Prolactin secreting pituitary carcinoma

Clinical features of pituitary carcinoma: analysis based on a case report and literature review

Introduction

Pituitary carcinoma (PC) is an extremely rare tumor of the adenohypophysis, which manifests as craniospinal dissemination and/or systemic metastasis. The diagnosis of PC is particularly difficult, as the clinical diagnosis only can be made after the metastasis is found. Owing to the complex diagnostic process and less effective treatments, the clinical prognosis of PC is usually very poor. Hence, it is of great significance to illustrate the diagnosis and treatment course of PC.

Methods

In this case report, we described a 48-year-old male patient who was diagnosed with pituitary adenoma (PA) initially and then was diagnosed with PC eventually after spinal cord metastasis was found, and we illustrated the treatment course as well. Furthermore, we summarized all the published case reports until now and provided a comprehensive review of the diagnosis, treatment, prediction, and clinical outcome of PC.

Results and Conclusions

We found that most PC patients had adrenocorticotropic hormone/prolactin (ACTH/PRL)-secreting tumors, Ki-67 ≥ 10%, and P53 positivity, which may have the potential to predict the transformation from PA to PC; surgery excision combined with temozolomide (TMZ) and radiotherapy is helpful to prolong the survival of PC patients.

Approach to the Patient With Prolactinoma

Prolactinomas are the most common pituitary tumor histotype, with microprolactinomas being prevalent in women and macroprolactinomas in men. Hyperprolactinemia is among the most common causes of hypogonadotropic hypogonadism in both sexes, prompting medical advice for hypogonadism (infertility, oligo-amenorrhea, impotence, osteoporosis/osteopenia) in both sexes, and for signs and symptoms of mass effects (hypopituitarism, visual loss, optic chiasm compression, cranial nerve deficits, headaches) predominantly in men. Diagnostic workup involves a single prolactin measurement and pituitary imaging, but some laboratory artifacts (ie, the "hook effect" and macroprolactin) can complicate or delay the diagnosis. The treatment of choice for prolactinomas is represented by dopamine agonists, mainly cabergoline, which are able to induce disease control, restore fertility in both sexes, and definitively cure one-third of patients, thus permitting treatment discontinuation. Pregnancy and menopause may promote spontaneous prolactin decline and anticipate cabergoline discontinuation in women. Surgery and/or radiotherapy are indicated in case of resistance to cabergoline not overcome by the increase in drug dose up to the maximally tolerated or the patient's personal choice of surgery. The evidence of resistance to cabergoline in invasive and proliferative tumors may indicate biological aggressiveness, thus requiring alternative therapeutic approaches mainly based on temozolomide use as monotherapy or combined with radiotherapy. In uncontrolled patients, new medical approaches (alternative hormonal treatments, cytotoxic drugs, peptide receptor radionuclide therapy, mTOR/Akt inhibitors, tyrosine kinase inhibitors, or immunotherapy) may be offered but the experience collected to date is still very scant. This article reviews different facets of prolactinomas and discusses approaches to the condition in more common clinical situations.

Macroprolactinoma with secondary resistance to dopamine agonists: a case report and review of the literature

BACKGROUND

Resistance to dopamine agonists is not uncommonly seen in prolactinomas. However, development of resistance to dopamine agonists after an initial period of robust treatment response is rare, and only 39 cases have been reported in the past four decades. We describe a Chinese man with this rare condition and explored the postulated mechanisms that may explain this phenomenon. We compiled similar cases that were previously reported and compared their etiology, progress, and response to treatment. On the basis of these cases, we derived a list of differential diagnoses to consider in patients with secondary resistance to dopamine agonists.

CASE PRESENTATION

A 63-year-old Chinese man presented with blurred vision and was subsequently diagnosed with a macroprolactinoma. He had initial response to cabergoline but developed secondary resistance to it after 5 years. The prolactinoma continued to grow, and his serum prolactin remained markedly elevated despite adherence to escalating dosages of cabergoline up to 6 mg/week. The patient finally underwent transsphenoidal surgery and was found to have a sparsely granulated lactotroph tumor with Ki-67 index of 5%. Postoperatively, there was improvement in his serum prolactin level, although he still required treatment with cabergoline at 6 mg/week.

CONCLUSIONS

Surgery can facilitate disease control in patients with prolactinomas that develop secondary resistance to dopamine agonists. Malignant prolactinoma is an important differential diagnosis in this group of patients, especially when serum prolactin remains markedly elevated despite resolution or stability of the primary pituitary lesion, suggesting a metastatic source of prolactin secretion.

Evolution of a refractory prolactin-secreting pituitary adenoma into a pituitary carcinoma: report of a challenging case and literature review

BACKGROUND

Pituitary carcinomas (PCs), defined as distant metastases of pituitary neoplasms, are very rare malignancies. Because the clinical presentation of PCs is variable, early diagnosis and management remain challenging. PCs are always refractory to comprehensive treatments, and patients with PCs have extremely poor prognoses.

