1
|
Smith EMD, Aggarwal A, Ainsworth J, Al-Abadi E, Avcin T, Bortey L, Burnham J, Ciurtin C, Hedrich CM, Kamphuis S, Lambert L, Levy DM, Lewandowski L, Maxwell N, Morand E, Özen S, Pain CE, Ravelli A, Saad Magalhaes C, Pilkington C, Schonenberg-Meinema D, Scott C, Tullus K, Beresford MW. Defining remission in childhood-onset lupus: PReS-endorsed consensus definitions by an international task force. Clin Immunol 2024; 263:110214. [PMID: 38604255 DOI: 10.1016/j.clim.2024.110214] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/23/2024] [Revised: 03/30/2024] [Accepted: 04/07/2024] [Indexed: 04/13/2024]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To derive childhood-onset SLE (cSLE) specific remission definitions for future treat-to-target (T2T) trials, observational studies, and clinical practice. METHODS The cSLE International T2T Task Force conducted Delphi surveys exploring paediatric perspectives on adult-onset SLE remission targets. A modified nominal group technique was used to discuss, refine, and agree on the cSLE remission target criteria. RESULTS The Task Force proposed two definitions of remission: 'cSLE clinical remission on steroids (cCR)' and 'cSLE clinical remission off steroids (cCR-0)'. The common criteria are: (1) Clinical-SLEDAI-2 K = 0; (2) PGA score < 0.5 (0-3 scale); (4) stable antimalarials, immunosuppressive, and biologic therapy (changes due to side-effects, adherence, weight, or when building up to target dose allowed). Criterion (3) in cCR is the prednisolone dose ≤0.1 mg/kg/day (maximum 5 mg/day), whereas in cCR-0 it is zero. CONCLUSIONS cSLE definitions of remission have been proposed, maintaining sufficient alignment with the adult-SLE definition to facilitate life-course research.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- E M D Smith
- Department of Women's & Children's Health, Institute of Life Course and Medical Sciences, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK; Department of Paediatric Rheumatology, Alder Hey Children's NHS Foundation Trust, Liverpool, UK.
| | - A Aggarwal
- Department of Clinical Immunology & Rheumatology, Sanjay Gandhi Postgraduate Institute of Medical Sciences, Lucknow, India
| | - J Ainsworth
- Department of Women's & Children's Health, Institute of Life Course and Medical Sciences, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK; Department of Paediatric Rheumatology, Alder Hey Children's NHS Foundation Trust, Liverpool, UK
| | - E Al-Abadi
- Department of Paediatric Rheumatology, Birmingham Women's and Children's Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham, UK
| | - T Avcin
- Department of Allergology, Rheumatology and Clinical Immunology, Children's Hospital, University Medical Center Ljubljana, Slovenia
| | - L Bortey
- TARGET Lupus Public Patient Involvement and Engagement Group, Institute of Life Course and Medical Sciences, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK
| | - J Burnham
- Department of Pediatric Rheumatology, Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, USA
| | - C Ciurtin
- Centre for Adolescent Rheumatology Versus Arthritis, Division of Medicine, University College London, UK
| | - C M Hedrich
- Department of Women's & Children's Health, Institute of Life Course and Medical Sciences, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK; Department of Paediatric Rheumatology, Alder Hey Children's NHS Foundation Trust, Liverpool, UK
| | - S Kamphuis
- Department of Pediatric Rheumatology, Sophia Children's Hospital, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, Netherlands
| | - L Lambert
- TARGET Lupus Public Patient Involvement and Engagement Group, Institute of Life Course and Medical Sciences, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK
| | - D M Levy
- Division of Rheumatology, Department of Pediatrics, The Hospital for Sick Children and University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada
| | - L Lewandowski
- Lupus Genomics and Global Health Disparities Unit, Systemic Autoimmunity Branch, National Institute of Arthritis and Musculoskeletal and Skin Diseases, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA
| | - N Maxwell
- TARGET Lupus Public Patient Involvement and Engagement Group, Institute of Life Course and Medical Sciences, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK
| | - E Morand
- Centre for Inflammatory Diseases, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia
| | - S Özen
- Department of Pediatrics, Hacettepe University, Ankara, Turkey
| | - C E Pain
- Department of Women's & Children's Health, Institute of Life Course and Medical Sciences, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK; Department of Paediatric Rheumatology, Alder Hey Children's NHS Foundation Trust, Liverpool, UK
| | - A Ravelli
- Direzione Scientifica, IRCCS Istituto Giannina Gaslini, Genoa, Italy; Dipartimento di Neuroscienze, Riabilitazione, Oftalmologia, Genetica e Scienze Materno Infantili (DINOGMI), Università degli Studi di Genova, Genoa, Italy
| | - C Saad Magalhaes
- Paediatric Rheumatology Division, Botucatu Medical School, Sao Paulo State, University (UNESP), Sao Paulo, Brazil
| | - C Pilkington
- Department of Paediatric Rheumatology, Great Ormond Street Hospital for Children NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - D Schonenberg-Meinema
- Department of Pediatric Immunology, Rheumatology and Infectious diseases, Emma Children's Hospital, Amsterdam University Medical Centres, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - C Scott
- Department of Pediatric Rheumatology, University of Cape Town, Cape Town, South Africa
| | - K Tullus
- Department of Paediatric Nephrology, Great Ormond Street Hospital for Children NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - M W Beresford
- Department of Women's & Children's Health, Institute of Life Course and Medical Sciences, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK; Department of Paediatric Rheumatology, Alder Hey Children's NHS Foundation Trust, Liverpool, UK
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Jesus D, Henriques C, Matos A, Doria A, Inês LS. Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Disease Activity Score Remission and Low Disease Activity States Discriminate Drug From Placebo and Better Health-Related Quality of Life. Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken) 2024; 76:788-795. [PMID: 38258369 DOI: 10.1002/acr.25305] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/11/2023] [Revised: 11/01/2023] [Accepted: 01/19/2024] [Indexed: 01/24/2024]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Our objective was to evaluate the ability of Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Disease Activity Score (SLE-DAS) remission and low disease activity (LDA) to discriminate active drug from placebo and to discriminate outcomes in the patients' perspective (health-related quality of life [HR-QoL]) in SLE trials. METHODS This was a post hoc analysis of the pooled Belimumab in Subjects With SLE (BLISS)-52 (NCT00424476) and BLISS-76 (NCT00410384) trials data. SLE-DAS remission and LDA attainment and discrimination between belimumab and placebo at 52 weeks were compared using chi-square tests. At week 52, 36-item Short Form Health Survey (SF-36) and Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy Fatigue (FACIT-F) scores were compared between patients attaining SLE-DAS remission versus nonremission and SLE-DAS LDA versus non-LDA using the t-test and Mann-Whitney test. Mean changes from week 0 to 52 in SF-36 and FACIT-F scores were compared between groups using multivariate regression analysis adjusted for baseline scores. RESULTS At week 52, significantly more patients attained SLE-DAS LDA taking belimumab 1 mg/kg (17.9% vs 13.0%; P = 0.023; odds ratio [OR] 1.459; relative risk [RR] 1.377; number needed to treat [NNT] 20.4) and 10 mg/kg (21.7% vs 13.0%; P < 0.001; OR 1.853; RR 1.668; NNT 11.5) compared with placebo. Likewise, more patients attained SLE-DAS remission taking belimumab 10 mg/kg compared to placebo (14.7% vs 10.1%; P = 0.019; OR 1.532; RR 1.454; NNT 21.7). At week 52, patients attaining SLE-DAS remission and LDA presented higher SF-36 domain and summary scores (all P < 0.001) and FACIT-F scores (both P < 0.001). Mean improvements from baseline in SF-36 and FACIT-F scores were significantly higher in patients achieving SLE-DAS remission and LDA. CONCLUSION SLE-DAS remission and LDA showed discriminant ability for identifying patients receiving active drug in SLE clinical trials. Attainment of these SLE-DAS targets are associated with better HR-QoL.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Diogo Jesus
