparative analysis of combination neoadjuvant platinum-based chemotherapy plus perioperative immunotherapy (PIO) versus perioperative placebo (PP) were included. Primary endpoints were overall survival (OS) and event-free survival (EFS). Secondary endpoints encompassed drug responses, AEs, and surgical outcomes.

Results

Three RCTs (KEYNOTE-671, NADIM II, and AEGEAN) were included in the final analysis. PIO group (neoadjuvant platinum-based chemotherapy plus perioperative immunotherapy) exhibited superior efficacy in OS (hazard ratio [HR]: 0.63 [0.49-0.81]), EFS (HR: 0.61 [0.52, 0.72]), objective response rate (risk ratio [RR]: 2.21 [1.91, 2.54]), pathological complete response (RR: 4.36 [3.04, 6.25]), major pathological response (RR: 2.79 [2.25, 3.46]), R0 resection rate (RR: 1.13 [1.00, 1.26]) and rate of adjuvant treatment (RR: 1.08 [1.01, 1.15]) compared with PP group (neoadjuvant platinum-based chemotherapy plus perioperative placebo). In the subgroup analysis, EFS tended to favor the PIO group in almost all subgroups. BMI (>25), T stage (IV), N stage (N1-N2) and pathological response (with pathological complete response) were favorable factors in the PIO group. In the safety assessment, the PIO group exhibited higher rates of serious AEs (28.96% vs. 23.51%) and AEs leading to treatment discontinuation (12.84% vs. 5.81%). Meanwhile, although total adverse events, grade 3-5 adverse events, and fatal adverse events tended to favor the PP group, the differences were not statistically significant.

Conclusion

PIO appears to be superior to PP for resectable stage II-III NSCLC, demonstrating enhanced survival and pathological responses. However, its elevated adverse event (AE) rate warrants careful consideration.

Systematic review registration

https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO/#recordDetails, identifier CRD42023487475.