CASE PRESENTATION

We describe one case of a prolactin-secreting pituitary adenoma (PA) refractory to conventional therapy that evolved into a PC with intraspinal metastasis. A 34-year-old female was diagnosed with an invasive prolactin-secreting PA in 2009 and was unresponsive to medical treatment with bromocriptine. The tumor was gross totally removed via transsphenoidal surgery (TSS). However, the patient experienced multiple tumor recurrences or regrowth despite comprehensive treatments, including medical therapy, two gamma knife radiosurgeries (GKSs), and four frontal craniotomies. In 2016, she was found to have an intradural extramedullary mass at the level of the fourth lumbar vertebra. The intraspinal lesion was completely resected and was confirmed as a metastatic PC based on histomorphology and immunohistochemical staining. The literature on the diagnosis, molecular pathogenesis, treatment, and prognosis of patients with prolactin-secreting PCs was reviewed.

CONCLUSION

PCs are very rare neoplasms with variable clinical features and poor prognosis. Most PCs usually arise from aggressive PAs refractory to conventional therapy. There is no reliable marker to identify aggressive PAs with a risk for progression to PCs; thus, it is difficult to diagnose these PCs early until the presence of metastatic lesions. It is still very challenging to manage patients with PCs due to a lack of standardized protocols for diagnosis and treatment. Establishing molecular biomarkers and the pathobiology of PCs could help in the early identification of aggressive PAs most likely to evolve into PCs.

Approach to the Treatment of a Patient with an Aggressive Pituitary Tumor

A small subset of pituitary adenomas grows despite maximal treatment with standard therapies; namely, surgery and radiotherapy. These aggressive tumors demonstrate 2 patterns of growth: they may be locally aggressive or metastasize distantly, either hematogenously or through the spinal fluid. Further surgery and radiotherapy may be helpful for palliation of symptoms, but they are rarely definitive in the management of these malignant tumors. The only chemotherapy with established activity in the treatment of pituitary tumors is the alkylating agent temozolomide. At most, 50% of patients exhibit an objective response to temozolomide and the median time to progression is short; thus, there remains a significant unmet need for effective treatments within this patient population. Several targeted agents have reported activity in this tumor type-including small molecule inhibitors, checkpoint inhibitors, and other biologics-but remain investigational at this time.

Aggressive prolactinomas: how to manage?

PURPOSE

Aggressive prolactinomas are defined as radiologically invasive tumors which cannot be cured by surgery, and that have an unusually rapid rate of tumor growth despite dopamine agonist treatment and surgery. In some cases, metastasis occurs, defining prolactin carcinoma which is the second most frequent pituitary carcinoma.

METHODS

A literature search was performed to review the available data on the treatment of aggressive pituitary prolactinomas or carcinomas.

RESULTS

When optimal standard therapies (high dose cabergoline, surgery and radiotherapy) failed, temozolomide, an alkylating drug, is currently the best option, allowing to control tumor growth in about 50% of treated prolactinomas and improving overall survival of these patients. However, long-term complete response occurs in a limited subgroup of tumors. Alternative drugs could be discussed in a subset of aggressive prolactinomas either before temozolomide (pasireotide, peptide receptor radionuclide therapy…) or after temozolomide failure.

CONCLUSION

Despite the significant improvement obtained with the use of temozolomide, a need for alternative drugs persists since a majority of these tumors are resistant or will recur during the follow-up. Patients suffering from such a rare condition should have access to clinical trials available for other types of rare cancers, such as tyrosine kinase inhibitors or immunotherapy.

Dopamine agonist resistant prolactinomas: any alternative medical treatment?

Consensus guidelines recommend dopamine agonists (DAs) as the mainstay treatment for prolactinomas. In most patients, DAs achieve tumor shrinkage and normoprolactinemia at well tolerated doses. However, primary or, less often, secondary resistance to DAs may be also encountered representing challenging clinical scenarios. This is particularly true for aggressive prolactinomas in which surgery and radiotherapy may not achieve tumor control. In these cases, alternative medical treatments have been considered but data on their efficacy should be interpreted within the constraints of publication bias and of lack of relevant clinical trials. The limited reports on somatostatin analogues have shown conflicting results, but cases with optimal outcomes have been documented. Data on estrogen modulators and metformin are scarce and their usefulness remains to be evaluated. In many aggressive lactotroph tumors, temozolomide has demonstrated optimal outcomes, whereas for other cytotoxic agents, tyrosine kinase inhibitors and for inhibitors of mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR), higher quality evidence is needed. Finally, promising preliminary results from in vitro and animal reports need to be further assessed and, if appropriate, translated in human studies.