- Centro Hospitalar de Leiria, Leiria, Portugal, and Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Beira Interior, Covilhá, Portugal
| | - Carla Henriques
- School of Technology and Management, Polytechnic Institute of Viseu, Viseu, Portugal, and Centre for Mathematics, University of Coimbra, Coimbra, Portugal
| | - Ana Matos
- School of Technology and Management, Polytechnic Institute of Viseu, and Research Centre in Digital Services (CISeD), Viseu, Portugal
| | | | - Luís S Inês
- Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Beira Interior, Covilhá, Portugal, and CHUC Lupus Clinic, Centro Hospitalar e Universit_ario de Coimbra, Coimbra, Portugal
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Bergkamp SC, Kanagasabapathy T, Gruppen MP, Kuijpers TW, Rashid ANS, van den Berg JM, Schonenberg-Meinema D. First validation of the childhood lupus low disease activity state (cLLDAS) definition in a real-life longitudinal cSLE cohort. Clin Immunol 2024; 262:110172. [PMID: 38490344 DOI: 10.1016/j.clim.2024.110172] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/01/2023] [Revised: 12/18/2023] [Accepted: 02/20/2024] [Indexed: 03/17/2024]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES To validate the childhood lupus low disease activity state (cLLDAS) definition in cSLE by describing differences in time to reach first adult LLDAS (aLLDAS) versus cLLDAS. Secondly, to analyse positive and negative predictors for maintaining cLLDAS for at least 50% of follow-up time (cLLDAS-50) and for the occurrence of damage. METHODS Prospective longitudinal data from a cSLE cohort were analysed. Used definitions were: aLLDAS according to Franklyn, cLLDAS by cSLE treat-to-target (T2T) Task Force, disease activity score by SLEDAI -2 K and damage by SLICC damage index. RESULTS Fifty cSLE patients were studied, with a median follow-up of 3.1 years. Each patient reached aLLDAS and cLLDAS at least once. Mean time to reach first aLLDAS/cLLDAS was 8.2/9.0 months, respectively. For 22/42 patients the mean steroid-dose related delay to reach first cLLDAS was 6.2 months. 58% of patients were able to maintain cLLDAS-50. Time to first cLLDAS (OR 0.8, p = 0.013) and higher number of flares (OR 0.374, p = 0.03) were negative predictors to maintain cLLDAS-50. Damage occurred in 34% of patients (23.5% steroid-related), in 64.7% within one year after diagnosis. African/Afro-Caribbean ethnicity, neuropsychiatric involvement and ever use of a biologic were significant predictors for damage. CONCLUSION Time to reach cLLDAS in cSLE differs from time to (a)LLDAS, which validates the new cLLDAS definition. Attaining cLLDAS-50 was difficult in real-life. This cohort shows the high risk for early damage in cSLE. T2T with earlier focus on steroid-tapering and starting steroid-sparing drugs seems important to prevent (steroid-related) damage in cSLE.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sandy C Bergkamp
- Department of Paediatric Immunology, Rheumatology and Infectious Diseases, Emma Children's Hospital, Amsterdam University Medical Centres (AUMC), University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
| | - Thipa Kanagasabapathy
- Department of Paediatric Immunology, Rheumatology and Infectious Diseases, Emma Children's Hospital, Amsterdam University Medical Centres (AUMC), University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Mariken P Gruppen
- Department of Paediatric Immunology, Rheumatology and Infectious Diseases, Emma Children's Hospital, Amsterdam University Medical Centres (AUMC), University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Taco W Kuijpers
- Department of Paediatric Immunology, Rheumatology and Infectious Diseases, Emma Children's Hospital, Amsterdam University Medical Centres (AUMC), University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Amara Nassar-Sheikh Rashid
- Department of Paediatric Immunology, Rheumatology and Infectious Diseases, Emma Children's Hospital, Amsterdam University Medical Centres (AUMC), University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands; Department of Paediatrics, Zaans Medisch Centrum, Zaandam, the Netherlands
| | - J Merlijn van den Berg
- Department of Paediatric Immunology, Rheumatology and Infectious Diseases, Emma Children's Hospital, Amsterdam University Medical Centres (AUMC), University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Dieneke Schonenberg-Meinema
- Department of Paediatric Immunology, Rheumatology and Infectious Diseases, Emma Children's Hospital, Amsterdam University Medical Centres (AUMC), University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Smith EMD, Aggarwal A, Ainsworth J, Al-Abadi E, Avcin T, Bortey L, Burnham J, Ciurtin C, Hedrich CM, Kamphuis S, Lambert L, Levy DM, Lewandowski L, Maxwell N, Morand E, Ozen S, Pain CE, Ravelli A, Saad Magalhaes C, Pilkington C, Schonenberg-Meinema D, Scott C, Tullus K, Beresford MW. PReS-endorsed international childhood lupus T2T task force definition of childhood lupus low disease activity state (cLLDAS). Clin Immunol 2023; 250:109296. [PMID: 36934849 PMCID: PMC10500564 DOI: 10.1016/j.clim.2023.109296] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/10/2023] [Revised: 03/14/2023] [Accepted: 03/15/2023] [Indexed: 03/19/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To achieve a consensus-based definition of Low Disease Activity (LDA) for use in cSLE trials. METHODS The International cSLE T2T Task Force, comprising of paediatric rheumatologists/nephrologists, and adult rheumatologists undertook a series of Delphi surveys/consensus meetings to discuss, refine, and vote upon cSLE LDA criteria. RESULTS The Task Force agreed that LDA should be based upon the adult-SLE Lupus Low Disease Activity State definition (LLDAS), with modifications to make it applicable to cSLE (cLLDAS). They agreed upon five cLLDAS criteria: (1) SLE Disease Activity Index (SLEDAI)-2 K ≤4, with no activity in major organ systems; (2) no new features of lupus disease activity compared with the last assessment; (3) Physician Global Assessment score of ≤1 (0-3 scale); (4) prednisolone dose of ≤0.15 mg/kg/day, 7.5 mg/day/maximum; while on (5) stable antimalarials, immunosuppressives, and biologics. CONCLUSIONS A cSLE-appropriate definition of cLLDAS has been generated, maintaining alignment with the adult-SLE definition to promote life-course research.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- E M D Smith
- Department of Women's & Children's Health, Institute of Life Course and Medical Sciences, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK; Department of Paediatric Rheumatology, Alder Hey Children's NHS Foundation Trust, Liverpool, UK.