An Institutional Experience of Tumor Progression to Pituitary Carcinoma in a 15-Year Cohort of 1055 Consecutive Pituitary Neuroendocrine Tumors

Pituitary carcinoma is a rare disease, defined by the presence of cerebrospinal or distant metastasis of a pituitary neuroendocrine tumor (PitNET). To review our institutional experience of pituitary carcinoma, we searched the database of the UHN Endocrine Oncology Site group and the University Health Network pathology laboratory information system from 2001 to 2016. Among 1055 PitNETs from 1169 transsphenoidal resections, we identified 4 cases of pituitary carcinoma, indicating that pituitary carcinoma represents around 0.4% of PitNETs. All four patients were women. The age at initial presentation ranged from 23 to 54 years. Two patients had Cushing disease with corticotroph tumors; one was initially a densely granulated corticotroph tumor that evolved to become sparsely granulated, while the other was a Crooke cell tumor. One patient had a functioning sparsely granulated lactotroph tumor and one had a clinically silent poorly differentiated PIT1 lineage tumor. Apart from a relatively high Ki67 labeling index (≥ 10%) in three tumors, there were no cytomorphologic features at the time of initial presentation that could predict subsequent metastatic behavior. The time from diagnosis of the pituitary neuroendocrine tumor to the diagnosis of malignancy was 3 to 14 years. Therapies included somatostatin analogs, external beam radiotherapy, chemotherapies including capecitabine/temozolomide, everolimus, sunitinib, bevacizumab, and peptide receptor radionuclide therapy (PRRT). One patient died of disease 18 years after initial diagnosis, underscoring the protracted course of this ultimately fatal neuroendocrine malignancy.

Aggressive and malignant pituitary tumours: state-of-the-art

Pituitary adenomas are unique in multiple ways. They are rarely malignant in terms of metastases; yet, they may be aggressive. Their cancerous potential is defined in a classic oncological way by the ability to metastasise, and therefore, it has been crucial to differentiate this process from aggressive behaviour, characterised as a particularly invasive and/or recurrent behaviour and resistance to common modalities of therapy. Recently, however, important changes have been introduced to the diagnosis and management of aggressive and malignant pituitary tumours including the 4th edition of the World Health Organization (WHO) classification for endocrine tumours (2017) as well as ESE Clinical Guidelines (2018), although an attempt to establish predictive and/or prognostic markers of clinical aggressiveness remains difficult. In this review, we focus on a group of pituitary tumours causing significant problems in clinical practice and requiring multidisciplinary input. We summarise updates in definitions of tumour invasiveness, aggressiveness and malignant transformation, as well as histological classification, and emphasise the new considerations regarding aggressive and malignant potential and its relationship to therapeutic strategies.

Corticotrophic pituitary carcinoma with cervical metastases: case series and literature review

PURPOSE

Pituitary tumors are the second most common intracranial tumors, however, pituitary carcinoma is a rare clinical entity which represents only 0.1-0.2% of all pituitary tumors. Diagnosis of pituitary carcinoma requires the presence of metastasis. Early identification of pituitary carcinoma is difficult, and only recently have guidelines been published for the treatment of aggressive pituitary tumors. We present two cases from our institution, with a review of other cases available in literature in order to better characterize this rare disease.

METHODS

A retrospective review of two patients with pituitary carcinoma treated at a tertiary medical center was performed. The MEDLINE database was searched for all cases of pituitary carcinoma. Information for age at diagnosis, sex, pituitary tumor type, latency period from pituitary tumor to presentation of carcinoma, sites of metastasis, number of surgical therapies, radiation and chemotherapy, and survival after diagnosis were collected.

RESULTS

A total of 69 studies were available for review for a total of 72 unique cases. The average age at diagnosis was 46.3 years. The most common tumors were ACTH-secreting (34.7%), Prolactin-secreting (23.6%), and Null Cell (15.3%). The average latency period from pituitary tumor diagnosis to metastasis was 9 years. All patients underwent surgical therapy during their treatment, with an average of 2.76 procedures. The mortality rate was 54.8% with average time to death after diagnosis of approximately 10 months.

CONCLUSIONS

Pituitary carcinoma is a rare disease with high mortality rate and is a diagnostic and treatment challenge. Further study is required but is difficult due to its low incidence.

European Society of Endocrinology Clinical Practice Guidelines for the management of aggressive pituitary tumours and carcinomas

BACKGROUND

Pituitary tumours are common and easily treated by surgery or medical treatment in most cases. However, a small subset of pituitary tumours does not respond to standard medical treatment and presents with multiple local recurrences (aggressive pituitary tumours) and in rare occasion with metastases (pituitary carcinoma). The present European Society of Endocrinology (ESE) guideline aims to provide clinical guidance on diagnosis, treatment and follow-up in aggressive pituitary tumours and carcinomas.

METHODS

We decided upfront, while acknowledging that literature on aggressive pituitary tumours and carcinomas is scarce, to systematically review the literature according to the GRADE (Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation) system. The review focused primarily on first- and second-line treatment in aggressive pituitary tumours and carcinomas. We included 14 single-arm cohort studies (total number of patients = 116) most on temozolomide treatment (n = 11 studies, total number of patients = 106). A positive treatment effect was seen in 47% (95% CI: 36-58%) of temozolomide treated. Data from the recently performed ESE survey on aggressive pituitary tumours and carcinomas (165 patients) were also used as backbone for the guideline. SELECTED RECOMMENDATION: (i) Patients with aggressive pituitary tumours should be managed by a multidisciplinary expert team. (ii) Histopathological analyses including pituitary hormones and proliferative markers are needed for correct tumour classification. (iii) Temozolomide monotherapy is the first-line chemotherapy for aggressive pituitary tumours and pituitary carcinomas after failure of standard therapies; treatment evaluation after 3 cycles allows identification of responder and non-responder patients. (iv) In patients responding to first-line temozolomide, we suggest continuing treatment for at least 6 months in total. Furthermore, the guideline offers recommendations for patients who recurred after temozolomide treatment, for those who did not respond to temozolomide and for patients with systemic metastasis.

Aggressive and malignant prolactin pituitary tumors: pathological diagnosis and patient management

According to the World Health Organization classification of pituitary tumors, only tumors with systemic metastasis must be considered as carcinomas. Invasive tumors with multiple recurrences are only classified as aggressive tumors or "atypical adenomas". To illustrate the problems encountered in the pathological diagnosis of pituitary carcinoma and in patient management, we present two male patients operated on for an aggressive prolactin pituitary adenoma with and without metastasis. In case 1, 5 surgeries, 3 irradiations, increased doses of dopamine agonists, and trials of temozolomide and carboplatine-VP16 failed to control tumor progression and the appearance of metastases which lead to death 16 years after onset. In case 2, based on the initial diagnosis of an aggressive-invasive adenoma that was resistant to dopamine agonists, gamma-Knife irradiation was initially performed on the intra-cavernous remnant. Eight years after onset, the remnant remained stabilized and the plasma PRL normalized under dopamine agonist. From these 2 cases alongside other cases found in the literature, we propose that the association of certain clinical signs (male sex, dopamine-resistant hyperprolactinemia), radiological signs (invasive macro or giant tumor on MRI) and histological signs (angiogenesis, Ki-67 > 3%, p53 positive, mitoses >2 per high power field, vascular invasion, up-regulation of genes related to invasion and proliferation, and allelic loss of chromosome 11) might suggest aggressiveness and be suspicious of malignancy before the appearance of metastasis. The early detection of an aggressive phenotype of a prolactin pituitary tumor should permit the earlier establishment of the optimum therapeutic strategy associating surgery and radiotherapy to delay or inhibit metastasis.

Temozolomide and unusual indications: review of literature

Temozolomide (TMZ) was first known to be useful as a radiosensitiser in both primary brain tumours like glioblastoma multiforme and oligodendroglioma. Later, TMZ proved its efficacy in the treatment of melanoma. Multiple publications have demonstrated the benefit of TMZ in terms of efficacy and tolerance (used as mono-therapy or as adjuvant chemotherapy) compared to the "gold standard" treatment of this kind of tumours. Furthermore, several recent clinical trials have shown the particular importance of TMZ in other types of cancer. This publication deals with the use of TMZ in cancers which are not formal indications for TMZ (excluding glioblastoma multiforme, oligodendroglioma and melanoma). It also includes a necessary review of recent literature about the role of TMZ in the treatment of brain metastases, lymphomas, refractory leukaemia, neuroendocrine tumours, pituitary tumours, Ewing's sarcoma, primitive neuroectodermal tumours, lung cancer and other tumours.

Clinical review: Pituitary carcinoma: difficult diagnosis and treatment

CONTEXT

Although pituitary tumors are common, pituitary carcinoma is very rare and is only diagnosed when pituitary tumor noncontiguous with the sellar region is demonstrated. Diagnosis is difficult, resulting in delays that may adversely effect outcome that is traditionally poor. Barriers to earlier diagnosis and management strategies for pituitary carcinoma are discussed.

EVIDENCE ACQUISITION

PubMed was employed to identify relevant studies, a review of the literature was conducted, and data were summarized and integrated from the author's perspective.

EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS

The available data highlight the difficulties in diagnosis and management and practical challenges in conducting clinical trials in this rare condition. They suggest that earlier diagnosis with aggressive multimodal therapy may be advantageous in some cases.

CONCLUSIONS

Although pituitary carcinoma remains difficult to diagnose and treat, recent developments have led to improved outcomes in selected cases. With broader use of molecular markers, efforts to modify current histopathological criteria for pituitary carcinoma diagnosis may now be possible. This would assist earlier diagnosis and, in combination with targeted therapies, potentially improve long-term survival.

Therapy of aggressive pituitary tumors

INTRODUCTION

Aggressive tumors of the pituitary gland are classically defined as pituitary tumors with a massive invasion of the surrounding anatomical structures and rapid growth. They are notoriously difficult to manage and are associated with poor prognosis because the therapeutic options are limited and the tumors are generally unresponsive to therapy.