| | - A Aggarwal
- Department of Clinical Immunology & Rheumatology, Sanjay Gandhi Postgraduate Institute of Medical Sciences, Lucknow, India
| | - J Ainsworth
- Department of Women's & Children's Health, Institute of Life Course and Medical Sciences, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK; Department of Paediatric Rheumatology, Alder Hey Children's NHS Foundation Trust, Liverpool, UK
| | - E Al-Abadi
- Department of Paediatric Rheumatology, Birmingham Women's and Children's Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham, UK
| | - T Avcin
- Department of Allergology, Rheumatology and Clinical Immunology, Children's Hospital, University Medical Center Ljubljana, Slovenia
| | - L Bortey
- TARGET Lupus Public Patient Involvement and Engagement Group, Institute of Life Course and Medical Sciences, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK
| | - J Burnham
- Department of Pediatric Rheumatology, Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, USA
| | - C Ciurtin
- Centre for Adolescent Rheumatology Versus Arthritis, Division of Medicine, University College London, UK
| | - C M Hedrich
- Department of Women's & Children's Health, Institute of Life Course and Medical Sciences, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK; Department of Paediatric Rheumatology, Alder Hey Children's NHS Foundation Trust, Liverpool, UK
| | - S Kamphuis
- Department of Pediatric Rheumatology, Sophia Children's Hospital, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, Netherlands
| | - L Lambert
- TARGET Lupus Public Patient Involvement and Engagement Group, Institute of Life Course and Medical Sciences, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK
| | - D M Levy
- Division of Rheumatology, Department of Pediatrics, The Hospital for Sick Children and University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada
| | - L Lewandowski
- Lupus Genomics and Global Health Disparities Unit, Systemic Autoimmunity Branch, National Institute of Arthritis and Musculoskeletal and Skin Diseases, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA
| | - N Maxwell
- TARGET Lupus Public Patient Involvement and Engagement Group, Institute of Life Course and Medical Sciences, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK
| | - E Morand
- Centre for Inflammatory Diseases, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia
| | - S Ozen
- Department of Pediatrics, Hacettepe University, Ankara, Turkey
| | - C E Pain
- Department of Women's & Children's Health, Institute of Life Course and Medical Sciences, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK; Department of Paediatric Rheumatology, Alder Hey Children's NHS Foundation Trust, Liverpool, UK
| | - A Ravelli
- Direzione Scientifica, IRCCS Istituto Giannina Gaslini, Genoa, Italy; Dipartimento di Neuroscienze, Riabilitazione, Oftalmologia, Genetica e Scienze Materno Infantili (DINOGMI), Università degli Studi di Genova, Genoa, Italy
| | - C Saad Magalhaes
- Department of Pediatric Rheumatology, Botucatu Medical School, Sao Paulo State University, Sao Paulo, Brazil
| | - C Pilkington
- Department of Paediatric Rheumatology, Great Ormond Street Hospital for Children NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - D Schonenberg-Meinema
- Department of Pediatric Immunology, Rheumatology and Infectious diseases, Emma Children's Hospital, Amsterdam University Medical Centres, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - C Scott
- Clinical Research Centre, Department of Pediatric Rheumatology, University of Cape Town, Cape Town, South Africa
| | - K Tullus
- Department of Paediatric Nephrology, Great Ormond Street Hospital for Children NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - M W Beresford
- Department of Women's & Children's Health, Institute of Life Course and Medical Sciences, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK; Department of Paediatric Rheumatology, Alder Hey Children's NHS Foundation Trust, Liverpool, UK
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Emamikia S, Oon S, Gomez A, Lindblom J, Borg A, Enman Y, Morand E, Grannas D, van Vollenhoven RF, Nikpour M, Parodis I. Impact of remission and low disease activity on health-related quality of life in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus. Rheumatology (Oxford) 2022; 61:4752-4762. [PMID: 35302581 PMCID: PMC9707321 DOI: 10.1093/rheumatology/keac185] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/30/2021] [Revised: 03/12/2022] [Indexed: 01/10/2023] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVES To investigate the impact of remission and lupus low disease activity state (LLDAS) on health-related quality of life (HRQoL) in systemic lupus erythematosus. METHODS Short-Form 36 (SF-36), three-level EQ-5D (EQ-5D-3L) and Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy (FACIT)-Fatigue data from the BLISS-52 (NCT00424476) and BLISS-76 (NCT00410384) trials were used. Duration in remission/LLDAS required to reach a HRQoL benefit ≥ minimal clinically important differences (MCIDs) during and post-treatment was determined using quantile regression and generalized estimating equations. RESULTS Patients (n = 1684) were assessed every fourth week (15 visits). Four cumulative (β = 0.60) or four consecutive (β = 0.66) visits in remission were required to achieve a benefit ≥MCID in SF-36 physical component summary (PCS) scores, and six cumulative (β = 0.44) or five consecutive (β = 0.49) for a benefit ≥MCID in mental component summary (MCS) scores. Eight cumulative (β = 0.30 for both) or eight consecutive (β = 0.32 for both) visits in LLDAS were required for a benefit in PCS/MCS ≥MCID, respectively. For EQ-5D-3L index scores ≥MCID, six cumulative (β = 0.007) or five consecutive (β = 0.008) visits in remission were required, and eight cumulative (β = 0.005) or six consecutive (β = 0.006) visits in LLDAS. For FACIT-Fatigue scores ≥MCID, 12 cumulative (β = 0.34) or 10 consecutive (β = 0.39) visits in remission were required, and 17 cumulative (β = 0.24) or 16 consecutive (β = 0.25) visits in LLDAS. CONCLUSION Remission and LLDAS contribute to a HRQoL benefit in a time-dependent manner. Shorter time in remission than in LLDAS was required for a clinically important benefit in HRQoL, and longer time in remission for a benefit in mental compared with physical HRQoL aspects. When remission/LLDAS was sustained, the same benefit was achieved in a shorter time.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sharzad Emamikia
- Division of Rheumatology, Department of Medicine Solna, Karolinska Institutet and Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Shereen Oon
- Departments of Medicine and Rheumatology, The University of Melbourne at St Vincent's Hospital, Fitzroy
| | - Alvaro Gomez
- Division of Rheumatology, Department of Medicine Solna, Karolinska Institutet and Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Julius Lindblom
- Division of Rheumatology, Department of Medicine Solna, Karolinska Institutet and Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Alexander Borg
- Division of Rheumatology, Department of Medicine Solna, Karolinska Institutet and Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Yvonne Enman
- Division of Rheumatology, Department of Medicine Solna, Karolinska Institutet and Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Eric Morand
- School of Clinical Sciences at Monash Health, Monash University Faculty of Medicine, Nursing and Health Sciences, Monash Medical Centre Clayton, Clayton, Victoria, Australia
| | - David Grannas
- Divison of Biostatistics, Institute of Environmental Medicine, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Ronald F van Vollenhoven
- Division of Rheumatology, Department of Medicine Solna, Karolinska Institutet and Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden,Department of Rheumatology, Amsterdam Rheumatology and Immunology Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Mandana Nikpour
- Departments of Medicine and Rheumatology, The University of Melbourne at St Vincent's Hospital, Fitzroy
| | - Ioannis Parodis
- Correspondence to: Ioannis Parodis, Rheumatology, Karolinska University Hospital, SE-171 76, Stockholm, Sweden. E-mail:
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Ugarte-Gil MF, Gamboa-Cardenas RV, Reátegui-Sokolova C, Pimentel-Quiroz VR, Medina M, Elera-Fitzcarrald C, Zevallos F, Pastor-Asurza CA, Zazzetti F, Karyekar CS, Alarcón GS, Perich-Campos RA. Severe flares are associated with a poorer health-related quality of life (HRQoL) in patients with SLE: data from the Almenara Lupus Cohort. Lupus Sci Med 2022; 9:9/1/e000641. [PMID: 35351811 PMCID: PMC8966564 DOI: 10.1136/lupus-2021-000641] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/12/2021] [Accepted: 03/17/2022] [Indexed: 01/19/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Flares in patients with SLE, regardless of their severity, have been associated with damage accrual. However, their impact on health-related quality of life (HRQoL) has not been fully evaluated. In fact, disease activity is only minimally associated with HRQoL. OBJECTIVE To determine the association between flares and HRQoL. METHODS Patients from the Almenara Lupus Cohort were included. Visits occurring between December 2015 and February 2020 were evaluated. Flares were defined as an increase on the SLE Disease Activity Index 2000 (SLEDAI-2K) of at least 4 points; severe flares were those with a final SLEDAI-2K ≥12 and mild-moderate flares all the others. HRQoL was measured using the LupusQoL. Univariable and multivariable generalised estimating regression equations were performed, adjusting for possible confounders. Confounders were determined at one visit, whereas the outcome was determined on the subsequent visit; flares were determined based on the variation of the SLEDAI-2K between these visits. RESULTS Two hundred and seventy-seven patients were included; 256 (92.4%) were female, mean age at diagnosis was 36.0 (SD: 13.3) years and mean disease duration at baseline was 9.1 (SD: 7.1) years. Patients had mean of 4.8 (SD: 1.9) visits and a mean follow-up of 2.7 (1.1) years. Out of 1098 visits, 115 (10.5%) flares were defined, 17 were severe and 98 mild-moderate. After adjustment for possible confounders, only severe flares were associated with a poorer HRQoL in planning, pain, emotional health and fatigue. CONCLUSIONS Severe flares, but not mild-moderate, flares are associated with poorer HRQoL.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Manuel Francisco Ugarte-Gil
- Rheumatology, Hospital Nacional Guillermo Almenara Irigoyen, EsSalud, Lima, Peru
- Grupo Peruano de Estudio de Enfermedades Autoinmunes Sistémicas, Universidad Cientifica del Sur, Lima, Peru
| | - Rocio Violeta Gamboa-Cardenas
- Rheumatology, Hospital Nacional Guillermo Almenara Irigoyen, EsSalud, Lima, Peru
- Grupo Peruano de Estudio de Enfermedades Autoinmunes Sistémicas, Universidad Cientifica del Sur, Lima, Peru
| | - Cristina Reátegui-Sokolova
- Rheumatology, Hospital Nacional Guillermo Almenara Irigoyen, EsSalud, Lima, Peru
- Unidad de Investigación Para La Generación y Síntesis de Evidencias en Salud, Universidad San Ignacio de Loyola, Lima, Peru
| | - Victor Román Pimentel-Quiroz
- Rheumatology, Hospital Nacional Guillermo Almenara Irigoyen, EsSalud, Lima, Peru
- Grupo Peruano de Estudio de Enfermedades Autoinmunes Sistémicas, Universidad Cientifica del Sur, Lima, Peru
| | - Mariela Medina
- Rheumatology, Hospital Nacional Guillermo Almenara Irigoyen, EsSalud, Lima, Peru
| | - Claudia Elera-Fitzcarrald
- Rheumatology, Hospital Nacional Guillermo Almenara Irigoyen, EsSalud, Lima, Peru
- Grupo Peruano de Estudio de Enfermedades Autoinmunes Sistémicas, Universidad Cientifica del Sur, Lima, Peru
| | - Francisco Zevallos
- Rheumatology, Hospital Nacional Guillermo Almenara Irigoyen, EsSalud, Lima, Peru
| | - Cesar Augusto Pastor-Asurza
- Rheumatology, Hospital Nacional Guillermo Almenara Irigoyen, EsSalud, Lima, Peru
- Facultad de Medicina, Universidad Nacional Mayor de San Marcos, Lima, Peru
| | | | | | - Graciela S Alarcón
- Heersink School of Medicine, The University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Alabama, USA
- School of Medicine, Universidad Peruana Cayetano Heredia, Lima, Peru
| | - Risto Alfredo Perich-Campos
- Rheumatology, Hospital Nacional Guillermo Almenara Irigoyen, EsSalud, Lima, Peru
- Facultad de Medicina, Universidad Nacional Mayor de San Marcos, Lima, Peru
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Radin M, El Hasbani G, Barinotti A, Roccatello D, Uthman I, Taher A, Sciascia S. Quality of life measures in Systemic Lupus Erythematosus: A systematic review. Reumatismo 2022; 73. [DOI: 10.4081/reumatismo.2021.1447] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/10/2021] [Accepted: 01/12/2022] [Indexed: 11/23/2022] Open
Abstract
In this study we systematically investigated the health-related quality of life (HRQoL) tools, which have been most often used over the last five years to evaluate the QoL in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE), focusing on their items and applications. A detailed literature search was conducted: the inclusion criteria were as follows: 1) studies including at least 50 patients; 2) studies including at least 25 patients with SLE; 3) quality of life testing with validated measures. The systematic review was based on 119 studies for a total of 32,449 SLE patients and 3092 controls. A total of 35 different patients-reported quality of life measures, applied in cohorts of patients with SLE, were retrieved with the 36-item Medical Outcome Short Form (SF-36) (63 studies of 119 =52.95%), Lupus Quality of Life (LupusQoL) (17 studies =14.3%) and Lupus Patient-Reported Outcome (LupusPRO) (12 studies =10%) being the most commonly used tools. Overall, this systematic review of the literature indicated that quality of life in patients with SLE appears to be poor and generally lower compared to both the general population and patients with other chronic conditions, as was shown by a few studies that used SF-36 and LupusPRO. The use of HRQoL scoring in SLE is gaining increasing interest and is used both in randomized controlled trials and in real-life. Future efforts are needed to improve the understanding of the impact of the disease burden on quality of life from the patient’s perspective.
Collapse
|
8
|
Smith EMD, Tharmaratnam K, Al-Abadi E, Armon K, Bailey K, Brennan M, Ciurtin C, Gardner-Medwin J, Haslam KE, Hawley D, Leahy A, Leone V, Malik G, McLaren Z, Pilkington C, Ramanan AV, Rangaraj S, Ratcliffe A, Riley P, Sen E, Sridhar A, Wilkinson N, Hedrich CM, Jorgensen A, Beresford MW. Attainment of Low Disease Activity and Remission Targets reduces the risk of severe flare and new damage in Childhood Lupus. Rheumatology (Oxford) 2021; 61:3378-3389. [PMID: 34894234 PMCID: PMC9348762 DOI: 10.1093/rheumatology/keab915] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/16/2021] [Revised: 12/03/2021] [Indexed: 11/14/2022] Open
Abstract
Objectives To assess the achievability and effect of attaining low disease activity (LDA) or remission in childhood-onset SLE (cSLE). Methods Attainment of three adult-SLE derived definitions of LDA (LLDAS, LA, Toronto-LDA), and four definitions of remission (clinical-SLEDAI-defined remission on/off treatment, pBILAG-defined remission on/off treatment) was assessed in UK JSLE Cohort Study patients longitudinally. Prentice–Williams–Petersen gap recurrent event models assessed the impact of LDA/remission attainment on severe flare/new damage. Results LLDAS, LA and Toronto-LDA targets were reached in 67%, 73% and 32% of patients, after a median of 18, 15 or 17 months, respectively. Cumulatively, LLDAS, LA and Toronto-LDA was attained for a median of 23%, 31% and 19% of total follow-up-time, respectively. Remission on-treatment was more common (61% cSLEDAI-defined, 42% pBILAG-defined) than remission off-treatment (31% cSLEDAI-defined, 21% pBILAG-defined). Attainment of all target states, and disease duration (>1 year), significantly reduced the hazard of severe flare (P < 0.001). As cumulative time in each target increased, hazard of severe flare progressively reduced. LLDAS attainment reduced the hazard of severe flare more than LA or Toronto-LDA (P < 0.001). Attainment of LLDAS and all remission definitions led to a statistically comparable reduction in the hazards of severe flare (P > 0.05). Attainment of all targets reduced the hazards of new damage (P < 0.05). Conclusions This is the first study demonstrating that adult-SLE-derived definitions of LDA/remission are achievable in cSLE, significantly reducing risk of severe flare/new damage. Of the LDA definitions, LLDAS performed best, leading to a statistically comparable reduction in the hazards of severe flare to attainment of clinical remission.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Eve M D Smith
- Department of Women's & Children's Health, Institute of Life Course and Medical Sciences, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK.,Department of Paediatric Rheumatology, Alder Hey Children's NHS Foundation Trust Hospital, Liverpool, UK
| | - Kukatharmini Tharmaratnam
- Department of Health Data Science, Institute of Population Health, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK
| | - Eslam Al-Abadi
- Department of Rheumatology, Birmingham Children's Hospital, Birmingham, UK
| | - Kate Armon
- Department of Paediatric Rheumatology, Cambridge University Hospitals, Cambridge, UK
| | - Kathryn Bailey
- Department of Paediatric Rheumatology, Oxford University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Oxford, UK
| | - Mary Brennan
- Department of Paediatric Rheumatology, Royal Hospital for Sick Children, Edinburgh, UK
| | - Coziana Ciurtin
- Centre for Adolescent Rheumatology, University College London, London, UK
| | | | - Kirsty E Haslam