AREAS COVERED

This review focuses on treatment options for aggressive pituitary tumors, including surgery, radiotherapy and medical treatment, as well as focusing on the promising therapeutic options for aggressive pituitary tumors, evaluating the literature of the last 15 years. With the exception of prolactinomas, surgery is the first-line option, but most aggressive pituitary tumors often require repeated surgery. Pharmacotherapies are useful when surgery is unlikely to improve symptoms, or as an adjunct therapy to surgery. In prolactinomas, dopamine agonists are the first-line treatment and normalize prolactin levels in most patients, even those with macroprolactinomas. Somatostatin analogs are effective agents for primary therapy, pre-operatively or post-operatively to control tumor re-expansion of pituitary adenomas. However, dopamine agonists and somatostatin analogs are not as effective as they are for the treatment of non-aggressive adenomas. When surgery and pharmacotherapy fail, radiotherapy is a useful third-line strategy. Conventional chemotherapy is poorly effective but recent case reports with the temozolomide, an alkylating agent, have provided better results in the short term.

EXPERT OPINION

Aggressive pituitary tumors are associated with poor prognosis as therapeutic options are limited. Moreover, they tend to recur quickly after initial treatment, are generally unresponsive to therapy, and are difficult to manage. To improve the overall response rate, the early application of current therapeutic approaches with the incorporation of new therapeutic developments is mandatory.

Temozolomide treatment for aggressive pituitary tumors: correlation of clinical outcome with O(6)-methylguanine methyltransferase (MGMT) promoter methylation and expression

CONTEXT

The typically indolent behavior of pituitary tumors is juxtaposed with high rates of tumor cell invasion into adjacent dural structures, and occasional aggressive behavior. Although clinically significant invasion and malignant transformation remain uncommon, there are limited treatment options available for the management of these aggressive tumors. Recently, case reports have described efficacy of temozolomide for the treatment of aggressive pituitary tumors.

DESIGN

Seven patients with aggressive pituitary tumors have been treated with temozolomide. We compared O(6)-methylguanine methyltransferase (MGMT) promoter methylation and MGMT expression in 14 surgical specimens from these seven patients and correlated these molecular features with the clinical response to temozolomide.

RESULTS

Significant tumor regression was seen in two patients (29%), a 20% reduction in tumor volume with subsequent stable tumor size was noted in one patient, arrest of tumor growth occurred in three patients, and progressive metastatic disease developed during treatment in one patient. The DNA promoter site for MGMT was unmethylated in all 14 adequate specimens, and variable MGMT expression was seen in all 14 cases. There was no correlation between MGMT expression and clinical outcomes.

CONCLUSIONS

We conclude that medical therapy with temozolomide can be helpful in the management of life-threatening pituitary tumors that have failed to respond to conventional treatments. The optimal duration of treatment in patients with stabilization or reduction of tumor size has not been established, and long-term follow up studies are needed.

[Pituitary carcinoma. Anatomic and clinical features of cases reported in literature]

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

Pituitary gland tumors that became aggressive, implying adjacent bone structure and the brain as metastases outside of the cranial box, are referred to as pituitary carcinomas.

METHODS

We reviewed 67 cases reported in the literature [44 corticotropic pituitary tumors, 11 PRL tumors, 3 GH tumors, 1 TSH tumor, 3 gonadotropic cell tumors and 5 non-functioning tumors].

RESULTS

The corticotropic tumors occurred in 23 female and 15 males. Signs of hypercorticism were characteristic: generalized melanosis before adrenalectomy (N=1); headache (N=1); altered visual (N=1); diabetes insipidus (N=1); amenorrhea (N=1); Cushing syndrome (N=2); weight loss (N=1); refractory hypokaliemic alkalosis (N=1); diabetes mellitus (N=1); hypertension (N=1). ACTH, beta-lipotrophin, betaendorphin, alphamelano-stimulating hormone, CRH, and beta-gamma MSH were contributive while ultrastructural microscopy provided little information, as did an equimolar Lph/ACTH ratio. The possible association of prolactin tumors with corticotrophin forms has been underlined. The characteristic feature is a time interval from the initial diagnosis of adenoma to that of cancer, which has ranged from 0.3 to 18 years (mean: 6.6 years; median: 5.0 years).

CONCLUSION

Corticotropic tumors resistance to high-dose medical treatment are usually aggressive tumors with a risk of recurrence after surgical treatment or even radiotherapy with the risk of metastases. GH tumors appear to predominate although it is known that these cancers can develop in association with corticotrophin cancers or with prolactin cell tumors.

Macroprolactinomas and epilepsy

OBJECTIVE

To assess the prevalence and characteristics of epilepsy in patients with macroprolactinomas. Secondly, to report the response to dopamine agonist (DA) therapy.

PATIENTS

A case note analysis of all patients with a diagnosis of macroprolactinoma attending a neuroendocrine clinic between 1996 and 2006. Those with epilepsy at diagnosis of macroprolactinoma were examined in detail.