- Department of Paediatrics, Bradford Royal Infirmary, Bradford, UK
| | - Daniel Hawley
- Department of Paediatric Rheumatology, Sheffield Children's Hospital, Sheffield, UK
| | - Alice Leahy
- Department of Paediatric Rheumatology, Southampton General Hospital, Southampton, UK
| | - Valentina Leone
- Department of Paediatric Rheumatology, Leeds Children Hospital, Leeds, UK
| | - Gulshan Malik
- Paediatric Rheumatology, Royal Aberdeen Children's Hospital, Aberdeen, UK
| | - Zoe McLaren
- Rheumatology Department, Aintree University Hospital, Liverpool, UK
| | - Clarissa Pilkington
- Department of Paediatric Rheumatology, Great Ormond Street Hospital, London, UK
| | - Athimalaipet V Ramanan
- University Hospitals Bristol NHS Foundation Trust & Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK
| | - Satyapal Rangaraj
- Department of Paediatric Rheumatology, Nottingham University Hospitals, Nottingham, UK
| | - Annie Ratcliffe
- Department of Paediatrics, Musgrove Park Hospital, Taunton, UK
| | - Philip Riley
- Department of Paediatric Rheumatology, Royal Manchester Children's Hospital, Manchester, UK
| | - Ethan Sen
- Paediatric Rheumatology, Great North Children's Hospital & Faculty of Medical Sciences, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK
| | - Arani Sridhar
- Leicester Children's Hospital, University Hospitals of Leicester NHS trust, Leicester, UK
| | - Nick Wilkinson
- Guy's & St Thomas's NHS Foundation Trust, Evelina Children's Hospital, London, UK
| | - Christian M Hedrich
- Department of Women's & Children's Health, Institute of Life Course and Medical Sciences, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK.,Department of Paediatric Rheumatology, Alder Hey Children's NHS Foundation Trust Hospital, Liverpool, UK
| | - Andrea Jorgensen
- Department of Health Data Science, Institute of Population Health, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK
| | - Michael W Beresford
- Department of Women's & Children's Health, Institute of Life Course and Medical Sciences, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK.,Department of Paediatric Rheumatology, Alder Hey Children's NHS Foundation Trust Hospital, Liverpool, UK
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Smith EMD, Gorst SL, Al-Abadi E, Hawley DP, Leone V, Pilkington C, Ramanan AV, Rangaraj S, Sridhar A, Beresford MW, Young B. 'It is good to have a target in mind': qualitative views of patients and parents informing a treat to target clinical trial in juvenile-onset systemic lupus erythematosus. Rheumatology (Oxford) 2021; 60:5630-5641. [PMID: 33629109 PMCID: PMC8645274 DOI: 10.1093/rheumatology/keab173] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/01/2020] [Revised: 02/05/2021] [Indexed: 01/04/2023] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE We sought to explore patient and parental views on treatment targets, outcome measures and study designs being considered for a future JSLE treat-to-target (T2T) study. METHODS We conducted topic-guided, semistructured interviews with JSLE patients and parents and analysed the audio recorded interviews using thematic approaches. RESULTS Patients and parents differed regarding symptoms they felt would be tolerable, representing 'low disease activity'. Patients often classed symptoms that they had previously experienced, were 'invisible' or had minimal disruption on their life as signs of low disease activity. Parents were more accepting of visible signs but were concerned about potential organ involvement and symptom severity. Overall, patients and parents preferred that children were entirely asymptomatic, with no ongoing treatment side effects. They regarded fatigue as particularly challenging, requiring proper monitoring using a fatigue patient-reported outcome measure. Most families felt that reducing corticosteroids would also be a good treatment target. Overall, families liked the concept of T2T, commenting that it could help to improve disease control, help structure treatment and improve communication with clinicians and treatment compliance. They were concerned that T2T might increase the frequency of hospital visits, thus impacting upon schooling, parental employment and finances. Families made suggestions on how to modify the future trial design to mitigate such effects. CONCLUSION This study provides guidance from patients and parents on T2T targets and study designs. Complementary quantitative studies assessing the achievability and impact of different targets (e.g. lupus low disease activity state or remission) are now warranted to inform an international consensus process to develop treatment targets.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Eve M D Smith
- Institute of Life Course and Medical Science, University of Liverpool
- Department of Paediatric Rheumatology, Alder Hey Children’s NHS Foundation Trust
| | - Sarah L Gorst
- Department of Health Data Science, University of Liverpool, Liverpool
| | - Eslam Al-Abadi
- Department of Rheumatology, Birmingham Children’s Hospital, Birmingham
| | - Daniel P Hawley
- Department of Paediatric Rheumatology, Sheffield Children’s NHS Foundation Trust, Sheffield
| | - Valentina Leone
- Department of Paediatric Rheumatology, Leeds General Infirmary, Leeds
| | | | - Athimalaipet V Ramanan
- Bristol Royal Hospital for Children & Translational Health Sciences, University of Bristol, Bristol
| | - Satyapal Rangaraj
- Department of Paediatric Rheumatology, Nottingham University Hospitals, Nottingham
| | - Arani Sridhar
- Leicester Children’s Hospital, University Hospitals of Leicester NHS Trust, Leicester
| | - Michael W Beresford
- Institute of Life Course and Medical Science, University of Liverpool
- Department of Paediatric Rheumatology, Alder Hey Children’s NHS Foundation Trust
| | - Bridget Young
- Institute of Population Health, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
van Vollenhoven RF, Bertsias G, Doria A, Isenberg D, Morand E, Petri MA, Pons-Estel BA, Rahman A, Ugarte-Gil MF, Voskuyl A, Arnaud L, Bruce IN, Cervera R, Costedoat-Chalumeau N, Gordon C, Houssiau FA, Mosca M, Schneider M, Ward MM, Alarcon G, Aringer M, Askenase A, Bae SC, Bootsma H, Boumpas DT, Brunner H, Clarke AE, Coney C, Czirják L, Dörner T, Faria R, Fischer R, Fritsch-Stork R, Inanc M, Jacobsen S, Jayne D, Kuhn A, van Leeuw B, Limper M, Mariette X, Navarra S, Nikpour M, Olesinska MH, Pons-Estel G, Romero-Diaz J, Rubio B, Schoenfeld Y, Bonfá E, Smolen J, Teng YKO, Tincani A, Tsang-A-Sjoe M, Vasconcelos C, Voss A, Werth VP, Zakharhova E, Aranow C. 2021 DORIS definition of remission in SLE: final recommendations from an international task force. Lupus Sci Med 2021; 8:8/1/e000538. [PMID: 34819388 PMCID: PMC8614136 DOI: 10.1136/lupus-2021-000538] [Citation(s) in RCA: 76] [Impact Index Per Article: 25.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/12/2021] [Accepted: 11/04/2021] [Indexed: 11/12/2022]
Abstract
Objective To achieve consensus on a definition of remission in SLE (DORIS). Background Remission is the stated goal for both patient and caregiver, but consensus on a definition of remission has been lacking. Previously, an international task force consisting of patient representatives and medical specialists published a framework for such a definition, without reaching a final recommendation. Methods Several systematic literature reviews were performed and specific research questions examined in suitably chosen data sets. The findings were discussed, reformulated as recommendations and voted on. Results Based on data from the literature and several SLE-specific data sets, a set of recommendations was endorsed. Ultimately, the DORIS Task Force recommended a single definition of remission in SLE, based on clinical systemic lupus erythematosus disease activitiy index (SLEDAI)=0, Evaluator’s Global Assessment <0.5 (0–3), prednisolone 5 mg/day or less, and stable antimalarials, immunosuppressives, and biologics. Conclusion The 2021 DORIS definition of remission in SLE is recommended for use in clinical care, education, and research including clinical trials and observational studies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ronald F van Vollenhoven
- Department of Rheumatology, Amsterdam Rheumatology and Immunology Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - George Bertsias
- Rheumatology, Clinical Immunology and Allergy, University Hospital of Heraklion, Heraklion, Greece
| | - Andrea Doria
- Division of Rheumatology, University of Padova, Padova, Italy
| | - David Isenberg
- Centre for Rheumatology, University College London, London, UK
| | - Eric Morand
- Monash Medical Centre, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Michelle A Petri
- Division of Rheumatology, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
| | | | - Anisur Rahman
- Medicine (Rheumatology), University College London, London, UK
| | | | | | - Laurent Arnaud