RESULTS

There were 64 patients with macroprolactinoma and 29 of these had tumours with suprasellar extension compressing/invading the optic apparatus and/or surrounding brain structures. Six of these 29 patients (four men), had a history of seizures at the time of diagnosis, five of whom had features suggestive of temporal lobe epilepsy. None of the other 35 patients had epilepsy. All six patients with epilepsy had invasive prolactinomas on cranial imaging and marked hyperprolactinaemia (median prolactin 369 000 mU/l, range 28 000 to > 750 000). Seizures had been present for a median of 2 years (range 1-23 years) before the diagnosis of macroprolactinoma. A rapid reduction in seizure frequency occurred in all patients with initiation of DA therapy. Four have been seizure-free between 18 months to 15 years despite only small reductions in tumour size.

CONCLUSIONS

Invasive macroprolactinomas can commonly be associated with epilepsy, particularly of temporal lobe origin. It is essential to enquire about epileptic symptoms, as the seizure disorder may have been undiagnosed/untreated for years. DA therapy can reduce ictal frequency and the doses of anti-epileptic drugs. Complete freedom from epilepsy can also occur.

Long-term response of pituitary carcinoma to temozolomide. Report of two cases

Pituitary carcinoma is a rare tumor characterized by poor responsiveness to therapy, leading to early death. Reported responses to standard chemotherapy have only been anecdotal, with no single agent or combination demonstrating consistent efficacy in the treatment of patients with this disease. The authors report rare examples of a persistent response to cytotoxic chemotherapy in two patients with pituitary carcinoma. One patient was a 38-year-old man with visual field loss caused by a luteinizing hormone-secreting pituitary carcinoma that had recurred despite multiple surgeries and radiation therapy. Intradural metastases to the spine that had failed to respond to radiation therapy were pathologically confirmed. The second patient was a 26-year-old man with hyperprolactinemia from a prolactin-secreting pituitary tumor. Spine magnetic resonance images obtained to search for causes of neck pain showed a vertebral tumor, which was later confirmed through pathological analysis to be a metastatic pituitary carcinoma. His disease progressed despite radiation therapy, high-dose bromocriptine, and chemotherapy. Both patients were treated monthly with temozolomide, which was administered orally on the first 5 days of a 28-day cycle. The patient in the first case underwent all 12 treatment cycles without serious side effects, and his visual field deficits improved. The patient in the second case had undergone only 10 cycles when the drug was stopped because of his severe fatigue. Nonetheless, his pain disappeared and his serum prolactin concentration decreased. Both patients continue to have partial responses and have been employed full-time for more than 1 year after discontinuing temozolomide therapy. These two examples demonstrate that temozolomide may be effective in treating pituitary carcinomas and thus should be considered in the treatment algorithm for these difficult cases.

Advances in the treatment of prolactinomas

Prolactinomas account for approximately 40% of all pituitary adenomas and are an important cause of hypogonadism and infertility. The ultimate goal of therapy for prolactinomas is restoration or achievement of eugonadism through the normalization of hyperprolactinemia and control of tumor mass. Medical therapy with dopamine agonists is highly effective in the majority of cases and represents the mainstay of therapy. Recent data indicating successful withdrawal of these agents in a subset of patients challenge the previously held concept that medical therapy is a lifelong requirement. Complicated situations, such as those encountered in resistance to dopamine agonists, pregnancy, and giant or malignant prolactinomas, may require multimodal therapy involving surgery, radiotherapy, or both. Progress in elucidating the mechanisms underlying the pathogenesis of prolactinomas may enable future development of novel molecular therapies for treatment-resistant cases. This review provides a critical analysis of the efficacy and safety of the various modes of therapy available for the treatment of patients with prolactinomas with an emphasis on challenging situations, a discussion of the data regarding withdrawal of medical therapy, and a foreshadowing of novel approaches to therapy that may become available in the future.

Corticotroph carcinoma of the pituitary: a clinicopathological study. Report of four cases

To understand the relationship between pituitary adenoma and carcinoma, four adrenocorticotropic hormone-producing pituitary adenomas and corresponding metastatic carcinomas were studied. All were functional macroadenomas (three cases of Nelson syndrome and one of Cushing disease) that initially invaded the sella turcica and occurred in women ranging in age from 17 to 66 years (mean 45 years). Metastases (two craniospinal and two systemic) occurred after latency periods of 6 to 13 years. Histological specimens were immunostained for pituitary hormones, Ki-67 antigen (MIB-1), p53 and p27 proteins, D-type cyclins, and glucocorticoid receptor messenger (m)RNA. The DNA content of the specimens was assessed using Feulgen stain. Reactivities were quantified by digital image analysis. Primary/recurrent lesions and metastatic tumors differed according to their respective mean mitotic indices (1.2/10 hpf compared with 4.3/10 hpf), MIB-1 labeling (1.7% compared with 8%), p53 staining (37.3% compared with 49.9%), and p27 labeling (48% compared with 25%). Cyclin D, immunoreactivity provided no prognostically significant information. Glucocorticoid receptor mRNA was detected in all cases. Results of a ploidy analysis were variable and nonprognostic. In keeping with the 2000 World Health Organization classification of endocrine neoplasms, our findings support the concept that primary tumors that exhibit mitotic activity, an increased (> 3%) MIB-1 labeling index, and/or p53 immunoreactivity should be termed "atypical adenomas" to denote their aggressive potential and the possibility of future malignant transformation.