- Department of Rheumatology, Strasbourg University Hospitals, Strasbourg, France.,Strasbourg Federation of Translational Medicine (FMTS), University of Strasbourg, Strasbourg, France
| | - Ian N Bruce
- The University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
| | | | | | - Caroline Gordon
- Rheumatology Research Group, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
| | - Frédéric A Houssiau
- Pole of Rheumatic Pathologies, Catholic University of Louvain, Institute for Experimental and Clinical Research, Brussels, Belgium.,Rheumatology Department, Saint-Luc University Clinics, Brussels, Belgium
| | | | - Matthias Schneider
- Policlinic for Rheumatology & Hiller Research Centre for Rheumatology, Heinrich-Heine-University, Düsseldorf, Germany
| | | | | | | | - Anka Askenase
- Columbia University Medical Center, New York, New York, USA
| | - Sang-Cheol Bae
- Rheumatology, Hanyang University Seoul Hospital, Seoul, Korea (the Republic of)
| | | | | | - Hermine Brunner
- Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati, Ohio, USA
| | | | - Cindy Coney
- Lupus Foundation of America, Washington, District of Columbia, USA
| | - László Czirják
- Department of Rheumatology and Immunology, University of Pecs, Pecs, Hungary
| | - Thomas Dörner
- Charite University Hospitals Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Raquel Faria
- Clinical Immunology Unit, Porto Hospital and University Center, Porto, Portugal
| | - Rebecca Fischer
- Rheumatology, Heinrich-Heine-University, Duesseldorf, Germany
| | | | - Murat Inanc
- Internal Medicine Rheumatology, University of Istanbul, Istanbul, Turkey
| | - Søren Jacobsen
- Rheumatology, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen University Hospital, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - David Jayne
- Medicine, University of Cambridge School of Clinical Medicine, Cambridge, UK
| | | | | | - Maarten Limper
- Rheumatology & Clinical Immunology, UMC Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Xavier Mariette
- Public Assistance, Paris Hospitals, Paris Saclay University, Le Kremlin-Bicetre, France
| | - Sandra Navarra
- Rheumatology, University of Santo Tomas Hospital, Manila, Philippines
| | - Mandana Nikpour
- Medicine and Rheumatology, University of Melbourne, Fitzroy, Victoria, Australia
| | | | - Guillermo Pons-Estel
- Regional Center for Autoimmune and Rheumatic Diseases (GO-CREAR), Rosario, Argentina
| | - Juanita Romero-Diaz
- Immunology and Rheumatology, National Institute of Medical Sciences and Nutrition Salvador Zubirán, Mexico City, Mexico
| | | | - Yehuda Schoenfeld
- Zabludowicz Center for Autoimmune Diseases, Sheba Medical Center, Tel Hashomer, Tel Aviv, Israel
| | - Eloisa Bonfá
- Rheumatology, University of Sao Paulo Faculty of Medicine, Sao Paulo, Brazil
| | | | - Y K Onno Teng
- Nephrology, Leiden University Medical Centre, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | | | - Michel Tsang-A-Sjoe
- Rheumatology, VU University Medical Centre Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | | | - Anne Voss
- Department of Rheumatology, Odense University Hospital, Odense, Denmark.,Department of Clinical Research, University of Southern Denmark Faculty of Health Sciences, Odense, Denmark
| | - Victoria P Werth
- Dermatology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Elena Zakharhova
- Rheumatology, A I Yevdokimov Moscow State University of Medicine and Dentistry of the Ministry of Healthcare of the Russian Federation Faculty of Dentistry, Moskva, Russian Federation
| | - Cynthia Aranow
- Autoimmune and Musculoskeletal Disease, The Feinstein Institute for Medical Research, Manhasset, New York, USA
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Ugarte-Gil MF, Mendoza-Pinto C, Reátegui-Sokolova C, Pons-Estel GJ, van Vollenhoven RF, Bertsias G, Alarcon GS, Pons-Estel BA. Achieving remission or low disease activity is associated with better outcomes in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus: a systematic literature review. Lupus Sci Med 2021; 8:e000542. [PMID: 34548375 PMCID: PMC8458331 DOI: 10.1136/lupus-2021-000542] [Citation(s) in RCA: 21] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/16/2021] [Accepted: 09/05/2021] [Indexed: 12/27/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Remission and low disease activity (LDA) have been proposed as the treatment goals for patients with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE). Several definitions for each have been proposed in the literature. OBJECTIVE To assess the impact of remission/LDA according to various definitions on relevant outcomes in patients with SLE. METHODS This systematic literature review was conducted according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses using PubMed (1946-week 2, April 2021), Cochrane library (1985-week 2, week 2, April 2021) and EMBASE (1974-week 2, April 2021). We included longitudinal and cross-sectional studies in patients with SLE reporting the impact of remission and LDA (regardless their definition) on mortality, damage accrual, flares, health-related quality of life and other outcomes (cardiovascular risk, hospitalisation and direct costs). The quality of evidence was evaluated using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale. RESULTS We identified 7497 articles; of them, 31 studies met the inclusion criteria and were evaluated. Some articles reported a positive association with survival, although this was not confirmed in all of them. Organ damage accrual was the most frequently reported outcome, and remission and LDA were reported as protective of this outcome (risk measures varying from 0.04 to 0.95 depending on the definition). Similarly, both states were associated with a lower probability of SLE flares, hospitalisations and a better health-related quality of life, in particular the physical domain. CONCLUSION Remission and LDA are associated with improvement in multiple outcomes in patients with SLE, thus reinforcing their relevance in clinical practice. PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER CRD42020162724.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Manuel Francisco Ugarte-Gil
- Grupo Peruano de Estudio de Enfermedades Autoinmunes Sistémicas, Universidad Cientifica del Sur, Lima, Peru
- Rheumatology, Hospital Nacional Guillermo Almenara Irigoyen, EsSalud, Lima, Peru
| | - Claudia Mendoza-Pinto
- Systemic Autoimmune Diseases Research Unit, Mexican Institute of Social Security, Puebla, Puebla, Mexico
- Medicine School, Benemerita Universidad Autonoma de Puebla, Puebla, Puebla, Mexico
| | - Cristina Reátegui-Sokolova
- Rheumatology, Hospital Nacional Guillermo Almenara Irigoyen, EsSalud, Lima, Peru
- Universidad San Ignacio de Loyola, Lima, Peru
| | - Guillermo J Pons-Estel
- Centro Regional de Enfermedades Autoinmunes y Reumáticas (GO-CREAR), Rosario, Santa Fe, Argentina
| | - Ronald F van Vollenhoven
- Amsterdam University Medical Centers, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Rheumatology, Amsterdam Rheumatology and Immunology Center, Amsterdam, Netherlands
| | | | - Graciela S Alarcon
- School of Medicine, The University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Alabama, USA
- School of Medicine, Universidad Peruana Cayetano Heredia, Lima, Peru
| | - Bernardo A Pons-Estel
- Centro Regional de Enfermedades Autoinmunes y Reumáticas (GO-CREAR), Rosario, Santa Fe, Argentina
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Jolly M, Sehgal V, Arora S, Azizoddin D, Pinto B, Sharma A, Devilliers H, Inoue M, Toloza S, Bertoli A, Blazevic I, Vilá LM, Moldovan I, Torralba KD, Mazzoni D, Cicognani E, Hasni S, Goker B, Haznedaroglu S, Bourre-Tessier J, Navarra SV, Clarke A, Weisman M, Wallace D, Mok CC. Does hydroxychloroquine improve patient reported outcomes in patients with lupus? Lupus 2021; 30:1790-1798. [PMID: 34304629 DOI: 10.1177/09612033211033983] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/15/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Hydroxychloroquine (HCQ) use is associated with less disease activity, flares, damage and improved survival in Systemic Lupus Erythematosus (SLE). However, its effect on patient reported health outcomes (PROs) such as quality of life (QOL) is not known. METHODS International data from Study on Outcomes of Lupus (SOUL) from 2,161 SLE patients were compared by HCQ use. Disease activity and damage were assessed using SELENA-SLEDAI and SLICC-ACR/SDI. QOL was evaluated using LupusPRO and Lupus Impact Tracker (LIT). Linear regression analyses were performed with LupusPRO summary scores health related HRQOL, non-health related NHRQOL and LIT as dependent and HCQ use as independent variable. Analyses were undertaken to test mediation of effects of HCQ use on QOL through disease activity. RESULTS Mean age was 40.5 ± 12.8 years, 93% were women. Sixty-three (1363/2161) percent were on HCQ. On univariate analysis, HCQ use was associated with (a) better QOL (LupusPRO-HRQOL: β 6.19, 95% CI 4.15, 8.24, P ≤ 0.001, LupusPRO NHRQOL: β 5.83, 95% CI 4.02, 7.64, P ≤ 0.001) and less impact on daily life (LIT: β -9.37, 95% CI -12.24, -6.50, P ≤ 0.001). On multivariate and mediational analyses, the effects of HCQ on QOL were indirectly and completely mediated through disease activity. CONCLUSIONS HCQ use in SLE is associated with better patient reported health outcomes (LupusPRO-HRQOL and NHRQOL and impact on daily life), and the effects are mediated through disease activity. This information can facilitate patients and physician's communication with decision-making regarding the use of HCQ for SLE management.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | - Desiree Azizoddin
- Emergency medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, USA
| | | | - Aman Sharma
- Post Graduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Chandigarh, India
| | - Herve Devilliers
- CHU Dijon Bourgogne - Hospital François Mitterrand, Dijon, France
| | | | - Sergio Toloza
- Rheumatology, Hospital San Juan Batista, Catamarca, Argentina
| | - Ana Bertoli
- Rheumatology, Instituto Reumatologico Strusberg, Cordoba, Spain
| | - Ivana Blazevic
- Rheumatology, 28196Universidad de Buenos Aires, 28196Universidad de Buenos Aires, Buenos Aires, Argentina
| | - Luis M Vilá
- Division of Rheumatology, University of Puerto Rico Medical Sciences Campus, San Juan, Puerto Rico
| | | | - Karina D Torralba
- Division of Rheumatology, 12221Loma Linda University School of Medicine, 12221Loma Linda University School of Medicine, Loma Linda, USA
| | - Davide Mazzoni
- Department of Oncology and Hemato-Oncology, University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy
| | - Elvira Cicognani
- Department of Oncology and Hemato-Oncology, University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy
| | - Sarfaraz Hasni
- Rheumatology, National Institute of Health, Bethesda, USA
| | - Berna Goker
- Rheumatology, Gazi University, Ankara, Turkey
| | | | | | - Sandra V Navarra
- Section of Rheumatology, University of Santo Tomas, Manila, Philippines
| | - Ann Clarke
- Division of Rheumatology, 2129University of Calgary, 2129University of Calgary, Calgary, Canada
| | - Michael Weisman
- Division of Rheumatology, Cedars Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, USA
| | - Daniel Wallace
- Division of Rheumatology, Cedars Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, USA
| | - Chi Chiu Mok
- Medicine, Tuen Mun Hospital, Hong Kong, Hong Kong
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Kernder A, Elefante E, Chehab G, Tani C, Mosca M, Schneider M. The patient's perspective: are quality of life and disease burden a possible treatment target in systemic lupus erythematosus? Rheumatology (Oxford) 2020; 59:v63-v68. [PMID: 33280017 PMCID: PMC7719037 DOI: 10.1093/rheumatology/keaa427] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/30/2020] [Revised: 06/16/2020] [Indexed: 12/12/2022] Open
Abstract
A few decades ago, the therapy goal of patients with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) was survival and the prevention of organ failure. Today, clinical remission and low disease activity are believed to be the optimal therapeutic targets. These aims are difficult to reach for many patients, but they still do not address the health-related quality of life (QoL) that is significantly impaired in SLE patients. Even in the state of remission, QoL and fatigue are insufficient controlled. Thus, patient-oriented research is essential to design new strategies for the management of lupus patients. The INTEGRATE project analyses the patients' and physicians' perspectives to pave the way to design an innovative therapeutic strategy for lupus and focuses on the multifaceted dimensions of the disease burden. Shared decision making (SDM) could include the patient's perspective of SLE to treatment strategy and consider QoL and the burden of lupus into the process of therapy decision.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anna Kernder
- Department Rheumatology & Hiller-Research Unit Rheumatology, Heinrich-Heine-University Düsseldorf, Medical Faculty, Düsseldorf, Germany
| | - Elena Elefante
- Rheumatology Unit, Department of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, University of Pisa, Pisa, Italy
| | - Gamal Chehab
- Department Rheumatology & Hiller-Research Unit Rheumatology, Heinrich-Heine-University Düsseldorf, Medical Faculty, Düsseldorf, Germany
| | - Chiara Tani
- Rheumatology Unit, Department of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, University of Pisa, Pisa, Italy
| | - Marta Mosca
- Rheumatology Unit, Department of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, University of Pisa, Pisa, Italy
| | - Matthias Schneider
- Department Rheumatology & Hiller-Research Unit Rheumatology, Heinrich-Heine-University Düsseldorf, Medical Faculty, Düsseldorf, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Elefante E, Tani C, Stagnaro C, Signorini V, Parma A, Carli L, Zucchi D, Ferro F, Mosca M. Articular involvement, steroid treatment and fibromyalgia are the main determinants of patient-physician discordance in systemic lupus erythematosus. Arthritis Res Ther 2020; 22:241. [PMID: 33054823 PMCID: PMC7559765 DOI: 10.1186/s13075-020-02334-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/09/2020] [Accepted: 10/01/2020] [Indexed: 02/08/2023] Open
Abstract
Background Remission or the lowest possible disease activity is the main target in the management of systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE). Anyway, conflicting data are present in the literature regarding the correlation between physician-driven definitions and patient perception of the disease. The objective of this study is to evaluate the relationship between the definition of lupus low disease activity state (LLDAS) and patient’s health-related quality of life (HRQoL). Methods This is a cross-sectional, monocentric study. Adult SLE patients were included. For each patient, demographics, disease duration, medications, comorbidities, organ damage, active disease manifestations and SELENA-SLEDAI were assessed. Patients have been categorised as follows: LLDAS, remission and active disease. Each patient completed the following patient-reported outcomes (PROs): SF-36, LIT, FACIT-Fatigue and SLAQ. A SLAQ score < 6 (25° percentile of our cohort) was used as the cut-off value to define a low disease activity state according to patient self-evaluation. Results We enrolled 259 consecutive SLE patients (mainly female and Caucasian, mean age 45.33 ± 13.14 years, median disease duration 14 years). 80.3% were in LLDAS, of whom 82.2% were in remission; 19.7% were active. No differences emerged for any of the PROs used between the LLDAS and the active group. Considering the LLDAS subgroup, we identified 56 patients with a subjective low disease activity (SLAQ < 6) and we defined them as “concordant”; the remaining 152 patients in LLDAS presented a subjective active disease (SLAQ ≥ 6) and were defined “discordant”. Discordant patients presented more frequently ongoing and past joint involvement (p < 0.05) and a diagnosis of fibromyalgia (p < 0.01); furthermore, they were more likely to be on glucocorticoid therapy (p < 0.01). Discordant patients showed a significantly poorer HRQoL, assessed by all PROs (p < 0.0001). Conclusions Joint involvement, glucocorticoid therapy and comorbid fibromyalgia resulted to be the most important variables determining the poor concordance between patient and physician perspective on the disease.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Elena Elefante
- Rheumatology Unit, Department of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, University of Pisa, Via Roma 67, Pisa, Italy.,Department of Medical Biotechnologies, University of Siena, Siena, Italy
| | - Chiara Tani
- Rheumatology Unit, Department of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, University of Pisa, Via Roma 67, Pisa, Italy
| | - Chiara Stagnaro
- Rheumatology Unit, Department of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, University of Pisa, Via Roma 67, Pisa, Italy
| | - Viola Signorini
- Rheumatology Unit, Department of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, University of Pisa, Via Roma 67, Pisa, Italy
| | - Alice Parma
- Rheumatology Unit, Department of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, University of Pisa, Via Roma 67, Pisa, Italy
| | - Linda Carli
- Rheumatology Unit, Department of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, University of Pisa, Via Roma 67, Pisa, Italy
| | - Dina Zucchi
- Rheumatology Unit, Department of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, University of Pisa, Via Roma 67, Pisa, Italy
| | - Francesco Ferro
- Rheumatology Unit, Department of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, University of Pisa, Via Roma 67, Pisa, Italy
| | - Marta Mosca
- Rheumatology Unit, Department of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, University of Pisa, Via Roma 67, Pisa, Italy.