Progression on metastatic neuroendocrine carcinoma from a recurrent prolactinoma: a case report

A 54 year old man was referred to the department of neurosurgery for frontal headache and vomiting. The patient was known in the department because of previous multiple surgery for a locally invasive pituitary prolactinoma (eight years, three years, and one year previously). The neurological examination revealed a frontal mass, which adhered to the dura, suggesting a meningioma. One year later, a left temporal metastasis was removed. Three months later, the patient died, with spinal metastases, of massive lung embolism. Histology revealed a progression of adenohypophyseal prolactinoma on neuroendocrine carcinoma, with an increase in proliferating indexes and modification of hormone production. This study documents a 10 year history of a rare prolactin producing pituitary carcinoma, which metastasised via liquoral flow.

Pituitary carcinoma: report of an exceptional case and review of the literature

Pituitary carcinomas are exceptional tumors and constitute 0.1 to 0.2% of pituitary tumors. Their definition includes well-established criteria but distant metastasis is the hallmark required for diagnosis. We report the fourth case of gonadotropic pituitary carcinoma described in the literature. This case illustrates the dramatic outcome of these tumors. The most interesting feature of our case was the loss of differentiation with time, established by retrospective analysis of the primary tumor surgically treated 15 years earlier. Most of the previously reported cases exhibited a majority of adrenocoticotropin and non-functioning pituitary tumors. However, the frequency of non-functioning tumors seems smaller than previously believed. In the discussion, we stress the need to detect these very aggressive tumors as early as possible and identify treatments to improve the dramatic course of these carcinomas.

Pituitary carcinoma containing gonadotropins: treatment by radical excision and cytotoxic chemotherapy: case report

OBJECTIVE AND IMPORTANCE

Pituitary carcinomas are extremely rare. Cases reported in the medical literature in the 20th century included tumors that produced adrenocorticotropic hormone, prolactin, growth hormone, and/or thyrotropin.

CLINICAL PRESENTATION

Here we present a 22-year-old woman with a pituitary carcinoma that was immunohistochemically positive for luteinizing hormone and follicle-stimulating hormone at both the primary and metastatic sites. The patient exhibited elevated serum levels of alpha-subunit.

INTERVENTION

The patient had experienced failure of previous treatments, including standard surgery and radiotherapy, and presented to us for radical resection of the tumor, with exenteration of the involved cavernous sinus. She was pretreated with cytotoxic chemotherapy and continued to receive this therapy after surgery.

CONCLUSION

This is the only documented case of a gonadotropin-staining pituitary carcinoma for which hormone production was proven in both the primary and metastatic tumors. Many benign "nonsecreting" pituitary adenomas actually produce subclinical amounts of gonadotropins, and malignant nonfunctional pituitary neoplasms may do the same.

The pathology of pituitary tumors

The pathologist plays an important role in the distinction of pituitary adenomas from other tumors and tumor-like lesions of the sellar region, and in the accurate morphologic characterization of pitutiary adenomas. A clinicopathologic classification of pituitary adenomas is based on cell differentiation correlated with clinical evidence of hormone secretion; this classification emphasizes clinically relevant features that can offer guidance for patient management. The application of a rational approach to the immunohistochemical analysis of these lesions can be used to evaluate pathogenetic and prognostic markers and to predict responses to specific therapeutic modalities.

Progression of a Nelson's adenoma to pituitary carcinoma; a case report and review of the literature

A 25-year-old woman developed Nelson's syndrome, 3 years after successful bilateral adrenalectomy for Cushing's disease. Despite pituitary surgery and radiotherapy the tumour showed invasive growth, leading to visual disturbance, paresis of the oculomotor nerve and, 34 years after adrenalectomy, to death by widespread purulent leptomeningitis. Autopsy revealed a large adenohypophyseal carcinoma with a metastasis attached to the dura, both tumours showing immunocytochemical staining for ACTH and TSH. We review the literature on metastatic adenohypophyseal carcinoma in Cushing's disease and Nelson's syndrome and discuss the role of proliferation markers as indicators of malignant progression.

Invasive pituitary tumors in female F344 rats induced by estradiol dipropionate

To clarify the histopathological progression of invasive tumors in the pituitary pars distalis due to estrogen, female Fischer 344 (F344) rats were treated subcutaneously with 5 mg/animal of estradiol dipropionate (ED) once every 2 wk for 13 wk. The animals were killed serially at 2-wk intervals during the investigation. The pituitaries with surrounding tissues were examined light microscopically. At week 7, pituitary cells showed proliferation and atypia with formation of blood-filled spaces. Lesions with these characteristics were diagnosed as adenomas. At week 9 or later, neoplastic cells exhibited extensive proliferation and infiltration into the surrounding tissues, suggesting development of carcinoma. Both proliferating cell nuclear antigen (PCNA) and 5-bromo-2'-deoxyuridine (BrdU) labeling index, markers of cell proliferation, were significantly increased in animals with adenoma or carcinoma. To detect sequential changes in pituitary weight, its signal intensity was periodically monitored in identical rats by using magnetic resonance (MR) imaging. The estimated pituitary weights revealed by MR imaging were comparable to the tumor weights obtained from rats at scheduled sacrifices. These results indicate that ED possesses the potential to cause carcinoma in rat pituitary and MR imaging is an effective tool for estimating the pituitary weight.