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Yang Z, Cheng C, Wang Z, Wang Y, Zhao J, Wang Q, Tian X, Hsieh E, Li M, Zeng X. Prevalence, predictors and prognostic benefits of remission achievement in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus: a systematic review. Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken) 2020; 74:208-218. [PMID: 32986933 DOI: 10.1002/acr.24464] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/12/2020] [Revised: 08/13/2020] [Accepted: 09/22/2020] [Indexed: 11/10/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES To systematically review and evaluate the prevalence, potential predictors and prognostic benefits of remission achievement in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE). METHODS Studies reporting prevalence, predictors and prognostic benefits of remission in adult SLE patients were searched and selected from Pubmed and EMBASE databases. Studies were reviewed for relevance and quality. Two reviewers independently assessed studies and extracted data. RESULTS Data from forty-one studies including 17270 patients were included and analyzed. Although no consensus has been achieved on the definition of remission, clinical disease activity, serological activity, duration and treatment are agreed to be critical components of defining remission status. In most studies published in the recent 5 years, 42.4% to 88% patients achieved and maintained the remission status for one year, and 21.1% to 70% for at least 5 years. Factors associated with remission included older age at diagnosis, lower baseline disease activity and absence of major organ involvement, while positive serological results were shown to be negatively associated with remission. Remission-especially prolonged remission-when achieved, demonstrated an association with lower accrual of damage and better quality of life among patients with SLE. CONCLUSIONS Remission is an achievable and desirable target for SLE patients, proven to be associated with prognostic benefits. Further development and assessment of a clear remission definition, a risk stratification model as well as a full algorithm with frequency of monitoring, timepoints for treatment adjustment and drug withdrawal are required.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ziyi Yang
- Department of Rheumatology, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Peking Union Medical College and Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, National Clinical Research Center for Dermatologic and Immunologic Diseases, Ministry of Science & Technology, Key Laboratory of Rheumatology and Clinical Immunology, Ministry of Education, Beijing, China
| | - Cheng Cheng
- Department of Rheumatology, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Peking Union Medical College and Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, National Clinical Research Center for Dermatologic and Immunologic Diseases, Ministry of Science & Technology, Key Laboratory of Rheumatology and Clinical Immunology, Ministry of Education, Beijing, China
| | - Ziqian Wang
- Department of Rheumatology, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Peking Union Medical College and Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, National Clinical Research Center for Dermatologic and Immunologic Diseases, Ministry of Science & Technology, Key Laboratory of Rheumatology and Clinical Immunology, Ministry of Education, Beijing, China
| | - Yanhong Wang
- Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Institute of Basic Medical Sciences Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences & School of Basic Medicine Peking, Union Medical College, Beijing, China
| | - Jiuliang Zhao
- Department of Rheumatology, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Peking Union Medical College and Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, National Clinical Research Center for Dermatologic and Immunologic Diseases, Ministry of Science & Technology, Key Laboratory of Rheumatology and Clinical Immunology, Ministry of Education, Beijing, China
| | - Qian Wang
- Department of Rheumatology, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Peking Union Medical College and Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, National Clinical Research Center for Dermatologic and Immunologic Diseases, Ministry of Science & Technology, Key Laboratory of Rheumatology and Clinical Immunology, Ministry of Education, Beijing, China
| | - Xinping Tian
- Department of Rheumatology, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Peking Union Medical College and Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, National Clinical Research Center for Dermatologic and Immunologic Diseases, Ministry of Science & Technology, Key Laboratory of Rheumatology and Clinical Immunology, Ministry of Education, Beijing, China
| | - Evelyn Hsieh
- Section of Rheumatology, Allergy and Immunology, Department of Internal Medicine, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, USA
| | - Mengtao Li
- Department of Rheumatology, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Peking Union Medical College and Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, National Clinical Research Center for Dermatologic and Immunologic Diseases, Ministry of Science & Technology, Key Laboratory of Rheumatology and Clinical Immunology, Ministry of Education, Beijing, China
| | - Xiaofeng Zeng
- Department of Rheumatology, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Peking Union Medical College and Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, National Clinical Research Center for Dermatologic and Immunologic Diseases, Ministry of Science & Technology, Key Laboratory of Rheumatology and Clinical Immunology, Ministry of Education, Beijing, China
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Ríos-Garcés R, Espinosa G, van Vollenhoven R, Cervera R. Treat-to-target in systemic lupus erythematosus: Where are we? Eur J Intern Med 2020; 74:29-34. [PMID: 32014364 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejim.2020.01.018] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/14/2019] [Revised: 01/22/2020] [Accepted: 01/24/2020] [Indexed: 01/08/2023]
Abstract
Systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) is the most paradigmatic disorder within systemic autoimmune diseases. The concept and principles of treat-to-target (T2T) in SLE were established half a decade ago and, since then, remarkable advances have been made. An international consensus was organized in order to define and unify the term remission, although plurality, with subtle nuances still exists and has not been overcome. Also, lupus low disease activity state (LLDAS) was coined as an alternative and, perhaps, more realistic target. Both of them have proven to be meaningful in terms of improving several outcomes, and have opened the path for future research in clinical trials. This review arises from the need to summarize the current state of some of the recommendations of the T2T task force.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Roberto Ríos-Garcés
- Department of Autoimmune Diseases, Hospital Clínic, Institut d'Investigacions Biomèdiques August Pi i Sunyer (IDIBAPS), University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Catalonia, Spain
| | - Gerard Espinosa
- Department of Autoimmune Diseases, Hospital Clínic, Institut d'Investigacions Biomèdiques August Pi i Sunyer (IDIBAPS), University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Catalonia, Spain.
| | - Ronald van Vollenhoven
- Department of Rheumatology and Clinical Immunology, Academic Medical Center, Vrije Universiteit Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
| | - Ricard Cervera
- Department of Autoimmune Diseases, Hospital Clínic, Institut d'Investigacions Biomèdiques August Pi i Sunyer (IDIBAPS), University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Catalonia, Spain.
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Louthrenoo W, Kasitanon N, Morand E, Kandane-Rathnayake R. Comparison of performance of specific (SLEQOL) and generic (SF36) health-related quality of life questionnaires and their associations with disease status of systemic lupus erythematosus: a longitudinal study. Arthritis Res Ther 2020; 22:8. [PMID: 31924267 PMCID: PMC6954627 DOI: 10.1186/s13075-020-2095-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 21] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/11/2019] [Accepted: 01/01/2020] [Indexed: 12/21/2022] Open
Abstract
Background The utility of generic health-related quality of life (HRQoL) questionnaires in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) is uncertain. We compared the performance of generic (SF36) and specific (SLEQOL) HRQoL surveys by examining their associations with the Global Rating of Change (GRC) and SLE clinical indicators. Methods The study included SLE patients who attended a single-center rheumatology clinic between 2013 and 2017. Patients completed both specific (SLEQOL) and generic (SF36) surveys and rated their GRC compared to the previous visit using a 7-point Likert scale on the same day of routine visits. Based on GRC scores, patients’ change in HRQoL was categorized as “no change,” “deterioration,” or “improvement.” Disease activity (SLEDAI-2K), flare, and lupus low disease activity state (LLDAS) were assessed at each visit, and organ damage (SDI) was determined annually. Pairwise correlations between SLEQOL and SF36 components were examined, and associations between GRC status and SLE disease indicators were compared using generalized estimating equations (GEE). Results Three hundred thirty-seven patients with 2062 visits were included in the analysis. SLEQOL correlated significantly with SF36. Patients reported improvements in HRQoL in 58%, deterioration in 15%, and “no change” in 27% of all visits. Compared to the “no change” group, mean SF36 and SLEQOL scores were significantly lower in the deterioration group and higher in the improvement group. The magnitude of changes observed with SLEQOL and SF36 in the deterioration and improvement groups was similar. Patients in LLDAS had significantly higher mean scores in both SLEQOL and SF36. In contrast, patients with active disease, especially those with cutaneous, renal, central nervous system, and musculoskeletal activity, had significantly lower SLEQOL and SF36. Flare and organ damage were also associated with lower SLEQOL and SF36-PCS (physical component) but not with SF36-MCS (mental component). Conclusion SLEQOL and SF36 similarly describe HRQoL in SLE. Both instruments demonstrated strong associations with GRC-based deterioration or improvement as well as SLE disease status. LLDAS was associated with improved HRQoL.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Worawit Louthrenoo
- Division of Rheumatology, Department of Internal Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Chiang Mai University, Chiang Mai, 50200, Thailand.
| | - Nuntana Kasitanon
- Division of Rheumatology, Department of Internal Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Chiang Mai University, Chiang Mai, 50200, Thailand
| | - Eric Morand
- School of Clinical Sciences at Monash Health, Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | | |
Collapse
|