Pituitary carcinoma: a clinicopathologic study of 15 cases

BACKGROUND

Pituitary carcinomas are rare adenohypophysial neoplasms, the definition, diagnosis, therapy, and prognosis of which are controversial.

METHODS

Pituitary carcinomas were defined as primary adenohypophysial neoplasms with documented craniospinal and/or systemic metastases. The authors report a clinicopathologic study of 15 examples examined by light microscopy, immunohistochemistry, and image analysis. Both proliferative activity and p53 tumor suppressor gene expression were studied.

RESULTS

The study group consisted of 15 patients, including 8 males and 7 females ranging in age from 34-71 years (mean, 56 years). Of these patients, seven had adrenocorticotropic hormone (ACTH)-producing tumors (four in the context of Nelson's syndrome), seven had prolactin-producing tumors, and one had a nonfunctioning tumor. No evidence of diabetes insipidus was seen in any case. Fourteen tumors were initially considered macroadenomas. Of the ten cases for whom tumor extent was known, all had invasive tumors. The interval from the initial diagnosis of adenoma to that of carcinoma ranged from 0.3 to 18.0 years (mean, 6.6 years; median, 5.0 years); the longest mean interval (15.3 years) occurred for patients with Nelson's syndrome. The latency was twice as long for ACTH-producing tumors as for prolactin (PRL) cell tumors (9.5 vs. 4.7 years). All carcinomas showed a greater tendency toward systemic metastasis than craniospinal metastasis; the rate of systemic metastasis was 71% for PRL cell tumors and 57% for ACTH-producing tumors. Thirteen percent of tumors showed both patterns of metastasis. Fully 50% of primary tumors and the majority of metastases showed nuclear pleomorphism and/or hyperchromasia. The mean mitotic, MIB-1, and proliferating cell nuclear antigen indices for primary tumors and metastases were as follows: 2/10 high-power field (hpf), 2.6% and 11%, respectively; 6/10 hpf, 7.8% and 16%, respectively. Staining for p53 protein was noted in 57% of primary tumors and 88% of metastatic tumors; a relative increase in p53 expression in metastases was noted in 83%. All but one of the primary and metastatic tumors were aneuploid. The most common treatments were radiation therapy and, for PRL cell carcinomas, dopamine agonist administration. Both treatments provided only palliation. Eighty percent of the patients died of metastatic disease 7 days to 8 years after the diagnosis of carcinoma; of these, 66% died within 1 year. At last follow-up, 20% of patients were alive with metastases 9-18 months after diagnosis.

CONCLUSIONS

Nearly all pituitary carcinomas present as functioning, microscopically atypical or mitotically active, invasive macroadenomas. By definition, after an interval related to their immunotype, all metastasize. The tumors show a greater tendency toward systemic metastasis than craniospinal metastasis and are associated with poor prognosis. Radiation and dopamine agonist therapy generally provide only palliation. Proliferation indices and p53 expression tend to be higher in metastases than in primary tumors. The current definition of pituitary carcinoma requires the demonstration of metastasis; however, high mitotic and MIB-1 labeling indices as well as p53 immunoreactivity suggest the diagnosis and appear to be of prognostic significance. A redefinition of aggressive pituitary tumors is proposed--one that facilitates the recognition of tumors prone to metastasis.

Prolactin-secreting pituitary carcinoma with implants in the cheek pouch and metastases to the ovaries. A case report and literature review

BACKGROUND

Prolactin-secreting pituitary carcinomas are uncommon, locally destructive neoplasms that rarely metastasize outside the central nervous system. The authors report a case of a prolactin-secreting tumor that initially presented as the empty sella syndrome. Two recurrences along transsphenoidal surgery tracts in cheek pouches were followed by distant metastases later in the abdomen and pelvis. Only 10 previous cases of either extracranial or intracranial metastases from prolactin-secreting pituitary carcinomas have been reported. No metastases below the diaphragm have been reported previously.

METHODS

The patient's cheek pouch implants, lymph node metastases, ovarian metastases, and uterine metastases were studied with prolactin-specific immunohistochemistry.

RESULTS

Long term treatment with bromocriptine, several debulking surgeries, extensive local radiation therapy (external beam and proton beam), and cytotoxic chemotherapy had little impact. Tamoxifen, however, may have slowed tumor growth.

CONCLUSION

Tamoxifen may have efficacy in the treatment of prolactin-secreting pituitary carcinomas.